Next Article in Journal
The Dynamics of Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposon Proliferation and Decay Drive the Evolution of Genome Size Variation in Capsicum
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Insights into Streptomyces Novel Species Qhu-G9 and Its Potential for Enhancing Salt Tolerance and Growth in Avena sativa L. and Onobrychis viciifolia Scop
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of Wheat Gene Resources Conferring Resistance to Stripe Rust
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Breeding Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in South Africa: Current Status and Future Prospects

by
Thobeka Philile Khumalo-Mthembu
1,2,*,
Palesa Mmereki
1,
Nokulunga Prudence Mzimela
1,
Annelie Barnard
1 and
Toi John Tsilo
1,2
1
Germplasm Development, Production Systems & Crop Protection, Agricultural Research Council–Small Grain Institute, Bethlehem 9700, South Africa
2
Department of Life and Consumer Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida 1710, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(14), 2134; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142134
Submission received: 4 June 2025 / Revised: 4 July 2025 / Accepted: 7 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improvement of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Quality of Wheat)

Abstract

Pre-harvest sprouting of wheat is the premature germination of ripened wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) kernels in the spike before harvest and is influenced by a combination of environmental and genetic factors, and their interaction. This greatly affects grain yield and quality, thus posing a threat to food security and sustainable agriculture. Pre-harvest sprouting has been studied for over 30 years in South Africa and remains a trait of interest in our wheat breeding programs amid climatic change. This paper therefore provides a comprehensive review of the progress made, as well as the challenges and limitations encountered, in breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in South Africa. Future prospects and research directions are also discussed. Conventional breeding has been the main breeding strategy used in the country, with the success of breeding commercial wheat cultivars with durable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance for deployment in the three main wheat production regions of South Africa. Therefore, augmenting conventional breeding with molecular markers and modern genomic breeding technologies is anticipated to speed up breeding locally adapted, climate-resilient wheat varieties that balance tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting with high yield potential. This is key to realizing sustainable development goals of food security and sustainable agriculture.

1. Introduction

Pre-harvest sprouting of wheat is the premature germination of ripened kernels in the spike before harvest caused by prolonged or continuous exposure to wet and humid conditions [1,2,3,4] (Figure 1). The condition not only affects wheat, but other cereal crops as well [5]. This physiological condition is complex and influenced by a combination of environmental and genetic factors, as well as their interaction [6,7,8]. Sprouting results from the activation of enzymes such as lipases, amylases, and proteases inside the grains in response to water absorption, leading to the degradation of lipids, starch, and protein reserves, and thereby increasing the level of gibberellic acid in the seed endosperm [4,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. This greatly reduces grain yield, the baking quality (milling and baking properties) of the produced flour, grain quality, seed test weight, and seed viability and storability, as well as the seedling vigor [1,4,9,10,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. As a result, the commercial value of the affected grain is downgraded [1,29,30], and the production and processing of high-quality products are restricted [4,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,24]. Poor-quality foods made from sprouted grains have detrimental effects on human health [5]. Therefore, pre-harvest sprouting is an international concern [6,31,32,33,34,35,36] affecting the entire wheat value chain including producers, grain merchants, millers, maltsters, bakers, other processors, and ultimately the consumer [29]. Annually, pre-harvest sprouting accounts for losses of more than USD 1 billion globally [5,37,38].
The occurrence of pre-harvest sprouting varies across growing seasons due to fluctuations in climatic conditions, thereby complicating the selection and breeding of wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. With the current unstable global climatic change that is characterized by fluctuations in temperatures and humidity, frequent rainfall, and extreme weather conditions, pre-harvest sprouting and other factors (both biotic and abiotic) compromising grain quality and yield may occur more regularly in wheat producing regions globally [40,41]. This poses a threat to the availability of sufficient high-quality food in the future [42,43].
Pre-harvest sprouting remains a common threat to the South African wheat production and has been extensively studied for over three decades in the country [24,36,44,45,46,47,48,49]. This paper therefore provides a comprehensive review of the progress made and gaps identified in breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in South Africa. The review (i) covers the significance of pre-harvest sprouting in wheat production and processing; (ii) provides an overview of the South African wheat germplasm and pre-harvest sprouting tolerance; (iii) discusses mechanisms of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance; (iv) outlines breeding strategies for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance; (v) exposes challenges and limitations in breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance; and (vi) suggests future prospects and research directions.
The present study revealed a rich genetic diversity for pre-harvest sprouting in the South African wheat germplasm. Moreover, wheat cultivars and breeding lines with durable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance were identified. Conventional breeding remains the main breeding technique in the country; however, it makes the breeding process lengthy and slow. Therefore, augmenting conventional breeding with molecular markers and genomic breeding technologies is envisaged to facilitate and improve accuracy in breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in South Africa.

2. Overview of South African Wheat Production and Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance

Wheat (T. aestivum) is an important staple crop grown in South Africa alongside other crops such as maize, sunflower, and sorghum [50,51]. The crop is planted in approximately 28 of 36 designated crop production regions distributed across the nine provinces of South Africa [52]. According to the 10-year (2014/15–2023/24) analysis of wheat data, the area dedicated to planted wheat amounts to 537,950 ha on average and gives an annual wheat production of 1842 million tons, with an average yield of 3.81 ton/ha [52,53]. Approximately 57% of wheat production occurs under dryland (rainfed) conditions, mainly dominated by the Western Cape (65%) and the Free State (30%) provinces [53]. The remaining portion (43%) of wheat production takes place under irrigation conditions, with the Northern Cape, the Free State, KwaZulu-Natal, and Limpopo provinces accounting for 36%, 23%, 17%, and 9% of the overall wheat production, respectively.
The South African wheat production is unique in the sense that there are three distinct wheat production regions, each with their own challenges, specific requirements, and production (yielding) potential [52,54,55] (Figure 2). These include (i) the winter rainfall region, where dryland spring wheat is grown in the Mediterranean climate of the Western Cape province; (ii) the irrigation region, where irrigated spring wheat types are grown adjacent to major rivers in the summer rainfall area; and (iii) the summer rainfall region, where winter and intermediate wheat is sown under rainfed conditions in the Free State province on stored soil moisture accumulated during the preceding summer and autumn. The summer rainfall region receives most of its rainfall in the summer (November–January), during the harvest season for winter wheat [36], and thus it is mostly affected by pre-harvest sprouting.
Pre-harvest sprouting has been a serious concern in South African wheat production, especially for the summer rainfall region. Wheat producers would incur loss at the point of selling their produce due to low (<220 s) falling numbers, but without any symptoms of sprouting [48]. According to the South African bread wheat-grading regulations [56] (Table S1), a cleaned 300 g wheat grain sample must have a minimum falling number value of 220 s and pass a visual inspection tolerance test of not more than 2% sprouted (or damaged) kernels per 25 g wheat sample to be considered free from pre-harvest sprouting damage and classified as Grade 3—Super Grade. Therefore, to assist wheat producers, the ARC-Small Grain formulated a pre-breeding program in the early 1990s, dedicated to screening, developing, and releasing both winter and spring wheat cultivars with improved pre-harvest sprouting tolerance for use in the three main production regions.
Since its inception, the program has evaluated more than 150 commercial wheat cultivars and breeding lines annually for their pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, alongside other important agronomic traits, such as adaptation, grain yield, yield stability, grain quality, resistance to diseases and pests, etc., across the three main production regions of South Africa. Cultivars to be evaluated are provided by the four wheat breeding institutions in the country, namely the ARC-Small Grain, Syngenta Seed (formerly Sensako), Corteva (formerly Pannar Seed), and Limagrain. This has provided South African wheat producers with improved and best-performing cultivars adapted to various environments to choose from based on long-term scientific data [57,58]. As a result, this secured and maximized the yield and quality of the producers’ wheat grain [48,54]. The “then” and “now” pre-harvest sprouting tolerance status of the South African commercial wheat cultivars is summarized in Table 1 below.
Even though the present percentage of cultivars with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is higher (62%) in the irrigation compared to summer rainfall region (>60%), annual evaluations indicated higher tolerance of rainfed winter wheat cultivars compared to irrigation cultivars [48]. Moderately tolerant or moderately susceptible wheat cultivars are prevalent in the irrigation production region due to the presence of excessive moisture during the later stages of grain filling [59], which renders cultivars vulnerable to pre-harvest sprouting. Therefore, these cultivars are considered sufficient for regulating pre-harvest sprouting and ensuring acceptable falling numbers in this production system [60]. Nonetheless, durable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance has been observed in all three production regions, and cultivars released in recent years showed increased tolerance in contrast to the older cultivars, highlighting the progress made in improving pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in South African wheat [36].
Table 2 below summarizes the rich genetic diversity for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance present in the South African wheat germplasm [36,44,54,61]. The classification was based on a scale of 1 (highly tolerant)–8 (highly susceptible) that is used at the ARC-Small Grain to assess variations in sprouting on intact heads [36,45,54,62] (Figure 3). Moreover, a list of wheat cultivars commonly grown in South Africa over multiple years and seasons, with known pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, is presented in Table S3. The phenotypic and molecular data of these cultivars were obtained through continuous annual evaluations under the ARC-Small Grain’s pre-breeding program for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the three production regions and from the research study conducted by [36].
In addition to identified commercial wheat cultivars with good tolerance (Table S3), a set of breeding lines (doubled haploids) with notable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance was also identified by [62,63]. These lines exhibited a combination of low pre-harvest sprouting scores (≤2.99 from the scale of 1–8 (Figure 3)) and high thousand-kernel weight (≥40 g) (Table S4). Few of these lines performed to the level of Elands, the standard pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant parent, with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance scores ≤ 2.00 and thousand-kernel weight of ≥41.6 g. These breeding lines included Tugela-Dn × Elands DH lines nos. 21 and 135 and Elands × Flamink DH lines nos. 9, 44, and 45. This presents a good germplasm recommended for further selection in a pre-breeding or breeding program for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and yield improvement.
Furthermore, a new research team has been formulated at Stellenbosch University (SU) in partnership with the South African Department of Science and Innovation (DSI), the Technology Innovation Agency (TIA), and Grain SA to navigate the threat of pre-harvest sprouting in the winter rainfall production region of South Africa amidst shifting weather patterns [64,65]. Driven by the increasing incidences of pre-harvest sprouting in the region, this research studies the interaction between the environment and the cultivar’s response to pre-harvest sprouting to make recommendations for cultivar selection based on environmental factors in the Western Cape. Genetic factors and their interaction on cultivars’ response, as well as the impact of management practices such as fungicide applications on pre-harvest sprouting susceptibility, will also be evaluated. This will add value to ongoing breeding efforts aimed at mitigating the threat of pre-harvest sprouting to wheat production in South Africa. No new material has been developed by this team yet. However, the existing genetic resources identified by [36,48,62,63] confirm the genotypic variation available for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and signify the progress made in breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat germplasm.

3. Mechanisms of Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance

Pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is a complex quantitative trait influenced by a network of developmental, physiological, genetic, and morphological features of the spike and seed [3,6,17,20,29,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. Tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting in wheat is predominantly regulated by the seed-dormancy mechanism that favors the production of abscisic acid (ABA) (dormancy-inducing plant growth hormone) over gibberellic acid (GA) (germination-inducing plant growth hormone) [9,71,78,79]. The ABA pathway inhibits the formation of hydrolytic enzymes such as α-amylases, lipases, and proteases in wheat grains [17,80,81], thereby conferring tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting. Several studies have reported the regulatory mechanisms of other hormones, like ethylene, jasmonate brassinosteroids, and auxin, in controlling seed dormancy, germination, and pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [69,70,82,83].
Furthermore, environmental conditions and the developmental stage of the wheat crop have a significant influence on seed-dormancy or tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting [24,64,65,66,84]. Wheat is more sensitive to severity and duration of fluctuations in temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall between grain filling and harvest maturity stages of development, and these conditions are critical in shaping the cultivar’s response to pre-harvest sprouting [1,16,23,29,39,66,67,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. Higher temperatures and relative humidity, coupled with rainfall, trigger the production of GA in mature wheat seeds, thereby promoting seed germination or pre-harvest sprouting. On the contrary, cooler temperatures and low relative humidity enhance seed-dormancy by increasing the production of ABA and auxin, which are dormancy-inducing plant growth hormones [59,84,91]. Drought-like conditions, coupled with high temperatures, were found to significantly enhance pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in a pre-harvest sprouting-sensitive genotype (white spring wheat variety, Cunderdin) to the levels similar to the well-known dormant genotype (DM2001) [59,85].
Morphological features of the spike and grain also influence seed-dormancy or pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, including spike erectness, spike and awn structure, openness of florets, and seed-coat color and permeability. These features influence the amount of water penetrating through into the seed, as well as the quantity that remains on the spike and the length of time the spike remains wet upon a rainfall event [67,71,77,90,92,93]. Drooped spikes, spikes with awns, and open florets are associated with pre-harvest sprouting susceptibility [64,92], while the impermeable seed coat acts as a physical barrier to prevent water uptake by the zygotic tissues to the germ [94]. Red-colored seeds are known to be more tolerant to pre-harvest sprouting (dormant) than white-colored seeds in wheat [1,95]. This is because of the tight linkage between seed-dormancy genes and seed coat-color genes (R genes) located on group 3 chromosomes of wheat.
Quantitative trait loci and responsible genes associated with seed-dormancy or pre-harvest sprouting tolerance have been identified on all 21 chromosomes of wheat [96]. Global molecular research on pre-harvest sprouting tolerance has uncovered >250 QTLs, and only 29 of these were major and stable across multiple environments [18]. These important (major and stable) genomic regions were identified in various studies [97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. A summary of major and stable QTLs for pre-harvest sprouting/dormancy-related traits in wheat, as well as their associated molecular markers and physical positions, is given in Table S2. These QTLs are distributed on 12 different chromosomes, namely 1B, 2B, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3D, 4A, 4B, 5A, 6A, 7B, and 7D [18]. Notably, chromosomes from homoeologous groups 3 and 4 harbored 18 of the 29 important QTLs, proving their significance in conferring pre-harvest sprouting tolerance or resistance in various wheat materials around the world [6,17,18,66,112,113,114].
Furthermore, several important genes, including TaVp-1 [115,116,117,118,119], TaDOG1L1 [120], TaMFT/TaPHS1 [27,121], TaSdr [93], TaMKK3 [114], TaQsd1/TaAlaAT [122], and Myb10-D [9,123], have been mapped and cloned in association with important QTLs for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in wheat [112] (Table 3). These genes have been used successfully in various studies and have provided effective markers for marker-assisted selection during genetic improvement of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [9,123]. However, more QTLs, genes, alleles, and pathways associated with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and seed-dormancy are yet to be discovered and utilized with continuous research. Such information will provide more effective diagnostic markers to expedite breeding pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant wheat cultivars without compromising important agronomic traits, such as grain yield and quality [74].
In summary, the complex and quantitative nature of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance presents both challenges and more opportunities in the improvement of this trait in wheat. Therefore, understanding the influence of and interaction between developmental, physiological, genetic, and morphological features of the spike and seed in regulating pre-harvest sprouting is crucial. Focusing on one promising aspect at a time, i.e., genetic improvement, can be effective and is less influenced by the environment, but it has its own limitations. This underscores the importance of integrating or using a holistic approach with the promise to yield better results.

4. Breeding Strategies for Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance

Breeding is imperative for improving wheat productivity and ensuring food security through the development of new wheat varieties that are better-performing, well-adapted to different environments and growing conditions, and possess tolerance to various abiotic and biotic stresses [126]. Various breeding strategies are used to develop wheat germplasm with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. These strategies vary in their approach and generation time required to achieve a desired outcome [127], but they have been used successfully in different studies conducted in South Africa and across the globe. The first class of these breeding strategies is traditional breeding methods, including phenotypic selection, crossbreeding, backcrossing, mass selection, bulk segregation, evaluation in stressful conditions, and using multi-location trials to identify stable pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant genotypes that perform well under varying climatic conditions [66,112,128,129].
The second class of breeding strategies for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance makes use of modern, more efficient molecular methods such as marker-assisted selection and genomic breeding [128,130]. These include genomic markers [66], genomic prediction models [131], high-throughput genotyping, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) [131], speed-breeding techniques [132,133,134], and gene-editing technologies [112,123,134,135,136,137,138]. The data integration and phenotyping approach also belongs to this class, with the intention to enable a better understanding of pre-harvest sprouting and targeted selection at different growth stages of the wheat crop and under varying environmental conditions. The third class of breeding strategies for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is called integrated breeding approaches. It embraces the strengths of conventional and modern molecular breeding methods, integrating them to enhance pre-harvest sprouting tolerance effectively [36,113,126].

4.1. Conventional Breeding

The significant progress in the development of wheat cultivars with improved pre-harvest sprouting tolerance for deployment in the three wheat production regions of South Africa (winter rainfall, summer rainfall, and irrigation) was achieved through conventional breeding methods [48,54]. The ARC-Small Grain pre-breeding program for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance has been mainly reliant on and continue to use phenotypic selection and testing in multi-locations to identify stable pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant genotypes that perform well under varying climatic conditions of the three wheat-production regions of South Africa. International wheat germplasms with remarkable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, including AC Domain [101], RL4137 [139,140], Renan [1], Transvaal [141], and Rio Blanco [102], have been crossbred and backcrossed with the South African wheat cultivars possessing various desirable characteristics but lacking pre-harvest sprouting tolerance to obtain improved germplasm. This research work spans three decades in the country, with emphasis on commercial wheat cultivars [24,36,44,45,46,47,48,55], and little research conducted on wheat hybrids [60]. Much of pre-harvest sprouting research work was conducted and documented from the ARC-Small Grain Campus, with a significant contribution from other breeding companies, such as Corteva and Syngenta Seeds. Most of the developed wheat cultivars with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance are shown in Table S3.

4.2. Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS)

In contrast to extensive and advanced molecular research conducted on pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in many parts of the world, very limited molecular research work has been conducted and published on pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat germplasm [36,62,142]. For over 30 years, breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance was mainly achieved using the challenging, long, and time-consuming processes of conventional breeding approaches [48,54]. Only recently, wheat breeding programs in the country have incorporated molecular markers in breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance to facilitate the efficient identification and targeted selection of breeding lines with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance (genes and alleles) [48,62,142].
One study [36] demonstrated the potential of molecular markers to expedite screening and selection of pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant varieties to use in breeding stable pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant genotypes that are adapted to the South African environment. The study identified favorable haplotypes for major QTLs regulating pre-harvest sprouting tolerance located on chromosomes 3A and 4A that explained >40% of the observed phenotypic variance in the South African wheat germplasm. The presence of different allelic versions of candidate genes or the presence of novel mutations at the 3A and 4A QTL regions was speculated and requires further validation. It is presumed that every new study on the genetics of pre-harvest sprouting leads to the identification of few novel QTLs or marker–trait associations (MTAs), indicating the deeper genetics of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and an existing potential for discovery of new loci [131].
Furthermore, ref. [36] demonstrated that the cultivar’s phenotype class could be predicted with accuracy and efficiency using the simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker haplotyping; however, the prediction accuracy improved with the advanced (Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR) molecular technology, proving the suitability of the methodology in future pre-harvest sprouting screenings. Predicting the cultivar’s pre-harvest sprouting tolerance class was the very first attempt in the South African wheat commercial cultivars. In a different study [62], single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and silicoDArT markers were deployed to uncover three stable QTLs with major effects (PVE = 10.08–20.30%) on chromosomes 5B and 7B, regulating pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in a DH wheat population adapted to the South African environment. These studies [36,62] summarize the molecular research that has been conducted and published to date on pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat germplasm.

4.3. Genomic Selection

Genomic selection and gene editing have come out as powerful tools known to accelerate breeding for complex traits like pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [143,144]. There are no published records for the application of these techniques in breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat germplasm; however, notable achievements about the improvement of various complex quantitative traits in wheat through genomic selection and gene editing have been reported in other countries. Genomic prediction (GP) has been used successfully in combination with genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to uncover 26 pre-harvest sprouting-responsive genomic regions spread over 16 chromosomes of wheat based on sprouting score, falling number, and grain color [131]. About 20 definitive and stable quantitative trait nucleotides were considered important for use in marker-assisted recurrent selection. The study [131] also reported higher comparable genomic prediction accuracies (0.41–0.55) for the three sprouting traits. Another example of genomic selection includes the successful transference of a maize seed-dormancy gene Vp-1 (including promoter and coding regions) into the wheat variety Zhengmai 9023, which significantly reduced seed germination index values in the transgenic generations (T3 = 79%, T4 = 80%, and T5 = 82%) compared with the wild type [145].
Advances in omics technologies have further enabled the identification of causal genes for breeding, although functional validation remains challenging due to inefficient transformation protocols [136]. Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 system (CRISPR-Cas9) is a genome-editing technique that has been successfully used for plant functional gene research and crop genetic improvement in wheat and other cereal crops [134]. The technique can precisely target any gene of interest using engineered site-specific nucleases and remove, insert, or mutate a DNA sequence [146,147]. For instance, CRISPR-Cas9 technology was successfully used to improve pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in wheat by editing the seed-dormancy locus TaQsd1, which resulted in genetically edited wheat with significantly longer dormancy period compared with the wild type [135].
In recent findings, the technology restored Tamyb10 in the white-grained variety Fielder to create pre-harvest sprouting-resistant wheat [138]. The resultant transgenic plants with edited Tamyb10-B1a changed seed coat color from white to red, in addition to enhanced anthocyanin index of seed and pre-harvest sprouting resistance compared to the wild type (Fielder). The most recent developments in this work further validated the association of TaMyb10 homologs with grain color and seed germination in wheat. Accessions exclusively harboring TaMyb10-D displayed red seed-coat color and reduced germination percentages, indicating the predominant role of TaMyb10-D compared to TaMyb10-A and TaMyb10-B [123]. These results demonstrate the potential of gene-editing technology to effectively improve breeding progress of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in wheat [112,137]. Importantly, gene-editing technologies can also reverse the loss of key traits that occurred during wheat domestication [137].

4.4. Integrated Approaches

Integrated breeding approaches that combine conventional methods with modern molecular tools have been commonly used to address the complex genetic and environmental factors influencing pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [112,131]. For example, integrating genomic-assisted breeding and genome-editing tools with speed-breeding technology offer the potential to accelerate selection, boost genetic gains, and transform PHS breeding efficiency in both global and South African contexts [132,133]. One study [74] proved the strength of integrated breeding through combining field trial evaluations with SNP markers to identify PHS-tolerant lines without compromising flour quality or the agronomic value of soft winter wheat. The current and future research on pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat germplasm aims to further explore the power of combining conventional breeding with marker-assisted breeding [36,62] and genomic breeding to expedite wheat improvement.

5. Challenges and Limitations in Breeding for Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance

Climate change remains the main challenge in breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. The shifting weather patterns associated with climate change exacerbate pre-harvest sprouting, thus presenting a huge threat to the availability of enough and high-quality food in future [13,42,43,66,148,149]. Recently, there has been an increase in the prevalence of pre-harvest sprouting in wheat-producing areas of South Africa [52,64,150,151,152] and other parts of the world [34,66,153]. This can be attributed to the unpredictable and heavy rainfall patterns occurring at physiological maturity, coupled with the fluctuation in temperature and humidity levels throughout the growing season, which break seed-dormancy and thus make wheat varieties more vulnerable to sprouting [13,62,64,66,125]. These conditions may be expected to occur very often in the future [40,41], greatly reducing the quality and yield of the produced wheat grain [154].
Genetic bottlenecks such as the limited genetic diversity imposed on wheat during domestication and in modern breeding practices and targeted selection present another challenge when breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [66,154]. This indicates the need to create new genetic diversity through genetic-improvement studies (i.e., mutation breeding) and germplasm exchange, as well as using landraces and wild relatives of wheat [6,19,137,154,155]. New genes, QTLs and alleles conferring pre-harvest sprouting tolerance can be mined, discovered, and deployed to develop improved wheat varieties [13,75,110,124,156]. Moreover, wild relatives, landraces, and wheat varieties with remarkable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance present valuable sources of genetic diversity for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and adaptation to local environmental conditions. Therefore, introducing genes from these sources would not only enrich the genetic base for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in modern wheat breeding programs, but would also facilitate the development of wheat varieties with improved wheat grain yield, quality, pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, and adaptation to local environmental conditions [66,154,157]. Table 4 below lists exotic landraces, varieties, and wheat breeding lines exhibiting pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, which have been identified and successfully used in different wheat breeding studies [66].
Another challenge or limitation in breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is the complex nature of pre-harvest sprouting. Pre-harvest sprouting is a complex trait that is influenced by numerous other traits and factors [3,6,68,69], implying that a pure selection targeted at improving pre-harvest sprouting tolerance will impact other traits as well. Therefore, understanding correlations between pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and grain yield, yield components, grain protein components, and other important agronomic traits is of paramount importance for wheat breeding programs to enable thoughtful and necessary selections [41,167]. It is documented that selection targeted at individual loci will reduce genetic diversity within and around the selected loci [168].
The negative association between pre-harvest sprouting and grain quality limits the production of high-quality wheat grains. Pre-harvest sprouting negatively impacts grain quality by reducing the baking and cooking properties of the produced flour [1]. The reduction in grain quality is due to the degradation of starch and protein in germinated kernels by alpha-amylase activity and is shown by the reduction in Hagberg falling number [41,169]. Flour and dough made from sprouted grains produce bread products with darker crust, sticky crumb texture, and poor slicing ability [1,80,170,171,172,173]. Moreover, the breakdown of grain carbohydrate reserves adversely impacts the quality of the cooked pasta and the malting process [23,174]. Poor-quality foods made from sprouted grains have detrimental effects on human health [5].
Pre-harvest sprouting also negatively impacts grain yield. Highly tolerant or dormant wheat seed results in tardy, variable, and poor seed germination and seedling establishment, which negatively affect grain yield [167]. Direct and indirect effects of pre-harvest sprouting on grain yield and yield components were evaluated in the Brazilian wheat germplasm using eight cultivars known to possess high pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [167]. Pre-harvest sprouting exhibited highly significant and positive genotypic (r = 0.752) and phenotypic (r = 0.716) correlations with grain yield, which indicated lower pre-harvest sprouting tolerance (susceptibility) in wheat cultivars with higher grain yield and productive potential. The path analysis further confirmed the highest direct effect (r = 0.511) of pre-harvest sprouting on grain yield, indicating that cultivars with less tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting have the highest grain yield in wheat [167]. The study also observed a reduced effect of pre-harvest sprouting on plants with shorter stature and lower hectoliter weight. The findings of this study [167] concur with the observations of [175], who still found no cultivar with both high grain yield and good tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting, despite using different wheat cultivars.
On the contrary, two studies [165,176] evaluated and identified wheat genotypes and combinations thereof with the potential of high tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting and grain yield. This underscores the possibility of achieving both pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and high yield potential in a single wheat variety, which is a much sought-after combination in wheat breeding programs worldwide [165,176]. However, this comes as a result of a calculated compromise: selecting for seed with intermediate dormancy level and high productive potential (i.e., high number of spikes per square meter) to achieve good plant establishment and ultimately higher grain yield in the field, while providing a good level of tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting to secure grain quality [41,69,167]. Moreover, molecular markers present an opportunity to rapidly characterize diverse germplasm for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance sources and transfer them to the well-adapted and high-yielding cultivars [132,177].

6. Future Prospects and Research Directions

Future prospects and research directions in breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance will be guided by three main themes, namely climate-resilient breeding, technological advances, and collaborative initiatives and policy support. These themes are critical in enhancing the ability to produce wheat varieties with tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting that adapt well to adverse conditions (changing climate) and maintain high productivity. Such is pivotal in attaining food security and sustainability.

6.1. Climate-Resilient Breeding

Wheat remains a vital food crop that nourishes billions of people worldwide [137,178,179,180,181]. However, factors such as climate change and the rapid population growth exert pressure on wheat production, necessitating a double increase in production to meet the demand and attain sustainability [40,42,43,148,149,179,182]. The impacts of climate change, such as erratic climatic fluctuations, are associated with an increase in pre-harvest sprouting incidences in wheat-growing regions globally. This greatly reduces grain yield and quality, lowers the producers’ income, and is associated with significant annual economic losses [5]. With the projected increase in temperatures, gradual population rise, and stagnant or reduced wheat yields despite substantial breeding efforts [183,184], breeding for climate-resilient wheat genotypes is both a necessity and a priority for global food and nutritional security [137,185]. This aligns well with the Sustainable Development Goal 2.0 (SDG 2.0) of the United Nations Agenda 2030 and its set targets [128,178,186,187,188,189], which aim to eradicate all forms of hunger and malnutrition worldwide by 2030, in addition to promoting sustainable agriculture [128,178,187].
For a climate-resilient breeding program with the intention to improve grain yield and quality or pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, the focus should be on genotype, environment, and genotype × environment interactions [190]. Priority traits should include intermediate seed-dormancy, early maturity, extended booting-to-heading and booting-to-anthesis durations, shorter heading-to-anthesis duration, selection of shorter genotypes for irrigated environments, and taller genotypes for heat stress and heat–drought-prone environments [178]. In terms of morphological traits, erect spikes with awns or epicuticular waxes (umbrella effect), harder kernels, and impermeable and red seed coats should be selected to reduce the negative impacts of pre-harvest sprouting [65,73].
Developing and deploying pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant wheat varieties that can withstand future climate conditions is a more sustainable, economical, safer, and effective approach to reducing damage caused by pre-harvest sprouting [17,89,112,137]. This can be achieved through identification and introgression of major dormancy genes and alleles from the wild wheat relatives and landraces to improve the adaptability and productivity of modern wheat varieties under changing climates [16,25,74]. For example, Aegilops tauschii (the D genome donor of bread wheat) is characterized by high variation for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [104,158,191] and is a good source of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [192]. Three Ae. tauschii-derived dormancy QTLs, namely QDor.3D.1, QDor.3D.2, and QDor.3D.3, were identified on the long arm of chromosome 3D, using four SSR markers [157]. The study further developed 10 Kompetitive allele-specific PCR markers that will expedite map-based cloning of these loci and their introgression into bread wheat [157].
Another approach to developing pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant wheat varieties that can withstand future climate conditions is using improved cropping systems. This involves shifting planting dates to enable harvesting outside of the rainfall season and using seasonal/regional weather forecast to predict the pre-harvest sprouting risk. Tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting depends on the cultivar choice (genotype), the developmental stage, the amount and duration of rain, the temperature level, and the moisture content, as well as the interactions between these factors [64,65,66,71,74,84]. Therefore, ref. [65] suggested that seasonal or regional weather forecast information may be used to advise producers on when to plant and harvest and which cultivar choice will be suitable for their production regions given the prediction of environmental conditions for the season.
Understanding the relationship between pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and other traits of agronomic importance is also crucial in the development of pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant wheat varieties that can withstand future climate conditions. Despite the negative association between pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and grain yield, as well as quality, ref. [74] recently reported the opposite. This study [74] reported the possibility of improving pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in wheat under adverse weather conditions brought about by climate change without affecting flour quality or the agronomic performance of soft winter. Other approaches to develop pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant wheat varieties that can withstand future climate conditions may include exchanging germplasm between countries and breeding programs; improving farm policies; investing in breeding wheat varieties that are climate-resilient and possess pre-harvest sprouting tolerance; and deploying advanced breeding techniques, such as gene editing, speed breeding, and other modern breeding technologies.

6.2. Technological Advances

Harnessing the technological advances and scientific progress made up to date is essential for better management of pre-harvest sprouting [137]. Such technological advances in genetic and biotechnological research enhance our understanding of the mechanisms involved (i.e., seed-dormancy) and genetic factors associated with tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting. This enables breeding environmentally adapted wheat varieties with acceptable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [69,137,167].
Complimenting conventional phenotyping techniques with the use of molecular markers for selection, as well as high-throughput screening technologies, has improved breeding efficiency. This has been validated by a few studies conducted on South African wheat [36,62], as well as numerous studies conducted across the globe [66,113,131]. Traits or genomic regions associated with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance were identified and successfully introgressed from good sources of tolerance (genotypes such as Frontana, Grandin, ND 674, and RL 4137) into locally adapted and high-yielding germplasms [156], using both conventional (backcrossing) and modern breeding techniques [66,113]. The efficiency of molecular markers in MAS was proven by [113] to expedite crop improvement by successfully stacking multiple loci of agronomic importance, including pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, grain protein content, and leaf rust resistance, into a single plant.
The identification of several genes underlying major QTLs regulating pre-harvest sprouting or seed-dormancy has also enabled the manipulation of these genes, using various approaches such as CRISPR/Cas9 technology to enhance pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in wheat. The gene-editing technology CRISPR-Cas9 has yielded significant progress in breeding wheat varieties with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [112,123,135,136,137,138]. Through this technology, important seed-dormancy genes that were lost or silenced through domestication are being restored or edited [137]. Moreover, new wheat varieties with desired variations in pre-harvest sprouting tolerance are developed through silencing genes associated with seed germination or related pathways.
The integration of genome editing tools, genomic-assisted breeding, and speed-breeding technology presents possibilities to further enhance breeding efficiency by increasing selection accuracy and genetic gain per year [132,133]. These results demonstrate the potential of modern breeding techniques to expedite breeding for pre-harvest sprouting and highlight promising prospects for future research in the South African wheat industry.

6.3. Collaboration and Policy Support

Pre-harvest sprouting is a global issue, and policies have been put in place to support efforts aimed at mitigating the negative effects of pre-harvest sprouting on the countries’ economies, food security, and the environment through breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. These include the use of molecular breeding techniques [17,18,66,112], phenotypic selection [193], identification of tolerance sources and tolerance genes [22,66,112], and combining breeding techniques with management practices [65,137].
Supporting policies related to breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and encouraging collaborations between countries and breeding programs working on understanding pre-harvest sprouting are efficient ways to drive future research. Engagement between breeders, producers, researchers, and policymakers can improve the conducted research and strengthen breeding programs. The integral role and benefits of international collaborations and policy support were demonstrated during “The Green Revolution” era [194,195] and afterwards, leading to the economic development and improvement of food security in many countries.
South Africa does not have enough capacity (resources and skills) to conduct the latest cutting-edge genomic research on pre-harvest sprouting, thus hindering the progress in this field. Therefore, collaborating with countries and research laboratories that are leading in this space will build up the much-needed capacity, enable knowledge and germplasm exchange, and open doors to funding opportunities. For example, South Africa is working closely with international agricultural research centers such as the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), the International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to improve its wheat germplasm and farming systems, as well as addressing issues related to climate change and food production. These collaborative initiatives have resulted in the enhancement of genetic diversity in our modern wheat varieties and contributed significantly to the improvement of the country’s food security. It is reported that most of modern wheat varieties contain at least one CIMMYT parent in their pedigrees [196]. Moreover, the pre-harvest sprouting tolerance of most South African cultivars traces back to similar sources in Canadian and Australian wheat cultivars [61], demonstrating the significant role played by international germplasm in supporting local breeding efforts.
Recently, South Africa participated in the latest (15th) International Symposium on Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Cereals (ISPHSC) held in Tsukuba, Japan, on 4–6 October 2023. The ISPHS is held once every three to four years and offers a platform for researchers, breeders, and seed companies from all over the world working on understanding pre-harvest sprouting using multidisciplinary approaches to gather and share/discuss recent developments (i.e., generated knowledge, developed germplasm, etc.) in breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in cereals. The status and future prospects in breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat germplasm were shared, and new knowledge was gained from the symposium presentations. Moreover, potential collaborations between South Africa and Japan, as well as between South Africa and China, were identified. Japan and China have conducted extensive and advanced molecular and genomic research on pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in wheat and other crops of agronomic importance [9,17,27,31,32,112,123,138,160,197,198,199,200,201,202]. Therefore, collaborating with these countries could be very beneficial and enhance the research conducted on the South African wheat germplasm.
The integrated approach of collaborations and policy support, technological advances, and the development of climate-resilient wheat germplasm that is tolerant to pre-harvest sprouting will enable a better understanding and manipulation of the genetic diversity for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance existing in our own wheat germplasm. This will facilitate the development of well-adapted wheat cultivars with intermediate tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting and high yield potential, contributing to both economic and environmental benefits.

7. Conclusions

Breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is important for the development of climate-resilient varieties. This is necessary to protect grain yield and quality, and to reduce economic losses associated with pre-harvest sprouting, thereby improving food and nutritional security around the world. The South African wheat germplasm contains a rich genetic diversity for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance, which can be explored with the assistance of molecular markers and genomic tools. Moreover, wheat cultivars with durable pre-harvest sprouting tolerance have been developed and released into the market. Tolerant wheat germplasms have also been reported in other countries and can be accessed through germplasm exchange.
Despite all the developments in identifying and developing wheat germplasm with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and the advancements in wheat genome sequencing, the progress in breeding for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African and global wheat germplasm is slow. This could be attributed to a number of factors, including (i) the lack of or limited capacity (resources and skills) allocated to the improvement of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance/seed-dormancy in wheat; (ii) the polygenic nature of the trait; (iii) poor understanding of pre-harvest sprouting/seed-dormancy and non-standardization of phenotyping techniques; (iv) trade-offs between pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and other agronomic traits of importance, such as grain yield; (v) limited available diversity in germplasm for the trait, which necessitates identification of newer sources of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance; (vi) the lack of suitable donors with seed-dormancy; (vii) breeding strategies used in breeding programs (most of the progress made is attributable to conventional breeding); (viii) poor adoption or late incorporation of genomic markers or improved (genomic) breeding technologies in breeding programs; (ix) and the scarcity of reliable markers that are diagnostic or closely linked to pre-harvest sprouting tolerance QTLs to expedite MAS.
Proposed solutions include the use of molecular markers and genomics in identifying pre-harvest sprouting tolerance traits. These techniques facilitate selection and are less sensitive to environmental conditions. Also, the adoption of improved genotypic breeding tools, such as speed-breeding technology, mutation breeding, genomic prediction, transgenic, and cisgenic breeding, as well as gene-editing breeding (CRISPR-Cas9), is important. The benefits of these technologies/tools include accelerated breeding cycles, increased genetic diversity, improved precision, and increased genetic gains. Genotypic breeding tools and technologies are effective independently, but their efficacy is enhanced when integrated with conventional breeding.
Breeding wheat for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is ongoing in the South African wheat germplasm, with promising leads in the University of Stellenbosch, with funding received from the Department of Science and Innovation, the Technology Innovation Agency, and Grain SA. Improvement of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in wheat is crucial to meet the Sustainable Development Goal 2.0 of ending all forms of hunger and malnutrition sustainably worldwide and promoting sustainable agriculture. Future research is anticipated to focus on the development of climate-resilient wheat varieties that are tolerant to pre-harvest sprouting, with the assistance of technological advancements, as well as collaborations and policy support. This is expected to improve food security and enhance economic sustainability in South Africa.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14142134/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.P.K.-M. and T.J.T.; investigation, T.P.K.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, T.P.K.-M.; writing—review and editing, T.P.K.-M., P.M., N.P.M., A.B. and T.J.T.; supervision, T.J.T.; project administration, T.P.K.-M. and T.J.T.; funding acquisition, T.J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation, grant number UID 144836.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed toward the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The Agricultural Research Council—Small Grain is thanked for providing necessary resources for writing the manuscript. The authors would also like to acknowledge colleagues at the ARC–Small Grain for proofreading the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ABAabscisic acid
ARC-Small GrainAgricultural Research Council—Small Grain Institute
COWClass Other Wheat
CRISPR-Cas9clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats-associated Cas-9 protein
CIMMYTInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre
DHdoubled-haploid
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
DSIDepartment of Science and Innovation
GAgibberellic acid
GEBVsgenomic estimated breeding values
GPgenomic prediction
GWASsgenome-wide association studies
ICARDAInternational Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas
ISPHSCInternational Symposium on Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Cereals
KASPKompetitive allele-specific PCR
MASmarker-assisted selection
MTAmarker–trait association
NDno data available
PHSpre-harvest sprouting
QTL(s)quantitative trait locus/loci
SDGSustainable Development Goal
SNPsingle-nucleotide polymorphism
SSRsimple sequence repeat
SUStellenbosch University
TIATechnology Innovation Agency
USDAUnited States Department of Agriculture

References

  1. Groos, C.; Gay, G.; Perretant, M.R.; Gervais, L.; Bernard, M.; Dedryver, F.; Charmet, G. Study of the relationship between pre-harvest sprouting and grain colour by quantitative trait loci analysis in a white × red grain bread-wheat cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 104, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodriguez, M.V.; Barrero, J.M.; Corbineau, F.; Gubler, R.L.F. Dormancy in cereals (not too much, not so little): About the mechanisms behind this trait. Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 99–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Mia, M.S.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Yan, G. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of near-isogenic lines targeting a major 4BL QTL responsible for pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yücel, C.; Baloch, F.S.; Hatipoǧlu, R.; Özkan, H. Genetic analysis of preharvest sprouting tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.). Turk. J. Agric. For. 2011, 35, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tai, L.; Wang, H.-J.; Xu, X.-J.; Sun, W.-H.; Ju, L.; Liu, W.-T.; Li, W.-Q.; Sun, J.; Chen, K.-M. Pre-harvest sprouting in cereals: Genetic and biochemical mechanisms. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 2857–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Barrero, J.M.; Cavanagh, C.; Verbyla, K.L.; Tibbits, J.F.G.; Verbyla, A.P.; Huang, B.E.; Rosewarne, G.M.; Stephen, S.; Wang, P.; Whan, A.; et al. Transcriptomic analysis of wheat near-isogenic lines identifies PM19-A1 and A2 as candidates for a major dormancy QTL. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Derera, N.F.; Bhatt, G.M.; McMaster, G.J. On the problem of pre-harvest sprouting of wheat. Euphytica 1977, 26, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Torada, A.; Koike, M.; Ikeguchi, S.; Tsutsui, I. Mapping of a major locus controlling seed dormancy using backcrossed progenies in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome 2008, 51, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lang, J.; Fu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Cheng, M.; Deng, M.; Li, M.; Zhu, T.; Yang, J.; Guo, X.; Gui, L.; et al. Myb10-D confers PHS-3D resistance to pre-harvest sprouting by regulating NCED in ABA biosynthesis pathway of wheat. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1940–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, M.; Liu, S.; Zhang, G.; Bai, G. Effects of TaPHS1 and TaMKK3-A genes on wheat pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Agronomy 2018, 8, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Y.; Ma, W. Wheat alpha amylase. JSM Biotechnol. BioMed. Eng. 2018, 5, 1086. [Google Scholar]
  12. Simsek, S.; Ohm, J.-B.; Lu, H.; Rugg, M.; Berzonsky, W.; Alamri, M.S.; Mergoum, M. Effect of pre-harvest sprouting on physicochemical properties of starch in wheat. Foods 2014, 3, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Patwa, N.; Penning, B.W. Environmental impact on cereal crop grain damage from pre-harvest sprouting and late maturity alpha-amylase. In Sustainable Agriculture in the Era of Climate Change; Roychowdhury, R., Choudhury, S., Hasanuzzaman, M., Srivastava, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, C.; Nonogaki, H.; Barrero, J. Seed dormancy, germination and pre-harvest sprouting. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bainotti, C.; Cuniberti, M.; Masiero, B.; Donaire, G.; Gomez, D.; Reartes, F.; Salines, J.; Formica, M.; Fraschina, J.; Nisi, J.; et al. Characterization of wheat cultivars for pre-harvest sprouting. Agriscientia 2009, 26, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andreoli, C.; Bassoi-Ml, C.; Brunetta, D. Genetic control of seed dormancy and preharvest sprouting in wheat. Sci. Agricola 2006, 63, 564–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ali, A.; Cao, J.; Jiang, H.; Chang, C.; Zhang, H.-P.; Sheikh, S.W.; Shah, L.; Ma, C. Unraveling molecular and genetic studies of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) resistance against factors causing pre-harvest sprouting. Agronomy 2019, 9, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gupta, P.K.; Balyan, H.S.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, R. Genetics of yield, abiotic stress tolerance and biofortification in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 1569–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martinez, S.A.; Godoy, J.; Huang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Carter, A.H.; Campbell, K.A.G.; Steber, C.M. Genome-wide association mapping for tolerance to preharvest sprouting and low falling numbers in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sohn, S.I.; Pandian, S.; Kumar, T.S.; Zoclanclunon, Y.A.B.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Shilpha, J.; Satish, L.; Ramesh, M. Seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting in rice—An updated overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vetch, J.M.; Stougaard, R.N.; Martin, J.M.; Giroux, M. Allelic impacts of TaPHS1, TaMKK3, and Vp1B3 on preharvest sprouting of northern great plains winter wheats. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vetch, J.M.; Stougaard, R.N.; Martin, J.M.; Giroux, M.J. Review: Revealing the genetic mechanisms of pre-harvest sprouting in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 2019, 281, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, A.K.; Knox, R.E.; Clarke, J.M.; Clarke, F.R.; Singh, A.; DePauw, R.M.; Cuthbert, R.D. Genetics of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a cross of Canadian adapted durum wheat genotypes. Mol. Breed. 2014, 33, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Barnard, A.; Smith, M.F. The effect of rainfall and temperature on the preharvest sprouting tolerance of winter wheat in the dryland production areas of the Free State Province. Field Crops Res. 2009, 112–113, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, G.L.; Xiao, S. Factorial cross analysis of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in white wheat. Field Crops Res. 2005, 91, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Morgan, G. Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Wheat (E-336 1/05). Texas A&M Agrilife Extension. Available online: https://taylor.agrilife.org/files/2015/01/E336-Pre-Harvest-Sprouting-in-Wheat.pdf (accessed on 26 November 2024).
  27. Nakamura, S.; Abe, F.; Kawahigashi, H.; Nakazono, K.; Tagiri, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Utsugi, S.; Ogawa, T.; Handa, H.; Ishida, H. A wheat homolog of MOTHER of FT and TFL1 acts in the regulation of germination. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3215–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Torada, A.; Ikeguchi, S.; Koike, M. Mapping and validation of PCR-based markers associated with a major QTL for seed dormancy in wheat. Euphytica 2005, 143, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Das, A.; Kim, D.W.; Khadka, P.; Rakwal, R.; Rohila, J.S. Unraveling key metabolomic alterations in wheat embryos derived from freshly harvested and water-imbibed seeds of two wheat cultivars with contrasting dormancy status. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fakthongphan, J.; Graybosch, R.A.; Baenziger, P.S. Combining ability for tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Y.; Tang, H.; Cheng, M.-P.; Dankwa, K.O.; Chen, Z.-X.; Li, Z.-Y.; Gao, S.; Liu, Y.-X.; Jiang, Q.-T.; Lan, X.-J.; et al. Genome-wide association study for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a large germplasm collection of Chinese wheat landraces. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kashiwakura, Y.; Kobayashi, D.; Jikumaru, Y.; Takebayashi, Y.; Nambara, E.; Seo, M.; Kamiya, Y.; Kushiro, T.; Kawakami, N. Highly sprouting-tolerant wheat grain exhibits extreme dormancy and cold imbibition-resistant accumulation of abscisic acid. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 715–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nonogaki, M.; Sall, K.; Nambara, E.; Nonogaki, H. Amplification of ABA biosynthesis and signaling through a positive feedback mechanism in seeds. Plant J. 2014, 78, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cabral, A.L.; Jordan, M.C.; McCartney, C.A.; You, F.M.; Humphreys, D.G.; MacLachlan, R.; Pozniak, C.J. Identification of candidate genes, regions and markers for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rakoczy-Trojanowska, M.; Krajewski, P.; Bocianowski, J.; Schollenberger, M.; Wakulinski, W.; Milczarski, P.; Masojc, P.; Targonska-Karasek, M.; Banaszak, Z.; Banaszak, Z.; et al. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphism associated with brown rust resistance, a-amylase activity and pre-harvest sprouting in rye (Secale cereale L.). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017, 35, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sydenham, S.L.; Barnard, A. Targeted Haplotype Comparisons between South African Wheat Cultivars Appear Predictive of Pre-harvest Sprouting Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wahl, T.I.; O’Rourke, A.D. The economics of sprout damage in wheat. Agribusiness 1994, 10, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Black, M.; Beweley, J.D.; Halmer, P. Science, technology and uses. In The Encyclopedia of Seeds: Science, Technology and Uses; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2006; pp. 528–530. [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomason, W.; Hughes, K.R.; Griffey, C.A.; Parrish, J.; Barbeau, W.E.; Walsh, O. Understanding Pre-Harvest Sprouting of Wheat. pp. 1–4. Available online: http://www.ext.vt.edu (accessed on 26 November 2024).
  40. Perkins, S.E.; Alexander, L.V.; Nairn, J.R. Increasing frequency, intensity and duration of observed global heatwaves and warm spells. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, L20714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shorinola, O.; Bird, N.; Simmonds, J.; Berry, S.; Henriksson, T.; Jack, P.; Werner, P.; Gerjets, T.; Scholefield, D.; Balcarkova, B.; et al. The wheat Phs-A1 pre-harvest sprouting resistance locus delays the rate of seed dormancy loss and maps 0.3 cM distal to the PM19 genes in UK germplasm. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4169–4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maity, A.; Pramanik, P. Climate change and seed quality: An alarming issue in crop husbandry. Curr. Sci. 2013, 105, 1336–1338. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258453138 (accessed on 12 June 2019).
  43. Ray, D.K.; Mueller, N.D.; West, P.C.; Foley, J.A. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barnard, A. Genetic diversity of South African winter wheat cultivars in relation to preharvest sprouting and falling number. Euphytica 2001, 119, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barnard, A.; Purchase, J.; Smith, M.; van Lill, D. Determination of the preharvest sprouting resistance of South African winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 1997, 14, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barnard, A.; Bona, L. Sprout damage and falling number in South African and Hungarian wheats. Cereal Res. Commun. 2004, 32, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barnard, A.; Smith, M.F. Determination of the influence of climate on falling number of winter wheat in the dryland production areas of the Free State Province of South Africa. Euphytica 2012, 188, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barnard, A.; Grain, S.A. Preharvest Sprouting Research—20 Years Later. Available online: https://www.grainsa.co.za/preharvest-sprouting-research-20-years-later (accessed on 1 August 2024).
  49. Barnard, A.; Purchase, J.L. The relationship of preharvest sprouted seed and seed treatment to emergence and yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Eastern Free State. Seed Sci. Technol. 1998, 26, 711–718. [Google Scholar]
  50. Guides, C.C. South Africa—Agricultural Sector. Available online: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/south-africa-agricultural-sector (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  51. DALRRD. Trends in the Agricultural Sector. Department of Agriculture, Land Reform & Rural Development Agriculture, Republic of South Africa; Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development: Pretoria, South Africa, 30 June 2023. Available online: https://www.dalrrd.gov.za/images/Branches/Economica%20Development%20Trade%20and%20Marketing/Statistc%20and%20%20Economic%20Analysis/statistical-information/trends-in-the-agricultural-sector-2023.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  52. SAGL. South African Wheat Crop Quality Report 2023/2024 Season. 2024. Available online: https://sagl.co.za/wheat/reports/#https-sagl-co-za-wp-content-uploads-wheat-report-2023-2024_web-pdf/1/ (accessed on 10 April 2025).
  53. IPAD. South Africa Wheat Area, Yield and Production. Available online: https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/countrysummary/default.aspx?id=SF&crop=Wheat (accessed on 10 April 2025).
  54. Smit, H.A.; Tolmay, V.L.; Barnard, A.; Jordaan, J.P.; Koekemoer, F.P.; Otto, W.M.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Purchase, J.L.; Tolmay, J.P.C. An overview of the context and scope of wheat (Triticum aestivum) research in South Africa from 1983 to 2008. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 2010, 27, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Van Niekerk, H.A. Southern Africa wheat pool. In The World Wheat Book: The History of Wheat Breeding; Bonjean, A.P., Angus, W.J., Eds.; Lavoisier Publishing: Paris, France, 2001; pp. 923–936. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gazette, S.G. Government notice no. R 1547 of 29 November 2019: Regulations Relating to the Grading, Packing and Marking of Bread Wheat Intended for Sale in the Republic of South Africa. Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, R 1547. 2019. Available online: https://sagl.co.za/wp-content/uploads/Page-17-2.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2024).
  57. Grain, A.-S. Production Guidelines for Small Grains. Available online: https://www.arc.agric.za/arc-sgi/Pages/SGI%20Pages%20Archive/Small-Grain-New-Homepage.aspx (accessed on 2 October 2024).
  58. Dube, E.; Khumalo, T. Wheat cultivar evaluation: Enhancing the sustainability of the wheat industry. Wheat Focus Magazine, 2 June 2023; p. 18. [Google Scholar]
  59. Biddulph, T.; Plummer, J.; Setter, T.; Mares, D. Influence of high temperature and terminal moisture stress on dormancy in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crops Res. 2007, 103, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Van Eeden, E.; Labuschagne, M.T. Sprouting tolerance and falling number in South African hybrid bread wheat cultivars and their parent lines. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 56, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Barnard, A.; Van Deventer, C.S.; Maartens, H. Genetic variability of preharvest sprouting—The South African situation. Euphytica 2005, 143, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khumalo, T.P.; Hlongoane, T.; Barnard, A.; Tsilo, T.J. Genomic regions influencing preharvest sprouting tolerance in two doubled-haploid wheat populations (Triticum aestivum L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Khumalo, T.P. Phenotypic and Molecular Analyses of Preharvest Sprouting and Yield Related Traits in Two Doubled-Haploid Populations of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Life & Consumer Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa, 2021. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10500/32333 (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  64. Hull, S.; Swanepoel, P.; Botes, W. Navigating the Threat of Pre-Harvest Sprouting of Wheat; SA Grain Magazine: Pretoria, South Africa, 2024; pp. 66–67. Available online: https://sagrainmag.co.za/2024/05/06/navigating-the-threat-of-pre-harvest-sprouting-of-wheat/ (accessed on 5 June 2024).
  65. Hull, S.I.; Swanepoel, P.A.; Botes, W.C. A critical review of the factors influencing pre-harvest sprouting of wheat. Agron. J. 2024, 116, 3354–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Singh, C.; Kamble, U.; Gupta, V.; Singh, G.; Sheoran, S.; Gupta, A.; Tyagi, B.; Kumar, P.; Mishra, C.N.; Krishnappa, G.; et al. Pre-harvest sprouting in wheat: Current status and future prospects. J. Cereal Res. 2021, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. King, R.W.; Richards, R.A. Water uptake in relation to pre-harvest sprouting in wheat: Ear characteristics. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1984, 35, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dhariwal, R.; Hiebert, C.W.; Sorrells, M.E.; Spaner, D.; Graf, R.J.; Singh, J.; Randhawa, H.S. Mapping pre-harvest sprouting resistance loci in AAC Innova × AAC Tenacious spring wheat population. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gao, F.; Ayele, B.T. Functional genomics of seed dormancy in wheat: Advances and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, S.; Sehgal, S.K.; Li, J.; Lin, M.; Trick, H.N.; Yu, J.; Gill, B.S.; Bai, G. Cloning and characterization of a critical regulator for preharvest sprouting in wheat. Genetics 2013, 195, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Mares, D.J.; Mrva, K. Wheat grain preharvest sprouting and late maturity alpha-amylase. Planta 2014, 240, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Munkvold, J.D.; Tanaka, J.; Benscher, D.; Sorrells, M.E. Mapping quantitative trait loci for preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 1223–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Olaerts, H.; Courtin, C.M. Impact of preharvest sprouting on endogenous hydrolases and technological quality of wheat and bread: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 698–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Patwa, N.; Penning, B.W. Genetics of a diverse soft winter wheat population for pre-harvest sprouting, agronomic, and flour quality traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1137808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rabieyan, E.; Bihamta, M.R.; Moghaddam, M.E.; Mohammadi, V.; Alipour, H. Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction for pre-harvest sprouting resistance, low α-amylase and seed color in Iranian bread wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yang, J.H.; Yu, Y.X.; Cheng, J.S.; Tan, X.L.; Shen, W.P. Study on the pre harvest sprouting tolerance in Triticum aestivum spp. Yunnanense King. J. Tritic. Crops 2011, 31, 747–752. [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wei, W.; Xie, H.; Liu, K.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Cao, J.; Zhao, L.; et al. Genome-wide association study of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance using a 90K SNP array in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 2947–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Finkelstein, R.; Reeves, W.; Ariizumi, T.; Steber, C. Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 387–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kucera, B.; Cohn, M.A.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2005, 15, 281–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Imtiaz, M.; Ogbonnaya, F.C.; Oman, J.; Van Ginkel, M. Characterization of quantitative trait loci controlling genetic variation for preharvest sprouting in synthetic backcross-derived wheat lines. Genetics 2008, 178, 1725–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lohwasser, U.; Arif, M.A.R.; Börner, A. Discovery of loci determining pre-harvest sprouting and dormancy in wheat and barley applying segregation and association mapping. Biol. Plant 2013, 57, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kim, S.Y.; Warpeha, K.M.; Huber, S.C. The brassinosteroid receptor kinase, BRI1, plays a role in seed germination and the release of dormancy by cold stratification. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 241, 153031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ju, L.; Jing, Y.; Shi, P.; Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Yan, J.; Chu, J.; Chen, K.-M. JAZ proteins modulate seed germination through interaction with ABI5 in bread wheat and Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mares, D.J. Genetic studies of sprouting tolerance in red and white wheat. In Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Cereals; Walker-Simmons, M.K., Ried, J.L., Eds.; American Associaton of Cereal Chemists: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 1993; pp. 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  85. Biddulph, T.B.; Mares, D.J.; Plummer, J.A.; Setter, T.L. Drought and high temperature increases preharvest sprouting tolerance in a genotype without grain dormancy. Euphytica 2005, 143, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Penfield, S.; MacGregor, D.R. Effects of environmental variation during seed production on seed dormancy and germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Strand, E. Studies on seed dormancy in small grain species. I Barley II Wheat. Norway J. Agric. Sci. 1989, 3, 101–115. [Google Scholar]
  88. Tuttle, K.M.; Martinez, S.A.; Schramm, E.C.; Takebayashi, Y.; Seo, M.; Steber, C.M. Grain dormancy loss is associated with changes in ABA and GA sensitivity and hormone accumulation in bread wheat, Triticum aestivum (L.). Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gao, X.; Hu, C.H.; Li, H.Z.; Yao, Y.J.; Meng, M.; Dong, J.; Zhao, W.C.; Chen, Q.J.; Li, X.Y. Factors affecting pre-harvest sprouting resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A review. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2013, 23, 556–565. [Google Scholar]
  90. Gale, M.D. The genetics of preharvest sprouting in cereals, particularly wheat. In Preharvest Field Spouting in Cereals, 1st ed.; Derera, N.F., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  91. King, R.W. Manipulation of grain dormancy in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ji, T.; Penning, B.; Baik, B.K. Pre-harvest sprouting resistance of soft winter wheat varieties and associated grain characteristics. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 83, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, Y.; Miao, X.; Xia, X.; He, Z. Cloning of seed dormancy genes (TaSdr) associated with tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting in common wheat and development of a functional marker. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Debeaujon, I.; Leon-Kloosterziel, K.M.; Koornneef, M. Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, an longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Torada, A.; Amano, Y. Effect of seed coat color on seed dormancy in different environments. Euphytica 2002, 126, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Guo, G.; Xu, S.; Chen, H.; Hao, Y.; Mao, H. QTL mapping for wheat seed dormancy in a Yangmai16/Zhongmai895 double haploid population. Plants 2023, 12, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zanetti, S.; Winzeler, M.; Keller, M.; Keller, B.; Messmer, M. Genetic analysis of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a wheat × spelt cross. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 1406–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kato, K.; Nakamura, W.; Tabiki, T.; Miura, H.; Sawada, S. Detection of loci controlling seed dormancy on group 4 chromosomes of wheat and comparative mapping with rice and barley genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 102, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kulwal, P.L.; Kumar, N.; Gaur, A.; Khurana, P.; Khurana, J.P.; Tyagi, A.K.; Balyan, H.S.; Gupta, P.K. Mapping of a major QTL for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance on chromosome 3A in bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mori, M.; Uchino, N.; Chono, M.; Kato, K.; Miura, H. Mapping QTLs for grain dormancy on wheat chromosome 3A and the group 4 chomosomes, and their combined effect. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110, 1315–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fofana, B.; Humphreys, D.G.; Rasul, G.; Cloutier, S.; Brule-Babel, A.; Woods, S.; Lukow, O.M.; Somers, D.J. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a red × white seeded spring wheat cross. Euphytica 2009, 165, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, S.; Cai, S.; Graybosch, R.; Chen, C.; Bai, G. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in US hard white winter wheat Rio Blanco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 117, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ogbonnaya, F.C.; Imtiaz, M.; Ye, G.; Hearnden, P.R.; Hernandez, E.; Eastwood, R.F. Genetic and QTL analyses of seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting resistance in the wheat germplasm CN10955. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ren, X.; Lan, X.; Liu, D.; Wang, J.; Zheng, Y. Mapping QTLs for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance on chromosome 2D in a synthetic hexaploid wheat × common wheat cross. J. Appl. Genet. 2008, 49, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Rasul, G.; Humphreys, D.G.; Brule-Babel, A.; McCartney, C.A.; Knox, R.E.; DePauw, R.M.; Somers, D.J. Mapping QTLs for pre-harvest sprouting traits in the spring wheat cross ‘RL4452/AC Domain’. Euphytica 2009, 168, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kumar, A.; Kumar, J.; Singh, R.; Garg, T.; Chhuneja, P.; Balyan, H.S. QTL analysis for grain colour and pre-harvest sprouting in bread wheat. Plant Sci. 2009, 177, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Miao, X.L.; Zhang, Y.J.; Xia, X.C.; He, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, J. Mapping quantitative trait loci for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in white-grained winter wheat line CA 0431. Crop Pasture Sci. 2013, 64, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lin, M.; Cai, S.; Wang, S.; Liu, S.; Zhang, G.; Bai, G. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) identified SNP tightly linked to QTL for pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 1385–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kumar, S.; Knox, R.E.; Clarke, F.R.; Pozniak, C.J.; DePauw, R.M.; Cuthbert, R.D.; Fox, S. Maximizing the identification of QTL for pre-harvest sprouting resistance using seed dormancy measures in a white-grained hexaploid wheat population. Euphytica 2015, 205, 287–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shao, M.; Bai, G.; Rife, T.W.; Poland, J.; Lin, M.; Liu, S.; Chen, H.; Kumssa, T.; Fritz, A.; Trick, H.; et al. QTL mapping of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a white wheat cultivar Danby. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1683–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Yang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, W.; Wang, X.; Zhao, H.; Dong, L.; et al. Molecular characterization of a novel TaGL3-5A allele and its association with grain length in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 1799–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chang, C.; Zhang, H.; Lu, J.; Si, H.; Ma, C. Genetic improvement of wheat with pre-harvest sprouting resistance in China. Genes 2023, 14, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gautam, T.; Kumar, K.; Agarwal, P.; Tyagi, S.; Jaiswal, V.; Gahlaut, V.; Kumar, S.; Prasad, P.; Chhuneja, P.; Singh, H.; et al. Development of white-grained PHS-tolerant wheats with high grain protein and leaf rust resistance. Mol. Breed. 2021, 41, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Torada, A.; Koike, M.; Ogawa, T.; Takenouchi, Y.; Tadamura, K.; Wu, J.; Matsumoto, T.; Kawaura, K.; Ogihara, Y. A causal gene for seed dormancy on wheat chromosome 4A encodes a MAP kinase kinase. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chang, C.; Zhang, H.-P.; Zhao, Q.-X.; Feng, J.-M.; Si, H.-Q.; Lu, J.; Ma, C.-X. Rich allelic variations of Viviparous-1A and their associations with seed dormancy/pre-harvest sprouting of common wheat. Euphytica 2011, 179, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chang, C.; Feng, J.M.; Si, H.Q.; Yin, B.; Zhang, H.P.; Ma, C.X. Validating a novel allele of viviparous-1 (Vp-1Bf) associated with high seed dormancy of Chinese wheat landrace, Wanxianbaimaizi. Mol. Breed. 2010, 25, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chang, C.; Zhang, H.P.; Feng, J.M.; Yin, B.; Si, H.Q.; Ma, C.X. Identifying alleles of Viviparous-1B associated with pre-harvest sprouting in micro-core collections of Chinese wheat germplasm. Mol. Breed. 2009, 25, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yang, Y.; Zhao, X.L.; Xia, L.Q.; Chen, X.M.; Xia, X.C.; Yu, Z.; He, Z.H.; Roder, M. Development and validation of a Viviparous-1 STS marker for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in Chinese wheats. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.L.; Liu, S.X.; Sun, Y.Q.; Meng, J.Y.; Xia, L.Q. Characterization of the rich haplotypes of Viviparous-1A in Chinese wheats and development of a novel sequence-tagged site marker for pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Mol. Breed. 2014, 33, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ashikawa, I.; Abe, F.; Nakamura, S. Ectopic expression of wheat and barley DOG1-like genes promotes seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2010, 179, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lei, L.; Zhu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhu, M.; Carver, B.F.; Yan, L. TaMFT-A1 is associated with seed germination sensitive to temperature in winter wheat. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Wei, W.; Min, X.; Shan, S.; Jiang, H.; Cao, J.; Li, L. Isolation and characterization of TaQsd1 genes for period of dormancy in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lang, J.; Jiang, H.; Cheng, M.; Wang, M.; Gu, J.; Dong, H.; Li, M.; Guo, X.; Chen, Q.; Wang, J. Variation of TaMyb10 and their function on grain color and pre-harvest sprouting resistance of wheat. Plant J. 2024, 118, 1388–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Jiang, H.; Zhao, L.-X.; Chen, X.-J.; Cao, J.-J.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Liu, K.; Zhang, C.; Wei, W.-X.; Xie, H.-Y.; Li, L.; et al. A novel 33-bp insertion in the promoter of TaMFT-3A is associated with pre-harvest sprouting resistance in common wheat. Mol. Breed. 2018, 38, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, Y.; Xia, X.; He, Z. The seed dormancy allele TaSdr-A1a associated with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is mainly present in Chinese wheat landraces. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Xu, Y.; Li, P.; Zou, C.; Lu, Y.; Xie, C.; Zhang, X.; Prasanna, B.M.; Olsen, M.S. Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2641–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sinha, D.; Maurya, A.K.; Abdi, G.; Majeed, M.; Agarwal, R.; Mukherjee, R.; Ganguly, S.; Aziz, R.; Bhatia, M.; Majgaonkar, A.; et al. Integrated genomic selection for accelerating breeding programs of climate-smart cereals. Genes 2023, 14, 1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Avana-Tientcheu, M.L.; Tiambo, C.K. Breeding and productivity in ending hunger and achieving food security and nutrition. In Zero Hunger. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals; Filho, W.L., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Ozuyar, P., Wall, T., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  129. Sun, L.; Lai, M.; Ghouri, F.; Nawaz, M.A.; Ali, F.; Baloch, F.S.; Nadeem, M.A.; Aasim, M.; Shahid, M.Q. Modern plant breeding techniques in crop improvement and genetic diversity: From molecular markers and gene editing to artificial intelligence—A critical review. Plants 2024, 13, 2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, H.P.; Chang, C.; Si, H.Q.; Lu, J.; Ma, C.X. Developing of molecular marker for pre-harvest sprouting resistance and its application in wheat MAS breeding. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2016, 34, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kumar, M.; Kumar, S.; Sandhu, K.S.; Kumar, N.; Saripalli, G.; Prakash, R.; Nambardar, A.; Sharma, H.; Gautam, T.; Balyan, H.S.; et al. GWAS and genomic prediction for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance involving sprouting score and two other related traits in spring wheat. Mol. Breed. 2023, 43, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Aziz, M.A.; Masmoudi, K. Molecular breakthroughs in modern plant breeding techniques. Hortic. Plant J. 2024, 11, 15–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ćeran, M.; Miladinovic, D.; Dordevic, V.; Trkulja, D.; Radanovic, A.; Glogovac, S.; Kondic-Spika, A. Genomics-assisted speed breeding for crop improvement: Present and future. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1383302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Krishna, T.P.A.; Maharajan, T.; Ceasar, S.A. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system to reduce the pre- and post-harvest yield losses in cereals. Open Biotechnol. J. 2022, 16, e2205190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Abe, F.; Haque, E.; Hisano, H.; Tanaka, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Mikami, M.; Kawaura, K.; Endo, M.; Onishi, K.; Hayashi, T.; et al. Genome-edited triple-recessive mutation alters seed dormancy in wheat. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 1362–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Alamillo, J.M.; López, C.M.; Rivas, F.J.M.; Torralbo, F.; Bulut, M.; Alseekh, S. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein and hairy roots: A perfect match for gene functional analysis and crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2023, 79, 102876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Matilla, A.J. Current insights into weak seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting in crop species. Plants 2024, 13, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Xiong, J.; He, Y.; Cheng, S.; Ye, X.; Wang, F.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated restoration of Tamyb10 to create pre-harvest sprouting-resistant red wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 665–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. DePauw, R.M.; Clarke, F.R.; Fofana, B.; Knox, R.; Humphreys, G.; Cloutier, S. RL4137 contributes preharvest sprouting resistance to Canadian wheats. Euphytica 2009, 168, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. DePauw, R.M.; Knox, R.E.; Singh, A.K.; Fox, S.L.; Humphreys, D.G.; Hucl, P. Developing standardized methods for breeding preharvest sprouting resistant wheat, challenges and successes in Canadian wheat. Euphytica 2012, 188, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Morris, G.F.; DeMacon, V.L. Seed dormancy and tissue culture response in wheat. Crop Sci. 1994, 34, 1324–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. ProAgri, S.A. Wheat Production: The Use of Molecular Markers to Assist in Pre-Harvest Sprouting Research. Available online: https://www.proagri.co.za/en/wheat-production-use-molecular-markers-assist-pre-harvest-sprouting-research/ (accessed on 9 September 2021).
  143. Meuwissen, T.H.E.; Hayes, B.J.; Goddard, M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157, 1819–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Moore, J.K.; Manmathan, H.K.; Anderson, V.A.; Poland, J.A.; Morris, C.F.; Haley, S. Improving genomic prediction for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in wheat by weighting large-effect quantitative trait loci. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 1315–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Huang, T.; Qu, B.; Li, H.P.; Zuo, D.Y.; Zhao, Z.X.; Liao, Y.C. A maize viviparous 1 gene increases seed dormancy and preharvest sprouting tolerance in transgenic wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 55, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Demirci, Y.; Zhang, B.; Unver, T. CRISPR/Cas9: An RNA-guided highly precise synthetic tool for plant genome editing. J. Cell Physiol. 2018, 233, 1844–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Jasin, M.; Haber, J.E. The democratization of gene editing: Insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair. DNA Repair 2016, 44, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Easterling, W.E.; Aggarwal, P.K.; Batima, P.; Brander, K.M.; Erda, L.; Howden, S.M.; Kirilenko, A.; Morton, J.; Soussana, J.-F.; Schmidhuber, J.; et al. Food, fibre and forest products. In Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 273–313. [Google Scholar]
  149. Rosegrant, M.W.; Agcaoili, M. Global Food Demand, Supply, and Price Prospects to 2010; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  150. ARC-Small Grain. Report on the National Small Grain Cultivar Evaluation Programme Under Dryland Conditions in the Summer Rainfall Region for 2021 Season. 2021. Available online: https://www.arc.agric.za/arc-sgi/ (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  151. ARC-Small Grain. Report on the National Small Grain Cultivar Evaluation Programme Under Dryland Conditions in the Summer Rainfall Region for 2020 Season. 2020. Available online: https://www.arc.agric.za/arc-sgi/ (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  152. ARC-Small Grain. Report on the National Small Grain Cultivar Evaluation Programme Under Dryland Conditions in the Summer Rainfall Region for 2019 Season. 2019. Available online: https://www.arc.agric.za/arc-sgi/ (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  153. Singh, K.; Shukla, S.; Kadam, S.; Semwal, V.K.; Singh, N.K.; Khanna-Chopra, R. Genomic regions and underlying candidate genes associated with coleoptile length under deep sowing conditions in a wheat RIL population. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 24, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lopes, M.S.; El-Basyoni, I.; Baenziger, P.S.; Singh, S.; Royo, C.; Ozbek, K.; Aktas, H.; Ozer, E.; Ozdemir, F.; Manickavelu, A.; et al. Exploiting genetic diversity from landraces in wheat breeding for adaptation to climate change. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3477–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Cavanagh, C.R.; Chao, S.; Wang, S.; Huang, B.E.; Stephen, S.; Kiani, S.; Forrest, K.; Saintenac, C.; Brown-Guedira, G.L.; Akhunova, A.; et al. Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8057–8062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Liton, M.M.U.A.; McCartney, C.A.; Hiebert, C.W.; Kumar, S.; Jordan, M.C.; Ayele, B.T. Identification of loci for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in the highly dormant spring wheat RL4137. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. He, J.; Zhang, D.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Hu, M.; Sun, S.; Su, Q.; Su, Y.; Li, S. Identification of QTLs and a candidate gene for reducing pre-harvest sprouting in Aegilops tauschii–Triticum aestivum chromosome segment substitution lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Deng-Cai, L.; Xiu-Jin, L.; Zhi-Rong, W.; You-Liang, Z.; Yong-Hong, Z.; Jun-Liang, Y.; Chi, Y. Evaluation of Aegilops tauschii Cosson for preharvest sprouting tolerance. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 1998, 45, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Yu, M.; Chen, G.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, J.; Pu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Lan, X.; Wei, Y.; et al. QTL mapping for important agronomic traits in synthetic hexaploid wheat derived from Aegiliops tauschii ssp. tauschii. J. Integr. Agric. 2014, 13, 1835–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Xiao, S.H.; Zhang, X.Y.; Yan, C.S.; Lin, H. Germplasm improvement for preharvest sprouting resistance in Chinese white-grained wheat: An overview of the current strategy. Euphytica 2002, 126, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yang, Y.; Chen, X.M.; He, Z.H.; Röder, M.; Xia, L.Q. Distribution of Vp-1 alleles in Chinese white-grained landraces, historical and current wheat cultivars. Cereal Res. Commun. 2009, 37, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bassoi, M.C.; Flintham, J. Relationship between grain colour and preharvest sprouting-resistance in wheat. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2005, 40, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Flintham, J.E. Grain color and sprout-resistance in wheat. In Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Cereals, 6th ed.; Walker-Simmons, M.K., Ried, J.L., Eds.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 1993; pp. 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  164. Santos, L.; Pinto, R.J.B.; Franco, F.A.; Schuster, I. Inheritance and potential use of grain color in the identification of genotypes resistant to pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2010, 10, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Nörnberg, R.; Gonzalez da Silva, J.A.; de Souza Luche, H.; Tessmann, E.; Kavalco, S.A.F.; Zimmer, C.M.; Baretta, D.; da Maia, L.C.; de Oliveira, A.C. Tolerance to preharvest sprouting and yield of wheat genotypes from different breeding programs. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2015, 50, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Jiménez, N.; Mares, D.; Mrva, K.; Lizana, C.; Contreras, S.; Schwember, A.R. Susceptibility to preharvest sprouting of Chilean and Australian elite cultivars of common wheat. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 462–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Rigatti, A.; Meira, D.; Olivoto, T.; Meier, C.; Nardino, M.; Lunkes, A.; Klein, L.A.; Fassini, F.; Moro, E.D.; Marchioro, V.S.; et al. Grain yield and its associations with pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tanksley, S.D.; Mccouch, S.R. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 1997, 277, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Flintham, J.E. Different genetic components control coat-imposed and embryo-imposed dormancy in wheat. Seed Sci. Res. 2000, 10, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Lukow, O.M.; Bushuk, W. Influence of germination on wheat quality. I. Functional (breadmaking) and biochemical properties. Cereal Chem. 1984, 61, 336–339. [Google Scholar]
  171. Chamberlain, N.; Collins, T.H.; McDermott, E.E. Alpha-amylase and bread properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 16, 127–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ibrahim, Y.; Appolonia, B.D. Sprouting in hard red spring wheat. Bak. Dig. 1979, 53, 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  173. Olaerts, H.; Vandekerckhove, L.; Courtin, C.M. A closer look at the bread making process and the quality of bread as a function of the degree of preharvest sprouting of wheat (Triticum aestivum). J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 80, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Perten, H. Application of the falling number method for evaluating alpha-amylase activity. Cereal Chem. 1964, 41, 127–140. [Google Scholar]
  175. Felicio, J.C.; De Oliveira Camargo, C.E.; Germani, R.; De Freitas, J.G. Grain yield and sprouting process within the head of wheat genotypes. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2002, 37, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Nornberg, R.; de Souza Luche, H.; Gonzalez da Silva, J.A.; Zimmer, C.M.; Cima, F.; Olivo, M.; de Oliveira, A.C. The challenge of finding high grain yield and pre-harvest sprouting tolerant genotypes in Brazilian wheat germplasm. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2016, 10, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Bunjkar, A.; Walia, P.; Sandal, S.S. Unlocking genetic diversity and germplasm characterization with molecular markers: Strategies for crop improvement. J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol. 2024, 27, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Bhandari, R.; Paudel, H.; Nyaupane, S.; Poudel, M.R. Climate resilient breeding for high yields and stable wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines under irrigated and abiotic stress environments. Plant Stress 2024, 11, 100352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Acevedo, M.; Zurn, J.; Molero, G.; Singh, P.K.; He, X. The role of wheat in global food security. In Agricultural Development and Sustainable Intensification: Technology and Policy Challenges in the Face of Climate Change, 1st ed.; Nagothu, U.S., Ed.; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2018; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  180. Dadrasi, A.; Chaichi, M.; Nehbandani, A.; Sheikhi, A.; Salmani, F.; Nemati, A. Addressing food insecurity: An exploration of wheat production expansion. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0290684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Shewry, P.R.; Hey, S. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. 2015, 4, 178–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hunter, M.C.; Smith, R.G.; Schipanski, M.E.; Atwood, L.W.; Mortensen, D.A. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. BioScience 2017, 67, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Grassini, P.; Eskridge, K.M.; Cassman, K.G. Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Long, S.P.; Marshall-Colon, A.; Zhu, X.G. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. J. Cell 2015, 161, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Pan, C.; Ahammed, G.J.; Li, X.; Shi, K. Elevated CO2 improves photosynthesis under high temperature by attenuating the functional limitations to energy fluxes, electron transport and redox homeostasis in tomato leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 26, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Nations, U. Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 2: Zero Hunger. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/hunger (accessed on 18 November 2024).
  187. Statistics, U.N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/goal-02 (accessed on 18 November 2024).
  188. Ferrari, M.; Benvenuti, L.; Rossi, L.; De Santis, A.; Sette, S.; Martone, D.; Piccinelli, R.; Le Donne, C.; Leclercq, C.; Turrini, A. Could dietary goals and climate change mitigation be achieved through optimized diet? The experience of modeling the national food consumption data in Italy. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Sachs, J.; Lafortune, G.; Kroll, C.; Fuller, G.; Woelm, F. From Crisis to Sustainable Development: The SDGs as Roadmap to 2030 and Beyond; Sustainable Development Report: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  190. Khan, M.M.H.; Rafii, M.Y.; Ramlee, S.I.; Jusoh, M.; Al Mamun, M. Path-coefficient and correlation analysis in Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea [L.] Verdc.) accessions over environments. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Lan, X.; Wei, Y.; Liu, D.; Yan, Z.; Zheng, Y. Inheritance of seed dormancy in Tibetan semi-wild wheat accession Q1028. J. Appl. Genet. 2005, 46, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  192. Lan, X.J.; Zheng, Y.L.; Liu, D.C.; Wei, Y.M.; Yan, Z.H.; Zhou, Y.H. Tolerant mechanism and chromosome location of genes controlling sprouting tolerance in Aegilops tauschii Cosson. Agr. Sci. China 2002, 1, 265–268. [Google Scholar]
  193. Brown, L.K.; Wiersma, A.T.; Olson, E.L. Preharvest sprouting and α-amylase activity in soft winter wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 79, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Conway, G. The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the 21st Century; Pengiun books: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  195. Reynolds, M.P.; Borlaug, N.E. Impacts of breeding on international collaborative wheat improvement. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Lantican, M.A.; Dubin, H.J.; Morris, M.L.; Heisey, P.W. Impacts of International Wheat Breeding Research in the Developing World, 1988–2002; CIMMYT: El Batán, Mexico, 2005; p. 54. [Google Scholar]
  197. Feng, Y.; Han, Y.; Han, B.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xing, Y. A 4 bp InDel in the promoter of wheat gene TaAFP-B affecting seed dormancy confirmed in transgenic rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 837805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Hisano, H.; Hoffie, R.E.; Abe, F.; Munemori, H.; Matsuura, T.; Endo, M.; Mikami, M.; Nakamura, S.; Kumlehn, J.; Sato, K. Regulation of germination by targeted mutagenesis of grain dormancy genes in barley. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Jia, Y.; Barrero, J.M.; Wang, J.; Considine, M.J.; Nakamura, S.; Li, C. Editorial: Seed dormancy, germination, and pre-harvest sprouting, volume II. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1399510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Nakamura, S. Grain dormancy genes responsible for preventing pre-harvest sprouting in barley and wheat. Breed. Sci. 2018, 68, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Nakamura, S.; Pourkheirandish, M.; Morishige, H.; Sameri, M.; Sato, K.; Komatsuda, T. Quantitative trait loci and maternal effects affecting the strong grain dormancy of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Xiao, C.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; Yang, J.; Cheng, M.; Watt, C.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Z.; Tan, Z.; Li, M. Characterization and expression quantitative trait loci analysis of TaABI4, a pre-harvest sprouting related gene in wheat. Seed Sci. Res. 2021, 31, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distinction between pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant (left) and -susceptible (right) wheat spikes. Symptoms such as discoloration and swelling of the grain, splitting of the seed coat, and emergence of roots and shoots were indicative of pre-harvest sprouting susceptibility [1,39].
Figure 1. Distinction between pre-harvest sprouting-tolerant (left) and -susceptible (right) wheat spikes. Symptoms such as discoloration and swelling of the grain, splitting of the seed coat, and emergence of roots and shoots were indicative of pre-harvest sprouting susceptibility [1,39].
Plants 14 02134 g001
Figure 2. Average yield per production region over the ten-year period (2014/15–2023/24) [52].
Figure 2. Average yield per production region over the ten-year period (2014/15–2023/24) [52].
Plants 14 02134 g002
Figure 3. A scale used to screen for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat, where a score of 1 indicates highly tolerant and 8 represents highly susceptible genotypes [45].
Figure 3. A scale used to screen for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in the South African wheat, where a score of 1 indicates highly tolerant and 8 represents highly susceptible genotypes [45].
Plants 14 02134 g003
Table 1. Pre-harvest sprouting tolerance status of the South African commercial wheat cultivars. Data taken from [48,54].
Table 1. Pre-harvest sprouting tolerance status of the South African commercial wheat cultivars. Data taken from [48,54].
Production RegionPre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in the Early 1990sStatus “Then”Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance NowStatus “Now”
Summer Rainfall23%Poor>60%Good–excellent
Irrigation42%Moderate62%Good
Winter rainfall --70–80%Excellent
Table 2. Classification of South African wheat cultivars for pre-harvest spouting tolerance based on a scale of 1–8 that is used at the ARC-Small Grain to assess variation in sprouting on intact heads [36,45,54,62] (Figure 3).
Table 2. Classification of South African wheat cultivars for pre-harvest spouting tolerance based on a scale of 1–8 that is used at the ARC-Small Grain to assess variation in sprouting on intact heads [36,45,54,62] (Figure 3).
GroupScoring SystemCharacteristic(s)
Tolerant1–3Excellent response. None-to-minimal signs of sprouting, such as the emergence of few roots.
Moderate3.1–4.5Moderately tolerant or moderately susceptible response. Visible roots and signs of shoots. The reaction of these cultivars/genotypes is strongly influenced by environmental conditions rather than the genetic makeup, which makes them unstable across environments and years [24].
Susceptible>4.5Poor tolerance. Swollen, discolored, and heavily germinated kernels, fully grown roots and shoots (see Figure 1).
Table 3. Summary of isolated genes and their favorable alleles for improving pre-harvest sprouting resistance in wheat. The table is adopted from [112].
Table 3. Summary of isolated genes and their favorable alleles for improving pre-harvest sprouting resistance in wheat. The table is adopted from [112].
GenesChromosomesMarkersPhysical Site/MbFavorable AllelesReferences
TaVp-13ALVp-1A659.6TaVp-1Ab, TaVp-1AdChang et al., 2011 [115]
Vp1A3 TaVp-1AgmYang et al., 2013 [119]
3BLVp1-b2693.3TaVp-1Bb, TaVp-1Bc, TaVp-1Bd, TaVp-1Be and TaVp-1BfChang et al., 2009a; Chang et al., 2009b [116,117]
Vp1B3 TaVp-1Bb, TaVp-1BcYang et al., 2007 [118]
TaDOG1L13ASDOG1L1534.5-Ashikawa et al., 2010 [120]
TaMFT/TaPHS1 MFT-A1 TaMFT-A1bKing & Richards, 1984 [67]
MFT-A2 TaMFT-3AaJiang et al., 2018 [124]
MFT-3A7.3SNP-222(C)Nakamura et al., 2011 [27]
TaPHS1-SNP1/TaPHS1-SNP1 SNP646/666 (G/A)Liu et al., 2013 [70]
TaSdr2ASdr2A158.5TaSdr-A1aZhang et al., 2017 [125]
Table 4. Wheat wild relatives, landraces, and lines identified to have pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [66].
Table 4. Wheat wild relatives, landraces, and lines identified to have pre-harvest sprouting tolerance [66].
Wild Relatives/Landraces/Lines Identified with Pre-Harvest Sprouting ToleranceCountry References
Aegilops tauschiiChinaDeng-Cai et al., 1998 [158]
Triticum Turgidum and Aegilops tauschii (DD)ChinaDeng-Cai et al., 1998; Yu et al., [158,159]
Synthetic hexaploid wheat genotypes (SHW-L1)ChinaYang et al., 2014 [119]
Chinese Landraces viz., Xiaoyuhua, Yongchuanbaike, and BaiyuhuaChinaXiao et al., 2002 [160]
Hongheshangtou and WanxianbaimaiziChinaYang et al., 2009; Chang et al., 2010 [116,161]
RL4137CanadaBassoi & Flintham 2005 [162]
BRS177BrazilFlintham 1993 [163]
FrontanaBrazilSantos et al., 2010; Nornberg et al., 2015 [164,165]
RL4137CanadaDePauw et al., 2009; DePauw et al., 2012 [139,140]
Konde, Kumpa, and Swindy cultivarsAustraliaJimenez et al., 2017 [166]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khumalo-Mthembu, T.P.; Mmereki, P.; Mzimela, N.P.; Barnard, A.; Tsilo, T.J. Breeding Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in South Africa: Current Status and Future Prospects. Plants 2025, 14, 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142134

AMA Style

Khumalo-Mthembu TP, Mmereki P, Mzimela NP, Barnard A, Tsilo TJ. Breeding Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in South Africa: Current Status and Future Prospects. Plants. 2025; 14(14):2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khumalo-Mthembu, Thobeka Philile, Palesa Mmereki, Nokulunga Prudence Mzimela, Annelie Barnard, and Toi John Tsilo. 2025. "Breeding Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in South Africa: Current Status and Future Prospects" Plants 14, no. 14: 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142134

APA Style

Khumalo-Mthembu, T. P., Mmereki, P., Mzimela, N. P., Barnard, A., & Tsilo, T. J. (2025). Breeding Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in South Africa: Current Status and Future Prospects. Plants, 14(14), 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop