Next Article in Journal
Elimination of Intraspecific Competition Does Not Improve Maize Leaf Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Topsoil Degradation
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemistry and Bioactivity of Essential Oil and Methanolic Extracts of Origanum vulgare L. from Central Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Yield Responses of Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Genotypes to Drought Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transient Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Grape Berries Enhances Susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea Through ROS Homeostasis Modulation

School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(16), 2469; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162469 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 7 July 2025 / Revised: 6 August 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 9 August 2025

Abstract

Gray mold disease, caused by Botrytis cinerea, severely impacts grape production worldwide. Although proanthocyanidins (PAs) contribute to fungal pathogen resistance, their role in grape defense against B. cinerea remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that VvMYBPA1, a key transcriptional regulator of PA biosynthesis, negatively modulates B. cinerea resistance in grape berries. While infection suppressed endogenous VvMYBPA1, its agroinfiltration-mediated transient overexpression in berries elevated susceptibility, paralleling reduced β-1,3-glucanase (BGL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activities. Additionally, VvMYBPA1 overexpression elevated VvRBOHs’ expression and reduced peroxidase (POD) activity, resulting in excessive hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation and more cell death. Our results reveal that VvMYBPA1 negatively regulates B. cinerea resistance by disrupting antioxidant enzyme activity and ROS homeostasis, providing new insights into the interplay between PA biosynthesis and fungal defense mechanisms.

1. Introduction

Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) is a globally vital fruit crop with high economic impact but its production faces severe threats from multiple diseases, notably Botrytis cinerea-induced gray mold [1]. B. cinerea is a broad-host-range necrotrophic fungal pathogen, causing significant pre- and post-harvest losses in grape berries [2,3]. The grapefruit-B. cinerea pathosystem exhibits a dynamic molecular interplay characterized by host pattern-triggered immunity and fungal effector-mediated virulence [4]. Elucidating the molecular basis of this interaction is essential for developing grape resistance strategies and mitigating economic impacts.
B. cinerea triggers lipid peroxidation and ROS bursts in host tissues [5]. ROS exhibit dual functionality in plant–pathogen systems [6]. ROS exhibit a biphasic role: at low levels, they mediate defense signaling (hypersensitive response, callose deposition); at high levels, they provoke oxidative injury, aiding necrotrophy proliferation [5,7]. The homeostatic regulation between ROS generation and detoxification is tightly regulated by a network of enzymes, including NADPH oxidases (RBOHs), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT). Emerging evidence underscores the pivotal regulatory role of ROS homeostasis in plant defense against B. cinerea. Molecular studies have demonstrated that Sly-miR398b-mediated disruption of ROS equilibrium compromises tomato resistance to this pathogen [8]. Similarly, genetic evidence confirms SlWRKY46 as a pivotal transcriptional controller of B. cinerea resistance through ROS metabolism reprogramming [9]. Supporting these findings, a comparative transcriptomic study between resistant and susceptible grape cultivars uncovered that perturbations in ROS metabolism and redox regulation significantly influence host susceptibility [10]. In grape berries, the regulation of ROS homeostasis during B. cinerea infection remains poorly understood, particularly in the context of transcriptional regulators such as MYB transcription factors.
MYB transcription factors play critical roles in plant secondary metabolism, stress responses, and defense mechanisms [11]. Among them, VvMYBPA1 has been functionally characterized as a transcriptional regulator of proanthocyanidin (PA) biosynthesis in grapevine through direct activation of anthocyanidin reductase (ANR) and leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR) promoters [12]. PAs, or condensed tannins, significantly influence fruit taste and wine flavor, underscoring the economic importance of their biosynthesis regulation. Research shows PAs also play key roles in plant–pathogen interactions. For example, cucumber CsMYB60 enhances resistance to Fusarium solani by promoting PA synthesis [13], while poplar MYB115 directly activates PA-specific genes ANR1 and LAR3, boosting resistance to Dothiorella gregaria [14]. In grapevines, the VvPUB26-VvWRKY24-VvDFR/VvLAR and VqWRKY56-VqbZIPC22-VvCHS3/VvLAR1/VvANR modules regulate PA biosynthesis, enhancing leaf resistance to Erysiphe necator [15,16]. Additionally, V. amurensis VvbHLH137 increases fruit resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides by promoting PA accumulation [17]. Emerging evidence demonstrates that MYB transcription factors can influence ROS production and scavenging, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. For instance, besides the role in the biosynthesis of anthocyanidin, SlMYB75 improved the scavenging of excess H2O2 to resist B. cinerea, suggesting a potential trade-off between secondary metabolite biosynthesis and ROS-mediated defense responses [18]. Despite its known functions, VvMYBPA1’s precise role in orchestrating ROS metabolism and immune responses against B. cinerea infection has not been systematically elucidated.
In this study, we systematically examined VvMYBPA1’s mechanistic involvement in orchestrating ROS metabolism and defense activation during B. cinerea pathogenesis, using both constitutively overexpressing Arabidopsis thaliana and agroinfiltration-mediated transient overexpression in grape berries. Our findings not only advance the knowledge of MYB transcription factors in plant–pathogen interactions but also offer potential strategies for enhancing grape resistance to B. cinerea through targeted manipulation of ROS dynamics and secondary metabolism.

2. Results

2.1. Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 Enhances the Susceptibility of Arabidopsis Leaves to B. cinerea

To investigate the role of PA biosynthesis in resistance to B. cinerea, we first analyzed VvMYBPA1 expression in mature ‘Kyoho’ grape berries at harvesting stage (E-L 38) during infection (Figure 1a). At 6 hpi, VvMYBPA1 expression decreased by nearly half, and by 48 hpi, it dropped to less than two-thirds of the initial level. To further explore cultivar-specific responses, we analyzed VvMYBPA1 expression across different varieties using the Botrytis Stress Atlas Explorer. While ‘Pinot’, ‘Semillon’, and ‘Garganega’ (G) berries showed negligible VvMYBPA1 induction upon infection, ‘Furmint’ exhibited progressive upregulation correlating with disease severity, suggesting a negative association between VvMYBPA1 expression and resistance (Figure S1) [19,20]. To elucidate VvMYBPA1’s involvement in defense mechanisms, we established overexpression Arabidopsis lines, from which three transgenic T3 progenies (OE#1, OE#10, and OE#23) showing stable transgene expression were isolated (Figure 1b). DMACA staining of immature seeds revealed that the transgenic lines, particularly OE#10 and OE#23, exhibited intense blue staining within 20 min, indicating higher PA accumulation relative to wild-type controls (Figure 1c). Pathogenicity assays using detached leaves revealed significantly enhanced susceptibility to B. cinerea in transgenic lines relative to WT plants at the 4-week developmental stage, including increased leaf yellowing and larger lesion diameters at 72 hpi (Figure 2a,b). Furthermore, quantification of fungal colonization confirmed higher B. cinerea levels in the transgenic lines (Figure 2c). These results demonstrate that VvMYBPA1 overexpression enhances Arabidopsis susceptibility to B. cinerea.

2.2. VvMYBPA1 Stimulates ROS Production in A. thaliana Leaves upon B. cinerea Challenge

Given the critical role of ROS generation in plant interactions with B. cinerea, we assessed H2O2 and O2 accumulation in Arabidopsis leaves 72 hpi using DAB and NBT staining. In contrast to the wild-type (WT) controls, the overexpressing lines exhibited darker staining, indicating elevated ROS levels (Figure 3a,b). In Arabidopsis thaliana, the NADPH oxidase family members AtRBOHD and AtRBOHF serve as primary enzymatic sources of ROS generation [21]. We analyzed their transcription levels in overexpression lines and WT plants post inoculation. At 72 hpi, AtRBOHD expression was significantly higher in OE#1 and OE#23 compared to WT, while AtRBOHF transcript levels were markedly elevated in OE#10 (Figure 3c,d). Additionally, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, indicative of ROS-mediated lipid peroxidation [22], were substantially higher in transgenic lines than in WT after inoculation (Figure 3f). Trypan blue staining further revealed increased cell death in transgenic leaves compared to WT at 72 hpi (Figure 3e). These findings suggest that in Arabidopsis VvMYBPA1 promotes B. cinerea proliferation by inducing oxidative burst-mediated cell death.

2.3. VvMYBPA1-Overexpressing Grape Berries Exhibit Decreased Resistance to B. cinerea Infection

Assessing the defensive function of VvMYBPA1 in grape berry–pathogen interactions, we generated transient VvMYBPA1-overexpressing grape berries via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and inoculated them with B. cinerea (Figure 4a). VvMYBPA1 expression in transgenic berries was 8-fold higher than in controls, accompanied by significantly elevated proanthocyanidin levels both pre- and post-inoculation (Figure 4b,c). Three days post inoculation, lesion areas in the overexpression group were significantly larger, and B. cinerea colonization was markedly higher compared to controls (Figure 4d,e). These results, consistent with heterologous overexpression in Arabidopsis, demonstrate that VvMYBPA1 overexpression compromises grape berry resistance against B. cinerea.
We further monitored the enzymatic activity of defense-associated proteins spanning both phenylpropanoid pathway (PAL, PPO) and pathogen cell wall degradation (BGL, CHI) functions. Prior to B. cinerea inoculation, the enzymatic profiles of VvMYBPA1-overexpressing and control berries showed comparable activity levels (Figure 5a–d). Post inoculation, besides CHI activity, all other three enzyme activities significantly increased in the control berries (Figure 5a–d). In contrast, the VvMYBPA1-overexpression group exhibited distinct responses; while PAL and CHI activities showed comparable activities compared to the control (Figure 5b,c), BGL and PPO activities were significantly reduced (Figure 5a,d). These findings further demonstrate that VvMYBPA1 overexpression compromises grape berry resistance against B. cinerea infection.

2.4. VvMYBPA1 Promotes ROS Accumulation in Mature Grape Berries During B. cinerea Inoculation

To further investigate whether VvMYBPA1 in grape berries promotes B. cinerea proliferation by enhancing ROS accumulation, we analyzed the expression levels of two key VvRBOH genes, VvRBOHA and VvRBOHB, in VvMYBPA1-overexpressing and control berries two days post inoculation. The results revealed that both genes were significantly upregulated in the overexpression group relative to the control, with VvRBOHB expression approximately 18-fold higher (Figure 6a,b). Additionally, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels were measured three days post inoculation. While no significant difference was observed prior to inoculation, H2O2 content in the overexpression group was markedly higher (approximately 1.5-fold) than in the control group post inoculation (Figure 6c). Furthermore, MDA levels were significantly elevated in the overexpression group (Figure 6d). VvVPE, a crucial enzyme in programmed cell death that facilitates vacuole rupture and subsequent release of hydrolytic enzymes, was also examined [23]. Its expression was low and comparable between groups before inoculation but increased approximately 2-fold in the overexpression group post inoculation (Figure 6e). These findings collectively demonstrate that VvMYBPA1 overexpression enhances H2O2 accumulation, exacerbates membrane lipid peroxidation, promotes host cell death, and ultimately facilitates B. cinerea proliferation.

2.5. Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 Altered the Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes in Grape Berries

To elucidate the dual role of VvMYBPA1 in ROS metabolism during grape–B. cinerea interaction, we measured the transcript levels of key antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT) at 48 hpi and their corresponding enzyme activities at 72 hpi in both VvMYBPA1-overexpressing and control berries. Transcriptional analysis revealed a pathogen-induced upregulation of SOD in both genotypes, with no significant variation between genotypes (Figure 7a). Consistently, SOD activity remained comparable between transgenic and control fruits (Figure 7b). Notably, VvMYBPA1 overexpression led to a marked suppression of both POD transcription and enzymatic activity compared to the control (Figure 7c,d). While CAT transcript accumulation was enhanced in transgenic berries, its catalytic activity showed no significant alteration (Figure 7e,f). These findings demonstrate that VvMYBPA1 orchestrates antioxidant enzyme regulation during B. cinerea infection, extending beyond its role in ROS biosynthesis in grape berries.

3. Discussion

3.1. VvMYBPA1 Negatively Regulates B. cinerea Resistance in Mature Grape Berries

B. cinerea, a highly destructive fungal pathogen, poses a significant threat to the post-harvest storage of grape berries. Understanding the defense mechanisms against gray mold is therefore crucial for improving grape quality and extending shelf life during storage. Numerous secondary metabolites in plants contribute to fungal pathogen resistance, among which PAs play a pivotal role. For instance, heterologous expression of MnANR and MnLAR from Morus alba in Nicotiana tabacum has been demonstrated to confer enhanced defense against B. cinerea infection [24]. Additionally, catechin-treated cucumber seedlings exhibit increased pathogen resistance [13]. Previous investigations have well established the contribution of PAs to Vitis vinifera defense mechanisms against Erysiphe necator infection. For example, VvPUB26 positively regulates resistance by ubiquitinating and degrading the PA synthesis repressor VvWRKY24 in grape leaves. Interestingly, VvPUB26-silenced plants show reduced powdery mildew resistance but elevated PA accumulation [15]. Genetic evidence from Vitis quinquangularis reveals that the VqWRKY56-VqbZIPC22 transcriptional module activates proanthocyanidin biosynthesis pathways, resulting in improved defense against Erysiphe necator infection [16].
The proanthocyanidin biosynthetic pathway requires coordinated action of multiple enzymes, including chalcone synthase catalyzing the initial condensation, chalcone isomerase mediating flavonoid ring formation, dihydroflavonol reductase reducing dihydroflavonols, and the terminal reductases LAR and ANR generating different PA subunits [24]. Several transcription factors, including VvMYBPAR, VvMYBPA1, VvMYBPA2, VvMYB5b, and VviMYB86, have been functionally identified as major determinants of PA biosynthesis in grapevines [12,25,26,27,28]. As previously reported, PA content in grape berry skins, along with the transcriptional level of VvMYBPA1, VvLAR, and VvANR, declines during berry ripening [12,29]. In this study, we investigated the function of VvMYBPA1 in gray mold resistance by ectopically expressing it in Arabidopsis and transiently overexpressing it in mature grape berries (Figure 2 and Figure 4). Surprisingly, VvMYBPA1 overexpression in mature berries increased PA accumulation but significantly reduced resistance to B. cinerea. These findings expand the knowledge of the complex relationship between PA biosynthesis and gray mold resistance.
Plants employ two key immune strategies against pathogens: pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [30]. Upon B. cinerea infection, pathogen-associated molecular patterns are recognized, triggering host defenses such as transcriptional reprogramming, PR protein secretion, ROS burst, and activation of secondary metabolic pathways [4,10]. Key enzymes, including BGL, CHI, PAL, and PPO, play critical roles [31,32]. BGL and CHI degrade fungal cell walls, leading to pathogen death. PAL, central to the phenylpropanoid pathway, enhances lignin and flavonoid synthesis when activated. In grapes, 15 PAL genes contribute to B. cinerea resistance during the green berry stage [33,34]. PPO promotes lignification and generates antimicrobial quinones via phenolic oxidation [35]. In our study, pre-inoculation enzyme activities showed no significant differences between VvMYBPA1-overexpressing and control fruits. Post inoculation, however, enzyme activities declined in overexpressing fruits, with significant reductions in BGL and PPO (Figure 5). This suggests VvMYBPA1 negatively regulates B. cinerea resistance by suppressing key defense enzyme activities in secondary metabolism.

3.2. ROS and PAs in Plant Defense: A Dual Role

ROS are pivotal signaling molecules that mediate plant defense mechanisms against diverse environmental challenges, especially in immune responses. Studies have demonstrated that ROS production is closely associated with both PTI and ETI [36]. As secondary messengers, ROS can induce hypersensitive responses, ultimately leading to host cell death. This mechanism effectively restricts nutrient acquisition by biotrophic pathogens, thereby inhibiting their proliferation [37,38,39]. Nevertheless, an overabundance of ROS can trigger programmed cell death in host tissues, rendering plants more vulnerable to infection by hemi-biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens [40,41]. Research has shown that in the interaction with the hemi-biotrophic pathogen Phytophthora infestans, the tomato 1R-type MYB transcription factor SlKUA1 enhances SlRBOHD expression, increasing ROS accumulation, while simultaneously reducing POD expression by binding to the SlPrx1 promoter, thereby impairing ROS scavenging and ultimately affecting tomato resistance to late blight [41]. In contrast, during interaction with the necrotrophic pathogen B. cinerea, tomato SlWRKY3 promotes ROS accumulation and negatively regulates resistance by affecting SlCAT1 expression [40]. Consistent with these findings, our study detected elevated ROS levels in both VvMYBPA1-overexpressing Arabidopsis leaves and grape fruits following B. cinerea infection (Figure 3 and Figure 6), accompanied by significantly reduced POD expression and activity (Figure 7). The disruption of ROS homeostasis ultimately led to increased MDA content, elevated host cell death, and upregulation of the apoptosis-related gene VvVPE, which facilitated B. cinerea proliferation (Figure 6).
PAs, as major defensive phenolic compounds, exhibit antioxidant activity [42]. However, our study revealed that VvMYBPA1 overexpression not only increased proanthocyanidin content (Figure 1 and Figure 4) but also enhanced ROS accumulation (Figure 3 and Figure 6), affecting the expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, POD, and SOD (Figure 7), ultimately exacerbating membrane lipid peroxidation and host cell death (Figure 3 and Figure 6). Parallel results have been documented in previous research. The WRKY transcription factor VqWRKY56, identified in wild grape Vitis quinquangularis, promotes anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin accumulation in grape leaves through interaction with VqbZIP22. Following powdery mildew infection, VqWRKY56-overexpressing lines exhibited elevated ROS levels and increased leaf cell death, which significantly inhibited fungal hyphal growth and spore production [16]. These findings unveil a sophisticated interplay between proanthocyanidin accumulation and defense activation during infection, where these processes exhibit dynamic and context-dependent coordination.
This work characterizes VvMYBPA1’s function in mediating the grape–B. cinerea interaction, with particular emphasis on its role in maintaining ROS balance (Figure 8). We demonstrated that transient overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in berries enhances ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation, increasing susceptibility to B. cinerea. The transient overexpression of MYBPA1, while capable of improving the content of PAs, concomitantly attenuates the established defense mechanisms in ripening grape berries against B. cinerea pathogenesis. This research significantly contributes to comprehending the intricate interplay between secondary metabolism and oxidative stress in grape–pathogen interactions. Future work will employ CRISPR-Cas9 knockout or RNAi-mediated knockdown of VvMYBPA1 in stable transgenic grape calli to definitively establish its negative regulatory role in Botrytis defense responses. These genetic studies will not only elucidate the molecular mechanism of susceptibility but also provide direct targets for breeding Botrytis-resistant grape cultivars through precision genome editing of MYB transcription factors.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) was maintained under laboratory conditions. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 15% (v/v) NaClO and then were treated at 4 °C for 3 days on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium. Wild-type and transgenic seedlings were then transferred into an autoclaved soil mix at the two-leaf stage. Plants were cultivated in a controlled-environment growth chamber (22 °C, 16/8 h photoperiod, 60% RH). For this study, Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Kyoho’, a cultivar reported to show resistance to B. cinerea [43] and widely cultivated in Shanxi Province, was sampled from an orchard in Taiyuan City (112°33′ E, 37°51′ N). Post harvest, berries at E-L 38 stage were promptly transported to the laboratory for transient transformation and B. cinerea pathogenicity assays.

4.2. Vector Construction

To clone the VvMYBPA1 gene into an overexpression vector, the VvMYBPA1 open reading frame (ORF) was PCR-amplified from cDNA derived from grape skins and VvMYBPA1 CDS F/VvMYBPA1 CDS R as primers and then cloned into pDONR221 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) vector to generate a pENTRY-VvMYBPA1 construct using BP Clonase (Invitrogen), which was then sequenced. The correct pENTRY-VvMYBPA1 plasmid was then cloned into a GATEWAY-compatible vector pB7FWG2 utilizing LR Clonase (Invitrogen). The plasmid pB7FWG2-VvMYBPA1 was further validated by restriction endonuclease digestion via Xba I and Xho I sites.

4.3. Generation of VvMYBPA1-Overexpressing Arabidopsis Transgenics

Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying the VvMYBPA1 overexpression vector was used to transform A. thaliana by the floral dip method [44]. T0 seeds were harvested and sown on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 10 mg/L Basta. Three independent overexpression lines (OE#1, OE#10, OE#23) were selected from the T1 population based on transgene expression stability, with homozygous T3 progenies serving as the experimental materials.

4.4. B. cinerea Infection Assay

B. cinerea strain B05.10, isolated from decayed grapefruits in our lab, was preserved on PDA plates (22 °C). For inoculation of A. thaliana, fresh B. cinerea conidial suspensions were adjusted to an inoculum density of 5 × 106 conidia/mL as described by Xue and Yi [32]. For consistent infection, 10 μL inoculum droplets were applied to the abaxial surface of five mature leaves per plant at developmental stage 3.90 (4-week-old vegetative growth). For gene expression analysis, leaf samples were acquired at 0 and 72 h post inoculation (hpi). Histopathological evaluation was performed using trypan blue (cell viability), 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB, H2O2 accumulation), and nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT, superoxide anion) staining at both pre-inoculation (0 hpi) and advanced infection (72 hpi) stages. For morphological assessment and lesion diameter measurement, detached leaves were infected with 10 µL of prepared conidial suspension using the droplet method. All measurements and photographic documentation were performed at 72 hpi.
For pathogen challenge assays, visually uniform ‘Kyoho’ fruits showing no signs of mechanical injury or pathological symptoms were subjected to biphasic surface decontamination (1% NaClO → 75% ethanol) with intermediate rinses in sterile ddH2O, and then air-drying at room temperature. Precise epidermal trauma (2 mm transverse × 4 mm longitudinal) was generated in the equatorial plane of each berry using sterile needles, and 10 μL of B. cinerea conidial suspensions (2 × 106 conidia/mL) was inoculated into each wound. Post inoculation, berries were maintained in controlled conditions: primary incubation at 22 °C with saturated humidity (90–100% RH) under dark regime for 24 h, transitioning to diurnal cycles (12 h light/12 h dark) for disease progression monitoring. Three independent biological replicates were performed, each consisting of 10 berries. Pericarp tissues (approximately 1 cm in diameter) surrounding the inoculation site were used for physiological index determination and gene expression detection.

4.5. ROS Levels and Cell Death Assay

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation was detected using DAB staining [45]. Briefly, leaf samples were vacuum-infiltrated for 20 min in freshly prepared 1 mg/mL DAB solution and incubated in darkness overnight. Subsequently, leaf specimens underwent thermal destaining (100 °C, 10 min) in acetic acid: glycerol: ethanol (1:1:3, v/v/v), followed by immersion in 95% ethanol. Superoxide anion (O2) accumulation was visualized by NBT staining [46]. Superoxide localization was achieved through vacuum-assisted infiltration (20 min, 25 inHg) of NBT reaction buffer (10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 10 mM NaN3, 0.1% (w/v) NBT), with subsequent dark incubation (60 min, 22 °C). Stained tissues were cleared by thermal treatment (100 °C, 10 min) in destaining solvent (acetic acid: glycerol: ethanol, 1:1:3 v/v/v) and archived in 95% ethanol for microscopic analysis. Histochemical detection of compromised cells was conducted via trypan blue uptake assay, according to Vogel and Somerville [47]. All specimens were imaged under controlled bright-field conditions under an Olympus light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The content of H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) was monitored according to Han et al. [48]. For each treatment, a minimum of six leaves per biological replicate were analyzed, with three independent biological replicates performed.

4.6. Histochemical Staining of DMACA

Proanthocyanidin localization in A. thaliana seeds was visualized through dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMACA) histochemistry [12]. Seed specimens were immersed in freshly prepared DMACA reagent (1% w/v DMACA in 6 M HCl-methanol, 1:99 v/v) for 20 min (25 °C), followed by sequential ethanol washes (75% v/v, 4 × 5 min) to eliminate nonspecific staining. PA deposition patterns were documented using stereomicroscopy with consistent illumination settings.

4.7. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR

Total RNA extraction from Arabidopsis leaves was conducted utilizing Trizol reagent (TaKaRa, Beijing, China). At the same time, grape berry pericarp RNA was isolated through an adapted CTAB-based approach [49]. RNA quality was assessed via 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis (Sigma-Aldrich, Hong Kong, China), with quantification performed using a Bio Spectrometer fluorescence spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). cDNA synthesis was performed using the Prime Script™ RT reagent Kit with a gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Osaka, Japan). Gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) were obtained from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Quantitative PCR was carried out on a Bio-Rad CFX96™ system under standardized thermal cycling parameters: following a 30 s hot start at 95 °C, the reaction mixture underwent 40 amplification cycles comprising 5 s denaturation pulses at 95 °C and 30 s incubation periods at 60 °C. For Arabidopsis and grapevine, gene expression levels were standardized against AtActin2 and Vvβactin as internal controls, with the 2−ΔΔCt method employed for comparative quantification [50].

4.8. Transient Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Grape Berries

Transient overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in grape berries was conducted following the methodology established by Xie et al. [51]. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains harboring either the pB7FWG2-VvMYBPA1 construct or the empty pB7FWG2 vector were first grown on LB agar plates containing 25 mg·L⁻1 rifampicin and 50 mg·L⁻1 spectinomycin. For pre-culture preparation, a selected colony was introduced into 2 mL of liquid LB medium and cultured at 28 °C (220 rpm) overnight (12 h). The bacterial culture was subsequently expanded to 20 mL in LB medium and allowed to grow until the OD600 reached 0.6–0.8. Cell pellets obtained by centrifugation (5 min, 4000× g, 25 °C) were subsequently resuspended in infiltration buffer of identical volume containing magnesium chloride (10 mM) and acetyleugenone (200 µM). The suspension was conditioned at 28 °C for a duration of 3 to 4 h before being used for infiltration. Transient expression was achieved by microinjecting 300 μL of Agrobacterium suspension into the stylar apex of grape berries using a 1 mL syringe, ensuring minimal leakage. Berries were sampled at 4 days post infiltration (DPI) for RNA extraction. The expression levels of VvMYBPA1 were quantified at 0 and 4 DPI using the RT-qPCR protocol described earlier. The agroinfiltrated grape fruits were kept for four days before being subjected to pathogenic infection tests.

4.9. Quantification of Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins Content

Oligomeric proanthocyanidins content (OPC) was quantified using a plant OPC assay kit (Beijing Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. A standard curve was established based on the linear relationship between OPC concentration and absorbance. The OPC concentration (X, mg·mL−1) was calculated using the linear regression equation X = (A500 − 0.0167)/0.1829 (R2 = 0.9981), where A500 represents the absorbance at 500 nm.
Grape fruit samples were freeze-dried to constant weight, homogenized using a mortar, and precisely weighed (0.1 g). The absorbance was recorded at 500 nm following the manufacturer’s protocol. OPC content was determined by normalizing the standard curve-derived concentration (X) against sample dry mass (W), expressed as mg per gram dry weight (mg·g−1 DW).

4.10. Measurement of Enzyme Activity

The enzymatic activities of four defense-related proteins—phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), β-1,3-glucanase (BGL), chitinase (CHI), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO)—were assayed following established protocols [32]. Concurrently, antioxidant enzyme activities (catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)) were evaluated according to the methodology of Jiang et al. [35].

4.11. Statistical Analysis

Three independent biological replicates were included for each experimental treatment. Results are presented as mean values ± standard error (SE). For transgenic Arabidopsis lines, statistical comparisons of lesion diameter measurements, transcriptional profiles, enzymatic activities, and secondary metabolite accumulation were conducted using two-tailed paired Student’s t-tests, with asterisks indicating significance levels (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). For agro-infiltrated grape samples, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied, with Duncan’s multiple range test used for comparisons (p < 0.05, denoted by different letters). Data processing was conducted using Microsoft Excel (v2019, Microsoft Corp.). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics 16.0, while data visualization was implemented in GraphPad Prism 6.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14162469/s1, Table S1: List of primers used in this study. Figure S1. Expression patterns of VvMYBPA1 in grapevine cultivars responding to Botrytis cinerea infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.H.; Data curation, Y.Z., Z.G., X.M. and Y.S.; Funding acquisition, L.H.; Methodology, Y.Z. and Z.G.; Supervision, H.Y.; Writing—original draft, L.H.; Writing—review and editing, H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 31800266), the Applied Basic Research Programs of Shanxi Province (No. 202203021221019), and the Open Project Program of Xinhuacun College of Shanxi (Shanxi Institute of Brewing Technology and Industry) (preparation) (No. XCSXU-KF-202315).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Williamson, B.; Tudzynski, B.; Tudzynski, P.; van Kan, J.A. Botrytis cinerea: The cause of grey mould disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 8, 561–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Saito, S.; Michailides, T.J.; Xiao, C.L. Fungicide-resistant phenotypes in Botrytis cinerea populations and their impact on control of gray mold on stored table grapes in California. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 154, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shen, F.; Wu, W.; Han, X.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, D. Study on the occurrence law and green control of grape gray mold from the perspective of ecological balance. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rahman, M.U.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Fan, B. Grapevine gray mold disease: Infection, defense and management. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Camejo, D.; Guzman-Cedeno, A.; Moreno, A. Reactive oxygen species, essential molecules, during plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deighton, N.; Muckenschnabel, I.I.; Goodman, B.A.; Williamson, B. Lipid peroxidation and the oxidative burst associated with infection of Capsicum annuum by Botrytis cinerea. Plant J. 1999, 20, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castillo, L.; Plaza, V.; Larrondo, L.F.; Canessa, P. Recent advances in the study of the plant pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea and its interaction with the environment. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017, 18, 976–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Fei, S.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; He, Y. Overexpression of Sly-miR398b compromises disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea through regulating ROS homeostasis and JA-related defense genes in Tomato. Plants 2023, 12, 2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shu, P.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Yao, L.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Over-expression of SlWRKY46 in tomato plants increases susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea by modulating ROS homeostasis and SA and JA signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wan, R.; Guo, C.; Hou, X.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, M.; Hu, X.; Zhang, S.; Jiao, C.; Guo, R.; Li, Z.; et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis highlights contrasting levels of resistance of Vitis vinifera and Vitis amurensis to Botrytis cinerea. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yu, Y.; Guo, D.; Li, G.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Li, S.; Liang, Z. The grapevine R2R3-type MYB transcription factor VdMYB1 positively regulates defense responses by activating the stilbene synthase gene 2 (VdSTS2). BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bogs, J.; Jaffe, F.W.; Takos, A.M.; Walker, A.R.; Robinson, S.P. The grapevine transcription factor VvMYBPA1 regulates proanthocyanidin synthesis during fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1347–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, J.; Luan, Q.; Han, J.; Chen, C.; Ren, Z. CsMYB60 confers enhanced resistance to Fusarium solani by increasing proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in cucumber. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, L.; Ran, L.; Hou, Y.; Tian, Q.; Li, C.; Liu, R.; Fan, D.; Luo, K. The transcription factor MYB115 contributes to the regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and enhances fungal resistance in poplar. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, T.; Huang, C.; Li, N.; Ge, Y.; Wang, L.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C. Ubiquitin ligase VvPUB26 in grapevine promotes proanthocyanidin synthesis and resistance to powdery mildew. Plant Physiol. 2024, 195, 2891–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Fang, J.; Yin, W.; Yan, X.; Tu, M.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Z.; Gao, M.; et al. VqWRKY56 interacts with VqbZIPC22 in grapevine to promote proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and increase resistance to powdery mildew. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 1856–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, D.; Wei, W.; Fan, Z.; Chen, J.; You, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhan, J. VabHLH137 promotes proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin biosynthesis and enhances resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in grapevine. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhac261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Ren, Z. Overexpression of SlMYB75 enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea and prolongs fruit storage life in tomato. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lagreze, J.; Pajuelo, A.S.; Coculo, D.; Rojas, B.; Pizzio, G.A.; Zhang, C.; Tian, M.B.; Malnoy, M.; Vannozzi, A.; Costa, L.D.; et al. PME10 is a pectin methylesterase driving PME activity and immunity against Botrytis cinerea in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Santiago, A.; Orduña, L.; Fernández, J.D.; Vidal, Á.; De Martín-Agirre, I.; Lisón, P.; Vidal, E.A.; Navarro-Payá, D.; Matus, J.T. The Plantae Visualization Platform: A comprehensive web-based tool for the integration, visualization, and analysis of omic data across plant and related species. bioRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Torres, M.A.; Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. Pathogen-induced, NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen intermediates suppress spread of cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 1130–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mostofa, M.G.; Rahman, A.; Ansary, M.M.; Watanabe, A.; Fujita, M.; Tran, L.S. Hydrogen sulfide modulates cadmium-induced physiological and biochemical responses to alleviate cadmium toxicity in rice. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamada, K.; Basak, A.K.; Goto-Yamada, S.; Tarnawska-Glatt, K.; Hara-Nishimura, I. Vacuolar processing enzymes in the plant life cycle. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xin, Y.; Meng, S.; Ma, B.; He, W.; He, N. Mulberry genes MnANR and MnLAR confer transgenic plants with resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Plant Sci. 2020, 296, 110473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Deluc, L.; Bogs, J.; Walker, A.R.; Ferrier, T.; Decendit, A.; Merillon, J.M.; Robinson, S.P.; Barrieu, F. The transcription factor VvMYB5b contributes to the regulation of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in developing grape berries. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 2041–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Terrier, N.; Torregrosa, L.; Ageorges, A.; Vialet, S.; Verries, C.; Cheynier, V.; Romieu, C. Ectopic expression of VvMybPA2 promotes proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in grapevine and suggests additional targets in the pathway. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1028–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Koyama, K.; Numata, M.; Nakajima, I.; Goto-Yamamoto, N.; Matsumura, H.; Tanaka, N. Functional characterization of a new grapevine MYB transcription factor and regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in grapes. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4433–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, J.; Yu, K.; Shi, Y.; Wang, J.; Duan, C. Transcription factor VviMYB86 oppositely regulates proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berries. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 613677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bogs, J.; Downey, M.O.; Harvey, J.S.; Ashton, A.R.; Tanner, G.J.; Robinson, S.P. Proanthocyanidin synthesis and expression of genes encoding leucoanthocyanidin reductase and anthocyanidin reductase in developing grape berries and grapevine leaves. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiao, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Ji, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, L. Activation and inhibition mechanisms of a plant helper NLR. Nature 2025, 639, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, L.; He, J.; Liu, H.; Zhou, H. The phenylpropanoid pathway affects apple fruit resistance to Botrytis cinerea. J. Phytopathol. 2018, 166, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xue, M.; Yi, H. Enhanced Arabidopsis disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea induced by sulfur dioxide. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jiu, S.; Wang, C.; Zheng, T.; Liu, Z.; Leng, X.; Pervaiz, T.; Lotfi, A.; Fang, J.; Wang, X. Characterization of VvPAL-like promoter from grapevine using transgenic tobacco plants. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2016, 16, 595–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, T.; Li, R.; Yao, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Genome-wide identification and characterisation of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene family in grapevine. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2021, 96, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiang, L.; Jin, P.; Wang, L.; Yu, X.; Wang, H.; Zheng, Y. Methyl jasmonate primes defense responses against Botrytis cinerea and reduces disease development in harvested table grapes. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 192, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, B.; Qi, F.; Liang, Y. Fuels for ROS signaling in plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 1124–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coll, N.S.; Epple, P.; Dangl, J.L. Programmed cell death in the plant immune system. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Guo, R.; Tu, M.; Wang, D.; Guo, C.; Wan, R.; Li, Z.; Wang, X. Ectopic expression of the wild grape WRKY transcription factor VqWRKY52 in Arabidopsis thaliana enhances resistance to the biotrophic pathogen powdery mildew but not to the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, G.; Yan, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, H.; van Nocker, S.; Li, Z.; Wang, X. The jasmonate-ZIM domain gene VqJAZ4 from the Chinese wild grape Vitis quinquangularis improves resistance to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 143, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, D.; Cai, J.; Sun, W.; Yang, Q.; Hu, G.; Wang, T. Tomato SlWRKY3 negatively regulates Botrytis cinerea resistance via TPK1b. Plants 2024, 13, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Z.; Lv, R.; Hong, Y.; Su, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Yang, R.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Meng, J.; et al. Transcription factor KUA1 positively regulates tomato resistance against Phytophthora infestans by fine-tuning reactive oxygen species accumulation. Plant J. 2025, 121, e70007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, K.; Song, Y.; Lin, J.; Dixon, R.A. The complexities of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and its regulation in plants. Plant Commun. 2023, 4, 100498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rahman, M.U.; Ma, Q.; Ahmad, B.; Hanif, M.; Zhang, Y. Histochemical and microscopic studies predict that grapevine genotype ‘’Ju mei gui’’ is highly resistant against Botrytis cinerea. Pathogens 2020, 9, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fryer, M.J.; Oxborough, K.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Baker, N.R. Imaging of photo-oxidative stress responses in leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1249–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, S.H.; Woo, D.H.; Kim, J.M.; Lee, S.Y.; Chung, W.S.; Moon, Y.H. Arabidopsis MKK4 mediates osmotic-stress response via its regulation of MPK3 activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 412, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vogel, J.; Somerville, S. Isolation and characterization of powdery mildew-resistant Arabidopsis mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1897–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Han, Y.; Wu, M.; Hao, L.; Yi, H. Sulfur dioxide derivatives alleviate cadmium toxicity by enhancing antioxidant defence and reducing Cd2+ uptake and translocation in foxtail millet seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 157, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yan, D.; Yi, H. Transcriptome analysis provides insights into preservation mechanism of postharvest Muscat Hamburg grapes treated with SO2. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 331, 113108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-△△Ct method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xie, J.; He, C.; Li, Z.; Li, M.; He, S.; Qian, J.; Tan, B.; Zheng, X.; Cheng, J.; Wang, W.; et al. A rapid and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation system in grape berries. Protoplasma 2024, 261, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Heterologous overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. (a) Temporal expression profile of VvMYBPA1 in grape berry skins following B. cinerea infection. Different letters denote significant differences among groups (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). (b) Relative expression of VvMYBPA1 in WT and three independent transgenic Arabidopsis lines (OE#1, OE#10, OE#23), normalized to AtTUB2. (c) Proanthocyanidin accumulation in seeds visualized by DMACA staining. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 1. Heterologous overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. (a) Temporal expression profile of VvMYBPA1 in grape berry skins following B. cinerea infection. Different letters denote significant differences among groups (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). (b) Relative expression of VvMYBPA1 in WT and three independent transgenic Arabidopsis lines (OE#1, OE#10, OE#23), normalized to AtTUB2. (c) Proanthocyanidin accumulation in seeds visualized by DMACA staining. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Plants 14 02469 g001
Figure 2. Ectopic expression of VvMYBPA1 enhances Arabidopsis sensitivity to B. cinerea infection. (a) Leaf symptoms observed in WT and three independent VvMYBPA1-overexpressing lines (#1, #10, #23) at 72 hpi. (b) Quantification of necrotic lesions on WT and VvMYBPA1-OE Arabidopsis leaves at 72 hpi. Data represent mean lesion diameters from three independent experiments (n = 33). (c) B. cinerea colonization was monitored by quantifying the ratio of BcActin to AtActin gene amplification in infected leaf samples collected at different infection stages. Error bars denote standard error of triplicate experiments. Statistical comparisons were made using two-tailed t-tests (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Ectopic expression of VvMYBPA1 enhances Arabidopsis sensitivity to B. cinerea infection. (a) Leaf symptoms observed in WT and three independent VvMYBPA1-overexpressing lines (#1, #10, #23) at 72 hpi. (b) Quantification of necrotic lesions on WT and VvMYBPA1-OE Arabidopsis leaves at 72 hpi. Data represent mean lesion diameters from three independent experiments (n = 33). (c) B. cinerea colonization was monitored by quantifying the ratio of BcActin to AtActin gene amplification in infected leaf samples collected at different infection stages. Error bars denote standard error of triplicate experiments. Statistical comparisons were made using two-tailed t-tests (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Plants 14 02469 g002
Figure 3. VvMYBPA1 overexpression exacerbates pathogen-triggered ROS production in Arabidopsis. (a) NBT staining reveals O2 distribution. (b) DAB staining indicates H2O2 accumulation. Analyses performed on WT and three independent VvMYBPA1-expressing lines at 72 hpi. Scale bars: 1 cm (whole leaf), 200 µm (magnified view). (c,d) Expression profiles of AtRBOHD and AtRBOHF in WT and transgenic lines during infection (0 and 72 hpi), normalized to AtActin2. (e) Trypan blue staining reveals cell death patterns at 72 hpi. Scale bars as in A-B. (f) MDA content as a lipid peroxidation marker at 0 and 72 hpi. Values shown are means ± SE from three biological replicates. Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. VvMYBPA1 overexpression exacerbates pathogen-triggered ROS production in Arabidopsis. (a) NBT staining reveals O2 distribution. (b) DAB staining indicates H2O2 accumulation. Analyses performed on WT and three independent VvMYBPA1-expressing lines at 72 hpi. Scale bars: 1 cm (whole leaf), 200 µm (magnified view). (c,d) Expression profiles of AtRBOHD and AtRBOHF in WT and transgenic lines during infection (0 and 72 hpi), normalized to AtActin2. (e) Trypan blue staining reveals cell death patterns at 72 hpi. Scale bars as in A-B. (f) MDA content as a lipid peroxidation marker at 0 and 72 hpi. Values shown are means ± SE from three biological replicates. Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Plants 14 02469 g003
Figure 4. Transient overexpression of VvMYBPA1 increases susceptibility of ‘Kyoho’ grape berries to B. cinerea infection. (a) Disease symptoms on grape berries infiltrated with either empty vector (PB) or VvMYBPA1 overexpression construct (PB-VvMYBPA1) at 24, 48, and 72 h post inoculation with B. cinerea (spore suspension: 2 × 106/mL). Representative images shown were derived from three biological replicates (n = 30). Bars = 1 cm. (b) Relative expression of VvMYBPA1 in transiently transformed berries. (c) Oligomeric proanthocyanidin (OPC) content in PB and PB-VvMYBPA1 berries at 0 and 72 hpi. (d) Lesion area quantification at 24, 48, and 72 hpi (n = 30 from three independent experiments). (e) B. cinerea biomass was quantified via qPCR at 0 and 72 hpi. Bars represent mean ± SE. Significant variations between treatments marked by * (t-test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01) or letters (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Transient overexpression of VvMYBPA1 increases susceptibility of ‘Kyoho’ grape berries to B. cinerea infection. (a) Disease symptoms on grape berries infiltrated with either empty vector (PB) or VvMYBPA1 overexpression construct (PB-VvMYBPA1) at 24, 48, and 72 h post inoculation with B. cinerea (spore suspension: 2 × 106/mL). Representative images shown were derived from three biological replicates (n = 30). Bars = 1 cm. (b) Relative expression of VvMYBPA1 in transiently transformed berries. (c) Oligomeric proanthocyanidin (OPC) content in PB and PB-VvMYBPA1 berries at 0 and 72 hpi. (d) Lesion area quantification at 24, 48, and 72 hpi (n = 30 from three independent experiments). (e) B. cinerea biomass was quantified via qPCR at 0 and 72 hpi. Bars represent mean ± SE. Significant variations between treatments marked by * (t-test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01) or letters (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Plants 14 02469 g004
Figure 5. VvMYBPA1 overexpression alters defense enzyme responses to B. cinerea infection. (ad) Activities of four defense-related enzymes (BGL, CHI, PAL, PPO) measured at 72 hpi. Data shown as mean ± SE from three biological replicates. Different letters denote statistical differences (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Figure 5. VvMYBPA1 overexpression alters defense enzyme responses to B. cinerea infection. (ad) Activities of four defense-related enzymes (BGL, CHI, PAL, PPO) measured at 72 hpi. Data shown as mean ± SE from three biological replicates. Different letters denote statistical differences (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Plants 14 02469 g005
Figure 6. VvMYBPA1 overexpression alters B. cinerea-induced ROS accumulation in grape berries. (a,b) Expression profiles of NADPH oxidase genes (VvRBOHA and VvRBOHB) in control (PB) and VvMYBPA1-overexpressing (PB-VvMYBPA1) grape berries at 0 and 48 hpi. Vvβactin served as the internal reference gene. (c,d) H2O2 and MDA levels in PB and PB-VvMYBPA1 berries at 0 and 72 hpi. (e) Relative expression of VvVPE in PB and PB-VvMYBPA1 berries at 0 and 48 hpi, normalized to Vvβactin. Values are means ± SE of three biological replicates. Distinct letters indicate ANOVA-grouped differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. VvMYBPA1 overexpression alters B. cinerea-induced ROS accumulation in grape berries. (a,b) Expression profiles of NADPH oxidase genes (VvRBOHA and VvRBOHB) in control (PB) and VvMYBPA1-overexpressing (PB-VvMYBPA1) grape berries at 0 and 48 hpi. Vvβactin served as the internal reference gene. (c,d) H2O2 and MDA levels in PB and PB-VvMYBPA1 berries at 0 and 72 hpi. (e) Relative expression of VvVPE in PB and PB-VvMYBPA1 berries at 0 and 48 hpi, normalized to Vvβactin. Values are means ± SE of three biological replicates. Distinct letters indicate ANOVA-grouped differences (p < 0.05).
Plants 14 02469 g006
Figure 7. Transcriptional and enzymatic reprogramming of antioxidant systems in transgenic berries during B. cinerea infection. (a,b) SOD dynamics. (c,d) POD parameters. (e,f) CAT profiles. Transcriptional changes (assessed at 48 hpi) and enzymatic alterations (evaluated at 72 hpi) are shown. Bars show mean ± SE of three biological replicates. Letter-based significance groupings (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Transcriptional and enzymatic reprogramming of antioxidant systems in transgenic berries during B. cinerea infection. (a,b) SOD dynamics. (c,d) POD parameters. (e,f) CAT profiles. Transcriptional changes (assessed at 48 hpi) and enzymatic alterations (evaluated at 72 hpi) are shown. Bars show mean ± SE of three biological replicates. Letter-based significance groupings (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Plants 14 02469 g007
Figure 8. A proposed model illustrating how VvMYBPA1 negatively regulates Botrytis cinerea resistance by modulating ROS homeostasis.
Figure 8. A proposed model illustrating how VvMYBPA1 negatively regulates Botrytis cinerea resistance by modulating ROS homeostasis.
Plants 14 02469 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ge, Z.; Meng, X.; Sun, Y.; Yi, H. Transient Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Grape Berries Enhances Susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea Through ROS Homeostasis Modulation. Plants 2025, 14, 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162469

AMA Style

Hao L, Zhang Y, Ge Z, Meng X, Sun Y, Yi H. Transient Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Grape Berries Enhances Susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea Through ROS Homeostasis Modulation. Plants. 2025; 14(16):2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hao, Lihong, Yuxin Zhang, Zeying Ge, Xinru Meng, Yu Sun, and Huilan Yi. 2025. "Transient Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Grape Berries Enhances Susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea Through ROS Homeostasis Modulation" Plants 14, no. 16: 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162469

APA Style

Hao, L., Zhang, Y., Ge, Z., Meng, X., Sun, Y., & Yi, H. (2025). Transient Overexpression of VvMYBPA1 in Grape Berries Enhances Susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea Through ROS Homeostasis Modulation. Plants, 14(16), 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14162469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop