Next Article in Journal
The Specificity of Transgene Suppression in Plants by Exogenous dsRNA
Next Article in Special Issue
Angiopteris cochinchinensis de Vriese Ameliorates LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury via Src Inhibition
Previous Article in Journal
Genus Salsola: Chemistry, Biological Activities and Future Prospective—A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/plants11060716
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mitigation of Gastric Damage Using Cinnamomum cassia Extract: Network Pharmacological Analysis of Active Compounds and Protection Effects in Rats

by
Ji Hwan Lee
1,†,
Hee Jae Kwak
2,†,
Dongchul Shin
1,
Hye Jin Seo
3,
Shin Jung Park
3,
Bo-Hee Hong
3,
Myoung-Sook Shin
1,
Seung Hyun Kim
2,* and
Ki Sung Kang
1,*
1
Cooperative-Center of Natural Product Central Bank for Biological Evaluation, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea
2
Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon 21983, Korea
3
Chong Kun Dang (CKD) Pharm Research Institute, Yongin-si 16995, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2022, 11(6), 716; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11060716
Submission received: 15 February 2022 / Revised: 2 March 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 8 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anti-Inflammatory Bioactivities in Plant Extracts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gastritis is a common disease worldwide that is caused by various causes such as eating habits, smoking, severe stress, and heavy drinking, as well as Helicobacter pylori infections and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cinnamomum cassia is a tropical aromatic evergreen tree commonly used as a natural medicine in Asia and as a functional food ingredient. Studies have reported this species’ anti-obesity, anti-diabetic, and cardiovascular disease suppression effects. We evaluated the potential effects of C. cassia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ethanol (EtOH), and ethanol/hydrochloric acid (HCl)-induced gastric mucosal injury models. C. cassia extracts reduced the area of gastric mucosa injury caused by indomethacin, NSAID, EtOH, and EtOH/HCl. We also applied a network pharmacology-based approach to identify the active compounds, potential targets, and pharmacological mechanisms of C. cassia against gastritis. Through a network pharmacology analysis, 10 key components were predicted as anti-gastritis effect-related compounds of C. cassia among 51 expected active compounds. The NF-κB signaling pathway, a widely known inflammatory response mechanism, comprised a major signaling pathway within the network pharmacology analysis. These results suggest that the anti-gastritis activities of C. cassia may be induced via the anti-inflammatory effects of key components, which suppress the inflammation-related genes and signaling pathways identified in this study.

1. Introduction

Gastritis is a common disease that affects many people every year worldwide. A gastrointestinal mucosal injury is caused by environmental factors such as eating habits, smoking, severe stress, and heavy drinking, as well as Helicobacter pylori infections and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, including indomethacin and aspirin) [1,2]. This inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal mucosa is called gastritis, and damage to the mucous membrane progresses and can develop into chronic gastritis and gastric ulcers, which ultimately become the cause of gastric cancer [3]. Common symptoms of gastritis include a burning pain in the upper abdomen, indigestion, vomiting, and nausea [4]. In addition, gastritis caused by a Helicobacter pylori infection increases gastric acid secretion [5]. Gastric acid secretion is induced by histamine 2 receptors (H2r) that bind to histamine and secrete gastric acid into the stomach lumen, which is then accelerated by the cAMP/protein kinase A/proton pump pathway [6]. Thus, most gastritis and gastric ulcer treatments use histamine 2-receptor agonist (H2RA)-type drugs such as ranitidine and cimetidine, as well as proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-type drugs such as pantoprazole and lansoprazole [7,8]. Although these drugs have demonstrated an acceptable clinical efficacy, side effects such as rashes and urticarial and digestive disorders have been reported [9,10]. Therefore, the development of therapeutic agents for gastritis and gastric ulcers using natural products, with no side effects, is in progress. Several studies have recently reported the protective effects of natural products without side effects and toxicity against gastric mucosal damage using several animal models [9,11,12].
Cinnamomum cassia (C. cassia) is a tropical aromatic evergreen tree commonly used in Asian medicine (including Korea, China, and India) and food ingredients [13]. In previous studies, C. cassia has demonstrated antitumor, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antidiabetic, antiobesity, antibacterial, antiviral, and cardiovascular pharmacological effects [13,14]. In addition, the components of this herb have been identified, including 64 terpenoids, 16 phenylpropanoids, 24 glycosides, 26 lignans, and 9 lactones [13]. An efficacy evaluation of C. cassia in the stomach in treating mild convulsive gastrointestinal disorders was reported by the European Medicines Agency in 2011, and the beneficial effects of oral administration on gastric mucosal damage were investigated [15]. This herb and its compounds have reportedly exerted anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting IL-8 in Helicobacter pylori [16]. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of Cinnamomum cassia extracts using an in vivo model of acute gastric mucosal injury induced by indomethacin, EtOH, and EtOH/HCl.
Network pharmacology has evolved through the convergence of bioinformatics, systems biology, and network analysis. Recently, this field has attracted attention as a new potential approach for interpreting the traditional efficacy of natural products. For example, Xiaona et al. identified the active ingredients of Sparganii rhizome and its anti-cancer mechanism in treating gastric cancer using network pharmacology analysis [17]. Additionally, Asi et al. identified the mechanisms of Artemisiae scoparia in treating chronic hepatitis B using a network pharmacology approach [18]. Network pharmacology thus provides a new opportunity to infer the active compounds and pharmacological mechanisms of natural products effectively.
An experimental validation was performed in the present study to confirm the anti-gastritis effects of the C. cassia extract in rats. Moreover, we applied a network pharmacology-based approach to deduce the active compounds, potential targets, and pharmacological mechanisms of standardized extracts of C. cassia in treating gastritis.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of C. cassia Extracts on Indomethacin Induced Gastric Ulcers

Gastric mucosal injuries caused by indomethacin were confirmed in the vehicle group. The injured area comprised 6.58% ± 1.60 of the total gastric mucosal area. The gastric mucosa injury area of each group with treated C. cassia extracts numbered 2.48% ± 1.79 of the total gastric mucosa area in WCC (water extract of C. cassia), 2.88% ± 2.28 of the total gastric mucosa area in BCC (water extract of C. cassia pre-washed with butanol), and 2.07% ± 0.91 of the total gastric mucosa area in ECC (water extract of C. cassia pre-washed with ethyl acetate). In the positive control group, the gastric mucosa injury area was observed 0.20% ± 0.29 of the total gastric mucosa area in ranitidine, and 1.23% ± 1.07 of the total gastric mucosa area in an Artemisia extract (AE) (Figure 1). ECC was lowered considerably more than in the other extracts; however, this difference was not statistically significant.
In the experiment, in order to confirm the dose-dependent effects of AE and ECC, the gastric mucosa injury area of each group treated with AE totaled 1.54% ± 1.39 of in the group treated with 50 mg/kg, 1.71% ± 1.79 in the group treated with 100 mg/kg, and 1.03% ± 1.31 in the group treated with 150 mg/kg. The gastric mucosa injury areas of each group treated with ECC were 1.03% ± 0.65 in the group treated with 50 mg/kg, 1.59% ± 1.49 in the group treated with 100 mg/kg, and 1.14% ± 1.33 in the group treated with 150 mg/kg (Figure 2). Therefore, the protective effect of ECC was as strong as that of AE.

2.2. Effect of C. cassia Extracts on Gastric Mucosa Injury Using EtOH

We compared the effects of C. cassia extracts on HCl-EtOH- and EtOH-induced gastric mucosal injuries. The HCl/EtOH mixture damaged 8.44% ± 3.84 of the total gastric mucosal area in the vehicle group. The ranitidine-treated group had an inhibitory effect of 15.78% compared with the vehicle group. The 75 mg/kg ranitidine-treated group demonstrated an inhibitory effect of 15.78% compared to the vehicle group. Each group treated with C. cassia extracts showed higher inhibitory effects than the ranitidine-treated group; an 18.09% inhibition was observed in the 150 mg/kg WCC-treated group, with a 44.46% inhibition in the 150 mg/kg ECC-treated group. However, these inhibitory effects were not statistically significant.
The 100% EtOH mixture showed a higher gastric mucosa injury than using the HCl/EtOH mixture damage. In addition, ranitidine did not inhibit gastric mucosal injuries. However, the C. cassia extract article showed a 27.74% inhibition in the 150 mg/kg WCC-treated group and a 29.74% inhibition in the 150 mg/kg ECC-treated group (Table 1). However, these inhibitory effects were not statistically significant.

2.3. Effect of C. cassia Extracts on HCl-EtOH-Induced Changes in Volume, pH, and Total Acidity

Next, the efficacy of the C. cassia extract in treating gastric juice secretions was confirmed. The HCl/EtOH mixture was used to induce gastritis, and gastric juice secretions were evaluated by measuring the gastric juice volume, pH, and gastric acidity. The gastric juice volume in the control group was higher than the vehicle group, with 0.6 mL ± 0.5 in the latter and 3.5 mL ± 0.7 in the former. Additionally, the gastric juice volumes of the treatment groups decreased compared to the control group, with 3.4 mL ± 0.7 in the group treated with 30 mg/kg Lansoprazole, 2.8 mL ± 0.7 in the group treated with 300 mg/kg WCC, and 2.7 mL ± 0.6 in the group treated with 300 mg/kg ECC. ECC significantly inhibited the increase in gastric juice volume induced by HCl-EtOH.
The gastric juice pH in the control group was higher than in the vehicle group, with 2.1 ± 0.8 in the latter and 3.7 ± 1.0 in the former. The gastric juice pH of each treatment group decreased compared to the control group, with 2.9 ± 0.9 in the group treated with 300 mg/kg WCC and 3.6 ± 0.5 in the group treated with 300 mg/kg ECC. However, lansoprazole increased the pH to 6.2 ± 1.0.
The total gastric acidity in the control group was higher than that in the vehicle group (0.040 mEq/4 h ± 0.041 in the latter, and 0.112 mEq/4 h ± 0.055 in the former). The total gastric acidity of each treatment group was lower than that of the control group (0.030 mEq/4 h ± 0.018 in the group treated with 30 mg/kg lansoprazole, 0.101 mEq/4 h ± 0.024 in the group treated with 300 mg/kg WCC, and 0.087 mEq/4 h ± 0.017 in the 300 mg/kg ECC-treated group) (Table 2).

2.4. Network Pharmacology Analysis

2.4.1. Drug-Likeness (DL) and Oral Bioavailability (OB) Screening of Chemical Components

A total of 114 chemical components of C. cassia were identified from reviewed databases and the literature. All collected compounds were evaluated for DL and OB using the QED method to select the expected active compounds (Table S1). Eight physicochemical properties were obtained from the SwissADME database to calculate QED value: (1) molecular weight (MW), (2) octanol–water partition coefficient (ALOGP), (3) number of hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA), (4) number of hydrogen bond donors (HBD), (5) polar surface area (PSA), (6) number of rotatable bonds (ROTB), (7) number of aromatic rings (AROM), and (8) number of structural alerts (ALERT). OB was judged on the basis of Veber’s rule: (1) ROTB of 10 or less, (2) sum of HBA and HBD of ≤12, and (3) PSA of 140 or less. If the above rule was satisfied, the OB value was marked as TRUE; otherwise, it was marked as FALSE. The cut-off values of QED and OB for the selection of expected active compounds were set to 0.4 or more and TRUE, respectively. On the basis of these cut-off values, 94 compounds were screened as expected active compounds (Table S2).

2.4.2. Prediction of Targets and Identification of Potential Targets

Targets for the expected active compounds were obtained using the SwissTargetPrediction database. A total of 611 expected active compound targets were identified after removing duplicates and false-positive targets. In total, 1254 gastritis-related targets were acquired from the GeneCards database. As shown in Figure 3, 162 targets were intersected, and a relevance score (≥1000) was used as the cut-off value to select potential targets. Ultimately, 59 potential targets were selected (Table 3).

2.4.3. Construction and Analysis of Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) Networks of Potential and Key Targets

PPI networks were established to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between the target genes. The STRING database was used to gather interactions between potential target genes. The interaction data were submitted to the Cytoscape software to construct PPI networks. Topological network analysis was performed using three major topological analytic parameters: degree (degree centrality), betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality. These parameters indicate the importance of nodes within a network. Among these three parameters, degree is the most intuitive evaluation index, which is defined as the number of node connections. Thus, high degree values represent the significance of the nodes in a network [19]. Betweenness centrality is defined as the number of shortest paths between nodes. Specifically, it helps identify the nodes that bridge others within the network [20]. Closeness centrality specifies the length of the shortest path between two nodes. In other words, a high closeness centrality means that it has close relationships with many nodes [21]. As shown in Figure 4, PPI networks were constructed; the nodes represent the target genes, and the edges indicate the links between target genes. The size and color of a node indicate the intensity of its degree. Thus, the higher the degree of the node, the larger the node, and the color gradually deepens from yellow to red. The width of the edge indicates the degree of correlation between targets. In other words, the larger the combined score, the higher the degree of binding between nodes, and the thicker the edge.
As shown in Figure 4A, the PPI network of the potential targets consisted of 52 nodes and 188 edges. Topological network analysis was performed to identify key targets. The three parameters were set as cut-off values: degree ≥5, betweenness centrality ≥0.003, and closeness centrality ≥0.4; 20 targets remained following the input of the cut-off values. As shown in Figure 4B, the PPI network of key targets consisted of 20 nodes and 98 edges. Among the 20 key targets, STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), IL6 (interleukin 6), TNF (tumor necrosis factor), IL1B (interleukin 1 beta), TLR4 (Toll-like receptor 4), PTGS2 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2), CXCL8 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8), IAM1 (intercellular adhesion molecule 1), MMP9 (matrix metallopeptidase 9), and VEGFA (vascular endothelial growth factor A) showed >10 degrees (Table 4). Specifically, IL6, TNF, IL1B, and CXCL8 exhibited relevance scores of ≥10. These targets comprise both widely known inflammatory mediators and successful targets for controlling inflammation [22,23,24,25]. Furthermore, these genes are also important in controlling gastritis. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), one of the causes of gastritis, induces inflammatory responses mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL6 [26]. Moreover, the expression levels of TNF, IL1B, and CXCL8 increase in the gastric mucosa during a H. pylori infection [27,28]. Therefore, these results suggest that key targets might be crucial in treating gastritis.

2.4.4. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway Enrichment Analysis

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses of key targets were performed using the DAVID database to identify related biological processes and signaling pathways. In the GO analysis, 130 GO terms were acquired, and the top 20 terms were selected by p-value. As shown in Figure 5A, the key targets were closely associated with inflammatory responses, including biosynthesis of the nitric oxide biosynthetic process and ERK1 and ERK2 cascades. In the KEGG pathway analysis, 52 KEGG pathway terms were acquired, and 10 top-ranking pathways were selected on the basis of their p-values. The selected 10 pathways are presented as a bubble chart in Figure 5B. KEGG pathway analysis showed that the key targets were associated with the NF-κB, HIF-1, and TNF signaling pathways. Specifically, the NF-κB signaling pathway exhibited the highest p-value and gene ratio. According to several studies, suppression of the NF-κB signaling pathway exhibits anti-gastritis effects [29,30,31]. In addition, extracts and derived compounds of C. cassia showed anti-inflammatory activities by suppressing the NF-κB signaling pathway [32,33,34]. Therefore, these results suggest that the key targets are highly associated with the inflammatory response and NF-κB signaling pathway.

2.4.5. Analysis of Expected Active Compounds–Key Targets–Pathway (C-T-P) Network

A C-T-P network was constructed to provide a comprehensive interpretation of network pharmacology analysis. The C-T-P network consisted of 81 nodes (51 expected active compounds, 20 key targets, and 10 pathways) and 169 edges (Figure 6). The blue diamond nodes represent the expected active compounds, the reddish circle nodes indicate the key targets, and the purple hexagon nodes symbolize the pathways. The sizes of the nodes and colors of the key target nodes denote the degree. In other words, the larger and redder the key targets are, the higher the degree value they have, thereby indicating that they are important nodes in the network.
Among the 51 expected active compound nodes, 10 compounds were selected as key components of C. cassia on the basis of their degree values (Table 5). According to previous studies, 4 of the 10 key components have exhibited anti-inflammatory activities [35,36,37,38]. For example, geranyl acetate was found to suppress iNOS and COX-2 gene expression as well as LPS-induced IL-1β biosynthesis in macrophages [35]. Coniferaldehyde downregulates the expressions of iNOS, COX-2, and cell death [36]. Sinapaldehyde has inhibited the production of NO, ROS, TNF-α, and IL6 in LPS-stimulated cells [37]. Additionally, 4-hydroxycinnamaldehyde has inhibited NO production in LPS-induced cells [38]. These results suggest that key components are involved in the anti-inflammatory activities of C. cassia.
In the key target nodes, PTGS2, TLR4, MMP9, JAK1, EGFR, CYP2C19, and PTGS1 showed ≥10 degrees. Most of these are strongly associated with inflammatory response mechanisms. For example, PTGS2 is induced by inflammatory stimuli and is a target for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [39]. TLR4 is a sensor receptor for LPS and is involved in inflammatory responses [40]. Additionally, MMP9 is induced by neutrophils and macrophages and is associated with various inflammatory diseases [41]. JAK1 is also strongly associated with the signal transduction of inflammatory cytokine receptors [42], and EGFR downregulates transcription factors such as NF-κB and stimulates pro-inflammatory gene transcription [43]. CYP2C19 is involved in the metabolism of several drugs. Specifically, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are widely used for treating H. pylori infections and gastric ulcers, are mainly metabolized in the liver by CYP2C19, thereby affecting drug efficacy [44]. Therefore, these genes may be crucial targets for the anti-gastritis activities of the key components of C. cassia.
The NF-κB signaling pathway exhibited the highest degree of expression in the pathway nodes. This is one of the major inflammation-related pathways [45] and was predicted to be a critical pathway in the GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses. Furthermore, recent studies have revealed a correlation between the NF-κB signaling pathway and anti-gastritis activities [32,34]. Consequently, the network pharmacology analysis conducted in this study indicated that the anti-gastritis activity of C. cassia may be caused by its inhibitory effect on the NF-κB signaling pathway through the determined key components.

3. Discussion

Gastritis and gastric ulcers can develop in children to adults and have symptoms such as burning upper gastric pain, nausea, indigestion, and vomiting [46]. The causes of these symptoms are damage to the gastric mucosa by irregular eating habits, excessive drinking, stress, Helicobacter pylori infections, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [9]. NSAIDs have demonstrated antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects that can reduce prostaglandins through inhibiting cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [47]. However, contrary to this effect was another study observed that acute gastritis caused by damage to the gastric mucosa occurred in patients who took NSAIDs [48,49]. Indomethacin, an NSAID, is a drug used in an NSAID-induced acute gastritis model [50,51,52]. In this study, we observed the beneficial effects of C. cassia extracts on indomethacin-induced gastric damage in mice following oral administration of WCC, BCC, and ECC. The injured area of the gastric mucosa treated with ranitidine, AE (Artemisia extract), and C. cassia extracts showed a statistically significant decrease in the injured area compared to the indomethacin-induced control group. To confirm the dose-dependent effect of ECC on indomethacin-induced gastric damage, experimental animals were administered AE, which was used as a positive control, and ECC at concentrations of 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg to indomethacin-induced gastric injury sites. The gastric mucosa injury areas in the ranitidine-, AE-, and ECC-treated groups showed a statistically significant decrease compared to that in the indomethacin-induced control group. The protective effect of ECC was as strong as that of AE.
In addition, the effects of C. cassia extracts were tested in another model of gastric mucosal damage caused by an EtOH/HCl mixture, and EtOH is widely used in the acute gastritis model [53,54,55]. The mucosal damage mechanism in this model exacerbates gastritis by directly stimulating the gastric mucosa to increase the activity of free radicals and lipid peroxidation [56,57]. Two types of C. cassia extracts, WCC and ECC, were orally administered to treat gastric injuries caused by HCl-EtOH. The groups treated with ranitidine, WCC, and ECC decreased gastric mucosal damage compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, in an experiment confirming the protective effects of the WCC and ECC administration groups against the 100% EtOH-induced gastric mucosal injury, the WCC- and ECC-treated groups inhibited the gastric mucosal damage compared to the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two. Gastric mucosal damage induced by NSAIDs, EtOH, and EtOH/HCl is caused by direct stimulation of the mucosal surface as well as via the generation of ROS or induction of lipid peroxidation. Previous studies have shown that C. cassia has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects [58,59,60]. Although the protective effects of WCC and ECC on EtOH-induced gastritis were not statistically significant, they may provide protective effects against gastritis-inducing factors other than NSAIDs.
Damaged mucous membranes can cause indigestion, nausea, and heartburn, among other symptoms. The causes of damage are stress, irregular eating habits, overeating, and Helicobacter pylori infections [5,61]. In a stimulated stomach, secretion of gastric juice is promoted and pepsin is activated [62]. Pepsin is activated at a low pH (pH 1.8–2.0) to break down proteins, and continuous exposure of the gastric wall to gastric juice and pepsin causes further damage [63,64]. Gastric acid is one of the factors that causes gastritis [65], and regulating gastric pH can prevent damage to the gastric mucosa [66,67]. In evaluating the gastric acid inhibitory effect via oral administration of WCC and ECC for treating pyloric ligation and HCl-EtOH-induced gastric injury, the amount of gastric juice secretion in the control group was higher than that in the vehicle group. In the group treated with the C. cassia extract, the gastric juice secretion amount showed a significant difference compared to the control group, with 20% in the group treated with WCC and 14.3% in the group treated with ECC. The pH of the lansoprazole-administered group was 6.2, which was significantly higher than that of the control group; this was likely caused by the inhibition of gastric acid secretion. The pH of the WCC-administered group was 2.8, which was lower than that of the control group, and the pH of the ECC-administered group was 3.6, which was similar to that of the control group (Table 2). Thus, the effects of the C. cassia extract on pH ranged from weak to absent. Total gastric acidity in the lansoprazole-administered group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The total gastric acidity of the WCC-and ECC-administered groups decreased, but these values were not statistically significant compared to that of the control group. In a rat model of gastric injury induced by pyloric ligation and HCl-EtOH, administration of WCC and ECC had no effect on pH compared to the control group, but ECC exerted an inhibitory effect on gastric juice secretion.
In the present study, we used a network pharmacology analysis to predict the active compounds, key targets, and pharmacological mechanisms of C. cassia against gastritis. The results showed that 10 key components were predicted as anti-gastritis effect-related compounds of C. cassia, among 51 expected active compounds. Specifically, four of the selected 10 key components have shown anti-inflammatory activities in previous studies [35,36,37,38]. Additionally, inflammatory response-related genes, PTGS2, TLR4, MMP9, JAK1, and EGFR, showed a significant degree value in the C-T-P network. These target genes were highly associated with the inflammatory response in previous studies [39,40,41,42,43]. The NF-κB signaling pathway, a widely known inflammatory response mechanism, comprised a major signaling pathway within the network pharmacology analysis. Several studies have recently been conducted on the relationship between the NF-κB signaling pathway and gastritis [32,33,34]. These results suggest that the anti-gastritis activity of C. cassia may be induced via the anti-inflammatory effects of its key components through suppressing inflammation-related genes and signaling the pathways identified in this study.
In summary, this study confirmed that C. cassia extracts reduced the area of gastric mucosa injuries caused by indomethacin, NSAID, EtOH, and EtOH/HCl, and also decreased the amount of gastric acid and total gastric acidity in comparison with the damaged gastric mucosal control group. In addition, we inferred the active ingredients and predicted targets and mechanisms of action of the anti-gastritis activities of C. cassia through applying a network pharmacology analysis. According to the analysis of the C-T-P network, 10 compounds were selected as key components on the basis of their degree values. Among them, geranyl acetate, coniferaldehyde, sinapaldehyde, and 4-hydroxycinnamaldehye have demonstrated anti-inflammatory activities in previous studies. In addition, PTGS2, TRL4, MMP9, JAK1, EGFR, CYP2C19, and PTGS1 were identified as crucial anti-gastritis target genes in C. cassia. Importantly, the NF-κB signaling pathway was identified as the major signaling pathway responsible for the anti-gastritis effect of C. cassia. These results suggest that C. cassia can potentially help mitigate stomach damage. Furthermore, we considered that the mitigation effect on gastric injury was cocktail effect caused by the individual compounds in C. cassia.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Chemicals

The C. cassia extracts (WCC, BCC, ECC) and Artemisia extract (AE) used in the experiment were provided by Chong Kun Dang Research Institute, Korea [14]. Briefly, C. cassia was extracted with distilled water using a heat-reflux extractor for 5 h after non-processing or processing. The extract was concentrated using reduced pressure in the evaporator and dry-powdered.

4.2. Experimental Animals and Their Management

All experimental animals used male Sprague-Dawley rats (7 weeks old upon receipt, company, nation) were used for the experiments after a week of acclimation. During the acclimation and experimental period, the animals were divided into three rats per cage and kept at a constant temperature (20–25 °C) and humidity (30–35%) in a 12 h light/dark cycle. The rats were given ad libitum access to feed and water. In experiments for inducing gastric ulcers, mice were administered their respective C. cassia extract article (except for the gastritis control groups, which were administered a carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC) solution) after 48 h of feed deprivation, and gastric damage was induced by administering indomethacin (80 mg/kg) [51,52], ethanol (100% EtOH), or an ethanol-HCl (150 mM HCl in 70% EtOH) [11,12] 30 min after the pre-treatment. Five hours later, all animals were sacrificed, and their stomachs were extracted for experimental purposes. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Inha University (protocol codes INHA120907-157, 158 approved on 9 September 2012, INHA130107-185 approved on 7 January 2013).

4.2.1. Animal Experiment Design

Experimental animals were divided into three groups (10 individuals per group): (1) a gastric ulcer control group with gastric damage induced following administration of the CMC solution, (2) experimental groups with gastric damage induced following administration of the C. cassia extract (150 mg/kg) at different concentrations, and (3) positive control groups with gastric damage induced following administration of ranitidine (75 mg/kg). All samples were dissolved in a CMC solution and orally administered at a ratio of 10 mL per 1 kg animal weight.

4.2.2. Determination of Stomach Injury

For evaluation of gastric mucosal damage, each stomach was removed after sacrificing the animals. The gastric mucosa pictures were taken at the same location using a digital camera (IXY digital 10, Canon, Tokyo, Japan) fixed to a stand. The stomachs of all the animals in each group were stretched to determine the degree of injury. The damaged area (ulcer index) was analyzed using ImageJ software (version 1.41, Bethesda, MD, USA) after taking a picture with a digital camera. The degree of gastric mucosa damage was calculated using the formula below, and the difference of gastric mucosal damage in each group was evaluated through statistical analysis.
Ulcer index (%) = (damaged area/total area of the stomach) × 100

4.2.3. Evaluation of Gastric Acid Secretion Inhibition

The gastric acid secretion inhibitory efficacy of the C. cassia extract articles was evaluated by measuring the gastric juice secretion rate, gastric juice pH, and total gastric acidity. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (INHA130307-196, approved on 7 March 2013). Mice fasted for 48 h, and then C. cassia extract articles were administered 30 min before the HCl/EtOH mixture (150 mM HCl in 70% EtOH) induced acute gastric damage [11,12]. After 1 h, the pylorus was ligated, and the stomachs were removed after 4 h. The stomachs were removed, and gastric juices were collected via syringe. The supernatant was collected via centrifugation at 3000 rpm, and the volumes were measured. The pH of the gastric juice was measured using pH test paper. Acidity was measured as the amount in which the pH was neutralized by adding 0.01 N NaOH to the collected gastric juice, and total acidity was expressed as mEq/L. The total gastric acidity of the gastric juice secretion volume after 4 h was expressed as the calculated value.
Total gastric acidity [mEq/4 h] = (total acidity × gastric juice volume)/1000

4.3. Network Pharmacology Analysis

4.3.1. Collecting and Screening of Chemical Components of C. cassia

The chemical components of C. cassia were manually determined through a review of databases and the literature, including National Herbal Medicine Information (NHMI, https://nifds.go.kr/nhmi/main.do (accessed on 29 December 2021)) and PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 29 December 2021)). All compounds were evaluated for their drug-likeness (DL) and oral bioavailability (OB) using the quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QED) method. The physicochemical properties of the components were acquired from the SwissADME database (https://www.swissadme.ch/ (accessed on 29 December 2021)) [68] and were introduced into the QED function to calculate the QED value of each component [69]. Two cut-off values (QED ≥ 0.4 and OB = TRUE) were set to select the expected active compounds of C. cassia.

4.3.2. Acquisition of Expected Active Compounds Targets and Disease Related Targets

SMILES codes of the expected active compounds of C. cassia were obtained from the PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 29 December 2021)) and SciFinder-n (https://scifinder-n.cas.org/ (accessed on 29 December 2021)) databases and uploaded to the SwissTargetPrediction database (http://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/ (accessed on 29 December 2021)) [70] to obtain the predicted targets. Disease-related targets were detected using the GeneCards database (https://www.genecards.org/ (accessed on 29 December 2021)) [71]. “Gastritis” was used as a key word for searching the disease related targets.

4.3.3. Acquisition of Potential Targets

Potential targets were selected as follows: (1) duplicates and false-positive targets of the expected active compounds were removed, then (2) compared with gastritis-related targets and the obtained common targets, and (3) a relevance score (≥1000) was set as the cut-off value to screen potential targets. The potential targets were visualized with a Venn diagram using Venny 2.1 (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (accessed on 29 December 2021)) [72]. The DisGeNET database (https://www.disgenet.org/search (accessed on 29 December 2021)) [73] was used to retrieve specific protein class information for potential targets.

4.3.4. Construction and Analysis of the Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network

Protein–protein interactions of potential targets were analyzed using the STRING database (https://string-db.org/ (accessed on 29 December 2021)) [74]. The analysis setting was set as follows: the required score was a high confidence (0.700) and a medium false discovery rate (FDR) stringency (5 percent). The resultant data were imported into Cytoscape software (v.3.9.0) (National Resource for Network Biology (NRNB), Bethesda, MD, USA) [75] to construct and analyze the PPI network of the potential targets. The “degree”, “betweenness centrality”, and “closeness centrality” parameters were used to estimate the topological features of the nodes in the network. Key targets were selected from the potential targets based on the topological analysis results.

4.3.5. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway Enrichment Analysis

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the key targets were performed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp (accessed on 29 December 2021)) [76]. The false discovery rate (FDR) error control method (FDR < 0.05) was used to correct the p-value, and p < 0.05 was set as a threshold value to obtain biological processes and signaling pathways. The GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis results were visualized using ImageGP (EHBIO Gene Technology, Beijing, China) (http://www.ehbio.com/ImageGP (accessed on 29 December 2021)).

4.3.6. Construction and Analysis of Expected Active Compounds-Key Targets-Pathways (C-T-P) Network

An integrated network of expected active compounds, key targets, and pathways was constructed and analyzed using the Cytoscape software (v.3.9.0) (NRNB, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.4. Statistical Analysis

All numerical values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. This statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software package for Windows (v.19, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and significant differences were considered present at the 5% level (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

The results of this study confirmed that C. cassia extracts reduced the area of gastric mucosa injuries caused by indomethacin, NSAID, EtOH, and EtOH/HCl. In addition, WCC and ECC decreased the amount of gastric acid and total gastric acidity in comparison with the control group. In this study, we inferred the active ingredients, predicted targets, and mechanisms of action of the anti-gastritis activities of C. cassia through applying a network pharmacology analysis. According to the analysis of the C-T-P network, 10 compounds were selected as key components on the basis of their degree values. In addition, PTGS2, TRL4, MMP9, JAK1, EGFR, CYP2C19, and PTGS1 were identified as crucial anti-gastritis target genes in C. cassia. Importantly, the NF-κB signaling pathway was identified as the major signaling pathway responsible for the anti-gastritis effect of C. cassia. These results suggest that C. cassia can potentially help mitigate stomach damage, and the mitigation effect on gastric injury was synergistic effects caused by the individual compounds in C. cassia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11060716/s1. Table S1: List of physicochemical properties, QED, and OB of compounds from C. cassia. Table S2: List of expected active compounds from C. cassia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.J.P. and K.S.K. methodology: J.H.L., H.J.K., and D.S. formal analysis: J.H.L., H.J.K., D.S., B.-H.H., and M.-S.S. investigation: H.J.S. and S.H.K. writing—original draft preparation: J.H.L. and H.J.K. writing—review and editing: S.H.K. and K.S.K. project administration: K.S.K. and S.J.P. funding acquisition: K.S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Chong Kun Dang (C.K.D.) Pharm Research Institute. This research was also supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1F1A1059173).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Inha University (protocol codes INHA120907-157, 158 approved on 9 September 2012, INHA130107-185 approved on 7 January 2013, INHA130307-196 approved on 7 March 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Graham, D.; Agrawal, N.; Roth, S. Prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcer with misoprostol: Multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 1988, 332, 1277–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Satyanarayana, M. Capsaicin and gastric ulcers. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 275–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Veldhuyzen van Zanten, S.; Sherman, P. Helicobacter pylori infection as a cause of gastritis, duodenal ulcer, gastric cancer and nonulcer dyspepsia: A systematic overview. CMAJ 1994, 150, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Schubert, T.T.; Schubert, A.B.; Ma, C.K. Symptoms, gastritis, and Helicobacter pylori in patients referred for endoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1992, 38, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McColl, K.; El-Omar, E.; Gillen, D. Interactions between H. pylori infection, gastric acid secretion and anti-secretory therapy. Br. Med. Bull. 1998, 54, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Takeuchi, K.; Kajimura, M.; Kodaira, M.; Lin, S.; Hanai, H.; Kaneko, E. Up-regulation of H2 receptor and adenylate cyclase in rabbit parietal cells during prolonged treatment with H2-receptor antagonists. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1999, 44, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hopkins, R.J.; Girardi, L.S.; Turney, E.A. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori eradication and reduced duodenal and gastric ulcer recurrence: A review. Gastroenterology 1996, 110, 1244–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suleyman, H.; Cadirci, E.; Albayrak, A.; Polat, B.; Halici, Z.; Koc, F.; Hacimuftuoglu, A.; Bayir, Y. Comparative study on the gastroprotective potential of some antidepressants in indomethacin-induced ulcer in rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2009, 180, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, A.; Lee, J.; Kim, M.; Shin, M.-R.; Shin, S.; Seo, B.; Kwon, O.; Roh, S.-S. Protective effects of a Lycium chinense ethanol extract through anti-oxidative stress on acute gastric lesion mice. Kor. J. Herbol. 2015, 30, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fullarton, G.; McLauchlan, G.; Macdonald, A.; Crean, G.; McColl, K. Rebound nocturnal hypersecretion after four weeks treatment with an H2 receptor antagonist. Gut 1989, 30, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Park, S.W.; Oh, T.Y.; Kim, Y.S.; Sim, H.; Park, S.J.; Jang, E.J.; Park, J.S.; Baik, H.W.; Hahm, K.B. Artemisia asiatica extracts protect against ethanol-induced injury in gastric mucosa of rats. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 23, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hong, Y.-J.; Kim, S.Y.; Han, J.; Lim, Y.-I.; Park, K.-Y. Inhibitory effects of cabbage juice and cabbage-mixed juice on the growth of AGS human gastric cancer cells and on HCl-ethanol induced gastritis in rats. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 42, 682–689. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, C.; Fan, L.; Fan, S.; Wang, J.; Luo, T.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yu, L. Cinnamomum cassia Presl: A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology. Molecules 2019, 24, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lee, J.H.; Park, D.H.; Lee, S.; Seo, H.J.; Park, S.J.; Jung, K.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kang, K.S. Potential and beneficial effects of Cinnamomum cassia on gastritis and safety: Literature review and analysis of standard extract. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2021, 64, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tankam, J.M.; Sawada, Y.; Ito, M. Regular ingestion of cinnamomi cortex pulveratus offers gastroprotective activity in mice. J. Nat. Med. 2013, 67, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zaidi, S.F.; Muhammad, J.S.; Shahryar, S.; Usmanghani, K.; Gilani, A.-H.; Jafri, W.; Sugiyama, T. Anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects of selected Pakistani medicinal plants in Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric epithelial cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Wen, F.; Huang, W.; Chen, X.; Ruan, S.; Gu, S.; Hu, Y.; Teng, Y.; Shu, P. Study of the active ingredients and mechanism of Sparganii rhizoma in gastric cancer based on HPLC-Q-TOF–MS/MS and network pharmacology. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, A.; Wang, W.; Xia, Y.; Niu, X. A network pharmacology approach to explore the mechanisms of artemisiae scopariae herba for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2021, 2021, e6614039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Golbeck, J. Introduction to Social Media Investigation: A Hands-On Approach; Syngress: Rockland, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hansen, D.; Shneiderman, B.; Smith, M.A. Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL, 2nd edition: Insights from a Connected World; Morgan Kaufmann: Burlington, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Metcalf, L.; Casey, W. Cybersecurity and Applied Mathematics; Syngress: Rockland, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rincon, M. Interleukin-6: From an inflammatory marker to a target for inflammatory diseases. Trends Immunol. 2012, 33, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, Y.; Cooper, D.K.; Wang, H.; Chen, P.; He, C.; Cai, Z.; Mou, L.; Luan, S.; Gao, H. Potential pathological role of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17) in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2019, 26, e12502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, K.; Torres, R. Role of interleukin-1β during pain and inflammation. Brain Res. Rev. 2009, 60, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ha, H.; Debnath, B.; Neamati, N. Role of the CXCL8-CXCR1/2 axis in cancer and inflammatory diseases. Theranostics 2017, 7, 1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Santos, M.; Pereira, J.; Delabio, R.; Smith, M.; Payão, S.; Carneiro, L.; Barbosa, M.; Rasmussen, L. Increased expression of interleukin-6 gene in gastritis and gastric cancer. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2021, 54, e10687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ren, H.-Y.; Wen, L.-S.; Geng, Y.-H.; Huang, J.-B.; Liu, J.-F.; Shen, D.-Y.; Meng, J.-R. Association between IL-1B gene polymorphisms and Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 137, 103769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kusters, J.G.; Van Vliet, A.H.; Kuipers, E.J. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 449–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kim, S.A.; Oh, J.; Choi, S.R.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, B.-H.; Lee, M.-N.; Hossain, M.A.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.; Cho, J.Y. Anti-Gastritis and Anti-Lung Injury Effects of Pine Tree Ethanol Extract Targeting Both NF-kB and AP-1 Pathways. Molecules 2021, 26, 6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Raish, M.; Ahmad, A.; Ansari, M.A.; Alkharfy, K.M.; Aljenoobi, F.I.; Jan, B.L.; Al-Mohizea, A.M.; Khan, A.; Ali, N. Momordica charantia polysaccharides ameliorate oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis in ethanol-induced gastritis in mucosa through NF-kB signaling pathway inhibition. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 111, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hossen, M.J.; Chou, J.-Y.; Li, S.-M.; Fu, X.-Q.; Yin, C.; Guo, H.; Amin, A.; Chou, G.-X.; Yu, Z.-L. An ethanol extract of the rhizome of Atractylodes chinensis exerts anti-gastritis activities and inhibits Akt/NF-κB signaling. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 228, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, T.; Lee, S.; Yang, W.S.; Jang, H.-J.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, T.W.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Cho, J.Y. The ability of an ethanol extract of Cinnamomum cassia to inhibit Src and spleen tyrosine kinase activity contributes to its anti-inflammatory action. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 139, 566–573. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hwang, H.; Jeon, H.; Ock, J.; Hong, S.H.; Han, Y.-M.; Kwon, B.-M.; Lee, W.-H.; Lee, M.-S.; Suk, K. 2′-Hydroxycinnamaldehyde targets low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 to inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation. J. Neuroimmunol. 2011, 230, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fu, Y.; Yang, P.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, X.; Wu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y. trans-Cinnamaldehyde inhibits microglial activation and improves neuronal survival against neuroinflammation in BV2 microglial cells with lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2017, 2017, 4730878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, J.H.; Chang, K.M.; Kim, G.H. Composition and anti-inflammatory activities of Zanthoxylum schinifolium essential oil: Suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, cytokines and cellular adhesion. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1762–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, K.M.; Heo, D.R.; Kim, Y.-A.; Lee, J.; Kim, N.S.; Bang, O.-S. Coniferaldehyde inhibits LPS-induced apoptosis through the PKC α/β II/Nrf-2/HO-1 dependent pathway in RAW264. 7 macrophage cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 48, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Baek, S.-H.; Park, T.; Kang, M.-G.; Park, D. Anti-inflammatory activity and ROS regulation effect of sinapaldehyde in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Molecules 2020, 25, 4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, J.; Shao, J.; Zhao, C.; Shen, J.; Dong, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhao, M.; Fan, J. Chemical constituents from Viburnum fordiae Hance and their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2018, 41, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cox, D.; Pontes, C.; Guinó, E.; Navarro, M.; Osorio, A.; Canzian, F.; Moreno, V. Polymorphisms in prostaglandin synthase 2/cyclooxygenase 2 (PTGS2/COX2) and risk of colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Molteni, M.; Gemma, S.; Rossetti, C. The role of toll-like receptor 4 in infectious and noninfectious inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2016, 2016, e6978936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, H.; Liu, L.; Jiang, C.; Pan, K.; Deng, J.; Wan, C. MMP9 protects against LPS-induced inflammation in osteoblasts. Innate Immun. 2020, 26, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Van Rompaey, L.; Galien, R.; van der Aar, E.M.; Clement-Lacroix, P.; Nelles, L.; Smets, B.; Lepescheux, L.; Christophe, T.; Conrath, K.; Vandeghinste, N. Preclinical characterization of GLPG0634, a selective inhibitor of JAK1, for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 3568–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, L.; Huang, Z.; Huang, W.; Chen, X.; Shan, P.; Zhong, P.; Khan, Z.; Wang, J.; Fang, Q.; Liang, G. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor attenuates atherosclerosis via decreasing inflammation and oxidative stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. El Rouby, N.; Lima, J.J.; Johnson, J.A. Proton pump inhibitors: From CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics to precision medicine. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2018, 14, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hannoodee, S.; Nasuruddin, D.N. Acute Inflammatory Response; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Meng, Y.; Cao, M.; Wang, J. Treatment effects of jinlingzi powder and its extractive components on gastric ulcer induced by acetic acid in rats. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2019, 2019, 7365841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Green, G.A. Understanding NSAIDs: From aspirin to COX-2. Clin. Cornerstone 2001, 3, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wallace, J.L. Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: Why doesn’t the stomach digest itself? Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 1547–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Risser, A.; Donovan, D.; Heintzman, J.; Page, T. NSAID prescribing precautions. Am. Fam. Phys. 2009, 80, 1371–1378. [Google Scholar]
  50. Odabasoglu, F.; Cakir, A.; Suleyman, H.; Aslan, A.; Bayir, Y.; Halici, M.; Kazaz, C. Gastroprotective and antioxidant effects of usnic acid on indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 103, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Swarnakar, S.; Ganguly, K.; Kundu, P.; Banerjee, A.; Maity, P.; Sharma, A.V. Curcumin regulates expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 2 during prevention and healing of indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 9409–9415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. AbdelAziz, E.Y.; Tadros, M.G.; Menze, E.T. The effect of metformin on indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer: Involvement of nitric oxide/Rho kinase pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 892, 173812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. AlRashdi, A.S.; Salama, S.M.; Alkiyumi, S.S.; Abdulla, M.A.; Hadi, A.H.A.; Abdelwahab, S.I.; Taha, M.M.; Hussiani, J.; Asykin, N. Mechanisms of gastroprotective effects of ethanolic leaf extract of Jasminum sambac against HCl/ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury in rats. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2012, 2012, 786426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kim, Y.-S.; Lee, J.H.; Song, J.; Kim, H. Gastroprotective Effects of Inulae Flos on HCl/Ethanol-Induced Gastric Ulcers in Rats. Molecules 2020, 25, 5623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jainu, M.; Devi, C.S.S. Antiulcerogenic and ulcer healing effects of Solanum nigrum (L.) on experimental ulcer models: Possible mechanism for the inhibition of acid formation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 104, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ishii, Y.; Fujii, Y.; Homma, M. Gastric acid stimulating action of cysteamine in the rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1976, 36, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Anandan, R.; Rekha, R.D.; Saravanan, N.; Devaki, T. Protective effects of Picrorrhiza kurroa against HCl/ethanol-induced ulceration in rats. Fitoterapia 1999, 70, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hong, C.H.; Hur, S.K.; Oh, O.-J.; Kim, S.S.; Nam, K.A.; Lee, S.K. Evaluation of natural products on inhibition of inducible cyclooxygenase (COX-2) and nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in cultured mouse macrophage cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 83, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schink, A.; Naumoska, K.; Kitanovski, Z.; Kampf, C.J.; Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.; Thines, E.; Pöschl, U.; Schuppan, D.; Lucas, K. Anti-inflammatory effects of cinnamon extract and identification of active compounds influencing the TLR2 and TLR4 signaling pathways. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 5950–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. He, S.; Jiang, Y.; Tu, P.-F. Three new compounds from Cinnamomum cassia. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 18, 134–140. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sipponen, P.; Maaroos, H.-I. Chronic gastritis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 50, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Katz, P.O. Lessons learned from intragastric pH monitoring. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2001, 33, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ozeki, T.; Mizuno, S.; Ohuchi, H.; Iwaki, K.; Watanabe, S.; Ueda, H.; Kawahara, H.; Masuda, H.; Sanefugi, H. The effects of prostaglandin E1 on the pepsin activities in gastric mucosa and juice. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1987, 68, 521. [Google Scholar]
  64. Guldvog, I.; Berstad, A. Opposite Effects of H2-Receptors on Parietal Cells and Chief Cells. Eur. Surg. Res. 1984, 16, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Goldberg, H.I.; Dodds, W.J.; Gee, S.; Montgomery, C.; Zboralske, F.F. Role of acid and pepsin in acute experimental esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1969, 56, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. DeMeester, T.R.; Wernly, J.A.; Bryant, G.H.; Little, A.G.; Skinner, D.B. Clinical and in vitro analysis of determinants of gastroesophageal competence: A study of the principles of antireflux surgery. Am. J. Surg. 1979, 137, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hunt, R.H. Importance of pH control in the management of GERD. Arch. Intern. Med. 1999, 159, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bickerton, G.R.; Paolini, G.V.; Besnard, J.; Muresan, S.; Hopkins, A.L. Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Gfeller, D.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. Shaping the interaction landscape of bioactive molecules. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 3073–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Stelzer, G.; Rosen, N.; Plaschkes, I.; Zimmerman, S.; Twik, M.; Fishilevich, S.; Stein, T.I.; Nudel, R.; Lieder, I.; Mazor, Y. The GeneCards suite: From gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2016, 54, 1.30.31–1.30.33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Oliveros, J.; Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. BioinfoGP CNB-CSIC. 2007. Available online: https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (accessed on 29 December 2021).
  73. Piñero, J.; Ramírez-Anguita, J.M.; Saüch-Pitarch, J.; Ronzano, F.; Centeno, E.; Sanz, F.; Furlong, L.I. The DisGeNET knowledge platform for disease genomics: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D845–D855. [Google Scholar]
  74. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Nastou, K.C.; Lyon, D.; Kirsch, R.; Pyysalo, S.; Doncheva, N.T.; Legeay, M.; Fang, T.; Bork, P. The STRING database in 2021: Customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D605–D612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar]
  76. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 00716 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison in the efficacy of C. cassia extract in treating gastric lesions. The test articles of C. cassia were pretreatment by oral administration. After 30 min, indomethacin was administered orally. After 5 h, a rat was sacrificed, and its ulcers were measured. (A) Configuration demonstrating the effects of the following vehicles. Positive controls: ranitidine (75 mg/kg, positive control) and AE (150 mg/kg, Artemisia extract, positive control), and with various C. cassia extracts: WCC (150 mg/kg, water extract of C. cassia), BCC (150 mg/kg, water extract C. cassia pre-washed with butanol), ECC (150 mg/kg, water extract of C. cassia pre-washed with ethyl acetate). (B) Representative effects on indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in various treatment groups. The results are expressed in mean ± SD (n = 10); statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19, and p-values were set at level p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***).
Figure 1. Comparison in the efficacy of C. cassia extract in treating gastric lesions. The test articles of C. cassia were pretreatment by oral administration. After 30 min, indomethacin was administered orally. After 5 h, a rat was sacrificed, and its ulcers were measured. (A) Configuration demonstrating the effects of the following vehicles. Positive controls: ranitidine (75 mg/kg, positive control) and AE (150 mg/kg, Artemisia extract, positive control), and with various C. cassia extracts: WCC (150 mg/kg, water extract of C. cassia), BCC (150 mg/kg, water extract C. cassia pre-washed with butanol), ECC (150 mg/kg, water extract of C. cassia pre-washed with ethyl acetate). (B) Representative effects on indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in various treatment groups. The results are expressed in mean ± SD (n = 10); statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19, and p-values were set at level p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***).
Plants 11 00716 g001
Plants 11 00716 g002 550
Figure 2. Protective effects of C. cassia extract against gastric damage. (A) Inhibiting effects of AE and ECC on ulcer indexes in SD rats. The ulcer index percentages showed markedly reduced gastric damage in each treatment concentration. (B) Representative comparison of gastric injury in the four studied groups. Data compared % of vehicle. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Protective effects of C. cassia extract against gastric damage. (A) Inhibiting effects of AE and ECC on ulcer indexes in SD rats. The ulcer index percentages showed markedly reduced gastric damage in each treatment concentration. (B) Representative comparison of gastric injury in the four studied groups. Data compared % of vehicle. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Plants 11 00716 g002
Plants 11 00716 g003 550
Figure 3. Venn diagram of expected active compounds and gastritis-related targets.
Figure 3. Venn diagram of expected active compounds and gastritis-related targets.
Plants 11 00716 g003
Plants 11 00716 g004 550
Figure 4. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks: (A) PPI network of potential targets; (B) PPI network of the key targets.
Figure 4. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks: (A) PPI network of potential targets; (B) PPI network of the key targets.
Plants 11 00716 g004
Plants 11 00716 g005 550
Figure 5. Bubble chart of GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis: (A) bubble chart of the GO enrichment analysis; (B) bubble chart of the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis.
Figure 5. Bubble chart of GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis: (A) bubble chart of the GO enrichment analysis; (B) bubble chart of the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis.
Plants 11 00716 g005
Plants 11 00716 g006 550
Figure 6. Expected active compounds–key targets–pathways (C-T-P) network.
Figure 6. Expected active compounds–key targets–pathways (C-T-P) network.
Plants 11 00716 g006
Table
Table 1. Potential effects of C. cassia extracts against HCl-EtOH/EtOH induced damage.
Table 1. Potential effects of C. cassia extracts against HCl-EtOH/EtOH induced damage.
DrugTreatmentDose (p.o.)Ulcer Index (%)Inhibition (%)
HCl-EtOHVehicle-8.44 ± 3.84-
Ranitidine75 mg/kg7.11 ± 4.2315.78
WCC150 mg/kg6.91 ± 4.5918.09
ECC150 mg/kg4.69 ± 3.3944.46
EtOHVehicle-12.75 ± 4.65-
Ranitidine75 mg/kg20.15 ± 11.26−58.32
WCC150 mg/kg9.21 ± 8.5827.74
ECC150 mg/kg8.95 ± 5.7429.74
Ulcer index data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10), and inhibition data were compared with the vehicle control percentage. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistics 19.
Table
Table 2. Potential effect of the C. cassia extract article against the volume, pH, and total acidity of gastric juice.
Table 2. Potential effect of the C. cassia extract article against the volume, pH, and total acidity of gastric juice.
TreatmentGastric Juice Volume (mL)pHTotal Acidity (mEq/4 h)
Vehicle0.6 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.80.040 ± 0.041
Control3.5 ± 0.73.7 ± 1.00.112 ± 0.055
Lansoprazole3.4 ± 0.76.2 ± 1.0 **0.030 ± 0.018 **
WCC2.8 ± 0.72.9 ± 0.90.101 ± 0.024
ECC2.7 ± 0.6 *3.6 ± 0.50.099 ± 0.028
Each treatment concentration was administered (lansoprazole: 30 mg/kg, WCC: 300 mg/kg). All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10), and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 19. * p < 0.05 compared to the control group. ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group. WCC: water extract of C. cassia; ECC: water extract of C. cassia prewashed ethyl acetate.
Table
Table 3. List of potential targets.
Table 3. List of potential targets.
No.Uniprot IDGeneRelevance ScoreTargetsProtein Class
1Q09472EP30023.750E1A-binding protein p300-
2P01584IL1B18.992interleukin 1 beta-
3P01375TNF12.518tumor necrosis factorSignaling
4P10145CXCL811.503C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8Signaling
5P05231IL610.297interleukin 6-
6P35354PTGS29.818prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2Enzyme
7O00206TLR48.350toll-like receptor 4-
8P35228NOS27.650nitric oxide synthase 2-
9P33261CYP2C197.234cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19-
10P14174MIF6.687macrophage migration inhibitory factor-
11P43405SYK6.451spleen-associated tyrosine kinaseKinase
12P19838NFKB16.449nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1Transcription factor
13P54707ATP12A6.033ATPase H+/K+ transporting non-gastric alpha2 subunitTransporter
14P23219PTGS15.667prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1Enzyme
15P40763STAT35.485signal transducer and activator of transcription 3Nucleic acid binding
16O14684PTGES4.898prostaglandin E synthase-
17P05091ALDH24.614aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 family memberEnzyme
18P08581MET3.626MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinaseKinase
19Q05655PRKCD3.378protein kinase C deltaKinase
20P05164MPO3.197myeloperoxidaseEnzyme
21P23458JAK13.146Janus kinase 1Kinase
22P00533EGFR2.978epidermal growth factor receptorKinase
23P08183ABCB12.735ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1Transporter
24P14780MMP92.670matrix metallopeptidase 9Enzyme
25P10415BCL22.352BCL2 apoptosis regulatorSignaling
26P08253MMP22.344matrix metallopeptidase 2Enzyme
27P39877PLA2G52.251phospholipase A2 group VEnzyme
28Q06124PTPN111.951protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11-
29Q9UBK2PPARG1.897PPARG coactivator 1 alphaTranscription factor
30P15692VEGFA1.827vascular endothelial growth factor ASignaling
31P21980TGM21.812transglutaminase 2Enzyme
32P12821ACE1.704angiotensin I-converting enzymeEnzyme
33Q8NER1TRPV11.702transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1Ion channel
34P09237MMP71.669matrix metallopeptidase 7Enzyme
35Q16236NFE2L21.543nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2Enzyme
36P05362ICAM11.526intercellular adhesion molecule 1-
37P09874PARP11.324poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1-
38P47989XDH1.295xanthine dehydrogenaseEnzyme
39P51681CCR51.266C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (gene/pseudogene)G-protein-coupled receptor
40P49682CXCR31.266C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3G-protein-coupled receptor
41P00813ADA1.263adenosine deaminaseEnzyme
42P16581SELE1.240selectin E-
43P20701ITGAL1.181integrin subunit alpha L-
44P25116F2R1.181coagulation factor II thrombin receptorG-protein-coupled receptor
45P26010ITGB71.179integrin subunit beta 7Receptor
46P08684CYP3A41.164cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 4Enzyme
47P10721KIT1.157KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinaseKinase
48P22894MMP81.131matrix metallopeptidase 8Enzyme
49P51679CCR41.131C-C motif chemokine receptor 4G-protein-coupled receptor
50P15056BRAF1.103B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinaseKinase
51P08246ELANE1.103elastase, neutrophil-expressedEnzyme
52P29597TYK21.081tyrosine kinase 2Kinase
53Q08881ITK1.074IL2-inducible T cell kinaseKinase
54P41180CASR1.074calcium-sensing receptorG-protein-coupled receptor
55P05093CYP17A11.074cytochrome P450 family 17 subfamily A member 1-
56P05177CYP1A21.074cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 2Enzyme
57P14222PRF11.074perforin 1-
58P29274ADORA2A1.070adenosine A2a receptorG-protein-coupled receptor
59P42345MTOR1.042mechanistic target of rapamycin kinaseKinase
Table
Table 4. Key targets based on PPI network topological analysis.
Table 4. Key targets based on PPI network topological analysis.
No.Uniprot IDGeneRelevance ScoreDegreeBetweenness
Centrality		Closeness
Centrality
1P40763STAT35.485160.0790.864
2P05231IL610.297150.0570.826
3P01375TNF12.503150.0580.826
4P01584IL1B18.992130.0260.760
5O00206TLR48.350130.0410.760
6P35354PTGS24.898130.1660.760
7P10145CXCL811.503120.0190.731
8P05362ICAM11.526120.0310.731
9P14780MMP92.670110.0070.704
10P15692VEGFA1.827110.0200.704
11P19838NFKB16.44990.0150.613
12P00533EGFR2.97890.0120.655
13P05164MPO3.19780.0310.633
14Q06124PTPN111.95180.0090.594
15Q09472EP30023.75070.0030.576
16P37231PPARG1.89770.0060.613
17P23458JAK13.14660.0040.559
18P43405SYK6.45160.0060.559
19P23219PTGS15.66730.0070.475
20P33261CYP2C197.23420.0000.463
Table
Table 5. List of 10 key components from the C-T-P network analysis.
Table 5. List of 10 key components from the C-T-P network analysis.
Compound NameStructureFormulaDegree
Geranyl acetate Plants 11 00716 i001C12H20O27
Coniferaldehyde Plants 11 00716 i002C10H10O37
Cinnamoid E Plants 11 00716 i003C15H22O27
Sinapaldehyde Plants 11 00716 i004C11H12O46
Cinnamoid C Plants 11 00716 i005C15H24O35
Cinnamoid B Plants 11 00716 i006C15H24O35
4-Hydroxycinnamaldehyde Plants 11 00716 i007C9H8O24
(7S,8R)-Lawsonicin Plants 11 00716 i008C20H24O64
cis-2-Methoxycinnamic acid Plants 11 00716 i009C10H10O34
Cinnamoid D Plants 11 00716 i010C15H24O24
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.H.; Kwak, H.J.; Shin, D.; Seo, H.J.; Park, S.J.; Hong, B.-H.; Shin, M.-S.; Kim, S.H.; Kang, K.S. Mitigation of Gastric Damage Using Cinnamomum cassia Extract: Network Pharmacological Analysis of Active Compounds and Protection Effects in Rats. Plants 2022, 11, 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11060716

AMA Style

Lee JH, Kwak HJ, Shin D, Seo HJ, Park SJ, Hong B-H, Shin M-S, Kim SH, Kang KS. Mitigation of Gastric Damage Using Cinnamomum cassia Extract: Network Pharmacological Analysis of Active Compounds and Protection Effects in Rats. Plants. 2022; 11(6):716. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11060716

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ji Hwan, Hee Jae Kwak, Dongchul Shin, Hye Jin Seo, Shin Jung Park, Bo-Hee Hong, Myoung-Sook Shin, Seung Hyun Kim, and Ki Sung Kang. 2022. "Mitigation of Gastric Damage Using Cinnamomum cassia Extract: Network Pharmacological Analysis of Active Compounds and Protection Effects in Rats" Plants 11, no. 6: 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11060716

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop