Next Article in Journal
Online Control of Lemna minor L. Phytoremediation: Using pH to Minimize the Nitrogen Outlet Concentration
Previous Article in Journal
Protective Effects of Filtrates and Extracts from Fungal Endophytes on Phytophthora cinnamomi in Lupinus luteus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/plants11111454
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Temperature Alters Leaf Lipid Membrane Composition Associated with Photochemistry of PSII and Membrane Thermostability in Rice Seedlings

by
Paphitchaya Prasertthai
1,2,
Warunya Paethaisong
2,
Piyada Theerakulpisut
2,3 and
Anoma Dongsansuk
1,2,*
1
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Salt Tolerant Rice Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
3
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(11), 1454; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111454
Submission received: 6 May 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 27 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Response to Abiotic Stress and Climate Change)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rice cultivated in the tropics is exposed to high temperature (HT) stress which threatens its growth and survival. This study aimed at characterizing the HT response in terms of PSII efficiency and membrane stability, and to identify leaf fatty acid changes that may be associated with HT tolerance or sensitivity of rice genotypes. Twenty-eight-day-old seedlings of two Thai rice cultivars (CN1 and KDML105), a standard heat tolerance (N22), and a heat sensitive (IR64) rice genotype were treated at 42 °C for 7 days. Under HT, N22 showed the highest heat tolerance displaying the lowest increase in electrolyte leakage (EL), no increments in malondialdehyde (MDA) and stable maximum quantum yield of PSII efficiency (Fv/Fm). Compared to KDML105 and IR64, CN1 was more tolerant of HT, showing a lower increase in EL and MDA, and less reduction in Fv/Fm. N22 and CN1 showed a higher percentage reduction of unsaturated fatty acids (C18:2 and C18:3), which are the major components of the thylakoid membrane, rendering the optimum thylakoid membrane fluidity and intactness of PSII complex. Moreover, they exhibited sharp increases in long-chain fatty acids, particularly C22:1, while the heat sensitive IR64 and KDML105 showed significant reductions. Dramatic increases in long-chain fatty acids may lead to cuticular wax synthesis which provides protective roles for heat tolerance. Thus, the reduction in unsaturated fatty acid composition of the thylakoid membrane and dramatic increases in long-chain fatty acids may lead to high photosynthetic performance and an enhanced synthesis of cuticular wax which further provided additional protective roles for heat tolerance ability in rice.

1. Introduction

High temperature (HT) is one of the main limiting factors in crop growth and development. It leads to morphological, physiological and biochemical changes in crops and restricts crop survival [1] and their productivity by negatively affecting the photosynthetic process [2]. It also causes a loss in membrane integrity [3,4], aging in plant cells, inhibition of plant growth and cell death [5,6]. A temperature greater than 40 °C affects many crops by causing thermal injury, inhibiting photosynthesis and changing protein structure and function such as protein unfolding, denaturation, aggregation and inactivation of enzyme reactions [1]. The first and highly sensitive photosynthetic site which is affected by HT is photosystem II (PSII) [7]. HT affects PSII by significantly decreasing its function. Several aspects of HT effects on PSII have been reported, including the disassociation of the PSII peripheral antenna complex from the core complex, inactivation and disassociation of oxygen-evolving PSII complexes [8,9], and inhibition of electron transport from QA to QB [9,10]. The photosynthetic carbon fixation is disrupted by temperatures above optimum for plant function. This commonly coincides with chlorophyll degradation (caused by reactive oxygen species; ROS) resulting in rapid leaf senescence [11,12].
The cellular membrane is the most sensitive site affected by environmental stimulation [13,14], including HT [9]. HT has been reported to be associated with disrupting cell membranes, breaking down cell compartmentalization [15], leading to solute leakage and affecting cellular functions that cause physiological injuries and leaf senescence [16,17]. The disruption of a cellular membrane by HT is related to the increase in membrane lipid peroxidation, which occurs when double bonds of unsaturated fatty acids are attacked by ROS [18,19].
The fluidity of lipid membrane is important for membrane function that depends on the interaction between lipid and protein compositions. The increase in membrane fluidity resulted from an HT-induced higher degree of lipid unsaturation [20,21]. Thus, to decrease membrane fluidity under HT, lipid unsaturations could be decreased by downregulating the fatty acid desaturase (FAD) gene [22]. Maintaining the optimum composition of unsaturated fatty acids is important in determining cellular membrane fluidity under HT [23]. For heat-tolerant plants under HT, the degree of saturated fatty acids increases in both thylakoid membranes [24] and cellular membranes [25]. This enhances lipid heat stability resulting in thermal tolerance in diverse species [26,27]. Some studies showed that changed lipid saturation was involved in the plant’s ability to tolerate heat. For example, roots of heat-tolerant creeping bentgrass exhibited increased lipid saturation under HT [15]. A heat-tolerant wheat genotype showed higher amounts of saturated lipids and a decrease in the amount of unsaturated lipids [28]. Similarly, Brassica carinata cv. Avanza 641 responded to HT by decreasing the level of unsaturation in membrane lipid, especially in unsaturated linolenic acid (18:3) to maintain optimal membrane fluidity [29]. Moreover, soybean [30] and peanut [31] also responded to HT by decreasing lipid unsaturation levels to maintain membrane fluidity, and the magnitudes of reduction were greater for heat-tolerant than for heat-sensitive genotypes. In contrast, some experiments demonstrated that higher degrees of unsaturated fatty acids can maintain membrane fluidity under HT [32]. For example, tall fescue genotypes that exhibited an increased degree of unsaturated fatty acids showed an improvement in heat tolerance [9].
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important food crop and a living factor for the world population. Especially in Asia, rice is necessary for household consumption, food products and the national economy [33]. Rice can be cultivated and grows well in a wide geographical and climatic range. Elevated temperature can impose adverse effects on rice at different growth stages (such as germination, seedling, tillering, reproductive and grain filling stages) and induce reductions in rice yield [34]. At the flowering stage, HT reduces spikelet fertility by inhibiting anther dehiscence and hence decreasing pollination. Additionally, at panicle initiation (PI), HT causes spikelet degeneration and damages the development of flower organs. The reduction in spikelet fertility can lead to a severe reduction in rice yield [35]. Several reports in rice and other plants showed that HT adversely affected PSII efficiency. A lower maximum quantum yield of PSII efficiency (Fv/Fm) was found in tall fescue grass exposed to 35/30 °C (day/night) for 20 days [36], and in spinach stressed at 50 °C [37]. In rice, significantly reduced Fv/Fm was reported when plants were subjected to heat stress at 40–55 °C for 30 min at seedling [38], 35 and 40 °C at tillering [39], 45 °C for 30 min at heading [40] and 42 °C for 30 min at dough grain stage [41]. The decline in photosynthetic pigments as affected by HT was found in tall fescue grass [36], in seedlings of rice cv. Riceberry [38], and in rice cvs. IR64 and KDML105 at the dough grain stage [41]. Moreover, HT also stimulated lipid peroxidation, resulting in a decline in cellular membrane thermal tolerance [39]. Previous reports in rice showed that HT led to significantly increased lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage [42], in cvs. Dular, IR64 and KDML105 at seedling [43], and in cvs. IR64 and KDML105 at the dough grain stage [41]. HT led to changes in lipid membrane structure and membrane fluidity relating to changes in lipid composition and saturation level [17]. Increased lipid saturation level was reported in creeping bentgrass exposed to high soil temperature (35 °C) [17] or high ambient temperature (35 °C) [15]. In tall fescue turfgrass, increased lipid unsaturation was reported when exposed to HT (40/35 °C, 14/10 h) [9], but in wheat under HT, there was a decline in the degree of lipid unsaturation [28]. Several reports pronounced the alteration of lipid composition upon heat stress such as the increase in degree of saturated fatty acids [15,16,44] or decrease in unsaturated fatty acids [28,44]. Hu et al. [9] proposed that an increase in unsaturated fatty acids enhanced lipid thermostability in a photosynthetic membrane and might contribute to heat tolerance in various species. Therefore, the experimental results inferring the relationship between lipid composition (degree of fatty acid saturation/unsaturation) and heat tolerance in various species are still inconclusive. Thus, this research studied the HT responses of two Thai rice cultivars compared to a standard heat tolerance and a heat-sensitive rice genotype, in terms of physiological parameters and leaf fatty acid composition changes.

2. Results

2.1. PSII Efficiency after High Temperature Exposure

Rice plants of all four cultivars in the control condition had the maximum quantum yield of PSII efficiency in the dark-adapted state (Fv/Fm) values equal to or higher than 0.80, indicating the absence of damage to PSII, with CN1 showing the highest value at 0.822 (Figure 1). However, when subjected to HT stress, Fv/Fm significantly decreased in IR64 (the heat sensitive check), KDML105 and CN1. In contrast, the heat-tolerant genotype (N22) maintained a high Fv/Fm value (approximately 0.806). Heat stressed CN1 still had relatively high Fv/Fm that was slightly higher than N22.

2.2. Leaf Membrane Stability after High Temperature Exposure

All four rice genotypes under the control condition displayed good membrane stability as indicated by low EL values ranging from 3.24% to 4.16% (Figure 2A). When subjected to HT stress, cellular membranes were damaged, and all rice genotypes showed significantly higher EL. The membranes of the heat-sensitive check, IR64, was most seriously damaged, showing a nine-fold increase in EL, while those of N22 showed the highest integrity with only a 7.15% increase in EL. Of the two Thai cultivars, CN1 maintained greater membrane stability with its EL value similar to that of N22. Loss of membrane stability is partly imposed by peroxidation of membrane lipids, which can be indicated by malondialdehyde content. In the non-stress plants, leaf MDA contents in the four rice genotypes were in the range of 19.19 to 20.63 g gFW−1 (Figure 2B), with KDML105 having slightly higher values than others. HT stress resulted in significantly increased MDA contents in CN1, KDML105 and IR64. In contrast, MDA content of N22 was significantly lower than the control. The highest degree of increment in MDA content was found in KDML105 (65.92% increase), followed by IR64 (37.22% increase) and CN1 (21.95% increase).

2.3. Alteration of Leaf Total Fatty Acids after High Temperature Exposure

Total fatty acids in seedlings of all four rice cultivars after an exposure to HT sharply reduced by 1.4–2.0-fold compared to the controls (Figure 3). Significant differences in total fatty acids were noted among genotypes. The highest total fatty acid content was found in CN1 for both the non-stress (10.769 µg µL−1) and HT-stressed (7.608 µg µL−1) plants. The HT-stressed plants of N22, KDML105 and IR 64 had similar contents of total fatty acids, varying from 3.89 to 7.61 µg µL−1. The highest percentage reduction in total fatty acids after HT exposure was found in KDML105 at 50.94% and the lowest in CN1 (29.35%).
Total fatty acid was typically composed of total saturated and total unsaturated fatty acid as shown in Figure 4. Total saturated fatty acid contents in seedlings of all rice cultivars were significantly lower than total unsaturated fatty acids. Only N22 and KDML105 showed slightly significant reductions in total saturated fatty acid contents after exposure to HT. The highest and the lowest total saturated fatty acid contents after HT treatment were found in CN1 (1.606 µg µL−1) and KDML105 (0.995 µg µL−1), respectively. In contrast, unsaturated fatty acid contents in all rice cultivars were markedly reduced compared to the controls. KDML105 showed the sharpest decline in total unsaturated fatty acids (2.6-fold reduction from the control), and the amount under HT was lowest in this cultivar. Conversely, the lowest reduction in total unsaturated fatty acid under HT was found in CN1.

2.4. Alteration of Leaf Saturated Fatty Acid Composition after High Temperature Exposure

A total of nine saturated fatty acids were identified from rice seedlings, and the content of each acid under the control and HT treatment are displayed in Table 1. Eight saturated fatty acids, namely lauric acid (C12:0), myristic acid (C14:0), pentadecanoic acid (C15:0), palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), arachidic acid (C20:0), behenic acid (C22:0) and lignoceric acid (24:0), were found in seedlings of all four rice cultivars in both control and HT conditions. Only one saturated fatty acid, namely capric acid (C10:0), was found only in Thai rice, CN1 and KDML105. Moreover, capric acid contents in HT-stressed CN1 and KDML105 exhibited significant increments. Palmitic acid (C16:0) was found in the greatest amount under both control and HT conditions. Palmitic acid and stearic acid markedly decreased with HT in all cultivars. Three saturated fatty acids including arachidic acid, behenic acid, and lignoceric acid in N22, CN1 and IR64 were significantly increased after HT treatment, but in KDML105, the contents of these acids declined significantly.

2.5. Alteration of Leaf Unsaturated Fatty Acid Composition after High Temperature Exposure

A total of nine unsaturated fatty acids were identified, and the contents under the control and HT treatment are shown in Table 2. Six-unsaturated fatty acids including linoleic acid (C18:2), γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3n6), linolenic acid (C18:3), cis-5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5), oleic acid (C18:1) and erucic acid (C22:1) were found in seedlings of all four rice cultivars under both conditions. Cis-11,14-eicosadienoic acid (C20:2) which was present in the non-stress seedlings of all cultivars completely disappeared from all HT-stressed seedlings. In the control seedlings, this acid was found in slightly greater amounts in the Thai rice, CN1 and KDML105. In the non-stress plants, palmitoleic acid (C16:1) was present in N22 and IR64 but absent from CN1 and KDML105. Upon HT stress, the content of this acid significantly increased in all cultivars. The content of palmitoleic acid in the HT plants of CN1 and KDML105 was present several folds higher than those in N22 and IR64.
Changes in mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids are shown in Figure 5. Monounsaturated fatty acids in all rice cultivars were several folds lower than polyunsaturated fatty acids. Upon HT exposure, monounsaturated fatty acids significantly increased in N22 and IR64, but significantly decreased in Thai rice, CN1. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in seedlings of all rice cultivars markedly decreased under HT. Thai rice, CN1 exhibited the highest level of polyunsaturated fatty acid compared to other cultivars in both control and HT.

2.6. Alteration of Leaf Ratio of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acids after High Temperature Exposure

The highest Sat:Unsat under both control and HT condition were found in KDML105 (Table 3). Sharp increases in Sat:Unsat after exposure to HT occurred in all rice cultivars in the range between 1.5–1.8-fold compared to the controls. The highest increase in Sat:Unsat was found in N22, and the lowest increase was found in CN1.

3. Discussion

High temperature (HT) is harmful to plant growth and survival. It decreases photosynthetic efficiency and yield [28]. HT can induce excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, resulting in cellular membrane injury, impaired photosynthetic mechanism and oxygen evolving complex associated with PSII, and inhibition of protein synthesis [45]. Plants can adapt to HT by changing the morphology and altering metabolism via signal transduction [9]. The chloroplast photosynthetic function is supposed to be the most HT-sensitive cellular function, and PSII is one of the most sensitive to HT [9,46]. In this study, PSII efficiency was determined by measuring the maximum quantum yield in the dark-adapted stage (Fv/Fm), which decreased significantly after exposure to HT in CN1, KDML105 and IR64 but remained unchanged in the heat-tolerant genotype, N22 (Figure 1). Heat-induced reduction in Fv/Fm resulted from an increase in minimum fluorescence in the dark-adapted state (F0) which indicated the inhibition of electron transport and a reduction in maximum fluorescence in the dark-adapted state (Fm) that is caused by a dissociation of peripheral antenna complex of PSII from its core complex [47]. Similarly, Dongsansuk et al. [40] reported that Fv/Fm significantly reduced in the heat-sensitive rice PT60 but was stable in Dular after exposure to 45 °C for 30 min. Dular is known to be a heat-tolerant rice variety comparable to N22 [48]. However, Sailaja et al. [49] stated that in response to heat stress, Fv/Fm in N22 was stable at the reproductive stage but reduced at the vegetative stage. This indicated that the ability to maintain PSII efficiency varies with developmental stage. However, Thai rice cv. CN1 showed the highest Fv/Fm level, although its Fv/Fm declined after HT exposure (Figure 1).
The cellular membrane is the most sensitive structure to be affected by HT [9,28]. The thylakoid membrane, where the photosynthetic light reaction occurs, is also highly thermal sensitive [50]. HT can induce an increase in membrane fluidity and oxidative burst, leading to lipid peroxidation resulting in malondialdehyde production (MDA) [28] and other changes in lipid membrane structure, which cause membrane injury, electrolyte leakage (EL) and cell death. MDA content and EL are sufficient indicators of membrane thermostability, and they can be considered directly related to the degree of plant damage by HT [9]. In this study, CN1 and N22 exhibited slightly decreased membrane thermostability, as indicated by a small increase in EL and MDA content (Figure 2), but IR64 and aromatic Thai rice KDML105 displayed a sharp increase in EL and MDA content under HT (Figure 2). Pansarakham et al. [41] previously reported that MDA and EL of rice cvs. IR64, KDML105, and PTT1 significantly increased after an exposure to 42 °C for 7 days while those of Dular and N22 remained unchanged. This suggested that HT caused a reduction in membrane thermostability in IR64 and KDML105 and resulted in markedly decreased photosynthetic efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) (Figure 1). Thylakoid membrane is the site where light harvesting pigments, PSII, PSI and electron carrier proteins are embedded. Thus, the thylakoid membrane-increased fluidity due to HT resulted in weakness in the bonding between lipid and electron carrier protein molecules [51]. Consequently, the light reaction taking place in the thylakoid membrane was inhibited, resulting in a reduction in the efficiency of the PSII photochemistry as seen in IR64 and KDML105 (Figure 1).
Plant lipids are crucial structural and functional biomolecules found in cell membranes, mitochondria membranes, tonoplasts, chloroplast membranes and other cellular structures. Extracellular lipids are also present in large amounts as components of cutin, suberin and waxes [52]. Diverse plant lipids consist of polyunsaturated fatty acids, mainly linoleic acid (C18:2) and linolenic acid (C18:3), monounsaturated fatty acids, mainly oleic acid (C18:1) and saturated fatty acids, mainly palmitic acid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0) [53]. An insight into the relationship between the observed physiological parameters under HT and alterations in leaf fatty acid content and composition was manifested in this study. Under HT, total fatty acid content decreased in all rice cultivars (Figure 3, Table 1). A comparison between the two Thai rice cultivars revealed that under HT, CN1 showed the lowest reduction compared to the control and contained the highest total fatty acid content, but KDML105 showed the highest reduction and the lowest amount of total fatty acids (Figure 3, Table 1). This suggested that HT significantly changed total leaf fatty acids, and different genotypes were affected to different degrees. The thylakoid membrane is reported to be the most sensitive site severely damaged by heat stress and the degree of damage is related to plant survival [54]. The major types of lipids in the thylakoid membrane are galactolipids (monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, MGDG and digalactosyldiacylglycerol, DGDG), sulfolipids (sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol, SQDG), and phospholipids (phosphatidylglycerol, PG). Of all lipids in thylakoids, MGDG and DGDG can reach 52% and 26%, respectively [55]. The ratio of MGDG to DGDG can indicate the photosynthetic membrane stability [56]. The major types of fatty acids that constitute lipids (MGDG, DGDG, SQDG and PG) in the plant thylakoid membrane are palmitic acid (C16:0) [51,57], palmitoleic acid (C16:1) [57], roughanic acid (C16:3) [51,58], oleic acid (C18:1) [57], linoleic acid (C18:2) [59], and linolenic acid (C18:3) [51,57,59]. Unsaturated fatty acids constitute 75% of total fatty acids in the thylakoid membrane, while the saturated fatty acid composition was approximately 25% [60]. The total saturated fatty acid content under HT remained unchanged in CN1 but significantly declined in KDML105 (Figure 4, Table 1). CN1 also contained the highest, and KDML105 the lowest amount of saturated fatty acids under HT. This suggested that, in CN1, lipid saturation level was well maintained under HT when associated with lower lipid peroxidation, a smaller increase in membrane fluidity, and lower EL (Figure 2). A higher lipid saturation level is also associated with greater membrane stability and higher efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Figure 1). In contrast, a decreased lipid saturation level in KDML105 led to lower membrane stability, hence more solute leakage (Figure 2), and dissociation of the photosystem and electron transport components, leading to a significant decline in PSII efficiency (Figure 1). Total unsaturated fatty acids decreased in all rice cultivars under HT. A lower content of unsaturated fatty acids, namely linolenic acid (C18:2), γ-linolenic acid (C18:3n6) and linolenic acid (C18:3), which are major components of the thylakoid membrane, helped maintain optimal fluidity and prevent the lipid peroxidation process, which predominantly attacks double bonds [17,18]. Moreover, the percentages of reduction in unsaturated fatty acids were greater than those in saturated fatty acids, resulting in an increased ratio between saturated:unsaturated fatty acids (Table 2 and Table 3 and Figure 4). The highest percent increase in the ratio between saturated:unsaturated fatty acids in N22 could be related to its highest thermotolerance, as indicated by the unchanged Fv/Fm (Figure 1), lowest lipid peroxidation and EL (Figure 2). Among cultivars, N22 showed the highest percentage reductions in major unsaturated fatty acids which constitute the thylakoid membrane (54% and 58% reduction in linolenic acid and linoleic acid, respectively). A decrease in unsaturation or increase in saturation of fatty acids in membrane lipids was known to help maintain appropriate membrane fluidity at high temperature [9]. Similar to our results, HT treatment in Brassica carinata resulted in remodelling of leaf lipidome manifested by decreases in unsaturated levels of membrane lipids, especially C18:3, and increases in saturated fatty acids such as C16:0 [29]. These authors proposed that plants can modulate the level of unsaturation of membrane lipids by decreasing the activity of FAD3, FAD7 and FAD8, which catalyse the formation of C18:3, or by increasing the activity of FAD2 and fatty acid synthase (FAS), which catalyse the formation of C18:2 or C16:0, respectively. The time of exposure and the level of temperature elicited different responses in relation to fatty acid changes, which varies depending on plant species. In contrast to this study, Wang et al. [61] reported that for temperate species such as Arabidopsis, heat shock at 38 °C for 6 h did not induce any changes in unsaturated fatty acids but prolonged treatment at warm temperature (28 °C, 7 d), resulting in an enrichment of these acids to achieve an optimum level of membrane fluidity.
Most previous studies focused on the changes in lipid composition of isolated thylakoid membranes under heat stress. Our study analysed fatty acid compositions of the whole leaf; therefore, many fatty acids not previously reported in heat-stress studies were identified and displayed some interesting patterns of responses. Among saturated fatty acids, arachidic acid (C20:0), behenic acid (C22:0) and lignoceric acid (24:0) (Table 1) sharply increased in N22, CN1 and IR64, while these acids significantly reduced in KDML105. In addition, erucic acid (C22:3), a long-chain unsaturated fatty acid, increased in response to HT in N22 and CN1, but significantly reduced in KDML105 and IR64 (Table 2). Long chain fatty acids (C20 to C36) are known to be precursors for cuticular wax synthesis [62]. A significant increase in long-chain fatty acids could be related to enhanced synthesis of cuticular wax and hence thicker cuticles in these cultivars. Thicker cuticles could help reduce excessive transpirational water loss during HT stress and increase light dispersion [63]; therefore, alleviated cellular damage was evidenced by lower EL and higher Fv/Fm, particularly in N22 and CN1, compared to those of KDML105. Although IR64 showed significant increases in the saturated long-chain fatty acids, its proposed enhanced cuticular wax synthesis might be offset by its weaker antioxidant systems as evidenced by high MDA content, leading to higher ROS-induced cellular damage. Moreover, saturated fatty acid, namely capric acid (C10:0), under HT and control was found in Thai rice, CN1 and KDML105. In particular, KDML105 showed the highest capric acid content, and it increased significantly after exposure to HT (Figure 5, Table 2). Capric acid (C10:0) was not found in N22 and IR64. Capric acid (C10:0) occurs in coconut oil, and it is used as an aromatic chemical in the manufacture of perfumes. This suggested that Thai rice, CN1 and KDML105, especially KDML105 or Thai Jasmine rice, is an aromatic rice and has volatile aromatic compounds that make the aroma and flavour in the rice. Thus, capric acid (C10:0) in Thai rice may involve aroma and flavour, not only 2AP.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Temperature Condition

Four rice cultivars, namely N22 (heat tolerant rice; [48]), CN1 (Thai rice growing in the central region of Thailand), KDML105 (aromatic Thai rice) and IR64 (heat sensitive rice; [64]) were used as plant materials. Rice seeds were sterilized by soaking in 70% ethanol, followed by 10% Clorox and rinsing three times in tap water. Sterilized seeds were soaked in tap water for 24 h and then germinated on wet filter paper for 7 days. Fifty seedlings were transplanted in a pot size of 12.5 L with 4 pots in each treatment. After they were grown for 28 days in a greenhouse (at Agronomy station, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, 16°28′14.6208″ N 102°48′41.3532″ E), seedlings were transferred to a temperature chamber for high temperature (HT) treatment at 42 °C/27 °C (day/night) for 7 days (Table 4 and Table 5) or remained in the greenhouse for control. Climate conditions in the greenhouse were observed during March–December 2019 with average air temperature at 35 °C, relative humidity at 89% and average daily PAR in the range of 1064–1145 µmol m−2 s−1. After 7 days of temperature treatment, maximum quantum yield of PSII efficiency (Fv/Fm) of seedlings was determined. Leaf samples were collected and immediately investigated for electrolyte leakage (EL). Other leaf samples were kept frozen at −20 °C for the determination of malondialdehyde (MDA) and fatty acid.

4.2. Determination of Photosynthetic Efficiency of PSII

Photosynthetic efficiency of PSII was determined by measuring maximum quantum yield of PSII efficiency in the dark-adapted state (Fv/Fm; (1)), minimal fluorescence in the dark-adapted state (F0) and maximal fluorescence in the dark-adapted state (Fm) using a chlorophyll fluorometer (Mini PAM, Walze, Effeltrich, Germany). The maximum quantum yield of PSII efficiency (Fv∕Fm) was calculated as described by Schreiber [65] as follows (1):
Fv∕Fm = (Fm − F0)∕Fm

4.3. Determination of Electrolyte Leakage

The electrolyte leakage (EL) was determined according to Bajji et al. [66] with some modifications. Fresh leaves (0.1 g) were placed in a test tube containing 10 mL of deionized water (DI water) and incubated in a water bath (Stirrer Digital Bath, Clifton, Nickel-Electro Co., Ltd., North Somerset, England) at 32 °C for 2 h. The electrical conductivity of the bathing solution was then measured using an EC meter (Five easy™ plus FEP30, Mettler-Toledo AG, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland) and recorded as EC1. After that, the tubes were autoclaved (Tomy Model ES-315, Tomy Seiko Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 15 PSI, 121 °C for 15 min. The samples were cooled, and the final electrical conductivity (EC2) was recorded. The unit of EL was expressed in % as follows (2):
EL (%) = (EC1/EC2) × 100

4.4. Determination of Malondialdehyde Contents

Malondialdehyde (MDA) contents were determined by a modified method of Heath and Packer [67]. Fresh leaves (0.1 g) were placed in 15 mL test tubes and added with 1.4 mL of distilled water. Then, 1.5 mL of 0.5% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added and mixed. The solution was incubated in a water bath (Stirrer Digital Bath, Clifton, Nickel-Electro Co., Ltd., England) at 100 °C for 25 min. The reaction was stopped by cooling down on ice for 5 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was taken at 532 and 600 nm in a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Spectrophotometer Model i3, Jinan Hanon Instruments Co., Ltd., Shandong, China). The MDA content was calculated according to (3) and expressed as mg gFW−1 (3).
MDA contents (mg gFW−1) = (OD532 − OD600)/155
where 155 mM−1 cm−1 is the extinction coefficient of the MDA at a wavelength of 532 nm.

4.5. Determination of Fatty Acid

Lipid extraction was modified according to Folch et al. [68]. Leaf samples (50 g) were placed in a beaker and 90 mL of chloroform:methanol (2:2 V/V) added. Samples were homogenized and filtered using a vacuum pump filter. The extracted solution was added with 30 mL of chloroform, 30 mL RO water and 50 mL of 0.58% NaCl and was shaken for separating the lipid layer. The lipid layer was placed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask and lipid was extracted one more time. All extracted lipid was added to Na2SO4 for dehydration and filtered by filter paper no. 1. The solvent was evaporated from lipid extraction until it disappeared completely by Rotary evaporator. Lipid extraction was blown by N2 gas until the lipid weight was stable.
Fatty acid contents were determined according to Metcalfe et al. [69]. Lipid-extracted solution was weighed (30 mg) and placed in a test tube. Then, 1.5 mL of 0.5 M Methanolic NaOH was added and boiled in a water bath at 80–90 °C for 2 min. The solution was shaken for breaking the lipid and then cooled at room temperature. Then, 1 mL of internal standard C17 and 2 mL of BF3 were added and boiled in the water bath at 80–90 °C for 30 min. Next, 1 mL of Isooctane and 5 mL of 36% NaCl were added and mixed by vortex. Supernatant was sucked and then placed into a test tube. Solvent in the supernatant was evaporated by blowing with N2 gas. This supernatant was diluted by 1 mL Isooctane, and fatty acids were analysed by gas chromatography (GC) (Agilent 7890a, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA)

4.6. Statistical Analysis

This research experiment was designed in completely randomized design (CRD) with 4 replications. The difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar was determined by independent-samples t test, and comparison of different rice cultivars in control or HT was analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range tests (DMRT). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 17.0.

5. Conclusions

HT caused differential alterations in fatty acid profiles, especially those comprising the thylakoid membrane in rice cultivars differing in heat tolerance. In the case of N22 and CN1, their leaves slightly decreased the degree of lipid thylakoid membrane composition in the amount of palmitic acid (C16:0), linolenic acid (C18:2), γ-linolenic acid (C18:3n6) and linolenic acid (C18:3) and increased the amount of palmitoleic acid (C16:1). The greater reduction in unsaturated fatty acids under HT, especially in N22, was related to maintenance of optimum thylakoid membrane fluidity and increased membrane stability. Moreover, in N22 and CN1, long-chain fatty acids, which serve as precursors of cuticular wax synthesis, namely arachidic acid (C20:0), behenic acid (C22:0), lignoceric acid (24:0) and erucic acid (C22:1), also increased. These long-chain fatty acids may contribute to increased thickness of the cuticle, which helps prevent excessive water loss and reflects strong light, resulting in lower HT-induced damage. Better maintenance of membrane thermostability and thicker cuticles in heat-tolerant genotypes lead to less electrolyte leakage, lower lipid peroxidation and stable Fv/Fm compared to the more sensitive genotypes. Thus, this study suggested that there may be some relationships between the lipid composition of the thylakoid membrane and cuticle characteristics in a rice leaf, and their ability to tolerate HT. From this study, changes in leaf fatty acid compositions can potentially be used as indicators for heat tolerance in rice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.D.; determination, P.P.; formal analysis, P.P., W.P. and A.D.; writing—original draft, P.P. and W.P.; writing—review and editing, A.D. and P.T.; supervision, A.D.; funding acquisition, A.D. and P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the research funding year 2019 from the Research and Technology Transfer Affairs, Khon Kaen University (project no. I62-00-27-13) and the Salt Tolerant Rice Research Group, Khon Kaen University. A grant from the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) through the Senior Research Scholar Project of Piyada Theerakulpisut (project no. NRCT813/2563) was also acknowledged for this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University for supporting scientific instruments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this research study, such as determination, data analysis, data interpretation, writing the manuscript or decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ashraf, M.; Hafeez, M. Thermotolerance of pearl millet and maize at early growth stages. Biol. Plant. 2004, 48, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Song, Y.; Chen, Q.; Ci, D.; Shao, X.; Zhang, D. Effects of high temperature on photosynthesis and related gene expression in poplar. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bita, C.E.; Gerats, T. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, F.; Dong, G.; Wang, F.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ruan, B.; Wu, Y.; Feng, X.; Zhao, C.; et al. A β-ketoacyl carrier protein reductase confers heat tolerance via the regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis and stress signaling in rice. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 655–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mostofa, M.G.; Yoshida, N.; Fujita, M. Spermidine pretreatment enhances heat tolerance in rice seedlings through modulating antioxidative and glyoxalase systems. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 73, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.; Hu, T.; Amombo, E.; Wang, G.; Xie, Y.; Fu, J. The Alleviation of Heat Damage to Photosystem II and Enzymatic Antioxidants by Exogenous Spermidine in Tall Fescue. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mathur, S.; Agrawal, D.; Jajoo, A. Photosynthesis: Response to high temperature stress. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2014, 137, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Busheva, M.; Tzonova, I.; Stoitchkova, K.; Andreeva, A. Heat-induced reorganization of the structure of photosystem ii membranes: Role of oxygen evolving complex. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2012, 117, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, L.; Bi, A.; Hu, Z.; Amombo, E.; Li, H.; Fu, J. Antioxidant metabolism, photosystem ii, and fatty acid composition of two tall fescue genotypes with different heat tolerance under high temperature stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Liu, D.; Zhao, S.; Gao, R.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, C.; Liu, Y. Response of plants photosynthesis to higher temperature. Bull. Bot. Res. Harbin 2002, 22, 205–212. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jajic, I.; Sarna, T.; Strzalka, K. Senescence, stress, and reactive oxygen species. Plants 2015, 4, 393–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ferguson, J.; Ausland, M.L.; Smith, K.E.; Price, A.H.; Wilson, Z.A.; Murchie, E.H. Rapid temperature responses of photosystem II efficiency forecast genotypic variation in rice vegetative heat tolerance. Plant J. 2020, 104, 839–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Glatz, A.; Vass, I.; Los, D.A.; Vígh, L. The Synechocystis model of stress: From molecular chaperones to membranes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1999, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saidi, Y.; Finka, A.; Muriset, M.; Bromberg, Z.; Weiss, Y.G.; Maathuis, F.J.; Goloubinoff, P. The heat shock response in moss plants is regulated by specific calcium-permeable channels in the plasma membrane. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2829–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Larkindale, J.; Huang, B. Changes of lipid composition and saturation level in leaves and roots for heat-stressed and heat-acclimated creeping bentgrass (Agrotis stolonifera). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2004, 51, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marcum, K.B. Cell membrane thermostability and whole plant heat tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Sci. 1998, 38, 1214–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, X.; Huang, B. Changes in fatty acid composition and saturation in leaves and roots of creeping bentgrass exposed to high soil temperature. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2004, 129, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Smirnoff, N. The role of active oxygen in the responses of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol. 1993, 125, 27–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Foyer, C.H.; Descourvieres, P.; Kunert, K.J. Photooxidative stress in plants. Physiol. Plant. 1994, 92, 696–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fan, W.; Evans, R.M. 2015. Turning Up the Heat on Membrane Fluidity. Cell 2015, 161, 962–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, Y.N.; Zhang, T.J.; Lu, X.X.; Ma, B.L.; Ren, A.; Shi, L.; Jiang, A.L.; Yu, H.S.; Zhao, M.W. Membrane fluidity is involved in the regulation of heat stress induced secondary metabolism in Ganoderma lucidum. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 1653–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Holthuis, J.C.M.; Menon, A.K. Lipid landscapes and pipelines in membrane homeostasis. Nature 2014, 510, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ma, D.K.K.; Li, Z.J.; Lu, A.Y.; Sun, F.; Chen, S.D.; Rothe, M.; Menze, R.; Sun, F.; Horvitz, H.R. Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase drives heat adaptation by sequestering fatty acids. Cell 2015, 161, 1152–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Vigh, L.; Gombos, Z.; Horvath, I.; Joo, F. Saturation of membrane lipids by hydrogenation induces thermal stability in chloroplast inhibiting the heat dependent stimulation of Photosystem I mediated electron transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989, 979, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vigh, L.; Los, D.A.; Horvath, I.; Murata, N. The primary signal in the biological perception of temperature: Pd catalysed hydrogenation of the membrane lipids stimulated the expression of the desA gene in Synecchocystis PC6803. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 9090–9094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Horvath, I.; Glatz, A.; Varvasovszki, V.; Zsolt, T.; Pali, T.; Balogh, G.; Kovacs, E.; Nadasdi, L.; Benko, S.; Joo, F.; et al. Membrane physical state controls the signalling mechanism of the heat shock response in Syneschocystis PCC 6803: Identification of HSP17 as a fluidity gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 3513–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Grove, A.; Agarwal, M.; Katiyar-Argarwal, S.; Sahi, C.; Argarwal, S. Production of high temperature tolerant transgenic plant through manipulation of membrane lipids. Curr. Sci. 2000, 79, 557–559. [Google Scholar]
  28. Narayanan, S.; Tamura, P.J.; Roth, M.R.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Welti, R. Wheat leaf lipids during heat stress: I. high day and high temperatures result in major lipid alterations. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 787–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zoong Lwe, Z.; Sah, S.; Persaud, L.; Li, J.; Gao, W.; Reddy, K.R.; Narayanan, S. Alterations in the leaf lipidome of Brassica carinata under high-temperature stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 404. [Google Scholar]
  30. Narayanan, S.; Zoong-Lwe, Z.S.; Gandhi, N.; Welti, R.; Fallen, B.; Smith, J.R.; Rustgi, S. Comparative lipidomic analysis reveals heat stress responses of two soybean genotypes differing in temperature sensitivity. Plants 2020, 9, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zoong Lwe, Z.S.; Welti, R.; Anco, D.; Naveed, S.; Rustgi, S.; Narayanan, S. Heat stress elicits remodeling in the anther lipidome of peanut. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 22163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Peng, Y.; Huang, B.R.; Li-Xin, X.U.; And, L.I. Heat stress effects on osmotic potential, membrane fatty acid composition and lipid peroxidation content of two kentucky bluegrass cultivars differing in drought tolerance. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2013, 40, 971–980. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoshida, H.; Tanigawa, T.; Kuriyama, I.; Yoshida, N.; Tomiyama, Y.; Mizushina, Y. Variation in Fatty Acid Distribution of Different Acyl Lipids in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Brans. Nutrients 2011, 3, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Dubey, A.N.; Verma, S.; Goswami, S.P.; Devedee, A.K. Effect of temperature on different growth stages and physiological process of rice crop- as a review. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2018, 7, 162–169. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, J.; Hu, S.; Chen, H.; Xiang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Shi, Q.; Zhu, D.; et al. Research progress on heat stress of rice at flowering stage. Rice Sci. 2019, 26, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cui, L.J.; Li, J.L.; Fan, Y.M.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Z. High temperature effects on photosynthesis, PSII functionality and antioxidant activity of two Festuca arundinacea cultivars with different heat susceptibility. Bot. Stud. 2006, 47, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang, Y.; Wen, X.; Lu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Lu, C. Heat stress induces an aggregation of the light-harvesting complex of photosystem II in Spinach plants. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Paethaisong, W.; Lontom, W.; Dondsansuk, A. Impact of short-term exposure to elevated temperatures on physiology of Thai rice (cv. Riceberry). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 346, 012083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sánchez-Reinoso, A.D.; Garcés-Varón, G.; Restrepo-Díaz, H. Biochemical and physiological characterization of three rice cultivars under different daytime temperature conditions. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2014, 74, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dongsansuk, A.; Theerakulpisut, P.; Pongdontri, P. Short-term heat exposure effect on PSII efficiency and growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2017, 40, 621–628. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pansarakham, P.; Pongdontri, P.; Theerakulpisut, P.; Dongsansuk, A. Effect of short-term heat exposure on physiological traits of rice indica at grain-filling stage. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Borriboon, W.; Lontom, W.; Pongdontri, P.; Theerakulpisut, P.; Dongsansuk, A. Effects of Short- and Long-Term Temperature on Seed Germination. Oxidative Stress and Membrane Stability of Three Rice Cultivars (Dular, KDML105 and Riceberry). Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2018, 41, 151–162. [Google Scholar]
  43. Dongsansuk, A.; Paethaisong, W.; Theerakulpisut, P. Membrane stability and antioxidant enzyme activity of rice seedlings in response to short-term high temperature treatments. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2021, 81, 607–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pearcy, R.W. Effect of growth temperature on the fatty acid composition of the leaf lipids in Atriplex lentiformis (Torr.) Wats. Plant Physiol. 1978, 61, 484–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wahid, A.; Close, T.J. Expression of dehydrins under heat stress and their relationship with water relations of sugarcane leaves. Biol. Plant. 2007, 51, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mathur, S.; Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Jajoo, A. Analysis of high temperature stress on the dynamics of antenna size and reducing side heterogeneity of Photosystem II in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1807, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dongsansuk, A.; Neuner, G. Temperature optimum, stress temperature range and thermal limits of quantum yeid of PSII in tropical versus temperate plants. 2013. Trends Photochem. Photobiol. 2013, 15, 77–87. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lang, N.T.; Ha, P.T.T.; Tru, P.C.; Toam, T.B.; Buu, B.C.; Cho, Y.C. Breeding for heat tolerance rice based on marker-assisted backcrossing in Vietnam. Plant Breed. Biotech. 2015, 3, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Sailaja, B.; Subrahmanyam, D.; Neelamraju, S.; Vishnukiran, T.; Roa, Y.V.; Vijayalakshmi, P.; Voleti, S.R.; Bhadana, V.P.; Mangrauthia, S.K. Integrated Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Analysis Identifies Important Traits and Mechanisms Associated with Differential Response of Rice Genotypes to Elevated Temperature. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sharkey, T.D. Effects of moderate heat stress on photosynthesis: Importance of thylakoid reactions, rubisco deactivation, reactive oxygen species and thermotolerance provided by isoprene. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yamamoto, Y. Quality control of photosystem ii: The mechanisms for avoidance and tolerance of light and heat stresses are closely linked to membrane fluidity of the thylakoids. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Suh, M.C.; Hahne, G.; Liu, J.R.; Stewart, C.N., Jr. Plant lipid biology and biotechnology. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 517–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Janila, P.; Pandey, M.K.; Shasidhar, Y.; Variath, M.T.; Sriswathi, M.; Khera, P.; Manohar, S.S.; Nagesh, P.; Vishwakarma, M.K.; Mishra, G.P.; et al. Molecular breeding for introgression of fatty acid desaturase mutant alleles (ahFAD2A and ahFAD2B) enhances oil quality in high and low oil containing peanut genotypes. Plant Sci. 2016, 242, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hu, S.; Ding, Y.; Zhu, C. Sensitivity and responses of chloroplasts to heat stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Kobayashi, K.; Endo, K.; Wada, H. Specific distribution of phosphatidylglycerol to photosystem complexes in the thylakoid membrane. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hernández, M.L.; Cejudo, F.J. Chloroplast lipids metabolism and function. a redox perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 712022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van Eerden, F.J.; de Jong, D.H.; de Vries, A.H.; Wassenaar, T.A.; Marrink, S.J. Characterization of thylakoid lipid membranes from cyanobacteria and higher plants by molecular dynamics simulations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1848, 1319–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Mongrand, S.; Bessoule, J.-J.; Cabantous, F.; Cassagne, C. The C16:3\C18:3 fatty acid balance in photosynthetic tissues from 468 plant species. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1049–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chapman, D.J.; De-Felice, J.; Barber, J. Growth Temperature Effects on Thylakoid Membrane Lipid and Protein Content of Pea Chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Popov, V.N.; Antipina, O.V.; Pchelkin, V.P.; Tsydendambaev, V.D. Changes in Fatty Acid Composition of lipids in chloroplast membranes of tobacco plants during cold hardening. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 64, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, L.; Ma, K.B.; Lu, Z.G.; Ren, S.X.; Jiang, H.R.; Cui, J.W.; Chen, G.; Teng, N.J.; Lam, H.M.; Jin, B. Differential physiological, transcriptomic and metabolomic responses of Arabidopsis leaves under prolonged warming and heat shock. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jetter, R.; Kunst, L.; Samuels, A.L. Composition of plant cuticular waxes. In Biology of the Plant Cuticle; Riederer, M., Müller, C., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 145–181. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yeats, T.H.; Rose, J.K.C. The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Coast, O.; Murdoch, A.J.; Ellis, R.H.; Hay, F.R.; Jagadish, K.S.V. Resilience of rice (Oryza spp.) pollen germination and tube growth to temperature stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Schreiber, U. Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation (PAM) Fluorometry and Saturation Pulse Method: An Overview; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 279–319. [Google Scholar]
  66. Bajji, M.; Lutts, S.; Kinet, J.M. The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 36, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Sloane, S.G.H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Metcalfe, L.D.; Schmitz, A.A.; Pelka, J.R. Rapid preparation of fatty acid esters from lipids gas chromatographic analysis. Anal. Chem. 1996, 38, 514–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 01454 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of HT on Fv/Fm in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar presents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Figure 1. Effect of HT on Fv/Fm in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar presents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Plants 11 01454 g001
Plants 11 01454 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of HT on electrolyte leakage (A) and lipid peroxidation (B) in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Figure 2. Effect of HT on electrolyte leakage (A) and lipid peroxidation (B) in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Plants 11 01454 g002
Plants 11 01454 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of HT on total fatty acids in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Figure 3. Effect of HT on total fatty acids in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Plants 11 01454 g003
Plants 11 01454 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of HT on total saturated and total unsaturated fatty acids in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4), and different small letters indicate significant difference in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Figure 4. Effect of HT on total saturated and total unsaturated fatty acids in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4), and different small letters indicate significant difference in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Plants 11 01454 g004
Plants 11 01454 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of HT on mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in mono- or poly unsaturated fatty acid and in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Figure 5. Effect of HT on mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids in four rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64). Each bar represents mean ± SE (n = 3–4). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in mono- or poly unsaturated fatty acid and in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Plants 11 01454 g005
Table
Table 1. Saturated fatty acids in the control and HT-stressed leaves of four rice cultivars.
Table 1. Saturated fatty acids in the control and HT-stressed leaves of four rice cultivars.
Saturated Fatty Acids
(µg µL−1)		N22CN1KDML105IR64
ControlHTControlHTControlHTControlHT
Capric acid (C10:0)0.000f0.000f0.006f0.008d *0.006f0.010c *0.000e0.000g
Lauric acid (C12:0)0.076c *0.047d0.093c *0.087c0.080e *0.050c0.050d0.052e
Myristic acid (C14:0)0.038d *0.023e0.028e0.030d *0.021f0.031c0.015e0.018f
Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0)0.017e *0.012ef0.025e0.029d *0.019f0.021c0.015e0.015f
Palmitic acid (C16:0)0.768a *0.498a1.048a *0.951a0.762a *0.550a0.655a *0.548a
Stearic acid (C18:0)0.161b *0.119b0.185b *0.150b0.156bc0.138b0.119b *0.089d
Arachidic acid (C20:0)0.088c *0.128b0.057d0.104c *0.131cd *0.057c0.060cd0.109c *
Behenic acid (C22:0)0.080c *0.133b0.055d0.110c *0.109de *0.035c0.066cd0.116b *
Lignoceric acid (24:0)0.085c0.104c0.097c0.138b *0.178b *0.103b0.071c0.108c *
Total1.313C *1.064b1.594A1.606a1.462B *0.995b1.050D1.055b
Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT. Superscript small letters indicate significant difference in the same column at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Table
Table 2. Unsaturated fatty acids in the control and HT-stressed leaves of four rice cultivars.
Table 2. Unsaturated fatty acids in the control and HT-stressed leaves of four rice cultivars.
Unsaturated Fatty Acids (µg µL−1)N22CN1KDML105IR64
ControlHTControlHTControlHTControlHT
Linoleic acid (C18:2)0.709b *0.298b1.012b *0.625b0.668b0.567b0.622b *0.381b
γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3n6)0.027c *0.010b0.033d *0.022c0.023d *0.012c0.018d *0.012c
Linolenic acid (C18:3)6.137a *2.855a7.981a *5.174a5.613a *2.199a5.099a2.910a
cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic acid (C20:2)0.003c *0.000c0.005d *0.000c0.005d *0.000c0.003d *0.000c
cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5)0.008c *0.008c0.002d0.013c *0.012d *0.008c0.006d0.010c
Palmitoleic acid (C16:1)0.004c0.006c *0.000d0.085c *0.000d0.046c *0.005d0.006c *
Oleic acid (C18:1)0.072c *0.030c0.132c *0.069c0.133c *0.058c0.109c *0.046c
Erucic acid (C22:1)0.014c0.016c0.009d0.013c *0.017d *0.008c0.014d *0.004c
Total6.974B *3.224bc9.174A *6.002a6.471C *2.897c5.875D *3.370b
Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by t test. Different capital letters indicate significant difference of control group in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT, and small letters indicate significant difference of HT in different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT. Superscript small letters in the same column indicate significant difference between different unsaturated fatty acid at p < 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Table
Table 3. Ratio of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids in different seedling rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64) after exposure to high temperature at 42 °C for 7 days.
Table 3. Ratio of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids in different seedling rice cultivars (N22, CN1, KDML105 and IR64) after exposure to high temperature at 42 °C for 7 days.
Rice CultivarsTotal SatTotal UnsatSat:Unsat% Increase in Sat:Unsat after HT
ControlHTControlHTControlHT
N221.3121.0646.9743.2240.188b0.330a *+75%a
CN11.5951.6069.1746.0020.174b0.268b *+54%b
KDML1051.4620.9956.4712.8970.226a0.346a *+53%b
IR641.0501.0555.8753.3700.179b0.313ab *+75%a
Asterisk (*) indicates significant different between control and HT in each rice cultivar at p ≤ 0.05 by independent-samples t test. Different small letter in the same column indicate significant difference between different rice cultivars at p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA and DMRT.
Table
Table 4. Temperature control data and relative humidity in the growth chamber (VRV.Corp., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand).
Table 4. Temperature control data and relative humidity in the growth chamber (VRV.Corp., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand).
No.Time (h)Temperature (°C)Relative Humidity (%)
100:00–03:002766
203:00–07:002670
307:00–09:002961
409:00–11:003649
511:00–15:004242
615:00–17:004040
717:00–18:003737
818:00–21:003333
921:00–00:002732
Temperature and relative humidity were obtained from Agronomy station, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University during March—May 2016 and 2017.
Table
Table 5. Temperature, humidity and light intensity control data in the growth chamber (VRV.Corp., Ltd., Thailand).
Table 5. Temperature, humidity and light intensity control data in the growth chamber (VRV.Corp., Ltd., Thailand).
No.Time (h)* Light Intensity (µmol m−2 s−1)
106:00–07:0070
207:00–08:00115
308:00–09:00200
409:00–10:00265
510:00–11:00340
611:00–13:00390
713:00–14:00340
814:00–15:00265
915:00–16:00200
1016:00–17:00115
1117:00–18:0070
1218:00–06:000
Light intensity was obtained from Agronomy station, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University during March—May 2016 and 2017. * Light intensity was measured by light incident on the rice leaves at 30 cm from the light source bulb.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prasertthai, P.; Paethaisong, W.; Theerakulpisut, P.; Dongsansuk, A. High Temperature Alters Leaf Lipid Membrane Composition Associated with Photochemistry of PSII and Membrane Thermostability in Rice Seedlings. Plants 2022, 11, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111454

AMA Style

Prasertthai P, Paethaisong W, Theerakulpisut P, Dongsansuk A. High Temperature Alters Leaf Lipid Membrane Composition Associated with Photochemistry of PSII and Membrane Thermostability in Rice Seedlings. Plants. 2022; 11(11):1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prasertthai, Paphitchaya, Warunya Paethaisong, Piyada Theerakulpisut, and Anoma Dongsansuk. 2022. "High Temperature Alters Leaf Lipid Membrane Composition Associated with Photochemistry of PSII and Membrane Thermostability in Rice Seedlings" Plants 11, no. 11: 1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111454

APA Style

Prasertthai, P., Paethaisong, W., Theerakulpisut, P., & Dongsansuk, A. (2022). High Temperature Alters Leaf Lipid Membrane Composition Associated with Photochemistry of PSII and Membrane Thermostability in Rice Seedlings. Plants, 11(11), 1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop