Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Lanthanum-Cysteine Chelate and Corn Steep Liquor Mitigate Cadmium Toxicity in Chinese Cabbage via Physiological–Microbial Coordination
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Analysis and Breeding-Oriented SNP Marker Development for Bacterial Wilt Resistance in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of the TCP Gene Family in Chimonanthus praecox and Functional Analysis of CpTCP2 Regulating Leaf Development and Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis

1
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River (Ministry of Education), Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Forest Ecological Restoration and Utilization in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing 400036, China
3
College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
4
College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
5
Key Laboratory for Flower Breeding of Yunnan Province, National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture, Floriculture Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(19), 3039; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193039
Submission received: 26 August 2025 / Revised: 23 September 2025 / Accepted: 27 September 2025 / Published: 1 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Omics Approaches to Analyze Gene Regulation in Plants)

Abstract

TCP transcription factors represent a crucial family of plant regulators that contribute significantly to growth and developmental processes. Although the TCP gene family has been extensively studied in various plant species, research on Chimonanthus praecox (wintersweet) remains limited. Here, we performed genome-wide identification and analysis of the TCP gene family in C. praecox and identified 22 CpTCP genes. We further systematically examined the associated physicochemical properties, evolutionary relationships, gene structures, and regulatory features. Analysis revealed that all CpTCP proteins possess a conserved TCP domain, and subcellular localization prediction indicated their localization in the nucleus. Promoter analysis revealed that multiple cis-elements are associated with abiotic stress responses and plant growth regulation. Further analysis revealed high CpTCP2 expression in the leaves and stamen, with significantly increased levels during flower senescence. CpTCP2 expression was upregulated in response to methyl jasmonate (MeJA), salicylic acid, abscisic acid, and shade. CpTCP2 overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana resulted in a reduced leaf area, delayed flowering, and increased rosette leaf numbers. Moreover, MeJA treatment accelerated leaf senescence in CpTCP2 transgenic Arabidopsis. These findings provide insights into the evolutionary characteristics of the TCP family in C. praecox, highlighting the functional role of CpTCP2 in regulating leaf development and flowering time in Arabidopsis, thereby offering valuable genetic resources for wintersweet molecular breeding.

1. Introduction

Chimonanthus praecox, commonly known as wintersweet, is a deciduous shrub native to China, renowned for its fragrant yellow flowers that bloom during the cold winter months [1]. Research on this species predominantly focuses on its horticultural value and molecular genetics. Widely cultivated across China, C. praecox is frequently used in landscaping, in garden decoration, and as an ornamental shrub, appreciated for its unique flowering season and elegant fragrance [2]. Molecular studies of C. praecox primarily explore its genomics [2,3,4], transcription factors [5,6,7,8], and their roles in regulating plant development [9,10,11,12]. Research on the flowering and leaf development of C. praecox using molecular biology techniques holds practical value.
TCP transcription factors are involved in multiple aspects of plant development, including embryogenesis, leaf development, branching, floral organ morphogenesis, pollen development, germination, senescence, circadian rhythms, cell cycle regulation, hormone signal transduction, and the regulation of cell differentiation, proliferation, and growth [13]. This family was originally named after three transcription factors: TB1 (Teosinte Branched1) from Zea mays [14], CYC (Cycloidea) from Antirrhinum majus [15], and PCF (Proliferating Cell Factor) from Oryza sativa [16]. Evolutionary studies have suggested that the TCP family originated from an unknown ancestor that appeared after the emergence of green algae but before terrestrial plants [17]. These proteins contain a highly conserved TCP domain, which is classified into two classes based on the characteristics within and outside the domain, specifically Class I (PCF) and Class II [18]. Class II TCPs have four additional amino acid residues in the conserved base region compared to Class I. Moreover, Class II TCPs are further divided into CIN (Cincinnata) and CYC/TB1 subfamilies [13]. Preliminary studies have suggested that Class I members in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa promote cell proliferation, whereas Class II members, such as CYC, CIN, and TB1, generally inhibit cell proliferation [13].
The CIN subfamily of TCPs plays a central role in regulating leaf size and shape. Mutations in the CIN gene of Antirrhinum majus result in larger leaves with wavy edges [19]. In A. thaliana, CIN TCPs exhibit redundant and additive effects on the regulation of leaf morphology. An Arabidopsis tcp4 mutant shows wavy leaf margins, whereas tcp4 and tcp2 double mutants produce larger curled leaves [20]. Further, overexpression of the TCP4 gene in Arabidopsis leads to plants with smaller leaf areas than the wild-type, and overexpressing plants exhibit lanceolate-shaped leaves [21]. Meanwhile, overexpression of the TCP2 gene in Arabidopsis causes the leaves to become outwardly angled and exhibit a greater degree of downward bending [22]. In Brassica rapa ssp., the CIN-like gene BrrTCP2 is conserved and controls leaf size and shape. BrrTCP2 overexpression reduces the leaf size in wild-type Arabidopsis and restores the leaf morphology in tcp2tcp4tcp10 mutants [23]. CIN-like TCPs inhibit the activity of the marginal meristem, which determines the complexity of leaf margins or compound leaf formation in different plants. In the Class I TCP gene family, AtTCP7, AtTCP8, AtTCP22, and AtTCP23 exhibit functional redundancies. In AtTCP7, AtTCP8, AtTCP22, and AtTCP23 multiple mutants, leaf shape and size are similar to those of wild-type Arabidopsis. However, when a repression domain is introduced, single mutants of AtTCP7 or AtTCP23 exhibit curled rosette leaves and smaller leaf sizes [24]. The Arabidopsis KNOX1 (Class I KNOTTED-like homeobox) family is involved in leaf development and compound leaf formation. AtTCP7, AtTCP8, AtTCP22, and AtTCP23 bind directly to the promoter of STM, a gene in the KNOX1 family, suggesting that Class I TCP genes in Arabidopsis directly or indirectly regulate KNOX1-family genes to control leaf development [25].
TCP transcription factors regulate leaf cell growth via lateral and longitudinal cell expansion. Plant hormones, such as ethylene and cytokinins, promote lateral growth, whereas auxins, brassinosteroids, and gibberellins drive longitudinal cell expansion [26]. Studies have shown that reduced expression of the TCP CIN subfamily in Arabidopsis results in an increased proportion of smaller cells and a reduced number of cells entering differentiation. In contrast, the overexpression this subfamily results in cell cycle exit in a higher proportion of cells and the induction of cell differentiation, thereby inhibiting further cell division [27]. These findings offer insights into the phenotypes of CIN subfamily mutants, as both loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations lead to alterations in leaf size and shape.
The TCP family has crucial roles in plant flower development, morphology, and timing. In Arabidopsis, an mir319a mutant exhibits significant defects in petal development, characterized by the formation of thread-like petals. Meanwhile, the CIN subfamily gene AtTCP4 restores the mutant phenotype, indicating that AtTCP4 is a key gene involved in the petal development pathway and regulated by miR319a [28]. In addition, an spe3 mutant of Arabidopsis produces larger petals, and this gene has an opposing function to that of miR319a. AtSPE3, an upstream gene, positively regulates the expression of AtTCP4 and AtTCP10 and negatively regulates miR319a expression, thereby controlling petal size [29]. Moreover, Class I TCP genes regulate flower development. Overexpression of the PePCF10 gene from Phalaenopsis aphrodite in Arabidopsis results in smaller petals compared with those in the wild-type, with a reduction in the petal cell area and an increase in the cell number [30]. Genes from the TB1/CYC subfamily also play a role in the regulation of flower development. The overexpression of Chrysanthemum morifolium Cyc2CL-1 and Cyc2CL-2 genes in Arabidopsis inhibits stamen and petal development [31]. Further, CmCYC2c binds to the promoter of ClCYC2f to regulate floral symmetry development [32].
In summary, TCP transcription factors are plant-specific and important transcriptional regulators. Although the TCP gene family has been extensively studied in many plants, research on the function of this family in C. praecox remains relatively scarce. A deeper understanding of the composition, evolutionary characteristics, and functional mechanisms of the TCP gene family in C. praecox is crucial for elucidating the molecular regulatory networks underlying plant growth and development. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a comprehensive genome-wide identification and systematic analysis of the TCP gene family in C. praecox, focusing on investigating the functional characteristics of CpTCP2 to explore its role in growth and development while also enhancing our understanding of the functional diversity of plant TCP transcription factors.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Physicochemical Properties of CpTCP Genes

TCP proteins were identified from the C. praecox protein database using HMMER software (version 3.0), with the hidden Markov model (PF03634) of TCP as the reference. Domain analysis of the TCP proteins was performed using online tools, such as NCBI-CD Search, Pfam, and SMART, excluding sequences that lacked the characteristic TCP domain. In total, 22 TCP family genes from C. praecox were identified (Table 1), including Ws006179, Ws001834, Ws008336, Ws004919, Ws020128, Ws013215, Ws002199, Ws000567, Ws026740, Ws018174, Ws021384, Ws013991, Ws025658, Ws007064, Ws004363, Ws000794, Ws005371, Ws022851, Ws007603, Ws017440, Ws002910, and Ws000671.
The physicochemical properties of the identified TCP proteins were analyzed (Table 1). The 22 C. praecox TCP genes were named based on their similarity to the 24 TCP genes in A. thaliana. Amino acid lengths ranged from 209 to 603 aa, the relative molecular weight varied between 22.06 and 65.10 kDa, and the theoretical pI values ranged from 5.90 to 10.20. The instability index ranged from 45.16 to 69.10, and the hydrophobicity index ranged from −0.884 to −0.209. Moreover, the aliphatic indices varied between 58.51 and 79.15. None of the TCP proteins possessed signal peptides or transmembrane domains, and subcellular localization predictions indicated that all TCP proteins are localized to the nucleus.

2.2. Multiple Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Tree Analysis of CpTCP Proteins

Multiple sequence alignment of the conserved TCP domains in the 22 CpTCP proteins revealed two groups: 14 proteins belonging to Class I (PCF) and 8 proteins belonging to Class II. Class II was further divided into the CYC/TB1 and CIN subgroups, with CpTCP1/12a/12b classified in the CYC/TB1 subgroup and CpTCP2/4/24/5/13 classified in the CIN subgroup. The conserved domain of TCP proteins is similar to the bHLH domain. Class II TCP proteins have a 4-amino acid insertion in the basic region compared with those of Class I, although both Class I and II proteins exhibit high amino acid conservation in this region. In the loop and helical regions, amino acid conservation was markedly lower in both classes (Figure 1a). In addition to the TCP domain, 6 Class II CpTCP proteins (CpTCP1/2/12a/12b/13/24) contain an R domain (18 arginine-rich residues) at the C-terminus, which distinguishes classes I and II (Figure 1b). A phylogenetic analysis showed that C. praecox TCP proteins cluster closely with those of submerged camphor, and similar clustering was observed between the Class II subfamily of C. praecox and Vitis vinifera. No significant clustering was found with Ocimum basilicum and Oryza sativa, further confirming a close evolutionary relationship between C. praecox and dicots, particularly of the Lauraceae family (Figure 1c).

2.3. Conserved Motif Analysis and Promoter Cis-Element Analysis of CpTCPs

Conserved motif analysis revealed that CpTCP proteins contain 10 distinct motifs, with the number of motifs per protein ranging from 2 to 7 and all proteins containing Motif1. Results indicated that Class I proteins uniquely harbor Motifs2/3/4/6, whereas the CYC/TB1 subfamily of Class II proteins specifically contains Motif10, which serves as a key marker for distinguishing CYC/TB1 from the other subgroups. Additionally, the CIN subgroup was found to contain Motif5 at the N-terminus, distinguishing it from the CYC/TB1 subgroup. Domain analysis revealed that each CpTCP protein contained a TCP domain. In the Class I subgroups, CpTCP9d and CpTCP19 were determined to have TCP domains closer to the N-terminus (Figure 2a).
The promoter cis-element analysis (Figure 2b) revealed 25 distinct cis-elements in the CpTCP family, including elements related to meristem and endosperm expression, defense, and the stress response, as well as abiotic stress-related elements such as those associated with drought, low temperature, and anaerobic induction. Several CpTCP promoters were found to contain methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-responsive elements (CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif), salicylic acid (SA)-responsive elements (TCA-element and SARE), abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive elements (ABREs), gibberellin-responsive elements (GARE-motif, TATC-box, and P-box), and auxin-responsive elements (TGA-element and AuxRR-core). Two cis-acting regulatory elements, CAT-box and NON-box, were determined to be associated with meristem expression during plant growth and development. Multiple CpTCP promoters were also found to contain cis-elements involved in endosperm expression (GCN4-motif) and seed-specific regulation (RY element). Thus, C. praecox CpTCP genes likely play significant roles in hormone responses, plant growth and development, and stress responses.

2.4. Chromosomal Localization and Synteny Analysis of CpTCP Genes

Gene localization analysis showed that CpTCP genes were distributed across all chromosomes (Figure 3a). Moreover, synteny analysis of C. praecox, A. thaliana, O. sativa, V. vinifera, submerged camphor, and camphor trees revealed replication events for all coding genes. Eleven pairs of syntenic genes were identified in the C. praecox TCP family: CpTCP8a/8b, CpTCP2/24, CpTCP5/13, CpTCP1/12b, CpTCP12a/12b, CpTCP14/15, CpTCP9d/19, CpTCP7a/7b, CpTCP9a/9b, CpTCP9b/9c, and CpTCP9a/9c. Synteny genes were found on all chromosomes except chromosome 04. Further, C. praecox shared 24, 14, 19, 39, and 16 syntenic gene pairs with A. thaliana, O. sativa, V. vinifera, submerged camphor, and camphor trees, respectively (Figure 3b), indicating a close evolutionary relationship with dicots, particularly of the Lauraceae family. Further analysis showed that CpTCP2, CpTCP4, CpTCP9b, CpTCP9c, CpTCP14, CpTCP15, CpTCP20b, and CpTCP24 exhibit synteny across the five species, suggesting that these genes appeared before the divergence of monocots and dicots and maintained high conservation. Conversely, CpTCP7b and CpTCP20a were not detected in the synteny analysis, indicating that they may be unique to C. praecox or may have emerged at later evolutionary stages.

2.5. Analysis of the Sequence Characteristics of CpTCP2

Expression analysis revealed that CpTCP2 was most highly expressed in the leaves of C. praecox, which was significantly higher than that in other tissues, and higher expression was also detected in the fruit, flowers, and buds (Figure 4a). The expression of CpTCP2 was substantially elevated during floral senescence compared with other floral stages, implying that CpTCP2 plays an important role in the regulation of flower senescence (Figure 4b). Among the floral organs, CpTCP2 was most highly expressed in the stamen and least expressed in the pistil (Figure 4c).
To explore the effects of exogenous hormones and shade on CpTCP2 expression, MeJA, ABA, SA, and shade treatments were used to significantly regulate expression (Figure 4d–g). MeJA treatment gradually upregulated CpTCP2 expression, which peaked at 12 h, whereas ABA treatment caused a gradual increase peaking at 24 h. SA treatment led to the rapid upregulation of CpTCP2 expression at 12 h, followed by a decrease at 24 h. Shading significantly increased CpTCP2 expression, which peaked at 12 h. These results suggest that CpTCP2 regulates senescence in C. praecox by influencing plant hormone signaling or photosynthetic processes.

2.6. Regulation of Flowering Time and Leaf Development by CpTCP2 in Arabidopsis

To investigate the functional role of CpTCP2, CpTCP2-overexpressing transgenic Arabidopsis plants were generated by transforming the pCAMBIA1300 vector containing the 35S promoter. Three overexpression lines with low, medium, and high CpTCP2 expression levels (OE3, OE9, and OE10, respectively) were selected (Figure S1). Phenotypic observations of the T3 generation (Figure 5a) revealed that the OE9 and OE10 lines exhibited significantly delayed flowering compared to the WT, with the differences being statistically significant (Figure 5b). Additionally, the CpTCP2 overexpression lines produced more rosette leaves than the WT in Arabidopsis. (Figure 5c). Measurements of the leaf areas of T3-generation CpTCP2-overexpressing lines and the WT showed that those in the OE3, OE9, and OE10 lines were smaller than those of the WT at 20, 30 and 40 days post-sowing, with OE10 having the smallest leaf area (Figure 5d,e). Moreover, the petioles of overexpressing lines were shorter than those of the WT plants (Figure 5f).
Scanning electron microscopy of the sixth leaf epidermal cells revealed that the average cell area and the cell area of both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces were significantly larger in the OE lines compared to those in the WT, with OE10 exhibiting the largest cell area (Figure 6a–d). Additionally, epidermal cell numbers in the leaves of the OE3, OE9, and OE10 lines were significantly reduced compared with the WT, with OE10 exhibiting the lowest level. Further, more than 60% of the cells in the OE10 line had an area greater than 10,000 μm2 (Figure 6e–g).

2.7. Regulation of Leaf Senescence by CpTCP2 in Arabidopsis

To further explore the regulatory relationship between MeJA and CpTCP2, the leaves from Arabidopsis plants overexpressing CpTCP2 were treated with 100 μmol/L MeJA for 4 days (Figure 7a). Both WT and OE lines (OE3, OE9, and OE10) exhibited leaf chlorosis after 4 days of MeJA treatment, with the OE lines showing more pronounced chlorosis compared with WT, and their chlorophyll content was significantly reduced (Figure 7a,b), indicating that CpTCP2 positively regulates MeJA-induced leaf senescence. To investigate the molecular mechanism through which CpTCP2 regulates leaf growth and senescence in C. praecox, gene expression analysis of the relevant pathways in Arabidopsis OE lines (OE10, OE9) was performed. Compared to that in the WT, the expression of AtNGA2 and AtNGA3 was significantly upregulated in the OE lines, whereas that of AtNGA4 was significantly downregulated, and AtGRF1 and AtNGA1 showed no significant changes (Figure 7c). These findings suggest that CpTCP2 regulates leaf development by modulating NGA family members, promoting the expression of NGA2 and NGA3, and inhibiting NGA4 in Arabidopsis. Furthermore, CpTCP2 may affect JA accumulation by upregulating AtLOX1 expression, thereby regulating leaf senescence in Arabidopsis.

3. Discussion

Plant-specific TCP transcription factors play multifaceted regulatory roles in plant growth and development, as demonstrated in various species. In the present study, 22 non-redundant TCP genes were identified in C. praecox, and they were found to be distributed across 11 chromosomes. Based on their similarity to homologous genes in A. thaliana, these genes were named, similar to the naming convention used for the 63 TCP-family genes in Brassica juncea [33]. A phylogenetic analysis indicated that these genes could be divided into Classes I and II, with Class II further subdivided into CYC/TB1 and CIN subgroups. This classification is consistent with TCP gene families in Arabidopsis [34], grape [35], and maize [36]. This classification is consistent with the classification of TCP gene families in other species, showing the conservation of TCP gene families across plants.
All CpTCP proteins were determined to contain a conserved TCP domain, and Class II CpTCP proteins were found to lack Motif 2. In Capsicum annuum, CaTCPs in the same subgroup exhibit similarities in motif number and distribution [37]. A similar motif composition was observed in BcTCP proteins in Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis, where motifs are clustered within the same subgroup, whereas structural differences between subgroups may reflect functional divergence among them [38]. These structural variations may reflect functional divergence among TCP subgroups, suggesting that even within the same class, the TCP proteins may have evolved distinct roles in plant development and stress responses. Promoter analysis revealed that the CpTCP promoters are rich in cis-regulatory elements related to hormone responses, stress, and developmental regulation, suggesting their potential role in various biological processes. The upregulation of CpTCP2 expression under hormone and shade treatments further suggests that this gene is involved in the regulation of environmental adaptability. Moreover, expression pattern analysis showed that multiple CpTCP genes exhibit significant responses to ABA and MeJA treatments, with the expression levels of some genes being rapidly upregulated or downregulated within a short time, indicating their involvement in mediating plant hormone signaling through multiple pathways. In Dimocarpus longan, the expression levels of most DlTCP genes are significantly downregulated 12 h after ABA induction, and a significant upregulation or downregulation of most DlTCP genes is observed at 2 h [39]. It suggests that TCP genes may play a role in the early response of plants to environmental stresses and may be involved in stress adaptation and hormone signaling pathways.
Additionally, the variations in CpTCP2 expression among different tissues suggest its potential role in organ development. Specifically, CpTCP2 was expressed at the highest levels in leaves, with the strongest expression in stamen, among floral organs, and expression was significantly elevated during flower senescence. In Prunus mume, the gene homologous to AtTCP2, PmTCP09, shows the highest expression in leaves [40], and in grapes, the homologous gene VvTCP6 is most highly expressed in young leaves, higher than that in mature and senescent leaves [35]. However, in maize, the expression levels of ZmTCP17 and ZmTCP03, which are homologous to AtTCP2, are significantly lower in the leaves than in the stems [36]. This contrast suggests that TCP2 homologs may exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns across species, reflecting functional diversification during evolution. Specifically, TCP2 genes are generally highly expressed in the leaves, which may indicate their involvement in regulating leaf growth and development. These discrepancies highlight the potential for TCP2 genes to play distinct roles in growth and developmental processes in different plant species.
In the present study, CpTCP2 overexpression in Arabidopsis led to significantly smaller leaves compared to those in wild-type plants, with fewer leaf cells and larger cell areas. Previous studies have reported that enhanced expression of CIN-subgroup TCPs leads to more cells exiting the cell cycle and undergoing differentiation, thus inhibiting cell division [27]. Therefore, CpTCP2 may regulate leaf size and morphology by controlling cell division and differentiation in Arabidopsis. Furthermore, CpTCP2 overexpression promoted MeJA-mediated leaf senescence in Arabidopsis, with a more obvious reduction in chlorophyll content compared to that in the wild-type. In Arabidopsis, AtTCP4 overexpression with 60 and 300 μmol/L MeJA treatment resulted in more pronounced leaf senescence compared to that in the wild-type [41]. This suggests the potential of TCP genes in regulating the senescence process through MeJA. Further, in CpTCP2-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines, expression of the JA biosynthesis-related gene AtLOX1 was significantly upregulated, whereas AtLOX2 expression remained unchanged, suggesting that CpTCP2 influences JA synthesis through the LOX1 pathway, rather than the LOX2 pathway, thereby promoting leaf senescence [42]. In Arabidopsis, AtTCP2 and AtTCP3 regulate leaf growth and development by promoting the expression of AtNGA3, leading to smaller leaf sizes and the inhibition of leaf growth [43]. In the CpTCP2-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines OE10 and OE9, AtNGA2 and AtNGA3 expression was significantly upregulated, whereas that of AtNGA4 was significantly downregulated. These results suggest that CpTCP2 regulates leaf growth and development by promoting NGA2 and NGA3 expression and inhibiting NGA4 expression. Additionally, there were no significant changes in AtGRF1 expression, suggesting that CpTCP2 might not be involved in the miR396–GRF regulatory pathway [21]. Studying the flowering and leaf development of C. praecox using molecular biology techniques holds potential value, providing key genetic resources for breeding. This can aid in the development of new wintersweet cultivars and improve their growth characteristics and flowering traits. This study revealed that CpTCP2 plays a role in the regulation of leaf growth and development; however, the signaling pathways through which CpTCP2 exerts its function in leaf development remain to be elucidated.

4. Materials and Methods

Wintersweet seeds were collected from Southwest University (Chongqing, China). The seeds were immersed in 98% sulfuric acid for 30 min, thoroughly rinsed with running water, surface-sterilized, and sown in pots containing a peat–vermiculite mixture (3:1, v/v). Plants were cultivated under controlled conditions of 25 °C, 70% relative humidity, 120 µmol·m−2·s−1 cool white fluorescent light, and a 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod [5].
Wild-type Arabidopsis (Columbia ecotype) seeds were obtained from the Flower Laboratory, College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University (Chongqing, China). Both wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis plants were grown in a peat: vermiculite mixture (1:1, v/v) under the same plant cultivation conditions described above.

4.1. Identification, Multiple Sequence Alignment, and Evolutionary Analysis of the CpTCP Gene Family

Sequences related to C. praecox were downloaded from published genome data [3]. Genome, CDS, protein, and annotation information for A. thaliana and Amborella trichopoda were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 12 June 2021)) and Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) database [44], respectively. Genome, CDS, protein, and annotation data for V. vinifera and O. sativa were downloaded from the Ensembl Plant website (https://plants.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 14 June 2021). The protein sequences of the TCP gene family in O. sativa, V. vinifera, A. trichopoda, and O. basilicum were retrieved from the PlantTFDB website (https://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/, accessed on 12 June 2021).
Local BLAST (version 2.2.31+) and HMMER software (version 3.0) were used to identify TCP family members in C. praecox. Initially, a local C. praecox genome database [3] was constructed using BLAST (version 2.2.31+), with the E-value threshold set to 1 × 10−5. The 24 TCP proteins from A. thaliana [44] were aligned against this database to obtain putative C. praecox TCP protein sequences, and redundant sequences or those with less than 50% similarity were removed. The corresponding protein sequences were then extracted from the C. praecox protein database using the Fasta Extract function in Tbtools (version 1.045) [45]. Subsequently, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of the TCP domain (PF03634) was downloaded from the Pfam database [46] and used with the Hmmsearch program in HMMER (version 3.0) to perform a genome-wide search of the C. praecox protein database. Homologous protein sequences identified in this search were also extracted using TBtools [45]. Domain screening and verification of the alignment results were conducted using the NCBI-CDD (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 20 June 2021), Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/null, accessed on 20 June 2021), and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 20 June 2021) platforms to remove redundant sequences and those lacking the typical TCP domain. A final list of C. praecox TCP family members was obtained. The ExPasy tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 15 July 2021) was used to analyze the primary physical properties of the TCPs. Subcellular localization was predicted using Cell-PLoc software (version 2.0; http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/, accessed on 15 July 2021).
Multiple sequence alignments of C. praecox TCP proteins were performed using the ClustalW algorithm in MEGA (version 10.0) software, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed. A cross-species evolutionary analysis was conducted based on A. thaliana, O. sativa, O. basilicum, V. vinifera, Cinnamomum micranthum, and A. trichopoda. The neighbor-joining method was used, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The resulting phylogenetic tree was visualized and enhanced using the iTOL platform (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 10 January 2022).

4.2. Gene Structure, Conserved Motif, and Promoter Element Analysis

The CDS and 2000 bp upstream promoter sequences of the C. praecox TCP genes were extracted using TBtools [45]. Conserved protein motifs were analyzed using the MEME Suite online tool (https://meme-suite.org/meme, accessed on 2 July 2021), with the maximum number of motifs set to 10. Conserved domains were identified using the NCBI-CDD platform. Gene structure diagrams, motif distribution maps, and protein domain diagrams were visualized using TBtools [45]. Promoter cis-acting element analysis was performed using the PlantCARE platform (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 2 July 2021) with a focus on the identification of regulatory elements related to hormone responses and stress resistance. These elements were visualized using the TBtools CSimple BioSequence Viewer [45].

4.3. Chromosome Localization and Synteny Analysis

Chromosomal location information for C. praecox TCP genes was extracted and visualized using TBtools software [45]. The one-step MCScanX tool was used to identify collinear relationships between C. praecox and other species, including A. thaliana, O. sativa, V. vinifera, C. micranthum, and A. trichopoda. Collinearity plots were generated using the Dual Synteny Plot tool. To further investigate the collinearity within the C. praecox species, the Ka/Ks values and divergence time (T = Ks/2λ, λ = 3.02 × 10−9) were calculated [47]. Chromosomal collinearity maps were generated using Advanced Circos and further refined using Adobe Illustrator 2020 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

4.4. Cloning of CpTCP2 Gene and Arabidopsis Transformation

Total RNA was extracted from C. praecox flowers using the EASYspin Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Boer, Beijing, China). Total RNA was extracted from C. praecox and A. thaliana using the EASYspin Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Boer, Beijing, China). Total RNA integrity was verified by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, which showed three clear bands (28S, 18S, and 5S rRNA) with the 28S band approximately twice as intense as the 18S band. RNA purity was assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and samples with OD260/280 ratios of 1.8–2.0 were considered suitable for subsequent experiments. cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript RT Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Based on the CpTCP2 CDS sequence obtained from transcriptome sequencing, specific primers were designed using Primer Premier software (version 5.0) (Table S1). For PCR amplification, cDNA synthesized from wintersweet was used as the template, and reactions were carried out with TransStart® Top taq DNA polymerase (TransGen, Beijing, China) under the following cycling conditions: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 57 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 100 s; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products were subsequently cloned into the pMD19-T vector (Takara, Shiga, Japan) and verified by sequencing.
CpTCP2 CDS sequence was cloned into the pCAMBIA1300 plant overexpression vector containing the 35S promoter, using KpnI and BamHI as restriction sites. Homologous recombination primers were designed (Table S1), resulting in the successful construction of the 35S::CpTCP2 expression vector. This vector was introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 (Weidibio, Shanghai, China) via electroporation. The recombinant GV3101 strain carrying the 35S::CpTCP2 construct was cultured in YEB liquid medium to an OD600 = 0.8, followed by transformation into wild-type Arabidopsis plants using the floral dip method [48]. T0 seeds were sown on MS medium containing 25 mg/L hygromycin for transgenic selection. After transformation, DNA was extracted from the leaves of both transgenic and wild-type Arabidopsis plants. PCR amplification was performed using CpTCP2-specific primers (CpTCP2 F/R) (Table S1), and the PCR products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, following the PCR program described above. The 35S::CpTCP2 plasmid was used as the positive control, and wild-type Arabidopsis was used as the negative control. Electrophoresis results were used to confirm the successful integration of the CpTCP2 gene into the genome of the transgenic plants.
For functional analysis, T1 seeds from transgenic T0 plants were selected on MS medium with 25 mg/L hygromycin. After obtaining homozygous lines from the T3 generation, total RNA was extracted and reverse-transcribed into cDNA. The expression levels of CpTCP2 were quantified by qRT-PCR, with AtActin as the internal reference gene [5]. Lines with high, medium, and low expression (OE10, OE9, and OE3, respectively) were selected for further phenotypic analysis.

4.5. Phenotypic Observation and Measurements of Transgenic Plants

Twelve plants each from the T3 high-, medium-, and low-expression Arabidopsis lines, as well as wild-type plants, were selected for growth measurements. The sixth leaf was marked when it was fully expanded, and samples were collected on days 20, 30, and 40 after sowing. The length, width, and petiole length of the sixth leaf were measured, and the leaf area was calculated using ImageJ software (version 1.53e). The number of rosette leaves and flowering time were recorded when the inflorescence reached 1 cm. The morphology of the epidermal cells on the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of the sixth leaf of both the OE and WT lines was observed using a HITACHI scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and the number and area of cells per field were measured using ImageJ. Rosette leaves from both OE and WT lines were treated with a 100 μmol/L MeJA solution and kept in the dark for 4 days, after which photos were taken, and the chlorophyll content was determined.

4.6. Gene Expression Analysis

Two-year-old seedlings of the ‘Qingkou’ variety were used to analyze the expression patterns of CpTCP genes in C. praecox. Samples were collected from the apex, root, stem, leaf, flower, bud, and seed, as well as from different flowering stages and floral organs. At the six-leaf stage, wintersweet plants were subjected to treatments in which leaves were sprayed with 100 μmol/L MeJA, 50 μmol/L ABA, or 50 μmol/L SA or subjected to shading using black plastic bags. The control was defined as samples collected from untreated wintersweet plants. Leaves were harvested at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post-treatment. Wild-type A. thaliana. All collected samples were promptly frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at −80 °C.
Specific qRT-PCR primers were designed with Primer Premier software (version 5.0) (Table S1), and qRT-PCR was performed using the Bio-Rad CFX96 system. The reaction system was set up according to the instructions of SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermix. The qRT-PCR was conducted under the following cycling conditions: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 5 s, and 72 °C for 5 s, and finalized with a melt curve analysis ranging from 65 °C to 95 °C. AtActin was used as an internal reference for the normalization of Arabidopsis data (Table S1) [5]. CpActin were used as internal reference genes for data normalization in wintersweet [9]. Each treatment included three biological and three technical replicates. Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method to calculate relative expression levels [49].

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed via one-way analysis of variance and Duncan’s test using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 22) (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Values of p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively. Graphical representations were generated using GraphPad Prism (version v8.0.1) (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

In total, 22 CpTCP genes were identified in the C. praecox genome, including 14 Class I and 8 Class II members, all of which contain the conserved TCP domain. The promoter regions are rich in cis-elements associated with hormone and stress responses, and some members are involved in developmental regulation, suggesting their potential roles in various biological processes. As a representative member of the CIN subfamily, CpTCP2 exhibited the highest expression in the leaves and strongest expression in the stamen, among the floral organs. Furthermore, its expression was significantly upregulated during flower senescence in response to SA, MeJA, ABA, and shade treatments, indicating its ability to respond to multiple hormones and environmental signals. Overexpression of CpTCP2 in Arabidopsis resulted in reduced leaf area and delayed flowering, and MeJA induction further aggravated leaf yellowing and senescence. These findings suggest that CpTCP2 may participate in the regulation of leaf development and senescence by modulating cell division and differentiation as well as responding to JA signaling. Future studies should aim to identify the upstream regulators, downstream targets, and protein interaction partners of CpTCP2 to establish its regulatory network in C. praecox. Moreover, CpTCP2 is expected to be a candidate gene that regulates leaf morphology and senescence, offering potential targets for genetic improvements and the molecular breeding of C. praecox.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14193039/s1, Table S1: List of primers; Figure S1: Expression of CpTCP2 gene in different transgenic Arabidopsis lines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C., G.G. and S.S.; data curation, Y.C., H.W., X.W., B.L. and X.Y.; formal analysis, G.G., Q.D., H.Z. (Hengxing Zhu), H.Z. (Haoxiang Zhu) and M.L.; funding acquisition, S.S.; investigation, X.Y., Q.D., H.Z. (Hengxing Zhu), M.L., H.Z. (Haoxiang Zhu) and Z.L.; Methodology, Y.C., G.G., H.W., X.W., S.L. and S.S.; software, Y.C., G.G., B.L. and C.J.; validation, G.G. and Z.L.; writing—original draft, Y.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.C., C.J., S.L. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Special Key Project for Technological Innovation and Application Development in Chongqing (Grant: CSTB2023TIAD-KPX0039).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, Z.; Liu, N.; Zhang, W.; Wu, C.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, J.; Li, M.; Sui, S. Integrated transcriptome and proteome analysis provides insight into chilling-induced dormancy breaking in Chimonanthus praecox. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shang, J.; Tian, J.; Cheng, H.; Yan, Q.; Li, L.; Jamal, A.; Xu, Z.; Xiang, L.; Saski, C.A.; Jin, S.; et al. The chromosome-level wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox) genome provides insights into floral scent biosynthesis and flowering in winter. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, Y.; Chen, F.; Song, A.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.; Gao, Y.; Wei, G.; Zhang, W.; Guan, Y.; Fu, J.; et al. The genome assembly of Chimonanthus praecox var. concolor and comparative genomic analysis highlight the genetic basis underlying conserved and variable floral traits of wintersweet. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 206, 117603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shen, Z.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Cao, H.; Provart, N.; Ding, X.; Sun, M.; Tang, Z.; Yue, C.; et al. The red flower wintersweet genome provides insights into the evolution of magnoliids and the molecular mechanism for tepal color development. Plant J. 2021, 108, 1662–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, H.; Huang, R.; Ma, J.; Sui, S.; Guo, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, Z.; Lin, Y.; Li, M. Two C3H Type Zinc Finger Protein Genes, CpCZF1 and CpCZF2, from Chimonanthus praecox Affect Stamen Development in Arabidopsis. Genes 2017, 8, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wu, H.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hua, R.; Liu, H.; Sui, S. CpBBX19, a B-Box Transcription Factor Gene of Chimonanthus praecox, Improves Salt and Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes 2021, 12, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, J.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Ahmed, S.; Li, M.; Kovinich, N.; Sui, S. Transgene CpNAC68 from Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox) Improves Arabidopsis Survival of Multiple Abiotic Stresses. Plants 2021, 10, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, H.; Liu, B.; Cao, Y.; Ma, G.; Zheng, X.; Zhu, H.; Sui, S. Genome-Wide Identification of WOX Gene Family in Chimonanthus praecox and a Functional Analysis of CpWUS. Plants 2025, 14, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Liu, D.; Lin, J.; Zhu, T.; Liu, N.; Yang, X.; Ma, J.; Sui, S. Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase Genes of Chimonanthus praecox, CpCCD7 and CpCCD8, Regulate Shoot Branching in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, M.; Li, Q.; Liu, N.; Li, J.; Huo, J.; Sui, S.; Li, Z. Ca2+-induced CpCBL8-CpCIPK9 module negatively regulates dormancy breaking and cold tolerance in winter-flowering wintersweet. Hortic. Plant J. 2025, 11, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, H.; Hua, R.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Ou, H.; Lu, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, D.; Sui, S. CpMAX1a, a Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase Gene of Chimonanthus praecox Regulates Shoot Branching in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, R.; Ma, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Li, Z.; Li, M.; Sui, S.; Liu, D. Overexpression of CpSIZ1, a SIZ/PIAS-Type SUMO E3 Ligase from Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox), Delays Flowering, Accelerates Leaf Senescence and Enhances Cold Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2021, 39, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martín-Trillo, M.; Cubas, P. TCP genes: A family snapshot ten years later. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Doebley, J.; Stec, A.; Hubbard, L. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 1997, 386, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Luo, D.; Carpenter, R.; Vincent, C.; Copsey, L.; Coen, E. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 1996, 383, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kosugi, S.; Ohashi, Y. PCF1 and PCF2 specifically bind to cis elements in the rice proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1607–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Navaud, O.; Dabos, P.; Carnus, E.; Tremousaygue, D.; Hervé, C. TCP transcription factors predate the emergence of land plants. J. Mol. Evol. 2007, 65, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Manassero, N.G.; Viola, I.L.; Welchen, E.; Gonzalez, D.H. TCP transcription factors: Architectures of plant form. Biomol. Concepts 2013, 4, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Das Gupta, M.; Aggarwal, P.; Nath, U. CINCINNATA in Antirrhinum majus directly modulates genes involved in cytokinin and auxin signaling. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 901–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bresso, E.G.; Chorostecki, U.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Palatnik, J.F.; Schommer, C. Spatial Control of Gene Expression by miR319-Regulated TCP Transcription Factors in Leaf Development. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1694–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schommer, C.; Debernardi, J.M.; Bresso, E.G.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Palatnik, J.F. Repression of cell proliferation by miR319-regulated TCP4. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1533–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, Z.M.; Zhou, X.M.; Chen, J.M.; Yin, L.T.; Zeng, Z.H.; Xiang, J.; Liu, S.C. Identification of a consensus DNA-binding site for the TCP domain transcription factor TCP2 and its important roles in the growth and development of Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 2223–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Du, J.; Hu, S.; Yu, Q.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.; Yang, Y.; Sun, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of BrrTCP Transcription Factors in Brassica rapa ssp. rapa. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aguilar-Martínez, J.A.; Sinha, N. Analysis of the role of Arabidopsis class I TCP genes AtTCP7, AtTCP8, AtTCP22, and AtTCP23 in leaf development. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cruz, R.; Melo-de-Pinna, G.F.A.; Vasco, A.; Prado, J.; Ambrose, B.A. Class I KNOX Is Related to Determinacy during the Leaf Development of the Fern Mickelia scandens (Dryopteridaceae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mizukami, Y. A matter of size: Developmental control of organ size in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Challa, K.R.; Rath, M.; Nath, U. The CIN-TCP transcription factors promote commitment to differentiation in Arabidopsis leaf pavement cells via both auxin-dependent and independent pathways. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1007988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nag, A.; King, S.; Jack, T. miR319a targeting of TCP4 is critical for petal growth and development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 22534–22539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, D.; Yan, W.; Fu, L.-Y.; Kaufmann, K. Architecture of gene regulatory networks controlling flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, Y.F.; Chen, Y.Y.; Hsiao, Y.Y.; Shen, C.Y.; Hsu, J.L.; Yeh, C.M.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Liu, Z.J.; Tsai, W.C. Genome-wide identification and characterization of TCP genes involved in ovule development of Phalaenopsis equestris. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5051–5066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, H.; Sun, M.; Pan, H.; Cheng, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q. Two Cyc2CL transcripts (Cyc2CL-1 and Cyc2CL-2) may play key roles in the petal and stamen development of ray florets in chrysanthemum. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yuan, C.; Huang, D.; Yang, Y.; Sun, M.; Cheng, T.; Wang, J.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Q. CmCYC2-like transcription factors may interact with each other or bind to the promoter to regulate floral symmetry development in Chrysanthemum morifolium. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 103, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. He, J.; He, X.; Chang, P.; Jiang, H.; Gong, D.; Sun, Q. Genome-wide identification and characterization of TCP family genes in Brassica juncea var. tumida. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, S. The Arabidopsis thaliana TCP transcription factors: A broadening horizon beyond development. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e1044192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Leng, X.; Wei, H.; Xu, X.; Ghuge, S.A.; Jia, D.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Y. Genome-wide identification and transcript analysis of TCP transcription factors in grapevine. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chai, W.; Jiang, P.; Huang, G.; Jiang, H.; Li, X. Identification and expression profiling analysis of TCP family genes involved in growth and development in maize. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 23, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dong, Z.; Hao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, W.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Hu, Y.; Guan, X.; Gu, F.; et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of the TCP Transcription Factor Gene Family in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plants 2024, 13, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, F.; Shi, C.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of TCP Family Genes in Pak-Choi [Brassica campestris (syn. Brassica rapa) ssp. chinensis var. communis]. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 854171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiang, M.Q.; Xue, X.; Su, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Lai, Z.; Lin, Y. Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of TCP Family in Dimocarpus longan. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2021, 48, 2481–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, K.; Yang, W.; Cheng, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q. Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization and Expression Analysis of the TCP Gene Family in Prunus mume. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sarvepalli, K.; Nath, U. Hyper-activation of the TCP4 transcription factor in Arabidopsis thaliana accelerates multiple aspects of plant maturation. Plant J. 2011, 67, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Danisman, S.; van der Wal, F.; Dhondt, S.; Waites, R.; de Folter, S.; Bimbo, A.; van Dijk, A.D.; Muino, J.M.; Cutri, L.; Dornelas, M.C.; et al. Arabidopsis class I and class II TCP transcription factors regulate jasmonic acid metabolism and leaf development antagonistically. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1511–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ballester, P.; Navarrete-Gomez, M.; Carbonero, P.; Onate-Sanchez, L.; Ferrandiz, C. Leaf expansion in Arabidopsis is controlled by a TCP-NGA regulatory module likely conserved in distantly related species. Physiol. Plant 2015, 155, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lamesch, P.; Berardini, T.Z.; Li, D.; Swarbreck, D.; Wilks, C.; Sasidharan, R.; Muller, R.; Dreher, K.; Alexander, D.L.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.; et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): Improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1202–D1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, C.J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.H.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Finn, R.D.; Bateman, A.; Clements, J.; Coggill, P.; Eberhardt, R.Y.; Eddy, S.R.; Heger, A.; Hetherington, K.; Holm, L.; Mistry, J.; et al. Pfam: The protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D222–D230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, J.Y.; Wang, Z.; Jia, C.H.; Miao, H.X.; Zhang, J.N.; Liu, J.H.; Xu, B.Y.; Jin, Z.Q. Genome-Wide Identification and Transcript Analysis of TCP Gene Family in Banana (Musa acuminata L.). Biochem. Genet. 2022, 60, 204–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conserved domain and evolutionary analysis of CpTCP proteins. (a) Multiple sequence alignment of CpTCP proteins. (b) Alignment of R domains in type II subfamily members. (c) Phylogenetic analysis of TCP proteins from Chimonanthus praecox, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Ocimum basilicum, Vitis vinifera, Cinnamomum micranthum, and Amborella trichopoda. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method, with 1000 bootstrap replicates, using MEGA (version 10.0).
Figure 1. Conserved domain and evolutionary analysis of CpTCP proteins. (a) Multiple sequence alignment of CpTCP proteins. (b) Alignment of R domains in type II subfamily members. (c) Phylogenetic analysis of TCP proteins from Chimonanthus praecox, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Ocimum basilicum, Vitis vinifera, Cinnamomum micranthum, and Amborella trichopoda. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method, with 1000 bootstrap replicates, using MEGA (version 10.0).
Plants 14 03039 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of conserved motifs and promoter cis-acting elements of CpTCPs. (a) Conserved motifs and domains. Motifs 1–10 are represented by differently colored boxes, and the box length represents the motif length. The conserved TCP domain is indicated by a blue box. (b) Analysis of cis-acting elements in the CpTCP promoter.
Figure 2. Analysis of conserved motifs and promoter cis-acting elements of CpTCPs. (a) Conserved motifs and domains. Motifs 1–10 are represented by differently colored boxes, and the box length represents the motif length. The conserved TCP domain is indicated by a blue box. (b) Analysis of cis-acting elements in the CpTCP promoter.
Plants 14 03039 g002
Figure 3. Chromosomal localization and analysis of CpTCP family genes. (a) Chromosomal locations and synteny of CpTCP genes. (b) Synteny analysis of Chimonanthus praecox with Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Vitis vinifera, Cinnamomum micranthum, and Amborella trichopoda.
Figure 3. Chromosomal localization and analysis of CpTCP family genes. (a) Chromosomal locations and synteny of CpTCP genes. (b) Synteny analysis of Chimonanthus praecox with Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Vitis vinifera, Cinnamomum micranthum, and Amborella trichopoda.
Plants 14 03039 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of the sequence characteristics of CpTCP2. Relative expression of CpTCP2 in the different tissues (a), flowering stages (b), and floral organs (c) of Chimonanthus praecox. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Relative expression of CpTCP2 in response to 100 μmol/L methyl jasmonate (MeJA) (d), 50 μmol/L abscisic acid (ABA) (e), 50 μmol/L salicylic acid (SA) (f), and shading treatment (g) in wintersweet leaves. Control refers to leaves collected from untreated wintersweet plants. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared with control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4. Analysis of the sequence characteristics of CpTCP2. Relative expression of CpTCP2 in the different tissues (a), flowering stages (b), and floral organs (c) of Chimonanthus praecox. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Relative expression of CpTCP2 in response to 100 μmol/L methyl jasmonate (MeJA) (d), 50 μmol/L abscisic acid (ABA) (e), 50 μmol/L salicylic acid (SA) (f), and shading treatment (g) in wintersweet leaves. Control refers to leaves collected from untreated wintersweet plants. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared with control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Plants 14 03039 g004
Figure 5. Regulation of flowering time and leaf development by CpTCP2 in Arabidopsis. (a) Overexpression of CpTCP2 delayed flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Statistical analyses of flowering time (b) and the number of leaves produced at the rosette stage of plant growth (c) in CpTCP2-overexpressing transgenic and WT Arabidopsis lines. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences compared with WT (p < 0.05). (d) Leaf growth phenotypes of the sixth leaf in CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis lines at 20, 30, and 40 days (bolting shoots were excised at 30 and 40 days). Statistical analyses of leaf area (e) and petiole length (f) in CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis lines. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared with WT, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 5. Regulation of flowering time and leaf development by CpTCP2 in Arabidopsis. (a) Overexpression of CpTCP2 delayed flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Statistical analyses of flowering time (b) and the number of leaves produced at the rosette stage of plant growth (c) in CpTCP2-overexpressing transgenic and WT Arabidopsis lines. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences compared with WT (p < 0.05). (d) Leaf growth phenotypes of the sixth leaf in CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis lines at 20, 30, and 40 days (bolting shoots were excised at 30 and 40 days). Statistical analyses of leaf area (e) and petiole length (f) in CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis lines. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared with WT, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Plants 14 03039 g005
Figure 6. Overexpression of CpTCP2 increases the leaf cell area and reduces cell numbers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Scanning electron microscopy images of leaf epidermal cells (a), and statistical analysis of the average cell size (b), areas of cells on the adaxial surface (c), areas of cells on the abaxial surface (d), number of cells on the adaxial surface (e), and number of cells on the abaxial surface (f). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences compared with WT (p < 0.05). The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. (g) Distribution of leaf epidermal cell sizes in the different lines. Based on the sixth leaves of CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis plants at 40 days.
Figure 6. Overexpression of CpTCP2 increases the leaf cell area and reduces cell numbers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Scanning electron microscopy images of leaf epidermal cells (a), and statistical analysis of the average cell size (b), areas of cells on the adaxial surface (c), areas of cells on the abaxial surface (d), number of cells on the adaxial surface (e), and number of cells on the abaxial surface (f). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences compared with WT (p < 0.05). The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. (g) Distribution of leaf epidermal cell sizes in the different lines. Based on the sixth leaves of CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis plants at 40 days.
Plants 14 03039 g006
Figure 7. Regulation of leaf senescence by CpTCP2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phenotypic observation (a) and chlorophyll content (b) analysis of CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis leaves 4 days after methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment. (c) Relative expression levels of endogenous genes in CpTCP2-overexpressing and WT Arabidopsis lines. The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared with control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Regulation of leaf senescence by CpTCP2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phenotypic observation (a) and chlorophyll content (b) analysis of CpTCP2 transgenic and WT Arabidopsis leaves 4 days after methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment. (c) Relative expression levels of endogenous genes in CpTCP2-overexpressing and WT Arabidopsis lines. The data of each group are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared with control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Plants 14 03039 g007
Table 1. The physicochemical properties of CpTCP family proteins in C. praecox.
Table 1. The physicochemical properties of CpTCP family proteins in C. praecox.
NameGene IDHomologAAMWpIIIGRAVYAISPTHSL
CpTCP1Ws006179AtTCP136540,312.966.5751.63−0.70759.42NO0Nucleus
CpTCP2Ws001834AtTCP243647,788.716.7745.49−0.78258.51NO0Nucleus
CpTCP4Ws008336AtTCP450855,927.396.3868.71−0.88460.39NO0Nucleus
CpTCP5Ws004919AtTCP534538,523.928.4362.36−0.74364.99NO0Nucleus
CpTCP7aWs020128AtTCP724925,889.279.9054.46−0.24476.59NO0Nucleus
CpTCP7bWs013215AtTCP720922,059.899.2957.09−0.34067.42NO0Nucleus
CpTCP8aWs002199AtTCP845247,290.067.0753.85−0.56365.95NO0Nucleus
CpTCP8bWs000567AtTCP844246,544.667.9463.48−0.48666.33NO0Nucleus
CpTCP9aWs026740AtTCP933835,322.839.5559.55−0.31573.11NO0Nucleus
CpTCP9bWs018174AtTCP935336,308.0710.2056.89−0.20977.76NO0Nucleus
CpTCP9cWs021384AtTCP930632,376.739.1369.60−0.27979.15NO0Nucleus
CpTCP9dWs013991AtTCP960365,091.485.9055.38−0.50271.38NO0Nucleus
CpTCP11Ws025658AtTCP1123424,461.386.6556.45−0.35563.55NO0Nucleus
CpTCP12aWs007064AtTCP1238943,437.096.7945.16−0.80159.51NO0Nucleus
CpTCP12bWs004363AtTCP1228832,374.649.9152.48−0.75565.69NO0Nucleus
CpTCP13Ws000794AtTCP1337642,297.498.9957.15−0.70065.35NO0Nucleus
CpTCP14Ws005371AtTCP1437340,123.807.2460.09−0.59160.72NO0Nucleus
CpTCP15Ws022851AtTCP1535037,916.247.2251.49−0.61063.94NO0Nucleus
CpTCP19Ws007603AtTCP1956961,907.046.3553.18−0.54370.47NO0Nucleus
CpTCP20aWs017440AtTCP2027028,772.239.1358.33−0.55465.81NO0Nucleus
CpTCP20bWs002910AtTCP2034036,678.306.8358.50−0.42671.41NO0Nucleus
CpTCP24Ws000671AtTCP2442746,947.918.2754.99−0.79159.72NO0Nucleus
AA, number of amino acids; MW, molecular weight; pI, theoretical isoelectric point; II, instability index; GRAVY, grand average of hydropathicity; AI, aliphatic index; SP, signal peptide; TH, transmembrane helix; SL, subcellular location prediction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, Y.; Guo, G.; Wu, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Yang, X.; Dai, Q.; Zhu, H.; Lu, M.; Zhu, H.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification of the TCP Gene Family in Chimonanthus praecox and Functional Analysis of CpTCP2 Regulating Leaf Development and Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plants 2025, 14, 3039. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193039

AMA Style

Cao Y, Guo G, Wu H, Wang X, Liu B, Yang X, Dai Q, Zhu H, Lu M, Zhu H, et al. Genome-Wide Identification of the TCP Gene Family in Chimonanthus praecox and Functional Analysis of CpTCP2 Regulating Leaf Development and Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plants. 2025; 14(19):3039. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Yinzhu, Gangyu Guo, Huafeng Wu, Xia Wang, Bin Liu, Ximeng Yang, Qianli Dai, Hengxing Zhu, Min Lu, Haoxiang Zhu, and et al. 2025. "Genome-Wide Identification of the TCP Gene Family in Chimonanthus praecox and Functional Analysis of CpTCP2 Regulating Leaf Development and Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis" Plants 14, no. 19: 3039. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193039

APA Style

Cao, Y., Guo, G., Wu, H., Wang, X., Liu, B., Yang, X., Dai, Q., Zhu, H., Lu, M., Zhu, H., Li, Z., Jin, C., Li, S., & Sui, S. (2025). Genome-Wide Identification of the TCP Gene Family in Chimonanthus praecox and Functional Analysis of CpTCP2 Regulating Leaf Development and Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plants, 14(19), 3039. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14193039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop