Next Article in Journal
A Vision-Based Neural Network Controller for the Autonomous Landing of a Quadrotor on Moving Targets
Previous Article in Journal
A Methodology for Multi-Camera Surface-Shape Estimation of Deformable Unknown Objects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beyond the Sex Doll: Post-Human Companionship and the Rise of the ‘Allodoll’
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Robotics 2018, 7(4), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics7040070

Sexbots: Customizing Them to Suit Us versus an Ethical Duty to Created Sentient Beings to Minimize Suffering

Law School, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NS, UK
Received: 15 August 2018 / Revised: 1 November 2018 / Accepted: 6 November 2018 / Published: 11 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Love and Sex with Robot)
Full-Text   |   PDF [275 KB, uploaded 16 November 2018]

Abstract

Sex robot scholarship typically focuses on customizable simulacra, lacking sentience and self-awareness but able to simulate and stimulate human affection. This paper argues that future humans will want more: sex robots customized to possess sentience and self-awareness [henceforth, sexbots], capable of mutuality in sexual and intimate relationships. Adopting a transdisciplinary critical methodology focused on the legal, ethical and design implications of sexbots, it assesses implications of sexbots’ non-mammalian subjectivity, balancing designed-in autonomy and control, decision-making capacity and consent, sexual preferences and desire, legal and moral status, vulnerability and contrasts between mammalian and non-mammalian moral decision-making. It explores theoretical, ethical, and pragmatic aspects of the tensions involved in creating sentient beings for utilitarian purposes, concluding that sexbots, customized manufactured humanlike entities with the capacity for thought and suffering, have a consequent claim to be considered moral and legal persons, and may become the first conscious robots. Customizing sexbots thus exemplifies many profound ethical, legal and design issues. The contradictions inherent in their inconsistent ethical and legal status as both manufactured things and sentient, self-aware entities who are customized to be our intimate partners augments existing human/animal scholars’ call for a new theoretical framework which supersedes current person/thing dichotomies governing human responsibilities to other sentient beings. The paper concludes that the ethical limits and legal implications of customizable humanlike robots must be addressed urgently, proposing a duty on humans as creators to safeguard the interests and minimize the suffering of created sentient beings before technological advances pre-empt this possibility. View Full-Text
Keywords: sexbots; sex robots; robot consciousness; roboethics; robot law; biomimetics; neurorobotics; robot customization; robot rights; ethical duty to created sentient beings; ethics of pain and suffering in robotics sexbots; sex robots; robot consciousness; roboethics; robot law; biomimetics; neurorobotics; robot customization; robot rights; ethical duty to created sentient beings; ethics of pain and suffering in robotics
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mackenzie, R. Sexbots: Customizing Them to Suit Us versus an Ethical Duty to Created Sentient Beings to Minimize Suffering. Robotics 2018, 7, 70.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Robotics EISSN 2218-6581 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top