Next Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Reveals Protected Cultivation Improves Chinese Plum (Prunus salicina L.) Quality via Light-Regulated Sugar Metabolism
Previous Article in Journal
Phylogenetic Divergence and Domestication Jointly Shape the Tomato Root Microbiome
error_outline You can access the new MDPI.com website here. Explore and share your feedback with us.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecological Niche Differentiation and Distribution Dynamics Revealing Climate Change Responses in the Chinese Genus Dysosma

1
Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China
2
Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Conservation in Karst Mountain Area of Southwestern China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Guiyang 550005, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2026, 15(1), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010162
Submission received: 24 November 2025 / Revised: 11 December 2025 / Accepted: 17 December 2025 / Published: 5 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Ecology)

Abstract

The genus Dysosma, a group of perennial herbaceous plants with significant medicinal value and a relatively narrow ecological niche, is potentially at risk due to the combined pressures of habitat degradation and climate change. As their habitats continue to degrade, all species of this genus have been included in the National Key Protected Wild Plants List (Category II). Investigating the impacts of climate change on the distribution of Dysosma resources is vital for their sustainable utilization. In this study, the potential distribution dynamics of seven Dysosma species under current and three future climate scenarios (SSP126, SSP245, SSP585) were quantified using 534 occurrence points and 25 environmental variables in a MaxEnt model, accompanied by the ecological niche overlap index (Schoener’s D), dynamic metrics (relative change rate [RCR], change intensity [CI], stability index [SI], spatial displacement rate [SDR]), and centroid migration analysis. The results indicated that (1) areas of high habitat suitability were consistently concentrated in the mountainous and hilly regions of southwestern Guizhou, Chongqing, and Hubei, with the minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio6) and the mean diurnal temperature range (Bio2) being identified as the primary driving factors. (2) The future suitable habitat areas remained highly stable overall (SI > 97.89%), though dynamic changes varied across scenarios. Under SSP126, only slight fluctuations were observed, with an average CI of approximately 3.78% and RCR ranging from −0.46% to 1.97%. Under the SSP245 scenario, suitable habitat areas showed a continuous, slight expansion (RCR = 0.45% to 1.54%), whereas under the high-emission SSP585 scenario, a typical “mid-term expansion–late-term contraction” pattern was observed, with RCR shifting from positive (1.32%, 1.44%) to negative (−0.92%). The SI reached its lowest value of 97.89% in the late term, and the spatial displacement rate increased, signaling a reorganization of the distribution pattern. (3) High ecological niche differentiation was observed within the genus, with the highest overlap index being only 0.562, and approximately one-third of species pairs exhibiting completely non-overlapping niches. (4) Dysosma tsayuensis, a niche-specialist species, exhibited a distribution that was highly dependent on the annual mean ultraviolet-B radiation (UVB, contribution rate 52.9%), displaying an adaptation strategy markedly different from that of conservative species. (5) Centroid analysis indicated that, although the overall centroid remained stable in Guizhou, the presence of niche-specialist species under the high-emission SSP585 scenario resulted in migration paths opposite to those observed under other scenarios. The findings reveal the potential vulnerability and differential response patterns of Dysosma species under rapid climate warming, thereby providing a scientific basis for targeted conservation, in situ and ex situ conservation strategies, and population restoration.

1. Introduction

Global climate change is profoundly reshaping the geographic distributions of species and represents one of the major threats to current biodiversity [1]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that ongoing temperature increases have driven the geographic distributions of many species to shift toward higher latitudes or elevations, with former suitable habitats progressively contracting or becoming spatially displaced [2,3,4]. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report indicates that, under different emission scenarios, the global mean temperature by the end of this century could increase by 1.4–4.4 °C relative to pre-industrial levels [5]. The consequent increases in temperature and changes in precipitation patterns are expected to further exacerbate habitat loss and significantly affect species’ ecological traits and potential distribution ranges [6,7]. Driven by these changes, approximately one-quarter of global plant species may face extinction risk, with the habitats of many rare plants continuing to degrade [8]. Typical representatives include alpine plants highly sensitive to temperature changes [9] and regional endemic species with narrow, topographically constrained distribution ranges [10,11], whose suitable habitats are progressively contracting under climate warming. For example, studies on Vatica guangxiensis, an endangered tree endemic to Guangxi’s karst region, indicate that under future climate warming scenarios, its already limited suitable habitat area will be further reduced and fragmented, thereby elevating its survival risk [12]. Due to their limited ecological tolerance, rare plants are often particularly sensitive to climate warming and extreme climatic events, and their conservation remains critical for maintaining and enhancing biodiversity [8,13].Therefore, in the context of intensifying climate change and extreme events, accurately predicting changes in the suitable habitats of plant species and providing a scientific basis for in situ and ex situ conservation have become critical scientific tasks in biodiversity protection.
Species distribution models (SDMs) analyze the relationships between species distributions and environmental variables to simulate and predict spatial distribution patterns, providing an effective quantitative tool for investigating species migration and dispersal mechanisms [14]. In recent years, with the advancement of machine learning methods and ensemble modeling, approaches such as boosted regression trees (BRT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and ensemble modeling frameworks (Biomod2) have been widely applied in presence-only data modeling, demonstrating significant advantages in parameter optimization and predictive performance [15,16]. Currently, mainstream species distribution models also include mechanistic climate suitability models (Climex) [17], random forests (RF) [18], and maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models [19]. Among these methods, the MaxEnt model, owing to its low sample-size requirements, operational simplicity, and high predictive accuracy, has been widely applied and broadly acknowledged in distribution modeling studies across various biological taxa [20,21,22]. Although the MaxEnt model is widely applied, it exhibits several notable limitations: (1) it primarily relies on environmental variables such as climate and elevation and fails to adequately account for biotic interactions [23]; and (2) its predictions represent only potential suitable habitats rather than actual distribution ranges [24]. Nevertheless, it remains a commonly used tool for ecological niche prediction.
The genus Dysosma, belonging to the family Berberidaceae, comprises perennial herbaceous plants and currently includes nine recognized species, mainly distributed in China and Vietnam, of which seven are recorded in the Flora of China (FOC). In addition, Dysosma villosa has only recently been reported [25], while Dysosma tonkinense displays distinct taxonomic characteristics in recent morphological and phylogenetic analyses and is recognized as a separate species [26]. The majority of Dysosma species are mainly distributed within China’s subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest belt, with a geographic range spanning approximately 23°–32° N and 94°–122° E [27]. Previous studies suggest that China constitutes the center of species diversity and the evolutionary origin of the genus Dysosma [28], while the eastern Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau extending toward the Three Gorges region has historically played a pivotal role in shaping its distribution patterns and species diversification [29].The genus Dysosma, used in traditional Chinese medicine, not only has high medicinal value but is also among the most threatened and rare plants [30]. Dysosma was recorded in the Shennong Bencao Jing Jiaozhu [31] under the name “guijiu”, with its medicinal properties described as “effective in eliminating poisonous parasites and malevolent influences, dispelling evil energies, and detoxifying a hundred poisons.” Modern pharmacological studies have revealed that podophyllotoxin, as a key bioactive constituent, is predominantly concentrated in the rhizomes of Dysosma and exhibits significant antitumor, antiviral, and antibacterial activities [32]. In recent years, research on Dysosma has been primarily directed toward its clinical applications [32], the extraction and synthesis of its derivatives [33], and the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying its toxic effects [34,35]. However, studies on the distribution patterns and ecological suitability of Dysosma remain limited, and systematic investigations into the migration and dispersal mechanisms of these species are particularly lacking [36]. In the context of intensifying climate change, there is an urgent need to investigate how Dysosma responds and adapts to extreme climate scenarios, such as global warming, thereby elucidating its ecological adaptive potential and future survival strategies.
To clarify the influence of species-level niche differentiation on the overall distribution patterns and future prospects of the genus, this study integrated species distribution data of Dysosma in China and employed the MaxEnt model in combination with spatial analysis techniques to simulate the potential distribution dynamics under current and future climate scenarios, while assessing the differentiated risks among species within the genus. The objectives of this study are to: (1) reveal the patterns of niche differentiation and the key environmental drivers of Dysosma species across China. (2) Quantify the distribution dynamics and response trajectories of species within the genus under future climate change scenarios. (3) Assess the vulnerability and species-specific risks under climate change. (4) Identify potential conservation priority areas and management gaps within China, thereby providing a scientific basis for hierarchical protection and strategic management. The results not only reveal the patterns of niche differentiation and future risk disparities among species within Dysosma, but also provide a scientific basis for developing hierarchical management strategies integrating overall conservation with species-specific measures, as well as for selecting suitable sites for in situ and ex situ cultivation.

2. Results

2.1. Integration of Ecological Niches in Dysosma and Assessment of MaxEnt Predictive Performance

This study assessed the robustness of genus-level modeling across three dimensions: ecological responses, environmental space, and geographic space. In terms of ecological responses, Dysosma delavayi, Dysosma difformis, Dysosma majoensis, and Dysosma versipellis exhibit broadly similar response curves to the mean diurnal temperature range (Bio2), each following a unimodal pattern with closely aligned peaks (Figure S1a). With respect to the minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio6), D. difformis, Dysosma pleiantha, and D. versipellis exhibit similar response patterns (Figure S1b). Only D. versipellis and D. difformis exhibited consistent response peaks across all four environmental variables, including Bio2, Bio6, annual precipitation (Bio12), and elevation (Figure S1). In the environmental space dimension, species generally clustered along PC1 and PC2; however, Dysosm atsayuensis and D. versipellis exhibited marked deviations, with their density ellipses clearly illustrating niche differentiation (Figure S2). In the geographic space dimension, the potential suitable areas of seven species overlapped with genus-level results by 31.1%, with a spatial correlation coefficient of 0.71 (Figure 1). The model achieved an AUC of 0.918 (Figure 2a), and the omission rate curve closely followed the theoretical expectation, indicating high predictive accuracy without evident overfitting (Figure 2b). Overall, genus-level modeling exhibited a certain degree of consistency with species-level distributions, although some species still showed discrepancies.

2.2. Overall Environmental Drivers of Dysosma Distribution

In the MaxEnt model predictions, the four environmental variables with the highest contributions were Bio6 (51.9%), Bio2 (30.5%), elevation (5.2%), and Bio12 (3.4%), collectively accounting for nearly 91% of the total contribution (Figure S3). The Jackknife test results indicated that, in single-variable analyses, Bio2 exerted the strongest influence on the distribution of Dysosma, followed by Bio6 (Figure 3). The results indicate that, under the current climatic conditions, the aforementioned environmental factors play a key regulatory role in the suitability of Dysosma growth. Based on the response curves of the key environmental variables (Figure 4), the suitable distribution areas of Dysosma are generally located in warm and humid climates with some tolerance to low temperatures. The optimal habitat parameter ranges are approximately 3–5 °C for Bio2 and −5–5 °C for Bio6.

2.3. Patterns of Niche Differentiation Among Species Within Dysosma

As shown in Figure 5, Schoener’s D index calculated across the full environmental space indicated that niche overlap among Dysosma species was generally low. Among 21 species pairs, seven pairs (33.3%) exhibited a niche overlap value of 0, indicating that these species did not overlap within the selected environmental space. The species pair with the highest overlap was D. delavayi and D. difformis, with a D value of only 0.562. Overall, the distribution of D values among species spanned a wide range, indicating substantial variation in niche overlap across different species pairs.

2.4. Key Environmental Drivers of Niche Differentiation in Dysosma

To elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying niche differentiation, comparisons were made between the key environmental drivers of the highly overlapping species pair D. delavayi and D. difformis and those of the non-overlapping pair D. versipellis and D. tsayuensis. As shown in Table 1, D. difformis exhibited the highest sensitivity to Bio2, with a contribution of 46.8%, whereas the contribution of this variable to D. tsayuensis was only 3.3%. Comparisons of environmental variable response curves between species pairs with high and low niche overlap indicated that the highly overlapping pair D. delavayi and D. difformis was primarily driven by Bio2 (Figure 6a). In contrast, D. versipellis and D. tsayuensis exhibited distinctly different driving patterns, with the distribution of D. versipellis mainly controlled by Bio6, whereas that of D. tsayuensis was predominantly influenced by annual mean ultraviolet-B radiation (UVB1) (Figure 6b).

2.5. Suitable Habitats of Dysosma Under Current and Future Climate Scenarios

As shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, Dysosma exhibited a stable “core–satellite” distribution pattern under both current and future climate scenarios. Its highly suitable areas remained consistently concentrated in the mountainous and hilly regions of southwestern Guizhou, Chongqing, and Hubei, forming the species’ distributional core, whereas moderately and poorly suitable areas acted as satellite patches, distributed in a surrounding pattern across central Hunan, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, and central Yunnan. As shown in Table 2, under the SSP126 low-emission scenario, the total suitable area remained consistently high from the current to 2090s, ranging from 253.02 × 104 km2 to 257.04 × 104 km2. Under the SSP245 intermediate-emission scenario, the total suitable area showed a gradual expansion from 2050s to 2090s, increasing from 254.16 × 104 km2 to 259.29 × 104 km2. Under the SSP585 high-emission scenario, the area of highly suitable habitats exhibited an initial increase followed by a decrease, reaching a peak of 56.58 × 104 km2 in 2050s, and subsequently declining to 53.83 × 104 km2.

2.6. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Dysosma Under Different Climate Scenarios

Distinct response patterns of Dysosma were observed under different emission pathways. Under the SSP585 high-emission scenario, suitable habitats exhibited the most pronounced changes, characterized by an initial expansion followed by a subsequent contraction. From a spatial perspective, suitable habitats expanded in southern Henan and eastern Shandong during the 2050s (Figure 9g). By the 2070s, however, these newly gained areas experienced a decline, reflecting pronounced spatial turnover (Figure 9h). By the 2090s, the region exhibited a renewed expansion trend (Figure 9i). From a mechanistic perspective, suitable habitats continued to expand during the first two periods, with relative change rates (RCR) of 1.32% and 1.44%, respectively. However, from the 2070s to the 2090s, a slight contraction occurred (RCR = 0.92%), primarily due to degradation from highly suitable to moderately suitable habitats (5.96 × 104 km2) and from moderately suitable to poorly suitable habitats (8.39 × 104 km2). The system’s long-term stability declined from 99.04% to 97.89%, while the spatial displacement rate (SDR) increased from 0.32 to 0.40, indicating that spatial instability intensified under climate change. However, under the SSP126 low-emission scenario, the system maintained dynamic equilibrium throughout the study period (current–2090s), with the stability index (SI) consistently at an exceptionally high level of 97.90–98.88%, and the change intensity index (CI) generally below 4.5%. Although local degradation from highly and moderately suitable habitats to lower suitability levels occurred during the early period (current–2050s), the overall system remained stable without significant structural changes. In the mid-to-late stages of the study, system dynamics further weakened, ultimately exhibiting a typical “quiescent-stable” pattern. The results under the SSP245 intermediate-emission scenario fell between those of the aforementioned scenarios, exhibiting a moderate expansion trend (Figure 10, Table 3).

2.7. Centroid Shifts of Highly Suitable Habitats of Dysosma Under Future Climate Change

As shown in Figure 11, under current climatic conditions, the centroid of highly suitable habitats of Dysosma is located in Sinan County, Guizhou Province (108.04° E, 28.03° N). Under the three future scenarios, although the migration directions of the centroid differ, its overall range of movement remains confined within Guizhou Province. Significance tests indicated that the centroid migration distances across all time periods were not statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Table 4). Under the low- and intermediate-emission scenarios (SSP126 and SSP245), the centroid primarily exhibited short-distance back-and-forth movements near northeastern Guizhou (Tongren–Dejiang region), with a maximum displacement of less than 40 km. Under the high-emission scenario (SSP585), the centroid showed a slight southward shift, but no statistically significant change was observed. Overall, regardless of the emission scenario, the centroid of highly suitable habitats of Dysosma remained within Guizhou Province and exhibited non-significant short-distance movements.

2.8. Potential Conservation Gaps for Dysosma Under Future Climate Scenarios

In this study, the current medium- and highly suitable habitats of Dysosma in China were designated as priority conservation areas, with a total area reaching 145.62 × 104 km2. However, the assessment revealed a severe lack of protection coverage: only 4.44% (6.46 × 104 km2) of the priority areas were covered by natural protected areas, leaving 95.56% as conservation gaps (Figure 12a). The suitable habitats of Dysosma partially overlapped with national-level protected areas in some southwestern regions (red), but the overall coverage remained low. Large contiguous areas of highly suitable habitats were not included in existing protected areas (blue), resulting in pronounced conservation gaps. Under different future scenarios, the total area of priority conservation zones generally exhibited an initial increase followed by a decline, although the overall magnitude of change remained limited. Notably, under the SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios, the area of priority conservation zones consistently exceeded that under SSP126 across all three periods (Figure 12b).

3. Discussion

3.1. Key Climatic Determinants Shaping the Geographical Distribution of Dysosma

Multiple studies have demonstrated that the MaxEnt model performs exceptionally well in ecological niche modeling, with its predictive power and accuracy often surpassing those of other approaches [37,38]. However, the full performance of the model largely depends on the quality of the input data and the appropriateness of parameter settings. Therefore, when predicting the suitable habitats of Dysosma using the MaxEnt model, key factors influencing model performance were systematically optimized, and the optimal parameter settings were identified using the ENMeval package (delta.AICc = 0; AUC = 0.918). Ultimately, the model yielded a highly plausible distribution pattern, with areas of high suitability concentrated from Guizhou through Chongqing to southwestern Hubei, thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of the model optimization and the robustness of its predictions. Climate change has been widely recognized as a primary driver of shifts in species geographic distributions, migration dynamics, and overall survival conditions [39]. In this context, species distribution patterns are not only the result of prolonged interactions with the environment, but also serve as detailed records of the dynamic evolutionary processes of the species [40]. Therefore, to elucidate the specific impacts of climate change on the distribution of Dysosma, this study simulated its potential distribution areas and identified the primary environmental drivers. The results indicate that Bio6 (contributing 51.9%) and Bio2 (contributing 30.5%) are the two primary environmental factors driving the potential distribution patterns of Dysosma. Diurnal temperature range (Bio2), which reflects the stability of day–night temperatures, imposes significant ecological constraints on the survival and distribution of Dysosma [41], a finding that is consistent with previous studies. The suitable ranges of minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio6: −5 to 5 °C) and diurnal temperature range (Bio2: 3 to 5 °C) jointly define the unique ecological niche of Dysosma, which occurs in warm-temperate to mid-subtropical mountainous regions that avoid extreme cold (Bio6 > −5 °C) while still experiencing moderate winter temperatures (Bio6 < 5 °C). The climate niche revealed by the model is highly consistent with microhabitat preferences reported in the literature, collectively indicating that this group is a shade-tolerant herb strictly adapted to subtropical montane forest environments [27]. Furthermore, the strict requirement of Dysosma for a narrow diurnal temperature range (Bio2: 3–5 °C) highlights its reliance on the stable microclimate maintained by forest canopies, a finding that is consistent with large-scale microclimate observations [42]. Physiological studies provide further evidence for this: Palaniyandi & Jun [43] reported that Dysosma exhibits more vigorous growth under low-temperature conditions (4–6 °C), with biomass, chlorophyll, carotenoid, and toxin contents significantly higher than those of plants grown under greenhouse conditions at 25–30 °C. These findings further confirm, at the physiological level, the critical role of temperature conditions in regulating the growth and development of Dysosma. However, the distribution of Podophyllum hexandrum, another member of the Berberidaceae family, is more dependent on precipitation of the driest month (Bio14) and mean annual temperature (Bio1) [44]. This stark contrast in dominant environmental factors highlights the decisive role of life form and habitat preference in shaping species distributions [45]: Dysosma, as a shade-tolerant understory herb, relies on a stable microclimate that avoids extreme low temperatures, whereas P. hexandrum, a relatively sun-loving species, responds more directly to large-scale climatic patterns of moisture and temperature, thereby establishing markedly distinct ecological niches for the two species. Therefore, species-specific ecological strategies must be fully considered when predicting the impacts of climate change. For Dysosma, winter warming may create opportunities for expansion into higher latitudes or elevations; however, climate change not only involves increases in mean annual temperature but also entails alterations in extreme winter cold and the degradation of critical microclimates due to forest fragmentation, all of which could pose serious threats to the long-term survival of the species [46].
Although elevation, as a composite geographic factor integrating temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation, plays a fundamental role in shaping species distribution patterns [47] and is often regarded as a primary driver of predictive differences [48], its contribution to the distribution of Dysosma in the present study was relatively low. This pattern aligns with general principles in species distribution modeling: when climate drivers that are more directly linked to species physiology (e.g., Bio6, Bio2) are incorporated into the model, their explanatory power is preferentially assigned to these direct factors rather than to topographic variables serving as proxies [49,50]. Therefore, the independent contribution of elevation is diminished, indicating that variables such as Bio6 and Bio2 more accurately capture the key physiological thresholds constraining the distribution of Dysosma. Furthermore, moderate slopes ensure adequate drainage, effectively preventing root rot caused by water accumulation under the forest canopy [51], which aligns closely with the hydrophilic yet water-sensitive ecological preference of Dysosma. Therefore, at the fine-scale habitat level, the regulatory effect of topography on moisture conditions may hold more direct ecological significance than regional annual precipitation, highlighting the unique water-use strategy of Dysosma [52]. However, while genus-level predictions provide an overall pattern, they may, to some extent, obscure finer-scale ecological adaptations within Dysosma. Even when major climatic factors dominate overall distribution patterns, individual species may possess distinct ecological thresholds and response mechanisms to temperature, moisture, or microtopographic conditions, resulting in high niche differentiation [53]. At the broader subfamily level of Podophylloideae, studies by Ye Wenqing, Zhu Shanshan, and colleagues [54] have demonstrated significant niche differentiation among genera and geographic populations, primarily driven by key climatic factors such as temperature seasonality. This finding provides a broader evolutionary perspective on the continuum of niche differentiation observed among Dysosma species, ranging from complete separation to moderate overlap, and suggests that this group may generally exhibit diverse ecological adaptation patterns.

3.2. Patterns of Niche Differentiation and Evolutionary Adaptation Within Dysosma Under Current Climatic Conditions

In this study, the niche overlap index Schoener’s D among seven Dysosma species was calculated using the maximum value method based on gradients of 25 environmental variables. The results indicate a high gradient of niche differentiation within Dysosma: ranging from near-zero overlap between species such as D. versipellis and D. delavayi or Dysosma aurantiocaulis, to moderate overlap between species such as D. difformis and D. majoensis or D. pleiantha, thereby forming a continuum of niches from complete separation to partial overlap. This pattern, quantified based on niche overlap, directly illustrates the high heterogeneity in niche relationships among closely related species. Some species pairs, such as D. delavayi and D. difformis, exhibit niche conservatism, sharing the mean temperature of the driest season (Bio2) as a key driving factor, with highly congruent response curves (Figure 6a). In contrast, other species pairs show either high niche separation or moderate overlap, likely resulting from a combination of recent divergence, gene flow, and other factors [55], the precise mechanisms of which remain to be elucidated. Similar frameworks based on niche overlap have been demonstrated to provide an effective tool for quantifying interspecific relationships in studies of other endangered plant species. For example, studies on the endangered tree species Zelkova serrata and its associated co-occurring species have shown that climate change may induce dynamic alterations in patterns of niche overlap [56]. This finding echoes the continuous spectrum of niche differentiation observed within Dysosma in the present study, providing a comparative perspective for further investigation of its underlying mechanisms and interspecific interactions.
In contrast to the niche-conservative pattern observed in D. delavayi and D. difformis, D. tsayuensis may exhibit niche innovation. Within Dysosma, taking D. versipellis and D. tsayuensis as examples, the distribution of the former is primarily driven by Bio6, whereas that of the latter mainly depends on UVB1 (Figure 6b). This fundamental shift in key driving factors reflects a strong signal of adaptive evolution [57]. The adaptation of D. tsayuensis to high-altitude, high-radiation environments may represent a pivotal evolutionary innovation enabling the genus to colonize novel habitats. This adaptation may manifest phenotypically as alpine-plant-like photosynthetic regulation, secondary metabolite accumulation, and antifreeze protein expression [58], while at the molecular and genetic levels it reflects systemic reorganization, with genomic analyses indicating convergent evolutionary patterns across species. For instance, Zhang et al. [59] found through analyses of gene selection pressure and protein evolutionary rates that genes or pathways associated with self-incompatibility, cell wall modification, DNA repair, and stress resistance exhibited convergent evolution, providing a critical genetic foundation for alpine plants to adapt to extreme cold, high ultraviolet radiation, and hypoxic environments. The closely related genus Diphylleia, particularly Diphylleia sinensis, occurs in shaded understories or along streams at mid to high altitudes (1880–3700 m) in China. Although it continues to prefer humid and shaded habitats, the ultraviolet radiation in these mountainous regions is substantially higher than in lowland areas [60], and UV-B as well as related light stress factors are likely more influential in determining its distribution than for low-altitude, closely related Dysosma species. This intensified UV-B stress may have driven the evolution of corresponding photoprotective mechanisms, such as the accumulation of secondary metabolites [61]. Furthermore, multiple studies within the family Berberidaceae have demonstrated that light environments, including light quality and UV-B radiation, play a critical role in adaptive differentiation among genera. For example, short-term UV-B exposure has been shown to significantly alter leaf morphology and increase the content of bioactive compounds in Epimedium brevicornu [62]. Transcriptome-based studies have further revealed candidate genes associated with local adaptation among different populations of the genus Epimedium [63]. Additionally, treatments with varying light qualities (e.g., red, yellow, and blue light) have been demonstrated to significantly influence flavonoid secondary metabolite accumulation in these species [64]. Therefore, responses of Berberidaceae plants to light environmental pressures, particularly combined UV-B and light quality signals, are phylogenetically conserved yet capable of independent and repeated evolution. This is highly consistent with the substantial shift observed in D. tsayuensis within this study, where its ecological niche drivers transition from temperature to dimensions of light intensity and light quality, further supporting an adaptive evolutionary trajectory driven by strong environmental selective pressures. These multilayered adaptive mechanisms provide critical insights into the ecological niche differentiation and potential evolutionary strategies of D. tsayuensis in high-altitude environments.
In summary, multiple Berberidaceae lineages distributed from mid- to high-altitude environments, including Dysosma, Diphylleia, and Epimedium, exhibit similar adaptive trends. As species colonize harsher montane or alpine habitats from relatively mild lowland environments, the core drivers of their survival strategies often undergo fundamental restructuring. These drivers shift from traditional climatic factors such as temperature and moisture to a novel adaptive framework dominated by ultraviolet radiation (UV-B), light quality composition, and a suite of extreme physical stressors. This cross-lineage “shift in core adaptive drivers” essentially represents a repeatable evolutionary response exhibited by organisms under intense and highly directional environmental selection pressures [65]. It demonstrates that adaptive evolution involves not only incremental adjustments of existing traits but may also entail qualitative transformations or restructuring of core survival strategies. Ultimately, within the same genus-level framework, different species achieve high niche differentiation and geographic segregation through differential specialization across both ancestral and novel environmental dimensions, thereby maintaining the diversity and coexistence patterns of the clade within montane and hilly landscapes.

3.3. Predicting Future Climate Suitability of Dysosma Species Based on Ecological Niche Modeling

The multidimensional indicator framework developed in this study demonstrated high applicability in analyzing the spatiotemporal dynamics of Dysosma’s suitable habitats, successfully revealing its patterns of change under different climatic scenarios. Dysosma is projected to remain highly stable under future climate scenarios (SI 97.89–99.98%), with its dynamic patterns exhibiting a gradient response to emission intensity: remaining stable under SSP126, experiencing gradual expansion under SSP245, and showing an initial expansion followed by contraction under SSP585, consistent with the dose–response relationship of climatic forcing [66]. During the early phase of change under the SSP126 scenario (current to 2050s), high CI values combined with moderate SDR values indicate that the system is in an active “turnover” state, consistent with the ecological niche migration theory [67]. However, during the late phase of the study under the SSP585 scenario (2070s–2090s), the system dynamics underwent a critical shift: although CI values remained high, SDR values showed a decreasing trend, indicating a depletion of expansion potential. Consequently, the system exhibited a “net contraction” pattern, characterized by the degradation of high-suitability areas to lower levels (Figure 8c), likely reflecting that the intensifying climate change has exceeded the ecological niche tolerance limits of the species [68]. This “stability-within-dynamics” pattern differs from the predictions reported by Fan et al. [69] for Magnoliaceae tree species, which exhibited strong shifts in their distribution ranges. This discrepancy may be attributed to the strong microclimatic dependence of Dysosma as an understory herb, which limits its ability to rapidly shift in response to changes in macroclimatic averages.
The spatial distribution results indicate that the high-suitability areas of Dysosma are primarily concentrated in the mountainous and hilly regions of southwestern Guizhou, Chongqing, and Hubei (Figure 9), closely overlapping with biodiversity hotspots and historical refugia such as the Wuling and Dalou Mountains [70]. This stable distribution may be related to the interactions among topography, ecosystems, and evolutionary history. Complex terrain not only buffers extreme low temperatures [71] but also creates diverse microclimatic units, such as valleys and slope aspects, providing microenvironmental heterogeneity for Dysosma. Well-preserved forest systems rely on these topographic features to maintain local water availability and humid microclimates, thereby fulfilling the species’ hygrophilous requirements [71]. Furthermore, the complexity of topography may also play a role at the evolutionary level: landscape genomics studies have shown that such mountainous systems provided refugia for plants (e.g., Tetrastigma hemsleyanum) during historical climatic fluctuations, while promoting local adaptation and maintaining genetic diversity, thereby enhancing the adaptive potential of populations to future environmental changes [72]. Centroid analysis indicated that the distribution centroid of Dysosma has remained largely stable within Guizhou, suggesting that this region may serve as a key climatic refugium (Figure 11). The results indicate that the stability observed in Guizhou is not attributable to a single factor, but rather arises from the combined effects of topography, climate, and ecological history. Furthermore, the newly suitable areas are primarily concentrated in southern Henan and northeastern Shandong, with scattered distributions in central Yunnan, northern Anhui, and northern Jiangsu, showing an overall trend of eastward migration toward central and eastern China. This finding is consistent with the results of Huang et al. [41], collectively indicating the potential directions of Dysosma expansion under climate change. This consistency not only enhances the reliability of the model results but also highlights the potential of areas surrounding the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain as future suitable habitats for the genus Dysosma. However, many of these newly identified suitable areas are situated within agricultural plains experiencing intensive human activity, and whether the existing forest cover and moist habitat conditions can support successful colonization by the species remains to be confirmed through field verification. Moreover, the formulation of more species-specific conservation or in situ and ex situ strategies necessitates moving beyond the aforementioned general predictions derived solely from climatic factors.
Notably, the pronounced niche differentiation within the genus Dysosma (Figure 5) suggests that genus-level suitability predictions could generate systematic biases across species. Centroid shift trends predominantly reflect the overall patterns of species with similar niche requirements and relatively “conservative” ecological strategies (e.g., D. delavayi and D. difformis), but may fail to adequately capture specialized species that undergo niche “dimensional shifts” (e.g., D. tsayuensis). The distribution of the latter strongly depends on UVB1 and the high-altitude, high-radiation habitats it represents, rendering it highly sensitive to climate change and susceptible to the typical “ceiling effect” under ongoing warming [73]. As a result, the rate of habitat loss and the corresponding extinction risk may substantially exceed the average values predicted by genus-level models. Nevertheless, the dynamic change indicators developed in this study continue to offer tangible spatial guidance for conservation planning. Stable high-suitability areas (Figure 9) can be considered core “refugia” for sustaining the diversity of the genus Dysosma and should be prioritized for protection within conservation networks. Centroid shift trajectories and potential expansion areas identify key corridors where ecological connectivity should be maintained or restored, thereby facilitating Dysosma species—especially those with relatively conservative niches—to implement necessary distributional adjustments under future environmental change. Simultaneously, while the overall centroid of the genus Dysosma remains in Guizhou across all three SSP scenarios, the migration trajectories diverge markedly—moving toward higher latitudes under SSP126 and SSP245, but toward lower latitudes under the high-emission SSP585 scenario. This anomalous pattern may indicate that specialized species favoring high-altitude, cool environments (e.g., D. tsayuensis) cannot “escape” to higher elevations under extreme warming, thereby exhibiting model-predicted contractions toward lower latitudes. Such high sensitivity to climate warming is relatively widespread among high-altitude-dependent species within the Berberidaceae, although the precise trajectories of their distributional responses may differ substantially due to variations in niche composition. For example, model projections for P. hexandrum, a member of the same family, indicate that its suitable habitats are projected to contract toward higher elevations and decline markedly under climate warming [44]. In contrast, our results suggest that D. tsayuensis, which similarly favors high-altitude environments within the genus Dysosma, may exhibit a contraction of suitable habitats toward lower elevations. Although these patterns proceed in opposite directions, they both illustrate the common challenges encountered by high-altitude specialist species in the context of climate warming, with their core habitats potentially experiencing significant shifts and facing a pronounced risk of loss. Thus, for niche-specialized species within Dysosma, the rate of future habitat loss and the corresponding extinction risk is likely to be underestimated by models relying on genus-wide average trends or assumptions of uniform elevational responses.

3.4. Targeted Conservation Strategies for Dysosma

The identification and strategic delineation of priority conservation areas for Dysosma under current and future climate scenarios are essential to secure its long-term persistence. However, the gap analysis indicates that existing protected areas encompass only about 4.44% of the identified priority zones (approximately 6.46 × 104 km2), leaving as much as 95.56% unprotected. Moreover, these gaps are not evenly distributed but are instead concentrated in key southern regions, including Guizhou, Sichuan, and Hunan (Figure 12a). In particular, core gap regions such as the Wuling and Dalou Mountains at the junction of Guizhou, Chongqing, and Hubei exhibit minimal overlap with the current protected-area network, indicating that existing conservation frameworks are insufficient to encompass the most critical and climatically stable habitats of Dysosma. The findings of this study align with those of Zhang et al. [74] on the distribution of priority conservation areas for nationally protected wild plants, thereby underscoring the strategic importance of the mountainous and hilly belt extending across southwestern Guizhou, Chongqing, and Hubei for future conservation planning. Meanwhile, this region represents a biodiversity hotspot, suggesting that the designated priority conservation areas may play a crucial role under future climate change [75]. Therefore, conducting climate-change monitoring within these priority conservation areas and assessing the sensitivity of Dysosma to future climatic shifts become particularly important. However, conservation efforts cannot be postponed until sufficient information on wild plant protection becomes available, as delays in action may result in missed opportunities to safeguard vulnerable species [76]. To mitigate the risk of losing conservation efficacy due to climate change [77], it is essential to balance both the effectiveness and timeliness of conservation actions.
Drawing on the aforementioned mechanisms of niche differentiation and projected future risk patterns, corresponding conservation strategies can be proposed; nevertheless, these recommendations are based on model predictions and inherently involve a degree of uncertainty. This study adopts a “full-dispersal” assumption, which does not adequately account for the dispersal constraints of Dysosma in natural ecological processes. The capacity of plants to track climate change is constrained not only by potential dispersal distances, but also by additional factors including microhabitat filtering, seedling establishment rates, dispersal vector efficiency, and habitat fragmentation [78]. For instance, species like Rhexia virginica, which have successfully expanded owing to strong dispersal capabilities [79], highlight the widespread risks confronting dispersal-limited species. Dysosma species are slow-lived, perennial herbs with limited dispersal distances; their dispersal fronts are strongly constrained by forest structure, humidity, and interspecific competition, and their migration rates may lag considerably behind the rapid shifts of climatically suitable habitats [80]. Consequently, a considerable fraction of model-predicted future climatically suitable areas may be “suitable yet inaccessible” in reality, resulting in an underestimation of species’ true contraction risk. Moreover, the representativeness of key environmental variables may also affect the accuracy of predictions. Future land-use changes and habitat fragmentation were not incorporated into the models [81], implying that actual available habitats may be smaller than predicted. Soil properties, including pH, texture, and organic matter, are critical for microhabitat selection by Dysosma, yet global-scale soil datasets (e.g., HWSD) poorly capture local heterogeneity and exhibit collinearity with climate and topographic variables at regional scales (Figure S5), thereby limiting the reflection of their independent contributions (Figure S3). Additionally, the models did not incorporate biotic interactions, including pollination and competition, potentially resulting in an overestimation of population establishment and persistence under novel climatic conditions [82]. Even under climatically suitable conditions, the lack of ecological interactions may hinder populations from successfully establishing or persisting within potential suitable habitats.
To enhance predictive accuracy, future studies could integrate dispersal models with habitat connectivity analyses to simulate more realistic migration scenarios, incorporate high-resolution land-use change data, and, at fine spatial scales (e.g., watersheds or slopes), combine in situ soil surveys with physiological and ecological experiments to quantify the influence of soil and microenvironmental factors on habitat suitability, thereby developing more mechanistic distribution models. Despite these limitations, quantitative analyses of potential suitable habitats for Dysosma still provide a critical foundation for formulating scientifically informed, tiered conservation strategies. Accordingly, the present study outlines the following priority conservation strategies: (1) Prioritize the protection of stable suitable areas. Model-identified current and future long-term high-suitability areas (Figure 9) should be incorporated into priority conservation zones, management of existing protected areas should be strengthened, and fragmentation of core habitats should be minimized. (2) Establish ecological corridors. In key expansion zones along centroid migration pathways, corridors should be implemented through vegetation restoration and the creation of small protected areas, thereby facilitating potential migration for niche-conservative species, including D. difformis and D. delavayi. (3) Priority monitoring of specialized species. For niche-divergent, specialized species, such as D. tsayuensis, long-term monitoring stations should be established in high-altitude refugia to track key environmental indicators and, when necessary, implement assisted migration. (4) Strengthen ex situ conservation. Living gene banks of Dysosma should be established, and ex situ cultivation should be implemented in experimental sites simulating future climates or varying elevations to assess environmental tolerance and mitigate pressure on wild populations. (5) Strengthen long-term monitoring and mechanistic research. A monitoring network spanning major distribution areas should be established, integrated with functional trait and genomic studies to elucidate the physiological and genetic underpinnings of niche differentiation. (6) Strengthen institutional support. Relevant laws and regulations should be reinforced to provide policy backing for the long-term conservation and sustainable use of Dysosma. The findings of this study provide a scientific basis for the conservation, domestication, and sustainable use of Dysosma species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Data Sources and Processing of Dysosma Spatial Distribution

This study used the genus Dysosma, as defined by the Flora of China (FOC) taxonomic system, as the research unit, focusing on seven species: Dysosma aurantiocaulis, Dysosma difformis, Dysosma majoensis, Dysosma pleiantha, Dysosma tsayuensis, Dysosma delavayi, and Dysosma versipellis. In addition, because Dysosma villosa is known from only a single type specimen record, it did not meet the requirements for constructing a stable and reliable MaxEnt model and was therefore excluded from the modeling analyses.  Species occurrence data were obtained from the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (CVH, http://www.cvh.ac.cn/), the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, http://www.gbif.org/), and field surveys conducted in situ. For records with locality information specified at the village or town level, geographic coordinates were extracted using Google Earth Pro version 7.3.6 (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA). For records documented only at the county level or with incomplete information, georeferencing was conducted within a plausible elevation range based on specimen altitude data. A total of 782 occurrence records with precise geographic coordinates were obtained through the aforementioned procedures (Table 5). To prevent model overfitting caused by duplicate records within the same grid cells, spatial thinning was performed at both the genus and species levels using the R package ENMTools 4.5.1. Spatial thinning was based on 5 km × 5 km environmental variable grids. Since the grid boundaries of all environmental variables were aligned at this resolution, using any single variable for thinning produced identical results. After processing, 534 occurrence records were retained at the genus level (Figure 13), and 598 records were retained at the species level (Table 6).

4.2. Selection of Environmental Variables for Dysosma

To identify the main environmental drivers of Dysosma, a total of 60 initial environmental variables (Supplementary Table S1) were selected as preliminary inputs for model screening and construction. The climatic variables included both current climate conditions (1970s–2000s) and future projected scenarios, comprising 19 bioclimatic variables and digital elevation model (DEM) data, all obtained from the WorldClim dataset [83] (http://www.worldclim.org). Slope and aspect were derived from DEM data using ArcGIS 10.2 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA). Thirty-two soil variables were obtained from the Chinese soil dataset v1.1 of the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD, http://vdb3.soil.csdb.cn), and six ultraviolet (UV) variables were sourced from the Global UV-B Radiation Database [84] (http://www.ufz.de/gluv/, accessed on 16 December 2025).
The modeling procedure was conducted in four sequential steps. (1) An initial MaxEnt v3.4.4 (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA) run was performed using distribution points following redundancy removal to estimate the contribution rates of 60 environmental variables. During this step, the MaxEnt options “Create response curves”, “Make pictures of predictions”, and “Do jackknife to measure variable importance” were enabled. The output format was set to Logistic, the file type to .asc, and the number of replicates to 10, while all other settings were retained as default. (2) Environmental variables with zero contribution were first removed, and the remaining variables were extracted at species occurrence points using ArcGIS “Sampling” tool, after which highly correlated variables (|r| ≥ 0.80) were excluded based on Pearson correlation analysis (Figure S5) [85]. Although Bio14 was highly correlated with Bio12 at the genus level (r = 0.83, Figure S5a) and at the species level (D. pleiantha, r = 0.86, Figure S5e), it was retained due to its ecological significance and relatively high contribution in preliminary model construction: 17.1% at the genus level (Figure S4a) and 48% at the species level (D. pleiantha, Figure S4e). (3) The ENMeval tool (version 2.0.0) was employed to optimize the regularization multiplier (RM) and feature combination (FC) parameters for the environmental variables retained after removing highly correlated predictors, thereby identifying the optimal modeling configuration. (4) The MaxEnt model was rerun using the optimized parameters and the environmental variables retained after removing highly correlated predictors, generating final suitability prediction rasters in Logistic format, environmental response curves, and the final contribution rates of all variables (Figure S3). Sensitivity analyses of the robustness of predicted suitable areas for Dysosma, along with calculations of environmental niche overlap indices, were conducted using the 25 environmental variables optimized at the genus level.

4.3. Future Climate Data and Scenario Settings

To simulate potential distribution patterns of Dysosma under future climate change scenarios, downscaled CMIP6 climate data from WorldClim v2.1 at a spatial resolution of 2.5′ were utilized, ensuring consistency with the baseline climate data (1970–2000). Future climate projections were generated using the BCC-CSM2-MR general circulation model (GCM) from CMIP6, developed by the National Climate Center of the China Meteorological Administration and widely applied in climate change impact assessments at global and regional scales [86,87,88,89,90]. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), the core scenario framework of CMIP6, define future socioeconomic development trajectories by quantifying key variables including population, GDP, urbanization, inequality, and energy structure, and are employed to assess comprehensively the potential impacts of socioeconomic changes on the climate system [91,92]. To capture climate uncertainty across different emission pathways, three representative scenarios were selected: low-emission SSP1-2.6, medium-emission SSP2-4.5, and high-emission SSP5-8.5. Future climate data covered three time periods: the 2050s (2041–2060), the 2070s (2061–2080), and the 2090s (2081–2100). For all future scenarios, the 19 bioclimatic variables were derived from the downscaled BCC-CSM2-MR products provided by WorldClim and employed in MaxEnt models to predict the potential suitable areas of Dysosma under future climate conditions and to analyze their spatiotemporal dynamics.

4.4. Performance Evaluation and Parameter Optimization of the MaxEnt Model

Model fit is influenced by the regularization multiplier (RM) and the feature combination (FC) parameters. This study used the ENMeval package in R 4.5.1 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) to optimize model parameters for selecting the best-fitting model: the regularization multiplier (RM) was set from 0.5 to 4, with increments of 0.5, and six feature combinations (FCs) were tested: L, H, LQ, LQH, LQPH, and LQPHT. The Akaike Information Criterion correction (AIC) was used as a measure of model fit [93], with a value of 0 indicating that the model parameters enhance both accuracy and scientific validity. Additionally, the performance of the MaxEnt model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) [94]. An AUC value ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 indicates poor performance, from 0.7 to 0.9 indicates moderate performance, and greater than 0.9 indicates high performance [95]. As shown in Table 7, to enhance model robustness across varying data scales, the genus-level model employed Subsample (75% training, 25% testing), while the species-level model utilized stratified sampling based on sample size (n ≥ 50: 70%/30%; 20 ≤ n < 50: 60% training; n < 15: Bootstrap).

4.5. Model Robustness Validation and Niche Differentiation Assessment Within Dysosma

To evaluate the validity of genus-level modeling and assess potential biases arising from interspecific ecological differences, this study performed a consistency analysis at both genus and species scales across three dimensions: ecological response, environmental space, and geographic space. First, an overall assessment was performed to evaluate the ecological niche conservatism of species within the genus, thereby providing a scientific basis for genus-level modeling. Using the four most influential environmental variables from the genus-level model, univariate response curves for each species were extracted (*_only.csv). Given the variability in species’ responses to dominant environmental factors, the number of species represented in each response curve differs. By overlaying the response curves of species that exhibit significant responses, the similarity in their ecological responses across critical environmental gradients is assessed. Next, by identifying species pairs with extreme levels of overlap (either high or low) in the niche overlap matrix, potential niche specialization and highly similar species assemblages are examined, thereby unveiling the specific patterns of niche differentiation within the genus. Given the current climatic conditions, environmental variables at the genus level corresponding to species distribution points were extracted from environmental grids. The Schoener’s D index was calculated using the ecospat package in R to quantify the pairwise ecological niche overlap between species [96].The calculation formula is as follows:
D = 1 1 2 i = 1 n p x , i p y , i
where p_(x,i) and p_(y,i) represent the normalized environmental variable densities of species x and y at environmental grid point i, ∑(i = 1)n p(x,i) = ∑(i = 1)n p(y,i) = 1; where n is the total number of grid points. To ensure comparability across species with varying sample sizes, kernel density estimation was consistently applied using a 35 × 35 grid [97,98], which provides stable density estimates for the species with the smallest sample size, D. aurantiocaulis (n = 8), while preventing the loss of critical distribution information due to excessively coarse grids. The ecological niche distributions of the species were subsequently visualized in the PCA environmental principal component space. Finally, species-level models were developed based on 25 environmental variables selected by MaxEnt, and the maximum value method [99,100] was used to integrate predictions for the seven species into a species-wide suitable habitat map for comparison with the genus-level prediction map. The Pearson correlation coefficient and the overlap ratio of high suitability areas (p ≥ 0.5) were calculated using the raster package in R 4.5.1 to quantify the consistency of predictions across both spatial scales.

4.6. Classification of the Potential Distribution Patterns of the Genus Dysosma

The Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) can effectively quantify the potential support provided by environmental factors for species distribution, making it an important tool for scientifically assessing species habitat suitability and quality [101]. Reclassification of the ASCII files from the MaxEnt output was performed using ArcGIS, using four potential habitat types: highly suitable habitat (0.5 ≤ p ≤ 1.0), moderately suitable habitat (0.3 ≤ p < 0.5), low suitability habitat (0.1 ≤ p < 0.3), and unsuitable habitat (p < 0.1).

4.7. Construction of Dynamic Indicators for Changes in the Suitable Habitat of the Genus Dysosma

In this study, the initial area was defined as the total area of all habitat suitability levels (low, moderate, and highly suitable habitats). As shown in Table 8, to construct a multidimensional evaluation framework, four indicators were used to represent the four core attributes of change. (1) Relative Change Rate (RCR) (magnitude of change); (2) Change Intensity (CI) (activity level of change); (3) Stability Index (SI) (core area persistence); (4) Spatial Displacement Rate (SDR) (spatial reorganization pattern). Although some indicators (e.g., Relative Change Rate, Stability, and Spatial Displacement Rate) are interrelated in their calculations (Figure 14), they offer different perspectives on the change process, collectively forming a comprehensive analytical framework. Subsequent analyses will integrate all indicators to avoid biased conclusions arising from the limitations of any single one.

4.8. Analysis of Centroid Shift in the Distribution of the Genus Dysosma

To reveal the direction and spatial extent of changes in the suitable habitat of the genus Dysosma, this study calculated the migration paths and distances of the geometric center (centroid) of the suitable habitat across different periods. First, the highly suitable habitat areas were extracted in ArcGIS, and the centroid positions of the genus Dysosma in China were calculated based on their spatial distribution for each period. This allowed the simulation of centroid migration trajectories and quantification of migration distances under different climate scenarios. Next, the Kruskal–Wallis test was performed in SPSS 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with a sample size of n = 3 per group, to compare differences between different scenarios. Given the extremely small sample size and the difficulty in meeting the normality assumption, non-parametric statistical methods were used to compare the groups to enhance the robustness of the results.

4.9. Analysis of Conservation Gaps for the Genus Dysosma

In this study, the current moderate and highly suitable habitats of the genus Dysosma in China were designated as priority conservation areas, with the boundaries of China’s nature reserves serving as the limits. The “Extract by Mask” tool in ArcGIS was used to extract the potential suitable habitats of the genus Dysosma for different periods, and the dynamic changes in the protected area over time were quantified.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the optimized MaxEnt model was used to simulate the distribution of suitable habitats for the genus Dysosma under various climate scenarios. The results of this study indicate that the lowest temperature of the coldest month (Bio6) and the mean daily temperature range (Bio2) are the key environmental factors driving the distribution pattern of the genus Dysosma. Under the current climatic conditions, its potential suitable habitats are primarily found in the subtropical montane forests of southern China, where the complex terrain in regions such as Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou creates forest microclimates, providing essential climate refuges for the species. Under future climate scenarios, the area of suitable habitats remains relatively stable under the SSP126 pathway. However, under the SSP245 and SSP585 pathways, as temperatures rise, suitable habitats first expand slowly and then gradually contract, suggesting that climate warming may reshape the species’ potential distribution patterns. Niche pattern analysis reveals significant differentiation among species within the genus Dysosma, with the highest ecological niche overlap index (D) value being only 0.562. The key driving factor for the specialized species D. tsayuensis is UV-B radiation during the growing season, contributing 52.9%, which reflects its unique adaptive strategy evolved in contrast to niche-conservative species. Centroid migration analysis indicates that the centroid of the suitable habitat remains generally stable within Guizhou. However, under the SSP585 high-emission scenario, significant reverse migration occurs, further suggesting that genus-level predictions may obscure the individual responses of species with distinct niche differentiation. From the perspective of conservation status, significant gaps exist in the protection of regions such as Guizhou and Chongqing, while the protected areas in southwest China are limited and poorly connected. This situation poses a threat to the long-term survival of the genus Dysosma. For niche-specialized species like D. tsayuensis, targeted monitoring and protection should be prioritized. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for the formulation of conservation strategies for the genus Dysosma under global climate warming, as well as for resource management and sustainable utilization.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants15010162/s1, Figure S1: Ecological response curves of Dysosma species to key environmental variables; Figure S2: Potential ecological niche space distribution patterns of Dysosma; Figure S3: Contributions of environmental variables in the tuned Maxent models for the seven Dysosma species; Figure S4: Initial contributions of environmental variables in the default Maxent models for the seven Dysosma species; Figure S5: Correlation heatmaps of environmental variables for Dysosma and its seven species (used for screening highly correlated factors); Table S1: Environmental variables used for species distribution modeling of the genus Dysosma.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C., M.L. and F.L.; methodology, M.L., R.C. and F.L.; software, R.C. and F.L.; validation, R.C. and F.L.; formal analysis, F.L.; investigation, M.L., R.C., H.L. and R.Y.; data curation, R.C., M.L. and L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C. and F.L.; writing—review and editing, M.L., R.C., F.L. and R.Y.; visualization, M.L., R.C. and H.L.; supervision, M.L. and W.Y.; project administration, R.C. and F.L.; funding acquisition, M.L., R.C. and L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding source: This study was supported by the following projects: 1. Germplasm Innovation and Integrated Demonstration of Efficient Cultivation Techniques for Characteristic Camellia and Rhododendron in Guizhou, funded by the Guizhou Academy of Forestry Research Foundation (Contract No. Guilin Kehe [2025] 15). 2. Second Scientific Survey of the Congjiang Moon Mountain Prefecture-level Nature Reserve, funded by the Congjiang County Forestry Bureau Research Fund (Project No. P522633202300082B). 3. Investigation, Collection, and Key Cultivation Technologies for Characteristic Ornamental Plant Germplasm Resources, funded by the Guizhou Academy of Forestry Research Foundation (Task Book No. Guilin Kehe [2024] 09).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yu Fan, a graduate student at the College of Forestry, Guizhou University, for his assistance and guidance in the graphical analyses of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pereira, H.M.; Leadley, P.W.; Proença, V.; Alkemade, R.; Scharlemann, J.P.W.; Fernandez-Manjarrés, J.F.; Araújo, M.B.; Balvanera, P.; Biggs, R.; Cheung, W.W.L.; et al. Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century. Science 2010, 330, 1496–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cai, H.W.; Zhang, G.F. Predicting the Potential Distribution of Rare and Endangered Emmenopterys henryi in China Under Climate Change. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 14, e70403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, M.; Yang, L.Q. Northward expansion of fire-adaptative vegetation in future warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liang, Q.; Yang, X.J.; Huang, Y.H.; Yang, Z.W.; Feng, M.C.; Qing, M.X.; Wang, C.; Yang, W.D.; Wang, Z.G.; Zhang, M.J.; et al. Prediction of the potential distribution and analysis of the freezing injury risk of winter wheat on the Loess Plateau under climate change. J. Integr. Agric. 2024, 23, 2941–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Masson-Delmotte, V.; Zhai, P.; Pörtner, H.-O.; Roberts, D.; Skea, J.; Shukla, P.R.; Pirani, A.; Moufouma-Okia, W.; Péan, C.; Pidcock, R.; et al. Global Warming Of 1.5 °C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C Above Pre-Industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  6. Basso, V.; De Freitas Pereira, M.; Maillard, F.; Mallerman, J.; Mangeot-Peter, L.; Zhang, F.; Bonnot, C. Facing global change: The millennium challenge for plant scientists. In Proceedings of the 41st New Phytologist Symposium ‘Plant Sciences for the Future’, Nancy, France, 29 April 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vincent, H.; Bornand, C.N.; Kempel, A.; Fischer, M. Rare species perform worse than widespread species under changed climate. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 246, 108586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, Z.B.; Bai, Y.; Alatalo, J.M.; Huang, Z.D.; Yang, F.; Pu, X.Y.; Wang, R.B.; Yang, W.; Guo, X.Y. Spatio-temporal variation in potential habitats for rare and endangered plants and habitat conservation based on the maximum entropy model. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 784, 147080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, S.K.; Li, Z.P.; Wu, R.; Qi, H.L.; Ke, H.; Huang, X.H.; Zhou, J.H.; Tang, Y.; Ran, J.H.; Gao, Y.Q. Upward and Northwest Range Shifts for Four Endemic Lamiaceae Medicinal Herbs in the Third Pole. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e71116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, X.; Liu, W.J.; Zhu, Y.Z.; Cao, Y.T.; Yang, X.M.; Geng, Y.; Zhang, F.J.; Sun, R.Q.; Jia, R.W.; Yan, C.L.; et al. Impacts of Climate Changes on Geographic Distribution of Primula filchnerae, an Endangered Herb in China. Plants 2023, 12, 3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, T.; Yang, S.Y.; Jiang, H.J.; Gu, L.; Zou, Q.F.; Fu, C.K.; Guo, K.J.; Zhang, T.; Liu, S.Y.; Chen, S.D. A new species of the genus Soriculus (Soricidae, Eulipotyphla, Mammalia) from Medog, Tibet, China, based on morphological and molecular data. ZooKeys 2025, 1262, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, W.J.; Lapuz, R.S.; Wee, A.K.S. Large-scale changes in the distribution of suitable habitat of the endangered subtropical canopy tree species Vatica guangxiensis under climate change. Biodivers. Conserv. 2024, 33, 3187–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qiu, C.J.; Shen, Z.H.; Peng, P.H.; Mao, L.F.; Zhang, X.S. How does contemporary climate versus climate change velocity affect endemic plant species richness in China? Sci. Bull. 2014, 59, 4660–4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guisan, A.; Thuiller, W. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 993–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Valavi, R.; Abegg, M.; Bruce, C.; Ford, A.; Guisan, A.; Hijmans, R.J.; Huettmann, F.; Lohmann, L. Presence-only and presence-absence data for comparing species distribution modeling methods. Biodivers. Inform. 2020, 15, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Valavi, R.; Guillera-Arroita, G.; Lahoz-Monfort, J.J.; Elith, J. Predictive performance of presence-only species distribution models: A benchmark study with reproducible code. Ecol. Monogr. 2021, 92, e01486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sutherst, R. A computerised system for matching climates in ecology. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1985, 13, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vincenzi, S.; Zucchetta, M.; Franzoi, P.; Pellizzato, M.; Pranovi, F.; De Leo, G.A.; Torricelli, P. Application of a Random Forest algorithm to predict spatial distribution of the potential yield of Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon, Italy. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222, 1471–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.Z.; Zhang, Y.F.; Li, S.Y.; Anderson, C.J.; Hou, S.L.; Zhang, M.X.; Mo, X. County-scale assessment of Spartina alterniflora spread risk in Hebei’s coastal areas using the MaxEnt model. Ecol. Indic. 2025, 180, 114325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matsane, W.; Dhau, I.; Mothapo, M.C.; Thamaga, K.H. Modelling the Potential Distribution of African Wormwood (Artemisia afra) Using a Machine Learning Algorithm-Based Approach (MaxEnt) in Sekhukhune District, South Africa. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e71866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Negi, M.; Brahmi, M.K.; Bhardwaj, S.K.; Dogra, K.S. Spatial distribution and habitat suitability of Ageratina adenophora in Himachal Pradesh: A MaxEnt-based approach. J. Nat. Conserv. 2025, 89, 127159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, G.; Wang, C.; Guo, Z.R.; Dai, L.J.; Wu, Y.Q.; Liu, H.Y.; Li, Y.F.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.A.; Zhao, Y.X.; et al. Integrating Maxent model and landscape ecology theory for studying spatiotemporal dynamics of habitat: Suggestions for conservation of endangered Red-crowned crane. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 116, 106472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pearson, R.G.; Dawson, T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003, 12, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Z.W.; Sun, W.G.; Xi, H.C.; Chang, S. Dysosmavillosa (Berberidaceae), a new species from Guizhou, Southwestern China. PhytoKeys 2019, 124, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pham, N.K.; Pham, T.H.; Nguyen, Q.N.; Floden, A.; Ninh, T.P.; Tran, T.V.T.; Phan, K.L. Characterisation of Dysosma tonkinense (Gagnep.) M. Hiroe (Berberidaceae) based on morphological characteristics and ITS sequences. Nord. J. Bot. 2020, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ying, J.S.; Boufford, D.E.; Anthony, R.B. Dysosma Woodson. In Flora of China; Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China; Missouri Botanical Garden Press: Saint Louis, MO, USA, 2011; Volume 19, pp. 797–800. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shaobin, M.; Zhihao, H. A Contribution to the Geographical Distribution and Phylogeny of Podophylloideae (Berberidaceae). Plant Divers. 1997, 19, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ying, T.S. On Dysosma Woodson and Sinopodophyllum Ying, gen. nov. of the Berberidaceae. Zhiwu Fenlei Xuebao 1979, 17, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  30. Motyka, S.; Jafernik, K.; Ekiert, H.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Calina, D.; Al-Omari, B.; Szopa, A.; Cho, W.C. Podophyllotoxin and its derivatives: Potential anticancer agents of natural origin in cancer chemotherapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 158, 114145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shang, Z.J. Shennong Bencao Jing Jiaozhu (Annotated and Collated Edition of Shennong’s Classic of Materia Medica); Xueyuan Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lerndal, T. A clinical study of CPH 82 vs methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2000, 39, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, Y.J.; Han, R.J.; Bai, H.Y.; Wang, H.J.; Li, M.; Si, Y.Y.; Wang, J.M.; Gong, J.H.; Chen, H.; Feng, W.S. Structurally diverse biflavonoids from Dysosma versipellis and their bioactivity. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 34962–34970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, C.; Zhang, C.; He, T.; Sun, L.; Wang, Q.; Han, S.; Wang, W.; Kong, J.; Yuan, F.; Huang, J. Study on potential toxic material base and mechanisms of hepatotoxicity induced by Dysosma versipellis based on toxicological evidence chain (TEC) concept. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Liu, C. Research progress on quality markers of traditional Chinese medicine. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2022, 211, 114588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guan, B.C.; Fu, C.X.; Qiu, Y.X.; Zhou, S.L.; Comes, H.P. Genetic structure and breeding system of a rare understory herb, Dysosma versipellis (Berberidaceae), from temperate deciduous forests in China. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, Q.; Zhuo, Z.; Wang, Z.; Peng, Y.; Xu, D. Assessing the climate change impact on Epimedium brevicornu in China with the MaxEnt model. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1534608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Song, G.; Liu, S.; Song, X.; Jiang, X.; Gong, S.; Hao, W.; Cui, Y.; Zhao, Y. Impact of climate change on the distribution of Ligustrum leucanthum using MaxEnt modeling. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 29017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pecl, G.T.; Araújo, M.B.; Bell, J.D.; Blanchard, J.; Bonebrake, T.C.; Chen, I.C.; Clark, T.D.; Colwell, R.K.; Danielsen, F.; Evengård, B.; et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 2017, 355, eaai9214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lane, H.S.; Symonds, J.E.; Ritchie, P.A. The phylogeography and population genetics of Polyprion oxygeneios based on mitochondrial DNA sequences and microsatellite DNA markers. Fish. Res. 2016, 174, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, B.; Zhang, H.C.; Xu, L.; Jiang, H.; Chen, T. Projecting the potential distribution of Dysosma versipellis (Berberidaceae) in China under present and future climate change scenarios. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2024, 22, 1107–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Haesen, S.; Lembrechts, J.J.; De Frenne, P.; Lenoir, J.; Aalto, J.; Ashcroft, M.B.; Kopecký, M.; Luoto, M.; Maclean, I.; Nijs, I.; et al. ForestTemp—Sub-canopy microclimate temperatures of European forests. Glob. Change Biol. 2021, 27, 6307–6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Palaniyandi, K.; Jun, W. Low temperature enhanced the podophyllotoxin accumulation vis-a-vis its biosynthetic pathway gene(s) expression in Dysosma versipellis (Hance) M. Cheng—A pharmaceutically important medicinal plant. Process Biochem. 2020, 95, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wani, Z.A.; Abdul Rahim, P.P.; Dar, J.A.; Lone, A.N.; Siddiqui, S. Predicting the potential distribution of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle in the Himalaya under CMIP6 climate projections. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 25374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, J.; Li, P.Z. Response of plant functional traits to climate change. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 300, 032078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Harris, R.M.B.; Beaumont, L.J.; Vance, T.R.; Tozer, C.R.; Remenyi, T.A.; Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S.E.; Mitchell, P.J.; Nicotra, A.B.; McGregor, S.; Andrew, N.R.; et al. Biological responses to the press and pulse of climate trends and extreme events. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Körner, C. The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Randin, C.F.; Engler, R.; Normand, S.; Zappa, M.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Pearman, P.B.; Vittoz, P.; Thuiller, W.; Guisan, A. Climate change and plant distribution: Local models predict high-elevation persistence. Glob. Change Biol. 2009, 15, 1557–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Elith, J.; Leathwick, J.R. Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40, 677–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. König, C.; Wüest, R.O.; Graham, C.H.; Karger, D.N.; Sattler, T.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Zurell, D. Scale dependency of joint species distribution models challenges interpretation of biotic interactions. J. Biogeogr. 2021, 48, 1541–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fan, Y.; Clark, M.; Lawrence, D.M.; Swenson, S.; Band, L.E.; Brantley, S.L.; Brooks, P.D.; Dietrich, W.E.; Flores, A.; Grant, G.; et al. Hillslope Hydrology in Global Change Research and Earth System Modeling. Water Resour. Res. 2019, 55, 1737–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. De Frenne, P.; Zellweger, F.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, F.; Scheffers, B.R.; Hylander, K.; Luoto, M.; Vellend, M.; Verheyen, K.; Lenoir, J. Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lourenço, J.; Enquist, B.J.; von Arx, G.; Sonsin-Oliveira, J.; Morino, K.; Thomaz, L.D.; Milanez, C.R.D. Hydraulic tradeoffs underlie local variation in tropical forest functional diversity and sensitivity to drought. New Phytol. 2022, 234, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ye, W.Q.; Zhu, S.S.; Comes, H.P.; Yang, T.; Lian, L.; Wang, W.; Qiu, Y.X. Phylogenomics and diversification drivers of the Eastern Asian—Eastern North American disjunct Podophylloideae. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2022, 169, 107427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wong, E.L.Y.; Nevado, B.; Hiscock, S.J.; Filatov, D.A. Rapid evolution of hybrid breakdown following recent divergence with gene flow in Senecio species on Mount Etna, Sicily. Heredity 2023, 130, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhang, G. Potentially differential impacts on niche overlap between Chinese endangered Zelkova schneideriana and its associated tree species under climate change. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1218149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Exposito-Alonso, M.; Vasseur, F.; Ding, W.; Wang, G.; Burbano, H.A.; Weigel, D. Genomic basis and evolutionary potential for extreme drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 2, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lv, M.; Su, H.Y.; Li, M.L.; Yang, D.L.; Yao, R.Y.; Li, M.F.; Wei, J.H. Effect of UV-B radiation on growth, flavonoid and podophyllotoxin accumulation, and related gene expression in Sinopodophyllum hexandrum. Plant Biol. 2020, 23, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhang, X.; Kuang, T.H.; Dong, W.L.; Qian, Z.H.; Zhang, H.J.; Landis, J.B.; Feng, T.; Li, L.J.; Sun, Y.X.; Huang, J.L.; et al. Genomic convergence underlying high-altitude adaptation in alpine plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 1620–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Caldwell, M.M.; Bornman, J.F.; Ballaré, C.L.; Flint, S.D.; Kulandaivelu, G. Terrestrial ecosystems, increased solar ultraviolet radiation, and interactions with other climate change factors. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2007, 6, 252–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Matthew Robson, T.; Aphalo, P.J.; Banaś, A.K.; Barnes, P.W.; Brelsford, C.C.; Jenkins, G.I.; Kotilainen, T.K.; Łabuz, J.; Martínez-Abaigar, J.; Morales, L.O.; et al. A perspective on ecologically relevant plant-UV research and its practical application. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019, 18, 970–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, P.S.; Xiang, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.; Dong, X.H. UV-B Radiation Enhances Epimediumbrevicornu Maxim. Quality by Improving the Leaf Structure and Increasing the Icaritin Content. Plants 2024, 13, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lu, S.S.; Qi, J.W.; Zhao, J.; Song, Q.W.; Xing, L.N.; Du, W.B.; Wang, X.H.; Zhang, X.W.; Zhou, X.L. Transcriptome-Based Phylogenomics and Adaptive Divergence Across Environmental Gradients in Epimedium brevicornu. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, L.L.; Zhou, S.W.; Hou, Y.W.; Ji, B.Y.; Pei, L.X.; Su, X.H.; Zhong, H.; Dong, C.M. Blue light induces biosynthesis of flavonoids in Epimedium sagittatum (Sieb.et Zucc.) Maxim. leaves, a study on a light-demanding medicinal shade herb. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 187, 115512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Losos, J. Improbable Destinies: Fate, Chance, and the Future of Evolution; Riverhead Books: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  66. Urban, M.C. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 2015, 348, 571–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, I.C.; Hill, J.K.; Ohlemüller, R.; Roy, D.B.; Thomas, C.D. Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming. Science 2011, 333, 1024–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Parmesan, C.; Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 2003, 421, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fan, Y.; Yao, W.H.; Wang, Z.H.; Fan, X.Y.; Hu, S.Y.; Wang, H.F.; Ou, J. Predicting Potential Suitable Habitats of Three Rare Wild Magnoliaceae Species (Michelia crassipes, Lirianthe coco, Manglietia insignis) Under Current and Future Climatic Scenarios Based on the Maxent Model. Plants 2025, 14, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cai, J.; Yu, W.B.; Zhang, T.; Wang, H.; Li, D.Z. China’s biodiversity hotspots revisited: A treasure chest for plants. PhytoKeys 2019, 130, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Davis, K.T.; Dobrowski, S.Z.; Holden, Z.A.; Higuera, P.E.; Abatzoglou, J.T. Microclimatic buffering in forests of the future: The role of local water balance. Ecography 2018, 42, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Y.H.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.C.; Ma, W.X.; Li, M.Y.; Guo, P.; Feng, L.; Fu, C.X. Using landscape genomics to assess local adaptation and genomic vulnerability of a perennial herb Tetrastigma hemsleyanum (Vitaceae) in subtropical China. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1150704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Thomas, C.D.; Cameron, A.; Green, R.E.; Bakkenes, M.; Beaumont, L.J.; Collingham, Y.C.; Erasmus, B.F.N.; de Siqueira, M.F.; Grainger, A.; Hannah, L.; et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 2004, 427, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, C.J.; Wan, J.Z.; Mu, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.X. Management planning for endangered plant species in priority protected areas. Biodivers. Conserv. 2015, 24, 2383–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Marcer, A.; Sáez, L.; Molowny-Horas, R.; Pons, X.; Pino, J. Using species distribution modelling to disentangle realised versus potential distributions for rare species conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 166, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wan, J.Z.; Wang, C.J.; Yu, J.H.; Nie, S.M.; Han, S.J.; Zu, Y.G.; Chen, C.M.; Yuan, S.S.; Wang, Q.G. Model-based conservation planning of the genetic diversity of Phellodendron amurense Rupr due to climate change. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 2884–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ockendon, N.; Baker, D.J.; Carr, J.A.; White, E.C.; Almond, R.E.A.; Amano, T.; Bertram, E.; Bradbury, R.B.; Bradley, C.; Butchart, S.H.M.; et al. Mechanisms underpinning climatic impacts on natural populations: Altered species interactions are more important than direct effects. Glob. Change Biol. 2014, 20, 2221–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. LaRue, E.A.; Emery, N.C.; Briley, L.; Christie, M.R. Geographic variation in dispersal distance facilitates range expansion of a lake shore plant in response to climate change. Divers. Distrib. 2019, 25, 1429–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Woodward, F.I.; Thompson, G.B.; McKee, I.F. How Plants Respond to Climate Change: Migration Rates, Individualism and the Consequences for Plant Communities. Ann. Bot. 1991, 67, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Asner, G.P.; Loarie, S.R.; Heyder, U. Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the future of humid tropical forests. Conserv. Lett. 2010, 3, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Van der Putten, W.H.; Macel, M.; Visser, M.E. Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: Why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 2025–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Beckmann, M.; Václavík, T.; Manceur, A.M.; Šprtová, L.; von Wehrden, H.; Welk, E.; Cord, A.F. glUV: A global UV-B radiation data set for macroecological studies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Worthington, T.A.; Zhang, T.; Logue, D.R.; Mittelstet, A.R.; Brewer, S.K. Landscape and flow metrics affecting the distribution of a federally-threatened fish: Improving management, model fit, and model transferability. Ecol. Model. 2016, 342, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wu, T.W.; Lu, Y.X.; Fang, Y.J.; Xin, X.G.; Li, L.; Li, W.P.; Jie, W.H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.M.; Zhang, L.; et al. The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): The main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 2019, 12, 1573–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Attarod, P.; Zhu, H.F.; Beiranvand, S.; Pypker, T.G.; Bayramzadeh, V.; Mariv, H.S.; Karimi, K. Past and future climate change in the Zagros region of western Iran. Anthropocene 2025, 50, 100475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ghanghermeh, A.A.; Roshan, G.R.; Martinez, A.; Iglesias, G. Offshore wind resources in the Caspian Sea under climate change. Energy 2025, 328, 136355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rusu, L. Climate change impact on the sea state conditions in the Mediterranean Sea under RCP and SSP emission scenarios. Renew. Energy 2025, 243, 122616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Eyring, V.; Bony, S.; Meehl, G.A.; Senior, C.A.; Stevens, B.; Stouffer, R.J.; Taylor, K.E. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2016, 9, 1937–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Riahi, K.; van Vuuren, D.P.; Kriegler, E.; Edmonds, J.; O’Neill, B.C.; Fujimori, S.; Bauer, N.; Calvin, K.; Dellink, R.; Fricko, O.; et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Glob. Environ. Change 2016, 42, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. O’Neill, B.C.; Kriegler, E.; Riahi, K.; Ebi, K.L.; Hallegatte, S.; Carter, T.R.; Mathur, R.; van Vuuren, D.P. A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 2013, 122, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Akaike, H.; Petrov, B.N.; Czaki, F. Information Theory and An Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  94. Peterson, A.T.; Papeş, M.; Soberón, J. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol. Model. 2008, 213, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Peterson, A.T. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2011; p. 152. [Google Scholar]
  96. Schoener, T.W. The Anolis Lizards of Bimini: Resource Partitioning in a Complex Fauna. Ecology 1968, 49, 704–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Broennimann, O.; Fitzpatrick, M.C.; Pearman, P.B.; Petitpierre, B.; Pellissier, L.; Yoccoz, N.G.; Thuiller, W.; Fortin, M.J.; Randin, C.; Zimmermann, N.E.; et al. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 21, 481–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Warren, D.L.; Glor, R.E.; Turelli, M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 2008, 62, 2868–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Guisan, A.; Rahbek, C. SESAM—A new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio-temporal patterns of species assemblages. J. Biogeogr. 2011, 38, 1433–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Baselga, A.; Araújo, M.B. Individualistic vs community modelling of species distributions under climate change. Ecography 2009, 32, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hirzel, A.H.; Le Lay, G. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 1372–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, X.M.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Asrar, G.R.; Zhu, Z.Y. Developing a 1 km resolution daily air temperature dataset for urban and surrounding areas in the conterminous United States. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 215, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pontius, R.G.; Shusas, E.; McEachern, M. Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2004, 101, 251–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bateman, B.L.; Pidgeon, A.M.; Radeloff, V.C.; VanDerWal, J.; Thogmartin, W.E.; Vavrus, S.J.; Heglund, P.J. The pace of past climate change vs. potential bird distributions and land use in the United States. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 22, 1130–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Alkemade, R.; van Oorschot, M.; Miles, L.; Nellemann, C.; Bakkenes, M.; ten Brink, B. GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss. Ecosystems 2009, 12, 374–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographic overlap of potential suitable areas for Dysosma.
Figure 1. Geographic overlap of potential suitable areas for Dysosma.
Plants 15 00162 g001
Figure 2. Validation of MaxEnt model predictions for Dysosma: (a) omission rates; (b) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Figure 2. Validation of MaxEnt model predictions for Dysosma: (a) omission rates; (b) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Plants 15 00162 g002
Figure 3. Contribution Rates of Regularized Training Gain.
Figure 3. Contribution Rates of Regularized Training Gain.
Plants 15 00162 g003
Figure 4. Ecological response curves of Dysosma to key environmental variables: (a) Bio2; (b) Bio6.
Figure 4. Ecological response curves of Dysosma to key environmental variables: (a) Bio2; (b) Bio6.
Plants 15 00162 g004
Figure 5. Spatial Environmental niche overlap patterns among Dysosma species.
Figure 5. Spatial Environmental niche overlap patterns among Dysosma species.
Plants 15 00162 g005
Figure 6. Environmental response curves for species pairs with high and low niche overlap. (a) High-overlap species pair; (b) Low-overlap species pair.
Figure 6. Environmental response curves for species pairs with high and low niche overlap. (a) High-overlap species pair; (b) Low-overlap species pair.
Plants 15 00162 g006
Figure 7. Distribution patterns of suitable habitats of Dysosma under the current climate scenario.
Figure 7. Distribution patterns of suitable habitats of Dysosma under the current climate scenario.
Plants 15 00162 g007
Figure 8. Habitat suitability of Dysosma under different climate scenarios: (a) Predicted Distribution (2050s, SSP1–2.6); (b) Predicted Distribution (2070s, SSP1–2.6); (c) Predicted Distribution (2090s, SSP1–2.6); (d) Predicted Distribution (2050s, SSP2–4.5); (e) Predicted Distribution (2070s, SSP2–4.5); (f) Predicted Distribution (2090s, SSP2–4.5); (g) Predicted Distribution (2050s, SSP5–8.5); (h) Predicted Distribution (2070s, SSP5–8.5); (i) Predicted Distribution (2090s, SSP5–8.5).
Figure 8. Habitat suitability of Dysosma under different climate scenarios: (a) Predicted Distribution (2050s, SSP1–2.6); (b) Predicted Distribution (2070s, SSP1–2.6); (c) Predicted Distribution (2090s, SSP1–2.6); (d) Predicted Distribution (2050s, SSP2–4.5); (e) Predicted Distribution (2070s, SSP2–4.5); (f) Predicted Distribution (2090s, SSP2–4.5); (g) Predicted Distribution (2050s, SSP5–8.5); (h) Predicted Distribution (2070s, SSP5–8.5); (i) Predicted Distribution (2090s, SSP5–8.5).
Plants 15 00162 g008
Figure 9. Spatial distribution patterns of Dysosma suitable habitat changes under future climate scenarios: (a) Range Dynamics (SSP1–2.6, 2050s); (b) Range Dynamics (SSP1–2.6, 2070s); (c) Range Dynamics (SSP1–2.6, 2090s); (d) Range Dynamics (SSP2–4.5, 2050s); (e) Range Dynamics (SSP2–4.5, 2070s); (f) Range Dynamics (SSP2–4.5, 2090s); (g) Range Dynamics (SSP5–8.5, 2050s); (h) Range Dynamics (SSP5–8.5, 2070s); (i) Range Dynamics (SSP5–8.5, 2090s).
Figure 9. Spatial distribution patterns of Dysosma suitable habitat changes under future climate scenarios: (a) Range Dynamics (SSP1–2.6, 2050s); (b) Range Dynamics (SSP1–2.6, 2070s); (c) Range Dynamics (SSP1–2.6, 2090s); (d) Range Dynamics (SSP2–4.5, 2050s); (e) Range Dynamics (SSP2–4.5, 2070s); (f) Range Dynamics (SSP2–4.5, 2090s); (g) Range Dynamics (SSP5–8.5, 2050s); (h) Range Dynamics (SSP5–8.5, 2070s); (i) Range Dynamics (SSP5–8.5, 2090s).
Plants 15 00162 g009
Figure 10. Spatiotemporal shifts in habitat suitability levels of Dysosma under future climate scenarios: (a) Spatiotemporal shifts (SSP1–2.6); (b) Spatiotemporal shifts (SSP2–4.5); (c) Spatiotemporal shifts (SSP5–8.5).
Figure 10. Spatiotemporal shifts in habitat suitability levels of Dysosma under future climate scenarios: (a) Spatiotemporal shifts (SSP1–2.6); (b) Spatiotemporal shifts (SSP2–4.5); (c) Spatiotemporal shifts (SSP5–8.5).
Plants 15 00162 g010
Figure 11. Centroid dynamics of highly suitable habitats of Dysosma under future climate scenarios.
Figure 11. Centroid dynamics of highly suitable habitats of Dysosma under future climate scenarios.
Plants 15 00162 g011
Figure 12. Habitat protection gaps for Dysosma under the current scenario: (a) Map of protection gaps; (b) Priority protection bar charts under three future scenarios.
Figure 12. Habitat protection gaps for Dysosma under the current scenario: (a) Map of protection gaps; (b) Priority protection bar charts under three future scenarios.
Plants 15 00162 g012
Figure 13. Distribution patterns of Dysosma species in China.
Figure 13. Distribution patterns of Dysosma species in China.
Plants 15 00162 g013
Figure 14. Correlation features of habitat suitability change indicators for the genus Dysosma.
Figure 14. Correlation features of habitat suitability change indicators for the genus Dysosma.
Plants 15 00162 g014
Table 1. Contribution (%) of key environmental drivers for species pairs with high and low niche overlap.
Table 1. Contribution (%) of key environmental drivers for species pairs with high and low niche overlap.
SpeciesBio2Bio6Bio7UVB1Contributions (%) of the Top Four Environmental Variables
D. delavayi13.9-46.2-84.5
D. difformis46.839.6--91.4
D. versipellis4036.7--85.4
D. tsayuensis3.331.1-52.995.1
Table 2. The suitable habitat area (km2) of the plants of the genus Dysosma  under different climate scenarios.
Table 2. The suitable habitat area (km2) of the plants of the genus Dysosma  under different climate scenarios.
Suitability ClassCurrentSSP126SSP245SSP585
  2050s2070s2090s2050s2070s2090s2050s2070s2090s
HS56.1352.2052.3251.2351.2854.3054.1456.5855.1053.83
MS89.4986.4294.0687.5795.5097.0293.6490.4093.3992.9
PS107.40113.24110.43118.25107.37106.75111.51109.38111.58110.95
TS253.02251.86256.82257.04254.16258.07259.29256.37260.07257.68
Note: Projected habitat area (km2) under future climate scenarios. Suitability classes are defined as: HS, Highly Suitable; MS, Moderately Suitable; PS, Poorly Suitable; TS, Total Suitable Area.
Table 3. Characteristics of Dysosma habitat suitability changes under future climate scenarios.
Table 3. Characteristics of Dysosma habitat suitability changes under future climate scenarios.
ScenarioTime PeriodRCR (%)CI (%)SI (%)SDR (%)Dynamic Stage
SSP126Current–2050s−0.463.9897.900.44Stable Period
2050s–2070s1.974.4098.880.30
2070s–2090s0.092.9798.660.48
 Period Mean0.533.7898.480.41 
SSP245Current–2050s0.453.4598.640.43Slow Expansion Period
2050s–2070s1.543.4399.190.30
2070s–2090s0.472.7898.980.43
 Period Mean0.823.2298.940.39 
SSP585Current–2050s1.323.5399.040.32Transition Period
2050s–2070s1.444.2798.720.35
2070s–2090s−0.923.5997.890.40
 Period Mean0.613.8098.550.36 
Note: RCR, CI, SI, and SDR represent Relative Change Rate, Change Intensity Index, Stability Index, and Spatial Displacement Rate, respectively.
Table 4. Significance tests of centroid migration distances of Dysosma under different climate scenarios.
Table 4. Significance tests of centroid migration distances of Dysosma under different climate scenarios.
Emission PathwaySample Size (N)Mean RankChi-SquareDegrees of Freedom (df)p-Value
SSP12636.674.3620.11
SSP24532.33
SSP58536
Significant at p < 0.05.
Table 5. Sources of Dysosma Distribution Data.
Table 5. Sources of Dysosma Distribution Data.
Data SourceD. aurantiocaulisD. difformisD. tsayuensisD. pleianthaD. majoensisD. delavayiD. versipellisTotal
CVH154161052989191485
GBIF 14332265826123291
Survey    1146
        782
Table 6. Comparison of spatial thinning results for geographic distribution data at the genus and species levels.
Table 6. Comparison of spatial thinning results for geographic distribution data at the genus and species levels.
SpeciesNumber of Samples
Before Spatial ThinningAfter Spatial Thinning
D. aurantiocaulis158
D. difformis8767
D. tsayuensis3822
D. pleiantha170126
D. majoensis3832
D. delavayi11684
D. versipellis318259
Subtotal598
Dysosma782534
Subtotal534
Table 7. MaxEnt Model Parameter Settings for Dysosma at the Genus and Species Levels.
Table 7. MaxEnt Model Parameter Settings for Dysosma at the Genus and Species Levels.
SpeciesNumber of SamplesRandom Test PercentageFeature Combination MultiplierRegularization Multiplier
Dysosma53425LQ0.5
D.versipellis25930LQ0.5
D.pleiantha12630LQ2
D.delavayi8430LQ0.5
D.diformis6730LQ2.5
D.majoensis3240LQH3.5
D.tsayuensis2240LQ2.5
D.aurantiocaulis80L2
Note: Feature types used in MaxEnt models are indicated as follows: L = Linear, Q = Quadratic, H = Hinge. Combinations such as LQ or LQH indicate that multiple feature types were selected simultaneously.
Table 8. Indicators of predicted changes in the suitable habitat of the genus Dysosma.
Table 8. Indicators of predicted changes in the suitable habitat of the genus Dysosma.
IndicatorIndexFormulaEcological Significance
Change Intensity IndicatorRelative Change Rate (%) R C R = A f i n a l A i n i t i a l A i n i t i a l × 100 % Quantifies the magnitude of change in the total area of suitable habitats [102].
Change Intensity (%) C I = A e x p a n s i o n + A c o n t r a c t i o n A i n i t i a l × 100 % Characterizes the overall activity level of changes in suitable habitats [103].
Stability IndexStability Index (%) S I = A s t a b l e A i n i t i a l × 100 % Assesses the ability of core habitats to persist [104]
Spatial Pattern IndicatorSpatial Displacement Rate S D R = m i n A e x p a n s i o n , A c o n t r a c t i o n A e x p a n s i o n + A c o n t r a c t i o n The range of this indicator is from 0 to 0.5, with higher values indicating stronger spatial reorganization [105].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, R.; Luo, F.; Yao, W.; Yang, R.; Huang, L.; Li, H.; Li, M. Ecological Niche Differentiation and Distribution Dynamics Revealing Climate Change Responses in the Chinese Genus Dysosma. Plants 2026, 15, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010162

AMA Style

Chen R, Luo F, Yao W, Yang R, Huang L, Li H, Li M. Ecological Niche Differentiation and Distribution Dynamics Revealing Climate Change Responses in the Chinese Genus Dysosma. Plants. 2026; 15(1):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Rui, Fangming Luo, Weihao Yao, Runmei Yang, Lang Huang, He Li, and Mao Li. 2026. "Ecological Niche Differentiation and Distribution Dynamics Revealing Climate Change Responses in the Chinese Genus Dysosma" Plants 15, no. 1: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010162

APA Style

Chen, R., Luo, F., Yao, W., Yang, R., Huang, L., Li, H., & Li, M. (2026). Ecological Niche Differentiation and Distribution Dynamics Revealing Climate Change Responses in the Chinese Genus Dysosma. Plants, 15(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop