Next Article in Journal
The Complementarity of Amino Acids in Cooked Pulse/Cereal Blends and Effects on DIAAS
Next Article in Special Issue
Protective Effects of Salicylic Acid and Calcium Chloride on Sage Plants (Salvia officinalis L. and Salviaelegans Vahl) under High-Temperature Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Antagonism to Plant Pathogens by Epichloë Fungal Endophytes—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Response of Moringa oleifera Seeds and Fixed Oil Production to Vermicompost and NPK Fertilizers under Calcareous Soil Conditions

by
Amira K. G. Atteya
1,*,
Aishah N. Albalawi
2,
Rasha S. El-Serafy
3,
Khalil N. Albalawi
4,
Hala M. Bayomy
5,6 and
Esmail A. E. Genaidy
7
1
Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Tabuk University, University College of Haql, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
3
Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
4
Prince Sultan Military College for Health Sciences, Dhahran 34313, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Tabuk University, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Food Science and Technology, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt
7
Pomology Department, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(10), 1998; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10101998
Submission received: 31 July 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 20 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021

Abstract

:
A shortages of soil nutrients resources and a lack of accessibility to them especially in calcareous soil are considered some of the main factors that limit plant production. In particular, the cultivation of the Moringa oleifera trees in this type of soil is of special interest given the increasing demand for every part of this tree. Several studies have focused on the production of its leaves as an herbaceous plant and not as a tree, but there has not been extensive research on its pods, seeds, and fixed oil production. In this sense, in this study, we provide an assessment of the use of fertilizers, vermicompost and NPK (as traditional minerals and as nanoparticles), in order to improve pods, seeds, and fixed oil contents, as indicators of the quality of the production of the Moringa oleifera trees in calcareous soil conditions. In this experiment, it was observed that all parameters and the yield of pods, seeds, and fixed oil of the Moringa oleifera tree were significantly improved by increasing the level of vermicompost and using NPK fertilization and combination treatments in both seasons of the study. The combination treatments of 10 and 20 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control produced the highest percentage of oleic acid with insignificant differences between them.

1. Introduction

Moringa oleifera is a small or medium-sized tree, about 10 m high. It is commonly known as a horseradish or drumstick tree and all its parts are useful. It belongs to the Moringaceae family, which consists of the single genus Moringa, comprised of 10–14 species. The best-known species is Moringa oleifera, which is indigenous to northwest India and widely cultivated in the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Pakistan, and other tropical and subtropical areas in Central Asia, America, and Africa [1,2], and is now cultivated in small areas and private gardens in Egypt. The Moringa oleifera tree is nutritional and rich in vitamins and minerals [3]. In addition, recently, its seeds have gained a attention as a source of plant oil rich in oleic fatty acid. This oil is semi-solid and yellowish-brown with a bitter almond-like odor [4]. High-oleic oils are gaining importance, especially as a replacement for polyunsaturated vegetable oils, and have been reported to exhibit good oxidative stability during frying [5]. This oil is suitable for both human consumption and commercial purposes, and therefore the Moringa oleifera tree is very useful in animal feed, alley cropping, household cleaning agents, biogas, medicine, green manure, ornamental plants, gum and water purification [6]. Moreover, many diseases, such as high blood pressure, lung diseases, and skin infections can be treated with different parts of the Moringa oleifera tree such as the leaves, inflorescences, seeds, and roots [7].
Soil is the main support for plants in agriculture, due to its contribution of nutrients through the soil solution and its function of providing physical support for plants. It is preferable to culture the Moringa oleifera tree in slightly acidic to neutral well-drained loam to clay loam soils [6]. Furthermore, suitable fertilization can aids the rapid growth of Moringa oleifera tree and enhance its ability to give a healthy plant [8] that will produces an economic yield of pods, seeds, and fixed oil.
However, agricultural production in calcareous soils faces many difficulties due to a high level of calcium carbonate; high infiltration rate; low water holding capacity; low organic matter and clay content, poor structure, low cation-exchange capacity, surface crusting and cracking; loss of nutrients via leaching or deep percolation; high pH with a nutritional imbalance between elements such as potassium, magnesium, and calcium; and low availability of nutrients, in particularly phosphorous, iron, and micronutrients. These difficulties can result in failure to obtain the desired plant growth and yield [9,10,11,12]. Potassium has a clear role in most biochemical and physiological processes related to plant growth, productivity, and resistance to drought and disease as it is able to regulates osmotic conditions, enhances photosynthesis, and promotes carbohydrate metabolism. Therefore, plants require quite large amounts of K to produce economic crops and to promote the adaptive plant responses of plants to the environment [13].
Nitrogen is the main element to provide plants with the required amino acid and protein in plant. Under the alkaline conditions of calcareous soil, the rate of N transformation increases and the efficiency of N use by plants can be influenced. Therefore, minimizing ammonia volatilization and leaching of N presents the proper N management for fertilization in calcareous soil [13,14]. Phosphorus is an essential macronutrient that can improve metabolism, plant growth, root growth, flowering, maturity of seed and fruit yield, and the degree of improvement increases when phosphorus is applied in combination with nitrogen [15,16]; In addition, with alkaline pH conditions, the availability of both native and added phosphorus decreases as its anions form limited solubility compounds of P, Mg, and Ca [17]. Under such conditions, finding an approach to improve soil chemical and physical properties and a successful method to give growing plants the fertilizers they need without losses is vital for the rapid vegetative growth of the Moringa oleifera trees. Under these conditions, foliar fertilization is important as a part of fertilization programs for the Moringa oleifera trees, especially using nanofertilizers in a nanoscale range of 1–100 nm that allows them to penetrate the plant tissues. In this field, foliar application of nano-NPK fertilizers reduces soil pollution and obviates the interaction of nutrients with water, microorganisms, and calcareous soil, and therefore reduces the amount of nutrients used to below recommended levels [18]. In their studies by Gohari and NoorhosseiniNiyaki [19], Sheykhbaglou et al. [20], Bozorgi [21], and Hagagg et al. [22], the authors emphasized the benefits of nano-fertilizers.
Vermicompost is one of the most favorable non-chemical plant nutritional sources. It can be produced through vermicomposting of organic material by earthworms, which can consume a wide range of organic residues. It has a positive influence on the physical and chemical structure of soil as well as plant growth [23] by improving the stability of soil aggregates, as well as water retention, bulk density and porosity, and soil thermal dynamics. In addition, it stimulates and increases the absorption of nutrients by plants and favors a biological control of bacterial and fungal diseases in plants [24]. Vermicompost can improve plant growth in calcareous soil in four ways:
(i) Vermicompost increases the availability of plant nutrients in soil by adding N, P, K, as well as other micro- and macro-nutrients during the process of mineralization of organic matter. Vermicompost contains a larger group of soil-friendly fungi, bacteria and actinomycetes [25,26], such as nitrogen-fixing anaerobes [27], microbes that are responsible for nitrogen mineralization and conversion of ammonium nitrogen into available plant forms [28], as well as phosphate-dissolving bacteria such as Pseudomonas striata [29], as plants can uptake phosphate only in a soluble ionic form [30]. Herencia et al. [31] reported that the use of organic fertilizer enriched s soil with N, available P and K as well as organic matter. Additionally, decreased availability of soil Mn, Fe, Cu, B and Zn has been associated with calcareous soils [32], which resulted from interactions with soil carbonates and pH effects [33].
(ii) Vermicompost stimulates growth-promoting hormones such as auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins that are produced by microorganisms in vermicompost [34,35], which improve plant growth and increases plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [36]. The results of a structural analysis by Canellas et al. [37] revealed the presence of exchangeable auxin groups in the macrostructure of the humic acid fraction of vermicompost, which were found to aid in the root growth and development of Zea mays.
(iii) Vermicompost provides biological control of plant and soil pathogens.
(iv) Soil health is improved by the organic matter content in vermicompost. Generally, the addition of vermicompost as an organic source to calcareous soil increases the nutrient cycling; retains soil water, soil structure, and biological processes [38,39,40,41]; and improves rooting by activating the plasma membrane H+−ATPase, by increasing acidification of the roots’ external medium [42,43]. Moreover, the low speed of nutrients degradation and release from vermicompost fertilizer is suitable for perennial plants and trees grown in calcareous soil, such as the Moringa oleifera trees in this study. Furthermore, organic fertilizers are suitable for achieving the objectives of sustainable agriculture as noted by many researchers, such as Arancon et al. [44], Joshi and Vig [45], Salehi et al. [46], Madahi [47], and Oftadeh [48] who studied the effect of vermicompost on plant growth. They observed that increasing the amount of vermicompost used significantly increased seeds germination, the number, length, and fresh weight of leaves; chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll; growth and flowering; fruit and seed yield; and the yield of some secondary products of medicinal and aromatic plants. Additionally, Vengadaramana and Jashothan [49] reported that the addition of organic fertilizer improved soil properties.
Despite the enormous potential of the Moringa oleifera trees, several studies, such as those by Sánchez et al. [50], Isaiah [51], and Dania et al. [52], have treated the Moringa oleifera tree as an herbaceous plant, not a tree, and therefore they have focused on its leaf production under normal conditions. However, there has not been exhaustive research on the mature tree and its pods, seeds, and fixed oil production. Consequently, this study was carried out to assess the response of the Moringa oleifera tree to different fertilization rates using vermicompost and NPK (mineral and nanoparticles), in order to determine, under calcareous soil conditions, the rate that corresponds to optimum pod, seed, and fixed oil yield, as well as the percentage of oleic fatty acid.

2. Results

2.1. Parameters of Mature Pods

The parameters of mature pods of the Moringa oleifera trees were significantly affected by different treatments of vermicompost, NPK, and combination treatments (Figure 1 and Table 1 and Table 2). The results indicate that the 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment produced the highest average number of pods per inflorescence (3.21 and 3.35 in the first and second seasons, respectively); the weight of mature pods (10.17 and 9.76 g), and the maximum mean values of number of pods per tree (164.6 and 176.1) in the first and second seasons respectively, were reduced by adding 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost across all NPK levels. In addition, when nano-NPK was used the maximum mean values of the number of pods per inflorescence (2.89 and 3.00), the number of pods per tree (140.6 and 147.6), and the weight of mature pods (9.27 and 9.03 g) were obtained across all vermicompost levels, in the first and second seasons, respectively. The interaction between vermicompost and NPK treatments was highly significant. Moreover, the 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 nano-NPK treatment resulted in the maximum highly significant mean values of the number of pods per inflorescence (3.53 and 3.69) and the weight of mature pods (11.22 and 10.93 g), in the first and second seasons, respectively; the maximum mean values of the number of pods per tree (243.8 and 263.5, in the first and second seasons, respectively) were produced with the 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 nano-NPK combination treatment (Table 1 and Table 2).

2.2. Yield of Mature Pods

The results of the highly significant effects of different treatment levels of vermicompost, NPK, and their combinations on the yield of mature pods of the Moringa oleifera trees are shown in Figure 2 and Table 3. On the one hand, the 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment across all NPK levels produced the highest average yields of mature pods per tree (1661 and 1749 g tree−1) and per hectare (16,605 and 17,493 kg ha−1) in the first and second seasons, respectively. On the other hand, by using the 50 or 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatments, insignificant differences were found in the mean values of mature pods per tree and per hectare, in both seasons. Regarding NPK fertilizer, the 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK treatment resulted in the maximum mean values of yield of mature pods per tree (1425 and 1454 g tree−1) and per hectare (14,252 and 14,537 kg ha−1) in the first and second seasons, respectively, across all vermicompost levels. The interaction between vermicompost and NPK treatments was high significant. Moreover, the 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 nano-NPK treatment produced the maximum mean values of yields of mature pods per tree (2616 and 2750 g tree−1) and per hectare (26,158 and 27,496 kg ha−1) in the first and second seasons, respectively.

2.3. Parameters of Mature Seeds

The mean values with the highest significance for the number of seeds per pod (20.5 and 20.7) and mature seeds (0.228 and 0.231 g) in the first and second seasons, respectively, were produced by the 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment as compared with the other vermicompost treatments, including the control. The same situation was observed for the 2 gL−1 nano-NPK treatment which recorded the maximum mean values of the number of seeds per pod (19.3 and 19.5) and weight of mature seed weight (0.208 and 0.210 g) as compared with the treatments of 2 gL−1 and the NPK control in both seasons. Regarding the combination treatments, the 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK treatment produced the significant maximum mean values of the number of seeds per pod (22.8 and 23.0) and weight of mature seed weight (0.267 and 0.270 g) in the first and second seasons, respectively (Figure 3 and Table 4).

2.4. Yield of Mature Seeds

As compared with the control treatment, different levels of vermicompost, NPK, and their combinations showed significant improvements in the yield of mature Moringa oleifera seeds per tree and per hectare (Figure 4 and Table 5). In the first season, the mean values of yield of mature seeds per tree (777 g tree−1) and per hectare (7777 kg ha−1) was maximum with 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment. In the second season, the 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment produced the highest mean yield of mature seeds per tree (868 g tree−1) and per hectare (8678 kg ha−1) as compared with the other vermicompost treatments including the control. For both seasons, the differences between the mean yield of mature seeds per tree and per hectare with the 50 and 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatments were insignificant. Regarding the use of NPK, it was observed that spraying 2 gL−1 nano-NPK gave the maximum mean values of yields of mature seeds per tree (676 and 737 g tree−1) and per hectare (6759 and 7370 kg ha−1), in the first and second seasons, respectively, as compared with the 2 gL−1 NPK treatment and NPK control. Regarding the combination treatments, the 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 nano-NPK treatment gave the maximum yields of mature seeds yield per tree (1350 and 1482 g tree−1) and per hectare (13,501 and 14,821 kg ha−1) in the first and second seasons of the study, respectively.

2.5. Fixed Oil Percentage

The fixed oil percentage of Moringa oleifera seeds was significantly affected by most levels of applied vermicompost, NPK, and their combinations treatments in both seasons (Figure 5 and Table 6). Contrary to the previously mentioned parameters, the fixed oil percentage of Moringa oleifera seeds in this study was decreased by increasing the vermicompost level. The vermicompost control had the maximum fixed oil percentage (35.89 and 36.50%). Insignificant differences were detected between the control and the 10 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment, in both seasons. The same situation was found for the effect of NPK on fixed oil percentage as the NPK control gave the maximum highly significant percentage of fixed oil (34.53 and 33.83%) as compared with 2 gL−1 NPK or nano-NPK in both seasons. For the combination treatments, the second treatment of vermicompost control plus 2 gL−1 NPK gave the maximum Fixed oil percentage of Moringa oleifera seeds (38.69 and 37.48%) with insignificant differences between this result and that of vermicompost control plus NPK control in the first and second seasons, respectively.

2.6. Fixed Oil Yield

The variability of seeds fixed oil yield per tree and per hectare of field grown the Moringa oleifera tree in response to treatment with vermicompost and NPK and their combination is presented in Figure 5 and Table 6 and Table 7. The application of 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost recorded the maximum mean values of fixed oil yield per tree (176.4 and 189.9 mL plant−1) and per hectare (1764 and 1899 L ha−1) in the first and second seasons, respectively, as compared with the other vermicompost levels and control. In the first season, there were insignificant differences between the applications of 50 and 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost in terms of fixed oil yield per tree and per hectare in the first season. NPK fertilization was able to increase fixed oil yield per tree and per hectare successfully in the first and second seasons as compared with the control treatment. Moreover, the foliar application of Nano-NPK produced the maximum mean values of fixed oil yield per tree (155.1 and 170.7 mL plant−1) and per hectare (1551 and 1707 L ha−1) in the first and second seasons, respectively. For the combination treatments, the application of 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 nano-NPK by spraying gave the maximum mean values of fixed oil yield per tree (270.5 and 299.1 mL plant−1) and per hectare (2705 and 2991 L ha−1) in the first and second seasons, respectively. Insignificant differences were detected among T15, T18, and T21 treatments in fixed oil yield per tree and per hectare in the first season of the study.

2.7. Fixed Oil Analysis

2.7.1. Saturated Fatty Acids

The major of detected saturated fatty acids of Moringa oleifera fixed oil are stearic acid, palmitic acid, eicosenoic acid, behenic acid and lignoceric acids (Figure 6 and Table 8). In this study, all saturated fatty acids of Moringa oleifera fixed oil increased by increasing the vermicompost level. The 10 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment produced the minimum percentage of stearic acid (3.71%), palmitic acid (4.47%); eicosenoic acid (2.07%), behenic acid (4.40%), and lignoceric acid (0.64%). With NPK treatments, the control treatment had the minimum mean percentages of stearic acid (4.02%), palmitic acid (4.51%), eicosenoic acid (2.25%), behenic acid (4.63%) and lignoceric acid (0.68%). With the combination treatment, the minimum percentage of stearic acid (3.00%), palmitic acid (4.20%), eicosenoic acid (1.91%), behenic acid (3.81%) and lignoceric acid (0.14%) were recorded with the application of the 20 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control treatment.

2.7.2. Unsaturated Fatty Acids

The main unsaturated fatty acids of Moringa oleifera fixed oil are oleic acid, linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, palmitoleic acid and paullinic acids (Figure 7 and Table 9). By comparing the between different levels of vermicompost, the highest mean percentages of oleic acid (71.63%) and linoleic acid (3.89%) were recorded with the 10 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment, while the maximum percentage of α-linolenic acid (0.65%), palmitoleic acid (2.55%), and paullinic acid (2.61%) were recorded with the 20 ton ha−1 vermicompost treatment. Using NPK, the control gave the maximum mean percentage of oleic acid (70.09%), linoleic acid (3.56%), α-linolenic acid (0.58%), palmitoleic acid (2.20%) and paullinic acid (2.45%). Regarding the combination treatments, the maximum highly significant mean percentages of oleic acid (72.46 and 72.56%) were found with the fourth and seventh combination treatments, respectively. In addition, the maximum mean percentages of linoleic acid (4.18%), α-linolenic acid (0.83%), palmitoleic acid (3.13%), and paullinic acid (2.78%) were recorded with the seventh combination treatment.

3. Discussion

3.1. Effects of Calcareous Soil

In this experiment, the seeds of the Moringa oleifera tree were able to germinate under the conditions of calcareous soil without any organic or inorganic fertilization treatment (control treatment, T1); however, after that the seedlings grew but very slowly. Finally, they produced small trees looking like thin branches with a few leaves with very small inflorescences. This gave the minimum mean values of pod and seed parameters, and yield of mature pods, seeds, and fixed oil per tree and per hectare in both seasons. This may have been due to the lack of accessibility of soil nutrients resources in the calcareous soil where nitrogen had been lost via leaching, deep percolation, or N transformations. Moreover, there was low availability of phosphorous and micronutrients have low availability and there was an imbalance among potassium, magnesium, calcium, and other elements [10,11,53], as well as inappropriate soil properties for plant growth [9]. These results were in agreement with Bavaresco and Poni [54], who found that the conditions of calcareous soil decreased P and K in different plant organs, which leads to a decrease in whole canopy photosynthesis, which would be reflected in the dry matter of plants and, finally, give low pods and seeds yields. Moreover, the decrease increased with increased levels of carbonate in the soil. Khan and Qasimwheat [55] reported that yields and most of the yield components of wheat crop, in pots and in the field experiment, also decreased because of the effect of calcareous soil. Semida et al. [56] found that untreated plants grown in saline calcareous soil had the lowest growth parameters, concentrations of total soluble sugars, free proline, as well as anthocyanin and photosynthetic efficiency. Aboukila et al. [12] found that the germination parameters of squash 15 days after sowing in calcareous soil, recorded the minimum values as compared with amendment with compost and spent grain. On the contrary, in this study, the control treatment was among the treatments that gave the maximum significant mean values of fixed oil percentage after the second treatment of 0 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 NPK, with insignificant differences between them, since the control treatment gave very small semi-atrophied seeds. As mentioned before, in calcareous soil, the amount of nitrogen and its availability are limited [10,11,54]. Under such conditions, the metabolism of grown plants changes more toward production of secondary metabolites with non-N-containing factors such as phenolics, fatty acids, and terpenoids [57], and decreased production of compounds with high N content such as proteins for growth according to the C/N balance hypothesis.

3.2. Effects of Vermicompost

It was obvious from the obtained results that the improvements of all the studied parameters of pods and seeds and the yield of pods, seeds, and fixed oil per tree and per hectare increased when the amount of vermicompost used was increased in the two seasons of the study. These improvements may have been due to the role of vermicompost in regulating growth by its natural auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins contents, and increasing the availability of plant nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and micro-elements in the soil through the mineralization of organic matter; increasing soluble forms of nutrients by improving the soil pH; as well as increasing the uptake of elements by roots [30,58,59]. In addition, using vermicompost improves physical and chemical properties of the calcareous soil. Vermicompost fertilizer is suitable for the long growth season of the Moringa oleifera tree, with its low rate of nutrients degradation speed [44,60]. The results of the present study agree with those of other studies that have shown that increased vermicompost consumption improved vegetative features, while it also improved dry matter content and flowering [47,48,61,62,63,64,65,66,67] along with fruiting, seeds, and oil yield. These findings agree with those of Arancon et al. [68], Arancon et al. [44], Atiyeh et al. [69], Liuc and Pank [70] and Muscolo et al. [71] who found that using vermicompost improved growth and flowering parameters as well as quantitative and qualitative parameters of strawberry, petunia, marigold and roman chamomile, and wild carrot.
Even though increased vermicompost improved the yield of fixed oil as a result of improving plant growth, it decreased the percentage of fixed oil of seeds, which may be because under high N conditions, the metabolism of grown plants shifts towards production of N-compounds, with reduced production of secondary non-N-containing metabolites such as phenolics, fatty acids, and terpenoids [72,73]. Whereas Law-Ogbomo [74] found that applying poultry manure to Okra plants increased growth, fruit yield, as well as P, K, Na, and Mn contents, Ngo and Rumple [75] and Aryal and Tamrakar [76] reported that in most cases vermicompost was more favorable than manure and plant compost, as the application of vermicompost resulted in increased growth and yield as compared with farmyard manure.

3.3. Effects of NPK Fertilizer

An inadequate supply of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium during crop growth is known to have a negative impact on the reproductive capability, growth, and yield of plants [77,78,79]. These elements are responsible for many enzymatic and metabolic activities as well as effective growth of seeds, pods, inflorescences shoots and roots. N has been shown to increase the number and size of fruits and overall yield [80]. Phosphorus is the main element in ATP, which is the energy unit of cells and it gives phosphorus bonds in DNA and RNA. P has an important role in improving rooting, flowering and seed development [81,82] as well as fruit set. K plays a main role in the CO2 assimilation rate in plants through its role in opening and closing stomata. Thus, it enhances photosynthesis and controls in the amount of glucose produced in plants and its translocation to seeds by controlling the enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism [83,84,85]. The results of this study show that, foliar application of nano-NPK surpassed ground application of NPK in achieving the best mean values of the studied growth characteristics, yield and chemical compounds of the Moringa oleifera tree as compared with the other ground application treatments and the control in both seasons under alkaline calcareous soil conditions. On the one hand, foliar fertilization has better potential to correct nutritional deficiencies in plants caused by the improper supply of nutrients to roots, and this practice is usually more economical and effective under alkaline calcareous soil conditions [86,87,88]. On the other hand, normal fertilizers are lost to the environment and cannot be absorbed by plants, causing not only substantial economic and resource losses, as well as very serious environmental pollution [89]. Nanofertilizers have shown promising results in optimum concentrations, as their size is in the nano-scale at a range of 1-100 nm, which allows them to penetrate into plant leaves, the basic units for photosynthesis, gas exchange and transpiration [90,91], and therefore they can reduces the needed amount of nutrients needed while increasing plant productivity [92]. Spraying nano-fertilizers can obviate the interaction of nutrients with water, microorganisms, and calcareous soil, and increase plant parameters and yield [18,93,94]. These results are in accordance with those of many researchers. Silberstein and Wittwer [95] and Dixon [96] suggested that foliar application improved nutrient efficiency and was the most effective way for growers to supply nutrients. Fuglier [7] found that the application of nitrogen and phosphorus to Moringa trees encouraged root development and leaf canopy growth. Liu and Lal [97] reported that synthesized nano-fertilizer improved biomass and production of Glycine max. Fagbenro [98], Ainika and Amans [99], Ghafariyan [100], Mahmoodzadeh [101], and Delfani [102] reported that crop growth, chemical composition, and yield parameters were found to respond significantly to compound NPK fertilizer application. Abdel-Aziz [91] reported that direct exposure of wheat plants to a specific type of nano-particles caused significant increases in all growth parameters and yield determined with optimum concentrations of nanosolution. Elshamy et al. [92], Farnia and Ghorbani [103], Oyedeji [104], Bărăscu [105], and Mokrani [106] compared growth, biomass, grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, chemical constituents, protein content, and fruits and lipid yield of plants with foliar application of nanofertilizers and normal NPK fertilizer, and they reported that all those were better with nanofertilizers application. Khalid and Shedeed [107] recorded that the highest values of vegetative growth characteristics of plant height, leaf number, branch number, capsule number, herb dry weight, and seed yield, and the highest values of chemical contents including fixed oil, total carbohydrate, soluble sugars, protein, potassium, and phosphorus contents with foliar application of NPK as compared with a control treatment and ground applications. Hasaneen and Abdel-aziz [108] found that the growth parameters of French bean plants increased with foliar application of either NPK nanoparticles or nano-engineered CNTs-NPK. Mokrani et al. [106] reported that the importance of NPK fertilizers was their role of supplying the necessary nutrients for plant growth. Soylu et al. [109], Soleimani [110], Arif et al. [111], and Hamayun et al. [112] reported rapid vegetative growth, and significant increases in the number of leaves, plant height, thousand-grain weight, and wheat yield as a result of foliar application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, together or individually. Jubeir and Ahmed [113] found that using nanofertilizer improved fruit weight, yield percentage at maturity, the appearance of amino acids in fruits, dry matter in leaves, and chlorophyll content, The treatment improved the vegetative growth and increased the yield of date palm. Alzreejawi and Al-Juthery [114] recorded the significant superiority of Nano-NPK (12-12-36) spray in achieving the highest means values for chlorophyll content in leaves, plant height, stem diameter, biological yield, grain yield, and harvest index. Rafiullah et al. [115] reported that fixation of phosphate fertilizers in alkaline calcareous soil was a major obstacle that could decrease the yield of maize and wheat. Foliar P on maize significantly enhanced grain yield and phosphorus use efficiency.

3.4. Effects of Combination Treatments of Vermicompost and NPK

Despite the important role of foliar NPK application in terms of rapid assimilation and translocation and the positive influence on growth and yield, foliar fertilization cannot replace nutrition through the roots;. however, it can be used to reduce the use of fertilizers on the soil [116]. To overcome this problem, the use of organic amendments such as adding vermicompost plus applying foliar nano-NPK in the calcareous soil conditions is a good practices that can improve the growth; pod, seed, and fixed oil yield; and fatty acid content of the Moringa oleifera trees.
In this study, combination treatments of vermicompost plus NPK and nano-NPK improved pod and seed parameters and yield per tree and per hectare, and these improvements increased with an increased vermicompost level and with spraying nano-NPK, while treatment of vermicompost control plus 2 gL−1 NPK gave the maximum fixed oil percentage. In addition, the minimum mean percentages of stearic acid, palmitic acid, eicosenoic acid, behenic acid and lignoceric saturated fatty acids and the maximum mean percentages of oleic acid, linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, palmitoleic acid, and paullinic unsaturated fatty acids were recorded with the application of the combination treatment of 20 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus the NPK control. The combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers, generally, has vital effects on plant growth as well as soil chemical and biological properties [117,118] generally, and in this study foliar application of Nano-NPK combined with ground application of vermicompost mean availability of NPK and other required nutrients for seed quality and production. Therefore, using vermicompost alone or using vermicompost integrated with mineral fertilizers promoted plant growth and yield [119].
Our results were in agreement with those of Bajracharya et al. [120], Bhattarai and Tomar [121], Thakur [122], Zhao et al. [123], and Prativa and Bhattarai [124], who reported that the use of vermicompost in combination with NPK gave the best results in terms of plant growth and fruit yield. Despite the decreased fixed oil percentage of seeds with an increased fertilization level, the yield increased due to the ability of fertilization to increase seed yield. This was in agreement with Valiki et al. [119], Morshedi [125], Rogério et al. [126] and Xie et al. [127], who studied fennel, canola, crambe, and flax, respectively. Anwar et al. [128] noted that fixed oil of Moringa oleifera seeds was up to 40% with a high-quality fatty acid composition, as the percentage of unsaturated oleic fatty acid reached 70% or more. In this study, the percentage of oleic acid decreased with increased fertilization level. These results were in agreement with those of Xie et al. [129] on flax and Darakeh et al. [130] on black cumin.

4. Materials and Methods

The present investigation was carried out during two successive seasons in 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 in an open field of a private farm in El-Amiriya, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt. The aim wasto study the effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on pod, seed and fixed oil yield as well as composition, especially the percentage of oleic fatty acid of the Moringa oleifera trees.

4.1. Plant Material

Seeds were collected from one selected mature Moringa oleifera tree grown alone in an isolated place in the study location. Its seed was previously brought from the national research center. The seeds were cultivated in February 2018 and 2019. A drip irrigation system was applied. Soil drainage conditions at the site were adequate to guarantee good oxygenation of the crop.

4.2. Treatment

The experiments were conducted in a split plot arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications during February and March 2018/2019 and 2019/2020. The main plots of the Moringa oleifera plants were assigned to organic fertilization in the form of a ground dose of vermicompost and sub-plots were assigned to mineral fertilization in the forms of mineral and nano-NPK (19:19:19). All possible combinations of the two studied factors were made (Table 10). The experiments included 21 treatments, which were combinations of vermicompost added to the ground (0 (control), 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60 ton ha−1 vermicompost, applied to the ground) and NPK fertilization (0 (control) and 2 gL−1 NPK or 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK). Every studied amount of vermicompost was added before planting over ten days, while the 2 gL−1 NPK treatment was applied as a ground dose and 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK was applied as foliar application. All NPK treatments were applied once per week after two weeks and until six weeks from planting; after that, they were applied twice a week until the end of the experiment. Tween 80 (0.01%) was used as the wetting agent. Untreated plants (NPK control) and plants treated with 2 gL−1 NPK were sprayed with distilled water and Tween 80 (0.01%). The data are presented as mean values ± SE (n = 3).

4.3. Nano-NPK Preparation

Around 400 g of 19:19:19 NPK mineral fertilizer was weighed in a 2 L glass beaker, then 550 mL of distilled water was added, and it was stirred until completely dissolved. The clear solution was heated to 50 °C, and with vigorous stirring, 50 g of citric acid was added and stirring was continued for 15 min. Potassium hydroxide was added slowly until the desired pH was reached. During the addition of potassium hydroxide, the clear solution changed to a milky appearance, indicating the conversion to nanoparticle size. The concentration used was prepared according to the amount of mineral NPK used in the preparation of nano-NPK. Seeds were sown on 1st February in both seasons.

4.4. Culture of Seeds

Seeds (three seeds per hill−1) were sown on one side of the row. After 30 days, the seedlings were thinned to one plant per hill. The plots were weeded every two weeks when possible. The climate of the culture location is desert, with a mean annual temperature of 20.8 °C and annual precipitation of 181 mm, mainly falling in November through February [131]. A composite soil sample was collected at a depth of 0–30 cm from 15 different sites in the study, air-dried, and sieved through a 2-mm sieve prior to analysis. Sub-samples of the air-dried soil were used for chemical and physical parameters determination (Three sub-samples for every parameter). The physical and chemical properties of the vermicompost and soil samples were determined according to [132,133] as shown in Table 11 and Table 12 for every soil parameter (n = 3).

4.5. Parameters and Measurements

4.5.1. Pods and Seeds Parameters and Yield

A sample of five plants was taken at random from each replication and fifteen plants from every treatment to measure the following parameters: number of pods per inflorescence, number of pods per tree, weight of mature pods (g), yield of mature pods (g tree−1 and kg ha−1), number of seeds per pod, weight of mature seed weight, and yield of mature seeds (g tree−1 and kg ha−1). The data are presented as mean values ± SE (n = 3).

4.5.2. Chemical Constituents of Seeds

Fixed Oil Content of Seeds

To determine the fixed oil content, seeds of each treatment were randomly selected, weighed, and dried at 50 °C. The drying process was continued until the difference between the two successive weights was less than 1 mg. Three replications were used for this process. The oil was extracted over 16 h with hexane using a Soxhlet apparatus [134]. The percentage of fixed oil was estimated, then, the fixed oil contents per plant and per hectare were calculated. The data are presented as mean values ± SE (n = 3).

Fixed Oil Analysis (GC/MS Analysis)

Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared with methanolic sulfuric acid and characterized by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. The analyses of the fixed oil were conducted using a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) instrument at the Department of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, National Research Center as mentioned in Atteya and Amer [135]

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The experiments were a split plot arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates. Analysis of variance with SAS software [136] was carried out on all tested treatments data. means of treatments were compared using the LSD test at 5% level of probability. The experiment was repeated in the second year using the same steps and techniques of the first year to compare the results in the two successive seasons.

5. Conclusions

As Compared with the soil-application of NPK, in this study, the foliar application of nano-NPK provided a good resolution for a low availability of NPK. Moreover, increasing the amount of vermicompost improved the parameters and yield of Moringa oleifera pods and seeds. Finally, in this study, the recommended treatment for reaching the maximum values for the yield of mature pods, seeds, and fixed oil per tree and per hectare is the 50 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 g L−1 Nano-NPK treatment. The 20 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control treatment is recommended for producing fixed oil with the minimum percentage of saturated fatty acids and the maximum percentage of oleic acid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; methodology, A.K.G.A., A.N.A., R.S.E.-S., K.N.A., H.M.B., and E.A.E.G.; software, A.K.G.A., A.N.A., R.S.E.-S., K.N.A., H.M.B. and E.A.E.G.; validation, A.K.G.A., A.N.A., R.S.E.-S., K.N.A., H.M.B., and E.A.E.G.; formal analysis, A.K.G.A. and E.A.E.G.; investigation, A.K.G.A. and E.A.E.G.; resources, A.K.G.A., A.N.A., R.S.E.-S., K.N.A., H.M.B. and E.A.E.G.; data curation, A.K.G.A. and E.A.E.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.G.A., E.A.E.G. and R.S.E.-S.; writing—review and editing, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; visualization, A.K.G.A. and E.A.E.G.; supervision, A.K.G.A. and E.A.E.G.; project administration, A.K.G.A. and E.A.E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramachandran, C.; Peter, K.V.; Gopalakrishnan, P.K. Drumstick (Moringa oleifera): A multipurpose. Indian vegetable. Econ. Bot. 1980, 34, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morton, J.F. The horseradish tree, Moringa pterygosperma (Moringaceae) a boon to arid lands. Econ. Bot. 1991, 45, 318–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rockwood, J.L.; Anderson, B.G.; Casamatta, D.A. Potential uses of Moringa oleifera and an examination of antibiotic efficacy conferred by M. oleifera seed and leaf extracts using crude extraction techniques available to underserved indigenous populations. Int. J. Phytother. Res. 2013, 3, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  4. Warra, A.A.A. Review of Moringa oleifera Lam. seed oil prospects in personal care formulations. Res. Rev. J. Pharm. Nanotechnol. 2014, 2, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nadeem, M.; Imran, M. Promising features of Moringa oleifera oil: Recent updates and perspectives. Lipids Health Dis. 2016, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Aiyelaagbe, I.O.O. Nigerian Horticulture: Facing the challenges of human health and agricultural productivity. In Proceedings of the Keynote Address Presented at the 29th Annual National Conference of Horticultural Society of Nigeria, Makurdi, Nigeria, 24–29 July 2011; pp. 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuglier, L.J. The Miracle Tree: Moringa oleifera, Natural Nutrition for the Tropics; Church World Service: Dakar, Senegal, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones, P.D. Journal on the propagation and growing of multipurpose trees, Volume 19, 56, 60–78. In Vegetative and Reproductive tissue of the Multipurpose tree, Moringa oleifera. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 51, 3546–3553. [Google Scholar]
  9. Elgabaly, M.M. Reclamation and management of the calcareous soils of Egypt. In FAO Soils Bulletin 21, Calcareous Soils: Report of the FAO/UNDP Regional Seminar on Reclamation and Management of Calcareous Soils; FAO Soils Bulletin: Cairo, Egypt, 1972; Volume 21, pp. 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Hady, O.A.; Abo-Sedera, S.A. Conditioning effect of composts and acrylamide hydrogels on a sandy calcareous soil. II-Physico-bio-chemical properties of the soil. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2006, 8, 876–884. [Google Scholar]
  11. FAO. FAO Soils Portal: Management of Calcareous Soils. 2016. Available online: http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/managementof-some-problem-soils/calcareous-soils/ar/ (accessed on 1 April 2016).
  12. Aboukila, E.F.; Nassar, I.N.; Rashad, M.; Hafez, M.; Norton, J.B. Reclamation of calcareous soil and improvement of squash growth using brewers’ spent grain and compost. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2018, 17, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wahba, M.M.; Labib, F.; Zaghloul, A. Management of Calcareous Soils in Arid Region. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. Environ. 2019, 2, 248–258. [Google Scholar]
  14. Parker, W.F. Influence of inorganic fertilizer on multipurpose trees in tropical regions. J. Propag. Grow Multipurp. Trees 1998, 15, 40–62. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sadat, M.S.I. Studies on the Effects of Different Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorous and Potassium on the Growth Yield and Seed Production of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Master’s Thesis, Deptartment of Horticulture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yadav, H.; Fatima, R.; Sharma, A.; Mathur, S. Enhancement of applicability of rock phosphate in alkaline soils by organic compost. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 113, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mortvedt, J.J.; Murphy, L.S.; Follet, R.H. Fertilizer Technology and Application; Meister Publishing: Willoughby, OH, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  18. DeRosa, M.R.; Monreal, C.; Schnitzer, M.; Walsh, R.; Sultan, Y. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat. Nanotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gohari, A.A.; Noorhosseini Niyaki, S.A. Effects of iron and nitrogen fertilizers on yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in staneh Ashrafiyeh, Iran. American-Eurasian. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2010, 9, 256–262. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sheykhbaglou, R.; Sedghi, M.; Shishevan, M.T.; Sharifi, R.S. Effects of Nano-Iron oxide particles on agronomic traits of soybean. Not. Sci. Biol. 2010, 2, 112–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bozorgi, H.R. Effects of foliar spraying with marine plant ascophyll umnodosum extract and Nano-iron chelate fertilizer on fruit yield and several attributes of eggplant (Solanum melongena l.). ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2012, 7, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hagagg, L.F.; Mustafa, N.S.; Genaidy, E.A.E.; El-Hady, E.S. Effect of spraying Nano-NPK on growth performance and nutrients status for (Kalamat cv.) olive seedling. Biosci. Res. 2018, 15, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bachmana, G.R.; Metzger, J.D. Growth of bedding plants in commercial potting substrate amended with vermicompost. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3155–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rivera, M.C.; Wright, E.R. Research on vermicompost as plant growth promoter and disease suppressive substrate in latin America. Dyn. Soil Dyn. Plant. 2009, 3, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  25. Brown, G.G. How do earthworms affect microfloral and faunal community diversity? Plant Soil. 1995, 170, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chaoui, H.; Edwards, C.A.; Brickner, M.; Lee, S.; Arancon, N. Suppression of the plant diseases, Pythium (damping off), Rhizoctonia (root rot) and Verticillum (wilt) by vermicomposts. In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Pests and Diseases, Brighton, UK, 18–21 November 2002; Volume II (8B-3), pp. 711–716. [Google Scholar]
  27. Singleton, D.R.; Hendrixb, P.F.; Colemanb, D.C.; Whitmana, W.B. Identification of uncultured bacteria tightly associated with the intestine of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus (Lumbricidae; Oligochaeta). Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abd El Gayed, M.E.; Attia, E.A. Impact of growing media and compound fertilizer rates on growth and flowering of cocks comb (Celosia argentea) Plants. J. Plant Production. 2018, 9, 895–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, V.; Singh, K.P. Enriching vermicompost by nitrogen fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 76, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goldstein, J. Compost suppresses diseases in the lab and fields. Biocycle 1998, 39, 62–64. [Google Scholar]
  31. Herencia, J.F.; Ruiz-Porras, J.C.; Melero, S.; Garcia-Galavis, P.A.; Morillo, E.; Maqueda, C. Comparison between organic and mineral fertilization for soil fertility levels, crop macronutrient concentrations, and yield. Agron. J. 2007, 99, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  33. Loeppert, R.H.; Hossner, L.R.; Amin, P.K. Formation of ferric oxyhydroxides from ferrous and ferric perchlorate in stirredcalcareous systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1984, 48, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tomati, U.; Grapppelli, A.; Galli, E. The hormone-like effect of earthworm casts on plant growth. Biol. Fertil Soils. 1988, 5, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nagavallemma, K.P.; Wani, S.P.; Stephane, L.; Padmaja, V.V.; Vineela, C.; Rao, M.B.; Sahrawat, K.L. Vermicomposting: Recycling wastes into valuable organic fertilizer. In Global Theme on Agrecosystems Report no.8. Patancheru 502324; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics: Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India, 2004; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aguiar, N.O.; Olivares, F.L.; Novotny, E.H.; Dobbss, L.B.; Balmori, D.M.; Santos-Júnior, L.G.; Chagas, J.G.; Façanha, A.R.; Canellas, L.P. Bioactivity of humic acids isolated from vermicomposts at different maturation stages. Plant Soil. 2013, 362, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Canellas, L.P.; Olivares, F.L.; Okorokova-Facanha, A.L.; Facanha, A.R. Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root elongation, lateral root emergence, and plasma membrane h+-atpase activity in maize roots. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1951–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Haynes, R.J.C.A.; Science, C.; Naidu, R. Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: A review. influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: A Review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1998, 51, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Johnston, A.E.; Poulton, P.R.; Coleman, K. Soil organic matter: Its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide fluxs. Adv. Agron. 2009, 101, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  40. Manlay, R.J.; Feller, C.; Swift, M.J. Historical evolution of soil organic matter concepts and their relationships with the fertility and sustainability of cropping systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 119, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burgin, A.J.; Groffman, P.M. Soil O2 controls denitrificationrates and N2O yield in a riparian wetland. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2012, 117, G01010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zandonadi1, D.B.; Santos, M.P.; Busato, J.G.; Peres, L.E.P.; Façanha, A.R. Plant physiology as affected by humified organic matter. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2013, 25, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Busato, J.G.; Lima, L.; Aguiar, N.O.; Canellas, L.P.; Olivares, F.L. Changes in labile phosphorus forms during maturation of vermicompost enriched with phosphorus-solubilizing and diazotrophic bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Arancon, N.Q.; Edwards, C.A.; Babenko, A.; Cannon, J.; Galvis, P.; Metzger, J.D. Influences of vermicomposts, produced by earthworms and microorganisms from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste, on the germination, growth and flowering of petunias in the greenhouse. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2008, 39, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Joshi, R.; Vig, A.P. Effect of vermicompost on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L). AJBAS 2010, 2, 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  46. Salehi, A.; Ghalavand, A.; Sefidkan, F.; Asgharzadeh, A. Effect of zeolite bacterial inoculum of vermicomposting concentration NPK elements essential oil content and essential oil yield in organic farming chamomile Matricaria chamomilla. J. Med. Aromat. Plants Iran Res. 2011, 27, 188–201. [Google Scholar]
  47. Madahi, S. Investigating the Effect of Organic Biological and Chemical Fertilizers and Soil Organic Carbon on the Yield of Saffron (Crocus Sativus, L.). Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  48. Oftadeh, A.; Aminifard, M.H.; Behdani, M.A.; Moradineghad, F. The Effect of different levels of nitroxin and vermicompost on yield and photosynthetic pigmentation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). J. Saffron Res. 2017, 5, 163–179. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vengadaramana, A.; Jashothan, P.T.J. Effect of organic fertilizers on the water holding capacity of soil in different terrains of Jaffna peninsula in Sri Lanka. J. Nat. Prod. Plant Resour. 2012, 2, 500–503. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sánchez, N.; Ledin, S.; Ledin, I. Biomass production and chemical composition of Moringa oleifera under different management regimes in nicaragua. Agrofor. Syst. 2006, 66, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Isaiah, M.A. Effects of inorganic fertilizer on the growth and nutrient composition of Moringa (Moringa oleifera). J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Appl. Sci. 2013, 4, 341–343. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dania, S.O.; Akpansubi, P.; Eghagara, O.O. Comparative effects of different fertilizer sources on the growth and nutrient content of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) seedling in a greenhouse trial. Adv. Agric. 2014, 726313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Von Uexküll, H.R.; Date, M.E.R.A.; Grundon, N.J.; Raymet, G.E.; Probert, M.E. Global Extent, Development and Economic Impact of Acid Soils, Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bavaresco, L.; Poni, S. Effect of calcareous soil on photosynthesis rate, mineral nutrition, and source-sink ratio of table grape. J Plant Nutr. 2007, 26, 2123–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Khan, M.J.; Qasimwheat, M. Integrated use of boiler ash as organic fertilizer and soil conditioner with NPK in calcareous soil. Songklanakarin. J. Sci. Technol. 2008, 30, 281–289. [Google Scholar]
  56. Semida, W.M.; Abd El-Mageed, T.A.; Howladar, S.M.; Mohamed, G.F.; Rady, M.M. Response of Solanum melongena l. seedlings grown under saline calcareous soil conditions to a new organo-mineral fertilizer. J. Plant Nutr. 2015, 25, 1018–7081. [Google Scholar]
  57. Haukioja, E.; Ossipov, V.; Koricheva, J.; Honkanen, T.; Larsson, S.; Lempa, K. Biosynthetic origin of carbon-based secondary compounds: Cause of variable responses of woody plants to fertilization. Chemoecology 1998, 8, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Atiyeh, R.M.; Dominguez, J.; Subler, S.; Edwards, C.A. Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouché) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 2000, 44, 709–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pant, A.P.; Radovich, T.J.K.; Hue, N.V.; Talcottb, S.T.; Krenek, K.A. Vermicompost extracts influence growth, mineral nutrients, phytonutrients and antioxidant activity in pakchoi (Brassica rapa cv. Bonsai, Chinensis group) grown under vermicompost and chemical fertilizer. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 2383–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Krishnamoorthy, R.V.; Ajranabhiah, S.N.V. Biological activity of earthworm Casts an assessment of plant growth promoter levels in casts. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 1986, 95, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rezaian, S.; Paseban, M. The effect of micronutrients and manure fertilizers on the quantity and quality of khorasan saffron. Acta Hortic. 2006, 739, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mohammad-Zadeh, A.R.; Paseban, M. The effect of the source and quantities of organic fertilizers on saffron crop yield. In Proceedings of the 10th Iranian Soil Science Conference, Karaj, Iran, 26–28 August 2007; Volume 26–28, pp. 813–814. [Google Scholar]
  63. Omidi, H.; Naghdibadi, H.A.; Golzad, A.H.; Torabi Fotoukian, M.H. The effect of hemical and bio-fertilizer source of nitrogen on qualitative and quantitative yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). J. Med. Plant. 2009, 8, 98–109. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ajami-Khals, M.R. Effects of the Weight of the Corms and Application of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers on Yield of Saffron. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Torbath, Torbath, Iran, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  65. Gholizadeh, Z.; Aminifard, M.H.; Sayari, M.H. Investigating the effect of urban waste compost and corm’s weight on quality traits and secondary metabolites of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Herb Prod. 2017, 40, 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ghanbari, J.; Khajoei-Negad, G.; Van Ruth, S.; Aghighi, S. The possibility for improvement of flowering, corm properties, bioactive compounds, and nutritional regimes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 135, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jami, N.; Rahimia, A.; Naghizadehb, M.; Sedaghati, E. Investigating the use of different levels of Mycorrhiza and Vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Sci. Hortic. 2020, 262, 109027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Arancon, N.Q.; Edwars, C.A.; Bierman, P.; Wech, C.; Metzger, J.D. Influence of vermicompost on field strawberries. J. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Atiyeh, R.M.; Arancon, N.; Edwards, C.A.; Metzger, J.D. Incorporation of wastes in to greenhouse container media for production of marigolds. J. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 81, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liuc, J.; Pank, B. Fertility levels on growth and oil yield of Roman Chamomile. J. Sci. Pharm. 2005, 46, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  71. Muscolo, A.; Bovalo, F.; Gionfriddo, F.; Nardi, F. Earthworm humic matter produces auxin-like effects on Daucus Carota Cell growth and nitrate metabolism. J. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1999, 31, 1303–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Brown, P.H.; Graham, R.B.; Nicholas, D.J.D. The effects of manganese and nitrate supply on the levels of phenolics and lignin in young wheat plants. Plant Soil. 1984, 81, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Estiarte, M.; Filella, I.; Serra, J.; Pefiuelas, J. Effects of nutrient and water stress on leaf phenolic content of peppers and susceptibility to generalist herbivore Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Oecologia 1994, 99, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Law-Ogbomo, K.E.; Ojeniyi, S.O.; OMazi, F.E. Combined and sole application of compost and NPK effect on Okra yield, soil and nutrient content. Nigeria. J. Soil Sci. 2013, 23, 130–135. [Google Scholar]
  75. Nieto, K.F.; Frankenberger, W.T. Biosynthesis of cytokinins in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2011, 53, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Aryal, J.; Tamrakar, A.S. Domestic organic waste composting in madhyapur thimi, bhaktapur. Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 14, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Vine, H. Experiments on the Maintenance of soil Fertility in Ibadan, Nigeria, Emp. J. Expt. Agric. 1953, 21, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  78. Cooke, G.W. Fertilizer for Maximum Yield; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982; p. 465. [Google Scholar]
  79. Solubo, R.A. Studies on white yam (Discorea rotundata) II. Changes in nutrient content with age. Exp. Agric. 1972, 8, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson, C.D.; Decoteau, D.R. Nitrogen and Potassium FertilityAffects Jalapeño Pepper Plant Growth, Pod Yield and Pungency. HortScience 1996, 31, 1119–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Havlin, J.L.; Beaton, J.D.; Tisdale, S.L.; Nelson, W.L. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management, 7th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  82. Schneider, K.D.; Martens, J.R.T.; Zvomuya, F.; Reid, D.K.; Fraser, T.D.; Lynch, D.H.; O’Halloran, I.P.; Wilson, H.F. Options for Improved Phosphorus Cycling and Use in Agriculture at the Field and Regional Scales. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 1247–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Ahmad, I.; Mian, A.; Maathuis, F.J.M. Overexpression of the rice AKT1 potassium channel affects potassium nutrition and rice drought tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2689–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Zahoor, R.; Dong, H.; Abid, M.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z. Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 137, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hu, W.; Lu, Z.; Meng, F.; Li, X.; Cong, R.; Ren, T.; Lu, J. Potassium fertilization reduces silique canopy temperature variation in Brassica napus to enhance seed yield. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 168, 113604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ling, F.; Silberbush, M. Response of maize to foliar vs. soil application of nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium fertilizers. J. Plant Nutr. 2002, 25, 2333–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fageria, N.K.; Filho, M.P.B.; Moreira, A.; Guimarães, C.M. Foliar fertilization of crop plants. J. Plant. Nutr. 2009, 32, 1044–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Danish, S.; Kiran, S.; Fahad, S.; Ahmad, N.; Ali, M.A.; Tahir, F.A.; Rasheed, M.K.; Shahzad, K.; Li, X.; Wang, D.; et al. Alleviation of chromium toxicity in maize by Fe fortification and chromium tolerant ACC deaminase producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 185, 109706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Rai, P.K. Impacts of particulate matter pollution on plants: Implications for environmental biomonitoring. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 129, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wang, W.; Tarafdar, J.C.; Biswas, P. Nanoparticle synthesis and delivery by an aerosol route for watermelon plant foliar uptake. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1415–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Abdel-Aziz, H.M.M.; Hasaneen, M.N.A.; Omer, A.M. Nano-chitosan-NPK fertilizer enhances the growth and productivity of wheat plants grown in sandy soil. Spanish. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  92. Elshamy, M.T.; ELKhallal, S.M.; Husseiny, S.M.; Farroh, K.Y. Application of Nano-chitosan NPK fertilizer on growth and productivity of potato plant. J. Sci. Res. Sci. 2019, 36, 424–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Bhushan, B. (Ed.) Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  94. Adisa, I.O.; Pullagurala, V.L.R.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Dimkpa, C.O.; Elmer, W.H.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; White, J.C. Recent advances in Nano-enabled fertilizers and pesticides: A critical review of mechanisms of action. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 2002–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Silberstein, O.; Wittwer, S.H. Foliar application of phosphatic nutrients to vegetable crops. In Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science; American Society for Horticultural Science: College Park, MD, USA, 1951; Volume 58, pp. 179–190. [Google Scholar]
  96. Dixon, R.C. Foliar fertilization improves nutrient use efficiency. Fluids 2003, 11, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  97. Liu, R.; Lal, R. Synthetic apatite Nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fagbenro, J.A. Effect of inorganic and organic NPK fertilizers on the growth of three tropical hardwood seedlings grown in an Ultisol. In Nursery Production and Stand Establishment of Broad Leaves to Promote Sustainable Forest Management; Ciccarese, L., Finno, A., Eds.; International Union of Forest Research Organization (IUFRO): Vienna, Austria; Italian Environmental Protection Agency (ANPA): Rome, Italy; Dalarna University: Falun, Sweden, 2001; pp. 79–91. [Google Scholar]
  99. Ainika, J.N.; Amans, E.B. Growth and yield response of vegetable Amaranth to NPK fertilizer and farmyard manure at Samaru, Nigeria. Proceedings of 29th Annual National Conference of Horticultural Society of Nigeria, (Hortson’11), Makurdi, Nigeria, 24–29 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
  100. Ghafariyan, M.H.; Malakouti, M.J.; Dadpour, M.R.; Stroeve, P.; Mahmoudi, M. Effects of magnetite Nanoparticles on soybean chlorophyll. Environ. Sci.Technol. 2013, 47, 10645–10652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Mahmoodzadeh, H.; Aghili, R.; Nabavi, M. Physiological effects of TiO2 Nanoparticles on wheat (Triticum aestivum). Tech. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Sci. Expl. Publi. 2013, 3, 1365–1370. [Google Scholar]
  102. Delfani, M.; Firouzabadi, M.B.; Farrokhi, N.; Makarian, H. Some physiological responses of black-eyed pea to iron and magnesium Nanofertilizers. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Farnia, A.; Ghorbani, A. Effect of K Nanofertilizer and N bio-fertilizer on yield and yield components of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Int. J. Biosci. 2014, 5, 296–303. [Google Scholar]
  104. Oyedeji, S.; Animasaun, D.A.; Bello, A.A.; Agboola, O.O. Effect of NPK and poultry manure on growth, yield, and proximate composition of three Amaranths. J. Bot. 2014, 828750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bărăscu, N.M.I.; Duda, M.M.; Donescu, V. The effect of high NPK levels on potato yield size structure and tubers starch content. Sci. Pap. Ser. A. Agronomy 2015, 58, 136–142. [Google Scholar]
  106. Mokrani, K.; Hamdi, K.; Tarchoun, N. ‘Potato (Solanum Tuberosum, L.) Response to Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilization Rates’, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49, 1314–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Khalid, A.K.; Shedeed, M.R. Effect of NPK and foliar nutrition on growth, yield and chemical constituents in Nigella sativa L. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2015, 6, 1709–1714. [Google Scholar]
  108. Hasaneen, M.N.A.; Abdel-aziz, H.M. Effect of foliar application of engineered Nanomaterials: Carbon Nanotubes NPK and chitosan Nanoparticles NPK fertilizer on the growth of French bean plant. Biochem. Biotechnol. Res. 2016, 4, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  109. Soylu, S.; Sade, B.; Topal, A.; Akgün, N.; Gezgin, S.; Hakki, E.E.; Babaoglu, M. Responses of irrigated durum and bread wheat cultivars to boron application in a low boron calcareous soil. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2005, 29, 275–286. [Google Scholar]
  110. Soleimani, R. The effects of integrated application of micronutrient on wheat in low organic carbon conditions of alkaline soils of western Iran. In Proceedings of the 18th World Congress of Soil Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 9–15 July 2006; p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  111. Arif, M.; Chohan, M.A.; Ali, S.; Gul, R.; Khan, S. Response of wheat to foliar application of nutrients. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2006, 1, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  112. Hamayun, M.; Khan, S.A.; Khan, A.L.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Ahmad, N.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, I.J. Effect of foliar and soil application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on yield components of lentil. Pak. J. Bot. 2011, 43, 391–396. [Google Scholar]
  113. Jubeir, S.M.; Ahmed, W.A. Effect Of Nano-Fertilizers And Application Methods On Vegetative Growth And Yield Of Date Palm. Iraqi J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 50, 267–274. [Google Scholar]
  114. Alzreejawi, S.A.M.; Al-Juthery, H.W.A. Effect of spray with Nano-NPK, Complete Micro Fertilizers and Nano Amino Acids on Some Growth and Yield Indicators of Maize (Zea mays L.); Earth and Environmental Science 553 012010; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  115. Rafiullah, M.; Khan, J.; Muhammad, D.; Fahad, S.; Adnan, M.; Wahid, F.; Alamri, S.; Khan, F.; Dawar, K.M.; Irshad, I.; et al. Phosphorus nutrient management through synchronization of application methods and rates in wheat and maize crops. Plants 2020, 9, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Toscano, P.; Godino, G.; Belfiore, T.; Briccoli-Bati, C. Foliar Fertilization: A valid alternative for olive cultivar. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Foliar Nutrition of Perennial Fruit Plants, Meran, Italy, 11–15 September 200l.
  117. Goyal, S.; Chander, K.; Mundra, M.C.; Kapoor, K.K. Influence of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil organic matter and soil microbial properties under tropical conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1999, 29, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kaur, K.; Kapoor, K.K.; Gupta, A.P. Impact of organic manures with and without mineral fertilizers on soil chemical and biological properties under tropical conditions. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Valiki, S.R.H.; Ghanbari, S.; Golmohammadzadeh, S.; Tat, O.F. The effect of vermicompost and npk fertilizer on yield, growth parameters and essential oil of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare). Int. J. Life Sci. 2015, 9, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Bajracharya, S.K.; Sherchan, D.P.; Bhattarai, S. Effect of vermicompost in combination with bacterial and mineral fertilizers on the yield of vegetable soybean. Korean J. Crop. Sci. 2007, 52, 100–103. [Google Scholar]
  121. Bhattarai, B.P.; Tomar, C.S. Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status of Walnut (Juglans regia L.). Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 2009, 10, 63–67. [Google Scholar]
  122. Thakur, A.K.; Uphoff, N.; Antony, E. An assessment of physiological effects of system of rice intensification (SRI) practices compared with recommended rice cultivation practices in India. Exp. Agric. 2010, 46, 77–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Zhao, L.; Wu, L.; Dong, C.; Li, Y. Rice yield, nitrogen utilization and ammonia volatilization as influenced by modified rice cultivation at varying nitrogen rates. Agric. Sci. 2010, 1, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Prativa, K.C.; Bhattarai, B.P. Effect of integrated nutrient management on the growth, yield and soil nutrient status in tomato. NJST 2011, 12, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  125. Morshedi, A. An investigation into the effects of sowing time, N and P fertilizers on seed yield, oil and protein production in canola. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2011, 57, 533–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rogério, F.; Silva, T.R.B.; Santos, J.I.; Poletine, J.P. Phosphorus fertilization influences grain yield and oil content in crambe. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 41, 266–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Xie, Y.P.; Niu, X.X.; Niu, J.Y. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on growth, phosphorus uptake, seed yield, yield components and phosphorus use efficiency of oilseed flax. Agron. J. 2016, 108, 1257–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Anwar, F.; Ashraf, M.; Bhanger, M.I. Interprovenance variation in the composition of Moringa oleifera oilseeds from pakistan. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2005, 82, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Xie, Y.; Yanb, Z.; Niuc, Z.; Coulterd, J.A.; Niuc, J.; Zhanga, J.; Wanga, B.; Yanc, B.; Zhaoa, W.; Wang, L. Yield, oil content, and fatty acid profile of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) as affected by phosphorus rate and seeding rate. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 112087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Darakeh, S.A.S.S.; Weisany, W.; Diyanat, M.; Ebrahimi, R. Bio-organic fertilizers induce biochemical changes and affect seed oil fatty acids composition in black cumin (Nigella sativa Linn). Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 164, 113383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Climate-Data.org. Climate: Madinat Mubarak. 2021.
  132. Jackson, M.L. Methods of Chemical Analysis; Prentice Hall of India: New Delhi, India, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  133. Cottenie, A.; Verloo, M.; Kikens, L. Chemical Analysis of Plants and Soils; RUG Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry: Gent, Belgium, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  134. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  135. Atteya, A.K.G.; Amer, H.M. Influence of Seaweed Extract and Amino Acids on Growth, Productivity and Chemical Constituents of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Plants Biosci. Res. 2018, 15, 772–791. [Google Scholar]
  136. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, 6.03th ed.; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The mean values of the number of pods per inflorescence, the number of pods per tree, and the weight of mature pods (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 1. The mean values of the number of pods per inflorescence, the number of pods per tree, and the weight of mature pods (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Plants 10 01998 g001
Figure 2. The mean value of yield of mature pods (g tree−1) and yield of mature pods (kg ha−1) of Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 2. The mean value of yield of mature pods (g tree−1) and yield of mature pods (kg ha−1) of Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Plants 10 01998 g002
Figure 3. The mean values of the number of seeds per pod and weight of mature seed weight (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 3. The mean values of the number of seeds per pod and weight of mature seed weight (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Plants 10 01998 g003
Figure 4. The mean values of mature seeds yield (g tree−1) and yield of mature seeds yield (kg ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 4. The mean values of mature seeds yield (g tree−1) and yield of mature seeds yield (kg ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Plants 10 01998 g004
Figure 5. The mean values of fixed oil percentage (%), fixed oil content (mL plant−1), and yield of fixed oil (l ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 5. The mean values of fixed oil percentage (%), fixed oil content (mL plant−1), and yield of fixed oil (l ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by organic and mineral fertilization treatments in both seasons of the study. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3). Bars with same lowercase letters are not significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.
Plants 10 01998 g005
Figure 6. Means within the same saturated fatty acids (same color) with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different by the least significant difference (LSD) at p ≤ 0.05. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 6. Means within the same saturated fatty acids (same color) with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different by the least significant difference (LSD) at p ≤ 0.05. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Plants 10 01998 g006
Figure 7. Means within the same unsaturated fatty acids (same color) with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different by the least significant difference (LSD) at p ≤ 0.05. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 7. Means within the same unsaturated fatty acids (same color) with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different by the least significant difference (LSD) at p ≤ 0.05. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Plants 10 01998 g007
Table 1. The mean values of the number of pods per inflorescence of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization, in both seasons of the study.
Table 1. The mean values of the number of pods per inflorescence of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization, in both seasons of the study.
TreatmentsNumber of Pods per Inflorescence
1st Season2nd Season
T10.88 ± 0.06 r0.92 ± 0.01 u
T20.98 ± 0.07 r1.02 ± 0.01 t
T31.77 ± 0.13 n1.84 ± 0.02 p
T41.18 ± 0.08 q1.23 ± 0.02 s
T51.37 ± 0.10 p1.43 ± 0.02 r
T62.26 ± 0.16 kl2.36 ± 0.03 m
T71.57 ± 0.11 o1.64 ± 0.02 q
T82.36 ± 0.17 k2.46 ± 0.03 l
T92.75 ± 0.20 hi2.87 ± 0.04 i
T101.96 ± 0.14 m2.05 ± 0.03 o
T112.55 ± 0.18 j2.66 ± 0.03 k
T123.04 ± 0.22 ef3.18 ± 0.04 f
T132.16 ± 0.16 l2.25 ± 0.03 n
T142.95 ± 0.21 fg3.07 ± 0.04 g
T153.34 ± 0.24 bc3.48 ± 0.04 c
T162.65 ± 0.19 ij2.77 ± 0.03 j
T173.14 ± 0.23 de3.28 ± 0.04 e
T183.44 ± 0.25 ab3.59 ± 0.05 b
T192.85 ± 0.21 gh2.97 ± 0.04 h
T203.24 ± 0.23 cd3.38 ± 0.04 d
T213.53 ± 0.25 a3.69 ± 0.05 a
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 2. The mean values of the number of pods per tree and the weight of mature pods (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization, in both seasons of the study.
Table 2. The mean values of the number of pods per tree and the weight of mature pods (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization, in both seasons of the study.
TreatmentsNumber of Pods per TreeWeight of Mature Pods (g)
1st Season2nd Season1st Season2nd Season
T15.6 ± 0.9 l6.0 ± 0.1 s4.39 ± 0.09 u4.27 ± 0.35 m
T29.2 ± 1.5 kl9.8 ± 0.2 rs5.30 ± 0.10 t5.17 ± 0.42 l
T329.3 ± 5.0 ijk31.4 ± 0.8 o6.43 ± 0.13 p6.26 ± 0.51 k
T411.6 ± 1.9 kl12.4 ± 0.3 r5.51 ± 0.11 s5.36 ± 0.44 l
T519.0 ± 3.2 jkl20.4 ± 0.5 q5.71 ± 0.11 r5.56 ± 0.46 l
T654.5 ± 9.3 gh58.4 ± 1.4 l7.65 ± 0.15 m7.45 ± 0.61 i
T723.7 ± 4.0 ijkl25.4 ± 0.6 p6.22 ± 0.12 q6.06 ± 0.50 k
T863.3 ± 10.9 fg67.9 ± 1.7 k8.06 ± 0.16 l7.85 ± 0.64 hi
T995.2 ± 16.4 e102.0 ± 2.5 h8.98 ± 0.18 i8.74 ± 0.72 efj
T1035.8 ± 6.1 hij38.4 ± 0.9 n6.94 ± 0.14 o6.75 ± 0.55 j
T1176.6 ± 13.2 ef82.1 ± 2.0 j8.36 ± 0.16 k8.15 ± 0.67 gh
T12132.8 ± 23.0 d142.4 ± 3.5 e9.69 ± 0.19 f9.44 ± 0.77 d
T1342.6 ± 7.2 ghi45.6 ± 1.1 m7.14 ± 0.14 n6.95 ± 0.57 j
T14117.3 ± 20.3 d125.8 ± 3.1 f9.49 ± 0.19 g9.24 ± 0.76 d
T15207.0 ± 36.0 b209.1 ± 5.2 c10.20 ± 0.20 c9.93 ± 0.81 c
T1685.3 ± 14.7 e94.1 ± 3.9 i8.77± 0.17 j8.54 ± 0.70 fg
T17164.7 ± 28.6 c170.7 ± 4.2 d9.79 ± 0.19 e9.92 ± 0.15 c
T18243.8 ± 41.1 a263.5 ± 6.6 a10.71± 0.21 b10.43 ± 0.86 b
T1995.4 ± 9.4 e116.3 ± 4.4 g9.28 ± 0.18 h9.04 ± 0.74 de
T20158.0 ± 27.4 c167.2 ± 4.1 d10.00 ± 0.20 d9.31 ± 0.69 d
T21202.6 ± 38.6 b226.6 ± 8.1 b11.22 ± 0.22 a10.93 ± 0.90 a
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 3. The mean value of yield of mature pods (g tree−1) and yield of mature pods (kg ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
Table 3. The mean value of yield of mature pods (g tree−1) and yield of mature pods (kg ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
TreatmentsYield of Mature Pods (g Tree−1)Yield of Mature Pods (kg ha−1)
1st Season2nd Season1st Season2nd Season
T125 ± 4 l26 ± 2 o246 ± 43 l256 ± 24 o
T249 ± 9 l51 ± 5 no489 ± 88 kl509 ± 48 no
T3189 ± 35 jkl197 ± 19 lmn1888 ± 349 jkl1966 ±186 lmn
T464 ±12 kl66 ± 6 no639 ± 116 kl665 ± 63 no
T5109 ± 20 kl113 ± 11mno1088 ± 200 kl1133 ± 107 mno
T6418 ± 78 hij436 ± 41 jk4180 ± 781 hij4356 ± 412 jk
T7148 ± 27 kl154 ± 15 mno1478 ± 272 jkl1539 ± 145 mno
T8511 ± 96 ghi533 ± 50 ij5112 ± 958 ghi5328 ± 503 ij
T9856 ± 161 f892 ± 84 g8560 ± 1611 ef8922 ± 843 g
T10249 ± 46 jkl260 ± 25 lm2491 ± 462 ijkl2595 ± 245 lm
T11642 ± 121 fgh669 ± 63 hi6421 ± 1206 fgh6692 ± 632 hi
T121289 ± 243 d1344 ± 127 e12894 ± 2434 d13441 ± 1271 e
T13305 ± 57 ijk317 ± 30 kl3046 ± 566 ijk3173 ± 300 kl
T141115 ± 210 de1162 ± 110 f11151 ± 2103 de11624 ± 1099 f
T152116 ± 401 b2078 ± 197 c21157 ± 4009 b20783 ± 1965 c
T16750 ± 141 fg806 ± 97 gh7498 ± 1409 fg8058 ± 970 gh
T171616 ± 306 c1692 ± 46 d16160 ± 3057 c16924 ± 462 d
T182616 ± 482 a2750 ± 260 a26158 ± 4820 a27496 ± 2600 a
T19887 ± 103 ef1054 ± 123 f8867 ± 1031 ef10536 ± 1231 f
T201583 ± 299 c1559 ± 155 d15826 ± 2992 c15586 ± 1546 d
T212276 ± 473 b2479 ± 271b22758 ± 4727 a24795 ± 2708 b
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 4. The mean values of the number of seeds per pod and weight of mature seed weight (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
Table 4. The mean values of the number of seeds per pod and weight of mature seed weight (g) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
TreatmentsNumber of Seeds per PodMature Seed Weight(g)
1st Season2nd Season1st Season2nd Season
T15.1 ± 0.1 u5.2 ± 0.1 u0.031 ± 0.001 u0.031 ± 0.001 u
T29.2 ± 0.2 t9.3 ± 0.2 t0.082 ± 0.002 t0.083 ± 0.002 t
T315.7 ± 0.3 p15.9 ± 0.3 p0.123 ± 0.003 p0.125 ± 0.002 p
T410.2 ± 0.2 s10.3 ± 0.2 s0.093 ± 0.002 s0.094 ± 0.002 s
T513.3 ± 0.2 r13.4 ± 0.3 r0.103 ± 0.002 r0.104 ± 0.002 r
T617.2 ± 0.3 m17.3 ± 0.3 m0.155 ± 0.003 m0.157 ± 0.003 m
T715.3 ± 0.3 q15.5 ± 0.3 q0.113 ± 0.002 q0.114 ± 0.002 q
T817.4 ± 0.3 l17.5 ± 0.3 l0.162 ± 0.004 l0.164 ± 0.003 l
T918.4 ± 0.3 i18.5 ± 0.4 i0.185 ± 0.004 i0.187 ± 0.004 i
T1016.3 ± 0.3 o16.5 ± 0.3 o0.144 ± 0.003 o0.146 ± 0.003 o
T1117.6 ± 0.3 k17.7 ± 0.3 k0.166 ± 0.004 k0.167 ± 0.003 k
T1219.4 ± 0.3 f19.6 ± 0.4 f0.221 ± 0.005 f0.224 ± 0.004 f
T1316.7 ± 0.3 n16.8 ± 0.3 n0.151 ± 0.003 n0.153 ± 0.003 n
T1419.0 ± 0.3 g19.2 ± 0.4 g0.195 ± 0.004 g0.198 ± 0.004 g
T1520.3 ± 0.3 c20.5 ± 0.4 c0.247 ± 0.005 c0.250 ± 0.005 c
T1618.1 ± 0.3 j18.2 ± 0.4 i0.180 ± 0.004 i0.182 ± 0.004 i
T1719.7 ± 0.3 e19.9 ± 0.4 e0.216 ± 0.005 e0.218 ± 0.004 e
T1821.5 ± 0.4 b21.6 ± 0.4 b0.257 ± 0.006 b0.260 ± 0.005 b
T1918.7 ± 0.3 h18.8 ± 0.4 h0.190 ± 0.004 h0.192 ± 0.004 h
T2020.0 ± 0.3 d20.2 ± 0.4 d0.226 ± 0.005 d0.229 ± 0.004 d
T2122.8 ± 0.4 a23.0 ± 0.4 a0.267 ± 0.006 a0.270 ± 0.005 a
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 5. The mean values of mature seeds yield (g tree−1) and mature seeds yield (kg ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
Table 5. The mean values of mature seeds yield (g tree−1) and mature seeds yield (kg ha−1) of the Moringa oleifera tree as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
TreatmentsYield of Mature Seeds (g Tree−1)Yield of Mature Seeds (kg ha−1)
1st Season2nd Season1st Season2nd Season
T11 ± 0 l1 ± 0 p9 ± 2 l10 ± 0 p
T27 ± 1 l8 ± 0 op70 ± 13 l76 ± 4 op
T357 ± 11 jkl62 ± 3 mn572 ± 113 jkl622 ± 30 mn
T411 ± 2 kl12 ± 1 op110 ± 21 kl119 ± 6 op
T526 ± 5 kl28 ± 1 nop261 ± 51 kl284 ± 14 nop
T6146 ± 29 hijk159 ± 8 jk1460 ± 290 hijk1588 ± 77 jk
T741 ± 8 kl45 ± 2 no413 ± 81 kl449 ± 22 no
T8179 ± 36 hij195 ± 9 j1794 ± 358 hijk1953 ± 95 j
T9325 ± 65 fg354 ± 17 h3253 ± 651 fg3541 ± 172 h
T1085 ± 17 jkl92 ± 4 lm847 ± 167 jkl922 ± 45 lm
T11224 ± 45 ghi244 ± 12 i2238 ± 447 ghi2436 ± 118 i
T12572 ± 115 de623 ± 30 e5723 ± 1149 de6231 ± 302 e
T13108 ± 21 ijkl117 ± 6 kl1076 ± 213 ijkl1171 ± 57 kl
T14437 ± 88 ef476 ± 23 f4374 ± 877 ef4763 ± 231 f
T151043 ± 210 b1070 ± 55 c10431 ± 2100 b10701 ± 551 c
T16279 ± 56 gh313 ± 15 h2788 ± 557 gh3127 ± 147 h
T17704 ± 127 cd741 ± 33 d7043 ± 1273 cd7413 ± 335 d
T181350 ± 265 a1482 ± 70 a13501 ± 2654 a14821 ± 696 a
T19340 ± 76 fg423 ± 20 g3403 ± 757 fg4226 ± 200 g
T20719 ± 160 c772 ± 42 d7189 ± 1597 c7723 ± 419 d
T211237 ± 323 a1408 ± 85 b12372 ± 3232 a14083 ±8 47 b
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 6. The mean values of fixed oil percentage (%) and fixed oil content (mL plant−1) of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
Table 6. The mean values of fixed oil percentage (%) and fixed oil content (mL plant−1) of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
TreatmentsFixed Oil Percentage (%)Fixed Oil Content (mL Plant−1)
1st Season2nd Season1st Season2nd Season
T136.57 ± 3.07 a36.49 ± 2.40 ab0.3 ± 0.1 h0.4 ± 0.0 r
T238.69 ± 1.22 a37.48 ± 2.12 a4.2 ± 0.7 gh4.5 ± 0.3 r
T332.41 ± 6.29 b35.52 ± 1.84 bc17.8 ± 0.9 fgh22.6 ± 1.1 o
T437.49 ± 2.82 a36.78 ± 2.09 ab2.6 ± 0.4 h2.8 ± 0.1 r
T536.55 ± 0.71 a37.83 ± 1.50 a9.5 ± 2.0 gh10.7 ± 0.2 q
T629.17± 0.91 cd33.78 ± 1.10 c42.5 ± 8.1 ef53.6 ± 1.1 l
T737.22 ± 1.16 a36.54 ± 1.19 ab15.3 ± 2.9 fgh16.4 ± 0.3 p
T836.72 ± 1.15 a36.05 ± 1.18 ab65.7 ± 12.5 de70.3 ± 1.4 k
T928.17 ± 0.88 cd28.64 ± 0.93 ef91.4 ± 17.5 cd101.3 ± 2.0 h
T1036.89 ± 1.71 a35.14 ± 1.14 bc32.2 ± 6.1 fg32.4 ± 1.0 n
T1132.19 ± 1.01 b31.61 ± 1.03 d71.9 ± 13.7 d76.9 ± 1.5 J
T1226.98 ± 0.40 de27.65 ± 0.90 fg154.4 ± 31.1 b172.2 ± 3.4 e
T1336.22 ± 1.13 a35.56 ± 1.16 bc38.9 ± 7.4 ef41.6 ± 0.8 m
T1423.14 ± 0.72 fg22.72 ± 0.74 ij101.0 ± 19.3 c108.1 ± 2.2 g
T1525.15 ± 0.79 ef24.69 ± 0.80 h261.8 ± 50.4 a264.0 ± 5.3 c
T1630.18 ± 0.94 bc29.63 ± 0.97 e83.9 ± 16.0 cd92.5 ± 4.4 i
T1724.79 ± 0.69 ef24.07 ± 1.24 hi174.8 ± 37.4 b178.2 ± 2.0 d
T1820.06 ± 0.31 h20.21 ± 0.89 k270.5 ± 52.2 a299.1 ± 2.3 a
T1927.16 ± 0.85 de26.67 ± 0.87 g92.3 ± 10.8 cd112.5 ± 5.0 g
T2021.44 ± 0.95 gh21.11 ± 0.73 jk153.3 ± 26.1 b163.0 ± 7.9 f
T2120.01 ± 0.17 h20.09 ± 0.84 k247.4 ± 27.8 a282.4 ± 7.2 b
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 7. The mean values of yield of fixed oil (L ha−1) of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
Table 7. The mean values of yield of fixed oil (L ha−1) of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization in both seasons of the study.
TreatmentsYield of Fixed Oil (L ha−1)
1st Season2nd Season
T13 ± 1 h4 ± 0 r
T242 ± 7 gh45 ± 3 r
T3178 ± 9 fgh226 ± 11 o
T426 ± 4 h28 ± 1 r
T595 ± 20 gh107 ± 2 q
T6425 ± 81 ef536 ± 11 l
T7153 ± 29 fgh164 ± 3 p
T8657 ± 125 de703 ± 14 k
T9914 ± 175 cd1013 ± 20 h
T10322 ± 61 fg324 ± 10 n
T11719 ± 137 d769 ± 15 j
T121544 ± 311 b1722 ± 34 e
T13389 ± 74 ef416 ± 8 m
T141010 ± 193 c1081 ± 22 g
T152618 ± 504 a2640 ± 53 c
T16839 ± 160 cd925 ± 44 i
T171748 ± 374 b1782 ± 20 d
T182705 ± 522 a2991 ± 23 a
T19923 ± 108 cd1125 ± 50 g
T201533 ± 261 b1630 ± 79 f
T212474 ± 278 a2824 ± 72 b
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 8. The mean percent of saturated fatty acids (%) of fixed oil of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization.
Table 8. The mean percent of saturated fatty acids (%) of fixed oil of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization.
TreatmentsStearic AcidPalmitic AcidEicosenoic AcidBehenic AcidLignoceric Acid
T13.12 ± 0.10 i4.31 ± 0.15 j2.01 ± 0.06 n4.26 ± 0.14 n0.84 ± 0.02 g
T24.61 ± 0.16 f4.56 ± 0.15 h2.16 ± 0.07 j4.64 ± 0.16 j0.92 ± 0.02 def
T34.96 ± 0.17 c4.64 ± 0.16 f2.72 ± 0.09 e5.35 ± 0.18 e1.00 ± 0.03 c
T43.03 ± 0.10 j4.32 ± 0.15 j1.97 ± 0.06 o4.02 ± 0.13 o0.15 ± 0.10 h
T53.16 ± 0.10 i4.51 ± 0.15 i2.04 ± 0.06 m4.36 ± 0.15 m0.88 ± 0.02 fg
T64.9 ± 0.17 cd4.57 ± 0.16 h2.20 ± 0.07 i4.83 ± 0.16 i0.94± 0.02 de
T73.00 ± 0.10 j4.20 ± 0.14 k1.91 ± 0.06 p3.81 ± 0.13 p0.14 ± 0.10 h
T83.51 ± 0.12 h4.59 ± 0.16 g2.10 ± 0.07 l4.41 ± 0.15 l0.86 ± 0.02 g
T94.67 ± 0.16 e4.63 ± 0.16 f2.61 ± 0.08 g4.9 ± 0.17 gh0.9 ± 0.02 cd
T104.01 ± 0.13 g4.60 ± 0.16 g2.14 ± 0.07 k4.53 ± 0.15 k0.85 ± 0.02 g
T114.94± 0.17 cd4.64 ± 0.16 f2.63 ± 0.08 fg4.87 ± 0.17 hi1.00 ± 0.03 c
T125.18± 0.18 ab4.85 ± 0.17 d2.88 ± 0.09 d5.63 ± 0.19 d1.05 ± 0.03 b
T134.90 ± 0.17 d4.59 ± 0.16 g2.23 ± 0.07 h4.92 ± 0.17 g0.91 ± 0.02 ef
T144.95± 0.17 cd4.64 ± 0.16 f2.65 ± 0.09 f5.20 ± 0.18 f0.88 ± 0.02 fg
T155.19± 0.18 ab4.88 ± 0.17 c2.90 ± 0.09 d5.94 ± 0.20 c1.07± 0.03 ab
T164.9 ± 0.17 cd4.66 ± 0.16 e2.64 ± 0.08 f5.23 ± 0.18 f0.86 ± 0.02 g
T175.20± 0.18 ab4.88 ± 0.17 c2.95 ± 0.10 c5.91 ± 0.20 c1.05 ± 0.03 b
T185.20± 0.18 ab5.20 ± 0.18 b2.97 ± 0.10 c6.04 ± 0.21 b1.08± 0.03 ab
T195.17 ± 0.18 b4.87 ±0.17 c2.89 ± 0.09 d5.62 ± 0.19 d1.06 ± 0.03 b
T205.22± 0.18 ab5.21 ± 0.18 b3.13 ± 0.10 b6.06 ± 0.21 b1.08± 0.03 ab
T215.23 ± 0.18 a5.52 ± 0.19 a3.23 ± 0.11 a6.15 ± 0.21 a1.11 ± 0.03 a
Means in columns followed by the same letter are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 9. The mean percent of unsaturated fatty acids (%) of fixed oil of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization.
Table 9. The mean percent of unsaturated fatty acids (%) of fixed oil of Moringa oleifera seeds as affected by combination treatments of organic and mineral fertilization.
TreatmentsOleic AcidLinoleic Acidα-Linolenic AcidPalmitoleic AcidPaullinic Acid
T171.87 ± 1.80 b4.03 ± 0.09 c0.72 ± 0.01 c2.34 ± 0.05 f2.43 ± 0.05 h
T270.97 ± 1.78 d3.83 ± 0.09 g0.56 ± 0.01 g3.04 ± 0.07 b2.27 ± 0.05 j
T367.48 ± 1.69 j2.66 ± 0.06 n0.31 ± 0.01 l1.31 ± 0.02 k2.76 ± 0.06 b
T472.46 ± 1.82 a4.11 ± 0.09 b0.79 ± 0.01 b2.56 ± 0.05 d2.72 ± 0.06 c
T571.77 ± 1.80 b4.01 ± 0.09 d0.66 ± 0.01 d2.12 ± 0.04 g2.49 ± 0.05 g
T670.67 ± 1.77 e3.53 ± 0.08 h0.05 ± 0.05 q3.03 ± 0.07 b2.38 ± 0.05 i
T772.56 ± 1.82 a4.18 ± 0.09 a0.83 ± 0.01 a3.13 ± 0.07 a2.78 ± 0.06 a
T871.47 ± 1.79 c3.98 ± 0.09 e0.64 ± 0.01 e2.42 ± 0.05 e2.38 ± 0.05 i
T970.27 ± 1.76 f3.23 ± 0.07 j0.48 ± 0.00 i2.12 ± 0.04 g2.68 ± 0.06 d
T1071.37 ± 1.79 c3.93 ± 0.09 f0.61 ± 0.01 f2.63 ± 0.06 c2.18 ± 0.04 k
T1169.97 ± 1.76 g3.03 ± 0.07 k0.41 ± 0.00 j1.35 ± 0.02 j2.58 ± 0.05 f
T1265.49 ± 1.64 k2.63 ± 0.06 o0.29 ± 0.01 m1.21 ± 0.02 l2.64 ± 0.06 e
T1370.47 ± 1.77ef3.43 ± 0.08 i0.50 ± 0.00 h2.04 ± 0.04 h2.49 ± 0.05 g
T1469.47 ± 1.74 h2.83 ± 0.06 l0.34 ± 0.01 k1.22 ± 0.02 l2.09 ± 0.04 m
T1562.40± 1.56 m2.42 ± 0.05 q0.02 ± 0.00 r1.14 ± 0.02 m2.68 ± 0.06 d
T1668.48 ± 1.72 i2.73 ± 0.06 m0.32 ± 0.01 l1.52 ± 0.03 i2.07 ± 0.04 n
T1760.40 ± 1.51 n2.38 ± 0.05 r0.20 ± 0.01 o1.06 ± 0.02 n2.16 ± 0.04 l
T1858.41 ± 1.46 o2.32 ± 0.05 s0.19 ± 0.01 o0.92 ± 0.01 o2.06 ± 0.04 n
T1963.39 ± 1.59 l2.53 ± 0.05 p0.27 ± 0.01 n1.20 ± 0.02 l2.49 ± 0.05 g
T2057.41 ± 1.44 p2.22 ± 0.05 t0.14 ± 0.01 p0.88 ± 0.01 p2.01 ± 0.04 o
T2157.02 ± 1.43 q2.12 ± 0.04 u0.02 ± 0.00 r0.07 ± 0.05 q1.98 ± 0.04 p
Means in columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not statistically different at the 0.05 significance level. Data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Table 10. All the different used combinations treatments of vermicompost and NPK fertilization with the following.
Table 10. All the different used combinations treatments of vermicompost and NPK fertilization with the following.
Treatments
T1Vermicompost control plus NPK control (Control)
T2Vermicompost control plus 2 gL−1 NPK
T3Vermicompost control plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK
T410 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control
T510 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 NPK
T610 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK
T720 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control
T820 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 NPK
T920 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK
T1030 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control
T1130 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 NPK
T1230 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK
T1340 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control
T1440 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 NPK
T1540 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK
T1650 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control
T1750 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 NPK
T1850 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK
T1960 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus NPK control
T2060 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 NPK
T2160 ton ha−1 vermicompost plus 2 gL−1 Nano-NPK
Table 11. The physical and chemical properties of the used vermicompost.
Table 11. The physical and chemical properties of the used vermicompost.
Vermicompost Property
Organic matter%44.57
C%17.02
N%1.82
Mn%0.03
Bmg g−10.054
Cumg g−10.25
Femg g−11.27
Mgmg g−16.01
Namg g−11.48
P2O5mg g−14.61
Kmg g−11.93
ECds m−11.78
pH 7.2
Table 12. The physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil.
Table 12. The physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil.
Soil Property
Organic matter 0.75
CaCO3%28.62
Sand%65.3
Silt%15.8
Clay%18.9
Texture classSandy clay loam
pH 8.51
ECds m−11.72
N%0.032
HCO3-mg g−10.099
P2O4mg g−10.004
K+mg g−10.287
Femg g−10.0038
Znmg g−10.0014
Mnmg g−10.0035
Cumg g−10.00059
Bmg g−10.0003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Atteya, A.K.G.; Albalawi, A.N.; El-Serafy, R.S.; Albalawi, K.N.; Bayomy, H.M.; Genaidy, E.A.E. Response of Moringa oleifera Seeds and Fixed Oil Production to Vermicompost and NPK Fertilizers under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 1998. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10101998

AMA Style

Atteya AKG, Albalawi AN, El-Serafy RS, Albalawi KN, Bayomy HM, Genaidy EAE. Response of Moringa oleifera Seeds and Fixed Oil Production to Vermicompost and NPK Fertilizers under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Plants. 2021; 10(10):1998. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10101998

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atteya, Amira K. G., Aishah N. Albalawi, Rasha S. El-Serafy, Khalil N. Albalawi, Hala M. Bayomy, and Esmail A. E. Genaidy. 2021. "Response of Moringa oleifera Seeds and Fixed Oil Production to Vermicompost and NPK Fertilizers under Calcareous Soil Conditions" Plants 10, no. 10: 1998. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10101998

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop