Next Article in Journal
Integrated Physiological, Transcriptomic, and Metabolomic Analysis Reveals Mechanism Underlying the Serendipita indica-Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Tea Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Nitrogen Application Strategies on Yield, Nitrogen Uptake and Leaching in Spring Maize Fields in Northwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Eco-Friendly Crop Protection: Argyrantemum frutescens, a Source of Biofungicides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Increasing CO2 Concentration on Crop Growth and Soil Ammonia-Oxidizing Microorganisms in a Fababean (Vicia faba L.) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum Yunmai) Intercropping System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Irrigation Intensities Drive Soil N2O Emission Reduction in Drip-Irrigated Cotton Fields

1
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2
Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Agriculture Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Urumqi 830091, China
3
College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(7), 987; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14070987
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 11 March 2025 / Accepted: 12 March 2025 / Published: 21 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water and Nitrogen Management in the Soil–Crop System (3rd Edition))

Abstract

:
Drip irrigation with plastic mulch is widely used to save water and improve fertilizer efficiency in arid regions in Xinjiang. However, farmers freely use irrigation water in pursuit of a high cotton yield, and the impact of different irrigation amounts on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions is still unclear. A field experiment was conducted in 2023 in Xinjiang, China, with drip-irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to determine N2O emissions with different irrigation intensities. The different irrigation treatments were designed as follows: irrigation was performed to maintain soil moisture at (1) an 80% field capacity (Q80); (2) 90% field capacity (Q90); and (3) 100% field capacity (Q100). The results showed that the yield of cotton decreased with the increase in irrigation intensity. A 100% field capacity is beneficial for ammonium and nitrate transformation. The N2O emissions remained at a relatively low level during the non-irrigated fertilization period. In every irrigation and fertilization cycle, the N2O emissions were mainly concentrated during the process from wet to dry. The peak occurred during days 1–3 of irrigation. Throughout the growth period, the cumulative N2O emissions were 1.15, 1.48, and 2.63 kg N ha−1 under the Q80, Q90, and Q100 treatments, respectively. As the irrigation intensity increased, the dominant species of soil bacteria and fungi showed substitution, while the dominant species of soil actinomycetes were not replaced. Fungi, actinomycetes, the available potassium, and the carbon to nitrogen ratio were positively correlated with nitrous oxide emissions, and the soil temperature was negatively correlated with nitrous oxide emissions. These results demonstrate that increased irrigation could increase the risk of greenhouse gas emissions when using plastic mulch with drip irrigation.

1. Introduction

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) that has existed for almost 120 years in the atmosphere, which also depletes stratospheric ozone and drives global climate change [1,2,3]. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer input is the main source of the N2O emissions of agricultural soils, accounting for 60% of the total global anthropogenic flux [4,5,6]. N2O is produced through biotic and abiotic processes, including ammonia oxidation, byproducts of ammonia oxidation, autotrophic denitrification, chemical denitrification, and heterotrophic denitrification [1,2,7,8]. The application of chemical nitrogen fertilizers stimulates these processes, and nitrous oxide emissions increase with the increase in nitrogen fertilizer applications [3,9]. In addition, these processes are regulated by climatic factors and soil properties, such as the type and amount of nitrogen fertilizer, soil organic carbon (SOC), soil moisture, soil temperature, and soil pH [1,2,10].
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the main cash crop in Xinjiang, Northwestern China. According to the data provided by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the planting area in 2022 was 2369.3 thousand ha in Xinjiang, accounting for 84.98% of the national cotton planting area [11]. Due to the arid climate and limited water resources, under-membrane drip irrigation technology has been widely adopted in Xinjiang, which can transport fertilizers together with water into the root of the crop so as to achieve a uniform, accurate, timed, and rationed supply of water and nutrients, reduce water evaporation, and increase soil temperature [12]. Nitrogen fertilizer (usually urea) is dissolved with drip irrigation and applied in batches along with irrigation water through surface or subsurface drip irrigation systems for multiple applications during the growing season. Thus, the soil undergoes a process of drying to wetting and then wetting to drying after each irrigation and fertilizer application. High-frequency wet–dry alternation led to higher N2O emissions due to enhanced microbial activity and increased nitrogen mineralization rates [4]. Wet–dry alternation may increase, decrease, or have no effect on soil N2O emissions, with studies reaching inconsistent conclusions [4].
It is hypothesized that a lower irrigation intensity can reduce nitrous oxide emissions, which directly reduces the contribution of agricultural production activities to global warming and helps to alleviate the severe water shortage in Xinjiang, Northern China. This study aims to explore the characteristics of nitrous oxide emission under different irrigation intensities and identify the main factors driving nitrous oxide emissions in drip-irrigated cotton fields in Xinjiang. The results will provide a theoretical basis for optimizing irrigation management practices to reduce soil N2O emissions, enhance nitrogen use efficiency, and support sustainable agricultural production under the double-carbon strategy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Soil Properties

Experiments were conducted in 2023 in cotton field in Baotou Lake farm in Korla City, Xinjiang, China (41.69° N, 85.87° E) (Figure 1). The average annual rainfall is 56.2 mm, and the average annual evaporation is 2497.4 mm. The average number of annual sunshine hours is 2878 h. The effective accumulated temperature is 4252.2 °C. The meteorological data during the planting period are presented in Figure 2 (LI-7500DS, Lincoln, NE, USA). The frost-free period is 205 days. The groundwater level is from 2.0 to 2.5 m. The soil texture is sandy loam soil, with a medium fertility level. Field soil belongs to Typic Haploxeralfs [13]. The bulk density and field capacity of the 0–30 cm soil are 1.33 g·cm−3 and 23.77%. The properties of the surface soil (0–30 cm) at the experimental site were as follows: organic matter is 8.10 g·kg−1, total N is 0.8 g·kg−1, available nitrogen (AN) is 89.24 mg·kg−1, available phosphorus (AP) is 71.45 mg·kg−1, available potassium (AK) is 272.67 mg·kg−1, and pH level is 8.20.

2.2. Experimental Design and Agronomic Management

The field experiment was conducted from April to October 2023. Three irrigation treatments were designed: irrigation was performed to maintain soil moisture at (1) 80% field capacity (Q80); (2) 90% field capacity (Q90); and (3) 100% field capacity (Q100). The selection of these irrigation intensities was based on common practices in the region, with 90% field capacity representing the typical irrigation intensity used by local farmers to maximize cotton yield. Irrigation time was every 7 days, which aligns with the daily water and fertilizer management practices of local farmers. Irrigation was applied 11 times throughout the cotton’s entire growth period. The first drip irrigation began on June 19th and the last irrigation ended on August 28th. The specific irrigation times and amounts are shown in Table 1.
Each treatment had 360 kg N ha−1 urea (46% N), 225 kg P ha−1 calcium phosphate (44% P), and 150 kg K ha−1 K2SO4 (50% K), which were based on the local cotton fertilizer consumption. Granular urea was applied where 20% of the total N was spread onto the field by hand as basal fertilizer before sowing for the three treatments. The remaining 80% of solubilized N was applied in the second to 11th irrigation events as follows: 4%, 6%, 6%, 10%, 24%, 10%, 6%, 6%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. P as calcium phosphate and K as K2SO4 were spread by hand onto all the plots, and they were placed into the soil using a rotator before sowing. The treatments were laid out according to a randomized complete block design with three replications. Each plot was 4.5 m × 8.0 m.
Cotton cultivar Xinluzzhong 56, a high-yielding variety developed for Xinjiang with high level of environmental adaptability, high lint percentage, disease/pest resistance, and superior fiber quality, was sown in late April. Drip irrigation pipes and plastic mulch were used during the sowing process, which was implemented using a custom-built tractor-drawn seeder. Seeds were sown in double rows with a gap of 30 cm between the two rows that formed a pair and a gap of 60 cm between one pair and the next. Within each row, seeds were sown 10 cm apart. The plastic mulch is made up of high-density, airtight, transparent polythene film in strips wide enough to cover two double rows. Weeds, pests, and disease were controlled using commercial herbicides, insecticides, and pesticides for local management of cotton. The cotton bud period was from July 3rd to August 3rd, flowering and boll period was from August 4th to September 4th, and boll-opening period was from September 5th to October 5th.

2.3. Sampling and Analysis

We collected soil samples from the 0–30 cm soil layer on the day before and three days after each irrigation application throughout the cotton growing season. The sampling locations are directly below the drip head, 38 cm to the left of the drip irrigation belt, and 38 cm to the right of the drip irrigation belt. After being thoroughly mixed, the soil is taken and divided into two parts. A portion of the soil sample is used to determine soil moisture content. The other portion is placed in a refrigerator for measuring soil nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen. We took a small amount of a soil sample before the experiment began and a final soil sample to determine the physical and chemical properties, which were analyzed at the Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Agriculture Environment, Ministry of Agriculture (Urumqi, China). We harvested fresh soil samples of 0–30 cm to determine soil microbial indicators.
We weighed fresh soil samples to obtain 0.5 g of each, passed them through a sieve (<1 mm), and removed plant debris and soil fauna. Total DNA was extracted to determine soil bacterial (16S rRNA genes), fungal (ITS regions), actinomycete (16S rRNA genes), ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA, 16S rRNA genes), and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB, 16S rRNA genes) contents using high-throughput sequencing methods (Illumina) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) techniques [14,15,16].
Soil bulk density (BD) is determined by ring knife method (100 cm3) [17]. Soil field capacity is determined by drying method [18]. Soil nitrate and ammonium nitrogen are determined by continuous flow injection analyzer (Seal AA3, Norderstedt, Germany). Soil temperature and moisture are determined by online monitoring system of three soil parameters (Campbell CS655, Logan, UT, USA). Soil organic matter (SOM) is determined using the potassium dichromate wet-combustion method [19]. Soil pH is determined using the potentiometric method. Soil total carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) are determined by elemental analyzer (Elementar Inc., Hanau, Hessen, Germany). Soil total phosphorus (P) is determined by visible spectrophotometer (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Soil available phosphorus (AP) is determined by the Olsen method [20]. Soil available potassium (AK) is determined by the ammonium acetate extraction method, followed by flame photometry to measure the extracted potassium [21]. Soil available potassium (K) is determined by potassium acetate extraction method. N2O flux in soil–air interface is determined by enhanced desktop N2O analyzer (GLA351, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
All cotton plants were manually harvested at the end of the growing season, and cotton bolls were collected from each plant in each experimental plot. Bolls of diameter >2 cm were categorized as mature bolls, <2 cm as young bolls, and shell cracks >3 mm as flocculent bolls. Rotten bolls were excluded from statistics. We put the cotton bolls in the same experimental plot together and weighed them (electronic scale, 0.1 kg). Subsequently, the bolls were processed using a 4MZ-6 cotton gin (China) to physically separate lint cotton from cottonseeds.
The yield per hectare (t/ha) was calculated using the following formula:
Y = m A × 10
  • Y = Y represents yield per unit area (t ha−1)
  • m represents total weight of seed or lint cotton in the test plot (kg), and A represents total area of the test plot (m2).

2.4. Data Analysis

Raw data were organized using Excel software (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Ggplot2 package in R software (Version 4.3.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used to draw line and bar charts to test significant differences in cumulative N2O emissions among different treatments, using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Before performing ANOVA, the homogeneity of variances among the groups was assessed using Levene’s test. When the assumption of homogeneity of variance was met (p > 0.05), ANOVA F-test for intergroup comparisons was used; otherwise, one-way ANOVA was employed for the analysis. To determine the factors affecting cumulative N2O emissions, the correlation between cumulative N2O emissions and the tested indicators were calculated using the Pearson correlation function cor in R, followed by visualization with ggplot2. Furthermore, linear regression analysis was performed between N2O flux and soil volumetric water content. All statistical results are presented as the mean value ± standard error, with significance levels set at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 to indicate statistical differences.

3. Results

3.1. Cotton Yield

There were significant differences in the seed cotton yield and lint yield under different irrigation intensities, with their overall performances ranked as follows: Q90 > Q80 > Q100 (Table 2). The yield of unginned and ginned cotton under Q90 increased by 39.6% and 42.0%, respectively, compared with Q80. The yield of unginned and ginned cotton under Q100 decreased by 36.1% and 34.0%, respectively, compared with Q80. In general, the yield of cotton decreased with the increase in irrigation intensity.

3.2. N H 4 + -N and N O 3 _N

The content of N H 4 + -N was closer to 2.50 mg·kg−1 before irrigation under the three treatments, with the values of 2.50 (Q80), 2.47 (Q90), and 2.52 mg·kg−1 (Q100), respectively (Figure 3A,C,E). After irrigation, the contents of N H 4 + -N had the following order: Q100 > Q90 > Q80, with the values of 6.00, 5.72, and 5.45 mg·kg−1, respectively. There was a significant increase in N H 4 + -N before and after the irrigation. The ranges of N H 4 + for Q80, Q90, and Q100 during the entire irrigation period were 2.06–5.45 mg·kg−1, 2.16–5.72 mg·kg−1, and 2.27–6.00 mg·kg−1. The result indicated that a 100% field capacity is beneficial for ammonium nitrogen transformation.
The content of N O 3 -N was closer to 22.53 mg·kg−1 before irrigation under the three treatments, with the values of 22.90 (Q80), 22.54 (Q90), and 22.14 mg·kg−1 (Q100), respectively (Figure 3 B,D,F). After irrigation, the contents of N O 3 -N had the following order: Q100 > Q90 > Q80, with the values of 124.60, 119.18, and 108.34 mg·kg−1, respectively. There was a significant increase in N O 3 -N before and after the irrigation. The variation ranges of N O 3 -N during the entire irrigation period were 22.90–108.34 mg·kg−1 (Q80), 22.54–119.18 mg·kg−1 (Q90), and 22.14–124.60 mg·kg−1 (Q100). The result indicated that a 100% field capacity is beneficial for nitrate nitrogen transformation.

3.3. N2O Flux

The N2O emissions remained at a relatively low level during the non-irrigated fertilization period, ranging from 0.02 to 0.79, 0.01 to 0.50, and 0.02 to 0.73 mg·m−2 under Q80, Q90, and Q100, respectively (Figure 4). The N2O emissions were mainly concentrated in the irrigation and fertilization period from July to August. In every irrigation and fertilization cycle, the N2O emissions were mainly concentrated in the wet–dry period. The peak occurred during 1–3 days after irrigation, with the values of 22.80 mg·m−2 (Q80), 32.94 mg·m−2 (Q90), and 62.98 mg·m−2 (Q100), respectively. In general, the N2O emissions showed an increase first and then a decreasing trend during the entire irrigation and fertilization period, which was consistent with the trend of the irrigation and fertilization amounts. As the irrigation amount increased, the N2O emissions also gradually increased, indicating that irrigation intensity is an important factor affecting N2O emissions. Throughout the cotton growth period, the cumulative N2O emissions were 1.15, 1.48, and 2.63 kg N ha−1 under Q80, Q90, and Q100, respectively.
The accumulated N2O emissions during the bud stage were the highest, followed by the flowering and boll stage, and finally the opening stage (Figure 5). The cumulative emissions of N2O in the three growth stages under Q80 accounted for 73.18%, 23.84%, and 2.98% of total emissions, respectively. The cumulative emissions of N2O in the three growth stages under Q90 accounted for 78.32%, 16.88%, and 4.80% of total emissions, respectively. The cumulative emissions of N2O in the three growth stages under Q100 accounted for 65.18%, 31.94%, and 2.88% of total emissions, respectively. As a whole, there was a significant difference across the entire growth period under different irrigation intensities. With the increase in irrigation intensity, the cumulative emissions of N2O increase.

3.4. Microbial Community Under Different Irrigation Treatments

3.4.1. Bacterium

There were 108 bacterial species in the Q80 treatment, 122 in the Q90 treatment, and 136 in the Q100 treatment (Figure 6). A total of 42 bacterial species were found in the Q80, Q90, and Q100 treatments. A total of 34 endemic species in Q80, 48 endemic species in Q90, and 56 endemic species in Q100 were found. The top two bacteria with the highest relative abundance were Rhodovulum sp. and Arenimonas sp. under the Q80 treatment, Rhodovulum sp. and Lysobacter fragaria under the Q90 treatment, and Arenimonas sp. and bacterium E2-14 under the Q100 treatment, respectively. As the irrigation intensity increased, the number of bacterial species and individual species increased. The relative abundance of bacterium E2-14 and Nocardioides gangwensis increased with the increase in irrigation intensity, while the relative abundance of Rhodovulum sp. decreased slightly. With the increase in irrigation, the dominant species of soil bacteria changed, indicating that the irrigation intensity had a significant effect on the soil bacterial community’s structure.

3.4.2. Fungi

The number of soil fungal species was 370 in the Q80 treatment, 273 in the Q90 treatment, and 536 in the Q100 treatment (Figure 7). A total of 124 fungal species were found in the Q80, Q90, and Q100 treatments. A total of 122 species were unique to Q80, 63 to Q90, and 270 to Q100. The two fungi with the highest relative abundances were Pseudoeurotium desertorum and Penicillium rubidurum under the Q80 treatment and the Q90 treatment. The two fungi with the highest relative abundances were Fusarium equiseti and Hebeloma mesophaeum under the Q100 treatment. The number of fungal species and individual species decreased and then increased with increasing irrigation intensity. The relative abundances of Pseudoeurotium desertorum and Penicillium rubidurum gradually decreased, while the relative abundance of Fusarium equiseti gradually increased to become the dominant species under the Q100 treatment. With the increase in irrigation, the dominant species of soil fungi changed, indicating that the irrigation intensity had a significant effect on the soil fungal community’s structure.

3.4.3. Actinobacteria

There were seven species of actinomycetes in Q80, seven species of actinomycetes in Q90, and thirteen species of actinomycetes in Q100 (Figure 8). Three fungal species were common to Q80, Q90, and Q100, two were endemic to Q80, one was endemic to Q90, and nine were endemic to Q100. The highest relative abundance of actinomycetes under the three treatments was found in Rhacophorus dennysi, while the relative abundance of the other types of actinomycetes was relatively low. As the irrigation intensity increased, the number of actinomycete species gradually increased, and the dominant species under the different treatments did not change, indicating that the irrigation intensity has a relatively small impact on the structure of actinomycete communities.

3.5. The Main Factors

After performing the Pearson correlation analysis, we found significant correlations (|r| > 0.8) between cumulative nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and several environmental and biological factors. The results of the analysis are as follows:
Positive and strong correlations: The cumulative N2O emissions showed very strong positive correlations with the fast-acting potassium content (K, r = 0.95), ammonium nitrogen ( N H 4 + ,-N r = 0.83), the carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N, r = 0.93), and microbial abundance (bacteria (BAC), fungi (ITS), and actinomycetes (ACT); r = 0.83–1.00). These results suggest that N2O production and release may be synergistically promoted in environments high in organic matter and rich in ammonium nitrogen, as well as in the presence of active microbial activity.
Negative strong correlation: Significant negative correlations were exhibited between the cumulative N2O emissions and the soil temperature (Temp, r = −0.98) and the total nitrogen content (N, r = −0.80). This suggests that N2O production and emissions may be suppressed under high-temperature conditions, thereby reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

4.1. The Effects of Irrigation Intensities on N2O Emissions

Nitrous oxide production, consumption, and transmission are directly or indirectly influenced by irrigation regimes. In our study, the N2O emissions were mainly concentrated on the period of irrigation and fertilization from July to September, especially from July to August. In each irrigation and fertilization cycle, the N2O emissions were mainly concentrated during the wet–dry period after irrigation and fertilization. The peak of N2O emissions occurs between the day of irrigation and the third day after irrigation. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that alternating wet and dry irrigation increases nitrogen mineralization rates and N2O emissions [22]. Wet–dry alternation affects N2O emissions by influencing the soil aggregate structure, void size, and microbial communities, and its effect depends mainly on the frequency and intensity of wet–dry alternation. The highest production of N2O in soil occurred in soil water-filled pore spaces (WFPSs): 50–70% [23]. However, the highest production of N2O occurred under a 100% field capacity in our study, which may be because the increase in WFPS in soil limits the utilization of oxygen and provides more favorable conditions for denitrification or nitrifying bacteria, thereby increasing soil N2O emissions [24]. When the soil volume moisture content exceeds a 60% field capacity, N2O mainly comes from denitrification. This result is inconsistent with Sha et al. [25]. Sha et al. [25] found that a lower soil water content promoted N2O production. The increase in N2O flux after basal fertilizer application was mainly attributed to denitrification. And the discovery by Johannes et al. [26] also illustrates this point. In the process of denitrification, microbial mortality was increased, and organic matter was decomposed due to frequent wet–dry alternation [27]. Drip irrigation systems have specific requirements for soil micro-environmental conditions such as soil moisture, temperature, microbial communities, and activity [28].
The mean N2O emissions in cotton under drip irrigation with plastic mulch were 1.75 kg N ha−1 in the growing season, and the N2O emissions increased with increasing irrigation amounts (Figure 3). The emissions were much lower than those in croplands, with an average of 2.55 kg N ha−1 in North America and Europe, and 2.10 kg N ha−1 was recorded in the fertilized soils of cotton fields according to 192 N2O area datasets [29,30]. Ma et al. [30] found growing season N2O emissions ranged between 259 and 473 g N ha−1 with 240 kg N ha−1 urea and an irrigation amount of 450 mm with plastic mulch and drip fertigation in Xinjiang, which were lower than our result, probably because of the following: (1) the amount of nitrogen fertilizer is two-thirds of that in our study; and (2) N2O emissions increase exponentially with nitrogen application rate according to Shcherbak et al. [31]. Thus, the amount of nitrous oxide emissions cannot easily be quantified, which is closely related to water and fertilizer management measures, soil texture, nutrient content, and other factors.

4.2. The Main Factors Influencing N2O Emissions

Previous studies have shown that there is a negative relationship between the soil C/N ratio and N2O emissions, mainly because a higher soil C/N ratio favors complete denitrification; i.e., N2O is reduced to N2 [12,24]. But the soil carbon and nitrogen ratios had a positive relationship with N2O emissions in our study, mainly because soil carbon and nitrogen ratios affect the composition and activity of the microbial community, which in turn affects the production of N2O, which indicates an increase in the soil nitrogen retention capacity and a reduction in nitrogen losses [32]. Some evidence suggests that fungi are powerful nitrifying and denitrifying organisms in arid and semi-arid soils, while archaea also play a significant role in nitrification and denitrification processes [33,34,35,36]. Fungi play a major role in N2O production, followed by archaea and bacteria [36]. This finding is in agreement with our results. Some fungi have a complete denitrification pathway that produces an intermediate product, N2O, during denitrification. Actinomycetes can carry out nitrification to convert ammonium nitrogen to nitrate nitrogen, and N2O is produced in this process. The soil water content affects the oxygen status of the soil, and it is easier to form an anaerobic environment when the water is saturated, which is conducive to the occurrence of the denitrification process. Although an elevated temperature can promote microbial activity and accelerate the rate of nitrogen conversion, it also promotes the further reduction of N2O to N2, thus showing a negative correlation.

4.3. Limitations and Future Works

This study did not monitor post-basal-fertilization soil N2O emission fluxes, which should be prioritized in subsequent experiments to fully assess fertilizer-driven greenhouse effects. Additionally, while microbial community structure was analyzed post-irrigation, long-term dynamic monitoring across growth stages is lacking; future work should incorporate multi-temporal soil sampling and high-throughput sequencing to track microbial evolution. Laboratory simulations are also needed to identify key mechanisms linking irrigation/fertilization practices to N2O production, coupled with physiological and biochemical assays to elucidate microbial metabolic pathways.

5. Conclusions

The yield of cotton decreased with the increase in irrigation intensity. Specifically, maintaining the soil moisture at a 100% field capacity (Q100) resulted in the lowest cotton yield, while a 90% field capacity (Q90) achieved the highest yield. This indicates that excessive irrigation can negatively impact cotton productivity. Additionally, a 100% field water holding capacity was found to be beneficial for ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen transformation in drip-irrigated cotton fields in Northwest China, Xinjiang. This suggests that while a higher irrigation intensity can enhance nitrogen transformation processes, it may not always be optimal for crop yield.
The N2O emissions remained at a relatively low level during the non-irrigated fertilization period. In every irrigation and fertilization cycle, the N2O emissions were mainly concentrated during wet–dry period, with peaks occurring 1–3 days after irrigation. The cumulative N2O emissions increased with the increase in irrigation intensity, reaching 1.15, 1.48, and 2.63 kg N ha−1 under the Q80, Q90, and Q100 treatments, respectively. As the irrigation intensity increased, the dominant species of soil bacteria and fungi changed, while the dominant species of soil actinomycetes did not. Fungi, actinomycetes, the available potassium, and the carbon to nitrogen ratio were positively correlated with nitrous oxide emissions, while the soil temperature was negatively correlated with nitrous oxide emissions. These findings demonstrate that increased irrigation can increase the risk of greenhouse gas emissions when using plastic mulch with drip irrigation. Therefore, optimizing irrigation intensity is crucial for reducing N2O emissions and mitigating the environmental impact of agricultural practices.

Author Contributions

H.M. and Q.W. contributed to the conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data collection, acquisition framework, data analysis, and writing of the original draft manuscript in terms of the scientific content. X.W. and Q.Z. contributed to the investigation and the sample collection. S.P. and X.M. contributed to conceptualization, data collection, the acquisition framework, supervision, and the design of the experiment. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Stable Support to Agricultural Sci-Tech Renovation (xjnkywdzc-2024003-53), Youth Science in the Autonomous Region (2022D01B165), and Young Doctoral in Tianchi Talents (No) and Tianshan Talents (2022TSYCLJ0050).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ravishankara, A.R.; Daniel, J.S.; Portmann, R.W. Nitrous oxide (N2O): The dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 2009, 326, 123–125. [Google Scholar]
  2. Khalil, A.A.K.; Akter, K.-M.; Kim, H.-J.; Park, W.S.; Kang, D.-M.; Koo, K.A.; Ahn, M.-J. Comparative Inner Morphological and Chemical Studies on Reynoutria Species in Korea. Plants 2020, 9, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Timilsina, A.; Bizimana, F.; Pandey, B.; Yadav, R.K.P.; Dong, W.; Hu, C. Nitrous oxide emissions from paddies: Understanding the role of rice plants. Plants 2020, 9, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gomez, J.A.; Ament, W.J. Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils in response to nitrogen fertilization: A review. Plants 2020, 9, 663. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, H.; Hu, H. Responses of Rice Yield, N Uptake, NH3 and N2O Losses from Reclaimed Saline Soils to Varied N Inputs. Plants 2023, 12, 2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yao, Z.; Zheng, X.; Liu, C.; Wang, R.; Xie, B.; Butterbach-Bahl, K. Stand age amplifies greenhouse gas and NO releases following conversion of rice paddy to tea plantations in subtropical China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 248, 386–396. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ji, C.; Li, S.; Geng, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zhi, J.; Yu, K.; Zou, J. Decreased N2O and NO emissions associated with stimulated denitrification following biochar amendment in subtropical tea plantations. Geoderma 2020, 365, 114233. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xia, L.; Li, X.; Ma, Q.; Lam, S.K.; Wolf, B.; Kiese, R.; Yan, X. Simultaneous quantification of N2, NH3 and N2O emissions from a flooded paddy field under different N fertilization regimes. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 2292–2303. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wei, Z.; Shan, J.; Well, R.; Yan, X.; Senbayram, M. Land use conversion and soil moisture affect the magnitude and pattern of soil-borne N2, NO, and N2O emissions. Geoderma 2022, 407, 115568. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kanerva, T.; Regina, K.; Rämö, K.; Ojanperä, K.; Manninen, S. Fluxes of N2O, CH4 and CO2 in a meadow ecosystem exposed to elevated ozone and carbon dioxide for three years. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 145, 818–828. [Google Scholar]
  11. National Statistical Office. Statistical Bulletin on Agricultural and Rural Work in 2022. 2023. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202302/t20230203_1901689.html (accessed on 1 January 2023).
  12. Wang, Y.; Cao, W.; Zhang, X.; Guo, J. Abiotic nitrate loss and nitrogenous trace gas emission from Chinese acidic forest soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 22679–22687. [Google Scholar]
  13. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2022, Update 2022. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. FAO, Rome. 2022. Available online: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-classification/world-reference-base-for-soil-resources/en/ (accessed on 3 January 2023).
  14. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S.M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1621–1624. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Fadrosh, D.W.; Ma, B.; Gajer, P.; Sengamalay, N.; Ott, S.; Brotman, R.M.; Ravel, J. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome 2014, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yu, Y.; Lee, C.; Kim, J.; Hwang, S. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative re-al-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89, 670–679. [Google Scholar]
  17. GB/T 50123-1999; Soil Quality—Determination of Bulk Density. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 1999.
  18. GB/T 17278-2008; Soil Quality—Determination of Field Water Capacity. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
  19. GB/T 22923-2008; Soil Quality—Determination of Organic Matter. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
  20. Olsen, S.R.; Cole, C.V.; Watanabe, F.S.; Dean, L.A. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular 1954, 939, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  21. HJ 491-2019; Soil and Sediment—Determination of Copper, Zinc, Lead, Nickel, Chromium—Flame Atomic Absorption Spectro-Photometry. Ministry of Ecology and Environment: Beijing, China, 2019.
  22. Linquist, B.A.; Anders, M.M.; Adviento-Borbe, M.A.A.; Chaney, R.L.; Nalley, L.L.; Da Rosa, E.F.; Van Kessel, C. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, water use, and grain ar-senic levels in rice systems. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Granli, T.; Bockman, O.C. Nitrous oxide from agriculture. Nor. J. Agric. Sci. 1994, 12, 1–128. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhai, M.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Z. A global synthesis of nitrous oxide emissions across cotton-planted soils. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 51, 315–326. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sha, Y.; Chi, D.; Chen, T.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Y.; Lærke, P.E. Zeolite application increases grain yield and mitigates greenhouse gas emissions under alternate wetting and drying rice system. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 156067. [Google Scholar]
  26. Friedl, J.; Deltedesco, E.; Keiblinger, K.M.; Gorfer, M.; De Rosa, D.; Scheer, C.; Rowlings, D.W. Amplitude and frequency of wetting and drying cycles drive N2 and N2O emissions from a subtropical pasture. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2022, 58, 593–605. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, S.; Sun, H.; Bi, J.; Zhang, J.; Riya, S.; Hosomi, M. Effect of water-saving irrigation on the N2O dynamics and the contribution of exogenous and endogenous nitrogen to N2O production in paddy soil using 15N tracing. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 200, 104610. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liao, N.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, G.; Ma, L.; Min, W.; Hou, Z. Effects of biochar on soil microbial community composition and activity in drip-irrigated desert soil. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2016, 72, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  29. Roelandt, C.; van Wesemael, B.; Rounsevell, M. Estimating annual N2O emissions from agricultural soils in temperate climates. Glob. Change Biol. 2025, 11, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma, Z.; Gao, X.; Tenuta, M.; Kuang, W.; Gui, D.; Zeng, F. Urea fertigation sources affect nitrous oxide emission from a drip-fertigated cotton field in northwestern China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 265, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shcherbak, I.; Millar, N.; Robertson, G.P. Global meta-analysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions to fertilizer nitrogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9199–9204. [Google Scholar]
  32. Khalil, M.; Hossain, M.; Schmidhalter, U. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in different upland soils of the subtropics treated with organic materials. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 1507–1518. [Google Scholar]
  33. Laughlin, R.J.; Stevens, R. Evidence for fungal dominance of denitrification and codenitrification in a grassland soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marusenko, Y.; Huber, D.P.; Hall, S. Fungi mediate nitrous oxide production but not ammonia oxidation in arid land soils of the southwestern US. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 63, 24–36. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu, T.; Meng, T.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, W.; Müller, C.; Cai, Z. Fungi dominant heterotrophic nitrification in a subtropical forest soil of China. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 705–709. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhong, L.; Wang, S.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Rui, Y.; Zhou, X.; Chen, G. Fungi regulate the response of the N2O production process to warming and grazing in a Tibetan grassland. Biogeosciences 2018, 15, 4447–4457. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental sites.
Figure 1. Experimental sites.
Plants 14 00987 g001
Figure 2. Meteorological data during the planting period.
Figure 2. Meteorological data during the planting period.
Plants 14 00987 g002
Figure 3. Dynamics of soil ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen before and after irrigation. (A,B) show the content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen under Q80 treatment; (C,D) under Q90 treatment; (E,F) under Q100 treatment. Red dots represents pre-irrigation. Blue dots represents post-irrigation.
Figure 3. Dynamics of soil ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen before and after irrigation. (A,B) show the content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen under Q80 treatment; (C,D) under Q90 treatment; (E,F) under Q100 treatment. Red dots represents pre-irrigation. Blue dots represents post-irrigation.
Plants 14 00987 g003aPlants 14 00987 g003b
Figure 4. Emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) during the irrigation period in cotton field under different irrigation intensities.
Figure 4. Emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) during the irrigation period in cotton field under different irrigation intensities.
Plants 14 00987 g004
Figure 5. Accumulated emissions of N2O in cotton field under three irrigation intensities. Different lowercase letters indicate differences between different treatments at a p-value of 0.05.
Figure 5. Accumulated emissions of N2O in cotton field under three irrigation intensities. Different lowercase letters indicate differences between different treatments at a p-value of 0.05.
Plants 14 00987 g005
Figure 6. Bacterial distribution under three irrigation intensities in cotton field.
Figure 6. Bacterial distribution under three irrigation intensities in cotton field.
Plants 14 00987 g006
Figure 7. Fungal distribution under three irrigation intensities.
Figure 7. Fungal distribution under three irrigation intensities.
Plants 14 00987 g007
Figure 8. Actinobacteria’s distribution under three irrigation intensities.
Figure 8. Actinobacteria’s distribution under three irrigation intensities.
Plants 14 00987 g008
Figure 9. Correlation coefficient between cumulative N2O emissions and measured indicators under different irrigation intensities. N H 4 + -N represents the ammonium nitrogen content, N O 3 -N represents the nitrate nitrogen content, Soil Tc represents soil temperature, Soil VWC represents soil volumetric moisture content, BAC represents bacteria, ITS represents fungi, and ACT represents actinomycetes.
Figure 9. Correlation coefficient between cumulative N2O emissions and measured indicators under different irrigation intensities. N H 4 + -N represents the ammonium nitrogen content, N O 3 -N represents the nitrate nitrogen content, Soil Tc represents soil temperature, Soil VWC represents soil volumetric moisture content, BAC represents bacteria, ITS represents fungi, and ACT represents actinomycetes.
Plants 14 00987 g009
Table 1. Irrigation amount applied per treatment (mm).
Table 1. Irrigation amount applied per treatment (mm).
Treatment1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th10th11thTotal Amount
Date19
June
26
June
3
July
10
July
17
July
24
July
31
July
7
August
14
August
21
August
28
August
Q80711184447475855362211358
Q90914245762627671482914466
Q1001218307177779589593618580
Table 2. Seed cotton yield and lint cotton yield under different treatments (t ha−1).
Table 2. Seed cotton yield and lint cotton yield under different treatments (t ha−1).
TreatmentUnginned CottonGinned Cotton
Q801.242 ± 0.019 b1.734 ± 0.027 b
Q901.763 ± 0.018 a2.421 ± 0.025 a
Q1000.793 ± 0.014 c1.144 ± 0.020 c
p value
Intensity0.03<0.01
F value
Intensity10.1636.65
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, H.; Wu, Q.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Pu, S.; Ma, X. Irrigation Intensities Drive Soil N2O Emission Reduction in Drip-Irrigated Cotton Fields. Plants 2025, 14, 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14070987

AMA Style

Ma H, Wu Q, Wu X, Zhu Q, Pu S, Ma X. Irrigation Intensities Drive Soil N2O Emission Reduction in Drip-Irrigated Cotton Fields. Plants. 2025; 14(7):987. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14070987

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Honghong, Qi Wu, Xianglin Wu, Qianqian Zhu, Shenghai Pu, and Xinwang Ma. 2025. "Irrigation Intensities Drive Soil N2O Emission Reduction in Drip-Irrigated Cotton Fields" Plants 14, no. 7: 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14070987

APA Style

Ma, H., Wu, Q., Wu, X., Zhu, Q., Pu, S., & Ma, X. (2025). Irrigation Intensities Drive Soil N2O Emission Reduction in Drip-Irrigated Cotton Fields. Plants, 14(7), 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14070987

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop