Next Article in Journal
Sensitive Quantitative In Vivo Assay for Evaluating the Effects of Biomolecules on Hair Growth and Coloring Using Direct Microinjections into Mouse Whisker Follicles
Next Article in Special Issue
High Phosphate-Induced JAK-STAT Signalling Sustains Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Inflammation and Limits Calcification
Previous Article in Journal
Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Rescues the Contractile Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype in Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aldosterone: Essential for Life but Damaging to the Vascular Endothelium
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?

Biomolecules 2023, 13(7), 1075; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071075
by Sebastian Spencer 1,2,3,*, Robert Desborough 2,3 and Sunil Bhandari 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 4:
Biomolecules 2023, 13(7), 1075; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071075
Submission received: 2 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 3 July 2023 / Published: 5 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Aspect of Cardiovascular Risk Factors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The review by Spencer and colleagues covers the important and current discussion on cystitis C use for eGFR estimation. The paper is overall well written and organised however I do believe Authors should discuss in a separate paragraph the studies investigating the associations between cystitine-C and GFR calculated by the gold standard inulin clearance. There are few studies analysing these associations and I believe they should be included to provide demonstration of cystitis-C-eGFR equation accuracy.

Author Response

Many thanks for your feedback.

Although many of the initial studies did indeed use inulin as an endogenous marker (“Gold Standard”), more recent good quality studies of the correlation between eGFR and mGFR have used both iohexol and iothalamate, which have supplanted inulin.

We have expanded the paragraph (line 134 – 142) which explores the bias and accuracy of eGFR equations to include the results of a robust, good quality metaanalysis. This incorporates all measures of mGFR and calculated Peason’s correlation coefficient CKD-EPI vs mGFR.

Reviewer 2 Report

With this review, Spencer et al. have addressed an extremely important topic in nephrology as well as cardiology. They have structured the review logically and prepared it conscientiously. The clear tables illustrate the advantages of the Cystatin C eGFR. I have no comments or suggestions for improvement and fully recommend the review for acceptance for publication.

Author Response

Many thanks for your feedback.

Reviewer 3 Report

It is a well organized review article, I don't have any concerns

Author Response

Many thanks for your feedback.

Reviewer 4 Report

The authors review the advantage of cystatin C eGFR for routine clinical practice instead creatinine eGFR. Although the cost of cystatin C method for evaluation kidney function compared to creatinine, earlier finding of cardiovascular risk of patients overcome this advantage. Also, there are some groups of patients that creatinine eGFR should not be applicable as some race and older. So, I recommend this article to be published.   

Author Response

Many thanks for your feedback.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors provided evidence for mGFR vs. eGFR and the paper is now suitable for publication

Back to TopTop