Next Article in Journal
Chromosomal Location of xa19, a Broad-Spectrum Rice Bacterial Blight Resistant Gene from XM5, a Mutant Line from IR24
Next Article in Special Issue
Salinity and Mulching Effects on Nutrition and Production of Grafted Sour Passion Fruit
Previous Article in Journal
A Wireless Acoustic Emission Sensor System with ACMD-IGWO-XGBoost Algorithm for Living Tree Moisture Content Diagnosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Horticultural Practices in Early Spring to Mitigate the Adverse Effect of Low Temperature on Fruit Set in ‘Lapins’ Sweet Cherry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Foliar Application of Hydrogen Peroxide on Gas Exchange, Photochemical Efficiency, and Growth of Soursop under Salt Stress

by
Jessica Dayanne Capitulino
1,
Geovani Soares de Lima
1,*,
Carlos Alberto Vieira de Azevedo
1,
André Alisson Rodrigues da Silva
1,
Thiago Filipe de Lima Arruda
1,
Lauriane Almeida dos Anjos Soares
2,
Hans Raj Gheyi
1,
Pedro Dantas Fernandes
1,
Maria Sallydelândia Sobral de Farias
1,
Francisco de Assis da Silva
1 and
Mirandy dos Santos Dias
1
1
Academic Unit of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande 58430-380, PB, Brazil
2
Academic Unit of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Campina Grande, Pombal 58840-000, PB, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(3), 599; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030599
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 17 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Horticultural Crops under Stresses)

Abstract

:
Hydrogen peroxide at low concentrations has been used as a salt stress attenuator because it induces a positive response in the antioxidant system of plants. This study aimed to assess the gas exchange, quantum yield, and development of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova grown with saline water irrigation and foliar hydrogen peroxide application. The experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions using a randomized block design in a 4 × 4 factorial scheme corresponding to four levels of electrical conductivity of irrigation water, ECw (0.8, 1.6, 2.4, and 3.2 dS m−1), and four doses of hydrogen peroxide, H2O2 (0, 10, 20, and 30 μM), with three replicates. The use of irrigation water with electrical conductivity above 0.8 dS m−1 inhibited stomatal conductance, internal CO2 concentration, transpiration, maximum fluorescence, crown height, and vegetative vigor index of the Morada Nova cultivar of soursop. Compared to untreated plants, the hydrogen peroxide concentration of 30 μM resulted in greater stomatal conductance. Water salinity of 0.8 dS m−1 with hydrogen peroxide concentrations of 16 and 13 μM resulted in the highest variable fluorescence and quantum efficiency of photosystem II, respectively, of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova at 210 days after transplantation.

1. Introduction

The soursop (Annona muricata L.), a fruit tree native to Central America and the Peruvian Valleys, is notable for its commercialization potential in the domestic market with significant economic importance and export prospects because of the high acceptance of its fruit and pulp, primarily for numerous food and pharmaceutical applications [1,2]. Despite the production potential of soursop for the Northeast region, one of the limitations to its production system is the occurrence of low rainfall and high evapotranspiration in most months of the year [3]. In addition, the water sources commonly used in irrigation have high concentrations of salts [4,5].
High salt concentration in water and/or soil inhibits plant growth due to restrictions of water absorption (osmotic effect) and changes in metabolism, as well as ionic imbalance (specific ion effect), which affects photosynthetic pigments, harms cellular components, and causes lipid peroxidation of the membrane [6,7].
In soursop, salt stress induces loss of photosynthetic activity due to stomatal and non-stomatal limitations [8,9]. It compromises the quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), demonstrating that PSII reaction centers have experienced photoinhibitory damage, which results in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [10] capable of inducing oxidative damage to proteins and other biological components [11].
Considering the socioeconomic importance of soursop in Brazilian agribusiness, it is essential to study strategies that enable the use of saline water in its cultivation in semi-arid regions. Among the alternatives used to reduce the effects of salt stress on plants, the application of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on leaves stands out [12]. Hydrogen peroxide is a reactive oxygen species (ROS) that, when applied in low concentrations, acts in acclimatization and/or signaling to salt stress due to metabolic alterations that are responsible for increasing its tolerance to stress, thus enabling its use of water with high concentrations of salts [13,14,15]. It must be considered that the beneficial effect of the application of H2O2 depends on several factors, including the concentration, plant species analyzed, development stage, and application method [16].
In recent years, studies have reported that foliar application with hydrogen peroxide can attenuate the deleterious effects caused by salt stress in several crops, for example, cotton [12], passion fruit [13], mini-watermelon [17], orange [18], tomato [19], maize [20], wheat [16], and rice [21]. However, information about its use in fruit plants is incipient, especially in the soursop crop.
This study is based on the hypothesis that the soursop crop suffers smaller losses from salt stress under the application of hydrogen peroxide through the regulation of physiological processes, which contributes to an increase in photosynthetic and antioxidant activity, avoiding lipid peroxidation caused by ROS and an increase in the rate of CO2 assimilation and stomatal regulation, thus leading to an improvement in the growth of the soursop plant. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the gas exchange, quantum yield, and growth of soursop cv. Morada Nova irrigated with saline water under the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide.

2. Results

2.1. Leaf Gas Exchange

The salinity of irrigation water had a significant effect on the soursop plants’ stomatal conductance (gs), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration € (Table 1). H2O2 concentrations, as a single factor, influenced stomatal conductance (gs). The CO2 assimilation rate (A), instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi), and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi) were all significantly affected by the interaction between water salinity levels and H2O2 concentrations.
The stomatal conductance of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova was linearly reduced by the increase in the electrical conductivity of irrigation water (Figure 1A), with a decrease of 18.08% per unit increment in ECw. When comparing the gs of plants subjected to ECw of 3.2 dS m−1 to that of plants that received the lowest salinity level (0.8 dS m−1), there was a reduction of 50.74%.
Regarding the effects of H2O2 concentrations on the stomatal conductance of soursop plants (Figure 1B), there was a linear increase corresponding to 5.25% per unit increment in H2O2 concentration. In relative terms, the foliar application of 30 μM resulted in an increase of 0.0870 H2O m−2 s−1 compared to plants grown under 0 μM of hydrogen peroxide.
Regarding the effects of the electrical conductivity of irrigation water on the internal CO2 concentration (Figure 1C) and transpiration (Figure 1D), there were linear reductions of 6.72 and 9.47%, respectively, per unit increase in ECw. When comparing the Ci and E of plants grown under water salinity of 3.2 dS m−1 to the values of those that received ECw of 0.8 dS m−1, there were reductions of 17.04 and 24.59%, respectively, at 210 days after transplantation.
For the interaction between the ECw levels and H2O2 concentrations (Figure 1E), the maximum estimated value of the CO2 assimilation rate (3.20 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) was obtained in plants irrigated with an ECw of 0.80 dS m−1 and in the absence of H2O2 application. On the other hand, the minimum value of A (0.05 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) was reached in plants subjected to ECw of 3.2 dS m−1 and the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at a concentration of 30 μM.
For instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi) (Figure 2A) and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) (Figure 2B), irrigation with water of electrical conductivity of 0.8 dS m−1 in the absence of foliar application of hydrogen peroxide (0 μM) resulted in higher estimated values of CEi (0.0278 (μmol m−2 s−1) (μmol mol−1)−1) and WUEi (2.67 (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) (mmol H2O m−2 s−1)−1). On the other hand, irrigation with an ECw of 3.2 dS m−1 and the foliar application of H2O2 at concentrations of 27 and 30 μM, respectively, led to the estimated minimum values of 0.008 ((μmol m−2 s−1) (μmol mol−1)−1) in CEi and 1.46 ((μmol m−2 s−1) (mmol H2O m−2 s−1)−1) in WUEi.

2.2. Quantum Yield

The initial fluorescence, variable fluorescence, and quantum efficiency of photosystem II of soursop plants at 210 DAT were significantly affected by the interaction between water salinity levels and hydrogen peroxide concentrations (Table 2). The salinity levels of the irrigation water significantly influenced the maximum fluorescence of the soursop. Hydrogen peroxide concentrations, as a single factor, influenced the initial and variable fluorescence and the quantum efficiency of photosystem II of soursop plants.
The interaction between water salinity levels and hydrogen peroxide concentrations significantly influenced the initial fluorescence of soursop (Figure 3A), with the highest estimated value (674.52) attained in plants irrigated with ECw of 0.8 dS m−1 without the foliar application of H2O2. Plants under irrigation with water of 3.2 dS m−1 and foliar application of 30 μM of H2O2 reached the estimated minimum value of 552.10.
The maximum fluorescence of soursop plants was linearly reduced by the increase in the electrical conductivity of irrigation water (Figure 3B), with a decrease of 2.85% per unit increment in ECw. When comparing the Fm of plants irrigated with an ECw of 3.2 dS m−1 to that of plants under irrigation with the lowest level of water salinity (0.8 dS m−1), a decrease of 6.99% was verified.
Irrigation with water of 0.8 dS m−1 associated with the application of hydrogen peroxide concentrations of 16 and 13 μM, respectively, promoted the highest estimated values of variable fluorescence (1875) and quantum efficiency of photosystem II (0.746). However, the combination between the highest salinity of irrigation water (3.2 dS m−1) and the highest concentration of H2O2 (30 μM) resulted in the lowest estimated values of Fv (1592.37) and Fv/Fm (0.690).

2.3. Morphological Parameters

The interaction between irrigation water salinity levels and hydrogen peroxide concentrations significantly affected stem diameter (SD) and crown diameter (Dcrown) (Table 3). The single factor of irrigation water salinity influenced the crown height (Hcrown) and the vegetative vigor index (VVI) of soursop plants 210 days after transplantation. There was a significant effect of hydrogen peroxide concentrations only on the Vcrown of soursop plants.
The salinity of irrigation water negatively affected the crown height (Figure 4A) and vegetative vigor index (Figure 4B) of soursop plants at 210 days after transplantation. Regression equations (Figure 4A,B) showed linear reductions of 3.32 and 4.23% per unit increment in ECw in the Hcrown and VVI of soursop plants, respectively. When comparing the Hcrown and VVI of plants irrigated with water of an electrical conductivity of 3.2 dS m−1 to the values of those subjected to water salinity of 0.8 dS m−1, there were reductions of 8.20 and 10.51%, respectively.
The interaction between water salinity levels and hydrogen peroxide concentrations significantly affected the crown volume (Figure 4C), crown diameter (Figure 4D), and stem diameter (Figure 4E) of soursop plants. Irrigation with water of 0.8 dS m−1 in the absence of the foliar application of H2O2 promoted the maximum values of 0.125 m3 and 1.47 m, respectively, for Vcrown and Dcrown. However, water salinity levels of 0.8 and 3.2 dS m−1 under the foliar application of 30 μM of H2O2 contributed to the minimum values of Vcrown (0.1238 m3) and Dcrown (0.762 m), respectively, in soursop plants cv. Morada Nova.
Regarding stem diameter (Figure 4E), it was verified that plants receiving water of 0.8 dS m−1 and exposed to a 30 μM H2O2 concentration achieved a stem diameter (SD) of 21.11 mm. On the other hand, water salinity of 3.2 dS m−1 associated with the foliar application of 11 μM of H2O2 resulted in a lower value of the stem diameter (17.96 mm).

3. Discussion

The excess of salts present in irrigation water induces salt stress in plants, which negatively affects their metabolism and limits their growth and development, standing out as a limiting factor for irrigated agriculture, especially in semi-arid regions [22]. In the present study, it was verified that the increase in the electrical conductivity of the irrigation water reduced the gas exchanges, the quantum yield, and the growth of the soursop plant, but the deleterious effects caused by the saline stress were partially mitigated by the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide.
The reduction of gs (Figure 1A) with increasing water salinity is a way for plants to minimize water losses in the form of vapor to the atmosphere and maintain turgor pressure inside their cells, in addition to reducing the absorption of salts [23,24]. Reductions in stomatal conductance due to salt stress were also observed in studies with other fruit plants such as acerola [24], guava [25], and custard apple [26]. The beneficial effect of H2O2 observed on the plants’ stomatal conductance (Figure 1B) may have occurred due to the defense mechanisms of the plant, inducing the system of antioxidant enzymes, thus minimizing the harmful effects of salinity [27,28]. Silva et al. [15], in their study evaluating the induction of salt stress tolerance (ECw ranging from 0.6 to 3.0 dS m−1) in soursop seedlings using hydrogen peroxide (from 0 to 20 μM), found that the application of hydrogen peroxide at a concentration of 20 μM promoted greater stomatal conductance compared to the control treatment (0 μM H2O2) for all salinity levels at 110 days after transplantation.
Increasing the electrical conductivity of irrigation water also reduced the transpiration of soursop plants (Figure 1D). A decrease in E is a strategy of plants to reduce water loss through transpiration, constituting a mechanism of tolerance to salt stress [29].
The decrease in A (Figure 1E) may be related to the lower concentrations of CO2 found in the substomatal chamber due to the partial closure of the stomata and possible metabolic restrictions to the Calvin cycle and, consequently, a diminution in the synthesis of sugars in the photosynthetic process and in the substrate for RuBisCo [30,31]. The stress-induced decrease in CO2 assimilation rate in plants can be caused by stomatal and/or non-stomatal factors, leading to changes in the metabolic processes of photosynthesis and affecting the activities of a number of enzymes in the stroma involved in CO2 reduction [32,33].
Salt stress in plants causes significant losses in the functioning of the photosystem due to the degradation of the proteins involved in the photosynthetic activity. This may explain the reductions in CEi (Figure 2A) and WUEi (Figure 2B) in soursop plants cv. Morada Nova with the increase in the electrical conductivity of irrigation water [34]. Silva et al. [35] also observed a decrease in the carboxylation efficiency in passion fruit under salt stress (electrical conductivity of water varying from 0.7 to 2.8 dS m−1) and application of hydrogen peroxide (0, 25, 50, and 75 μM) at 60 days after transplantation.
In the present study, it was verified that the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at a concentration of 30 µM intensified the effects of salt stress on the initial fluorescence (Figure 3A). In this case, the concentration of 30 μM may have induced oxidative damage to the cell membrane and possibly had a negative influence on the initial fluorescence of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova at 210 DAT. At high concentrations, H2O2 causes damage to plants, presumably because of alterations in their metabolism, mainly as a consequence of oxidative stress, which limits photosynthetic activities [36].
The restriction of maximum fluorescence (Figure 3B) by salt stress indicates a slowdown in photosynthetic activity aimed at mitigating the toxic effects of salinity [37]. In a study conducted by Silva et al. [38] evaluating the fluorescence of chlorophyll a in soursop plants under saline stress (ECw ranging from 0.8 to 4.0 dS m−1), a reduction of 3.31% in maximum fluorescence was also observed by an increase in the electrical conductivity of the irrigation water; the authors attributed this fact to the low efficiency in the photoreduction of quinones and in the flow of electrons between the photosystems, which results in the low activity of photosystem II in the thylakoid membrane, directly influencing the flow of electrons between the photosystems.
The variable fluorescence (Figure 3C) and quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Figure 3D) benefited from the application of hydrogen peroxide at estimated concentrations of 16 and 13 μM, respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that the use of hydrogen peroxide at low concentrations contributed to greater efficiency in the photoreduction of quinone A and the flow of electrons between the photosystems, promoting the adequate activity of PSII in the membrane of thylakoids, directly influencing the flow of electrons between the photosystems, which indicates that PS II was not damaged because, when the photosynthetic apparatus is intact, the values of Fv/Fm vary between 0.75 and 0.85 [39]. This result is similar to that reported by Veloso et al. [40], who evaluated the photochemical efficiency and growth of soursop rootstocks subjected to salt stress (ECw ranging from 0.6 to 3.0 dS m−1) and hydrogen peroxide (0 and 20 μM) and found that applications of hydrogen peroxide at the concentration of 20 μM minimized the negative effects of salinity on the initial fluorescence and favored the variable fluorescence and quantum efficiency of photosystem II at 120 days after sowing.
The results obtained in the present study indicate that the growth of soursop plants is negatively affected by the increase in the salinity of the irrigation water. Inhibition of plant growth may be a consequence of the effect caused by excess salts in the root zone, which imposes water limitations, negatively affecting cell elongation and expansion. In addition, the partial closure of stomata compromises photosynthesis, resulting in lower growth [3,41].
On the other hand, the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at an estimated concentration of 11 µM promoted an increase in growth in stem diameter. Veloso et al. [42], while evaluating the physiological changes and growth of soursop cultivated under saline waters and H2O2 in the post-grafting stage, reported that the exogenous application of H2O2 at 20 μM reduced the harmful effect of water salinity on the stem diameter of the rootstock and scion of soursop plants irrigated with water of 1.6 dS m−1 at 150 days after transplantation.
In general, the results of this research reveal that the salt stress caused by the irrigation water up to 3.2 dS m−1 negatively affected the gas exchanges, the photochemical efficiency, and the growth of the soursop plants under the conditions of a protected environment. These alterations may be related to osmotic and ionic effects, particularly of Na+ and Cl, which interfere with the metabolic processes, causing damage to the membrane, nutritional imbalance, changes in the levels of growth regulators, and decreases in the synthesis of chlorophyll [43,44]. However, the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide in low concentrations can reduce the harmful effects of the salinity of irrigation water on the soursop plant. This fact may be related to enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanisms (catalase and peroxidase) in plants, reducing the negative effect of reactive oxygen species [45,46]. Additionally, hydrogen peroxide can improve the absorption of water and nutrients, including elements such as N, P, and K that are essential for plant growth and development [47].
On the other hand, at higher concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, an effect was observed on the analyzed variables. It is important to note that the beneficial effect of hydrogen peroxide depends on several variables, including the concentration of the solution; i.e., at higher concentrations, H2O2 can exert hazardous effects on plants [12,48]. Hydrogen peroxide is the most stable reactive oxygen species in cells and, at high concentrations, can quickly spread across the subcellular membrane, resulting in oxidative damage to the plasma membrane [16]. Additionally, at high concentrations, hydrogen peroxide can react with O2 and possibly become responsible for the dissociation of the pigment-protein complex of the internal antenna of the PS II light-gathering system within the photosynthetic apparatus, leading to enzymatic inactivation, pigment discoloration, and lipid peroxidation [45,49].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Location of the Experiment

The experiment was carried out between April and November 2020 under the conditions of the greenhouse that belongs to the Academic Unit of Agricultural Engineering of the Federal University of Campina Grande, situated in the municipality of Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil, at the geographic coordinates of 07°15′18″ S, 35°52′28″ W with a mean altitude of 550 m. Figure 5 shows the temperature (maximum and minimum) and average relative air humidity data for the experimental site.

4.2. Treatments and Experimental Design

The experimental design was randomized in a 4 × 4 factorial arrangement. The treatments consisted of the combination of two factors: four levels of electrical conductivity of irrigation water (ECw; 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, and 3.2 dS m−1) associated with four concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 0, 10, 20, and 30 μM), with three replicates and one plant per plot, totaling forty-eight experimental units.
The salinity levels of the water were established based on a study conducted by [15], who observed that water up to 2.0 dS m−1 can be used to produce soursop seedlings with an acceptable average reduction (up to 10%) in growth. Concentrations of hydrogen peroxide were based on the results of an assay conducted by [9], who verified that the use of hydrogen peroxide at the concentration of 20 μM attenuated the harmful effects of irrigation water salinity on the initial growth and gas exchange of soursop cv. Morada Nova.

4.3. Description of the Experiment

Plastic recipients adapted as drainage lysimeters with 200 L capacity were used to grow the plants, and each lysimeter was drilled at the base to allow the drainage of excess water and connected to a transparent drain of 16 mm diameter. The end of the drain inside the lysimeter was wrapped with a nonwoven geotextile (Bidim OP 30) to prevent clogging by soil material. A container was placed below each drain to collect drained water and determine water consumption by the plants (Figure 6).
The pots were filled with a soil classified as Entisol with sandy loam texture from the rural area (0–0.30 m layer) of the municipality of Riachão de Bacamarte, PB, Brazil, whose chemical and physical characteristics (Table 4) were obtained according to the methodologies recommended by [50].
The saline waters were obtained by the addition of sodium chloride, calcium chloride, and magnesium chloride salts in the equivalent proportion of 7:2:1, a predominant ratio found in the principal sources of water in northeastern Brazil [51], following the relationship between electrical conductivity and the salt concentration [52], according to Equation (1):
Q = 640 × ECw
where:
Q = Quantity of salts to be applied (mg L−1);
ECw = Electrical conductivity of water (dS m−1).
After transplanting the seedlings to the lysimeters, irrigation was performed manually and applied daily to each container at 5 p.m., with the volume corresponding to that obtained by the water balance, according to Equation (2):
V I = ( V a V d ) ( 1 L F )
where:
VI = Volume of water to be applied in the irrigation event (mL);
Va = Volume applied in the previous irrigation event (mL);
Vd = Volume drained (mL);
LF = Leaching fraction of 0.10.
The soursop seedlings cv. Morada Nova were acquired from a commercial nursery accredited in the Registry of Seeds and Seedlings, located in the District of São Gonçalo, Sousa-PB, species registered under No. 23458 in the national registry of cultivars (RNC) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply of Brazil, and were produced in polyethylene bags with dimensions of 10 × 20 cm. Mineral fertilization was performed according to the recommendations of [53], applying 40 g of N, 60 g of K2O, and 40 g of P2O5 per plant per year. Urea, potassium chloride, and monoammonium phosphate (MAP) were used as sources of nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus, respectively.
The fertilizer doses were split into 24 portions and applied every 15 days. Micronutrients were applied from 60 days after transplantation (DAT) and continued at fortnightly intervals with Dripsol micro solution (2.5 g L−1) with the following composition: N (15%), P2O5 (15%), K2O (15%), Ca (1%), Mg (1.4%), S (2.7%), Zn (0.5%), B (0.05%), Fe (0.5%), Mn (0.05%), Cu (0.5%), and Mo (0.02%), by spraying on the adaxial and abaxial sides of the leaves.
The different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide were obtained by dilution in distilled water, followed by calibration in a spectrophotometer at an absorbance wavelength of 240 nm. Foliar applications started at 30 DAT of the seedlings to the lysimeters and were performed at 30-day intervals, spraying the abaxial and adaxial sides of the leaves to obtain complete wetting using a backpack sprayer between the hours of 17:00 and 18:00. On average, 330 mL of H2O2 solution was applied per plant in each application. The air drift between treatments was controlled by a plastic tarpaulin curtain which involved the entire plant as the hydrogen peroxide solution was applied (Figure 7).
Formative pruning was carried out as the plant reached 60 cm height when the apical meristem bud was cut. Of the shoots that emerged, three well-distributed and equidistant branches were selected, and these branches, in turn, were pruned when they reached 40 cm in length [54]. During the experimental period, the emergence of pests and diseases was monitored by observing their incidence, and they were eradicated by chemical control using recommended insecticides/pesticides.

4.4. Variables Analyzed

Gas exchange, chlorophyll a fluorescence, and the growth of soursop cv. Morada Nova were evaluated at 210 DAT. Gas exchange was evaluated by CO2 assimilation rate (A) (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), transpiration (E) (mmol H2O m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs) (mol H2O m−2 s−1), and internal CO2 concentration (Ci) (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) in the leaves of the middle third of the plants using a portable IRGA (infrared gas analyser, LCpro-SD model, ADC BioScientific, UK). The ratios A/gs and A/Ci were utilized to obtain WUEi, the water use efficiency ((μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) (mmol H2O m−2 s−1)−1), and CEi, the carboxylation efficiency ((μmol m−2 s−1) (μmol mol−1)−1), respectively. Observations were taken between 07:00 and 10:00 a.m. on the third fully expanded leaf counted from the apical bud under natural conditions of air temperature, CO2 concentration, and employing an artificial source of radiation established through the photosynthetic response curve to light and determination of the point of photosynthetic saturation by light [55].
Chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements were made on the same leaves utilizing a pulse-modulated fluorometer, OS5p model from Opti Science. Initial fluorescence (F0), maximum fluorescence (Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv), and the quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) were measured; this protocol was performed after adaptation of the leaves to the dark for 30 minutes between 06:00 and 09:00 a.m., utilizing a clip of the device to ensure that all the primary acceptors were fully oxidized.
The growth of soursop was evaluated by measuring crown height (Hcrown), stem diameter (SD), and crown diameter (Dcrown), which was considered the average crown diameter in the row direction (RD) and in the inter-row direction (IRD). Crown volume (Vcrown) and the vegetative vigor index (VVI) were determined by Equations (3) and (4), respectively, following the methodology of [56]:
V crown   = π   ×   H   ×   RD   ×   IRD 6
VVI = H   +   D crown + SD + 10 100
where:
Vcrown—Crown volume (m3);
VVI—Vegetative vigor index;
H—Crown height (m);
RD—Crown diameter in the row direction (m);
IRD—Crown diameter in the inter-row direction (m);
SD—Stem diameter (m).

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The collected data were subjected to the distribution normality test (Shapiro–Wilk test) at a 0.05 probability level. Subsequently, analysis of variance was performed at a 0.05 and 0.01 probability level, and in the cases of significance, a regression analysis was performed using the statistical program SISVAR-ESAL [57]. The choice of model was based on the coefficient of determination. In the case of the significance of the interaction between factors, TableCurve 3D software was used to create the response surfaces.

5. Conclusions

Physiological indices of soursop are negatively affected by increases in the electrical conductivity of irrigation water above 0.8 dS m−1. However, the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide between concentrations of 10 and 30 µM mitigates the harmful effects of salinity on the gas exchange, quantum yield, and growth in stem diameter of soursop cv. Morada Nova at 210 days after transplantation. These results reinforce the hypothesis that the foliar application of hydrogen peroxide in adequate concentrations can act as a signaling molecule, influential in mitigating salt stress in soursop plants, which can potentialize the use of brackish water in irrigated agriculture, mainly in regions with a scarcity of fresh water. However, further studies are necessary to understand how hydrogen peroxide acts in salt stress signaling through biochemical analysis. In addition, it is fundamental to perform research under field conditions to prove the beneficial effects of hydrogen peroxide in the attenuation of salt stress in soursop plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D.C. and G.S.d.L.; methodology, A.A.R.d.S., J.D.C., F.d.A.d.S. and M.d.S.D.; software, A.A.R.d.S. and T.F.d.L.A.; validation, J.D.C., G.S.d.L. and L.A.d.A.S.; formal analysis, M.S.S.d.F. and L.A.d.A.S.; investigation, G.S.d.L. and J.D.C.; resources, G.S.d.L. and L.A.d.A.S.; data collection, A.A.R.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.D.C. and G.S.d.L.; writing—review and editing, A.A.R.d.S., G.S.d.L., C.A.V.d.A., P.D.F. and H.R.G.; supervision, H.R.G.; project administration, G.S.d.L., C.A.V.d.A. and L.A.d.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) (Proc. 306245/2017-5 and 430525/2018-4), CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel), and UFCG (Universidade Federal de Campina Grande).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Graduate Program in Agricultural Engineering of the Federal University of Campina Grande, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the financial support in carrying out this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cavalcante, L.F.; Carvalho, S.D.; Lima, E.D.; Feitosa Filho, J.C.; Silva, D.A. Produção e qualidade da graviola sob irrigação e cobertura do solo com resíduo de sisal. Magistra 2016, 28, 91–101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bento, E.B.; Monteiro, Á.B.; Lemos, I.C.S.; Brito Junior, F.E.; Oliveira, D.R.; Menezes, I.R.A.; Kerntopf, M.R. Estudio etnofarmacológico comparativo en la región del Araripe de la Annona muricata L. (Graviola). Rev. Cubana Plant. Med. 2016, 21, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  3. Da Silva, A.A.R.; de Lima, G.S.; de Azevedo, C.A.V.; Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; Souza, L.D.P.; de Fátima, R.T.; Silva, F.D.A.D.; Gheyi, H.R. Exogenous application of salicylic acid on the mitigation of salt stress in Capsicum annuum L. Ciênc. Rural. 2023, 53, e20210447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silva, A.A.R.; Veloso, L.L.S.A.; Lima, G.S.; Azevedo, C.A.V.; Gheyi, H.R.; Fernandes, P.D. Hydrogen peroxide in the acclimation of yellow passion fruit seedlings to salt stress. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2021, 25, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Lima, G.S.; Pinheiro, F.W.A.; Gheyi, H.R.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; Sousa, P.F.D.N.; Fernandes, P.D. Saline water irrigation strategies and potassium fertilization on physiology and fruit production of yellow passion fruit. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2022, 26, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Lima, G.S.; dos Santos, J.B.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; Gheyi, H.R.; Nobre, R.G.; Pereira, R.F. Irrigação com águas salinas e aplicação de prolina foliar em cultivo de pimentão ‘All Big’. Comun. Sci. 2016, 7, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pinheiro, F.W.A.; de Lima, G.S.; Gheyi, H.R.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; de Oliveira, S.G.; da Silva, F.A. Gas exchange and yellow passion fruit production under irrigation strategies using brackish water and potassium. Rev. Cien. Agron. 2022, 53, e20217816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Da Silva, E.M.; De Lima, G.S.; Gheyi, H.R.; Nobre, R.G.; Sá, F.V.D.S.; Souza, L.D.P. Growth and gas exchanges in soursop under irrigation with saline water and nitrogen sources. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2018, 22, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; da Silva, A.A.R.; de Lima, G.S.; de Azevedo, C.A.V.; Gheyi, H.R.; Moreira, R.C.L. Growth and gas exchange of soursop under salt stress and hydrogen peroxide application. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2022, 26, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; Nobre, R.G.; Souza, L.D.P.; Gheyi, H.R.; Cavalcante, I.T.S.; Araujo, E.B.G.; Da Silva, W.L. Formation of soursop seedlings irrigated using waters with different salinity levels and nitrogen fertilization. Biosci. J. 2018, 34, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dos Santos, A.N.; Silva, E.F.S.; Silva, G.S.; Bezerra, R.R.; Pedrosa, M.R.P. Antioxidant response of cowpea co-inoculated with plant growth-promoting bacteria under salt stress. Braz. J. Micro. 2018, 49, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; de Azevedo, C.A.V.; Nobre, R.G.; de Lima, G.S.; Capitulino, J.D.; Silva, F.D.A.D. H2O2 alleviates salt stress effects on photochemical efficiency and photosynthetic pigments of cotton genotypes. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2023, 27, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andrade, E.M.G.; De Lima, G.S.; De Lima, V.L.A.; Da Silva, S.S.; Gheyi, H.R.; Da Silva, A.A.R. Gas exchanges and growth of passion fruit under saline water irrigation and H2O2 application. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2019, 23, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bagheri, M.; Gholami, M.; Baninasab, B. Hydrogen peroxide-induced salt tolerance in relation to antioxidant systems in pistachio seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 243, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Da Silva, A.A.R.; De Lima, G.S.; De Azevedo, C.A.V.; Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; Capitulino, J.D.; Gheyi, H.R. Induction of tolerance to salt stress in soursop seedlings using hydrogen peroxide. Comun. Sci. 2019, 10, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, L.; Huang, L.; Lin, X.; Sun, C.O. Hydrogen peroxide alleviates salinity-induced damage by increasing proline buildup in wheat seedlings. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Da Silva, A.A.R.; Sousa, P.F.D.N.; de Lima, G.S.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; Gheyi, H.R.; de Azevedo, C.A.V. Hydrogen peroxide reduces the effect of salt stress on growth and postharvest quality of hydroponic mini watermelon. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tanou, G.; Job, C.; Rajjou, L.; Arc, E.; Belghazi, M.; Diamantidis, G.; Molassiotis, A.; Job, D. Proteomics reveals the overlapping roles of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in the acclimation of citrus plants to salinity. Plant J. 2009, 60, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hajivar, B.; Zare-Bavani, M.R. Alleviation of salinity stress by hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in tomato plants. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 33, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gondim, F.A.; Miranda, R.S.; Gomes-Filho, E.; Prisco, J.T. Enhanced salt tolerance in maize plants induced by H2O2 leaf spraying is associated with improved gas exchange rather than with non-enzymatic antioxidant system. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2013, 25, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.; Hou, C.; Liu, J.; He, W.; Nan, W.; Gong, H.; Bi, Y. Hydrogen peroxide is involved in the regulation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) tolerance to salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mendonça, A.J.T.; da Silva, A.A.R.; de Lima, G.S.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; Oliveira, V.K.N.; Gheyi, H.R.; de Lacerda, C.F.; de Azevedo, C.A.V.; de Lima, V.L.A.; Fernandes, P.D. Salicylic acid modulates okra tolerance to salt stress in hydroponic system. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Lima, G.S.; De Andrade, J.N.F.; De Medeiros, M.N.V.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; Gheyi, H.R.; Nobre, R.G.; Fernandes, P.D.; De Lacerda, C.N. Gas exchange, growth, and quality of passion fruit seedlings cultivated with saline water. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2021, 42, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dias, A.S.; De Lima, G.S.; Sá, F.V.D.S.; Gheyi, H.R.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; Fernandes, P.D. Gas exchanges and photochemical efficiency of West Indian cherry cultivated with saline water and potassium fertilization. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2018, 22, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abrar, M.M.; Sohail, M.; Saqib, M.; Akhtar, J.; Abbas, G.; Wahab, H.A.; Xu, M. Interactive salinity and water stress severely reduced the growth, stress tolerance, and physiological responses of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sá, F.V.D.S.; Gheyi, H.R.; de Lima, G.S.; Pinheiro, F.W.A.; de Paiva, E.P.; Moreira, R.C.L.; Silva, L.D.A.; Fernandes, P.D. The right combination of NPK fertilization may mitigate salt stress in custard apple (Annona squamosa L.). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2021, 43, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carvalho, F.E.L.; Lobo, A.K.M.; Bonifacio, A.; Martins, M.O.; Lima Neto, M.C.; Silveira, J.A.G. Aclimatação ao estresse salino em plantas de arroz induzida pelo pré-tratamento com H2O2. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2011, 15, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Baxter, A.; Mittler, R.; Suzuki, N. EROS as key players in plant stress signalling. JXB 2014, 65, 1229–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Simões, W.L.; Coelho, D.S.; Mesquita, A.C.; Calgaro, M.; da Silva, J.S. Physiological and biochemical responses of sugarcane varieties to salt stress. Rev. Caatinga 2020, 32, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dias, A.S.; De Lima, G.S.; Pinheiro, F.W.A.; Gheyi, H.R.; Soares, L.A.D.A. Gas exchanges, quantum yield and photosynthetic pigments of West Indian cherry under salt stress and potassium fertilization. Rev. Caatinga 2019, 32, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Silveira, A.G.; Silva, S.L.F.; Silva, E.V.; Viégas, R.V. Mecanismos biomoleculares envolvidos com a resistência ao estresse salino em plantas. In Manejo da Salinidade na Agricultura: Estudos Básicos e Aplicados, 2nd ed.; Gheyi, H.R., Dias, N.d.S., de Lacerda, C.F., Gomes Filho, É., Eds.; INCTSal: Fortaleza, Brazil, 2016; Chapter 13; pp. 181–197. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hnilicková, H.; Hnilička, F.; Martinkova, J.; Kraus, K. Effects of salt stress on water status, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of rocket. Plant Soil Environ. 2017, 63, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Turan, M.; Ekinci, M.; Kul, R.; Boynueyri, F.G.; Yildirim, E. Mitigation of salinity stress in cucumber seedlings by exogenous hydrogen sulfide. J. Plant Res. 2022, 135, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Manivannan, A.; Soundararajan, P.; Muneer, S.; Ko, C.H.; Jeong, B.R. Silicon mitigates salinity stress by regulating the physiology, antioxidant enzyme activities, and protein expression in Capsicum annuum ‘Bugwang’. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 3076357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Da Silva, A.A.R.; De Lima, G.S.; De Azevedo, C.A.V.; Gheyi, H.R.; Souza, L.D.P.; Veloso, L.L.D.S.A. Gas exchanges and growth of passion fruit seedlings under salt stress and hydrogen peroxide. Pesq. Agropecu. Trop. 2019, 49, e55671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cattivelli, L.; Rizza, F.; Badeck, F.W.; Mazzucotelli, E.; Mastrangelo, A.M.; Francia, E.; Maré, C.; Tondelli, A.; Stanca, A.M. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 2008, 105, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Monteiro, D.R.; De Melo, H.F.; Lins, C.M.T.; Dourado, P.R.M.; Santos, H.R.B.; De Souza, E.R. Chlorophyll a fluorescence in saccharine sorghum irrigated with saline water. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2018, 22, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Da Silva, A.A.R.; de Lima, G.S.; de Azevedo, C.A.V.; Gheyi, H.R.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; Veloso, L.L.D.S.A. Salicylic acid improves physiological indicators of soursop irrigated with saline water. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2022, 26, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reis, F.O.; Campostrini, E. Microaspersão de água sobre a copa: Um estudo relacionado às trocas gasosas e à eficiência fotoquímica em plantas de mamoeiro. Rev. Bras. Agroc. 2011, 17, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; da Silva, A.A.R.; Capitulino, J.D.; de Lima, G.S.; de Azevedo, C.A.V.; Gheyi, H.R.; Nobre, R.G.; Fernandes, P.D. Photochemical efficiency and growth of soursop rootstocks subjected to salt stress and hydrogen peroxide. AIMS Agric. Food 2020, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yadav, S.P.; Bharadwaj, R.B.; Nayak, H.; Mahto, R.; Singh, R.K.; Prasad, S.K. Impact of salt stress on growth, productivity and physicochemical properties of plants: A Review. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2019, 7, 1793–1798. [Google Scholar]
  42. Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; De Lima, G.S.; De Azevedo, C.A.V.; Nobre, R.G.; Da Silva, A.A.R.; Capitulino, J.D.; Gheyi, H.R.; Bonifácio, B.F. Physiological changes and growth of soursop plants under irrigation with saline water and H2O2 in post-grafting phase. Semin. Ciênc. Agrár. 2020, 41, 3023–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shobha, S.; Ashwani, K.; Sehrawat, N.; Kumar, K.; Kumar, N.; Lata, C.; Mann, A. Effect of saline irrigation on plant water traits, photosynthesis and ionic balance in durum wheat genotypes. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 2510–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Najar, R.; Aydi, S.; Sassi-Aydi, S.; Zarai, A.; Abdelly, C. Effect of salt stress on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in Medicago truncatula. Plant Biosyst. 2019, 153, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kilic, S.; Kahraman, A. The mitigation effects of exogenous hydrogen peroxide when alleviating seed germination and seedling growth inhibition on salinity-induced stress in barley. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016, 25, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Da Silva, A.A.R.; De Lima, G.S.; De Azevedo, C.A.V.; Veloso, L.L.D.S.A.; Gheyi, H.R.; Soares, L.A.D.A. Salt stress and exogenous application of hydrogen peroxide on photosynthetic parameters of soursop. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2019, 23, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nazir, F.; Fariduddin, Q.T.; Khan, A. Hydrogen peroxide as a signaling molecule in plants and its crosstalk with other plant growth regulators under heavy metal stress. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Farouk, S.; Amira, M.S.A.Q. Enhancing seed quality and productivity as well as physio-anatomical responses of pea plants by folic acid and/or hydrogen peroxide application. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 240, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, L.; Ma, H.; Chen, T.; Pen, J.; Yu, S.; Zhao, X. Morphological and physiological responses of cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to salinity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Teixeira, P.C.; Donagemma, G.K.; Fontana, A.; Teixeira, W.G. Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo, 3rd ed.; Embrapa Solos: Brasília, Brazil, 2017; p. 573. [Google Scholar]
  51. Medeiros, J.F. Qualidade de Água de Irrigação e Evolução da Salinidade nas Propriedades Assistidas Pelo GAT nos Estados de RN, PB e CE. Master’s Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil, 1992; 196p. [Google Scholar]
  52. Richards, L.A. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1954; 160p.
  53. Cavalcante, F.J. Recomendações de Adubação Para o Estado de Pernambuco, 2nd ed.; IPA: Recife, Brazil, 2008; Volume 3, p. 212. [Google Scholar]
  54. EMBRAPA. A Cultura da Gravioleira, 1st ed.; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental: Manaus, Brazil, 1999; 19p. [Google Scholar]
  55. Fernandes, E.A.; Soares, L.A.D.A.; de Lima, G.S.; Neta, A.M.D.S.S.; Roque, I.A.; da Silva, F.A.; Fernandes, P.D.; de Lacerda, C.N. Cell damage, gas exchange, and growth of Annona squamosa L. under saline water irrigation and potassium fertilization. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2021, 42, 999–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Portella, C.R.; Marinho, C.S.; Amaral, B.D.; Carvalho, W.S.G.; Campos, G.S.; Silva, M.P.S.; Sousa, M.C. Desempenho de cultivares de citros enxertados sobre o trifoliateiro ‘Flying Dragon’ e limoeiro ‘Cravo’ em fase de formação do pomar. Bragantia 2016, 1, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ferreira, D.F. SISVAR: A computer analysis system to fixed effects split plot type designs. Rev. Bras. Biom. 2019, 37, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Stomatal conductance (gs) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the salinity of irrigation water (ECw) (A) and concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (B), internal CO2 concentration (Ci) (C), and transpiration (E) (D) as a function of ECw and CO2 assimilation rate (A) (E) as a function of the interaction between ECw levels and H2O2 at 210 days after transplantation. ** is, significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Figure 1. Stomatal conductance (gs) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the salinity of irrigation water (ECw) (A) and concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (B), internal CO2 concentration (Ci) (C), and transpiration (E) (D) as a function of ECw and CO2 assimilation rate (A) (E) as a function of the interaction between ECw levels and H2O2 at 210 days after transplantation. ** is, significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Plants 12 00599 g001aPlants 12 00599 g001b
Figure 2. Instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi) (A) and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) (B) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the interaction between the irrigation water salinity levels (ECw) and concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at 210 days after transplantation. ns and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Figure 2. Instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi) (A) and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) (B) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the interaction between the irrigation water salinity levels (ECw) and concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at 210 days after transplantation. ns and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Plants 12 00599 g002
Figure 3. Initial fluorescence (F0) (A), variable fluorescence (Fv) (C), and quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) (D) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the interaction between the salinity levels of irrigation water (ECw) and hydrogen peroxide concentrations, and maximum fluorescence (Fm) (B) as a function of the irrigation water salinity (ECw) at 210 days after transplantation. ns, * and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05 and ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Figure 3. Initial fluorescence (F0) (A), variable fluorescence (Fv) (C), and quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) (D) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the interaction between the salinity levels of irrigation water (ECw) and hydrogen peroxide concentrations, and maximum fluorescence (Fm) (B) as a function of the irrigation water salinity (ECw) at 210 days after transplantation. ns, * and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05 and ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Plants 12 00599 g003
Figure 4. Crown height (Hcrown) (A) and vegetative vigor index (VVI) (B) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the irrigation water salinity (ECw), and crown volume (Vcrown) (C), crown diameter (Dcrown) (D), and stem diameter (SD) (E), as a function of the interaction between the salinity of irrigation water (ECw) and hydrogen peroxide concentrations at 210 days after transplantation. ns and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Figure 4. Crown height (Hcrown) (A) and vegetative vigor index (VVI) (B) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova as a function of the irrigation water salinity (ECw), and crown volume (Vcrown) (C), crown diameter (Dcrown) (D), and stem diameter (SD) (E), as a function of the interaction between the salinity of irrigation water (ECw) and hydrogen peroxide concentrations at 210 days after transplantation. ns and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F-test. x and y correspond to ECw and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations, respectively.
Plants 12 00599 g004aPlants 12 00599 g004b
Figure 5. Observed daily temperature (maximum and minimum) and average relative humidity of air in the internal area of the greenhouse during the experimental period.
Figure 5. Observed daily temperature (maximum and minimum) and average relative humidity of air in the internal area of the greenhouse during the experimental period.
Plants 12 00599 g005
Figure 6. Illustration of filling drainage lysimeters.
Figure 6. Illustration of filling drainage lysimeters.
Plants 12 00599 g006
Figure 7. Application of hydrogen peroxide on the abaxial and adaxial sides of soursop leaves.
Figure 7. Application of hydrogen peroxide on the abaxial and adaxial sides of soursop leaves.
Plants 12 00599 g007
Table 1. Analysis of variance (F-test) summary of stomatal conductance (gs), transpirati€(E), CO2 assimilation rate (A), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi), and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at 210 days after transplantation.
Table 1. Analysis of variance (F-test) summary of stomatal conductance (gs), transpirati€(E), CO2 assimilation rate (A), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (CEi), and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at 210 days after transplantation.
Source of VariationDFMean Squares
gsEACiCEiWUEi
Salinity levels (SL)40.000547 **0.1781 **0.880 ns87.729 **0.00009 ns0.3614 ns
Linear regression10.000240 *0.111 **-122.90 **--
Quadratic regression10.00010 ns0.1220 ns-124.32 ns--
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)40.001836 **0.0206 ns2.650 *3594.42 ns0.000083 **3.1369 **
Linear regression10.004160 **-0.0811 ns-0.00009 ns5.693 **
Quadratic regression10.000300 ns-4.656 **-0.00030 **0.0965 ns
Interaction (SL × H2O2)160.001775 ns0.3500 ns9.450 **2442.85 ns0.000186 **1.074 **
Blocks30.00015 ns0.0687 ns0.1692 ns23.003 ns0.000053 ns0.2020 ns
Residual300.0001490.03470.334105.270.0000600.112
CV (%) 15.6510.3312.393.9710.2613.91
ns, * and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01. CV: coefficient of variation; DF: degrees of freedom.
Table 2. Analysis of variance (F-test) summary of initial fluorescence (F0), maximum fluorescence (Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv), and quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at 210 days after transplantation.
Table 2. Analysis of variance (F-test) summary of initial fluorescence (F0), maximum fluorescence (Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv), and quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at 210 days after transplantation.
Source of VariationDFMean Squares
F0FmFvFv/Fm
Salinity levels (SL)47842.51 **75277.36 **139489.6 **0.002239 **
Linear regression 119634.8 **190976.0 **415168.01 **0.006202 **
Quadratic regression12257.7 ns32870.5 ns3088.02 ns0.000033 ns
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)4658.99 **1771.91 ns4881.95 *0.000928 **
Linear regression 1436.32 *-608.01 ns0.000375 ns
Quadratic regression121.60 ns-13736.3 **0.002408 **
Interaction (SL × H2O2)16362.87 **7207.74 ns5538.60 **0.000163 *
Blocks3140.15 ns16949.8 ns1220.47 ns0.000065 ns
Residual3082.833186.541279.870.000049
CV (%) 1.362.422.080.97
ns, * and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05 and ≤ 0.01. DF: degrees of freedom; CV: coefficient of variation.
Table 3. Analysis of variance (F-test) summary of stem diameter (SD), crown height (Hcrown), crown diameter (Dcrown), crown volume (Vcrown), and vegetative vigor index (VVI) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at 210 days after transplantation.
Table 3. Analysis of variance (F-test) summary of stem diameter (SD), crown height (Hcrown), crown diameter (Dcrown), crown volume (Vcrown), and vegetative vigor index (VVI) of soursop plants cv. Morada Nova irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of hydrogen peroxide at 210 days after transplantation.
Source of VariationDFMean Squares
SDHcrownDcrownVcrownVVI
Salinity level (SL)40.00002 ns0.0250 *0.0748 ns0.00262 *0.0007 *
Linear regression1-0.0297 *-0.00662 **0.00001 *
Quadratic regression1-0.0285 ns-0.00063 ns0.00002 ns
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)40.000021 ns0.0129 ns0.0344 ns0.01284 **0.00006 ns
Linear regression1---0.01460 **-
Quadratic regression1---0.0107 ns-
Interaction (SL × H2O2)160.000021 **0.0109 ns0.1119 **0.0067 ns0.00005 ns
Blocks30.000030 ns0.0520 ns0.0230 ns0.00129 ns0.000075 ns
Residual 300.0000230.0780.02010.00450.00004
CV (%) 7.297.2815.8115.391.63
ns, * and ** are, respectively, not significant and significant at p ≤ 0.05 and ≤ 0.01. CV: coefficient of variation; DF: degrees of freedom.
Table 4. Chemical and physical characteristics of the soil (0–0.30 m depth) used in the experiment.
Table 4. Chemical and physical characteristics of the soil (0–0.30 m depth) used in the experiment.
Chemical characteristics
pHH2OOMPK+Na+Ca2+Mg2+Al3+H+
1:2.5g dm−3mg dm−3cmolc kg−1
6.58.1790.240.5114.95.400.9
Chemical characteristicsPhysical characteristics
ECseCECSARseESPParticle-size fraction (g kg−1)Moisture (dag kg−1)
dS m−1cmolc kg−1(mmol L−1)0.5%SandSiltClay33.42 kPa 11519.5 kPa 2
2.1516.540.163.08572.7100.7326.625.9112.96
pH: hydrogen potential, OM: Organic matter, Walkley–Black Wet Digestion; Ca2+ and Mg2+ extracted with 1 M potassium chloride at pH 7.0; Na+ and K+ extracted with 1 M ammonium acetate at pH 7.0; Al3+ + H+ extracted with 0.5 M calcium acetate at pH 7.0; ECse: electrical conductivity of saturated paste extract; CEC: cation exchange capacity; SARse: sodium adsorption ratio of saturated paste extract; ESP: exchangeable sodium percentage; superscripts 1 and 2 correspond to field capacity and permanent wilting point, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Capitulino, J.D.; Lima, G.S.d.; Azevedo, C.A.V.d.; Silva, A.A.R.d.; Arruda, T.F.d.L.; Soares, L.A.d.A.; Gheyi, H.R.; Dantas Fernandes, P.; Sobral de Farias, M.S.; Silva, F.d.A.d.; et al. Influence of Foliar Application of Hydrogen Peroxide on Gas Exchange, Photochemical Efficiency, and Growth of Soursop under Salt Stress. Plants 2023, 12, 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030599

AMA Style

Capitulino JD, Lima GSd, Azevedo CAVd, Silva AARd, Arruda TFdL, Soares LAdA, Gheyi HR, Dantas Fernandes P, Sobral de Farias MS, Silva FdAd, et al. Influence of Foliar Application of Hydrogen Peroxide on Gas Exchange, Photochemical Efficiency, and Growth of Soursop under Salt Stress. Plants. 2023; 12(3):599. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Capitulino, Jessica Dayanne, Geovani Soares de Lima, Carlos Alberto Vieira de Azevedo, André Alisson Rodrigues da Silva, Thiago Filipe de Lima Arruda, Lauriane Almeida dos Anjos Soares, Hans Raj Gheyi, Pedro Dantas Fernandes, Maria Sallydelândia Sobral de Farias, Francisco de Assis da Silva, and et al. 2023. "Influence of Foliar Application of Hydrogen Peroxide on Gas Exchange, Photochemical Efficiency, and Growth of Soursop under Salt Stress" Plants 12, no. 3: 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030599

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop