Next Article in Journal
Coffee Disease Visualization and Classification
Next Article in Special Issue
Leaf Plasmodesmata Respond Differently to TMV, ToBRFV and TYLCV Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Development of an Aus-Derived Nested Association Mapping (Aus-NAM) Population in Rice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification and Mapping of Tomato Genome Loci Controlling Tolerance and Resistance to Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/plants10061256
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Detection of the Tobamoviruses Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV) Using CRISPR-Cas12a

by
Dan Mark Alon
1,2,
Hagit Hak
3,
Menachem Bornstein
2,
Gur Pines
1,* and
Ziv Spiegelman
2,*
1
Department of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization—the Volcani Center, 68 HaMaccabim Road, P.O. Box 15159, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
2
The Shmunis School of Molecular Cell Biology & Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
3
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization—the Volcani Center, 68 HaMaccabim Road, P.O. Box 15159, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(6), 1256; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061256
Original submission received: 11 May 2021 / Revised: 14 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 21 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tobamoviruses and Interacting Viruses in Modern Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection is a novel approach for the efficient, sequence-specific identification of viruses. Here we adopt the use of CRISPR/Cas12a to identify the tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV), a new and emerging tobamovirus which is causing substantial damage to the global tomato industry. Specific CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) were designed to detect either ToBRFV or the closely related tomato mosaic virus (ToMV). This technology enabled the differential detection of ToBRFV and ToMV. Sensitivity assays revealed that viruses can be detected from 15–30 ng of RT-PCR product, and that specific detection could be achieved from a mix of ToMV and ToBRFV. In addition, we show that this method can enable the identification of ToBRFV in samples collected from commercial greenhouses. These results demonstrate a new method for species-specific detection of tobamoviruses. A future combination of this approach with isothermal amplification could provide a platform for efficient and user-friendly ways to distinguish between closely related strains and resistance-breaking pathogens.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Plant viruses of the Tobamovirus genus (family: Virgaviridae) are important crop pathogens, causing significant damage to the global agriculture industry [1,2,3]. The Tobamovirus genus contains several Solanaceae-infecting species, including the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and the tomato mosaic virus (ToMV). Tobamovirus particles are rod-shaped, encapsulating a single-stranded sense RNA (+ssRNA) genome of approximately 6.4 kb encoding four ORFs. ORFs 1 and 2 encode the two subunits of the viral replicase complex, separated by a read-through stop codon. ORF3 encodes the viral 30 kDa movement protein (MP). ORF4 encodes the 17–18 kDa viral coat protein (CP) [4,5]. Tobamoviruses are highly infectious and transmitted by mechanical contact with working hands, tools, soil, and parts of infected plants [6,7,8]. Importantly, tobamoviruses are also transmitted by seeds [9,10].
Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV), a new tomato-infecting tobamovirus emerged in tomato greenhouses in Israel and Jordan in 2014 [11,12]. ToBRFV was found to overcome all tobamovirus resistance genes in tomatoes, including the durable Tm-22 resistance gene, which has remained unbroken for over 60 years [12,13]. Outbreaks of ToBRFV in Europe [14,15,16,17,18,19], North America [20,21], and Asia [22,23], indicate a rapidly emerging global epidemic.
Serological methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western-blot are currently used to detect ToBRFV [12,24,25,26]. However, these methods lack species-specificity and cannot be used to distinguish between ToBRFV and closely related tobamoviruses such as TMV and ToMV. This is due to the high conservation of the tobamovirus CP, resulting in antibody cross-reactivity between tobamovirus species [12]. To cope with this challenge, protocols for specific detection of ToBRFV were developed, including deep sequencing [12], sequence-specific reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) primers [12,14,27,28,29], real-time RT-PCR [18,21,29,30] and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [30,31].
An emerging approach for the species-specific identification of viruses is based on CRISPR/Cas technology. The CRISPR/Cas is an innate immune system present in many bacteria and archaea [32]. In this system, Cas proteins target specific viral sequences by the formation of a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex with a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) complementary to the invading viral DNA sequence [33]. Directed by their crRNA, Cas proteins then bind and cleave the viral DNA, thereby neutralizing the pathogen [34]. While this system is mostly utilized for genome editing [35,36,37,38], more recently, it has been shown that some Cas proteins can be used for the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences [39,40,41]. For example, Cas12a obtains a nonspecific single-stranded DNAse activity following specific interaction with its DNA substrate [39]. This property was used by Chen and colleagues to apply Cas12a as a biosensor: in addition to the RNP complex of Lachnospiraceae bacterium Cas12a and its crRNA, a fluorophore quencher (FQ)–labeled single-stranded DNA substrate was added. Upon Cas12a activation, it nonspecifically degrades ssDNA, releasing the fluorophore from its quencher, resulting in a fluorescent signal. This approach was performed for the detection of human papillomavirus and has also proven efficient in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) detection [39,42], demonstrating the great potential of this method in viral diagnostics.
Recently, CRISPR/Cas12a was applied for the detection of RNA [43,44] and DNA [45] plant viruses, suggesting its potential application in the detection of plant viral diseases. Here we adopt the CRISPR/Cas12a technology to specifically identify the emerging ToBRFV and to distinguish it from a closely related tobamovirus, ToMV. Moreover, we show that this method can be used to detect ToBRFV in samples from commercial greenhouses. Since TMV only rarely infects tomato plants [46], it was not included in this study. We have set up an experimental system based on the conservation and the variation between these two viruses (Figure 1). First, tomato plants were infected with each of the two viruses (Figure 1A). Then, RNA was extracted from leaves of the infected plant (Figure 1B) and RT-PCR was performed using primers on a conserved region from both viruses (Figure 1C). The resulting PCR product was then subjected to CRISPR/Cas12a detection assays using crRNAs specific for either ToMV or ToBRFV (Figure 1D). Cleavage of the ssDNA reporter and release of the fluorophore from the quencher indicates the presence of the specific virus (Figure 1E).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Virus Inoculation

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Moneymaker) (LA2706) were grown in soil in a light- and temperature-controlled chamber at 25 °C with a 16 h light/8 h dark regime. Three-week-old tomato plants were used for mechanical inoculation of ToMV and ToBRFV. ToMV was derived from the infectious clone pTLW3 [13]. For ToBRFV infection we used the Israeli isolate of ToBRFV, ToBRFV-IL (KX619418.1). Plants were dusted with carborundum powder prior to inoculation, and were then rubbed with a phosphate buffer solution (0.01 M, pH 7.0) supplemented with crushed leaves from ToMV- or ToBRFV-infected tomato plants. After three weeks, samples were collected from young leaves showing viral symptoms, distant from the site of inoculation.
For field sample analysis, tomato leaves with mosaic symptoms were collected from two commercial greenhouses in Azriel village, Israel, in December 2020.

2.2. RT-PCR Analysis

Total plant RNA was extracted from 50–100 mg of leaf tissue by Plant Total RNA Mini Kit (Geneaid, RPD050, New Taipei City, Taiwan R.O.C), which includes a DNAse treatment. The extracted RNA (500 ng) served as a template for cDNA synthesis using the qPCRBIO cDNA Synthesis Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (PCRBIO, PB30.11). The ToMV/ToBRFV ORF1 region (Figure 2A) was amplified using the Q5 High-Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs; NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) with primers directed against conserved regions in both ToMV and ToBRFV F-1381 (5′-ccaggtctgagtgggatg-3′), and R-3208 (5′-gtctcaccttgtacctcatgtac-3′). PCR products were purified using Zymo DNA Clean & Concentrator kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), quantified using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and diluted to target concentrations using ultra-pure nuclease-free water.

2.3. CRISPR RNA (crRNA) Design

CRISPR RNA (crRNAs) (Table 1) were designed using the CRISPOR computational platform for the detection of efficient and specific design of crRNA sequences [47]. Both ToMV and ToBRFV genomes were obtained from the NCBI website (AF332868.1 and KX619418.1, respectively). To create unique crRNAs for each virus, the sequences of both viruses were concatenated into a single long sequence. This single sequence, harboring both viruses, was used as an input for CRISPOR guide gRNA search, allowing the detection of crRNAs that are specific to each virus (Figure 2A). The resulting crRNA sequences (Table 1) were then concatenated to a T7 promoter (T7-crRNA-F; Table 1) sequence and the designed oligonucleotides were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT; https://eu.idtdna.com/, Coralville, USA) (T7-crRNA-F).

2.4. In Vitro crRNA Transcription

First, each DNA oligo was annealed with oligo T7-crRNA-F. Oligos were suspended in annealing buffer (10 mM Tris pH 8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) to a final concentration of 100 uM. Next, 10 uL of each oligo was mixed with 10 uL T7-crRNA-F and incubated for 5 min at 95 °C and cooled at room temperature for 1 h. After oligo duplexes were ready, RNA was generated using TranscriptAid T7 High Yield Transcription Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer protocol with overnight incubation. Subsequently, RNA was purified using Zymo RNA Clean & Concentrate kit (Zymo), with a DNase I digestion preceding the purification as suggested by the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was diluted 1:150 and measured using a NanoDrop One instrument (Thermo Scientific).

2.5. LbCas12a Cleavage Assays

All reactions were prepared on ice. crRNA-LbCas12a complexes were prepared by mixing 62.5 nM gRNA with 50 nM LbCas12a (NEB) in NEBuffer 2.1 (NEB) to a final volume of 20 uL and incubated in 37 °C for 30 min. Next, 1 uM FAM reporter (/56-FAM/TTATTATT/3BHQ_1/)) and 1 nM (120 ng) RT-PCR product were added to the complexes together with 80 uL of 1X concentration NEBuffer 2.1 and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. Samples were transferred to a black 384 well plate and measured using Tecan Spark plate-reader (Tecan Trading AG, Männedorf, Switzerland) with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm, and emission was measured at 535 nm. Emission was read in relative fluorescence units (RFU) to compare between samples within each experiment.

3. Results

3.1. Differential Detection of ToMV and ToBRFV Using CRISPR/Cas12a

A region within the tobamovirus ORF1 was used for the design of species-specific crRNAs (Figure 2A). Within this region, four ToMV-specific crRNAs (tomv-1, tomv-7, tomv-8, and tomv-9) and three ToBRFV-specific crRNAs (tobrfv-3, tobrfv-5, and tobrfv-9), were designed. To test the ability of the different crRNAs to detect ToMV or ToBRFV, 3-week-old tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Moneymaker) were inoculated separately with ToMV and ToBRFV (n = 4). After three weeks, RNA was extracted from newly emerged systemic leaves showing viral symptoms. The different crRNA were then tested to specifically identify each virus in the CRISPR/Cas12a fluorescence assay. For ToMV detection, all four tomv crRNA-Cas12a complexes were incubated individually with the ToMV RT-PCR product. The ToBRFV RT-PCR product served as a negative control (Figure 2B). Among these crRNAs, tomv-1 and tomv-7 emitted robust fluorescent signals in response to ToMV in three independent experiments (n = 4), which were 4.2- and 2.5- times higher than with the ToBRFV negative control (Figure 2B,C). The tomv-8 crRNA produced a fluorescent signal 57% higher than the control, and tomv-9 signal was similar in ToMV and ToBRFV (Figure 2B) (n = 4).
A reciprocal experiment was performed for ToBRFV detection, only this time with the ToMV RT-PCR product serving as a negative control (Figure 2D). Here, tobrfv-3 produced a strong fluorescent signal when incubated with the ToBRFV template, which was 6.5 times higher than the ToMV control template (Figure 2D,E) (n = 4). The tobrfv-5 and tobrfv-9 crRNAs were also efficient in ToBRFV detection, producing fluorescent signals that were 5 and 1.9 higher than the ToMV control (Figure 2D) (n = 4). These results were consistent in three independent experiments and established the ability of the CRISPR/Cas12a for species-specific identification of ToMV and ToBRFV. As the most efficient detection of ToMV and ToBRFV was achieved by the tomv-1 and tobrfv-3 crRNAs, respectively, these crRNAs were selected for further analysis.

3.2. Sensitivity and Specificity of CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Detection

To test the sensitivity of this system, a series of dilutions was performed for each of the ToMV and ToBRFV RT-PCR products (Figure 3A,B). While 15 ng of RT-PCR product was sufficient for detecting ToMV (Figure 3A), 15–30 ng of RT-PCR product was needed for the detection of ToBRFV (Figure 3B). As 15–30 ng of PCR products was the minimal threshold for detection, we further used these parameters to examine if the CRISPR/Cas12a system could specifically detect each virus in the case of a mixture of ToMV and ToBRFV. To test this, detection assays were performed individually using tomv-1 or tobrfv-3 on a mixture of RT-PCR products from both ToMV and ToBRFV (Figure 3C,D). Notably, 15 ng of ToMV was detected in a mixture with 15 ng of ToBRFV, resulting in a fluorescent signal that was 85% higher than the signal obtained with 30 ng of ToBRFV only (Figure 3C). In addition, the CRISPR/Cas12a system was also able to detect 15 ng of ToBRFV mixed with 15 ng of ToMV, producing a fluorescent signal that was 3.5-fold higher than the signal received with only 30 ng of ToMV (Figure 3D). These results suggest that the CRISPR/Cas12a system can be used to detect ToBRFV, even in the case of mixed infection with the related virus ToMV.

3.3. CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Detection of ToBRFV from Field Samples

Next, we tested the applicability of the CRISPR/Cas12a system for specific detection of tobamoviruses in two field samples from Azriel village, Israel. In two separate greenhouses, plants with severe mosaic and shoestring leaf symptoms were detected, consistent with tobamovirus infection (Figure 4A). We used our CRISPR/Cas12a system to diagnose if the plants were infected with ToMV or ToBRFV. Analysis using ToMV crRNA tomv-1 revealed that both tomato plants were likely not infected with ToMV, as indicated by the weak fluorescent signal that was similar to the ToBRFV as negative control (Figure 4B). In marked contrast, the ToBRFV crRNA tobrfv-3 showed high fluorescence for both samples, which was similar to the ToBRFV positive control (Figure 4C). To confirm these results, RT-PCR products from both samples were sequenced. Indeed, both samples showed 100% identity to ToBRFV-IL (KX619418.1) and 76.91% to ToMV (AF332868). These results establish that the CRISPR/Cas12a system can detect ToBRFV in field samples.

4. Discussion

ToBRFV is an emerging tobamovirus, which is spreading rapidly throughout the world and poses a substantial threat to the global tomato industry. ToBRFV symptoms are similar to other tobamoviruses, such as ToMV. These challenges drove the development of new real-time PCR and LAMP assays for specific ToBRFV detection [31,48]. While it was shown that CRISPR/Cas12a can be used to detect plant viruses [44], it was unknown if it could be applied to distinguish between closely related plant viruses of the same genus. Here, we provide evidence that the CRISPR/Cas12a technology can also be applied to identify ToBRFV and distinguish it from the closely related ToMV (Figure 2). Using this method, ToBRFV can be detected with low concentrations of RT-PCR products, and also when mixed with ToMV (Figure 3). Detection of ToBRFV in field samples (Figure 4) demonstrates this technology’s potential as a bona fide virus identification method that can be used in agricultural practice.
Further research is required to determine if our method is able to distinguish ToBRFV from solanaceous-infecting viruses other than ToMV. The tobrfv-3 crRNA sequence is highly specific to ToBRFV, and shows no significant similarity to the closely related viruses TMV (V01408), tomato mottle mosaic virus (ToMMV) (KF477193) and rehmannia mosaic virus (RheMV) (EF375551) according to BLAST analysis. Therefore, it can be anticipated that this CRISPR/Cas12a system will also be able to distinguish between ToBRFV and these tobamoviruses.
While the current setting of our experiment still requires a thermocycler, further development can enhance the CRISPR/Cas12a method for more accessible and user-friendly applications. For example, CRISPR/Cas12a can be combined with isothermal amplification methods such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) or recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), to detect ToBRFV quickly and accurately in less than 15 min. Such detection platforms named SHERLOCK and DETECTR [42,49] were successfully commercialized for SARS-Cov-2 detection based on CRISPR/Cas13 and Cas12a, respectively. Importantly, such technology can be applied using simple incubation instrumentation, such as a low-cost hand warmer (~USA Dollars 0.3), rather than expensive and complex thermocyclers [50]. Moreover, the LAMP/RPA-coupled CRISPR-Cas12 technology is cost effective, with a price of 2–5 USD/reaction [51], which is comparable to existing RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR techniques. Our protocol still relies on the RT-PCR step. Replacement of RT-PCR with isothermal amplification such as RPA or LAMP, as in SHERLOCK and DETECTR, would significantly improve the applicability of our system and enable its future application in the field.
Recently, it was shown that the amplification step may be avoided through signal amplification. One such option is to use gold nanoparticles, or L-methionine gold nanoclusters combined with electrochemiluminescence to enhance and stabilize the signal [52,53]. Another approach was recently reported where the use of several crRNAs, targeting several loci within the target DNA, significantly increased the fluorescent signal achieved following Cas13 activation [54]. In addition, several reports have shown that the output signal can be visual rather than fluorescent, further simplifying the detection procedure. Such outputs may be colorimetric, or by using lateral flow strips, similar to common pregnancy tests [42,52]. Collectively, these approaches will allow onsite, rapid, and accurate detection without the need for specialized training or equipment. These techniques will be especially relevant for the detection of closely related pathogen species or strains, and resistance-breaking variants.

Author Contributions

conceptualization, D.M.A., G.P. and Z.S.; investigation, D.M.A. and H.H.; methodology, D.M.A., H.H., Menachem Bornstein, G.P. and Z.S.; project administration, G.P. and Z.S.; resources, M.B.; supervision, G.P. and Z.S.; writing—original draft, G.P. and Z.S.; writing—review and editing, D.M.A., G.P. and Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grant number 20-02-0130 from the Chief Scientist, Israeli Ministry of Agriculture.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Neta Mor (Extension Service, Israeli Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development), for providing tomato field samples and Victor Gaba (ARO, Israel) for his critical reading of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dombrovsky, A.; Tran-Nguyen, L.T.T.; Jones, R.A.C. Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus: Rapidly Increasing Global Distribution, Etiology, Epidemiology, and Management. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oladokun, J.O.; Halabi, M.H.; Barua, P.; Nath, P.D. Tomato brown rugose fruit disease: Current distribution, knowledge and future prospects. Plant Pathol. 2019, 68, 1579–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  3. Broadbent, L. Epidemiology and Control of Tomato Mosaic Virus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1976, 14, 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dawson, W.O.; Beck, D.L.; Knorr, D.A.; Grantham, G.L. cDNA cloning of the complete genome of tobacco mosaic virus and production of infectious transcripts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 1832–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Goelet, P.; Lomonossoff, G.P.; Butler, P.J.; Akam, M.E.; Gait, M.J.; Karn, J. Nucleotide sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 5818–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  6. Reingold, V.; Lachman, O.; Belausov, E.; Koren, A.; Mor, N.; Dombrovsky, A. Epidemiological study ofCucumber green mottle mosaic virusin greenhouses enables reduction of disease damage in cucurbit production: Reducing CGMMV damage in greenhouses. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2016, 168, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tomlinson, J.A. Epidemiology and control of virus diseases of vegetables. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1987, 110, 661–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Panno, S.; Caruso, A.G.; Barone, S.; Lo Bosco, G.; Rangel, E.A.; Davino, S. Spread of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus in Sicily and Evaluation of the Spatiotemporal Dispersion in Experimental Conditions. Agronomy 2020, 10, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dombrovsky, A.; Smith, E. Seed Transmission of Tobamoviruses: Aspects of Global Disease Distribution. In Seed Biology; Jimenez-Lopez, J.C., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Davino, S.; Caruso, A.G.; Bertacca, S.; Barone, S.; Panno, S. Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus: Seed Transmission Rate and Efficacy of Different Seed Disinfection Treatments. Plants 2020, 9, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salem, N.; Mansour, A.; Ciuffo, M.; Falk, B.W.; Turina, M. A new tobamovirus infecting tomato crops in Jordan. Arch. Virol. 2016, 161, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luria, N.; Smith, E.; Reingold, V.; Bekelman, I.; Lapidot, M.; Levin, I.; Elad, N.; Tam, Y.; Sela, N.; Abu-Ras, A.; et al. A New Israeli Tobamovirus Isolate Infects Tomato Plants Harboring Tm-22 Resistance Genes. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Hak, H.; Spiegelman, Z. The Tomato brown rugose fruit virus movement protein overcomes Tm-22 resistance in tomato while attenuating viral transport. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beris, D.; Malandraki, I.; Kektsidou, O.; Theologidis, I.; Vassilakos, N.; Varveri, C. First Report of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus Infecting Tomato in Greece. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Alfaro-Fernández, A.; Castillo, P.; Sanahuja, E.; Rodríguez-Salido, M.D.C.; Font, M.I. First report of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus in tomato in Spain. Plant Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. van de Vossenberg, B.T.L.H.; Visser, M.; Bruinsma, M.; Koenraadt, H.M.S.; Westenberg, M.; Botermans, M. Real-time tracking of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) outbreaks in the Netherlands using Nextstrain. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Skelton, A.; Buxton-Kirk, A.; Ward, R.; Harju, V.; Frew, L.; Fowkes, A.; Long, M.; Negus, A.; Forde, S.; Adams, I.P.; et al. First report of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus in tomato in the United Kingdom. New Dis. Rep. 2019, 40, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  18. Panno, S.; Caruso, A.G.; Davino, S. First Report of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus on Tomato Crops in Italy. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Menzel, W.; Knierim, D.; Winter, S.; Hamacher, J.; Heupel, M. First report of tomato brown rugose fruit virus infecting tomato in Germany. New Dis. Rep. 2019, 39, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Camacho-Beltrán, E.; Pérez-Villarreal, A.; Leyva-López, N.E.; Rodríguez-Negrete, E.A.; Ceniceros-Ojeda, E.A.; Méndez-Lozano, J. Occurrence of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus Infecting Tomato Crops in Mexico. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ling, K.-S.; Tian, T.; Gurung, S.; Salati, R.; Gilliard, A. First Report of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus Infecting Greenhouse Tomato in the United States. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, Z.-Y.; Ma, H.-Y.; Han, S.-L.; Geng, C.; Tian, Y.-P.; Li, X.-D. First Report of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus Infecting Tomato in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fidan, H.; Sarikaya, P.; Calis, O. First report of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus on tomato in Turkey. New Dis. Rep. 2019, 39, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  24. Klap, C.; Luria, N.; Smith, E.; Hadad, L.; Bakelman, E.; Sela, N.; Belausov, E.; Lachman, O.; Leibman, D.; Dombrovsky, A. Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus Contributes to Enhanced Pepino Mosaic Virus Titers in Tomato Plants. Viruses 2020, 12, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Klap, C.; Luria, N.; Smith, E.; Bakelman, E.; Belausov, E.; Laskar, O.; Lachman, O.; Gal-On, A.; Dombrovsky, A. The Potential Risk of Plant-Virus Disease Initiation by Infected Tomatoes. Plants 2020, 9, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Levitzky, N.; Smith, E.; Lachman, O.; Luria, N.; Mizrahi, Y.; Bakelman, H.; Sela, N.; Laskar, O.; Milrot, E.; Dombrovsky, A. The bumblebee Bombus terrestris carries a primary inoculum of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus contributing to disease spread in tomatoes. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rodríguez-Mendoza, J.; de Jesús García-Ávila, C.; López-Buenfil, J.A.; Araujo-Ruiz, K.; Quezada-Salinas, A.; Cambrón-Crisantos, J.M.; Ochoa-Martínez, D.L. Identificación de Tomato brown rugose fruit virus por RT-PCR de una región codificante de la replicasa (RdRP). Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. Mex. J. Phytopathol. 2019, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Alkowni, R.; Alabdallah, O.; Fadda, Z. Molecular identification of tomato brown rugose fruit virus in tomato in Palestine. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 101, 719–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abstracts of Presentations at Plant Health 2019. Phytopathology 2019, 109, S2.1–S2.191.
  30. Rizzo, D.; Da Lio, D.; Panattoni, A.; Salemi, C.; Cappellini, G.; Bartolini, L.; Parrella, G. Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus in Tomato and Pepper Seeds by Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays (Real Time and Visual) and Comparison with RT-PCR End-Point and RT-qPCR Methods. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 640932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sarkes, A.; Fu, H.; Feindel, D.; Harding, M.; Feng, J. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, F.; Doudna, J.A. CRISPR-Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2017, 46, 505–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Gasiunas, G.; Barrangou, R.; Horvath, P.; Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2579–E2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  34. Charpentier, E.; Marraffini, L.A. Harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 immunity for genetic engineering. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014, 19, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  35. Jinek, M.; Chylinski, K.; Fonfara, I.; Hauer, M.; Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science 2012, 337, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hwang, W.Y.; Fu, Y.; Reyon, D.; Maeder, M.L.; Tsai, S.Q.; Sander, J.D.; Peterson, R.T.; Yeh, J.-R.J.; Joung, J.K. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 227–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shalem, O.; Sanjana, N.E.; Hartenian, E.; Shi, X.; Scott, D.A.; Mikkelsen, T.S.; Heckl, D.; Ebert, B.L.; Root, D.E.; Doench, J.G.; et al. Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells. Science 2014, 343, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  38. Garst, A.D.; Bassalo, M.C.; Pines, G.; Lynch, S.A.; Halweg-Edwards, A.L.; Liu, R.; Liang, L.; Wang, Z.; Zeitoun, R.; Alexander, W.G.; et al. Genome-wide mapping of mutations at single-nucleotide resolution for protein, metabolic and genome engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, J.S.; Ma, E.; Harrington, L.B.; Da Costa, M.; Tian, X.; Palefsky, J.M.; Doudna, J.A. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 2018, 360, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  40. Harrington, L.B.; Burstein, D.; Chen, J.S.; Paez-Espino, D.; Ma, E.; Witte, I.P.; Cofsky, J.C.; Kyrpides, N.C.; Banfield, J.F.; Doudna, J.A. Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science 2018, 362, 839–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Lee, J.W.; Essletzbichler, P.; Dy, A.J.; Joung, J.; Verdine, V.; Donghia, N.; Daringer, N.M.; Freije, C.A.; et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 2017, 356, 438–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  42. Broughton, J.P.; Deng, X.; Yu, G.; Fasching, C.L.; Servellita, V.; Singh, J.; Miao, X.; Streithorst, J.A.; Granados, A.; Sotomayor-Gonzalez, A.; et al. CRISPR–Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 870–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  43. Jiao, J.; Kong, K.; Han, J.; Song, S.; Bai, T.; Song, C.; Wang, M.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, R.; et al. Field detection of multiple RNA viruses/viroids in apple using a CRISPR/Cas12a-based visual assay. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Aman, R.; Mahas, A.; Marsic, T.; Hassan, N.; Mahfouz, M.M. Efficient, Rapid, and Sensitive Detection of Plant RNA Viruses with One-Pot RT-RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Assay. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 610872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mahas, A.; Hassan, N.; Aman, R.; Marsic, T.; Wang, Q.; Ali, Z.; Mahfouz, M.M. LAMP-Coupled CRISPR–Cas12a Module for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Plant DNA Viruses. Viruses 2021, 13, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tomato Mosaic Virus and Tobacco Mosaic Virus. Available online: https://extension.umn.edu/diseases/tomato-mosaic-virus-and-tobacco-mosaic-virus (accessed on 13 June 2021).
  47. Concordet, J.-P.; Haeussler, M. CRISPOR: Intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W242–W245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Panno, S.; Ruiz-Ruiz, S.; Caruso, A.G.; Alfaro-Fernandez, A.; Font San Ambrosio, M.I.; Davino, S. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction development for rapid detection of Tomato brown rugose fruit virus and comparison with other techniques. Peer J. 2019, 7, e7928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  49. Kellner, M.J.; Koob, J.G.; Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Zhang, F. SHERLOCK: Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 2986–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ding, X.; Yin, K.; Li, Z.; Lalla, R.V.; Ballesteros, E.; Sfeir, M.M.; Liu, C. Ultrasensitive and visual detection of SARS-CoV-2 using all-in-one dual CRISPR-Cas12a assay. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ali, Z.; Aman, R.; Mahas, A.; Rao, G.S.; Tehseen, M.; Marsic, T.; Salunke, R.; Subudhi, A.K.; Hala, S.M.; Hamdan, S.M.; et al. iSCAN: An RT-LAMP-coupled CRISPR-Cas12 module for rapid, sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2. Virus Res. 2020, 288, 198129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Choi, J.-H.; Lim, J.; Shin, M.; Paek, S.-H.; Choi, J.-W. CRISPR-Cas12a-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification-Free DNA Biosensor via Au Nanoparticle-Assisted Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence and Colorimetric Analysis. Nano Lett. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, P.-F.; Zhao, K.-R.; Liu, Z.-J.; Wang, L.; Ye, S.-Y.; Liang, G.-X. Cas12a-based electrochemiluminescence biosensor for target amplification-free DNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 176, 112954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fozouni, P.; Son, S.; Díaz de León Derby, M.; Knott, G.J.; Gray, C.N.; D’Ambrosio, M.V.; Zhao, C.; Switz, N.A.; Kumar, G.R.; Stephens, S.I.; et al. Amplification-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 with CRISPR-Cas13a and mobile phone microscopy. Cell 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 01256 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustration of plant virus detection using CRISPR/Cas12. (A) Leaf samples are collected from the infected plant. (B), RNA is extracted from the infected leaf. (C) Amplification of part of the viral genome using genus-specific RT-PCR primers. (D) Using species-specific crRNA, Cas12a-crRNAs specifically target the sequence of ToBRFV or ToMV. (E) Activation of Cas12a by sequence-specific binding, which triggers the degradation of the ssDNA probe and releases the fluorophore (F) from the quencher (Q) to emit the fluorescent signal.
Figure 1. Illustration of plant virus detection using CRISPR/Cas12. (A) Leaf samples are collected from the infected plant. (B), RNA is extracted from the infected leaf. (C) Amplification of part of the viral genome using genus-specific RT-PCR primers. (D) Using species-specific crRNA, Cas12a-crRNAs specifically target the sequence of ToBRFV or ToMV. (E) Activation of Cas12a by sequence-specific binding, which triggers the degradation of the ssDNA probe and releases the fluorophore (F) from the quencher (Q) to emit the fluorescent signal.
Plants 10 01256 g001
Plants 10 01256 g002 550
Figure 2. Analysis of different crRNAs for the detection of ToMV and ToBRFV. (A) A 1827 bp fragment was amplified using RT-PCR from virus-infected plants. Four crRNAs were designed for ToMV detection (tomv-1, tomv-7, tomv-8 and tomv-9) and three sgRNAs were designed for ToBRFV detection (tobrfv-3, tobrfv-5 and tobrfv-9). (B) CRISPR/Cas12-based fluorescent detection of ToMV using the different crRNAs on samples from ToMV- (light blue) and ToBRFV- (dark blue) infected tomato plants. (C) Fluorescence image of ToMV detection using the tomv-1 crRNA. (D) CRISPR/Cas12-based fluorescent detection of ToBRFV using the different crRNAs on samples from ToMV (light blue) and ToBRFV (dark blue) infected tomato plants. (E) Fluorescence image of ToBRFV detection using the tomv-3 crRNA. RFU = relative fluorescence units. n.s = not significant. ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001 in Student’s t-test.
Figure 2. Analysis of different crRNAs for the detection of ToMV and ToBRFV. (A) A 1827 bp fragment was amplified using RT-PCR from virus-infected plants. Four crRNAs were designed for ToMV detection (tomv-1, tomv-7, tomv-8 and tomv-9) and three sgRNAs were designed for ToBRFV detection (tobrfv-3, tobrfv-5 and tobrfv-9). (B) CRISPR/Cas12-based fluorescent detection of ToMV using the different crRNAs on samples from ToMV- (light blue) and ToBRFV- (dark blue) infected tomato plants. (C) Fluorescence image of ToMV detection using the tomv-1 crRNA. (D) CRISPR/Cas12-based fluorescent detection of ToBRFV using the different crRNAs on samples from ToMV (light blue) and ToBRFV (dark blue) infected tomato plants. (E) Fluorescence image of ToBRFV detection using the tomv-3 crRNA. RFU = relative fluorescence units. n.s = not significant. ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001 in Student’s t-test.
Plants 10 01256 g002
Plants 10 01256 g003 550
Figure 3. Sensitivity and specificity analysis for the selected crRNAs. (A) Detection of ToMV using the tomv-1 crRNA in a series of dilutions of ToMV RT-PCR products. (B) Detection of ToBRFV using the tobrfv-3 crRNA in a series of dilutions of ToBRFV RT-PCR products. (C) Identification of ToMV in a mix of ToMV and ToBRFV RT-PCR products from using the tomv-1 crRNA. (D) Identification of ToBRFV in a mix of ToMV and ToBRFV RT-PCR products using the tobrfv-3 crRNA. Different letters indicate statistical significance in Tukey-HSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. Sensitivity and specificity analysis for the selected crRNAs. (A) Detection of ToMV using the tomv-1 crRNA in a series of dilutions of ToMV RT-PCR products. (B) Detection of ToBRFV using the tobrfv-3 crRNA in a series of dilutions of ToBRFV RT-PCR products. (C) Identification of ToMV in a mix of ToMV and ToBRFV RT-PCR products from using the tomv-1 crRNA. (D) Identification of ToBRFV in a mix of ToMV and ToBRFV RT-PCR products using the tobrfv-3 crRNA. Different letters indicate statistical significance in Tukey-HSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Plants 10 01256 g003
Plants 10 01256 g004 550
Figure 4. Detection of ToBRFV in field samples using CRISPR/Cas12a. (A) Tomato with mosaic leaf pattern were detected in two different sites in Azriel village, Israel, in December 2020. Samples were obtained from two infected tomato cultivars, Ikram and Sgula. (B) CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection using the tomv-1 crRNA indicated no presence of ToMV. (C) CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection using the tobrfv-3 crRNA indicated the presence of ToBRFV in the sample.
Figure 4. Detection of ToBRFV in field samples using CRISPR/Cas12a. (A) Tomato with mosaic leaf pattern were detected in two different sites in Azriel village, Israel, in December 2020. Samples were obtained from two infected tomato cultivars, Ikram and Sgula. (B) CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection using the tomv-1 crRNA indicated no presence of ToMV. (C) CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection using the tobrfv-3 crRNA indicated the presence of ToBRFV in the sample.
Plants 10 01256 g004
Table
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used for crRNA synthesis.
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used for crRNA synthesis.
Name (* nt Position)Sequence (5′-3′)
T7-crRNA-FATCTACAACAGTAGAAATTCCCTATAGTGAGTCGTATTAATTTC
tobrfv-3 (3023–3049)** ACCGACGATGTACACATGACATGatctacaacagtagaaattccctatagtgagtcgtattaatttc
tobrfv-5 (2826–2852)GCACAGAGACATAGAAACAAGAAatctacaacagtagaaattccctatagtgagtcgtattaatttc
tobrfv-9 (1822–1848)GAGGTAGACCCAATGACTGCAGCatctacaacagtagaaattccctatagtgagtcgtattaatttc
tomv-1 (2469–2495)GCCATATCAGAATATACTACCGAatctacaacagtagaaattccctatagtgagtcgtattaatttc
tomv-7 (2295–2321)GAAGCAACATCCAGAACTCCGAAatctacaacagtagaaattccctatagtgagtcgtattaatttc
tomv-8 (1746–1772)AGTACAGACAGTTCGGACAGTGCatctacaacagtagaaattccctatagtgagtcgtattaatttc
tomv-9 (2906–2932)CCGTACCCTGCGCACTTTGCAAAatctacaacagtagaaattccctatagtgagtcgtattaatttc
* Numbers indicate the nucleotide positions of each crRNA binding site on the viral sequence. ** Capital letters mark the DNA-binding part and lower case letters mark the conserved sequence in each crRNA.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alon, D.M.; Hak, H.; Bornstein, M.; Pines, G.; Spiegelman, Z. Differential Detection of the Tobamoviruses Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV) Using CRISPR-Cas12a. Plants 2021, 10, 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061256

AMA Style

Alon DM, Hak H, Bornstein M, Pines G, Spiegelman Z. Differential Detection of the Tobamoviruses Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV) Using CRISPR-Cas12a. Plants. 2021; 10(6):1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alon, Dan Mark, Hagit Hak, Menachem Bornstein, Gur Pines, and Ziv Spiegelman. 2021. "Differential Detection of the Tobamoviruses Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV) Using CRISPR-Cas12a" Plants 10, no. 6: 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop