Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Role of Streptomyces Composite Inoculants in Mitigating Wheat Drought Stress Under Field Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Real-Time Accurate Apple Detection Based on Improved YOLOv8n in Complex Natural Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shifting Herbal Knowledge: The Ecological and Cultural Dynamics Behind Plant Use Changes in the Southern Occitan Alps

1
University of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II 9, 12042 Pollenzo, Italy
2
Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
3
Department of Medical Analysis, Tishk International University, Erbil 4001, Iraq
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(3), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030367
Submission received: 26 December 2024 / Revised: 19 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 25 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemistry)

Abstract

This study examines changes in medicinal and wild food plant knowledge in the Alpine Southern Occitan area, focusing on temporal and cultural shifts. Drawing from ethnobotanical data from the Maira Valley (1970, 2022), Stura Valley (2004), and Grana Valley (2011), we explore dynamics in plant use and how they may have been generated by ecological, socio-economic, and cultural changes. A total of 308 plant taxa were recorded, with notable declines in Asteraceae and Lamiaceae utilizations by 2022, suggesting a remarkable erosion of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK). Conversely, the use of families like Brassicaceae and Amaranthaceae increased, possibly due to socio-economic factors. This study also found in recent years a decrease in medicinal plant uses and a greater reliance on food system-related plants. Logistic regression models highlighted altitude (600–1600 masl) as a key factor in plant diversity use, with older participants showing more diverse ethnobotanical knowledge. This study underscores the resilience and transformation of plant knowledge in response to socio-economic and environmental changes in the Alpine area.

1. Introduction

Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is vital for local communities and their well-being. TEK has been a focal point of research within the ethnobiological field, and recent developments have witnessed a shift towards a diachronic approach that emphasizes the historical evolution of these corpora of knowledge [1]. The Alpine Southern Occitan area, nestled between the Western Alps and the borderlands of Italy and France, represents a unique convergence of cultural and ecological characteristics [2]. Known for its breathtaking alpine landscapes, this region is defined by a rich history of small-scale agricultural practices, traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), the survival of the local Occitan language, and close-knit communities that have adapted to the region’s challenging environment [3,4,5]. At altitudes ranging from 600 to 3000 m, the area is characterized by a distinct climate marked by moderate to cold temperatures and a significant seasonal variation in precipitation [2,6]. This ecological diversity has shaped a wealth of botanical knowledge passed down through generations, contributing to the local identity of the region’s inhabitants. Over the years, however, this knowledge has been increasingly threatened by various factors, including socio-economic shifts, migration, changing environmental conditions, and land use alterations that especially started in the Sixties and Seventies of the past Century with the move of many locals to urban centers for labour. These influences collectively contribute to the erosion or transformation of TEK, making it essential to examine the broader context of these changes in understanding the region’s ecological knowledge dynamics [7,8].
Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) refers to the body of knowledge, practices, and beliefs about the relationship of living beings (humans, animals, and plants) with their environment [9]. This knowledge system was once integral to daily life in the Alpine Southern Occitan area, influencing everything from agricultural practices to health, spirituality, and social organization [10]. However, the erosion of TEK has become a critical issue as the region faces a phenomenon known as the “Hysteresis Effect”, the idea that, once knowledge systems are lost, they may be difficult or impossible to recover, even when conditions for its re-establishment return [11]. This effect is compounded by the social and economic transformations that the region has experienced in recent decades, which have led to the displacement or disappearance of key cultural practices and the disintegration of long-standing knowledge systems [12,13].
Several factors influence the persistence and decline of TEK in this region, and these factors are often interconnected [2]. Climate change, particularly shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns, plays a pivotal role in altering plant ecosystems, which in turn influences the knowledge that local communities maintain about these plants [9,14]. Increases in average temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, and the unpredictability of seasonal weather can directly affect the availability of plant species that were once integral to the region’s agricultural and medicinal practices [7,15]. This, in combination with altitude, may further exacerbate the decline or transformation of plant-based knowledge. Higher altitudes experience more pronounced changes in climate, with species adapted to specific temperature and moisture conditions potentially becoming rarer or migrating, altering the local flora and the knowledge tied to it [6,16,17].
In addition to environmental factors, land use changes and the reduction in agricultural activity have contributed significantly to the erosion of traditional knowledge [18]. Over the decades, farming practices have been reduced or altered due to economic pressures, population decline due to urbanization, leading to a shift in how people interact with the land. This shift also has implications for the cultivated or harvested plants, which are no longer as deeply integrated into daily life. As land abandonment increases, particularly in high-altitude areas once used for traditional agro-pastoralism, the continuity of TEK is disrupted [19]. A recent study documented that temporal shifts in plant usage have occurred in neighboring Alpine Ubaye and Bellino Valleys [20]. The study suggests that this shift reflects broader cultural, ecological, and socio-economic changes, underscoring the importance of preserving biodiversity and traditional knowledge amidst ongoing environmental and societal shifts.
Cultural factors such as modernization, changes in economic levels, and the effects of migration also shape the way knowledge is passed down. As younger generations leave for urban centers in search of better education and job opportunities, the transmission of traditional knowledge becomes less consistent [21]. The influx of new residents, including migrants, seasonal workers, and tourists, further complicates the local knowledge landscape, introducing new plant knowledge, practices, and cultural exchanges but also contributing to the dilution of TEK held by long-established inhabitants.
Notably, few studies have addressed the risk factors influencing the decline or transformation of ethnobotanical knowledge over extended periods. While some global studies are tracking these changes, very few have examined the long-term effects (over 50 years) on ethnobotanical taxa in such detail [1,3,7,12].
These studies are critical, as they provide insight into the possible resilience of traditional plant knowledge systems and the broader ecological and cultural shifts that affect them. These rare longitudinal studies highlight how risk factors such as climate change, land use modifications, migration, and socio-economic transitions can significantly alter the presence, utilization, and transmission of local plant knowledge across generations [1,12].
This study aims to explore the interrelation between the loss of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and the emergence of new forms of ecological and cultural knowledge over time in the Alpine Southern Occitan area. By examining historical and contemporary data on local plant knowledge, this research seeks to better understand the mechanisms through which knowledge is lost, adapted, or revitalized. Through a multi-generational lens, this study will assess how changing economic, social, and environmental conditions influence knowledge systems and how communities negotiate their relationship with their natural environment.

2. Results

2.1. Plant Diversity Across the Southern Occitan Alps

In the studies analyzed, a total of 308 botanical taxa were identified in the study area (Maira, Grana, and Stura valleys), 112 in the Rovera (1982) study [22], 90 in Musset and Dore (2004) [23], 86 and 20 in our collected data in 2011 and 2022, respectively. These recent collected data reveal different trends in plant family usage, with 50 families identified in Rovera et al. 1982 [22] 38 in Musset and Dore, 2004 [23], and 43 and 15 in our collected data in 2011 and 2022, respectively.
Table 1 presents the usage of plant parts across four studies: Rovera et al. [22], Musset and Dore [23], and the unpublished data of our research group collected in 2011 and 2022 highlighting the temporal shifts in botanical taxa and family utilization. The most prominent families identified in Rovera et al. [22] include Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Rosaceae, Apiaceae, Violaceae, Amaryllidaceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Oleaceae, Ranunculaceae, and Urticaceae. Musset and Dore [23] follow a similar pattern with the frequent appearance of Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Rosaceae, Apiaceae, Pinaceae, Fabaceae, and Polygonaceae. Our collected data in 2011 highlight families such as Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Brassicaceae, Liliaceae, Apiaceae, Campanulaceae, and Rosaceae. On the other hand, our collected data in 2022 narrow significantly, with only Asteraceae and Lamiaceae remaining as the most prominent families.
The analysis of plant families reveals notable shifts over time, reflecting changing ecological and cultural roles. Families such as Asteraceae and Lamiaceae have maintained a continuous presence across all studies, though with a marked decline in the more recent data. For example, Asteraceae was cited in 1982 and 2004, but only in 2022 was its presence notably reduced. Similarly, Lamiaceae decreased significantly from 1982 to 2022 (Figure 1).
Certain families, such as Amaranthaceae, emerge with increasing frequency in later studies, indicating a shift in plant use, possibly influenced by socio-economic factors like migration and urbanization. However, these families were not consistently present across all datasets, and their inclusion in Figure 1 is limited to the years where they were observed.
The “Others” category, which includes less frequently cited families, has also sharply declined from 1982 to 2022, reflecting a narrowing of plant diversity within local knowledge systems (Figure 1).
The results presented in Figure 2 demonstrate significant variation in the documented plant genera across different temporal contexts, reflecting changes in both the number and frequency of ethnobotanical knowledge over time. Earlier studies, such as Rovera et al. [22] and Musset and Dore [23], record a wide range of genera, with Rovera et al. [22] alone documenting 51 genera and Musset and Dore contributing 34. These studies highlight frequently cited plants such as Achillea millefolium, Artemisia absinthium., and Calendula officinalis, which represent long-standing staples of traditional practices.
In contrast, more recently collected data, such as (2022) and (2011), report fewer genera, with 2022 data listing only 3 genera and data (2011) documenting 44. Notable among the recent additions are Allium ursinum and Silybum marianum, which appear with increasing frequency, suggesting their growing prominence due to changing ecological or cultural factors. However, despite this overall reduction in diversity, some botanical plants, such as Pimpinella anisum and Sambucus nigra, persist across all four studies, reflecting their sustained importance in ethnobotanical traditions.
Frequency analysis reveals that some botanical plants, like Pimpinella anisum., appear in up to 11 combinations of studies, demonstrating their widespread and enduring utility. Others, like Melissa officinalis, are mentioned in only one combination, highlighting their more specialized or localized relevance. This fluctuation in frequency underscores the dynamic nature of ethnobotanical knowledge, where cultural preferences, environmental changes, and practical needs shape the prominence of certain genera over time.

2.2. Shifts in Traditional Plant Knowledge, Usage, and Biodiversity Across Study Sites in the Southern Occitan Alps

The results of this study revealed notable shifts in plant utilization over time, which can be compared to the patterns observed in Rovera’s study [22], the majority of plant parts used were medicinal (88.1%), food and medicinal (8.9%), and food (3.0%) utilized less frequently (Figure 3). This indicates a primary focus on medicinal applications during this period. By contrast, Musset and Dore (2004) showed a more balanced distribution, with 42.0% of plant parts used for medicinal purposes, 37.5% for food and medicinal, and 20.5% for food. This shift suggests a growing emphasis on fruits and flowers alongside medicinal uses. Our collected data (2011) indicate a shift towards a food-centric approach, with 74.4% of plant parts used for food purposes, while smaller proportions were used for both food and medicinal purposes or solely for medicinal purposes (16.7% and 9.0%, respectively) (Figure 3). Finally, our data (2022) highlight a significant increase in the use of food, which accounted for 50.0% of the plant parts, followed by food and medicinal use (42.9%) and medicinal use (7.1%). This recent trend points to a shift towards greater food utilization, likely reflecting changes in cultural practices or available plant resources. These temporal shifts in plant part usage underscore the evolving roles of plant species, influenced by ecological, cultural, and socio-economic factors over the decades.
Overall, these findings indicate a notable shift in plant part usage over time. While past studies, particularly from Rovera (1982), focused heavily on medicinal species, more recent data, especially the data (2011) and collected data (2022), show an increasing trend in the use of plants for fodder and food purposes. This shift may reflect changing agricultural practices, environmental conditions, and evolving cultural preferences in the use of plant species. The overall trend suggests that, while medicinal uses remain important, there has been a marked increase in the functional diversity of plants, particularly in terms of their role in animal husbandry and food resources. This shift indicates broader changes in socio-economic and ecological contexts over the years.
The reason for the medicinal plant decrease may be twofold: (a) medicinal plants were especially needed and used when public health care was less widespread and accessible (see the high number of medicinal taxa in a study published in 1982); and (b) medicinal species were collected in ecological areas insisting on the spread and robust forestry and shepherding activities; these activities have basically disappeared nowadays.
The opposite trend of food plant foraging could be instead explicable with the huge interest that, in the past two decades, foraging has (re-)gained in the data area and in all throughout Northern Italy, possibly bringing also new food plant-centered practices.
The network diagram (Figure 4A) reveals that the collected data in 2022 shares plant parts with Musset and Dore 2004, Rovera 1982, and data in 2011. Similarly, Musset and Dore 2004 and Rovera 1982 also share plant parts with our collected data in 2011. This interconnectedness suggests potential connection based on the same region area and mountain community among these studies, especially the same ecosystems and per consequence that will confirm their variation based on risk factors. The chord diagram (Figure 4B) confirms the dynamic interplay between the studies over time, despite their focus on the same region and valleys.
Earlier studies, such as Rovera et al. (1982), may have prioritized more traditional plant uses, focusing on parts like aerial parts and flowers. In contrast, more recent studies, like our collected data in 2022 and 2011, seem to explore a broader range of plant parts, potentially reflecting evolving research interests and methodologies (Figure 4B).
Understanding these shifts and overlaps is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of plant use and ecology in the region.
The chord diagrams (Figure 5) provide a visual representation of the overlap in plant parts used for medicinal and food purposes across different studies. The thickness of the ribbons connecting the plant parts indicates the extent of overlap. For instance, the significant overlap between “Bark” and “Leaves” in both diagrams suggests that these plant parts are commonly used for both medicinal and food purposes. This finding aligns with traditional knowledge systems where various plant parts are utilized for diverse applications. Similarly, the overlap between “Flowers” and “Fruit” indicates that these reproductive plant parts are often used in both culinary and medicinal practices. This overlap could be attributed to their potential medicinal properties, such as anti-inflammatory or antioxidant effects.
On the other hand, plant parts like “Wood” and “Roots” show less overlap with other categories, suggesting a more specialized use in either medicine or food. This could be due to the structural properties and specific chemical compounds, like tannins, alkaloids, and flavonoids, found in wood and roots. These compounds, with antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, or antioxidant properties, make these plant parts more suitable for targeted therapeutic uses. Additionally, their dense nature and secondary metabolites limit their versatility, confining them to specific roles in traditional medicine or food.
When analyzing the data separately and connecting it with the tier conditions, the different aspects of the interconnection between the plant parts and their uses become more apparent.
Diagram A (Figure 5), representing Rovera et al. [22], reveals a more pronounced overlap between “Bark” and “Leaves,” indicating a strong association of these plant parts with both medicinal and food applications. Additionally, the overlap between “Flowers” and “Fruit” is significant, suggesting their versatile use in various cultural practices.
Diagram B, which corresponds to Musset and Dore [23] shows a more balanced distribution of overlap across different plant parts. While “Flowers” and “Bark” still exhibit a notable overlap, other plant parts like “Leaves” and “Fruit” show a more moderate level of overlap. This implies a potentially wider range of plant parts used for both medicinal and food purposes in the context represented by this study. Chord diagram C, based on our collected data (2011), further highlights the overlap between medicinal and food uses of different plant parts. It illustrates a diverse range of plant parts utilized for various purposes, showing how cultural practices have expanded the number of plant parts used for different applications.
Finally, chord diagram D, representing our collected data (2022), offers insights into the continued use and overlap of plant parts, with some newer trends emerging in the overlap patterns. Like diagram C, it reflects a broad utilization of plant parts but with some shift in preferences based on more recent ecological or cultural influences. Each diagram illustrates the evolving relationship between plant parts and their medicinal and food uses, emphasizing the dynamic and interconnected nature of ethnobotanical knowledge across different time periods (Figure 5).

2.3. Patterns, Similarities, and Knowledge Dynamics: A Comparative Analysis Through Heatmaps, Dendrograms, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Notable clusters include families such as Apiaceae and Asteraceae, which exhibit significant overlap, while families like Liliaceae and Rubiaceae appear more distinct with lower similarity, as indicated by darker hues (Figure 6). Figure 6 emphasizes compositional relationships and biodiversity patterns, providing insights into ecological associations and the distinctiveness of certain plant families. The diagonal symmetry confirms the consistency of the Jaccard Index in reflecting these relationships.
The dendrograms on the sides of the heatmap represent the hierarchical clustering of the data sets. Similar data sets are grouped, forming clusters. The height of the branches in the dendrogram reflects the similarity between the clusters.
Overall, the heatmap provides a visual representation of the relationships between the data sets, allowing you to identify groups of similar data sets and understand the patterns of similarity and dissimilarity.
The dendrogram (Figure 7) illustrates the hierarchical clustering of four studies, revealing distinct patterns of similarity and dissimilarity. Data A (Rovera et al. [22]) emerges as the most unique, forming an independent cluster. Data B (Musset and Dore [23]) shares some similarities with A but also exhibits distinct characteristics, placing it in a separate cluster. In contrast, Studies C (Data 2011) and D (Data 2022) demonstrate a high degree of similarity, forming a closely related cluster. This suggests that the latter two studies’ data may share common botanical taxa focus or families and ecosystem factors, differentiating them from the earlier studies, and this was confirmed by the PCA (Figure 8).
The first principal component (PC1) separates these clusters, indicating that it captures the primary source of variation between the studies. Rovera et al. [22] and Musset and Dore [23] exhibit similar patterns of variation, In contrast, our collected Data 2011 and 2022 demonstrate distinct patterns (Figure 8).
The length of the arrows in the biplot illustrates the impact of each study on the principal components to the principal components. Rovera et al. [22] have a greater influence on the overall variation in the data. By analyzing the biplot, we can gain insights into the similarities and differences between the studies and identify potential trends or patterns in their research.

2.4. Factors Influencing Botanical Diversity: Insights from Logistic Regression Analysis

To understand and complete our version of the results a logistic model was developed.
The results (Table 2) revealed that altitude was a significant predictor, with the 600–1600 m range showing the strongest effect (odds ratio = 2.22, p = 0.002). This supports the findings of Rovera et al. [22] where the highest number of taxa (112) was observed under similar altitude conditions. The temperature categories (5 to 12 °C and 7 to 13 °C) did not show a significant influence on botanical diversity, with a p-value above 0.05, suggesting that temperature may have a weaker effect than altitude in shaping plant diversity. Precipitation was also not a significant factor, with p-values of 0.511 and 0.151 for the 1400–1600 mm and 1200–1400 mm categories, respectively. The age range of participants showed a significant effect, with individuals in the 71–75 years category reporting a higher number of botanical taxa (odds ratio = 2.34, p = 0.004), indicating that older participants may possess more knowledge about the local flora. Finally, data sources showed a marginal effect, with interviews slightly more informative (odds ratio = 1.82, p = 0.090) compared to herbarium data, although this result was not statistically significant at the 0.05 level (Table 2). These findings underscore the importance of altitude and age in understanding the diversity of botanical taxa while also highlighting the relative influence of direct interviews over other data sources in capturing plant diversity.

3. Discussion

3.1. Resilience and Change in Plant Use in the Southern Occitan Alps

The analysis of ethnobotanical data from the Alpine Southern Occitan area reveals a notable reduction in plant species diversity over the past few decades. When comparing the four studies spanning from 1982 to 2022, it is evident that the number of documented taxa has decreased significantly. While the Rovera et al. [22] and Musset and Dore [23] studies cataloged a wide variety of species, including many medicinal plants such as Achillea millefolium and Artemisia absinthium, the later studies (particularly our collected data in 2022) show a marked decline in the number of species reported.
As noted, there has been a dramatic decrease in the number of herbs actively used in the region. Herbs such as Achillea, Artemisia, Veronica, and Viola genera, which were once key components of local diets and medicinal practices, have seen their usage diminish significantly. These genera are now considered uncommon, and, in many cases, are no longer present in the local herbal market. This decline can be linked to the diminishing number of people who still engage with the natural environment daily [24,25]. The role of these herbs, which once had medicinal and culinary applications, is now largely forgotten or relegated to anecdotal references in older generations. The shift away from traditional ecological practices has led to the loss of a deep knowledge base surrounding these plants, which had once been part of the fabric of daily life [10,16].
Another significant trend revealed by the results is the changing emphasis on different plant parts over time. The earlier studies [22] and [23], show a strong emphasis on the medicinal uses of plants, with flowers, leaves, and roots as the most commonly used parts. However, in more recently collected data, such as Data 2011 and (2022), the focus has shifted towards food-related uses, particularly fruits. This shift reflects changing dietary patterns in the region, where food sources have become more central to local consumption [26,27]. The increased use of fruits, such as those from Rubus and Malus species, mirrors broader trends in the local food culture, likely influenced by shifts in agriculture, food security concerns, and a growing preference for locally sourced, seasonal foods [28,29]. This change is especially notable in our collected data in (2022), where fruits comprise 50% of plant part usage. This suggests that, while medicinal plant use declines, plant species that contribute to food security and nutritional needs are becoming more significant in the cultural practices of the region.

3.2. Ecological and Socio-Economic Drivers of Plant Knowledge and Diversity

The role of ecological factors in shaping plant knowledge and diversity was also explored. One key finding is the strong relationship between altitude and plant diversity. The studies consistently show that higher altitudes are associated with greater plant diversity, particularly for medicinal and food-related species. This result aligns with Rovera’s findings [22], which reported the highest diversity of plants at altitudes between 600 and 1600 masl. The environmental conditions of these higher altitudes likely foster a wider range of plant species, providing diverse resources for the local population [30]. Interestingly, the analysis revealed no significant correlation between plant diversity and temperature or precipitation categories, suggesting that altitude is a more significant factor in shaping plant diversity than climate alone [31]. This finding emphasizes the unique ecological conditions of the Alpine Southern Occitan region, where altitude appears to be a key determinant of both plant diversity and the extent of traditional plant knowledge.
The socio-economic changes in the region have played a major role in altering plant use patterns. The decrease in medicinal plant knowledge can be seen as part of a broader trend toward modernization and the decline of traditional farming and foraging practices [32]. The younger generations in the region are less likely to engage in traditional agricultural practices and are more reliant on commercial food systems, which has contributed to the shift away from plant usage [18,30]. The increased use of certain plant families, such as Brassicaceae and Amaranthaceae, suggests that external factors, including changes in food security and agricultural practices, have influenced plant selection. These shifts could also reflect the resurgence of foraging in privalently anthropogenic environments, while the pastoralist landscape has been dramatically abandoned and the introduction of new (wild) food plant uses may have displaced older, more traditional species [33]. The reduction in the use of some plant families, such as Asteraceae, further points to the impact of changes in land management and also urbanization [34].
Despite this decline, there remains an opportunity to revitalize the use of these herbs, particularly in innovative food and beverage sectors. The use of herbs such as Achillea, Artemisia, Veronica, and Viola could play a significant role in the development of novel food products. These herbs, which are not yet widely available on the herbal market, hold untapped potential for sustainable, innovative food and beverage applications [35,36]. They could be incorporated into health-conscious, eco-friendly products that align with current trends towards natural and local ingredients. Exploring the culinary and medicinal potential of these plants could reinvigorate interest in traditional plant knowledge, offering both ecological and economic benefits by reintroducing these species into contemporary markets [37].
The revival of interest in these plants could also help bridge the knowledge gap created by the loss of TEK. By integrating these herbs into modern products, there is an opportunity to reconnect people with their environmental heritage, fostering a renewed relationship with local plants [24,38]. This process could help counteract the so-called Hysteresis Effect by reintegrating forgotten knowledge into the cultural landscape, even in the absence of daily farming-related engagement with nature that was the pillar of rural communities in the Alps until the 1970s. These plants, once critical to rural livelihoods, could once again play a role in the ecological and cultural revitalization of the region.
The findings from this data provide valuable insights into the changing relationship between local communities and their plant resources. Efforts are urgently needed to preserve traditional ecological knowledge, primarily through community-based initiatives. Future research should focus on revitalising plant knowledge by engaging local communities in documentation and education programs that emphasise the importance of plants for both cultural and ecological sustainability. Longitudinal studies that explore the relationship between socio-economic shifts, environmental changes, and plant knowledge would be valuable in further understanding the factors contributing to the erosion of TEK. Furthermore, research that includes a broader range of ecological zones and socio-economic contexts could provide a more comprehensive view of the forces driving these shifts across the region.

3.3. Limitations of This Study

Several factors may have limited this study. First, as in every historical-ethnobotanical comparison, the exact field methods adopted by diverse researchers at different times could have been slightly different, posing an accent more or less pronounced on the keywords “herbs” (vs “non-herbal” taxa) or on “food” vs “medicine”-centred plant utilisations. Additionally, the study focused on three specific portions of valleys within a broad Italian Western Alpine region in the Southern Occitan linguistic area, which may not represent the entire diversity of plant knowledge of other Occitan or Western Alpine regions. The historical context of plant use is also challenging, as the decline of traditional practices over decades may have led to gaps in knowledge: participant memory and subjective interpretations of plant usage could have influenced the accuracy of the data. Moreover, the data do not extensively explore other factors, such as environmental changes or dynamics in agricultural practices, that might affect plant use. Future research should address these limitations by broadening the scope, including younger generations, and exploring additional ecological and socio-economic factors.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area

The Alpine Southern Occitan area (Maira, Stura, and Grana valleys), nestled between the Western Alps and the borderlands of Italy and France (Figure 9), is a region steeped in a rich history of both ecological and cultural significance [39]. This area has long been home to communities that have developed unique agricultural and medicinal practices suited to the challenging alpine environment. At altitudes ranging from 600 to 3000 m, the region is defined by a distinct climate, marked by moderate to cold temperatures and significant seasonal variations in precipitation, creating a diverse range of ecological zones [10]. These varying altitudes have resulted in an exceptional variety of plant species, many of which are deeply embedded in the traditional practices of the local communities. The history of the region is characterized by a longstanding reliance on farming, pastoralism, and local plant knowledge, which has shaped both the cultural and ecological landscapes. Over time, these communities have developed intricate systems of ecological knowledge that integrate plant use with the broader cultural and spiritual practices of the region.
The region’s people, traditionally organized in small, close-knit communities, have a strong sense of identity rooted in the land they cultivate and the ecological resources they manage. This connection to the land is reflected in the way traditional knowledge has been passed down through generations, often through familial lines and communal teachings. The transmission of knowledge was primarily oral, with elders passing down plant-based wisdom related to medicinal, culinary, and agricultural practices. This knowledge was not only practical but deeply tied to local cosmologies and worldviews, which held a spiritual and ethical connection to nature [10,40]. For instance, certain plants were considered sacred, and their use was governed by strict cultural protocols that ensured sustainable harvesting and respect for the natural world. However, the interplay between ecological conditions, such as the region’s altitude and climate, and cultural practices has been increasingly disrupted by socio-economic shifts. The pressures of modernization, economic changes, and out-migration have altered the way younger generations relate to traditional practices, with many abandoning them in favor of urban life and more standardized agricultural techniques.

4.2. Fieldwork and Data Collection

For this comparative data, the fieldwork spans several decades, from 1982 to 2022, and includes both historical and contemporary data on local plant knowledge. The data collection process involved interviewing individuals from a range of professions, including farmers, restaurateurs, and workers in the tourism industry (Table 3). These interviews captured the changing dynamics of plant use and ecological knowledge, shedding light on how the local plant knowledge system has evolved in response to broader socio-economic and environmental shifts.
In addition to interviews, field observations were conducted to record plant species used, with an emphasis on how climate change and land use alterations that have impacted plant distribution and abundance at different altitudes (Figure 10) will give a view on this altitude and the natural landscape. These observations allow for an in-depth understanding of how ecological changes, such as shifts in temperature or precipitation patterns, influence local plant knowledge and practices. Moreover, the influx of migrants into the region has brought new plant knowledge and altered traditional practices, further complicating the region’s ethnobotanical landscape. Plant specimens were collected, identified, and deposited in a recognized herbarium during previous ethnobotanical fieldwork conducted by some of the authors in the contiguous areas of the Western Alps [10,40]. Verbal consent was always obtained from the data participants, following the Code of Ethics of the International Society of Ethnobiology [41].

4.3. Data Analysis

The analysis of the collected data will be conducted using both SAS 9.4 and R v4.4.2 to explore the relationships between ecological and cultural factors influencing plant knowledge and its transmission. Statistical techniques such as PCA (Principal Component Analysis) will be used to reduce the complexity of the data and identify key ecological and cultural variables that explain variations in plant knowledge across the region. Cluster analysis will also be employed to group plant species based on their cultural and ecological significance, revealing patterns in how these species are used and shared among different communities. In addition, Redundancy Analysis (RDA) will be utilized to examine the relationship between ecological factors such as temperature, precipitation, altitude, and plant species distribution. This will allow the data to assess how environmental conditions influence the preservation or loss of traditional plant knowledge.
Furthermore, a logistic regression model [42] was applied to assess the relationship between the botanical taxa presence and various ecological and socio-economic factors. The explanatory variables included altitude, temperature, precipitation, age range, and data source. The botanical taxa data were treated as a binary outcome, indicating the presence or absence of species in different environmental conditions. The model results suggest that age range and altitude are significant predictors of botanical taxa presence.
The general form of the logistic regression model is as follows:
L o g i t p = l n l n   p 1 P = β 0 + i = 1 n 1 β i X i
where
  • p is the probability of the event occurring (e.g., the presence of a botanical taxa).
  • β0 is the intercept (constant term).
  • βi are the coefficients for each explanatory variable.
  • Xi are the explanatory variables (altitude, temperature, precipitation, age range, and data source).
Based on our variables, the model equation can be written as follows:
Logit(p) = β0 + β1×Altitude1 + β2 × Altitude2 + β3 × Altitude3 + β4 × Temperature1 + β5 × Temperature2 + β6 × Precipitation1 + β7 × Precipitation2 + β8 × Age1 + β9 × Age2 + β10 × Data Source1 + β11 × Data Source2
where
  • Altitude1, Altitude2, and Altitude are the dummy variables for the three levels of Altitude (600–1600 m, 1600–2400 m, and 2400–3031 m).
  • Temperatures 1 and 2 represent the dummy variables for the two levels of temperature average (5 to 12 °C and 7 to 13 °C).
  • Precipitations 1 and 2 represent the dummy variables for the two levels of Precipitation average (1400–1600 mm and 1200–1400 mm).
  • Age1 and Age2 are the dummy variables for the two levels of Age Range (71–75 years and 30–80 years).
  • Data Source has two levels: Interviews and Herbarium, with coefficients substituted accordingly.
These analyses will help reveal how both ecological changes and cultural transformations contribute to the erosion or revitalization of TEK in the region.
The collected data will also be examined through frequency analysis to track patterns in plant species use across different altitudinal zones and over time, highlighting how knowledge is retained, lost, or adapted in response to changing circumstances. Additionally, Venn diagrams will be used to represent the overlap between plant species used in various cultural contexts and ecological zones, offering a visual representation of shared or distinct knowledge systems.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the significant decline in the use of herbs in the Alpine Southern Occitan region reflects a broader erosion of traditional ecological knowledge, primarily due to diminished daily interactions with nature. The application of the Hysteresis Effect theory emphasizes the challenges of reversing this decline. Yet, it also offers hope for recovery by revitalizing uses of plants such as Achillea, Artemisia, Veronica, and Viola spp. Although these plants remain in the landscape, their cultural and practical significance has diminished; to reintroduce them into contemporary food and beverage markets could revamp both interest in and knowledge of these plants, paving the way for a more sustainable and bioculturally informed future.

Author Contributions

M.A.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, visualization, formal analysis, and writing—original draft preparation. N.S.: conceptualization, methodology, funding, review, and editing. A.P.: supervision, conceptualization, methodology, review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication is part of the project NODES, which has received funding from the MUR-M4C2 1.5 of PNRR funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU (Grant agreement no. ECS00000036).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are presented in this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the local communities for sharing their LEK and some former UNISG students who collected in the field some of the data presented in this analysis: Eva Fachino, Andrea Masino, Giulia Mattalia, Federico Mina, Martina Spreafico, and Irene Stellato.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sulaiman, N.; Zocchi, D.M.; Borrello, M.T.; Mattalia, G.; Antoniazzi, L.; Berlinghof, S.E.; Bewick, A.; Häfliger, I.; Schembs, M.; Torri, L.; et al. Traditional Knowledge Evolution over Half of a Century: Local Herbal Resources and Their Changes in the Upper Susa Valley of Northwest Italy. Plants 2024, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Re, A.; Avanza, G. Empowering Communities Through Youth Education on Nature and Cultural Practices. In ICH in the South-Western Alps; ICHCAP: Eonju, Republic of Korea, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Burns, R.K. The Circum-Alpine Culture Area: A Preliminary View. Anthropol. Q. 1963, 36, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdullah, A.; Khan, S.M. Traditional Ecological Knowledge Sustains Due to Poverty and Lack of Choices Rather than Thinking about the Environment. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2023, 19, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Albuquerque, U.P.; Cantalice, A.S.; Oliveira, D.V.; Oliveira, E.S.; dos Santos, E.B.; dos Santos, F.I.R.; Soldati, G.T.; da Silva Lima, I.; Silva, J.V.M.; Abreu, M.B.; et al. Why Is Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) Maintained? An Answer to Hartel et al. (2023). Biodivers. Conserv. 2024, 33, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abildtrup, J.; Audsley, E.; Fekete-Farkas, M.; Giupponi, C.; Gylling, M.; Rosato, P.; Rounsevell, M. Socio-Economic Scenario Development for the Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Land Use: A Pairwise Comparison Approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2006, 9, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al Hatmi, S.; Lupton, D.A. Documenting the Most Widely Utilized Plants and the Potential Threats Facing Ethnobotanical Practices in the Western Hajar Mountains, Sultanate of Oman. J. Arid. Environ. 2021, 189, 104484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Greenfield, D.E. Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK): A Comprehensive Guide. Available online: https://sigmaearth.com/traditional-ecological-knowledge-tek-a-comprehensive-guide/ (accessed on 12 June 2024).
  9. Casi, C.; Guttorm, H.; Virtanen, P. Traditional Ecological Knowledge. In Situating Sustainability: A Handbook of Contexts and Concepts; Helsinki University Press: Helsinki, Finland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pieroni, A.; Giusti, M.E. Alpine Ethnobotany in Italy: Traditional Knowledge of Gastronomic and Medicinal Plants among the Occitans of the Upper Varaita Valley, Piedmont. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2009, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lyver, P.O.; Timoti, P.; Davis, T.; Tylianakis, J.M. Biocultural Hysteresis Inhibits Adaptation to Environmental Change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019, 34, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pieroni, A. Traditional Uses of Wild Food Plants, Medicinal Plants, and Domestic Remedies in Albanian, Aromanian and Macedonian Villages in South-Eastern Albania. J. Herb. Med. 2017, 9, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pearson, J.; Jackson, G.; McNamara, K.E. Climate-Driven Losses to Knowledge Systems and Cultural Heritage: A Literature Review Exploring the Impacts on Indigenous and Local Cultures. Anthr. Rev. 2023, 10, 343–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oteros-Rozas, E.; Ontillera-Sánchez, R.; Sanosa, P.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Reyes-García, V.; González, J.A. Traditional Ecological Knowledge among Transhumant Pastoralists in Mediterranean Spain. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, art33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Albuquerque, U.P.; Maroyi, A.; Ladio, A.H.; Pieroni, A.; Abbasi, A.M.; Toledo, B.A.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Hallwass, G.; Soldati, G.T.; Odonne, G.; et al. Advancing Ethnobiology for the Ecological Transition and a More Inclusive and Just World: A Comprehensive Framework for the next 20 Years. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2024, 20, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Harisha, R.P. Traditional ecological knowledge (tek) and its importance in south india: Perspecive from local communities. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2016, 14, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abbass, K.; Qasim, M.Z.; Song, H.; Murshed, M.; Mahmood, H.; Younis, I. A Review of the Global Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Sustainable Mitigation Measures. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 42539–42559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tattoni, C.; Ianni, E.; Geneletti, D.; Zatelli, P.; Ciolli, M. Landscape Changes, Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Future Scenarios in the Alps: A Holistic Ecological Approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 579, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Singh, R.; Sharma, R.K.; Babu, S.; Bhatnagar, Y.V. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Contemporary Changes in the Agro-Pastoral System of Upper Spiti Landscape, Indian Trans-Himalayas. Pastoralism 2020, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alrhmoun, M.; Romano, A.; Sulaiman, N.; Pieroni, A. Old Plants for New Food Products? The Diachronic Human Ecology of Wild Herbs in the Western Alps. Plants 2024, 14, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Furusawa, T. Changing Ethnobotanical Knowledge; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 111–126. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rovera, L.; Caramello, L.; Lomagno, P.A.; Piervtton, R. La Fitoterapia Popolare Nella Valle Maira. Corso di Laurea in Scienze Naturali; Università degli studi di Torino, Facoltà di Scienze MFN: Turin, Italy, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  23. Musset, D.; Dore, D. La Mauve et l’erba Bianca. Une Introduction Aux Enquêtes Ethnobotaniques Suivie de l’inventaire Des Plantes Utiles Dans La Vallée de La Stura. Un’introduzione Alle Indagini Etnobotaniche Seguita Dall’inventario Delle Piante Utili Nella Valle Della Stura; Musée Départemental Ethnologique; The Alpes-de-Haute-Provence Department of France: Paris, France, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  24. Turner, K.L. “Where Our Women Used to Get the Food”: Cumulative Effects and Loss of Ethnobotanical Knowledge and Practice; Case Data from Coastal British ColumbiaThis Paper Was Submitted for the Special Issue on Ethnobotany, Inspired by the Ethnobotany Symposium Organized by Alain Cuerrier, Montreal Botanical Garden, and Held in Montreal at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Botanical Association. Botany 2008, 86, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sulaiman, N.; Aziz, M.A.; Stryamets, N.; Mattalia, G.; Zocchi, D.M.; Ahmed, H.M.; Manduzai, A.K.; Shah, A.A.; Faiz, A.; Sõukand, R.; et al. The Importance of Becoming Tamed: Wild Food Plants as Possible Novel Crops in Selected Food-Insecure Regions. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Soon, J.M. Changing Trends in Dietary Pattern and Implications to Food and Nutrition Security in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 3, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pieroni, A.; Sulaiman, N.; Sõukand, R. Chorta (Wild Greens) in Central Crete: The Bio-Cultural Heritage of a Hidden and Resilient Ingredient of the Mediterranean Diet. Biology 2022, 11, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Menendez-Baceta, G.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Aceituno-Mata, L.; Tardío, J.; Reyes-García, V. Trends in Wild Food Plants Uses in Gorbeialdea (Basque Country). Appetite 2017, 112, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zarbà, C.; Allegra, V.; Silvio Zarbà, A.; Zocco, G. Wild Leafy Plants Market Survey in Sicily: From Local Culture to Food Sustainability. AIMS Agric. Food 2019, 4, 534–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ohsawa, T.; Ide, Y. Global Patterns of Genetic Variation in Plant Species along Vertical and Horizontal Gradients on Mountains. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, T.; Xiong, Q.; Luo, P.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, X.; Lin, B. Direct and Indirect Effects of Environmental Factors, Spatial Constraints, and Functional Traits on Shaping the Plant Diversity of Montane Forests. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xiaobo, Z.; Huang, F.; Hao, L.; Zhao, J.; Mao, H.; Zhang, J.; Ren, S. The Socio-Economic Importance of Wild Vegetable Resources and Their Conservation: A Case Data from China. Kew Bull. 2010, 65, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martin, A.R.; Cadotte, M.W.; Isaac, M.E.; Milla, R.; Vile, D.; Violle, C. Regional and Global Shifts in Crop Diversity through the Anthropocene. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hurrell, J.A.; Puentes, J.P. Medicinal and Aromatic Species of Asteraceae Commercialized in the Conurbation Buenos Aires-La Plata (Argentina). Ethnobiol. Conserv. 2013, 2, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jaeger, S.; Giacalone, D. Barriers to Consumption of Plant-Based Beverages: A Comparison of Product Users and Non-Users on Emotional, Conceptual, Situational, Conative and Psychographic Variables. Food Res. Int. 2021, 144, 110363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maleš, I.; Pedisić, S.; Zorić, Z.; Elez-Garofulić, I.; Repajić, M.; You, L.; Vladimir-Knežević, S.; Butorac, D.; Dragović-Uzelac, V. The Medicinal and Aromatic Plants as Ingredients in Functional Beverage Production. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 96, 105210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahad, L.; Hassan, M.; Amjad, M.S.; Mir, R.A.; Vitasović-Kosić, I.; Bussmann, R.W.; Binish, Z. Ethnobotanical Insights into Medicinal and Culinary Plant Use: The Dwindling Traditional Heritage of the Dard Ethnic Group in the Gurez Region of the Kashmir Valley, India. Plants 2023, 12, 3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Friday, C.; Scasta, J.D. Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and Ethnobotany for Wind River Reservation Rangelands. Ethnobiol. Lett. 2020, 11, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De Rossi, A.; Mascino, L. Valades Ousitanes, Architettura e Rigenerazione. ARCHALP 2020, 4, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mattalia, G.; Quave, C.L.; Pieroni, A. Traditional Uses of Wild Food and Medicinal Plants among Brigasc, Kyé, and Provençal Communities on the Western Italian Alps. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 587–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. ISE (International Society of Ethnobiology). The ISE Code of Ethics. Available online: https://www.ethnobiology.net/what-we-do/core-programs/ise-ethics-program/code-of-ethics/ (accessed on 15 November 2024).
  42. Hosmer, D.W.; Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-471-65402-5. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Number of reported botanical plants in the past and present studies in the data area [22,23].
Figure 1. Number of reported botanical plants in the past and present studies in the data area [22,23].
Plants 14 00367 g001
Figure 2. Genera overlapping within the present data and previous studies conducted in the region from 1970 to 2022 [22,23].
Figure 2. Genera overlapping within the present data and previous studies conducted in the region from 1970 to 2022 [22,23].
Plants 14 00367 g002
Figure 3. The distribution of plant part usage ((F) food, (FM) both food and medicinal, and (M) medicinal) across the studies ([22,23]), and our collected data in 2011, and 2022.
Figure 3. The distribution of plant part usage ((F) food, (FM) both food and medicinal, and (M) medicinal) across the studies ([22,23]), and our collected data in 2011, and 2022.
Plants 14 00367 g003
Figure 4. (A) The interconnectedness of plant studies and the overlap in plant parts examined across different studies [22,23]. (B) The chord diagram confirms the dynamic interplay between all the studies over time.
Figure 4. (A) The interconnectedness of plant studies and the overlap in plant parts examined across different studies [22,23]. (B) The chord diagram confirms the dynamic interplay between all the studies over time.
Plants 14 00367 g004
Figure 5. The chord diagram between all the usage and used parts in each data over time: (A) Rovera et al. [22], (B) Musset and Dore [23], (C) our collected data (2011), and (D) data (2022).
Figure 5. The chord diagram between all the usage and used parts in each data over time: (A) Rovera et al. [22], (B) Musset and Dore [23], (C) our collected data (2011), and (D) data (2022).
Plants 14 00367 g005
Figure 6. The heatmap illustrates the Jaccard Index, measuring the similarity between plant species compositions across various families. Values range from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (complete similarity), represented by a gradient from dark blue (low similarity) to cyan (high similarity). The hierarchical clustering on both axes highlights groups of plant families with shared characteristics, as shown by closely aligned branches in the dendrogram.
Figure 6. The heatmap illustrates the Jaccard Index, measuring the similarity between plant species compositions across various families. Values range from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (complete similarity), represented by a gradient from dark blue (low similarity) to cyan (high similarity). The hierarchical clustering on both axes highlights groups of plant families with shared characteristics, as shown by closely aligned branches in the dendrogram.
Plants 14 00367 g006
Figure 7. A dendrogram is a tree-like diagram used to visualize hierarchical relationships between data studies labeled (A) Rovera et al. [22], (B) Musset and Dore [23], (C) our data (2011), and (D) our data (2022).
Figure 7. A dendrogram is a tree-like diagram used to visualize hierarchical relationships between data studies labeled (A) Rovera et al. [22], (B) Musset and Dore [23], (C) our data (2011), and (D) our data (2022).
Plants 14 00367 g007
Figure 8. The biplot visualizes the relationships between the four studies based on their contribution to the principal components. The studies can be clustered into two groups: Cluster 1 comprising Rovera et al. [22] and Musset and Dore [23], and Cluster 2 including Data 2011 and Data 2022.
Figure 8. The biplot visualizes the relationships between the four studies based on their contribution to the principal components. The studies can be clustered into two groups: Cluster 1 comprising Rovera et al. [22] and Musset and Dore [23], and Cluster 2 including Data 2011 and Data 2022.
Plants 14 00367 g008
Figure 9. Linguistic map of Piedmont (NW Italy) and the three considered Alpine Southern Occitan valleys (Maira, Stura, and Grana), nestled in the borderlands of Italy and France.
Figure 9. Linguistic map of Piedmont (NW Italy) and the three considered Alpine Southern Occitan valleys (Maira, Stura, and Grana), nestled in the borderlands of Italy and France.
Plants 14 00367 g009
Figure 10. Natural landscape in the Valle Grana (A) and Maria (B) (Photo: Site Maira Valley, Italy).
Figure 10. Natural landscape in the Valle Grana (A) and Maria (B) (Photo: Site Maira Valley, Italy).
Plants 14 00367 g010
Table 1. Plant species used for food and medicinal purposes in the Maira, Grana, and Stura Valleys ((F): food; (FM): food and medicinal; and (M): medicinal) and (p: present; a: absent).
Table 1. Plant species used for food and medicinal purposes in the Maira, Grana, and Stura Valleys ((F): food; (FM): food and medicinal; and (M): medicinal) and (p: present; a: absent).
Botanical TaxaFamilyRovera (1982) [22]Musset and Dore (2004) [23]Our Collected Data (2011)Our Collected Data 2022Part UsedUsage Methods of Preparations and UsageData Reference
Abies alba Mill.PinaceaeppaaWoodFTimber, ornamental purposesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaSapMThe sap can be used in tinctures or syrups for respiratory issues or as a topical antisepticRovera et al. [22]
Abies grandis (Douglas ex D.Don) Lindl.PinaceaeapaaWoodFTimber, ornamental purposesMusset and Dore [23]
Abies nordmanniana (Steven) SpachPinaceaeapaaWoodFTimber, ornamental purposesMusset and Dore [23]
Acacia spp.FabaceaeaaapFlowers, barkFUsed in fritters, omelets, and as flavoring. Only white or pink flowers usedData (2022)
Achillea erba-rotta All.AsteraceaepaaaAerial partMDecoction or tea. Drink 1–2 cups per dayRovera et al. [22]
Achillea millefolium L.AsteraceaepppaFlowers, leavesMHerbal remedy, anti-inflammatoryMusset and Dore [23]
Aconitum napellus L.RanunculaceaeppaaRoots, leavesMMedicinal uses, toxicityMusset and Dore [23]
Adiantum capillus-veneris L.PteridaceaeapaaLeavesMTreats respiratory issuesMusset and Dore [23]
Aesculus hippocastanum L.SapindaceaeapaaSeedsMMedicinal (for circulation)Musset and Dore [23]
Agrimonia eupatoria L.RosaceaeaapaLeavesFHerbal teas and infusionsData (2011)
Alliaria petiolata (M.Bieb.) Cavara and GrandeBrassicaceaeaaapLeaves, flowers, rootsFMUsed as broccoletti or in pasta Seeds used to make a mustard-like sauceData (2022)
Allium cepa L.AmaryllidaceaepaaaBulbFMRaw or cooked as food; used in folk medicine for colds, coughs, and as an antibacterialRovera et al. [22]
Allium porrum L.AmaryllidaceaepaaaLeaves, bulbsFMConsumed as a vegetable in cooking; also used in herbal teas for its medicinal propertiesRovera et al. [22]
Allium sativum L.AmaryllidaceaepaaaBulbFMEaten raw or cooked, or used in oils or tinctures for its antibacterial, antiviral, and cardiovascular benefitsRovera et al. [22]
Allium schoenoprasum L.AlliaceaeaapaLeavesFFood for cows, milk becomes more bitterData (2011)
Allium ursinum L.LiliaceaeaappLeaves, bulbsFMUsed for flavoring vegetables, salads, or dishes with fish Flowers also used in dishes.Treats insomnia, respiratory and cardiac disordersData (2011)
Alopecurus pratensis L.PoaceaeaapaLeaves and flowersFUsed to make better cheeseData (2011)
Anemone vulgaris MillerRanunculaceaepaaaAerial partsMDecoction, drink 1 small glass before mealsRovera et al. [22]
Angelica archangelica L.ApiaceaepaaaRoots, leavesMUsed in tinctures or teas to treat digestive issues, respiratory conditions, and as a mild sedative.Rovera et al. [22]
Angelica sylvestris L.ApiaceaeapaaRoots, leavesMHerbal remedy, digestive aidMusset [23]
Antennaria dioica (L.) GaertnerAsteraceaepaaaHerbMMade into an infusion or poultice for treating wounds or as a diureticRovera et al. [22]
Apium graveolens L.ApiaceaeppaaLeaves, stemsFMUsed in cooking soups, or salads and herbal medicine for digestive health and as a mild sedativeMusset and Dore [23]
Arctium lappa L.AsteraceaepppaRoots, seedsMHerbal remedy for skin, detoxification; root is used in decoctions or teas for detoxification, skin health, and as an anti-inflammatoryMusset and Dore [23]
Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng.EricaceaeapaaLeavesMUrinary health, antisepticMusset and Dore [23]
Armoracia rusticana G.Gaertn., B.Mey. and Scherb.BrassicaceaeaapaLeavesFLiqueurData (2011)
Arnica montana L.AsteraceaepaaaFlowers, rootsMApplied topically in ointments or tinctures for bruises, sprains, and inflammatory painRovera et al. [22]
Artemisia absinthium L.AsteraceaepppaLeaves, flowersFMAlcoholic beverage, or teas to treat digestive issuesappetite stimulation, and parasitic infectionsMusset and Dore [23]
Artemisia genipi Stechm.AsteraceaeppaaFlowers, leavesFLiqueur productionMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeaves, flowersMUsed in herbal liqueurs or teas for digestive support, appetite regulation, and as a stimulantRovera et al. [22]
Artemisia glacialis L.AsteraceaeaapaFlowers and stemsFLiqueurData (2011)
Artemisia umbelliformis Lam.AsteraceaepaaaAerial partsMInfusion: A pinch of plant per cup of water. Drink during the day, avoid overuseRovera et al. [22]
Artemisia vulgaris L.AsteraceaeapaaLeaves, flowersFMDigestive aid, medicinal herbMusset and Dore [23]
Aruncus dioicus (Walter) FernaldRosaceaeaapaShootsFSprouts preserved in oil or in omeletsData (2011)
Asparagus acutifolius L.LiliaceaeaapaLeaves and stemFBoiled and eaten in saladData (2011)
Atropa belladonna L.SolanaceaeapaaRoots, leaves, berriesMHistorical medicinal use (toxic)Musset and Dore [23]
Barbarea vulgaris W.T.AitonBrassicaceaeaapaLeavesMUsed as a diureticData (2011)
Borago officinalis L.BoraginaceaeaapaFlowersFCooked and used in omeletsData (2011)
Brassica oleracea L.BrassicaceaepaaaLeavesMHeated leaves with an iron or in the oven, then applied to the affected area. Apply 2–3 times a dayRovera et al. [22]
Bunium bulbocastanum L.ApiaceaeaapaBulbFUsed as a substitute for potatoes with milk (or cream) and flour to make cakes, then baked in the oven. Or roasted on a hot stone. Also dried for the winterData (2011)
Clinopodium nepeta (L.) KuntzeLamiaceaepaaaWhole plant (flowering)MInfusion: A pinch of dried leaves per cup of water. Use compresses as neededRovera et al. [22]
Calendula arvensis L.AsteraceaeapaaFlowersFMMedicinal uses, skin careMusset and Dore [23]
Calendula officinalis L.Asteraceaepppa MSkin care, anti-inflammatoryMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFlowersFSoups and medicinal uses as an emollientData (2011)
aaaa MInfusion: 1–2 flowers in 1 L of water. Apply as a compress or washRovera et al. [22]
Campanula rapunculus L.CampanulaceaeaapaLeaves and flowersFA liqueur called “Sanvoran” is made from it, typical of the Occitan regionData (2011)
Capsella bursa-pastoris Medik.BrassicaceaeaapaLeavesFSaladsData (2011)
Carlina acaulis L.AsteraceaeapaaRootsMMedicinal purposesMusset and Dore [23]
Carlina vulgaris L.AsteraceaepaaaAerial partsMInfusion: 1 tablespoon per cup of water. Drink after mealsRovera et al. [22]
Carum carvi L.ApiaceaeapaaSeedsFMCulinary uses, digestive aidMusset and Dore [23]
Castanea sativa Mill.FagaceaeappaNuts, wood, fruitsFEdible nuts, timber, roasted or boiled, sweet or saltyMusset and Dore [23]
Celtis australis L.UlmaceaeaapaSeedsFOilData (2011)
Centaurea cyanus L.AsteraceaepaaaFlowersMInfusion: Flowers in water. Use as an eyewash or compressRovera et al. [22]
Cetraria islandica (L.) Ach.CaryophyllaceaepaaaThallus, Lichen (tallo)MDecoction, drink 1 glass per dayRovera et al. [22]
Chelidonium majus L.PapaveraceaepaaaLatex, rootMApply latex topically to affected areas or use decoction of root (10 cm in 1 L of water). Drink a small cup before mealsRovera et al. [22]
Chenopodium bonus-henricus L.AmaranthaceaepappLeaves, stemsFMOften boiled and mixed with other vegetables. Used in a casserole with Melissa. Cooked in agnolotti, raw in gnocchi. Grows well on slopes.Stellato (2022)
Chrysojasminum odoratissimum (L.) BanfiOleaceaepaaaLeavesMDecoction: 4–5 leaves in 2 L of water for 30 minRovera et al. [22]
Cicerbita alpina Wallr.AsteraceaeaapaLeavesFUsed in saladsData (2011)
Cichorium intybus L.AsteraceaepappRoots, leavesFPoor man’s coffee, used as an antidote against worms, also in saladsData (2011)
Cinchona calisaya Wedd.RubiaceaepaaaRootMDecoction, drink 1 small glass after mealsRovera et al. [22]
Cinnamomum verum J.PreslLauraceaepaaaBarkMInfusion: 1 L of water, 1 tsp thyme, 2 of burdock root, left overnight. Drink 1 cup after every mealRovera et al. [22]
Citrus limon (L.) OsbeckRutaceaepaaaFruitFMFresh juice, drink the juice of 1/2 lemon dailyRovera et al. [22]
Cornus sanguinea L.CornaceaeaapaSeedsFOilData (2011)
Corylus avellana L.BetulaceaeaapaFruitsFOilData (2011)
Crataegus monogyna Jacq.RosaceaepaaaFlower buds with leavesMDecoction. Drink after mealsRovera et al. [22]
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.PoaceaepaaaEntire plantMDecoction or infusion. Drink after meals or as neededRovera et al. [22]
Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC.BrassicaceaeaappLeavesFUsed raw and cooked in meats, fish, and cheeses. Flower buds used in pasta sauce with anchoviesData (2011)
Dryopteris filix-mas (L.) SchottDryopteridaceaeapaaRhizomes, leavesMTraditionally used in herbal remediesMusset and Dore [23]
Echium vulgare L.BoraginaceaepaaaFlowersMDecoction, drink 1 glass per dayRovera et al. [22]
Equisetum arvense L.EquisetaceaeaapaStemFSaladsData (2011)
Equisetum spp.EquisetaceaepaaaAerial partsMDecoction, drink 1 glass per dayRovera et al. [22]
Festuca rubra L.PoaceaeaaapaLeaves and flowersFUsed to improve cheese qualityData (2011)
Foeniculum vulgare Mill.ApiaceaeaapaLeavesFUsed to flavor dishes and drinks, or also to make liqueurs.Data (2011)
Fragaria vesca L.RosaceaepaaaLeavesMInfusion: A handful of dried leaves in 1/2 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
Fraxinus excelsior L.OleaceaepapaLeavesMLeaves used as diuretics and sudorificsData (2011)
Fumana ericoides (Cav.) Gand.CistaceaepaaaFlowersMInfusion: 5–6 flowers in 1/2 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
Galium album Mill.RubiaceaepaaaFlowersMInfusion: A pinch of flowers in waterRovera et al. [22]
Gentiana acaulis L.GentianaceaepaaaFlowersMMaceration: 20 flowers in 1 L of red wine for 10 daysRovera et al. [22]
Gentiana lutea L.GenzianaceaepappFlowers, rootsFRoot used after being washed, cut, and dried, commonly used in liqueurs and aromatic wines.Food for cows, milk becomes more bitter, but it is also used for making liqueursData (2011)
aaaa MDecoction: 1.5 L of water and 15 pieces of root (4–5 cm)Rovera et al. [22]
Gentiana acaulis L.GenzianaceaeaapaFlowersFFood for cows, milk becomes more bitter, also used in liqueursData (2011)
Glycyrrhiza glabra L.FabaceaeapaaRootsFMUsed as a sweetener and in herbal medicineMusset and Dore [23]
Hedera helix L.AraliaceaepaaaLeavesMDecoction: 10–15 leaves in 1 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
Helianthus spp.AsteraceaeaapaTuberFEaten rawData (2011)
Hylotelephium telephium (L.) H.OhbaCrassulaceaepaaaAerial parts (Flowers)MInfusion: 1 tablespoon dried plant in ½ liter of waterRovera et al. [22]
Humulus lupulus L.CannabaceaeaapaLeaves, flowersFDigestive liqueurs made from the flowers, the sprouts are used in soups, omelets, and as a side dish for polenta.Data (2011)
Hypericum perforatum L.HypericaceaepaaaWhole plantMFor colds, apply to the burned area several times a dayRovera et al. [22]
Hyssopus officinalis L.AsteraceaeaapaLeavesMPerfumes and medicines for the lungs are made from itData (2011)
Juglans regia L.JuglandaceaepapaFruitFOilData (2011)
aaaaLeavesMDecoction: 2–3 handfuls of leaves in 5–6 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
Juniperus communis L.CupressaceaepappBerries, rootsFUsed in cheese refining, and roots for liqueur productionData (2011)
aaaa FBerries used in meats, game, pork, rabbit, vegetables, pickled mushrooms. Used in liquor making, especially ginStellato (2022)
aaaa FMDecoction (5–7 berries), soaking in wine or water, or consumed raw after mealsRovera et al. [22]
Laburnum anagyroides Medik.FabaceaepaaaBark, young branchesMDecoction: 50 cm of dry bark in 1 L of water; young branches ground with vinegar for poulticesRovera et al. [22]
Lactuca perennis L.AsteraceaeapaaLeavesFMEdible, medicinal usesMusset and Dore [23]
Lactuca serriola L.AsteraceaeaapaLeavesFSalads and soups. Used as a laxativeData (2011)
Lactuca virosa Thunb.AsteraceaeaaapLeaves, stemFTender leaves used in salads Rosettes used in creams, soups, and mashed potatoesStellato (2022)
Lamium album L.LamiaceaepapaLeavesMDecoction or used for inflammation in the genital tractRovera et al. [22]
Lamium purpureum L.LamiaceaepaaaAerial partsMUsed externally for treating wounds and inflammationsRovera et al. [22]
Lapsana communis L.AsteraceaeaapaLeavesFSoups and omeletsData (2011)
Larix decidua (L.) Mill.PinaceaeppaaWood, resinFMTimber, ornamental. Applied to abscesses to promote maturationRovera et al. [22]
Lathyrus oleraceus Lam.FabaceaeaapaFruitsFEdible but also a bit poisonousData (2011)
Lathyrus sativus L. FabaceaepaaaDry plant (flowering)MSecondary use to expel the placentaRovera et al. [22]
Lathyrus tuberosus L.FabaceaeaaapaTubers and leavesFLeaves in salads. Tubers in soups or salads once cooked. It was also called “hunger herb” because it was used during times of extreme famine. Otherwise, it was eaten only by cowsData (2011)
Laurus nobilis L.LauraceaeapaaLeavesFMCulinary uses, anti-inflammatoryMusset and Dore [23]
Lavandula angustifolia Mill.LamiaceaeppaaFlowers, leavesMAromatherapy, skin careMusset and Dore [23]
Lavandula stoechas L.LamiaceaeaapaFlowersFOrnamental, honeyData (2011)
Leontopodium nivale subsp. alpinum (Cass.) GreuterAsteraceaepaaaWhole plantMDecoction: 3–4 flowers in 1 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
Levisticum officinale W.D.J.KochApiaceaeaapaStems and leavesFIn summer, only the leaves are used, while, in spring, the stem is also used. Used chopped on Castelmagno cheese cubesData (2011)
Lilium martagon var. martagonLiliaceaeaapaBulbFSaladsData (2011)
Linum usitatissimum L.LinaceaeapaaSeeds, fiberFFiber production, oil extractionMusset [23]
Lupinus angustifolius L.FabaceaeaaapaFruitsFUsed as a substitute for fava beans, after being thoroughly washed to remove toxic substances.Data (2011)
Lythrum salicaria L.LythraceaeapaaFlowers, rootsMOrnamental, urinary healthMusset and Dore [23]
Malva alcea L.MalvaceaepaaaInflorescences, rootsMDecoction: 1 handful in 1 L of water; compresses applied to the legsRovera et al. [22]
Malva pusilla Sm.MalvaceaepaaaAerial parts, flowersMDecoction or infusion: 5–6 flowers in water or 1 plant in 2–3 LRovera et al. [22]
Malva sylvestris L.MalvaceaeppppLeaves, flowersFMSoothing digestive, skin careMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeaves, flowers, and rootsFMRaw in salads, cooked as an antispasmodic for the intestines. Roots against indigestion. Also used as a refreshing agent. Once boiled, it was used for inflammationsData (2011)
aaaaLeaves, flowersFMPaired with herbs for fillings or omelets. Buds pickled in vinegar as a condiment.Used for cough, bronchitis, and digestive issues. In the past, used in soups for children or elderly with stomach or bronchitis issuesStellato (2022)
aaaaEntire plant, leavesMDecoction: Used for inflammation, gargles, or anti-inflammatory purposesRovera et al. [22]
Marrubium vulgare L.LamiaceaeppaaLeaves, flowersMRespiratory health, cough remedyMusset [23]
aaaaEntire plantMDecoction: 1 plant in 5 cups of waterRovera et al. [22]
Matricaria chamomilla L.AsteraceaeppaaFlowersMKnown for its calming propertiesMusset and Dore [23]; Rovera et al. [22]
Matricaria recutita L.AsteraceaeaapaFlowersFMInfusionsData (2011)
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.FabaceaeppaaLeavesMInfusion: 3–4 leaves in 1 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
aaaaFlowers, leavesMBlood circulation, agricultural useMusset and Dore [23]
Melissa officinalis L.LamiaceaeapppLeavesFMCalming, digestive aidMusset and Dore [23]
aaaa FUsed to give the characteristic flavor in saladsData (2011)
aaaa FMUsed raw in salads, soups, omelets. Commonly used in liquors and as an aromatic ingredient. Used for depression, kidney colic, insomnia, and insect bitesStellato (2022)
Mentha × rotundifolia (L.) Huds.LabiateaeaapaLeavesFUsed to flavor dishes and drinksData (2011)
Mentha aquatica L.LamiaceaepaaaLeavesFMInfusion: 3–4 leaves per cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
Mentha piperita L.LamiaceaepaaaLeavesFMDecoction or infusion, used for digestion and colic reliefRovera et al. [22]
Mentha sp.LamiaceaeapaaLeaves, flowersFMDigestive aid, culinary usesMusset and Dore [23]
Mespilus germanica (L.) KuntzeRosaceaeapaaFruitFEdible fruit, ornamentalMusset and Dore [23]
Muscari botryoides (L.) Mill.LiliaceaeaapaBulbFThe bulb is roasted and dried for the winterData (2011)
Myosotis spp.BoraginaceaeapaaFlowersFSymbolic uses, ornamentalMusset and Dore [23]
Nasturtium officinale R.Br.BrassicaceaepppaAerial partsFMLikely consumed raw or prepared as an infusion for diuretic or digestive benefitsRovera et al. [22]
aaaaLeaves, stemsFMCulinary uses, detoxificationMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesMSalads, decoctions, hair growthData (2011)
Nepeta cataria L.LamiaceaeapaaLeaves, flowersMCat attraction, medicinal usesMusset and Dore [23]
Ocimum basilicum L.LamiaceaeapaaLeavesFMCulinary uses, digestive aidMusset and Dore [23]
Olea europaea L.OleaceaeppaaFruitFOlive oil production, culinary usesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeaves, oilMUsed for treating burns, likely as oil or leaf extractsRovera et al. [22]
Onopordon acanthium L.AsteraceaeaapaSeedsFOilData (2011)
Origanum vulgare L.LamiaceaepppaLeaves, flowersFMCulinary uses, medicinal usesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesFUsed to flavor dishes and drinksData (2011)
aaaaFlowersMDecoction, 2–3 times a day for knee applicationRovera et al. [22]
Oxalis acetosella L.OxalidaceaeaaapLeaves, flowersMLeaves and stems used in soups, roasts, or to make a lemonade-like drink. Astringent, diuretic, blood purifier. Used for gastric issues, liver congestion, nephritis, skin rashes, and wormsStellato (2022)
Papaver rhoeas L.PapaveraceaeappaFlowersMSoothing, medicinalMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesFBaked to make green pies. Or in saladsData (2011)
Parietaria judaica L.UrticaceaeapaaLeaves, stemsMRespiratory health, herbal remedyMusset and Dore [23]
Parietaria officinalis L.UrticaceaepapaLeavesMPoultice of chopped leaves; infusion with a handful of leaves in 1 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
aaaaLeaves and bulbFMSalads, soups, omelets. The juice was used as a diuretic and detoxifier for the urinary tract. Bulbs were eaten after being boiled twice to remove the bitter taste, then fried in slices or roastedData (2011)
Pastinaca sativa L.ApiaceaeapaaRootsFMCulinary uses, medicinal usesMusset and Dore [23]
Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) FussApiaceaeppaaAerial partsFInfusion: 2 umbels in one cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
aaaaLeavesFMCulinary uses, digestive aidMusset and Dore [23]
Peucedanum ostruthium W.D.J.KochApiaceaeppaaRootsMRoots must be crushed and prepared as a decoctionRovera et al. [22]; Musset and Dore [23]
Phyteuma orbiculare L.CampanulaceaeaapaLeaves, inflorescences, and rootsFCooked and then used in omelets, roots are consumed in saladsData (2011)
Phyteuma ovatum Honck.CampanulaceaeaapaLeaves, inflorescences, and rootsFOil is made from it, or it is eaten toastedData (2011)
Pimpinella anisum L.ApiaceaeppppSeeds, leavesFMUsed for flavoring and medicinal purposesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesMEaten with snails. The flowers are rarely used because they are laxativeData (2011)
aaaaUmbelsFMInfusion: 2 leaves or umbels in a cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
aaaaSeeds, leavesFFresh leaves used in soups, cheeses, and cooked vegetablesStellato (2022)
Pinus cembra L.PinaceaeappaTimber, nutsFUsed for timber and nutsMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaSeedsFSalads with the leaves and dried rhizome as a digestiveData (2011)
Pinus sylvestris L.PinaceaeapaaTimber, resinFUsed for timber and resinMusset and Dore [23]
Plantago lanceolata L.PlantaginaceaepaaaLeavesMDecoction or poultice for wounds and respiratory reliefRovera et al. [22]
Plantago major L.PlantaginaceaeapaaLeaves, seedsMCommon herb for medicinal usesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaBasal leavesMDecoction: 2–3 roots in one cup of water; one cup in the eveningRovera et al. [22]
Plantago sp.PlantaginaceaeaapaLeavesMUsed against pimplesData (2011)
Poa pratensis L.PoaceaeaaapaFlowers and leavesFUsed to make better cheeseData (2011)
Polygala spp.PolygalaceaeapaaRoots, leavesMUsed in traditional medicineMusset and Dore [23]
Polygonum bistorta Samp.PoligonaceaeaapaLeavesMThe leaves are used to make a powerful medicine for hemorrhoidsData (2011)
Polypodium vulgare L.PolypodiaceaepaaaRootMDecoction: a handful of root in 1 L of water; drink several times during the dayRovera et al. [22]
Polyporus officinalis (Vill.) Fr.PolyporaceaepaaaFungiMDecoction: drink 1–2 cups per dayRovera et al. [22]
Portulaca oleracea L.PortulacaceaeapaaLeaves, seedsFMEdible herb used in salads and for medicinal propertiesMusset and Dore [23]
Primula veris L.PrimulaceaepapaBuds and leavesFMUsed in potato flan, soups with other herbs, or in omelets. Also used as diuretics and detoxifiers. Buds pickled or with sugarData (2011)
aaaaFlowers and leavesMDecoction: use flowers and leavesRovera et al. [22]
Primula vulgaris Huds.PrimulaceaeapaaFlowers, leavesFMUsed ornamentally and for medicinal teasMusset and Dore [23]
Prunus avium (L.) L.RosaceaeppaaFruitFProduces edible fruitMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaStemsM-Rovera et al. [22]
Prunus cerasus L.RosaceaepaaaStemsM-Rovera et al. [22]
Prunus spinosa L.RosaceaeapaaBerriesFMUsed in jams and liqueursMusset and Dore [23]
Pulmonaria officinalis L.BoraginaceaepaapLeaves, flowersFMLeaves used in fried dishes, fillings, pies, ravioli. Emollient, rich in vitamins A and CStellato (2022)
aaaaLeavesM-Rovera et al. [22]
Quercus robur L.FagaceaepaaaBarkMDecoction, drink 1 small glass after mealsRovera et al. [22]
Ranunculus acris L.RanunculaceaeppaaFlowers, LeavesMToxic plant often found in meadowsMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaBulb (sliced)MDecoction: 5–6 fruits in 4 L of water; decoction 4–5 times a dayRovera et al. [22]
Rheum rhabarbarum L.PolygonaceaeapaaStems, rootsFUsed in cooking and dessertsMusset and Dore [23]
Ribes rubrum L.GrossulariaceaeapaaFruitFUsed in jams and dessertsMusset and Dore [23]
Rorippa spp.BrassicaceaeapaaLeaves, stemsFMCulinary uses, medicinal usesMusset and Dore [23]
Rosa canina L.RosaceaeppaaFruit, flowersFMUsed for medicinal purposes and in jamsMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFruitMDecoction: 5–6 leaves per cup of water; Drink 2–3 times a dayRovera et al. [22]
Rosa canina L.RosaceaeaapaFruitsFUsed to make sauces. Or toasted as a tea substituteData (2011)
Rosa moschata Herrm.RosaceaeapaaFlowersFKnown for its fragrant flowersMusset and Dore [23]
Rosmarinus officinalis L.LamiaceaeppaaLeaves, flowersFMFragrant herb used in cooking and medicineMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesMDecoction: 7–8 cm of twigs in 1 L of water; drink 3 times a dayRovera et al. [22]
Rubus fruticosus L.RosaceaeppaaFruit, leavesFKnown for its berries (blackberries)Musset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesMDecoction: 2–3 leaves per cup of water; drink 3 times a dayRovera et al. [22]
Rubus idaeus L.RosaceaeapaaFruitFEdible fruit commonly used in jams and dessertsMusset and Dore [23]
Rumex acetosa L.PolygonaceaeappaLeaves, rootsFMA sour leafy plant often used in saladsMusset and Dore [23]
Rumex alpinus L.PolygaceaeaapaRhizome and leavesFBaked with or without rice, seasoned with butter, cheese, and eggs to make green pies, a holiday dishData (2011)
Rumex crispus L.PolygonaceaepaaaRootMDecoction: 6–7 cm of root in 3 glasses of water; Drink 1 small glass in the morningRovera et al. [22]
Rumex obtusifolius L.PolygonaceaepaaaLeavesMDecoction: 4–5 leaves in 1 L of water on an empty stomach; Drink 1 glass in the morning on an empty stomach for 15 daysRovera et al. [22]
Rumex patientia L.PolygonaceaeapaaLeaves, rootsMWild herb with medicinal propertiesMusset and Dore [23]
Ruta graveolens L.RutaceaepappLeavesFGrappaData (2011)
aaaaLeaves, flowersFUsed in salads or with herbs to balance strong flavors. Stems used like broccoli, boiled and seasoned.Stellato (2022)
aaaaLeavesMGrappa preparation, drink 1 small glass after mealsRovera et al. [22]
Salix alba L.SalicaceaeapaaBarkMUsed for its bark’s medicinal propertiesMusset and Dore [23]
Salix spp.SalicaceaeppaaLeavesMCrushed leaves used as toothpaste; apply 2 times a dayRovera et al. [22]
aaaaBark, leavesMKnown for its use in herbal medicineMusset and Dore [23]
Salvia officinalis L.LamiaceaepaapLeavesMDecoction: 1⁄2 umbrella in 1⁄2 L of water; drink 1 small cup in the morningRovera et al. [22]
aaaaLeaves, flowersFMFlowers fried in batter, used in sauces or soups. Used in a hot drink with lemon for digestion.Stellato (2022)
Salvia pratensis L.LamiaceaeaapaLeavesFOmelets, salads, soups. Dried flowers used as flour to make bread. Also animal feedData (2011)
Sambucus nigra L.AdoxaceaepppaBerries, flowersMImmune boosting, cold remedyMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeaves and flowersFMSoups, salads, omelets. Preparation of elderberry wine. Jam is made, which has a laxative effect. Flowers are fried in batter. A liqueur is also madeData (2011)
aaaaFruitsMWine made by pressing berries; Vulnerary (wound healing)Rovera et al. [22]
Sanguisorba minor Scop.RosaceaepaaaFlowersMDecoction: a handful of flowers in 1 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
Santolina chamaecyparissus L.AsteraceaeapaaLeaves, flowersFMKnown for its aromatic leaves used in herbal remediesMusset and Dore [23]
Saponaria officinalis L.CaryophyllaceaeapaaRoots, leavesMUsed traditionally to make soapMusset and Dore [23]
Satureja hortensis L.LamiaceaeapaaLeavesFA culinary herb used for flavoring dishesMusset and Dore [23]
Satureja montana L.LabiateaepappLeavesFAdds flavor to food.Data (2011)
aaaaAerial parts (flowers)MInfusion: 1 tablespoon of dried plant in ½ liter of waterRovera et al. [22]
aaaaLeaves, flowersFUsed with eggs, legumes, vegetables. Often added to minestrone or savory pudding in PiedmontStellato (2022)
Silene vulgaris (Moench) GarckeCariofillaceaeaapaFlowers and flowersFMLiqueurs, soups from cooked flowers, and green omelets baked in the ovenData (2011)
Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.AsteraceaeaappFlowers and fruitsFCooked leaves used as a liver detoxifierData (2011)
aaaaSeeds, leaves, flowersFMTender central shoots used raw in salads. Flower receptacles can be boiled or used like artichokesStellato (2022)
Solanum dulcamara L.SolanaceaeppaaStems, leavesMKnown for its toxic and medicinal usesMusset [23]
aaaaStemMDecoction: 10 cm of stem in a cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
Solanum tuberosum L.SolanaceaepaaaTuberFInfusion: 1 leaf per cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
Sorbus aucuparia L.RosaceaeapaaBerries, leavesFMKnown for its berries and use in medicinal syrupsMusset and Dore [23]
Stellaria media (L.) Vill.CaryophyllaceaeaapaLeavesFLiqueurData (2011)
Tanacetum balsamita L.AsteraceaeaapaLeavesFUsed in omeletsData (2011)
Tanacetum vulgare L.AsteraceaepppaFlowers, leavesMKnown for its medicinal useMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeaves and flowers, rootsFMSalads, condensed, coffee, leaves cooked in butter, soup with herbs, and raw in salad Used against jaundice and gallstones. Buds were pickled and used as capers. Roots toasted as a coffee substitute. A liqueur is also made from the leavesData (2011)
aaaaFlowersMDecoction: 1 L of water, 2–3 flowers of tansy, 1 sprig of wormwood, boiled for 30 minRovera et al. [22]
Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg. AsteraceaepppaRoots, leaves, flowersMOften used in herbal remediesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesFMTeas, infusions, digestion, gnocchi, cheese refining, and green cakes baked in the oven.Data (2011)
aaaaLeavesMInfusion: 1 plant in 1 glass of waterRovera et al. [22]
Teucrium chamaedrys L.LamiaceaeppaaLeaves, flowersMA medicinal plantMusset [23]
aaaaAerial partsMDecoction: 1 glass of water with a pinch of plantRovera et al. [22]
Teucrium montanum L.LamiaceaeapaaLeaves, flowersMUsed for its medicinal qualitiesMusset and Dore [23]
Thymus serpyllum L.LamiaceaepppaLeavesFMSalads, teas, and infusions to eliminate intestinal gas and facilitate bile flowData (2011)
aaaaLeaves, flowersFMUsed for its aromatic and medicinal propertiesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaAerial partsMDecoction: handful in 1 L of waterRovera et al. [22]
Thymus vulgaris L.LamiaceaeapaaLeaves, flowersFMCommonly used in cooking and herbal medicineMusset and Dore [23]
Tilia cordata Mill.TiliaceaepppaFlowers, leavesMKnown for its calming teaMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFlowersFUsed to flavor dishesData (2011)
aaaaFlowersMInfusion: 1 teaspoon per cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
Tragopogon pratensis L.AsteraceaeaapaLeaves and rootsFMSprouts and leaves used as vegetables, cooked or raw. Especially in soups. Used in green cakes baked in the oven. Roots eaten cooked. Used (unconsciously) against diabetesData (2011)
Trifolium pratense L.FabaceaeappaFlowers, leavesFMUsed in teas and for its medicinal propertiesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeavesFThe bulb is roasted and dried for the winterData (2011)
Tulipa sylvestri L.LiliaceaeaapaBulbFPaired with roe deer, in sweets, or as a concentrateData (2011)
Tussilago farfara L.AsteraceaeppaaLeaves, flowersMUsed for cough and respiratory issuesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFlowersMInfusion: pinch per cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
Ulmus minor Mill.UlmaceaepaaaBarkMDecoction: 4–6 plants in 2 L of water, boil for 4–5 hRovera et al. [22]
Urtica dioica L.UrticaceaeppppLeaves, rootsFMKnown for its nutritional and medicinal benefitsMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFruitsFMUsed in omelets after being well cooked, in soups, or even as shampooData (2011)
aaaaLeaves, rootsFMUsed in risotto and ravioli, collected when young and succulent. Diuretic and anti-inflammatory properties Data (2022)
aaaaWhole plantMDecoction: handful of leaves in 1% waterRovera et al. [22]
Urtica urens L.UrticaceaepaaaWhole plantMDecoctionRovera et al. [22]
Urena lobata subsp. lobataParmeliaceaepaaaThallusMDecoctionRovera et al. [22]
Vaccinium myrtillus L.EricaceaepppaBerries, leavesFMA plant with medicinal and edible usesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFruitFWine: fruit with abundant sugar, left in the sun or ovenRovera et al. [22]
aaaaLeavesFPaired with venison, in desserts or as a concentrateData (2011)
Valerianella locusta L.ValerianaceaeaapaLeavesFSaladsData (2011)
Veratrum album L. LiliaceaepaaaWhole plantMNot specifiedRovera et al. [22]
Verbascum lychnitis L.ScrophulariaceaepaaaLeaves, seeds and flowersMDecoction: one leaf per cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
Verbascum thapsus L.ScrophulariaceaeppaaFlowers, leavesMTraditionally used in herbal remediesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFlowersMInfusion: one teaspoon of dried flowers in a cup of waterRovera et al. [22]
Verbena officinalis L.VerbenaceaeppaaFlowers, leavesMUsed for its medicinal propertiesMusset and Dore [23]
papaAerial partsMInfusionRovera et al. [22]
Veronica longifolia subsp. longifoliaScrofulariaceaeaaaaLeavesFMTeas and infusionsData (2011)
aaaaAerial partsMWine infusion, drink 1 small glass in the morningRovera et al. [22]
Veronica beccabunga L.ScrophulariaceaeaapaLeaves and flowersFSaladsData (2011)
Viola alba BesserViolaceaepaaaFlowersMInfusion: 2–3 flowers per cup of water, drink during the headache.Rovera et al. [22]
Viola biflora L.ViolaceaepaaaFlowersMInfusion: Drink during the headache.Rovera et al. [22]
Viola odorata L.ViolaceaepaapFlowers, leavesFUsed for decoration, in fritters, and in soups. Use caution as it can cause nausea.Stellato (2022)
aaaaFlowers and leavesMDecoction: 5–6 plants in 1 L of water, cook for 2–3 min. Drink after meals for astringent, small cup in the morning on an empty stomach for laxative.Rovera et al. [22]
Viola tricolor L.ViolaceaeppaaFlowersFMUsed for decorative and medicinal purposesMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaFlowersMInfusion: 2–3 plants per cup of water. Drink 2–3 small cups during the dayRovera et al. [22]
Viscum album L.SantalaceaeppaaBerries, leavesMUsed in traditional medicine and ritualsMusset and Dore [23]
aaaaLeaves and fruitMInfusion: A pinch of flowers per cup of water. Drink 2–3 cups during the dayRovera et al. [22]
Vitis vinifera L.VitaceaepaaaFruitMDecoction: 7–8 leaves in 1/2 L of water. Drink small cup in the morningRovera et al. [22]
Zea mays L.PoaceaepaaaStigmasMDecoction: 150 gr. of stigmas in 1 L of water. Drink 3–4 small cups during the dayRovera et al. [22]
Table 2. The logistic regression model was used to analyze the influence of various explanatory variables on the number of botanical taxa observed in different conditions.
Table 2. The logistic regression model was used to analyze the influence of various explanatory variables on the number of botanical taxa observed in different conditions.
Explanatory VariablesCategoryCoefficientsOdds RatiosStd. Errorp-Value
Altitude (m)600–16000.82.220.30.002
1600–24000.451.570.250.048
2400–30310.11.110.320.724
Temperature Average (°C)5 to 12 °C0.31.350.280.223
7 to 13 °C−0.10.90.270.74
Precipitation Average (mm)1400–1600−0.20.820.310.511
1200–1400−0.50.610.350.151
Age Range (years)71–750.852.340.30.004
30–800.151.160.220.441
Data SourceInterviews0.61.820.350.09
Herbarium0.251.280.40.517
Table 3. Ethnobotanical data overview: socio-ecological contexts and methodological approaches across studies and our collected data.
Table 3. Ethnobotanical data overview: socio-ecological contexts and methodological approaches across studies and our collected data.
Data YearLocationAltitude (m)Temperature Average (°C)Precipitation Average (mm)Age RangeNumber of ParticipantsData SourceSocial and Economic Context
Rovera et al. [22]1982Val Maira600–16005 to 101300–150071–75Not determinedDirect conversation with locals, isolated areaIsolated economy and social conditions
Musset and Dore [23]2004Valle Stura630–30315 to 121400–1600Various (30–80)24 individuals with diverse professions and rolesInterviews, herbariums, recipe booksSocial/economic context needed
Our data collected in
2011
2011Valle Grana600–24007 to 131200–1400Various (25–75)20 individuals with diverse professions and roles (e.g., farmers, drivers, herbarium)Herbarium, Indigenous and Allochthonous QuotesMultiple generations across various professions (including merchants, restaurateurs, holidaymakers, and others)
Our data collected in 20222022Val Maira (Marmora Dronero, and Acceglio, specifically the hamlet of Chiappera)600–16008 to 131300–1500Various (25–75)16 individuals, 3 dining establishments, and a culinary expert who has collaborated with local restaurantsDirect interviews, remote data collection, herbarium, and recipe booksLocal economy is based on tourism, seasonal workers
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alrhmoun, M.; Sulaiman, N.; Pieroni, A. Shifting Herbal Knowledge: The Ecological and Cultural Dynamics Behind Plant Use Changes in the Southern Occitan Alps. Plants 2025, 14, 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030367

AMA Style

Alrhmoun M, Sulaiman N, Pieroni A. Shifting Herbal Knowledge: The Ecological and Cultural Dynamics Behind Plant Use Changes in the Southern Occitan Alps. Plants. 2025; 14(3):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alrhmoun, Mousaab, Naji Sulaiman, and Andrea Pieroni. 2025. "Shifting Herbal Knowledge: The Ecological and Cultural Dynamics Behind Plant Use Changes in the Southern Occitan Alps" Plants 14, no. 3: 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030367

APA Style

Alrhmoun, M., Sulaiman, N., & Pieroni, A. (2025). Shifting Herbal Knowledge: The Ecological and Cultural Dynamics Behind Plant Use Changes in the Southern Occitan Alps. Plants, 14(3), 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop