Next Article in Journal
Tracking Permeation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) in Mentha × piperita Shoot Tips Using Coherent Raman Microscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Tomato Fruit Quality and Identification of Volatile Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Histological and Physiological Effects of Treatment of Rudbeckia hirta with Gamma Radiation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Promoter Variation of the Key Apple Fruit Texture Related Gene MdPG1 and the Upstream Regulation Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Important Volatile Organic Compounds and Genes Produced by Aroma of Pepper Fruit by HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA Sequencing

1
Sanming Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanming 365509, China
2
Fujian Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and Innovative Utilization for Mountain Area, Sanming 365509, China
3
Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China
4
Key Laboratory of Applied Genetics of Universities in Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
5
College of Horticultural Sciences, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 350002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(12), 2246; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122246
Submission received: 4 May 2023 / Revised: 1 June 2023 / Accepted: 2 June 2023 / Published: 8 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fruit Development and Quality Formation of Horticultural Crops)

Abstract

:
Pepper is an important condiment, and its aroma affects its commercial value. In this study, transcriptome sequencing and combined headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) were used to analyze the differentially expressed genes and volatile organic compounds in spicy and non-spicy pepper fruits. Compared with non-spicy fruits, there were 27 up-regulated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 3353 up-regulated genes (Up-DEGs) in spicy fruits. The results of KEGG enrichment analysis of the Up-DEGs combined with differential VOCs analysis showed that fatty acid biosynthesis and terpenoid biosynthesis may be the main metabolic pathways for aroma differences between non-spicy and spicy pepper fruits. The expression levels of the fatty acid biosynthesis-related genes FAD, LOX1, LOX5, HPL, and ADH and the key terpene synthesis gene TPS in spicy pepper fruits were significantly higher than those in non-spicy pepper fruits. The differential expression of these genes may be the reason for the different aroma. The results can provide reference for the development and utilization of high-aroma pepper germplasm resources and the breeding of new varieties.

1. Introduction

Pepper is one of the world’s most popular vegetables and spices [1,2]. The Capsicum genus comprises at least 32 species, of which 5 (C. annuum, C. chinense, C. baccatum, C. frutescens, and C. pubescens) are domesticated, while the others are classified as semi-domesticated and wild [3]. Their unique aroma components have an important influence on the flavor of fruits and vegetables and their processed products [4]. C. annuum and C. chinense are the two most widely cultivated peppers in China. The most obvious difference between them is that C. chinense has a volatile irritating smell and a unique spicy flavor. Moreover, most C. chinense varieties have a distinctive fragrance and are of high commercial value [5,6]. In C. annuum varieties, the contents and types of volatile substances have gradually decreased or even disappeared with fruit development in different periods [7].
Terpenoids, most of which have strong biological activity and aroma, are important raw materials for food, medicine, cosmetics, and spices [8]. Terpenoids are closely related to the production of fruit aroma [9,10,11]. Volatile terpenes mainly include isoprene, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes and its derivatives [8]. Terpenoids are the main volatile components in pepper. These terpenoids are not only produced by the metabolism of pepper, but also by the decomposition of macromolecular terpenoids (such as carotenoids) in storage [12]. In addition to terpenoids, pepper also contains small amounts of aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, esters, and other substances, most of which come from the decomposition and esterification of fatty acids [13,14]. Some aldehydes, ketones, and esters have a low flavor threshold and tend to have the characteristic green smell and fruity aroma of pepper. They may also be important flavor components in pepper [13,15].
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be grouped according to their biosynthetic origins as fatty acid derivatives, amino acid derivatives, terpenoids, phenylpropanoids/benzenoids, and species- or genus-specific compounds not involved in those major classes [16,17]. As an important attribute of the sensory quality of pepper, VOCs are one of the important indicators for measuring the commerciality of pepper, which has been paid more and more attention by pepper producers, processing enterprises, and consumers [18]. Because of its high nutritional value, it is necessary to study and evaluate its potential as a functional food and active compound. Like most of the quality traits of the pepper fruit, the variation of volatile substances is the result of the combination of genotype and environment, and it may be jointly regulated by many genes and metabolic networks [19,20,21]. The types and contents of volatile substances vary according to the cultivated species, the fruit’s development stage, and the fruit’s location [22,23]. At present, although there are some studies on the types, the sources, and influencing factors of pepper aroma substances, most of them focus on dried chili and its products, the aroma substances and their relationship with external factors, and most of them concern the expression of their appearance, and there is a lack of in-depth research on the formation mechanism of pepper aroma [24,25].
Combined transcriptome (RNA-Seq) and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis are widely used to systematically study the formation mechanism of fruit aroma [26,27,28,29]. However, it has not been reported that RNA-Seq and HS-SPME-GC-MS have been used to analyze the formation mechanism of pepper aroma.
In the present study, we investigated two main cultivated pepper species’ (C. annuum and C. chinense) VOC classification and content, and identified their main odor-contributing volatile components. Moreover, we conducted global expression analysis using RNA-Seq in two main cultivated pepper species (C. annuum and C. chinense) to identify the key candidate genes controlling pepper aroma that were obtained, and we used qPCR to validate our findings. These results help us to understand the main aroma biosynthesis that affects the fruit quality of capsicum and to improve the fruit quality of pepper in future cultivation.

2. Results

2.1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Non-Spicy (A) and Spicy (B) Pepper Fruits

Through OPLS-DA analysis of the filter metabolites in the orthogonal variables, 88 unrelated to the classification variables and 89 to the non-orthogonal variables and orthogonal variables were analyzed, respectively, to obtain more reliable metabolites among the 90 group differences and the degree of correlation information of the experimental group. The R2Y in OPLS-DA analysis of aroma substances in non-spicy and spicy pepper fruits was 1, indicating that the more stable and reliable the model was, the more successfully the model could be used to screen differential metabolites. Q2Y = 0.944 > 0.9, indicating that this model is an excellent model that can distinguish correct sample groups by metabolite expression (Figure 1A). The analysis of PCA (Principal Component Analysis) results showed that the three biological repeats of non-spicy (A) C. annuum were in the same category, and the three biological repeats of spicy (B) C. chinense were in the same category, with good repeatability (Figure 1A). A total of 166 volatile compounds was detected in both the non-spicy and spicy capsicum fruits, including 27 Esters (16%), 25 Alkanes (15%), 22 Ketones (16%), 21 Alcohols (13%), 20 Others (12%), 17 Aldehydes (10%), and 11 Heterocyclic compounds (7%), 4 Acids (3%), 3 Phenols (2%), 3 Furans (2%), 3 Cyanides (2%), 2 Amides (1%), 2 Thioethers (1%), 2 Pyrazines (1%), 2 Terpenoids (1%), and 2 Alkenes (1%) (Figure 1B). In addition, the average volatile matter content of spicy pepper fruit (B) was 39.79% higher than that of non-spicy pepper fruit (A).

2.2. Differential VOCs in the Non-Spicy (A) and Spicy (B) Pepper Fruits

Based on the quantitative analysis of aroma substances of non-spicy and spicy pepper fruits, 37 different volatile components were found. According to the structural characteristics of the 37 different volatile metabolites, they were further divided into fatty derivatives such as butanal, 3-methyl-, hexanal, 2-Pentenal, (E)-, 2-Hexenal, (E)-, octanal, nonanal, etc., aromatic derivatives such as mequinol, nitrogen and oxygen heterocyclic compounds such as furan, 3-methyl-,Furan, 2-ethyl-,Furan, 2-pentyl-,2(4H)-Benzofuranone, and 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, (R), and terpenoid derivatives such as 1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde, 2,6,6-trimethyl-,Hydroxypivalic acid.
There were 30 fatty derivatives in the differentially volatile components, and there were 22 fatty derivatives. The content of spicy pepper fruit (B) was significantly higher than that of non-spicy pepper fruit (A), and the content of 1-Hexanol, 2-Hexen-1-ol, (E)-, 2-Hexenal, (E)-, 1-Penten-3-ol, Hexanal and other fatty derivatives was higher. Moreover, the content in non-spicy pepper fruit (A) had the largest difference (Table 1). In addition, the content of 1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde,2,6,6-trimethyl-, a terpenoid derivative in spicy pepper fruit (B) was significantly higher than that contained in non-spicy pepper fruit (A). These results suggest that fatty derivatives may be an important reason for the difference in aroma between non-spicy and spicy pepper fruits.

2.3. Overview of Transcriptomic Data for 17-03 and H1023 Non-Spicy (A) and Spicy (B) Pepper Fruits

An Illumina sequencing platform was used for high-throughput sequencing analysis of cDNA from pepper fruit samples. After sequencing quality control of the original data, the redundant sequences and low-quality reads were removed, generating 28.87 Gb of clean data. At least 2.21 Gb of clean data were generated for each sample, with a minimum of 92.87% of the clean data achieving a quality score of Q30 (Table 2). The clean reads of each sample were mapped to the specified reference genome. The mapping ratio ranged from 89.67% to 94.55% (Table 3).
The mapping ratio refers to the percentage of mapped reads in clean reads, which indicates the utilization of RNA data. Besides the influence of sequencing data quality, the mapping ratio is also affected by the quality of reference genome assembly and the biological classification relation between the sequenced sample and reference subspecies. The mapping ratio is an important parameter for examining whether the reference genome is suitable for following bioinformatic analysis.

2.4. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

For experiments with biological replicates, differential expression analysis is processed by DESeq2 [30]. For projects without biological replicates, edgeR [31] is applied. The criteria for differentially expressed genes were set as Fold Change (FC) ≥ 2 and FDR < 0.01. Fold change (FC) refers to the ratio of gene expression in two samples. False Discovery Rate (FDR) refers to adjusted p-value, which is used to measure the significance of difference.
The FPKM algorithm was used for differential expression analysis among the samples, and the results showed that there was a total of 8172 differentially expressed genes between the non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits, of which 3353 genes of spicy pepper fruit (B) were up-regulated and 4819 genes of spicy pepper fruit (B) were down-regulated relative to non-spicy pepper fruit (A) (Figure 2).

2.5. KEGG Functional Annotations of DEGs

In this session, we examined if the pathways are over-presented with DEGs. Enrichment factors and Fisher’s test were applied in the determination of enrichment degree and significancy of the pathway. The enrichment of DEGs in KEGG pathways is shown in the figures below. The top 20 different expressed up-regulated gene-enriched pathways (with smallest Q-value) are shown (Figure 3).
The KEGG metabolic pathways that significantly up-regulated gene enrichment of spicy (B) and non-spicy (A) pepper fruits mainly included fatty acid biosynthesis, ubiquinone and other kinds of terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway, fructose and mannose metabolism, citrate cycle (TCA cycle), arginine biosynthesis, purine metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, and other metabolic pathways. On the strength of the analysis results of the VOCs in the non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits, the biosynthesis of fatty acid biosynthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis and ubiquinone and other kinds of terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis may be the main metabolic pathways of aroma differences between non-spicy and spicy pepper fruits.

2.6. Analysis of DEGs Related to Fatty Acid and Terpene Biosynthesis

The results of up-regulated differential metabolites and differential gene KEGG enrichment in non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits indicated that the differential expression of genes related to fatty acid biosynthesis, fatty acid elongation, and ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis pathways may be the key reason for the aroma differences between two kinds of pepper fruits. Through transcriptome data screening, the key genes of the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway in spicy pepper fruit (B) were found to be FAD (Capana03g000452, Capana06g002292), LOX (Capana12g002284, Capana01g000180), HPL (Capana03g003512, Capana03g003513), and ADH (Capana04g000980). The above key gene expressions in spicy pepper fruit (B) were significantly higher than those in non-spicy pepper fruit (A). In addition, TPS (Capana10g000571), a key gene for ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis pathways, was significantly up-regulated in spicy pepper fruit (B) (Figure 4A). In order to confirm the accuracy of the transcriptome sequencing results, qRT-PCR was performed to verify the differentially expressed genes above, and the results showed that the expression levels of the above genes in spicy pepper fruit (B) were significantly higher than those in non-spicy pepper fruit (A) (Figure 4B).

3. Discussion

Aroma is an important feature of pepper fruit flavor and quality, which is closely related to VOCs in pepper fruit [32,33]. In this study, headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) combined with transcriptome were used to reveal the differential gene expression of aroma components and related metabolic pathways in non-spicy and spicy pepper fruit. It is not only helpful to understand the main VOCs formed by different aroma, but also to further explore the main metabolic pathways and potential key genes forming aroma differences. The purpose of this study is to provide a theoretical basis for future molecular breeding of pepper aroma.

3.1. The Contents of Fatty Acids and Terpenes Affect the Aroma Production of Capsicum Fruit

The main VOCs in pepper fruits are esters and terpenes. Other trace compounds include lipoxygenase derivatives, nitrogen–sulfur compounds, phenolic derivatives, norcarotene, carbonyl groups, alcohols, and other hydrocarbons [5,34]. In this study, it was found that there were 166 kinds of VOCs in non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits, of which esters accounted for the largest proportion, which were the main VOCs in the two kinds of pepper fruits. The average volatile content of spicy pepper fruit (B) was significantly higher than that of non-spicy pepper fruit (A). According to this result, we think that the content of VOCs determines the formation of the aroma of pepper fruit, not the type of VOCs.
According to the structural characteristics, VOCs can be divided into fatty derivatives, terpene derivatives, aromatic derivatives, and nitrogen-containing and oxygen-containing heterocyclic compounds [35]. The content of 27 VOCs in spicy pepper fruit (B) was significantly higher than that in non-spicy pepper fruit (A), among which fat derivatives accounted for the highest proportion. The contents of n-hexanol, trans-2-hexenol, 2-hexenal-2, 1-pentene-3-ol, n-hexanal, nonanal, geranyl acetone, and other fatty derivatives in spicy pepper fruit are quite different from those in non-spicy pepper fruit, which may be an important reason for the aroma difference between spicy pepper fruit and non-spicy pepper fruit (A) with strong green aroma and flower and fruit aroma. In previous studies, sniffing analysis showed that the odors produced by peppers were green leaves, cucumbers, irritants, or herbs [36]. During the ripening process of pepper, fatty derivatives are accumulated, and they can synthesize VOCs using fat and linolenic acid as precursors, thus giving pepper fruit a green aroma [17]. In this study, spicy pepper fruit (B) contained higher levels of trans-2-hexenol and 2-hexenal, which are fatty derivatives.
Due to the odor threshold, not all VOCs could significantly affect the formation of pepper aroma. Previous studies have found that n-hexanal, 2-hexenal, and nonanal can significantly promote the formation of pepper aroma [37], and these substances also have a high content in spicy pepper fruits (B). Floral and fruity aroma is another important feature of pepper aroma; β-ring citral, n-hexanol, and 1-penten-3-ol have sweet fruity aroma; nonanal has a citrus and orange-like odor; and geranyl acetone has a woody floral scent [38]. In spicy pepper fruit (B), the content of β-ring citral, n-hexanol, and 1-penten-3-ol is higher, which makes it produce a more intense fruit aroma. However, the characteristic flavor of pepper fruit is related to the type and combination ratio of VOCs, and the proportion of the unique flavor of spicy pepper fruit (B) needs further study.

3.2. The Key DEGs in the Aroma of Spicy Pepper Fruits

In this study, transcriptome sequencing was used to explore the main metabolic pathways and potential key genes responsible for the aroma difference between non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits. Through KEGG functional enrichment of up-regulated expressed genes in spicy pepper fruits (B), it was found that it contains multiple metabolic pathways related to the formation of aroma differences: fatty acid biosynthesis and extension related to fatty derivatives, biosynthesis of ubiquinone and other terpenoids related to terpenoid biosynthesis, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate, fructose and mannose metabolism related to the biosynthesis of aroma substances with monosaccharides and glycosides as precursors, and the metabolism of arginine biosynthesis related to the synthesis of aroma substances from amino acids as precursors (Figure 3). Previous studies have shown that C6 and C9 aldehydes are the main contributors to the green aroma and are involved in fatty acid metabolism [32]. Unsaturated fatty acids are oxidized to form 9-hydroperoxy and 13-hydroperoxy intermediates, which are further metabolized by two lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway branches to produce VOCs such as n-hexanal, nonanal, and 2-hexenal, which are high in spicy pepper fruit (B) [39]. Terpenoids are one of the important components of fruit aroma, and the content of β-cyclic citral B is high in spicy pepper fruit (B). Therefore, the biosynthesis pathway of terpenes such as ubiquinone may also be an important factor in the formation of aroma differences [16,40]. In addition, the synthesis of aroma substances also involves biosynthesis with amino acids as precursors. Therefore, it is speculated that the biosynthesis of arginine may also be related to the formation of aroma differences.
Combined with the results of differential volatile component analysis and differential gene metabolic pathway analysis of non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits, the results showed that fatty acid biosynthesis and biosynthesis of terpenoids such as elongation and ubiquinone may be the main metabolic pathway for aroma differences between non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits. Fatty acids form linoleic acid and linolenic acid under the action of fatty acid desaturase (FAD); LOX recognizes and binds linoleic acid and linolenic acid, deoxidizes the substrate, and then decomposes and metabolizes peroxisome lyase (HPL) to produce oxygen-containing acids and volatile aldehydes; and volatile aldehydes can be converted into alcohols by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) [41,42,43]. It was found that the expression levels of FAD, LOX1, LOX5, HPL, and ADH genes in spicy pepper fruit (B) were significantly higher than those in non-spicy pepper fruit (A). These genes were highly related to the synthesis of fat derivatives. In addition, terpene synthase (TPS) is the key enzyme of terpene biosynthesis pathway, and the expression level of TPS in pepper fruit (B) is significantly higher than that in non-spicy pepper fruit (A). The high expression of these genes may be the reason why the synthesis of fat derivatives and terpenes in spicy pepper fruit (B) is higher than that in non-spicy pepper fruit (A) and form the aroma of pepper fruit. However, in most cases, the use of pepper fruit aroma is in ripe fruit. However, in future research, we should further consider using fruits at different development stages as research materials for analysis because this is more conducive to understanding the differences of important metabolites and gene expression in different stages of pepper fruit aroma formation.
Conclusions: We analyzed the important VOCs and key genes of aroma formation in spicy pepper fruit (B) by the combination of HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA-seq. It was found that the difference of fat derivatives and terpene synthesis was an important reason for the aroma of pepper fruit.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

A: C. annuum high generation inbred line (fruit yellow, not spicy) and B: C. chinense (fruit yellow, spicy) (Figure 5). The seeds of the two pepper varieties came from Sanming Academy of Agricultural Sciences and were planted in the high heat pepper artificial climate chamber of the Vegetable Research Institute of Sanming Academy of Agricultural Sciences in the spring of 2021. On 15 January, the seedlings were sown and cultivated, and, on 25 March, the pepper was planted in the artificial climate chamber with high spiciness. Each material was planted with 20 POTS, and the conventional cultivation and management were carried out. After the fruits were ripe, 6 fruits of A: C. annuum and B: C. chinense were selected and mixed into a biological replicate: a total of 3 groups of biological replicates.

4.2. Sample Preparation and GC-MS Analysis

Take a 100 mg sample into the 20 mL headspace bottle, add 10 μL of 2-Octanol (10 mg/L stock in dH2O) as internal standard, and set the extraction time at 30 min. All samples were analyzed by a gas chromatography system coupled with a spectrometer (GC-MS) in an SPME cycle of a PAL rail system. The type of 57299-USPME (divinylstyrene/carbon box/polydimethylsiloxane DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber was used. The incubate temperature was 60 °C; the preheat time was 15 min; the incubate time was 30 min; and the desorption time was 4 min. GC-MS analysis was performed using an Agilent 7890 gas chromatography system (The system utilized a DB-Wax, injected in Splitless Mode) coupled with a 5977B mass spectrometer. Helium was used as the carrier gas, the front inlet purge flow was 3 mL min−1, and the gas flow rate through the column was 1 mL min−1. The initial temperature was kept at 40 °C for 4 min, then raised to 245 °C at a rate of 5 °C min−1 and kept there for 5 min. The injection, transfer line, ion source, and quad temperatures were 250, 250, 230, and 150 °C, respectively. The energy was −70 eV in electron impact mode. The mass spectrometry data were acquired in scan mode with the m/z range of 20–400 and a solvent delay of 0 min. Chroma TOF 4.3X software of LECO Corporation and a Nist database were used for raw peaks’ exacting, the data baselines’ filtering and calibration of the baseline, peak alignment, deconvolution analysis, peak identification, integration, and spectrum match of the peak area.

4.3. RNA Extraction and RNA-Seq Analysis

RNA extraction, transcriptome sequencing, and data analysis were commissioned by Beijing Baimaike Cloud Technology Co., LTD. The total RNA was extracted by the Trizol method (Invitrogen). RNA concentration and purity were measured by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 test kit from the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Two cDNA libraries of the capsicum non-spicy group (A1, A2, A3) and spicy pepper group (B1, B2, B3) were constructed and sequenced by the Illumina HiSeq platform after quality detection. With the capsicum genome database (URL: http://peppersequence.genomics.cn/ accessed on 19 January 2014) as the reference sequence, annotation high quality clean reads were obtained. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was adopted to calibrate the hypothesis testing probability (p value) by multiple hypothesis testing and to obtain the False Discovery Rate, FDR. EdgeR was used for differential expression analysis of the two samples. FDR < 0.01 and Fold Change ≥ 2 were set as thresholds for significant differential expression. The differential expression, functional annotation, and functional enrichment of the genes in the non-spicy and spicy samples were analyzed.

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

qRT-PCR assay was performed following the method of a previous study [44]. The SYBR Premix Ex Taq II system of TaKaRa in Japan was used to measure relative expression levels at the transcription level of specific genes. The total RNA of Capsicum was extracted by a Trizol kit (Invitrogen, 15596026). The cDNA obtained by reverse transcription was used as the reaction template, and specific primers were performed according to aroma-related candidate genes. The reaction system (10 μL): cDNA template 1 μL; specific primer (Table 4) 0.3 μL; 2×SYBR 5 μL; ddH2O 3.4 μL. Reaction procedure: 94 °C 5 s; 94 °C 30 s; 60 °C 34 s; each group involved 8 biological replicates. The transcription expression levels of CaACTIN (GQ339766) or 18 s rRNA (EF564281) were used as internal parameters to standardize the relative transcription expression levels of the candidate genes to be tested relative to the control group.

Author Contributions

Y.Q. and W.C. (Weiwei Cai) conceived the research and designed the experiments. W.C. (Weiwei Cai), L.W., H.W., J.F., W.C. (Weiting Chen), Y.L. (Yongqing Li) and W.S. performed the experiments. C.L., S.L., S.Z., Y.L. (Ying Luo), Y.L. (Ying Luo) and R.Z. analyzed the data. Y.Q. and S.Y. (Sheng Yang) wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the Guiding project of Fujian Province of China (Breeding of new pepper varieties with high aroma, 2020N0047).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perry, L.; Dickau, R.; Zarrillo, S.; Holst, I.; Pearsall, D.; Piperno, D.; Berman, M.; Cooke, R.; Rademaker, K.; Ranere, A.; et al. Starch fossils and the domestication and dispersal of chili peppers (Capsicum spp. L.) in the Americas. Science 2007, 315, 986–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kim, S.; Park, M.; Yeom, S.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.; Seo, E.; Choi, J.; Cheong, K.; Kim, K.; et al. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Qin, C.; Yu, C.; Shen, Y.; Fang, X.; Chen, L.; Min, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhao, S.; Xu, M.; Luo, Y.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5135–5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Yang, W.; Yu, J.; Pei, F.; Mariga, A.; Ma, N.; Fang, Y.; Hu, Q. Effect of hot air drying on volatile compounds of Flammulina velutipes detected by HS-SPME-GC-MS and electronic nose. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rodríguez-Burruezo, A.; Kollmannsberger, H.; González-Mas, M.; Nitz, S.; Fernando, N. HS-SPME comparative analysis of genotypic diversity in the volatile fraction and aroma-contributing compounds of Capsicum fruits from the annuum-chinense-frutescens complex. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 4388–4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moreno, E.; Fita, A.; González-Mas, M.; Rodríguez-Burruezo, A. HS-SPME study of the volatile fraction of Capsicum accessions and hybrids in different parts of the fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 135, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Forero, M.; Quijano, C.E.; Pino, J.A. Volatile compounds of chile pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. glabriusculum) at two ripening stages. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 24, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Culleré, L.; San-Juan, F.; Cacho, J. Characterisation of aroma active compounds of Spanish saffron by gas chromatography–olfactometry: Quantitative evaluation of the most relevant aromatic compounds. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1866–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, Y.; Ariefandie Febrianto, N.; Zhu, F. Characterization of physicochemical properties, flavor volatiles and phenolic compounds of feijoa fruit varieties. Food Chem. 2023, 419, 136074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Yue, N.; Shao, H.; Wang, J.; Jin, F. Discrimination and Characterization of Volatile Flavor Compounds in Fresh Oriental Melon after Forchlorfenuron Application Using Electronic Nose (E-Nose) and Headspace-Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS). Foods 2023, 12, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mihaylova, D.; Popova, A.; Dincheva, I. Pattern Recognition of Varieties of Peach Fruit and Pulp from Their Volatile Components and Metabolic Profile Using HS-SPME-GC/MS Combined with Multivariable Statistical Analysis. Plants 2022, 11, 3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, S.; Lee, J.; Cho, Y.; Kim, M.; Kim, Y. Determination of Volatiles and Carotenoid Degradation Compounds in Red Pepper Fermented by Lactobacillus parabuchneri. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 2083–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Korkmaz, A.; Hayaloglu, A.A.; Atasoy, A.F. Evaluation of the volatile compounds of fresh ripened Capsicum annuum and its spice pepper (dried red pepper flakes and isot). LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 84, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luning, P.A.; Carey, A.T.; Roozen, J.P.; Wichers, H.J. Characterization and Occurrence of Lipoxygenase in Bell Peppers at Different Ripening Stages in Relation to the Formation of Volatile Flavor Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 1493–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luning, P.A.; Ebbenhorst-Seller, T.; De Rijk, T.; Roozen, J.P. Effect of Hot-Air Drying on Flavour Compounds of Bell Peppers (Capsicum annuum). J. Sci. Food Agric. 1995, 68, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Martina, M.; Tikunov, Y.; Portis, E.; Bovy, A. The Genetic Basis of Tomato Aroma. Genes 2021, 12, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Zhao, H.; Deng, Y.; Luo, W.; Luo, X.; Wang, C.; Quan, C.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Y. Bacterial diversity and its correlation with sensory quality of two types of zha-chili from Shennongjia region, China. Food Res. Int. 2023, 168, 112789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, C.; Liu, H.; Hu, S.; Zong, Y.; Xia, H.; Li, H. Transcriptomic profiling of the floral fragrance biosynthesis pathway of Liriodendron and functional characterization of the LtuDXR gene. Plant Sci. 2022, 314, 111124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qiao, D.; Mi, X.; An, Y.; Xie, H.; Cao, K.; Chen, H.; Chen, M.; Liu, S.; Chen, J.; Wei, C. Integrated metabolic phenotypes and gene expression profiles revealed the effect of spreading on aroma volatiles formation in postharvest leaves of green tea. Food Res. Int. 2021, 149, 110680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Hao, N.; Feng, R.; Meng, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Z. Transcriptome and metabolite profiling analyses provide insight into volatile compounds of the apple cultivar ‘Ruixue’ and its parents during fruit development. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bauchet, G.; Grenier, S.; Samson, N.; Segura, V.; Kende, A.; Beekwilder, J.; Cankar, K.; Gallois, J.; Gricourt, J.; Bonnet, J.; et al. Identification of major loci and genomic regions controlling acid and volatile content in tomato fruit: Implications for flavor improvement. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 624–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mozūraitis, R.; Hall, D.; Trandem, N.; Ralle, B.; Tunström, K.; Sigsgaard, L.; Baroffio, C.; Fountain, M.; Cross, J.; Wibe, A.; et al. Composition of Strawberry Floral Volatiles and their Effects on Behavior of Strawberry Blossom Weevil, Anthonomus rubi. J. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 46, 1069–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martín, A.; Hernández, A.; Aranda, E.; Casquete, R.; Velázquez, R.; Bartolomé, T.; Córdoba, M. Impact of volatile composition on the sensorial attributes of dried paprikas. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Reale, S.; Biancolillo, A.; Gasparrini, C.; Di Martino, L.; Di Cecco, V.; Manzi, A.; Di Santo, M.; D’Archivio, A.A. Geographical Discrimination of Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum) Spices by (HS)-SPME/GC-MS Aroma Profiling and Chemometrics. Molecules 2021, 26, 6177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, C.; Xin, M.; Li, L.; He, X.; Yi, P.; Tang, Y.; Li, J.; Zheng, F.; Liu, G.; Sheng, J.; et al. Characterization of the aromatic profile of purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) during ripening by HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA sequencing. Food Chem. 2021, 355, 129685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yue, X.; Liu, S.; Wei, S.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ju, Y. Transcriptomic and Metabolic Analyses Provide New Insights into the Effects of Exogenous Sucrose on Monoterpene Synthesis in “Muscat Hamburg” Grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 4164–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, H.; Chen, W.; Chai, Y.; Liu, W.; Chen, H.; Sun, L.; Tang, X.; Luo, C.; Chen, D.; Cheng, X.; et al. Opisthopappus taihangensis Terpenoids and their gene regulatory networks in ‘Taihang Mingzhu’ as detected by transcriptome and metabolome analyses. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1014114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; He, L.; Song, Y.; Zhang, P.; Chen, D.; Guan, L.; Liu, S. Comprehensive study of volatile compounds and transcriptome data providing genes for grape aroma. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Love, M.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Robinson, M.; McCarthy, D.; Smyth, G. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Han, K.; Bakpa, E.; Li, J.; Lyu, J.; Yu, J.; Xie, J. Capsicum annuum Comprehensive fruit quality assessment and identification of aroma-active compounds in green pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1027605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Trovato, E.; Vento, F.; Creti, D.; Dugo, P.; Mondello, L. Elucidation of Analytical-Compositional Fingerprinting of Three Different Species of Chili Pepper by Using Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis, and Sensory Profile Evaluation. Molecules 2022, 27, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Garruti, D.; Mesquita, W.; Magalhes, H.; Arajo, D.; Pereira, R. Odor-contributing volatile compounds of a new Brazilian tabasco pepper cultivar analyzed by HS-SPME-GC-MS and HS-SPME-GC-O/FID. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 41, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ye, Z.; Shang, Z.; Li, M.; Qu, Y.; Long, H.; Yi, J. Evaluation of the physiochemical and aromatic qualities of pickled Chinese pepper (Paojiao) and their influence on consumer acceptability by using targeted and untargeted multivariate approaches. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pino, J.; Gonzalez, M.; Ceballos, L.; Centurion-Yah, A.R.; Trujillo-Aguirre, J.; Latournerie-Moreno, L.; Sauri-Duch, E. Characterization of total capsaicinoids, colour and volatile compounds of Habanero chilli pepper (Capsicum chinense Jack.) cultivars grown in Yucatan. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1682–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bogusz Junior, S.; Marco, P.H.; Valderrama, P.; Damasceno, F.C.; Aranda, M.S.; Zini, C.A.; Caramao, E.B.; Tavares Melo, A.M.; Teixiera Filho, J.; Godoy, H.T. Analysis of volatile compounds in Capsicum spp. by headspace solid-phase microextraction and GC × GC-TOFMS. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fall, R.; Karl, T.; Hansel, A.; Jordan, A.; Lindinger, W. Volatile organic compounds emitted after leaf wounding: On-line analysis by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1999, 104, 15963–15974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, L.; Baldwin, E.A.; Bai, J. Recent Advance in Aromatic Volatile Research in Tomato Fruit: The Metabolisms and Regulations. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. ul Hassan, M.; Zainal, Z.; Ismail, I. Green leaf volatiles: Biosynthesis, biological functions and their applications in biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jin, Z.; Wang, J.; Cao, X.; Wei, C.; Kuang, J.; Chen, K.; Zhang, B. Peach fruit PpNAC1 activates PpFAD3-1 transcription to provide ω-3 fatty acids for the synthesis of short-chain flavor volatiles. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, J.; Yu, X.; Shan, Q.; Shi, Z.; Li, J.; Zhao, X.; Chang, C.; Yu, J. Lonicera japonicaIntegrated volatile metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis provides insights into the regulation of floral scents between two contrasting varieties of Lonicera japonica. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 989036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ma, D.; Dong, S.; Zhang, S.; Wei, X.; Xie, Q.; Ding, Q.; Xia, R.; Zhang, X. Chromosome-level reference genome assembly provides insights into aroma biosynthesis in passion fruit (Passiflora edulis). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2021, 21, 955–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, S.; Cai, W.; Shen, L.; Cao, J.; Liu, C.; Hu, J.; Guan, D.; He, S. A CaCDPK29-CaWRKY27b module promotes CaWRKY40-mediated thermotolerance and immunity to Ralstonia solanacearum in pepper. New Phytol. 2022, 233, 1843–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classification of total 166 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in both non−spicy and spicy pepper fruits. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of the samples of pepper fruit by HS−SPME−GC/MS at different ripening stages. (B) Differential VOCs’ accumulation pattern of pepper fruit.
Figure 1. Classification of total 166 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in both non−spicy and spicy pepper fruits. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of the samples of pepper fruit by HS−SPME−GC/MS at different ripening stages. (B) Differential VOCs’ accumulation pattern of pepper fruit.
Plants 12 02246 g001
Figure 2. Expression analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in non−spicy vs. spicy pepper fruits. (A) Numbers of up− and down-regulated DEGs in non-spicy vs. spicy pepper fruits. (B) Volcano plot of up− and down-regulated DEGs in non−spicy vs. spicy pepper fruits.
Figure 2. Expression analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in non−spicy vs. spicy pepper fruits. (A) Numbers of up− and down-regulated DEGs in non-spicy vs. spicy pepper fruits. (B) Volcano plot of up− and down-regulated DEGs in non−spicy vs. spicy pepper fruits.
Plants 12 02246 g002
Figure 3. The top 20 enriched KEGG pathways for DEGs of up-regulated genes in spicy (B) vs. non-spicy (A) pepper fruits.
Figure 3. The top 20 enriched KEGG pathways for DEGs of up-regulated genes in spicy (B) vs. non-spicy (A) pepper fruits.
Plants 12 02246 g003
Figure 4. DEGs of fatty acid and terpene biosynthesis. (A) The fragments per kilobase million (FPKM) of DEGs in fatty acid and terpene biosynthesis. (B) qRT−PCR-based validation of DEGs in fatty acid and terpene biosynthesis. Data represent of eight replicates. CaActin was used as an internal control, and asterisks above the bars indicate significant differences between means (p < 0.01), as calculated with Fisher’s protected t test. The center line represents the median value and the boundaries indicate the 25th percentile (upper) and the 75th percentile (lower). Whiskers extend to the largest and smallest value.
Figure 4. DEGs of fatty acid and terpene biosynthesis. (A) The fragments per kilobase million (FPKM) of DEGs in fatty acid and terpene biosynthesis. (B) qRT−PCR-based validation of DEGs in fatty acid and terpene biosynthesis. Data represent of eight replicates. CaActin was used as an internal control, and asterisks above the bars indicate significant differences between means (p < 0.01), as calculated with Fisher’s protected t test. The center line represents the median value and the boundaries indicate the 25th percentile (upper) and the 75th percentile (lower). Whiskers extend to the largest and smallest value.
Plants 12 02246 g004
Figure 5. Two pepper inbred lines with different aroma. (A) C. annuum (not spicy). (B) C. chinense (spicy).
Figure 5. Two pepper inbred lines with different aroma. (A) C. annuum (not spicy). (B) C. chinense (spicy).
Plants 12 02246 g005
Table 1. The details of 37 VOCs’ significant difference in two pepper fruits.
Table 1. The details of 37 VOCs’ significant difference in two pepper fruits.
NO.NamesCASR.T. (min)Relative AmountUp and Down
AB
Fatty derivatives
1Butanal, 3-methyl-590-86-33.3610.02850.0052down
2Hexanal66-25-17.0960.07612.5828up
32-Pentenal, (E)-1576-87-08.4220.00590.1034up
42-Hexenal, (E)-6728-26-311.0880.11706.2553up
5Octanal124-13-013.2060.00170.0109up
6Nonanal124-19-616.1170.00590.0163up
75-Ethylcyclopent-1-enecarboxaldehyde 16.6450.00320.0194up
82-Dodecenal, (E)-20407-84-519.780.00120.0179up
92,4-Di-tert-butylphenol96-76-435.8520.02570.0041down
10Acetone67-64-12.3450.24850.0158down
113-Octanone106-68-312.1910.00370.0318up
123-Hepten-2-one1119-44-413.5250.00610.0276up
133-Octanone, 2-methyl-923-28-414.2880.03511.1169up
145-Hepten-2-one, 6-methyl-110-93-014.5780.01170.1538up
152-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,4,4-trimethyl-17299-41-117.5060.00280.0418up
165,9-Undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-, (E)-3796-70-127.1310.00310.0399up
173-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,2,6-trimethyl-7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl)-23267-57-429.890.00650.1235up
181H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-20189-42-834.9770.00070.0029up
191-Penten-3-ol616-25-19.7060.02171.0939up
201-Pentanol71-41-012.3260.01520.1110up
211-Hexanol111-27-315.2570.01561.3680up
222-Hexen-1-ol, (E)-928-95-016.6290.00550.4177up
231-Octen-3-ol3391-86-417.7830.00190.0223up
244,4,6-Trimethyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-ol21592-95-031.4220.00090.0032up
25Methyl 2-ethyldecanoate 32.6940.00730.0019down
262-Propanol, 1-chloro-, phosphate (3:1)13674-84-542.5420.00030.0002down
27Methyl salicylate119-36-825.2550.00380.0414up
28Cyclohexen-1-carbonitrile1855-63-620.3450.00740.0027down
29Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-149-57-529.2810.11680.0340down
30Octanoic acid124-07-231.5110.02090.0049down
Aromatic derivatives
31Mequinol150-76-527.0820.00540.0306up
Nitrogen and oxygen heterocyclic compounds
32Furan, 3-methyl-930-27-83.0610.01390.0028down
33Furan, 2-ethyl-3208-16-03.9820.00300.0240up
34Furan, 2-pentyl-3777-69-311.4850.01170.0578up
352(4H)-Benzofuranone,5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, (R)-17092-92-136.240.00180.0232up
Terpenoid derivatives
361-Cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde,2,6,6-trimethyl-432-25-721.8220.00110.0309up
37Hydroxypivalic acid4835-90-932.2580.01200.0019down
A: C. annuum (non-spicy). B: C. chinense (spicy).
Table 2. Overview of read counts of all samples of non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits.
Table 2. Overview of read counts of all samples of non-spicy (A) and spicy (B) pepper fruits.
SamplesClean ReadsGbClean BasesGC Content%≥Q30
A116,205,7874,808,073,63442.55%93.12%
A221,019,0326,251,941,42242.36%93.22%
A323,177,1636,915,966,40042.27%93.54%
B117,803,4625,305,305,85042.54%93.37%
B27,404,7042,209,849,41442.48%92.87%
B311,323,5653,377,464,64242.70%93.53%
Table 3. Overview of all samples read counts mapping to reference genome.
Table 3. Overview of all samples read counts mapping to reference genome.
SamplesTotal ReadsMapped ReadsUniq Mapped ReadsMultiple Map ReadsReads Map to ‘+’Reads Map to ‘−’
A132,411,57430,153,480 (93.03%)29,180,709 (90.03%)972,771 (3.00%)14,970,003 (46.19%)15,006,995 (46.30%)
A242,038,06439,748,585 (94.55%)38,393,724 (91.33%)1,354,861 (3.22%)19,700,905 (46.86%)19,778,992 (47.05%)
A346,354,32641,728,496 (90.02%)40,347,864 (87.04%)1,380,632 (2.98%)20,723,470 (44.71%)20,785,507 (44.84%)
B135,606,92432,174,009 (90.36%)31,015,903 (87.11%)1,158,106 (3.25%)15,969,352 (44.85%)16,009,903 (44.96%)
B214,809,40813,344,748 (90.11%)12,922,962 (87.26%)421,786 (2.85%)6,635,327 (44.80%)6,652,940 (44.92%)
B322,647,13020,308,455 (89.67%)19,647,834 (86.76%)660,621 (2.92%)10,092,548 (44.56%)10,120,926 (44.69%)
Table 4. Primers used in quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
Table 4. Primers used in quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
Gene NameGnen IDPrimer F:Primer R:
FAD1Capana03g000452CCTGTAGCACTTGCAGCTCTTCTCCAAATGCAAGCAACGC
FAD2Capana06g002292CTACCCAAAGCCCAGACCAGACTAACCCTCAATGCCCAGC
ADHCapana03g001569TGGCCAGTGTGTGCATACATACTGCATCTGAAGGAAGGCC
ADHL1Capana04g000980CAAGGGATGGAAGCAGCAGAGCAACTTTCCATGCTGCTCC
TPSCapana10g000571ACCTCACGTAGCCAAACGAGAAGGGCGTCAACTAAGGCAA
LOX3.1Capana12g002284TGCGAAGTGAAGTTAGCCGTGTTGCTTCCCTCCTCAAGCT
LOX1.5Capana01g000180TGCAAACGCGTGAAGAACTGATAGTCAGCGGTACCAGGGT
HPL-1Capana03g003512TTAGGGCCACTTTGGGATCGTTGACATCCAGTACCGCCAC
HPL-2Capana03g003513CGCCTATCTTGATGCATGGCAGTCTGTTTGTGCCCTCGTT
ActinGQ339766CCTCTCAACCCTAAGGCCAACAACGTCCAGCAAGATCCAAACGAA
18SREF564281CCGGTCCGCCTATGGTGTGCACCGGGCAGTTGTTCGTCTTTCATAAATC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, L.; Wei, H.; Fu, J.; Chen, W.; Lin, S.; Yang, S.; Zhang, R.; Shang, W.; et al. Analysis of Important Volatile Organic Compounds and Genes Produced by Aroma of Pepper Fruit by HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA Sequencing. Plants 2023, 12, 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122246

AMA Style

Qiu Y, Li Y, Wu L, Wei H, Fu J, Chen W, Lin S, Yang S, Zhang R, Shang W, et al. Analysis of Important Volatile Organic Compounds and Genes Produced by Aroma of Pepper Fruit by HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA Sequencing. Plants. 2023; 12(12):2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Yinhui, Yongqing Li, Lidong Wu, Hang Wei, Jianwei Fu, Weiting Chen, Shuting Lin, Sheng Yang, Rui Zhang, Wei Shang, and et al. 2023. "Analysis of Important Volatile Organic Compounds and Genes Produced by Aroma of Pepper Fruit by HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA Sequencing" Plants 12, no. 12: 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122246

APA Style

Qiu, Y., Li, Y., Wu, L., Wei, H., Fu, J., Chen, W., Lin, S., Yang, S., Zhang, R., Shang, W., Liao, C., Zeng, S., Luo, Y., & Cai, W. (2023). Analysis of Important Volatile Organic Compounds and Genes Produced by Aroma of Pepper Fruit by HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA Sequencing. Plants, 12(12), 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop