Next Article in Journal
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Silica Nanoparticles Stimulate Sugar Beet Resilience to Irrigation with Saline Water in Salt-Affected Soils
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Characterization of a Novel Wheat–Tetraploid Thinopyrum elongatum 6E (6D) Disomic Substitution Line with Stripe Rust Resistance at the Adult Stage
Previous Article in Journal
Autotetraploidization Gives Rise to Differential Gene Expression in Response to Saline Stress in Rice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Characterization of Spring Wheat Germplasm for Macro-, Microelements and Trace Metals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Allelic Variations in Phenology Genes of Eastern U.S. Soft Winter and Korean Winter Wheat and Their Associations with Heading Date

1
Soft Wheat Quality Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS)-CSWQRU, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
2
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
3
Eastern Regional Small Grains Genotyping Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
4
Rural Development Administration, National Institute of Crop Science, Suwon 16429, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(22), 3116; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223116
Submission received: 3 October 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 15 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wheat Breeding: From Genetic Diversity to End-Use Quality)

Abstract

:
Wheat heading time is genetically controlled by phenology genes including vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd) and earliness per se (Eps) genes. Characterization of the existing genetic variation in the phenology genes of wheat would provide breeding programs with valuable genetic resources necessary for the development of wheat varieties well-adapted to the local environment and early-maturing traits suitable for double-cropping system. One hundred forty-nine eastern U.S. soft winter (ESW) and 32 Korean winter (KW) wheat genotypes were characterized using molecular markers for Vrn, Ppd, Eps and reduced-height (Rht) genes, and phenotyped for heading date (HD) in the eastern U.S. region. The Ppd-D1 and Rht-D1 genes exhibited the highest genetic diversity in ESW and KW wheat, respectively. The genetic variations for HD of ESW wheat were largely contributed by Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1 and Vrn-D3 genes. The Rht-D1 gene largely contributed to the genetic variation for HD of KW wheat. KW wheat headed on average 14 days earlier than ESW wheat in each crop year, largely due to the presence of the one-copy vrn-A1 allele in the former. The development of early-maturing ESW wheat varieties could be achieved by selecting for the one-copy vrn-A1 and vrn-D3a alleles in combination with Ppd-B1a and Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive alleles.

1. Introduction

Double cropping increases total crop production without the expansion of cultivation acreage. Growing soybean immediately after the harvest of winter wheat is the most common double-cropping system practiced in the United States. However, the double-crop soybean yields tend to be lower by 10–40% compared to their full-season counterparts [1]. Late planting is the major reason for the yield reduction in double-crop soybean and each day of delay in planting after mid-June reduces soybean yield by 0.65% and 1.7% in North Carolina and Maryland, respectively [2], and by 34 kg ha−1, 36 kg ha−1 and 67 kg ha−1 in Virginia, Georgia and Ohio, respectively [3,4,5]. The development of early-maturing wheat varieties with high yield potential is, therefore, crucial for avoiding delayed soybean planting and yield loss and for improving the profitability of the double-cropping system. The identification and acquisition of the genetic resources for the early-maturing trait, and selection of the effective molecular markers for marker-assisted selection, are prerequisites for the development of early-maturing wheat varieties. Early maturity has been a major trait considered by Korean wheat breeding programs for the development of winter wheat varieties suitable for implementing the wheat-rice double-cropping system [6]. Cho et al. [6] observed that all Korean winter (KW) wheat varieties released after 1991 carried the photoperiod insensitive allele at the photoperiod (Ppd)-D1 gene, which was associated with early maturity [7], and they headed on average 4 days earlier than those released before 1991. However, only 12.5–50.0% of U.S. winter wheat genotypes that carried the photoperiod insensitive allele at the Ppd-D1 gene were observed in several worldwide and regional collections of wheat [7,8,9]. KW wheat varieties would provide bountiful genetic resources needed for the development of early-maturing U.S. winter wheat varieties.
Wheat heading time is genetically controlled by the phenology genes including vernalization (Vrn), Ppd and earliness per se (Eps) genes [8]. Vernalization requirements of wheat are controlled by three major genes including Vrn-1, Vrn-2 and Vrn-3. The Vrn-1 and Vrn-3 genes are dominant in spring wheat, whereas the Vrn-2 genes are dominant in winter wheat [10]. Among the Vrn genes, only Vrn-B1 and Vrn-D3 genes are reported to significantly influence heading date of soft winter wheat under eastern U.S. environments [9,11]. In addition, genotypes with an increased copy number of the winter allele vrn-A1 at the Vrn-A1 gene require a longer vernalization, thereby delaying wheat heading [12]. However, the variation in copy number of the winter allele vrn-A1 and its effect on heading date of eastern U.S. soft winter wheat are still unknown. Wheat photoperiod response is mainly controlled by the Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 genes [8,12]. In general, genotypes with the photoperiod insensitive allele tend to head earlier than those with the photoperiod sensitive allele [12,13,14]. Eps genes influence wheat heading and flowering time when both vernalization and photoperiod requirements are satisfied and act in fine tuning the heading and flowering time [15]. However, the effects of Eps genes on wheat heading are usually inconsistent across environments [16]. Wheat heading time could be affected also by the reduced-height (Rht) genes through the gibberellin pathway [17]. Compared with the wild type, the semi-dwarf alleles Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b each have a single nucleotide substitution that causes a premature stop codon and reduces the plant’s ability to respond to gibberellic acid. Gibberellin insensitivity has been found to be associated with early heading in wheat [17].
The diversity of phenology genes has been observed in several worldwide and regional collections of wheat [7,8,17]. Substantial variation in the presence of phenology genes and their geographic distribution have been observed among continents and countries [7,8,17]. However, information is lacking on the diversity of phenology genes of eastern U.S. soft winter (ESW) wheat and their effects on wheat heading date under eastern U.S. environments. A better understanding of the allelic variation in the phenology genes of ESW wheat and their effects on heading dates would provide a valuable tool for wheat breeders in the development of early-maturing ESW wheat varieties suitable for the double-cropping system. The objectives of this study were to characterize the allelic variation in the phenology genes of ESW and KW wheat and to assess their effects on heading date under eastern U.S. environments.

2. Results

2.1. Variation in Heading Date among ESW and KW Wheat

Figure 1 shows the mean and range of HDs of 121 ESW wheat genotypes in 2015–2018, and 32 KW wheat varieties in 2017 and 2018, grown in Wooster, Ohio. The HDs of each genotype in each crop year are provided in Supplemental Table S1. Significant differences were observed in the HDs of ESW and KW wheat genotypes among the tested crop years. The HDs of ESW wheat genotypes ranged from 138 to 148, 138–143, 127–140 and 139–149 in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. The average HD of ESW wheat genotypes was the shortest in 2017 (134) followed by 2016 (140), 2015 (143) and 2018 (145). Early spring temperatures in Wooster, Ohio, were warmer in 2017 than in the other years when the growing degree days after January 1 accumulated more slowly (Supplemental Figure S1). HDs of KW wheat varieties ranged from 113 to 119 and 130–136 in 2017 and 2018, respectively. KW wheat varieties headed on average 14 days earlier than did ESW wheat genotypes in each crop year.
The two-way ANOVA showed that genotype, crop year and the interaction of the genotype and crop year all significantly contributed to the variation in HD (p < 0.0001, Supplemental Table S2). Crop year exhibited the biggest influence on HD, followed by genotype and the interaction between genotype and crop year. The HD was proved to be highly heritable as indicated by the significant correlations (r ranged from 0.52 to 0.73, p < 0.001, Supplemental Table S3) between HDs of ESW wheat genotypes grown in different crop years, and its high estimated heritability of 0.86. Wheat genotypes exhibited similar responses to the different environments with regards to HD.

2.2. Allelic Frequencies at Phenology Genes

Considerable genetic variation in the phenology gene profile was observed among ESW wheat genotypes. The phenology genes of each genotype are summarized in Supplemental Table S1. Among the 149 ESW wheat genotypes examined, 111 genotypes possessed homogeneous alleles at all the tested genes, while 38 genotypes carried heterogeneous alleles at one of the tested genes. Among the 32 KW wheat varieties examined, 30 varieties carried homogeneous alleles at all the phenology genes evaluated. The occurrence frequencies of the alleles at the phenology genes in the 149 ESW and 32 KW wheat genotypes are summarized in Table 1.

2.2.1. Vernalization Genes

All ESW and KW wheat genotypes carried the winter allele at the evaluated Vrn genes (Table 1), which was expected since only winter wheat genotypes were included in this study. Little genetic variation was observed in the evaluated Vrn genes among ESW wheat (Table 1). The copy number variation (CNV) of the vrn-A1 winter allele was significantly different between ESW and KW wheat genotypes. Most ESW wheat genotypes (94.0%) carried three or more copies of the vrn-A1 winter allele, while most KW wheat varieties (81.3%) carried a single copy of the vrn-A1 winter allele. Only three ESW wheat genotypes (Jamestown, Ernie and VA08MAS-369) possessed two copies or a single copy of the vrn-A1 allele (Supplemental Table S1).
Little variation was also observed in the Vrn-B1 gene in ESW and KW wheat. Two winter alleles (vrn-B1-AGS2000 and vrn-B1-Neuse) were identified at the Vrn-B1 gene in ESW wheat (Table 1). Most of the ESW wheat genotypes (96%) and all the KW wheat varieties (100%) carried the vrn-B1-Neuse allele. Only one ESW wheat variety ‘AGS 2060′ carried the vrn-B1-AGS2000 allele. In addition, two ESW wheat genotypes were found to have a null allele at the vrn-B1 gene.
Two winter alleles were identified at the Vrn-D3 gene in both ESW and KW wheat genotypes (Table 1). The vrn-D3a allele was carried by 10.1% of ESW wheat genotypes and 46.9% of KW wheat varieties. Most ESW wheat genotypes with the vrn-D3a allele possessed the photoperiod sensitive allele at the Ppd-D1 gene, while KW wheat varieties with the vrn-D3a allele had the Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele, indicating that different allelic combinations exist in ESW and KW wheat genotypes.

2.2.2. Photoperiod Genes

Allelic variations in the Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 genes in ESW wheat genotypes were greater than those in KW wheat varieties. Most ESW wheat (56.4%) and all KW wheat (100%) carried the Ppd-A1b photoperiod sensitive allele. The Ppd-B1b photoperiod sensitive allele was carried by 73.8% of ESW wheat genotypes and 87.5% of KW wheat varieties, and was most frequent in both ESW and KW wheat genotypes. In addition, eight ESW wheat genotypes and one KW wheat variety possessed a null allele at the Ppd-B1 gene. The Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele was the predominant allele at the Ppd-D1 gene with a frequency of 59.7% among the 149 ESW wheat genotypes, followed by the Ppd-D1b photoperiod sensitive allele with a frequency of 16.1% (Table 1). The Ppd-D1b-Norstar photoperiod sensitive allele was observed in 12.8% of the 149 ESW wheat genotypes. For the KW wheat varieties, 96.9% carried the Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele; one KW wheat variety carried heterogeneous alleles at the Ppd-D1 gene.

2.2.3. Earliness Per Se Genes

The predominant alleles at the Eps-B1 and Eps-D1 genes were the late heading-related alleles TaELF3-B1a and TaELF3-D1a with frequencies of 92.6% and 73.2% (Table 1), respectively, among the 149 ESW wheat genotypes. All KW wheat varieties carried the late heading-related alleles TaELF3-B1a and TaELF3-D1a at both the Eps-B1 and Eps-D1 genes.

2.2.4. Reduced Height Genes

Most ESW (63.8%) and KW (65.6%) wheat genotypes carried the wild type (tall) Rht-B1a allele at the Rht-B1 gene (Table 1). The semi-dwarfing Rht-D1b allele was the predominant allele at the Rht-D1 gene in ESW wheat genotypes with a frequency of 56.4%, while most KW wheat varieties (53.1%) carried the Rht-D1a allele at the Rht-D1 gene. Eight ESW wheat genotypes (5.4%) and seven KW wheat varieties (21.9%) carried the tall alleles Rht-B1a and Rht-D1a at the Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 genes (Supplemental Table S1).

2.3. Genetic Diversity of Phenology Genes

The genetic diversity of Vrn, Ppd, Eps and Rht genes in the 111 ESW and 30 KW wheat genotypes, which possessed homogeneous alleles at all the tested genes, is summarized in Table 2. ESW and KW wheat had the lowest genetic diversities of the Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1 and Eps genes but exhibited different genetic diversities of the Vrn-D3 and Ppd genes (Table 2). KW wheat had the highest genetic diversity of Vrn-D3 gene, but ESW wheat had the relatively low genetic diversity of Vrn-D3 gene. The indices of genetic diversity at the Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 loci ranged from 0.40–0.49 and 0.00–0.18 in ESW and KW wheat, respectively (Table 2). Similar genetic diversities of the Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 genes were observed in both ESW and KW wheat.

2.4. Combined Analyses of Phenology Genes on the Heading Date of ESW Wheat over Four Crop Years and KW Wheat over Two Crop Years

Among 111 ESW wheat genotypes with homozygous alleles for each gene, 86 genotypes were evaluated for HD in four crop years and were used for testing the significance of crop year, and the Vrn, Ppd, Eps and Rht genes, and their interactions, on the HD of ESW wheat genotypes. The GLM with crop year and the phenology genes as the independent variables and HD as a dependent variable explained 92.7% of the variation in the HD of ESW wheat, with most of the variation (87.0%) explained by crop year, and a smaller amount (5.7%) explained by genetic variation (Table 3). A similarly larger influence of crop year than genetic variation on HD was also observed by Grogan et al. [8] in hard winter wheat genotypes adapted to the great plains region of the United States.
Of the genetic variation, 27.8% was contributed by the Ppd-D1 gene, 8.9% by the Ppd-B1 gene, 7.4% by the Vrn-D3 gene, and 11.6% by the two-way interaction between the Ppd-B1 gene and the Ppd-D1 gene (Table 3). A smaller influence of genetic variation on HD was explained by the Ppd-A1 gene (2.8%) and the Eps-D1 gene (3.7%) and by the two-way interactions between the Ppd-B1 (5.9%) gene or Ppd-D1 (10.4%) gene and the Ppd-A1 gene. The Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1 and Eps-B1 genes exhibited insignificant effects on the HD of ESW wheat genotypes, as there is limited allelic diversity at these genes (Table 2).
The influences of crop year and the phenology genes on the HD variation in KW wheat were determined using 30 KW wheat varieties (Supplemental Table S4) with homozygous alleles at each gene. Most of the HD variation of KW wheat varieties (94.7%) was explained by crop year, and a smaller amount (1.7%) was explained by the phenology genes. Of the genetic variation in the HD of KW wheat varieties, 63.4% was accounted for by the Rht-D1 gene (Supplemental Table S4). The Vrn, Ppd and Eps genes did not significantly affect KW wheat HD; this mainly resulted from the lack of genetic diversity of these genes (Table 2).

2.5. Individual Analysis of Phenology Genes on Heading Date of ESW and KW Wheat for Each Crop Year

The GLMs with the phenology genes as the independent variables and HD as a dependent variable were tested for each crop year separately for ESW wheat genotypes (Supplemental Table S5) and KW wheat varieties (Supplemental Table S6). The best-fit GLMs varied among crop years and not all phenology genes were significant. The model explained, on average, 42.0% of the variation in the HD of ESW wheat genotypes, which ranged from a minimum of 38.0% in 2018 to a maximum of 47.1% in 2016 (Supplemental Table S5). The Ppd-D1 gene significantly affected the HD of ESW wheat in all four crop years and accounted for, on average, 13.3% of the variation in HD, which ranged from 9.2% in 2015 to 23.5% in 2017 (Supplemental Table S5). The largest effect of the Ppd-D1 gene on HD was observed in 2017 (Supplemental Table S5), probably due to the warm spring weather that year. The Vrn-D3 gene exhibited a significant influence on the HD of ESW wheat only in 2015 and 2016. The interaction between the Ppd-D1 and the Ppd-B1 genes, and between the Ppd-D1 and the Vrn-D3 genes, also contributed to small variations in the HD of ESW wheat genotypes in 2018 and 2016, respectively. No significant effects of the Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, Ppd-A1, Eps-B1, Eps-D1, Rht-B1 or Rht-D1 genes were observed on the HD of ESW wheat genotypes in any individual crop year.
Among the tested genes, only the Rht-D1 gene showed a significant influence on the HD of KW wheat varieties in both crop years, and accounted for 21.0% of the variation in the HD in 2017 and 18.2% in 2018 (Supplemental Table S6). The other genes showed no significant influence on the HD of KW wheats in a crop year.

2.6. Influence of Alleles at the Vrn-D3, Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 Genes on the Heading Date of ESW and KW Wheat

Five genes, including the Vrn-D3, Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1 and Eps-D1 genes, were identified to significantly influence the HDs of ESW wheat genotypes in the combined analyses over four crop years (Table 3). The influences of the alleles at these five significant genes on the HD of ESW wheat were further evaluated using 86 ESW wheat genotypes, which possessed homozygous alleles at the phenology genes and were evaluated for HD in four crop years. No significant differences were observed in HD between ESW wheat genotypes carrying different alleles at the Vrn-D3, Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1 and Eps-D1 genes in any individual crop year. The effects of alleles at the Ppd-D1 gene were inconsistent in four crop years (Figure 2). No significant differences in HD (except for 2017) were observed between ESW wheat genotypes carrying different alleles at the Ppd-D1 gene. ESW wheat carrying the Ppd-D1a insensitive allele headed on average 2 days earlier than those carrying the Ppd-D1b or Ppd-D1b-Norstar sensitive allele in 2017 (Figure 2).
For KW wheat varieties, only the Rht-D1 gene showed a significant influence on HD in each crop year (Supplemental Table S6). KW wheat varieties carrying the Rht-D1a allele headed on average 2 days earlier than those carrying the Rht-D1b allele in each crop year (Supplemental Figure S2).

2.7. Influence of Allelic Combinations on the Heading Date of ESW and KW Wheat

Considering the significant influence of allelic variation in the Vrn-D3, Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 genes on the HD of ESW wheats (p < 0.001, Table 3), as well as significant differences in the allelic frequencies at the Vrn-A1 gene between ESW and KW wheat genotypes, the influences of allelic combinations at the Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1, Vrn-A1 and Vrn-D3 genes on the HD of winter wheat were determined using 86 ESW wheat genotypes and 30 KW wheat varieties with homozygous alleles at these four genes. A total of 14 phenology gene profiles were observed in 86 ESW wheat genotypes (Table 4). More than half (57.0%) of 86 ESW wheat genotypes, however, possessed the same profile of Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV > 2)/vrn-D3b. Around 26.0% of ESW wheat genotypes possessed one of these four profiles: Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1b/vrn-A1 (CNV > 2)/vrn-D3b (9.3%); Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1b-Norstart/vrn-A1 (CNV > 2)/vrn-D3b (7.0%); null/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV > 2)/vrn-D3b (4.7%); and Ppd-B1a-Sonora 64/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV > 2)/vrn-D3b (4.7%). Nine other phenology gene profiles were observed in three or fewer genotypes. The 30 KW wheat varieties carried six phenology gene profiles at the Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1, Vrn-A1 and Vrn-D3 genes (Table 4). Most KW wheat varieties possessed one of these two profiles: Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV = 1)/vrn-D3a (40.0%) and Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV = 1)/vrn-D3b (36.7%). Four other phenology gene profiles were observed in three or fewer varieties.
Within ESW wheat genotypes, the average HD of 14 phenology gene profiles ranged from 140 to 144 in 2015, 139–141 in 2016, 130–136 in 2017 and 142–147 in 2018 (Table 4). Within KW wheat varieties, the average HD of six phenology gene profiles ranged from 116 to 119 in 2017 and 132–135 in 2018 (Table 4). Within ESW wheat genotypes or KW wheat varieties, relatively small variations in HD were observed among the 14 or six phenology gene profiles in each crop year, respectively, whereas each phenology gene profile exhibited considerable variation in HD among the crop years (Table 4).
Five predominant profiles of ESW wheat genotypes had the same winter alleles at the Vrn-A1 and Vrn-D3 genes. Among these five predominant profiles, ESW wheat genotypes carrying the profile of Ppd-B1a-Sonora 64/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV > 2)/vrn-D3b headed 1–6 days earlier than those carrying one of the remaining four profiles. Two predominant profiles of KW wheat varieties had the same alleles at the Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1 and Vrn-A1 genes. No significant differences were observed in the average HD of KW wheat varieties between different phenology gene profiles.

3. Discussion

3.1. Heading Date of ESW and KW Wheat

ESW wheat genotypes had the shortest average HDs in 2017 followed by 2016, 2015 and 2018, largely due to the warmer spring temperatures in 2017 than in the other years (Supplemental Figure S1). Hu et al. [18] also reported that the HD of winter wheat was governed primarily by temperature. KW wheat varieties headed on average 14 days earlier than did ESW wheat genotypes in each crop year, indicating that genetics, in addition to crop year, have a significant influence on winter wheat HD. Würschum et al. [19] also reported that wheat HD was mainly controlled by both genotype and environment, and much less by the interaction between genotype and environment from a study of 1110 winter wheat cultivars of worldwide origin. KW wheat varieties seem to carry the genetic resources needed for the development of early-maturing ESW wheat varieties.

3.2. Allelic Variations in the Phenology Genes of ESW and KW Wheat

Both ESW and KW wheat showed relatively low genetic diversity in the Vrn-A1 and Vrn-B1 genes (Table 1 and Table 2). The small variations in the Vrn genes were also observed by Tessmann et al. [9] in 256 ESW wheat genotypes and Cho et al. [6] in 410 Korean wheat varieties. Increased copy number of the Vrn-A1 gene is known to be associated with greater vernalization requirements, resulting in late heading [12]. Most ESW wheat genotypes (94.0%) carried three or more copies of the vrn-A1 winter allele (Table 1). A single copy of the vrn-A1 winter allele was observed in most KW wheat varieties (81.3%); however, only one (VA08MAS-369) out of 149 ESW wheat genotypes carried a single copy of the vrn-A1 allele (Supplemental Table S1). The HDs of VA08MAS-369 in 2017 and 2018 were 135 and 146, respectively, and were longer than those of KW wheat in each crop year, largely due to the presence of the Ppd-D1b photoperiod sensitive allele in the former. The high frequency of a single copy of the vrn-A1 allele in KW wheat may be related to the earlier heading of KW wheat than ESW wheat. The vrn-B1-AGS2000 allele is known to have stronger associations with low vernalization requirements and early heading than the vrn-B1-Neuse allele [20]. The vrn-B1-AGS2000 allele was observed in only one ESW wheat genotype and in none of the KW wheat varieties. The vrn-B1-Neuse allele was the predominant allele and was observed in 96% of ESW wheat genotypes and in 100% of KW wheat varieties. The similar frequency of the vrn-B1-Neuse allele in ESW and KW wheat genotypes suggests that the Vrn-B1 gene may not be responsible for the difference in HD between ESW and KW wheat genotypes. In addition, the null allele at the Vrn-B1 gene was detected in two ESW wheat genotypes. Tessmann et al. [9] also observed that two ESW wheat genotypes carried the null allele at the Vrn-B1 genes in an ESW wheat collection. No significantly difference in influence on HD was observed between the null allele and other alleles at the Vrn-B1 gene. The vrn-D3a allele, which is known to be associated with early heading [21], was carried by 10.1% of ESW wheat genotypes and 46.9% of KW wheat varieties. Tessmann et al. [9] observed that around 30.0% of 256 ESW wheat genotypes carried the vrn-D3a allele, while the frequency of the vrn-D3a allele varied from 3.0% to 59.5% in ESW wheat genotypes from different states, which was presented in the Supplemental Table S5 reported by Tessmann et al. [9].
Allelic variations in the Ppd genes in ESW wheat genotypes were greater than those in KW wheat varieties. The Ppd-A1a.1 photoperiod insensitive allele was observed in 32.9% of 149 ESW wheat genotypes, which agrees with the previous reports [9,20]. Guedira et al. [20] found that the photoperiod insensitive allele Ppd-A1a.1 was common in ESW wheat varieties. Tessmann et al. [9] also observed that 57.4% of ESW wheat genotypes carried the Ppd-A1a.1 allele. In contrast, the Ppd-A1b photoperiod sensitive allele was detected in all KW wheat varieties, which agrees with the report by Cho et al. [6], in which all 410 KW wheat genotypes carried the Ppd-A1b photoperiod sensitive allele. The Ppd-A1 gene may not be responsible for the differences in HD between ESW and KW wheat genotypes as the Ppd-A1b photoperiod sensitive allele, which is known to be associated with late heading [14], was observed to have a high frequency in KW wheat (Table 1). The Ppd-B1b photoperiod sensitive allele was the predominant one observed in both ESW wheat genotypes and KW wheat varieties, and also was reported to be present in a high percentage of ESW wheat genotypes [9] and Korean wheat varieties [6]. The null allele at the Ppd-B1 gene was detected in eight ESW wheat genotypes and one KW wheat variety. Tessmann et al. [9] observed that 7.4% of ESW wheat genotypes carried the null allele at the Ppd-B1 gene. The association of the null allele at the Ppd-B1 gene with HD was not evident in ESW wheat.
Grogan et al. [8] found a higher frequency of the Ppd-A1b photoperiod sensitive allele (98.0%) and lower frequencies of the Ppd-B1b photoperiod sensitive allele (57%) and the Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele (29.0%) in 299 U.S. great plains hard winter wheat genotypes than in ESW wheat genotypes. Guo et al. [7] observed that the predominant allele at the Ppd-D1 gene was the photoperiod sensitive allele (Ppd-D1b, haplotype IV) among wheat varieties from the United States and Canada. The Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele was, on the other hand, predominantly observed in ESW wheat genotypes (Table 1). Tessmann et al. [9] also reported that 50.0% of ESW wheat genotypes carried the Ppd-D1a allele. It appears that the occurrence of the Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele varies among different wheat classes in the United States. The Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele was predominantly observed in KW wheat with a frequency of 96.9%, which agrees with the report by Guo et al. [7] who found that haplotype I (Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele) was most common in Asian wheat varieties. Cho et al. [6] also observed that all KW wheat varieties developed since 1991 carried the Ppd-D1a photoperiod insensitive allele.
The TaELF3-B1a and TaELF3-D1a alleles, known to be associated with late heading [15], were predominantly observed in both ESW and KW wheat genotypes, suggesting that the Eps-B1 and Eps-D1 genes may not be responsible for the difference in HD between ESW and KW wheat genotypes.
The semi-dwarf alleles Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b were present in ESW and KW wheat at similar frequencies to those observed by Guedira et al. [22] in 247 ESW wheat varieties released before 2008 and Cho et al. [6] in 410 KW wheat genotypes. Wilhelm et al. [17] and Grogan et al. [8] reported that the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b alleles could promote wheat heading probably through their significant associations with the reduction in gibberellin sensitivity. The similar frequencies of the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b alleles in ESW and KW wheat genotypes suggest that the Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 genes may not contribute to the difference in HD between ESW and KW wheat genotypes.

3.3. Influences of Phenology Genes on the Heading Date of ESW and KW Wheat

Five genes, including Vrn-D3, Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1 and Eps-D1, were identified to significantly influence the HD of ESW wheat (Table 3). These results agree with the report by Huang et al. [11], who found that the Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1 and Vrn-D3 genes significantly affected the HD of ESW wheat under eastern U.S. environments. The low levels of genetic diversity in the Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1 and Eps-B1 genes explains their insignificant influences on ESW wheat HD. Thus, additional variation in the HD of ESW wheat genotypes could be achieved by increasing the genetic diversities in the Vrn and Eps genes and the introduction of the early heading-related alleles of those genes, such as the one-copy vrn-A1 winter allele and the vrn-B1-AGS2000 allele.
No significant differences were observed in HD between ESW wheat genotypes carrying different alleles at the Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1 and Eps-D1 genes in any individual crop year. These results agree with the report by Tessmann et al. [9], in which ESW wheat genotypes carrying the different alleles at the Ppd-B1 gene exhibited no significant difference in HD under eastern U.S. environments. The low frequency of the photoperiod insensitive allele at the Ppd-B1 gene may contribute to its insignificant influence on HD. Griffiths et al. [16] observed that the effects of Eps genes on wheat heading were inconsistent across environments. Additionally, no significant differences in HD were also observed between ESW wheat genotypes carrying the vrn-D3a allele or the vrn-D3b allele at the Vrn-D3 gene. The allelic variation in the Ppd-D1 gene showed variable influence on HD among crop years, suggesting differential expression under varying climatic conditions, especially temperature. The early heading of ESW wheat genotypes with the photoperiod insensitive allele Ppd-D1a agree with the reports by Grogan et al. [8] and Whittal et al. [23]. These results indicate that the effects of alleles at phenology genes on ESW wheat HD are inconsistent across crop years and the existing genetic resources of ESW wheat may not be sufficient to provide the early maturing trait in the development of early-maturing ESW wheat varieties.
The Vrn, Ppd and Eps genes were found to have insignificant effects on KW wheat HD, considering their lack of genetic variations. The Rht-D1 gene had the highest genetic variation in KW wheat and its variation might explain most of the genetic variation in KW wheat HD (Supplemental Table S6). Grogan et al. [8] found that the Rht-B1 gene significantly affected the HD of hard winter wheat genotypes grown in the U.S. great plains, but not the Rht-D1 gene. In this study, the Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 genes had insignificant influences on the HD of ESW wheat genotypes under the tested environments. KW wheat varieties carrying the Rht-D1a allele headed on average 2 days earlier than those carrying the Rht-D1b allele in each crop year (Supplemental Figure S2). Tessmann et al. [9] also observed a slight decrease (0.6%) in the HD of ESW wheat genotypes with the Rht-D1a allele compared to those with the Rht-D1b allele under eastern U.S. environments. Several other studies reported that the presence of the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b alleles in wheat could lead to early heading through their significant associations with the reduction in gibberellin sensitivity [8,17]. It is not evident why the Rht-D1a allele shows an association with early heading in winter wheat.

3.4. Influence of Allelic Combinations on the Heading Date of ESW and KW Wheat

A total of 14 and 6 phenology gene profiles at four major genes (Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1, Vrn-A1 and Vrn-D3) were observed in ESW and KW wheat, respectively. A phenology gene profile (Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (three or more copies)/vrn-D3b) was predominantly observed in 57.0% of ESW genotypes, while 76.7% of KW varieties carried one of these two phenology gene profiles: Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (one copy)/vrn-D3a or Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (one copy)/vrn-D3b. Within each population, relatively small variations in HD were observed among the phenology gene profiles in each crop year, whereas each phenology gene profile exhibited considerable variation in HD among the crop years (Table 4). Wheat genotypes adapted to a specific location have HDs appropriate to the local climatic conditions to ensure the maximum yield potential. The copy number variation in the Vrn-A1 gene was the major difference in the predominant phenology gene profiles between ESW and KW wheat genotypes and might be responsible for the differences in HDs between ESW and KW wheat genotypes under eastern U.S. environments. The introduction of the one-copy vrn-A1 winter allele, and the increased frequencies of the vrn-D3a winter allele and the photoperiod insensitive alleles at the Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 genes should be considered in the development of early-maturing ESW wheat varieties suitable for wheat–soybean double-cropping systems.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Two populations, including 149 eastern U.S. soft winter (ESW) wheat genotypes and 32 Korean winter (KW) wheat varieties, were used in this study. The ESW wheat genotypes were obtained from over 20 ESW wheat breeding programs, while the seeds of KW wheat varieties were obtained from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). The heading dates for ESW wheat genotypes and KW wheat varieties were determined over two consecutive crop years (2017 and 2018) in Wooster, Ohio (40.8051° N, 81.9351° W). ESW wheat genotypes were additionally phenotyped for heading date in 2015 and 2016 in Wooster, Ohio (Table 5 and Supplemental Table S1). A complete list of ESW and KW wheat genotypes can be found in Supplemental Table S1. Wheat genotypes were planted in a randomized complete block design with two replications. Heading date (HD) was recorded as the Julian date when the 50% of the spikes in a plot had fully emerged from the flag leaf sheath.

4.2. Genetic Evaluation

Genomic DNA was extracted from 10–15-day-old hypocotyls of germinating seeds using DNAzol ES (Extra Strength) reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Molecular marker assays for phenology genes were conducted at the USDA-ARS Eastern Regional Small Grain Genotyping Laboratory, Raleigh, NC, USA. Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) markers developed from published sequences were used to distinguish alleles at the Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1, Eps-B1, Eps-D1, Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 genes (Table 6 and Supplemental Table S7). The recessive allele vrn-A1 was distinguished from the dominant alleles Vrn-A1a and Vrn-A1b using molecular markers wMAS000033 and wMAS000035 [24], respectively. Two molecular markers (vrn-A1exon4_C/T and vrn-A1exon7_G/A) were used to determine copy number variation (CNV) of winter allele vrn-A1 [12]. Three markers (TaVrn-B1_D-I, wMAS000037, and Vrn-B1_C) were used to distinguish the dominant alleles Vrn-B1a, Vrn-B1b [25], and Vrn-B1c [26] at the Vrn-B1 gene. Molecular marker (TaVrn-B1_1752) was used to detect an A/G polymorphism in intron 1 of the recessive allele vrn-B1 [20] and to distinguish alleles (vrn-B1-Neuse and vrn-B1-AGS2000). Genotypes were considered to carry a null allele at the Vrn-B1 gene if no PCR amplification was detected using the molecular marker TaVrn-B1_1752. The primer pair VRN-D3-F6/VRN-D3-R8 was used to distinguish alleles at the Vrn-D3 gene according to the method described by Chen et al. [21].
Photoperiod insensitive allele Ppd-A1a.1 was distinguished with the marker TaPpd-A1prodel [14], which detects a deletion characteristic of the insensitive allele. Alleles at the Ppd-B1 gene were distinguished using two markers: wMAS000027, which detects the ‘Chinese Spring’-type insensitive allele with a truncated copy and TaPpdBJ003, which identifies the ‘Sonora 64′-type insensitive allele with an inter copy junction [12]. Wheat genotypes were considered to carry the null allele at the Ppd-B1 gene if no amplification occurred with the markers. Photoperiod sensitive and insensitive alleles at the Ppd-D1 gene were distinguished using two markers: wMAS000024, which detects a deletion upstream of the coding region responsible for the photoperiod insensitive phenotype [13], and TaPpdDD002, which identifies the ‘Norstar’-type sensitive allele [27]. Mutations at the Eps-B1 and Eps-D1 loci were detected using markers TaELF3-B1 Kasp and TaELF3-D1 Kasp2, respectively [15]. Mutations at the Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 loci were genotyped using wMAS000001 and wMAS000002 [28], respectively.

4.3. Genetic Diversity

The genetic diversity at each locus was calculated as described by Nei [29] using the equation: H = 1−∑ pi2 (where H is Nei’s genetic diversity index, and pi is the frequency of the ith allele at that locus). The frequencies of alleles were counted only for those genotypes with a homogeneous allele at all the tested loci and used for calculating the genetic diversity.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis System software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A general linear model (GLM) was used to determine the effects of crop years, and the vernalization, photoperiod, earliness per se and reduced-height genes, and their interactions, on the HD of ESW and KW wheat genotypes in a combined analysis over four crop years for the former and two crop years for the latter, or in each crop year for both. The sum of squares was used to estimate the proportion of total variance contributed by crop year and each gene, and the proportion of genetic variance contributed by each gene [8]. A least significant difference (LSD) test was used to determine the differences in the effects of crop year, individual allele at each gene, and phenology gene profiles on the HD of ESW and KW wheat genotypes with homozygous alleles at the phenology genes. Pearson’s linear correlation analysis was conducted to determine the relationships between HDs of ESW wheat genotypes grown in different crop years. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was conducted to evaluate the effects of crop years and genotype and their interaction effects on HD using 121 ESW wheat genotypes. Broad sense heritability (H2) was calculated over four crop years in terms of mean squares (MS): H2 = (MSGenotype − MSGenotype × Year)/MSGenotype [30].

5. Conclusions

The genetic effects on the HD of ESW wheat genotypes were largely explained by the Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1 and Vrn-D3 genes. The Rht-D1 gene had the highest genetic diversity in KW wheat. ESW wheat genotypes exhibited, on average, an HD 14 days later than that of KW wheat varieties in each crop year, largely due to the absence of a single copy of the vrn-A1 allele in the former. A phenology gene profile (Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV > 2)/vrn-D3b) was predominantly observed in ESW wheat genotypes with a frequency of 57.0%. Two phenology gene profiles (Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV = 1)/vrn-D3a and Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1a/vrn-A1 (CNV = 1)/vrn-D3b) were predominantly observed in KW wheat varieties, making up 76.7% of the total observed profiles. The development of early-maturing ESW wheat varieties could be achieved by selecting for the one-copy vrn-A1 and vrn-D3a winter alleles in combination with photoperiod insensitive alleles at the Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 genes. These results enhance our understanding of the effects of phenology genes on the HD of winter wheat under eastern U.S. environments and could be useful for the development of early-maturing wheat varieties suitable for wheat–soybean double-cropping systems and wheat varieties well-adapted to the current and future climate conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11223116/s1, Figure S1: Cumulative growing degree days from January 1st to May 31st in Wooster, Ohio, in 2015–2018; Figure S2: Heading dates of 30 Korean winter wheat varieties with different alleles at the Rht-D1 gene grown in Wooster, Ohio, in two different years; Table S1: Phenology gene profiles and heading dates of 149 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes grown in Wooster, Ohio, for four years and 32 Korean winter wheat varieties grown in Wooster, Ohio, for two years; Table S2: Analysis of variance of genotype, year and genotype × year for heading date in 121 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes; Table S2: Correlations between heading dates of 121 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat in different crop years; Table S4: Influences of crop year and the vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes on variations in the heading date of 30 Korean winter wheat varieties observed in two crop years; Table S5: Contributions of vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes, and their interactions, to the heading date of 86 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes in each of four crop years; Table S6: Contributions of vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes to the heading date of 30 Korean winter wheat varieties in each of two crop years; Table S7: Primer sequences of KASP markers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M., G.B.-G., M.K. and B.-K.B.; methodology, F.M., G.B.-G., M.K. and B.-K.B.; software, F.M.; validation, F.M., G.B.-G., M.K. and B.-K.B.; formal analysis, F.M.; investigation, F.M., G.B.-G. and M.K.; resources, B.-K.B.; data curation, F.M., G.B.-G., M.K. and B.-K.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.M.; writing—review and editing, G.B.-G., M.K. and B.-K.B.; visualization, F.M., G.B.-G., M.K. and B.-K.B.; supervision, B.-K.B.; project administration, B.-K.B.; funding acquisition, B.-K.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Current Research Information System Project 5082-43440-001-000-D.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data reported in this manuscript are provided in the Supplementary Files.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Cindy Hampton, Amy Bugaj, Tony Karcher and Tom Donelson at the USDA-ARS Soft Wheat Quality Laboratory for their assistance in field data collection, sample harvesting and DNA extraction, and Kim Howell and Jared Smith at the USDA-ARS Eastern Regional Small Grain Genotyping Laboratory for their assistance in conducting molecular marker assays for the evaluation of phenology genes. We are grateful to Clay Sneller, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, for his assistance in planting wheat samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manu-script, or in the decision to publish the results.

Disclaimer Statement

The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.

References

  1. Kyei-Boahen, S.; Zhang, L. Early-maturing soybean in a wheat-soybean double-crop system yield and net returns. Agron. J. 2006, 98, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Parvej, M.R.; Holshouser, D.L.; Kratochvil, R.J.; Whaley, C.M.; Dunphy, E.J.; Roth, G.W.; Faé, G.S. Early high-moisture wheat harvest improves double-crop system: II. Soybean growth and yield. Crop Sci. 2020, 60, 2650–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Holshouser, D.L. Double Cropping Soybeans in Virginia; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2014; Available online: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/CSES/CSES-102/CSES-102.html (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  4. Boerma, H.R.; Ashley, D.A. Irrigation, row spacing and genotype effects on late and ultra-planted soybean. Agron. J. 1982, 74, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Beuerlein, J. Soybean Inoculation: Its Science, Use, and Performance. Columbus: The Ohio State University Extension. 2004. Available online: http://agcrops.osu.edu/soybean/documents/SoybeanInoculation.pdf (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  6. Cho, E.J.; Kang, C.S.; Jung, J.U.; Yoon, Y.M.; Park, C.S. Allelic variation of Rht-1, Vrn-1 and Ppd-1 in Korean wheats and its effect on agronomic traits. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Guo, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhou, R.; Ren, Z.; Jia, J. Discovery, evaluation and distribution of haplotypes of the wheat Ppd-D1 gene. New Phytol. 2010, 185, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Grogan, S.M.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Haley, S.D.; McMaster, G.S.; Reid, S.D.; Smith, J.; Byrne, P.F. Allelic variation in developmental genes and effects on winter wheat heading date in the US Great Plains. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Tessmann, E.W.; Dong, Y.; Van Sanford, D.A. GWAS for Fusarium head blight traits in a soft red winter wheat mapping panel. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 1823–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yan, L.; Loukoianov, A.; Blechl, A.; Tranquilli, G.; Ramakrishna, W.; SanMiguel, P.; Bennetzen, J.L.; Echenique, V.; Dubcovsky, J. The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science 2004, 303, 1640–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Huang, M.; Mheni, N.; Brown-Guedira, G.; McKendry, A.; Griffey, C.; Van Sanford, D.; Costa, J.; Sneller, C. Genetic analysis of heading date in winter and spring wheat. Euphytica 2018, 214, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Díaz, A.; Zikhali, M.; Turner, A.S.; Isaac, P.; Laurie, D.A. Copy number variation affecting the Photoperiod-B1 and Vernalization-A1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beales, J.; Turner, A.; Griffiths, S.; Snape, J.W.; Laurie, D.A. A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nishida, H.; Yoshida, T.; Kawakami, K.; Fujita, M.; Long, B.; Akashi, Y.; Laurie, D.A.; Kato, K. Structural variation in the 5′ upstream region of photoperiod-insensitive alleles Ppd-A1a and Ppd-B1a identified in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and their effect on heading time. Mol. Breed. 2013, 31, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zikhali, M.; Wingen, L.U.; Griffiths, S. Delimitation of the Earliness per se D1 (Eps-D1) flowering gene to a subtelomeric chromosomal deletion in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Griffiths, S.; Simmonds, J.; Leverington, M.; Wang, Y.; Fish, L.; Sayers, L.; Alibert, L.; Orford, S.; Wingen, L.; Herry, L.; et al. Meta-QTL analysis of the genetic control of ear emergence in elite European winter wheat germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wilhelm, E.P.; Boulton, M.I.; Al-Kaff, N.; Balfourier, F.; Bordes, J.; Greenland, A.J.; Powell, W.; Mackay, I.J. Rht-1 and Ppd-D1 associations with height, GA sensitivity, and days to heading in a worldwide bread wheat collection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 2233–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, Q.; Weiss, A.; Feng, S.; Baenziger, P.S. Earlier winter wheat heading dates and warmer spring in the U.S. Great Plains. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 135, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Würschum, T.; Langer, S.M.; Longin, C.F.H.; Tucker, M.R.; Leiser, W.L. A three-component system incorporating Ppd-D1, copy number variation at Ppd-B1, and numerous small-effect quantitative trait loci facilitates adaptation of heading time in winter wheat cultivars of worldwide origin. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guedira, M.; Maloney, P.; Xiong, M.; Petersen, S.; Murphy, J.P.; Marshall, D.; Johnson, J.; Harrison, S.; Brown-Guedira, G. Vernalization duration requirement in soft winter wheat is associated with variation at the VRN-B1 locus. Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 1960–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Y.; Carver, B.F.; Wang, S.; Cao, S.; Yan, L. Genetic regulation of developmental phases in winter wheat. Mol. Breed. 2010, 26, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guedira, M.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Van Sanford, D.; Sneller, C.; Souza, E.; Marshall, D. Distribution of Rht genes in modern and historic winter wheat cultivars from the Eastern and Central USA. Crop Sci. 2010, 50, 1811–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Whittal, A.; Kaviani, M.; Graf, R.; Humphreys, G.; Navabi, A. Allelic variation of vernalization and photoperiod response genes in a diverse set of North American high latitude winter wheat genotypes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Yan, L.; Helguera, M.; Kato, K.; Fukuyama, S.; Sherman, J.; Dubcovsky, J. Allelic variation at the VRN-1 promoter region in polyploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 1677–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Santra, D.K.; Santra, M.; Allan, R.E.; Campbell, K.G.; Kidwell, K.K. Genetic and molecular characterization of vernalization genes Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, and Vrn-D1 in spring wheat germplasm from the Pacific Northwest region of the USA. Plant Breed. 2009, 128, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Milec, Z.; Tomková, L.; Sumíková, T.; Pánková, K. A new multiplex PCR test for the determination of Vrn-B1 alleles in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed 2012, 30, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shaw, L.M.; Turner, A.S.; Herry, L.; Griffiths, S.; Laurie, D.A. Mutant alleles of Photoperiod-1 in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that confer a late flowering phenotype in long days. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ellis, M.; Spielmeyer, W.; Gale, K.; Rebetzke, G.; Richards, R. “Perfect” markers for the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b dwarfing genes in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 1038–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nei, M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 70, 3321–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Brown, L.K.; Wiersma, A.T.; Olson, E.L. Preharvest sprouting and α-amylase activity in soft winter wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 79, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean heading dates of 121 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes grown in 2015–2018 and 32 Korean winter wheat varieties grown in 2017 and 2018 in Wooster, Ohio. x indicates the mean. Means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Mean heading dates of 121 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes grown in 2015–2018 and 32 Korean winter wheat varieties grown in 2017 and 2018 in Wooster, Ohio. x indicates the mean. Means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 03116 g001
Figure 2. Heading dates of 86 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes with different alleles at the Ppd-D1 gene in four crop years. b-Norstar, ‘Norstar’-type sensitive allele. x indicates the mean. Means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Heading dates of 86 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes with different alleles at the Ppd-D1 gene in four crop years. b-Norstar, ‘Norstar’-type sensitive allele. x indicates the mean. Means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 03116 g002
Table 1. Frequency of different alleles at the vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes in 149 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes and 32 Korean winter wheat varieties.
Table 1. Frequency of different alleles at the vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes in 149 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes and 32 Korean winter wheat varieties.
GeneAlleleFrequency (%)
U.S. Soft Winter WheatKorean Winter Wheat
Vrn-A1vrn-A1, CNV a > 294.012.5
vrn-A1, CNV = 21.30.0
vrn-A1, CNV = 10.781.3
heterogeneous4.06.3
Vrn-B1vrn-B1-Neuse96.0100.0
vrn-B1-AGS20000.70.0
null1.30.0
heterogeneous2.00.0
Vrn-D3vrn-D3a10.146.9
vrn-D3b89.953.1
Ppd-A1Ppd-A1a.132.90.0
Ppd-A1b56.4100.0
heterogeneous10.70.0
Ppd-B1Ppd-B1a-Chinese Spring12.86.3
Ppd-B1a-Sonora 646.73.1
Ppd-B1b73.887.5
null5.43.1
heterogeneous1.30.0
Ppd-D1Ppd-D1a59.796.9
Ppd-D1b16.10.0
Ppd-D1b-Norstar12.80.0
heterogeneous11.43.1
Eps-B1TaELF3-B1a92.6100.0
TaELF3-B1b3.40.0
heterogeneous4.00.0
Eps-D1TaELF3-D1a73.2100.0
TaELF3-D1b19.50.0
heterogeneous7.40.0
Rht-B1Rht-B1a63.865.6
Rht-B1b33.631.3
heterogeneous2.73.1
Rht-D1Rht-D1a38.953.1
Rht-D1b56.446.9
heterogeneous4.70.0
a. CNV, copy number variation.
Table 2. Genetic diversity of the vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes in eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes and Korean winter wheat varieties.
Table 2. Genetic diversity of the vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes in eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes and Korean winter wheat varieties.
GeneNei’s Genetic Diversity
U.S. Soft Winter WheatKorean Winter Wheat
Vrn-A10.020.23
Vrn-B10.050.00
Vrn-D30.160.50
Ppd-A10.440.00
Ppd-B10.400.18
Ppd-D10.490.00
Eps-B10.090.00
Eps-D10.310.00
Rht-B10.430.42
Rht-D10.470.50
Table 3. The influence of crop year, and the vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes and their interactions, on the heading date of eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes in four crop years.
Table 3. The influence of crop year, and the vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes and their interactions, on the heading date of eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes in four crop years.
Source of VariationDegrees of FreedomMean SquareProportion of Total
Variance (%)
Proportion of Genetic
Variance (%)
Crop year32119.6 ***87.0
Vrn-A122.50.11.2
Vrn-B120.40.00.2
Vrn-D3130.3 ***0.47.4
Ppd-A1111.7 *0.22.8
Ppd-B1312.2 ***0.58.9
Ppd-D1257.3 ***1.627.8
Eps-B115.80.11.4
Eps-D1115.3 **0.23.7
Rht-B113.50.00.8
Rht-D112.70.00.6
Ppd-A1 * Ppd-B138.1 **0.35.9
Ppd-A1 * Ppd-D1142.9 ***0.610.4
Ppd-B1 * Ppd-D1411.9 ***0.711.6
Ppd-A1 * Ppd-B1 * Ppd-D110.10.00.0
Error2622.07.3
The sum of squares was used to calculate the proportion of total variance contributed by crop years and each gene, and the proportion of genetic variance by each gene. Eighty-six eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes with homozygous alleles at each gene were evaluated for heading date in four crop years and included in the analyses of variation. *** significant at p < 0.001, ** significant at p < 0.01, * significant at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Phenology gene profiles of 86 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes and 30 Korean winter wheat varieties carrying homozygous alleles at the Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1, Vrn-A1 and Vrn-D3 genes sorted by frequency and their heading dates.
Table 4. Phenology gene profiles of 86 eastern U.S. soft winter wheat genotypes and 30 Korean winter wheat varieties carrying homozygous alleles at the Ppd-B1, Ppd-D1, Vrn-A1 and Vrn-D3 genes sorted by frequency and their heading dates.
AlleleFrequency
(%)
Heading Date (Day)
Ppd-B1Ppd-D1vrn-A1
CNV a
vrn-D32015201620172018
U.S. soft winter wheat
ba>2b57.0143140133145
bb>2b9.3144141135146
bb-Nor d>2b7.0144140136147
nulla>2b4.7143140134146
a-S64 ea>2b4.7140139130143
bb>2a3.5141139134144
a-CSa>2b3.5143141133145
a-CS fb-Nor>2b2.3142139134144
bb-Nor>2a2.3142140133144
a-CSb>2a1.2141139130142
a-CSb>2b1.2144141136146
nullb>2b1.2142140133142
nullb-Nor>2b1.2144141135146
bb1a1.2143139135146
LSD (0.05) c4244
Korean winter wheat
ba1a40.0 nd bnd116133
ba1b36.7ndnd117133
ba>2b10.0ndnd118134
a-CSa1b6.7ndnd119135
ba>2a3.3ndnd117132
nulla1a3.3ndnd119135
LSD (0.05) 44
a. CNV, copy number variation. b. nd, not determined. c. LSD, least significant difference (at p < 0.05). d. b-nor, ‘Norstar’-type sensitive allele. e. a-S64, ‘Sonora 64′-type insensitive allele. f. a-CS, ‘Chinese Spring’-type insensitive allele.
Table 5. Populations evaluated for heading date.
Table 5. Populations evaluated for heading date.
PopulationCrop YearGrowing LocationNumber of Entries
Eastern U.S. soft winter wheat a2015Wooster, Ohio125
2016Wooster, Ohio149
2017Wooster, Ohio149
2018Wooster, Ohio138
Korean winter wheat2017Wooster, Ohio32
2018Wooster, Ohio32
a. A total of 121 ESW wheat genotypes were phenotyped for heading date over four consecutive crop years.
Table 6. Alleles of vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes governing the heading date of wheat.
Table 6. Alleles of vernalization (Vrn), photoperiod (Ppd), earliness per se (Eps) and reduced-height (Rht) genes governing the heading date of wheat.
GeneAlleleMarker IDAllele EffectReference
Vrn-A1Vrn-A1awMAS000033spring growth habit[24]
Vrn-A1bwMAS000035spring growth habit[24]
vrn-A1, CNV a > 2vrn-A1exon4winter growth habit, late heading[12]
vrn-A1, CNV = 2vrn-A1exon7winter growth habit, late heading[12]
vrn-A1, CNV = 1vrn-A1exon7winter growth habit, early heading[12]
Vrn-B1Vrn-B1aVrn-B1_I_Dspring growth habit[25]
Vrn-B1bwMAS000037spring growth habit[25]
Vrn-B1cVrn-B1_Cspring growth habit[26]
vrn-B1-NeuseTaVrn-B1_1752winter growth habit, late heading, Neuse-type[20]
vrn-B1-AGS2000TaVrn-B1_1752winter growth habit, early heading, AGS2000-type[20]
Vrn-D3vrn-D3aVRN-D3-F6/VRN-D3-R8winter growth habit with early heading[21]
vrn-D3bVRN-D3-F6/VRN-D3-R8winter growth habit with late heading[21]
Ppd-A1Ppd-A1a.1Ppd-A1prodelphotoperiod insensitive, early heading[14]
Ppd-A1bPpd-A1prodelphotoperiod sensitive, late heading[14]
Ppd-B1Ppd-B1a-Chinese SpringwMAS000027photoperiod insensitive, early heading[12]
Ppd-B1a-Sonora 64TaPpdBJ003photoperiod insensitive, early heading[12]
Ppd-B1bwMAS000027photoperiod sensitive, late heading[12]
Ppd-D1Ppd-D1awMAS000024photoperiod insensitive, early heading[13]
Ppd-D1bwMAS000024photoperiod sensitive, late heading[13]
Ppd-D1b-NorstarTaPpdDD002photoperiod sensitive, late heading[27]
Eps-B1TaELF3-B1aTaELF3-B1 Kasplate heading and flowering[15]
TaELF3-B1bTaELF3-B1 Kaspearly heading and flowering[15]
Eps-D1TaELF3-D1aTaELF3-D1 Kasp2late heading and flowering[15]
TaELF3-D1bTaELF3-D1 Kasp2early heading and flowering[15]
Rht-B1Rht-B1awMAS000001tall[28]
Rht-B1bwMAS000001semi-dwarf[28]
Rht-D1Rht-D1awMAS000002tall[28]
Rht-D1bwMAS000002semi-dwarf[28]
a. CNV, copy number variation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, F.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Kang, M.; Baik, B.-K. Allelic Variations in Phenology Genes of Eastern U.S. Soft Winter and Korean Winter Wheat and Their Associations with Heading Date. Plants 2022, 11, 3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223116

AMA Style

Ma F, Brown-Guedira G, Kang M, Baik B-K. Allelic Variations in Phenology Genes of Eastern U.S. Soft Winter and Korean Winter Wheat and Their Associations with Heading Date. Plants. 2022; 11(22):3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Fengyun, Gina Brown-Guedira, Moonseok Kang, and Byung-Kee Baik. 2022. "Allelic Variations in Phenology Genes of Eastern U.S. Soft Winter and Korean Winter Wheat and Their Associations with Heading Date" Plants 11, no. 22: 3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop