Next Article in Journal
Intermediate Anthropogenic Disturbances Boost Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Diversities but Reduce Functional Diversity in Subtropical Forests of Eastern China
Previous Article in Journal
Insecticide Resistance Evolution Negatively Affects the Fitness of Aphis gossypii Glover During Selection on Cotton Plants Under Laboratory Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenotypic Identification and Fine-Mapping of the Rice Narrow-Leaf Mutant nal25

by
Kaizhen Xie
1,†,
Fuan Niu
1,†,
Peng Hu
2,
Can Cheng
1,
Huangwei Chu
1,
Jihua Zhou
1,
Bin Sun
1,
Yuting Dai
1,
Liming Cao
1,* and
Anpeng Zhang
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Genetic Improvement of Grain and Oil Crops (Co-Construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Crop Breeding and Cultivation Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Crop Germplasm and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Food Crops, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2025, 14(16), 2528; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162528
Submission received: 1 July 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 11 August 2025 / Published: 14 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Physiology and Crop Production)

Abstract

Leaf morphology significantly impacts rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant architecture and yield. Here, we identified and characterized a novel narrow-leaf mutant, nal25, derived from indica rice cultivar ‘Huazhan’ using EMS mutagenesis. Phenotypic analyses revealed that nal25 exhibited significantly narrower leaves, reduced plant height, increased tiller number, and notably decreased grain size, seed setting rate, and thousand-grain weight compared to the wild type. Genetic analyses demonstrated that the narrow-leaf phenotype is controlled by a single recessive nuclear gene. Through precise localization analysis, the NAL25 gene was located within a region of approximately 103 kb on the long arm of rice chromosome 7. The sequencing results showed that the mutant nal25 had a T to C mutation at position 173 of the heat-shock protein gene LOC_Os07g09450 encoding the DnaJ domain in this interval, resulting in a change in amino acid 58 from leucine to proline. The qRT-PCR results showed that the expression level of NAL25 gene decreased in the mutant. The nal25 mutant obtained in this study exhibits stable mutant phenotypes, including dwarfism and excessive tillering, traits typically unfavorable for rice production. Nevertheless, it serves as valuable genetic material for forward genetics approaches to identify yield-related genes regulating leaf morphology and culm height. Thus, research on the nal25 mutant advances the development of rice varieties with ideal plant architecture, thereby stabilizing yield increases and safeguarding global food security.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the world’s most important staple crops, serving as the primary food source for approximately 3.5 billion people globally. With the continuous rise in population, decreasing availability of arable land, and increasing environmental pressures, sustaining rice production presents significant challenges. Thus, maintaining stable rice yields is essential for ensuring global food security [1,2]. Currently, optimizing plant architecture is widely recognized as a critical strategy for breeding high-yielding rice varieties. Rice plant architecture is primarily determined by the morphological characteristics and spatial arrangements of the roots, stems, leaves, and panicles [3]. Among these, leaves play a pivotal role through photosynthesis, providing energy and organic materials necessary for plant growth and development. Leaf morphology directly influences photosynthetic efficiency and the leaf area index (LAI), consequently affecting photosynthetic product accumulation, and ultimately, rice yield [4]. Therefore, manipulating rice leaf shape has emerged as a critical approach for improving plant architecture and enhancing grain yield.
Rice leaf shape traits mainly include leaf length, width, color, thickness, rolling, drooping, and leaf angle [5]. An optimal balance between leaf length and width is particularly crucial, as it maximizes leaf area and enhances light utilization efficiency [6]. Previous studies have demonstrated that genes influencing rice leaf morphology mainly regulate leaf vein architecture, hormone synthesis and transport, and cellular proliferation or elongation [6]. Narrow-leaf mutants are valuable resources for dissecting the genetic mechanisms controlling leaf area in rice. Several narrow-leaf mutants, such as nal1 [7], nal2/3 [8], nal7 [9], nal9 [10], nal11 [11,12], nal21 [13], nal22 [14], dnl1 [15,16], nsl2 [17], and avb [18], have been reported, all exhibiting narrower leaves and reduced plant height compared to wild types.
Genes associated with leaf width in rice have mainly been identified on chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, and 12. For instance, several critical genes, including NAL7, NAL9, NAL21, NAL22, and AVB, are localized on chromosome 3. The NAL7 gene encodes a flavin-containing monooxygenase, which is involved in leaf development and auxin biosynthesis [9]. NAL9 encodes an ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit involved in regulating cell division [10]. NAL21 encodes ribosomal protein small subunit 3A (RPS3A), participating in auxin responses and thus regulating leaf development [13]. The NAL22 gene encodes a Maf-like nucleoside triphosphate pyrophosphatase protein family member that is highly expressed in leaves and roots, regulating leaf width through the modulation of leaf vein diameter and cell division [14]. The AVB gene encodes a conserved protein of unknown function essential for maintaining normal cell division in rice [18].
On chromosome 4, NAL1 encodes an unknown-function protein, predominantly expressed in vascular tissues, which is involved in auxin polar transport and leaf cell division [7]. NSL2, located on chromosome 6, encodes a small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, affecting leaf development through nucleotide transport and metabolic regulation [17]. On chromosome 7, NAL11 encodes a heat-shock protein (HSP) containing a DNAJ domain involved in cell cycle control, proliferation, chloroplast development, and gibberellin biosynthesis [12]. NAL2 and NAL3, homologous genes located on chromosomes 11 and 12, respectively, encode WOX3A proteins belonging to the plant-specific Wushel-related homeobox (WOX) transcription factor family, regulating gene transcription and auxin transport during leaf development [8]. DNL1, located on chromosome 12, encodes a cellulose synthase-like D4 protein involved in gibberellin metabolism and leaf growth [16].
Additionally, several transcription factors regulate leaf growth by influencing cell proliferation or plant hormone biosynthesis. For example, the rice transcription factors Growth-regulating factor 1 (OsGRF1) and GRF-interacting factor 1 (OsGIF1) control leaf growth through cell-cycle-related gene expression [19]. Auxin response factor 11 (ARF11) regulates leaf development by modulating brassinosteroid receptor gene expression [20].
Although narrow-leaf regulatory genes in rice frequently exhibit pleiotropic effects—influencing plant height, tillering, and stem thickness—the molecular mechanisms coordinating these interdependent morphological traits remain unresolved. This knowledge gap impedes the reconstruction of regulatory networks for leaf morphogenesis. To address this, we generated a stable narrow-leaf mutant nal25 via EMS mutagenesis in indica rice ‘Huazhan’. Agronomic traits of nal25 were systematically characterized, confirming its narrow-leaf phenotype. The mutant also displayed pleiotropic effects, including reduced plant height (dwarfism), increased tiller number, and decreased yield. Genetic analysis indicated that the narrow-leaf trait is governed by a single recessive gene. Subsequently, map-based cloning was employed to localize the target gene. The candidate gene was sequenced for validation, identifying the causal mutation site. Its expression pattern was preliminarily analyzed to investigate gene function. This study provides novel genetic resources for elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying leaf shape development in rice. It advances research on ideal plant architecture (IPA) and establishes a foundation for achieving precision and efficiency in rice breeding.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

All experimental materials employed in this work originated from and were maintained in our laboratory stock collection. The indica rice cultivar ‘Huazhan’, the genetically stable EMS-induced narrow-leaf mutant nal25 derived from ‘Huazhan’, and the japonica rice restorer line ‘Shenhui 26’ (SH 26) were used in this study. All plant materials were cultivated during the normal rice growing season at the Zhuanghang Experimental Base, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences (30°89′ N, 121°39′ E). Each genotype was planted with six rows, comprising six plants per row, at a standard spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm, ensuring a single-plant-per-hill planting. All plants were managed uniformly according to standard agricultural field practices.

2.2. Phenotypic and Agronomic Trait Analysis

At the heading stage, the length and width of flag leaves were measured in both the wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and the mutant nal25. At maturity, agronomic traits including plant height, number of effective panicles, panicle length, grain length, grain width, and thousand-grain weight were recorded. Ten plants exhibiting uniform growth vigor within each plot were randomly selected for measurement, and mean values were calculated. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistics 22.0.

2.3. Genomic DNA Extraction and PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from rice leaves using the CTAB method [21]. PCR amplifications were performed using the 2× Hieff® PCR Master Mix (No Dye) (Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The total reaction volume was 20 μL, consisting of 10 μL of 2× Hieff® PCR Master Mix, 8.8 μL sterile ddH2O, 0.4 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM), and 0.4 μL genomic DNA template. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 45 s; with a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min.

2.4. Genetic Analysis of the nal25 Mutant

The mutant nal25 was crossed as the maternal parent with indica rice ‘Huazhan’ and japonica restorer line ‘SH26’ to generate two separate hybrid populations (nal25/Huazhan and nal25/SH26). The numbers of normal and mutant phenotypes were recorded in both F1 and F2 segregating populations. Data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 22.0, and chi-square tests were performed to evaluate the segregation ratio and inheritance pattern of the nal25 mutation in the F2 populations.

2.5. Fine-Mapping of the NAL25 Gene

For initial genetic mapping, genomic DNA was extracted from approximately 2.0 g of fresh leaves from the parental lines (japonica ‘SH26’, mutant nal25, and their F1 progeny) and 21 mutant phenotype plants from the segregating F2 population. PCR amplification was performed using evenly distributed SSR markers covering the 12 rice chromosomes (primer sequences synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). PCR products were separated by 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), visualized by silver staining (0.1% AgNO3 and 1.5% NaOH), and genotypes of each F2 mutant individual were analyzed. According to preliminary mapping results, sequence differences between indica and japonica genomes were identified by aligning genomic sequences using the NCBI database (accessed 31 March 2024; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). New primers for fine-mapping were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software (Table 1). The F2 mapping population size was expanded for further fine-mapping. Open reading frames (ORFs) within the fine-mapping interval were retrieved from the rice genome database (accessed 20 June 2024; http://rice.uga.edu/cgi-bin/gbrowse/rice/), and candidate gene functions were predicted. Candidate genes within this region were then sequenced for validation.

2.6. Gene Expression Analysis of NAL25

Total RNA was extracted from rice leaves using the Polysaccharides & Polyphenolics-Rich Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (+gDNA wiper) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays were carried out using Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.) on a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Reaction conditions are detailed in Table 1. Rice actin was employed as the internal reference gene, and the primer sequences for qPCR analysis are provided in Table 2. All qPCR reactions were performed following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol.

3. Results

3.1. Agronomic Traits of the Narrow-Leaf Mutant nal25

The mutant used in this study was isolated from an EMS-mutagenized mutant library of the rice variety ‘Huazhan’ in previous work. Following multiple generations of self-pollination, its traits are stably inherited. Evidently, the leaf width was significantly reduced, measuring 0.57 ± 0.02 cm, corresponding to 33.14% of the wild-type leaf width (Figure 1C, Table 3). Conversely, the flag leaf of the main panicle of nal25 presented a distinctive long and narrow phenotype (Figure 1A). Specifically, the flag leaf length of nal25 was significantly greater, measuring 41.80 ± 1.66 cm, approximately 1.14 times that of the wild-type (Figure 1B, Table 3). Additionally, at the heading stage, compared with the wild-type cultivar ‘Huazhan’, the mutant nal25 exhibited a significantly increased tiller number, averaging 25 ± 0.82 tillers, which was 2.08 times that of the wild-type (Figure 2A,B, Table 3). At maturity, the plant height of nal25 was significantly reduced, averaging 90.80 ± 2.48 cm, about 84.07% of the wild-type height (Figure 2C, Table 3).
Other agronomic traits also significantly decreased compared with the wild-type, including panicle length, total grain number per panicle, seed setting rate, grain length, grain width, and thousand-grain weight (Figure 3, Table 3). Specifically, the panicle length was 22.06 ± 1.33 cm (86.07% of wild-type), total grain number per panicle was 75.25 ± 3.49 (27.84% of wild-type), seed setting rate was 66.00 ± 2.92% (70.03% of wild-type), grain length was 8.97 ± 0.09 cm (96.24% of wild-type), grain width was 2.09 ± 0.04 cm (89.69% of wild-type), and thousand-grain weight was 15.33 ± 1.52 g (77.50% of wild-type) (Figure 3, Table 3). Collectively, these results indicate that the nal25 mutant exhibits not only significant morphological changes in leaf width, but also reduced yield potential.

3.2. Genetic Analysis of the Narrow-Leaf Mutant nal25

To determine the inheritance pattern of the nal25 mutation, two cross-combinations were generated with the mutant nal25 as the maternal parent crossed separately with indica cultivar ‘Huazhan’ and japonica restorer line ‘Shenhui 26’. The resulting F1 plants from both crosses exhibited a normal leaf phenotype. In the F2 generation obtained from selfing F1 individuals, segregation for leaf phenotype occurred, producing both normal and narrow-leaf plants.
In the cross nal25/Shenhui 26, among 1145 F2 plants, 862 exhibited normal leaves and 283 had narrow leaves, with a segregation ratio of 3.04:1.00 (χ2 = 0.05 < χ20.05 = 3.84) (Table 4). Similarly, in the cross nal25/Huazhan, among 1192 F2 plants, 905 had normal leaves and 287 had narrow leaves, with a segregation ratio of 3.15:1.00 (χ2 = 0.46 < χ20.05 = 3.84) (Table 4). Both segregation ratios fit a typical Mendelian inheritance pattern of 3:1, suggesting that the nal25 mutation is recessive and controlled by a single nuclear gene.

3.3. Fine-Mapping and Candidate Gene Prediction of NAL25

For initial mapping of the NAL25 gene, genomic DNA from parental lines, F1 plants, and 21 mutant individuals was analyzed using 48 SSR markers evenly distributed across the 12 rice chromosomes (Table S1). Based on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and band-pattern analyses, NAL25 was mapped between markers RM7479 and R7M20 on chromosome 7.
To narrow this region, 283 F2 mutant plants were further analyzed using additional molecular markers located between RM7479 and R7M20. Fine-mapping localized NAL25 between markers RM6574 and RM125. Subsequently, four insertion–deletion (InDel) markers 7-4915, 7-5194, 7-5209, and 7-5262 were developed within this interval, ultimately refining the target region to a 103 kb interval between markers 7-4915 and 7-5194 (Figure 4).
Within this 103 kb region, rice genome database searches identified 15 open reading frames (ORFs). Sequencing revealed a T→C single-nucleotide substitution in the candidate gene LOC_Os07g09450, causing an amino acid change from leucine to proline at position 170 (Figure 4). Importantly, no sequence variations (SNPs or indels) were identified within the other 14 genes in the interval upon comparison of mutant and wild-type sequences. This mutation represents a novel allele distinct from previously reported variants, likely affecting protein structure and function.

3.4. Expression Analysis of the NAL25 Gene

Quantitative RT-PCR was conducted to examine the expression of LOC_Os07g09450 in leaves, leaf sheaths, stems at the tillering stage, and young panicles at 10 days after flowering in both wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and the mutant nal25. Expression analyses indicated that NAL25 transcripts were detected in all tissues examined, with the highest expression in young panicles, followed by leaf sheaths and stems (Figure 5).
Notably, LOC_Os07g09450 expression was significantly reduced in all tissues of the nal25 mutant compared to the wild-type. The mutant exhibited phenotypic traits such as shorter plant height, narrower leaves, and increased tiller number (Figure 1). qRT-PCR analysis revealed a significant decrease in the transcript abundance of this gene in mutant- compared to wild-type. This observation suggests that the mutation may affect post-transcriptional regulation of LOC_Os07g09450. Furthermore, significantly reduced thousand-grain weight and seed setting rate were observed in nal25, implying that LOC_Os07g09450 may regulate rice yield.

4. Discussion

In the late 1990s, Yuan Longping, widely recognized as the “father of hybrid rice”, highlighted that ideal super-high-yield rice should possess a distinctive leaf phenotype described as “long, erect, narrow, concave, and thick” in three major functional leaves (flag leaf, second leaf, and third leaf from the top). This specific leaf morphology maximizes photosynthetic efficiency, thus providing abundant resources for high-yield rice production [22]. Narrow-leaf rice mutants frequently exhibit additional phenotypic alterations, such as reduced plant height, increased tiller numbers, hull splitting, fewer effective panicles, and decreased thousand-grain weight [6,7,10]. Consequently, exploring the molecular mechanisms underlying rice narrow-leaf formation is critical for designing ideal plant architectures and breeding super-high-yield rice varieties.
This study identified a novel EMS-induced mutant, nal25, derived from the indica rice cultivar ‘Huazhan’. Compared to wild-type plants, the nal25 mutant exhibits pleiotropic phenotypic alterations, including significantly reduced plant height, narrower and elongated leaves, and an increased number of effective panicles. However, these potentially advantageous traits are counterbalanced by substantial yield-compromising defects, namely reduced panicle length, fewer grains per panicle, lower seed set rate, diminished grain dimensions (length and width), and decreased 1000-grain weight, collectively leading to severely impaired final yield. This narrow-leaf trait is controlled by a single recessive gene, as shown by genetic analysis of hybrid combinations of mutant nal25/’Huazhan’ and mutant nal25/’Shenhui26’. Fine-mapping analysis revealed that NAL25 was located in a 103 kb region of chromosome 7 in rice. Sequencing alignment revealed a single-base mutation at position 173 from the T to C mutations of the LOC_Os07g09450 gene, resulting in an amino acid substitution from leucine to proline. At the same time, expression analysis revealed that the expression level of this gene was significantly downregulated in the leaves, sheaths, stems, and young spikes in mutant nal25. NAL25 is a new allele of NAL11, encoding the OsHSP40 protein of rice, and participates in the regulation of rice leaf morphology development and the biosynthesis of gibberellin [12]. This gene has been reported to possess three allelic forms, namely ZYX-nal11 [11], lw7 [23], and NAL11−923del−1552 [12]. In the ZYX-nal11 gene, a G→T mutation occurs at the last base of the second exon, leading to an alteration in the alternative splicing pattern of the mRNA and abnormal translation [11]. In the lw7 gene, a C→T mutation takes place at the 136th base of the coding sequence, forming a stop codon and causing premature translation termination [23]. For the NAL11−923del−1552 gene, a fragment deletion occurs in the 923–1522 region of the promoter, resulting in an upregulation of the gene expression level [12].
HSP40 is also referred to as the DnaJ protein or J protein because it contains the DNAJ domain. Heat-shock proteins mainly function in abnormal protein degradation, protein three-dimensional structure folding, protein input and output, signal transduction, and transcriptional activation, and play important roles in the growth and development of plants and their stress resistance. According to the increasing molecular weight of the protein, they are mainly divided into the following six categories: sHSPs (15–42 kD), HSP40 (41 kD), HSP60 (60 kD), HSP70 (66–78 kD), HSP90 (83–90 kD), and HSP100.
When plants are exposed to adverse stress conditions such as high temperature, low temperature, drought, salt stress, and pathogen invasion, HSP40 is highly expressed and participates in stress resistance physiological and biochemical reaction processes. During the normal growth process of plants, HSP40 also participates in processes such as chloroplast development, photosynthesis, and protein transport [24]. There are a large number of genes encoding HSP40 in the rice genome [25], and the known cloned OsHSP40 genes in rice mainly play roles in salt stress resistance [26,27], biotic stress resistance [28,29,30], and chloroplast development [31], such as LOC_Os02g01030 [26], OsDNAJ15 [27], OsDjA2 [28], OsDjA6 [29], OsDjA9 [30], and LOC_Os05g26926 gene [31], While numerous leaf-shape regulatory genes have been identified, the research on the role of OsHSP40 gene in rice morphological development is relatively scarce. The complexity of leaf development—integrating internal structure, developmental processes, and environmental responses—necessitates further research to enrich our understanding of the regulatory network underlying rice leaf morphology [32].
Optimal plant architecture constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for breeding elite super rice cultivars, as this trait enables enhanced yield and grain quality. Superior genetic resources are essential for optimizing plant architecture [33]. The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) established the Ideal Plant Architecture (IPA) concept, defined by the key traits of minimized unproductive tillers, robust culms, and enlarged panicles. During the past decade, Ideal Plant Architecture 1 (IPA1) has emerged as a key genetic target for enhancing rice yield. Fine-tuning IPA1 expression optimizes plant architecture, inducing phenotypes of decreased tiller number, increased stem thickness, and larger panicle size, thereby demonstrating considerable utility in breeding programs [34]. Beyond its established function in the strigolactone (SL) pathway, IPA1 has been demonstrated to participate in gibberellin (GA) homeostasis regulation [35]. Impairment of LOC_Os07g09450 gene function results in diminished chloroplast count, altered chloroplast morphology, and reduced thylakoid membrane abundance. These phenotypes, along with decreased tillering, are rescued by exogenous GA, which also improves emergence rate and seedling height in early growth stages [12]. Despite these, the mechanistic basis of IPA1-mediated plant architecture control through GA signaling cascades and associated downstream genes remains elusive. The present study provides a novel genetic resource for dissecting leaf-shape determination in rice, highlighting the role of the heat-shock protein OsHSP40 in regulating rice leaf morphology. These findings provide new insights and valuable resources for future research and targeted breeding aimed at optimizing rice plant architecture and increasing yield.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14162528/s1: Table S1: 48 SSR markers for initial mapping of the NAL25 gene.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, K.X. and A.Z.; formal analysis, P.H. and C.C.; resources, H.C.; data curation, B.S. and J.Z.; visualization, Y.D.; writing—review and editing, F.N.; supervision, L.C. and A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Chongming Agriculture Innovation Project (2023CNKC-01-03) and the Wuhan Knowledge Innovation Special Project (2023020201020429).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Xiao, J.; Chen, L.; Huang, X.; Cheng, Z.; Han, B.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, C. Rice Functional Genomics Research: Past Decade and Future. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 359–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, T.; Yu, H.; Qiu, J.; Li, J.Y.; Han, B.; Lin, H.X. Advances in rice genetics and breeding by molecular design in China. Sci. Sin. Vitae 2019, 49, 1185–1212. [Google Scholar]
  3. Xu, N.; Xu, Q.; Xu, Z.J.; Chen, W.F. Research progress on physiological ecology and genetic basis of rice plant architecture. Acta Agron. Sin. 2023, 49, 1735–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, M.; Li, X.B.; Huang, J.; Huang, G.F. The Relationship Between Leaf Area Index and Yield of Rice: Research Progress. J. Agric. 2022, 12, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, M.L.; Ye, S.H.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.L.; Zhai, R.R.; Ye, J.; Wu, M.M.; Zhu, G.F.; Zhang, X.M. Research Progress of Leaf Shape Related Regulation Genes in Rice. Mol. Plant Breed. 2022, 20, 7540–7549. [Google Scholar]
  6. Subudhi, P.K.; Garcia, R.S.; Coronejo, S.; Leon, T.B.D. A Novel Mutation of the NARROW LEAF 1 Gene Adversely Affects Plant Architecture in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8106–8127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qi, J.; Qian, Q.; Bu, Q.; Li, S.; Chen, Q.; Sun, J.; Liang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Chu, C.; Li, X. Mutation of the Rice Narrow leaf1 Gene, Which Encodes a Novel Protein, Affects Vein Patterning and Polar Auxin Transport1. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1947–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cho, S.H.; Yoo, S.C.; Zhang, H. The rice narrow leaf2 and narrow leaf3 loci encode WUSCHEL-related homeobox 3A (OsWOX3A) and function in leaf, spikelet, tiller and lateral root development. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 1071–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fujino, K.; Matsuda, Y.; Ozawa, K.; Nishimura, T.; Koshiba, T.; Fraaije, M.W.; Sekiguchi, H. NARROW LEAF 7 controls leaf shape mediated by auxin in rice. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2008, 279, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, W.; Liu, W.; Chao, W.; Hu, G.; Li, X.; Qian, W.; Si, H.; Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Fu, Y. Characterization and Fine Mapping of a Novel Rice Narrow Leaf Mutant nal9. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 1016–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Y.; Luo, L.; Chen, L.; Tao, X.; Huang, M.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Xiao, W. Chromosome mapping, molecular cloning and expression analysis of a novel gene response for leaf width in rice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 480, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, L.X.; Xie, Y.L.; Yu, S.J.; Yang, J.; Chen, S.R.; Yuan, X.; Guo, T.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.Z.; Chen, C.; et al. The DnaJ domain-containing heat-shock protein NAL11 determines plant architecture by mediating gibberellin homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2023, 237, 2163–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Uzair, M.; Long, H.; Zafar, S.A.; Patil, S.B.; Chun, Y.; Li, L.; Fang, J.J.; Zhao, J.F.; Peng, L.X.; Yuan, S.J.; et al. Narrow Leaf21, encoding ribosomal protein RPS3A, controls leaf development in rice. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 497–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, Y.C.; Yan, S.Y.; Jiang, S.; Bai, L.; Liu, Y.C.; Peng, S.S.; Chen, R.B.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, Y.H.; Kang, H.X. Identification of a Rice Leaf Width Gene Narrow Leaf 22 (NAL22) through Genome-Wide Association Study and Gene Editing Technology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4073–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, X.J.; Tang, S.Q.; Shao, G.N.; Chen, M.L.; Hu, Y.C.; Hu, P.S. Fine mapping and characterization of a novel dwarf and narrow-leaf mutant dnl1 in rice. Genet. Mol. Res. 2013, 12, 3845–3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ding, Z.Q.; Lin, Z.F.; Li, Q.; Wu, H.; Xiang, C.Y.; Wang, J.F. DNL1, encodes cellulose synthase-like D4, is a major QTL for plant height and leaf width in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 457, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shen, W.Q.; Sun, J.J.; Xiao, Z.; Feng, P.; Zhang, T.; He, G.H.; Sang, X.C. Narrow and Stripe Leaf 2 Regulates Leaf Width by Modulating Cell Cycle Progression in Rice. Rice 2023, 16, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, L.; Sang, X.C.; Zhang, T.; Yu, Z.Y.; Li, Y.F.; Zhao, F.M.; Wang, Z.W.; Wang, Y.T.; Yu, P.; Wang, N.; et al. ABNORMAL VASCULAR BUNDLES regulates cell proliferation and procambium cell establishment during aerial organ development in rice. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, Y.Z.; Meng, Y.L.; Zeng, J.; Luo, Y.; Feng, Z.; Bian, L.Y.; Gao, S.Y. Coordination between GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR1 and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR1 plays a key role in regulating leaf growth in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sakamoto, T.; Morinaka, Y.; Inukai, Y.; Kitano, H.; Fujioka, S. Auxin signal transcription factor regulates expression of the brassinosteroid receptor gene in rice. Plant J. 2013, 73, 676–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chu, H.W.; Cheng, C.; Niu, F.A.; Zhou, J.H.; Tu, R.J.; Luo, Z.Y.; Wang, X.Q.; Cao, L.M. Distribution of 8 rice blast-resistant genes in parents of three-line hybrid keng rice. Acta Agric. Shanghai 2018, 34, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yuan, L.P. Hybrid Rice Breeding for Super High Yield. Hybrid Rice 1997, 12, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, F.H.; Tang, Z.B.; Wang, Y.; Fu, J.; Yang, W.B.; Wang, S.X.; Wang, Y.T.; Bai, T.; Huang, Z.B.; Yin, H.Q.; et al. Leaf Mutant 7 Encoding Heat Shock Protein OsHSP40 Regulates Leaf Size in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4446–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fan, F.F.; Yang, X.; Kang, Y.Y.; Chai, X.R.; Meng, L.P. Research Progress on DnaJ Proteins in Plants. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 16, 2028–2034. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sarkar, N.K.; Thapar, U.; Kundnani, P.; Panwar, P.; Grover, A. Functional relevance of J-protein family of rice (Oryza sativa). Cell Stress Chaperones 2013, 18, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Shao, L.Y.; Yan, X.; Peng, H.; Ouyang, J.X.; Li, S.B. Expression and function analysis of a rice OsHSP40 gene under salt stress. Genes Genom. 2019, 41, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.T.; Li, M.T.; Yu, J.L.; Ma, A.; Wang, J.; Yun, D.J.; Xu, Z.Y. Plasma membrane-localized Hsp40/DNAJ chaperone protein facilitates OsSUVH7-OsBAG4-OsMYB106 transcriptional complex formation for OsHKT1; 5 activation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Távora, F.T.P.K.; Meunier, A.C.; Vernet, A. Murielle Portefaix, M.; Milazzo, J.; Adreit, H.; Tharreau, D.; Lfranco, O.; Mehta, A. CRISPR/Cas9-Targeted Knockout of Rice Susceptibility Genes OsDjA2 and OsERF104 Reveals Alternative Sources of Resistance to Pyricularia oryzae. Rice Sci. 2022, 29, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhong, X.H.; Yang, J.X.; Shi, Y.L.; Wang, X.L.; Wang, G.L. The DnaJ protein OsDjA6 negatively regulates rice innate immunity to the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, G.J.; Zhong, X.H.; Shi, Y.L.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, N.; Liu, J.; Ding, B.; Li, Z.Q.; Kang, H.X.; Ning, Y.S.; et al. A fungal effector targets a heat shock-dynamin protein complex to modulate mitochondrial dynamics and reduce plant immunity. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabb7719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, X.B.; Liang, S.H.; Yin, J.J.; Yuan, C.; Wang, J.; Li, W.T.; He, M.; Wang, J.H.; Chen, W.L.; Ma, B.T.; et al. The DnaJ OsDjA7/8 is essential for chloroplast development in rice (Oryza sativa). Gene 2015, 574, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Qian, Q.; Zhang, G.H. Research Advance in Molecule Regulation Mechanism of Leaf Morphogenesis in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron. Sin. 2013, 39, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, L.J.; Luo, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, N. From Green Revolution to Green Balance: The Nitrogen and Gibberellin Mediated Rice Tiller Growth. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1917838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, L.; Yu, H.; Ma, B.; Liu, G.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Gao, R.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, J.; et al. A natural tandem array alleviates epigenetic repression of IPA1 and leads to superior yielding rice. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, F.; Han, T.; Song, Q.; Ye, W.; Song, X.; Chu, J.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.J. The Rice Circadian Clock Regulates Tiller Growth and Panicle Development Through Strigolactone Signaling and Sugar Sensing. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3124–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flag leaf morphology of wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and mutant nal25. (A) Flag leaf morphology, scale bar = 5 cm; (B) comparison the length of flag leaf, ** significantly different at p < 0.01; (C) comparison the width of flag leaf, ** significantly different at p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Flag leaf morphology of wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and mutant nal25. (A) Flag leaf morphology, scale bar = 5 cm; (B) comparison the length of flag leaf, ** significantly different at p < 0.01; (C) comparison the width of flag leaf, ** significantly different at p < 0.01.
Plants 14 02528 g001
Figure 2. Plant phenotype of wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and mutant nal25. (A) Plant phenotype at heading stage, scale bar = 10 cm; (B) comparison of the number of tillers at heading stage, **** significantly different at p < 0.0001; (C) comparison of plant height at maturation stage, *** significantly different at p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Plant phenotype of wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and mutant nal25. (A) Plant phenotype at heading stage, scale bar = 10 cm; (B) comparison of the number of tillers at heading stage, **** significantly different at p < 0.0001; (C) comparison of plant height at maturation stage, *** significantly different at p < 0.001.
Plants 14 02528 g002
Figure 3. Comparison the agronomic traits of wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and mutant nal25: (A) panicle length; (B) total grain number of per spike; (C) seed setting rate; (D) grain length; (E) grain width; (F) thousand-grain weight. * significantly different at p < 0.05; *** significantly different at p < 0.001; **** significantly different at p < 0.0001.
Figure 3. Comparison the agronomic traits of wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and mutant nal25: (A) panicle length; (B) total grain number of per spike; (C) seed setting rate; (D) grain length; (E) grain width; (F) thousand-grain weight. * significantly different at p < 0.05; *** significantly different at p < 0.001; **** significantly different at p < 0.0001.
Plants 14 02528 g003
Figure 4. Fine-mapping of NAL25. Note: (A) fine-mapping of NAL25 gene, n represents the number of single plants for mapping; (B) the open reading frame in the region; (C) the diagram of NAL25 gene; (D) sequencing comparative analysis of wild-type.
Figure 4. Fine-mapping of NAL25. Note: (A) fine-mapping of NAL25 gene, n represents the number of single plants for mapping; (B) the open reading frame in the region; (C) the diagram of NAL25 gene; (D) sequencing comparative analysis of wild-type.
Plants 14 02528 g004
Figure 5. The expression level of the NAL25 in the leaf, leaf sheath, stem, and spike. Note: **** significantly different at p < 0.0001.
Figure 5. The expression level of the NAL25 in the leaf, leaf sheath, stem, and spike. Note: **** significantly different at p < 0.0001.
Plants 14 02528 g005
Table 1. qPCR reaction system and reaction parameters.
Table 1. qPCR reaction system and reaction parameters.
ReagentUsage/μLReaction Parameters
2× Master Mix10.0Stage 1Initial
denaturation
Reps:195 °C30 s
Primer1 (10 μM)0.4Stage 2Cycle
reaction
Reps:4095 °C3~10 s
Primer2 (10 μM)0.460 °C10~30 s
cDNA0.2Stage 3Melting
curve
Rep:195 °C15 s
Sterilized
double-distilled water
Add to 20.060 °C60 s
95 °C15 s
Table 2. Primer sequences for fine-mapping.
Table 2. Primer sequences for fine-mapping.
NameForward Primer Sequence (5′-3′)Reverse Primer Sequence (5′-3′)
RM7479GCTCTGGTTAGTGATCATGGACATGGTGGCTTAGGAGTG
RM6574AACCTCGAATTCCTTGGGAGTTCGACTCCAAGGAGTGCTC
7-4915ATTCAATCCAACCTCTCACAATCTTGAAGTTCTTGGGGTTCAT
7-4934TACTGAGAGAGAGGGCTTGAGAAACTAGTGGCATATTCGCTGAT
7-5037TATGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTCAACAAATTTGGAAACAAAAA
7-5194ATTAGCAGCAGCTTTGTATTCGATAGGTCCATGGTTGAACAAAA
7-5209AGCATCGATAAGTTGAGGAGACGCCTGTTAGGAATGGGAAGT
7-5262GGCTAAAAGTGGATAGATGCAGACACACCAAGATTGTCAGATCA
RM125ATCAGCAGCCATGGCAGCGACCAGGGGATCATGTGCCGAAGGCC
RM5672CACCCTACAAGGAAACAAGCTGCCCAATATAGAGGCAACC
R7M7ACCTTCCCTCCCCTTTTGATAACTTGGTCTTCCTGTTTTATTG
RM6776AGCCCGGACATGCAAAACGAAGCAGGCGAAATCTCCTC
RM1253CTGAACTTGCCTGAGAACTCGACGACCTCTCCATGCTCG
RM3718AGCGCTCGAGAATTTCTAGGATGCTGACGTCACCCCAC
R7M20GTTTTGTGCATTCCTTTACTTTATGACATTTGACCG
Actin-qPCRCCAAGGCCAATCGTGAGAAGAAATCAGTGAGATCACGCCCAG
Nal25-qPCRATTCTATGAAGGTGGCTTTCAATCCTTTTGTCTTCCCTAACAAA
Table 3. The flag leaf length/width and agronomic traits of the wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and the mutant nal25.
Table 3. The flag leaf length/width and agronomic traits of the wild-type ‘Huazhan’ and the mutant nal25.
Agronomic TraitsMaterial
‘Huazhan’nal25
Plant height/cm108.00 ± 1.5390.80 ± 2.48 ***
Flag leaf length/cm36.57 ± 1.0541.80 ± 1.66 **
Flag leaf width/cm1.73 ± 0.050.57 ± 0.02 **
No. of effective panicles25 ± 0.8252 ± 1.63 ****
Panicle length/cm25.63 ± 1.0422.06 ± 1.33 ****
Total grain number of per spike270.20 ± 5.5375.25 ± 3.49 ****
Seed setting rate/%94.25 ± 0.8366.00 ± 2.92 ***
Grain length/cm9.32 ± 0.188.97 ± 0.09 *
Grain width/cm2.33 ± 0.052.09 ± 0.04 ***
1000-grain weight/g19.78 ± 0.2115.33 ± 1.52 *
Note: * significantly different at p < 0.05; ** significantly different at p < 0.01; *** significantly different at p < 0.001; **** significantly different at p < 0.0001.
Table 4. Genetic analysis on narrow and short leaf of nal25 mutant.
Table 4. Genetic analysis on narrow and short leaf of nal25 mutant.
Cross CombinationF1F2χ220.05 = 3.84)
Total No. of PlantsNo. of Wild-Type PlantsNo. of Mutant-Type Plants
nal25/Shenhui 26normal11458622830.05
nal25/Huazhannormal11929052870.46
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, K.; Niu, F.; Hu, P.; Cheng, C.; Chu, H.; Zhou, J.; Sun, B.; Dai, Y.; Cao, L.; Zhang, A. Phenotypic Identification and Fine-Mapping of the Rice Narrow-Leaf Mutant nal25. Plants 2025, 14, 2528. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162528

AMA Style

Xie K, Niu F, Hu P, Cheng C, Chu H, Zhou J, Sun B, Dai Y, Cao L, Zhang A. Phenotypic Identification and Fine-Mapping of the Rice Narrow-Leaf Mutant nal25. Plants. 2025; 14(16):2528. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Kaizhen, Fuan Niu, Peng Hu, Can Cheng, Huangwei Chu, Jihua Zhou, Bin Sun, Yuting Dai, Liming Cao, and Anpeng Zhang. 2025. "Phenotypic Identification and Fine-Mapping of the Rice Narrow-Leaf Mutant nal25" Plants 14, no. 16: 2528. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162528

APA Style

Xie, K., Niu, F., Hu, P., Cheng, C., Chu, H., Zhou, J., Sun, B., Dai, Y., Cao, L., & Zhang, A. (2025). Phenotypic Identification and Fine-Mapping of the Rice Narrow-Leaf Mutant nal25. Plants, 14(16), 2528. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop