Next Article in Journal
Lightweight GAN for Restoring Blurred Images to Enhance Citrus Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Bioactive Compounds in Grammatophyllum speciosum Blume Using Bioreactor Cultures Under Elicitation with Sodium Chloride
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 14
Issue 19
10.3390/plants14193084
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Suitable Habitat Range Shift Dynamics of the Rare Orchid Cymbidium cyperifolium in China Under Global Warming

by
Yaqi Huang
1,2,3,
Xiangdong Liu
2,3,
Ting Chen
1,
Chan Chen
2,3,
Yibo Luo
4,
Lu Xu
1,* and
Fuxiang Cao
1,*
1
College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
Hunan Botanical Garden, Changsha 410116, China
3
Hunan Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan City Cluster National Research Station of Forest Ecosystem, Changsha 410116, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(19), 3084; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193084
Submission received: 18 August 2025 / Revised: 28 September 2025 / Accepted: 3 October 2025 / Published: 6 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Ecology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Wild orchids, valued for their beauty and economic importance, are facing the challenges of distribution contraction and range shifts from climate change. The rare Cymbidium cyperifolium (class II in the List of National Key Protected Wild Plants in China, Vulnerable on the China Biodiversity Red List) remains understudied regarding its responses to climate variability. Utilizing an enhanced MaxEnt model, we predicted suitable habitats under diverse climate scenarios, revealing a potential distribution of 52.37 × 104 km2, concentrated in eastern Yunnan, western Guangxi, the Guizhou border, and southern Hainan. Cymbidium cyperifolium is sensitive to climate change, and temperature annual range (Bio 7) contributes a significant 77.42% of the distribution probability (i.e., habitat suitability), highlighting temperature’s pivotal influence on its distribution. Although the overall potential distribution area and low-suitability regions in China are predicted to decrease, medium and high-suitability areas are expected to expand. The center of mass of the high-altitude habitat is concentrated in southeastern Yunnan Province, migrating just slightly, yet tending westward and northeastward. Based on these findings, we recommend the expansion of existing protected areas or the establishment of new ones for C. cyperifolium, particularly in eastern Yunnan and western Guangxi. Additionally, our research can serve as a reference for the ex situ conservation of C. cyperifolium and other orchids with similar ecological habits, underscoring the broader implications in biodiversity preservation efforts.

1. Introduction

Five primary factors, climate change, habitat alteration, overexploitation, pollution, and invasive alien species, are recognized as main threats to global biodiversity in the 21st century [1]. Climate change, a significant driver of global change, predominantly manifests through rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events. These climatic factors influence growth, reproduction, phenology, and geographical distribution on a regional scale [2], and this impact is particularly pronounced in endemic plants [3,4]. Current biodiversity conservation strategies typically rely on the existing species distribution, but with the increasing impact of climate change, these strategies face mounting challenges. Understanding the shifts in the suitable distribution areas of species under future climate scenarios and implementing targeted conservation measures promptly is vital for enhancing biodiversity conservation effectiveness.
According to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, global average temperature is expected to rise by 1.4 to 5.8 degrees Celsius in the 22nd century, representing an increase rate 2 to 10 times the warming rate in the 21st century. As global temperatures climb, hydrothermal conditions are anticipated to undergo unprecedented changes, leading to corresponding changes in the potential distribution of plant species [5]. The substantial rise in temperature is expected to significantly change the habitat distribution range of many species and elevate their extinction risk [6]. In recent decades, multiple studies on the relationship between species geographic distribution and global climate change have shown that over 80% of species’ geographic distribution will be affected by climate dynamics [7]. Shifts in species distribution are closely related to climate warming, and with pronounced impacts observed in high-altitude areas [8].
The Orchidaceae family is known for its vast species diversity [9]. It is also one of the most visually appealing plant families, ranking as the second largest among angiosperms worldwide [10,11]. Within this family, the semi-epiphytic Cymbidium cyperifolium exhibits distinctive morphological and ecological characteristics (Figure 1a–c), and is primarily distributed in southern China, including Guangdong, Hainan, southern Guangxi, southwestern Guizhou, and southeastern Yunnan (Figure 1d). Beyond China, its range extends to Nepal, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, and the Philippines. This perennial herb demonstrates a prolonged flowering period extending from October to February of the subsequent year. Its floral morphology produces lemon-scented flowers akin to those of C. kanran. The phyllotaxis of C. cyperifolium is particularly noteworthy, typically presenting 4–12 distichously arranged leaves that form a characteristic fan-shaped architecture, a unique trait distinguishing it from other congeneric species. Ecological investigations reveal its preference for well-drained lithophytic environments in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests, predominantly karst landforms at elevations between 900 and 1600 m. The Yachang Orchidaceae National Nature Reserve harbors the world’s largest known population of C. cyperifolium, with both population density and total abundance surpassing those of other documented localities. Population densities can reach 8.2 ± 1.3 individuals/m2 in optimal microhabitats, the highest documented for this species [12]. Nevertheless, there is a significant lack of documented information and scientific studies regarding the population status of C. cyperifolium due to habitat loss and wild collection.
Despite the vast number of orchid species, many have a limited geographical distribution range [13]. Orchids, both terrestrial and epiphytic, are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change [14,15]. Currently, the long-term survival of orchids is threatened by urbanization, habitat loss and fragmentation, climate change, atmospheric nitrogen deposition, and excessive harvesting [13,16,17]. Although orchids can produce thousands of seeds in one growing season, few seeds grow into plants, and the survival rate of germinated seeds from the seedling stage to the adult stage is usually low [18,19]. Similar to other species in Cymbidium, the seeds of C. cyperifolium lack endosperm and rarely germinate under natural field conditions. Even when germination does occur, the seedling stage is highly vulnerable; minor environmental fluctuations can prevent seedlings from progressing to subsequent developmental stages [20]. Therefore, in many cases, asexual reproduction serves as a crucial mechanism for the maintenance and expansion of C. cyperifolium populations. Notably, 86.5% of the plants on the trade ban list released by the International Trade Organization for Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) are orchids [21]. C. cyperifolium is designated as a National Key Protected Wild Plants Category II in China. It is assessed as Vulnerable (VU) on the China Biodiversity Red List: Higher Plants, reflecting specific threats to its wild populations within the country [22]. Despite this, proactive conservation efforts are often insufficient to secure their long-term survival, necessitating the development of additional strategies. This study focused solely on China due to the considerable challenges of multinational research, including securing permits and complying with varying biodiversity regulations. Furthermore, species occurrence data from other countries are scarce and often unverified. This research aims to provide conservation and management recommendations at the national scale. Extending the modeling to a broader region may be possible in the future if reliable occurrence data become available. However, comprehensive studies predicting the suitable habitats for C. cyperifolium are currently lacking, which significantly hinders the development of effective conservation strategies.
To address the knowledge gap in the spatial distribution of the threatened C. cyperifolium, in this study, the Maxent model was employed to predict the potential habitat areas of C. cyperifolium in China under the current and future climate, thereby offering a scientific basis for its targeted conservation. Our objectives were (1) to identify the distribution of C. cyperifolium and understand its growth response to climate change, and (2) to forecast the potential distribution area and the migration of the center of mass of high-suitability zones under climate change in China. This study will provide a scientific basis for the long-term planning and cultivation of C. cyperifolium in China, offering theoretical support for the relocation and in situ conservation of C. cyperifolium and other orchids with similar ecological requirements. This strategy aims not only to protect and expand the population of C. cyperifolium but also to conserve its entire associated biological community. This need arises from the species’ specific habitat requirements and complex ecological relationships, such as those with specialized pollinators and mycorrhizal fungi [23], as well as the vulnerability of its habitat to degradation, including severe rocky desertification in karst environments and limited capacity for autonomous recovery [24,25]. By creating ecological corridors to link fragmented populations and securing vital habitats, this approach efficiently conserves a mutually dependent ecosystem, thus transforming a single-species conservation initiative into a comprehensive ecosystem preservation strategy.

2. Results

2.1. Model Parameter Optimization

For parameter selection, the regularization multiplier (RM) is set to 0.5, and the feature class (FC) is set to LQ; the Akaike Information Criterion corrected (AICc) value is minimized (delta AICc = 0) (Table 1). This indicates that the model’s complexity is the lowest under these parameter settings, and consequently, the degree of overfitting is relatively low. Hence, the study selected RM = 0.5 and FC = LQ as the optimal parameters for the final model setting.

2.2. Prediction of Potential Suitable Areas for Current C. cyperifolium

2.2.1. Model Fitting Results

This section evaluates the fitting accuracy of the Maxent model. Under current conditions, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrates an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.985, which significantly exceeds the random prediction baseline of 0.5 (Figure 2). This suggests that the Maxent model is both stable and reliable, and it can be employed for accurately predicting the distribution of C. cyperifolium in suitable areas across China.

2.2.2. Distribution of Suitable Habitats in the Current Context

The Maxent model predicts that the total suitable growth area of C. cyperifolium spans 52.37 × 104 km2, comprising 5.45% of the entire study area (Table 2). Areas of high suitability are predominantly located in the southeastern Yunnan Province, southwestern Guizhou Province, the western Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, and southwestern Hainan Province, covering 7.67 × 104 km2 and accounting for 0.80% of the entire research area. Moderate suitability regions are primarily situated in the southwest subtropical regions in China, including Yunnan, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guizhou, Hainan, etc. In contrast to the highly suitable areas, the moderately suitable area also extends into the eastern Guangdong Province and central Fujian Province, covering 10.12 × 104 km2 or 1.05% of the total study area. The poorly suitable area encompasses the majority of Yunnan Province, eastern and southern Guangxi Province, eastern Guizhou Province, southeastern Sichuan Province, and some parts of Guangdong Province and Fujian Province in Taiwan Province, with an area of 34.58 × 104 km2, representing 3.60% of the entire study area (Figure 3).

2.3. Meteorological Factor Response Curve

It is generally accepted that when the probability of occurrence exceeds 0.5, the corresponding environmental factor is deemed suitable for species distribution. Figure 4 illustrates the response curves for seven climate factors influencing the distribution of potential suitable areas for C. cyperifolium. Most climate variable response curves exhibit an approximately normal distribution pattern, where the probability of occurrence initially increases and then decreases as climate conditions change.
When considering isotherm (Bio 3), the existence probability of C. cyperifolium increases with rising isotherm values and surpasses 0.5 when the isotherm exceeds 24.07. Conversely, the probability of occurrence decreases with the expansion of the annual temperature average range (Bio 7), specifically, when this range exceeds 22.33 °C, it indicates unsuitability for C. cyperifolium growth. These trends suggest the species is sensitive to meteorological variations. Mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio 9) spans 8.74 °C to 16.17 °C, while the mean temperature of warmest quarter (Bio 10) ranges from 20.09 °C to 25.51 °C. Annual precipitation (Bio 12) varies between 1157 mm and 1644 mm, and the precipitation seasonality (Bio 15) ranges from 70.26 to 88.38. Additionally, the precipitation of driest quarter (Bio 17) ranges between 51.55 mm and 100.66 mm.
The Jackknife test results for each climate variable indicate that when simulations are conducted using a single variable, the three variables that contribute the most to the model’s regularization training gains are the temperature annual range (Bio 7), the mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio 9), and the precipitation of driest quarter (Bio 17) (Figure 5). These climate variables provide more comprehensive and effective information than others. The temperature annual range (Bio 7), with contributions of 77.42%, contributes significantly to the model’s performance. This suggests that both the direct and indirect impacts on the distribution range of C. cyperifolium as critical limiting or promoting factors.

2.4. Changes in Potential Distribution Areas Under Future Climate Change

2.4.1. Distribution Range of Potential Suitable Areas for C. cyperifolium Under Future Climate Scenarios

Figure 6 indicates that the geographic distribution of potential suitable areas for C. cyperifolium under the four future climate scenarios remains largely consistent with the current scenario. These continue to be concentrated in the subtropical climate regions of China, with highly suitable areas mainly located in the southeastern Yunnan Province, the southwestern Guizhou Province, the western Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Prefecture, the southwestern of Hainan Province, and the central Taiwan Province. Significant changes in area primarily occur in the southern region of Sichuan. The optimal area during the 2070s SSP1–2.6 and SSP3–7.0 periods is relatively small, whereas SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 scenarios display larger areas.
The total area of suitable habitat for C. cyperifolium fluctuates over time, peaking in the SSP2–4.5 scenario circa 2070s, with a 13.44% increase from the current scenario. Conversely, the SSP3–7.0 scenario of the 2070s shows the smallest total suitable habitat area, decreasing by 19% from the current scenario, though its high-suitability area is 87,100 km2, a 13.56% increase over the current scenario.
Overall, with the increase in time, the high-altitude habitat of C. cyperifolium exhibits only a slight decline in the SSP2–4.5 scenario during the 2030s and 2090s, decreasing by 6.5% and 7.3%, respectively. All other periods and scenarios show an increasing trend, suggesting that while C. cyperifolium growth is sensitive to future climate change, these changes will not threaten the species’ survival in the short term.

2.4.2. Potential Habitat Area of C. cyperifolium Under Future Climate Scenarios

This process generated a schematic representation of the potential geographic distribution changes for C. cyperifolium under projected climate conditions compared to current environments (Figure 7).
Compared with the current climate scenario, the changes in the suitable habitat area of C. cyperifolium are inconsistent in different periods and situations. Notably, suitable habitat regions are increasing toward southwestern Yunnan, southeastern Guangdong Province, and central southern Hainan Province, while contracting in central eastern Yunnan Province. Across China, there is a trend of suitable habitat areas gradually spreading and expanding towards the periphery of concentrated distribution zones. Overall, the distribution of C. cyperifolium is gradually shifting towards high-altitude areas.

2.5. Centroid Migration of Suitable Area in the Future Climate Scenarios

Under various climate scenarios, the centroid of the high-suitability area for C. cyperifolium is concentrated in the southeastern region of Yunnan Province. Compared to the current situation, this centroid predominantly shifts westward and northward, albeit over relatively short distance (Figure 8). The average migration distances across four different periods are as follows: 0.11 km in the 2030s period, 0.23 km in the 2050s period, 0.30 km in the 2070s period, and 0.28 km in the 2090s period. Studies indicate that the centroid’s degree of dispersion increases over time across different contexts. From 2021 to 2040, under the SSP1–2.6 scenario, the centroid migration in high-altitude areas is minimal (0.09 km) compared to the current scenario. Conversely, in the 2090s under the SSP2–4.5 scenario, the migration of the centroid for high-altitude habitats is the most pronounced at 0.62 km. Although the center of C. cyperifolium high-altitude habitat shifts varying distances under different climate scenarios, no consistent directional pattern of movement has been identified between the movement distance and climate scenarios across different periods.

3. Discussion

3.1. Distribution of C. cyperifolium in China

We found that the potential suitable areas of C. cyperifolium are concentrated in the present day, widely distributed across the coastal regions of Guangdong, Guangxi, and Taiwan, as well as in southeast of Xizang, Yunnan, southwest Sichuan, and central to southwest of Guizhou, aligning with existing records. Currently, C. cyperifolium in China is mainly distributed in Guangxi, Yunnan, Hainan, and Guizhou regions. The world’s largest cluster of C. cyperifolium was discovered in Leye County, northwest Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (106°11′31”~106°27′04” E, 24°44′16”~24°53′58 N), characterized by a typical subtropical monsoon climate [26]. This suggests that the microenvironment climate and geographical features of this region are highly suitable for the growth of C. cyperifolium.
The geographical distribution of plants is the result of long-term interactions with climate. Changes in plant distribution patterns result from shifts in climate factors within suitable areas, as well as the species’ distribution characteristics and adaptability to extreme climatic conditions [27]. However, the distribution area of C. cyperifolium in China is relatively small at only 5.45%, which is less than that of most endangered Orchidaceae species such as Cypripedium macranthos [28], C. japonicum [29], and C. shanxiense [30]. This indicates a strong environmental dependence. Species with broader ecological niches usually exhibit greater adaptability and resource utilization ability [31], suggesting that C. cyperifolium is more affected by environmental changes, and therefore deserves more attention regarding trends in its potential habitat.

3.2. Limiting Factors of C. cyperifolium

C. cyperifolium is extremely sensitive to climate conditions, particularly temperature changes (Figure 5). Key temperature metrics, including isothermality (Bio3), temperature annual range (Bio 7), mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio9), mean temperature of warmest quarter (Bio 10), and three precipitation indicators—annual precipitation (Bio 12), precipitation seasonality (Bio 15), and precipitation of driest quarter (Bio 17)—are the primary climatic factors influencing this species’ potential distribution in China. Similar to many species, climate warming is the major driver of shifts in distribution patterns [32,33]. Importantly, the contribution rate of Bio 7 reached 77.42%, underscoring the crucial role of temperature in determining the distribution of C. cyperifolium.
We have identified the annual temperature range (Bio7) as the primary climatic factor determining the macro-scale distribution of C. cyperifolium in China (Figure 5). Nonetheless, the model paradoxically categorizes some known occurrence points within this range as having low climatic suitability. This discrepancy underscores the multi-scale nature of species distribution patterns. At the macro scale, climate factors set the climatic boundaries for the species’ potential range; at the local scale, particularly for Orchidaceae, species persist in these seemingly unsuitable grids by taking advantage of more favorable microenvironments (such as sheltered ravines or forest understories [23,34]) or relying on biotic factors like mycorrhizal fungi [35,36] and pollinators [37]. These populations may function as ecological sink populations, relying on dispersal from source areas to maintain their presence or continue to exist at the edge of their physiological tolerance. As a result, the species’ overall suitable habitat does not appear to be significantly affected under future scenarios (Figure 6 and Figure 7). These findings not only confirm the dominant role of climate factors but also highlight the critical importance of identifying microrefugia—small-scale environmental sanctuaries that can offer temporary refuge to species amidst macro-scale climate changes—and marginal habitats, which are essential for developing effective conservation strategies and accurately assessing the species’ vulnerability to environmental changes.
This sensitivity is related to the growth characteristics of the spider plant. C. cyperifolium typically grows in shaded forest areas with minimal light. However, due to the relatively low annual precipitation in the distribution area, the dry and wet seasons are obvious [38]. Due to the predominance of gravel and thin soil layers, as well as poor water retention, these plants often exist in a semi-epiphytic state [39]. The morphology and anatomical structure of the leaves and roots of C. cyperifolium show adaptations typical of both wet and dry environments, including thin leaves, raised stomata, and a high shoot-to-root ratio typical of wet habitats, as well as a thick cuticle, well-developed mechanical tissues, compact cells, crystal idioblasts, fleshy roots with velamen, and thickened endodermal and exodermal walls, characteristic of dry environments, indicating a high degree of adaptability to environmental conditions [39]. The variable thickness of leaf veins increases the surface area, enhancing photosynthesis and leaf rigidity. Internally, frequent fiber cell clusters within the mesophyll, along with well-developed vessels and fibers in the vascular bundles, provide mechanical support, facilitating leaf extension and efficient light use under forest canopies [40]. These structural features at the microscopic level explain the temperature sensitivity of C. cyperifolium.

3.3. Changes in Potential Habitable Areas

Global warming may lead to the redistribution of precipitation in different regions, thereby altering plant distribution patterns [41]. Research indicates that climate warming tends to cause most species to migrate towards higher latitudes and altitudes [8,42,43]. Our findings align with this, showing that the suitable habitat of C. cyperifolium gradually expands from the border of Yunnan and Guangxi to the surrounding regions, migrating to higher altitudes such as Yunnan and southeastern Tibet, possibly due to shifts in climate zones in Yunnan Province (Figure 6).
In most instances, the centroid migrates westward and northward (Figure 8). The temperature increase in high-altitude regions is more pronounced compared to lower altitudes, significantly altering species’ geographical distributions [44], encouraging species to move northward or migrate to higher altitudes [45,46]. Due to the combined influence of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, the East Asian monsoon, and Southwest monsoon, climate change in the karst region of central Yunnan, situated on a low-latitude plateau, is particularly pronounced and complex, making it sensitive to climate change [47]. Cheng et al. [48] noted that climate zones in Yunnan are shifting, with an increase in subtropical areas and a decrease in northern subtropical and temperate regions, demonstrating a northward movement and a trend of expansion into high-altitude areas.
Variability in C. cyperifolium’s potential habitat at different times and contexts is notable, with the expansion range being most significant during the SSP2–4.5 scenario in the 2050s. This stems from a less extreme land use and aerosol pathway, offering a milder warming trend [49]. C. cyperifolium, a warmth- and humidity-loving plant, will likely see increased suitable habitats due to climate warming, as these conditions favor light and temperature-preferring species. Conversely, global warming is predicted to increase rainfall in mid-to-high-latitude regions, while drought events may become more frequent in low-latitude areas [50], pressuring species like C. cyperifolium to migrate to higher latitudes for more favorable growth conditions [51]. Additionally, increasing SSPs may negatively impact orchid distribution [52], as seen with a decrease in suitable habitat areas of C. cyperifolium in the SSP3–7.0 scenario, a phenomenon similar to observations with Horsfieldia hainanensis Merr [53] reminding us to monitor potential adverse effects of climate change on species in the future.
To ensure the long-term survival of C. cyperifolium, we recommend prioritizing the identified key suitability areas, especially those with high predicted probabilities (e.g., in Yunnan and Guangxi), for establishing formal protected areas. However, recognizing the logistical and financial challenges of creating new state-managed reserves, a complementary strategy is vital. For suitable habitats within community forests or on private lands, conservation goals can be effectively advanced by empowering local stakeholders. This involves supporting Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas (ICCAs) and promoting mechanisms such as conservation easements, which provide legal and economic incentives for habitat protection without relying solely on government administration. Integrating formal protection with collaborative governance can establish a resilient conservation network for C. cyperifolium across the landscape [54,55].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Species Distribution Location

Distribution data for C. cyperifolium in China were acquired from several sources (1) a field investigations conducted in 2022 October at the National Nature Reserve of Orchidaceae Plants in Baise City, Guangxi Province (106°11′31″–106°27′04″ E, 24°44′16″–24°53′58″ W), (2) the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, https://www.gbif.org/, accessed on 8 March 2023) [56] (3) the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (CVH, http://www.cvh.ac.cn/, accessed on 23 September 2024), and (4) the published literature. All occurrence records obtained from GBIF and CVH were rigorously validated for taxonomic identity and spatial accuracy through expert verification, coordinate screening, and removal of duplicates. To reduce spatial autocorrelation, distribution points were thinned to retain only those spaced at least 2.5 km apart. This refinement yielded 46 geographical distribution records of C. cyperifolium (Figure 1d).

4.2. Climate Data Sourcing and Screening

4.2.1. Climate Data Sourcing

The climate variables used in this study were sourced from the World Climate Database (http://www.worldclim.org/, with a resolution of 2.5 arc minutes). Nineteen bioclimatic factors were obtained (Table 3), with significant impacts on species distribution across five periods—the current period (1950–2000), 2030s (2020–2040), 2050s (2040–2060), 2070s (2060–2080), and 2090s (2080–2100)—with a resolution of 2.5 min. We selected the BCC-CSM2-MR climate system model, and employed four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) scenarios in this model, to describe the quantitative relationship between the extent of climate change and socio-economic development paths [52]. These scenarios include SSP1–2.6 (low-carbon and sustainable development pathway), SSP2–4.5 (intermediate emissions and middle-of-the-road pathway), SSP3–7.0 (high emissions and regional rivalry pathway), and SSP5–8.5 (very high emissions and fossil-fueled development pathway), each representing varying greenhouse gas emission concentration scenarios from low to high.

4.2.2. Climate Factors Screening

The correlation between climate variables can result in the overfitting of model predictions. To mitigate this risk, Pearson correlation analysis was conducted on 19 layers of Bioclimatic variables using the band set statistical tool in ArcGIS 10.7 software (version 10.7.0.10450; Esri, Redlands, CA, USA). Concurrently, climate factors were screened based on their contribution to the distribution of C. cyperifolium. Following this analysis, and considering seven climate variables were ultimately selected, including four temperature indicators such as isothermality (Bio 3), temperature annual range (Bio 7), mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio 9), mean temperature of warmest quarter (bio 10), and three precipitation indicators, such as annual precipitation (Bio 12), precipitation seasonality (Bio 15), and precipitation of driest quarter (Bio 17). Based on the longitude and latitude of the existing distribution records of C. cyperifolium, the climatic data under the current scenario was extracted using ArcGIS 10.7, and the results are presented in Table 4.

4.3. Species Distribution Predictive Modeling Framework

4.3.1. Maxent Model

The Maxent (Maximum Entropy) model has been extensively utilized to predict geographic distributions across various species and is acknowledged as one of the highest-performing and most widely used species distribution models [57]. Studies have frequently compared the performance of various niche models, with most results demonstrating that Maxent outperforms other modeling approaches [58,59]. Phillips et al. [60] developed Maxent software (https://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/, accessed on 8 January 2024) in 2004, a Java-based application for predicting potential geographic distributions of species. In this study, we employed the Maxent model, Version 3.4.1 (https://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/, accessed on 8 January 2024) for model construction.

4.3.2. Implementation of MaxEnt Modeling Workflow

The filtered distribution point data for C. cyperifolium was saved in Excel in the format “species name, longitude, latitude” and exported as a CSV file necessary for running Maxent software. Regarding environmental variable data, the “Grid to ASCII” tool in ArcGIS 10.7 is utilized to convert all environmental variables into ASC files compatible with Maxent software (Version 3.4.1). Subsequently, C. cyperifolium distribution point data and climate variable layer are loaded in the appropriate format. The maximum number of background points is set to 10,000, and a cross-validation method is employed to extract test samples by partitioning all known distribution data into ten subsets—one for testing and nine for training—to enhance data utilization. This process was repeated ten times, with the final ASCII output file representing the average of these repetitions.

4.3.3. Model Parameterization and Tuning

When utilizing the Maxent model to predict potential species distribution areas, although most researchers employ default parameters, some have highlighted that models built with these defaults can be overly complex, potentially leading to overfitting and challenges in result interpretation. To address this issue, Muscarella et al. [61] developed the program package ENMeval in R (4.2.1) to optimize the model parameters. This package adjusts two parameters of the model, Regulation Multiplier (RM) and Feature Combination (FC). It assesses model complexity using various parameter combinations and identifies those that reduce complexity, thereby optimizing the model.
In this study, the ENMeval package was employed to optimize the model using the block method, which partitioned the 46 distribution records of C. cyperifolium distribution records into four approximately equal parts, with three parts designated for training and one for testing. The RM varied from 0.5 to 4.0, in increments of 0.5. For FC parameters, the Maxent model provides five types of features, linear (L), quadratic (Q), fragmented (Hint, H), product (P), and threshold (T). Six feature combinations were used for testing, L, LQ, H, LQH, LQHP, and LQHPT. The ENMeval package evaluated 48 parameter combinations, selecting the one that minimized the delta AICc to establish the optimal model.

4.3.4. Model Verification

The Area Under the Curve (AUC) value was chosen as the metric for assessing the accuracy of the model prediction in this study. The Maxent model software can generate the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve corresponding to its prediction results and calculate its AUC value.

4.3.5. Response Curves

The Maxent model generates response curves that elucidate the impact of major environmental factors on species distribution. These curves allow for the determination of the relationship between the probability of species occurrence and environmental variables.

4.4. Prediction of Potential Suitable Habitats for C. cyperifolium

4.4.1. Prediction of Suitable Habitats

Utilizing species distribution points alongside seven chosen environmental factors within the Maxent modeling framework, this study anticipated the potential distribution of C. cyperifolium across China under current climatic conditions. ArcGIS (version 10.7) facilitated the processing the prediction results and subsequent reclassification. The study area was categorized into four suitability classes based on the fitness index, unsuitable (0–0.1), poorly suitable (0.1–0.3), moderately suitable (0.3–0.5), and highly suitable (0.5–1).

4.4.2. Migration of Centroids in High Suitable Habitats Areas

To further analyze changes in the potential habitat areas of C. cyperifolium across varying climate scenarios, ArcGIS 10.7 was employed to spatially overlay distribution maps of potential habitat areas under diverse future climate scenarios with current climate distribution maps. Additionally, the centroid calculation tool in ArcGIS 10.7 was used to derive the centroids of the high-altitude areas of C. cyperifolium across different climate scenarios. This analysis aimed to explore potential migration trends of suitable habitats for C. cyperifolium in the context of climate change.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we employed the MaxEnt model toassess the suitable habitat conditions for C. cyperifolium under varying climatic scenarios. The findings indicate that C. cyperifolium is predominantly distributed in eastern Yunnan, western Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, at the border of Guizhou Province, and southern Hainan Island. Its suitable growth area spans approximately 52.37 × 104 km2, constituting 5.45% of the total study area. C. cyperifolium demonstrates sensitivity to climate fluctuations, with the center of mass of its high-potential distribution area migrating towards the west and northeast. We propose expanding expansion or establishment protected areas to safeguard this orchid’s habitats, especially in eastern Yunnan and western Guangxi, offering a model for conserving similarly ecological orchids. This study provides essential data for devising protective strategies and offers a reference for the ex situ conservation of C. cyperifolium and orchids with similar ecological characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Conceptualization, Y.H. and Y.L.; Data curation, Y.H. and Y.L.; Formal analysis, Y.H. and X.L.; Funding acquisition, L.X. and F.C.; Investigation, Y.H., X.L. and T.C.; Methodology, Y.H., L.X. and F.C.; Project administration, L.X.; Software, T.C. and C.C.; Supervision, F.C.; Writing—original draft, Y.H.; Writing—review and editing, X.L., C.C., Y.L. and L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2024JJ6283) and Teaching Reform in Regular Higher Education Institutions in Hunan Province (HNJG–2022–0103).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Yachang Orchidaceae National Nature Reserve for their strong support and assistance during our fieldwork. We also extend our sincere thanks to Xiaoma Li and Huihui Xi for their insightful suggestions on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hirsch, T. Global Biodiversity Outlook 3; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards, P.N. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kelly, A.E.; Goulden, M.L. Rapid Shifts in Plant Distribution with Recent Climate Change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 11823–11826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huang, E.; Chen, Y.; Yu, S. Climate Factors Drive Plant Distributions at Higher Taxonomic and Larger Spatial Scales. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 11, 1233936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aitken, S.N.; Yeaman, S.; Holliday, J.A.; Wang, T.; Curtis-McLane, S. Adaptation, Migration or Extirpation: Climate Change Outcomes for Tree Populations. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Urban, M.C. Accelerating Extinction Risk from Climate Change. Science 2015, 348, 571–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Root, T.L.; Price, J.T.; Hall, K.R.; Schneider, S.H.; Rosenzweig, C.; Pounds, J.A. Fingerprints of Global Warming on Wild Animals and Plants. Nature 2003, 421, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parmesan, C.; Yohe, G. A Globally Coherent Fingerprint of Climate Change Impacts across Natural Systems. Nature 2003, 421, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Christenhusz, M.J.M.; Byng, J.W. The Number of Known Plant Species in the World and Its Annual Increase. Phytotaxa 2016, 261, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shao, S.C.; Luo, Y.; Jacquemyn, H. Successful Reintroduction Releases Pressure on China’s Orchid Species. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 1101–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, T.; Cai, H.W.; Zhang, G.F. Predicting the Potential Distribution of Endangered Changnienia amoena S.S. Chien in China Based on Ensemble Modeling. Plants 2024, 13, 1234. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, J.; Liu, S.Y.; He, R.; Wei, X.L.; Luo, Y.B. Food-Deceptive Pollination in Cymbidium lancifolium (Orchidaceae) in Guangxi, China. Biodivers. Sci. 2007, 15, 608–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Richards, P.S.; Hans, J.A.; Tllui, K.; Michael, J.H. The Demography of Terrestrial Orchids: Life History, Population Dynamics and Conservation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2020, 192, 315–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wotavová, K.; Balounová, Z.; Kindlmann, P. Factors Affecting Persistence of Terrestrial Orchids in Wet Meadows and Implications for Their Conservation in a Changing Agricultural Landscape. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 118, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsiftsis, S.; Tsiripidis, I. Temporal and Spatial Patterns of Orchid Species Distribution in Greece: Implications for Conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 3461–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gale, S.W.; Fischer, G.A.; Cribb, P.J.; Fay, M.F. Orchid Conservation: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 186, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Swarts, N.D.; Dixon, K.W. Terrestrial Orchid Conservation in the Age of Extinction. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arditti, J.; Ghani, A.K.A. Numerical and Physical Properties of Orchid Seeds and Their Biological Implications. New Phytol. 2000, 145, 367–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jones, O.R.; Scheuerlein, A.; Salguero-Gómez, R.; Camarda, C.G.; Schaible, R.; Casper, B.B.; Dahlgren, J.P.; Ehrlén, J.; García, M.B.; Menges, E.S. Diversity of Ageing Across the Tree of Life. Nature 2014, 505, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rosmala, A.; Hardarani, N. Orchids Phytochemistry, Biology and Horticulture: Fundamentals and applications. Agron. J. 2024, 116, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, H. A Large Number of Wild Orchid Species are Offered Legal Protection in China. Orchid Conserv. News 2021, 3, 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (MEE); Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). China Biodiversity Red List: Higher Plants; Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2018; 627p.
  23. Zhang, Z.; Yan, Y.; Tian, Y.; Yan, Y.J.; He, J.S. Distribution and Conservation of Orchid Species Richness in China. Biol. Conserv. 2015, 181, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nave, L.E.; DeLyser, K.; Domke, G.M.; Holub, S.M.; Janowiak, M.K.; Kittler, B.; Ontl, T.A.; Sprague, E.; Sucre, E.B.; Walters, B.F.; et al. Disturbance and Management Effects on Forest Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Pacific Northwest. Ecol. Appl. 2022, 32, e2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, L.; Wang, S.; Bai, X.; Tian, Y.C.; Luo, G.J.; Wang, J.F.; Li, Q.; Chen, F.; Deng, Y.C.; Yang, Y.J.; et al. Climate Change Weakens the Positive Effect of Human Activities on Karst Vegetation Productivity Restoration in Southern China. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 115, 106392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Feng, C.L.; Deng, Z.H.; Cai, D.X.; Wu, T.G.; Su, Y. Current Status and Conservation Strategies of Wild Orchid Resources in Guangxi Yachang Forests. Plant Sci. J. 2012, 30, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Woodward, F.I.; Williams, B.G. Climate and Plant Distribution at Global and Local Scales. Vegetatio 1987, 69, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, Q.; Dong, S.B.; Yang, L.; Ji, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, M.Q.; Ren, Z.H.; Liu, Q.H.; Cheng, J. Prediction of Potential Distribution of Cypripedium macranthos under Climate Change Scenarios in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 44, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, Y.D.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, H.R.; Yang, M.; Zhuang, Y.; Ye, X. Modelling the Effects of Climate Change on the Distribution of Endangered Cypripedium japonicum in China. Forests 2021, 12, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dai, C.Q.; Zhang, D.L.; Yuan, Z.Q.; Peng, B.B.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, W.L. Prediction of the Suitable Habitat for Cypripedium shanxiense in China under Climate Change. Grassl. Turf 2025, 45, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ying, L.X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.T. Simulation of the potential range of Pistacia weinmannifolia in Southwest China with climate change based on the maximum-entropy (Maxent) model. Biodivers. Sci. 2016, 24, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Menéndez, R.; González-Megías, A.; Jay-Robert, P.; Marquéz-Ferrando, R. Climate Change and Elevational Range Shifts: Evidence from Dung Beetles in Two European Mountain Ranges. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23, 646–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rowe, K.C.; Rowe, K.M.C.; Tingley, M.W.; Koo, M.S.; Patton, J.L.; Conroy, C.J.; Perrine, J.D.; Beissinger, S.R.; Moritz, C. Spatially Heterogeneous Impact of Climate Change on Small Mammals of Montane California. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20141858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, Y.F.; Wang, X.M.; Zhang, X.B.; Luo, X.Q. Analysis of Influence Factors and Growth Status Investigation of Dendrobium officinale. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 16, 6175–6182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mccormick, M.K.; Whigham, D.F.; Canchani-Viruet, A. Mycorrhizal Fungi Affect Orchid Distribution and Population Dynamics. New Phytol. 2018, 219, 1207–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mccormick, M.K.; Jacquemyn, H. What Constrains the Distribution of Orchid Populations? New Phytol. 2018, 202, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, K.W.; Liu, Z.J.; Huang, L.Q.; Li, L.Q.; Tang, G.D. Pollination: Self-fertilization Strategy in an Orchid. Nature 2006, 441, 945–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Huang, C.B.; Chen, J.L.; Feng, C.L.; Lu, Z.F.; Li, J.X. Characteristics of Climate Vertical Distribution in Yachang Orchids Nature Reserve. J. Northwest For. Univ. 2008, 23, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhu, L.Q.; Xu, Y.X.; Zhao, L.J.; Yuan, J.; Yang, L.M. Anatomical Structure and Environmental Adaptability of Cymbidium cyperifolium in Karst Areas. Guihaia 2016, 36, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Terashima, I.; Hikosaka, K. Comparative Ecophysiology of Leaf and Canopy Photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18, 1111–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bracegirdle, T.J.; Krinner, G.; Tonelli, M.; Haumann, F.A.; Naughten, K.A.; Rackow, T.; Roach, L.A.; Wainer, I. Twenty-First Century Changes in Antarctic and Southern Ocean Surface Climate in CMIP6. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 2020, 21, e952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lenoir, J.; Gegout, J.C.; Marquet, P.A.; de Ruffray, P.; Brisse, H. A Significant Upward Shift in Plant Species Optimum Elevation during the 20th Century. Science 2008, 320, 1768–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, Q.L.; Xu, X.T.; Mao, K.S.; Wang, M.C.; Wang, K.; Xi, Z.X.; Liu, J.Q. Shifts in Plant Distributions in Response to Climate Warming in a Biodiversity Hotspot, the Hengduan Mountains. J. Biogeogr. 2018, 45, 1334–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, I.; Hill, J.K.; Ohlemüller, R.; Roy, D.B.; Thomas, C.D. Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming. Science 2011, 333, 1024–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hickling, R.; Roy, D.B.; Hill, J.K.; Fox, R.; Thomas, C.D. The Distributions of a Wide Range of Taxonomic Groups Are Expanding Polewards. Glob. Change Biol. 2006, 12, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chardon, N.I.C.W.; Cornwell, W.K.; Flint, L.E.; Flint, A.L.; Ackerly, D.D. Topographic, Latitudinal and Climatic Distribution of Pinus coulteri: Geographic Range Limits Are Not at the Edge of the Climate Envelope. Ecography 2015, 38, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Z.X.; He, Y.Q.; Theakstone, W.H.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, W.; Cao, W.H.; Du, J.; Xin, H.J.; Chang, L. Altitude Dependency of Trends of Daily Climate Extremes in Southwestern China, 1961–2008. J. Geogr. Sci. 2012, 22, 416–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cheng, J.; Wang, X.; Fan, L.; Yang, X.; Yang, P. Variations of Yunnan Climatic Zones in Recent 50 Years. Prog. Geogr. 2009, 28, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zheng, F.; Huang, Z.C.; Chen, L.J.; Wang, M.; Yan, Y.H.; Chen, J.B. Prediction of Distribution Patterns and Dominant Climatic Factors of Cymbidium in China Using MaxEnt Model. Guihaia 2023, 43, 1027–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, R. Response of the Distribution of Bamboo Forests to Climate Change in China During Historic Periods. J. Bamboo Res. 2002, 21, 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wan, Z.H.; Lai, Y.L.; Hong, Y.J.; Liu, G.X.; Jiang, M.X. Evolution of Jingjiang Section of the Yangtze River Based on Historical Maps and Remote Sensing over the Past 100 Years. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2019, 39, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liang, H.Y.; Jiang, X.L.; Kong, Y.H.; Yang, X.T. Prediction of the Potential Geographical Distribution of Cymbidium goeringii and C. faberi under Global Warming. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 8345–8353. [Google Scholar]
  53. Liang, H.Z.; Lin, Y.; Liu, S.X.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, J.S.; Huang, R.L.; Wang, R.J.; Wang, Y. Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Endangered Plant Horsfieldia hainanensis Based on the Optimized MaxEnt Model. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2024, 44, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bingham, H.; Fitzsimons, J.A.; Redford, K.H.; Mitchell, B.A.; Cumming, T.L. Privately Protected Areas: Advances and Challenges in Guidance, Policy and Documentation. Parks 2017, 23, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Porter-Bolland, L.; Ellis, E.A.; Guariguata, M.R.; Ruiz-Mallen, I.; Negrete-Yankelevich, S.; Reyes-Garcia, V. Community Managed Forests and Forest Protected Areas: An Assessment of their Conservation Effectiveness Across the Tropics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 268, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. GBIF Occurrence Download. Available online: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.mkk7q8 (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  57. Venne, S.; Currie, D.J. Can Habitat Suitability Estimated from MaxEnt Predict Colonizations and Extinctions? Divers. Distrib. 2021, 27, 1237–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Anderson, R.P.; Dudík, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A.; Hijmans, R.J.; Huettmann, F.; Leathwick, J.R.; Lehmann, A.; et al. Novel Methods Improve Prediction of Species’ Distributions from Occurrence Data. Ecography 2006, 29, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cao, X.F.; Qian, G.L.; Hu, B.S.; Liu, F.Q. Prediction of Potential Suitable Distribution Area of Flaveria bidentis in China Based on Niche Models. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 21, 3063–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M.; Schapire, R.E. A Maximum Entropy Approach to Species Distribution Modeling. Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 2004, 69, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Muscarella, R.; Galante, P.J.; Soley-Guardia, M.; Boria, R.A.; Kass, J.M.; Uriarte, M.; Anderson, R.P. ENMeval: An R Package for Conducting Spatially Independent Evaluations and Estimating Optimal Model Complexity for Maxent Ecological Niche Models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 14 03084 g001
Figure 1. Wild characteristics and distribution of Cymbidium cyperifolium in China. (a) Wild growth of C. cyperifolium, (b) flowers of C. cyperifolium, (c) fruit of C. cyperifolium. (d) Distribution of C. cyperifolium in China.
Figure 1. Wild characteristics and distribution of Cymbidium cyperifolium in China. (a) Wild growth of C. cyperifolium, (b) flowers of C. cyperifolium, (c) fruit of C. cyperifolium. (d) Distribution of C. cyperifolium in China.
Plants 14 03084 g001
Plants 14 03084 g002
Figure 2. Maxent ROC curve and AUC value.
Figure 2. Maxent ROC curve and AUC value.
Plants 14 03084 g002
Plants 14 03084 g003
Figure 3. Potential suitable habitats of C. cyperifolium in China predicted by Maxent model.
Figure 3. Potential suitable habitats of C. cyperifolium in China predicted by Maxent model.
Plants 14 03084 g003
Plants 14 03084 g004
Figure 4. Response curve for 7 climate variables: (a) isothermality, (b) temperature annual range, (c) mean temperature of driest quarter, (d) mean temperature of warmest quarter, (e) annual precipitation, (f) precipitation seasonality, (g) precipitation of driest quarter.
Figure 4. Response curve for 7 climate variables: (a) isothermality, (b) temperature annual range, (c) mean temperature of driest quarter, (d) mean temperature of warmest quarter, (e) annual precipitation, (f) precipitation seasonality, (g) precipitation of driest quarter.
Plants 14 03084 g004
Plants 14 03084 g005
Figure 5. Jacknife text of environment variables in MaxEnt.
Figure 5. Jacknife text of environment variables in MaxEnt.
Plants 14 03084 g005
Plants 14 03084 g006
Figure 6. Potential suitable habitats for C. cyperifolium in different climate scenarios.
Figure 6. Potential suitable habitats for C. cyperifolium in different climate scenarios.
Plants 14 03084 g006
Plants 14 03084 g007
Figure 7. Change in potential suitable habitats of C. cyperifolium. The red part in the figure represents the area where the fitness increases, the blue part represents the area where the fitness decreases, and the green part represents the area where the fitness remains.
Figure 7. Change in potential suitable habitats of C. cyperifolium. The red part in the figure represents the area where the fitness increases, the blue part represents the area where the fitness decreases, and the green part represents the area where the fitness remains.
Plants 14 03084 g007
Plants 14 03084 g008
Figure 8. Distribution of centroids of C. cyperifolium in highly suitable habitats under different climatic scenarios. Red pentagram represent current; yellow represents 2030s; green represents 2050s; blue represents 2070s; purple represents 2090s.
Figure 8. Distribution of centroids of C. cyperifolium in highly suitable habitats under different climatic scenarios. Red pentagram represent current; yellow represents 2030s; green represents 2050s; blue represents 2070s; purple represents 2090s.
Plants 14 03084 g008
Table 1. Evaluation results of Maxent model under different parameter combinations.
Table 1. Evaluation results of Maxent model under different parameter combinations.
RMFCAICc 6Delta. AICc
0.5H 12821.38 1907.19
L 2975.66 61.46
LQ 3914.19 0.00
LQHNANA
LQHP 4NANA
LQHPT 5NANA
1H1595.29 681.09
L978.67 64.48
LQ930.89 16.70
LQH1107.90 193.70
LQHP1061.47 147.28
LQHPT1095.81 181.61
1.5H1371.42 457.23
L982.82 68.63
LQ931.11 16.91
LQH1017.23 103.03
LQHP1020.07 105.88
LQHPT1011.44 97.25
2H1070.73 156.54
L984.86 70.66
LQ938.16 23.97
LQH1016.05 101.86
LQHP969.75 55.56
LQHPT1014.11 99.91
2.5H1009.80 95.61
L986.81 72.62
LQ937.75 23.56
LQH947.89 33.69
LQHP945.78 31.59
LQHPT947.13 32.93
3H1069.49 155.30
L989.13 74.94
LQ941.79 27.60
LQH925.86 11.66
LQHP952.43 38.24
LQHPT940.73 26.54
3.5H1007.02 92.83
L991.79 77.60
LQ945.93 31.74
LQH931.43 17.24
LQHP945.19 30.99
LQHPT959.40 45.21
4H999.54 85.35
L994.68 80.48
LQ950.18 35.99
LQH941.31 27.12
LQHP952.50 38.31
LQHPT956.92 42.73
1 Hint (H), 2 linear (L), 3 quadratic (Q), 4 product (P), 5 threshold (T), 6 AICc represent Akaike’s lnformation Criterion with Corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion.
Table 2. Areas of suitable habitats of C. cyperifolium under climate scenarios and their proportion of the national area/104 km2.
Table 2. Areas of suitable habitats of C. cyperifolium under climate scenarios and their proportion of the national area/104 km2.
Time Shared Socio-Economic Pathways SSPsAll SuitablePoorly SuitableModerately SuitableHighly Suitable
Area%Area%Area%Area%
Current52.37 5.45 34.58 3.60 10.12 1.05 7.67 0.80
2030s1–2.653.75 5.59 34.90 3.63 10.88 1.13 7.97 0.83
2–4.548.42 5.03 30.76 3.20 10.49 1.09 7.17 0.75
3–7.046.03 4.79 26.22 2.73 11.45 1.19 8.36 0.87
5–8.555.06 5.72 34.24 3.56 12.86 1.34 7.96 0.83
2050s1–2.651.84 5.39 32.09 3.34 11.77 1.22 7.98 0.83
2–4.559.41 6.18 38.08 3.96 13.10 1.36 8.23 0.86
3–7.055.17 5.74 34.01 3.54 12.68 1.32 8.48 0.88
5–8.558.44 6.08 37.27 3.88 12.37 1.29 8.80 0.91
2070s1–2.646.15 4.80 28.49 2.96 9.93 1.03 7.73 0.80
2–4.554.53 5.67 35.00 3.64 12.07 1.25 7.46 0.78
3–7.042.42 4.41 24.80 2.58 8.91 0.93 8.71 0.91
5–8.552.59 5.47 31.28 3.25 12.85 1.34 8.46 0.88
2090s1–2.647.04 4.89 29.70 3.09 9.64 1.00 7.70 0.80
2–4.553.60 5.57 34.50 3.59 11.99 1.25 7.11 0.74
3–7.052.64 5.47 31.96 3.32 11.72 1.22 8.96 0.93
5–8.557.42 5.97 36.40 3.78 12.84 1.34 8.18 0.85
Table 3. Environmental variables used for modeling the potentially suitable habitat of C. cyperifolium.
Table 3. Environmental variables used for modeling the potentially suitable habitat of C. cyperifolium.
CodeName of Bioclimate VariablesUnit
Bio 1Annual Mean Temperature℃
Bio 2Mean Diurnal Range (Mean of monthly)℃
Bio 3Isothermality %
Bio 4Temperature Seasonality℃
Bio 5Max Temperature of Warmest Month℃
Bio 6Min Temperature of Coldest Month℃
Bio 7Temperature Annual Range℃
Bio 8Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter℃
Bio 9Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter℃
Bio 10Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter℃
Bio 11Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter℃
Bio 12Annual Precipitationmm
Bio 13Precipitation of Wettest Monthmm
Bio 14Precipitation of Driest Monthmm
Bio 15Precipitation Seasonalitymm
Bio 16Precipitation of Wettest Quartermm
Bio 17Precipitation of Driest Quartermm
Bio 18Precipitation of Warmest Quartermm
Bio 19Precipitation of Coldest Quartermm
Table 4. Climatic conditions for the growth of C. cyperifolium under the current scenario.
Table 4. Climatic conditions for the growth of C. cyperifolium under the current scenario.
Bio 3
%		Bio 7
℃		Bio 9
℃		Bio 10
℃		Bio 12
mm		Bio 15
mm		Bio 17
mm
47.93 22.06 8.82 19.32 1263 76.16 65
48.78 22.68 9.13 19.72 921 76.71 52
48.66 23.36 12.60 23.25 960 81.90 49
48.38 21.70 11.31 19.95 1029 80.01 54
42.99 19.30 12.96 23.50 1396 81.60 74
47.80 20.69 8.84 18.86 1300 86.03 51
42.37 19.09 10.22 20.84 1555 81.38 78
41.49 19.16 10.25 21.08 1630 81.24 80
39.99 18.74 11.10 21.02 1762 83.44 80
43.40 23.34 9.05 21.64 1108 79.80 62
44.50 21.28 9.76 21.16 1297 86.04 48
42.07 20.69 9.87 21.45 1356 86.96 52
41.42 19.92 10.01 21.24 1667 95.96 52
40.57 22.53 13.37 24.23 1133 80.13 62
40.92 20.19 11.80 23.26 1561 92.21 53
41.62 20.68 9.44 21.05 1392 87.90 53
41.11 20.52 11.09 22.71 1530 91.96 53
42.36 21.46 8.82 20.68 1244 83.15 53
39.49 22.59 8.17 21.04 1235 80.10 65
38.31 23.26 9.52 22.98 1257 80.61 67
37.90 22.67 9.64 22.87 1240 80.47 65
42.22 22.96 10.27 22.87 1076 79.47 45
40.48 21.55 9.81 21.94 1205 83.87 45
38.12 22.77 9.09 22.32 1257 84.34 56
36.55 23.54 8.08 22.05 1309 80.52 65
34.70 23.59 7.95 22.35 1307 79.62 64
38.70 21.07 11.04 23.36 1367 87.15 54
36.72 22.58 9.31 22.73 1268 87.41 52
39.45 21.52 12.02 24.45 1291 87.49 45
33.68 23.46 8.68 23.11 1320 81.40 62
37.20 20.70 11.60 24.06 1420 86.86 58
36.38 20.60 10.54 23.02 1416 88.00 58
34.81 20.46 12.49 25.23 1501 87.90 74
34.04 23.44 8.66 22.99 1249 82.00 52
33.13 23.00 9.71 24.07 1305 81.85 63
33.34 21.43 14.82 26.97 1466 83.53 87
30.48 26.44 6.63 23.51 1274 68.50 83
28.73 25.89 4.90 21.82 1293 66.73 89
30.46 19.84 13.40 24.59 1862 82.00 105
29.49 26.06 9.04 25.91 1409 67.39 114
42.60 15.74 17.50 25.65 1420 79.03 52
42.46 15.90 15.65 23.89 1594 77.59 64
43.19 15.72 16.80 24.83 1591 76.18 70
48.10 14.41 22.85 28.75 1456 77.74 76
29.57 23.83 11.25 24.75 1613 65.65 132
29.83 25.13 12.32 26.47 1553 66.11 129
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, T.; Chen, C.; Luo, Y.; Xu, L.; Cao, F. Potential Suitable Habitat Range Shift Dynamics of the Rare Orchid Cymbidium cyperifolium in China Under Global Warming. Plants 2025, 14, 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193084

AMA Style

Huang Y, Liu X, Chen T, Chen C, Luo Y, Xu L, Cao F. Potential Suitable Habitat Range Shift Dynamics of the Rare Orchid Cymbidium cyperifolium in China Under Global Warming. Plants. 2025; 14(19):3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yaqi, Xiangdong Liu, Ting Chen, Chan Chen, Yibo Luo, Lu Xu, and Fuxiang Cao. 2025. "Potential Suitable Habitat Range Shift Dynamics of the Rare Orchid Cymbidium cyperifolium in China Under Global Warming" Plants 14, no. 19: 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193084

APA Style

Huang, Y., Liu, X., Chen, T., Chen, C., Luo, Y., Xu, L., & Cao, F. (2025). Potential Suitable Habitat Range Shift Dynamics of the Rare Orchid Cymbidium cyperifolium in China Under Global Warming. Plants, 14(19), 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop