Next Article in Journal
Straw Retention with Reduced Fertilization Enhances Soil Properties, Crop Yields, and Emergy Sustainability of Wheat–Soybean Rotation
Next Article in Special Issue
Variations in Root Characteristics and Cadmium Accumulation of Different Rice Varieties under Dry Cultivation Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Forest Orchids under Future Climate Scenarios: Habitat Suitability Modelling to Inform Conservation Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Cadmium Stress on Tartary Buckwheat Seedlings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Phytoremediation Potential: A Comprehensive Study of Flora Inventory and Soil Heavy Metal Contents in the Northeastern Mining Districts of Morocco

1
Laboratory for Agricultural Productions Improvement, Biotechnology and Environment (LAPABE), Faculty of Sciences, University Mohammed First, BP-717, Oujda 60000, Morocco
2
University of Orleans, P2E-EA1207, INRAE USC1328, Rue de Chartres, Cedex 2, 45067 Orleans, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(13), 1811; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131811
Submission received: 31 May 2024 / Revised: 22 June 2024 / Accepted: 22 June 2024 / Published: 30 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Plants and Heavy Metals)

Abstract

:
Mining activities produce waste materials and effluents with very high metal concentrations that can negatively impact ecosystems and human health. Consequently, data on soil and plant metal levels are crucial for evaluating pollution severity and formulating soil reclamation strategies, such as phytoremediation. Our research focused on soils and vegetation of a highly contaminated site with potentially toxic metals (Pb, Zn, and Cu) in the Touissit mining districts of eastern Morocco. Vegetation inventory was carried out in three mine tailings of the Touissit mine fields using the “field tower” technique. Here, 91 species belonging to 23 families were inventoried: the most represented families were Poaceae and Asteraceae, and the biological spectrum indicated a predominance of Therophytes (55.12%). From the studied areas, 15 species were selected and collected in triplicate on the tailings and sampled with their corresponding rhizospheric soils, and analyzed for Pb, Zn, and Cu concentrations. Reseda lutea, lotus marocanus, and lotus corniculatus can be considered as hyperaccumulators of Pb, as these plants accumulated more than 1000 mg·kg−1 in their aerial parts. According to TF, these plant species could serve as effective plants for Pb phytoextraction.

1. Introduction

The degradation of terrestrial resources resulting from mining activities presents a serious threat to the environment. It has been estimated that approximately 0.4 × 106 km2 of land worldwide are affected by mining activities [1]. Indeed, extractive activities have significant repercussions on the environment, especially due to the mechanization of operations. Apart from the negative aesthetic impact, abandoned mine sites have poor soils and limited vegetation, and they are generally abiotic, highly susceptible to erosion, and likely to pollute a large surrounding area [2]. Mining activities involving copper, zinc, lead, manganese, and iron, commonly utilized in various industrial applications, have been identified as the primary sources of soil pollution [3]. High concentrations of these heavy metals have consistently been found in soil samples collected from mining sites, underscoring the need for a comprehensive evaluation of their diverse environmental impacts [4]. The contamination of soil by heavy metals due to mining activities poses significant environmental risks, including soil and water pollution, disruption of ecosystems, and the potential release of hazardous materials into the environment [5].
For this reason, it is crucial to restore productivity to affected lands and prepare them for revegetation after mineral extraction. Growing environmental concerns have made post-mining reclamation of degraded land an essential aspect of the entire mining process [6]. Soil remediation methods include physical, chemical, and biological remediation [7,8]. Physical and chemical methods present drawbacks, such as high costs, permanent alteration of soil properties, and secondary pollution [9,10]. Among these restoration approaches, phytoremediation stands out for its cost-effectiveness, environmental sustainability, and economic advantages [11]. Phytoremediation is one of the emerging techniques extensively utilized for soil remediation, aiming to eliminate and/or stabilize pollutants in the environment [12]. Its application extends beyond soil stabilization or pollution mitigation and can also enhance aesthetics [13]. However, a crucial aspect of phytoremediation is the selection of appropriate indigenous plant species that are well suited to the edaphic conditions of the environment, with high tolerance and metal accumulation capacity [14]. Natural succession on mining residues is typically slow, with low species richness and limited colonization remaining unchanged for decades or even centuries. However, mining residues have the ability to collect a unique assemblage of plant species, different from the surrounding vegetation. This species can play a significant role in informing ecological restoration practices [15]. Phytoremediation involves the natural capabilities of plants to absorb, accumulate, and detoxify heavy metals present in soil. Certain plant species, known as hyperaccumulators, possess the unique ability to accumulate high concentrations of metals in their tissues. By strategically cultivating these plants in contaminated areas, they can effectively absorb and sequester metals, reducing soil contamination. Once the plants have absorbed the metals, they can be harvested and removed, thereby eliminating the contaminants from the soil [16]. A variety of plant species are employed in phytoremediation processes to remove heavy metal ions, including Brassica napus, Brassica juncea, Festuca arundinacea, Pinus massoniana, Phragmites australis, Medicago sativa, Lolium perenne, Robinia pseudoacacia, Brassica juncea (Indian mustard), Chrysopogon zizanioides (Vetiver grass), Fern, Sedum alfredii, Chrysopogon zizanioides, and Helianthus annuus [17,18]. Phytoremediation encompasses a range of techniques tailored to different pollutants, such as phytoextraction, phytostabilization, and phytovolatilization [19]. Key factors influencing the effectiveness of phytoextraction include the bioconcentration factor and the translocation factor, which reflect the accumulation and movement of metals within plants, respectively. Enhancements such as chelators and soil conditioners can boost the phytoextraction efficiency by enhancing metal accessibility and mitigating metal toxicity [20].
The Oriental region of Morocco is known for its rich geological structure and is historically associated with the production of lead. The region has been a significant contributor to the national production of lead, with the construction of a foundry in Oued El-Heimer in 1945, located 33 km northeast of Oujda. In 1980, Morocco’s lead production reached 170,000 tons, accounting for 3.5% of the global production. In 1998, the foundry treated 92,666 tons of lead concentrate, with 79% coming from the Touissit, Tighza, and other mines [21]. The abandoned mining sites of Touissit, under the management of the CMT group (Compagnie Minière de Touissit), have been a serious environmental problem since the ore was exhausted in the 1990s, and are represented by the washing waste that forms sand dykes with high concentrations of heavy metals, particularly Pb, resulting in contamination of the region. Some dykes are covered by sterile or non-sterile materials, with or without plantations. Some dykes have been reforested with pine and acacia without prior phytoremediation studies. However, several species present in these sites are known to be hyperaccumulators, such as Hirschfeldia incana and Heydesarum spinosissmum [22]. It is, therefore, necessary to rehabilitate the abandoned mining site on a phytoremediation basis to prevent and control the impacts of the problems mentioned. The aims of this study are to (i) create an inventory of native flora growing naturally on this site and their taxonomy, and (ii) assess heavy metals’ contents in the soils in some dominant plants growing on abandoned Pb/Zn mining sites.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Flora Diversity and Composition

Overall, 91 plants species were found in the Touissit mine tailings, belonging to 29 families (Figure 1), distributed over the 3 stations (TMD1, TMD2, and TMD3). The comparative study of the different surveys at the 3 mines tailings’ dykes showed a difference in composition and richness: floristic richness at the scale of each tailings’ dyke varied, with 78 (belonging to 23 families), 68 (belonging to 22 families), and 71 (belonging to 23 families), respectively, in TMD1, TMD2, and TMD3. Floristic richness remained remarkable compared with other mining sites, where richness and cover are very low. This is the case of the 5 tailing sites in southern China, with a richness of 56 species and a cover of just 3% [15], and the Lefke-Gemikonagi mine site in northern Cyprus, with just 23 species identified [14]. Additionally, 73 species (34 families) were found and mainly herbaceous plants in the wasteland of a pyrite mine in the southwest of Xingwen County, Sichuan Province, China [23]. This diversification of vegetation between tailings’ dykes could be due to the nature of the soil, which would experience varying degrees of contamination depending on the orientations as well as the age of the dykes [24]. The low level of natural colonization on mine waste dykes is mainly due to the difficulty of immigration of adapted species and the extreme physicochemical characteristics of these sites [14].
According to the analysis of the floristic composition (Figure 1a,b), Asteraceae and Poaceae families were the most prominently represented, showing a high percentage of 23.08% (21 species) and 18.68% (17 species), respectively, followed by Fabaceae at 13.04% (12 species), Amaranthaceae at 8.79% (8 species), Convolvulaceae at 4.40% (4 species), and Brassicaceae at 4.40% (4 species). Collectively, these families accounted for 66 species, representing 72.53% of the total recorded species. The remaining families exhibited a notably lower percentage and composition of species. The comparison of the results obtained for each studied station in terms of composition in botanical families and species (Figure 1a,b), taking into account the parameters of dyke reforestation and soil covering, highlighted that the stations richest in botanical families and species were TMD1 and TMD3, with 23 families, while TMD2 had only 22 families. The analysis of botanical families by station (Figure 1a,b) highlighted the existence of two classes of botanical families. First, typical families for each station, as follows: TMD1 station was characterized by Papaveraceae and Solanaceae, while TMD3 station differed by the presence of Anacardiaceae, Fagaceae, Meliaceae, and Simaroubaceae. Second, botanical families that were common to all stations included Amaranthaceae, Apocynaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Caryophylaceae, Geraniaceae, Convolvulaceae, Cupressaceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Pinaceae, Plantaginaceae, Poaceae, Resedaceae, Rhamnaceae, and Rosaceae. The predominant botanical families in the weed flora were practically the same at all the mining dumps (TMD1, TMD2, and TMD3). Their manifestation and specific contribution to the weed flora slightly varied from one station to another. The dominance of these families is explained by their preponderance on the Morocco national scale, by their Mediterranean biogeographical range, and by their ability to adapt to unstable and diverse biotopes [25]. This is due to their high seed productivity and phenology, perfectly adapted to difficult edaphic conditions [26]. The dominance of the Poaceae and Asteraceae families suggests that these species have been able to adapt and tolerate unfavorable edaphic conditions (heavy metal toxicity, lack of nutrients, etc.). Metal tolerance has been demonstrated in numerous vascular plant families worldwide, and the majority of species widespread as metallophytes in the UK belong to three families: Poaceae, Brassicaceae, and Caryophylaceae. Other families, such as Asteraceae, Rosaceae, and Apiaceae, are poorly represented. Indeed, the successful colonization of Poaceae on current Pb/Zn mine tailings may reflect this strong potential for the evolution of metal tolerance [15].
Regarding the Ranaukier life-form of the 91 species (Figure 1c), the vegetation was dominated by Therophytes 55.12% (43 species), Hemicryptophytes 28.20% (22 species), Phanerophytes 21.79% (17 species), Chamephytes 5.49% (5 species), and Geophytes 3.84% (3 species). The general pattern of biological type on the sites was Th > Hem > Pha > Cha > Geo. The composition of the flora in the biological groups (Figure 1c) was relatively similar at all three sites. Figure 1c represents the proportion (%) of each biological type across the three sites (TMD1, TMD2, and TMD3). Similar to previous studies [27], the simple composition of the plants was probably caused by low soil fertility, which limited plant growth [28]. Zhu [29] reported that wasteland vegetation predominantly consists of herbaceous plants, comprising 94.1% of the flora. This observation highlights the survival characteristics of herbs, and with fine and light seeds quantity, easy propagation, and fast germination, herbaceous plants can easily survive in the contaminated areas [29,30]. In addition, herbaceous plants have developed roots, rapid growth rates, and the ability to grow in conditions of infertility, thus enhancing their ability to develop heavy metal tolerance [31].

2.2. Analysis of Freqeuncy and Coverage of Species

Analysis of the relative frequency of species (Table 1) revealed four classes of species:
  • (S) Class IV (Figure 2) (between 60% and 80%) contained 3 species: Bromus mollis, Reseda lutea, and Aristida pungens.
  • Class III (Figure 2) (between 40% and 60%) contained 14 species, including Atractylis caepistosa, Lamarckia aurea, Lomelosia stellata, Agatophora alopecoïdes, Carlina racemosa, Genista hirsuta, Phragmites australis, Astragatlus armatus, and Lotus maroccanus.
  • Class II (between 20% and 40%) comprised 31 species, including Lotus corniculatus, Onopordum macracanthum schrub, Cardaria draba, Chenopodium murale, Genista trispucidata, and Juniperus oxycedrus.
  • Class I (−20%) comprised 49 plant species, including Melia azedarach L. Pistacia lentiscus, Quercus ilex, and Retama monosperma.
The most dominant plant species recovery indices, with D ≥ 200 (Table 1), were found for two plant species in the entire study area, with a maximum cover of D = 462 for Aristida pungens, followed by Bromus mollis with a cover value of D = 331. There were 10 species with D ≥ 100, namely, Acacia cyanophylla, Genista hirsuta, Lotus corniculatus, Lotus maroccanus, Pinus halepensis, Arisitda pungens, Bromus mollis, Hordeum murinum, Lamarckia aurea, and Phragmites australis.
The low level of natural colonization on mine waste dykes is mainly due to the difficulty of immigration of adapted species and the extreme physicochemical characteristics of these sites [14].

2.2.1. Analyses of Species Composition in Different Sites

Analysis of vegetation diversity across various studied sites (Table 2 and Table S1) revealed distinct patterns in species abundance and ecosystem stability.
At the TMD2 site, which contained the highest number of species (17 species with cover rate D ≥ 100), there was a substantial representation in ecological Classes V and III (28 species) and notable species richness (68 species), with the total coverage D = 5050 and sum of frequencies (%) = 2546.1, indicating a diverse and stable ecosystem due to successful revegetation efforts. TMD1, despite being older (24 years) and revegetated earlier with Pinus and Acacia species, displayed slightly lower diversity metrics (11 species > 100 in dominance, 11 species in Classes V and III, and species richness of 78). However, it maintains high diversity considering its smaller area (13.95 ha), with a high sum of coverage (D = 3854) and frequencies (% = 1823). In contrast, TMD3, the youngest site at 16 years, with revegetation starting in 2008 and the largest area (20.49 ha), showed fewer species exceeding 100 in dominance (7 species), lower representation in Classes V and III (10 species), and moderate species richness (71 species). The corresponding sum of coverage (D = 3503) and sum of frequencies (2076.86) were also lower.
The most frequent species in the study area included Reseda lutea, Bromus mollis, and Aristida pungens. Reseda lutea was the most frequent at TMD1, whereas Aristida pungens and Bromus mollis were the most frequent at TMD2, with 84.62% occurrence, followed by Atractylis caepistosa, Astragalus armatus, and Lamarckia aurea at 76.92%. At TMD3, Bromus mollis and Reseda lutea were the most frequent, with a 71.79% occurrence. TMD2 also had the highest number of abundant species (17 species), with Aristida pungens being the most abundant (D = 458). TMD1 followed with 11 abundant species, where Bromus mollis was the most abundant (D = 565). TMD3 had only 7 abundant species, with Aristida pungens remaining the most abundant (D = 835). Blońska et al. [32] found that mining activities can significantly diminish species richness.
However, the implementation of revegetation strategies can enhance both the coverage per hectare and the species count. The higher species richness observed in TMD3 compared to TMD2, despite TMD2 being older and revegetated, may be due to the larger surface area of TMD3. Despite TMD3 having lower cover and frequency of vegetation, its greater area potentially supports more diverse habitats and ecological niches, contributing to increased species diversity.
These findings are consistent with Hendrychová’s study [33], which suggested that species composition within the community is positively influenced by revegetation efforts, contingent upon the age and species composition of the planted vegetation. Implementing vegetation in post-mining revegetation activities offers significant ecological benefits, including expediting ecological succession, providing habitat structure, and facilitating land rehabilitation to mitigate mining-induced environmental damage [34].
The vegetation analysis revealed that the grass Aristida pungens emerged as the dominant species in several age classes of the revegetation process. Aristida pungens, a type of grass, is well-adapted to various ecological niches. It demonstrates the ability to thrive in challenging environments with low soil fertility, such as post-mining sites. This species was abundant across all sites studied, indicating its robust potential for ecological restoration and adaptation to disturbed landscapes. This grass species demonstrates robust growth and adaptation capabilities in harsh environments with low fertility, such as post-mining land [35].
The post-mining reclamation efforts can significantly transform natural forest ecosystems. This transformation, as noted by Holl [36], is indicated by increasing species diversity and richness, along with the colonization of new species, reflecting successful ecological succession and habitat restoration on reclaimed land.

2.2.2. Local Plant Diversity: A Promising Avenue for Sustainable Mining Reclamation (AHC)

Ground Coverage and Frequency Analysis

The relationship between average abundance and relative frequency provides an indication of the importance of a species [37]. Understanding the relationships between species’ frequency, abundance, and their clustering patterns is crucial for conservation efforts. Identifying key species that dominate or stabilize the ecosystem can inform management strategies aimed at preserving biodiversity and restoring disturbed environments, such as mining sites [38]. Thus, the relation between the species’ frequency and abundance was analyzed by PCA (Figure S1). Because of the large number of species, the species were grouped by cluster analysis into three groups (Figure 3). Each group consisted of species with very similar frequency and coverage parameters. To designate the principal species, priority was assigned to the frequency of a given species in its study area, while also considering its abundance [39].
The species of the group “a” were those with moderate frequency and abundance in all sites, and this group contained 48 species (Table S2). The broad range of distances within this group indicated a mix of species with high frequency and abundance. Species with large distances from the centroid (e.g., Genista hirsute and Reseda lutea) were likely to be dominant, suggesting they have adapted well to the mining environment and highlighting their competitive character and adaptability [40].
The group “b” was similar, but with lower frequency and abundance. This group was represented by 41 species. The low variance and small distances to the centroid implied that these species have more uniform frequency and cover rates, reflecting stable populations. These species might occupy more specific niches or be less competitive, indicating a more balanced presence within the site. Their balanced presence within the site indicated that they may be integral to maintaining ecological stability in these environments [38].
The group “c” had a notably higher frequency and abundance and was the most important in terms of species coverage and occurrence. Two species were included in this group, Aristida pungens and Bromus mollis. The significant distances from the centroid for these species indicated their high abundance and frequency, marking them as dominant species. Their dominant presence suggested that these species thrive particularly well under the current environmental conditions, making them ideal candidates for phytoremediation due to their robust growth and ability to establish quickly. Aristida pungens can be effectively used for stabilizing soil due to its robust root system that effectively anchors soil, preventing erosion and promoting stability [41].
Figure 3. Cluster formation using the relative frequency and the cover values of plant species through the Ward D2 method [42]. C1: group 1, C2: group 2, and C3: group 3.
Figure 3. Cluster formation using the relative frequency and the cover values of plant species through the Ward D2 method [42]. C1: group 1, C2: group 2, and C3: group 3.
Plants 13 01811 g003

2.3. Physicochemical Properties of Soil

The main physicochemical characteristics of mine tailings (presented in Table 3) revealed variations among the three sites (TMD1, TMD2, and TMD3). In our study, soils in all samples had neutral to alkaline pH, with values between 7.4 and 7.9. There was no significant difference (p < 0.0001). Similar to previous studies in the same mining area [22,43,44], this alkalinity generally results from the presence of carbonates in the soil. These carbonates can be an important reservoir for soil HMs. Pendias [45] reported that Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn have a particularly high affinity for carbonate [22].
In terms of organic matter content (OM), the Touissit mine tailings generally had a very poor OM content, while TMD1, the oldest dyke with a decade of coverage and reforestation with pine, exhibited a slightly lower organic matter content (0.969%), but not statistically significant. In general, mine tailings have a low organic matter content [46].
The electrical conductivity (EC) of the tailings ranged from 129.2 to 293.9 µs·cm−1, being the highest in TMD3, probably due to the accumulation of salts at this site due to the absence of reforestation of the pond and the low cover rate by plant species. Several studies have shown that reforestation of mine tailings can lead to significant reductions in EC levels over time [47].
The total metal content in the different study sites was variable, ranging from 13,426.2 to 3417.8 mg·kg−1 for Pb, 7559.1 to 1906.4 mg·kg−1 for Zn, and 933.866 to 293.943 mg·kg−1 for Cu indicating the high heterogeneity of these mining wastes across the sites. The variation in ETM concentrations between sites, and even between different areas of the same site, seems to be a characteristic of pollution at mining sites [22]. Studies have consistently reported high concentrations of heavy metals at various mine sites. For example, El Hachimi et al. [48] reported significant contamination in the High Moulouya region of Morocco, with the Mibladen mine containing 10,520 mg Pb kg−1 and 9075 mg Zn kg−1, the Zaida mine containing 5547 mg Pb kg−1 and 7500 mg Zn kg−1, and the Aouli mine containing 2101 mg Pb kg−1 and 3125 mg Zn kg−1.
The bio-extractible (Cacl2) Zn, Cu, and Pb showed low values regarding the values of pseudo-total concentrations. Furthermore, there were no differences between sites, expect for Pb, which showed slightly higher values ranging from 3.663 to 5.129 mg·kg−1. The highest values were in the TMD3 mine dump. Studies suggest that the bioavailability of lead (Pb) in neutral and alkaline sandy soils can be influenced by various factors, including soil properties, such as pH, organic matter content, and cation exchange capacity. Additionally, it should be noted that the availability of heavy metals, such as lead and zinc, is directly influenced by the minerals present in the soil, as well as other variables, such as pH [49]. The presence of specific minerals, such as anglesite, cerussite, and lead oxides, in Pb-contaminated soils and sediments can also reduce the bioavailability of lead [22,50]. Biochar amendment has been found to reduce the availability of Pb in the soil and its uptake in plants [47].
These findings highlight the complex interplay of various factors in determining the bioavailability of lead in neutral and alkaline sandy soils. The majority of abandoned mines are characterized by high levels of soil metal contamination due to anthropogenic activities. This has been supported by various studies, including research on the phytoremediation potential of native plant species in mine soils polluted by metal(loid)s and rare earth elements [51].

2.4. Heavy Metals in Rhizospheric Soils and Native Plants

Among the 15 studied plant species, there was variation in metal toxicity levels (Table 4) in the rhizospheric soil, with the highest concentrations observed in Robinia pseudoacacia for Pb with 29.61 g·kg−1, in Quercus ilex for Zn (20.02 g·kg−1), and in Lotus maroccanus for Cu (0.933 g·kg−1). In contrast, Pistacia lentiscus showed the lowest soil metal concentrations for Pb (2.39 g·kg−1), Zn (2.9 g·kg−1), and Cu (0.8 g·kg−1). Astragalus armatus showed the lowest Zn concentration in soils (1.74 g·kg−1). The metal kinetics in soil depends on factors such as intrinsic metal solubility, binding to soil particles, and soil physicochemical properties [52,53]. Root exudates influence metal dynamics in plants by altering the rhizospheric soil acidity, thereby enhancing pollutant availability to plants [54]. Specifically, variations in exudate effects among the studied plants may depend on root-system-specific development and the specific release of compounds, thereby modifying metal mobility in the soil [54].
Analysis of metal accumulation in plant species showed distinct patterns across Pb, Zn, and Cu accumulation in shoots and roots (Table 4). There were significant differences in heavy metals’ content between plant species (p < 0.0001).
In shoots, the highest concentrations for all tested metals, Pb, Zn, and Cu, were in the aerial parts of Lotus corniculatus, Lotus maroccanus, and Reseda lutea, with 2270, 1480, and 1600 mg·kg−1 for Pb, 840, 1100, and 1060 mg·kg−1 for Zn, and 180.13, 221.32, and 167 mg·kg−1 for Cu, respectively, for the three plant species. These three species were the only plants studied that met the Pb hyperaccumulation criteria, which was 1000 mg·kg−1 for Pb and Cu and 10,000 mg·kg−1 for Zn in aerial parts, according to [55]. Matanzas et al. [51] proposed the use of Lotus corniculatus for phytostabilization of soil contaminated with heavy metals (Pb and As). Furthermore, endophytic bacteria associated with Lotus corniculatus have been studied for their hydrocarbon degradation potential and plant-growth-promoting activity, further highlighting the plants’ potential for phytoremediation [56]. Reseda lutea has been associated with phytoremediation processes, particularly in the context of zinc pollution in soil. Malayeri [57] have reported high zinc concentrations in Reseda lutea plants, indicating its potential for addressing zinc contamination in the environment. Robinia pseudoacacia exhibited the lowest foliar concentration of Pb (49.16 mg·kg−1), although it had the highest rhizhospheric lead concentration. Also had the lowest concentrations of Zn and Cu in shoots, with 72.01 mg·kg−1 of Zn and 7.85 mg·kg−1 of Cu. Robinia pseudoacacia, also known as black locust, has been identified as a potential metal excluder in some studies. This plant species exhibits an excluder phenotype for certain heavy metals, including cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), and lead (Pb). Additionally, Robinia pseudoacacia was found as a good extractor of arsenic (As) and boron (B) from the soil, indicating its ability to accumulate these elements in its leaves [58].
In roots, the lowest values were recorded for Genista hirsuta for all tested metals, with foliar metal concentrations of 152.99, 71.15, and 18.25 mg·kg−1 for Pb, Zn, and Cu, respectively. Anawar [59] reported that Genista hirsuta is not suitable for phytoremediation but may have major importance for the rehabilitation and recovery of the contaminated mining area as a metal excluder. In contrast, Lotus maroccanus accumulated the highest amount of Pb (0.86 g·kg−1) and Cu (139.08 mg·kg−1), while for Zn, Aristida pungens accumulated it in the roots more than the other species, with 1.30 g·kg−1.
However, it is essential to acknowledge that variations in metal accumulation patterns within the same plant species can be attributed to the distinct environmental conditions encompassing climate, soil characteristics, and the overall ecosystem. For instance, the climate in the Touissit region is characterized as semi-arid since it is heavily influenced by the Sahara [60], creating extreme conditions that may lead to varying behaviors within and across species in terms of biomass production and, consequently, metal accumulation. The recognition of indigenous plant species and the assessment of their capacity to tolerate and accumulate heavy metals are acknowledged as effective strategies for rehabilitating polluted environments [61]. Moreover, investigations into the native and prevalent flora thriving in abandoned Pb/Zn mining sites in eastern Morocco have enriched our knowledge of heavy metal tolerance and accumulation, underscoring the promise of phytoremediation [62,63].

2.5. Bioconcentration (BCF), Bioaccumulation Factor (BAC), and Translocation Factor (TF) of the Native Plants and Phytoremediation Potential

Results of TF, BCF, and BAC for Zn, Cu, and Pb are presented in Figure 4 and Table S3. In this study, TF, BCF, and BAC values exhibited variation among plant species and heavy metals. Translocation factors (TF) and bioconcentration factors (BCF) were employed to assess the efficacy of metal accumulation in plants and estimate their potential for phytoextraction and/or phytostabilization [64]. BCF, TF, and BAC were used to estimate the ability of plants to accumulate metals and to determine their phytostabilization and/or phytoextraction potential. The plants could be classified into four classes: high accumulator plants (1.0–10), moderate accumulator plants (0.1–1.0), low accumulator plants (0.01–0.1), and non-accumulator plants (<0.01) [65,66]. If BCF, TF, and BAC > 1, it means that the plant is a phytoextractor, while values of BCF > 1 and TF < 1 are criteria for assessing the phytostabilization potential of plants [44].
The majority of the examined plant species demonstrated TF > 1, indicating their capacity to translocate metals from roots to shoots, thus showcasing their potential for phytoextraction [67]. For the Touissit mine, five species, which were Lotus corniculatus, Lotus maroccanus, Reseda lutea, Chenopodium murale, and Atractylis caespitosa, showed a good ability of phytoremediation of three metals, Pb, Zn, and Cu, with a TF > 1. None of the plant species had a BCF or BAC higher than 1, which is in accordance with the findings of [44].
The highest values for TF were noted in Lotus corniculatus for Pb, Zn, and Cu (respectively, 8.62, 7.26, and 6.8), and Reseda lutea (8.38, 5.80, and 5.40). The species with TF > 1 for at least one metal were Astragalus armatus (Cu: 1.53 and Pb: 2.21), Atractylis caespitosa (Cu: 1.17, Pb: 1.01, and Zn: 1.74), Genista hirsuta (Cu: 1.81 and Zn: 1.39), Lotus corniculatus (Cu: 8.62, Pb: 6.82, and Zn: 7.27), Lotus maroccanus (Cu: 1.58, Pb: 1.72, and Zn: 2.82), Reseda lutea (Cu: 5.41, Pb: 8.38, and Zn: 9.34), and Chenopodium murale (Cu: 1.19, Pb: 1.43, and Zn: 1.31). Astragalus armatus showed potential for phytoextraction of copper with values above 1 and a BAC of Cu: 0.20. Atractylis caespitosa can extract lead and zinc effectively, with a BAC of Pb: 0.12 and Zn: 0.13. Both Lotus corniculatus (BAC for Cu: 0.63, Pb: 0.62, and Zn: 0.69) and Lotus maroccanus (BAC for Cu: 0.27, Pb: 0.23, and Zn: 0.23) demonstrated strong phytoextraction capabilities for Cu, Pb, and Zn, indicated by their high TF values. Reseda lutea, due to its high values of TF for multiple metals, is more suited for phytoextraction due to its low values of BCF (Cu: 0.23, Pb: 0.54, and Zn: 0.34). Conversely, Genista hirsuta (with BCF of Cu: 0.05 and Zn: 0.05) and Chenopodium murale (with BCF of Cu: 0.06, Pb: 0.08, and Zn: 0.05) are not suitable for phytoextraction because of their low values. It should be noted that differences in metals’ accumulation and translocation were not only observed between species but also within each individual species regarding Pb, Zn, and Cu. These variances may be associated with the solubility and complexity of metals in the rhizospheric soil, thereby affecting the plants’ ability to uptake and transport metals within their systems [68,69,70]. Furthermore, the capacity of plants to absorb or adsorb metals in their root systems is a crucial factor, as roots may sometimes limit the transportation of metals into other parts of the plant [71].
Based on the translocation factor (TF) values, we evaluated the phytoremediation potential of various plant species. Table S4 lists the species along with their corresponding phytoremediation strategies for lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu).

2.5.1. Phytoextraction

An ideal candidate for phytoextraction should demonstrate a translocation factor (TF) > 1, indicating efficient movement of heavy metals from roots to shoots. Additionally, it should possess a high capacity to accumulate multiple heavy metals in its above-ground biomass, facilitating effective harvest using conventional agricultural methods. Furthermore, the plant should exhibit robust resistance to infections and adverse growth conditions, commonly found in contaminated environments [72].
From the 15 plants studied, the most important plant species that demonstrated phytoextraction potential were Lotus corniculatus, Lotus maroccanus, Reseda lutea, Atractyis caepitosa, and Chenopodium murale, which demonstrated promising potential for phytoextraction of the tested heavy metals Cu, Pb, and Zn, as indicated by their translocation factor (TF) values exceeding 1. Lotus corniculatus and Lotus maroccanus exhibited significant TF values for these metals, along with high concentrations in their shoots, qualifying them as efficient phytoextractors. Reseda lutea also showed high TF values for Cu (TF = 5.41), Pb (TF = 8.38), and Zn (TF = 5.80).
Additionally, these species accumulated more than 1000 mg·kg−1 of Pb in their aerial parts (Lotus corniculatus (2279.72 mg·kg−1), Lotus maroccanus (1484.51 mg·kg−1), and Reseda lutea (1609.82 mg·kg−1)), surpassing the hyperaccumulation threshold, which makes them good candidates for Pb phytoextraction. According to Nouri et al. [73], Reseda lutea accumulated 1774 mg·kg−1 of Pb in the vicinity of the Ahangaran lead–zinc mine in Hamedan, Iran, surpassing the threshold of 1000 mg·kg−1. Hasnaoui et al. [44] found significant Pb accumulation (±832.4 mg·kg−1) in the aerial parts of Lotus corniculatus at the Touissit mine site, aligning with our finding on the phytoextraction potential of this species.
Also, these species were found dominant and frequent in our study sites. Lotus corniculatus exhibited high cover (D = 112.82). Similarly, Lotus maroccanus showed high cover (D = 110.26) and frequency Class III. Reseda lutea demonstrated moderate to high cover (D = 60.26) and was the most frequent species in our study area (Class IV). These results suggest their high adaptability to these sites.
The Lotus genus species are known for their robust biomass production and deep rooting capabilities, which enhance their capacity to accumulate metals from contaminated soil. Their adaptability to diverse environmental conditions makes them suitable candidates for ecological restoration and phytoremediation efforts, particularly in soils affected by nutrient deficiencies, salinity, drought, or contaminants [74]. L. corniculatus is a cosmopolitan species noted for its ecological plasticity, thriving across diverse environmental gradients. It is prominently employed in ecological restoration efforts targeting soils afflicted by nutrient deficiency, salinity, drought, or contaminants, owing to its robust adaptive traits [75].

2.5.2. Phytostabilization (Metal Excluders)

Plants selected for phytostabilization should demonstrate minimal metal bioaccumulation in above-ground tissues, restricted metal translocation from roots to shoots, dense canopy and root systems, rapid growth, and high tolerance to metal pollutants and adverse environmental conditions. It is advantageous for these species to be indigenous to the region, facilitating straightforward establishment and upkeep in contaminated areas. Examples of suitable plants include those that establish a dense vegetative cover while maintaining the lowest concentrations of metals in their above-ground biomass [72,75].
From our study, several species emerged as potential species that can be used in phytostabilization, with TF values < 1, high concentrations in roots and soil, and with low values in aerial parts (Table 4, Figure 4). Species such as Genista tricuspidata and Pinus halepensis showed a good phytostabilization potential, with TF < 1, higher concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu in the roots, and low values in aerial parts. These species, with their substantial biomass (Genista tricuspidata D = 80.77; Pinus halepensis D = 142.31), can effectively immobilize metals in the root zone, reducing metal mobility and bioavailability in the soil, thereby contributing to the stabilization of contaminated sites [64].
In our study, Aristida pungens emerged as the predominant species for phytostabilization of Pb, Zn, and Cu, characterized by a translocation factor (TF) < 1. This indicates limited metal translocation from roots to shoots, effectively reducing metal bioaccumulation in above-ground tissues. With the highest cover rate (D = 462.82), Aristida pungens is a grass species noted for its dense canopy and extensive root system, essential traits that significantly enhance soil stabilization and erosion control in contaminated environments [41].

2.6. Evaluation of Plants’ Heavy Metal Accumulation (PCA)

The biplot derived from one-half of the principal component analysis (PCA), conducted on metal concentrations in the shoots of the studied plant species (Figure 5a), explained 97.96% of the total variance. The F1 axis, which accounts for 92.09% of the total inertia, signifies the species’ capability to simultaneously accumulate various heavy metals (Pb, Zn, and Cu). It distinguished Reseda lutea, Lotus marrocanus, and Lotus corniculatus, characterized by high concentrations of Cu, Zn, and Pb in their shoots, from the remaining 12 species, which exhibited low concentrations of these metals in their shoots (Figure 5a). These findings are consistent with prior research, suggesting that certain species have developed mechanisms to tolerate and accumulate elevated levels of heavy metals. This capability can be attributed to their distinctive physiological and biochemical properties [68,70]. The F2 axis, accounting for 5.87% of the total inertia, delineates the gradients of Pb, Zn, and Cu concentrations (Figure 5a). It distinguished Arisitida pungens and Lotus corniculatus from the other species. Arisitida pungens showed a strong correlation with Zn concentrations in shoots, whereas Lotus corniculatus exhibited a robust correlation with Pb and Cu. This indicates species-specific uptake and accumulation patterns, possibly attributable to variations in root exudates and metal transport mechanisms [76].
The biplot generated from one-half of the PCA conducted on metal concentrations in the roots of the studied species (Figure 5b) accounted for 92.84% of the total variance. The F1 axis, which represents 67.71% of the total inertia, predominantly explains the species’ capacity to simultaneously accumulate various heavy metals (Figure 5b). Along this axis, Lotus maroccanus and Aristida pungens exhibited a high correlation with Pb, Cu, and Zn, suggesting that these species possess strong accumulation abilities for all studied metals in their roots (Figure 5b). In contrast, the other group, consisting of Pinus halepensis, Atractylis caepitosa, Genista tricuspidata, and Chenopodium murale from another cluster, demonstrated a moderate accumulation of Pb, Zn, and Cu in their roots. The F2 axis (25.13%) for metal accumulation in roots adds another layer of understanding by distinguishing species based on their differential uptake of metals. This axis separates Aristida pungens, which was highly correlated with Zn accumulation, from Lotus maroccanus, which showed a strong correlation with Cu accumulation. These specific correlations suggest that Aristida pungens has a particular affinity for Zn, while Lotus maroccanus is more efficient at accumulating Cu. The species closer to the axis, such as Pinus halepensis and Genista tricuspidata, had lower concentrations of these metals in their roots, indicating weaker accumulation patterns. These differences can be attributed to variations in root morphology, exudate composition, and the presence of specific metal transporters and chelators that influence the bioavailability and uptake of metals [77]. The clusters of plant species identified with PCA were corroborated by a dendrogram obtained through ascending hierarchical classification (AHC; Figure S2).
These findings underscore the importance of species selection in phytoremediation strategies, where the goal is to enhance the removal of heavy metals from contaminated soils [64]. Future research should focus on further elucidating the mechanisms underlying metal uptake and accumulation in these species. Investigating the role of root exudates, mycorrhizal associations, and gene expression profiles related to metal transporters can provide deeper insights into the adaptive strategies of these plants [78]. Additionally, field trials should be conducted to assess the practicality and efficiency of these species in large-scale phytoremediation projects, considering factors such as soil type, metal speciation, and environmental conditions [79].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Description of the Study Site

The study site (Figure 6), located in the Touissit-Bou Beker district, lies in the northeastern portion of the horst range belt, covering an elongated, ENE-trending area spanning 64 square kilometers. It comprises five mines, with four situated in Morocco (Mekta, Beddiane, Touissit, and Bou Beker), and one in neighboring Algeria (El Abed). In this district, lead predominates in the western part, while zinc is more abundant in the eastern region. The Moroccan deposits, falling within a primary envelope of Pb + Zn mineralization established by a cutoff grade of 3% Pb + Zn, exhibit differences from most Mississippi Valley Type (MVT) deposits due to the prevalence of lead over zinc and the elevated concentrations of copper (Cu) at approximately 1% and silver (Ag) at 120 g/t. The Touissit Mining Company operated the Touissit mine from 1974 to 2002, resulting in the production of millions of tons of waste in the form of mill tailings and waste rock [80,81]. The Touissit-Boubker polymetallic district has produced 75 million tons of ores with 5% lead (Pb) and 3% zinc (Zn). This extensive mining operation has resulted in the generation of substantial quantities of both liquid and solid mining waste. The solid waste is currently stored in dykes situated near the city of Touissit. These dykes at the Touissit mine contain remnants of minerals leached by rainwater, raising potential concerns for human health and the nearby environment. Specifically, there are apprehensions regarding soil and water contamination [43,82,83].
The Touissit mining site is located 38 km south of the city of Oujda, and the mine is operated by the CMT Group (Mining Company of Touissit), a company that explores, extracts, and processes non-ferrous ores, namely, lead, zinc, and silver. Our study area is located in Eastern Morocco, which experiences a Mediterranean climate in the northern part of the region, transitioning to a much more arid and continental climate in the south, with a sunnier disposition. Average annual rainfall does not exceed 100 mm, which accounts for the overall scarcity of vegetation cover. The climate in the eastern region of Morocco is of the Mediterranean type, similar to the rest of Morocco. It is characterized by a dry summer of varying duration and a wet winter. Precipitation is low and distributed across three seasons (fall, winter, and spring). Overall, the amounts are not very substantial, and they often occur in the form of sudden showers [22,44,84]. The primary source of pollution in this region primarily comes from washing waste, forming substantial sand dykes. These sands can be readily carried by winds and precipitation in particulate form. It is essential to highlight the existence of numerous residences situated directly at the base of these dykes (Figure 6). Moreover, some of these dykes have been covered with a sterile substrate comprised of residual materials directly originating from the ore extraction activities conducted during the mine’s operation [22,82]. This study focused on three tailing deposits or mine dykes of Touissit mine districts, which differ in age and size (Figure 6). Work has been concentrated on these dykes because of their proximity to the town. The TMD1 dyke represents the oldest dyke in the Touissit region. Although covered for about a decade, it has undergone reforestation with pine and acacia. Dykes TMD3 and TMD2 represent an uncovered dyke and a covered dyke that have been reforested with pine and acacia, respectively (Table 5).

3.2. Sampling

3.2.1. Flora Inventory

Among the various floristic sampling methods currently used, considering the nature of the mining dumps with sparse vegetation, we deemed it useful to employ the field tower survey sampling method [85]. This method considers the high heterogeneity and low density of vegetation distribution in the tailings, which allows for maximum comprehensiveness, enabling the identification of various species by surveying a significantly larger area than the minimum area specified by Braun-Blanquet [86]. This field survey method is the most comprehensive compared to other techniques for conducting vegetation surveys [87]. The method entails systematically traversing the area in various directions until no new species are encountered, which requires extensive coverage [88]. Additionally, as outlined in [85], this approach enables the inclusion of rare species, which hold significant agronomic importance, particularly those with rapid dissemination or those that serve as indicators of specific environmental characteristics [89].
The flora inventory of the tailings took place during the months of May, June, and July, in order to collect specimens during the flowering season, with a total of 39 plots (Figure 7): 13 plots per tailing across the 3 topographic horizons (base, slope, and summit). Each horizon was inventoried in accordance with the four cardinal directions (N, S, E, and W), with one transect for each cardinal direction and topographic horizon. Each transect was represented by one plot, and one plot was added at the summit center of each dump (Figure 7). For each recorded species, an abundance–dominance index was noted, which is represented through the 7-level Braun-Blanquet scale (r, +, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; here, this index was transformed to values for statistical treatment, to 0.5, 2.5, 15, 37.5, 62, 87.5, and 100%, respectively) [90]. The cover coefficient (D) was calculated by dividing the sum of the average percentage cover of species by the total number of phytosociological surveys and multiplying by 100 [91].
Relative frequency (RF) was calculated by dividing the number of hits where the species were recorded by the total number of plots. RF provides information on the rate of occurrence of a species along a transect for each site. The number and proportions of particular species were determined [92]. The proportion of each plant species was determined based on frequency classes (S): V—80–100% of all phytosociological relevés, IV—60–80%, III—40–60%, II—20–40%, and I—0.01–20% [91]. The inventoried plant species were also analyzed according to functional groups. Raunkiaer’s life-form system provides straightforward and effective indicators that characterize the botanical and ecological adaptations as well as habitat preferences of plants. The identified plant species were categorized into five primary life-form groups: Phanerophytes, Chamaephytes, Hemicryptophytes, Geophytes, and Therophytes. Assigning a life-form to each plant species facilitated the assessment of the proportion of different life-forms within the flora at the study sites, known as the biological spectrum. This spectrum is particularly valuable, as it reflects the vegetation structure and, consequently, offers insights into the climatic conditions of the surrounding environment [62]. From each site, three composite samples were randomly sampled for physicochemical analyses of tailings.

3.2.2. Soil and Plant Sample Collection and Pretreatment

To assess the heavy metal content in both soil and plants, a total of 15 native dominant species (Table 6) were randomly collected, comprising 9 herbaceous species and 6 woody plants. These species were collected in triplicate from the tailings, along with their corresponding soil samples [93]. The concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu were analyzed for all samples, resulting in a total of 45 samples from dominant plants. To ensure accurate plant species information, soil samples were collected from the rooting zone (0–20 cm depth) of the plants. For woody species, only aerial parts (shoots) were sampled, along with their corresponding soil. All soil and plant samples were carefully sealed in clean polythene bags for transportation to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the fresh plants underwent meticulous washing with tap water, followed by three rinses with deionized water. Subsequently, the plant samples were oven-dried at 60 °C until a constant weight was achieved. The dried plant tissues were then separated into roots and shoots, milled into a fine powder, and stored in polythene bags for further analyses. The soil samples were air-dried, milled to a particle size less than 2 mm, and stored in polyethylene bags until subjected to analysis [94].

3.3. Chemical Analyses of Soil and Plant Samples

The pH and EC were determined with AFNOR standard NF T01-013. Here, 3 g of each soil sample was immersed in 21 mL of Milli-Q water at room temperature and subjected to agitation for 4 h at 200 rpm. Following filtration, pH and EC were determined using a combined pH–EC meter (Seven Excellence, Mettler-Toledo AG, Urtenen-Schönbühl, Switzerland), standard-calibrated with pH 4.0 and pH 7.0 and a KCl standard solution with an electrical conductivity of 1430 μs·cm−1. Soil organic matter (OM) was calculated using the mass loss percentage after burning, as described in [95]. Bio-extractable concentrations of heavy metals were determined using calcium chloride as a selective extractant at 0.01 M, with a ratio of 1:20 soil extractant, adapted from [96]. The mixtures were shacked for 2 h (50 rpm at room temperature), then centrifuged (10 min at 3000× g). Ultimately, the solution was filtered using Whatman filters, and then 5 mL was acidified with 83 µL of HNO3 for ICP–AOS measurement.
The plants (both shoots and roots) were separated and dried in an oven at 60 °C for 72 h [97]. Subsequently, the plant samples underwent acid digestion in a microwave system: 6 mL of 65% HNO3 and 3 mL of 35% HCl were combined with 0.2 g of plant sample. The mixtures were then heated using a pressurized vacuum microwave system (Multiwave 3000; Anton Paar GmbH, Ostfildern, Germany) with a heating rate of 15 min up to 180 °C, followed by a 15 min resting period at 180 °C and a 15 min cooldown period. After cooling to room temperature, the samples were diluted in 30 mL of ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm) and filtered through a 0.45 μm nitrocellulose filter [98]. Concentrations of Pb, Zn, and Cu were determined using ICP–AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy; ULTIMA 2, HORIBA, San Francisco, CA, USA). The same procedure was employed to assess the metal content in soils.

3.4. Calculation of Phytoremediation Indices

The efficiency of plants in accumulating heavy metals from the soil was determined by calculating the bioaccumulation factor (BAF). Additionally, the translocation factor (TF) was computed to assess the plants’ capacity to translocate heavy metals from roots to shoots. Phytoremediation indices were derived using the following formulas [28]:
BCF = [C]metal plant root/[C]metal soil
TF = [C]metal plant shoot/[C]metal plant root
BAC = [C]metal plant shoot/[C]metal soil
BCF, BAC, and TF are commonly employed to assess the effectiveness of heavy metal accumulation in plants and to estimate their potential for phytoextraction and/or phytostabilization [29,64]

3.5. Identification of Plant Species

The botanical determination of most species was conducted in situ. Unidentified species were preserved in a herbarium and later identified using various botanical determination keys, such as the flora in [99], the practical flora of Morocco [25,100], and the herbarium specimens of ISTA Zraib. In the course of this work, an herbarium was created, comprising a collection of plants found on the mine site.

3.6. Statistics

To estimate significant differences (p < 0.0001) at confidence level of 95%, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test was performed as a parametric test for normal data to assess median comparisons between plant soil characteristics and between plant shoots, roots, and soil. The similarity between species for their cover and frequency was studied using principal component analysis (PCA) and ascending hierarchical classification (AHC). To investigate the relationships between metal concentrations in shoots and roots of the studied plant species, a principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted. For mapping purposes, spatial analysis was conducted using ArcGIS 10.3 Desktop (Esri, 2010), with Google Maps (Google LLC, 2023) serving as the base layer. Data integration, processing, and cartographic design adhered to standard procedures. Statistical calculations were performed using XLSTAT 2023 (XLSTAT Statistical Software for Excel).

4. Conclusions

The comprehensive investigation of the floristic diversity in the Touissit mine tailings revealed a high plant biodiversity, with 91 species belonging to 29 taxonomic families, despite the severe environmental conditions. The prevalence of Asteraceae and Poaceae, along with the dominant presence of species such as Bromus mollis, Reseda lutea, and Aristida pungens, underscored their physiological and ecological adaptability to environments characterized by high heavy metal (Pb, Zn, and Cu) concentrations, and low organic content. Species such as Bromus mollis, Reseda lutea, and Aristida pungens showed robust adaptation and potential for phytoremediation, with high frequencies or cover rates. Among the 15 studied species for heavy metal accumulation, Lotus corniculatus, Lotus maroccanus, Reseda lutea, and Atractylis caepitosa were highlighted as crucial for phytoremediation strategies. They effectively accumulated Pb, Zn, and Cu in their biomass, with Pb levels exceeding 1000 mg·kg−1, suitable for metal extraction from soils. Conversely, Aristida pungens, Genista tricuspidata, and Pinus halepensis had high metal concentrations in roots, offering phytostabilization perspectives.
Research at these sites is now exploring biochar amendment effects on enhancing soil fertility and metal bioavailability and mycorrhizal associations for nutrient uptake to optimize metal tolerance and uptake mechanisms in hyperaccumulators using these species. Implementing these strategies through field trials will advance sustainable phytoremediation solutions for restoring mining-impacted soils and improving ecosystem health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13131811/s1, Table S1: Species composition in different study sites; Figure S1: Principal component analysis (PCA) of the vegetation dataset highlighting the relative frequency and the cover values of plant species. Group (a) Colored in blue species with the lowest values., Group (b) Colored in green species with average values, Group (c) Colored in red species of with the highest values; Table S2. The species groups according Ward method cluster analysis for species (abbreviations of species names are listed in Table 3). Table S3. Bioconcentration Factor (BCF), Translocation Factor (TF), and Biological Accumulation Coefficient (BAC) of the Studied Plant Species.; Figure S2. Dendrogram Derived from Ascending Hierarchical Classification (AHC) of Metal Concentrations in Shoots (a) and Roots (b) of Investigated Plant Species: Species Name Abbreviations are listed in Table 2. C1: group 1, C2: group 2, C3: group 3, C4: group 4, C5: group5; Table S4. Plants phytoremediation strategy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O.; data curation, M.O. and Y.C.; formal analysis, M.O., D.M., S.B. and A.B.; funding acquisition, M.O.; investigation, M.O., Y.C. and D.M.; methodology, M.O., A.B., D.M., S.B. and Y.C.; project administration, A.B.; resources, A.B., M.A. and D.M.; software, M.O., M.S.-V. and Y.C.; supervision, A.B. and M.A.; validation, M.O., Y.C. and A.B.; visualization, M.O., A.B. and D.M.; writing—original draft, M.O., Y.C., A.B., M.A. and D.M.; writing—review and editing, M.O., Y.C., A.B., M.A. and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was carried out as part of the PPR2 N° 9-17 priority project, entitled: “Using microbial and plant biotechnologies to rehabilitate abandoned mining sites (BIOMIVER)”, with support from the Moroccan Ministry of National Education, Vocational Training, Higher Education, and Scientific Research, and CNRST.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hooke, R.L.; Martín Duque, J.F.; de Pedraza Gilsanz, J. Land Transformation by Humans: A Review; Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Le Roux, C. La réhabilitation des mines et carrières à ciel ouvert. Bois For. Trop. 2002, 272, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zheng, J.; Noller, B.; Huynh, T.; Ng, J.; Taga, R.; Diacomanolis, V.; Harris, H. How the population in Mount Isa is living with lead exposure from mining activities. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2021, 8, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wuana, R.A.; Okieimen, F.E. Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2011, 2011, e402647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, T.; Wang, B. Effect and mechanism of nano-alumina on early hydration properties and heavy metals solidification/stabilization of alkali-activated MSWI fly ash solidified body. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sheoran, V.; Sheoran, A.S.; Poonia, P. Soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation: A review. Int. J. Soil Sediment Water 2010, 3, 13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sarwar, N.; Imran, M.; Shaheen, M.R.; Ishaque, W.; Kamran, M.A.; Matloob, A.; Rehim, A.; Hussain, S. Phytoremediation strategies for soils contaminated with heavy metals: Modifications and future perspectives. Chemosphere 2017, 171, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wei, Z.; Gu, H.; Van Le, Q.; Peng, W.; Lam, S.S.; Yang, Y.; Li, C.; Sonne, C. Perspectives on phytoremediation of zinc pollution in air, water and soil. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2021, 24, 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salas-Moreno, M.; Marrugo-Negrete, J. Phytoremediation potential of Cd and Pb-contaminated soils by Paspalum fasciculatum Willd. ex Flüggé. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2020, 22, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xin, J.; Ma, S.; Li, Y.; Zhao, C.; Tian, R. Pontederia cordata, an ornamental aquatic macrophyte with great potential in phytoremediation of heavy-metal-contaminated wetlands. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 111024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Emenike, C.U.; Jayanthi, B.; Agamuthu, P.; Fauziah, S.H. Biotransformation and removal of heavy metals: A review of phytoremediation and microbial remediation assessment on contaminated soil. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Juwarkar, A.A.; Jambhulkar, H.P. Phytoremediation of coal mine spoil dump through integrated biotechnological approach. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4732–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Banerjee, R.; Goswami, P.; Mukherjee, A. Chapter 22—Stabilization of Iron Ore Mine Spoil Dump Sites with Vetiver System A2-Prasad, Majeti Narasimha Vara. In Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation; Favas, P.J.d.C., Maiti, S.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 393–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cetinkaya, G.; Sozen, N. Plant Species Potentially Useful in the Phytostabilization Process for the Abandoned CMC Mining Site in Northern Cyprus. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2011, 13, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shu, W.S.; Ye, Z.H.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Lan, C.Y.; Wong, M.H. Natural colonization of plants on five lead/zinc mine tailings in Southern China. Restor. Ecol. 2005, 13, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hou, J.; Wu, L.; Christie, P.; Liu, W. Microbial community assembly of the hyperaccumulator plant Sedum plumbizincicola in two contrasting soil types with three levels of cadmium contamination. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 863, 160917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Steliga, T.; Kluk, D. Application of Festuca arundinacea in phytoremediation of soils contaminated with Pb, Ni, Cd and petroleum hydrocarbons. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 194, 110409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yadav, R.; Singh, G.; Santal, A.R.; Singh, N.P. Omics approaches in effective selection and generation of potential plants for phytoremediation of heavy metal from contaminated resources. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 336, 117730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bharagava, R.N.; Saxena, G.; Mulla, S.I. Introduction to Industrial Wastes Containing Organic and Inorganic Pollutants and Bioremediation Approaches for Environmental Management. In Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety: Volume I: Industrial Waste and Its Management; Saxena, G., Bharagava, R.N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saxena, G.; Purchase, D.; Mulla, S.I.; Saratale, G.D.; Bharagava, R.N. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Sites: Eco-environmental Concerns, Field Studies, Sustainability Issues, and Future Prospects. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 249; de Voogt, P., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 71–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wadjinny, A. Le District a Plomb-zinc de Touissit: Presentation Gitologique et Synthese des Travaux Realises: Notes et Memoires du Service Geologique. R. Maroc 1997, 388, 151–164. [Google Scholar]
  22. Abdelaziz, S.; Ater, M.; Auguy, F.; Laplaze, L.; El Mzibri, M.; Fatiha, B.; Abdelkarim, F.-M.; Patrick, D. Evaluation de la contamination par les éléments-traces métalliques dans une zone minière du Maroc oriental. Cah. Agric. 2010, 19, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, B.; Peng, H.; Sheng, M.; Luo, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Xu, F.; Xu, H. Evaluation of phytoremediation potential of native dominant plants and spatial distribution of heavy metals in abandoned mining area in Southwest China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 220, 112368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ben Ghaya, A.; Hamrouni, L.; Mastouri, Y.; Hanana, M.; Charles, G. Impacts of toxic metals on vegetation of the Djebel Hallouf mine in the area of Sidi Bouaouane in BouSalem Northwestern Tunisia. Geo Eco Trop 2013, 37, 243–254. [Google Scholar]
  25. Taleb, A.; Maillet, J. Mauvaises herbes des céréales de la Chaouia (Maroc). I. Aspect floristique. Weed Res. 1994, 34, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tanji, A.; Boulet, C.; Hammoumi, M. Inventaire phytoécologique des adventices de la betterave sucrière dans le Gharb (Maroc). Weed Res. 1984, 24, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ater, M.; Hadi, A.; Meerts, P. Vegetation of the Mine Fields Touissite, Boubker and Oued El Heimer and Species with Potential in Phytoremediation. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317329204_Vegetation_of_the_mine_fields_Touissite_Boubker_and_Oued_El_Heimer_and_species_with_potential_in_phytoremediation (accessed on 21 June 2024).
  28. Mohanty, M.; Patra, H.K. Phytoremediation Potential of Paragrass—An In Situ Approach for Chromium Contaminated Soil. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2012, 14, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, G.; Xiao, H.; Guo, Q.; Song, B.; Zheng, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Okoli, C.P. Heavy metal contents and enrichment characteristics of dominant plants in wasteland of the downstream of a lead-zinc mining area in Guangxi, Southwest China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 151, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Karaca, O.; Cameselle, C.; Reddy, K.R. Mine tailing disposal sites: Contamination problems, remedial options and phytocaps for sustainable remediation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 17, 205–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, S.; Liang, S.; Yi, L.; Xu, B.; Cao, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Y. Heavy metal accumulation and phytostabilization potential of dominant plant species growing on manganese mine tailings. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2014, 8, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Błońska, A.; Kompała-Bąba, A.; Sierka, E.; Bierza, W.; Magurno, F.; Besenyei, L.; Ryś, K.; Woźniak, G. Diversity of Vegetation Dominated by Selected Grass Species on Coal-Mine Spoil Heaps in Terms of Reclamation of Post-Industrial Areas. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 20, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hendrychová, M. Reclamation success in post-mining landscapes in the Czech Republic: A review of pedological and biological studies. J. Landsc. Stud. 2008, 1, 63–78. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lugo, A.E. The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. For. Ecol. Manag. 1997, 99, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sarma, K.; Kushwaha, S.P.S.; Singh, K.J. Impact of coal mining on plant diversity and tree population structure in Jaintia Hills district of Meghalaya, North East India. N. Y. Sci. J. 2010, 3, 79–85. [Google Scholar]
  36. Holl, K.D. Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J. Appl. Ecol. 2002, 39, 960–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barralis, G. Méthode d’étude des groupements adventices des cultures annuelles; Application à la Côte d’Or. In Proceedings of the 5th International Colloquium on Weed Ecology and Biology, Dijon, France, 8–10 September 1976. [Google Scholar]
  38. Legendre, P. Legendre. Numerical Ecology with R, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  39. Soufi, Z. Les principales mauvaises herbes des vergers dans la région maritime de Syrie. Weed Res. 1988, 28, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McCune, B.; Grace, J.B.; Urban, D.L. Analysis of Ecological Communities; MjM Software Design: Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, 2002; Volume 28. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferhi, F.; Das, S.; Moussaoui, Y.; Elaloui, E.; Yanez, J.G. Paper from Stipagrostis pungens. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 59, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Murtagh, F.; Legendre, P. Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion? J. Classif. 2014, 31, 274–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. El Khazanti, F.; Rachid, A.; Harrou, A.; Nasri, H.; Et-tayea, Y.; El Ouahabi, M.; Gharibi, E.K. Assessment of a Mining-Waste Dump of Galena Mine in the East of Morocco for Possible Use in Civil Engineering. J. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 23, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hasnaoui, S.E.; Fahr, M.; Keller, C.; Levard, C.; Angeletti, B.; Chaurand, P.; Triqui, Z.E.A.; Guedira, A.; Rhazi, L.; Colin, F.; et al. Screening of Native Plants Growing on a Pb/Zn Mining Area in Eastern Morocco: Perspectives for Phytoremediation. Plants 2020, 9, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pendias, H. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  46. Acosta, J.A.; Abbaspour, A.; Martínez, G.R.; Martínez-Martínez, S.; Zornoza, R.; Gabarrón, M.; Faz, A. Phytoremediation of mine tailings with Atriplex halimus and organic/inorganic amendments: A five-year field case study. Chemosphere 2018, 204, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Heiskanen, J.; Hagner, M.; Ruhanen, H.; Mäkitalo, K. Addition of recyclable biochar, compost and fibre clay to the growth medium layer for the cover system of mine tailings: A bioassay in a greenhouse. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. El Hachimi, M.L.; Fekhaoui, M.; Abidi, A.E.; Rhoujatti, A. Heavy metal contamination of soils from abandoned mines: The case of Aouli-Mibladen-Zeïda mines in Morocco. Cah. Agric. 2014, 23, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, H.; Yang, F.; Li, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, F.; Ba, Y.; Cui, L.; Sun, L.; Lv, T.; Wang, N.; et al. Heavy metal pollution and health risk assessment of agricultural soil near a smelter in an industrial city in China. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2020, 30, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, L.; Verweij, R.A.; Van Gestel, C.A.M. Effect of soil properties on Pb bioavailability and toxicity to the soil invertebrate Enchytraeus crypticus. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Matanzas, N.; Afif, E.; Díaz, T.E.; Gallego, J.R. Phytoremediation Potential of Native Herbaceous Plant Species Growing on a Paradigmatic Brownfield Site. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, X.; Zeng, B.; Li, H.; Huang, J.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, X.; Tan, Z.; Wu, Z.; Qin, X.; Feng, C.; et al. Soil heavy metals and phytoremediation by Populus deltoides alter the structure and function of bacterial community in mine ecosystems. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 172, 104359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Uchimiya, M.; Bannon, D.; Nakanishi, H.; McBride, M.B.; Williams, M.A.; Yoshihara, T. Chemical Speciation, Plant Uptake, and Toxicity of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12856–12869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Agarwal, P.; Vibhandik, R.; Agrahari, R.; Daverey, A.; Rani, R. Role of root exudates on the soil microbial diversity and biogeochemistry of heavy metals. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023, 196, 2673–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Krämer, U. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pawlik, M.; Cania, B.; Thijs, S.; Vangronsveld, J.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z. Hydrocarbon degradation potential and plant growth-promoting activity of culturable endophytic bacteria of Lotus corniculatus and Oenothera biennis from a long-term polluted site. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 19640–19652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Malayeri, B.E.; Chehregani, A.; Mohsenzadeh, F.; Kazemeini, F.; Asgari, M. Plants growing in a mining area: Screening for metal accumulator plants possibly useful for bioremediation. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2013, 95, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kostić, O.; Gajić, G.; Jarić, S.; Vukov, T.; Matić, M.; Mitrović, M.; Pavlović, P. An Assessment of the Phytoremediation Potential of Planted and Spontaneously Colonized Woody Plant Species on Chronosequence Fly Ash Disposal Sites in Serbia—Case Study. Plants 2021, 11, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Anawar, H.M.; Canha, N.; Santa-Regina, I.; Freitas, M.C. Adaptation, tolerance, and evolution of plant species in a pyrite mine in response to contamination level and properties of mine tailings: Sustainable rehabilitation. J. Soils Sediments 2013, 13, 730–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mkadmi, Y.; Benabbi, O.; Fekhaoui, M.; Benakkam, R.; Bjijou, W.; Elazzouzi, M.; Kadourri, M.; Chetouani, A. Study of the impact of heavy metals and physico-chemical parameters on the quality of the wells and waters of the Holcim area (Oriental region of Morocco). J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2018, 9, 672–679. [Google Scholar]
  61. Bacchetta, G.; Cappai, G.; Carucci, A.; Tamburini, E. Use of Native Plants for the Remediation of Abandoned Mine Sites in Mediterranean Semiarid Environments; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 94. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zine, H.; Hakkou, R.; Elmansour, A.; Elgadi, S.; Ouhammou, A.; Benzaazoua, M. Native plant diversity for ecological reclamation in Moroccan open-pit phosphate mines. Biodivers. Data J. 2023, 11, e104592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Boularbah, A.; Schwartz, C.; Bitton, G.; Morel, J.L. Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 1. Use of a biotest to assess metal toxicity of tailings and soils. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals—Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cheraghi, M.; Lorestani, B.; Khorasani, N.; Yousefi, N.; Karami, M. Findings on the phytoextraction and phytostabilization of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 144, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nabil, B.; Najwa, A.; Aya, Z.; Nessma, A.; Rajab, E. Phytoremediation Potential of Malva Parviflora for Some Heavy Metals in Roadside Soil in Benghazi, Libya. 2022. Available online: https://repository.uob.edu.ly/bitstream/handle/123456789/1635/LCCA4%206.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 30 May 2024).
  67. Barajas-Aceves, M.; Camarillo-Ravelo, D.; Rodríguez-Vázquez, R. Mobility and Translocation of Heavy Metals from Mine Tailings in Three Plant Species after Amendment with Compost and Biosurfactant. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2015, 24, 223–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Baker, A.J.M.; Brooks, R.R. Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements. A review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1989, 1, 81–126. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chaabani, S.; Abdelmalek-Babbou, C.; Ben Ahmed, H.; Chaabani, A.; Sebei, A. Phytoremediation assessment of native plants growing on Pb–Zn mine site in Northern Tunisia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Verbruggen, N.; Hermans, C.; Schat, H. Molecular mechanisms of metal hyperaccumulation in plants. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 759–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Omeka, M.; Igwe, O. Heavy metals concentration in soils and crop plants within the vicinity of abandoned mine sites in Nigeria: An integrated indexical and chemometric approach. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2021, 103, 4111–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ernst, W.H.O. Phytoextraction of mine wastes—Options and impossibilities. Geochemistry 2005, 65, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nouri, J.; Lorestani, B.; Yousefi, N.; Khorasani, N.; Hasani, A.H.; Seif, F.; Cheraghi, M. Phytoremediation potential of native plants grown in the vicinity of Ahangaran lead–zinc mine (Hamedan, Iran). Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 62, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Escaray, F.J.; Menendez, A.B.; Gárriz, A.; Pieckenstain, F.L.; Estrella, M.J.; Castagno, L.N.; Carrasco, P.; Sanjuán, J.; Ruiz, O.A. Ecological and agronomic importance of the plant genus Lotus. Its application in grassland sustainability and the amelioration of constrained and contaminated soils. Plant Sci. 2012, 182, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wong, M.H. Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2003, 50, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ma, Y.; Rajkumar, M.; Freitas, H. Improvement of plant growth and nickel uptake by nickel resistant-plant-growth promoting bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 1154–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gadd, G.M. Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma 2004, 122, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Clemens, S.; Ma, J.F. Toxic heavy metal and metalloid accumulation in crop plants and foods. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 489–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yan, A.; Wang, Y.; Tan, S.N.; Mohd Yusof, M.L.; Ghosh, S.; Chen, Z. Phytoremediation: A promising approach for revegetation of heavy metal-polluted land. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bouabdellah, M.; Boukirou, W.; Potra, A.; Melchiorre, E.; Bouzahzah, H.; Yans, J.; Zaid, K.; Idbaroud, M.; Poot, J.; Dekoninck, A.; et al. Origin of the Moroccan Touissit-Bou Beker and Jbel Bou Dahar Supergene Non-Sulfide Biomineralization and Its Relevance to Microbiological Activity, Late Miocene Uplift and Climate Changes. Minerals 2021, 11, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bouabdellah, M.; Niedermann, S.; Velasco, F. The Touissit-Bou Beker Mississippi Valley-Type District of Northeastern Morocco: Relationships to the Messinian Salinity Crisis, Late Neogene-Quaternary Alkaline Magmatism, and Buoyancy-Driven Fluid Convection. Econ. Geol. 2015, 110, 1455–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Argane, R.; Benzaazoua, M.; Bouamrane, A.; Hakkou, R. Valorisation des rejets miniers du district Pb-Zn de Touissit-Boubker (région orientale-Maroc). Environ. Ing. Dév. 2014, 66, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bell, D.T.; Rokich, D.P.; McChesney, C.J.; Plummer, J.A. Effects of temperature, light and gibberellic acid on the germination of seeds of 43 species native to Western Australia. J. Veg. Sci. 1995, 6, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lamin, H.; Alami, S.; Bouhnik, O.; ElFaik, S.; Abdelmoumen, H.; Bedmar, E.J.; Missbah-El Idrissi, M. Nodulation of Retama monosperma by Ensifer aridi in an Abandonned Lead Mine Soils in Eastern Morocco. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Maillet, J. Evolution de la Flore Adventice Dans le Montpellierais Sous la Pression des Techniques Culturales [Cereales, Vigne]. 1981. Available online: https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/123819/records/64735d822c1d629bc97cf2be (accessed on 12 January 2024).
  86. Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  87. Le Bourgeois, T.; Merlier, H. Merlier, Adventrop. Les Adventices D’Afrique Soudano-Sahélienne. CIRAD-CA. 1995. Available online: https://agritrop.cirad.fr/326208/ (accessed on 12 January 2024).
  88. Mzabri, I.; Chafik, Z.; Berrichi, A. Weeds flora associated with Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in Morocco. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 13, 1108–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ka, S.L.; Gueye, M.; Mbaye, M.S.; Ngom, M.; Camara, A.A.; Cissokho, M.K.; Mballo, R.; Sidybe, M.; Diouf, N.; Diop, D.; et al. Taxonomic diversity and abundance of weed flora in upland rice fields of Southern Groundnut Basin, Senegal. J. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2020, 2, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wikum, D.A.; Shanholtzer, G.F. Application of the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale for vegetation analysis in land development studies. Environ. Manag. 1978, 2, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pawłowski, B.; Pawłowski, B. Composition and structure of plant communities and methods of their research. In The Flora of Poland; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1972; pp. 237–269. [Google Scholar]
  92. Godron, Quelques Applications de la Notion de Fréquence en Ecologie Végétale: (Recouvrement, Information Mutuelle Entre Espèces et Facteurs Ecologiques, Echantillonnage)-Detail-Ermes, Volume III. In “Oecologia Plantarum”, Volume III. Gauthier-Villars. [Paris]. 1968. Available online: https://bibliotheques.mnhn.fr/medias/doc/EXPLOITATION/HORIZON/130159/quelques-applications-de-la-notion-de-frequence-en-ecologie-vegetale-recouvrement-information-mutuel (accessed on 31 January 2024).
  93. Midhat, L.; Ouazzani, N.; Hejjaj, A.; Ouhammou, A.; Mandi, L. Accumulation of heavy metals in metallophytes from three mining sites (Southern Centre Morocco) and evaluation of their phytoremediation potential. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Qasim, B.; Motelica-Heino, M. Potentially toxic element fractionation in technosoils using two sequential extraction schemes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 5054–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Van Ranst, E.; Verloo, M.; Demeyer, A.; Pauwels, J.M. Manual for the Soil Chemistry and Fertility Laboratory-Analytical Methods for Soils and Plants, Equipment, and Management of Consumables; NUGI: Ghent, Belgium, 1999; Volume 243, p. 1999. ISBN 90-76603-01-4. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-113771 (accessed on 4 May 2024).
  97. Sylvain, B.; Mikael, M.-H.; Florie, M.; Emmanuel, J.; Marilyne, S.; Sylvain, B.; Domenico, M. Phytostabilization of As, Sb and Pb by two willow species (S. viminalis and S. purpurea) on former mine technosols. Catena 2016, 136, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nandillon, R.; Lebrun, M.; Miard, F.; Gaillard, M.; Sabatier, S.; Villar, M.; Bourgerie, S.; Morabito, D. Capability of amendments (biochar, compost and garden soil) added to a mining technosol contaminated by Pb and As to allow poplar seed (Populus nigra L.) germination. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bourlière, F.; Quezel, P. et Santa, S.—Nouvelle Flore de l’Algérie et de ses régions désertiques méridionales. Tome II. Paris, Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1963. Rev. Décologie Terre Vie 1964, 18, 238. [Google Scholar]
  100. Faris, F.Z.; Oualidi, J.; Fennane, M.; Ibn Tattou, M.; Mathez, J.; Ouchbani, S.; Ouyahya, A.; Raymaud, C.; Salvo Tierra, Á.; Abidine, A.Z. Flore Pratique du Maroc; Fennane, M., Tattou, M., Mathez, J., Ouyahya, A., Oualidi, J., Eds.; Institut Scientifique, Université Mohammed V: Rabat, Morocco, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Contribution (a) and composition (b) of the families of species. (c) Biological spectrum of the vascular plants inventoried in different study sites.
Figure 1. Contribution (a) and composition (b) of the families of species. (c) Biological spectrum of the vascular plants inventoried in different study sites.
Plants 13 01811 g001
Figure 2. Illustrative images of some the herbaceous plants with the highest frequency Classes VI and III: (a) Bromus hordeaceus subsp. mollis (L.) Maire, (b) Arisitda pungens Desf., (c) Reseda lutea L., (d) Genista hirsuta Vahl, (e) Lomelosia stellata (L.) Raf., 1., (f) Atractylis caepistosa Desf., (g) Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., (h) Scolymus hispanicus L., 1753., and (i) Echinops spinosus L.
Figure 2. Illustrative images of some the herbaceous plants with the highest frequency Classes VI and III: (a) Bromus hordeaceus subsp. mollis (L.) Maire, (b) Arisitda pungens Desf., (c) Reseda lutea L., (d) Genista hirsuta Vahl, (e) Lomelosia stellata (L.) Raf., 1., (f) Atractylis caepistosa Desf., (g) Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., (h) Scolymus hispanicus L., 1753., and (i) Echinops spinosus L.
Plants 13 01811 g002
Figure 4. Bioconcentration factor (BCF), translocation factor (TF), and biological accumulation coefficient (BAC) for the studied plant species. Notes: red line indicates values TF > 1. nd mean not determined.
Figure 4. Bioconcentration factor (BCF), translocation factor (TF), and biological accumulation coefficient (BAC) for the studied plant species. Notes: red line indicates values TF > 1. nd mean not determined.
Plants 13 01811 g004
Figure 5. Plot of axes 1 and 2 of the principal component analysis (PCA), showing the means of the metal concentrations separately in the shoots (a) and the roots (b) for the studied species. Abbreviations of species are the same as in Table 1. Abbreviations are cited in Table 1.
Figure 5. Plot of axes 1 and 2 of the principal component analysis (PCA), showing the means of the metal concentrations separately in the shoots (a) and the roots (b) for the studied species. Abbreviations of species are the same as in Table 1. Abbreviations are cited in Table 1.
Plants 13 01811 g005
Figure 6. Location and description of the study sites in Touissit mining district.
Figure 6. Location and description of the study sites in Touissit mining district.
Plants 13 01811 g006
Figure 7. Basic scheme of flora inventory in the Touissit mine tailings.
Figure 7. Basic scheme of flora inventory in the Touissit mine tailings.
Plants 13 01811 g007
Table 1. List of plant species present in the Touissit mine dumps with their frequency and cover rate (D) (Class IV (frequency between 60% and 80%), Class III (between 40% and 60%), Class II (between 20% and 40%), and Class I (−20%)).
Table 1. List of plant species present in the Touissit mine dumps with their frequency and cover rate (D) (Class IV (frequency between 60% and 80%), Class III (between 40% and 60%), Class II (between 20% and 40%), and Class I (−20%)).
FamilyLife-FormsCodeSpeciesFrequency ClassFrequency %Cover (D)
AmaranthaceaeHemAGAALAgatophora alopecoïdes (Delile) BungeIII43.5985.90
ThAMAALAmaranthus albus L.I2.561.28
PhaATRSEAtriplex semibaccatan R. Br.I10.265.13
HemBETMABeta macrocarpa Guss.II30.7729.49
HemBETVUBeta vulgaris L.I5.132.56
ThCHEALChenopodium album L.II23.0850.00
ThCHEMUChenopodium murale L.II33.3398.72
AnacardiaceaePhaPISLEPistacia lentiscus L.I10.265.13
ApocynaceaePhaNEROLNerium oleander L.II28.2178.21
ArecaceaePhaPHODAPhoenix dactylifera L.I5.132.56
AsteraceaeThAMBLIAmberboa lipii L.I5.132.56
ThANAMOAnacyclus monanthos L.I10.265.13
HemATRCAAtractylis caepistosa Desf.III48.7262.82
ThATRGUAtractylis gummifera L.I12.826.41
HemCARLACarlina racemosa L.III43.5946.15
ThCARRACarthamus lanatus L., 1753II20.518.97
ThCENMACentaurea marocana Balt.I12.826.41
ThCHRCOChrysanthemum coronarium L.II30.7715.38
ThECHSPEchinops spinosus L.III51.2888.46
ThECHHOEchium horridum Batt.I15.387.69
ThERICAEryngium campestre L., 1753I2.561.28
ThLACSELactuca serriola L.II38.4632.05
HemLAUNULaunaea nudicaulis Hook.f.II28.2126.92
ThLOMSTLomelosia stellata (L.) Raf., 1838III46.1560.26
HemMANSAMantisalca salmantica (L.) Briq. & Cavill.II33.3366.67
HemONOMAOnopordum macracanthum schrub sb,II35.9043.59
HemPALSPPallenis spinosa (L.) Cass., 1825II23.0811.54
HemSCOHIScolymus hispanicus L., 1753III58.9766.67
ThSCOLAScorzonera laciniata L.II20.518.97
ThSONOLSonchus oleraceus L.II25.6412.82
BrassicaceaeGeoCARDRCardaria draba L.II33.3341.03
ThHIRINHirschfieldia incana (L.) W.D.J.KochII28.2139.74
ThRAPRIRapistrum rugosum (L.) All.II28.2114.10
ThSISIRSisymbrium irio L.II33.3358.97
CampanulaceaeThHEYSPHerniaria hirsuta L.II15.387.69
CaryophylaceaeHemPARARParonychia argentea Lam., 1779II30.7756.41
CistaceaePhaCISTSACistus salviifolius L.I5.132.56
ConvolvulaceaeHemCONALConvolvulus althaeoides L., 1753I15.386.41
HemCONALConvolvulus arvensis L.II20.5123.08
HemCONARConvolvus lineatus L.I7.693.85
HemCONLIFoeniculum vulgare subsp. VulgareI2.561.28
CupressaceaePhaJUNOXJuniperus oxycedrus L.II33.3367.95
FabaceaePhaACACYAcacia cyanophylla Lindl.II20.51143.59
ChaASTARAstragalus armatus Willd.III41.0397.44
PhaCERSICercis siliquastrum L., 1753I5.1315.38
ChaGENHIGenista hirsuta Vahl.III43.59185.90
ChaGENTRGenista tricuspidata Desf.II33.3380.77
PhaGLETRGledistia trianthos L.I2.561.28
ThHERHIHedysarum spinosissimum L.II20.5150.00
HemLOTCOLotus corniculatus L.I35.90112.82
HemLOTMALotus maroccanus ball.III41.03110.26
ThMEDPOMedicago polymorpha L., 1753I7.693.85
PhaRETMORetama monosperma
(L.) Boiss., 1840
I7.693.85
PhaROBPSRobinia pseudoacacia L., 1753I12.8275.64
FagaceaePhaQUEILQuercus ilex L., 1753I10.265.13
GeoraniaceaeThEROMAErodium malacoïdes, Willd.I12.825.13
JuncaceaeGeoJUNACJuncus acutus L.I10.2648.72
LamiaceaeHemMARVUMarrubium vulgare L.I17.9521.79
LiliaceaeChaASPACAsparagus acutifolius L.I5.132.56
MalvaceaeThMALPAMalva parviflora L.I5.132.56
MeliaceaePhaMELAZMelia azedarach L.I10.2630.77
PapaveraceaeThPAPRHPapaver rhoeas L.I2.561.28
PinaceaePhaPINHAPinus halepensis Miller 1768.II33.33142.31
PlantaginaceaeThPLACOPlantago coronopus L.I15.387.69
ThPLAPSPlantago psyllium Moench 1794III43.5971.79
PoaceaeThAEGGEAegilops Geniculata RothI7.6916.67
HemARIADArisitda adscensionis Desf.I12.8219.23
HemARIPUArisitda pungens Desf.IV66.67462.82
ThAVESTAvena sterilis L.I35.9056.41
ThBROMOBromus hordeaceus subsp. mollis (L.) MaireIV71.79330.77
ThBRORIBromus rigidus Roth.II25.6425.64
ThBRORUBromus rubens L.I12.826.41
ThBROSTBromus sterilis (L.) NevskII23.0810.26
ThCYNDACynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.III51.2851.28
ThHORMUHordeum murinum L.II30.77110.26
ThLAMAULamarckia aurea (L.) MoenchIII46.15130.77
ThLOLMULolium multiflorum Lam.I12.8219.23
ThLOLRILolium rigidum GaudinII35.9016.67
ChaLYGSPLygeum spartum L.I10.263.85
GeoPHRCOPhragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.III43.59193.59
ThPOLMOPolypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf.I2.561.28
ThSHIBASchismus barbatus (L.) Thell.I5.132.56
ResedaceaeThRESLUReseda lutea L.IV71.7960.26
RhamnaceaePhaZIZLOZizyphus lotus (L.) Desf.I17.958.97
RosaceaeHemSANMISanguisorba minor L. 1753I10.265.13
SimaroubaceaePhaAILALAilanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle, 1916I5.1315.38
SolanaceaeThSOLLYSolanum lycopersicum L.I2.561.28
TamaricaceaePhaTAMCATamarix canariensis Willd.II28.2152.56
Nd-NdSp n.dI12.825.13
Notes. Th: Therophytes, Pha: Phanerophytes, Hem: Hemicryptophytes, Cha: Chamephytes, and Geo: Geophytes.
Table 2. Species composition of the studied sites.
Table 2. Species composition of the studied sites.
TMD1TMD2TMD3Study Sites
Number of species (D > 100)1117710
Number of species in Classes V and III11281017
Species richness78687191
Sum of coverage (D)3854505035034130
Sum of frequency %18232546.12076.862148.7
Age242216-
Table 3. Soil properties of Touissit mine tailings.
Table 3. Soil properties of Touissit mine tailings.
Site TMD1TMD2TMD3
Age 242216
SOM%Mean0.969 a1.024 a0.945 a
SD0.000.020.12
pHMean7.613 a7.490 a7.900 a
SD0.110.140.02
EC (µs·cm−3)Mean129.267 b148.800 b254.200 a
SD28.0515.368.43
Cu (mg·kg−1)Mean818.616 b293.943 c933.866 a
SD14.218.4135.08
Pb (mg·kg−1)Mean13,426.182 a3417.775 c6527.435 b
SD126.0350.72344.37
Zn (mg·kg−1)Mean7559.096 a1906.363 c3582.990 b
SD21.029.21151.11
Bio-extractible Cu (mg·kg−1)Mean1.422 ab1.709 a1.360 b
SD0.040.090.07
Bio-extractible Pb (mg·kg−1)Mean3.663 a4.582 a5.129 a
SD0.210.030.66
Bio-extractible Zn (mg·kg−1)Mean1.234 a1.073 a1.243 a
SD0.020.030.24
Note. The results are presented as means (n = 3), with values in the same column followed by the same letter indicating no statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). SOM% means soil organic matter.
Table 4. Heavy metal concentrations (mg·kg−1 DW) in the roots/shoots and rhizospheric soils of plants collected from the Touissit mine tailings.
Table 4. Heavy metal concentrations (mg·kg−1 DW) in the roots/shoots and rhizospheric soils of plants collected from the Touissit mine tailings.
PbZnCu
Species CodeShootsSDRootsSDSoilSDShootsSDRootsSDSoilSDShootsSDRootsSDSoilSD
ARSPU416.870 c98.47607.629 a79.183590.337 de126.22832.202 abc208.411307.998 a278.2514,070.731 b545.4616.740 b3.0938.123 b14.1499.029 d4.39
ASTAR501.871 c433.13227.424 a62.205501.175 de1481.05224.157 cd188.31329.593 b65.831743.064 f70.6042.600 b32.2127.766 b4.95209.078 cd7.46
ATRCA572.682 bc254.65568.098 a227.834908.724 de327.58306.905 bcd133.10176.512 b68.062408.230 f80.3750.218 b25.2242.964 b19.661077.393 a432.11
CHEMU544.825 bc129.76381.351 a110.754637.003 de98.06236.134 bcd45.79179.779 b41.333324.001 ef8.3649.949 b5.0541.891 b5.04704.562 abcd9.99
GENHI72.560 c19.75152.993 a77.504072.320 de179.9572.016 d18.4171.157 b32.612064.299 f67.598.850 b0.9718.257 b7.07329.657 bcd7.14
GENTR69.012 c2.76451.040 a210.593417.775 de50.7272.894 d6.07242.356 b95.841906.363 f9.2120.600 b3.3350.065 ab21.98293.943 cd8.41
LOTCO2279.724 a284.91264.210 a90.776307.600 cde233.68846.271 ab90.56116.482 b34.363333.050 ef82.34180.113 a24.3226.423 b5.11592.092 abcd27.46
LOTMA1484.512 ab342.93864.085 a294.786527.435 cd344.371109.958 a307.16575.610 b245.353582.990 ef151.11221.332 a64.48139.809 a48.11933.866 ab35.08
MELAZ248.873 c11.69ndnd9844.292 bc345.08267.758 bcd6.47ndnd12,488.420 b919.1321.493 b0.21ndnd290.655 cd4.37
PINHA76.555 c8.44676.562 a64.3510,038.321 bc921.7788.972 d2.69312.924 b27.836173.859 cd169.387.877 b0.4031.630 b2.30924.319 ab60.33
PISLE61.991 c1.78ndnd2396.654 e270.8389.550 d3.38ndnd14,065.316 b1063.8911.710 b0.37ndnd103.779 d17.01
QUEIL151.694 c5.01ndnd3633.154 de206.04227.859 cd2.29ndnd20,028.993 a543.598.797 b0.16ndnd125.885 d9.41
RESLU1609.817 a154.11192.046 a35.475529.843 de186.331063.421 a89.08183.274 b31.864889.819 de392.27167.005 a16.4630.879 b7.601124.250 a125.75
RETMO93.629 c3.44ndnd13,426.182 b126.03112.726 d3.19ndnd7559.096 c21.029.753 b0.45ndnd818.616 abc14.21
ROBPS49.165 c2.91ndnd29,661.245 a2313.91105.421 d3.90ndnd19,042.828 a350.1011.789 b0.46ndnd556.457 abcd11.92
Note. The results are presented as means (n = 3), with values in the same column followed by the same letter indicating no statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). nd mean not determined.
Table 5. Description of the study sites.
Table 5. Description of the study sites.
Site *Year of Soil AmendmentYear of RevegetationAgeArea (ha)
TMD1200020012413.95
TMD2200220032213.92
TMD32008Not revegetated1620.49
* TMD1,TMD2, and TMD3: Touissit mine dumps 1, 2, and 3.
Table 6. List of sampled plant species for evaluation of their phytoremediation potential.
Table 6. List of sampled plant species for evaluation of their phytoremediation potential.
Sampling SiteNo.Family NameScientific NameLife-FormAbbreviationReplicates
Touissit mine dumps1FabaceaeAstragalus armatusHcASTAR3
2AsteraceaAtractylis caespitosaHcATRCA3
3FabaceaeGenista hirsutaPhGENHI3
4FabaceaeGenista tricuspidataPhGENTR3
5FabaceaeLotus corniculatusPhLOTCO3
6FabaceaeLotus maroccanusThLOTMA3
7ResedaceaeReseda luteaThRESLU3
8PoaceaeAristida pungensHcARSPU3
9ChenopodiaceaeChenopodium muraleThCHEMU3
10MeliaceaeMélia azedarachPhMELAZ3
11AnacardiaceaePistacia lentiscusPhPISLE3
12FabaceaeRetama monospermaPhRETMO3
13FagaceaeQuercus ilexPhQUEIL3
14FabaceaeRobinia pseudoacaciaPhROBPS3
15PinaceaePinus halpensisPhPINHA3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oujdi, M.; Chafik, Y.; Boukroute, A.; Bourgerie, S.; Sena-Velez, M.; Morabito, D.; Addi, M. Exploring Phytoremediation Potential: A Comprehensive Study of Flora Inventory and Soil Heavy Metal Contents in the Northeastern Mining Districts of Morocco. Plants 2024, 13, 1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131811

AMA Style

Oujdi M, Chafik Y, Boukroute A, Bourgerie S, Sena-Velez M, Morabito D, Addi M. Exploring Phytoremediation Potential: A Comprehensive Study of Flora Inventory and Soil Heavy Metal Contents in the Northeastern Mining Districts of Morocco. Plants. 2024; 13(13):1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131811

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oujdi, Mohammed, Yassine Chafik, Azzouz Boukroute, Sylvain Bourgerie, Marta Sena-Velez, Domenico Morabito, and Mohamed Addi. 2024. "Exploring Phytoremediation Potential: A Comprehensive Study of Flora Inventory and Soil Heavy Metal Contents in the Northeastern Mining Districts of Morocco" Plants 13, no. 13: 1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131811

APA Style

Oujdi, M., Chafik, Y., Boukroute, A., Bourgerie, S., Sena-Velez, M., Morabito, D., & Addi, M. (2024). Exploring Phytoremediation Potential: A Comprehensive Study of Flora Inventory and Soil Heavy Metal Contents in the Northeastern Mining Districts of Morocco. Plants, 13(13), 1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131811

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop