Next Article in Journal
Convolutional Neural Network based Estimation of Gel-like Food Texture by a Robotic Sensing System
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Kalman Filter Applied to Vision Based Head Gesture Tracking for Playing Video Games
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Robotics 2017, 6(4), 36;

Advances in the Inspection of Unpiggable Pipelines

School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 2 October 2017 / Revised: 18 November 2017 / Accepted: 23 November 2017 / Published: 29 November 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [3509 KB, uploaded 29 November 2017]   |  


The field of in-pipe robotics covers a vast and varied number of approaches to the inspection of pipelines with robots specialising in pipes ranging anywhere from 10 mm to 1200 mm in diameter. Many of these developed systems focus on overcoming in-pipe obstacles such as T-sections and elbows, as a result important aspects of exploration are treated as sub-systems, namely shape adaptability. One of the most prevalent methods of hybridised locomotion today is wall-pressing; generating traction using the encompassing pipe walls. A review of wall-pressing systems has been performed, covering the different approaches taken since their introduction. The advantages and disadvantages of these systems is discussed as well as their effectiveness in the inspection of networks with highly varying pipe diameters. When compared to unconventional in-pipe robotic techniques, traditional full-bore wall-pressing robots were found to be at a disadvantage. View Full-Text
Keywords: in-pipe; review; locomotion in-pipe; review; locomotion

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mills, G.H.; Jackson, A.E.; Richardson, R.C. Advances in the Inspection of Unpiggable Pipelines. Robotics 2017, 6, 36.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Robotics EISSN 2218-6581 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top