Next Article in Journal
Increased Invasion Risk of Tagetes minuta L. in China under Climate Change: A Study of the Potential Geographical Distributions
Previous Article in Journal
Metal- and Organ-Specific Response to Heavy Metal-Induced Stress Mediated by Antioxidant Enzymes’ Activities, Polyamines, and Plant Hormones Levels in Populus deltoides
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Orthodox Dry Seeds Are Alive: A Clear Example of Desiccation Tolerance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

A View into Seed Autophagy: From Development to Environmental Responses

by
Raquel Iglesias-Fernández
1,2,* and
Jesús Vicente-Carbajosa
1,2
1
Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas-Severo Ochoa (CBGP, UPM-INIA), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (CSIC/INIA), 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain
2
Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(23), 3247; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233247
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 20 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 26 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene Networks in Seeds)

Abstract

:
Autophagy is a conserved cellular mechanism involved in the degradation and subsequent recycling of cytoplasmic components. It is also described as a catabolic process implicated in the specific degradation of proteins in response to several stimuli. In eukaryotes, the endoplasmic reticulum accumulates an excess of proteins in response to environmental changes, and is the major cellular organelle at the crossroads of stress responses. Return to proteostasis involves the activation of the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) and eventually autophagy as a feedback mechanism to relieve protein overaccumulation. Recent publications have focused on the relevance of autophagy in two central processes of seed biology: (i) seed storage protein accumulation upon seed maturation and (ii) reserve mobilization during seed imbibition. Although ER-protein accumulation and the subsequent activation of autophagy resemble the Seed Storage Protein (SSP) deposition during seed maturation, the molecular connection between seed development, autophagy, and seed response to abiotic stresses is still an underexplored field. This mini-review presents current advances in autophagy in seeds, highlighting its participation in the normal course of seed development from embryogenesis to germination. Finally, the function of autophagy in response to the seed environment is also considered, as is its involvement in controlling seed dormancy and germination.

1. Plant Autophagy: General Background

The word autophagy comes from ancient Greek and means self-eating. In eukaryotic organisms, autophagy is a conserved cellular mechanism involved in the degradation of cytoplasmic constituents to reuse their basic units [1,2]. Autophagy removes any unnecessary, damaged, or dysfunctional cellular components; therefore, it is a primary cell recycling system in eukaryotes. In the plant cell, autophagy occurs in the acidic central vacuole in three different ways: microautophagy, macroautophagy, and mega-autophagy. In microautophagy, the central vacuole engulfs cytoplasmic constituents (i.e., cargos) from the cytosol by direct invagination of the tonoplast [3]. In contrast, macroautophagy involves the sequestration and delivery of cargo by the autophagosome, a double-membrane vesicle that appears to originate from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). At the central vacuole, the tonoplast fuses with the outer layer of the autophagosome, and the inner membrane with the cargo inside is engulfed. There, vacuolar hydrolases degrade and return the broken-down materials to the cytosol [4,5,6]. How autophagy recognizes its cargo in the plant cell is not well understood. Mega-autophagy is the massive degradation of the cellular components that occurs in the late phase of programmed cell death (PCD) when the central vacuole releases large amounts of hydrolases into the cytoplasm [7]. The autophagic process occurs at basal levels, but intensifies in response to specific developmental programs (e.g., senescence, germination, and reproduction) and to support plant survival under abiotic and biotic stresses [8,9,10,11,12].
The autophagy molecular machinery comprises approximately 40 proteins conserved in plants, animals, and fungi, and some designated AuTophaGy-related (ATGs) proteins. ATGs are heterogeneous in function and belong to over seventeen protein families, such as kinases, ubiquitin-like proteins, Vacuolar Protein Sorting (VPS) factors, and cysteine proteases [13]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, ATGs are part of four complexes involved in autophagosome formation: (i) the ATG1 kinase complex that activates autophagy in response to nutrient starvation—the kinase Target Of Rapamycin (TOR) inactivates the ATG1 complex by phosphorylation in non-stressful conditions; (ii) the Phosphatidyl-Inositol 3-Kinase (PI3K) complex participates in the genesis of the phagophore (a pre-autophagosome structure); (iii) the ATG9 complex, which recruits portions of the ER membrane for phagophore expansion; and (iv) the ATG12 complex, which assists in cargo recruitment [14,15,16,17].

2. Autophagy as Part of the Vesicle Trafficking in Seeds

The origin of seeds is a decisive milestone in plant evolution. The appearance of seeds in spermatophytes allowed these plants to spread over long distances, arrest their life cycle when adverse conditions are met, and resume growth under favorable environments [18]. A seed crop is a staple food that feeds humans and animals because of its content of proteins, carbohydrates, and oils. Seed yield and vigor are relevant for modern agriculture, and depend on the seed’s nutritional value and its ability to germinate across a wide range of environmental conditions [19,20].
The accumulation of reserves during maturation and their mobilization during germination are central cellular processes that control seed yield and vigor. Seeds mainly accumulate carbohydrates (starch), proteins (Seed Storage Proteins, SSPs), and oils (triacylglycerols TAGs). Starch accumulation occurs in plastids, leading to amyloplast formation. Similarly, oil biosynthesis begins at the plastid but finishes when the ER releases oil bodies into the cytoplasm [21]. However, SSP synthesis occurs in the ER boundaries when proteins accumulate in Protein Storage Vacuoles (PSVs) and Protein Bodies (PBs)—see [22] and references therein. Protein accumulation in the ER during seed maturation resembles the aggregation of proteins that occurs during ER stress, which eventually activates autophagy to relieve protein overproduction under environmental stress conditions [23,24]. PSV formation implies the engulfment of the pre-existing Lytic Vacuole (LV) in an autophagy-like process, generating two compartments with different functions: storage (matrix and crystalloid) and lytic (globoid) [25]. This separation may assure that an initial source of hydrolytic enzymes is needed for protein degradation during early imbibition (preceding germination). SSPs require post-translational processing by proteolytic cleavage, carried out by Vacuolar Processing Enzymes (VPEs) such as cysteine proteases [26]. While PSVs store SSPs in the cotyledons, embryonic axis, and aleurone cells of both dicot and monocot seeds, PBs accumulate SSPs in the starchy endosperm of monocots [27].
As depicted in Figure 1, SSP transport occurs by two alternative routes: (i) a direct pathway from the ER (Golgi-independent) to PSV; and (ii) through the classical cellular transport pathway with an intermediate step at the Golgi apparatus (Golgi-dependent). The Golgi-independent route is an unconventional vesicular track known as the “ER to vacuole trafficking” (ERvt) pathway [28]. Both routes involve mechanisms similar to autophagy (Figure 1). During seed imbibition, de novo synthesis of proteolytic enzymes starts at the ER and finishes when ER-derived vesicles arrive at PSVs to mobilize SSPs. The transport of reserve proteins in seeds implies several types of intermediate vesicles: (i) Dense Vesicles (DVs), MultiVesicular Bodies (MVBs), and Pre-Vacuolar Compartments (PVCs) required for the Golgi-dependent route; and (ii) Precursor-Accumulating (PAC) vesicles involved in the Golgi-independent pathway (Figure 1) [10,19,27,28].

3. Autophagy in Seed Formation: Nutrient Allocation and Reserve Accumulation

Autophagy is a relevant process affecting seed quality, as disclosed by nutrient content analysis and the performance of seeds of atg mutants when sown or stored [34,35]. Zygotic embryogenesis, cell division, and histodifferentiation lead to the diversification into endosperm and embryonic tissues. At maturation, the seed accumulates reserves, acquires desiccation tolerance, and enters primary dormancy as a final stage [36]. Frequently, dicot seeds store reserve materials in the cotyledons, while monocot seeds do so in the endosperm. Therefore, autophagy-like processes related to reserve allocation occur in different tissues, depending on the seed type. Likewise, nutrients are mobilized through the phloem to the apoplast between the maternal and filial tissues: the seed coat in dicotyledonous seeds, and the placenta-chalazal region in monocotyledonous seeds [19].
During zygotic embryogenesis, autophagy is involved in nutrient allocation from senescent vegetative tissue (mainly leaves) to the growing embryo, and represents a critical step for nitrogen, sulfur, and metal remobilization [34,35,37,38,39]. Upon seed maturation, involvement of the ERvt pathway, an autophagy-like process, has been consistently reported in Ricinus communis, Vigna mungo, Zea mays, and several species of Cucurbita. It participates in the transport of SSP precursors to the cytoplasm via PAC bodies in cereal endosperm cells, and in the transport of SSPs to PSVs in aleurone cells of monocot seeds and embryo cells of dicots [27,40,41,42].
Global transcriptomic data in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds show that ATG genes are up-regulated, especially in the pericarp, funiculus, and chalazal maternal tissues during embryogenesis, and in the embryo during seed maturation [10,43,44]. Several genetic studies carried out in this species have demonstrated the relevance of autophagy in seed biology. Thus, the knock-out mutants atg5, atg8a, and atg9 produce mature seeds with significant alterations in the N- and C-terminal contents, whereas the atg7 and the double atg4a–4b mutants generate mature dry seeds with a lower weight than those of the wild-type. Likewise, atg5 and atg7 show reduced content of storage proteins such as 12S globulins and 2S albumins. Additionally, atg5 seeds display premature development compared to the wild type, since protein storage deposition begins earlier. The stable overexpression of AtATG5 and AtATG7 genes improves seed production, and overexpression of the AtATG8a and AtATG8g genes results in a significant increment in the N content of seeds [10,29,30]. Concerning other storage compounds, there is evidence of autophagy involvement in lipid turnover and mobilization in yeast, algae, and animals. Notably, the fatty acid content in seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana plants overexpressing ATG5 and ATG7 is higher than that of the wild-type [45]. In addition, a recent study confirmed the direct contribution of basal autophagy to triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis and lipid droplet degradation in leaves and seeds of Arabidopsis plants [46].
Interestingly, atg5 plants contain higher levels of molecules involved in redox homeostasis (e.g., glutathione) than wild-type plants. Similarly, the level of ROS-scavenging catalase enzymes is also up-regulated in Oryza sativa Osatg7-1 mutant seeds [47], suggesting a bond between autophagy and oxidative stress management, therefore supporting that reactive oxygen species (ROS) might affect (i) the maturation of the SSP precursors, (ii) the transport of the SSP precursors to the MVBs and/or to the PSVs, and (iii) the processing of SSP precursors into mature SSPs [30].
In Oryza sativa seeds, autophagy contributes to starch quality in the endosperm during seed maturation. The autophagy-deficient mutant Osatg7-1 produces fewer and smaller seeds than the wild type, as occurs in the A. thaliana atg7 mutant. Additionally, Osatg7-1 seeds present a chalky appearance and lower starch content in the endosperm of mature seeds. These chalky seeds contain higher levels of several Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs), Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) proteins, and chaperones than the wild-type ones. This suggests a link between autophagy and the acquisition of tolerance to desiccation before dormancy establishment [47].

4. Autophagy in Seed Germination: Reserve Mobilization

Seed germination begins with water uptake and terminates when the radicle protrudes through the layers surrounding the embryo (germination sensu stricto). The protrusion also denotes the starting point of post-germination events, where the hydrolysis of seed storage reserves mainly sustains seedling growth until photosynthetic capacity is acquired. During seed germination, extensive protein breakdown occurs through the action of endo- and exo-peptidases—mostly cysteine proteases, but also serine, aspartic, and metalloproteases. These enzymes are stored within PSVs as an initial battery of proteases needed to start SSP degradation during early seed imbibition and become functionally active when their zymogens undergo N-terminal peptide proteolysis [20,48].
During post-germination, significant SSP hydrolysis occurs, sustained by de novo-synthesized proteases in the cotyledons [49]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the ERvt pathway transports cysteine proteases synthesized at the ER to PSVs. These cysteine proteases contain a C-terminal K/HDEL signal, characteristic of ER-resident proteins, and they are transported as inactive aggregates within KDEL Vesicles (KVs). In maize aleurone and Vigna mungo cotyledons, PSVs engulf KVs by a microautophagy-like process during seed germination [50,51,52]. Interestingly, starch hydrolysis during germination in Vigna mungo seeds also implies the engulfment of alfa-amylase enzyme by PSVs through a microautophagy-like mechanism [50]. In the Osatg7-1 mutant, the α-amylase 3 gene is up-regulated in germinating grains, suggesting a molecular association between starch mobilization and autophagy [47].

5. Seed Autophagy, Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER), and Environmental Responses

In Nature, seeds are immersed in the soil seedbed, which is a complex environment exposed to multiple stresses. In this context, seeds develop several molecular and cellular mechanisms to respond to environmental fluctuations and guarantee offspring survival [20]. In eukaryotes, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the central cellular organelle regulating stress responses [53]. In the seedbed ecosystem, activation of different stress responses leads to the accumulation of an excess of proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER stress). Cell homeostasis is restored by the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) pathway [53], which helps reduce ER-accumulated unfolded proteins. When ER stress persists, autophagy is activated as a feedback mechanism to alleviate protein overaccumulation [54]. The specific removal of certain ER domains via autophagy (ER-phagy) has been described as a central mechanism for maintaining cell homeostasis [55]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the Inositol-Requiring 1 (IRE1) enzyme, an ER transmembrane protein with kinase and nuclease activities, has been involved in the degradation of RNAs to prevent the translation of proteins that interfere with autophagy. Accordingly, ire1 mutants are more sensitive to different environmental stresses [56,57,58]. Although there is no evidence for a similar role for IRE1 in seed germination in response to stress conditions, in Medicago truncatula, the model plant for Leguminosae, autophagy and ER-stress are implicated in seed development and drought stress responses through the participation of MtATGs [59].
Autophagy has classically been considered a non-selective bulk degradation mechanism, but recently, the specific degradation of proteins (e.g., transcription factors, TFs), lipid droplets, and organelles (i.e., mitochondria, peroxisomes, etc.) has been related to responses to several biotic and abiotic stresses, including nutrient starvation or salt stress [32,60,61,62]. In addition, genetic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have shed light on its potential implications for the seed. The knock-out mutant of Regulatory-Associated Protein of Tor1b gene (raptor-1b—a TOR interactor) produces seeds with delayed germination, reduced resistance to stresses, low viability, and high concentrations of the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), a well-known inhibitor of seed germination. Interestingly, when the phytohormone gibberellic acid (GA) is added to the raptor-1b seeds, they recover normal germination. Moreover, raptor-1b seeds germinate more slowly than wild-type seeds when undergoing accelerated aging, osmotic stress, and salt stress. All these data suggest that TOR acts as an “autophagy switcher” and is a major player in controlling seed germination in response to environmental changes [63].
The autophagy factor ATG8 (a ubiquitin-fold protein) holds an outstanding position in the selective recruitment of autophagy cargos. ATG8 interacts with other specific receptor proteins (e.g., Neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1, NBR1) that contain ATG8-interacting motifs (AIMs) that recognize autophagy tags [3,15]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, and Zea mays, several autophagy receptors have been described that interact with ATG8 through AIMs, and transport cargos from the ER to the vacuole (ATI1/2, ATI3, Sec62, Rtn, TSPO, etc.; reviewed in [31]). Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtNBR1 produce seeds that are less sensitive to ABA than wild-type seeds when ABA is added to the imbibition medium [32,33]. Similarly, Triticum aestivum transgenic plants overexpressing the TaNBR1 gene show lower seed germination rates under drought stress conditions than wild-type seeds, suggesting a role for TaNBR1 in response to drought stress during germination [64]. Interestingly, the Arabidopsis thaliana NBR1 receptor has been reported to be essential for fine-tuning ABA signaling by physically interacting with transcription factors ABI3 (B3-subfamily, ortholog to VP1), ABI4 (ERF/AP2), and ABI5 (bZIP-family). ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 are involved in ABA signaling and the control of seed dormancy, preharvest sprouting (PHS), and germination in orthodox seeds. PHS is one of the most significant seed quality defects, causing important economic annual losses of approximately USD 1 billion worldwide [31,65,66].

6. Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

Seeds are the most important world crop, and seed yield and germination performance in response to environmental fluctuations are two key features of modern agriculture. This review compiles recent advances supporting the relevance of autophagy in these crucial seed parameters. Autophagy-like mechanisms have been described as essential at the cellular level for reserve accumulation and mobilization during seed development. Genetic studies have also demonstrated the importance of several ATG factors in the regular course of seed development.
One of the most exciting aspects concerning the impact of autophagy on the seed is how it can modulate developmental processes and responses to the environment by controlling the selective degradation of transcription factors and other molecular switches. Tarnowski et al. [33] have demonstrated such a mechanism for ABI3 (ortholog to VP1), ABI4, and ABI5; the major transcription factors controlling ABA sensing during seed dormancy and germination [31,66] (Figure 1). These results are the basis for subsequent studies to answer important questions concerning (i) the involvement of autophagy in the seed as a general response mechanism to environmental changes and (ii) the identification and characterization of selective autophagy receptors that participate specifically in the seed (TSPO, RPN10, etc.) [31]. Major advances in the genetics and molecular basis of seed autophagy will be essential to the development of new plant varieties by targeting autophagy genes with high seed yield and germination vigor in response to changes in the ecosystem.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.I.-F. and J.V.-C.; resources, R.I.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.I.-F.; writing—review and editing, R.I.-F. and J.V.-C.; funding acquisition, J.V.-C. and R.I.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the project BIO2017-82873-R funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank A. Matilla and P. Carbonero for their critical reading of the manuscript. The authors apologize to other authors who are not cited in the manuscript because of space limitations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Su, T.; Li, X.; Yang, M.; Shao, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, P. Autophagy: An intracellular degradation pathway regulating plant survival and stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Qi, H.; Xia, F.N.; Xiao, S. Autophagy in plants: Physiological roles and post-translational regulation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sieńko, K.; Poormassalehgoo, A.; Yamada, K.; Goto-Yamada, S. Microautophagy in plants: Consideration of its molecular mechanism. Cells 2020, 9, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bu, F.; Yang, M.; Guo, X.; Huang, W.; Chen, L. Multiple functions of ATG8 family proteins in plant autophagy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matilla, A.J. Seed Dormancy: Molecular Control of Its Induction and Alleviation. Plants 2020, 9, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stefaniak, S.; Wojtyla, Ł.; Pietrowska-Borek, M.; Borek, S. Completing autophagy: Formation and degradation of the autophagic body and metabolite salvage in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. van Doorn, W.G.; Papini, A. Ultrastructure of autophagy in plant cells: A review. Autophagy 2013, 9, 1922–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Bassham, D.C. Autophagy is required for tolerance of drought and salt stress in plants. Autophagy 2009, 5, 954–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Michaeli, S.; Galili, G.; Genschik, P.; Fernie, A.R.; Avin-Wittenberg, T. Autophagy in plants—what’s new on the menu? Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di Berardino, J.; Marmagne, A.; Berger, A.; Yoshimoto, K.; Cueff, G.; Chardon, F.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Reisdorf-Cren, M. Autophagy controls resource allocation and protein storage accumulation in Arabidopsis seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marshall, R.S.; Vierstra, R.D. Autophagy: The master of bulk and selective recycling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 173–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wojciechowska, N.; Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, E.; Bagniewska-Zadworna, A. Plant organ senescence – regulation by manifold pathways. Plant Biol. 2018, 20, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ohsumi, Y. Historical landmarks of autophagy research. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dobrenel, T.; Caldana, C.; Hanson, J.; Robaglia, C.; Vincentz, M.; Veit, B.; Meyer, C. TOR signaling and nutrient sensing. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 261–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kellner, R.; De la Concepcion, J.C.; Maqbool, A.; Kamoun, S.; Dagdas, Y.F. ATG8 expansion: A driver of selective autophagy diversification? Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ding, X.; Zhang, X.; Otegui, M.S. Plant autophagy: New flavors on the menu. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 46, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sawa-Makarska, J.; Baumann, V.; Coudevylle, N.; von Bülow, S.; Nogellova, V.; Abert, C.; Schuschnig, M.; Graef, M.; Hummer, G.; Martens, S. Reconstitution of autophagosome nucleation defines Atg9 vesicles as seeds for membrane formation. Science 2020, 369, eaaz7714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baroux, C.; Grossniklaus, U. Seeds-An evolutionary innovation underlying reproductive success in flowering plants. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2019, 131, 605–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bewley, J.D.; Bradford, K.J.; Hilhorst, H.W.M.; Nonogaki, H. Structure and composition. In Seeds; Bewley, J.D., Bradford, K.J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 85–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Bassel, G.W. Seed vigour and crop establishment: Extending performance beyond adaptation. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 567–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hernández, M.L.; Cejudo, F.J. Chloroplast lipids metabolism and function. A redox perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 712022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ibl, V.; Stoger, E. The formation, function and fate of protein storage compartments in seeds. Protoplasma 2012, 249, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yorimitsu, T.; Klionsky, D.J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: A new pathway to induce autophagy. Autophagy 2007, 3, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Vitale, A.; Pedrazzini, E. StresSeed: The unfolded protein response during seed development. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 869008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Feeney, M.; Frigerio, L.; Kohalmi, S.E.; Cui, Y.; Menassa, R. Reprogramming cells to study vacuolar development. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Iglesias-Fernández, R.; Wozny, D.; Iriondo-de Hond, M.; Oñate-Sánchez, L.; Carbonero, P.; Barrero-Sicilia, C. The AtCathB3 gene, encoding a cathepsin B-like protease, is expressed during germination of Arabidopsis thaliana and transcriptionally repressed by the basic leucine zipper protein GBF1. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 2009–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reyes, F.C.; Chung, T.; Holding, D.; Jung, R.; Vierstra, R.; Otegui, M.S. Delivery of prolamins to the protein storage vacuole in maize aleurone cells. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ren, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, T.; Duan, E.; Bao, X.; Zhu, J.; Teng, X.; Zhang, P.; Gu, C.; et al. Endomembrane-mediated storage protein trafficking in plants: Golgi-dependent or Golgi-independent? FEBS Lett. 2022, 596, 2215–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Guiboileau, A.; Avila-Ospina, L.; Yoshimoto, K.; Soulay, F.; Azzopardi, M.; Marmagne, A.; Lothier, J.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C. Physiological and metabolic consequences of autophagy deficiency for the management of nitrogen and protein resources in Arabidopsis leaves depending on nitrate availability. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Clément, G.; Anne, P.; Routaboul, J.M.; Guiboileau, A.; Soulay, F.; Shirasu, K.; Yoshimoto, K. Stitching together the multiple dimensions of autophagy using metabolomics and transcriptomics reveals impacts on metabolism, development, and plant responses to the environment in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1857–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Luo, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, Y.; Fan, B.; Zhu, C.; Chen, Z. Cargo recognition and function of selective autophagy receptors in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jung, H.; Lee, H.N.; Marshall, R.S.; Lomax, A.W.; Yoon, M.J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.H.; Vierstra, R.D.; Chung, T. Arabidopsis cargo receptor NBR1 mediates selective autophagy of defective proteins. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tarnowski, L.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Brzywczy, J.; Piecho-Kabacik, M.; Krčkova, Z.; Martinec, J.; Wawrzynska, A.; Sirko, A. A selective autophagy cargo receptor NBR1 modulates abscisic acid signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Rep. 2020, 10, 7778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pottier, M.; Dumont, J.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Thomine, S. Autophagy is essential for optimal translocation of iron to seeds in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lornac, A.; Havé, M.; Chardon, F.; Soulay, F.; Clément, G.; Avice, J.C.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C. Autophagy controls sulphur metabolism in the rosette leaves of Arabidopsis and facilitates S remobilization to the seeds. Cells 2020, 9, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Carbonero, P.; Iglesias-Fernández, R.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J. The AFL subfamily of B3 transcription factors: Evolution and function in angiosperm seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Thompson, A.R.; Doelling, J.H.; Suttangkakul, A.; Vierstra, R.D. Autophagic nutrient recycling in Arabidopsis directed by the ATG8 and ATG12 conjugation pathways. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2097–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Xiong, Y.; Contento, A.L.; Bassham, D.C. AtATG18a is required for the formation of autophagosomes during nutrient stress and senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 42, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, P.; Hua, Z. The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system and autophagy relay proteome homeostasis regulation during silique development. Plant J. 2022, 111, 1324–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Levanony, H.; Rubin, R.; Altschuler, Y.; Galili, G. Evidence for a novel route of wheat storage proteins to vacuoles. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 119, 1117–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Toyooka, K.; Okamoto, T.; Minamikawa, T. Mass transport of proform of a KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase (SH-EP) to protein storage vacuoles by endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicle is involved in protein mobilization in germinating seeds. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 148, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, F.; Chung, T.; Pennington, J.G.; Federico, M.L.; Kaeppler, H.F.; Kaeppler, S.M.; Otegui, M.S.; Vierstra, R.D. Autophagic recycling plays a central role in maize nitrogen remobilization. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1389–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Guiboileau, A.; Yoshimoto, K.; Soulay, F.; Bataillé, M.P.; Avice, J.C.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C. Autophagy machinery controls nitrogen remobilization at the whole-plant level under both limiting and ample nitrate conditions in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2012, 194, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bernard, A.; Jin, M.; Xu, Z.; Klionsky, D.J. A large-scale analysis of autophagy-related gene expression identifies new regulators of autophagy. Autophagy 2015, 11, 2114–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; d’Andrea, S.; Bouchez, I.; Cacas, J.L. Reserve lipids and plant autophagy. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2854–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fan, J.; Yu, L.; Xu, C. Dual role for autophagy in lipid metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2019, 31, 1598–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sera, Y.; Hanamata, S.; Sakamoto, S.; Ono, S.; Kaneko, K.; Mitsui, Y.; Koyano, T.; Fujita, N.; Sasou, A.; Masumura, T.; et al. Essential roles of autophagy in metabolic regulation in endosperm development during rice seed maturation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Iglesias-Fernández, R.; Matilla, A.J. Genes involved in ethylene and gibberellins metabolism are required for endosperm-limited germination of Sisymbrium officinale L. seeds Planta 2010, 231, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Nakabayashi, K.; Okamoto, M.; Koshiba, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Nambara, E. Genome-wide profiling of stored mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana seed germination: Epigenetic and genetic regulation of transcription in seed. Plant J. 2005, 41, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Toyooka, K.; Okamoto, T.; Minamikawa, T. Cotyledon cells of Vigna mungo seedlings use at least two distinct autophagic machineries for degradation of starch granules and cellular components. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Okamoto, T.; Shimada, T.; Hara-Nishimura, I.; Nishimura, M.; Minamikawa, T. C-terminal KDEL sequence of a KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase (sulfhydryl-endopeptidase) is involved in formation of KDEL vesicle and in efficient vacuolar transport of sulfhydryl-endopeptidase. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1892–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ding, X.; Zhang, X.; Paez-Valencia, J.; McLoughlin, F.; Reyes, F.C.; Morohashi, K.; Grotewold, E.; Vierstra, R.D.; Otegui, M.S. Microautophagy mediates vacuolar delivery of storage proteins in maize aleurone cells. Front. Plant Sci. 2002, 13, 833612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ellgaard, L.; Helenius, A. Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, X.; Srivastava, R.; Howell, S.H.; Bassham, D.C. Activation of autophagy by unfolded proteins during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Plant J. 2016, 85, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Stephani, M.; Picchianti, L.; Gajic, A.; Beveridge, R.; Skarwan, E.; Sanchez de Medina Hernandez, V.; Mohseni, A.; Clavel, M.; Zeng, Y.; Naumann, C.; et al. A cross-kingdom conserved ER-phagy receptor maintains endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis during stress. elife 2020, 9, e58396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hossain, M.A.; Henríquez-Valencia, C.; Gómez-Páez, M.; Medina, J.; Orellana, A.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; Zouhar, J. Identification of novel components of the Unfolded Protein Response in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Bao, Y.; Pu, Y.; Yu, X.; Gregory, B.D.; Srivastava, R.; Howell, S.H.; Bassham, D.C. IRE1B degrades RNAs encoding proteins that interfere with the induction of autophagy by ER stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Autophagy 2018, 14, 1562–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Li, Z.; Tang, J.; Srivastava, R.; Bassham, D.C.; Howell, S.H. The transcription factor bZIP60 links the Unfolded Protein Response to the heat stress response in maize. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3559–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, M.; Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Guo, X.; Lin, C.; Huang, W.; Chen, L. Genome-wide analysis of autophagy-related genes in Medicago truncatula highlights their roles in seed development and response to drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Velázquez, A.P.; Tatsuta, T.; Ghillebert, R.; Drescher, I.; Graef, M. Lipid droplet-mediated ER homeostasis regulates autophagy and cell survival during starvation. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 212, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Su, W.; Bao, Y.; Yu, X.; Xia, X.; Liu, C.; Yin, W. Autophagy and its regulators in response to stress in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 2, 8889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thirumalaikumar, V.P.; Gorka, M.; Schulz, K.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Sampathkumar, A.; Skirycz, A.; Vierstra, R.D.; Balazadeh, S. Selective autophagy regulates heat stress memory in Arabidopsis by NBR1-mediated targeting of HSP90 and ROF1. Autophagy 2021, 17, 2184–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Salem, M.A.; Li, Y.; Wiszniewski, A.; Giavalisco, P. Regulatory-associated protein of TOR (RAPTOR) alters the hormonal and metabolic composition of Arabidopsis seeds, controlling seed morphology, viability and germination potential. Plant J. 2017, 92, 525–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Chen, L.; Lv, Q.; Yang, W.; Yang, H.; Chen, Q.; Wang, B.; Lei, Y.; Xie, Y. TaNBR1, a novel wheat NBR1-like domain gene negatively regulates drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Matilla, A.J. Exploring breakthroughs in three traits belonging to seed life. Plants 2022, 11, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Abraham, Z.; Iglesias-Fernández, R.; Martínez, M.; Rubio-Somoza, I.; Díaz, I.; Carbonero, P.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J. A developmental switch of gene expression in the barley seed mediated by HvVP1 (Viviparous-1) and HvGAMYB Interactions. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 2146–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Schematic representation of possible autophagy-like mechanisms in seeds. The Golgi-dependent pathway participates in the transport of DV, MVD, and PVC vesicles to the vacuole in a microautophagy-like mechanism during seed maturation. However, PAC and KDEL vesicles move from ER to PSV through the Golgi-independent route (also a microautophagy-like process). During seed imbibition, macroautophagy controls the expression of seed-specific transcription factors (ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5; ABA signaling) by a selective degradation mediated by ATG8 and the cargo receptor NBR1. Under unfavorable conditions, autophagy-selective degradation ceases, thus inhibiting seed germination. DV: Dense Vesicle; MVB: Multivesicular Vesicle Body; PAC: Pre-Accumulating Vesicle; PSV: Protein Storage Vacuole; PVC: Pre-Vacuolar Compartment. Picture created with BioRender.com (https://biorender.com/; accessed on 7 October 2022); numbers within yellow circles indicate sections in the manuscript where the particular process is described and references are provided. (B) Summary of the role of certain autophagic factors during seed development. Images illustrate a dicotyledonous seed from the globular stage during embryogenesis to germination. Sections are stained with naphthol blue-black (proteins in blue) and periodic acid plus Schiff’s reagent (insoluble polysaccharides in pink; R.I-F. contribution). ABA, GAs, and reserve levels are shown throughout seed development. ATG factors described as relevant in several aspects of seed development are indicated. C: Cotyledon; E: Embryo; R: Radicle. Mechanisms depicted in (A,B) are mainly taken from [10,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], and summarize all the content included in this mini-review.
Figure 1. (A) Schematic representation of possible autophagy-like mechanisms in seeds. The Golgi-dependent pathway participates in the transport of DV, MVD, and PVC vesicles to the vacuole in a microautophagy-like mechanism during seed maturation. However, PAC and KDEL vesicles move from ER to PSV through the Golgi-independent route (also a microautophagy-like process). During seed imbibition, macroautophagy controls the expression of seed-specific transcription factors (ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5; ABA signaling) by a selective degradation mediated by ATG8 and the cargo receptor NBR1. Under unfavorable conditions, autophagy-selective degradation ceases, thus inhibiting seed germination. DV: Dense Vesicle; MVB: Multivesicular Vesicle Body; PAC: Pre-Accumulating Vesicle; PSV: Protein Storage Vacuole; PVC: Pre-Vacuolar Compartment. Picture created with BioRender.com (https://biorender.com/; accessed on 7 October 2022); numbers within yellow circles indicate sections in the manuscript where the particular process is described and references are provided. (B) Summary of the role of certain autophagic factors during seed development. Images illustrate a dicotyledonous seed from the globular stage during embryogenesis to germination. Sections are stained with naphthol blue-black (proteins in blue) and periodic acid plus Schiff’s reagent (insoluble polysaccharides in pink; R.I-F. contribution). ABA, GAs, and reserve levels are shown throughout seed development. ATG factors described as relevant in several aspects of seed development are indicated. C: Cotyledon; E: Embryo; R: Radicle. Mechanisms depicted in (A,B) are mainly taken from [10,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], and summarize all the content included in this mini-review.
Plants 11 03247 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iglesias-Fernández, R.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J. A View into Seed Autophagy: From Development to Environmental Responses. Plants 2022, 11, 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233247

AMA Style

Iglesias-Fernández R, Vicente-Carbajosa J. A View into Seed Autophagy: From Development to Environmental Responses. Plants. 2022; 11(23):3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233247

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iglesias-Fernández, Raquel, and Jesús Vicente-Carbajosa. 2022. "A View into Seed Autophagy: From Development to Environmental Responses" Plants 11, no. 23: 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233247

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop