Next Article in Journal
Integrative Approach to Identifying System-Level Mechanisms of Chung-Sang-Bo-Ha-Hwan’s Influence on Respiratory Tract Diseases: A Network Pharmacological Analysis with Experimental Validation
Next Article in Special Issue
Salicylic Acid- and Potassium-Enhanced Resilience of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) against Salinity and Cadmium Stress through Mitigating Ionic and Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Different Ecological Niches of Poisonous Aristolochia clematitis in Central and Marginal Distribution Ranges—Another Contribution to a Better Understanding of Balkan Endemic Nephropathy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Uses of Salt-Tolerant Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

ROS Homeostasis and Antioxidants in the Halophytic Plants and Seeds

by
Hadi Pirasteh-Anosheh
1,2,*,
Maryam Samadi
3,
Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini
3,*,
Munir Ozturk
4,
Agnieszka Ludwiczak
5 and
Agnieszka Piernik
5
1
National Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd 8917357676, Iran
2
Natural Resources Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Shiraz 7155863511, Iran
3
Department of Plant Production and Genetics, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran
4
Department of Botany and Centre for Environmental Studies, Ege University, Izmir 35100, Turkey
5
Department of Geobotany and Landscape Planning, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(17), 3023; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173023
Submission received: 7 July 2023 / Revised: 1 August 2023 / Accepted: 3 August 2023 / Published: 22 August 2023

Abstract

:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are excited or partially reduced forms of atmospheric oxygen, which are continuously produced during aerobic metabolism like many physiochemical processes operating throughout seed life. Previously, it was believed that ROS are merely cytotoxic molecules, however, now it has been established that they perform numerous beneficial functions in plants including many critical roles in seed physiology. ROS facilitate seed germination via cell wall loosening, endosperm weakening, signaling, and decreasing abscisic acid (ABA) levels. Most of the existing knowledge about ROS homeostasis and functions is based on the seeds of common plants or model ones. There is little information about the role of ROS in the germination process of halophyte seeds. There are several definitions for halophytic plants, however, we believed “halophytes are plants that can grow in very saline environment and complete their life cycle by adopting various phenological, morphological and physiological mechanisms at canopy, plant, organelle and molecular scales”. Furthermore, mechanisms underlying ROS functions such as downstream targets, cross-talk with other molecules, and alternative routes are still obscure. The primary objective of this review is to decipher the mechanisms of ROS homeostasis in halophytes and dry seeds, as well as ROS flux in germinating seeds of halophytes.

1. Introduction

Approximately 2.5 billion years ago, reactive oxygen species (ROS) emerged on the planet alongside atmospheric oxygen, and have since played a critical part in the evolution of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms [1,2]. Numerous studies have confirmed that ROS serves a plethora of advantageous and regulatory functions in various living organisms, including plants, animals, and other eukaryotes [1,3]. For instance, ROSs have been shown to play a crucial role in regulating different developmental processes, signaling stress, interacting with other organisms, eliciting systemic responses, and triggering programmed cell death in higher plants [3].
In an ideal situation, the coordinated activity of various antioxidant enzymes and compounds assists plant cells in balancing their levels of ROS [4]. Nevertheless, when stressors are present, the amount of ROS produced surpasses the intrinsic antioxidant defense system’s capacity to eliminate them, leading to oxidative harm to various cell components such as proteins, membrane lipids, and nucleic acids [5]. These deleterious effects of ROS are often termed oxidative stress.
One of the most common plant responses to salinity and drought stress is to reduce stomatal conductivity, thus minimizing water loss [6]. This response limits the Calvin cycle’s access to CO2 for carbon stabilization; consequently, the absorbed light exceeds the amount required for normal photosynthesis [7]. Combined with the toxic impacts of sodium and chlorine accumulated in the cytosol of plants under salinity stress, this excess excitation light by depleting electron receptors (QA in PSII and NADP in PSI) affects electron transfer through photosystems and also increases ROS production (mainly O2•− and 1O2) by reducing O2 [8]. Limiting CO2 availability increases the rate of photorespiration in C3 plants, which in turn increases ROS production [9]. Therefore, salt-stressed plants use mechanisms to reduce ROS production that can maintain an acceptable level of net photosynthesis under CO2 limitation conditions and/or use alternative electron sinks that can prevent ROS formation from O2 [8].
Oxidative damage and the activity of antioxidant enzymes occur in halophyte plants like all plants. Halophytes are plants with very high tolerance to salinity stress that use different mechanisms for growth and survival in very saline environments. These plants grow in saline habitats in soils with a high salt concentration and with their special capabilities can replace ordinary plants in saline conditions [10]. Despite the differences in the definition of halophytes, in which plants are included, there are about 2500 to 3000 species of halophytes in the world [11].
It seems that halophyte species have a more noteworthy capacity than glycophytes to preserve net photosynthesis and to secure and stabilize both PS I and PS II beneath saline conditions [8,12]. Preserving net photosynthesis and protecting photosystems are the physiological mechanisms by which halophytes prevent the production of ROS in oxidative damage induced by salinity. Another interesting mechanism of halophytes to avoid oxidative damage is the switch from different modes of carbon assimilation; as some halophytes can change the carbon assimilation from C3 or C4 to Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) in high-salinity environments [13,14]. This switch is useful in reducing the production of salt-induced ROS in halophytes because CAM plants keep the stomata open at night and closed throughout the day to maintain photosynthesis during the day [8]. Although this mechanism is at first glance to prevent water loss during the day, however, by consuming the absorbed light in the current photosynthesis, it prevents the overproduction of ROS [15].
However, there is generally a dearth of knowledge about the production, scavenging, and roles of ROS in seeds and especially during the germination stage [16]. This information is even scarcer for the seeds of halophytes which naturally are salinity-tolerant plants of saline environments and hold immense potential to become non-conventional crops for arid saline lands in the future [5]. Therefore, this review aims to present an overview of the findings on (i) general mechanisms of ROS homeostasis in halophytes, (ii) ROS production and scavenging in dry seeds of halophytes, and (iii) ROS flux in germinating seeds under stress conditions.

2. Halophytes: Importance, Classification, and Salt Tolerance Mechanisms

The existence of huge resources of saline soil and water can be a major threat to sustainable agricultural production [2,15,17]. Globally, about 11% of the world’s irrigated lands are affected by varying levels of salinity [18]. However, many plants are sensitive to salinity, and their growth is limited even at low concentrations of salt [19,20].
A review of worldwide research into the introduction of salinity-tolerant cultivars shows that little success has been achieved in this regard. Thus, research on various crops in recent years has practically not led to actual salinity-tolerant cultivars for introduction to the farmer [21,22]. The findings of research on improving salinity tolerance using transgenic methods also show that a small number of these cultivars have been tested in the real field [19]. Therefore, the restrictions of common crops and the huge resources of saline water and soil have made the use of halophyte a suitable option for the production of fodder, edible seed, oilseed, biofuels, and green space inevitable [23]. Many halophyte species are used as forage; however, some are poisonous [24]. These taxa play an important role in the control of soil erosion. They are also used to clean contaminated soils and water [17,25].
Halophytes have the ability to naturally inhabit man-made areas like salt pans, roadside verges, and salt marshes [26]. This makes them ideal for bioenergy production and saline agriculture because they do not compete with crops for arable land or freshwater resources [27,28]. However, we must be cautious about the impact of activities on wild halophyte populations as their preservation is at risk due to exploitation. To ensure their long-term survival it is crucial to develop management plans that prevent the gathering of these valuable halophytic species [12,26,28].
Many studies have shown that at high salinity, the amount of halophyte production is much higher than the economic yield of commercial crops and trees [6,29]. However, it should be noted that the growth of the halophytes may be decreased at very high salinities. Therefore, is an inverse relationship between intensifying salinity and the proper halophyte number/abundance of halophytes [29], so only a few halophytes, like some Salicornia species, can grow with the salinity of seawater [22].
In general, the reaction of plants to salinity depends on their tolerance to soil salinity. Therefore, plants are divided into four categories based on the amount of dry matter production under saline conditions [30,31]:
(1)
Eu-halophytes: Growth of eu-halophytes is stimulated even in moderate salinities (such as Salicornia europaea and Suaeda maritima).
(2)
Facultative halophytes: Growth of these halophytes is slightly stimulated at low salinity (such as Plantago maritima and Aster tripolium).
(3)
Non-halophytes with low salinity tolerance: These plants are not halophytes and often include salt-tolerant crops and orchards. This group includes a wide range of economic plants such as barley (Hordeum vulgare), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), cotton (Gossypium spp.), and pistachios (Pistacia vera).
(4)
Halophobic: Plants that are sensitive to salinity and even at low salinity levels there is a significant reduction in their growth and yield, such as saffron (Crocus sativus), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), and most vegetables.
Halophytes are categorized according to the mechanism of salt extrusion [32]:
  • Recretohalophytes: Include halophytes that excrete salts on the outer surface (Exo-recretohalophytes) or the inside (Endo-recretohalophytes) of plant tissue.
  • Euhalophytes: Or true halophytes with succulent leaves or stems.
  • Pseudo-halophytes: Unreal halophytes that store salts in the parenchymal organs of the root.
By all categories, halophytes are plants with special capabilities that are good choices for the current global situation where severely limited freshwater resources, poor soil quality, and climate change have restricted the production of conventional plants [33]. Therefore, understanding the physiology of these species and elucidating their mechanisms for their high salinity tolerance is essential. Although good research has been carried out on the production of ROS, oxidative damage, and antioxidant enzymes in halophytes, more research is required to emphasize the role of ROS and antioxidants in the germination of halophytes.
Halophytes have various important mechanisms for salt tolerance, which work together to help them maintain ion balance and protect their cells from the effects of high salinity. The main important mechanisms of salt tolerance in halophytes include:
  • Halophytes have developed ways to reduce the uptake of sodium ions (Na+) from the surrounding soil or water (reduction in Na+ influx). By preventing the accumulation of sodium ions in their cells, they can avoid salt-related damage [34,35].
  • Halophytes possess compartments like vacuoles that can store and isolate excess sodium ions. This compartmentalization helps maintain sodium ion concentrations in the cytoplasm, which is crucial for cell health when dealing with high salinity conditions [34,35].
  • Some halophytes have evolved salt glands or bladders that actively excrete sodium ions from their tissues (excretion of sodium ions.) By removing these ions from their cells, they effectively regulate salt concentration and protect themselves against saline stress [35].
These mechanisms collectively allow halophytes to tolerate and thrive in environments with levels of salt. By minimizing sodium influx compartmentalizing ions within structures and actively excreting them when necessary, halophytes ensure ion homeostasis and safeguard their cells from the damaging effects of elevated salinity [36].

3. ROS and Antioxidants in Halophytes and Their Role in Salinity Tolerance

Plants primarily generate ROS in their chloroplasts during photosynthesis, resulting in the production of O2•, H2O2, and O21. Meanwhile, mitochondria produce O2• and H2O2 as a byproduct of respiration, and peroxisomes generate H2O2 during the process of photorespiration [4] as illustrated in Figure 1. Plant antioxidant defense systems include non-enzymatic and enzymatic systems involving compounds and enzymes that are distributed in different cellular compartments. The synergic action of both systems is responsible for the enhancement of the antioxidative response under salinity stress for many halophytes [37,38]. Enzymatic components of antioxidant defense include superoxide dismutases (SOD), catalases (CAT), peroxidases (POX) (glutathione peroxidase—GPX, ascorbate peroxidase—APX), and reductases (dehydroascorbate reductase—DHAR and monodehydroascorbate reductase—MDHAR). Certain antioxidant enzymes, including SOD and CAT, are speculated to have emerged as early as 3.6–4.1 billion years ago, prior to the great oxidation event that enabled organisms to cope with reactive oxygen species (ROS). These ROS emerged on Earth around 2.5 billion years ago, along with atmospheric oxygen [39]. The key non-enzymatic components are ascorbate, glutathione, tocopherol, phenolic, flavonoid, and carotenoid compounds [40,41].
By transforming O2• into H2O2, superoxide dismutase acts as “the first line of defense against ROSs”. Three primary varieties of SOD, namely cytosolic Cu-Zn SOD, mitochondrial Mn-SOD, and chloroplastic Fe-SOD, have been identified in plants [42]. Both glycophytes and halophytes exhibit a positive association between SOD activity and tolerance to salinity [8]. Nevertheless, halophytes are recognized to have relatively higher levels of SOD activity than glycophytes. For instance, when exposed to salt, Cakile maritima as a halophyte exhibits greater SOD activity than Arabidopsis thaliana as a glycophyte [43]. Yildiztugay et al. [44] indicated high SOD activity under toxic salt concentrations for Salsola crassa. However, after 30 days of salinity exposure, the activity of antioxidant enzymes in S. crassa was decreased. Therefore, the fast and stronger enhancement in SOD activity in halophytes could play an important role in stress signaling in halophytes. For example, SOD activity for halophyte Tripolium pannonicum can be dependent on salinity level and also on organs [45]. However, in Salicornia europaea, both ROS production and SOD activity are not growing at high NaCl concentrations i.e., 800 mM NaCl [46].
Catalases are enzymes consisting of 4 haem-containing subunits that help convert H2O2 into oxygen and water (H2O), effectively detoxifying it [47]. The CAT performs a range of functions, such as participating in photorespiration, eliminating H2O2 during the β-oxidation of fatty acids in germinating seeds, and promoting stress tolerance. Multiple isoforms of CAT are frequently present in plants, primarily located in the mitochondria or peroxisomes [48]. Catalases play a less significant role than SOD as was demonstrated for obligatory halophyte S. europaea [46]. Many other antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione S-transferases (GST), thiol peroxidase type II peroxiredoxin (Prx), and guaiacol peroxidase (GPOX) have also been reported from plants and contribute toward ROS homeostasis [8].
Peroxidases (POX) are glycoproteins catalyzing the oxidation of substrates by degradation of H2O2 analogical to CAT activity. The increase in the activity of POX and SOD at 300 mM NaCl in S. europaea was activated by the peroxidation of lipid membranes [49]. The highest peak intensities of POX activity were observed for S. europaea compared with A. macrostachyum and S. fruticosa from the same ecological habitat indicating the importance of POD activity in salinity tolerance strategy [50]. Kumar et al. [51] documented also that APX and POX are one of the main strategies for halophytes to control ion fluxes under high salinity for ten halophytic species.
Dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) are essential enzymes in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle, a key part of plant antioxidant defense mechanisms. DHAR and MDHAR regenerate strong antioxidant ascorbate utilizing dehydroascorbate (DHA) and monodehydroascorbate (MDHA) to maintain the pool of ascorbate in the cell [52]. The activity of both APX and MDHAR are enhanced in salt-stressed plants compared with unstressed plants. The addition of external ascorbic acid and tocopherol to plants affected by salt further heightened the activities of these enzymes compared with untreated salt-stressed controls [53]. DHAR and MDHAR activity was increased after long-term salinity stress for S. crassa. Additionally, the expression of these enzymes was found to increase 2–3 fold with increasing salinity in the halophytes Urochondra setulosa and Dichanthium annulatum [54].
To keep ROS levels within the tolerable range, plants also utilize low molecular weight non-enzymatic antioxidants such as ascorbate (AsA), glutathione (GSH), tocopherols, and flavonoids (Figure 2). Studies Anjum et al. [47] indicate a direct correlation between a plant’s tolerance to salinity and the levels of these antioxidants. AsA and GSH, two frequently occurring non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants, are present in all major compartments of plant cells, including the cytoplasm, apoplast, and chloroplast, with the ability to scavenge free radicals [55]. Their significance in enhancing salinity tolerance has been well documented. Ascorbate is a multifunctional cellular compound with an antioxidant and cofactor function. AsA is thought to play a role in mitigating the effects of salt stress by maintaining the osmotic balance in cells [56]. Sphaerophysa kotschyana as reported by Yildiztugay et al. [57] and Limonium stocksii as reported by Hameed et al. [58], both halophytic species, demonstrated an increase in AsA and GSH levels in response to salinity. Tocopherols, also known as vitamin E, are lipid-soluble compounds found in four distinct forms and are known to serve as an effective antioxidant defense for biological membranes [7].
The α-tocopherol, as a dominant form of vitamin E in the green tissues of plants, plays a crucial role in reducing the production of reactive oxygen species in the chloroplast under environmental stress conditions [59]. Ellouzi et al. [43] demonstrated an impressive antioxidant capacity of Cakile maritima correlated with the retention of a significant amount of α-tocopherol [49]. However, the level of α-tocopherol did not change significantly under salt stress, which implies that Crithmum maritima might neutralize the ROS production through direct quenching. The antioxidant role of phenolic compounds, including the subgroup flavonoids is particularly important in halophytes exposed to high salt conditions generating oxidative stress. The high content of flavonoids was noticed for Salicornia europaea, Crithmum maritimum L., Mesembryanthemum edule, and Juncus acutus [60].
The collaborative efforts of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants help maintain the levels of various ROS within a critical range necessary for regulating a variety of plant processes [8]. For example, ROSs are involved in the regulation of seed germination and dormancy [7], growth and development [61], stress acclimation, and programmed cell death [61]. However, these benefits are strictly dose-dependent. During periods of environmental stress, the production of ROS surpasses the cell’s ability to eliminate them, leading to elevated levels of ROS in the cell. This, in turn, results in oxidative damage to various cellular components such as nucleic acids, membrane lipids, and proteins [8]. Therefore, an effective antioxidant system is crucial for plants to cope with salinity stress, maintaining a crucial balance between the production of harmful ROS and their removal protects plant cells from potential oxidative damage. Furthermore, in response to salinity stress, some plants may even boost the production or activity of specific antioxidants to establish their ability to effectively manage this challenging condition [27,41].

4. ROS and Antioxidants in Dry Seeds

The seeds of many plant species have a remarkable ability to endure harsh environmental conditions such as high salinity and drought, as long as they are in a dry and inactive state. This means that most species’ seeds can remain viable in the soil for an extended period of time while still retaining the ability to sprout when conditions become favorable [62]. Even halophytes, which are plants that grow in salty environments, have seeds with low moisture content and can survive in a quiescent state. However, the production of ROS is a necessary part of seed development, germination, and seedling establishment. Therefore, an effective antioxidant system is critical for seed development, longevity, and the ability to germinate [16]. Hameed et al. [58] found that dry seeds of two halophytes, Suaeda fruticose, and Limonium stocksii, contain H2O2 and malondialdehyde. Seeds of Cladium mariscus L. (Pohl.) as a halophyte were studied for their nutritional and phytotherapeutic value. Antioxidants protect cells from oxidative stress by scavenging ROS, reactive species of nitrogen (RNS), and reactive species of sulfur (RSS) [63].
During the maturation and drying stage of seeds, ascorbate, and ascorbate peroxidase are typically depleted, which means that dry seeds usually lack these components. Nevertheless, there may be an ascorbate-independent antioxidant system in place, which could include enzymes such as SOD and CAT, as well as compounds like reduced GSH and tocopherols [64]. Hameed et al. [58] found that dry seeds of S. fruticosa and L. stocksii did not contain ascorbate, but they did have SOD, CAT, and glutathione reductase activity. The mechanisms by which quiescent seeds respond to ROS signaling pathways are still not fully understood, and it remains intriguing how seeds are able to sense ROS in their dry state.
The ascorbate-independent antioxidant system in dry seeds is a collection of enzymes and compounds that work together to protect the seeds from oxidative damage even in the absence of ascorbate and ascorbate peroxidase [47]. Superoxide dismutase is an enzyme that helps to neutralize superoxide radicals, which are highly reactive molecules that can cause damage to cell structures. Catalase is another enzyme that breaks down hydrogen peroxide, which is a type of ROS that can also cause damage to cells. Reduced glutathione (GSH) is a compound that can directly scavenge ROS and also act as a cofactor for other enzymes that play a role in antioxidant defense [47,58]. Tocopherols, also known as vitamin E, are a group of compounds that act as antioxidants by donating electrons to free radicals and thereby neutralizing them. Together, these components of the ascorbate-independent antioxidant system help to protect the dry seeds from oxidative damage and maintain their viability. However, it is still not entirely clear how this system works in detail, and further research is needed to fully understand its mechanisms [56,58].
The ascorbate-independent antioxidant system in dry seeds is thought to be an adaptation that allows seeds to withstand the oxidative stress that they may encounter during periods of desiccation and dormancy. During these periods, seeds are in a state of metabolic quiescence, which means that they are not actively growing or dividing. This quiescence is associated with a reduction in metabolic activity, including a decrease in the production of ROS [56,59]. However, while seeds are in this quiescent state, they are still exposed to environmental stresses that can generate ROS, such as exposure to light or fluctuations in temperature. The ascorbate-independent system is thought to provide a way for seeds to cope with these stresses and maintain their viability until conditions become favorable for germination [52,65].
One interesting aspect of the ascorbate-independent system is that it appears to be different in different plant species. For example, some species may have higher levels of SOD or CAT, while others may rely more on tocopherols or other compounds [7,64]. This suggests that the system has evolved independently in different lineages of plants and has been shaped by selective pressures in different environments. The ascorbate-independent antioxidant system is a fascinating adaptation that allows seeds to survive in harsh environments and maintain their viability over long periods of time. Ongoing research is helping to shed light on the details of how this system works and how it varies across different plant species [7,59].
While the ascorbate-independent antioxidant system in dry seeds has been extensively studied, many questions remain unanswered. For example, it is not yet clear how these components work together or how their activities are regulated during seed development, maturation, and dormancy. Additionally, the relative importance of each component in protecting seeds from oxidative damage may vary depending on the species and environmental conditions.
Furthermore, recent research has suggested that other compounds, such as polyamines and proline, may also play a role in the ascorbate-independent antioxidant system in dry seeds. Polyamines are organic compounds that can scavenge ROS and protect cell membranes, while proline is an amino acid that can act as a free radical scavenger and also help to stabilize proteins and membranes under stress conditions. The ascorbate-independent antioxidant system in dry seeds is a complex and dynamic network of enzymes and compounds that work together to protect the seeds from oxidative damage and maintain their viability. Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms underlying this system and how it varies across different species and environments.

5. ROS and Antioxidants in Germinating Seeds under Environmental Stresses

Abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, heat, cold, heavy metals, high irradiance, and biotic stresses can all trigger the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can cause oxidative damage to critical cell components including membrane lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids [3]. In general, stress conditions can inhibit seed germination, and this inhibition is frequently associated with oxidative stress [66]. Therefore, the efficacy of an antioxidant defense system during germination is crucial for the successful germination of seeds. Lima et al. [67] reported that Salicornia ramosissima grown at moderate to high salinity levels (110 and 200 mM) indicated a higher antioxidant activity with higher levels of phenolic compounds. Al-Shamsi et al. [68] found that Suaeda vermiculata collected from highly saline marsh showed greater activity of CAT, GPX, and APX and less content of MDA and H2O2 as ROS. Duan et al. [69] also reported that salt stress enhanced the concentration of H2O2, and MDA, as well as, the activity of SOD and APX in the leaves of Suaeda glauca during both seedling emergence and seedling growth stages in two waterlogged and drained conditions. According to Wang et al. [70], after four days of exposure to high salinity (300 mM NaCl), the seeds of Medicago sativa and Melilotus officinalis had significantly higher levels of MDA than the control group, while the MDA content of germinating seeds of Salsola drummondii did not change with increasing salinity [71]. Meanwhile, exposure to salinity led to an increase of endogenous H2O2 and MDA in two halophytes, Suaeda fruticose, and Limonium stocksii, as well as in seedlings of Sorghum bicolor, as reported by Hameed et al. [58] and Chai et al. [72], respectively.
The production of ROS and the response of halophyte seeds to oxidative damage appear to vary depending on the species and type of stress, but our current understanding is limited to a few studies. Therefore, more research is needed to fully elucidate these processes. In general, the activation of different antioxidant enzymes is often critical for successful seed germination, particularly under stress conditions [71]. For example, Pinheiro et al. [73] observed increased activity of SOD and CAT in germinating seeds of Cucumis melo after 48 h of exposure to NaCl. Similarly, the activity of SOD, CAT, and APX increased three days after sowing seeds of Chenopodium quinoa in various NaCl solutions, highlighting the importance of inducing antioxidant enzyme activity, particularly CAT, for successful seed germination under stress conditions [74]. Higher POX activity was noticed for halophytes Plantago coronopus, P. maritima, and Basia sedoides collected from different salinity areas [75] to effectively degradation of H2O2.
Our current understanding of the variations in the content of different non-enzymatic antioxidants in germinating seeds under stress conditions is limited. Hameed et al. [58] found that salinity inhibited seed germination in the coastal halophytes Suaeda fruticosa and Limonium stocksii by decreasing the ascorbate-dependent antioxidant system. Similarly, the concentration of ascorbate in germinating seeds of Salsola drummondii declined under high salinity and non-optimal temperatures [71]. In the absence of ascorbate, reduced glutathione serves as the key antioxidant in orthodox seeds [58]. However, environmental stresses can cause a decrease in its level. For example, reduced glutathione levels decreased with increasing salinity in germinating seeds of L. stocksii, S. fruticose [58], and Melilotus officinalis [70].

6. Conclusions

The production of ROS is a fundamental aspect of aerobic metabolism and is present throughout every stage of plant life, including seed development and germination. Despite their reputation as cytotoxic agents, ROS have emerged as crucial signaling molecules that regulate many plant processes, including seed germination and dormancy. The tight regulation of ROS levels creates an “oxidative window” that facilitates the germination of most seeds. The antioxidant defense system of seeds, comprising both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, plays a pivotal role in this regulation. ROS contribute to seed germination by loosening the cell wall, weakening the endosperm, triggering signaling pathways, and reducing abscisic acid levels. This suggests that ROS and antioxidants have a more extensive role in seed biology than previously recognized, and further research is needed to clarify the downstream targets, cross-talk with other molecules, and alternative pathways involved in ROS function.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and S.A.K.; methodology, H.P.-A., S.A.K. and A.L.; investigation, M.S., A.L. and H.P.-A.; resources, M.S. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and H.P.-A.; writing—review and editing, S.A.K., M.O., A.L. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ślesak, I.; Ślesak, H.; Kruk, J. Oxygen and hydrogen peroxide in the early evolution of life on earth: In silico comparative analysis of biochemical pathways. Astrobiology 2012, 12, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Ranjbar GHPakniyat, H.; Emam, Y. Physiological mechanisms of salt stress tolerance in plants: An overview. In Plant-Environment Interaction: Responses and Approaches to Mitigate Stress; Azooz, M.M., Ahmad, P., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Choudhury, F.K.; Rivero, R.M.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017, 90, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mittler, R. ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shabala, S. Signalling by potassium: Another second messenger to add to the list? J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4003–4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Ranjbar, G.; Akram, N.A.; Ghafar, M.A.; Panico, A. Forage potential of several halophytic species grown on saline soil in arid environments. Environ. Res. 2023, 219, 114954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ozgur, R.; Uzilday, B.; Sekmen, A.H.; Turkan, I. Reactive oxygen species regulation and antioxidant defence in halophytes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 832–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bose, J.; Rodrigo-Moreno, A.; Shabala, S. ROS homeostasis in halophytes in the context of salinity stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 241–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saed-Moucheshi, A.; Pakniyat, H.; Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Azooz, M.M. Role of ROS as signaling molecules in plants. In Oxidative Damage to Plants: Antioxidant Networks and Signaling; Ahmad, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 585–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Öztürk, M.; Altay, V.; Güvensen, A. Sustainable Use of Halophytic Taxa as Food and Fodder: An Important Genetic Resource in Southwest Asia. In Ecophysiology, Abiotic Stress Responses and Utilization of Halophytes; Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., Öztürk, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guvensen, A.; Gork, G.; Ozturk, M. An overview of the halophytes in Turkey. In Sabkha Ecosystems; Khan, M.A., Böer, B., Kust, G.S., Barth, H.J., Eds.; Tasks for Vegetation Science; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Parvizi, H.; Parnian, A.; Esfahan, E.Z.; Ranjbar, G.; Bhardwaj, A.K. Relationship between soil salinity and alkalinity with Alhagi camelorum growth in hypersaline and hyperarid environments. J. Arid Environ. 2022, 206, 104830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hnilickova, H.; Kraus, K.; Vachova, P.; Hnilicka, F. Salinity stress affects photosynthesis, malondialdehyde formation, and proline content in Portulaca oleracea L. Plants 2021, 10, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shah, W.H.; Saleem, S.; Mushtaq, N.U.; Rasool, A.; Tahir, I.; Rehman, R.U. C4 and CAM Plants with Better Resilience to Environmental Stresses. In Photosynthesis and Respiratory Cycles during Environmental Stress Response in Plants; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 163–191. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Saed-Moucheshi, A.; Pakniyat, H.; Pessarakli, M. Stomatal responses to drought stress. In Water Stress and Crop Plants: A Sustainable Approach; Ahmad, P., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: London, UK, 2016; pp. 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pehlivan, F.E. Free radicals and antioxidant system in seed biology. In Advances in Seed Biology; InTech: London, UK, 2017; pp. 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Parnian, A.; Spasiano, D.; Race, M.; Ashraf, M. Haloculture: A system to mitigate the negative impacts of pandemics on the environment, society and economy, emphasizing COVID-19. Environ. Res. 2021, 198, 111228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. FAO. The Statistical Year Book; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Panta, S.; Flowers, T.; Lane, P.; Doyle, R.; Haros, G.; Shabala, S. Halophyte agriculture: Success stories. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 107, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caparrós, P.G.; Ozturk, M.; Gul, A.; Batool, T.S.; Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Unal, B.T.; Altay, V.; Toderich, K.N. Halophytes have potential as heavy metal phytoremediators: A comprehensive review. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 193, 104666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Solis, C.A.; Yong, M.T.; Vinarao, R.; Jena, K.; Holford, P.; Shabala, L.; Zhou, M.; Shabala, S.; Chen, Z.H. Back to the wild: On a quest for donors toward salinity tolerant rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ranjbar, G.; Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Dehghanie, F.; Keshtkar, S.; Race, M. Feasibility of growing Salicornia species in a coastal environment through planting date and density management in a direct seawater irrigation system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 47800–47809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ranjbar, G.; Pirasteh-Anosheh, H. A glance at the salinity research in Iran with emphasis on the improvement of field crop production. Iran. J. Crop Sci. 2015, 17, 165–178. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Mirhosseini, A.; Akram, N.A.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Forage potential of Salsola species in arid-saline rangelands. Turk. J. Bot. 2021, 45, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Öztürk, M.; Altay, V.; Gucel, S.; Guvensen, A. Halophytes in the East Mediterranean—Their Medicinal and Other Economical Values. In Sabkha Ecosystems; Khan, M.A., Böer, B., Öztürk, M., Al Abdessalaam, T.Z., Clüsener-Godt, M., Gul, B., Eds.; Tasks for Vegetation Science; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Polo-Ávila, A.; Infante-Izquierdo, M.D.; Sánchez-Gullón, E.; Castillo, J.M.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F. Population Dynamic of the Annual Halophyte Salicornia ramosissima in Salt Pans: Towards a Sustainable Exploitation of Its Wild Populations. Plants 2022, 11, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hedayati-Firoozabadi, A.; Kazemeini, S.A.; Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Ghadiri, H.; Pessarakli, M. Forage yield and quality as affected by salt stress in different ratios of Sorghum bicolor-Bassia indica intercropping. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43, 2579–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fekete, R.; Bak, H.; Vincze, O.; Süveges, K.; Molnár, V.A. Road traffic and landscape characteristics predict the occurrence of native halophytes on roadside verges. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ranjbar, G.; Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Banakar, M.H.; Miri, H.R. Review on halophytes researches in Iran: Explanation of Challenges and Offer Approaches. J. Plant Ecophysiol. 2018, 10, 117–129. [Google Scholar]
  30. Prasad, M.N.V. Trace Elements as Contaminants and Nutrients: Consequences in Ecosystems and Human Health; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kue Foka, I.C.; Ketehouli, T.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.W.; Wang, F.W.; Li, H. The emerging roles of diacylglycerol kinase (DGK) in plant stress tolerance, growth, and development. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kefu, Z.; Hai, F.; Ungar, I.A. Survey of halophyte species in China. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Corwin, D.L. Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2020, 72, 842–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mishra, A.; Tanna, B. Halophytes: Potential Resources for Salt Stress Tolerance Genes and Promoters. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Meng, X.; Zhou, J.; Sui, N. Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Halophytes: Current Understanding and Recent Advances. Open Life Sci. 2018, 13, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Plant salt tolerance: Adaptations in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hafsi, C.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Gupta, D.K.; del Río, L.A.; Sandalio, L.M.; Abdelly, C. Moderate salinity enhances the antioxidative response in the halophyte Hordeum maritimum L. under potassium deficiency. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 69, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reginato, M.; Cenzano, A.M.; Arslan, I.; Furlan, A.; Varela, C.; Cavallin, V.; Papenbrock, J.; Luna, V. Na2SO4 and NaCl salts differentially modulate the antioxidant systems in the highly stress tolerant halophyte Prosopis strombulifera. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 748–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Inupakutika, M.A.; Sengupta, S.; Devireddy, A.R.; Azad, R.K.; Mittler, R. The evolution of reactive oxygen species metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5933–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, V.; Anderson, D.; Dhawan, A. Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative DNA damage and ROS-triggered mitochondria mediated apoptosis in human liver cells. Apoptosis 2012, 17, 852–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pakar, N.; Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Emam, Y.; Pessarakli, M. Barley growth, yield, antioxidant enzymes, and ion accumulation affected by PGRs under salinity stress conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 39, 1372–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alscher, R.G.; Erturk, N.; Heath, L.S. Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ellouzi, H.; Ben Hamed, K.; Cela, J.; Munné-Bosch, S.; Abdelly, C. Early effects of salt stress on the physiological and oxidative status of Cakile maritima (halophyte) and Arabidopsis thaliana (glycophyte). Physiol. Plant. 2011, 142, 128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yildiztugay, E.; Ozfidan-Konakci, C.; Kucukoduk, M. The role of antioxidant responses on the tolerance range of extreme halophyte Salsola crassa grown under toxic salt concentrations. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 110, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ludwiczak, A.; Ciarkowska, A.; Rajabi Dehnavi, A.; Cárdenas-Pérez, S.; Piernik, A. Growth Stage-, Organ- and Time-Dependent Salt Tolerance of Halophyte Tripolium pannonicum (Jacq.) Dobrocz. Life 2023, 13, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cárdenas-Pérez, S.; Rajabi Dehnavi, A.; Leszczynski, K.; Lubinska-Mielinska, S.; Ludwiczak, A.; Piernik, A. Salicornia europaea L. Functional Traits Indicate Its Optimum Growth. Plants 2022, 11, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Anjum, N.A.; Sharma, P.; Gill, S.S.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Khan, E.A.; Kachhap, K.; Sofo, A. Catalase and ascorbate peroxidase representative H2O2 detoxifying heme enzymes in plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 19002–19029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shugaev, A.G.; Lashtabega, D.A.; Shugaeva, N.A.; Vyskrebentseva, E.I. Activities of antioxidant enzymes in mitochondria of growing and dormant sugar beet roots. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 58, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lombardi, T.; Bertacchi, A.; Pistelli, L.; Pardossi, A.; Pecchia, S.; Toffanin, A.; Sanmartin, C. Biological and Agronomic Traits of the Main Halophytes Widespread in the Mediterranean Region as Potential New Vegetable Crops. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ghanem, A.-M.F.M.; Mohamed, E.; Kasem, A.M.M.A.; El-Ghamery, A.A. Differential Salt Tolerance Strategies in Three Halophytes from the Same Ecological Habitat: Augmentation of Antioxidant Enzymes and Compounds. Plants 2021, 10, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar, A.; Mann, A.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, N.; Meena, B.L. Physiological response of diverse halophytes to high salinity through ionic accumulation and ROS scavenging. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2021, 23, 1041–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Anee, T.I.; Parvin, K.; Nahar, K.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M. Regulation of Ascorbate-Glutathione Pathway in Mitigating Oxidative Damage in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kohli, S.K.; Khanna, K.; Bhardwaj, R.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Ahmad, P.; Corpas, F.J. Assessment of subcellular ros and no metabolism in higher plants: Multifunctional signaling molecules. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mann, A.; Kumar, N.; Lata, C.; Kumar, A.; Meena, B.L.; Kumar, A. Physiological and differential gene expression reveals a trade-off between antioxidant capacity and salt tolerance in halophytes Urochondra setulosa and Dichanthium annulatum. Plant Growth Regul. 2023. preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Akram, N.A.; Shafiq, F.; Ashraf, M. Ascorbic acid-a potential oxidant scavenger and its role in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xiao, M.; Li, Z.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, F.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z. The multiple roles of ascorbate in the abiotic stress response of plants: Antioxidant, cofactor, and regulator. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 598173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yildiztugay, E.; Ozfidan-Konakci, C.; Kucukoduk, M. Sphaerophysa kotschyana, an endemic species from Central Anatolia: Antioxidant system responses under salt stress. J. Plant Res. 2013, 126, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hameed, A.; Rasheed, A.; Gul, B.; Khan, M.A. Salinity inhibits seed germination of perennial halophytes Limonium stocksii and Suaeda fruticosa by reducing water uptake and ascorbate dependent antioxidant system. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 107, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Szarka, A.; Tomasskovics, B.; Bánhegyi, G. The ascorbate–glutathione–α-tocopherol triad in abiotic stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 4458–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Castagna, A.; Mariottini, G.; Gabriele, M.; Longo, V.; Souid, A.; Dauvergne, X.; Magné, C.; Foggi, G.; Conte, G.; Santin, M.; et al. Nutritional Composition and Bioactivity of Salicornia europaea L. Plants Grown in Monoculture or Intercropped with Tomato Plants in Salt-Affected Soils. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gechev, T.S.; Van Breusegem, F.; Stone, J.M.; Denev, I.; Laloi, C. Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death. Bioessays 2006, 28, 1091–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gul, B.; Ansari, R.; Flowers, T.J.; Khan, M.A. Germination strategies of halophyte seeds under salinity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 92, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rodrigues, M.J.; Custódio, L.; Mecha, D.; Zengin, G.; Cziáky, Z.; Sotkó, G.; Pereira, C.G. Nutritional and Phyto-Therapeutic Value of the Halophyte Cladium mariscus L. (Pohl.): A Special Focus on Seeds. Plants 2022, 11, 2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, K.; Arora, R. Dynamics of the antioxidant system during seed osmopriming, post priming germination, and seedling establishment in Spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Plant Sci. 2011, 180, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kamińska, I.; Lukasiewicz, A.; Klimek-Chodacka, M.; Długosz-Grochowska, O.; Rutkowska, J.; Szymonik, K.; Baranski, R. Antioxidative and osmoprotecting mechanisms in carrot plants tolerant to soil salinity. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xu, S.; Zhu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, N.; Wang, R.; Shen, W.; Yang, J. Hydrogen-rich water alleviates salt stress in rice during seed germination. Plant Soil 2013, 370, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lima, A.R.; Castaneda-Loaiza, V.; Salazar, M.; Nunes, C.; Quintas, C.; Gama, F.; Pestana, M.; Correia, P.J.; Santos, T.; Varela, J.; et al. Influence of cultivation salinity in the nutritional composition, antioxidant capacity and microbial quality of Salicornia ramosissima commercially produced in soilless systems. Food Chem. 2020, 333, 127525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Al-Shamsi, N.; Hussain, M.I.; El-Keblawy, A. Physiological responses of the xerohalophyte Suaeda vermiculata to salinity in its hyper-arid environment. Flora 2020, 273, 151705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Duan, H.; Ma, Y.; Liu, R.; Li, Q.; Yang, Y.; Song, J. Effect of combined waterlogging and salinity stresses on euhalophyte Suaeda glauca. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, X.; Zhao, G.; Gu, H. Physiological and antioxidant responses of three leguminous species to saline environment during seed germination stage. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 5773–5779. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rasheed, A.; Hameed, A.; Khan, M.A.; Gul, B. Variation in temperature and light but not salinity invokes antioxidant enzyme activities in germinating seeds of Salsola drummondii. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chai, Y.Y.; Jiang, C.D.; Shi, L.; Shi, T.S.; Gu, W.B. Effects of exogenous spermine on sweet sorghum during germination under salinity. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pinheiro, D.T.; Silva, A.L.; Silva, L.J.; Sekita, M.C.; Dias, D.C. Germination and antioxidant action in melon seeds exposed to salt stress. Pesqui. Agropecuária Trop. 2016, 46, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Panuccio, M.R.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Akhtar, S.S.; Muscolo, A. Effect of saline water on seed germination and early seedling growth of the halophyte quinoa. AoB Plants 2014, 6, plu047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ivan, M.A.; Zamfirache, M.M.; Grigore, M.N.; Oprica, L. Determination of antioxidant enzymatic activity in several halophytes from Dobrogea area. J. Exp. Mol. Biol. 2012, 13, 47. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Major compartments of plant cells responsible for ROS generation. Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and cellular respiration as crucial processes responsible for ROS production were highlighted in the plant cell. ROS are constantly synthesized in chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes as part of normal plant cell metabolism. The leak out in the electron transport chain in chloroplasts and mitochondria leads to the formation of superoxide (O2) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Oxidative metabolism in peroxisome produces H2O2, O2, and singlet oxygen (1O2). Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Major compartments of plant cells responsible for ROS generation. Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and cellular respiration as crucial processes responsible for ROS production were highlighted in the plant cell. ROS are constantly synthesized in chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes as part of normal plant cell metabolism. The leak out in the electron transport chain in chloroplasts and mitochondria leads to the formation of superoxide (O2) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Oxidative metabolism in peroxisome produces H2O2, O2, and singlet oxygen (1O2). Created with BioRender.com.
Plants 12 03023 g001
Figure 2. Essential non-enzymatic antioxidants and their multifunctional role. Ascorbate, glutathione, tocopherols, and flavonoids function as protection molecules against oxidative stress in the cell were marked. As non-enzymatic antioxidants cooperate to neutralize ROS and their negative impact on cells and by additional function (listed in the frame) mitigate abiotic stress. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Essential non-enzymatic antioxidants and their multifunctional role. Ascorbate, glutathione, tocopherols, and flavonoids function as protection molecules against oxidative stress in the cell were marked. As non-enzymatic antioxidants cooperate to neutralize ROS and their negative impact on cells and by additional function (listed in the frame) mitigate abiotic stress. Created with BioRender.com.
Plants 12 03023 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pirasteh-Anosheh, H.; Samadi, M.; Kazemeini, S.A.; Ozturk, M.; Ludwiczak, A.; Piernik, A. ROS Homeostasis and Antioxidants in the Halophytic Plants and Seeds. Plants 2023, 12, 3023. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173023

AMA Style

Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Samadi M, Kazemeini SA, Ozturk M, Ludwiczak A, Piernik A. ROS Homeostasis and Antioxidants in the Halophytic Plants and Seeds. Plants. 2023; 12(17):3023. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pirasteh-Anosheh, Hadi, Maryam Samadi, Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini, Munir Ozturk, Agnieszka Ludwiczak, and Agnieszka Piernik. 2023. "ROS Homeostasis and Antioxidants in the Halophytic Plants and Seeds" Plants 12, no. 17: 3023. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop