Next Article in Journal
Safety Evaluation of Cyhalofop-Butyl on Agronomic Traits and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Foxtail Millet
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement by Burkholderia contaminans ZCC Combined with Biochar on the Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Soil by Pteris vittata
Previous Article in Special Issue
Precise Identification and Analysis of Maize Germplasm Resistance to Ear Rot Caused by Six Fusarium Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Analysis of Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight in Maize Germplasm Resources

1
State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Crop Molecular Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
Institute of Maize Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, National Agricultural Experimental Station for Plant Protection in Xinzhou, Xinzhou 034000, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding, Syngenta Biotechnology (China) Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
4
Seeds Research, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2025, 14(20), 3171; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14203171
Submission received: 16 September 2025 / Revised: 10 October 2025 / Accepted: 11 October 2025 / Published: 15 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Identification of Resistance of Maize Germplasm Resources to Disease)

Abstract

Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB), caused by the fungus Exserohilum turcicum, is one of the most significant foliar diseases in maize worldwide, with its severity being highly influenced by environmental conditions. An effective strategy used to control NCLB involves screening diverse maize germplasm for resistant sources through multi-environment inoculation assays, ultimately aiming to develop resistant varieties. This study systematically evaluated 711 maize germplasm accessions with rich genetic diversity. The evaluation was conducted under four location–year environment combinations (Shangluo, Shaanxi Province, China in 2014–2015 and Xinzhou, Shanxi Province, China in 2021–2022) using artificial inoculation with physiological race 123N (or races 1, 2, 3, N). The results showed that the estimated variances of genotype, environment, and genotype-by-environment interaction were all highly significant (p < 0.01). Significant correlations (p < 0.01) were observed among replicates within each environment, with correlation coefficients (r) ranging from 0.67 to 0.88. At the Xinzhou trial in 2021, four replicates were inoculated with four physiological races (1, 2, 3, and N), revealing highly significant correlations (r = 0.77–0.80, p < 0.01) among them. The disease severity of the tropical germplasm was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of the temperate germplasm. Among the temperate subgroups, the PA and PB (groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids) subgroups exhibited lower disease severity, with the PB subgroup showing the lowest, while the Iodent and Reid subgroups exhibited higher susceptibility. The disease severity responses to the four physiological races were highly positively correlated (r = 0.77–0.80, p < 0.001), and their correlations with the composite inoculation (race 123N) ranged from 0.65 to 0.83. Based on the resistance evaluations across four location–year environment combinations, the 711 maize accessions were classified into five categories: 20 were highly resistant, 236 resistant, 205 moderately resistant, 237 susceptible, and 13 highly susceptible. The findings indicate that the tropical germplasm and the temperate PB subgroup are major sources of NCLB resistance.

1. Introduction

Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB), caused by the fungus Exserohilum turcicum, is one of the major foliar diseases of maize. It occurs widely in maize-growing regions worldwide, with reports of its incidence and management documented across Asia [1], Europe [2], Africa [3], and South America [4]. In addition to infecting maize leaves, E. turcicum can also colonize husks and leaf sheaths, though the most typical symptoms appear on leaves as spindle-shaped lesions. The pathogen typically first infects the lower leaves and gradually progresses upward, potentially spreading to the entire plant under severe conditions [5]. In high-humidity environments, grayish-black mold may develop on the lesion’s surface, primarily on the abaxial side of the leaves, impairing photosynthesis and nutrient accumulation. This leads to shriveled or deteriorated kernels, ultimately reducing yield [6]. NCLB is an airborne disease favored by moderate temperatures and high humidity. Typically, it can cause yield losses of 15%–20%, while infections occurring before silking may result in losses as high as 40%–50% [7]. To respond to NCLB, the most economical, reliable, and environmentally friendly method is to identify highly resistant inbred lines to develop resistant varieties.
Maize resistance to NCLB can be classified into qualitative (monogenic) resistance and quantitative (polygenic) resistance. Qualitative resistance is conferred by Ht genes. To date, 11 resistance genes (Ht1, Ht2, Ht3, HtM, HtP, HtNB, Htn1, NNc, St, ht4, and rt) have been identified. However, Ht2 and Ht3 were later confirmed to be identical at the genomic sequence level, representing a novel allelic variant of Htn1. Htn1/Ht2/Ht3 encodes a wall-associated receptor-like kinase [8,9]. The Ht1 gene has also been cloned and encodes a nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat immune receptor [10]. Nevertheless, qualitative resistance is often unstable, particularly in tropical regions, where it may fail due to emerging virulent races or climate sensitivity. Quantitative resistance is broad-spectrum and highly heritable. Through linkage and association analysis, multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been mapped [11,12,13]. While most of these QTL explain only a small proportion of the phenotypic variation [14], some QTL contribute to larger genetic effects [15].
Based on virulence against maize lines carrying different Ht genes, E. turcicum can be classified into distinct physiological races [16]. In China, 16 races (0, 1, 2, 3, N, 12, 13, 1N, 23, 2N, 3N, 123, 12N, 23N, 13N, and 123N) have been identified, with race 0 being the most prevalent, followed by race 1. The 123N race, also termed the super race, can overcome all four major Ht genes (Ht1, Ht2, Ht3, and HtN) [17]. Besides China, this virulent race has been reported in multiple regions worldwide [18,19]. In China during the 1960s, NCLB caused severe damage only in limited regions. Following the widespread deployment of hybrid varieties, the balance between the pathogen and the host was disrupted, resulting in progressive annual increases in NCLB severity. By the 1980s, the deployment of the NCLB-resistant inbred line Mo17 enabled the development of resistant hybrids that effectively contained large-scale epidemics. However, by the late 1980s, pathogen evolution had generated new physiological races capable of infecting Mo17—which carries the Ht resistance gene—thereby intensifying disease pressure. This culminated in a 1993 NCLB outbreak across multiple maize-growing regions, causing substantial yield losses. To address persistent challenges, resistance identification against diverse physiological races, particularly those with heightened virulence, remains imperative [20].
Maize utilizes heterosis, and inbred lines can be classified into different heterotic groups based on combining ability or molecular markers. In U.S. maize breeding, two major groups (Stiff Stalk, SS; Non-Stiff Stalk, NSS) dominate. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) lines are divided into Tropical Heterotic Group A and Tropical Heterotic Group B [21,22]. Chinese maize inbreds are typically classified into eight heterotic groups, including Tang Sipingtou (SPT), derived from Chinese landraces [23]. Different heterotic groups not only contribute to hybrid performance but also exhibit varying responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [24,25]. The tropical germplasm generally shows stronger disease resistance and stress tolerance compared with the temperate germplasm [26]. Among temperate subgroups, the PB heterotic group, derived from U.S. hybrid germplasm including accessions 78599, 78641, 78698, and 87001, demonstrates robust resistance to multiple diseases, representing a key genetic resource for disease resistance breeding [27,28]. Heterotic groups exhibit distinct characteristics due to divergent geographical origins and primary cultivation ranges. The identification of heterotic groups with high NCLB resistance would represent a significant advancement in breeding NCLB-resistant cultivars. This would enable breeders to strategically exploit established combining ability patterns between heterotic groups, facilitating the efficient development of highly resistant hybrids for NCLB management.
When conducting this study, we had three primary objectives: (1) to identify stable resistance sources with low environmental sensitivity by evaluating a large panel of maize germplasm for NCLB resistance across multiple environments; (2) to determine the primary sources of NCLB resistance by analyzing resistance variation among heterotic groups and providing insights into NCLB-resistant breeding; and (3) to assess the virulence variation and correlations among different physiological races (1, 2, 3, N, and 123N) through inoculations on the same germplasm set, thereby selecting accessions with broad-spectrum resistance.

2. Results and Analysis

2.1. Analysis of Individual Environments

Significant variations in NCLB severity were observed across the four location–year environment combinations. The most severe infection occurred in Shangluo2014, with a mean resistance rating of 7.01 across all accessions, which was classified as susceptible. In contrast, Xinzhou2022 showed the mildest infection, with a mean resistance rating of 4.10, indicating a moderate resistance level that approaches the resistant category. Across all four location–year environment combinations, the overall mean resistance rating of the 711 accessions was 5.12, corresponding to a moderately resistant level (Table 1). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that genotypic variance was highly significant (p < 0.001) for all of the materials tested across the four environments, with the highest genotypic variance observed in Shangluo2015 (5.03 ***). The genotype-by-environment interaction variance also reached highly significant levels. The broad-sense heritability (H2) estimates for NCLB resistance were 0.93, 0.85, 0.95, and 0.93 for Shangluo2014, Shangluo2015, Xinzhou2021, and Xinzhou2022, respectively, with a combined heritability of 0.94 (Table 1).
Correlation analysis demonstrated highly significant (p < 0.001) associations between replicates within each environment. The correlation coefficients between two replicates were 0.88 and 0.75 for Shangluo2014 and Shangluo2015, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). Among eight replicates in Xinzhou2021, the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.67 to 0.79 (Supplementary Table S1), while those among the four replicates in Xinzhou2022 varied between 0.74 and 0.78 (Supplementary Table S1). The phenotypic correlations across the four location–year environment combinations were all highly significant (p < 0.001), with coefficients (r) ranging from 0.65 to 0.83 (Figure 1). Notably, despite using different physiological races (1, 2, 3, and N) for inoculation in Xinzhou2021, significant correlations (p < 0.001) were observed with Shangluo2014 (r = 0.65 ***), Shangluo2015 (r = 0.81 ***), and Xinzhou2022 (r = 0.83 ***) (Figure 1).

2.2. Resistance Variation Among Heterotic Groups

Based on the classification by Guo et al. [29], the 711 maize inbred lines were categorized into eight heterotic groups commonly utilized in Chinese breeding programs. The evaluation of NCLB resistance across all four location–year environment combinations (Shangluo2014, Shangluo2015, Xinzhou2021, and Xinzhou2022) revealed that the tropical germplasm exhibited significantly lower disease severity (p < 0.001) compared with other groups, with mean resistance ratings of 5.39, 2.79, 3.98, and 3.03, respectively (Figure 2). Among temperate groups, the PB group (group B germplasm derived from modern US hybrids) demonstrated the highest resistance, showing consistently lower disease severity compared with the other temperate groups across all the environments (mean ratings: 7.69, 4.76, 5.60, and 3.95). In contrast, the Iodent and Reid groups exhibited higher susceptibility, with Iodent being the most vulnerable (Figure 2; Table 2). Comparative analysis across the environments indicated that disease severity was more pronounced in Shangluo2014 and Xinzhou2021, with minimal variation among the temperate groups. In Shangluo2015 and Xinzhou2022, distinct resistance hierarchies emerged, consistently ranking as follows: tropical > PB > PA (group A germplasm derived from modern US hybrids) > SPT (derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace) > LRC (Lvda Red Cob) > Lancaster > Reid > Iodent. The SPT group displayed intermediate resistance, with mean severity ratings of 8.46, 6.09, 6.03, and 5.04 across the four environments (Figure 2; Table 2).
Further, we conducted an analysis of variance (ANOVA) regarding NCLB resistance among the heterotic groups in the two environments (Xinzhou2021 and Xinzhou2022), where complete material planting was achieved (Table 2). The results demonstrated that both genotypic variance and genotype-by-environment interaction variance reached highly significant levels (p < 0.001) across all eight groups in both location–year environment combinations. Specifically, in Xinzhou2021, the tropical and PB groups exhibited larger genetic variances, while in Xinzhou2022, the LRC and Iodent groups showed greater genetic variances. All eight heterotic groups maintained high broad-sense heritability (H2) values. The tropical group displayed the highest H2 (0.93) in Xinzhou2021, whereas the Iodent and Reid groups showed the peak H2 values (0.90) in Xinzhou2022.

2.3. Resistance Induced by Different Physiological Races

In Xinzhou2021, four different physiological races (1, 2, 3, and N) were used for inoculation, with two replicates for each race. The results showed that the correlation between two replicates was highest for NCLB infection caused by race 3, while the correlation was lowest for race 1 infection. The correlation coefficients of disease severity between two replicates for races 1, 2, 3, and N were 0.690, 0.722, 0.767, and 0.713, respectively, with all correlations between replicates reaching highly significant levels (p < 0.001) (Figure 3). Significant correlations (p < 0.001) were observed among all four physiological races (1, 2, 3, and N), with phenotypic correlation coefficients (r) ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 for disease severity under inoculation with these four races (Figure 3). Combined with the correlations between Xinzhou2021 and the other three location–year environment combinations (Figure 1), these results indicate that the pathogenicity of the four physiological races showed little difference from that of 123N.
Furthermore, using data from the 2021 Xinzhou trial site, we compared the resistance of different heterotic groups to physiological races (Figure 4). The results showed that, similar to inoculation with the 123N race, when inoculated separately with races 1, 2, 3, and N, both the tropical and PB groups showed lower average disease severity. The disease severity of the tropical group was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of the other groups, and also significantly lower than that of the PB group, with mean values of 4.20, 4.16, 3.86, and 3.70, respectively. Similarly, the Iodent and Reid groups showed higher disease severity, with the disease severity values for the Iodent group being 7.28, 7.41, 6.56, and 6.72 (Figure 4).

2.4. Comprehensive Analysis of Resistance Evaluation Results Across Four Environments

Based on the resistance evaluation results from four location–year environment combinations, among the 711 maize materials, 20 were identified as highly resistant (HR), 236 as resistant (R), 205 as moderately resistant (MR), 237 as susceptible (S), and 13 as highly susceptible (HS). Further classification according to their groups revealed that among the 20 highly resistant accessions, 15 were from the tropical group (Supplementary Table S2). Among the 13 highly susceptible germplasms, 5 were from the Iodent group, 5 were from the Reid group, 2 were from the LRC group, and 1 was from the other groups. Of the 256 materials identified as resistant or higher (HR+R), the tropical group had the largest number (204 materials) (Figure 5A). Among the 250 materials identified as susceptible or highly susceptible, the Reid group had the highest number (40 materials) (Figure 5B).
Taking the complete material planting results from Xinzhou2021 and Xinzhou2022 as examples for analysis, the results showed (Table 3) that the tropical group included 19 materials identified as highly resistant, while the other groups had no materials rated as highly resistant. The Iodent, LRC, and Reid groups had one, one, and four materials evaluated as highly susceptible, respectively, while other groups had no materials rated as highly susceptible. The most resistant material came from the tropical group with a resistance rating score of 1.48. The least resistant material came from the LRC group with a resistance rating score of 8.65.

3. Discussion

Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) frequently occurs in spring maize regions of Northern China and cool mountainous areas of southwest maize production zones, with the development of the disease being significantly influenced by environmental conditions [30]. In this study, using consistent inoculation methods and spore concentrations, there were substantial differences in the overall NCLB severity across the four location–year environment combinations. Shangluo2014 showed the highest average severity (7.01), with both environmental variance and genotype-by-environment interaction variance reaching highly significant levels. This indicates that environmental conditions significantly affect NCLB’s development, and an evaluation of NCLB resistance in maize germplasm should be conducted through multi-environment testing. The genotypic variance reached highly significant levels across all four location–year environment combinations, demonstrating significant differences in NCLB resistance among the 711 tested accessions. Different resistant germplasm resources can be selected from these materials. The high heritability indicates that NCLB resistance is a genetically controlled trait that can be addressed through breeding resistant varieties [3].
The genetics of NCLB resistance involves not only major genes but also polygenic resistance [31]. NCLB-associated QTL intervals and significantly associated SNPs have been identified at multiple loci, including bin1.06–1.07, bin6.05 [32], and bin3.04 [12]. The cloned lesion mimic-related gene Mexicana lesion mimic 1 (ZmMM1) promotes the accumulation of the ZmMM1 protein, which suppresses the transcription of ZmMT3, a downstream gene that negatively regulates plant immune responses, thereby enhancing resistance to NCLB [33]. Existing research shows that polygenic resistance to NCLB is primarily additive, with minimal nonadditive effects [34,35]. This suggests that the resistance of inbred lines is closely related to hybrid resistance, and when breeding resistant hybrids, resistant inbreds should be selected at first [36].
Maize inbreds can be classified into heterotic groups based on their combining ability [37]. The analysis of resistance across heterotic groups indicates that the tropical germplasm and PB germplasm show stronger resistance, suggesting that the tropical germplasm is an excellent material for NCLB-resistant breeding and gene mining, while temperate breeding should focus on PB germplasm [38]. It is noteworthy that the tropical group, which, in this study, was represented by a substantially larger number of accessions, exhibited highly significant genotypic variance, indicating considerable variation in NCLB resistance among these accessions. Since the Iodent germplasm showed high susceptibility across all four location–year environment combinations, it should be used cautiously in high-NCLB-incidence regions of China, though it could serve as a susceptible parent material for genetic mapping.
Different physiological races of NCLB cause varying symptoms [17,18,39,40,41,42,43]. The results from Xinzhou2021 showed high correlations among the disease phenotypes caused by different races. In other words, if a material shows susceptibility when inoculated with race 1, it will also likely show susceptibility when inoculated with races 2, 3, or N. This suggests two possibilities: firstly, the four dominant genes Ht1, Ht2, Ht3, and HtN may be closely linked; secondly, most NCLB resistance genes are quantitative trait loci, as quantitative resistance typically provides broad-spectrum resistance without showing race-specific phenotypes [8,44,45,46]. The analysis of heterotic groups also showed consistent phenotypic responses to inoculation with races 1, 2, 3, and N, confirming the validity of using race 123N for evaluation instead of individual race inoculations.
Through comprehensive analysis across four location–year environment combinations, this study identified several highly resistant materials, though most were from tropical groups. How to modify the photoperiod/thermal sensitivity of the tropical germplasm for use in Chinese NCLB-resistant breeding programs remains an ongoing and urgent problem [47,48,49,50]. The adaptability of tropical maize germplasm can be improved through gradually cultivating it from low-latitude to high-latitude regions [51]. Additionally, PB germplasm containing tropical ancestry represents an important resistance source [52,53,54]. Among the highly susceptible materials identified, besides the Iodent group, LRC materials showed poor resistance. Many hybrids planted in Northeast China contain LRC ancestry, partly explaining why Northeast China is one of the high-NCLB-incidence regions [55,56]. Future breeding efforts should focus on improving NCLB resistance in LRC germplasm [57,58].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

A total of 711 maize accessions were used for the NCLB resistance evaluation, including 402 temperate materials provided by the Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), and 309 tropical accessions from the CIMMYT. Based on genotypic data obtained from 40K mSNP liquid chip assays, genetic diversity analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed [29]. The temperate materials comprised seven major heterotic groups used in Chinese maize breeding: Iodent (32 accessions), Lancaster (49), Reid (43), LRC (derivatives from the Lvda red coda Chinese landrace) (47), SPT (derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace) (39), PA (28), and PB (39) (groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids, respectively) [29]. The remaining 125 inbred lines did not fall into the heterotic groups predominantly used in Chinese maize breeding programs (Supplementary Table S2).

4.2. Field Experimental Design and Management

Field trials were conducted in four environments: Shangluo, Shaanxi Province, China (33.87° N, 109.94° E) in 2014 and 2015 (Shangluo2014 and Shangluo2015); and Xinzhou, Shanxi Province, China (38.47° N, 112.95° E) in 2021 and 2022 (Xinzhou2021 and Xinzhou2022). These two trial sites, Shangluo and Xinzhou, were selected because their environmental conditions are generally conducive to the development of NCLB in maize (Supplementary Table S3). The planting dates were 5 May and 6 May for Shangluo2014 and 2015, and 14 May and 18 May for Xinzhou2021 and 2022, respectively. The experimental design followed an incomplete randomized block design with single-row plots (3 m length, 13 plants per row, 0.25 m plant spacing, and 0.6 m row spacing). The replication numbers were 2 replicates (2014–2015), 8 replicates (2021), and 4 replicates (2022). Standard local agronomic practices were followed for fertilization and field management (Supplementary Table S1).

4.3. Fungal Isolates and Culture

To evaluate the resistance of 711 maize accessions against Exserohilim turcicum physiological races, races 1, 2, 3, and N were inoculated at the Xinzhou trial site in 2021. In the other trial environments, the highly virulent race 123N was used to ensure stringent selection pressure for durable resistance (Supplementary Table S1). The 123N race for inoculations was provided by CAAS (for the 2014 and 2015 inoculations) and Syngenta China (for the 2022 inoculation). In Xinzhou2021, four distinct races (1, 2, 3, and N) provided by CAAS were inoculated (two replicates per race). Fungal cultures were initially grown on PDA medium; PDA plates colonized by the fungal strain were aseptically cut into segments and transferred to sterile Erlenmeyer flasks containing autoclaved sorghum grains. The flasks were incubated within a 12 h photoperiod at 20–25 °C for 7–14 days, with daily agitation to ensure uniform mycelial colonization of all grain surfaces. Subsequently, the colonized grains were spread onto porcelain trays sterilized with 75% ethanol and covered with sterile newspaper moistened with minimal sterile water to maintain humidity. Sporulation was induced by incubation in complete darkness at ambient room temperature.

4.4. Inoculation and Disease Assessment

In all four location–year environment combinations, inoculation was performed when 50% of the plants had fully expanded 12 of their leaves. After microscopic confirmation of abundant spore production, spores were washed from sorghum grains and adjusted to a concentration of 1 × 106 spores/mL. The suspension was mixed with 0.05% Tween-20 and applied using a sprayer during cool within humid evening conditions. Additionally, the washed sorghum grains were evenly distributed into the leaf whorls of the maize plants to ensure successful inoculation.
Disease evaluation was conducted 30 days after natural pollen shedding, following the established protocols [59,60]. Each plant within rows was manually rated using a 9-grade scale based on lesion area coverage (Table 4) [61]: Grade 1: high resistance; Grade 9: high susceptibility.
The mean resistance score ( NCLBS M ) for each accession was calculated as follows:
NCLBS M = i n N C L B S n
where NCLBS = northern corn leaf blight score per plant (1–9 scale); NCLBS M = mean northern corn leaf blight score; and i = 1 (first plant) to n (last plant in row). The final resistance classifications followed the scale outlined in Table 4.

4.5. Data Analysis

For data processing, Microsoft Excel and R (psych package for correlation analysis; ggplot2 for visualization) were used [62,63,64]. ANOVA and heritability calculations were performed using QTL IciMapping 4.2 [65] with the linear model, as follows:
y i j k = μ + g i + e j + b k / j + g e i j + ε i j k
where i = genotype, j = environment, k = replicate, y i j k = phenotypic value, μ = grand mean, g i = genotype effect, e i = environment effect, b k / j = block effect within environment, g e i j = G×E interaction, and ε i j k = residual error.
The broad-sense heritability (H2) was calculated as follows [66]:
Single environment:
H 2 = σ G 2 / ( σ G 2 + σ ε 2 / r )
Multiple environments:
H 2 = σ G 2 / ( σ G 2 + σ G E 2 / l + σ ε 2 / l r )
where σ G 2 represents the genetic variance, σ ε 2 represents the residual error variance, σ G E 2 represents genotype × environment interaction variance, r is the number of replications in each environment, and l is the number of environments.
The 2021 dataset comprising four races (1, 2, 3, and N) was processed using the following two approaches: Firstly, without distinguishing between physiological races, the Xinzhou2021 data were treated as eight replicates and analyzed collectively with other location–year environment combinations. Secondly, we separately analyzed the Xinzhou2021 data to examine resistance differences in northern corn leaf blight caused by different physiological races.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the multi-environment evaluation of 711 accessions demonstrated that NCLB severity is strongly influenced by environmental conditions, making multi-location testing necessary. Genetic factors predominantly control resistance (H2 = 0.85–0.95), enabling the selection of resistant breeding materials. The tropical germplasm and temperate PB group showed superior resistance, while the Iodent and Reid groups were the most susceptible. High correlations (r = 0.77–0.80) among race-specific responses suggest polygenic, broad-spectrum resistance mechanisms. The identified resistant accessions provide valuable genetic resources for NCLB-resistant breeding programs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14203171/s1. Table S1: Physiological races, number of planting replicates, and correlation coefficients (r) between replicates across the four location-year environment combinations. Table S2: Heterotic group classification of the inbred lines used for northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) evaluation and their mean NCLB scores across four location-year environment combinations. LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace. HR, highly resistant; R, resistant; MR, moderately resistant; S, susceptible; HS, highly susceptible. Table S3: Environmental information for the four location-year environment combinations used in the evaluation of northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X., C.D., Z.G., Q.L., and D.Z.; data curation, B.M., J.Y., Z.G., L.T., and C.D.; formal analysis, B.M. and Z.G.; funding acquisition, Q.L. and Y.X.; investigation, J.Y., B.M., C.D., L.T., and Z.G.; methodology, Y.X., C.D., J.W., and Z.G.; project administration, L.T. and Z.G.; resources, Y.X., J.W., and W.-X.L.; supervision, Y.X. and Q.L.; validation, B.M. and Z.G.; visualization, B.M. and Z.G.; writing—original draft, B.M., Z.G., J.Y., and L.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.X., C.D., W.-X.L., and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD1202500, 2022YFD1201004) and Syngenta Collaborative Research Project “Trait Discovery and Validation for Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight” (ZKSXZD202002).

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article/supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Lixiu Tong, Qingli Liu, and Dongfeng Zhang were employed by the company State Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding, Syngenta Biotechnology (China) Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AbbreviationFull term
NCLBNorthern corn leaf blight
QTLQuantitative trait loci
SSStiff Stalk
NSSNon-Stiff Stalk
ANOVAAnalysis of variance
SPTDerivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace
PAGroup A germplasms derived from modern US hybrids
PBGroup B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids
LRCLvda Red Cob

References

  1. Lohithaswa, H.C.; Balasundara, D.C.; Mallikarjuna, M.G.; Sowmya, M.S.; Mallikarjuna, N.; Kulkarni, R.S.; Pandravada, A.S.; Bhatia, B.S. Experimental evaluation of effectiveness of genomic selection for resistance to northern corn leaf blight in maize. J. Appl. Genet. 2025, 66, 493–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Galiano-Carneiro, A.L.; Kessel, B.; Presterl, T.; Miedaner, T. Intercontinental trials reveal stable QTL for northern corn leaf blight resistance in Europe and in Brazil. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ndlovu, N.; Gowda, M.; Beyene, Y.; Das, B.; Mahabaleswara, S.L.; Makumbi, D.; Ogugo, V.; Burgueno, J.; Crossa, J.; Spillane, C.; et al. A combination of joint linkage and genome-wide association study reveals putative candidate genes associated with resistance to northern corn leaf blight in tropical maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1448961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rizzardi, D.A.; Peterlini, E.; Scapim, C.A.; Pinto, R.J.B.; Faria, M.V.; Contreras-Soto, R.I. Genome wide association study identifies SNPs associated with northern corn leaf blight caused by Exserohilum turcicum in tropical maize germplasm (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 2022, 218, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Welz, H.G.; Geiger, H.H. Genes for resistance to northern corn leaf blight in diverse maize populations. Plant Breed. 2000, 119, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramathani, I.; Biruma, M.; Martin, T.; Dixelius, C.; Okori, P. Disease severity, incidence and races of Setosphaeria turcica on sorghum in Uganda. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 131, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Rossi, R.; Guerra, F.; Plazas, M.; Vuletic, E.; Brücher, E.; Guerra, G.; Reis, E. Crop damage, economic losses, and the economic damage threshold for northern corn leaf blight. Crop Prot. 2021, 154, 105901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hurni, S.; Scheuermann, D.; Krattinger, S.G.; Kesssel, B.; Wicker, T.; Herren, G.; Fitze, M.N.; Breen, J.; Presterl, T.; Ouzunova, M.; et al. The maize disease resistance gene Htn1 against northern corn leaf blight encodes a wall-associated receptor-like kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8780–8786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, P.; Scheuermann, D.; Kessel, B.; Koller, T.; Greenwood, J.R.; Hurni, S.; Herren, G.; Zhou, S.; Marande, W.; Wicher, T.; et al. Alleles of a wall-associated kinase gene account for three of the major northern corn leaf blight resistance loci in maize. Plant J. 2021, 106, 526–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thatcher, S.; Leonard, A.; Lauer, M.; Panangipalli, G.; Norman, B.; Hou, Z.; Llaca, V.; Hu, W.; Qi, X.; Jaqueth, J.; et al. The northern corn leaf blight resistance gene Ht1 encodes a nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat immune receptor. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 24, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ding, J.; Ali, F.; Chen, G.; Li, H.; Mahuku, G.; Yang, N.; Narro, L.; Magorokosho, C.; Makumbi, D.; Yan, J. Genome-wide association mapping reveals novel sources of resistance to northern corn leaf blight in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J.; Yang, W.; Shi, X.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, M.; Qi, X.; Ma, J.; Jaqueth, J.S.; Li, B.; Dai, M.; et al. Identification and fine-mapping of qNCLB3.04 resistant to northern corn leaf blight. Mol. Breed. 2025, 45, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gong, X.; Jiang, F.; Shaw, R.K.; Sun, J.; Dai, T.; Bi, Y.; Pan, Y.; Kong, J.; Zong, H.; Yang, X.; et al. Genome-wide association study of northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) resistance using temperate and subtropical maize recombinant inbred lines. BMC Genom. 2025, 26, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Inghelandt, D.; Melchinger, A.E.; Martinant, J.P.; Stich, B. Genome-wide association mapping of flowering time and northern corn leaf blight (Setosphaeria turcica) resistance in a vast commercial maize germplasm set. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 30, 12–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Xu, Z.; Yang, J.; Lu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, L.; Tian, R.; Hao, Z.; Yong, H.; et al. qNCLB7.02, a novel QTL for resistance to northern corn leaf blight in maize. Mol. Breed. 2018, 38, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Galiano-Carneiro, A.L.; Miedaner, T. Genetics of resistance and pathogenicity in the maize/Setosphaeria turcica pathosystem and implications for breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ogliari, J.B.; Guimarães, M.A.; Geraldi, I.O.; Camargo, L.E.A. New resistance genes in the Zea mays: Exserohilum turcicum pathosystem. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2005, 28, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Niwas, R.; Anwer, M.A.; Ranjan, T.; Ghatak, A.; Jain, K.; Kumar, J.; Bharti, A.; Kumari, N.; Srivastava, J.N. Exserohilum turcicum (Passerini) leonard and suggs: Race population distribution in Bihar, India. Bioengineering 2022, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Muñoz-Zavala, C.; Loladze, A.; Vargas-Hernández, M.; García-León, E.; Alakonya, A.E.; Tovar-Pedraza, J.M.; Goodwin, P.H.; Leyva-Mir, S.G. Occurrence and distribution of physiological races of Exserohilum turcicum in maize-growing regions of Mexico. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 1054–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X. Study on Resistance of Maize to Northern Corn Leaf Blight and Southern Corn Rust. Doctoral Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vasal, S.K.; Srinivasan, G.; González, C.F.; Han, C.G.; Pandey, S.; Beck, D.L.; Crossa, J. Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT’s Tropical × Subtropical maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 1992, 32, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vasal, S.K.; Srinivasan, G.; Crossa, J.; Beck, D.L. Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT’s subtropical and temperate early-maturity maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 1992, 32, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, Z.; Wang, H.; Tao, J.; Ren, Y.; Xu, C.; Wu, K.; Zou, C.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Y. Development of multiple SNP marker panels affordable to breeders through genotyping by target sequencing (GBTS) in maize. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, C.; Zhang, H.; Sun, J.; Guo, Z.; Zou, C.; Li, W.X.; Xie, C.; Huang, C.; Xu, R.; Liao, H.; et al. Genome-wide association study dissects yield components associated with low-phosphorus stress tolerance in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1699–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guo, Z.; Zou, C.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Li, W.; Jeffers, D.; Fan, X.; Xu, M.; Xu, Y. Complex genetic system involved in Fusarium ear rot resistance in maize as revealed by GWAS, bulked sample analysis, and genomic prediction. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 1725–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rashid, Z.; Singh, P.K.; Vemuri, H.; Zaidi, P.H.; Prasanna, B.M.; Nair, S.K. Genome-wide association study in Asia-adapted tropical maize reveals novel and explored genomic regions for sorghum downy mildew resistance. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, H.; Xu, C.; Liu, X.; Guo, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, S.; Xie, C.; Li, W.; Zou, C.; Xu, Y. Development of a multiple-hybrid population for genome-wide association studies: Theoretical consideration and genetic mapping of flowering traits in maize. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, W. Heterosis and heterotic patterns of maize germplasm revealed by a multiple-hybrid population under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. J. Integr. Agric. 2022, 21, 2477–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Z.; Yang, Q.; Huang, F.; Zheng, H.; Sang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wu, K.; Tao, J.; Prasanna, B.M.; et al. Development of high-resolution multiple-SNP arrays for genetic analyses and molecular breeding through genotyping by target sequencing and liquid chip. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ma, Z.; Hui, H.; Huang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, B.; Gao, Z. Evaluation of maize hybrids for identifying resistance to northern corn leaf blight in northeast China. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miedaner, T.; Boeven, A.L.G.; Gaikpa, D.S.; Kistner, M.B.; Grote, C.P. Genomics-assisted breeding for quantitative disease resistances in small-grain cereals and maize. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chung, C.L.; Poland, J.; Kump, K.; Benson, J.; Longfellow, J.; Walsh, E.; Balint-Kurti, P.; Nelson, R. Targeted discovery of quantitative trait loci for resistance to northern leaf blight and other diseases of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123, 307–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, H.; Hou, J.; Ye, P.; Hu, L.; Huang, J.; Dai, Z.; Zhang, B.; Dai, S.; Que, J.; Min, H.; et al. A teosinte-derived allele of a MYB transcription repressor confers multiple disease resistance in maize. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1846–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Carson, M.L. Inheritance of latent period length in maize infected with Exserohilum turcicum. Plant Dis. 1995, 79, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Technow, F.; Bürger, A.; Melchinger, A.E. Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups. G3 2013, 3, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abdelsalam, N.R.; Balbaa, M.G.; Osman, H.T.; Ghareeb, R.Y.; Desoky, E.M.; Elshehawi, A.M.; Aljuaid, B.S.; Elnahal, A.S.M. Inheritance of resistance against northern leaf blight of maize using conventional breeding methods. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 1747–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xue, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhu, S.; Fan, Y.; Xu, L.; et al. Insights into the genomic divergence of maize heterotic groups in China. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2025, 67, 1467–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.; Wang, T. Germplasm base of maize breeding in China and formation of foundation parents. J. Maize Sci. 2010, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hooker, A.L. A second major gene locus in corn for chlorotic-lesion resistance to Helminthosporium turicum. Crop Sci. 1977, 17, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carson, M.L. A new gene in maize conferring the “Chlorotic Halo” reaction to infection by Exserohilum turcicum. Plant Dis. 1995, 79, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Robbins, W.A., Jr.; Warren, H.L. Inheritance of resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in PI 209135, ‘Mayorbela’ variety of maize. Maydica 1993, 38, 209–213. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, F.; Xiao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zheng, Y.; Qiu, F. Mapping of HtNB, a gene conferring non-lesion resistance before heading to Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.), in a maize inbred line derived from the Indonesian variety Bramadi. Genet. Mol. Res. 2012, 11, 2523–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gevers, H.O. A new major gene for resistance to Helminthosporium turcicum leaf blight in maize. Plant Dis. Rep. 1975, 59, 296–299. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang, Q.; Balint-Kurti, P.; Xu, M. Quantitative disease resistance: Dissection and adoption in maize. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poland, J.A.; Bradbury, P.J.; Buckler, E.S.; Nelson, R.J. Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6893–6898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xiao, M.; Song, F.; Sun, B.; Zuo, X.; Zhao, G.; Xin, A.; Li, Z. Exploration of foreign maize inbred lines with broad spectrum resistance to northern corn leaf blight and preliminary identification of resistance genes. Acta Agron. Sin. 2018, 44, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhu, C.; Ren, D.; Liu, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, R.; Zheng, H.; Hu, E.; Lin, H.; Li, J.; Lu, Y.; et al. Combining ability analysis on quality traits and breeding potential evaluation of 23 waxy maize lines from Laos. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2024, 57, 2931–2952. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, S.; Zhang, R.; Wang, R.; Song, W.; Zhao, J. Research progress of southern corn rust and resistance breeding. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2024, 57, 2732–2743. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, C.; Cheng, F.; Sun, Z.; Tang, J.; Wu, L.; Ku, L.; Chen, Y. Genetic analysis of photoperiod sensitivity in a tropical by temperate maize recombinant inbred population using molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 117, 1129–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zheng, T.; Bo, J.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Li, H.; Liu, M.; Niu, H.; Nguyen, T.; Chen, Y.; Sun, J. Unveiling photoperiod-responsive regulatory networks in tropical maize through transcriptome analysis. Genes 2025, 16, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, Y.; Sang, Z.; Du, Q.; Guo, Z.; Li, Z.; Kong, X.; Xu, Y.; Zou, Z. Flowing time regulation model revisited by pooled sequencing of mass selection populations. Plant Sci. 2021, 304, 110797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. Heterotic pattern, improvement and utilization of corn 78599 germplasm. J. Maize Sci. 2008, 16, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  53. Teng, W.; Cao, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Jing, X.; Zhang, F.; Li, J. Analysis of maize heterotic groups and patterns during past decade in China. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2004, 37, 1804–1811. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, X.; Jing, X.; Wang, X.; Ge, L.; Jing, X.; Yao, Y.; Chen, R. Usage of PN78599 group germplasm in breeding and produce of maize in China. J. Maize Sci. 2012, 20, 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, W.; Xu, C.; An, Y.; Sun, M.; Min, L.; Jiang, S.; Hu, G. Genetic diversity analysis of 257 maize inbred lines by SSR core primers. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci. 2012, 07, 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  56. Xiao, M.; Li, M.; Li, X.; George, M.L.; Zhang, S. Comparisons of heterotic patterns on maize germplasm between Northeast provinces and huanghuaihai valley. J. Maize Sci. 2010, 18, 23–28+34. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shi, J.; He, K. Characterization and genetic predisposition of diseases resistance of maize foundation parents. J. Maize Sci. 2021, 29, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cai, X.; Liu, J.; Xia, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, F.; Liu, X.; Sang, J.; Jiao, R.; Jia, L. Creation and application of maize inbred line JiD284 and JiD2417. J. Maize Sci. 2010, 30, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  59. Duan, C.; Dong, H.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Li, C.; Sun, S.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, X. A large-scale screening of maize germplasm for resistance to multiple diseases in multi-plot demonstration for several years under natural condition. Acta Agron. Sin. 2020, 46, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, X.; Dai, F.; Zhu, Z.; He, K.; Wang, X. Rules for Evaluation of Maize for Resistance to Pests; Part 1: Rule for evaluation of maize for resistance to northern corn leaf blight (NY/T 1248.1-2006); (In Chinese). China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  61. Li, C.; Ling, F.; Su, G.; Sun, W.; Liu, H.; Su, Y.; Qi, X. Location and mapping of the NCLB resistance genes in maize by bulked segregant analysis (BSA) using whole genome re-sequencing. Mol. Breed. 2020, 40, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R package 4.4.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 17 April 2025).
  63. Revelle, W. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research, R package version 2.5.3; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 2025; Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych (accessed on 17 April 2025).
  64. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, R package version 3.5.1; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Available online: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/ (accessed on 17 April 2025).
  65. Meng, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. QTL IciMapping: Integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J. 2015, 3, 69–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Knapp, S.J.; Stroup, W.W.; Ross, W.M. Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Sci. 1985, 25, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correlation analysis of northern corn leaf blight severity among replicates for maize inbred lines across four location–year environment combinations. *** denotes p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Correlation analysis of northern corn leaf blight severity among replicates for maize inbred lines across four location–year environment combinations. *** denotes p < 0.001.
Plants 14 03171 g001
Figure 2. Disease severity ratings of eight maize heterotic groups across different location–year environment combinations. LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace. **** denotes p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Disease severity ratings of eight maize heterotic groups across different location–year environment combinations. LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace. **** denotes p < 0.001.
Plants 14 03171 g002
Figure 3. Correlation analysis of disease severity following inoculation with four physiological races (1, 2, 3, and N). *** denotes p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Correlation analysis of disease severity following inoculation with four physiological races (1, 2, 3, and N). *** denotes p < 0.001.
Plants 14 03171 g003
Figure 4. Disease severity statistics for eight heterotic groups after separate inoculation with physiological races 1, 2, 3, and N. LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace. **** denotes p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Disease severity statistics for eight heterotic groups after separate inoculation with physiological races 1, 2, 3, and N. LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace. **** denotes p < 0.001.
Plants 14 03171 g004
Figure 5. Distribution patterns of accessions rated highly resistant (HR) and resistant (R) (A) or susceptible (S) and highly susceptible (HS) (B) across four location–year environment combinations among heterotic groups. LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace.
Figure 5. Distribution patterns of accessions rated highly resistant (HR) and resistant (R) (A) or susceptible (S) and highly susceptible (HS) (B) across four location–year environment combinations among heterotic groups. LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace.
Plants 14 03171 g005
Table 1. Variance components for 711 maize inbred lines across four location–year environment combinations.
Table 1. Variance components for 711 maize inbred lines across four location–year environment combinations.
EnvironmentsNumber NCLB ScoreVariance ComponentsH2
Mean ± SDRange σ G 2 σ ε 2 σ E 2 σ G E 2
Shangluo20145567.01 ± 1.941.50–9.004.21 ***0.48  0.93
Shangluo20155404.51 ± 2.281.00–9.005.03 ***1.34  0.85
Xinzhou20217115.13 ± 1.991.50–8.752.79 ***1.14  0.95
Xinzhou20227114.10 ± 1.751.08–8.902.79 ***0.87  0.93
Total7115.12 ± 2.141.00–9.002.68 ***1.040.84 ***0.41 ***0.94
Note: σ G 2 , σ E 2 , σ G E 2 , and σ ε 2 represent genotypic, environment, genotype-by-environment interaction, and error variance, respectively; H2 represents heritability; *** indicates significance at p < 0.001. The actual number of surveyed lines was reduced in the Shangluo trial due to severe lodging.
Table 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of NCLB ratings among heterotic groups at the Xinzhou site (2021 and 2022).
Table 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of NCLB ratings among heterotic groups at the Xinzhou site (2021 and 2022).
Heterotic GroupNumberNCLB Score (Mean ± SD) σ G 2 σ G E 2 H2
202120222021202220212022
Iodent326.99 ± 0.826.33 ± 1.360.59 ***1.79 ***0.55 ***0.860.90
Lancaster496.35 ± 0.835.31 ± 1.230.58 ***1.32 ***0.38 ***0.830.87
LRC476.38 ± 1.055.32 ± 1.500.97 ***2.08 ***0.28 ***0.870.92
PA286.21 ± 1.004.62 ± 1.160.90 ***0.91 ***0.25 ***0.870.73
PB395.60 ± 1.313.95 ± 1.151.64 ***0.97 ***0.30 ***0.930.82
Reid436.93 ± 0.726.38 ± 1.310.42 ***1.60 ***0.36 ***0.790.90
SPT396.03 ± 1.085.04 ± 1.251.05 ***1.34 ***0.14 **0.890.86
Tropical3093.98 ± 1.443.03 ± 1.161.92 ***1.08 ***0.37 ***0.930.83
Note: LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace; H2, heritability; σ G 2 and σ G E 2 , genotypic variance and genotype-by-environment interaction variance, respectively; ** and ***, significance at p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Table 3. Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) resistance evaluation results for germplasm groups in Xinzhou2021 and Xinzhou2022.
Table 3. Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) resistance evaluation results for germplasm groups in Xinzhou2021 and Xinzhou2022.
GroupNumberHRRMRSHSRangeMean
Iodent320142612.96–8.296.66
Lancaster4902252203.65–7.345.83
LRC4704222013.73–8.655.85
PA280217902.88–6.785.42
PB3901122602.70–6.564.78
Reid430073244.11–8.336.66
SPT3905171703.46–7.155.54
Tropical30919204721401.48–7.503.51
Note: LRC, Lvda Red Cob; PA and PB, groups A and B germplasms derived from modern US hybrids; SPT, derivatives from the Tangshan Sipingtou Chinese landrace. HR, highly resistant; R, resistant; MR, moderately resistant; S, susceptible; HS, highly susceptible.
Table 4. Rating scale for northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) severity and resistance.
Table 4. Rating scale for northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) severity and resistance.
Resistance Rating ScoresDescription of Leaf DiseaseResistance
1The area of the leaf lesions is less than 5% of the leaf area.Highly resistant (HR) (1 ≤ NCLBSM < 2)
3There are a small number of lesions on the spike leaves, accounting for 6–10% of the leaf area.Resistant (R) (2 ≤ NCLBSM < 4)
5There are numerous lesions on the leaves, accounting for 11–30% of the leaf area.Moderately resistant (MR) (4 ≤ NCLBSM < 6)
7There are a large number of lesions on the leaves above the ear position, and the lesions are connected, accounting for 31–70% of the leaf area.Susceptible (S) (6 ≤ NCLBSM < 8)
9Almost all the leaves of the whole plant are covered by lesions, and the leaves are withering and dying.Highly susceptible (HS) (8 ≤ NCLBSM ≤ 9)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, B.; Yang, J.; Tong, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, D.; Li, W.-X.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Duan, C. Identification and Analysis of Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight in Maize Germplasm Resources. Plants 2025, 14, 3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14203171

AMA Style

Meng B, Yang J, Tong L, Liu Q, Zhang D, Li W-X, Wang J, Xu Y, Guo Z, Duan C. Identification and Analysis of Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight in Maize Germplasm Resources. Plants. 2025; 14(20):3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14203171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Bing, Junwei Yang, Lixiu Tong, Qingli Liu, Dongfeng Zhang, Wen-Xue Li, Jianjun Wang, Yunbi Xu, Zifeng Guo, and Canxing Duan. 2025. "Identification and Analysis of Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight in Maize Germplasm Resources" Plants 14, no. 20: 3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14203171

APA Style

Meng, B., Yang, J., Tong, L., Liu, Q., Zhang, D., Li, W.-X., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Guo, Z., & Duan, C. (2025). Identification and Analysis of Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight in Maize Germplasm Resources. Plants, 14(20), 3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14203171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop