Next Article in Journal
The Effect of the Height of Coppicing and Harvest Season on the Yield and Quality of the Essential Oil of Kunzea ambigua
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantification of Protein Uptake by Endocytosis in Carnivorous Nepenthales
Previous Article in Journal
Antiviral Activity of Selected Essential Oils against Cucumber Mosaic Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
ROS and RNS Alterations in the Digestive Fluid of Nepenthes × ventrata Trap at Different Developmental Stages
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/plants12010019
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenotypic Diversity in Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance to Striga hermonthica in a Core Collection of Rice Germplasms

by
Hiroaki Samejima
*,† and
Yukihiro Sugimoto
Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Hokkaido Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 1 Hitsujigaoka, Toyohira, Sapporo 062-6555, Japan.
Plants 2023, 12(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010019
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 17 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Carnivorous and Parasitic Plants)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In sub-Saharan Africa, upland rice cultivation is expanding into rainfed areas endemic to the root parasitic weed Striga hermonthica. We evaluated the Striga resistance of 69 accessions from the World Rice Core Collection (WRC) to estimate the phenotypic diversity within the Oryza sativa species. Pre-attachment resistance was screened based on the germination-inducing activities of the root exudates, while post-attachment resistance was screened through rhizotron evaluation. The 69 WRC accessions showed a wide variation in both pre- and post-attachment resistance. Root exudates of one accession induced 0.04% germination, and those of some accessions displayed >80% germination. In the evaluation of post-attachment resistance, the successful parasitism percentages ranged from 1.3% to 60.7%. The results of these resistance evaluations were subjected to cluster analysis, which recognized five groups: group I of 27 accessions, with high pre- and post-attachment resistance; group II of 12 accessions, with high post-attachment resistance but moderate pre-attachment resistance; group III of 4 accessions, with low pre-attachment resistance; group IV of 13 accessions, with low post-attachment resistance; and group V of 13 accessions, with low pre- and post-attachment resistance. The wide variation found in the WRC accessions will help to elucidate the genetic factors underpinning pre- and post-attachment resistance.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the staple food for over half of the world’s population and is of increasing nutritional importance for large portions of the population in Africa [1]. In sub-Saharan Africa, rice is the third-largest source of food energy, with a rising demand due to population growth and changes in eating habits [2]. The expansion of rice cultivation by converting fallow, maize, and sorghum fields into rainfed rice fields is one method that will help to close the gap between rice demand and production in the region [3]; however, these rainfed areas are sometimes infested by the root parasitic weed Striga hermonthica (Delile) Benth. The agricultural damage caused by Striga threatens food security for the growing population in sub-Saharan Africa. The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations estimates that, across the continent, Striga causes annual losses exceeding US$7 billion, adversely affecting more than 300 million people [4]. Thus, the increased production of rice in rainfed areas is likely to be associated with increased S. hermonthica problems. Under the prevailing farming conditions in sub-Saharan Africa, resistant crop varieties have been proposed as the most integral, cost effective, and easy to adopt component of an integrated Striga management strategy [4].
Many Striga-resistant rice varieties that have adapted to the growing environments in Africa have already been identified [3]; however, an increased variation in Striga-resistant rice germplasms could provide new practical rice varieties for use in areas of Striga infestation. Large collections of rice germplasms have been conserved in gene banks or germplasm centers around the world [5]. Core collections are small collections of germplasms that represent the genetic diversity in the larger gene bank collections, and are a powerful tool that enables the efficient use of genetic resources [6]. The rice accessions contained in these core collections, however, have not yet been evaluated for Striga resistance.
The lifecycle of parasitic plants can be divided into the pre-attachment, free living phase, and the post-attachment, parasitic phase. Similarly, crop resistance to parasitic plants can be defined as pre-attachment and post-attachment [7]. As obligate hemiparasites, Striga seeds germinate only when exposed to host root-derived stimulants [8]. Pre-attachment resistance occurs when host plants prevent parasite attachment by producing lower amounts or less effective types of germination stimulants [9,10]. The germination stimulants are collectively known as strigolactones. They function as rhizosphere signaling molecules to induce germination of root parasitic weed seeds. The strigolactones also promote the formation of mutually beneficial symbioses between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [11], which provide phosphate to plants. In addition, these molecules function as phytohormones, regulating various aspects of plant architecture and development [12,13]. In contrast, post-attachment resistance prevents parasite development [7]. For example, the lowland rice cultivar Nipponbare has been reported to exhibit a post-attachment resistance that is associated with an incompatibility of its cortex, endodermis, and root stele to Striga [14,15]. Specifically, site-specific lignification of the endodermis at the Striga infection site is crucial to Nipponbare’s Striga resistance, as indicated by its increased susceptibility to Striga when its S-, G-, and H-unit lignin balance is disrupted [16]. Several rice varieties have been reported as resistant to Striga at the pre- and post-attachment phases [3,17].
In this study, we evaluated the pre- and post-attachment resistance in rice accessions found in a core collection, which is assumed to represent the genetic diversity of >32,000 accessions [18]. The evaluation was conducted under controlled conditions in a laboratory setting to lessen any confounding environmental factors. We collected and measured the germination-inducing activity of root exudates from a hydroponic solution to determine pre-attachment resistance. Post-attachment resistance was determined by observing the growth of Striga seedlings that were artificially attached to rice roots in a rhizotron. We estimated the phenotypic diversity within the Oryza sativa species using these two indices.

2. Results

2.1. Germination Test to Phenotype for Pre-Attachment Resistance

The root exudates from the 69 accessions displayed a 0.04–81.0% germination rate, with significant (p < 0.05) differences found between the accessions (Figure 1). Nipponbare, which is known for its Striga pre-attachment resistance, exhibited low germination-inducing activities (0.1%), or in other words, displayed a high pre-attachment resistance (Figure 1). Kasalath induced germination at a rate of 64.4% (Figure 1). The frequency distribution for pre-attachment resistance showed a bimodal distribution (Figure 2).

2.2. Rhizotron Evaluation to Phenotype for Post-Attachment Resistance

Successful parasitism varied widely among the 69 accessions and represented 1.3–60.7% of the original inoculums with significant (p < 0.05) differences between the accessions (Figure 3). The proportion of successful parasitism were relatively low (16.0%) in Nipponbare, a known Striga post-attachment resistant variety (Figure 3). Kasalath retained 5.3% of the original inoculums (Figure 3). The frequency distribution for post-attachment resistance approximately fitted a normal distribution (Figure 4).

2.3. Clustering of the Accessions Based on Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance

The cluster analysis divided the 69 accessions into five groups (Figure 5). Figure 6 shows the pre- and post-attachment resistance of each accession in the five groups. Group I consisted of 27 accessions that displayed a high resistance during both the pre- and post-attachment phases. Nipponbare was in this group. Group II consisted of 12 accessions that displayed an intermediate pre-attachment resistance and a high post-attachment resistance, comparable to group I. Group III consisted of 4 accessions that displayed a low pre-attachment resistance and a high post-attachment resistance, comparable to or higher than those of group I. Group IV consisted of 13 accessions that displayed high pre-attachment resistance that was comparable to that of group I, and a low post-attachment resistance. Group V consisted of 13 accessions that displayed a low resistance at both the pre- and post-attachment phases. The number and proportion of accessions allocated to each group by type of rice (i.e., japonica, indica I, and indica II) are provided in Table 1. All groups included each rice type, except for group III, which lacked the indica II type. The highest proportion of japonica and indica II accessions were in group I with 35.7% and 51.5%, respectively. For the indica I type, 22.7% were in group I, but more (36.4%) were in group V. Three of the 4 accessions in group III were indica I type, which included Kasalath.

3. Discussion

3.1. Differences among Accessions in Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance

We focused on Nipponbare and Kasalath, whose pre- and post-attachment resistance have been previously reported, to evaluate the reliability of the phenotyping methods used in this study. The results in this study were in line with those reported by Samejima et al. [17], in which Nipponbare had a high pre- and post-attachment resistance and Kasalath had a high post-attachment resistance to Striga from sorghum fields in Sudan. Gurney et al. [14] reported that Kasalath had low post-attachment resistance to Striga from maize fields in Kenya. The different Kasalath evaluation results are probably due to the ecotype differences of the Striga seedlings used for each study. Post-attachment resistance to Striga was higher in Nipponbare than in Kasalath when Striga was collected from maize fields in Kenya, but was comparable when the Striga was collected from rice fields in the Ivory Coast, and was lower in Nipponbare than in Kasalath when Striga was collected from millet fields in Gambia [19]. In addition, Bevawi [20] reported that the ranking of sorghum cultivars varied depending on Striga ecotypes, with respect to germination-inducing activities of their root exudates. Germination-inducing activities of several synthetic strigolactones were higher for Striga from Sudan than those from Burkina Faso, Niger, and Kenya [21]. These findings suggest that results for pre- and post-attachment resistance can vary depending on Striga ecotypes. We judged, however, the phenotyping methods used in our study to be reliable for both pre- and post-attachment resistance to Striga collected from sorghum fields in Sudan.
In this study, the pre- and post-attachment resistance varied widely among the 69 WRC accessions. Understanding the genetic nature of these variations requires the integration of genomics and phenotyping. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a powerful and efficient tool to analyze the natural allelic variation associated with agronomic traits, using a diverse population of accessions [6]. For example, GWAS with 173 and 206 diverse sorghum genotypes determined the genetic factors that underpin pre- and post-attachment resistance, respectively [22,23]. Although the WRC is a very small population categorized as a mini-core collection [5,24], it can be an effective population for detecting the genes responsible for Striga resistance by GWAS, if there are strong quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with the trait of interest and if the number of related QTLs is relatively small [6]. GWAS detected waxy and GS3 as genes associated with seed amylose content and grain length, whose distribution was bimodal and approximately normal, respectively [6]. Thus, the detection of the genes associated with the desired phenotypic characteristics may be possible using GWAS on the WRC accessions, as indicated by the bimodal and normal distributions for the pre- and post-attachment resistance observed in this study, respectively.
Elucidating the physiological mechanisms for the observed resistances in each accession is a topic for future study. A compositional analysis of root exudates is necessary to reveal the mechanisms for pre-attachment resistance, which includes absent or reduced germination stimulants production and exudation of germination inhibitors [25]. After Striga germination, reduction of haustorium formation and mechanical barriers by thickening of host root cell-walls are candidate resistance mechanisms [25]. Furthermore, once Striga starts penetrating the host root tissues and tries to connect to the host vascular system, different post-attachment resistance mechanisms might be included, for example, the synthesis or release of cytotoxic compounds in the form of phenolic acids or phytoalexins within infected host root cells, the formation of physical barriers to prevent possible pathogen ingress and growth, and programmed cell death in the form of a hypersensitive response at the point of parasite attachment [25].

3.2. Combination of Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance in Each Accession

Rice varieties with multiple resistances (i.e., high resistance at both the pre- and post-attachment phases) will be useful genetic resources for rice cultivation in areas where Striga is endemic. When the 69 WRC accessions were clustered into the five groups, the largest number of accessions were categorized into group I (high resistance at both pre- and post-attachment phases). To develop the WRC, the RFLP data on 332 accessions were subjected to cluster analysis and 67 groups were recognized, then a single accession from each of the 67 groups was selected [18]. The findings in our study suggest that many rice varieties not included in the WRC may have the same multiple resistance. Several rice varieties have thus far been reported as possessing this multiple resistance, such as Nipponbare, Umgar [17], CG14, and NERICA 1 [3]. The accessions with only one resistance, such as those in groups II (high post-attachment resistance), III (high post-attachment resistance), and IV (high pre-attachment resistance), could also be good genetic resources for improving Striga resistance in rice. In contrast, the accessions in group V (low resistance at both pre- and post-attachment phases) suggest that many rice varieties not included in the WRC may be very susceptible to Striga. Careful attention should be paid to the responses of different rice varieties to Striga, before their introduction to areas under Striga infestation.
The distribution percentages of the japonica, indica I, and indica II types in the five groups seemed to vary. Wide variation in the pre- and post-attachment resistance within each of these types was found, as indicated by the inclusion of all three types in each group (except for a lack of indica II in group III). Japonica and indica II tended to be in group I (high resistance at both pre- and post-attachment phases), while indica I tended to be in group V (low resistance at both pre- and post-attachment phases). In addition, three of the four group III accessions (low pre-attachment resistance and high post-attachment resistance) were of the indica I type. It should be noted that how accurately the WRC accessions represent each type is unclear. Further study is required to understand the differences in Striga resistance among the indica I, indica II, and japonica types.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

The 69 rice accessions found in the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO) World Rice Core Collection (WRC) were used to evaluate pre- and post-attachment resistance to Striga. The 69 accessions included 14 japonica, 22 indica I, and 33 indica II types that were originally collected from 19 different countries [26]. Sixty-seven of these accessions retained 91% of the 554 RFLP alleles in 332 accessions, selected based on passport data from the entire NARO gene bank collection [18]. The WRC consists of these 67 accessions and 2 reference accessions for japonica (Nipponbare) and indica (Kasalath) discrimination in the RFLP survey [18]. S. hermonthica seeds were collected from sorghum fields in Sudan.

4.2. Germination-Inducing Activity of Root Exudates

The germination bioassay followed the protocol described by Samejima et al. [17]. The rice accession seeds were sown on moist filter paper in a Petri dish and incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 4 days. Next, each rice seedling was transplanted into a 50 mL plastic tube that was wrapped in aluminum foil to block-out any light. The plants were then hydroponically grown in a 40% Long Ashton solution in a growth chamber at 30 °C, with a 12 h photoperiod using fluorescent lights (photosynthetic active radiation of 220 μmol m−2 s−1) until 28 days after sowing (DAS). Roots were thoroughly rinsed on 29 and 30 DAS with fresh tap water, and then grown in fresh tap water for two days. After two days, the water lost from each tube was replenished. On 31 DAS, 10 mL of the aqueous solution containing the root exudates was extracted with 2 mL of ethyl acetate, as reported previously [27]. After centrifuging for 5 min at 3500 rpm, 40 μL of the ethyl acetate extract was applied to a new 8 mm diameter glass fiber disk. The disks were dried at room temperature for 2 h. Each treated disk was overlaid with an 8 mm diameter glass fiver disk containing conditioned Striga seeds moistened with 40 μL distilled water. The Striga seeds had been conditioned under sterilized conditions for 12 days on the disks (approximately 50 seeds per disk). The disks containing the conditioned Striga seeds were tapped on filter paper to remove any excess water, before being placed on the disks treated with the root exudates. Striga germination was examined using a stereomicroscope after incubation in the dark at 30 °C for 1 day. The synthetic strigolactone GR24 was used at 0.34 μM as a positive control and tap water was used as a negative control, which induced 54.1–89.2% and 0.0–3.1% germination, respectively. Three plants per accession were used, and the root exudates from each plant were tested in three technical replicates.

4.3. Rhizotron Experiment

The rhizotron experiment followed the protocol described by Samejima et al. [17]. The rice accession seedlings were prepared in the same manner as in the Striga germination test. Each seedling was transferred to a 10 mL test tube and grown hydroponically in a 40% Long Ashton solution for 6 days, in a growth chamber at 30 °C with a 12 h photoperiod using fluorescent lights (photosynthetic active radiation of 220 μmol m−2 s−1). Next, a 10-day-old seedling of each accession (with five replicates) were transferred to a rhizotron comprising of a 15 cm Petri dish filled with rock wool that was overlaid by glass fiber filter paper that was watered with 40% Long Ashton solution. The seedlings were then grown in the same growth chamber for an additional 10 days. The Striga seeds were surface sterilized by immersion in 0.75% (w/v) NaClO that contained a few drops of Tween 20, and then were subjected to sonication for 3 min in an ultrasonic cleaner. After rinsing with distilled water, the seeds were dried in a laminar hood, then were pre-treated (conditioned) for 12 days on distilled water-saturated filter paper in a Petri dish. The conditioned Striga seeds were then treated in separate Petri-dishes with GR24 at 0.34 μM and incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 1 day prior to inoculation. The roots of each 20-day-old rice seedling were inoculated with 30 pre-germinated Striga seeds, carefully picked up with a pair of tweezers from the Petri dish, and subsequently incubated in the same growth chamber. Striga seedling growth was observed 21 days after inoculation using a stereomicroscope. The number of successful parasitism was counted.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Mean comparison between the accessions was determined for both the pre- and post-attachment resistance using JMP software (version 16.1.0; SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA). The germination percentage values as an index of pre-attachment resistance were transformed to arcsine, then compared by Tukey’s HSD test and back-transformed [28]. For the rhizotron evaluation of post-attachment resistance, the number of successful parasitisms were examined by Tukey’s HSD Test, since all rice seedlings were inoculated with 30 pre-germinated Striga seeds. Cluster analysis was performed to divide the accessions into groups using the statistical package R (version 3.4.0; R Development Core Team, 2017) with the built-in hclust function, using the complete method and Euclidean distance.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we phenotyped 69 WRC accessions for pre- and post-attachment resistance to Striga. The wide diversity in the WRC observed here may help to elucidate the genetic factors that underpin pre- and post-attachment resistance, since the genetic diversity found in the WRC accessions has been well characterized by whole genome sequencing [6]. The existence of accessions displaying only one type of resistance, such as those in groups II, III, and IV, suggests that pre- and post-attachment resistance is genetically independent. The accessions in groups I–IV could provide good genetic resources for improving S. hermonthica resistance in rice. The presence of accessions in group V indicates the continued need to carefully consider Striga resistance when expanding rice cultivation in Africa.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S. and Y.S.; methodology, H.S. and Y.S.; investigation, H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.; visualization, H.S.; supervision, Y.S.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a JST/JICA SATREPS Grant Number JPMJSA1607 (Japan Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo, Japan and Japan International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo, Japan) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15H05248 (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Chizu Yoshimoto for her assistance in conducting the experiments. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Abdel Gabar Babiker (1949 to 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Muthayya, S.; Sugimoto, J.D.; Montgomery, S.; Maberly, G.G. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1324, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wopereis, M.C.S. Introduction. In Realizing Africa’s Rice Promise; Wopereis, M.C.S., Johnson, D.E., Ahmadi, N., Tollens, E., Jalloh, A., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. xix–xxii. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rodenburg, J.; Tippe, D.E.; Touré, A.; Irakiza, R.; Kayeke, J.; Bastiaans, L. From rice-like plants to plants liking rice: A review of research on weeds and their management in African rice systems. Field Crop. Res. 2022, 276, 108397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ejeta, G. The Striga scourge in Africa: A growing pandemic. In Integrating New Technologies for Striga Control: Towards Ending the Witch-Hunt; Ejeta, G., Gressel, J., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2007; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Raturi, D.; Chaudhary, M.; Bhat, V.; Goel, S.; Raina, S.N.; Rajpal, V.R.; Singh, A. Overview of developed core and mini core collections and their effective utilization in cultivated rice and its related species (Oryza sp.)—A review. Plant Breed. 2022, 141, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tanaka, N.; Shenton, M.; Kawahara, K.; Kumagai, M.; Sakai, H.; Kanamori, H.; Yonemaru, J.; Fukuoka, S.; Sugimoto, K.; Ishimoto, M.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing of the NARO World Rice Core Collection (WRC) as the basis for diversity and association studies. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 922–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Fishman, M.R.; Shirasu, K. How to resist parasitic plants: Pre- and post-attachment strategies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 62, 102004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. López-Ráez, J.A.; Matusova, R.; Cardoso, C.; Jamil, M.; Charnikhova, T.; Kohlen, W.; Ruyter-Spira, C.; Verstappen, F.; Bouwmeester, H. Strigolactones: Ecological significance and use as a target for parasitic plant control. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jamil, M.; Rodenburg, J.; Charnikhova, T.; Bouwmeester, H.J. Pre-attachment Striga hermonthica resistance of new rice for Africa (NERICA) cultivars based on low strigolactone production. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 964–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gobena, D.; Shimels, M.; Rich, P.J.; Ruyter-Spira, C.; Bouwmeester, H.; Kanuganti, S.; Mengiste, T.; Ejeta, G. Mutation in sorghum LOW GERMINATION STIMULANT 1 alters strigolactones and causes Striga resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4471–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Akiyama, K.; Matsuzaki, K.; Hayashi, H. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 2005, 435, 824–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gomez-Roldan, V.; Fermas, S.; Brewer, P.B.; Puech-Pages, V.; Dun, E.A.; Pillot, J.P.; Letisse, F.; Matusova, R.; Danoun, S.; Portais, J.C.; et al. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 2008, 455, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Umehara, M.; Hanada, A.; Yoshida, S.; Akiyama, K.; Arite, T.; Takeda-Kamiya, N.; Magome, H.; Kamiya, Y.; Shirasu, K.; Yoneyama, K.; et al. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 2008, 455, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gurney, A.L.; Slate, J.; Press, M.C.; Scholes, J.D. A novel form of resistance in rice to the angiosperm parasite Striga hermonthica. New Phytol. 2006, 169, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Swarbrick, P.J.; Huang, K.; Liu, G.; Slate, J.; Press, M.C.; Scholes, J.D. Global patterns of gene expression in rice cultivars undergoing a susceptible or resistant interaction with the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mutuku, J.M.; Cui, S.; Hori, C.; Takeda, Y.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Nakabayashi, R.; Mori, T.; Saito, K.; Demura, T.; Umezawa, T.; et al. The structural integrity of lignin is crucial for resistance against Striga hermonthica parasitism in rice. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 1796–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Samejima, H.; Babiker, A.G.; Mustafa, A.; Sugimoto, Y. Identification of Striga hermonthica-resistant upland rice varieties in Sudan and their resistance phenotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kojima, Y.; Ebana, K.; Fukuoka, S.; Nagamine, T.; Kawase, M. Development of an RFLP-based rice diversity set of germplasm. Breed. Sci. 2005, 55, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huang, K.; Whitlock, R.; Press, M.C.; Scholes, J.K. Variation for host range within and among populations of the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica. Heredity 2012, 108, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bebawi, F.F. Intraspecific physiological variants of Striga hermonthica. Exp. Agric. 1981, 17, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jamil, M.; Wang, J.Y.; Yonli, D.; Ota, T.; Berqdar, L.; Traore, H.; Margueritte, O.; Zwanenburg, B.; Asami, T.; Al-Babili, S. Striga hermonthica suicidal germination activity of potent strigolactone analogs: Evaluation from laboratory bioassays to field trials. Plants 2022, 11, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kavuluko, J.; Kibe, M.; Sugut, I.; Kibet, W.; Masanga, J.; Mutinda, S.; Wamalwa, M.; Magomere, T.; Odeny, D.; Runo, S. GWAS provides biological insights into mechanisms of the parasitic plant (Striga) resistance in sorghum. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mallu, T.S.; Irafasha, G.; Mutinda, S.; Owuor, E.; Githiri, S.M.; Odeny, D.A.; Runo, S. Mechanisms of pre-attachment Striga resistance in sorghum through genome-wide association studies. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2022, 297, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ebana, K.; Yonemaru, J.; Fukuoka, S.; Iwata, H.; Kanamori, H.; Namiki, N.; Nagasaki, H.; Yano, M. Genetic structure revealed by a whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism survey of diverse accessions of cultivated Asian rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci. 2010, 60, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Timko, M.P.; Huang, K.; Lis, K.E. Host resistance and parasite virulence in Striga-host plant interaction: A Shifting balance of power. Weed Sci. 2012, 60, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Matsunami, M.; Matsunami, T.; Kon, K.; Ogawa, A.; Kodama, I.; Kokubun, M. Genotypic variation in nitrogen uptake during early growth among rice cultivars under different soil moisture regimes. Plant Prod. Sci. 2013, 16, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fukui, K.; Ito, S.; Asami, T. Selective mimics of strigolactone actions and their potential use for controlling damage caused by root parasitic weeds. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kgosi, R.L.; Zwanenburg, B.; Mwakaboko, A.S.; Murdoch, A.J. Strigolactone analogues induce suicidal seed germination of Striga spp. in soil. Weed Res. 2012, 52, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 00019 g001 550
Figure 1. Germination-inducing activity of root exudates (pre-attachment resistance) of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection. The percentage values were arcsine transformed, compared by multiple mean-separation tests among the accessions and back-transformed. Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05). The synthetic strigolactone GR24 was used at 0.34 μM as a positive control, and tap water was used as a negative control, which induced 54.1–89.2% and 0.0–3.1% germination, respectively.
Figure 1. Germination-inducing activity of root exudates (pre-attachment resistance) of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection. The percentage values were arcsine transformed, compared by multiple mean-separation tests among the accessions and back-transformed. Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05). The synthetic strigolactone GR24 was used at 0.34 μM as a positive control, and tap water was used as a negative control, which induced 54.1–89.2% and 0.0–3.1% germination, respectively.
Plants 12 00019 g001
Plants 12 00019 g002 550
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection for percentage of germination-inducing activity of root exudates (pre-attachment resistance).
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection for percentage of germination-inducing activity of root exudates (pre-attachment resistance).
Plants 12 00019 g002
Plants 12 00019 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentage of successful parasitism out of 30 seedlings of S. hermonthica (post-attachment resistance) on the root of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection. Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05). Insert A, B, C is unsuccessful parasitism because of failure to attach, no shoot emergence, and withering, respectively. Insert D is successful parasitism.
Figure 3. Percentage of successful parasitism out of 30 seedlings of S. hermonthica (post-attachment resistance) on the root of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection. Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05). Insert A, B, C is unsuccessful parasitism because of failure to attach, no shoot emergence, and withering, respectively. Insert D is successful parasitism.
Plants 12 00019 g003
Plants 12 00019 g004 550
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection for percentage of successful parasitism (post-attachment resistance).
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection for percentage of successful parasitism (post-attachment resistance).
Plants 12 00019 g004
Plants 12 00019 g005 550
Figure 5. Cluster dendrogram for the classification of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection based on pre- and post-attachment resistance.
Figure 5. Cluster dendrogram for the classification of 69 accessions in World Rice Core Collection based on pre- and post-attachment resistance.
Plants 12 00019 g005
Plants 12 00019 g006 550
Figure 6. Germination-inducing activity (pre-attachment resistance) and percentage of successful parasitism (post-attachment resistance) of each accession in five groups.
Figure 6. Germination-inducing activity (pre-attachment resistance) and percentage of successful parasitism (post-attachment resistance) of each accession in five groups.
Plants 12 00019 g006
Table
Table 1. Number and proportion of accessions allocated to each group within japonica, indica I, and indica II type.
Table 1. Number and proportion of accessions allocated to each group within japonica, indica I, and indica II type.
TypeGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup VSum
japonica5
(35.7)		2
(14.3)		1
(7.1)		4
(28.6)		2
(14.3)		14
(100)
indica I5
(22.7)		4
(18.2)		3
(13.6)		2
(9.1)		8
(36.4)		22
(100)
indica II17
(51.5)		6
(18.2)		0
(0.0)		7
(21.2)		3
(9.1)		33
(100)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samejima, H.; Sugimoto, Y. Phenotypic Diversity in Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance to Striga hermonthica in a Core Collection of Rice Germplasms. Plants 2023, 12, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010019

AMA Style

Samejima H, Sugimoto Y. Phenotypic Diversity in Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance to Striga hermonthica in a Core Collection of Rice Germplasms. Plants. 2023; 12(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samejima, Hiroaki, and Yukihiro Sugimoto. 2023. "Phenotypic Diversity in Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance to Striga hermonthica in a Core Collection of Rice Germplasms" Plants 12, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010019

APA Style

Samejima, H., & Sugimoto, Y. (2023). Phenotypic Diversity in Pre- and Post-Attachment Resistance to Striga hermonthica in a Core Collection of Rice Germplasms. Plants, 12(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop