Next Article in Journal
Morpho-Physiological Testing of NaCl Sensitivity of Tobacco Plants Overexpressing Choline Oxidase Gene
Previous Article in Journal
OseIF3h Regulates Plant Growth and Pollen Development at Translational Level Presumably through Interaction with OsMTA2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/plants10061103
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Characteristics and Research Progress of Legume Nodule Senescence

by
Shunxin Zhou
,
Chanjuan Zhang
,
Yi Huang
,
Haifeng Chen
*,
Songli Yuan
* and
Xinan Zhou
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430062, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(6), 1103; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061103
Submission received: 23 April 2021 / Revised: 28 May 2021 / Accepted: 28 May 2021 / Published: 30 May 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Delaying the nodule senescence of legume crops can prolong the time of nitrogen fixation and attenuate the lack of fertilizer in the later stage of legume crop cultivation, resulting in improved crop yield and reduced usage of nitrogen fertilizer. However, effective measures to delay the nodule senescence of legume crops in agriculture are relatively lacking. In the present review, we summarized the structural and physiological characteristics of nodule senescence, as well as the corresponding detection methods, providing technical support for the identification of nodule senescence phenotype. We then outlined the key genes currently known to be involved in the regulation of nodule senescence, offering the molecular genetic information for breeding varieties with delayed nodule senescence. In addition, we reviewed various abiotic factors affecting nodule senescence, providing a theoretical basis for the interaction between molecular genetics and abiotic factors in the regulation of nodule senescence. Finally, we briefly prospected research foci of nodule senescence in the future.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen is one of the most important limiting factors for the growth and development of plants in nature. At present, the high yield of crops largely depends on the use of nitrogen fertilizers. However, large-scale application of nitrogen fertilizers not only increases production costs but also causes environmental pollution. As a biological process between nitrogen-fixing microorganisms and legumes, symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) directly converts atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia through nitrogenase [1]. Therefore, it is the most economical and environmentally-friendly way of achieving nitrogen fixation [2]. Moreover, SNF plays a significant role in enhancing the recovery of grassland ecosystems, promoting the growth of windbreak and sand fixation tree species, accelerating the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated land, improving the composition of soil nutrients, and ameliorating the agricultural weight loss and efficiency [3,4].
The formation of legume-rhizobium symbiosis is the result of mutual recognition between microorganisms and plants, as well as the interaction between signaling molecules [5]. First, flavonoid compounds released by the legume roots can induce rhizobia to produce Nod factors, which have the function as signal molecules and can be recognized by Nod factor receptors of legume plants. Then, the root hairs of legumes curl, deform and form infection threads [6] through which rhizobia penetrate the root tissue [7]. Simultaneously, some cortical cells of the root are stimulated to start dividing to form a primordial nodule [8]. The cells infected by the bacteria derive from root inner cortex cells, which differentiate and then proliferate to form the nodule meristem. The timing of initiation, development, and maturing of nodule organogenesis inside root cells has been well documented [9,10].
Nodules in legumes can be divided into two types depending on the persistence of the nodule meristem as follows: determinate nodules and indeterminate nodules, which have different characteristics in morphology [11]. Indeterminate nodules, such as those in Medicago truncatula, Pisum sativum, Vicia faba, and Trifolium repens, contain five different zones: the active meristem that allows the growth of the nodule (Zone I), the infection zone, where the cells differentiate and are infected by the bacteria (Zone II), the nitrogen fixation zone (Zone III), in which bacteroids fix atmospheric nitrogen, and the senescent zone (Zone IV), where bacteria and plant cells are deconstructed, accompanied by the destruction of symbiosis [12]. Determinate nodules, such as Glycine max and Lotus japonicus, have non-persistent meristems, and all the infected cells are always at the similar stage of development. In both determinate and indeterminate nodules, rhizobia supply nitrogen sources for the growth and development of legume plants by SNF, and in return, legumes provide carbon sources to rhizobia to sustain their growth and reproduction within the nodules [13].
There are three major approaches to increase SNF efficiency: increasing the number of nodules to improve nitrogen fixation efficiency; improving nitrogen-fixing enzyme activity, and delaying nodule senescence to extend the time of nitrogen fixation and increase nitrogen fixation amount. Among them, delaying nodule senescence and prolonging the time of nitrogen fixation are the key measures to ensure nitrogen fixation and adequate supply of nitrogen to legumes in the reproductive period and to solve the problem of late defertilization in legumes, which often occurs in pod stage when the symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability of legume crops is gradually weakened, and meanwhile it is hard to artificially supply extra nitrogen fertilizer to meet the demand at this stage. In the present review, we summarized the characteristics and research methods of legume nodule senescence, and the research progress related to molecular and abiotic factors in the regulation of nodule senescence. In our current work, we aimed to compile information on legume nodule development and senescence and to provide ideas to further delay nodule senescence.

2. Characteristics and Research Methods of Legume Nodule Senescence

Generally, the efficiency of nitrogen fixation in legume plants reaches a peak at 4–6 weeks after inoculation with rhizobia, after which the bacteroids differentiate and the nitrogen fixation ability is gradually weakened [14]. Nodule senescence is a complex and programmed process, including the reduction of Leghemoglobin content, structural changes of nodule cells, the decrease of nitrogenase activity, changes in the lifestyle and growth capacity of bacteria, and so on. The morphology, physiological and biochemical changes and the corresponding methods are summarized in Table 1.
During the nodule senescence, in particular, the color of the nitrogen fixation zone is converted from pink to green due to the nitration of the heme group of functional leghemoglobin (LHb) [15]. This nodule color change is caused by nitrogen biomobilization and a rapid decrease in LHb content [16]. Therefore, we can assess the degree of nodule senescence by calculating the ratio of senescent nodules to the total nodules by observing the changes in nodule color, and detect the content of LHb by using the cyanmethemoglobin method, which is a rapid, quantitative method for the determination of LHb in legume nodules [17,18]. Besides, we can also examine the content of LHb at the transcriptional and protein levels by using qPCR and Western blotting analysis.
The most representative characteristic of nodule senescence is the structural changes of the nodule cells, including progressively reduced electron density, the appearance of numerous vesicles in the cytoplasm, increased number of peroxisomes, the formation of complex elongated structures by mitochondria, symbiotic membrane disintegration, damaged cell wall, and lysis of bacteroids [14,19,20]. Generally, paraffin sections of nodules are made to observe the dynamic changes of senescence zone [21], the TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) staining assay is used to detect the programmed cell death or apoptotic-like cell death in nodules [22,23], transmission electron microscopy is utilized to observe the morphology of the inner cells, the electron density of the symbiosis, and the integrity of the symbiotic membrane [23], and in situ live/dead staining assay has been found to detect the rhizobia with intact cell membranes or damaged membranes [24,25].
Table
Table 1. The morphology, physiological and biochemical changes of legume nodule senescence and the corresponding detection methods.
Table 1. The morphology, physiological and biochemical changes of legume nodule senescence and the corresponding detection methods.
Characteristics of Nodule SenescenceCorresponding Detection MethodsReference
Morphology changes
The color of nodules is converted to green; loss of turgidity in nodulesCalculating the ratio of senescent nodules to the total nodules[15]
Less electron dense; appearance of numerous vesicles and peroxisomes;Nodule paraffin sections micromorphology analysis; electron microscope scanning[14,19,20]
The formation of complex elongated structures by mitochondria
Symbiotic membrane disintegration; damaged cell wall and lysis of bacteroidsNodule paraffin sections micromorphology analysis; electron microscope scanning;TUNEL staining assay; in situ live/dead staining assay[14,19,20,24,25]
Physiological and Biochemical changes
Decreased nitrogenase activityAcetylene reduction assay (ARA)[26,27]
Decreased leghemoglobin contentThe cyanmethemoglobin method, qPCR and Western blotting analysis[17,18]
Decreased lifestyle and growth capacity of RhizobiumTesting the lifestyle and growth capacity of Rhizobium[28,29]
Increased the concentration of nitric oxide (NO), ethylene, ABA and so onMeasuring the nodule senescence-related metabolites and hormone signals[5,30]
Increased in the expression of nodule senescence-related marker genesLaser microdissection; ACC immunolocalization; qPCR[31]
Decreased nitrogenase activity, lifestyle and growth capacity of bacteria are also the major features of nodule senescence [28,29]. The decline in nitrogen-fixing enzyme activity is measured using the acetylene reduction assay (ARA), which is a high sensitivity, rapid, low cost, and nondestructive method [26,27]. Rhizobium is an important player in nodule senescence, and the morphological and physiological characteristics of senescent nodules have revealed that half of the rhizobia surviving in a hemibiotrophic-like lifestyle cannot grow [28,29]. Therefore, testing the lifestyle and growth capacity of bacteria is also an efficient method to evaluate nodule senescence.
Legumes can control the formation of symbiosis and the lifespan of nodules through the molecular dialogue between metabolites and hormones [5,30]. Therefore, nodule senescence can be detected by measuring the metabolites and hormone signals that determine the onset of nodule senescence in plants [32]. For example, endogenous ethylene plays a role in the formation and position of nodule primordia [33,34,35].Two ethylene inhibitors silver ions (Ag+) and aminoethoxy-vinylglycine (AVG) can counteract the interfering effect of ethylene, we therefore measured the position of nodule formation in the presence of AVG or Ag + to test whether the endogenous ethylene provided the position information to control the formation of nodule primordia [35].Furthermore, according to known molecular markers associated with nodule senescence, several methods such as laser microdissection, qPCR, and ACC immunolocalization are employed for nodule senescence detection [31].
In summary, the morphology, physiological and biochemical characteristics of legume nodule senescence and the corresponding detection methods have been described in detail. According to these findings, we can easily identify the nodule senescence phenotype of legumes and provide technical support for functional studies of genes in nodule senescence.

3. Gene Regulation Related to Legume Nodule Senescence

Delaying nodule senescence and/or prolonging nitrogen fixation time are the key measures to solve the problem of late defertilization of legumes, which is critical for the planting of legumes and agriculture. Nodule senescence is a genetically controlled process, and transcriptomic studies of the model legumes L. japonicus and M. truncatula have identified lots of up- or down-regulated genes in senescent nodules [19,36,37,38]. In soybean, we analyzed the nodule development at five different developmental stages (branching stage, flowering stage, fruiting stage, pod stage and harvest stage), and found many nodule senescence-related genes, including those encoding soybean cysteine proteases, cystatins, cysteine-rich proteins and transcription factors, as well as proteins involved in plant-pathogen interactions [21]. We performed whole-genome surveys of soybean papain-like cysteine protease (PLCP) family genes [39], soybean cystatin family genes [40] and soybean C2H2 zinc finger family genes [41], analyzed their expression profiles during nodule development and senescence, and identified dozens of candidate genes related to nodule senescence. Besides, many genes have been studied to play roles in regulating the nodule senescence of legume plants in recent years. These genes mainly include cysteine proteases, transcription factors, peptides, enzymes, and other functional genes (Figure 1).
During the progress of nodule senescence, the expressions of various hydrolases are up-regulated to trigger large-scale protein degradation, which is a hallmark of nodule senescence, especially for cysteine proteases [42]. Cysteine proteases are a class of proteins widely involved in the senescence and programmed cell death of various tissues and organs of plants [43], and they have been shown to play key roles in legume nodule senescence [10,31]. In Astragalus sinicus, Asnodf32 is a nodule-specific cysteine protease and RNAi interference with the expression of Asnodf32 delays nodule senescence and prolongs nodule lifespan [23,44]. In M. truncatula, Mtcp1-Mtcp6, a conserved cysteine protease subfamily, may be involved in the degradation of symbiont structure [45], and MtCP6 promotes nodule senescence [46]. MtCP77 positively regulates nodule senescence by accelerating plant PCD and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation [47]. In pea, PsCYP1 is expressed at the onset of senescence in the indeterminate nodules, and inhibition of PsCyp15A or MsCYP15A delays the senescence of nodules [48,49,50]. In soybean, GmCYSP1 may participate in nodule development and senescence [51]. Transcriptomic studies have shown that dozens of papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) are associated with nodule senescence [21,52]. We performed the genome-wide survey of PLCPs to detect their expression in root nodule symbiosis, and identified many nodule senescence-related PLCPs [39]. Moreover, cysteine protease can specifically inhibit nodule cysteine-rich (NCR) peptides, which mainly exist in legumes and are closely related to the terminal differentiation of rhizobia [53]. For example, MtNFS1 and MtNFS2 can induce bacterial death and early nodule senescence in rhizobial strain-dependent manner [54,55,56]. MtDNF4 and MtDNF7 are essential for bacterial survival, bacterial differentiation and nitrogen fixation [57,58,59]. MtSymCRK can prevent nodule senescence and avoid defense-like reactions [60]. Cysteine protease can be inhibited by its natural inhibitor cystatin, several of which are differently expressed in symbiosis and play roles in nodule senescence [21,40,52]. Cysteine protease can also be regulated by transcription factors during nodule senescence. For example, MtbHLH2 can repress MtCP77 to negatively regulate nodule senescence [47]. MtNAC920 can up-regulate MtCP2 to play positive roles in nodule senescence [47]. These findings suggested complex relationships may exist among cysteine proteases, cystatins, NCR proteins and transcription factors. In the regulation of the root nodule senescence of legumes, previous studies have proved that cystatins and transcription factors can regulate cysteine proteases, cysteine proteases can inhibit NCR proteins, while whether transcription factors can regulate cystatins and NCR proteins, and whether cystatins can regulate NCR proteins remain unclear (Figure 1).
Nodule senescence is coregulated by legumes and rhizobia, and a series of cellular metabolic processes and the transport of nutrients are involved in this process. In legume plants, except for cysteine proteases, the genes associated with these biological processes mainly are membrane proteins, transcription factors and other functional genes. LjSST1, which is a nodule-specific sulfate transporter that is located on the symbiosome membrane in Lotus nodules, is critical for symbiotic nitrogen fixation [61]. LjSEN1, encoding an integral membrane protein, plays important roles in regulating the nitrogen fixation activity and the differentiation of bacteroids or symbiosomes [62]. LjIGN1 is an ankyrin-repeat membrane protein and is essential for bacteroid differentiation and functioning [63]. Many soybean C2H2 transcription factors may play key roles in nodule senescence [41]. MtRSD, which encodes a nodule-specific C2H2 transcription factor, can repress the transcription of VAMP721a and promote symbiosome development in M.truncatula [64]. A bZIP transcription factor MtATB2, which can regulate carbon metabolism and metabolite partitioning, is regulated by sucrose and enhanced during nodule senescence [65]. Two NAC transcription factors MtNAC969 and MtNAC920 can be induced by root abiotic stress and have been shown to play roles in nodule senescence [66,67]. bHLH2 transcription factor MtbHLH2 plays significant roles in plant PCD, ROS accumulation, and nodule senescence [47]. LjAPN1 is a nepenthesin-type aspartic peptidase, and plays critical roles in the persistence of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis functioning in a rhizobial strain-dependent manner [68]. MtNAD1 and MtDNF2 are essential for the maintenance of rhizobial endosymbiosis and the control of plant defense during the symbiotic colonization [25,69,70]. Lines with different MtNPDs mutation combinations presented smaller nodules, earlier nodule senescence, or ineffective nodules [71].
Nodule senescence can also be regulated by the genes associated with phytohormones and stress. Two genes ACS2 and ACO1, which encode two enzymes that are involved in the biosynthesis of ethylene, can activate nodule senescence [31]. Similarly, aldehyde oxidase AO3, which is a key enzyme for the biosynthesis of ABA, can also positively regulate nodule senescence [31]. Opposite to the above-mentioned three genes, GA2-oxidase, which is involved in the catabolism of gibberellins, has been shown to suppress nodule senescence [31]. Mt serpin6 and Mtferritins can mediate ordered drought-induced senescence and reduce plant growth [72]. MtCAS31 protects MtLb120-1 from the damage of drought stress to delay nodule senescence [73].
In this part, we outline the key genes currently known to be involved in the regulation of nodule senescence, mainly including cysteine proteases, transcription factors, cystatins, NCR peptides, hormones signals-related genes, stress signals-related genes, membrane proteins and other functional proteins (Figure 1). These findings offer molecular genetic information for breeding varieties with delayed nodule senescence. Cysteine proteases usually are considered as adequate molecular markers of nodule senescence [31], and the relationships between the cysteine proteases and other key genes are universal (Figure 1), while the regulatory mechanism of cysteine proteases and the coordinated regulation of cysteine proteases and other key genes during nodule senescence should be the focus in the future works.

4. Abiotic Factors in the Regulation of Nodule Senescence

Nodule senescence is mainly triggered by normal development, while environmental stress can also affect and regulate its progress [45,74,75], such as drought [72,76], salt [66,77], darkness [45,78], nitrate [37,79,80,81], and so on. Under drought stress, more deleterious reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced, and the synthesis of ferritin is inhibited, thus accelerating the senescence of root nodules [72], while leaves of low photosynthetic capacity are sacrificed in favor of nodule nitrogen metabolism to delay nodule senescence [76]. Salt stress can inhibit the N2-fixation activity and nodule respiration, and induce premature senescence of existing nodules [77]. Nitrogenase activity and the content of leghemoglobin are decreased under prolonged dark treatment, which can rapidly trigger a wide range of nodule senescence [45]. In nitrate-induced nodule senescence, the antioxidant content and nitrogenase activity are reduced, leading to serious impairment of nodule metabolism related to nodule senescence [79]. Besides, it has also been shown that the expression of acds is increased in nodules under hypoxic conditions, resulting in postponed degradation of enzymes associated with nitrogen fixation and delayed senescence of nodules [82].
Accumulating evidence suggests that oxidative damage exists in legume nodule senescence [14,78,83,84], and in these oxidative stress-induced aging nodules, ROS (mainly organic peroxides), oxidized glutathione and homoglutathione, catalytic Fe, lipid peroxidation, and oxidatively modified proteins and DNA bases are increased [84,85,86]. Oxidative stress is a result of over production of free radicals and is associated ROS [87]. ROS may induce irreversible posttranslational modification (carbonylation, advanced glycation) of crucial proteins in nodules, which play key roles in cell metabolism and nodule senescence [88]. Mitochondria are an important source of regulatory redox signals and an early target of oxidative modifications in senescing legume nodules [14,89]. ROS (such as H2O2) was shown to act as signaling molecule that regulate nodule senescence [14,32], and the concentrations of ROS will be tightly controlled by antioxidant enzymes and metabolites [90]. The antioxidant systems in symbiotic nodules can protect cells from oxidative damage [14,91,92], and the roles of ROS and antioxidant systems in nodule senescence have been reviewed comprehensively elsewhere [14,90].
As a signaling and defense molecule involved in diverse plant developmental processes and the plant response to pathogens, nitric oxide (NO) has been detected as a signal in nodule senescence [93]. Reducing the NO concentration can delay the senescence of nodules in dark conditions, while increasing the endogenous NO leads to cytological modifications of the nodule structure and the early expression of a specific senescence marker [93]. Meanwhile, the rhizobia can control NO-mediated post-translational modifications of legume proteins to regulate nodule senescence [93,94,95]. Hmp-a, encoding a NO detoxification enzyme, can inhibit the level of NO and delay nodule senescence [93,96]. Similarly, LjGlb1-1, a non-symbiotic class 1 Hb, can negatively regulate the level of NO, enhance the nitrogenase activity of mature and senescent nodules, and delay nodule senescence [97,98]. Meanwhile, iron-induced NO leads to an increased expression of ferritin during the senescence of L. japonicus nodules, supporting the above-mentioned point [99].
Nodule senescence is also tightly regulated by plant hormones, which are small molecules playing versatile roles in regulating plant growth, development, and responses to the environment [100]. These nodule senescence-related hormones mainly include ABA, ethylene, gibberellins, and jasmonate (JA). ABA plays roles in plants generally by decreasing growth rate and enhancing cell sustainability, while it also can inhibit lateral root development [101]. ABA is involved in the response of roots to high nitrate levels in the soil [102], and regulates the root nodule senescence [103]. When legumes are treated with ABA, the contents of leghemoglobin and N-fixation are declined, leading to the premature senescence of root nodules [103]. During nodule senescence, ethylene response factors (ERFs), SAM synthetase, ACC synthase, and ACC oxidase are up-regulated, which can increase ethylene production and activate nodule senescence [104,105]. Besides, when ethylene biosynthesis and signaling are altered, the bacteroid number per symbiosome [106], bacterial elongation [107] and bacteroid senescence will change [108]. Gibberellins are a large group of diterpenoid carboxylic acids in higher plants and have been well studied in nodulation, nodule development, and senescence [109,110,111]. The size of the nodule and the zone of nitrogen fixation are increased, and the number of nodules and senescence zone is decreased in the GA3-treated legumes [111], suggesting a negative effect of GAs on the nodule senescence. Furthermore, GA3 treatment can stimulate nodule meristem bifurcation [111], indicating a possible role of GAs in the redifferentiation of nodule meristem. JAs are important molecules in regulating physiological processes in plant growth and development, which can mediate the plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [112]. JAs are highly expressed in root nodules, and previous studies have shown that JAs can inhibit the expressions of early nodulation genes to negatively regulate nodulation [113]. Besides, they can also affect nodule cell growth and senescence process by affecting the antioxidant metabolism [114].
Among the above-mentioned factors, the concentration of NO in legumes will increase when the plants are exposed to environmental stresses [115,116,117]. NO may be produced downstream in the phytohormone signaling pathway in nodules [97], and plant hormones play critical roles in plant responses to adverse environmental conditions [100,118]. ROS and antioxidants can interact with hormones in the orchestration of nodule senescence [14], ROS and antioxidant systems are also participate in environmental stress-induced nodule senescence [76,78,79,119], and crosstalk between ROS and NO appears to be a key point to understand the redox regulation of symbiosis [120]. Therefore, these four signaling pathways can interact with each other in the regulating the senescence of nodules, and the interactions between different hormones or different environmental stresses are also existed during nodule senescence (Figure 2). In darkness-induced nodule senescence, the degree of senescence is reduced by removing NO from the nodules, suggesting that NO could be an intermediate in this process [93]. ABA and ethylene can induce NO accumulation during nodule senescence and the senescence-associated changes are suppressed by the NO scavenger cPTIO, indicating that ABA and ethylene trigger nodule senescence maybe by regulating the NO levels of nodules [97]. JAs, which have a strong senescence-promoting effect, were recognized as being signals in plant responses to lots of biotic and abiotic factors, including salt stress, drought stress and darkness stress [121]. ABA can interact with drought stress [76] or nitrate treatment [102] in the regulating the nodule senescence. The interactions between different hormones [14,111] or different environmental stress factors [66,74] are also found during nodule senescence. In drought stress [76], darkness stress [78] and nitrate treatment- included [79] nodule senescence, ROS and oxidatively modified proteins are increased, and these oxidative damage may have originated from the decrease in antioxidant defenses. Ascorbate, an important nodule antioxidant, is involved in dioxygenase reactions, such as those required for the synthesis of ABA, gibberellic acid and ethylene [14,122]. Both ROS and NO can mediate post-translational modification of proteins during nodule senescence, and legume plants possess different hemoglobins which play a significant role in ROS and RNS metabolism by contributing to ROS production and NO scavenging [117,120].
Here, we analyzed the effects of common environmental stresses, oxidative stress, NO, and plant hormones on the senescence of nodules, and reviewed the interactions between these four signaling pathways in regulating nodule senescence. Future research on screening or cultivating legumes and/or rhizobia those are resistant to these abiotic factors, and discovering additional crosstalk mechanisms among these signaling pathways will be important themes in the field of nodule senescence research.

5. Summary and Prospect

Delaying the senescence of root nodules and prolonging the time of nitrogen fixation are key measures to solve the lack of fertilizer in the later stage of legume crop cultivation. These approaches are effective ways to fully utilize the role of nitrogen fixation and promote the sustainable development of green agriculture. However, the means by which to delay nodule senescence and prolong the time of nitrogen fixation remain to be further studied.
In the present review, the structural and physiological characteristics of legume nodule senescence were described in detail, and several effective research methods detecting the senescence of nodules were summarized. However, the molecular mechanism of nodule senescence is still unclear. Although a large number of mutations of legume plants have phenotypes associated with nodule senescence, methods regarding the identification of genes that precisely control nodule senescence have not yet been well established. Additionally, many cysteine proteases, transcription factors, peptides, enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of hormones, and other functional genes for nodule senescence have been identified, although the regulatory mechanism of these key genes remains unclear. Therefore, the coordinated regulation of various key genes during nodule senescence should be the focus of future works.
Abiotic stresses are a major agricultural restriction factor affecting crop yield. Meanwhile, they also play key roles in regulating the root nodule senescence. Here, we reviewed the effects of common environmental stresses, oxidative stress, NO, and plant hormones on the senescence of nodules. Environmental stress factors such as drought, salt, darkness, and nitrate mainly reduce the activity of nitrogen fixation and promote the senescence of root nodules. Therefore, it is important to enhance the resistance of symbiosis to environmental stress to delay the nodule senescence. Moreover, screening or cultivating legumes and/or rhizobia that are resistant to these environmental stress factors is the subsequent focus. The redox regulation of nodule senescence mainly depends on ROS and antioxidant systems, and the roles of ROS and antioxidant systems in nodule senescence have been reviewed comprehensively, while the mechanism of the balance between ROS and antioxidant system is unclear. NO, as one of the RNS (reactive nitrogen species) involved in the interaction between legumes and rhizobia, is an important factor affecting nodule senescence, and it has been detected as a signal in nodule senescence. However, the mechanism underlying the NO-regulated nodule senescence is still unknown. Some plant hormones, including ABA, ethylene, gibberellins, and JA, also play important roles in the regulation of nodule senescence, while little is known about the regulatory mechanisms of these hormones and interactions between different hormones during nodule senescence. Additionally, ROS or NO can interact with hormones and environmental stress factors, and hormones can interact with environmental stress factors. Therefore, the coordinated regulation of various factors in nodule senescence will be very vital in future work.
In summary, we reviewed the structural and physiological characteristics and related research methods of legume nodule senescence, as well as important genes and abiotic factors related to legume nodule senescence. Our present review provided theoretical guidance for the cultivation of high nitrogen fixation legume and rhizobium varieties, and clues for establishing the technology of delaying nodule senescence, prolonging effective nitrogen fixation time, and enhancing SNF effect in legume-rhizobial symbiosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C. and S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.C. and S.Y.; formal analysis, C.Z. and Y.H.; project administration, X.Z.; funding acquisition, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32071964),the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2020YFD1000903-10) and the Basic scientific research service fee special of the Central Scientific Research Institute (1610172018001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stonoha-Arther, C.; Wang, D. Tough love: Accommodating intracellular bacteria through directed secretion of antimicrobial peptides during the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 44, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Biswas, B.; Gresshoff, P.M. The role of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in sustainable production of biofuels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 7380–7397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zhang, X. Application of plant rhizobia inoculation in agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and environmental protection. Biol. Teach. 2012, 37, 2–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, X.; Xu, R.; Liao, H. Contribution and application potential of soybean symbiotic nitrogen fixation in reducing weight and increasing efficiency in agriculture. Soybean Sci. 2016, 35, 531–535. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferguson, B.J.; Indrasumunar, A.; Hayashi, S.; Lin, M.H.; Lin, Y.H.; Reid, D.E.; Gresshoff, P.M. Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tsyganova, A.V.; Kitaeva, A.B.; Tsyganov, V.E. Cell differentiation in nitrogen-fixing nodules hosting symbiosomes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Via, V.D.; Zanetti, M.E.; Blanco, F. How legumes recognize rhizobia. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1120396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Timmers, A.C.; Auriac, M.C.; Truchet, G. Refined analysis of early symbiotic steps of the Rhizobium-Medicago interaction in relationship with microtubular cytoskeleton rearrangements. Development 1999, 126, 3617–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiao, T.T.; Schilderink, S.; Moling, S.; Deinum, E.E.; Kondorosi, E.; Franssen, H.; Kulikova, O.; Niebel, A.; Bisseling, T. Fate map of Medicago truncatula root nodules. Development 2014, 141, 3517–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mergaert, P.; Kereszt, A.; Kondorosi, E. Gene Expression in Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiotic Nodule Cells in Medicago truncatula and Other Nodulating Plants. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 42–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hirsch, A.M. Tansley Review No. 40. Developmental Biology of Legume Nodulation. New Phytol. 1992, 122, 211–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vasse, J.; de Billy, F.; Camut, S.; Truchet, G. Correlation between ultrastructural differentiation of bacteroids and nitrogen fixation in alfalfa nodules. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4295–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kawaharada, Y.; Nielsen, M.W.; Kelly, S.; James, E.K.; Andersen, K.R.; Rasmussen, S.R.; Füchtbauer, W.; Madsen, L.H.; Heckmann, A.B.; Radutoiu, S.; et al. Differential regulation of the Epr3 receptor coordinates membrane-restricted rhizobial colonization of root nodule primordia. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Puppo, A.; Groten, K.; Bastian, F.; Carzaniga, R.; Soussi, M.; Lucas, M.M.; de Felipe, M.R.; Harrison, J.; Vanacker, H.; Foyer, C.H. Legume nodule senescence: Roles for redox and hormone signalling in the orchestration of the natural aging process. New Phytol. 2005, 165, 683–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Navascués, J.; Pérez-Rontomé, C.; Gay, M.; Marcos, M.; Yang, F.; Walker, F.A.; Desbois, A.; Abián, J.; Becana, M. Leghemoglobin green derivatives with nitrated hemes evidence production of highly reactive nitrogen species during aging of legume nodules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2660–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Xia, X. Phenotypic Analysis and Molecular Markers of Plant Nodule Senescence. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1744, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wilson, D.O.; Reisenauer, H.M. Determination of leghemoglobin in legume nodules. Anal. Biochem. 1963, 6, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schiffmann, J.; Löbel, R. Haemoglobin determination and its value as an early indication of peanut rhizobium efficiency. Plant Soil 1970, 33, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van de Velde, W.; Guerra, J.C.; De Keyser, A.; De Rycke, R.; Rombauts, S.; Maunoury, N.; Mergaert, P.; Kondorosi, E.; Holsters, M.; Goormachtig, S. Aging in legume symbiosis. A molecular view on nodule senescence in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hernández-Jiménez, M.J.; Lucas, M.M.; Felipe, M.R.d. Antioxidant defence and damage in senescing lupin nodules. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 40, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yuan, S.L.; Li, R.; Chen, H.F.; Zhang, C.J.; Chen, L.M.; Hao, Q.N.; Chen, S.L.; Shan, Z.H.; Yang, Z.L.; Zhang, X.J.; et al. RNA-Seq analysis of nodule development at five different developmental stages of soybean (Glycine max) inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain 113-2. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gavrieli, Y.; Sherman, Y.; Ben-Sasson, S.A. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 119, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, D.; Tan, X.; Lei, L.; Zhou, J. A nodule-specific plant cysteine proteinase, AsNODF32, is involved in nodule senescence and nitrogen fixation activity of the green manure legume Astragalus sinicus. New Phytol. 2008, 180, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Haag, A.F.; Baloban, M.; Sani, M.; Kerscher, B.; Pierre, O.; Farkas, A.; Longhi, R.; Boncompagni, E.; Hérouart, D.; Dall’angelo, S.; et al. Protection of Sinorhizobium against host cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides is critical for symbiosis. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9, e1001169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bourcy, M.; Brocard, L.; Pislariu, C.I.; Cosson, V.; Mergaert, P.; Tadege, M.; Mysore, K.S.; Udvardi, M.K.; Gourion, B.; Ratet, P. Medicago truncatula DNF2 is a PI-PLC-XD-containing protein required for bacteroid persistence and prevention of nodule early senescence and defense-like reactions. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 1250–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hardy, R.W.; Holsten, R.D.; Jackson, E.K.; Burns, R.C. The acetylene-ethylene assay for n(2) fixation: Laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 1968, 43, 1185–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Egli, M.A.; Griffith, S.M.; Miller, S.S.; Anderson, M.P.; Vance, C.P. Nitrogen Assimilating Enzyme Activities and Enzyme Protein during Development and Senescence of Effective and Plant Gene-Controlled Ineffective Alfalfa Nodules. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Franck, S.; Strodtman, K.N.; Qiu, J.; Emerich, D.W. Transcriptomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Strodtman, K.N.; Frank, S.; Stevenson, S.; Thelen, J.J.; Emerich, D.W. Proteomic Characterization of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Bacteroids Reveals a Post-Symbiotic, Hemibiotrophic-Like Lifestyle of the Bacteria within Senescing Soybean Nodules. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lodwig, E.M.; Hosie, A.H.; Bourdès, A.; Findlay, K.; Allaway, D.; Karunakaran, R.; Downie, J.A.; Poole, P.S. Amino-acid cycling drives nitrogen fixation in the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. Nature 2003, 422, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Serova, T.A.; Tikhonovich, I.A.; Tsyganov, V.E. Analysis of nodule senescence in pea (Pisum sativum L.) using laser microdissection, real-time PCR, and ACC immunolocalization. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 212, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Montiel, J.; Arthikala, M.K.; Cárdenas, L.; Quinto, C. Legume NADPH Oxidases Have Crucial Roles at Different Stages of Nodulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Nukui, N.; Ezura, H.; Minamisawa, K. Transgenic Lotus japonicus with an ethylene receptor gene Cm-ERS1/H70A enhances formation of infection threads and nodule primordia. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yuhashi, K.; Ichikawa, N.; Ezura, H.; Akao, S.; Minakawa, Y.; Nukui, N.; Yasuta, T.; Minamisawa, K. Rhizobitoxine production by Bradyrhizobium elkanii enhances nodulation and competitiveness on Macroptilium atropurpureum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2658–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Heidstra, R.; Yang, W.C.; Yalcin, Y.; Peck, S.; Emons, A.M.; van Kammen, A.; Bisseling, T. Ethylene provides positional information on cortical cell division but is not involved in Nod factor-induced root hair tip growth in Rhizobium-legume interaction. Development 1997, 124, 1781–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Maunoury, N.; Redondo-Nieto, M.; Bourcy, M.; Van de Velde, W.; Alunni, B.; Laporte, P.; Durand, P.; Agier, N.; Marisa, L.; Vaubert, D.; et al. Differentiation of symbiotic cells and endosymbionts in Medicago truncatula nodulation are coupled to two transcriptome-switches. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cabeza, R.; Koester, B.; Liese, R.; Lingner, A.; Baumgarten, V.; Dirks, J.; Salinas-Riester, G.; Pommerenke, C.; Dittert, K.; Schulze, J. An RNA sequencing transcriptome analysis reveals novel insights into molecular aspects of the nitrate impact on the nodule activity of Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 400–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chungopast, S.; Hirakawa, H.; Sato, S.; Handa, Y.; Saito, K.; Kawaguchi, M.; Tajima, S.; Nomura, M. Transcriptomic profiles of nodule senescence in Lotus japonicus and Mesorhizobium loti symbiosis. Plant Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yuan, S.; Ke, D.; Li, R.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, H.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Chen, L.; Hao, Q.; et al. Genome-wide survey of soybean papain-like cysteine proteases and their expression analysis in root nodule symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yuan, S.; Li, R.; Wang, L.; Chen, H.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Hao, Q.; Shan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; et al. Search for Nodulation and Nodule Development-Related Cystatin Genes in the Genome of Soybean (Glycine max). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Yuan, S.; Li, X.; Li, R.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Hao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Shan, Z.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Classification of Soybean C2H2 Zinc Finger Proteins and Their Expression Analysis in Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Pladys, D.; Vance, C.P. Proteolysis during Development and Senescence of Effective and Plant Gene-Controlled Ineffective Alfalfa Nodules. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sueldo, D.J.; van der Hoorn, R.A.L. Plant life needs cell death, but does plant cell death need Cys proteases? FEBS J. 2017, 284, 1577–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Naito, Y.; Fujie, M.; Usami, S.; Murooka, Y.; Yamada, T. The involvement of a cysteine proteinase in the nodule development in Chinese milk vetch infected with Mesorhizobium huakuii subsp. rengei. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Pérez Guerra, J.C.; Coussens, G.; De Keyser, A.; De Rycke, R.; De Bodt, S.; Van De Velde, W.; Goormachtig, S.; Holsters, M. Comparison of developmental and stress-induced nodule senescence in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1574–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pierre, O.; Hopkins, J.; Combier, M.; Baldacci, F.; Engler, G.; Brouquisse, R.; Hérouart, D.; Boncompagni, E. Involvement of papain and legumain proteinase in the senescence process of Medicago truncatula nodules. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 849–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Deng, J.; Zhu, F.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wen, J.; Wang, T.; Dong, J. Transcription Factor bHLH2 Represses CYSTEINE PROTEASE77 to Negatively Regulate Nodule Senescence. Plant Physiol. 2019, 181, 1683–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Vincent, J.L.; Brewin, N.J. Immunolocalization of a cysteine protease in vacuoles, vesicles, and symbiosomes of pea nodule cells. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kardailsky, I.V.; Brewin, N.J. Expression of cysteine protease genes in pea nodule development and senescence. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1996, 9, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sheokand, S.; Dahiya, P.; Vincent, J.L.; Brewin, N.J. Modified expression of cysteine protease affects seed germination, vegetative growth and nodule development in transgenic lines of Medicago truncatula. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alesandrini, F.; Mathis, R.; Sype, G.V.d.; Hérouart, D.; Puppo, A. Possible roles for a cysteine protease and hydrogen peroxide in soybean nodule development and senescence. New Phytol. 2003, 158, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Van Wyk, S.G.; Du Plessis, M.; Cullis, C.A.; Kunert, K.J.; Vorster, B.J. Cysteine protease and cystatin expression and activity during soybean nodule development and senescence. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Young, N.D.; Debellé, F.; Oldroyd, G.E.; Geurts, R.; Cannon, S.B.; Udvardi, M.K.; Benedito, V.A.; Mayer, K.F.; Gouzy, J.; Schoof, H.; et al. The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature 2011, 480, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Yang, S.; Wang, Q.; Fedorova, E.; Liu, J.; Qin, Q.; Zheng, Q.; Price, P.A.; Pan, H.; Wang, D.; Griffitts, J.S.; et al. Microsymbiont discrimination mediated by a host-secreted peptide in Medicago truncatula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6848–6853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Yang, S.; Körmöczi, P.; Kereszt, A.; Zhu, H. Nodule-Specific Cysteine-Rich Peptides Negatively Regulate Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis in a Strain-Specific Manner in Medicago truncatula. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, Q.; Yang, S.; Liu, J.; Terecskei, K.; Ábrahám, E.; Gombár, A.; Domonkos, Á.; Szűcs, A.; Körmöczi, P.; Wang, T.; et al. Host-secreted antimicrobial peptide enforces symbiotic selectivity in Medicago truncatula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6854–6859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kim, M.; Chen, Y.; Xi, J.; Waters, C.; Chen, R.; Wang, D. An antimicrobial peptide essential for bacterial survival in the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15238–15243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Horváth, B.; Domonkos, Á.; Kereszt, A.; Szűcs, A.; Ábrahám, E.; Ayaydin, F.; Bóka, K.; Chen, Y.; Chen, R.; Murray, J.D.; et al. Loss of the nodule-specific cysteine rich peptide, NCR169, abolishes symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the Medicago truncatula dnf7 mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15232–15237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Xi, J.; Chen, Y.; Nakashima, J.; Wang, S.M.; Chen, R. Medicago truncatula esn1 defines a genetic locus involved in nodule senescence and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Berrabah, F.; Bourcy, M.; Eschstruth, A.; Cayrel, A.; Guefrachi, I.; Mergaert, P.; Wen, J.; Jean, V.; Mysore, K.S.; Gourion, B.; et al. A nonRD receptor-like kinase prevents nodule early senescence and defense-like reactions during symbiosis. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Krusell, L.; Krause, K.; Ott, T.; Desbrosses, G.; Krämer, U.; Sato, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Tabata, S.; James, E.K.; Sandal, N.; et al. The sulfate transporter SST1 is crucial for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Lotus japonicus root nodules. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hakoyama, T.; Niimi, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Isobe, S.; Sato, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Tabata, S.; Kumagai, H.; Umehara, Y.; Brossuleit, K.; et al. The integral membrane protein SEN1 is required for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Lotus japonicus nodules. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kumagai, H.; Hakoyama, T.; Umehara, Y.; Sato, S.; Kaneko, T.; Tabata, S.; Kouchi, H. A novel ankyrin-repeat membrane protein, IGN1, is required for persistence of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis in root nodules of Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1293–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Sinharoy, S.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Bandyopadhyay, K.; Kereszt, A.; Pislariu, C.I.; Nakashima, J.; Benedito, V.A.; Kondorosi, E.; Udvardi, M.K. The C2H2 transcription factor regulator of symbiosome differentiation represses transcription of the secretory pathway gene VAMP721a and promotes symbiosome development in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3584–3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. D’Haeseleer, K.; De Keyser, A.; Goormachtig, S.; Holsters, M. Transcription factor MtATB2: About nodulation, sucrose and senescence. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1416–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. De Zélicourt, A.; Diet, A.; Marion, J.; Laffont, C.; Ariel, F.; Moison, M.; Zahaf, O.; Crespi, M.; Gruber, V.; Frugier, F. Dual involvement of a Medicago truncatula NAC transcription factor in root abiotic stress response and symbiotic nodule senescence. Plant J. 2012, 70, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Verdier, J.; Lalanne, D.; Pelletier, S.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Righetti, K.; Bandyopadhyay, K.; Leprince, O.; Chatelain, E.; Vu, B.L.; Gouzy, J.; et al. A regulatory network-based approach dissects late maturation processes related to the acquisition of desiccation tolerance and longevity of Medicago truncatula seeds. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 757–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yamaya-Ito, H.; Shimoda, Y.; Hakoyama, T.; Sato, S.; Kaneko, T.; Hossain, M.S.; Shibata, S.; Kawaguchi, M.; Hayashi, M.; Kouchi, H.; et al. Loss-of-function of Aspartic Peptidase Nodule-Induced 1 (APN1) in Lotus japonicus restricts efficient nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with specific Mesorhizobium loti strains. Plant J. 2018, 93, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Domonkos, Á.; Kovács, S.; Gombár, A.; Kiss, E.; Horváth, B.; Kováts, G.Z.; Farkas, A.; Tóth, M.T.; Ayaydin, F.; Bóka, K.; et al. NAD1 Controls Defense-Like Responses in Medicago truncatula Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixing Nodules Following Rhizobial Colonization in a BacA-Independent Manner. Genes 2017, 8, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Wang, C.; Yu, H.; Luo, L.; Duan, L.; Cai, L.; He, X.; Wen, J.; Mysore, K.S.; Li, G.; Xiao, A.; et al. Nodules with Activated Defense 1 is required for maintenance of rhizobial endosymbiosis in Medicago truncatula. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 176–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Trujillo, D.I.; Silverstein, K.A.T.; Young, N.D. Nodule-specific PLAT domain proteins are expanded in the Medicago lineage and required for nodulation. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1538–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dhanushkodi, R.; Matthew, C.; McManus, M.T.; Dijkwel, P.P. Drought-induced senescence of Medicago truncatula nodules involves serpin and ferritin to control proteolytic activity and iron levels. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Li, X.; Feng, H.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.; Wang, T. MtCAS31 Aids Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation by Protecting the Leghemoglobin MtLb120-1 Under Drought Stress in Medicago truncatula. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Matamoros, M.A.; Baird, L.M.; Escuredo, P.R.; Dalton, D.A.; Minchin, F.R.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Rubio, M.C.; Moran, J.F.; Gordon, A.J.; Becana, M. Stress-induced legume root nodule senescence. Physiological, biochemical, and structural alterations. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Asensio, A.C.; Gil-Monreal, M.; Pires, L.; Gogorcena, Y.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Moran, J.F. Two Fe-superoxide dismutase families respond differently to stress and senescence in legumes. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Marquez-Garcia, B.; Shaw, D.; Cooper, J.W.; Karpinska, B.; Quain, M.D.; Makgopa, E.M.; Kunert, K.; Foyer, C.H. Redox markers for drought-induced nodule senescence, a process occurring after drought-induced senescence of the lowest leaves in soybean (Glycine max). Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Swaraj, K.; Bishnoi, N.R. Effect of salt stress on nodulation and nitrogen fixation in legumes. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 37, 843–848. [Google Scholar]
  78. Gogorcena, Y.; Gordon, A.J.; Escuredo, P.R.; Minchin, F.R.; Witty, J.F.; Moran, J.F.; Becana, M. N2 Fixation, Carbon Metabolism, and Oxidative Damage in Nodules of Dark-Stressed Common Bean Plants. Plant Physiol. 1997, 113, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Escuredo, P.R.; Minchin, F.R.; Gogorcena, Y.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Klucas, R.V.; Becana, M. Involvement of Activated Oxygen in Nitrate-Induced Senescence of Pea Root Nodules. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 1187–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Becana, M.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Sanchez-Diaz, M. Root Nodule Enzymes of Ammonia Metabolism from Medicago sativa L. as Influenced by Nitrate Levels. J. Plant Physiol. 1984, 116, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, P.C.; Phillips, D.A. Induction of Root Nodule Senescence by Combined Nitrogen in Pisum sativum L. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 440–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. López, S.M.Y.; Sánchez, M.D.M.; Pastorino, G.N.; Franco, M.E.E.; García, N.T.; Balatti, P.A. Nodulation and Delayed Nodule Senescence: Strategies of Two Bradyrhizobium Japonicum Isolates with High Capacity to Fix Nitrogen. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 75, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dalton, D.A.; Russell, S.A.; Hanus, F.J.; Pascoe, G.A.; Evans, H.J. Enzymatic reactions of ascorbate and glutathione that prevent peroxide damage in soybean root nodules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 3811–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Evans, P.J.; Gallesi, D.; Mathieu, C.; Hernandez, M.J.; Felipe, M.d.; Halliwell, B.; Puppo, A. Oxidative stress occurs during soybean nodule senescence. Planta 1999, 208, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Swaraj, K.; Dhandi, S.; Sheokand, S. Relationship between defense mechanism against activated oxygen species and nodule functioning with progress in plant and nodule development in Cajanus cajan L. Millsp. Plant Sci. 1995, 112, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Loscos, J.; Matamoros, M.A.; Becana, M. Ascorbate and homoglutathione metabolism in common bean nodules under stress conditions and during natural senescence. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1282–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Newsholme, P.; Cruzat, V.F.; Keane, K.N.; Carlessi, R.; de Bittencourt, P.I., Jr. Molecular mechanisms of ROS production and oxidative stress in diabetes. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 4527–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Matamoros, M.A.; Kim, A.; Peñuelas, M.; Ihling, C.; Griesser, E.; Hoffmann, R.; Fedorova, M.; Frolov, A.; Becana, M. Protein Carbonylation and Glycation in Legume Nodules. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1510–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Matamoros, M.A.; Fernández-García, N.; Wienkoop, S.; Loscos, J.; Saiz, A.; Becana, M. Mitochondria are an early target of oxidative modifications in senescing legume nodules. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Becana, M.; Matamoros, M.A.; Udvardi, M.; Dalton, D.A. Recent insights into antioxidant defenses of legume root nodules. New Phytol. 2010, 188, 960–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Matamoros, M.A.; Dalton, D.A.; Ramos, J.; Clemente, M.R.; Rubio, M.C.; Becana, M. Biochemistry and molecular biology of antioxidants in the rhizobia-legume symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Redondo, F.J.; de la Peña, T.C.; Morcillo, C.N.; Lucas, M.M.; Pueyo, J.J. Overexpression of flavodoxin in bacteroids induces changes in antioxidant metabolism leading to delayed senescence and starch accumulation in alfalfa root nodules. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1166–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Cam, Y.; Pierre, O.; Boncompagni, E.; Hérouart, D.; Meilhoc, E.; Bruand, C. Nitric oxide (NO): A key player in the senescence of Medicago truncatula root nodules. New Phytol. 2012, 196, 548–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Blanquet, P.; Silva, L.; Catrice, O.; Bruand, C.; Carvalho, H.; Meilhoc, E. Sinorhizobium meliloti Controls Nitric Oxide-Mediated Post-Translational Modification of a Medicago truncatula Nodule Protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Meilhoc, E.; Blanquet, P.; Cam, Y.; Bruand, C. Control of NO level in rhizobium-legume root nodules: Not only a plant globin story. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Berger, A.; Boscari, A.; Frendo, P.; Brouquisse, R. Nitric oxide signaling, metabolism and toxicity in nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4505–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fukudome, M.; Watanabe, E.; Osuki, K.I.; Imaizumi, R.; Aoki, T.; Becana, M.; Uchiumi, T. Stably Transformed Lotus japonicus Plants Overexpressing Phytoglobin LjGlb1-1 Show Decreased Nitric Oxide Levels in Roots and Nodules as Well as Delayed Nodule Senescence. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 816–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Fukudome, M.; Calvo-Begueria, L.; Kado, T.; Osuki, K.; Rubio, M.C.; Murakami, E.; Nagata, M.; Kucho, K.; Sandal, N.; Stougaard, J.; et al. Hemoglobin LjGlb1-1 is involved in nodulation and regulates the level of nitric oxide in the Lotus japonicus-Mesorhizobium loti symbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5275–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Chungopast, S.; Duangkhet, M.; Tajima, S.; Ma, J.F.; Nomura, M. Iron-induced nitric oxide leads to an increase in the expression of ferritin during the senescence of Lotus japonicus nodules. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 208, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jiang, K.; Asami, T. Chemical regulators of plant hormones and their applications in basic research and agriculture. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2018, 82, 1265–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. De Smet, I.; Signora, L.; Beeckman, T.; Inzé, D.; Foyer, C.H.; Zhang, H. An abscisic acid-sensitive checkpoint in lateral root development of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003, 33, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Signora, L.; De Smet, I.; Foyer, C.H.; Zhang, H. ABA plays a central role in mediating the regulatory effects of nitrate on root branching in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2001, 28, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. González, E.M.; Gálvez, L.; Arrese-Igor, C. Abscisic acid induces a decline in nitrogen fixation that involves leghaemoglobin, but is independent of sucrose synthase activity. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Santoyo, G.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Orozco-Mosqueda Mdel, C.; Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 183, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tittabutr, P.; Awaya, J.D.; Li, Q.X.; Borthakur, D. The cloned 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase gene from Sinorhizobium sp. strain BL3 in Rhizobium sp. strain TAL1145 promotes nodulation and growth of Leucaena leucocephala. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 31, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lohar, D.; Stiller, J.; Kam, J.; Stacey, G.; Gresshoff, P.M. Ethylene insensitivity conferred by a mutated Arabidopsis ethylene receptor gene alters nodulation in transgenic Lotus japonicus. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Kondorosi, E.; Mergaert, P.; Kereszt, A. A paradigm for endosymbiotic life: Cell differentiation of Rhizobium bacteria provoked by host plant factors. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 67, 611–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Guinel, F.C. Ethylene, a Hormone at the Center-Stage of Nodulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. McAdam, E.L.; Reid, J.B.; Foo, E. Gibberellins promote nodule organogenesis but inhibit the infection stages of nodulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2117–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Hayashi, S.; Gresshoff, P.M.; Ferguson, B.J. Mechanistic action of gibberellins in legume nodulation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Serova, T.A.; Tsyganova, A.V.; Tikhonovich, I.A.; Tsyganov, V.E. Gibberellins Inhibit Nodule Senescence and Stimulate Nodule Meristem Bifurcation in Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Ruan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, M.; Yan, J.; Khurshid, M.; Weng, W.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, K. Jasmonic Acid Signaling Pathway in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Costanzo, M.E.; Andrade, A.; del Carmen Tordable, M.; Cassán, F.; Abdala, G. Production and function of jasmonates in nodulated roots of soybean plants inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Arch. Microbiol. 2012, 194, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hause, B.; Schaarschmidt, S. The role of jasmonates in mutualistic symbioses between plants and soil-born microorganisms. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1589–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Signorelli, S.; Corpas, F.J.; Borsani, O.; Barroso, J.B.; Monza, J. Water stress induces a differential and spatially distributed nitro-oxidative stress response in roots and leaves of Lotus japonicus. Plant Sci. 2013, 201–202, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nóra, L.; Lyudmila, L.; Peter, S.; Gábor, F.; Attila, Ö.; Kristóf, S.; László, E.; Zsuzsanna, K. Nitro-oxidative stress contributes to selenite toxicity in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Soil 2016, 400, 107–122. [Google Scholar]
  117. Signorelli, S.; Sainz, M.; Tabares-da Rosa, S.; Monza, J. The Role of Nitric Oxide in Nitrogen Fixation by Legumes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Verma, V.; Ravindran, P.; Kumar, P.P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Gogorcena, Y.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Escuredo, P.R.; Becana, M. Antioxidant Defenses against Activated Oxygen in Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Puppo, A.; Pauly, N.; Boscari, A.; Mandon, K.; Brouquisse, R. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide: Key regulators of the Legume-Rhizobium and mycorrhizal symbioses. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 2202–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wasternack, C.; Hause, B. Jasmonates and octadecanoids: Signals in plant stress responses and development. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2002, 72, 165–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Arrigoni, O.; De Tullio, M.C. Ascorbic acid: Much more than just an antioxidant. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1569, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 01103 g001 550
Figure 1. Prediction of the relationships among cysteine proteases, cystatins, NCR proteins, transcription factors and other genes in the regulation of nodule senescence. The dotted lines and/or question marks indicate that the relationship between the two proteins is uncertain. The double arrows indicate that the direct regulatory relationship between the two proteins is proved. The single arrows indicate that the relationship between the two proteins exists. The red ellipses indicate that the genes positively regulate nodule senescence. The green ellipses indicate that the genes negatively regulate nodule senescence. The ellipsis indicates that many genes have not yet been identified [10,21,23,25,31,40,41,42,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73].
Figure 1. Prediction of the relationships among cysteine proteases, cystatins, NCR proteins, transcription factors and other genes in the regulation of nodule senescence. The dotted lines and/or question marks indicate that the relationship between the two proteins is uncertain. The double arrows indicate that the direct regulatory relationship between the two proteins is proved. The single arrows indicate that the relationship between the two proteins exists. The red ellipses indicate that the genes positively regulate nodule senescence. The green ellipses indicate that the genes negatively regulate nodule senescence. The ellipsis indicates that many genes have not yet been identified [10,21,23,25,31,40,41,42,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73].
Plants 10 01103 g001
Plants 10 01103 g002 550
Figure 2. The interaction network of different abiotic factors in the regulation of the senescence of nodules [14,66,76,78,79,93,97,102,111,117,120,121,122].
Figure 2. The interaction network of different abiotic factors in the regulation of the senescence of nodules [14,66,76,78,79,93,97,102,111,117,120,121,122].
Plants 10 01103 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, S.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, X. Characteristics and Research Progress of Legume Nodule Senescence. Plants 2021, 10, 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061103

AMA Style

Zhou S, Zhang C, Huang Y, Chen H, Yuan S, Zhou X. Characteristics and Research Progress of Legume Nodule Senescence. Plants. 2021; 10(6):1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Shunxin, Chanjuan Zhang, Yi Huang, Haifeng Chen, Songli Yuan, and Xinan Zhou. 2021. "Characteristics and Research Progress of Legume Nodule Senescence" Plants 10, no. 6: 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop