Next Article in Journal
Accumulation and Distribution Characteristics of Cd in the Soil-Lilium System and the Remediation Mechanism by Soil Amendments
Previous Article in Journal
A Precise Apple Quality Prediction Model Integrating Driving Factor Screening and BP Neural Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Overcoming Recalcitrance: A Review of Regeneration Methods and Challenges in Roses

by
Anna Nelson
1,2,
Thomas Ranney
2,
Wusheng Liu
2,
Tim Kelliher
2,3,
Hui Duan
4 and
Kedong Da
1,2,*
1
Plant Transformation Lab, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
2
Department of Horticultural Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
3
Genome Editing Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
4
USDA-ARS, U.S. National Arboretum, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(24), 3797; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243797
Submission received: 21 October 2025 / Revised: 29 November 2025 / Accepted: 8 December 2025 / Published: 13 December 2025

Abstract

Roses (Rosa spp.) are among the most economically and ornamentally important floricultural crops worldwide, yet their improvement is constrained by inefficient breeding methods. Tissue culture regeneration based plant transformation and genome editing technologies provide innovative and increasingly effective approaches to surmount these longstanding challenges; however, rose tissue culture regeneration remains notoriously recalcitrant. Successful plant regeneration in roses depends on multiple factors, including genotype, explant source, physiological status, and the precise combination of plant growth regulators and culture conditions. Over the past three decades, numerous efforts have focused on optimizing rose organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis systems. Despite progress, low regeneration frequencies, strong genotype dependency continue to limit molecular breeding and genome editing application in rose. This review synthesizes current advances in in vitro regeneration methods for roses, emphasizing key determinants of morphogenic response, including explant selection, hormonal balance, media composition, light and temperature regimes, and the organic and inorganic additives. The underlying causes of recalcitrance are discussed in relation to tissue physiology, biochemical and molecular regulation of morphogenesis. Finally, strategies for overcoming regeneration barriers—such as the use of morphogenic regulators and in planta transformation—are highlighted as emerging avenues toward cultivar independent transformation and genome editing for rose.
Keywords: Rosa; in vitro culture; regeneration; cultivar; explants Rosa; in vitro culture; regeneration; cultivar; explants
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nelson, A.; Ranney, T.; Liu, W.; Kelliher, T.; Duan, H.; Da, K. Overcoming Recalcitrance: A Review of Regeneration Methods and Challenges in Roses. Plants 2025, 14, 3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243797

AMA Style

Nelson A, Ranney T, Liu W, Kelliher T, Duan H, Da K. Overcoming Recalcitrance: A Review of Regeneration Methods and Challenges in Roses. Plants. 2025; 14(24):3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243797

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nelson, Anna, Thomas Ranney, Wusheng Liu, Tim Kelliher, Hui Duan, and Kedong Da. 2025. "Overcoming Recalcitrance: A Review of Regeneration Methods and Challenges in Roses" Plants 14, no. 24: 3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243797

APA Style

Nelson, A., Ranney, T., Liu, W., Kelliher, T., Duan, H., & Da, K. (2025). Overcoming Recalcitrance: A Review of Regeneration Methods and Challenges in Roses. Plants, 14(24), 3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243797

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop