Next Article in Journal
Global Transcriptome Analysis of the Peach (Prunus persica) in the Interaction System of Fruit–Chitosan–Monilinia fructicola
Previous Article in Journal
Polyethylene Glycol Priming Enhances the Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi under Salt Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

PvARL1 Increases Biomass Yield and Enhances Alkaline Tolerance in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)

1
College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Institute of Leisure Agriculture, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(5), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050566
Submission received: 4 January 2024 / Revised: 6 February 2024 / Accepted: 9 February 2024 / Published: 20 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Response to Abiotic Stress and Climate Change)

Abstract

:
Switchgrass is an important bioenergy crop valued for its biomass yield and abiotic tolerance. Alkali stress is a major abiotic stress that significantly impedes plant growth and yield due to high salinity and pH; however, the response mechanism of switchgrass to alkali stress remains limited. Here, we characterized PvARL1, an ARF-like gene, which was up-regulated in both the shoot and root tissues under alkali stress conditions. Overexpression of PvARL1 not only improved alkali tolerance but also promoted biomass yield with more tiller and higher plant height in switchgrass. Moreover, PvARL1 overexpression lines displayed higher capacities in the maintenance of water content and photosynthetic stability compared with the controls under alkali treatments. A significant reduction in the ratio of electrolyte leakage, MDA content, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) showed that PvARL1 plays a positive role in protecting cell membrane integrity. In addition, PvARL1 also negatively affected the K+ efflux or uptake in roots to alleviate ion toxicity under alkali treatments. Overall, our results suggest that PvARL1 functions as a positive regulator in plant growth as well as in the plant response to alkali stress, which could be used to improve switchgrass biomass yield and alkali tolerance genetically.

1. Introduction

Saline–alkaline stress inhibits plant growth. Over 1 billion hectares of soil were found to be affected by salt, of which 40% and 60% were classified as saline and sodic soils, respectively, thus seriously threatening human and animal food supplies [1]. Different from saline soil, which mainly contains sodium chloride (NaCl) and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) or other neutral salts, sodic soils usually over-accumulate sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), leading to alkaline soils with a pH of over 8.2 [2]. Therefore, plants undergo a higher risk under alkaline stress compared with salinity stress by neutral salts [3]. However, alkali stress on plants has yet to raise considerable research attention [1]. Improving the alkali tolerance of plants is crucial to maintaining environmental sustainability. Due to the importance of improving plant alkali tolerance for increasing food demands and protecting the environment, it is essential to understand alkaline response mechanisms in plants.
Previous studies have shown that many genes could be simultaneously involved in salt and alkali stress in various plant species, like Miscanthus sinensis, soybean, and grapevine [4,5,6]. Soybean GmSNF1 (SUCROSE NON-FERMENTING PROTEIN KINASE 1) was up-regulated and Miscanthus sinensis MsGRAS60 (GAI (gibberellic acid-insensitive), RGA (a repressor of GAI), and SCR (scarecrow)) was down-regulated under salt and alkali stress [5,6]. Ectopic-expressing Glycine max GmPKS4 (CALCINEURIN B-LIKE PROTEIN-INTERACTING KINASES 4) in Arabidopsis and Medicago sativa MsCBL4 (CALCINEURIN B-LIKE 4) in tobacco both enhanced salt and alkali tolerance of the corresponding plants [7,8]. The overexpression of Osa-MIR393 in rice and Arabidopsis resulted in more sensitivity to salt and alkali stress [9]. However, studies have shown that the detrimental effects of alkali stress on the growth and photosynthesis of wheat were more severe than those caused by salt stress [10]. Apart from stress-specific responses, a considerable number of genes respond to both salt and alkali stress, allowing for the identification of alkali-tolerant genes based on known salt-tolerant ones, thus expediting the breeding of alkali-tolerant varieties.
The ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) family of small GTP-binding proteins belongs to the Ras superfamily, which was originally identified due to inactivating the cholera toxin [11]. ARF proteins were then found to function in multiple aspects, including the regulation of various intracellular signaling and vesicular trafficking pathways and the abiotic stress response in eukaryotic cells [12,13,14]. The ARF family proteins are classified into two groups based on their sequence homology and functional characteristics: ARF and ARF-like (ARL) proteins [15]. ARFs are highly conserved proteins (>60% sequence identity) sharing similar biological activities, but ARLs are more divergent (40–60% sequence identity) and function in secretory and other pathways [16]. The Longan DlARL1, DlARL2, and DlARL8a promoter sequences were found to contain abiotic stress response elements [17]. The ectopic expression of Medicago falcate MfARL1 in Arabidopsis enhanced the salt tolerance of the transgenic plant [18]. Previous research suggested that the overexpression of PvARFs (PvArf1-, PvArf-B1C-, and PvArf-related) in switchgrass resulted in improved plant growth and enhanced salt tolerance [19]. However, there has been no research on the response of ARL genes to alkali stress in switchgrass so far. Given the conserved sequences between ARLs and ARFs, we hypothesize that PvARLs might play a role in the alkali stress response in switchgrass.
Therefore, we used the PvARL1-overexpressed and PvARL1-RNAi lines, to reveal its function and regulatory mechanism in switchgrass under alkali stress, aiming to gain a theoretical basis and targeted gene resources for alkali-tolerant crop breeding.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The seeds of the cultivar “Alamo”, a lowland switchgrass ecotype, were immersed in 5% NaClO (v/v) for 1 h with shaking every 15 min, followed by washing five times with sterilized water and germinating on wet filter paper in growth chambers at 25 °C and a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod for 7 days. The seedlings were cultured in a hydroponic system with 1/4 Hoagland solution until the three-leaf stage and were then used for detecting PvARL1 expression patterns at different time points under alkali stress.
All the transgenic plants were generated from the callus originating from the same Alamo seed, according to the switchgrass transformation protocol described previously [20]. The plants with empty vectors (EVs) and non-transgenic (NT) plants were used as controls for the overexpressed and RNAi lines, respectively. After producing enough tillers, the transgenic and control lines were propagated by separated tillers. Each tiller was trimmed to both shoots and roots of 5 cm in length before replanting in pots filled with pure vermiculite to ensure the consistency of each replicate in development. The plants, including the EV, PvARL1-OE lines and the NT, PvARL1-RNAi lines, were cultured in a greenhouse with natural light at a temperature ranging from 30 °C to 25 °C during the day/night.
The phenotypes EV, PvARL1-OE and NT, PvARL1-RNAi were measured at the R3 stage and three independent transgenic lines.

2.2. Plasmid Construction and Plant Transformation in Switchgrass

Full-length coding sequences of PvARL1 were cloned from the switchgrass ecotype Alamo. Corrected sequences were introduced into the binary vector Ubi1301 by restriction enzymes BamHI/KpnI (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). A 200 bp distinctive fragment of PvARL1 was selected for RNAi via generating a hairpin structure in the pEntry/D-Kannibal and then recombined into the destination vector pVT1629 by the LR reaction, as indicated in the user manual (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, Gateway LR Clonase).
The constructed vectors were introduced into EHA105 Agrobacterium tumefaciens by freeze–thaw transformation. The control plants for the PvARL1-OE lines were generated with transformations of empty vectors (EVs) of Ubi1301 into switchgrass, while the controls for the PvARL1-RNAi lines were the non-transgenic (NT) plants. All primers used in this study are listed in Supplemental Table S1.

2.3. Abiotic Tolerance Assay in Switchgrass

The three-leaf stage seedlings, cultured hydroponically as mentioned in Section 2.1, were treated with 0 or 150 mM Na+, NaHCO3:Na2CO3 = 9:1 alkaline salt in 1/4 Hoagland solution for 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. The shoots and roots were split and, respectively, collected from three replicates of each genotype for detecting the relative expression of PvARL1 by RT-qPCR.
We tested the alkaline tolerance of switchgrass transgenic plants in a vermiculite-culture system using the transgenic and control plants mentioned in Section 2.1. Until most of the newly generated shoots from the trimmed tillers reached the developmental stage of E3, i.e., the elongation 3 stage [21], 1/4 Hoagland solution containing 0 or 150 mM Na+ (NaHCO3:Na2CO3 = 9:1, pH 9.0) was applied every third day to the plants. To avoid stress shock, a solution with 50 mM Na+ was watered for the first time, followed by solutions with 100 mM and 150 mM Na+. The PvARL1-OE and EV lines were exposed to alkali stress for 14 days, and then leaf and root samples from each genotype were used to determine physiological and chemical changes under alkali stress. Three independent replicates of each genotype were used.

2.4. RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR

The total RNA of plants was isolated using a Beijing Hua Yueyang Kit, and 1 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA reverse transcription using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, RR047A). qPCR was performed using SYBR Green supermix (Takara, RR420A) and qTOWER3 G (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). Transcript levels were normalized to the control PvUbiquitin1 (AP13CTG25905) [22] in switchgrass.

2.5. Na+ and K+ Content Measurements

The leaves and roots were harvested and dehydrated at 60 °C for 3 days. Then, all the samples were shaken well to suspend in the 5% HNO3 for 2 days at room temperature. The K+ and Na+ contents were measured by a 4100-MP-AES device (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as previously reported [23].

2.6. Chlorophyll Content and Fv/Fm Measurements

The leaves were soaked in 95% ethyl alcohol for 48 h in the dark, and the extract was measured at 665 nm, 649 nm, and 470 nm using a spectrophotometer (PuXi General instrument, T6 New Century, Beijing, China) for chlorophyll content.
The leaves were adapted to the dark for 30 min, and then the Fv/Fm values were measured by a fluorescence meter (Opti-sciences, OS30p+, Beijing, China).

2.7. Relative Water Content and Electrolyte Leakage Measurements

The relative water content and electrolyte leakage of the leaves were performed as previously described [24]. The leaves were soaked in deionized water and left to absorb water to saturation, and then their weight was measured. Then, the leaves were dehydrated at 65 °C for 24 h, and then their weight was measured again and the relative water content was calculated. For electrolyte leakage, the leaves were soaked in deionized water and shaken for 24 h followed by autoclave sterilization for 30 min and shaking for 24 h, and then the electrolyte leakage was measured.

2.8. MDA and H2O2 Accumulation Analysis

The H2O2 content was measured by a H2O2 kit as indicated in the user manual (COMIN, H2O2-1-Y). Briefly, 0.1 g of the control and alkali-stressed switchgrass leaves were harvested and homogenized in 1 mL of prechilled acetone, and then the H2O2 content was measured.
To test MDA content, 0.1 g of the control and alkali-stressed switchgrass leaves were harvested and measured by an MDA kit (COMIN, MDA-1-Y) according to the user manual.

2.9. Subcellular Localization

CDS without the stop codon of PvARL1 was cloned into the pMDC83-GFP vector by the gateway method to generate a GFP fusion construct. It was then introduced into the GV2260 Agrobacterium strain and co-infiltrated together with the P19 suppressor and marker of the cell nucleus into 4-week-old N. benthamiana leaves and co-cultivated for 48 h to 60 h. The GFP signal (excitation at 488 nm and scanning at 561 nm) was observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon, A1, Tokyo, Japan).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The Duncan’s test (p ≤ 0.05) was used for pairwise multiple comparisons. The data analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism version 8 and SPSS 23 software. The error bars in RT-qPCR and physiological parameter figures show the standard deviation of three biological or technical replicates, as indicated in the legends.

3. Results

3.1. PvARL1 Responses to Alkaline Stress

To explore whether the PvARL1 gene responds to alkaline stress, three-leaf switchgrass seedlings were treated under alkali conditions from a two-day time course. The shoots and roots were harvested, respectively, at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h for transcripts detection. The RT-qPCR analysis results showed that transcripts of PvARL1 in the shoots were upregulated at 3 h and then peaked at 12 h with a 1.6-fold increase compared with the nontreatment (Figure 1A). The expression of PvARL1 in the roots under alkaline stress was also induced, which was significantly elevated after 3 h and reached a peak after 6 h with about 2.7 folds of the expression in the control (Figure 1B). The expression levels of PvARL1 in both shoots and roots were weaker after the peak and then disappeared after 24 h of alkaline treatment (Figure 1A,B). In summary, PvARL1 could respond fast in both shoots and roots under alkaline stress, indicating that PvARL1 is involved in the alkaline response of switchgrass.

3.2. Expression Pattern and Subcellular Location of PvARL1

To investigate the expression pattern of PvARL1, tissues at different developmental stages were collected for transcriptional detection. The RT-qPCR results showed that PvARL1 was expressed in all tested tissues, including the leaves, stems, roots, panicles, flowers, and tillers (Figure 1C). Moreover, PvARL1 was expressed not only in the vegetative stages (E0, E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5) [21] but also in the reproductive stages (R1 and R2), with the highest expression level at the R1 stage (Figure 1D), the early reproductive stage, indicating that PvARL1 might respond to alkaline stress at both vegetative and reproductive stages and have a stronger response at early reproductive stage.
To determine the subcellular localization of PvARL1, we constructed PvARL1-fused GFP at the C-terminus driven by the 35S promoter. The corrected construct was infiltrated with a nucleus localized marker mRFP-AHL22 into N. benthamiana leaves for fluorescent detection. Similar to the GFP control, the PvARL1-GFP fusion protein localized to the cytoplasm and nucleus (Figure 1E).

3.3. PvARL1 Positively Regulates Plant Growth

To explore the function of PvARL1, we constructed PvARL1 driven by the Ubiquitin promoter to generate overexpression lines (PvARL1-OE). A total of 12 independent lines were obtained with higher transcripts compared with the control, and 3 out of 12 lines were used for further study (Figure S1A). We first examined the growth traits related to the biomass yield. Two independent PvARL1-OE lines #6 and #10 showed a significant increase in plant height and dry biomass (Figure 2A–F) and produced significantly longer leaves, while no significant changes or clear trends were found in the leaf width (Figure 2H,I). Except for plant height and biomass, only overexpression line #6 exhibited significantly more tillers compared with the controls (Figure 2G). In addition to the significant changes according to statistics, it showed a clear trend of an increase in stem diameters of the PvARL1-OE lines (Figure 2J).
PvARL1 RNA-interfered (PvARL1-RNAi) switchgrass lines were also generated for further study. Nine independent transformants with downregulation transcripts were obtained (Figure S1B), and three out of nine PvARL1-RNAi lines (#5, #7, #10) were selected for phenotyping compared with a non-transformant. Under normal growth conditions, the plant height and biomass were significantly shorter and less compared with the NT control (Figure 3A–F). Also, the tillers of PvARL1-RNAi #5 and #7 exhibited fewer than the control tillers (Figure 3G). Additionally, no significant changes or clear trends were found in leaf length or width (Figure 3H,I). The stem diameters showed a reduced trend in PvARL1-RNAi, although no significant changes occurred according to the statistics (Figure 3J). Taken together, the plant height and dry weight in the PvARL1-OE lines were significantly higher but were lower in RNAi plants than in each control, indicating that PvARL1 likely promoted switchgrass growth and development by increasing plant height, leading to higher biomass.

3.4. PvARL1 Alleviates Leaf Damage under Alkali Conditions

The quick response of PvARL1 to alkali in Figure 1 led us to investigate the phenotypes of transformants in detail under alkali treatment. Firstly, we conducted a detached leaf assay under alkali stress using the leaves from the PvARL1-OE and EV lines at the vegetative stage of E3. In contrast to the control treatment, the three PvARL1-OE lines all exhibited smaller yellowing areas of treated leaves compared with those of the EVs under alkali stress (Figure S2), suggesting that PvARL1 improved alkali stress tolerance in switchgrass. Next, we further investigated the function of PvARL1 in response to alkali in soil conditions. The EV plants as a control and the PvARL1-OE lines were cultured in soil with or without 150 mM Na+, NaHCO3:Na2CO3 = 9:1 for 14 days. Under control growth conditions, the EV and PvARL1-OE plants grew well and stayed green, although the PvARL1-OE lines displayed a faster growth rate than the EV ones (Figure 4A). After alkali treatment, the difference in plant height between the EV control and the PvARL1-OE lines was more visible. Leaves of EV control plants exhibited visible withered and yellowish leaves compared with the overexpressed lines, indicating that the EV lines suffered from alkali stress more severely than the PvARL1-OE lines (Figure 4B). One typical phenomenon for plant sensitivity to alkaline environments is leaf damage, which is always indexed by the water loss ratio and chlorophyll. Consistent with the appearance, the three PvARL1-OE lines all exhibited higher relative water rates compared with the EV control under alkaline stress (Figure 4C); similarly, Fv/Fm as well as the chlorophyll contents also displayed higher in the PvARL1-OE lines (Figure 4D,E).

3.5. PvARL1 Overexpression Decreases Oxidative Damage after Alkali Treatment

It is well known that abiotic stresses destroy cell membrane integrity, indicated by electrolyte leakage. No differences existed in electrolyte leakage in leaves between the EV and PvARL1-OE transgenic plants under control growth conditions. In contrast, electrolyte leakage was significantly lower in all three PvARL1-OE overexpressed lines than in EV plants after alkali treatment (Figure 4F).
To further investigate whether the overexpression of PvARL1 would decrease oxidative damage under alkali conditions, the quantification of H2O2 content was tested. The accumulation of H2O2 in all three PvARL1-OE leaves was lower than the EV under alkali treatment, whereas no differences under control growth conditions were observed (Figure 4H). In addition, malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration is a valid indicator of cytomembrane oxidative damage in monitoring ROS levels. Under normal conditions, there were no differences in MDA content between the PvARL1-OE and EV transformants. However, the MDA content in the PvARL1-OE lines was lower than that in the EV plants after alkali stress (Figure 4G). In addition, expression levels of the ROS scavengers PvSOD and PvCAT were measured. Under normal conditions, the qPCR analysis showed no differences between the EV and PvARL1-OE lines, whereas the transcripts of PvSOD and PvCAT1 accumulated in the PvARL1 lines under alkali stress conditions (Figure S3). These results suggest that PvARL1 promoted alkaline stress tolerance better because of the capacity to maintain cell membrane stability and accumulate fewer ROS under alkali stress.

3.6. PvARL1 Maintained Ion Homeostasis in Switchgrass

A low cytosolic Na+/K+ ratio in the cytoplasm is necessary for plants to maintain iron homeostasis under salt, salt–alkali, and alkali stresses. To investigate whether PvARL1 plays a role in this process under alkaline stress in switchgrass, we measured Na+ and K+ content and calculated the Na+/K+ ratio in the roots and leaves separately under normal and alkaline conditions. Consistent with the phenotypes, the PvARL1 overexpression lines were more resistant to alkaline stress than the control as they displayed significantly lower Na+ content in their leaves, a higher K+ content in their roots, and a lower Na+/K+ ratio in both their leaves and roots under alkaline stress (Figure 5). We next tested the expression levels of the High-Affinity K+ Transporter PvHAK5 in the PvARL1-OE lines by RT-qPCR. Transcripts of PvHAK5 were significantly higher compared with EV, whereas no difference between the EV and PvARL-OE lines were observed (Figure S4). Those results demonstrated that PvARL1 played a positive role in alkaline tolerance by regulating Na+ and K+ homeostasis under alkaline treatments.

4. Discussion

Small G proteins including Ras-like in the brain (Rab), Rho in plants (Rop), ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf), and Ras-like nuclear (Ran) have been identified and demonstrated to play a role in plant growth and the abiotic stress response [25,26,27]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the overexpression of a Ran family gene AtRAN1 promoted transgenic plants’ vegetative growth and enhanced their tolerance to salt, ABA, and freezing, whereas the atran1 atran3 double mutant exhibited opposite phenotypes [28,29]. Additionally, ectopically expressing maize ZmARF2 in Arabidopsis increased leaf and seed size, thus augmenting overall plant growth [30]. Overexpressing PvARF1, PvARF-B1C, and PvARF-related in switchgrass enhanced biomass by improving tillers, height, and leaf length [19]. ARF family proteins are classified into two subclades: ARFs and ARLs. ARLs have been extensively studied in mammals compared with plants, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of the gene functions in plants. Similar to ARFs, we found that the overexpression of PvARL1 increased plant height and dry weight, indicating the conserved roles of small G protein family members during plant growth and development.
In this study, PvARL1 was significantly induced in both shoots and roots under alkali stress (Figure 1), and the PvARL1 overexpression lines showed promoted growth in plant height and biomass compared with the control under normal or alkali conditions (Figure 4A,B). These results strongly suggest that alkali-induced PvARL1 plays a critical role in alkali tolerance. In addition, the results in this study mirror the behavior of OsARL1a, which shows upregulation under NaCl, PEG, and ABA stress conditions [31]. However, OsARL1b, OsARL1d, and OsARL1e did not exhibit any changes under abiotic stress conditions [31], indicating diverse functionalities among ARL genes in plants.
One of the key physiological aspects affected by various abiotic stresses, including salt, alkali, and drought, is the relative water content and photosynthetic capacity in plants. Chlorophyll is an important pigment in photosynthesis, reflecting plants’ ability to assimilate substances [32,33]. Fv/Fm is an index of the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII in the dark-adapted state, and a decrease in this parameter is a reliable sign of photoinhibition [34]. Here, we found that the relative water content in the leaves of the PvARL1-OE lines was significantly higher than that in the EV lines under alkali stress (Figure 4C). Under alkali stress conditions, PvARL1-OE switchgrass exhibited higher chlorophyll levels and a greater Fv/Fm ratio compared with the EV plants (Figure 4D,E). This suggests that PvARL1 mitigates the adverse effects of alkali stress on the chlorophyll content and photoinhibition, thereby preserving the higher photosynthetic capacity in the PvARL1-OE lines.
Excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by abiotic stresses leads to oxidative conditions that can disrupt cellular homeostasis, evidenced by increased levels of H2O2 and MDA [35]. It is noteworthy that small GTPases regulate plant responses to abiotic stresses through pathways involving reactive oxygen species, as reported in numerous other plant species. The heterologous expression of Medicago falcata MfARL1 in Arabidopsis enhanced salt tolerance by elevating CAT (catalase) activities and reducing the accumulation of H2O2 and MDA compared with the wild-type under salt stress [18]. In switchgrass, overexpressing PvARF genes enhanced salt tolerance, and the H2O2 content was significantly lower compared with that of the WT, indicating a reduction in oxidative damage caused by stress [19]. Excess production of ROS exerts toxic effects on plant cell metabolism. Nevertheless, plants have evolved multiple antioxidant systems to tightly regulate an appropriate amount of ROS [36]. It has been proven that the overexpression of key antioxidant genes, such as SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASES (SOD) and CATALASE (CAT), effectively improves plant abiotic stress tolerance by increasing ROS scavenging capacity in a variety of plant species [37,38]. In this study, the control plants accumulated higher levels of H2O2 and MDA when exposed to alkali stress (Figure 4G,H). However, the PvARL1-OE transgenic switchgrass exhibited a lower accumulation of H2O2 and MDA content under alkali stress conditions, even equal to the control growth conditions (Figure 4G,H). The ROS-scavenging enzyme genes PvSOD and PvCAT were significantly upregulated in the PvARL1-OE lines compared with that of EVs (Figure S3). These results indicate that the promoted alkali tolerance of the PvARL1 overexpression plants was attributed to their lower ROS content levels.
Additionally, the PvARL1 overexpression lines displayed higher Na+ content in their roots compared with the EVs, yet in the leaves, the Na+ content was significantly lower in the overexpression lines than in the EVs. Those results imply that Na+ could accumulate in the roots, yet the transportation to the leaves is reduced, thus mitigating ion toxicity. Meanwhile, the PvARL1 overexpression lines maintained a higher level of K+ in their roots compared with the EVs, but there was no clear trend in K+ content in the leaves. The PvHAK5 expression level in the PvARL1-OE lines was upregulated compared with the EV control under alkali conditions, which has been reported to enhance K+ uptake in a lower K+ environment [39]. These results imply that the PvARL1 maintenance of a higher level of K+ content in the roots might be attributed to reduced K+ efflux or maintaining a higher selective absorption of K+ under alkali stress, thus playing a crucial role in preserving ion homeostasis. It has been reported that electrolyte leakage primarily corresponds to the efflux of K+, mediated by plasma membrane cation conductance [40]. This aligns with the findings of our study, wherein the PvARL1-OE lines exhibited lower electrolyte leakage compared with the EVs under alkali stress. Collectively, these results highlight the involvement of PvARL1 in plant growth and illustrate how the overexpression of PvARL1 enhances alkali tolerance in switchgrass.

5. Conclusions

In this study, PvARL1 exhibited induction in both shoot and root tissues in response to alkali stress, and the overexpression of PvARL1 notably enhanced alkali tolerance in switchgrass. Physiologically, the improved alkali tolerance observed in PvARL1-overexpressing lines can be attributed to the maintenance of water content and photosynthetic stability in switchgrass. Additionally, these lines showed a reduced accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), maintained cell membrane integrity, and exhibited decreased K+ efflux or uptake in the roots, potentially alleviating ion toxicity under alkali stress. Our research also revealed that the PvARL1 gene contributes to enhanced plant growth and increased biomass yield under normal conditions.
Moving forward, our future investigations will delve deeper into uncovering the regulatory mechanisms of PvARL1 in switchgrass under alkali stress. Understanding the mechanisms holds significant promise for utilizing switchgrass as a valuable resource in salt–alkali soil applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13050566/s1, Figure S1: Relative expression of PvARL1 in PvARL1-OE and PvARL1-RNAi transgenic switchgrass. Figure S2: Phenotypes analysis of detached leaves of PvARL1-OE under alkali stress. Figure S3: Relative expression of PvSOD (A) and PvCAT (B) in PvARL1-OE transgenic switchgrass. Figure S4. Relative expression of PvHAK5 in PvARL1-OE transgenic switchgrass. Table S1: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G., X.B. and Y.Z.; data curation, X.L., C.G. and T.W.; formal analysis, X.L.; funding acquisition, Y.Z.; methodology, H.L., T.W., M.L. and D.Z.; project administration, Y.Z.; software, H.L. and M.L.; writing—original draft, X.L.; writing—review and editing, X.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Provincial school cooperation project (2022JBGS0016-03) and the China Agricultural University-Aksu region, agricultural science and technology innovation project.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the figures and tables provided in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Yu, F.; Xie, P.; Sun, S.; Qiao, X.; Tang, S.; Chen, C.; Yang, S.; Mei, C.; Yang, D.; et al. A Gγ protein regulates alkaline sensitivity in crops. Science 2023, 379, eade8416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Caon, L.; Forlano, N.; Cori Keene, M.S.; Sorokin, A.; Verbeke, I.; Ward, C. Status of the World’s Soil Resources; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2015; pp. 1–650. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, Y.; Guo, Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, X.; Ma, L.; Zhang, C.; Yan, H.; Bao, J.; Gong, M.; Wang, W.; Li, S.; Ma, S.; Chen, B. Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) responses to salt stress and alkali stress: Transcriptional and metabolic profiling. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, X.; Xu, Y.; He, G.; He, K.; Xiao, L.; Hu, R.; Li, S. Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of the GRAS gene family in salt and alkali stresses in Miscanthus sinensis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, P.; Dai, S.-Y.; Yong, L.-T.; Zhou, B.-H.; Wang, N.; Dong, Y.-Y.; Liu, W.-C.; Wang, F.-W.; Yang, H.-Y.; Li, X.-W. A Soybean Sucrose Non-Fermenting Protein Kinase 1 Gene, GmSNF1, positively regulates plant response to salt and salt–alkali stress in transgenic plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. An, Y.; Yang, X.X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Du, B.; Yao, L.; Li, X.T.; Guo, C. Alfalfa MsCBL4 enhances calcium metabolism but not sodium transport in transgenic tobacco under salt and saline-alkali stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ketehouli, T.; Zhou, Y.G.; Dai, S.Y.; Carther, K.F.I.; Sun, D.Q.; Li, Y.; Nguyen, Q.V.H.; Xu, H.; Wang, F.W.; Liu, W.C.; et al. A soybean calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase, GmPKS4, regulates plant responses to salt and alkali stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 256, 153331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, P.; Bai, X.; Yang, L.; Lv, D.; Pan, X.; Li, Y.; Cai, H.; Ji, W.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, Y. Osa-MIR393: A salinity- and alkaline stress-related microRNA gene. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 38, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, R.; Yang, Z.; Li, F.; Yan, C.; Zhong, X.; Liu, Q.; Xia, X.; Li, H.; Zhao, L. Comparative metabolic responses and adaptive strategies of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to salt and alkali stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kahn, R.A.; Gilman, A.G. The protein cofactor necessary for ADP-ribosylation of Gs by cholera toxin is itself a GTP binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 7906–7911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Takeuchi, M.; Ueda, T.; Yahara, N.; Nakano, A. Arf1 GTPase plays roles in the protein traffic between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus in tobacco and Arabidopsis cultured cells. Plant J. 2002, 31, 499–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. D’Souza-Schorey, C.; Chavrier, P. ARF proteins: Roles in membrane traffic and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, M.K.; Jürgens, G. Specificity of plant membrane trafficking—ARFs, regulators and coat proteins. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 80, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bourne, H.R.; Sanders, D.A.; McCormick, F. The GTPase superfamily: Conserved structure and molecular mechanism. Nature 1991, 349, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Kelly, W.G.; Logsdon, J.M., Jr.; Schurko, A.M.; Harfe, B.D.; Hill-Harfe, K.L.; Kahn, R.A. Functional genomic analysis of the ADP-ribosylation factor family of GTPases: Phylogeny among diverse eukaryotes and function in C. elegans. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1834–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shen, X.; Chen, R.; Chen, X.; Munir, N.; Zhang, S.; Xu, X.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; et al. Molecular evolution and expression analysis of ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) from longan embryogenic callus. Gene 2021, 777, 145461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, T.-Z.; Xia, X.-Z.; Zhao, M.-G.; Tian, Q.-Y.; Zhang, W.-H. Expression of a Medicago falcata small GTPase gene, MfARL1 enhanced tolerance to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 63, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guan, C.; Li, X.; Tian, D.-Y.; Liu, H.-Y.; Cen, H.-F.; Tadege, M.; Zhang, Y.-W. ADP-ribosylation factors improve biomass yield and salinity tolerance in transgenic switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1623–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.R.; Cen, H.F.; Yan, J.P.; Zhang, Y.W.; Zhang, W.J. Inside out: High-efficiency plant regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of upland and lowland switchgrass cultivars. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1099–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hardin, C.F.; Fu, C.; Hisano, H.; Xiao, X.; Shen, H.; Stewart, C.N., Jr.; Parrott, W.; Dixon, R.A.; Wang, Z.-Y. Standardization of Switchgrass Sample Collection for Cell Wall and Biomass Trait Analysis. Bioenergy Res. 2013, 6, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Yan, J.; Wang, K.; Luo, H.; Zhang, W. MiR319-mediated ethylene biosynthesis, signalling and salt stress response in switchgrass. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 2370–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Munns, R.; Wallace, P.A.; Teakle, N.L.; Colmer, T.D. Measuring soluble ion concentrations (Na+, K+, Cl) in salt-treated plants. Plant Stress Toler. Methods Protoc. 2010, 639, 371–382. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Z.; Baldwin, C.M.; Hu, Q.; Liu, H.; Luo, H. Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis H+ plus-pyrophosphatase enhances salt tolerance in transgenic creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 272–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wennerberg, K.; Rossman, K.L.; Der, C.J. The Ras superfamily at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 843–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Reiner, D.J.; Lundquist, E.A. Small GTPases. WormBook 2018, 2018, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ganotra, J.; Sharma, B.; Biswal, B.; Bhardwaj, D.; Tuteja, N. Emerging role of small GTPases and their interactome in plants to combat abiotic and biotic stress. Protoplasma 2022, 260, 1007–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, K.; Xu, P.; Zang, A.; Chen, H.; Cai, W. The small G protein AtRAN1 regulates vegetative growth and stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154787. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, P.; Ma, W.; Liu, J.; Hu, J.; Cai, W. Overexpression of a small GTP-binding protein Ran1 in Arabidopsis leads to promoted elongation growth and enhanced disease resistance against P. syringae DC3000. Plant J. 2021, 108, 977–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Q.; Xue, X.; Li, Y.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Q.; Deng, F.; Ma, Z.; Qiao, D.; Hu, C.; et al. A maize ADP-ribosylation factor ZmArf2 increases organ and seed size by promoting cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 156, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Muthamilarasan, M.; Mangu, V.R.; Zandkarimi, H.; Prasad, M.; Baisakh, N. Structure, organization and evolution of ADP-ribosylation factors in rice and foxtail millet, and their expression in rice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pellegrini, E.; Francini, A.; Lorenzini, G.; Nali, C. PSII photochemistry and carboxylation efficiency in Liriodendron tulipifera under ozone exposure. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 70, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, H.; Liu, B.; Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, S.; Wang, J.; Tan, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. LpNAC6 reversely regulates the alkali tolerance and drought tolerance of Lilium pumilum. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 270, 153635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gong, B.; Li, X.; VandenLangenberg, K.M.; Wen, D.; Sun, S.; Wei, M.; Li, Y.; Yang, F.; Shi, Q.; Wang, X. Overexpression of S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase increased tomato tolerance to alkali stress through polyamine metabolism. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 694–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, G.; Zhang, S.; Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Kong, F.; Meng, Q. A stress-associated NAC transcription factor (SlNAC35) from tomato plays a positive role in biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 158, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: A re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1056–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Barba-Espin, G.; Antonio Hernandez, J. Elucidating hormonal/ROS networks during seed germination: Insights and perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 1491–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, J.; Yang, J.; Duan, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, P. Increased expression of native cytosolic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase improves tolerance to oxidative and chilling stresses in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brauer, E.K.; Ahsan, N.; Dale, R.; Kato, N.; Coluccio, A.E.; Pineros, M.A.; Kochian, L.V.; Thelen, J.J.; Popescu, S.C. The Raf-like Kinase ILK1 and the High Affinity K+ Transporter HAK5 are required for innate immunity and abiotic stress response. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1470–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bajji, M.; Kinet, J.M.; Lutts, S. Osmotic and ionic effects of NaCl on germination, early seedling growth and ion content of Atriplex halimus (Chenopodiaceae). Can. J. Bot. 2002, 80, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression patterns of PvARL1 and subcellular localization. (A,B): Expression levels of PvARL1 transcripts in shoots (A) and roots (B) under a series time-course of alkali treatment. Fourteen-day-old “Alamo” seedlings were transferred to 1/4 Hoagland solution with or without 150 mM Na+, NaHCO3:Na2CO3 = 9:1 from 3 h to 48 h. Data are the means of three biological replicates (±SD). Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan analysis by SPSS 23 software. (C,D): Expression patterns of PvARL1 in different tissues (C) and leaves at different development stages (D). E0–E5, the youngest leaf of plants at the 5-elongation vegetative stage; R1–R2 indicate the flag leaf at different reproductive stages (Hardin et al., 2013) [21]. (E): Subcellular localization of PvARL1. Nuclear protein AHL22 was used as a nuclear localization marker. Bars = 50 µm.
Figure 1. Expression patterns of PvARL1 and subcellular localization. (A,B): Expression levels of PvARL1 transcripts in shoots (A) and roots (B) under a series time-course of alkali treatment. Fourteen-day-old “Alamo” seedlings were transferred to 1/4 Hoagland solution with or without 150 mM Na+, NaHCO3:Na2CO3 = 9:1 from 3 h to 48 h. Data are the means of three biological replicates (±SD). Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan analysis by SPSS 23 software. (C,D): Expression patterns of PvARL1 in different tissues (C) and leaves at different development stages (D). E0–E5, the youngest leaf of plants at the 5-elongation vegetative stage; R1–R2 indicate the flag leaf at different reproductive stages (Hardin et al., 2013) [21]. (E): Subcellular localization of PvARL1. Nuclear protein AHL22 was used as a nuclear localization marker. Bars = 50 µm.
Plants 13 00566 g001
Figure 2. Phenotypes of overexpressing PvARL1 transgenic switchgrass lines. (AD): Phenotypes of the R3-stage empty vector (EV) and three independent transgenic lines overexpressing PvARL1. Bars = 15 cm. (EJ): Total aboveground dry weight of the R3 stage (E), plant height of the R3 stage (F), tillers (G), length of the third leaf from the top (H), width of the third leaf (I), and stem diameter of the second internode from the base (J). Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Figure 2. Phenotypes of overexpressing PvARL1 transgenic switchgrass lines. (AD): Phenotypes of the R3-stage empty vector (EV) and three independent transgenic lines overexpressing PvARL1. Bars = 15 cm. (EJ): Total aboveground dry weight of the R3 stage (E), plant height of the R3 stage (F), tillers (G), length of the third leaf from the top (H), width of the third leaf (I), and stem diameter of the second internode from the base (J). Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Plants 13 00566 g002
Figure 3. Phenotype and biomass analysis of switchgrass PvARL1-RNAi lines. (AD): Phenotypes of the R3 stage non-transgenic (NT) and three independent transgenic lines PvARL1-RNAi. (EJ): Total aboveground dry weight of the R3 stage (E), plant height of the R3 stage (F), tillers (G), length of the third leaf from the top (H), width of the third leaf (I), and stem diameter of the second internode from the base (J). Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Figure 3. Phenotype and biomass analysis of switchgrass PvARL1-RNAi lines. (AD): Phenotypes of the R3 stage non-transgenic (NT) and three independent transgenic lines PvARL1-RNAi. (EJ): Total aboveground dry weight of the R3 stage (E), plant height of the R3 stage (F), tillers (G), length of the third leaf from the top (H), width of the third leaf (I), and stem diameter of the second internode from the base (J). Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Plants 13 00566 g003
Figure 4. Overexpression PvARL1 improves switchgrass alkaline tolerance. (A,B): Phenotype analysis of PvARL1 overexpression lines under normal conditions in (A) (0 mM Na+ with 1/4 Hoagland solution, pH = 7) and alkaline stress in (B) (150 mM Na+ with 1/4 Hoagland solution, NaHCO3:Na2CO3 = 9:1, pH = 9). E3-stage plants were exposed to normal or alkaline solution for another 14 days. Bars = 15 cm. (CH): Relative leaf content (C), Fv/Fm (D), chlorophyll content (E), electrolyte leakage (F), MDA content (G), and H2O2 content (H) in EV and PvARL1-OE under normal and alkaline condition for 14 days. Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Figure 4. Overexpression PvARL1 improves switchgrass alkaline tolerance. (A,B): Phenotype analysis of PvARL1 overexpression lines under normal conditions in (A) (0 mM Na+ with 1/4 Hoagland solution, pH = 7) and alkaline stress in (B) (150 mM Na+ with 1/4 Hoagland solution, NaHCO3:Na2CO3 = 9:1, pH = 9). E3-stage plants were exposed to normal or alkaline solution for another 14 days. Bars = 15 cm. (CH): Relative leaf content (C), Fv/Fm (D), chlorophyll content (E), electrolyte leakage (F), MDA content (G), and H2O2 content (H) in EV and PvARL1-OE under normal and alkaline condition for 14 days. Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Plants 13 00566 g004
Figure 5. Na+ and K+ uptake of transgenic lines under alkaline stress/under control conditions. (AC): Na+ content (A), K+ content (B), Na+/K+ ratio (C) in leaves after 14 days under alkaline stress/control conditions. (DF): Na+ content (D), K+ content (E), and the Na+/K+ ratio (F) in roots after 14 days under alkaline stress/control conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Figure 5. Na+ and K+ uptake of transgenic lines under alkaline stress/under control conditions. (AC): Na+ content (A), K+ content (B), Na+/K+ ratio (C) in leaves after 14 days under alkaline stress/control conditions. (DF): Na+ content (D), K+ content (E), and the Na+/K+ ratio (F) in roots after 14 days under alkaline stress/control conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences as indicated by Duncan’s test calculated by SPSS 23 software.
Plants 13 00566 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Guan, C.; Liu, H.; Wang, T.; Lin, M.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, Y.; Bi, X. PvARL1 Increases Biomass Yield and Enhances Alkaline Tolerance in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plants 2024, 13, 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050566

AMA Style

Li X, Guan C, Liu H, Wang T, Lin M, Zhou D, Zhang Y, Bi X. PvARL1 Increases Biomass Yield and Enhances Alkaline Tolerance in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plants. 2024; 13(5):566. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xue, Cong Guan, Huayue Liu, Tingting Wang, Mengzhuo Lin, Die Zhou, Yunwei Zhang, and Xiaojing Bi. 2024. "PvARL1 Increases Biomass Yield and Enhances Alkaline Tolerance in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)" Plants 13, no. 5: 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop