Next Article in Journal
Biochemical and Physiological Changes during Early Adventitious Root Formation in Chrysanthemum indicum Linné Cuttings
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Heat and Drought Stress Responses among Twelve Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) Varieties
Previous Article in Journal
Mutagenic Effect of 60Co γ-Irradiation on Rosa multiflora ‘Libellula’ and the Mechanism Underlying the Associated Leaf Changes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decontamination and Germination of Buckwheat Grains upon Treatment with Oxygen Plasma Glow and Afterglow
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Adaptative Responses of Common and Tartary Buckwheat to Different Altitudes

1
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva ulica 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Nutrition Institute, Tržaška 40, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(11), 1439; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111439
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 17 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 28 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breeding Buckwheat for Nutritional Quality Volume II)

Abstract

:
Environmental conditions at different elevations are harsher at higher elevations and impose constraints upon plants. The response of common and Tartary buckwheats to environmental conditions at elevations between 300 and 1180 m above sea level (asl) was studied. In common buckwheat, grown at the highest elevation, there was an increased investment in secondary metabolism, and decreased investment in primary metabolism, since the production of UV-absorbing compounds was enhanced while the amounts of chlorophylls and carotenoids decreased. In Tartary buckwheat, the amounts of UV-absorbing compounds, chlorophylls and carotenoids were similar in plants grown at different elevations, indicating better adaptation to conditions at higher elevations. Common and Tartary buckwheat plants from Podbeže had thicker leaves than plants from the two other locations. This could be a response to high radiation in the very sunny position in Podbeže.

1. Introduction

Climatic conditions and agroecosystems are strongly interconnected. The distribution and production of crops largely depend upon climatic conditions, which are site-specific and identified mainly as differences in rainfall, light conditions and temperature over the years [1]. Irregular and erratic rainfall, rises in temperature, extreme weather, flooding and prolonged drought in ambient climates are all noticeable events of climate change in nature. These induce changes in plant morphology, physiology, phenology, reproduction, species distribution, community structures, ecosystems and the evolutionary processes of species, all of which can affect yields and the spread of infectious diseases and pests [1]. Conditions at higher elevations can be harsh and may impose different constraints upon plants. Temperatures and precipitation are lower, the growth season is shorter, and snow often persists much longer at higher elevations [2,3]. The intensity of UV-B radiation increases sharply at higher altitudes, while the daily total solar radiation is similar along the elevation gradient [4]. The increase in UV-B radiation (290–320 nm) ranges from between 6 and 8% [4] to 20% [5] per 1000 m of elevation. UV radiation, particularly UV-B radiation, can generate free radicals in plants that damage susceptible tissues and cells [6], impacting agricultural production [7]. Recent results showed that plants can adapt to the environmental changes that accompany high altitudes by decreasing leaf area and by increasing leaf thickness, mesophyll tissue thickness, and stomatal density [8]. Plants originating from high elevations were generally shorter and produced less biomass, while their phenology did not vary consistently [9].
Plants from the Polygonaceae family have numerous calcium oxalate (CaOx) druses, which can protect plants against herbivory [10]. Production of CaOx druses is also one of the mechanisms for regulation of total free Ca levels in plant tissues and organs [11]. The light-scattering functions of CaOx crystals contribute to an even dispersion of the light penetrating into shaded leaf tissue [12], enabling leaves to use the incoming light flux more efficiently [13].
Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) and Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) are underutilized crops from the Polygonaceae family. Buckwheat has attracted much interest and is becoming one of the most important alternative crops for healthy food [14]. Common buckwheat is generally grown at lower altitudes in Asia and Europe, while Tartary buckwheat is grown at higher altitudes in small areas of marginal and unproductive land in countries in Southeast Asia [15]. It has been reported that cultivation of five common buckwheat variants in the Himalayan region is restricted to elevations between 500 and 2500 m. Above 2500 m, the Tartary buckwheat replaces the common buckwheat. The areas of origin of the wild ancestors of common buckwheat and Tartary buckwheat are thought to be the Chinese provinces of Yunnan and Sichuan [16], and Zhang et al. [17] recently reported that Tartary buckwheat originated in western China. In China and Nepal, Tartary buckwheat grows at higher elevations than common buckwheat [18] and has thus adapted to the harsh environmental parameters of higher altitudes.
Our research attempted to discover how common and Tartary buckwheat respond at physiological and morphological levels to environmental conditions at different elevations. As Tartary buckwheat originated in higher elevations, we presumed that these plants would be less vulnerable to the environmental constraints that predominate at higher elevations.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Soil Properties, Weather Conditions and Physiological Parameters of Buckwheats

Characteristics of soils and weather conditions at experimental locations are presented in Table 1. Soil from Ljubljana (Lj) was classified as clay loam and had similar characteristics to those of soil from Podbeže (Po), which was classified as loam–clay loam, while soil from Javorje (Ja) was classified as loam–silt loam and had a higher proportion of total carbon and nitrogen, and a higher concentration of potassium, than soil from Ljubljana and Podbeže.
Mean temperatures at the highest location, Javorje, 1180 m above sea level (m asl), in June and July are about 10 °C lower than in Podbeže (600 m asl) and Ljubljana (300 m asl). In Javorje, there is also more rain than in other locations, especially in July.
Despite the differences in weather and soil conditions between locations, both common (CB) and Tartary buckwheat (TB) plants were found to be in good condition at all locations. The relatively high value of the potential photochemical efficiency of photosystem (PS)II, which is close to the theoretical maximum of 0.83, indicates that experimental plants did not suffer irreversible damage to their PSII reaction centers [19]. There were no significant differences between CB and TB in stomatal conductance at different locations, and values were relatively high (more than 300 mmol/m2s) (data not shown).

2.2. Biochemical Characteristics

Statistical analysis of the results showed that the content of chlorophylls, anthocyanins and UV-absorbing compounds in buckwheat leaves depended on plant growth location but was independent of the species of buckwheat (Table 2). Differences between locations were seen only for common buckwheat (CB). Leaves from CB grown at the highest altitude in Javorje had a significantly lower content of chlorophylls and higher content of UV-absorbing compounds than leaves from plants grown in Ljubljana at the lowest altitudes (Figure 1).
The higher content of chlorophylls in CB plants from the lowest locations suggests that these plants were growing in favorable conditions. The synthesis of chlorophylls demands energy and if plants grow in supportive conditions, they have enough energy to support the primary metabolism. In conditions of stress, the trade-off between primary and secondary metabolism can be directed toward secondary metabolism. UV-absorbing compounds such as flavonoids and related phenylpropanoids are secondary metabolites and the most important compounds that absorb UV radiation [20]. They are located in the upper epidermis and represent the first barrier to sunlight, which can damage vulnerable tissue in plants. The number of UV-absorbing compounds in common buckwheat was highest in plants from the highest elevation for CB, but not for TB (Figure 1). UV radiation increases at higher elevations [4], and with the synthesis of UV-absorbing compounds, plants can protect processes and structures such as DNA from damage caused by UV radiation [21].
In the current study of CB, the total content of UV-absorbing compounds in leaves increased with altitude, while the chlorophyll content showed the opposite trend in St. John’s wort, which was grown in a continuum of habitats from lowlands to highlands [22]. In 2017, Golob et al. [23] found a similar pattern. Wheat plants treated with Se and exposed to ambient UV radiation produced the highest number of UV-absorbing compounds and the lowest levels of photosynthetic pigments. In the current research, we presumed that, at higher elevations, there would be a trade-off between the plant’s investment in primary and secondary metabolisms, as the synthesis of UV-absorbing compounds was enhanced while that of chlorophylls decreased. Tartary buckwheat (TB) plants failed to show the same patterns. There were no differences between the number of chlorophylls and of UV-absorbing compounds in plants from different elevations (Figure 1). It is possible that TB possesses enough UV-absorbing compounds for efficient protection and the plants did not use additional energy in their expanded synthesis. Compared to CB, TB originates from higher elevations. These plants may be better adapted to higher elevation without additional synthesis of protective compounds. It has been reported that the production of UV-absorbing compounds is either dose-dependent or not. Dose independence has been mainly identified in plant colonies in high-radiation environments [24]. Tartary buckwheat grown under different UV-B levels showed that UV-B-absorbing compounds and rutin concentrations became essentially ambient, but this did not occur under elevated levels of UV-B [25]. Suchar and Robberecht (2016) [26] have suggested that this is possibly related to the costs needed to prevent stress due to UV-B at the highest radiation level.

2.3. Morphological Characteristics

Plants from the middle elevation (Podbeže) had thicker leaves and palisade tissue than plants from other locations. Of the two species, TB plants had thinner leaves and palisade tissue (Table 3). At the same time, TB did not contain higher levels of chlorophylls and UV-absorbing compounds per dry weight than CB, which means significantly higher levels of chlorophylls and UV-absorbing compounds per leaf area. The better potential of TB to cope with environmental constraints was indicated. Otherwise, thicker leaves allow greater concentrations of chlorophyll per leaf area [27], and this was found in our study. Thinner leaves intercept light better [27]. Plants from Javorje grew in a more shaded environment, and with thinner leaves, they could increase their light interception. CB from Javorje had a higher number of UV-absorbing compounds than CB from other locations, and this prevented the penetration of potentially harmful UV radiation to the sensitive mesophyllic tissue. On the other hand, plants from Podbeže were fully irradiated almost all day and their thicker leaves offered protection against excessive radiation.
In both species, the number of CaOx druses was highest in plants from the lowest elevation (Table 2). However, in CB, the dimensions of CaOx druses were smaller in plants grown at the lowest altitude (Figure 2). Because CaOx druses were mainly located along the main veins, this suggests their structural role in supporting leaf tissue.
Golob et al. [13] revealed an effect of CaOx druses in the optical properties of buckwheat plants. They found a positive correlation between the density of CaOx druse crystals and the light reflectance of the blue, green, yellow and UV-B parts of the light spectrum and a positive correlation between the percentage of the surface area of CaOx druses and leaf transmittance in the green and yellow parts of the light spectrum of Tartary buckwheat leaves. In addition, the number, size and distribution of CaOx druses could additionally contribute to the more efficient use of incoming light.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Experimental Plan

Seeds of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) (CB) and Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) (TB) were sown in sites at different elevations: in Ljubljana (300 m asl; 46.048313 N, 14.473318 E), in Podbeže near Ilirska Bistrica (600 m asl; 45.547141 N, 14.152469 E) and in Javorje, near Črna na Koroškem (1180 m asl; 46.45704 N, 14.93038 E). The plants were grown in experimental fields beginning on 28 May 2020 in Javorje and on 2 June 2020 in Ljubljana and Podbeže. Samples of plants were collected on 20 July 2020 in Podbeže, on 21 July in Javorje and on 22 July in Ljubljana, and biochemical measurements and anatomical analysis of leaves were performed in the laboratory. Samples were transferred from field to laboratory in polybags and kept at ambient temperature. In the experimental growth fields, we performed physiological measurements on plants between 27 July 2020 and 29 July 2020.

3.2. Biochemical Parameters

The content of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids) was determined according to the method of Lichtenthaler and Buschmann (2001a and 2001b) [28,29]. Fresh leaf was collected, weighed and homogenized in a mortar, then extracted with acetone (90%). The homogenized samples were centrifuged for 4 min at 4000 rpm and 4 °C, and after centrifugation, the volume of the extract was determined. Extinction measurements using a VIS spectrophotometer (Lambda 12; PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 470, 645 and 662 nm were performed. The content of chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids per unit of dry weight of the sample was calculated using the measured extinction values.
The anthocyanin levels were measured using the method published by Lindoo and Caldwell in 1978 [30]. The dried lyophilized plant tissue was ground, covered and incubated with HCl:methanol:water (1:79:20 v/v/v) for 48 h in the dark at 3–5 °C. The homogenates were centrifuged for 4 min (4000 rpm and 4 °C), and then the absorbance at 530 nm of the extracts was measured using a UV/VIS spectrometer (Lambda 25; PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). After centrifugation, the volume of the extract was measured, and anthocyanin levels were expressed in relative units.
The content of UV-absorbing substances in buckwheat leaves was determined by the method described by Caldwell (1968) [31]. A powdered sample was extracted in extraction medium methanol:H2O:HCl = 79: 20: 1 (v/v/v). The sum of absorption values in the range 280–315 nm was used to calculate UV-B-absorbing compounds, and the sum of absorption values in the range 316–400 nm was used to calculate UV-A-absorbing compounds.

3.3. Physiological Parameters

The potential photochemical efficiency of PSII is expressed by Fv/Fm [Fv/Fm = (Fm − F0)/Fm] and was measured using a portable chlorophyll fluorometer (PAM 2500; Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). Fv is a variable fluorescence and F0 and Fm are the minimal and maximal chlorophyll fluorescence yields in dark adapted samples. For dark adaptation, samples were kept in cuvettes for 20 min before measurement. Fluorescence was excited with a saturating beam of “white light” (photosynthetic photon flux density, 8000 μmol/ m x s; 0.8 s). The effective quantum yield was determined by a saturating pulse of “white light” using a standard 60° angle clip, under saturating irradiance. Measurements of effective quantum yield were made at the prevailing ambient temperature. The effective quantum yield was defined as Y = (Fm’ – F0’)/Fm’; Fm’ is the maximum and F0’ the minimum fluorescence of an irradiated sample [32].
The degree of stomatal conductance was measured with a porometer (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, USA), which has a built-in thermometer to measure leaf temperatures. Measurements were performed on the same day and under the same conditions as the measurement of photochemical efficiency of FSII. We performed them on healthy developed leaves of plants (the youngest fully developed leaf) from 10 plants of each group of plants of the same species. Measurements were performed at each location three times in one day: at 9, 14 and 18 h. At the time of the measurements, the weather was clear.

3.4. Morphological Parameters

The numbers and dimensions of the CaOx druses in plants, the thickness of leaves, the thickness of palisade tissue and the thickness of epidermis were determined on transverse sections of leaves using light microscopy (CX41; Olympus, Japan) with a digital camera (XC30; Olympus, Japan) and the CellSens software (Olympus, Japan).

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Shapiro–Wilk tests were used to evaluate the normal distribution of the data. Homogeneity of variance from the means was assessed using Levene’s tests. Differences between treatments were tested using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey testing. To test for a statistically significant effect of factors (Location and Species) and interaction between both factors (Location x pecies), the factorial ANOVA was used. The level of significance was accepted at p < 0.05. The XLSTAT (version 2021.1.1, Addinsoft, 2022; New York, NY, USA) was used for these calculations.

4. Conclusions

Both species of buckwheat are well adapted to the conditions at different elevations. Tartary buckwheat did not respond to higher elevation with the production of UV-absorbing compounds, indicating better adaptation to high elevation conditions. Common buckwheat reacted to the climate conditions at the highest elevation with increased energy investment in secondary metabolism. According to our results, buckwheat responded differently to the conditions at different elevations. Deeper studies of metabolic profile, especially phenolics and proteins, will also enable us to find out the effects of different elevations upon the nutritional value of buckwheat.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G. and I.K.; methodology, A.G.; software, A.G.; validation, A.G., N.L. and M.G.; formal analysis, N.L.; data curation, A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, M.G. and I.K; visualization, A.G.; supervision, M.G.; project administration, M.G.; funding acquisition, I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian Research Agency, through the programme P1-0212 “Biology of Plants”, project J1-3014 and the applied project L4-9305, co-financed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food, Republic of Slovenia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Čuš-Artiček and Stopar families who enabled us to carry out the experimental part of our research on their properties, and to Bill Milne, a native speaker, for English editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Vogel, E.; Donat, M.G.; Alexander, L.V.; Meinshausen, M.; Ray, D.K.; Karoly, D.; Meinshausen, N.; Frieler, K. The Effects of Climate Extremes on Global Agricultural Yields. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 054010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rosbakh, S.; Margreiter, V.; Jelcic, B. Seedlings of Alpine Species Do Not Have Better Frost-Tolerance than Their Lowland Counterparts. Alp. Bot. 2020, 130, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Körner, C. Plant ecology at high elevations. In Alpine Plant Life; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Caldwell, M.M.; Robberecht, R.; Billings, W.D. A Steep Latitudinal Gradient of Solar Ultraviolet-B Radiation in the Arctic-Alpine Life Zone. Ecology 1980, 61, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blumthaler, M.; Ambach, W.; Huber, M. Altitude Effect of Solar UV Radiation Dependent on Albedo, Turbidity, and Solar Elevation. Meteorol. Zeitschrift 1993, 2, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Booij-James, I.S.; Dube, S.K.; Jansen, M.A.K.; Edelman, M.; Mattoo, A.K. Ultraviolet-B Radiation Impacts Light-Mediated Turnover of the Photosystem II Reaction Center Heterodimer in Arabidopsis Mutants Altered in Phenolic Metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yao, X.; Jianzhou, C.; Xueli, H.; Binbin, L.; Jingmin, L.; Zhaowei, Y. Effects of Selenium on Agronomical Characters of Winter Wheat Exposed to Enhanced Ultraviolet-B. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 92, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, W.; Zheng, L.; Qi, D. Variation in Leaf Traits at Different Altitudes Reflects the Adaptive Strategy of Plants to Environmental Changes. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 8166–8175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Halbritter, A.H.; Fior, S.; Keller, I.; Billeter, R.; Edwards, P.J.; Holderegger, R.; Karrenberg, S.; Pluess, A.R.; Widmer, A.; Alexander, J.M. Trait Differentiation and Adaptation of Plants along Elevation Gradients. J. Evol. Biol. 2018, 31, 784–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nakata, P.A. Plant Calcium Oxalate Crystal Formation, Function, and Its Impact on Human Health. Front. Biol. 2012, 7, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Franceschi, V.R.; Nakata, P.A. Calcium Oxalate in Plants: Formation and Function. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 41–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gal, A.; Brumfeld, V.; Weiner, S.; Addadi, L.; Oron, D. Certain Biominerals in Leaves Function as Light Scatterers. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, OP77–OP83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Golob, A.; Stibilj, V.; Nečemer, M.; Kump, P.; Kreft, I.; Hočevar, A.; Gaberščik, A.; Germ, M. Calcium Oxalate Druses Affect Leaf Optical Properties in Selenium-Treated Fagopyrum tataricum. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 180, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Halbrecq, B.; Romedenne, P.; Ledent, J.F. Evolution of Flowering, Ripening and Seed Set in Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench): Quantitative Analysis. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 23, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ohnishi, O. Population Genetics of Cultivated Common Buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, VII, Allezyme Variability in Japan, Korea and China. Jpn. J. Genet. 1988, 63, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ohnishi, O. Search for the Wild Ancestor of Buckwheat III. The Wild Ancestor of Cultivated Common Buckwheat, and of Tatary Buckwheat. Econ. Bot. 1998, 52, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, K.; He, M.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, H.; Gao, B.; Yang, K.; Li, F.; Tang, Y.; Gao, Q.; Lin, T.; et al. Resequencing of Global Tartary Buckwheat Accessions Reveals Multiple Domestication Events and Key Loci Associated with Agronomic Traits. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Germ, M.; Gaberšick, A. The Effect of Environmental Factors on Buckwheat. Mol. Breed. Nutr. Asp. Buckwheat 2016, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Germ, M.; Kreft, I.; Osvald, J. Influence of UV-B Exclusion and Selenium Treatment on Photochemical Efficiency of Photosystem II, Yield and Respiratory Potential in Pumpkins (Cucurbita pepo L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gaberščik, A.; Vončina, M.; Trošt, T.; Germ, M.; Olof Björn, L. Growth and Production of Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) Treated with Reduced, Ambient, and Enhanced UV-B Radiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2002, 66, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Caldwell, M.M.; Björn, L.O.; Bornman, J.F.; Flint, S.D.; Kulandaivelu, G.; Teramura, A.H.; Tevini, M. Effects of Increased Solar Ultraviolet Radiation on Terrestrial Ecosystems. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1998, 46, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roblek, M.; Germ, M.; Gaberščik, A. Morphological and Biochemical Variations in St. John’s Wort, Hypericum Perforatum L., Growing over Altitudinal and UV-B Radiation Gradients. Period. Biol. 2008, 110, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  23. Golob, A.; Kavčič, J.; Stibilj, V.; Gaberščik, A.; Vogel-Mikuš, K.; Germ, M. The Effect of Selenium and UV Radiation on Leaf Traits and Biomass Production in Triticum aestivum L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 136, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Golob, A.; Kugovnik, A.; Kreft, I.; Gaberščik, A.; Germ, M. The Interactions between UV Radiation, Drought and Selenium in Different Buckwheat Species. Acta Biol. Slov. 2019, 62, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yao, Y.; Xuan, Z.; Li, Y.; He, Y.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Effects of Ultraviolet-B Radiation on Crop Growth, Development, Yield and Leaf Pigment Concentration of Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) under Field Conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 25, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Suchar, V.A.; Robberecht, R. Integration and Scaling of UV-B Radiation Effects on Plants: From Molecular Interactions to Whole Plant Responses. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 4866–4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. White, J.W.; Montes, C. Variation in Parameters Related to Leaf Thickness in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). F. Crop. Res. 2005, 91, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Buschmann, C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. In Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; Volume 1, pp. F4.3.1–F4.3.8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Buschmann, C. Extraction of phtosynthetic Tissues: Chlorophylls and carotenoids. In Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; Volume 1, pp. F4.2.1–F4.2.6. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lindoo, S.J.; Caldwell, M.M. Ultraviolet-B Radiation-Induced Inhibition of Leaf Expansion and Promotion of Anthocyanin Production. Plant Physiol. 1978, 61, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Caldwell, M.M. Solar Ultraviolet Radiation as an Ecological Factor for Alpine Plants. Ecol. Monogr. 1968, 38, 243–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schreiber, U.; Kühl, M.; Klimant, I.; Reising, H. Measurement of Chlorophyll Fluorescence within Leaves Using a Modified PAM Fluorometer with a Fiber-Optic Microprobe. Photosynth. Res. 1996, 47, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The effect of growth location on the concentrations of chlorophylls (A), carotenoids (B) and UV-absorbing compounds (C) in leaves of CB and TB. Data are means ± standard deviation. Means followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Figure 1. The effect of growth location on the concentrations of chlorophylls (A), carotenoids (B) and UV-absorbing compounds (C) in leaves of CB and TB. Data are means ± standard deviation. Means followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Plants 11 01439 g001
Figure 2. The effect of growth location on concentration diameter of CaOx druses (A) and leaf epidermis thickness (B) of CB and TB. Data are represented as means ± standard deviation. Means followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Figure 2. The effect of growth location on concentration diameter of CaOx druses (A) and leaf epidermis thickness (B) of CB and TB. Data are represented as means ± standard deviation. Means followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Plants 11 01439 g002
Table 1. Properties of soil and weather conditions of experimental locations Ljubljana, Podbeže and Javorje.
Table 1. Properties of soil and weather conditions of experimental locations Ljubljana, Podbeže and Javorje.
LjubljanaPodbežeJavorje
Soil typeclay loamloam–clay loamloam–silt loam
Soil moisture (%)17.515.414.7
EC (µS/cm)80.875.9180.2
C total (%)2.83.18.4
N (%)0.210.30.73
C org/N12.410.011.4
Si (mg/g)212162164
P (mg/g)1.651.751.15
S (mg/g)0.240.380.36
Cl (mg/g)0.642.310.96
K (mg/g)16.415.426.9
Ca (mg/g)10.210.87.3
Average T June (°C)19.417.49.7
Average T July (°C)21.719.612.1
Rainfall June (mm)142.7189.8170.9
Rainfall July (mm)155.268.0308.0
Legend: EC—electric conductivity; T—temperature, C total—total amount of carbon; C org—organic carbon.
Table 2. Contents of chlorophylls, anthocyanins and UV-absorbing compounds in common and Tartary buckwheat plants, grown at different elevations.
Table 2. Contents of chlorophylls, anthocyanins and UV-absorbing compounds in common and Tartary buckwheat plants, grown at different elevations.
Model Parameter Chlorophylls (mg/g d.w.)Carotenoids (mg/g d.w.)Anthocyanins (rel. u/g d.w.)UV Abs. Comp. (rel u/g d.w.)
LocationLj17.2 ± 1.0 a2.64 ± 0.14 a0.18 ± 0.01 a229 ± 11 ab
Po13.4 ± 0.7 b2.42 ± 0.10 a0.12 ± 0.01 b217 ± 16 b
Ja15.6 ± 0.7 ab2.57 ± 0.10 a0.17 ± 0.01 a277 ± 22 a
Pr > F(Location)0.0050.3060.0010.012
SpeciesCB15.4 ± 0.6 a2.56 ± 0.08 a0.15 ± 0.01255 ± 15 a
TB15.4 ± 0.9 a2.46 ± 0.10 a0.16 ± 0.01227 ± 15 a
Pr > F(Species)0.9730.7620.4630.148
Location x SpeciesPr > F(Location x Species)0.0070.0070.3820.045
Legends: CB—common buckwheat; TB—Tartary buckwheat; UV abs. comp.—absorbing compounds. Data are represented as means ± standard deviation. Means followed by different letters in the column are significantly different at p < 0.05 (n = 8). Statistical significances are marked with bold.
Table 3. Leaf thickness, palisade tissue thickness, epidermis thickness, number and diameter of CaOx druses.
Table 3. Leaf thickness, palisade tissue thickness, epidermis thickness, number and diameter of CaOx druses.
Model Parameter Leaf Thickness (μm)Thickness of Palisade Tissue (μm)Epidermis Thickness (μm)Density of CaOx Druses (No/mm2)2r of CaOx Druses (μm)
LocationLj156 ± 3 b56 ± 1 b24.1 ± 0.3 a21.7 ± 0.7 a18.2 ± 0.6 c
Po168 ± 5 a66 ± 2 a23.1 ± 0.4 a17.3 ± 0.9 b23.0 ± 0.6 a
Ja150 ± 4 b51 ± 2 c23.6 ± 0.5 a17.4 ± 1.0 b20.8 ± 1.3 b
Pr > F (Location)0.0002<0.00010.112<0.0001<0.0001
SpeciesCB168 ± 3 a61 ± 2 a24.3 ± 0.4 a20.8 ± 0.6 a23.0 ± 0.6 a
TB148 ± 3 b54 ± 2 b23.0 ± 0.3 b16.8 ± 0.9 b18.3 ± 0.7 b
Pr > F (Species)<0.00010.00020.003<0.0001<0.0001
Location x SpeciesPr > F (Location x Species)0.1250.2380.0070.602<0.0001
Legends: CB—common buckwheat, TB—Tartary buckwheat, Lj—Ljubljana, Po—Podbeže, Ja—Javorje. abs. comp.—absorbing compounds. Data are represented as means ± standard deviation. Means followed by different letters in the column are significantly different at p < 0.05 (n = 8). Statistical significances are marked with bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Golob, A.; Luzar, N.; Kreft, I.; Germ, M. Adaptative Responses of Common and Tartary Buckwheat to Different Altitudes. Plants 2022, 11, 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111439

AMA Style

Golob A, Luzar N, Kreft I, Germ M. Adaptative Responses of Common and Tartary Buckwheat to Different Altitudes. Plants. 2022; 11(11):1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Golob, Aleksandra, Neja Luzar, Ivan Kreft, and Mateja Germ. 2022. "Adaptative Responses of Common and Tartary Buckwheat to Different Altitudes" Plants 11, no. 11: 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111439

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop