Next Article in Journal
Metabolomics Reveals the Mechanism of Browning Inhibition by Transient Light Quality in Tea Plant Tissue Culture
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative Roles of miRNAs and circRNAs in Plant Antiviral Gene Regulation and Autophagy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Black Rice Performance Under Water Deficit Conditions and Genotype X Environment Interactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Responses to Different Magnesium Supply Treatments in the Mature Leaves of Cunninghamia lanceolata Seedlings: Morphological, Physiological, and Structural Perspectives

1
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Key Laboratory for Forest Adversity Physiological Ecology and Molecular Biology, Fuzhou 350002, China
3
College of Computer and Information Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(22), 3542; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223542
Submission received: 13 October 2025 / Revised: 14 November 2025 / Accepted: 17 November 2025 / Published: 20 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Responses of Crops to Abiotic Stress—2nd Edition)

Abstract

(1) Background: Repeated planting cycles and monoculture practices have led to widespread magnesium (Mg) deficiency in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantations. To gain clarity on how different Mg concentrations affect seedling growth and physiology, we designed the following experiment. (2) Methods: One-year-old seedlings were exposed to three Mg concentration treatments: High (HM), Medium (MM), and Low (LM). Their responses were evaluated in terms of growth traits, photosynthetic activity, and chloroplast structure. (3) Results: Both HM and LM significantly affected leaf development, with LM having the strongest impact. LM disrupted chloroplast structure, causing thylakoid membrane rupture, mitochondrial damage, accumulation of osmiophilic granules, and increased spacing between chloroplasts and cell walls. LM also impaired photosynthesis, lowering the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and peroxidase (POD) activity, while increasing malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. Leaf growth was reduced, as shown by smaller leaf area and lower biomass. In contrast, HM temporarily enhanced some physiological traits, including intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration rate (Tr), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), and ATPase activity, though it also reduced Fv/Fo compared to MM. (4) Conclusions: Both high and low Mg concentration negatively affected photosynthesis, with Mg deficiency causing the most severe damage. These findings highlight the importance of managing soil Mg levels to maintain healthy growth and productivity in C. lanceolata plantations.

1. Introduction

Photosynthesis is the foundation of plant productivity, supplying energy for most life on Earth [1]. As the primary site of photosynthesis, leaves are highly responsive to environmental conditions [2,3]. Their efficiency depends on chloroplast integrity, enzyme activity, and pigment content-factors closely linked to soil nutrient availability [4,5,6]. Among these nutrients, magnesium (Mg) plays a critical role. It is the central atom in chlorophyll and is essential for enzyme activation, membrane and ribosome stability, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and the regulation of oxidative stress [7].
Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.), a fast-growing conifer native to southern China, is a key species in regional plantation forestry [8] due to its economic value and adaptability [9,10]. However, its biology and management practices contribute to nutrient imbalances. Old leaves decompose slowly, limiting nutrient return to the soil [11]. Additionally, long-term monoculture and repeated rotations have caused ongoing nutrient depletion, including Mg loss [12,13], leading to declines in soil fertility and plantation productivity [14,15]. Research indicates that environmental stressors like high temperatures [16] and acid rain [17] further increase Mg leaching. Because Mg is mobile in soil [18] and competes with other ions [19,20], its effective availability is often low. Yet most fertilization regimes still prioritize nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, while Mg remains underutilized [21,22]. Targeted Mg management could improve photosynthetic performance and help restore productivity in nutrient-poor C. lanceolata stands [23,24].
From a plant developmental biology perspective, leaf development is co-regulated by multiple factors, including environmental conditions, nutrient status, hormones, and genetic control [25,26]. It typically follows a stage-specific developmental trajectory that progresses from primordium initiation and polarity establishment to subsequent expansion [27]. As leaves mature, their photosynthetic capacity gradually increases until reaching a stable level [28]. Previous studies have systematically elucidated the developmental processes of species such as Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) [29], Ginkgo biloba (ginkgo) [30], and Areca catechu (areca palm) [31]. However, research on C. lanceolata has predominantly focused on individual growth stages or isolated physiological and biochemical indicators [32,33]. To date, no study has comprehensively tracked the continuous dynamic changes in morphological development, physiological metabolism, and cellular structure of C. lanceolata throughout the entire process from bud germination to full leaf maturation [34]. This lack of systematic investigation has greatly constrained a holistic understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying leaf development in C. lanceolata.
As a core functional element of the plant photosynthetic system, Mg not only serves as the central atom of chlorophyll but also plays an essential role in key physiological processes such as photosynthetic electron transport and carbon assimilation [35,36]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that Mg deficiency impairs photosynthetic performance and overall plant vitality. Therefore, the scientific regulation of nutrient supply to optimize leaf photosynthetic characteristics represents an important strategy for overcoming obstacles associated with continuous cropping [37,38,39,40]. In this context, the present study employed C. lanceolata seedlings as experimental materials to systematically investigate the multi-level response mechanisms-from structural to physiological to phenotypic levels-of C. lanceolata under different Mg concentration treatments.
First, by observing chloroplast ultrastructure through transmission electron microscopy, we directly examined how varying Mg concentrations affect the integrity and stability of core chloroplast components (e.g., thylakoid membranes), thereby providing a cytological basis for analyzing changes in photosynthetic function. Next, the degree of Mg stress–induced inhibition of photosynthetic capacity was evaluated by determining leaf photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics. Meanwhile, through the assessment of antioxidant system activity and key photosynthetic enzyme activity, the underlying physiological mechanisms mediating these responses were further elucidated. Finally, the comprehensive effects of Mg stress on the growth and development of C. lanceolata were quantified by measuring leaf mineral element content and growth indicators such as leaf area.
Based on these research objectives, two core hypotheses were proposed in this study: (1) Low Mg concentrations disrupt the photosynthetic system at multiple levels, including chloroplast structure, enzyme activity, and photosynthetic physiological processes; and (2) both high and low magnesium concentration treatments disturb the normal growth pattern of seedlings, triggering adaptive regulatory mechanisms that enable them to cope with environmental stress. The findings of this study provide a theoretical foundation for precision Mg fertilization in C. lanceolata plantations in Mg-deficient regions and hold significant practical implications for promoting the sustainable management of C. lanceolata forests [39].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Site

The experiment was conducted in an artificial climate chamber at Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University where is located in Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China (119°27′ E, 26°09′ N). One-year-old clonal seedlings (clone 020) of C. lanceolata were sourced from the Yangkou State-owned Forest Farm in Shunchang County, Fujian Province. In March 2023, healthy seedlings with uniform growth and no visible pest or disease symptoms were selected. On average, seedlings measured 40.8 ± 1.3 cm in height, with a basal diameter of 0.44 ± 0.03 cm and a crown width of 16.7 ± 1.6 cm. Seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots (19 cm top diameter, 15.5 cm bottom diameter, 20 cm height) filled with a sterilized mixture of quartz sand and perlite (3:1, v/v; sieved to 1 mm). Transplanting occurred one month prior to treatment to allow for acclimation in a growth chamber. Environmental conditions were maintained at a photosynthetic photon flux intensity of 100–110 μmol·m−2·s−1, relative humidity of 65–70%, and temperature between 26 and 30 °C. During the acclimation period, seedlings were irrigated with a complete nutrient solution as described in Pérez-Harguindeguy’s study [41]. The nutrient solution contained macronutrients (2.5 mM KNO3, 2.5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.5 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4) and micronutrients (10 μM H3BO3, 2 μM MnCl2, 2 μM ZnSO4, 0.5 μM CuSO4, 0.065 μM (NH4)6Mo7O24, 20 μM Fe-EDTA). To prevent salt accumulation, roots were flushed with deionized water every 15 days.

2.2. Different Magnesium Concentration Treatments

Following acclimation, seedlings were rinsed with deionized water and randomly assigned to one of three magnesium (Mg) treatments: low Mg concentration, medium Mg concentration, and high Mg concentration. Each treatment group included 20 seedlings, for a total of 60. The three Mg treatments were implemented by adjusting the concentration of MgSO4 in the nutrient solution, while all other components of the nutrient solution remained constant. Specifically, the complete nutrient solution used for all treatments contained macronutrients (2.5 mM KNO3, 2.5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.5 mM KH2PO4) and micronutrients (10 μM H3BO3, 2 μM MnCl2, 2 μM ZnSO4, 0.5 μM CuSO4, 0.065 μM (NH4)6Mo7O24, 20 μM Fe-EDTA). For the low Mg concentration treatment (LM), no MgSO4 was added, and 1 mM Na2SO4 was included to maintain ion balance. For the medium Mg concentration treatment (MM), 1 mM MgSO4 was added. For the high Mg concentration treatment (HM), 3 mM MgSO4 was added. Seedlings were irrigated with 100 mL of the designated nutrient solution every two days and leached with deionized water every 15 days to prevent salt accumulation.

2.3. Sample Collection

Leaf physiological parameters were assayed at 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after treatment (DAT). Sampling positions were standardized by selecting the third whorl of lateral branches below the shoot apex. For each plant, one lateral branch was collected at each time point, with different branches used across time points to avoid excessive damage and ensure data reliability. If fewer than four lateral branches were present in the designated whorl, subsequent measurements were conducted by randomly selecting branches within the same whorl. From each selected lateral branch, twelve leaves were randomly collected and combined into three composite samples (four leaves per composite). Each composite sample was analyzed as one technical replicate, and the mean of the three replicates represented the physiological value for that plant. For each treatment group, twenty plants were independently sampled according to this protocol, yielding twenty biological replicates in total.
Prior to leaf harvesting, non-destructive measurements were performed on the pre-selected leaves, including the determination of photosynthetic parameters and the detection of chlorophyll fluorescence. Upon completion of these assessments, the target leaves were harvested for subsequent analyses. These analyses included the quantification of mineral element contents, the assay of antioxidant and photosynthetic enzyme activities, and the ultrastructural observation of chloroplasts via microtome sectioning.

2.4. Leaf Morphology and Biomass Measurement

Leaves were soaked in distilled water at 5 °C in the dark for 12 h to achieve full turgor. After gently blotting surface moisture with absorbent paper, saturated fresh weight and dry weight were measured using an analytical balance (CP224C, ±0.1 mg, Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ, USA). Leaf area was calculated using Image-Pro Plus 6.0. Samples were then oven-dried to a constant weight. Specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC) were calculated as follows:
SLA = leaf area/leaf dry weight
LDMC = leaf dry weight/saturated fresh weight

2.5. Determination of Mineral Elements in Leaves

Leaves were oven-dried (105 °C for 30 min, followed by 75 °C until constant weight), ground, and sieved through a 0.149 mm mesh. Total carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) were analyzed with an elemental analyzer (Vario Macro Cube). Phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), and aluminum (Al) were measured using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES; Perkin ICP-MS 8000, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) after H2SO4-HClO4 digestion.

2.6. Photosynthetic Physiology Analysis

Photosynthetic pigments [42]: Fresh leaves were extracted in 95% ethanol in darkness until fully decolorized. Extracts were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and absorbance was recorded using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 645, 663, and 470 nm to quantify chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids, respectively.
Chlorophyll fluorescence: Fluorescence measurements were taken between 9:00 and 11:00 a.m. on sunny days. After 30 min of dark adaptation, using a portable fluorometer (Pocket-PEA, Hansatech, UK). Parameters recorded included Fo, Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm, and Fv/Fo.
Gas exchange: The measurements were conducted from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on sunny days. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration rate (Tr), and water-use efficiency (WUE = Pn/Tr) were measured with a LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system under ambient CO2 concentration (400 μmol·mol−1). Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was adjusted to ambient light, with automatic control of airflow.

2.7. Oxidation-Related Indicators and Photosynthetic Enzyme Activities Analysis

The determinations of malondialdehyde (MDA) and peroxidase (POD) activity were performed following the methods described by Xudan Zhou et al. [43].
Lipid peroxidation: MDA content was determined using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method. Fresh leaves were ground with SiO2 and 10% trichloroacetic acid, reacted with 0.6% TBA at 100 °C for 15 min, and absorbance was measured at 532 nm.
Antioxidant enzymes: POD activity was measured using the guaiacol method. Fresh leaves were homogenized in phosphate buffer and centrifuged. The reaction mixture containing the enzyme extract, guaiacol, and H2O2 was prepared, and absorbance was recorded at 470 nm to determine POD activity.
Enzyme activities: Rubisco and Ca2+Mg2+-ATPase activities were quantified using commercial assay kits (Komin Biotechnology, Suzhou, China), following the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.8. Chloroplast Ultrastructure Observation

First, fixation was performed: leaf tissue cubes (<1 mm3 in size) were first fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 6 h, followed by three 15 min washes in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer. Subsequently, the samples were fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h and rinsed three more times with the same 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer, for 15 min per rinse. Next, dehydration was carried out: samples were sequentially dehydrated in a 4 °C refrigerator via immersion in 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol, 90% ethanol, a 1:1 mixture of 90% ethanol and 90% acetone, and 90% acetone, with 15–20 min per step, and after this gradient dehydration, they were rinsed three times with 100% acetone at room temperature, 15 min per rinse. Following dehydration, embedding was conducted: samples were first incubated at room temperature for 3–4 h in a 3:1 pure acetone-embedding medium mixture, then incubated overnight at room temperature in a 1:1 pure acetone-embedding medium mixture, followed by additional incubation in a 1:3 acetone–embedding medium mixture at room temperature, and finally treated with pure embedding medium three times at 37 °C, 2–3 h per treatment. Subsequently, polymerization was completed by first placing the samples in a 37 °C oven overnight, then moving them to a 45 °C oven for 12 h, and ultimately polymerizing them at 60 °C for 24 h. Finally, ultrathin sections (50–60 nm thick) were cut using an ultramicrotome, stained with a double protocol (3% uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate), and observed under a transmission electron microscope (FEI Tecnai Spirit G2 BioTWIN, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

2.9. Data Analysis and Structural Equation Model Construction

Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics 26.0. To evaluate the importance of each measurement indicator for constructing the structural equation model, an out-of-bag scoring random forest model was trained based on the final (120 days) and initial (30 days) values of the selected indicators. For each feature, 30 permutations were performed to calculate permutation importance analysis, assessing the extent of model performance degradation after permutation. SmartPLS v3.2.9 was used to construct the PLS-SEM model based on the residuals between the final and initial values of the selected features.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Magnesium Treatments on Leaf Morphology and Chemical Traits

Specific leaf area (SLA) declined over time under all treatments. Both the MM and HM groups showed an initial increase followed by a decrease, with SLA values in HM consistently lower than those in MM. In contrast, SLA in the LM declined steadily throughout the study. Although SLA in LM was significantly higher than the other treatments at 30 days, it became markedly lower by 60 days (Figure 1a). Leaf dry matter content (LDMC) increased progressively under all treatments. HM showed the highest LDMC, with significant differences emerging at 90 days. LM also exhibited higher LDMC than MM between 30 and 90 days, but by 120 days, no significant differences were observed among the three treatments (Figure 1b). Leaf area in both MM and LM followed a general pattern of increase, decline, and partial recovery. However, LM consistently had smaller leaf area than MM throughout. In contrast, HM showed a continuous increase followed by a decline, with a later peak than the other groups. At 90 days, leaf area in HM was significantly greater than in MM and LM (Figure 1c). Leaf dry weight increased steadily under all treatments. LM remained consistently lower than MM across all time points (Figure 1d).
Leaf nutrient concentrations shifted in response to magnesium availability. Nitrogen levels were higher in LM at 60 days but fell below those in MM and HM by 90 days (Figure 2a). Carbon concentrations were higher in HM during the early stages and significantly lower in LM at 60 days (Figure 2b). Magnesium content closely followed treatment levels, consistently ranking as HM > MM > LM (Figure 2d). Potassium displayed a decline followed by a rebound, with HM significantly lower than MM and LM in later stages (Figure 2e). Calcium increased over time across all treatments, though the rate of increase was slower in HM and LM (Figure 2f). Aluminum remained higher in MM, while HM showed significantly lower levels at 90 days and LM at 120 days (Figure 2h). Phosphorus and copper both exhibited overall declines, although copper exhibited a late-stage rebound in MM (Figure 2c,k). Iron, zinc, and manganese each declined initially before partially recovering, with MM maintaining slightly higher concentrations at the end of the experiment (Figure 2g,i,j).

3.2. Magnesium-Mediated Changes in Photosynthetic Performance and Chlorophyll Metabolism

Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), and carotenoids (Car) all followed a similar pattern, increasing during early development and declining later. Concentrations were lowest at 30 days and peaked between 60 and 90 days. At these peak stages, LM had significantly lower Chl a and Chl b levels compared to MM and HM. By 120 days, Chl a and Chl b concentrations in HM had declined below those in MM, while Car levels in LM were significantly higher than in the other treatments (Figure 3a–c). The Chl a/b ratio initially declined and later recovered, with a significant difference observed only at 60 days, when LM was lower than MM (Figure 3d).
Net photosynthetic rate (Pn) peaked at 30 days across all treatments before declining. HM maintained higher Pn values than MM and LM up to 60 days, but by 120 days, Pn in LM had dropped significantly below that in MM (Figure 4a). Intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) showed distinct patterns: HM declined steadily over time, MM peaked at 60 days before decreasing, and LM rose initially before falling (Figure 4b). Transpiration rate (Tr) followed a trend similar to Pn, peaking at 30 days. MM exhibited the lowest Tr at 90 days before recovering (Figure 4c). At 30 days, Gs increases with the rise in magnesium concentration. As the number of days of growth and development changes, Gs under HM and LM treatments gradually decreases. Under MM treatment, a trough appears at 90 days (Figure 4d). Water-use efficiency (WUE) peaked at 90 days under all treatments, with LM recording the lowest efficiency at that point (Figure 4e).
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters responded to changes in magnesium supply. Both minimal (Fo) and maximal (Fm) fluorescence increased initially, peaking between 60 and 90 days, before declining (Figure 5a,b). The Fv/Fm ratio reached its lowest point at 90 days, but exhibited no clear treatment-related differences except at 60 days, when the HM group was significantly lower (Figure 5c). A similar trend was observed in the Fv/Fo ratio, with HM falling significantly below MM at 60 days (Figure 5d).

3.3. Effects on Enzyme Activities: Carbon Assimilation and Oxidative Stress

Malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of oxidative stress, showed divergent trends across treatments. Levels in HM and MM peaked mid-period before declining, whereas LM fluctuated more strongly and peaked at 90 days. From 90 to 120 days, MDA levels in LM remained significantly higher than in HM and MM (Figure 6a). Peroxidase (POD) activity increased steadily in HM and MM but varied irregularly in LM, where it declined over time. MM consistently showed the highest POD activity (Figure 6b). Rubisco activity followed a rise-and-fall pattern across treatments. LM displayed marked fluctuations and differed significantly from HM and MM for most of the study period (Figure 6c). Ca2+Mg2+-ATPase activity varied sharply among treatments. At 30 days, activity was highest in HM, followed by LM and MM. LM peaked at 60 days before dropping sharply, while HM surpassed both other treatments at 90 and 120 days. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among treatments at most time points (Figure 6d).

3.4. Magnesium-Induced Changes in Chloroplast Ultrastructure

Transmission electron microscopy revealed progressively distinct ultrastructural differences among treatments (Figure 7). By 30–60 days, all groups had developed basic chloroplast structures. However, LM already showed irregular cell walls and loosely arranged chloroplasts, in contrast to the more organized structures in HM and MM. By 90 days, these differences became more pronounced. HM retained dense thylakoids and abundant osmiophilic granules, while MM exhibited well-organized thylakoids with few starch grains. In LM, chloroplasts appeared irregular, partially detached from the cell wall, with visible cavities. At 120 days, HM and MM maintained smooth cell walls and compact thylakoid organization, with HM showing a higher accumulation of osmiophilic granules. In contrast, LM displayed distorted cell walls, fragmented thylakoids, enlarged gaps between chloroplasts and the wall, and signs of mitochondrial degradation.

3.5. Key Factors Regulating Mature Leaves Growth Mediates by Different Magnesium Supply

An independent random forest analysis was performed to further identify the potential factors regulating mature leaf growth under varying levels of magnesium (Mg) supply. The analysis revealed that five variables, including Zn, Fv, Chla and et al., exhibited relatively small mean permutation errors (<0.0), suggesting weak associations with variations in mature leaf growth. In contrast, the remaining 19 variables were identified as potential influential factors (Figure 8a). Based on the regression residuals between the final and initial measurements, two partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) frameworks were subsequently constructed using the variables selected from the random forest analysis. The photosynthesis-related model (Figure 8b) indicated that both high (HM) and low (LM) Mg supplies indirectly affected the activity of key photosynthetic enzymes by modulating oxidative/antioxidative physiological responses and photosynthetic performance. Among all variables, MDA content showed the highest relative importance. Notably, the two key photosynthetic enzymes, Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase and Rubisco, exerted significant but opposite effects on the dry weight (DW) of mature leaves. In the nutrient-related model (Figure 8c), mobile nutrients (N, P, and K) and Ca content were identified as potential determinants of mature leaf growth. Moreover, MDA content mediated the effect of Mg supply on leaf aluminum (Al) content, which subsequently influenced DW through its impact on Ca content. It should be emphasized that the overall performance of both structural equation models was acceptable but not optimal, with GoF values of 0.39 and 0.34, and SRMR values of 0.093 and 0.109, respectively. The integration of the two models proved difficult, likely due to the inherent differences between the two categories of variables. Specifically, photosynthetic parameters represent the instantaneous physiological state of the photosynthetic apparatus, whereas nutrient parameters reflect longer-term processes such as absorption, translocation, accumulation, and remobilization.

4. Discussion

4.1. Dynamic Changes in Leaf Functional Traits During Development

Leaves are the main photosynthetic organ, and their development reflects the plant’s capacity to assimilate carbon. As leaves mature, specific leaf area (SLA) typically decreases [44], signaling a shift from rapid expansion to structural stability [45]. During this transition, antioxidant enzymes such as peroxidase (POD) help protect developing organelles by stabilizing thylakoid membranes [46,47].
Magnesium (Mg) plays a central role in regulating leaf traits in plants [48]. It supports chlorophyll synthesis and boosts photosynthetic efficiency [49], promoting both leaf expansion and pigment accumulation [50]. Mg also activates essential enzymes, including Rubisco [51] and Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase, which drive carbohydrate metabolism, energy transfer, and photosynthate transport [52]. In addition, Mg helps maintain POD activity and limits malondialdehyde (MDA) buildup, preserving membrane integrity [53,54]. It also stabilizes chloroplast structure, preventing thylakoid damage and sustaining photosynthetic function [55,56,57]. Altogether, these functions indicate that adequate Mg enhances structural stability, photosynthetic performance, and stress resistance [58].

4.2. Responses of C. lanceolata Leaves to Magnesium Stress

As a core component of chlorophyll [59], Mg directly influences enzyme activity, thylakoid stacking, fluorescence efficiency, photosystem II (PSII) function, carbon fixation, and electron transport [60]. Previous studies have shown that during leaf development, traits shift from acquisitive to conservative strategies [61], with corresponding adjustments in enzyme activity, nutrient allocation, and photosynthetic capacity. Understanding how leaves respond to Mg stress supports forest productivity, ecological restoration, and the management of C. lanceolata [62].
Low magnesium concentration treatments (LM), photosynthetic function is severely impaired. Chloroplast ultrastructure is disrupted [63], with fragmented thylakoids, damaged mitochondria, increased plastoglobuli, and widened gaps between chloroplasts and cell walls [64], all of which reduce light capture and electron transport efficiency. LM also disrupts PSII reaction centers and PSI electron flow [65], lowering photochemical conversion and altering gas exchange [66]. Pn drops sharply, Fv/Fm falls below 0.8 [67], and Fv/Fo remains consistently low [68]—clear signs of photodamage [69]. From the perspective of the dynamic changes in gas exchange parameters, there are significant differences in the limiting factors of photosynthesis at different growth stages. At 30 days, both Gs and Ci decreased with the reduction in Mg concentration, indicating that photosynthetic limitation at this stage was primarily stomatal. In contrast, at later stages, although the Pn continued to decline, Ci increased, suggesting that photosynthesis became progressively constrained by non-stomatal factors. This pattern is consistent with the findings of Lin-Tong Yang et al., who reported similar responses in Citrus sinensis grown under Mg-deficient conditions [70]. The lower Chla/b ratio during 60–90 days (particularly in LM) likely reflects enhanced Chlb synthesis to develop a more efficient light-harvesting antenna for maximal light capture and rapid growth. Its subsequent increase at 120 days may represent an adaptive response to excess light, preventing damage to the photosynthetic apparatus. Elevated Car levels may correspond to stage-specific roles-early photoprotection and preferential chlorophyll degradation at later stages. At the same time, the antioxidant system is activated under low magnesium treatment [71]: MDA levels spike [72], and POD activity declines [73], further indicating oxidative stress. Enzymes essential to photophosphorylation, including Rubisco and Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase, are also impaired [74]. Rubisco, a Mg-dependent enzyme [75], shows reduced activity under LM, though a temporary rise at day 60 may reflect compensatory accumulation. In addition, Mg deficiency affects SLA, LDMC, and pigment synthesis, shaped by both synergistic and antagonistic nutrient interactions [18,76]. Notably, elevated aluminum, a known phytotoxin, worsens Mg-related stress [77]. These combined perturbations reduce chlorophyll content, impair photosystem performance, and decrease carbon assimilation. Mg deficiency destabilizes ribosomes, impedes protein synthesis, and directly suppresses cell division, limiting the increase in leaf cell number [18]. Collectively, these findings suggest that magnesium deficiency disrupts key physiological processes in plants.
High magnesium concentration treatments (HM), on the other hand, had mixed effects. It enhanced Ci, Tr, and the activity of Rubisco and ATPase, delayed MDA accumulation [78], and extended leaf lifespan. However, as the most stress-sensitive component of the photosynthetic apparatus, PSII in the HM treatment likely exhibited an early detectable decline in efficiency at 60 days, as evidenced by the decrease in Fv/Fm [79]. The stress intensity at this stage remained relatively low, inducing only a slight numerical increase in POD activity without causing significant lipid peroxidation (no significant change in MDA), the photosynthetic system may already have experienced ionic imbalance or impaired photoprotective regulation under high Mg concentration. This could explain the seemingly contradictory phenomenon in HM, where certain photosynthetic parameters were enhanced while fluorescence parameters were inhibited. Such inconsistency may arise from imbalanced energy distribution mechanisms or dynamic ROS accumulation, leading to mismatched electron transport and photochemical quenching capacity. Consequently, accelerated electron flow without adequate energy dissipation renders PSII more susceptible to photooxidative damage. Overall, while moderate Mg levels promote photosynthesis and growth [80,81,82], excess input may destabilize the photosynthetic system. These findings highlight the necessity of precise regulation of Mg nutrition, balancing between deficiency and oversupply to sustain photosynthetic efficiency and ensure the healthy growth of C. lanceolata.

4.3. Growth Characteristics and Regulatory Factors of Mature Leaves in Cunninghamia lanceolata Seedlings Exposed to Magnesium Stress

The structural disintegration of cells serves as a critical indicator of the physiological status of mature leaves in Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings subjected to prolonged magnesium stress. This phenomenon is observed under both magnesium deficiency and excess conditions [40,83,84]. In the present investigation, MDA content occupies a central role within both structural equation models, where it exhibits consistent directional effects across all treatment conditions (Figure 6a, Figure 8b,c). This parameter integrates key characteristics of mature leaf growth, reflecting two fundamental processes: energy conversion and material accumulation. From the perspective of photosynthetic physiology, MDA content demonstrates a strong correlation with the activities of Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase and Rubisco, two enzymes pivotal in light energy conversion and carbon assimilation. These enzymes show a pronounced inverse relationship with dry matter accumulation in mature leaves (Figure 8b). The negative impact of Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase activity may be attributed to the energy consumption associated with stress-induced physiological responses [85], whereas the positive influence of Rubisco highlights the critical contribution of carbon fixation to dry matter accumulation. Abnormal expression of Rubisco-related genes and a decline in carboxylation rate under magnesium stress have been documented in various species, including banana [86], tomato [36], and tea [85]. Nevertheless, our analysis revealed no significant correlation between leaf carbon content and dry matter accumulation. In contrast, Papadakis, I.E. et al. reported the accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates in the leaves of Citrus sinensis cv. Newhall under magnesium deficiency [87], suggesting that labile carbon components might mitigate the adverse effects of impaired carbon fixation [88]. Furthermore, MDA content serves primarily as a marker of aluminum ion fluctuations within the leaf dry matter system, which are influenced by nutrient element accumulation under stress conditions. This alteration may be driven by the cell’s tendency to sequester toxic elements such as aluminum in aging or damaged vacuoles [89], which subsequently affects calcium accumulation in leaves through competitive binding at available sites [90]. In addition, the synergistic relationship between magnesium and potassium has been well-established in the literature. Excess magnesium increases potassium concentration in buds, while a negative correlation between these two elements is observed in leaves and roots [91]. This finding corroborates our results (Figure 8c) and underscores the general principle that mobile elements are preferentially allocated to growth points [92]. Papadakis, I.E. et al. proposed that phosphorus absorption is not influenced by magnesium efficiency [87], and our structural equation modeling further supports this by indicating that the relationship between magnesium treatments and phosphorus content is not statistically significant (Figure 8c). Nonetheless, phosphorus, like nitrogen and potassium, remains a crucial regulator of dry weight in mature leaves. In conclusion, our findings suggest that photosynthetic enzyme activities, the availability of mobile nutrients, and calcium content are pivotal determinants influencing the growth of mature leaves under magnesium stress in seedlings.

4.4. Practical Implications for C. lanceolata Plantation Management

C. lanceolata is one of China’s most important timber species. However, repeated monoculture has degraded soil fertility and reduced site productivity [93]. To reverse this trend, better nutrient cycling is needed, including practices like retaining harvest residues and maintaining understory vegetation to improve organic matter inputs [94].
Magnesium should be prioritized alongside nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in fertilization strategies [95,96]. Our findings show that low magnesium concentration impairs leaf development, photosynthetic efficiency, and chloroplast stability, underlining the need for supplementation. Regular soil testing and targeted Mg application should be incorporated into plantation management. Both foliar spraying and root-zone application are effective, and timing fertilization to match developmental stages can boost nutrient uptake [18,97]. Implementing these practices can improve photosynthesis, increase biomass yield, and support long-term soil fertility-ensuring more sustainable C. lanceolata plantation management.

4.5. Limitations

This study offers preliminary insights into the physiological responses and structural adaptations of photosynthetic tissues in mature C. lanceolata leaves under varying magnesium (Mg) supply conditions. However, several limitations warrant attention to improve future research in this area. A primary constraint was the limited sample size [98], which restricted the analytical depth and reduced the robustness of our conclusions. Given Mg’s essential role in photosynthesis, energy metabolism, and nutrient cycling, disruptions in its availability trigger complex physiological adjustments. The small dataset necessitated the use of a least squares model, which may have compromised the accuracy and generalizability of our results. Another notable limitation lies in the modeling framework, which did not adequately incorporate latent variables. This shortfall likely stems from both the sample limitations and the intrinsic characteristics of the measured parameters [98,99]. Mg deficiency influences multiple physiological pathways, with responses shaped by both immediate environmental fluctuations and cumulative stress effects. In our approach, we constructed separate models for photosynthetic and nutrient-related traits. Photosynthetic responses tend to vary with short-term environmental conditions (e.g., light intensity, air movement), whereas nutrient dynamics often reflect longer-term processes. While this distinction offered some analytical clarity, it may have overlooked important cross-system interactions and feedbacks. Future work should aim to refine modeling strategies by incorporating integrated variables that reflect both immediate and cumulative physiological responses. Increasing the sample size will also be critical to enhance statistical power and model reliability. Additionally, because Mg is a highly mobile nutrient, its redistribution and internal reutilization under stress conditions should be explored more thoroughly. Finally, this study focused exclusively on mature leaves, neglecting younger leaves and meristematic tissues, which are often more responsive to nutrient stress. Addressing this gap will be essential for developing a more comprehensive understanding of Mg dynamics in plant development.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that magnesium (Mg) supply levels regulate the photosynthetic performance and leaf functional traits of C. lanceolata seedlings. LM causes magnesium stress, disrupts chloroplast ultrastructure, impairs photochemical processes, and significantly reduces the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), accompanied by a decline in Fv/Fm below 0.8 and inhibition of Rubisco and Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase activities, ultimately altering key growth traits and lowering leaf dry matter content (LDMC). In contrast, moderate Mg supply enhances intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration rate (Tr), and the activities of Rubisco and ATPase while delaying MDA accumulation. However, it slightly decreases Fv/Fm. Overall, both high and low magnesium concentration treatments negatively influence leaf photosynthesis, with LM exerting a more pronounced inhibitory effect. Magnesium plays a complex regulatory role in plant physiology. However, the underlying signaling pathways and the roles of magnesium transporters remain largely unknown. Future studies using multi-omics approaches—such as transcriptomics and proteomics—are needed to identify the key genes and regulatory networks involved in magnesium stress responses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.D., C.W., G.C. and Y.C.; methodology, F.W., C.W. and G.D.; validation, Y.Z., B.S., S.L. and T.H.; formal analysis, F.W., Y.Z. and B.S.; investigation, F.W., C.W. and G.D.; resources, G.D., C.W., G.C. and Y.C.; data curation, Y.Z., B.S., S.L. and T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z., B.S., S.L., T.H. and F.W.; writing—review and editing, G.D., C.W., G.C. and Y.C.; supervision, G.D., C.W., G.C. and Y.C.; project administration, G.C. and Y.C.; funding acquisition, G.C. and Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD2201302), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32572020).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the support of Yangkou State-owned Forest Farm in Shunchang County, Fujian Province for assisting in sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yaniv, S.; Gadi, S.; Noam, A. Harnessing Photosynthesis to Produce Electricity Using Cyanobacteria, Green Algae, Seaweeds and Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 955843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Murchie, E.H.; Kefauver, S.; Araus, J.L.; Muller, O.; Rascher, U.; Flood, P.J.; Lawson, T. Measuring the Dynamic Photosynthome. Ann. Bot. 2018, 122, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Legris, M. Light and Temperature Regulation of Leaf Morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 2191–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qi, X.; Wang, W.; Hu, S.; Liu, M.; Zheng, C.; Sun, X. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Photosynthesis and Physiological Characteristics of Chry-Santhemum Seedlings Under High Temperature Stress. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 32, 2496–2504. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Verryckt, L.T.; Vicca, S.; Langenhove, L.V.; Stahl, C.; Asensio, D.; Urbina, I.; Ogaya, R.; Llusià, J.; Grau, O.; Peguero, G.; et al. Vertical Profiles of Leaf Photosynthesis and Leaf Traits and Soil Nutrients in Two Tropical Rainforests in French Guiana Before and After a 3-Year Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition Experiment. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, B.; Sui, Y.; Wang, B.; Yuan, F. How Membrane Receptors Mediate Biochemical Responses in Leaf Development Under Environmental Stresses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 21235–21246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nazir, A.; Zhang, B.; Bilquees, B.; Sadaruddin, C.; Mehtab, R.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Faisal, H.; Zaid, C.; Tu, P. The Power of Magnesium: Unlocking the Potential for Increased Yield, Quality, and Stress Tolerance of Horticultural Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1285512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Xiong, C.; Lou, Y.; Xu, H.; Cheng, Q.; Sun, S.; Xiao, F. High-Density Genetic Map and QTL Analysis in Cunninghamia lanceolate: Insights into Growth and Wood-Color Traits. Forests 2023, 14, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Han, Z.; Zhang, J.; Han, S.; Lin, H. Growth Characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata in China. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ren, X.; Jia, J.; Hu, Y.; Han, B.; Peng, P.; Zhang, M.; Liu, M. Cunninghamia lanceolata Cannot Depend Solely on Xylem Embolism Resistance to Withstand Porolonged Seasonal Drought. J. Hydrol. 2024, 645, 132255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, L.; Li, S.; Jia, Y.; Heal, K.V.; He, Z.; Wu, P.; Ma, X. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Canopy Litter and Nutrient Resorption in a Chronosequence of Different Development Stages of Cunninghamia lanceolata in Southeast China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 762, 143153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, J.; Deng, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Sun, J.; Meng, F.; Zuo, X.-H.; Wu, L.-k.; Cao, G.; Cao, S. Variations of Rhizosphere and Bulk Soil Microbial Community in Successive Planting of Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 954777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H.; Pan, F.; Wen, Z.; Chen, W.; Zhou, C. Impacts of Successive Chinese Fir Plantations on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics: Conclusive Insights from Metagenomic Analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 376, 124510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farooq, T.H.; Yan, W.; Rashid, M.H.U.; Tigabu, M.; Wu, P. Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) a Green Gold of China with Continues Decline in Its Productivity Over the Successive Rotations: A Review. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 11055–11067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shen, L.; Ye, S.; Liu, H.; Deng, X.; He, P.; Cheng, F. Linkage Between Leaf-Litter-Soil, Microbial Resource Limitation, and Carbon-Use Efficiency in Successive Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) Plantations. Forests 2023, 14, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jing, M.; Zhu, L.; Liu, S.; Cao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Yan, W. Warming-Induced Drought Leads to Tree Growth Decline in Subtropics: Evidence from Tree Rings in Central China. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 964400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ding, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, C.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, M.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X. Effects of Short-Term Simulated Acid Rain and Nitrogen Deposition on Soil Nutrients and Enzyme Activities in Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 12, 1365954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Senbayram, M.; Gransee, A.; Wahle, V.; Thiel, H. Role of Magnesium Fertilisers in Agriculture: Plant–soil Continuum. Crop Pasture Sci. 2015, 66, 1219–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qu, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Gao, J.; Ma, R.; Ma, L.; Ma, J. Effects of Magnesium Imbalance on Root Growth and Nutrient Absorption in Different Genotypes of Vegetable Crops. Plants 2023, 12, 3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Dwaipayan, S.; Soumi, D. Molecular Mechanism of Aluminum Tolerance in Plants: An Overview. In Plant Metal and Metalloid Transporters; Kumar, K., Srivastava, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 179–205. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fang, J.; Chen, B.; Wang, F.; Li, W.; Zhang, H.; Fang, J.; Liu, S.; Zheng, Z.; Guo, M.; Niu, S. Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Co-Limitation in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Global Meta-Analysis. Plants People Planet 2024, 6, 1329–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yahaya, S.M.; Mahmud, A.A.; Abdullahi, M.; Haruna, A. Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium as Fertilizers in Soil: A Review. Pedosphere 2023, 33, 385–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, Z.; Ren, T.; Li, Y.; Cakmak, I.; Lu, J. Nutrient Limitations on Photosynthesis: From Individual to Combinational Stresses. Trends Plant Sci. 2025, 30, 872–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhu, Y.; Ma, L.; Geng, S.; Ruan, J. Optimization of Nutrient Management Improves Productivity, Quality and Sustainability of Albino Tea Cultivar Baiye-1. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1369015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gong, Y.; Alassimone, J.; Varnau, R.; Sharma, N.; S, C.L.; C, B.D. Tuning self-renewal in the Arabidopsis Stomatal Lineage by Hormone and Nutrient Regulation of Asymmetric Cell Division. eLife 2021, 10, e63335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, P.; Li, Z.; Guo, H. New Advances in the Regulation of Leaf Senescence by Classical and Peptide Hormones. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 923136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gong, X.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; He, Y.; Jiang, D. Advancements in Rice Leaf Development Research. Plants 2024, 13, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lv, Z.; Zhao, W.; Kong, S.; Li, L.; Lin, S. Overview of Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Leaf Development: A Systematic Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1293424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Q.; Zheng, D.; Lian, N.; Zhu, X.; Wu, J. Hormonal Regulation and Stimulation Response of Jatropha curcas L. Homolog Overexpression on Tobacco Leaf Growth by Transcriptome Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, H.; Han, X.; Ruan, J.; Xu, L.; He, B. Transcriptome Analysis of Ginkgo biloba L. Leaves Across Late Developmental Stages Based on RNA-Seq and Co-Expression Network. Forests 2021, 12, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prathibha, V.H.; Rajesh, M.K.; Dinesh, A.; Patil, B.; Daliyamol; Nagaraja, N.R.; Rajkumar; Sabana, A.A.; Gangaraj, K.P.; Thejasri, K.P.; et al. Multi-Gene Phylogeny and Phenotypic Analyses Revealed an Association of Different Colletotrichum Species with Inflorescence Dieback and Leaf Spot of Arecanut in India. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2024, 134, 102416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Q.; Huang, Z.; Ma, X.; Mulualem, T.; Xing, X.; Jin, S.; Liu, B. Phenotypic Plasticity of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook. Seedlings in Response to Varied Light Quality Treatments. Forests 2022, 13, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Z.; Zhou, B. Effects of Simulated Nitrogen Deposition on the Physiological and Growth Characteristics of Seedlings of Two Typical Subtropical Tree Species. Plants 2025, 14, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, R.; Sun, Y.; Wu, B.; Duan, H.; Zheng, H.; Hu, D.; Lin, H.; Tong, Z.; Xu, J.; Li, Y. Somatic Embryogenesis of Immature Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook Zygotic Embryos. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tian, X.Y.; He, D.D.; Bai, S.; Zeng, W.Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, M.; Wu, L.Q.; Chen, Z.C. Physiological and Molecular Advances in Magnesium Nutrition of Plants. Plant Soil 2021, 468, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Tian, H.; Chai, G.; Muhammad, R.; Wang, Q.; Liang, B.; Wu, X. Comprehensive Analysis of the Effects on Photosynthesis and Energy Balance in Tomato Leaves Under Magnesium Deficiency. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 222, 109671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chaudhry, A.H.; Nayab, S.; Hussain, S.B.; Ali, M.; Zhiyong, P. Current Understandings on Magnesium Deficiency and Future Outlooks for Sustainable Agriculture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Li, R.; Wei, R.; Geng, X.; Zhang, X.; Wei, H.; Gao, P.; Xu, K.; Dai, Q.; et al. Foliar Magnesium Enhances Rice Salt Tolerance by Improving Photosynthesis and Regulating Ion Homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1578023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shi, Y.; Jin, X.; Ackah, M.; Amoako, F.K.; Li, J.; Tsigbey, V.E.; Li, H.; Cui, Z.; Sun, L.; Zhao, C.; et al. Comparative Physio-Biochemical and Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Contrasting Responses to Magnesium Imbalances in Leaves of Mulberry (Morus alba L.) Plants. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ye, X.; Chen, X.F.; Deng, C.L.; Yang, L.T.; Lai, N.W.; Guo, J.X.; Chen, L.S. Magnesium-Deficiency Effects on Pigments, Photosynthesis and Photosynthetic Electron Transport of Leaves, and Nutrients of Leaf Blades and Veins in Citrus Sinensis Seedlings. Plants 2019, 8, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perez-Harguindeguy, N.; Diaz, S.; Garnier, E.; Lavorel, S.; Poorter, H.; Jaureguiberry, P.; Bret-Harte, M.S.; Cornwell, W.K.; Craine, J.M.; Gurvich, D.E.; et al. New Handbook for Standardised Measurement of Plant Functional Traits Worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 2013, 61, 167–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, S.; Lu, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, C.; Wang, M.; Guo, J. Divergent Effects of Single and Combined Stress of Drought and Salinity on The Physiological Traits and Soil Properties of Platycladus Orientalis Saplings. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1351438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhou, X.; Jin, T.; Li, T.; An, Y.; Dai, X.; Zhao, C.; Qu, T. Euphorbia marginata Alleviate Heavy Metal Ni-Cu Combined Stress by Regulating the Synthesis of Signaling Factors and Flavonoid Organisms. Plants 2025, 14, 2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thakur, D.; Singh, L.; Chawla, A. Reliability of Leaf Functional Traits after Delayed Measurements. Aust. J. Bot. 2020, 68, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poorter, H.; Niinemets, U.; Poorter, L.; Wright, I.J.; Villar, R. Causes and Consequences of Variation in Leaf Mass Per Area (LMA): A Meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 565–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, X.; Li, N.; Ji, T.; Zhou, B.; Wei, M.; Li, J.; Yang, F. Effects of Microbial Agents and Corn Protein Ferment on Physiological Characteristics in Leaves and Yield of Tomato. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2023, 34, 3039–3044. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive Oxygen Species Signalling in Plant Stress Responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kong, L.L.; Huang, Z.Q.; He, Z.M.; Zheng, L.J.; Liu, Z.M.; Wang, M.H. Variations of Water Use Efficiency and Foliar Nutrient Concentrations in Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantations at Different Ages. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 28, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, S.; Zhao, S.; Wei, C.; Yu, S.; Shi, J.; Zhang, B. Effect of Magnesium Deficiency on Photosynthetic Physiology and Triacylglyceride (TAG) Accumulation of Chlorella Vulgaris. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2014, 35, 1462–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Niyogi, K.K.; Truong, T.B. Evolution of Flexible Non-photochemical Quenching Mechanisms that Regulate Light Harvesting in Oxygenic Photosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cakmak, I.; Kirkby, E.A. Role of Magnesium in Carbon Partitioning and Alleviating Photooxidative Damage. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 133, 692–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. He, H.; Veneklaas, E.J.; Kuo, J.; Lambers, H. Physiological and Ecological Significance of Biomineralization in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ye, X.; Gao, Z.; Xu, K.; Li, B.; Ren, T.; Li, X.; Cong, R.; Lu, Z.; Cakmak, I.; Lu, J. Photosynthetic Plasticity Aggravates the Susceptibility of Magnesium-Deficient Leaf to High Light in Rapeseed Plants: The importance of Rubisco and mesophyll conductance. Plant J. 2024, 117, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xiao, J.; Li, Y.; Jeong, B.R. Foliar Silicon Spray before Summer Cutting Propagation Enhances Resistance to Powdery Mildew of Daughter Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Kleczkowski, L.A. Implications of Adenylate Kinase-governed Equilibrium of Adenylates on Contents of Free Magnesium in Plant Cells and Compartments. Biochem. J. 2001, 360 Pt 1, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Kleczkowski, L.A. Magnesium and Cell Energetics in Plants under Anoxia. Biochem. J. 2011, 437, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Kleczkowski, L.A. Optimization of CO2 Fixation in Photosynthetic Cells Via Thermodynamic Buffering. Biosystems 2011, 103, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, L.; Lai, U.L.; Yang, S.; Chu, M.; Kuo, C.; Tsai, M.; Sun, C. Delayed Flower Senescence of Petunia Hybrida Plants Transformed with Antisense Broccoli ACC Synthase and ACC Oxidase Genes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007, 46, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tanaka, A.; Tanaka, R. Chlorophyll Metabolism. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fatemi, A.; Moaveni, P.; Daneshian, J.; Mozafari, H.; Ghaffari, M. Magnesium Nanoparticles Improve Grain Yield, Oil Percentage, Physiological, and Biochemical Traits of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under Drought Stress. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2022, 24, 665–678. [Google Scholar]
  61. Reich, P.B. The World-wide ‘Fast-slow’ Plant Economics Spectrum: A Traits Manifesto. J. Ecol. 2014, 102, 275–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Laughlin, D.C. The Intrinsic Dimensionality of Plant Traits and its Relevance to Community Assembly. J. Ecol. 2014, 102, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Setoodeh, A.; Sakinejad, T.; Shokuhfar, A.; Lack, S.; Mojaddam, M. Changes in Assimilate Partitioning and Remobilization and Maize Water Use Efficiency under Influence of Abscisic Acid and Magnesium-Potassium Ratio under Drought Stress Conditions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2025, 56, 1555–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Brehelin, C.; Kessler, F. The Plastoglobule: A Bag Full of Lipid Biochemistry Tricks. Photochem. Photobiol. 2008, 84, 1388–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xie, R.; Gao, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Tong, L.; Ke, Y.; Li, C.; Zheng, C.; Li, W. Improving High Light Tolerance of Tobacco Plants: Adequate Magnesium Supply Enhances Photosynthetic Performance. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pohland, A.-C.; Bernat, G.; Geimer, S.; Schneider, D. Mg2+ Limitation Leads to A Decrease in Chlorophyll, Resulting in an Unbalanced Photosynthetic Apparatus in The Cyanobacterium Synechocytis sp. PCC6803. Photosynth. Res. 2024, 162, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yang, G.; Yang, L.; Jiang, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Chen, L. Physiological Impacts of Magnesium-Deficiency in Citrus Seedlings: Photosynthesis, Antioxidant System and Carbohydrates. Trees-Struct. Funct. 2012, 26, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kalaji, H.M.; Jajoo, A.; Oukarroum, A.; Brestic, M.; Zivcak, M.; Samborska, I.A.; Cetner, M.D.; Lukasik, I.; Goltsev, V.; Ladle, R.J. Chlorophyll A Fluorescence as A Tool to Monitor Physiological Status of Plants under Abiotic Stress Conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kovenock, M.; Koven, C.D.; Knox, R.G.; Fisher, R.A.; Swann, A.L.S. Leaf Trait Plasticity Alters Competitive Ability and Functioning of Simulated Tropical Trees in Response to Elevated Carbon Dioxide. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2021, 35, e2020GB006807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, L.T.; Zhou, Y.F.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wu, Y.M.; Ye, X.; Guo, J.X.; Chen, L.S. Magnesium Deficiency Induced Global Transcriptome Change in Citrus sinensis Leaves Revealed by RNA-Seq. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Driever, S.M.; Simkin, A.J.; Alotaibi, S.; Fisk, S.J.; Madgwick, P.J.; Sparks, C.A.; Jones, H.D.; Lawson, T.; Parry, M.A.J.; Raines, C.A. Increased SBPase Activity Improves Photosynthesis and Grain Yield in Wheat Grown in Greenhouse Conditions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tan, S.; Yang, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhang, S.; Huang, W. Responses of Photosystem I Compared with Photosystem II to Combination of Heat Stress and Fluctuating Light in Tobacco leaves. Plant Sci. 2020, 292, 110371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cejudo, F.J.; Sandalio, L.M.; Van Breusegem, F. Understanding Plant Responses to Stress Conditions: Redox-based Strategies. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 5785–5788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rabhi, M.; Farhat, N.; Krol, M.; Barhoumi, Z.; Ivanov, A.G.; McCarthy, A.; Abdelly, C.; Huner, N.P.A.; Smaoui, A. Effects of Mg Deficiency and Subsequent Recovery on Sulla Carnosa Leaves. Agrochimica 2017, 61, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Parisa, D.; Repnik, U.; Abdalla, M.A.; Muehling, K.H. Leaf Anatomical Adaptation and Chloroplast Ultrastructure Changes Upon Magnesium Foliar Application of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Grown Under Drought Stress. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2025, 188, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Minden, V.; Kleyer, M. Internal and External Regulation of Plant Organ Stoichiometry. Plant Biol. 2014, 16, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kochian, L.V.; Pineros, M.A.; Liu, J.; Magalhaes, J.V. Plant Adaptation to Acid Soils: The Molecular Basis for Crop Aluminum Resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 571–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Khator, K.; Shekhawat, G.S. Nitric oxide Mitigates Salt-induced Oxidative Stress in Brassica Juncea Seedlings by Regulating ROS Metabolism and Antioxidant Defense System. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Patel, M.; Rangani, J.; Kumari, A.; Parida, A.K. Mineral Nutrient Homeostasis, Photosynthetic Performance, and Modulations of Antioxidative Defense Components in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Arachis hypogaea L. (peanut) for Mitigation of Nitrogen and/or Phosphorus Starvation. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 323, 136–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Farhat, N.; Elkhouni, A.; Zorrig, W.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C.; Rabhi, M. Effects of Magnesium Deficiency on Photosynthesis and Carbohydrate Partitioning. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guo, W.; Nazim, H.; Liang, Z.; Yang, D. Magnesium Deficiency in Plants: An Urgent Problem. Crop J. 2016, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tang, X.; Wei, C.; Gao, L.; Jia, B.; Lu, X. Similarity in Fine-to-Total Root Mass Ratio Leads to Comparative Plant-Soil Feedbacks between Co-occurring Native and Invasive Plants. J. Plant Ecol. 2021, 14, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ouni, A.; Abboud, S.; Tlili, D.; Ben Abdelwaheb, S.; Jellali, M.; Bousetta, W.; Mars, M.; Dbara, S. Growth Disturbance, Mineral Nutrient Imbalance, Specific Symptoms and Leaf Characteristics Changes in Two Pomegranate Cultivars Induced by Deficiencies and Excess of Ca, Mg, Zn and Fe. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 24, 8291–8305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, H.; Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Gao, J.; Chen, P. Magnesium Deficiency or Excess Hinders Tomato Growth, Potassium and Calcium Uptake. Plant Soil Environ. 2024, 70, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, J.; Li, Q.-H.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Zhang, L.-Y.; Zhao, P.-L.; Wen, T.; Zhang, J.-Q.; Xu, W.-L.; Guo, F.; Zhao, H.; et al. Exploring the Effects of Magnesium Deficiency on the Quality Constituents of Hydroponic-Cultivated Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14278–14286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kan, B.; Yang, Y.; Du, P.; Li, X.; Lai, W.; Hu, H. Chlorophyll decomposition is accelerated in banana leaves after the long-term magnesium deficiency according to transcriptome analysis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0270610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Papadakis, I.E.; Antonopoulou, C.; Sotiropoulos, T.; Chatzissavvidis, C.; Therios, I. Effect of Magnesium on Mineral Nutrition, Chlorophyll, Proline and Carbohydrate Concentrations of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis cv. Newhall) Plants. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Huang, Z.R.; Zhang, H.; Ye, X.; Lai, N.W.; Yang, L.T.; Guo, J.X.; Chen, L.S. UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS-based metabolomics reveals altered metabolic profiles in magnesium deficient leaves of Citrus sinensis. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 278, 109870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yamaji, N.; Huang, C.F.; Nagao, S.; Yano, M.; Sato, Y.; Nagamura, Y.; Ma, J.F. A Zinc Finger Transcription Factor ART1 Regulates Multiple Genes Implicated in Aluminum Tolerance in Rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3339–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kochian, L.V.; Piñeros, M.A.; Hoekenga, O.A. The Physiology, Genetics and Molecular Biology of Plant Aluminum Resistance and Toxicity. Plant Soil 2005, 274, 175–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lamichhane, S.; Tarpley, L.; Dou, F. Impact of Excess Magnesium Salt Supply on Rice Yield, Physiological Response, and Grain Mineral Content. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Guo, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Hu, W.; Zhang, L.; Luo, Z.; Xu, H.; Chen, L.-S. Magnesium Deficiency Induced Leaf Chlorosis Affects Plant Growth, Mineral Concentration and Fruit Quality in Field Pomelo Trees. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 18, 101338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Berthrong, S.T.; Jobbagy, E.G.; Jackson, R.B. A Global Meta-analysis of Soil Exchangeable Cations, PH, Carbon, and Nitrogen with Afforestation. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 2228–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. James, J.; Harrison, R. The Effect of Harvest on Forest Soil Carbon: A Meta-Analysis. Forests 2016, 7, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Vadeboncoeur, M.A. Meta-analysis of Fertilization Experiments Indicates Multiple Limiting Nutrients in Northeastern Deciduous Forests. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40, 1766–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, Y.; Long, Q.; Li, Y.; Kang, F.; Fan, Z.; Xiong, H.; Zhao, H.; Luo, Y.; Guo, R.; He, X.; et al. Mitigating Magnesium Deficiency for Sustainable Citrus Production: A Case Study in Southwest China. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 295, 110832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, Z.; Hassan, M.U.; Nadeem, F.; Wu, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, X. Magnesium Fertilization Improves Crop Yield in Most Production Systems: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lamb, E.; Shirtliffe, S.; May, W. Structural Equation Modeling in the Plant Sciences: An Example Using Yield Components in Oat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 91, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Leaf morphological traits of C. lanceolata under different magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf area, and leaf dry weight, respectively. SLA was calculated as leaf area divided by dry weight. The x-axis shows sampling time (30, 60, 90, and 120 days). Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Leaf morphological traits of C. lanceolata under different magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf area, and leaf dry weight, respectively. SLA was calculated as leaf area divided by dry weight. The x-axis shows sampling time (30, 60, 90, and 120 days). Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Plants 14 03542 g001
Figure 2. Concentrations of mineral elements in C. lanceolata leaves under different magnesium treatments. Panels (ak) represent nitrogen (N), carbon (C), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), aluminum (Al), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and copper (Cu), expressed as mg·g−1. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Concentrations of mineral elements in C. lanceolata leaves under different magnesium treatments. Panels (ak) represent nitrogen (N), carbon (C), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), aluminum (Al), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and copper (Cu), expressed as mg·g−1. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Plants 14 03542 g002
Figure 3. Photosynthetic pigments in C. lanceolata leaves under different magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show Chl a, Chl b, carotenoids, and the Chl a/b ratio. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Photosynthetic pigments in C. lanceolata leaves under different magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show Chl a, Chl b, carotenoids, and the Chl a/b ratio. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Plants 14 03542 g003
Figure 4. Photosynthetic parameters in C. lanceolata under magnesium treatments. Panels (ae) show Pn, Ci, Tr, Gs and WUE. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Photosynthetic parameters in C. lanceolata under magnesium treatments. Panels (ae) show Pn, Ci, Tr, Gs and WUE. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Plants 14 03542 g004
Figure 5. Chlorophyll fluorescence traits in C. lanceolata under magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, and Fv/Fo. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Chlorophyll fluorescence traits in C. lanceolata under magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, and Fv/Fo. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Plants 14 03542 g005
Figure 6. Antioxidant and photosynthetic enzyme activities in C. lanceolata leaves under magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show MDA, POD, Rubisco, and Ca2+Mg2+-ATPase. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Antioxidant and photosynthetic enzyme activities in C. lanceolata leaves under magnesium treatments. Panels (ad) show MDA, POD, Rubisco, and Ca2+Mg2+-ATPase. Values are means ± SE (n = 20). Uppercase letters indicate significant differences across time points within a treatment, and lowercase letters indicate differences among treatments at the same time (p < 0.05).
Plants 14 03542 g006
Figure 7. Chloroplast ultrastructure in newly developed leaves of C. lanceolata under magnesium treatments. St = starch grain, Hu = osmiophilic granule, Mi = mitochondrion, Chl = chloroplast, Cw = cell wall, Cm = chloroplast membrane, Th = thylakoid, Nu = nucleus.
Figure 7. Chloroplast ultrastructure in newly developed leaves of C. lanceolata under magnesium treatments. St = starch grain, Hu = osmiophilic granule, Mi = mitochondrion, Chl = chloroplast, Cw = cell wall, Cm = chloroplast membrane, Th = thylakoid, Nu = nucleus.
Plants 14 03542 g007
Figure 8. Structural equation model depicting the multi-indicator importance assessment and the influence of divergent magnesium treatments on mature-leaf growth. (a) The model error generated after each feature is randomly permutation 30 times under the random forest model trained with out-of-bag (OOB) data. Colors of the features listed left of the panel represent whether the increase error when permuted > 0.0 (red) or <0.0 (green). (b) Photosynthesis-related structural equations model. (c) Nutrient-related structural equations model. Arrows indicate potential pathways; path coefficients greater than 0.400 are displayed along the corresponding paths to denote relative influence strength. The R2 and significance level (ns indicates p > 0.05; * indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01; *** indicates p < 0.001) of each variable are presented beneath the variable name, whereas the blindfolding Q2 value is shown below the variable node. Colors of nodes and paths are used to differentiate variable and pathway categories.
Figure 8. Structural equation model depicting the multi-indicator importance assessment and the influence of divergent magnesium treatments on mature-leaf growth. (a) The model error generated after each feature is randomly permutation 30 times under the random forest model trained with out-of-bag (OOB) data. Colors of the features listed left of the panel represent whether the increase error when permuted > 0.0 (red) or <0.0 (green). (b) Photosynthesis-related structural equations model. (c) Nutrient-related structural equations model. Arrows indicate potential pathways; path coefficients greater than 0.400 are displayed along the corresponding paths to denote relative influence strength. The R2 and significance level (ns indicates p > 0.05; * indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01; *** indicates p < 0.001) of each variable are presented beneath the variable name, whereas the blindfolding Q2 value is shown below the variable node. Colors of nodes and paths are used to differentiate variable and pathway categories.
Plants 14 03542 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Su, B.; Lu, S.; Han, T.; Wang, F.; Ding, G.; Wu, C.; Cao, G.; Chen, Y. Responses to Different Magnesium Supply Treatments in the Mature Leaves of Cunninghamia lanceolata Seedlings: Morphological, Physiological, and Structural Perspectives. Plants 2025, 14, 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223542

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Su B, Lu S, Han T, Wang F, Ding G, Wu C, Cao G, Chen Y. Responses to Different Magnesium Supply Treatments in the Mature Leaves of Cunninghamia lanceolata Seedlings: Morphological, Physiological, and Structural Perspectives. Plants. 2025; 14(22):3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yaling, Bigui Su, Sheng Lu, Tianran Han, Fenglin Wang, Guochang Ding, Chao Wu, Guangqiu Cao, and Yu Chen. 2025. "Responses to Different Magnesium Supply Treatments in the Mature Leaves of Cunninghamia lanceolata Seedlings: Morphological, Physiological, and Structural Perspectives" Plants 14, no. 22: 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223542

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Su, B., Lu, S., Han, T., Wang, F., Ding, G., Wu, C., Cao, G., & Chen, Y. (2025). Responses to Different Magnesium Supply Treatments in the Mature Leaves of Cunninghamia lanceolata Seedlings: Morphological, Physiological, and Structural Perspectives. Plants, 14(22), 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223542

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop