Next Article in Journal
Exploring Ocimum basilicum’s Secondary Metabolites: Inhibition and Molecular Docking against Rhynchophorus ferrugineus for Optimal Action
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Gossypium hirsutum Fiber Development in Mutant Materials (xin w 139) Provides New Insights into Cotton Fiber Development
Previous Article in Journal
Climate Change—The Rise of Climate-Resilient Crops
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applications of Virus-Induced Gene Silencing in Cotton
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/plants13040492
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zinc Finger Protein8 (GhZFP8) Regulates the Initiation of Trichomes in Arabidopsis and the Development of Fiber in Cotton

by
Yongchang Liu
1,*,
Xiaomei Ma
2,
Ying Li
1,
Xiaoyu Yang
1 and
Wenhan Cheng
1
1
College of Bioengineering, Jingchu University of Technology, Jingmen 448000, China
2
Cotton Research Institute, Xinjiang Science Academy of Agriculture and Reclaimation, Shihezi 832000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(4), 492; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040492
Submission received: 5 December 2023 / Revised: 1 February 2024 / Accepted: 5 February 2024 / Published: 8 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cotton Genomics, Genetics and Breeding)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cotton is one of the most important natural fibers used in the textile industry worldwide. It is important to identify the key factors involved in cotton fiber development. In this study, zinc finger protein8 (GhZFP8) encoding a C2H2 transcription factor (TF) was cloned from cotton. qPCR showed that the transcripts of GhZFP8 in cotton were detected in the leaves and fibers at 3, 6, and 30 days post-anthesis (DPA), but not in the roots, stems, or flowers. The overexpression of GhZFP8 increased the trichome number on the siliques, leaves, and inflorescence, but inhibited the growth. The expression of trichome development and cell-elongation-related genes decreased obviously in GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 1-Aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid (ACC) contents were much higher in GhZFP8 overexpressors than that found in the wild type, but the gibberellin (GA) content was lower. The interference of GhZFP8 in cotton caused smaller bolls and shorter fibers than that of the control. The results of DNA affinity purification (DAP)-seq showed that GhZFP8 could bind to the promoter, exon, intron, and intergenic region of the target genes, which are involved in photosynthesis, signal transduction, synthesis of biomass, etc. Our findings implied that GhZFP8 processed multiple biological functions and regulated the development of cotton fiber.

1. Introduction

The trichome of Arabidopsis is a typical single-cell structure derived from epidermal cells by cell fate determination, cell specialization, and morphogenesis. The epidermal growth factors expressed in the epidermal cells can activate the expression of the trichome suppressor. The expression of inhibitors determines whether the cells eventually develop into trichomes [1]. In this pathway, there are two kind of regulators, including positive regulators, such as GL1, WER, MYB23, GL3, EGL3, and TTG1, and negative regulators, such as CPC, TRY, ETC1, and TCL1. GL1 and TTG1 can interact with WD40 protein GL3/EGL3 to form a BMW complex. This can activate the expression of GL2 and TTG2 and finally promote the differentiation of epidermal cells into trichomes [2]. However, the positive regulators activated by the BMW complex, such as GL2, TTG2, SIM, and RBR1, can inhibit the expression of some genes related to cell division, such as CYCD3;1 and CYCB1;2, making the cell stop division, enter internal replication, and eventually differentiate into trichomes [3]. Negative regulators can shuttle between cells and compete with GL1 to bind GL3/EGL3, therefore, the complex cannot promote the expression of downstream activators, which results in the failure of epidermal cells to differentiate into trichomes [2].
ZFPs are the largest group of TFs involved in various biological processes, including pollen development [4], shoot development [5], root hair initiation and elongation [6], and the response to abiotic stresses [7], through transcriptional activation or inhibition, binding to RNA, and protein interaction. The conserved cysteine and histidine can combine with a zinc ion to form a finger-like structure and then bind to DNA to inhibit or activate gene expression. Recent studies have shown that C2H2-ZFPs, such as GIS, GIS2, GIS3, and ZFP5/6/8, regulate the development of trichome in Arabidopsis by acting on the BMW complex. ZFP5 can directly regulate the expression of GIS, GIS2, and ZFP8, and then GIS can increase the expression of GL1 and GL3 [8]. The trichome density of ZFP8 and GIS2 RNAi plants was significantly reduced in the flower organs, stems, and leaves [9,10]. GIS3 regulated the initiation of trichomes in Arabidopsis and acted upstream of GIS, GIS2, and ZFP8 [11]. The trichomes of Arabidopsis and cotton fiber are derived from epidermal cells and are non-glandular single cells. In cotton, GhSIZ1, homologous of AtZFP5, was induced by NaCl, PEG6000, and cold treatment, and expressed primarily in the fiber of the early and advanced stage of fiber development [12]. Several GhZFP8 subfamily members have a high expression level of fiber and are regulated by phytohormone [13]. In another paper, GhZFP8 expression showed a high transcription level in the ovules at 0- and 1DPA [14]. Our previous study showed that GhZFP8, encoding a protein sharing 62% amino acid identifying with AtZFP8, was induced by abiotic stress and regulated the response of transgenic Arabidopsis to high salinity and abscisic acid (ABA) [15]. All studies have indicated that ZFPs might localize to the key point of cotton fiber development, especially GhZFP8 and its homologous genes.
In this study, we analyzed the expression pattern of GhZFP8 during the whole process of fiber development and in different cultivars. We also explored its biological function on the trichome initiation in Arabidopsis and the fiber development in cotton. DAP-seq was performed to identify the target genes of GhZFP8. All of the findings suggested that GhZFP8 plays a vital role in the development of cotton through complex pathways.

2. Results

2.1. The Expression Pattern of GhZFP8 in Different Organs

To check the expression pattern of GhZFP8, the total RNA was extracted from different tissues of cotton. qPCR was performed to check the transitional level of GhZFP8. Transcripts of GhZFP8 were detected in the leaves and fibers of 3, 6, and 30 DPA, with the highest level being found in the fibers of 3 DPA (Figure 1a). GUS staining showed that the expression of GUS could be driven by the GhZFP8 promoter in the flowers and leaves of Arabidopsis, especially at the bottom of trichomes (Figure 1b). To investigate the expression of GhZFP8 in different varieties, two cultivars possessing different fiber lengths were selected (Table S1). The expression level of GhZFP8 was much higher in the variety with long fibers (LF) than that found in the variety with short fibers (SF), and also reached the highest level at 3 DPA, then reduced obviously (Figure 1c).

2.2. Correlation of GhZFP8 to the Parameters of Cotton Fiber

In J02 and ZRI015, GhZFP8 was highly expressed in the fibers of 0 and 3 DPA, but was low in the fibers of the other time points, which was consistent with the results shown in Figure 1a,c. The expression of GhZFP8 was much higher in J02, which had longer fibers than ZRI015 (Figure 2a). In order to explore the relationship between GhZFP8 and the development of cotton fiber, the correlation between the GhZFP8 expression and the different parameters of cotton fiber were analyzed. The results showed that there was no significant correlation between GhZFP8 and fiber elongation (FE), micronaire value (MV), fiber length (FL), and fiber strength (FS) (Figure 2b–e). Apart from those four cotton fiber parameters, the correlation between GhZFP8 and FU was most significant, but its correlation coefficient was only −0.12, and the p-value was 0.065 (Figure 2f). GhZFP8 had a high transcriptional level at 0 and 3 DPA, but the cotton fiber used for the correlation analysis was harvested on 15 DPA, when GhZFP8’s expression was very low.

2.3. Subcellular Localization of GhZFP8 in Tobacco Leaves

In order to check the localization, the coding sequence of GhZFP8 was fused with GFP. GhZFP8-GFP-fused genes were expressed and driven by a CaMV35S promoter in tobacco leaves. The results showed that GFP was located in the nuclei and cytoplasm (Figure 3 upper panels), while the fluorescence of GhZFP8-GFP in about 60% of the cells was distributed in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Figure 3 middle panels). In addition, GhZFP8-GFP was also detected in the nucleus in only about 40% of the cells (Figure 3 bottom panels), which could merge with NLS-mKate perfectly. This demonstrated that GhZFP8 was a nuclear-localized and cytoplasm-localized protein.

2.4. Overexpression of GhZFP8 Enhanced Formation of Trichomes

To explore the biological function, an overexpressor Arabidopsis of GhZFP8 driven by a 35S promoter was generated. About 45% of the overexpressors had much more trichomes, but all lines had a smaller plant size than the WT. qPCR was performed to check the transcripts of GhZFP8. The result showed that the transcripts were almost undetectable in the WT, and the relative expression of GhZFP8 in the overexpressor plants was much higher (Figure 4a). The number of trichomes on the flowers and leaves increased, and ectopic trichomes were visible on the silique surfaces (Figure 4b). The WT plants had no trichomes on their silique surfaces, while 25–38 trichomes were observed on the silique of the GhZFP8 overexpressors (Figure 4c). There were 2–3 trichomes on the WT flowers, but more than 20 on the GhZFP8 overexpressors (Figure 4d). Compared to the rosette leaves of the WT (76), the trichome numbers were 92, 99, and 103 for the different overexpressors, respectively (Figure 4e).
In order to explore the molecular mechanisms of the GhZFP8 function in trichome formation, qPCR was performed to check the expression of trichome-development-related genes using a gene-specific primer (Table S2). The results showed that the expression of TRY1-, ETC1-, and TCL1-encoded negative regulators was much lower than that found for the WT (Figure 4f–h). The genes encoding a positive regulator, such as GL1, GL2, GL3, EGL3, TTG1, etc., were also downregulated in the transgenic lines, except for WER1 (Figure S1). Our results showed that GhZFP8 promoted the initiation of trichomes by inhibiting the expression of negative regulators.

2.5. Overexpression of GhZFP8 Inhibited the Growth of Overexpressor Arabidopsis

The overexpression of GhZFP8 also inhibited the growth of overexpressor Arabidopsis. The leaves of the GhZFP8 overexpressors were much shorter than those of WT, which made the overexpressor plants look smaller (Figure 5a,b). To explore the change in plant size, the contents of the phytohormones were measured. The contents of ACC and IAA in all three lines were higher than those in the WT, while the content of GA was lower (Figure 5c–e). qPCR was performed to check the expression of genes related to cell extension. The results showed that the expression of FLA3, AGP11, AGP19, TBL31, and TBL33, which were positively correlated with cell extension, decreased dramatically (Figure 5f). Therefore, we speculated that GhZFP8 might negatively regulate the growth by inhibiting gene expression and changing the hormone content.

2.6. Interference of GhZFP8 Regulated the Growth of Cotton

To explore the function of GhZFP8 in the development of cotton, the expression of GhZFP8 was interfered in upland cotton cultivar JM14, and four GhZFP8 RNAi transgenic plants were generated. qPCR was performed to detect the transcripts of GhZFP8 in RNAi transgenic lines, and the result showed that the transcription was inhibited significantly in all lines, especially in Ri2# and Ri4# (Figure S2). The interference of GhZFP8 caused bad fertility, because the RNAi transgenic lines generated less pollen than JM14, especially in Ri2# and Ri4#, which had almost no pollen (Figure 6a). Meanwhile, Ri1# and Ri3# had smaller bolls and shorter fibers than JM14 (Figure 6a,b).

2.7. Identiffcation of GhZFP8-Binding Region by DAP-seq

It is known that TF can bind to the promoter or other regions of downstream genes, which is helpful to the activation or suppression of their expression. To find out the putative target genes of GhZFP8, DAP-seq was performed using genomics DNA of Jimian14- and GhZFP8-Halo-fused proteins. The results of the sequence showed that 8761 binding regions of GhZFP8 were detected in the whole genome of cotton, but the number of binding peaks was different on each chromosome of cotton (Figure 7a). Compared to the negative control, the distribution of binding peaks was abundant near the transcription start site (TSS), which accounted for 25.50% of the total peaks, while 2.31% of the total peaks were distributed in the intron and exon (Figure 7b,c). To identify the binding motifs of GhZFP8 in cotton, prediction was performed in HOMER (http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/download.html, accessed on 23 September 2023). The result showed that 117 known motifs were found in cotton, in which motif A and motif B existed in more than 50% of total target genes, while 38 de novo motifs were found and existed in less than 3% of the total target genes (Figure 7d, Table S3).

2.8. GhZFP8 Binds to Genes Associated with Cotton Fiber Development

Go and KEGG analyses were employed to explore the mechanism of GhZFP8. The results indicated that the binding-peak-related genes were related in terms of catalytic activity, binding, cell components, metabolic processes, etc., (Figure 8a). Many of the genes were known as important components of photosynthesis, including Gohir. A04G042000 (uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase), Gohir. A06G122200 (FAD-linked oxidase), Gohir. A13G075900 (FAD/NAD-binding protein), Gohir. A04G053130 (NADH ubiquinone oxidoreductase), Gohir. D08G108108 (NADH quinone oxidoreductase), and Gohir. A10G124100 (chlorophyllase hydrolase). Some genes were involved in signal transduction, including Gohir. A01G138600 (calmodulin-binding protein), Gohir. D03G071400 (calcineurin-like phosphoesterase), Gohir. A03G076800 (calcium-ion-binding protein), Gohir. A06G054000 (GTPase-activating protein GYP1), and Gohir. A10G135900 (small GTP-binding protein. GhZFP8 could bind to some genes related to the synthesis of biomass, including Gohir. D04G151200.1 (cellulose-synthase-like protein), Gohir. D11G223300 (acyl-CoA oxidase), Gohir. A11G232000 (very-long-chain enoyl-CoA reductase), Gohir. A11G200216 (trehalose-phosphatase), etc., (Figure 8b,c; Tables S4–S6).

3. Discussion

3.1. GhZFP8 Might Function as a Suppressor in Arabiodosis

The molecular mechanism for regulating the development of trichomes is relatively conservative in plants. In recent years, several homologous genes regulating the formation of trichomes in Arabidopsis were shown to affect the development of trichomes in other plant species [16,17,18]. In this study, the overexpression of GhZFP8 in Arabidopsis increased the number of trichomes in the leaves, flowers, and siliques, similar to the function of AtZFP8, AtGIS, and AtGIS2. As a positive regulator, AtGIS could activate the expression of GL1; however, the targets of AtZFP8 and AtGIS2 have not been identified [9]. A previous study showed that GhZFP8 encodes a C2H2 zinc finger protein containing a DNA-binding motif (QALGGH) and a suppression motif (DLNbox/EAR) in its C-terminus [15]. In GhZFP8 overexpressor plants, not only many positive regulators, including GL1, GL2, GL3, GIS, GIS3, GA1, TTG1, and EGL3, but also some negative key factors, such as TCL1, ETC1, and TRY, were downregulated. In Arabidopsis, the suppression of TCL1, ETC1, and TRY could increase the number of trichomes [19,20]. The increased numbers of trichomes in GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis might result from the inhibition of some negative regulators.
Previous studies have shown that disordering the auxin and ethylene content or the signaling pathway could inhibit the growth and development of Arabidopsis [21,22]. In fact, AtZFP8, AtGIS, JcZFP8, and NbGIS play important roles in regulating trichome formation through the hormone signaling pathway [9,17,18,23]. A previous study indicated that the GhZFP8 subfamily has high expression levels during the early stage of fiber development and were regulated by BR and GA treatment [13]. In GhZFP8 overexpressors, the contents of IAA and ACC were much higher than those found in the WT, but the GA content was lower, which may account for the small plant size of GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis. Compared to the WT, many genes involved in cell wall biogenesis were downregulated, such as FLA3, AGP11, AGP19, MYB103, AGP8, AGP9, FLA3, TBL31, and TBL33. Arabinogalactan proteins are important components of a cell wall and are key factors for cell elongation and reproductive processes. Abnormal expression of AGP genes could inhibit pollen tube growth, pollen development, female gametogenesis, and stem elongation [24,25,26,27]. The interference of FLA3 encoding fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein caused abnormal grains, but its overexpression inhibited the elongation of the stamen filament, reduced female fertility, and led to short siliques in Arabidopsis [28]. Xylan is a heterogeneous polysaccharide in plant cell walls and is the main component of plant hemicellulose. TBL3, TBL31, TBL32, and TBL33 are homologous to ESK1 and have a redundant function in catalyzing 2-O- and 3-O-monoacetylation of xylan. A mutation of TBL3/31 and ESK1, or TBL32/33 and ESK1, could inhibit the growth of Arabidopsis [29,30]. In a word, the overexpression of GhZFP8 inhibited growth by disordering the content of the phytohormone and gene expression.

3.2. GhZFP8 Positively Regulates the Elongation of Cotton Fibers

The expression of GhZFP8 was low in the ovules of the fuzzless-lintless mutant at −1, 0, 1 DPA and in the wild type at −1 DPA, and then remarkably increased in the wild type at 0, 1 DPA [14]. In this study, GhZFP8 had the highest level of fibers at 3 DPA, when cotton fibers begin to initiate and elongate. Meanwhile, the overexpression of GhZFP8 enhanced the initiation of trichomes in Arabidopsis. Many of the key genes involved in trichome development have homologous genes in many plant species and similar biological functions. In cotton, GhMYB1, GaMYB2, GhTTG1, and GhTTG3 regulate the development of the cotton fiber [31,32,33,34]. In this study, the interference of GhZFP8 inhibited the fiber elongation. DAP-seq is an effective technology to identify the target genes of transcription factors in vitro, by which the GhZFP8 recognition sites in the putative target genes were identified in JM14. Previously studies have shown that photosynthesis is closely related to fiber development, and the overexpression or inhibition of some genes involved in photosynthesis could also change the quality or yield of cotton fiber [35]. Meanwhile, many regulators could play an important role in both photosynthesis and the development of cotton fiber at the same time [36,37]. GhZFP8 could bind to many photosynthesis-related genes associated with the biosynthesis of carbohydrates, including glucose and sucrose, which promote the initiation and elongation of fibers.
The development of cotton fiber is regulated by the synthesis or transport of biomass, such as fatty acids, sucrose, cellulose, etc. [38,39,40]. In this study, some GhZFP8-binding genes functioning on biosynthetic processes were identified, such as cellulose synthase, acyl-CoA oxidase, very-long-chain enoyl-CoA reductase, trehalose-phosphatase, etc. Meanwhile, calcium is a secondary signaling molecule, which plays an important role in regulating cotton fiber development [41,42]. Many genes encoding the key components of Ca2+ signal transduction, including calmodulin-binding protein, calcium-binding protein, Ca2+-dependent kinase, etc., were identified as GhZFP8′s putative target genes. Our result has illustrated that GhZFP8 has multiple functions in the development of cotton.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Four cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum) were used in this study, including Xinluzao33, Jinmian11 (J), 14m7-4 (H), and Jiaman14 (JM14). Cotton seeds of Xinluzao33 were sown in soil and grown under normal conditions for about twenty days. After the third true leaf emerged, uniform seedlings were transferred to the nutrient solution for two days. All of the seedlings were harvested for RNA extraction. The cotton seeds were then planted in the field. Their flowers were tagged on the day of anthesis. The fibers were collected on 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30 days post-anthesis (DPA). The flowers were carefully excised from the developing bolls when the plants began to blossom. The leaves, stems, and roots were harvested from 25-day-old seedlings growing in pots filled with soil. The samples were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for total RNA extraction.
Arabidopsis (Col-0) was used for most experiments in this study. For phenotypic analysis, the plants were grown in cycles of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness (22 °C). The number of trichomes on the siliques was monitored by counting all trichomes on the siliques’ surfaces. The total trichome number on the fourth rosette leaf was measured after four weeks of culturing. Trichome production on the sepals was evaluated by counting the trichomes on ten flowers per plant. The leaves were harvested from four-week-old plants for RNA extraction and phytohormone measurement to detect the gene expression and hormone content. SigmaPlot10 (v10.0) was used to draw the bar chart and GraphPad Prism 8 (v8.0.2) was used to analyze the data’s significance.

4.2. Construction of RNAi Vector and Generation of RNAi Transgenic Cotton

To construct the RNAi vector, the sequence of GhZFP8 (Gene accession XM_041111365 and Protein accession XP_040967299) was isolated from the JM14 cDNA using specific primers and then induced into a pBWA(V)HS vector by homologous recombination and seamless cloning of the golden gate. The pBWA(V)HS-GhZFP8 RNAi vector was transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 after sequencing. To generate RNAi transgenic plants, hypocotyls of JM14 were infected with LBA4404 harboring the GhZFP8 RNAi vector. The transgenic cotton plants were characterized by PCR using genomic DNA and specific primers, and then the transcription of GhZFP8 in the transgenic plants was detected by qPCR using cDNA as a template.

4.3. RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR

To check the expression pattern of GhZFP8, total RNA was extracted from the roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and cotton fibers and stored at –80 °C. The cDNA synthesis was performed with M-MLV reverse transcriptase, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was performed to determine the gene expression with the gene-specific primers, and the cotton UBI gene was used as the internal control (Table S1). The qPCR conditions were as follows: pre-incubation at 94 °C for 1 min was followed by 45 cycles of 15 s of denaturing 95 °C, 20 s of annealing at 55 °C, and 30 s of extension at 72 °C. The final step was conducted at 72 °C for 10 min. Quantification was performed using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The means of the three biological experiments were calculated as the expression level, and the expression assay was repeated three times, with each assay being performed with three independent technical repeats.

4.4. Analysis of the Correlation between GhZFP8 and the Development of Cotton Fiber

The cotton fiber of J02 and ZRI015, which generate long and short fibers, respectively [43], were harvested on 0, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 DPA. The RNA-sequence was performed to obtain the transcriptomic data [44]. The cotton fiber of 251NIL was harvested on 15 DPA, and the average values of the fiber length (FL), fiber micronaire value (MV), fiber elongation (FE), fiber strength (FS), and fiber uniformity (FU) were measured. Then, an RNA sequence was performed to obtain the transcriptomic data [45]. The lme function in the R package lme4 was used to calculate the best linear unbiased predictive value (BLUP) of the upper FL, MV, FE, FS, and FU of 251 upland natural cotton populations, which were grown in four different places in two years, and the correlation analysis was conducted with the expression amount of the candidate genes in the 251 populations at 15 DPA.

4.5. Subcellular Localization of GhZFP8

The coding sequence of GhZFP8 was cloned into a pBWA(V)HS-green fluorescent protein (GFP) vector with a homologous recombination and the gold gate method using specific primers (Supplementary Materials Table S1). To decrease the influence of GFP, a linker was inserted between the coding sequence of GhZFP8 and GFP. Then, the pBWA(V)KS-GhZFP8-linker-GFP vector was transferred into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105. The cultures were diluted to OD600 = 1.5 and infiltrated into young tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves. After infiltration, the tobacco plants were cultured for three days to induce the transient expression of the GhZFP8-GFP fusion gene. Then, the cells of the tobacco leaves were observed under a confocal microscope.

4.6. Measurement of Phytohormone in Arabidopsis

The sample preparation and extraction were performed as follows: Approximately 100 mg of frozen plant material samples were extracted in 1 mL of ice-cold, 50% aqueous ACN (VV). The samples were sonicated for 3 min at 4 °C and subsequently extracted using a benchtop laboratory rotator for 30 min at 15 rpm at 4 °C. After centrifugation (10 min, 12,000 rpm, 4 °C), the supernatant was transferred to clean plastic microtubes. All samples were purified using C18 reversed-phase, polymer-based, solid-phase extraction (RP-SPE) cartridges, washed with 1 mL of MeOH and 1 mL of deionized water, and then equilibrated with 50% aqueous ACN (V/Vl). After loading a sample, the cartridge was then rinsed with 1 mL of 30% ACN (V/Vl), and this fraction was collected. After this single step (SPE), the samples were evaporated to dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen and stored at −20 °C until the analysis. For UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS analysis, the samples were dissolved in 200 μL of 30% ACN (V/V) and transferred to insert-equipped vials. The samples were analyzed using an UPLC–Orbitrap-MS system (UPLC, Vanquish; MS, QE). The analytical conditions were as follows: UPLC: column, Waters HSS T3 (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm); column temperature, 40 °C; flow rate, 0.3 mL/min; injection volume, 2 μL; solvent system, water (0.1% Acetic acid) and acetonitrile (0.1% Acetic acid); gradient program, 90:10 V/V at 0 min, 90:10 V/V at 1.0 min, 90:10 V/V at 7.0 min, 90:10 V/V at 7.1 min, and 90:10 V/V at 9.0 min.
The HRMS data were recorded with a Q Exactive hybrid Q–Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with a heated ESI source (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using SIM MS acquisition methods. The ESI source parameters were set as follows: spray voltage, −2.8 kV/3.0 kV; sheath gas pressure, 40 arb; aux gas pressure, 10 arb; sweep gas pressure, 0 arb; capillary temperature, 320 °C; and aux gas heater temperature, 350 °C. The data were acquired with the Q-Exactive using Xcalibur 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and were processed using TraceFinder™ 4.1 Clinical (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quantified data were output into excel format.

4.7. DNA Afffnity Puriffcation Sequencing Analysis

The raw data were saved in Fastq format, and the quality control of the target protein (TF) sample and negative control (Halo) sample was performed using Fastp (version 0.20.1) software, including the removal of connectors, duplicate sequences, and low-quality sequences, to obtain clean data. Afterwards, bowtie2 (version 2.4.2) was used to sequence align clean reads with the specified reference genome and obtain a bam format alignment file. After deduplicating the results from the unique comparison, MACS2 (version 2.2.7.1) was used for peak calling. The obtained bigwig format file was visualized and displayed using IGV software (v1.5). The peak was annotated using R package ChIP seeker. Motif analysis was performed using HOMER (http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/download.html, v4.11.1, accessed on 23 September 2023). For experiments involving two or more experimental groups, the differences between the experimental groups could be analyzed. We used MAnorm software (v1.3.0) for differential analysis on samples without biological duplication. For samples with biological replicates, we used Diffbind software (v3.2.7) for differential analysis.

5. Conclusions

GhZFP8 is a nuclear- and cytoplasm-localized protein that regulates the growth and development of Arabidopsis. Furthermore, the content of phytohormones and the expression of many genes are changed in transgenic Arabidopsis. Interestingly, the interference of GhZFP8 inhibited the expansion of bolls and the elongation of fibers. GhZFP8 could bind to the promoter, exon, intron, and intergenic region of the candidate genes involved in photosynthesis, signal transduction, and synthesis of biomass. All of these findings will aid in understanding the biological function of GhZFP8 on the development of cotton.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13040492/s1, Figure S1: Expression pattern of trichome-related genes in GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis; Figure S2: Transcription level of GhZFP8 in RNAi plants; Table S1: Primers used in this study; Table S2: Fiber parameters of the four cultivars used in this study; Table S3: Analysis of GhZFP8-binding region in the target genes; Table S4: Annotation of binding peak in GhZFP8 target genes; Table S5: GO enrichment analysis of GhZFP8 target genes; Table S6: KEGG enrichment analysis of GhZFP8 target genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. (Yongchang Liu) and X.M.; investigation, Y.L. (Yongchang Liu), Y.L. (Ying Li) and X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. (Yongchang Liu) and Y.L. (Ying Li); writing—review and editing, W.C. and X.M.; supervision, Y.L. (Yongchang Liu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31960439; Scientific Research Project of Jingchu University of Technology, grant number ZD202301; The Opening Project of Hubei Engineering Research Center for Specialty Flowers Biological Breeding, grant number 2023TD004; and the APC was funded by 31960439.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xianpeng Xiong (Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for kindly providing the technological support for the analysis of the correlation between GhZFP8 and the development of cotton fiber.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Larkin, J.C.; Brown, M.L.; Schiefelbein, J. How do cells know what they want to be when they grow up? Lessons from epidermal patterning in Arabidopsis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 403–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhao, M.; Morohashi, K.; Hatlestad, G.; Grotewold, E.; Lloyd, A. The TTG1-bHLH-MYB complex controls trichome cell fate and patterning through direct targeting of regulatory loci. Development 2008, 135, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, C.; Ye, Z. Trichomes as models for studying plant cell differentiation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 1937–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Han, Y.Y.; Zhou, H.Y.; Xu, L.A.; Liu, X.Y.; Fan, S.X.; Cao, J.S. The zinc-finger transcription factor BcMF20 and its orthologs in Cruciferae which are required for pollen development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prigge, M.J.; Wagner, D.R. The arabidopsis serrate gene encodes a zinc-finger protein required for normal shoot development. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1263–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Han, G.; Wei, X.; Dong, X.; Wang, C.; Sui, N.; Guo, J.; Yuan, F.; Gong, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Arabidopsis ZINC FINGER PROTEIN1 Acts Downstream of GL2 to Repress Root Hair Initiation and Elongation by Directly Suppressing bHLH Genes. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 206–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. He, F.; Li, H.G.; Wang, J.J.; Su, Y.; Wang, H.L.; Feng, C.H.; Yang, Y.; Niu, M.X.; Liu, C.; Yin, W.; et al. PeSTZ1, a C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor from Populus euphratica, enhances freezing tolerance through modulation of ROS scavenging by directly regulating PeAPX2. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 2169–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gan, Y.; Kumimoto, R.; Liu, C.; Ratcliffe, O.; Yu, H.; Broun, P. GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS modulates the regulation by gibberellins of epidermal differentiation and shoot maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gan, Y.; Liu, C.; Yu, H.; Broun, P. Integration of cytokinin and gibberellin signalling by Arabidopsis transcription factors GIS, ZFP8 and GIS2 in the regulation of epidermal cell fate. Development 2007, 134, 2073–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, Z.; An, L.; Sun, L.; Zhu, S.; Xi, W.; Broun, P.; Yu, H.; Gan, Y. Zinc finger protein5 is required for the control of trichome initiation by acting upstream of zinc finger protein8 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, L.; Zhang, A.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, A.; Bao, S.; Yu, H.; Gan, Y. GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS3 (GIS3) regulates trichome initiation and development in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, X.Y.; Lin, S.D.; Zhang, T.; Pei, L.L.; Tang, Q.; Liu, F.; Liu, Y.C. Cloning and expression analysis of GhSIZ1, encoding a C2H2 zinc finger protein in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Cotton Sci. 2015, 27, 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  13. He, P.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, P.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ma, Y.; Pang, C.; Yu, J.; Xiao, G. Comprehensive analyses of ZFP gene family and characterization of expression profiles during plant hormone response in cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, R.; Das, J.; Raghavendra, K.P.; Nandeshwar, S.B. Identification and expression pattern analysis of two Gossypium hirsutum zinc finger transcription factors during cotton fiber initiation. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2020, 43, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, Z.H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Cheng, W.H.; Liu, Y.C. A C2H2 zinc finger protein GhZFP8 from cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum) is involved in salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Pak. J. Bot. 2024, 56, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chang, J.; Yu, T.; Yang, Q.; Li, C.; Xiong, C.; Gao, S.; Xie, Q.; Zheng, F.; Li, H.; Tian, Z.; et al. Hair, encoding a single C2H2 zinc-finger protein, regulates multicellular trichome formation in tomato. Plant J. 2018, 96, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Khan, A.R.; Liu, B.; Wu, M.; Huang, L.; Wu, J.; Song, G.; Ni, H.; Ying, H.; et al. NbGIS regulates glandular trichome initiation through GA signaling in tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 98, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shi, X.; Gu, Y.; Dai, T.; Wu, Y.; Wu, P.; Xu, Y.; Chen, F. Regulation of trichome development in tobacco by JcZFP8, a C2H2 zinc finger protein gene from Jatropha curcas L. Gene 2018, 658, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, N.; Yang, L.; Luo, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Cheng, Y.; Tian, H.; Zheng, K.; Cai, L.; Wang, S. Genetic evidence suggests that GIS functions downstream of TCL1 to regulate trichome formation in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Esch, J.J.; Chen, M.A.; Hillestad, M.; Marks, M.D. Comparison of TRY and the closely related At1g01380 gene in controlling Arabidopsis trichome patterning. Plant J. 2004, 40, 860–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Guo, L.; Luo, X.; Li, M.; Joldersma, D.; Plunkert, M.; Liu, Z. Mechanism of fertilizat ion-induced auxin synthesis in the endosperm for seed and fruit development. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, G.; Wang, K.; Huang, B.; Mila, I.; Frasse, P.; Maza, E.; Djari, A.; Hernould, M.; Zouine, M.; Li, Z.; et al. The auxin-responsive transcription factor SlDOF9 regulates inflorescence and flower development in tomato. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Hu, R.; Hua, C.; Ali, I.; Zhang, A.; Liu, B.; Wu, M.; Huang, L.; Gan, Y. AtGIS, a C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factor from Arabidopsis regulates glandular trichome development through GA signaling in tobacco. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 483, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Levitin, B.; Richter, D.; Markovich, I.; Zik, M. Arabinogalactan proteins 6 and 11 are required for stamen and pollen function in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 56, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, J.; Yu, M.; Geng, L.L.; Zhao, J. The fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein gene, FLA3, is involved in microspore development of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 64, 482–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Acosta-Garcia, G.; Vielle-Calzada, J.P. A classical arabinogalactan protein is essential for the initiation of female gametogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2614–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, M.H.; Suzuki, Y.; Chono, M.; Knox, J.P.; Yamaguchi, I. CsAGP1, a gibberellin-responsive gene from cucumber hypocotyls, encodes a classical arabinogalactan protein and is involved in stem elongation. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1450–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Coimbra, S.; Costa, M.; Jones, B.; Mendes, M.A.; Pereira, L.G. Pollen grain development is compromised in Arabidopsis agp6 agp11 null mutants. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3133–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, Y.; Teng, Q.; Zhong, R.; Ye, Z.H. TBL3 and TBL31, Two Arabidopsis DUF231 Domain Proteins, are Required for 3-O-Monoacetylation of Xylan. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, Y.; Teng, Q.; Zhong, R.; Haghighat, M.; Richardson, E.A.; Ye, Z.H. Mutations of Arabidopsis TBL32 and TBL33 Affect Xylan Acetylation and Secondary Wall Deposition. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guan, X.Y.; Li, Q.J.; Shan, C.M.; Wang, S.; Mao, Y.B.; Wang, L.J.; Chen, X.Y. The HD-Zip IV gene GaHOX1 from cotton is a functional homologue of the Arabidopsis GLABRA2. Physiol Plant. 2008, 134, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qin, Y.M.; Zhu, Y.X. How cotton fibers elongate: A tale of linear cell-growth mode. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, S.; Wang, J.W.; Yu, N.; Li, C.H.; Luo, B.; Gou, J.Y.; Wang, L.J.; Chen, X.Y. Control of plant trichome development by a cotton fiber MYB gene. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2323–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Humphries, J.A.; Walker, A.R.; Timmis, J.N.; Orford, S.J. Two WD-repeat genes from cotton are functional homologues of the Arabidopsis thaliana TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 (TTG1) gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Haigler, C.H.; Singh, B.; Zhang, D.; Hwang, S.; Wu, C.; Cai, W.X.; Hozain, M.; Kang, W.; Kiedaisch, B.; Strauss, R.E.; et al. Transgenic cotton over-producing spinach sucrose phosphate synthase showed enhanced leaf sucrose synthesis and improved fiber quality under controlled environmental conditions. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 63, 815–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Hu, W.; Wang, S.; Snider, J.L.; Zhou, Z. Carbohydrate metabolism in the subtending leaf cross-acclimates to waterlogging and elevated temperature stress and influences boll biomass in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Physiol. Plant. 2017, 161, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, J.; Meng, Y.; Lv, F.; Chen, J.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Z. Photosynthetic characteristics of the subtending leaf of cotton boll at different fruiting branch nodes and their relationships with lint yield and fiber quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Ge, X.; Lu, L.; Qin, W.; Qanmber, G.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, F. Brassinosteroids regulate cotton fiber elongation by modulating very-long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 2114–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ahmed, M.; Iqbal, A.; Latif, A.; Din, S.U.; Sarwar, M.B.; Wang, X.; Rao, A.Q.; Husnain, T.; Ali Shahid, A. Overexpression of a Sucrose Synthase Gene Indirectly Improves Cotton Fiber Quality Through Sucrose Cleavage. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 476251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wen, X.; Zhai, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, G.; Wang, K.; Zhu, Y. Molecular studies of cellulose synthase supercomplex from cotton fiber reveal its unique biochemical properties. Sci. China Life Sci. 2022, 65, 1776–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, K.; Tu, L.; He, Y.; Deng, J.; Wang, M.; Huang, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X. Interaction between calcium and potassium modulates elongation rate in cotton fiber cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5161–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Cheng, F.; Zhang, S.P.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, X.B. Comparative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals that phosphorylation of sucrose synthase GhSUS2 by Ca2+-dependent protein kinases GhCPK84/93 affects cotton fiber development. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 1836–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, L.; He, S.; Dia, S.; Sun, G.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Pan, Z.; Jia, Y.; Liru, W.; Baoyin, P.; et al. Alien genomic introgressions enhanced fiber strength in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 159, 113028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. He, S.; Sun, G.; Geng, X.; Gong, W.; Dai, P.; Jia, Y.; Shi, W.; Pan, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; et al. The genomic basis of geographic differentiation and fiber improvement in cultivated cotton. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 916–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, Z.; Wang, P.; You, C.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; Yan, F.; Ye, Z.; Shen, C.; Li, B.; Guo, K.; et al. Combined GWAS and eQTL analysis uncovers a genetic regulatory network orchestrating the initiation of secondary cell wall development in cotton. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1738–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 13 00492 g001
Figure 1. Expression pattern of GhZFP8 in different tissue and varieties. (a) Expression pattern of GhZFP8 in different tissues. R: Root; S: Stem; L: Leaf; F: Flower; 3 D, 6 D, 9 D, 12 D, 18 D, 21 D, 24 D, 27 D, and 30 D stand for cotton fiber of 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30 DPA, respectively. (b) The expression of GUS driven by the GhZFP8 promoter in overexpressor Arabidopsis, flower and leaf, Bar = 0.25 cm. (c) The expression pattern of GhZFP8 in the fibers of two cultivars. Here, 0 D, 3 D, 6 D, 9 D, and 15 D stand for cotton fiber of 0, 3, 6, 9, and 15 DPA, respectively. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates.
Figure 1. Expression pattern of GhZFP8 in different tissue and varieties. (a) Expression pattern of GhZFP8 in different tissues. R: Root; S: Stem; L: Leaf; F: Flower; 3 D, 6 D, 9 D, 12 D, 18 D, 21 D, 24 D, 27 D, and 30 D stand for cotton fiber of 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30 DPA, respectively. (b) The expression of GUS driven by the GhZFP8 promoter in overexpressor Arabidopsis, flower and leaf, Bar = 0.25 cm. (c) The expression pattern of GhZFP8 in the fibers of two cultivars. Here, 0 D, 3 D, 6 D, 9 D, and 15 D stand for cotton fiber of 0, 3, 6, 9, and 15 DPA, respectively. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates.
Plants 13 00492 g001
Plants 13 00492 g002
Figure 2. Correlation between GhZFP8 expression and different parameters of cotton fiber. (a) The GhZFP8 expression in the cotton fiber of J02 and ZRI015. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. (b–f) Correlation of GhZFP8 with different parameters of cotton fiber. MV (b), FE (c), FL (d), FS (e), and FU (f) are abbreviations for the fiber’s micronaire value, fiber elongation, fiber strength, and fiber uniformity, respectively.
Figure 2. Correlation between GhZFP8 expression and different parameters of cotton fiber. (a) The GhZFP8 expression in the cotton fiber of J02 and ZRI015. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. (b–f) Correlation of GhZFP8 with different parameters of cotton fiber. MV (b), FE (c), FL (d), FS (e), and FU (f) are abbreviations for the fiber’s micronaire value, fiber elongation, fiber strength, and fiber uniformity, respectively.
Plants 13 00492 g002
Plants 13 00492 g003
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of GhZFP8 in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Confocal section of tobacco leaves expressing GFP (upper panels) and GhZFP8-GFP (middle and bottom panels), respectively, Bar = 20 µm. The green fluorescence was the fluorescence of GFP and GhZFP-GFP; The red fluorescence was the fluorescence of NLS-mkate; The pink fluorescence was the autofluorescence of chloroplast; The yellow fluorescence was the fluorescence of GFP and RED merge.
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of GhZFP8 in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Confocal section of tobacco leaves expressing GFP (upper panels) and GhZFP8-GFP (middle and bottom panels), respectively, Bar = 20 µm. The green fluorescence was the fluorescence of GFP and GhZFP-GFP; The red fluorescence was the fluorescence of NLS-mkate; The pink fluorescence was the autofluorescence of chloroplast; The yellow fluorescence was the fluorescence of GFP and RED merge.
Plants 13 00492 g003
Plants 13 00492 g004
Figure 4. Trichome and gene analysis of GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis. (a) The relative expression of GhZFP8 in overexpressors. (b) Rosette leaf, silique, and bud of WT (left) and GhZFP8 transgenic Arabidopsis (right), Bar = 1 mm. (c–e) The statistical analysis of trichomes on silique (c), sepal (d), rosette leaf (e). (f–h) Expression of TRY1 (f), ETC1 (g) and TCL1 (h) in GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis. RNA was isolated from the leaves of 21-day-old plants, and qRT-PCR was performed to check the expression of genes involved in trichome development. The expression of ACTIN2 was used as a reference gene. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. Significant differences compared with WT (one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Trichome and gene analysis of GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis. (a) The relative expression of GhZFP8 in overexpressors. (b) Rosette leaf, silique, and bud of WT (left) and GhZFP8 transgenic Arabidopsis (right), Bar = 1 mm. (c–e) The statistical analysis of trichomes on silique (c), sepal (d), rosette leaf (e). (f–h) Expression of TRY1 (f), ETC1 (g) and TCL1 (h) in GhZFP8 overexpressor Arabidopsis. RNA was isolated from the leaves of 21-day-old plants, and qRT-PCR was performed to check the expression of genes involved in trichome development. The expression of ACTIN2 was used as a reference gene. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. Significant differences compared with WT (one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Plants 13 00492 g004
Plants 13 00492 g005
Figure 5. Overexpression of GhZFP8 inhibited the growth of overexpressor Arabidopsis. (a) Phenotype of the overexpressor plant of GhZFP8, Bar = 1 cm. (b) Statistical analysis of the length of the fifth leaf. (c–e) The content of ACC (c), IAA (d), and GA (e) in the GhZFP8 overexpressor and WT. (f) The expression of genes related to cell extension in the transgenic line and WT. Significant differences compared with WT (one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ns, not significant.
Figure 5. Overexpression of GhZFP8 inhibited the growth of overexpressor Arabidopsis. (a) Phenotype of the overexpressor plant of GhZFP8, Bar = 1 cm. (b) Statistical analysis of the length of the fifth leaf. (c–e) The content of ACC (c), IAA (d), and GA (e) in the GhZFP8 overexpressor and WT. (f) The expression of genes related to cell extension in the transgenic line and WT. Significant differences compared with WT (one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ns, not significant.
Plants 13 00492 g005
Plants 13 00492 g006
Figure 6. Phenotype of GhZFP8 RNAi transgenic cotton and JM14. (a) Phenotype of flowers, bolls, and fibers of GhZFP8 and JM14, Bar = 1 cm. (b) Statistical analysis of the length of bolls. (c) Statistical analysis of the length of fibers, n ≥ 12. Significant differences compared with WT (one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Phenotype of GhZFP8 RNAi transgenic cotton and JM14. (a) Phenotype of flowers, bolls, and fibers of GhZFP8 and JM14, Bar = 1 cm. (b) Statistical analysis of the length of bolls. (c) Statistical analysis of the length of fibers, n ≥ 12. Significant differences compared with WT (one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Plants 13 00492 g006
Plants 13 00492 g007
Figure 7. DAP-seq analysis of cotton GhZFP8. (a) The distribution of reads on the cotton genome. In order, from outside to inside, the outermost circle is the genome length scale, measured in kilobytes. The other circles represent the distribution histograms of reads on the positive and negative strands of the genome in samples of GhZFP8-negative (Orange) and GhZFP8-DAP (Blue), with the innermost red showing the gene distribution. (b) Statistics of distribution regions of peaks on gene functional elements. The promoter represents the region of 0–3 Kb upstream of the transcription start site (TSS). “Others” represents the locations of binding sites in 3′UTR (0.01%) and 5′UTR (0.34%), 300 bp downstream of TSS (1.23%). (c) Distribution map of peaks in the 3-kb region upstream and downstream of TSS. The horizontal axis represents position information, while the vertical axis represents the standardized signal value (CPM value). (d) Conservative motif found in the putative target genes of GhZFP8.
Figure 7. DAP-seq analysis of cotton GhZFP8. (a) The distribution of reads on the cotton genome. In order, from outside to inside, the outermost circle is the genome length scale, measured in kilobytes. The other circles represent the distribution histograms of reads on the positive and negative strands of the genome in samples of GhZFP8-negative (Orange) and GhZFP8-DAP (Blue), with the innermost red showing the gene distribution. (b) Statistics of distribution regions of peaks on gene functional elements. The promoter represents the region of 0–3 Kb upstream of the transcription start site (TSS). “Others” represents the locations of binding sites in 3′UTR (0.01%) and 5′UTR (0.34%), 300 bp downstream of TSS (1.23%). (c) Distribution map of peaks in the 3-kb region upstream and downstream of TSS. The horizontal axis represents position information, while the vertical axis represents the standardized signal value (CPM value). (d) Conservative motif found in the putative target genes of GhZFP8.
Plants 13 00492 g007
Plants 13 00492 g008
Figure 8. Target genes analysis of GhZFP8 in cotton. (a) GO analysis of GhZFP8 putative target genes. (b) KEGG analysis of GhZFP8 putative target genes. (c) Binding sites in two putative target genes. The horizontal axis represents the position of peaks, and the vertical axis represents standardized signal values (RPGC values). The gray box represents the exon of the gene, and the line represents the intron. The blue color in subfigure represent binding peaks in negative sample, and the red color represent binding peaks in two DAP samples. Arrows represent the predicted binding sites of GhZFP8.
Figure 8. Target genes analysis of GhZFP8 in cotton. (a) GO analysis of GhZFP8 putative target genes. (b) KEGG analysis of GhZFP8 putative target genes. (c) Binding sites in two putative target genes. The horizontal axis represents the position of peaks, and the vertical axis represents standardized signal values (RPGC values). The gray box represents the exon of the gene, and the line represents the intron. The blue color in subfigure represent binding peaks in negative sample, and the red color represent binding peaks in two DAP samples. Arrows represent the predicted binding sites of GhZFP8.
Plants 13 00492 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Cheng, W. Zinc Finger Protein8 (GhZFP8) Regulates the Initiation of Trichomes in Arabidopsis and the Development of Fiber in Cotton. Plants 2024, 13, 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040492

AMA Style

Liu Y, Ma X, Li Y, Yang X, Cheng W. Zinc Finger Protein8 (GhZFP8) Regulates the Initiation of Trichomes in Arabidopsis and the Development of Fiber in Cotton. Plants. 2024; 13(4):492. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yongchang, Xiaomei Ma, Ying Li, Xiaoyu Yang, and Wenhan Cheng. 2024. "Zinc Finger Protein8 (GhZFP8) Regulates the Initiation of Trichomes in Arabidopsis and the Development of Fiber in Cotton" Plants 13, no. 4: 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040492

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop