Next Article in Journal
Roles and Regulations of Acid Invertases in Plants: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
Azadirachtin-Based Biopesticide Affects Fitness and Ovarian Development of the Natural Enemy Ceraeochrysa claveri (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Floristic Account of Apocynaceae (Gentianales) in Tunisia: New Additions to National and North African Flora with Nomenclatural Updates and Taxonomic Notes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Behavioral, Physiological, and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Adaptation of Helicoverpa armigera to the Fruits of a Marginal Host: Walnut (Juglans regia)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol of Tuta absoluta Within Sustainable IPM Frameworks

1
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, Key Laboratory of Biopesticides and Chemical Biology, MOE, College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Vector-Borne Virus Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
3
Department of Entomology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam 70050, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(3), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030319
Submission received: 2 December 2024 / Revised: 19 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 22 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Pest Management—from Chemicals to Green Management)

Abstract

:
The tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta, is a pest threatening global tomato production. This pest’s adaptability and resistance to chemical insecticides have necessitated integrated pest management (IPM) strategies prioritizing sustainable alternatives. This review explores the role of biological control agents (BCAs) in managing T. absoluta populations, emphasizing the integration of floral resources to enhance their efficacy. Predatory mirids such as Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis and parasitoids such as N. artynes and Trichogramma spp. are pivotal in pest suppression; however, their performance depends on nutritional and habitat support. Floral resources provide essential sugars and proteins, improving the longevity, fecundity, and predation efficiency of these BCAs. This review synthesizes case studies highlighting the benefits of selected flowering plants, such as Lobularia maritima and Fagopyrum esculentum, in supporting predator and parasitoid populations while minimizing advantages to T. absoluta. Mechanisms such as nectar quality, floral accessibility, and spatial–temporal resource availability are explored in detail. Additionally, the challenges of selective floral attraction, microbial impacts on nectar composition, and the unintended support of non-target organisms are discussed. This review proposes targeted floral management strategies to optimize BCA performance within IPM systems by integrating ecological and chemical insights. This approach offers a pathway toward reducing chemical pesticide reliance, fostering sustainable agriculture, and mitigating the economic impacts of T. absoluta infestations.

1. Introduction

The tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is a highly destructive pest significantly threatening tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. (Solanales: Solanaceae) cultivation. Originating from South America, this pest has spread globally, becoming a primary agricultural concern. Since its introduction to Europe—initially recorded in eastern Spain in 2006—it has proliferated across several European, Middle Eastern, and North African countries, inflicting substantial yield losses and economic damage [1]. In some cases, T. absoluta has caused yield reductions of up to 100% in severely infested fields, with reported losses of up to 1.2 billion USD annually in affected regions, including parts of South America, Europe, and the Middle East [1,2]. The adaptability of T. absoluta to various climates, combined with its high reproductive rate, has facilitated its spread from its native range in South America to several regions, including Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Asia and Africa, where it continues to escalate pressure on tomato production systems [1,3]. To counter this pest, the most commonly adopted management approach has involved chemical insecticides, often applied according to a calendar-based schedule in large-scale open-field tomato systems, especially those catering to processing industries [4]. While this approach can effectively reduce pest populations, the overreliance on chemical controls presents significant challenges, notably in regions such as South America, where repeated applications have led to increased resistance among T. absoluta populations [5,6]. This resistance spans various chemical classes, including pyrethroids and organophosphates, complicating pest management and increasing costs and health risks. In addition, the indiscriminate use of pesticides has negative consequences for non-target species, particularly natural enemies such as predatory insects and parasitoids, which are critical for sustainable pest management [4].
Biological control offers a promising alternative to chemical management, using natural enemies such as predatory mirid bugs, Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) (Hemiptera: Miridae) and Nesidiocoris tenuis Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae), which are widely used in both greenhouse and open-field settings [7,8,9]. These predators effectively control T. absoluta by preying on its eggs, although they perform less efficiently on larvae [10,11]. To supplement these predators, larval parasitoids can be highly beneficial. In Mediterranean regions, parasitoid species such as Necremnus artynes Walker, Stenomesiu japonicus Ashmed (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), and Bracon nigricans Szépligeti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) have been successfully used to target T. absoluta larvae [12,13,14].
Recent studies indicate that the effectiveness of these biological agents can be further enhanced through floral resources. Parasitoids, for example, rely on sugar-rich diets to maximize their reproductive potential and lifespan. Nectar from flowers has been shown to support parasitoids by increasing their longevity and abundance, thereby strengthening their biological control services [15,16,17]. Studies have specifically highlighted the potential of nectar to boost the fitness of T. absoluta parasitoids, such as N. artynes, which live longer when feeding on floral nectar in the absence of the pest [18]. Additionally, specific parasitoids such as N. tutae, S. japonicus, and B. nigricans require a protein-rich diet to sustain egg production, often obtained by feeding on T. absoluta larvae [19,20]. While these findings support the role of floral resources in enhancing the performance of biocontrol agents, the specific mechanisms by which flowers contribute to improved pest control of T. absoluta remain poorly understood. Although the presence of flowers has been associated with enhanced fitness and longevity of certain biocontrol agents, such as predators and parasitoids, the exact ways in which floral traits—such as nectar quality, accessibility, and nutrient composition—translate into better pest control outcomes need further exploration. The aim of this review is to examine these mechanisms of floral resource utilization in the biocontrol of T. absoluta, providing a detailed analysis of how different floral attributes might optimize the performance of predators and parasitoids against this pest. This review will synthesize current research on the interactions between floral resources and biocontrol agents, ultimately contributing to a more targeted and effective IPM strategy for T. absoluta.

2. Biological Control Agents and Habitat Enhancements for Effective T. absoluta Management

Biological control strategies for managing T. absoluta primarily involve natural predators and parasitoids to reduce pest populations sustainably [21]. These agents play a key role in IPM systems, offering a chemical-free alternative for pest control. The effectiveness of biological control depends on ecological factors such as the availability of floral resources, habitats, and environmental stability, which provide sustenance and shelter for biocontrol agents [22]. In the Mediterranean basin, where T. absoluta first invaded, conservation biological control has been particularly successful, primarily utilizing the mirid predators M. pygmaeus and N. tenuis [23]. These generalist predators, which feed on various pests, are most effective against T. absoluta eggs; however, their impact on larvae is limited, with less than one larva consumed daily from the second instar onward [24]. To enhance control, studies suggest combining mirid predators with other natural enemies, such as hymenopteran parasitoids, to target various pest stages [25]. Additionally, habitat improvements—such as introducing flowering plants or non-crop refuges—can support biocontrol agents by providing nectar and shelter, thereby boosting their population and enhancing their effectiveness in pest control. This section explores key biocontrol agents for T. absoluta control and highlights the ecological conditions, particularly the role of floral resources and habitat enhancements that contribute to their effectiveness.

2.1. Key Biocontrol Agents for T. absoluta

Biological control has emerged as a vital alternative for managing T. absoluta, given the challenges posed by chemical controls, including issues such as insecticide resistance; however, identifying effective natural enemies for a newly invasive pest is challenging, as T. absoluta is associated with many predators and parasitoids [26]. Currently, only four key species have been commercialized and widely used for T. absoluta control: the egg parasitoids Trichogramma pretiosum and Trichogramma achaeae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and the predatory mirids N. tenuis and M. pygmaeus [3,12]. While these agents were initially identified fortuitously or based on ease of mass rearing, they have since become foundational in T. absoluta management. N. tenuis, for example, was observed preying on T. absoluta in Spanish tomato crops shortly after the pest’s detection there [24]. This predator effectively controls T. absoluta by targeting its eggs and early larval stages, thereby helping reduce pest populations before larvae can cause significant damage to plants; however, N. tenuis, while effective as a biocontrol agent, can cause visible and sometimes economically significant plant damage due to phytophagy under low prey levels [27,28,29], prompting suggestions to exploit genetic variation to mitigate these effects [30].
M. pygmaeus, another major predator, is widely used in greenhouse tomato crops. It effectively suppresses T. absoluta by feeding on eggs and young larvae. Dissimilar to N. tenuis, M. pygmaeus is less likely to harm plants. Still, it does require alternative food sources, such as pollen or additional prey, to sustain its population and support reproduction [7]. This dependency limits its efficacy in open fields where food sources may be scarce, especially if T. absoluta populations are low. Both predatory mirids are synovigenic, meaning their reproductive success depends on continued food intake during adulthood. Studies suggest that when floral resources are available, these predators can increase their longevity and effectiveness in pest control [31].
The egg parasitoids T. pretiosum and T. achaeae have also been utilized, along with other species such as N. artynes and B. nigricans, which are important for targeting the larval stages of T. absoluta, though typically on a smaller scale and in controlled environments such as greenhouses. These parasitoids lay eggs within T. absoluta eggs, thereby preventing larval emergence. Because they target the pest at its earliest stage, Trichogramma species are valuable in reducing pest populations before significant damage occurs; however, their efficacy is constrained by the need for frequent and high-volume releases to maintain control, especially in larger fields [32,33]. The relatively short lifespans of Trichogramma species necessitate consistent reintroduction in the absence of stable populations, primarily limiting their application to greenhouses. Their effectiveness relies heavily on the rapid reproduction cycle and the ability to target multiple generations of T. absoluta. Still, this requirement for frequent release poses economic challenges in large-scale open-field settings [34].
The parasitoid N. artynes, an idiobiont ectoparasitoid that attacks T. absoluta larvae, has shown promise in pest control, particularly in the Mediterranean region. Native to the Palearctic, N. artynes primarily targets larvae of T. absoluta and has adapted well to Mediterranean climates where the pest is particularly damaging [35,36]. This parasitoid attacks second and third larval instars, feeding destructively on the pest’s body tissues. Synovigenic in nature, N. artynes females emerge with a limited number of mature eggs and require steady food sources to sustain oogenesis and maximize reproductive output [18,33]. Access to floral nectar or honeydew significantly boosts the reproductive success and longevity of N. artynes, enhancing its impact on T. absoluta populations. Research indicates that feeding on floral resources prolongs adult lifespans, which can increase pest suppression by sustaining N. artynes populations during periods of low pest density. Despite its adaptability and larval targeting capabilities, further research is necessary to optimize its commercial use in T. absoluta management programs [18].
Biological control agents such as N. tenuis and M. pygmaeus effectively suppress T. absoluta by targeting its eggs and larvae, the most vulnerable stages of the pest’s lifecycle. These predators exhibit a flexible feeding behavior, relying on alternative prey and plant-derived resources, such as floral nectar and pollen, to sustain their populations. As noted by Biondi et al. [3], access to alternative prey and supplementary food sources significantly enhances these species’ survival, fecundity, and predation efficiency. Similarly, Trichogramma parasitoids focus on egg parasitism, preventing larval emergence and mitigating foliar damage, with frequent releases enhancing their utility in greenhouse settings. N. artynes, an ectoparasitoid targeting larvae, disrupts the pest’s lifecycle and reduces crop damage, with its host-feeding behavior further boosting effectiveness when supported by floral nectar. Collectively, these biocontrol agents provide a comprehensive and sustainable approach to T. absoluta management, promoting pest control in tomato cultivation [23].

2.2. Role of Supplemental Floral Resources in Supporting Biocontrol Agent Performance Needs

The availability of floral resources, such as nectar and pollen, is crucial in enhancing the fitness, longevity, and reproductive success of biocontrol agents targeting T. absoluta. Floral nectar, rich in sugars such as sucrose, glucose, and fructose, is an essential energy source for parasitoids and predators [37]. Several studies have highlighted the positive effects of flowering plants, such as Lobularia maritima (Brassicales: Brassicaceae) and Fagopyrum esculentum (Caryophyllales: Polygonaceae), on the performance of natural enemies. For example, nectar from L. maritima has increased the longevity and fecundity of parasitoids such as N. artynes and predators such as M. pygmaeus [18,19,38]. Furthermore, recent research by [39] demonstrated that L. maritima flowers significantly improve the fitness of D. gelechiidivoris and enhance the biological control of T. absoluta by parasitoids. These findings underscore the vital role of nectar sources, such as those provided by L. maritima, in supporting the efficacy of biocontrol agents in tomato agroecosystems. In a field study conducted in 2019, eulophids, including N. tutae and braconids, were observed on L. maritima flower strips adjacent to tomato fields, further illustrating the importance of supplemental floral resources in improving biocontrol outcomes.
Pollen is a protein source, enhancing reproduction, especially for synovigenic species that rely on adult-acquired resources to produce eggs. Flowering plants around or within tomato fields—such as Verbena × hybrid Voss (Lamiales: Verbenaceae) and Scaevola aemula (Asterales: Goodeniaceae) can provide essential nutrition that supports the survival and reproduction of key predators such as M. pygmaeus and N. tenuis. For example, flowers such as Calendula officinalis (Asteraceae) planted in the margins of tomato crops have successfully been used to maintain populations of M. pygmaeus, resulting in earlier colonization and increased population densities in tomato crops [40,41]. This integration of flowering plants is essential in regions such as Northeast Spain and Southeast France, where predator population stability is crucial for pest suppression [42,43]. To improve the biocontrol of T. absoluta, Table 1 at the end summarizes key floral species such as L. maritima and F. esculentum, detailing their benefits in enhancing the longevity, reproduction, and foraging of biocontrol agents within IPM strategies. Adding such floral resources not only supports the nutritional needs of these mirid predators but also contributes to their persistence and dispersal, especially during periods when prey populations are low. Additionally, sugar dispensers on tomato plants can help manage mirid populations by curbing phytophagy, thus reducing plant damage while ensuring that predatory behaviors against pests remain effective [44]. Floral and extra floral nectar sources further contribute to an IPM strategy by enhancing the density and effectiveness of biological control agents, facilitating their ability to keep T. absoluta and other pests under control [45].

2.3. Shelter, Habitat Structure, and Environmental Stability

Structural elements within agricultural landscapes are pivotal in enhancing biocontrol agents’ survival, dispersal, and efficacy in targeting T. absoluta. Techniques such as intercropping, companion planting, and the establishment of ecological infrastructures, such as flower margins, provide critical shelter and create microhabitats that mitigate environmental stressors, including extreme climatic conditions and pesticide exposure. For instance, companion planting with S. indicum has been demonstrated to reduce plant damage associated with N. tenuis, thereby enhancing pest control in tomato crops while minimizing plant harm [33,51].
Crop architecture and adjacent natural habitats facilitate the colonization of predators and parasitoids, enabling their effective dispersion within agricultural systems. Such habitats supply nutritional resources, including pollen and nectar, alongside structural complexity, which collectively fulfill the ecological requirements of biocontrol agents. These integrations improve predator and parasitoid survival and bolster their performance within IPM frameworks [52,53]. Moreover, incorporating features such as natural vegetation strips and mulch layers enhances environmental stability by conserving soil moisture and providing protection against adverse conditions. These interventions contribute to the long-term sustainability of biological control programs by maintaining stable populations of natural enemies [54].
As summarized in Table 2, various habitat features play crucial roles in supporting biocontrol agents. For example, natural vegetation strips enhance predator persistence and dispersal, while artificial shelters provide critical refuges during adverse conditions. Similarly, mulch layers and perennial ground cover create favorable microhabitats, ensuring consistent support for predator establishment and reproduction. Shelter belts reduce wind speed and provide stable conditions for biocontrol agents, further reinforcing their effectiveness in pest management. These habitat features collectively improve the resilience and efficiency of biological control strategies.
Using banker plants represents another effective strategy, particularly in controlled environments such as greenhouses. Banker plants provide alternative prey or hosts, supporting the establishment and reproduction of natural enemies before pest infestations occur. This proactive approach enables predators to build their populations in advance, ensuring their readiness to suppress pests when infestations emerge [41]. This method has shown substantial efficacy with generalist predators, including mirid species, which benefit from structured habitats that simultaneously fulfill their shelter and nutritional needs.
Interactions between T. absoluta and other pest species within the same crop can further enhance the efficacy of biological control by promoting prey switching among generalist predators. This dynamic interaction contributes to pest suppression within IPM programs [7,55]. Strategic habitat modifications, including shelter plants and flower margins, create favorable conditions for natural enemies, reduce reliance on chemical pesticides, and support the implementation of sustainable pest management strategies in tomato cultivation.
Table 2. Influence of Shelter and Habitat Structure on the Performance and Stability of Biocontrol Agents in T. absoluta Integrated Pest Management.
Table 2. Influence of Shelter and Habitat Structure on the Performance and Stability of Biocontrol Agents in T. absoluta Integrated Pest Management.
Habitat FeatureBiocontrol Agent(s)Observed BenefitsDescriptionCitation
Natural vegetation stripsN. tenuis, M. pygmaeusEnhance persistence and dispersal of predators; provides continuous cover for natural enemiesEffective in reducing pest populations by maintaining predator stability in regions such as Northeast Spain and Southeast France[41]
Artificial sheltersN. artynes, Bracon nigricansProtect from adverse environmental factorsOffer refuge, especially during climatic extremes or pesticide application[56]
Hedge rowsN. tenuisReduce pesticide drift and enhance biodiversityActs as a buffer zone, providing environmental stability and habitat diversity[57]
Mulch layersM. pygmaeusCreate a favorable microclimate and support predator establishmentConserve soil moisture and improve local microhabitats[58]
Perennial ground coverN. tutaeSupport continuous habitat for reproductionProvide constant habitat for overwintering biocontrol agents[33]
Shelter beltsN. tenuis, N. artynesReduce wind speed and maintain stability for biocontrol agentsIt is essential for providing consistent shelter and stabilizing agent populations in open fields[59]

3. Nutritional Ecology of Biocontrol Agents in Enhancing Biological Control Efficacy

The study of nutritional ecology in biocontrol agents, particularly parasitoids, has revealed critical insights into how various food resources enhance their pest control potential. As adults, most parasitoids and many predators rely on sugar-rich resources to meet their energy requirements, influencing longevity, fecundity, and overall fitness, which are vital for effective pest control. Historically, practitioners have sought to boost the nutritional state of these agents by introducing flowering plants and artificial sugars in agroecosystems [60,61]. In many ecosystems, honeydew also represents a primary carbohydrate source, offering an often-overlooked nutritional reservoir [62]. This section explores biocontrol agents’ sugar and protein requirements, the impacts of nectar quality and accessibility, and the importance of spatial and temporal availability of floral resources for sustaining biocontrol efficacy.

3.1. Sugar-Rich Resources and Their Impact on Biocontrol Agent Fitness

Sugar-rich resources, particularly floral nectar and honeydew, are crucial for supporting the fitness and effectiveness of biocontrol agents in agricultural systems. The absence of sugar intake significantly reduces the fecundity and lifespan of parasitoids, impairing their ability to control pest populations effectively [45]. Nectar, with sugar concentrations ranging from 20% to as high as 80%, typically consists of sucrose, glucose, and fructose, which serve as essential energy sources for parasitoids and predators, enabling them to forage across larger areas and interact with prey more efficiently [63,64]. These sugars are indispensable for maintaining the sustained activity of biocontrol agents, particularly in agroecosystems where pests such as T. absoluta threaten crop productivity. While nectar is often preferred because of its optimal sugar composition, honeydew, excreted by sap-sucking insects, provides an abundant and accessible carbohydrate source, particularly in large-scale agricultural settings; however, the nutritional quality of honeydew varies significantly, as some oligosaccharides it contains are not metabolizable by parasitoids [65,66]. Incorporating diverse sugar-rich resources in farming landscapes reduces biocontrol agents’ reliance on floral nectar, ensuring their prolonged activity and effectiveness in pest suppression.
Several studies have highlighted the role of flowering plants in enhancing the performance of natural enemies. For instance, the nectar of Lobularia maritima serves as a nutrient-rich food source for N. tutae and Dolichogenidea gelechiidivoris (Marsh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), significantly reducing the percentage of live T. absoluta larvae in tomato crops [39,67]. This finding underscores the importance of sugary foods in supporting the foraging behavior of parasitoids, which is essential for successfully controlling pests during the early stages of infestation; however, questions remain regarding the nutritional profiles of carbohydrates and proteins in L. maritima nectar and the volatiles it emits, which may attract both parasitic wasps and pests such as T. absoluta. Notably, volatiles from L. maritima have been shown to positively affect other parasitic wasps, such as Cotesia vestalis, enhancing their foraging behavior and parasitism rates [68]. Additionally, research has demonstrated that C. vestalis benefits from floral nutrients, maturing more eggs for parasitism and extending its reproductive capacity [18,68,69].
Beyond nectar, other floral resources, including pollen and extrafloral nectaries, contribute to the nutritional needs of biocontrol agents. For example, feeding on corn pollen has been found to significantly extend the longevity of Trichogramma brassicae, illustrating the value of non-nectar sugar sources [70]. Moreover, the presence of Coriandrum sativum (Apiales: Apiaceae) in agricultural landscapes has been linked to increased fertility and reproductive success in indigenous predators, emphasizing the importance of diverse plant assemblages with overlapping flowering periods [45,71]. Such habitats support biocontrol agents and enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services, creating more resilient agroecosystems. Floral nectar provides more than just sugars; it also delivers proteins, amino acids, and lipids, which are vital for fecundity and egg maturation in parasitoids [67]. Deliberate selection and integration of flowering plants, such as L. maritima and C. sativum, into cropping systems extend the availability of these resources, significantly boosting biocontrol efficacy. Collectively, these findings emphasize the need for integrating sugar-rich resources into pest management strategies to sustain and enhance the performance of biocontrol agents [18,65,68,72]. Sugar-rich resources, such as floral nectar and honeydew, are essential for enhancing the performance and sustainability of biological control agents, and their strategic incorporation into cropping systems can strengthen pest management while promoting ecosystem resilience.

3.2. Protein and Amino Acid Contributions to Reproduction and Longevity

Proteins and amino acids in nectar play a substantial role in biocontrol agents’ reproductive success and longevity. Specific amino acids, such as proline and serine, contribute to the development and fecundity of many insect predators and parasitoids [73]. Nectar amino acids are particularly valuable for synovigenic parasitoids, which produce eggs throughout their adult life and require continuous access to external nutritional sources for reproduction. Studies on parasitic wasps, for example, indicate that protein and amino acid-rich sources can significantly impact egg production, leading to higher pest suppression rates [74].
In addition to sugars and amino acids, certain parasitoid species also engage in “host-feeding” behavior, consuming hemolymph from their host insects. This behavior allows them to obtain proteins directly from their prey, supplementing the typically carbohydrate-based diet provided by nectar and honeydew [75]. Host hemolymph provides proteinaceous materials necessary for egg production, otherwise absent in nectar [76]. By offering both nectar-based amino acids and host-derived proteins, agroecosystems can improve parasitoid populations’ reproductive potential and sustainability, facilitating more consistent biocontrol efficacy.

3.3. Nectar Quality and Floral Accessibility as Drivers of Biocontrol Efficacy

Nectar quality and accessibility are critical determinants of biocontrol agent feeding behavior and efficacy. Nectar compositions are rich in sugars, amino acids, and bioactive compounds, which optimize feeding efficiency and provide essential energy and reproductive benefits for sustained pest suppression [77]. Predatory wasps, for instance, rely on nectar sugars for energy and amino acids to enhance fertility and egg production, with these nutrients playing a vital role in extending their lifespan and improving pest control activity (Figure 1). Studies show that sugar concentration directly influences the energy expenditure and activity levels of biocontrol agents, increasing their ability to locate, pursue, and control prey [78]. Flower morphology, including corolla depth and structure, further affects nectar accessibility. Flowers with shallow corollas are generally more accessible, allowing a broader range of biocontrol species to utilize the nectar, whereas deep corollas may restrict access to species with specialized mouthparts [79].
Research has demonstrated that even slight differences in floral architecture can impact feeding behaviors, with more accessible flowers leading to higher feeding rates and, consequently, improved pest control outcomes [80]. Additionally, nectar quality varies significantly among plant species. Certain plants produce nectar containing secondary metabolites, which may deter or enhance feeding by specific biocontrol agents, affecting agent selection and pest suppression capabilities. Selecting flowering plants with optimal nectar compositions can improve the nutritional intake of biocontrol agents, making them more effective within agricultural landscapes [63]; however, it is essential to note that while nectar contributes significantly to biocontrol agents’ energy and reproductive potential, its role is most effective when combined with alternative nutrient sources, such as host hemolymph. For example, hemolymph-derived proteins aid tissue repair, while amino acids support egg production and reproduction. This synergy highlights the need for a diverse habitat that supports both floral and prey availability to maximize the efficacy of biocontrol agents. Future research should explore the precise balance of these nutrient sources and how agricultural landscapes can be optimized to sustain these essential ecological interactions.

3.4. Temporal and Spatial Availability of Floral Resources in Supporting Biocontrol Populations

Temporal resource continuity is vital for the lifecycle requirements of biocontrol agents. Many arthropods have stage-specific or season-specific resource needs, such as parasitoid wasps that depend on caterpillars during their larval stages but shift to nectar as adults or predatory beetles that use herbaceous vegetation in summer but overwinter in wooded areas [81,82]. Recognizing these dynamics, the movement of natural enemies into crops and their spillover back to natural vegetation is essential for maintaining population stability and resource access [83,84]. Ensuring such continuity can promote early recruitment of natural enemies, a key factor for effective pest suppression populations, essential for managing pests such as T. absoluta within sustainable IPM frameworks. Floral resources provide critical support for biocontrol agents, particularly during periods of low pest density, ensuring their persistence and readiness for pest outbreaks. This approach is widely applicable across agroecosystems, but a persistent bias in research has focused predominantly on developed regions [85,86].
Strategic spatial and temporal arrangements of floral resources are indispensable for biocontrol efficacy. Flower strips adjacent to fields provide immediate access to nectar and shelter from environmental stressors and pesticides [87]. These strips and a diversity of flowering plants staggered across bloom times ensure year-round resource availability. For example, continuous flowering supports parasitoid survival and prevents population bottlenecks that could undermine pest control [88,89]. Field studies corroborate these benefits: Balzan and Moonen [90] found increased natural enemy abundance and pest suppression in tomato fields integrated with flowering plants, while [19] reported enhanced parasitoid efficacy against T. absoluta in similar setups. Moreover, these strategies can foster biodiversity, creating an agroecosystem that supports a broader range of beneficial organisms beyond biocontrol agents.
The availability of specific floral resources, such as L. maritima, demonstrates context-dependent effects on biocontrol agents. While it supports parasitic wasps such as N. tutae under low host density conditions, it provides negligible benefits in high host density scenarios [18,19]. These findings highlight the need for tailored resource integration strategies based on specific crop–pest–biocontrol contexts and emphasize the importance of further research on long-term effects across growing seasons. Additionally, variations in floral resource availability must be assessed to prevent disruption of ecosystem balance by non-target species. Through intentional floral management, agricultural settings provide the highest biocontrol agent densities, while urban and rural areas show moderate to low densities due to limited floral resources [91]. This underscores the need for spatial and temporal floral resource planning for effective pest suppression. Integrating floral diversity into agricultural landscapes ensures stable biocontrol populations, reduces reliance on synthetic pesticides, and enhances pest management sustainability [92]. By aligning floral resource availability with biocontrol agents’ life cycles and nutritional needs, agricultural systems can achieve dual benefits, supporting biocontrol populations and enhancing resilience against pests such as T. absoluta. The seasonal dynamics of biocontrol populations, as shown in Figure 2, emphasize the importance of strategic floral planning for optimal pest control.

4. Synergistic Effects of Floral Resources on Biocontrol Agent Dynamics

4.1. Behavioral Patterns and Floral Resource Utilization

Conservation biological control (CBC) strategies focus on enhancing the environment to sustain natural arthropod enemies and maximize their efficacy in pest management through habitat modifications that provide essential resources [93]. Floral resources, such as nectar and pollen, have been shown to positively influence the movement, foraging behavior, and predation efficiency of biocontrol agents, thereby contributing to improved pest suppression in agricultural landscapes. By providing sustenance, floral resources support the longevity and fecundity of predators and parasitoids, critical factors for sustained biocontrol activity [78]. In diversified agroecosystems, where multiple crop and non-crop plants create varied phonologies, natural enemies often face challenges due to limited shelter and food, which are less accessible in simplified, monoculture-dominated landscapes. Here, the introduction of flowering plants around or within crops can provide crucial non-host-derived nutrients, including nectar from flowers and extra floral nectarines, which enhance biocontrol agents’ ability to locate, subdue, and reproduce effectively in proximity to pest populations [94].
Floral volatiles are crucial in mediating the attraction of biocontrol agents such as parasitoids and predators. These compounds, including terpenes, phenylpropanoids, and fatty acid derivatives, act as chemical cues that guide natural enemies to their hosts or prey. For example, terpenes such as linalool and pinene and phenylpropanoids such as eugenol are known to attract parasitoids such as N. artynes [18]. Fatty acid derivatives such as (E)-2-hexenal, emitted by flowers such as S. aemula, also enhance the foraging efficiency of biocontrol agents [19]. The presence of these volatiles signals the availability of both floral resources and pest populations, improving pest control by guiding natural enemies to infested areas [1].
Chemical ecology further aids CBC by identifying plants that can attract beneficial insects, improving crop pest suppression. Traditionally, CBC studies have emphasized attraction via insect-produced kairomones and herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs), which increase host-seeking efficiency among natural enemies [95]; however, the role of floral odors in this context, while comparatively underexplored, is crucial, as these scents communicate flower identity and nectar quality, potentially guiding biocontrol agents to beneficial plants [96]. Integrating flowering plants with desirable chemical cues could enhance CBC efforts, aligning pest control with sustainable, ecology-based agricultural practices.

4.2. Influence of Floral Resources on Parasitoid-Host Interaction

Floral resources significantly shape parasitoid-host interactions by providing essential nutrients that enhance parasitoid longevity, reproductive success, and efficacy in T. absoluta biocontrol. Floral odors, which carry information about the flower’s identity and nectar quality, can attract pollinators and parasitoids seeking nutrition for sustained parasitism activity. Model simulations reveal that parasitoids are more advantageous in visiting beautiful flowers with limited nectar accessibility, as these yield greater longevity and parasitism success than readily accessible but less attractive flowers [97]. Beyond this direct attraction, microbes present in floral nectar can modify nectar’s chemical composition, including sugar and amino acid profiles, through microbial volatiles. This microbial influence can alter floral attractiveness and nutrient availability for parasitoids, complicating the interactions between flowering plants and biocontrol agents [98]. Nutritional pathways play a pivotal role in shaping the efficacy of parasitoid-based biological control systems. Parasitoids benefit from two primary nutrient sources: nectar, providing sugars for energy and amino acids for reproduction, and protein-rich hosts, such as T. absoluta larvae, which support reproductive success; however, while floral resources enhance the survival and efficiency of primary parasitoids, they can also bolster hyperparasitoid populations, potentially undermining CBC strategies by reducing the primary parasitoid’s pest suppression capabilities (Figure 3). These changes introduce a “hidden” factor in CBC, as microbes may indirectly shape how parasitoids utilize floral resources [77]. Further complicating matters, hyperparasitoids—natural enemies of parasitoids—may also be attracted to the same resources, potentially reducing the effectiveness of CBC by preying on primary parasitoids [99].
The search for food and hosts in parasitoids is closely linked to their nutritional state. For example, starved C. vestalis females preferred floral scents over vegetative plant parts, indicating that energy-deprived parasitoids prioritize feeding [100]. On the other hand, well-fed parasitoids focused more on host searching, underscoring how adequate nutrition from floral resources can balance foraging behavior to improve parasitism. In monoculture-dominated agriculture, a lack of flowering vegetation limits food availability, often leaving parasitoids starved, significantly reducing their efficacy as biocontrol agents [40]. Nectar’s value goes beyond sugars, as it contains essential amino acids, proteins, and organic acids necessary for ovigenesis, particularly in synovigenic parasitoids that rely on adult-acquired nutrients for reproduction [101]. Floral nectar supports longevity for T. absoluta parasitoids, such as N. artynes, while protein-rich diets, typically sourced from pest larvae, are crucial for sustained egg production [18,102]. Floral resources not only attract parasitoids but also support their foraging and reproductive activities, which are critical to the success of CBC. The selective management of floral resources is essential to mitigate risks associated with hyperparasitoid attraction and microbial alterations to nectar, thus ensuring optimal efficacy in T. absoluta IPM.

5. Case Studies on the Use of Floral Resources to Enhance Biocontrol of T. absoluta

While research on the impact of floral resources, specifically on T. absoluta, is still being conducted, several case studies provide evidence of the measurable benefits of using flowering plants to support biocontrol agents. Balzan and Wäckers [18] investigated the effects of selected flowering plants on the fitness and efficacy of N. artynes, a parasitoid of T. absoluta. Their findings revealed that floral nectar from L. maritima increased parasitoid lifespan by an average of 35%, while nectar from buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) improved survival by 28%. Importantly, these benefits were not observed for T. absoluta, demonstrating the potential for targeted floral resources to strengthen biological control while avoiding unintended support for the pest.
Similarly, Kandori et al. [46] explored the use of V. hybrida and S. aemula as banker plants to sustain populations of N. tenuis, an effective predator of T. absoluta. These plants provided sugars, including fructose and glucose, which increased predator reproduction by 40% and survival by 50% in greenhouse environments. This approach reduced the dependency on alternative prey, making banker plants a practical solution for sustaining predator populations and improving pest control efficacy.
Arnó et al. [10] conducted a comparative evaluation of flowering plants to determine their suitability for supporting parasitoids of T. absoluta. They found that L. maritima and Fagopyrum esculentum significantly increased the longevity and egg load of Necremnus tutae and B. nigricans by 30–50% without extending the survival of T. absoluta. These results highlight the strategic value of these plants in IPM programs. In contrast, plants such as Achillea millefolium, Calendula officinalis (Asterales: Asteraceae), and Sinapis alba (Brassicales: Brassicaceae) provided mixed results, emphasizing the importance of plant selection based on specific biocontrol needs and environmental conditions.

6. Challenges and Future Directions

Integrating floral resources into IPM programs to control T. absoluta offers promising avenues for enhancing biocontrol efficacy, yet comes with significant challenges [103,104,105]. One primary challenge is achieving selective attraction, as floral resources ideally support beneficial species such as N. artynes and N. tenuis without unintentionally attracting other, less beneficial organisms or pests. [106]. Floral traits, such as specific volatile profiles, could be harnessed to ensure these resources appeal mainly to targeted biocontrol agents, thus minimizing the risk of attracting competitors or unintended species [107,108,109]. A related challenge is environmental variability, which can cause the efficacy of floral resources to fluctuate across different conditions [110]. Nectar quality, for example, can be highly influenced by climate, seasonality, and soil composition, affecting its role in supporting biocontrol agents [63,111]. This variability complicates the reliable application of IPM, as consistent pest control across diverse environments is necessary to ensure that the systems can be applied broadly and effectively [112]. The microorganisms in floral nectar add complexity to the utility of these resources. Nectar-inhabiting bacteria and fungi can alter the chemical makeup of nectar, sometimes changing its sugar concentration or amino acid profile, which can directly impact its attractiveness and nutritional value for biocontrol agents [113,114]. Such microbial modifications can significantly influence the survival, fecundity, and overall effectiveness of parasitoids or predators that rely on these nectar sources [115,116]. This potential for microbial impact reveals a gap in the current knowledge of IPM, suggesting further research to understand how these organisms influence biocontrol dynamics and whether they can be managed or leveraged to improve nectar quality [117,118].
Another critical factor is the temporal and spatial availability of floral resources, as inconsistent flowering periods or inadequate spatial arrangements can result in “resource gaps” that leave biocontrol agents without essential nutrients during key times in the pest control cycle [119]. Ensuring a continuous nectar supply throughout the growing season is crucial, as it helps maintain biocontrol agent populations through periods of low pest density, which would otherwise lead to population declines and reduce pest control efficacy when pest numbers rise [66]. Strategies such as staggered planting of various flowering species with different bloom times or positioning flower strips adjacent to crop fields are recommended to provide a steady flow of resources [120]. This targeted spatial and temporal deployment of resources not only sustains agent populations but can also provide accessible food sources and shelter from environmental stressors, thereby enhancing survival and performance [121]. Future research directions should prioritize the development of floral resource strips designed to selectively attract key biocontrol agents without benefiting pests such as T. absoluta or hyperparasitoids that prey on these beneficial insects [47,122]. By studying the floral traits that appeal specifically to natural enemies, such as unique volatile compounds or nectar profiles, researchers may create floral resource profiles tailored to maximize attraction to beneficial species while deterring others [123]. Such advancements could refine IPM strategies by providing targeted flower strips that effectively enhance pest control with fewer unintended consequences. Another promising area is exploring the role of nectar-associated microorganisms, as understanding how these microbes influence nectar chemistry could offer new ways to optimize floral resources for IPM [124]. Beneficial microbes might improve nectar quality, increasing biocontrol agents’ longevity and reproductive success; microbial volatiles could even act as chemical cues that enhance parasitoid attraction to appropriate flowering plants [77]. Future research could lead to microbial management strategies that further support biocontrol dynamics.
Optimizing temporal and spatial floral resource deployment through field studies would provide essential insights into the best practices for sustaining agent populations. Such studies could identify the most effective plant combinations for staggered flowering times, ensuring a continuous supply of nectar that bolsters agent presence across the growing season [125]. The strategic spatial placement of flower strips adjacent to or within crop fields can also retain biocontrol agents near pest populations, reducing the need for chemical inputs and allowing a steady, natural pest suppression response [126]. Additionally, such arrangements may help mitigate environmental stressors, such as pesticide drift, protecting biocontrol agents from harm [127]. Integrating banker plants with floral resources offers a complementary approach, where banker plants provide a steady source of prey or nectar for biocontrol agents, reducing the reliance on pests as food sources during off-peak pest periods. Banker plants such as V. hybrida and S. aemula have proven effective in supporting N. tenuis populations in greenhouse settings, thus reducing the need for chemical interventions [128].
Advances in chemical ecology could be pivotal in refining IPM systems further. Floral volatiles are specifically attractive to beneficial insects but unappealing to T. absoluta or hyperparasitoids, so they could be isolated and integrated into IPM strategies to strengthen biocontrol dynamics. Manipulating these volatiles could create flower strips that attract biocontrol agents and deter pests, adding a layer of pest management and reducing pest establishment near crop fields. This understanding of floral scents and preferences could foster selective attraction, ensuring that beneficial insects benefit while minimizing unintended attraction or pest facilitation risks.
The integration of floral resources into IPM systems represents a promising approach to enhance the biocontrol efficacy of T. absoluta by providing continuous support for beneficial agents; however, realizing the full potential of this approach requires addressing several complex challenges, including achieving selective attraction of natural enemies, adapting to variable environmental conditions, mitigating microbial influences on nectar, and optimizing the temporal and spatial availability of resources. Future research should focus on identifying floral species with the precise traits needed to attract and support biocontrol agents without benefiting pests or hyperparasitoids. Additionally, exploring the microbial ecology of nectar and its interactions with floral resources could further enhance the effectiveness of biocontrol agents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H. and Y.H.; methodology, M.H.; validation, A.B., I.U.H., M.A.G. and M.Y.; formal analysis, M.H.; investigation, M.H.; resources, Y.H.; data curation, M.H. and Z.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.; writing—review and editing, M.R.A. and Y.H.; visualization, M.H.; supervision, Y.H.; project administration, Y.H.; funding acquisition, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20489; 32361143791).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the valuable comments and suggestions from the reviewers and editors. We acknowledge using artificial intelligence tools for language editing and manuscript drafting assistance while the research, ideas, and conclusions remain solely the authors’ work. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version, maintaining full responsibility for its content.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Desneux, N.; Wajnberg, E.; Wyckhuys, K.A.; Burgio, G.; Arpaia, S.; Narváez-Vasquez, C.A.; González-Cabrera, J.; Catalán Ruescas, D.; Tabone, E.; Frandon, J. Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: Ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control. J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 197–215. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chinchilla-Ramírez, M.; Pérez-Hedo, M.; Pannebakker, B.A.; Urbaneja, A. Genetic variation in the feeding behavior of isofemale lines of Nesidiocoris tenuis. Insects 2020, 11, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Biondi, A.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Wan, F.H.; Desneux, N. Ecology, Worldwide Spread, and Management of the Invasive South American Tomato Pinworm, Tuta absoluta: Past, Present, and Future. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 239–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Balzan, M.V.; Moonen, A.C. Management strategies for the control of Tuta absoluta (L epidoptera: G elechiidae) damage in open-field cultivations of processing tomato in Tuscany (Italy). EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guedes, R.; Picanço, M. The tomato borer Tuta absoluta in South America: Pest status, management and insecticide resistance. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tarusikirwa, V.L.; Machekano, H.; Mutamiswa, R.; Chidawanyika, F.; Nyamukondiwa, C. Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on the “offensive” in Africa: Prospects for integrated management initiatives. Insects 2020, 11, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Konan, K.A.J.; Monticelli, L.S.; Ouali-N’Goran, S.-W.M.; Ramirez-Romero, R.; Martin, T.; Desneux, N. Combination of generalist predators, Nesidiocoris tenuis and Macrolophus pygmaeus, with a companion plant, Sesamum indicum: What benefit for biological control of Tuta absoluta? PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gabarra, R.; Riudavets, J.; Rodríguez, G.A.; Pujade-Villar, J.; Arnó, J. Prospects for the biological control of Drosophila suzukii. BioControl 2015, 60, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pérez-Hedo, M.; Riahi, C.; Urbaneja, A. Use of zoophytophagous mirid bugs in horticultural crops: Current challenges and future perspectives. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Arnó, J.; Molina, P.; Aparicio, Y.; Denis, C.; Gabarra, R.; Riudavets, J. Natural enemies associated with Tuta absoluta and functional biodiversity in vegetable crops. BioControl 2021, 66, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aynalem, B. Tomato leafminer [(Tuta absoluta Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)] and its current ecofriendly management strategies: A review. J. Agric. Biotechnol. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 10, 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferracini, C.; Bueno, V.H.; Dindo, M.L.; Ingegno, B.L.; Luna, M.G.; Salas Gervassio, N.G.; Sánchez, N.E.; Siscaro, G.; Van Lenteren, J.C.; Zappalà, L. Natural enemies of Tuta absoluta in the Mediterranean basin, Europe and South America. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 578–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chailleux, A.; Desneux, N.; Arnó, J.; Gabarra, R. Biology of two key Palaearctic larval ectoparasitoids when parasitizing the invasive pest Tuta absoluta. J. Pest Sci. 2014, 87, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mwangi, N.V.R.G.M. Prevalence of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) and Chemical Management in Loitoktok, Kajiado County, Kenya. Prevalence 2019, 9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wäckers, F. The parasitoids’ need for sweets: Sugars in mass rearing and biological control. In Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents: Theory and Testing Procedures; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2003; pp. 59–72. [Google Scholar]
  16. Benelli, G.; Giunti, G.; Tena, A.; Desneux, N.; Caselli, A.; Canale, A. The impact of adult diet on parasitoid reproductive performance. J Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 807–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jervis, M.A.; Ellers, J.; Harvey, J.A. Resource acquisition, allocation, and utilization in parasitoid reproductive strategies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008, 53, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balzan, M.V.; Wäckers, F.L. Flowers to selectively enhance the fitness of a host-feeding parasitoid: Adult feeding by Tuta absoluta and its parasitoid Necremnus artynes. Biocontrol 2013, 67, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arnó, J.; Oveja, M.F.; Gabarra, R. Selection of flowering plants to enhance the biological control of Tuta absoluta using parasitoids. Biocontrol 2018, 122, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, R. Bottom-Up Effects of Fertilization on Biocontrol Agents. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  21. Colmenarez, Y.C.; Vasquez, C. Benefits associated with the implementation of biological control programmes in Latin America. BioControl 2024, 69, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, P.; Bayram, Y.; Shaltiel-Harpaz, L.; Sohrabi, F.; Saji, A.; Esenali, U.T.; Jalilov, A.; Ali, A.; Shashank, P.R.; Ismoilov, K. Tuta absoluta continues to disperse in Asia: Damage, ongoing management and future challenges. J. Pest Sci. 2019, 92, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Desneux, N.; Han, P.; Mansour, R.; Arnó, J.; Brévault, T.; Campos, M.R.; Chailleux, A.; Guedes, R.N.; Karimi, J.; Konan, K.A.J. Integrated pest management of Tuta absoluta: Practical implementations across different world regions. J. Pest Sci. 2022, 95, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  24. Urbaneja, A.; Montón, H.; Mollá, O. Suitability of the tomato borer Tuta absoluta as prey for Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis. J. Appl. Entomol. 2009, 133, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Urbaneja, A.; González-Cabrera, J.; Arno, J.; Gabarra, R. Prospects for the biological control of Tuta absoluta in tomatoes of the Mediterranean basin. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1215–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cock, M.J.; van Lenteren, J.C.; Brodeur, J.; Barratt, B.I.; Bigler, F.; Bolckmans, K.; Cônsoli, F.L.; Haas, F.; Mason, P.G.; Parra, J.R.P. Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the convention on biological diversity threaten the future of biological control? BioControl 2010, 55, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pérez-Hedo, M.; Urbaneja, A. The Zoophytophagous Predator Nesidiocoris tenuis: A Successful But Controversial Biocontrol Agent in Tomato Crops. In Advances in Insect Control and Resistance Management; Horowitz, A., Ishaaya, I., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arnó, J.; Castañé, C.; Riudavets, J.; Gabarra, R. Risk of damage to tomato crops by the generalist zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter)(Hemiptera: Miridae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2010, 100, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cano, M.; Vila, E.; Janssen, D.; Bretones, G.; Salvador, E.; Lara, L.; Tellez, M. Selection of refuges for Nesidiocoris tenuis (Het.: Miridae) and Orius laevigatus (Het.: Anthocoridae): Virus reservoir risk assessment. IOBC WPRS Bull 2009, 49, 281–286. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dumont, F.; Aubry, O.; Lucas, E. From evolutionary aspects of zoophytophagy to biological control. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 6, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Amodeo, V. Intraguild Interactions Between Egg Parasitoids: From Laboratory to Field Investigations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cherif, A.; Mansour, R.; Grissa-Lebdi, K. The egg parasitoids Trichogramma: From laboratory mass rearing to biological control of lepidopteran pests. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2021, 31, 661–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonthier, J. Improving the Efficiency of Biological Control with Parasitoids for Tuta absoluta Pest Management. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Bern, Bern, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  34. White, B. Biological Control of Insects Pests; Scientific e-Resources: New Delhi, India, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Luna, M.; Sánchez, N.E.; Pereyra, P.C.; Nieves, E.; Savino, V.; Luft, E.; Virla, E.; Speranza, S. Biological control of Tuta absoluta in A rgentina and I taly: Evaluation of indigenous insects as natural enemies. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mansour, R.; Cherif, A.; Attia-Barhoumi, S.; Zappalà, L.; Grissa-Lebdi, K. Tuta absoluta in Tunisia: Ten years of invasion and pest management. Phytoparasitica 2019, 47, 461–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Badenes-Pérez, F.R. Trap crops and insectary plants in the order Brassicales. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2019, 112, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tompkins, J.-M.; Wratten, S.; Wäckers, F. Nectar to improve parasitoid fitness in biological control: Does the sucrose: Hexose ratio matter? BAAE 2010, 11, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Urbaneja Bernat, P.; Riudavets, J.; Denis Lopez, C.; Ojeda, J.; Alomar, O.; Arnó, J. Lobularia maritima as a nutrient-rich floral food source for two parasitoid wasps of Tuta absoluta. Entomol. Gen. 2024, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fataar, S.E. Promoting Cotesia rubecula Marshall, 1885 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Against the Cabbage Pest Pieris rapae Linnaeus, 1758 (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) through Flowering Plants. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ardanuy Gabarra, A.; Figueras, M.; Matas, M.; Arnó i Pujol, J.; Agustí Abella, N.; Alomar, Ò.; Albajes Garcia, R.; Gabarra i Ambert, R. Banker plants and landscape composition influence colonisation precocity of tomato greenhouses by mirid predators. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 95, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lantero, E.; Matallanas, B.; Callejas, C. Current status of the main olive pests: Useful integrated pest management strategies and genetic tools. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aparicio, Y.; Riudavets, J.; Gabarra, R.; Agustí, N.; Rodríguez-Gasol, N.; Alins, G.; Blasco-Moreno, A.; Arnó, J. Can insectary plants enhance the presence of natural enemies of the green peach aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Mediterranean peach orchards? J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pérez-Hedo, M.; Bouagga, S.; Zhang, N.X.; Moerkens, R.; Messelink, G.; Jaques, J.A.; Flors, V.; Broufas, G.; Urbaneja, A.; Pappas, M.L. Induction of plant defenses: The added value of zoophytophagous predators. J. Pest Sci. 2022, 95, 1501–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Heimpel, G.E.; Jervis, M.A. Does floral nectar improve biological control by parasitoids. In Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects: A Protective Mutualism and Its Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; pp. 267–304. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kandori, I.; Miura, S.; Yano, E.; Yoneya, K.; Akino, T. V erbena× hybrida and Scaevola aemula flowers provide nutrients for the reproduction of Nesidiocoris tenuis used for biological pest control in greenhouses. J Pest Sci. 2022, 95, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McGrath, H. Bespoke Field Margins Delivering Multiple Benefits to Fresh Produce. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading, Berkshire, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  48. Amoabeng, B. Dual Ecosystem Services from Non-Food Crop Vegetation: Benefits for Cabbage Pest Management. Ph.D. Thesis, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yadav, S.P.S.; Bhattarai, S.; Ghimire, N.P.; Yadav, B. A review on ecology, biology, and management of a detrimental pest, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Agric. Appl. Biol. 2022, 3, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chailleux, A.; Ndjiliw, S.; Diakhaté, M.; Akodjetin, G.F.; Correa, P.; Deletre, E.; Brévault, T. Approaches to conservation of Nesidiocoris tenuis for biological control of pests in field-grown tomato in Senegal. Biocontrol 2022, 172, 104984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vivekanandhan, P.; Swathy, K.; Sarayut, P.; Patcharin, K. Biology, classification, and entomopathogen-based management and their mode of action on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in Asia. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1429690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Han, P.; Rodriguez-Saona, C.; Zalucki, M.P.; Liu, S.-s.; Desneux, N. A theoretical framework to improve the adoption of green Integrated Pest Management tactics. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bottrell, D.; Schoenly, K. Integrated pest management for resource-limited farmers: Challenges for achieving ecological, social and economic sustainability. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 156, 408–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Evans, E.W. Dispersal in host–parasitoid interactions: Crop colonization by pests and specialist enemies. Insects 2018, 9, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chailleux, A.; Bearez, P.; Pizzol, J.; Amiens-Desneux, E.; Ramirez-Romero, R.; Desneux, N. Potential for combined use of parasitoids and generalist predators for biological control of the key invasive tomato pest Tuta absoluta. J. Pest Sci. 2013, 86, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Giorgini, M.; Guerrieri, E.; Cascone, P.; Gontijo, L. Current strategies and future outlook for managing the Neotropical tomato pest Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in the Mediterranean Basin. Neotrop. Entomol. 2019, 48, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bocca, F. Biology and Biocoenosis of Three Exotic Pests of the Vineyard Agroecosystem, with Particular Reference to New Associations Involving Palaearctic Parasitoids. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Torino, Torino, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kruidhof, H.M.; Elmer, W.H. Cultural methods for greenhouse pest and disease management. In Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 285–330. [Google Scholar]
  59. Miall, J. The Parasitoid Community Associated with the Invasive Leek Moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae): Can Conservation Biological Control Benefit an Introduced Classical Biological Control Agent in North America? Master’s Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, AB, Canada, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  60. Peri, E.; Moujahed, R.; Wajnberg, E.; Colazza, S. Applied chemical ecology to enhance insect parasitoid efficacy in the biological control of crop pests. In Chemical Ecology of Insects; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 234–267. [Google Scholar]
  61. Thompson, M.N.; Medina, R.F.; Helms, A.M.; Bernal, J.S. Improving natural enemy selection in biological control through greater attention to chemical ecology and host-associated differentiation of target arthropod pests. Insects 2022, 13, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ali, J.; Abbas, A.; Abbas, S.; Ji, Y.; Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Mahamood, M.; Chen, R. Honeydew: A keystone in insect–plant interactions, current insights and future perspectives. J. Appl. Entomol. 2024, 148, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wäckers, F.L.; Van Rijn, P.C. Pick and mix: Selecting flowering plants to meet the requirements of target biological control insects. In Biodiversity and Insect Pests: Key Issues for Sustainable Management; John Wiley and Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 139–165. [Google Scholar]
  64. Stone, C.M.; Foster, W.A. Plant-sugar feeding and vectorial capacity. In Ecology of Parasite-Vector Interactions; Wageningen Academic: Gelderland, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 35–79. [Google Scholar]
  65. Dong, Y.C.; Han, P.; Niu, C.Y.; Zappalà, L.; Amiens-Desneux, E.; Bearez, P.; Lavoir, A.V.; Biondi, A.; Desneux, N. Nitrogen and water inputs to tomato plant do not trigger bottom-up effects on a leafminer parasitoid through host and non-host exposures. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gillespie, M.A.; Gurr, G.M.; Wratten, S.D. Beyond nectar provision: The other resource requirements of parasitoid biological control agents. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2016, 159, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Heimpel, G.E. Linking parasitoid nectar feeding and dispersal in conservation biological control. Biocontrol 2019, 132, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, Y.; Mao, J.; Reynolds, O.L.; Chen, W.; He, W.; You, M.; Gurr, G.M. Alyssum (Lobularia maritima) selectively attracts and enhances the performance of Cotesia vestalis, a parasitoid of Plutella xylostella. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Aparicio, Y.; Gabarra, R.; Arnó, J. Attraction of Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) to sweet alyssum and assessment of plant resources effects on their fitness. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, G.; Zimmermann, O.; Hassan, S.A. Pollen as a source of food for egg parasitoids of the genus Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2004, 14, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hyder, M.; Li, Y.; Raza, M.F.; Zhang, M.; Chen, J.; Mao, J.; Bukero, A.; Zhang, L. Enhancing Coccinella Beetle Biological Pest Control via a Floral Approach in Cucumber Greenhouse. Life 2023, 13, 2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Martin, K.; Sauerborn, J.; Martin, K.; Sauerborn, J. Crops and their Environment. Agroecology 2013, 1, 103–185. [Google Scholar]
  73. Álvarez-Pérez, S.; Lievens, B.; de Vega, C. Floral nectar and honeydew microbial diversity and their role in biocontrol of insect pests and pollination. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2024, 61, 101138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cavallini, L. Can Conservation Biocontrol of Wheat Stem Sawfly Be Improved? Contributions of Supplemental Nutrition to Longevity, Egg Load, and Egg Volume of Bracon cephi and B. lissogaster. Master’s Thesis, Montana State University-Bozeman, Bozeman, MT, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  75. Strand, M.R.; Casas, J. Parasitoid and host nutritional physiology in behavioral ecology. In Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications; Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 113–128. [Google Scholar]
  76. Jervis, M.A.; Heimpel, G.E.; Ferns, P.N.; Harvey, J.A.; Kidd, N.A. Life-history strategies in parasitoid wasps: A comparative analysis of ‘ovigeny’. J. Anim. Ecol. 2001, 70, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Colazza, S.; Peri, E.; Cusumano, A. Chemical ecology of floral resources in conservation biological control. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2023, 68, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mills, N.J.; Wajnberg, É. Optimal foraging behavior and efficient biological control methods. Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications; Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sivinski, J.; Wahl, D.; Holler, T.; Al Dobai, S.; Sivinski, R. Conserving natural enemies with flowering plants: Estimating floral attractiveness to parasitic Hymenoptera and attraction’s relationship to flower and plant morphology. BioControl 2011, 58, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Abrahamczyk, S.; Kessler, M. Morphological and behavioural adaptations to feed on nectar: How feeding ecology determines the diversity and composition of hummingbird assemblages. J. Ornithol. 2015, 156, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rand, T.A.; Tylianakis, J.M.; Tscharntke, T. Spillover edge effects: The dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Blitzer, E.J.; Dormann, C.F.; Holzschuh, A.; Klein, A.-M.; Rand, T.A.; Tscharntke, T. Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 146, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ekbom, B.; Wiktelius, S.; Chiverton, P. Can polyphagous predators control the bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) in spring cereals? A simulation study. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1992, 65, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. van Rijn, P.C.; Kooijman, J.; Wäckers, F.L. The contribution of floral resources and honeydew to the performance of predatory hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae). Biol. Control 2013, 67, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wyckhuys, K.A.; Lu, Y.; Morales, H.; Vazquez, L.L.; Legaspi, J.C.; Eliopoulos, P.A.; Hernandez, L.M. Current status and potential of conservation biological control for agriculture in the developing world. Biocontrol 2013, 65, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Peñalver-Cruz, A.; Alvarez-Baca, J.K.; Alfaro-Tapia, A.; Gontijo, L.; Lavandero, B. Manipulation of agricultural habitats to improve conservation biological control in South America. Neotrop. Entomol. 2019, 48, 875–898. [Google Scholar]
  87. Hatt, S.; Xu, Q.; Francis, F.; Osawa, N. Aromatic plants of East Asia to enhance natural enemies towards biological control of insect pests. A review. Entomol. Gen. 2019, 38, 275–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Phanindra, P.; Vinay, M.; Paul, S.S.; Kotiyal, A. Regulations of Flowering in Fruit Crop for Higher Yield and Quality Production. In A Monthly Peer Reviewed Magazine for Agriculture and Allied Sciences; Scripown: New Delhi, India, 2024; 91p. [Google Scholar]
  89. Schellhorn, N.A.; Gagic, V.; Bommarco, R. Time will tell: Resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015, 30, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Balzan, M.; Moonen, A.C. Field margin vegetation enhances biological control and crop damage suppression from multiple pests in organic tomato fields. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2014, 150, 45–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Iuliano, B.; Gratton, C. Temporal resource (dis) continuity for conservation biological control: From field to landscape scales. Food Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Spiesman, B.; Iuliano, B.; Gratton, C. Temporal resource continuity increases predator abundance in a metapopulation model: Insights for conservation and biocontrol. Land 2020, 9, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rayl, R.J.; Shields, M.W.; Tiwari, S.; Wratten, S.D. Conservation biological control of insect pests. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 28: Ecology for Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 103–124. [Google Scholar]
  94. Gardiner, M. Good Garden Bugs: Everything You Need to Know About Beneficial Predatory Insects; Quarry Books: Beverly, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  95. Khan, Z.R.; James, D.G.; Midega, C.A.; Pickett, J.A. Chemical ecology and conservation biological control. Biocontrol 2008, 45, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Junker, R.R.; Romeike, T.; Keller, A.; Langen, D. Density-dependent negative responses by bumblebees to bacteria isolated from flowers. Apidologie 2014, 45, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bianchi, F.J.; Wäckers, F.L. Effects of flower attractiveness and nectar availability in field margins on biological control by parasitoids. Biocontrol 2008, 46, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lewis, W.; Stapel, J.O.; Cortesero, A.M.; Takasu, K. Understanding how parasitoids balance food and host needs: Importance to biological control. Biocontrol 1998, 11, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Snyder, W.E. Give predators a complement: Conserving natural enemy biodiversity to improve biocontrol. Biocontrol 2019, 135, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. You, S.; You, M.; Niu, D. Identification of floral volatiles from Fagopyrum esculentum that attract Cotesia vestalis with potentially better biocontrol efficacy against Plutella xylostella. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. dos Reis, D.A. The Potential of Sugar Resources in the Reproductive Biology of Wheat Stem Sawfly Parasitoids. Ph.D. Thesis, Montana State University-Bozeman, Bozeman, MT, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  102. Van Lenteren, J.C.; Alomar, O.; Ravensberg, W.J.; Urbaneja, A. Biological control agents for control of pests in greenhouses. In Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 409–439. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mancoa, E.; Lombardi, N.; Cascone, P.; de Kogel, W. Application of pheromone-based control of Tuta absoluta in greenhouse tomato IPM in Campania, southern Italy. In Proceedings of the IPM Innovation in Europe, Poznan, Poland, 14–16 January 2015. 42p. [Google Scholar]
  104. Qasim, M.; Islam, W.; Rizwan, M.; Hussain, D.; Noman, A.; Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Han, X. Impact of plant monoterpenes on insect pest management and insect-associated microbes. Heliyon 2024, 10, e39120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Liambila, R.N. Characterisation of Essential Oil Compounds and Optimisation of Water and Potassium for Production of Lantana camara (L.) for Tuta absoluta Management. Ph.D. Thesis, JKUAT-CoANRE, Juja, Kenia, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  106. Lahiri, S.; Orr, D. Biological control in tomato production systems: Theory and practice. In Sustainable Management of Arthropod Pests of Tomato; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 253–267. [Google Scholar]
  107. Lahlali, R.; Ezrari, S.; Radouane, N.; Kenfaoui, J.; Esmaeel, Q.; El Hamss, H.; Belabess, Z.; Barka, E.A. Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ferreira, F.V.; Musumeci, M.A. Trichoderma as biological control agent: Scope and prospects to improve efficacy. World J. Microbiol. Biot. 2021, 37, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Supriyadi, S.; Bashir, H. Effects of Sweet Alyssum (Lobularia maritima) on Parasitoid and Predator Diversity and Abundance in Agroecosystems Especially in Rice. Int. J. Agric. Biosci. 2024, 13, 347–355. [Google Scholar]
  110. Scheper, J.; Holzschuh, A.; Kuussaari, M.; Potts, S.G.; Rundlöf, M.; Smith, H.G.; Kleijn, D. Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss—A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Brito Vera, G.A.; Pérez, F. Floral nectar (FN): Drivers of variability, causes, and consequences. Bras. J. Bot. 2024, 47, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Thomas, M.B. Ecological approaches and the development of “truly integrated” pest management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 5944–5951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Morris, M.M.; Frixione, N.J.; Burkert, A.C.; Dinsdale, E.A.; Vannette, R.L. Microbial abundance, composition, and function in nectar are shaped by flower visitor identity. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Vannette, R.L. The floral microbiome: Plant, pollinator, and microbial perspectives. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2020, 51, 363–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cusumano, A.; Lievens, B. Microbe-mediated alterations in floral nectar: Consequences for insect parasitoids. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2023, 60, 101116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lenaerts, M.; Goelen, T.; Paulussen, C.; Herrera-Malaver, B.; Steensels, J.; Van den Ende, W.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Wäckers, F.; Jacquemyn, H.; Lievens, B. Nectar bacteria affect life history of a generalist aphid parasitoid by altering nectar chemistry. Funct. Ecol. 2017, 31, 2061–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gonzalez, F.; Tkaczuk, C.; Dinu, M.M.; Fiedler, Ż.; Vidal, S.; Zchori-Fein, E.; Messelink, G.J. New opportunities for the integration of microorganisms into biological pest control systems in greenhouse crops. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Wang, L.; Keyhani, N.O.; Xia, Y.; Xie, J. The potential and limitations of entomopathogenic fungi as biocontrol agents for insect pest management. Entomol. Gen. 2024, 44, 797–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Haan, N.L.; Iuliano, B.G.; Gratton, C.; Landis, D.A. Designing agricultural landscapes for arthropod-based ecosystem services in North America. In Advances in Ecological Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 64, pp. 191–250. [Google Scholar]
  120. Schütz, L.; Wenzel, B.; Rottstock, T.; Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S.; Golla, B.; Kehlenbeck, H. How to promote multifunctionality of vegetated strips in arable farming: A qualitative approach for Germany. Ecosphere 2022, 13, e4229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Le Billon, P. The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts. Pol. Geogr. 2001, 20, 561–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Eustacchio, E.; Bonelli, M.; Minici, A.; Melotto, A.; Dinatale, E.; Gobbi, M.; Gianfranceschi, L.; Casartelli, M.; Caccianiga, M. Plants and flower-visiting arthropods in mountain ecosystems: The case study of the alpine species Androsace brevis (Primulaceae). In Proceedings of the 11th European PhD Network “Insect Science” Annual Meeting, Online, 14–16 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  123. Jervis, M.A.; Lee, J.C.; Heimpel, G.E. Use of behavioural and life-history studies to understand the effects of habitat manipulation. In Ecological Engineering for Pest Management: Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods; CSIR: New Delhi, India, 2004; pp. 65–100. [Google Scholar]
  124. Fountain, M.T. Impacts of wildflower interventions on beneficial insects in fruit crops: A review. Insects 2022, 13, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Isaacs, R.; Williams, N.; Ellis, J.; Pitts-Singer, T.L.; Bommarco, R.; Vaughan, M. Integrated crop pollination: Combining strategies to ensure stable and sustainable yields of pollination-dependent crops. BAAE 2017, 22, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Holland, J.M.; Bianchi, F.J.; Entling, M.H.; Moonen, A.C.; Smith, B.M.; Jeanneret, P. Structure, function and management of semi-natural habitats for conservation biological control: A review of European studies. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1638–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Ekström, G.; Ekbom, B. Pest control in agro-ecosystems: An ecological approach. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Huang, N.; Enkegaard, A.; Osborne, L.S.; Ramakers, P.M.; Messelink, G.J.; Pijnakker, J.; Murphy, G. The banker plant method in biological control. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 259–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The figure illustrates predatory wasps’ dual nutrient acquisition strategies, emphasizing their dependence on host hemolymph and floral nectar. Host hemolymph, extracted from prey insects such as aphids, supplies amino acids that support reproduction and egg production and proteins essential for tissue repair. On the other hand, floral nectar provides amino acids that enhance fertility and egg production, along with sugars that offer energy and promote longevity. These nutrient sources synergistically improve the wasps’ lifespan and pest control efficacy, highlighting their critical role in ecological balance and integrated pest management.
Figure 1. The figure illustrates predatory wasps’ dual nutrient acquisition strategies, emphasizing their dependence on host hemolymph and floral nectar. Host hemolymph, extracted from prey insects such as aphids, supplies amino acids that support reproduction and egg production and proteins essential for tissue repair. On the other hand, floral nectar provides amino acids that enhance fertility and egg production, along with sugars that offer energy and promote longevity. These nutrient sources synergistically improve the wasps’ lifespan and pest control efficacy, highlighting their critical role in ecological balance and integrated pest management.
Plants 14 00319 g001
Figure 2. The circular diagram illustrates seasonal variations in insect density (High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) across three distinct settings: agricultural, urban, and rural areas. The inner sections depict seasonal changes affecting insect activity in spring, summer, autumn, and winter. Agricultural settings have the highest density of beneficial insects, such as lady beetles and parasitoids, supported by deliberate floral resource management. Urban areas maintain moderate densities, while rural regions show lower densities, reflecting limited floral resource availability. The visualization underscores the importance of floral resource planning in maintaining biocontrol agents’ populations year-round.
Figure 2. The circular diagram illustrates seasonal variations in insect density (High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) across three distinct settings: agricultural, urban, and rural areas. The inner sections depict seasonal changes affecting insect activity in spring, summer, autumn, and winter. Agricultural settings have the highest density of beneficial insects, such as lady beetles and parasitoids, supported by deliberate floral resource management. Urban areas maintain moderate densities, while rural regions show lower densities, reflecting limited floral resource availability. The visualization underscores the importance of floral resource planning in maintaining biocontrol agents’ populations year-round.
Plants 14 00319 g002
Figure 3. The figure illustrates the interaction between parasitoids, their prey (e.g., T. absoluta larvae), and the role of nectar in influencing biological control outcomes. 1. Nectar Pathway (Sugars, Amino Acids): Parasitoids that access nectar resources gain sugars for energy and amino acids for reproduction. 2. Host Pathway (Protein-Rich Diet): Parasitoids also derive proteins by parasitizing T. absoluta larvae, which supports their reproductive success and fitness. 3. Impact of Floral Resources on Hyperparasitoids: This highlights how nectar availability supports hyperparasitoid populations. At the same time, nectar resources are crucial for maintaining the primary parasitoid population.
Figure 3. The figure illustrates the interaction between parasitoids, their prey (e.g., T. absoluta larvae), and the role of nectar in influencing biological control outcomes. 1. Nectar Pathway (Sugars, Amino Acids): Parasitoids that access nectar resources gain sugars for energy and amino acids for reproduction. 2. Host Pathway (Protein-Rich Diet): Parasitoids also derive proteins by parasitizing T. absoluta larvae, which supports their reproductive success and fitness. 3. Impact of Floral Resources on Hyperparasitoids: This highlights how nectar availability supports hyperparasitoid populations. At the same time, nectar resources are crucial for maintaining the primary parasitoid population.
Plants 14 00319 g003
Table 1. Key Floral Resources Supporting Biocontrol Agents in the Management of T. absoluta. This table summarizes various flowering plants, their associated natural enemies, and specific benefits to biocontrol efficacy based on recent findings in integrated pest management (IPM) strategies.
Table 1. Key Floral Resources Supporting Biocontrol Agents in the Management of T. absoluta. This table summarizes various flowering plants, their associated natural enemies, and specific benefits to biocontrol efficacy based on recent findings in integrated pest management (IPM) strategies.
Floral SpeciesAssociated Biocontrol Agent(s)Specific BenefitsCitation
Lobularia maritima (Sweet Alyssum)N. artynes, N. tenuisIncrease longevity and fecundity; provides nectar and shelter for agents[18]
Fagopyrum esculentum (Buckwheat)Necremnus tutae, Bracon nigricansEnhance parasitoid survival and egg load[19]
Verbena × hybridaN. tenuisSupply essential sugars; supports reproduction in greenhouse settings[46]
Scaevola aemulaN. tenuisProvide fructose and glucose, enhancing predator survival[46]
Centaurea cyanus
(Cornflower)
N. artynesSupport parasitoid survival and foraging behavior[47]
Calendula officinalis (Marigold)M. pygmaeusPromote predator population density; effective in tomato crop margins[41]
Achillea millefolium (Yarrow)B. nigricans, N. tutaeEnhance parasitoid survival; does not benefit T. absoluta[10]
Sinapis alba
(White Mustard)
N. tenuisProvide pollen as a protein source; supports reproduction and fitness[18]
Borago officinalis
(Borage)
M. pygmaeus, N. tenuisIncrease predation rates; provides nectar with high nutritional value[48]
Cosmos bipinnatus
(Cosmos)
N. artynesBoost parasitoid fecundity and longevity[49]
Phacelia tanacetifolia (Lacy Phacelia)N. tenuis, M. pygmaeusEnhance foraging efficiency and lifespan[24]
Sesamum indicum
(Sesame)
N. tenuisReduce plant damage risk while enhancing pest control[50]
Vicia sativa (Vetch)N. artynes, B. nigricansProvide necessary proteins for egg production[8]
Lantana camaraN. tenuisIncrease longevity; provides rich nectar for biocontrol agents[48]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hyder, M.; Ul Haq, I.; Younas, M.; Ghafar, M.A.; Akhtar, M.R.; Ahmed, Z.; Bukero, A.; Hou, Y. Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol of Tuta absoluta Within Sustainable IPM Frameworks. Plants 2025, 14, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030319

AMA Style

Hyder M, Ul Haq I, Younas M, Ghafar MA, Akhtar MR, Ahmed Z, Bukero A, Hou Y. Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol of Tuta absoluta Within Sustainable IPM Frameworks. Plants. 2025; 14(3):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hyder, Moazam, Inzamam Ul Haq, Muhammad Younas, Muhammad Adeel Ghafar, Muhammad Rehan Akhtar, Zubair Ahmed, Aslam Bukero, and Youming Hou. 2025. "Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol of Tuta absoluta Within Sustainable IPM Frameworks" Plants 14, no. 3: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030319

APA Style

Hyder, M., Ul Haq, I., Younas, M., Ghafar, M. A., Akhtar, M. R., Ahmed, Z., Bukero, A., & Hou, Y. (2025). Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol of Tuta absoluta Within Sustainable IPM Frameworks. Plants, 14(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop