Next Article in Journal
Nitric Oxide and Salicylic Acid Regulate Glutathione and Ethylene Production to Enhance Heat Stress Acclimation in Wheat Involving Sulfur Assimilation
Previous Article in Journal
Green Synthesized of Thymus vulgaris Chitosan Nanoparticles Induce Relative WRKY-Genes Expression in Solanum lycopersicum against Fusarium solani, the Causal Agent of Root Rot Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 22
10.3390/plants11223130
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pectin Characteristics Affect Root Growth in Spinach under Salinity

by
Jia Liu
1,
Victoria Otie
2,
Asana Matsuura
3,
Kashiwagi Junichi
4,
Muhammad Irshad
5,
Yuanrun Zheng
6,
Haruyuki Fujimaki
1 and
Ping An
1,*
1
Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, Japan
2
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, P.M.B. 1115, Calabar 540271, Nigeria
3
Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, 8304, Minamiminowa-Village, Kamiina-County Nagano, Nagano 399-4598, Japan
4
Graduate School of Global Food Resources, Hokkaido University, Kita 9, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0809, Japan
5
Department of Environmental Sciences, Abbottabad Campus, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan
6
Key Laboratory of Resource Plants, West China Subalpine Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(22), 3130; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223130
Submission received: 25 September 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Wall Dynamics: Formation and Disassembly from a Transcriptomic and Molecular Perspective)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In understanding the role of root cell wall mechanisms in plant tolerance to salinity, it is important to elucidate the changes in the pectin composition and physical properties of the cell wall. Two salt-sensitive (Helan 3 and Prius β) and one salt-tolerant (R7) spinach cultivars were used to investigate the pectin polysaccharides, the characteristics of pectin, including the degree of pectin methy-lesterification, the HG:RG-I ratio, neutral side chains (galactan/arabinangalactan), and elasticity and viscosity parameters in the root elongation zone under salinity. Root growth was inhibited by salinity, whereas the root diameter was thickened in all cultivars. Salinity significantly reduced cell wall extensibility in all cultivars, and increased cell wall viscosity in Helan 3 and R7 relative to Prius β. Pectin was significantly increased under salinity stress. Cell wall viscosity was affected by pectin due to the molar proportion of uronic acid and/or pectin characteristics (HG:RG-I ratio). The molar proportion of uronic acid in pectin was reduced in Helan 3 and R7 compared with Prius β. The length and degree of pectin methy-lesterification of neutral side chains were significantly decreased in the R7 cultivar, with no significant changes in the other two cultivars. Demethylation of pectin could alter root growth and boost salt tolerance in the R7 cultivar. In this study, it is shown that cell wall pectin played important roles in regulating the root growth of Spinacia oleracea L. under salinity stress.

1. Introduction

Soil salinity is an important environmental problem for more than 800 million hectares of land, which results in osmotic stress, ionic imbalances, ion toxicity, oxidative damage and complex effects on the physiology and metabolism of plants, including spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) [1,2]. The growth of most spinach crops is reduced when the soil salinity exceeds 4 dS/m of electrical conductivity, which is equivalent to 40 mM sodium chloride [3,4]. Although excessive salts are toxic to salt-sensitive plants, some cultivars in spinach may be salt tolerant once adapted to a moderate saline stress. Exposure to high salt concentrations adversely affects crop performance due to salinity-induced nutritional imbalance. Studying the physiological responses of cultivars of spinach with different levels of salt tolerance is a useful tool for understanding the mechanisms underlying plant responses to salinity.
The root cell wall is a major storage site for several environmental pollution problems, including salinity. It acts as a protective barrier of protoplasts by trapping toxic substances to reduce cellular damage mainly caused by salts or other trace metals [5]. Its important role in plant resistance to salinity stress could be attributed to the interaction with salts present in plants and the soil [6,7,8]. The cell wall matrix is composed of pectin, hemicellulose, and cellulose. Pectin is composed of homogalacturonan (HG) and rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I) [9]. The main changes in the cell wall following salinity stress were found in the pectin sugar composition, pectin characteristics such as HG:RG-I and the degree of methyl esterification [10,11,12]. The synthesis of galactose and arabinose side chains are also considered to contribute to maintaining cell wall integrity under salinity stress [10,13].
The plant cell wall is essential for the strength, growth and development of plants [14]. The cell walls of spinach contain phenolic acids (ferulic, p-coumarics, and diferulic), which are bound to polysaccharide compounds, including pectin. These affect the physical properties of cell walls by increasing the calcium cross-links between homogalacturonans, resulting in the stiffening of the pectin gel and primary cell walls [15]. Xiong et al. [16] reported that cell expansion in rice seedlings cultured in the absence of Ca2+ was still regulated by pectin. Huang et al. [11] reported that a modified pectin structure can provide a different strength for the cell wall architecture. However, there are few studies on the structural changes of cell wall pectin under salinity stress. Our previous research revealed that cell wall pectin played important roles in cell wall extension in both Spinacia oleracea and Suaeda salsa under salinity, and that the salt tolerance of S. oleracea was affected by pectin [17].
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), being a well-known leafy vegetable with various salinity tolerance levels in different cultivars, has been recently reported [2,17,18,19,20]. In this study, we investigated the salinity tolerance of three spinach cultivars with a focus on pectin content, such as: pectin polysaccharides, the degree of pectin methy-lesterification (PMD) and pectin-related wall parameters in the cell walls.

2. Results

2.1. Root Growth

Salinity significantly inhibited root elongation in all spinach cultivars (Figure 1A). Root growth across the cultivars was significantly inhibited under 200 mM NaCl treatment. This inhibition was more pronounced in Helan 3 and Prius β, compared with R7, which was a more tolerant cultivar. The diameter of the roots of all three cultivars increased significantly under salinity (Figure 1B). There was a 44% and 46% increase in rooting diameter in Helan 3 and R7 under salinity stress, respectively, whereas a 13% increase was observed in Prius β (Figure 1B).

2.2. Root Cell Wall Extensibility and Viscosity

The elastic moduli of E0 in root elongation zone in all three cultivars increased significantly under salinity stress (Figure 2). The E0 in the salt-sensitive cultivar Helan 3 was significantly higher compared with the salt-tolerant cultivar R7, whether under 0 or 200 mM NaCl. The viscosity coefficient, ηN, was significantly increased in the sensitive Helan 3 cultivar and tolerant R7cultivar. However, there was no significant change in Prius β (Figure 2). Meanwhile, in 0 mM NaCl treatment, the viscosity coefficient of Prius β was significantly higher than that of the other two cultivars (Figure 2).

2.3. Chemical Composition of Root Cell Wall

Salinity treatment significantly increased the pectin content of the root cell wall in all cultivars (Figure 3). The molar proportion of each monosaccharide component in the pectin across the cultivars is shown in Table 1. Salinity increased the molar proportion of rhamnose, arabinose and galactose in the pectin of Helan 3 and R7, while the molar proportion of uronic acid in the cultivars decreased (Table 1). In the Prius β cultivar, the molar proportion of the monosaccharide compositions had no significant changes in all monosaccharide components under salinity stress (Table 1).
Table 2 shows the effect of salt treatment on pectin characteristics, including the degree of pectin methyl-esterification (PMD) in pectin fractions, he HG:RG-I ratio, galactan side-chain length and arabinangalactan side-chain length. In the R7 cultivar, the PMD was decreased significantly and the length of galactan and arabinangalactan side chains were significantly increased when exposed to salinity, while there were no significant changes in Helan 3 and Prius β cultivars (Table 2). The HG:RG-I ratio was significantly decreased in Helan 3 and R7 cultivars, with no significant change in the Prius β cultivar (Table 2).
Root growth was negatively correlated with pectin content, E0 and root diameter across the cultivars (Table 3). Both E0 and ηN in Helan 3 and R7 were significantly correlated positively and negatively with pectin content and molar proportion of uronic acid in the pectin, respectively. The PMD had a significant positive correlation with root length and a negatively significant relationship with E0 and ηN in R7, relative to the other two cultivars. (Table 3).

3. Discussion

3.1. Root Growth

Spinach belongs to a broad family of Amaranthaceae, which shows relatively high salt tolerance. However, due to different cultivars selected, differences in salt tolerance among cultivars were also reported [17,18,19,20]. The root growth of Helan 3 and Prius β was more affected by salinity; however, R7 showed higher root growth [21]. This indicated that the R7 cultivar had higher salt tolerance than the other two cultivars. Root growth could be affected by various factors under salinity. Pectin is one of these factors which has been reported to regulate root growth [22]. The polysaccharides, degree of esterification, HG:RG-I ratio and neutral side chains of pectin may all affect cell elongation and root growth because these pectin constituents affect cation binding, pH adjustment and ion homeostasis in the cell wall [17,21,22,23]. Under salinity stress, all cultivars showed a siginificant increase in root diameter. This may be due to a pH decrease in apoplasts [24,25]. In barley, a decrease in pH resulted in an increase in rhizodermal cell diameter [24], thereby thickening the roots. The correlation analysis was consistent with these results (Table 3).

3.2. Root Cell Wall Extensibility and Viscosity

Cell wall extensibility is known to regulate cell elongation. This extensibility is associated with cell wall structure and composition [26,27]. It was recently reported that salinity stress could alter the cell wall structure and composition, thereby affecting wall extensibility [28]. A higher cell wall extensibility is favorable for root growth under saline conditions [29]. In this study, the low E0 (i.e., high extensibility) in R7 compared with Helan 3 may have contributed to its higher root growth under salinity. The negative correlation between E0 and root length across the cultivars was indicative that cell wall extensibility in the root elongation zone is important for root growth under saline conditions (Figure 2, Table 3).
Under salinity stress, cell volume shrinkage and cell wall deformity occurred through increased cell wall synthesis and strength [17,30,31,32]. Reboul et al. [33] reported that the lack of glucuronic acid could limit cell wall expansion. Similarly, Zdunek et al. [34] reported that the amount of uronic acid in cell walls may be related to its stiffness, especially in pear plants. In this study, pectin content, the molar proportion of uronic acid in pectin and HG:RG-I ratio were significantly correlated to E0 under salinity stress in Helan 3 and R7 cultivars. These correlations indicate that cell wall extensibility was affected by pectin in Helan 3 and R7 cultivars, which may have affected cell expansion under the stress condition. Moelants et al. [35] reported that pectin viscosity was affected by the polysaccharide chain structure in carrot and tomato. This is also in line with the report of Mierczyńska et al. [36] that pectin viscosity is related to uronic acid content, and a smaller pectin molecule could lead to increased viscosity in carrot. Furthermore, Pieczywek et al. [37] reported an increase in GalA (galacturonic acid) content that led to softening of the cell walls. The molar proportion of uronic acid in pectin and the HG:RG-I ratio were significantly correlated with ηN across the cultivars; this is an indication that uronic acid in pectin and the RG-I backbone may have regulated cell wall viscosity during salinity stress in spinach.

3.3. Chemical Composition of Pectin

The pectin content was significantly increased across the cultivars under salinity stress (Figure 3), whereas the molar proportion of uronic acid in pectin was significantly decreased in Helan 3 and R7 cultivars (Table 1). There was a positive correlation between the molar proportion of uronic acid in pectin and the root length of the two cultivars (Table 3). This showed that pectic uronic acid was consistent with root growth in the two cultivars. A previous study reported that uronic acid in pectin had been found to provide cation binding sites, which can trap Na+ to reduce cellular damage [5,14]. Interestingly, combined Na+ and uronic acid was found to release H+, which adjusted the pH of apoplasts and consequently altered the expansion, thereby affecting cell wall extensibility and thus improving root growth [23,25]. In this study, no significant effect of uronic acid on root growth was found in all three cultivars. A similar trend was observed in Suaeda salsa and S. oleracea ‘Akinokagayaku’ [17], which belonged to the same family of Amaranthaceae. The role of uronic acid under salinity stress may be said to be species-dependent.
In the R7 cultivar, the PMD decreased significantly but did not show any significant difference in the other two cultivars. The PMD was significantly correlated to root length, pectin content, E0 and ηN in R7, relative to the other cultivars. This is indicative that salt tolerance in plant cultivars could be regulated by the demethylation of pectin. Zheng et al. [38] and John et al. [39] disclosed that Na+-induced de-esterification of pectin could result in the formation of an egg-box structure with divalent cations in the form of a gel, and the concentration of sodium ions affects the crosslinking strength. The increased galactan and arabinangalactan side chains under salinity stress in R7 may improve network formation. Pectin gels can be embedded in cellulose–hemicellulose networks and contribute to cell wall elasticity [15], which may possibly be achieved through the amount of pectin gel on cell wall hydration and the demethylation of pectin [15,40,41,42]. The degree of pectin methy-lesterification (PMD) determines negative charges and has a close negative correlation with ion adsorption in the cell walls of plant roots [43,44]. The increases in cell wall elasticity also correlated with the PMD [22]. The positive correlation between the PMD and root length in R7 indicated that the extensive demethylation of pectin enhanced salt tolerance, and the correlation between the PMD and E0 in the R7 cultivar could be attributed to the decrease in the PMD that correlated negatively with the cell wall extensibility. The increased side chains and demethylation of pectin under salinity stress may be the reason for the higher salt tolerance of R7 compared to Prius β and Helan 3.
The molar proportion of uronic acid of pectin and the HG:RG-I ratio were found to be significantly correlated to cell viscosity. The RG-I backbone is reportedly involved in the regulation of the water-binding capacity of potato cell walls [45]. The viscosity of cell walls in apple plants was also reported to affect its water-binding capacity [46]. This cell wall viscosity could be regulated by the water-binding capacity provided by pectin characteristics (HG:RG-I ratio). In Broxterman and Schols [47], pectin and cellulose were reported to have been linked by short and highly branched galactose and arabinose side chains on the RG-I backbone. Therefore, salinity stress increased the length of the galactose and arabinose side chains in R7 (Table 2), while they were decreased substantially in Helan 3 and Prius β cultivars (Table 2). The increased length of the galactose and arabinose side chains under salinity stress may provide more binding sites for pectin and cellulose, thereby increasing cell wall stability. This may possibly benefit the salt tolerance in R7.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

The seeds of Spinacia oleracea L., salt-sensitive ‘Helan 3′ (bred in Holland) and ‘Prius β’ (bred in Denmark), and salt-tolerant ‘R7’ (bred in Japan) were purchased from a seed market in the city of Tottori, Japan. The evaluation of their salt tolerance was based on the effects of salinity stress on root length, which is an important indicator for evaluating salt tolerance [48,49]. Spinach seeds were washed and soaked in distilled water for 24 h. Seed germination and seedling growth were conducted in growth chambers (MLR-350HT; Sanyo, Osaka, Japan) at 20 °C. Fifteen seeds were aligned on a sheet of filter paper in a zip-lock plastic bag. Filter papers were moistened every day during the three-day germination period for spinach in the dark. After germination, 1/12 diluted Hoagland solution, containing 0 and 200 mM NaCl treatments, was applied to the roots every 2 days (d). Seedlings were subjected to salinity treatments for 6 d. Light conditions were set to 12/12 h cycles (day/night). Each salt concentration treatment comprised 24 filter paper germination sheets. At the end of germination test, six filter papers were randomly selected from each treatment combination for the measurement of the root length of each seedling.

4.2. Mechanical Parameters of the Root Cell Wall

Root samples separated from cultured seedlings were excised 10 mm from the apical zone and immediately transferred to boiling methanol in a water bath (80 °C, 5 min). Methanol-killed root segments were rehydrated with 1/12 diluted Hoagland solution (pH 6.5) and extended. We determined the root extensibility following Tanimoto et al. [29]. The cell wall extensibility and viscosity were measured using a creep meter (RE2-33005C-1,2; Yamaden, Tokyo, Japan). A 3–7 mm root segment behind the root cap was fixed between the two clamps of the creep meter used for the measurement of extension. Roots were stretched under 0.1 N tensile force for 5 min and then released for 5 min. The final length at 5 min was read as the reversible extension (elastic extension), while the length difference between final length and original length (4 mm) was read as the plastic extension. The elastic modulus (E0) and the viscosity coefficient (ηN) were determined using the software supplied with the creep meter, which indicated the extensibility and viscosity, respectively [29]. An increase in E0 value indicated a decrease in elasticity, while greater ηN values indicated higher cell wall viscosity [29]. We measured the cell wall physical parameters of at least 18–25 root segments for each replicate.

4.3. Extraction of Cell Wall Fractions

Seedling roots were taken out from growth bags, thoroughly washed with distilled water and cut into 10 mm segments behind the root tips as elongation zones [50]. About 50 segments from 4 filter paper sheets were taken as one replicate, while 6 replicates were measured for one treatment.
Cell wall pectin was extracted using the procedure in An et al. [6]. The root segments were immediately homogenized in a mixture of ice-cold Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) and Tris buffer-saturated phenol using a bead crusher (Model μT-12; TAITEC Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The homogenate was centrifuged at 3800× g for 10 min at 10 °C. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet containing the cell walls was further purified by sequential incubation and centrifugation in ethanol, acetone, a mixture of methanol: chloroform (1:1, v/v), and again in acetone and ethanol. The centrifuged residues were designated as cell walls after treated with pronase in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The pectin fractions were extracted five times with CDTA at pH 6.5 at 20 °C. To extract the remaining polyuronides, cell walls were further extracted three times with CDTA at 100 °C (hot CDTA) for 1 h each. These CDTA extractions were designated as the pectin fraction.

4.4. Characterization of the Extracts

4.4.1. Sugar Composition

The amounts of total sugars and uronic acid in each extract of cell wall were measured using the phenol–sulfuric acid method [51] and m-hydroxydiphenyl colorimetric method [52], respectively.
The pectin fraction was hydrolyzed with 4 M trifluoroacetic acid at 100 °C for 6 h in a sealed tube. Excess trifluoroacetic acid was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure. Neutral monosaccharides (Rhamnose, Arabinose, Xylose, Mannose, Glucose and Galactose) in pectin were derivatized and analyzed as their acetylated derivatives using gas chromatography (GC) [53]. The pectin fraction was hydrolyzed with 4 M trifluoroacetic acid at 100 °C for 6 h in a sealed tube. Trifluoroacetic acid was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure (Speedvac SPD131DDA, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 5 mg ammonium hydrochloride and 0.5 mL pyridine were added and allowed to react in a 90 °C water bath for 30 min. Acetic anhydride (0.5 mL) was added to the test tube and incubated at 90 °C for another 30 min to allow the acetylation reaction to occur. The acetylated derivatives were analyzed by GC (GCMS-QP2010C Plus, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) with a HP-5MS column (0.25 mm × 30 m × 0.25 μm) and a flame ionization detector. The temperature program was set at 130 °C and maintained for 5 min and then increased to 240 °C at an increment of 5 °C/min. The 240 °C temperature was held for 5 min. The HG:RG-I ratio was calculated by GalA/Rha; the side-chain length of galactan and arabinogalactan were Gal/Rha and (Ara + Gal)/Rha in mol%, respectively [11].

4.4.2. Determination of Pectin Methyl-Esterification

The degree of pectin methyl-esterification (PMD) was quantified by the amount of methanol produced using enzymatic pectin hydrolysis and the colorimetric method as described in Anthon et al. [54]. Pectin samples were mixed with alcohol oxidase 30 °C in a water bath. After 10 min, freshly prepared 5 mg/mL Purpald in 0.5M NaOH was added, and the mixture incubated for an additional 40 min at 30 °C. Methanol content was determined at 550 nm absorbance using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV−1900i, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The PMD was calculated as the moles of methyl ester groups per 100 mol of uronic acid.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlation; means were compared using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test (p < 0.05). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 28.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

5. Conclusions

The cell wall pectin played important roles in regulating root growth and root diameter under salinity stress. Pectin can affect cell wall viscosity, which may be related to the molar proportion of uronic acid or the HG:RG-I ratio in spinach cultivars. In comparing Helan 3 and Prius β cultivars, the high salt tolerance of the R7 cultivar was significantly correlated with the pectin characteristics. The demethylation and increased side chains of pectin under salinity stress may lead to changes in cell wall elongation, and thus root growth, which fundamentally enhances plant growth under salt tolerance.

Author Contributions

J.L. and P.A. conceived and designed the research. J.L. conducted experiments. J.L. and P.A. contributed analytical tools and analyzed data. J.L., V.O. and P.A. wrote the manuscript. A.M., K.J., M.I., Y.Z. and H.F. provided scientific advice and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially funded by tottori university and the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [No. 26450020].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not application.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yang Shao and Shuoshuo Liang for valuable academic suggestions in our study, and Mizuki Yokono and Soichiro Okida for assistance with experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors read and approved the manuscript and have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Negrão, S.; Schmöckel, S.; Tester, M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ors, S.; Suarez, D. Salt tolerance of spinach as related to seasonal climate. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 43, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Scudiero, E.; Corwin, D.; Anderson, R.; Yemoto, K.; Clary, W.; Wang, Z.; Skaggs, T. Remote sensing is a viable tool for mapping soil salinity in agricultural lands. Calif. Agric. 2017, 71, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Munns, R.; Passioura, J.B.; Colmer, T.D.; Byrt, C.S. Osmotic adjustment and energy limitations to plant growth in saline soil. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Richter, J.; Ploderer, M.; Mongelard, G.; Gutierrez, L.; Hauser, M.-T. Role of Cr RLK1L Cell Wall Sensors HERCULES1 and 2, THESEUS1, and FERONIA in Growth Adaptation Triggered by Heavy Metals and Trace Elements. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. An, P.; Li, X.; Zheng, Y.; Matsuura, A.; Abe, J.; Eneji, A.; Tanimoto, E.; Inanaga, S. Effects of NaCl on root growth and cell wall composition of two soya bean cultivars with contrasting salt tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2014, 200, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shao, Y.; An, P.; Feng, X.; Muhammad, I.; Otie, V.; Li, W.; Zheng, Y.; Qiman, Y. Differential responses of roots for varying tolerance to salinity stress in wheat with special reference to elasticity. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 94, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tenhaken, R. Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Albersheim, P.; Darvill, A.G.; O’Neill, M.A.; Schols, H.A.; Voragen, A.G.J. An hypothesis: The same six polysaccharides are components of the primary cell walls of all higher plants. In Progress in Biotechnology; Visser, J., Voragen, A.G.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; Volume 14, pp. 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Corrêa-Ferreira, M.L.; Viudes, E.B.; de Magalhães, P.M.; de Santana Filho, A.P.; Sassaki, G.L.; Pacheco, A.C.; de Oliveira Petkowicz, C.L. Changes in the composition and structure of cell wall polysaccharides from Artemisia annua in response to salt stress. Carbohydr. Res. 2019, 483, 107753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, J.-H.; Kortstee, A.; Dees, D.C.; Trindade, L.M.; Visser, R.G.; Gruppen, H.; Schols, H.A. Evaluation of both targeted and non-targeted cell wall polysaccharides in transgenic potatoes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 156, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, J.-H.; Kortstee, A.; Dees, D.C.T.; Trindade, L.M.; Schols, H.A.; Gruppen, H. Modification of potato cell wall pectin by the introduction of rhamnogalacturonan lyase and β-galactosidase transgenes and their side effects. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 144, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, C.; Zhang, H.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.-K.; Shabala, S. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. Innovation 2020, 1, 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Caffall, K.H.; Mohnen, D. The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1879–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cosgrove, D.J. Plant cell wall extensibility: Connecting plant cell growth with cell wall structure, mechanics, and the action of wall-modifying enzymes. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Xiong, J.; Yang, Y.; Fu, G.; Tao, L. Novel roles of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in regulating pectin synthesis and demethylesterification in the cell wall of rice (Oryza sativa) root tips. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, J.; Shao, Y.; Feng, X.; Otie, V.; Matsuura, A.; Irshad, M.; Zheng, Y.; An, P. Cell Wall Components and Extensibility Regulate Root Growth in Suaeda salsa and Spinacia oleracea under Salinity. Plants 2022, 11, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, B.M.; Lee, H.J.; Song, Y.H.; Kim, H.J. Effect of salt stress on the growth, mineral contents, and metabolite profiles of spinach. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 3787–3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Turhan, A.; Kuşçu, H.; Şeniz, V. Effects of different salt concentrations (NaCl) on germination of some spinach cultivars. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Derg. 2011, 25, 65–77. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, C.; Mou, B. Responses of spinach to salinity and nutrient deficiency in growth, physiology, and nutritional value. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 141, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rozema, J.; Schat, H. Salt tolerance of halophytes, research questions reviewed in the perspective of saline agriculture. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 92, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Peaucelle, A.; Braybrook, S.A.; Le Guillou, L.; Bron, E.; Kuhlemeier, C.; Höfte, H. Pectin-Induced Changes in Cell Wall Mechanics Underlie Organ Initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Feng, W.; Kita, D.; Peaucelle, A.; Cartwright, H.N.; Doan, V.; Duan, Q.; Liu, M.-C.; Maman, J.; Steinhorst, L.; Schmitz-Thom, I. The FERONIA receptor kinase maintains cell-wall integrity during salt stress through Ca2+ signaling. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 666–675.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jaskowiak, J.; Kwasniewska, J.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Kurczynska, E.U.; Szurman-Zubrzycka, M.; Szarejko, I. Aluminum Alters the Histology and Pectin Cell Wall Composition of Barley Roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Shao, Y.; Feng, X.; Nakahara, H.; Irshad, M.; Eneji, A.E.; Zheng, Y.; Fujimaki, H.; An, P. Apical-root apoplastic acidification affects cell wall extensibility in wheat under salinity stress. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 1850–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Neumann, P.; Azaizeh, H.; Leon, D. Hardening of root cell walls: A growth inhibitory response to salinity stress. Plant Cell Environ. 1994, 17, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Munns, R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Byrt, C.S.; Munns, R.; Burton, R.A.; Gilliham, M.; Wege, S. Root cell wall solutions for crop plants in saline soils. Plant Sci. 2018, 269, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tanimoto, E.; Fujii, S.; Yamamoto, R.; Inanaga, S. Measurement of viscoelastic properties of root cell walls affected by low pH in lateral roots of Pisum sativum L. Plant Soil 2000, 226, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, J.-q.; Qi, Q.; Zhao, Y.-l.; Tian, X.-m.; Lu, H.; Gai, Y.; Jiang, X.-n. Unraveling the impact of Pto4CL1 regulation on the cell wall components and wood properties of perennial transgenic Populus tomentosa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 139, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Novaković, L.; Guo, T.; Bacic, A.; Sampathkumar, A.; Johnson, K.L. Hitting the wall—Sensing and signaling pathways involved in plant cell wall remodeling in response to abiotic stress. Plants 2018, 7, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Taiz, L. Plant cell expansion: Regulation of cell wall mechanical properties. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1984, 35, 585–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reboul, R.; Geserick, C.; Pabst, M.; Frey, B.; Wittmann, D.; Lütz-Meindl, U.; Léonard, R.; Tenhaken, R. Down-regulation of UDP-glucuronic acid biosynthesis leads to swollen plant cell walls and severe developmental defects associated with changes in pectic polysaccharides. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 39982–39992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zdunek, A.; Kozioł, A.; Cybulska, J.; Lekka, M.; Pieczywek, P.M. The stiffening of the cell walls observed during physiological softening of pears. Planta 2016, 243, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Moelants, K.; Jolie, R.P.; Palmers, S.K.; Cardinaels, R.; Christiaens, S.; Van Buggenhout, S.; Van Loey, A.M.; Moldenaers, P.; Hendrickx, M.E. The effects of process-induced pectin changes on the viscosity of carrot and tomato sera. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 2870–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mierczyńska, J.; Cybulska, J.; Pieczywek, P.M.; Zdunek, A. Effect of storage on rheology of water-soluble, chelate-soluble and diluted alkali-soluble pectin in carrot cell walls. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015, 8, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Pieczywek, P.M.; Kozioł, A.; Konopacka, D.; Cybulska, J.; Zdunek, A. Changes in cell wall stiffness and microstructure in ultrasonically treated apple. J. Food Eng. 2017, 197, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Wu, D.; Ye, X.; Linardt, R.J.; Chen, S. Gelling mechanism of RG-I enriched citrus pectin: Role of arabinose side-chains in cation-and acid-induced gelation. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 101, 105536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. John, J.; Ray, D.; Aswal, V.K.; Deshpande, A.P.; Varughese, S. Dissipation and strain-stiffening behavior of pectin–Ca gels under LAOS. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 6852–6866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kennedy, C.J.; Šturcová, A.; Jarvis, M.C.; Wess, T.J. Hydration effects on spacing of primary-wall cellulose microfibrils: A small angle X-ray scattering study. Cellulose 2007, 14, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kirui, A.; Du, J.; Zhao, W.; Barnes, W.; Kang, X.; Anderson, C.T.; Xiao, C.; Wang, T. A pectin methyltransferase modulates polysaccharide dynamics and interactions in Arabidopsis primary cell walls: Evidence from solid-state NMR. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 270, 118370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. White, P.B.; Wang, T.; Park, Y.B.; Cosgrove, D.J.; Hong, M. Water–polysaccharide interactions in the primary cell wall of Arabidopsis thaliana from polarization transfer solid-state NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10399–10409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Eticha, D.; Staß, A.; Horst, W.J. Localization of aluminium in the maize root apex: Can morin detect cell wall-bound aluminium? J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, H.; Zheng, X.; Tao, L.; Yang, Y.; Gao, L.; Xiong, J. Aeration Increases Cadmium (Cd) Retention by Enhancing Iron Plaque Formation and Regulating Pectin Synthesis in the Roots of Rice (Oryza sativa) Seedlings. Rice 2019, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kesten, C.; Menna, A.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, C. Regulation of cellulose synthesis in response to stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 40, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vetter, S.; Kunzek, H.; Senge, B. The influence of the pre-treatment of apple cell wall samples on their functional properties. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2001, 212, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Broxterman, S.E.; Schols, H.A. Interactions between pectin and cellulose in primary plant cell walls. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 192, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, W.F.; Shi, W.M. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana constitutively overexpressing the tomato 14-3-3 protein TFT7. Plant Soil 2007, 301, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Demiral, T.; Türkan, I. Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2005, 53, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nonami, H.; Tanimoto, K.; Tabuchi, A.; Fukuyama, T.; Hashimoto, Y. Salt stress under hydroponic conditions causes changes in cell wall extension during growth. Hydroponics Transpl. Prod. 1994, 396, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.; Hamilton, J.; Rebers, P.; Smith, F. A colorimetric method for the determination of sugars. Nature 1951, 168, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahmed, A.E.R.; Labavitch, J.M. A simplified method for accurate determination of cell wall uronide content. J. Food Biochem. 1978, 1, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, T.; Mao, G.; Feng, W.; Mao, R.; Gu, X.; Li, T.; Li, Q.; Bao, Y.; Yang, L.; Wu, X. Isolation, characterization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Schisandra sphenanthera. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 105, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Anthon, G.E.; Barrett, D.M. Combined enzymatic and colorimetric method for determining the uronic acid and methylester content of pectin: Application to tomato products. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 11 03130 g001 550
Figure 1. Final root length, relative root length (A) and root diameter (B) of Helan 3, Prius β and R7 in 0 and 200 NaCl treatments. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Final root length, relative root length (A) and root diameter (B) of Helan 3, Prius β and R7 in 0 and 200 NaCl treatments. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Plants 11 03130 g001
Plants 11 03130 g002 550
Figure 2. Elastic moduli (E0) and viscosity coefficient (ηN) of the root cell wall in the elongation zone in Helan 3, Prius β and R7 in 0 and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 15–24). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Elastic moduli (E0) and viscosity coefficient (ηN) of the root cell wall in the elongation zone in Helan 3, Prius β and R7 in 0 and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 15–24). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Plants 11 03130 g002
Plants 11 03130 g003 550
Figure 3. Pectin contents in root cell wall in three cultivars, Helan 3, Prius β and R7, under 0 and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Pectin contents in root cell wall in three cultivars, Helan 3, Prius β and R7, under 0 and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Plants 11 03130 g003
Table
Table 1. Monosaccharide composition (mol%) of rhamnose (Rha), arabinose (Ara), xylose (Xyl), mannose (Man), glucose (Glc), galactose (Gal) and uronic acid (UA) in Helan 3, Prius β and R7 cultivars under salinity stress. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6).
Table 1. Monosaccharide composition (mol%) of rhamnose (Rha), arabinose (Ara), xylose (Xyl), mannose (Man), glucose (Glc), galactose (Gal) and uronic acid (UA) in Helan 3, Prius β and R7 cultivars under salinity stress. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6).
CultivarNaCl (mM)Mol%
RhaAraXylManGlcGalUA
Helan 305.9 (0.4) c9.2 (0.6) b4.3 (0.4) a2.4 (0.2) b8.1 (1.3) a14.7 (0.8) c55.5 (2.1) a
2007.5 (0.3) b12.1 (0.7) a5.1 (0.5) a4.0 (0.6) b5.1 (1.1) ab17.9(1.2) ab48.3 (2.3) b
Prius β06.2 (0.7) c11.1(1.3) ab3.1 (0.5) b9.7 (1.2) a2.7 (0.5) b19.8 (2.1) a47.4 (3.9) b
2006.2 (0.4) c9.8 (0.6) ab2.1 (0.2) bc11.2 (0.9) a1.7(0.2) b17.6(1.2) ab51.4(3.1) ab
R708.8 (0.8) b10.6 (0.9) b2.4 (0.3) bc1.3 (0.1) b4.2 (0.5) b14.6 (1.0) c58.2 (2.6) a
20010.4 (0.7) a12.5 (0.8) a1.5 (0.3) c2.5 (0.2) b5.1 (0.7) ab20.9 (1.3) a47.0 (2.9) b
Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (p  <  0.05).
Table
Table 2. Degree of pectin methyl-esterification (PMD) in pectin fractions, HG:RG-I ratio, galactan side-chain length and arabinangalactan side-chain length in Helan 3, Prius β and R7 cultivars under salinity stress. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6).
Table 2. Degree of pectin methyl-esterification (PMD) in pectin fractions, HG:RG-I ratio, galactan side-chain length and arabinangalactan side-chain length in Helan 3, Prius β and R7 cultivars under salinity stress. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6).
CultivarNaCl (mM)PMD (%)HG:RG-I RatioGalactan
Side Chain		Arabinangalactan Side Chain
Helan 3035.1 (6.7) c9.8 (1.1) a2.6 (0.3) ab4.2 (0.3) b
20031.4 (2.8) c6.5(0.7) bc2.4 (0.1) bc4.0 (0.1) bc
Prius β042.4 (3.5) b8.3 (1.5) ab3.3 (0.3) a5.0 (0.3) a
20038.8 (3.2) bc8.6 (1.1) ab2.8 (0.1) ab4.4 (0.1) ab
R7059.0 (6.9) a7.0 (0.8) ab1.7 (0.1) d2.9 (0.1) d
20042.5 (2.2) b4.7 (0.6) c2.0 (0.1) c3.2 (0.1) c
Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (p  <  0.05).
Table
Table 3. Cross-correlation coefficients of final root length, elastic moduli (E0), viscosity coefficient (ηN), pectin content in cell wall, molar proportion of uronic acid in pectin, HG:RG-I ratio and degree of pectin methyl-esterification (PMD) of root cell wall in spinach under salinity stress.
Table 3. Cross-correlation coefficients of final root length, elastic moduli (E0), viscosity coefficient (ηN), pectin content in cell wall, molar proportion of uronic acid in pectin, HG:RG-I ratio and degree of pectin methyl-esterification (PMD) of root cell wall in spinach under salinity stress.
Root LengthE0ηNPectin
Content		Uronic AcidHG:RG-I
Ratio		PMD
Helan 3
E0−0.875 **
ηN−0.868 **0.780 **
Pectin content−0.885 **0.685 *0.825 **
Uronic acid0.601 *−0.656 *−0.623 *−0.268
HG:RG-I ratio0.621 *−0.556−0.638 *−0.640 *0.325
PMD0.2470.006−0.355−0.3950.0630.352
Root diameter−0.889 **0.591 *0.740 **0.927 **−0.344−0.579 *−0.412
Prius β
E0−0.628 *
ηN0.275−0.264
Pectin content−0.712 **0.3840.180
Uronic acid−0.1750.114−0.869 **−0.291
HG:RG-I ratio0.0130.098−0.838 **−0.4080.964 **
PMD0.2270.057−0.185−0.2350.0560.056
Root diameter−0.659 *0.286−0.611 *0.586 *0.3630.363−0.086
R7
E0−0.816 **
ηN−0.821 **0.879 **
Pectin content−0.737 **0.689 *0.741 **
Uronic acid0.708 **−0.611 *−0.666 *−0.557
HG:RG-I ratio0.615 *−0.633 *−0.657 *−0.5120.979 **
PMD0.807 **−0.657 *−0.651 *−0.581 *0.4500.351
Root diameter−0.914 **0.779 **0.786 **0.823 **−0.656 *−0.585 *−0.687 *
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). (N = 12).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Otie, V.; Matsuura, A.; Junichi, K.; Irshad, M.; Zheng, Y.; Fujimaki, H.; An, P. Pectin Characteristics Affect Root Growth in Spinach under Salinity. Plants 2022, 11, 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223130

AMA Style

Liu J, Otie V, Matsuura A, Junichi K, Irshad M, Zheng Y, Fujimaki H, An P. Pectin Characteristics Affect Root Growth in Spinach under Salinity. Plants. 2022; 11(22):3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jia, Victoria Otie, Asana Matsuura, Kashiwagi Junichi, Muhammad Irshad, Yuanrun Zheng, Haruyuki Fujimaki, and Ping An. 2022. "Pectin Characteristics Affect Root Growth in Spinach under Salinity" Plants 11, no. 22: 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223130

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop