Next Article in Journal
Phytohormones 2020
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Stimulatory Receptor Signaling in CAR-T Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Type III Effectome of the Symbiotic Bradyrhizobium vignae Strain ORS3257
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/biom12091304
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chitosan as an Adjuvant to Enhance the Control Efficacy of Low-Dosage Pyraclostrobin against Powdery Mildew of Rosa roxburghii and Improve Its Photosynthesis, Yield, and Quality

by
Cheng Zhang
1,2,
Qinju Li
1,
Jiaohong Li
2,
Yue Su
3,* and
Xiaomao Wu
2,*
1
Guizhou Food Quality and Safety Technology Service Platform, School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
Institute of Crop Protection, College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
3
Department of Food and Medicine, Guizhou Vocational College of Agriculture, Qingzhen 551400, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(9), 1304; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12091304
Submission received: 26 August 2022 / Revised: 12 September 2022 / Accepted: 14 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Adaptation to Their Biotic and Abiotic Environment through the Lens of Secretomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Powdery mildew is the most serious fungal disease of Rosa roxburghii in Guizhou Province, China. In this study, the control role of chitosan-assisted pyraclostrobin against powdery mildew of R. roxburghii and its influences on the resistance, photosynthesis, yield, quality and amino acids of R. roxburghii were evaluated. The results indicate that the foliar application of 30% pyraclostrobin suspension concentrate (SC) 100 mg L−1 + chitosan 500 mg L−1 displayed a superior control potential against powdery mildew, with a control efficacy of 89.30% and 94.58% after 7 d and 14 d of spraying, respectively, which significantly (p < 0.01) exceeded those of 30% pyraclostrobin SC 150 mg L−1, 30% pyraclostrobin SC 100 mg L−1, and chitosan 500 mg L−1. Simultaneously, their co-application could effectively enhance their effect on the resistance and photosynthesis of R. roxburghii leaves compared to their application alone. Meanwhile, their co-application could also more effectively enhance the yield, quality, and amino acids of R. roxburghii fruits compared to their application alone. This work highlights that chitosan can be applied as an effective adjuvant to promote the efficacy of low-dosage pyraclostrobin against powdery mildew in R. roxburghii and improve its resistance, photosynthesis, yield, quality, and amino acids.

1. Introduction

Rosa roxburghii Tratt., a promising natural medicine and third-generation fruit rich in vitamin C, flavonoids, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and minerals, has various beneficial functions, such as enhancing immunity, decreasing blood pressure, and regulating the digestive system, as well as anti-cancer, anti-oxidation, and anti-radiation effects, etc. [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Recently, as an agricultural industry boosting affluence and revitalizing rural areas, the R. roxburghii industry has flourished rapidly in Guizhou Province in China, with a planting areas of over 170,000 hm2, representing the largest production area in the world [3,6] However, powdery mildew caused by Sphaerotheca sp. constantly occurs and seriously restricts the growth, yield, and quality of R. roxburghii, as well as frequently generating 30~40% economic losses [1,7]. As R. roxburghii is mainly produced in China, its powdery mildew also occurs frequently in the Sichuan, Yunnan, Chongqing, southwestern Shaanxi, Hubei and Hunan production areas in China, often causing equally great economic losses [7,8]. Consequently, some chemical fungicides and natural products for controlling powdery mildew have been proposed by local scholars. For example, Yan et al. [9] found that 10% benazoxystrobin suspension concentrate (SC) could effectively control powdery mildew with a control efficacy of 83.59%~ 94.33%. Moreover, Yan et al. [10] also reported that 6% ascorbic acid aqueous solutions induced the resistance of R. roxburghii to powdery mildew with a control efficacy of 61.45%. Subsequently, Li et al. [7] reported that 1.0~1.5% chitosan could also induce R. roxburghii resistance to powdery mildew, with an induced control effect of 69.30%~72.87%. Nonetheless, considering the serious harmfulness of powdery mildew, it is of major significance to excogitate various alternative and practicable control strategies for the healthy development of the R. roxburghii industry.
Pyraclostrobin, an efficient broad-spectrum strobilurin fungicide containing a pyrazole structure, is one of the most widely used and sold fungicides in the world [11,12]. Due to its good protective, therapeutic and systemic properties, pyraclostrobin is widely registered for controlling many plant diseases of fruit trees, vegetables and grains caused by various fungal pathogens, including Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, Hemimycetes, and Oomycetes, etc. [13,14]. It mainly inhibits the electron transfer between cytochrome b and c1 in mitochondrial respiration of pathogenic cells, so that mitochondria cannot normally provide the required energy for cell metabolism, thereby achieving a bactericidal effect [15,16,17]. In a previous report from our research group, Wu et al. [18] found that 30% pyraclostrobin SC could effectively control powdery mildew with a control efficacy of more than 90%, and notably promote its yield and quality. Nevertheless, with the increasing of its application areas, targets, and dosage, its potential risk to the environment, animals, and humans is also increased [19,20,21,22]. In the meantime, it easily triggers pathogen resistance with the growth of application frequency [23,24]. Noteworthily, Wang et al. [25] reported that oligosaccharins could be applied as an adjuvant to enhance tebuconazole’s control of soft rot disease of kiwifruit and reduce tebuconazole application. In that way, whether some natural products or biomolecules can be applied as an adjuvant to pyraclostrobin to more effectively control powdery mildew of R. roxburghii, reduce pyraclostrobin application and mitigate potential risks should be further explored and studied.
Chitosan, a natural biomolecule widely applied in the food, agriculture, medicine and cosmetic fields, has various outstanding advantages, such as nontoxicity, renewability, biocompatibility, etc. [26,27,28]. In agriculture, it can be used as a growth enhancer for promoting a plant’s growth and also as a bio-fungicide and inductor for managing diseases and pests [29,30,31]. The putative mechanisms of chitosan-mediated plant growth regulation are shown in Figure 1. Effectively, Li et al. [7] found that chitosan could induce R. roxburghii to resist powdery mildew and promote its photosynthesis and quality. Subsequently, the authors further demonstrated that chitosan had good toxicity against Sphaerotheca sp. with an EC50 value of 416.21 mg kg−1, and the co-application of allicin and chitosan effectively controlled powdery mildew with an efficacy of 85.97%, as well as reliably enhancing the resistance, growth and quality of R. roxburghii [32]. Meanwhile, Wang et al. [33] found that chitosan could be used as an adjuvant to improve the efficacy of isopyrazam·azoxystrobin against leaf spot disease of kiwifruit and decrease its application dosage. In our early report, we also demonstrated that chitosan was also a good adjuvant of the bio-fungicide tetramycin for controlling leaf spot disease of kiwifruit and improving its resistance, photosynthesis, and quality [34]. Accordingly, whether chitosan can enhance the control efficacy of pyraclostrobin against powdery mildew of R. roxburghii and reduce pyraclostrobin application is worth further study.
In the present study, the control efficacy of pyraclostrobin + chitosan against powdery mildew in R. roxburghii was investigated for the first time. Simultaneously, the effects of pyraclostrobin + chitosan on the resistance and photosynthetic capacities of R. roxburghii leaves were determined. Subsequently, the effects of pyraclostrobin + chitosan on the yield, quality, and amino acids of R. roxburghii fruits were also evaluated. This work presents a novel, feasible and alternative approach toward using natural product-assisted chemical fungicides in controlling the powdery mildew of R. roxburghii and reducing chemical fungicide application.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungicide, Atomizer and Chemical

In this study, 30% pyraclostrobin SC was provided by Zhongke Green Biological Engineering Co. Ltd. (Jinan, China). Chitosan (deacetylation ≥ 90.00%) was produced by Mingrui Bioengineering Co. Ltd. (Zhenzhou, China). The electrostatic atomizer was produced by Qiming Machinery Co. Ltd. (Taizhou, China), and its nominal capacity, spraying flow rate and working pressure were 16 L, ≤2.7 L min−1 and 0.15~0.40 MPa, respectively. All chemicals were of chromatographic or analytical grade.

2.2. Field Orchard

An orchard of R. roxburghii in Longli country, Guizhou province, China (26°54′36′′ N, 106°95′13′′ E) was used in the field experiment. The planted cultivar was high-quality ‘Guinong 5′, which is widely planted in Guizhou province. The tree age of the R. roxburghii plants was eight years old, and the planting density was 106 plants per 666.7 m2. Additionally, the altitude, temperature, annual sunshine, annual rainfall, and frostless season in R. roxburghii orchard were approximately 1384 m, 13.9 °C, 1265 h, 1100 mm and 280 d, respectively. The fertility information for R. roxburghii orchard soils is displayed in Table 1, while its pH value and exchangeable calcium were 6.37 and 17.06 cmol kg −1, respectively.

2.3. Field Control Experiment of Powdery Mildew

The foliar spray method was applied for the control experiment of powdery mildew in R. roxburghii. Meanwhile, a completely randomized experimental method was used for the delineation of the experimental plots. Five treatments were designed for controlling powdery mildew: (1) 30% pyraclostrobin SC 100 mg L−1 + chitosan 500 mg L−1 (P 100 + C 500), (2) 30% pyraclostrobin SC 150 mg L−1 (P 150), (3) 30% pyraclostrobin SC 100 mg L−1 (P 100), (4) chitosan 500 mg L−1 (C 500), and (5) clear water (control). For the preparation of P 100 + C 500, the appropriate amount of water was firstly used to dissolve 30% pyraclostrobin SC and chitosan, respectively, then the 30% pyraclostrobin SC and chitosan diluents were mixed, and the required water was finally complemented. Each treatment consisted of three replicates, and each plot contained nine trees, and the five trees on the diagonal were applied for testing. Considering that the young leaves, young stems, flower buds, flowers, and young fruits of R. roxburghii are the main organs damaged by powdery mildew, the leaves, stems, flowers and buds of each R. roxburghii plant (including) were sprayed with 1.50 L of fungicide liquid on April 3 and April 10 in 2021.
The control efficacy of R. roxburghii powdery mildew was investigated on April 17 and April 24 in 2021 as described by Li et al. [7,32]. The classification of the incidence degree was as follows: 0 degree was no incidence, 1 degree was 1~2 diseased lobules with thin hyphae, 2 degree was 3~4 diseased lobules with thick hyphae, 3 degree was 5~6 diseased lobules with dense hyphae, and 4 degree was more than 7 diseased lobules with dense hyphae. The disease index and control effect of powdery mildew in R. roxburghii were calculated using Equations (1) and (2), respectively.
Disease index = 100 × ∑ (Disease degree value × Leaf number within each degree)/(Total leaf number × the highest degree)
Control effect (%) = 100 × (1 − Disease index of fungicide/Disease index of control)

2.4. Determination of Disease Resistance and Photosynthesis Parameters of R. roxburghii

R. roxburghii leaves from the middle, east, west, south and north orientations of each tree tested were randomly collected on April 24 in 2021. A mixture of collected leaves in each plot were used for determining the disease resistance parameters of R. roxburghii leaves, including total phenolics, total flavonoids, soluble protein, soluble sugar, proline (Pro), malonaldehyde (MDA), SOD activity and polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity, as described by Wang et al. [35] and Zhang et al. [36,37]. In the meantime, the photosynthesis parameters of R. roxburghii leaves including chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and water use efficiency (WUE) were also measured on April 24 in 2021 according to Zhang et al. [34]. Chlorophyll content was determined by an UV-5800PC spectrophotometer at 663 nm and 645 nm with acetone–ethanol (v/v, 2:1) extraction. Additionally, a portable LI-6400XT photosynthesis measurement system (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) was applied for monitoring the Pn and Tr of R. roxburghii leaves at 8:00–10:00 a.m. on April 24 in 2021.

2.5. Determination of Yield, Quality and Amino Acids of R. roxburghii

R. roxburghii fruits from the middle, east, west, south and north orientations of each tree tested were randomly collected on September 3 in 2021. The single fruit weight and yield per plant of R. roxburghii were measured as described by Li et al. [7,32]. Meanwhile, the quality parameters of R. roxburghii fruits including vitamin C, soluble solid, soluble protein, soluble sugar, total acidity, total flavonoids, total triterpenes, and SOD were also determined as described by Wang et al. [35] and Zhang et al. [36,37]. Subsequently, a HPLC system (ThermoFisher U3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific (China), Shanghai, China) was used for determining 17 hydrolyzed amino acids of R. roxburghii fruits according to Zhang et al. [34]. Additionally, essential amino acids (EAA), nonessential amino acids (NAA), total amino acids (TAA), the percentage of EAA in TAA, and EAA/NAA were then calculated according to the contents of 17 hydrolyzed amino acids.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The mean value ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates was displayed. SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to check the significant differences of data, and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied. Figures were drawn using Origin 10.0 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Field Control Effect of Pyraclostrobin and Chitosan against Powdery Mildew

The control effects of pyraclostrobin + chitosan, pyraclostrobin and chitosan against powdery mildew of R. roxburghii are depicted in Table 2. After 7 d and 14 d of spraying with fungicides, P 100 + C 500, P 150, P 100, and C 500 significantly (p < 0.01) attenuated the disease index of powdery mildew, and P 100 + C 500 exhibited an optimal effect. P 100 + C 500 displayed a superior control potential for powdery mildew, with control effects of 89.30% and 94.58% after 7 d and 14 d of spraying, respectively, which significantly (p < 0.01) exceeded those of P 150, P 100, and C 500. The control effects against powdery mildew were ranked as follows: P 100 + C 500 > P 150 > P 100 > C 500, which all showed preferable persistence. Although C 500 displayed a relatively inferior control potential against powdery mildew, its control effects still reached 58.73% and 73.87% after 7 d and 14 d of spraying, respectively. Meanwhile, the pyraclostrobin amount in P 100 + C 500 was effectively reduced compared with P 150. These results show that chitosan induced a favorable control effect on powdery mildew and could significantly enhance the control effect of a low dosage of pyraclostrobin against powdery mildew and effectively decrease the application amount of pyraclostrobin.

3.2. Influence of Pyraclostrobin and Chitosan on Disease Resistance of R. roxburghii Leaves

The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the total phenolics, total flavonoids, soluble protein, and soluble sugar of R. roxburghii leaves is depicted in Figure 2. Compared with the control, P 100 + C 500, P 150, and C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) augmented the total phenolics, total flavonoids, soluble protein, and soluble sugar contents of R. roxburghii leaves, while P 100 also significantly (p < 0.05) enhance their total flavonoids and soluble protein contents. Moreover, the total flavonoids, soluble protein, and soluble sugar contents of R. roxburghii leaves treated with P 100 + C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) exceeded those of P 150, P 100, and C 500. Additionally, the total phenolics content of R. roxburghii leaves treated with P 100 + C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) exceeded that of P 150 and P 100, as well as demonstrating no significant (p < 0.05) differences with that of C 500. Simultaneously, the phenolics, flavonoids, soluble protein, and soluble sugar contents were not significantly (p < 0.05) different in P 150 and C 500, but those of C 500 were slightly higher than those of P 150. These results show that as compared to the application of pyraclostrobin or chitosan alone, pyraclostrobin + chitosan could effectively improve the total phenolics, total flavonoids, soluble protein, and soluble sugar contents of R. roxburghii leaves, thereby promoting the resistance of R. roxburghii to powdery mildew.
The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the Pro, MDA, SOD and PPO activities of R. roxburghii leaves is shown in Figure 3. Compared with the control, P 100 + C 500, P 150, and C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) increased the Pro content, SOD and PPO activities of R. roxburghii leaves and reduced their MDA content, while P 100 could only significantly (p < 0.05) promote their SOD activity and reduce their MDA content. Furthermore, the Pro content, SOD and PPO activities of R. roxburghii leaves treated with P 100 + C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) exceeded those of P 150, P 100, and C 500, and their MDA content was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of P 150, P 100, and C 500. Meanwhile, the Pro content, MDA content, SOD and PPO activities of R. roxburghii leaves also showed no significant (p < 0.05) differences in the P 150 and C 500 treatments, but those of C 500 were slightly higher than those of P 150. These results further indicate that chitosan used together with pyraclostrobin could effectively enhance the Pro content, SOD and PPO activities of R. roxburghii leaves and reduce their MDA content, reliably improving the resistance of R. roxburghii to powdery mildew.

3.3. Influence of Pyraclostrobin and Chitosan on Photosynthetic Capacity of R. roxburghii Leaves

The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the chlorophyll, Pn, Tr, and WUE of R. roxburghii leaves is displayed in Figure 4. Compared with the control, P 100 + C 500, P 150, and C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced the chlorophyll, Pn, and Tr of R. roxburghii leaves, while P 100 also significantly (p < 0.05) improved their Pn and Tr. Moreover, the chlorophyll, Pn, and Tr of R. roxburghii leaves treated with P 100 + C 500 were 6.25 μg g−1, 8.32 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1, and 2.91 mmol H2O m−2 s−1, respectively, being 1.06-, 1.17-, 1.07-, and 1.22-fold, 1.11-, 1.21-, 1.10-, and 1.36-fold, and 1.10-, 1.18-, 1.09-, and 1.30-fold higher compared to those of P 150, P 100, C 500 and the control, respectively. Simultaneously, the chlorophyll, Pn, and Tr of R. roxburghii leaves treated with C 500 were slightly higher than those of P 150, but there were no significant differences. Nevertheless, the water use efficiency of R. roxburghii leaves was not significantly (p < 0.05) different in the four treatments. The results presented here demonstrate that the co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan could more effectively enhance the chlorophyll, Pn, and Tr of R. roxburghii compared to their application alone, thereby promoting its favorable growth.

3.4. Influence of Pyraclostrobin and Chitosan on Yield and Quality of R. roxburghii

The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on weight and yield per plant of R. roxburghii fruits is displayed in Figure 5. Compared with the control, P 100 + C 500, P 150, P 100, and C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced the weight and yield of R. roxburghii fruits. P 100 + C 500 exhibited a superior increasing yield performance for R. roxburghii with a single fruit weight and fruit yield of 20.46 g and 7.18 kg per plant, respectively, being significantly (p < 0.05) higher by 1.12-, 1.25-, 1.09-, and 1.35-fold and 1.11-, 1.24-, 1.15-, and 1.55-fold compared to P 150, P 100, C 500 and the control, respectively. In addition, the weight and yield of R. roxburghii fruits were not significantly (p < 0.05) different in the P 150 and C 500 treatments. The results show that pyraclostrobin + chitosan could more effectively enhance R. roxburghii yield compared to pyraclostrobin or chitosan alone.
The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on R. roxburghii quality is shown in Table 3. Compared with the control, P 100 + C 500, P 150, and C 500 could significantly (p < 0.05) enhance vitamin C, soluble solid, soluble protein, soluble sugar, total acidity, total flavonoids, total triterpenes, and SOD activity of R. roxburghii fruits. Vitamin C, soluble protein, and total triterpenes content of R. roxburghii fruits treated with P 100 + C 500 were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of P 150 and C 500, and their total flavonoids content was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of P 150. Simultaneously, compared with P 100, P 100 + C 500 could also significantly (p < 0.05) enhance the vitamin C, soluble solid, soluble protein, soluble sugar, total acidity, total flavonoids, total triterpenes, and SOD activity of R. roxburghii fruits. However, P 100 could only significantly (p < 0.05) improve their vitamin C, total acidity, total triterpenes, and SOD activity compared to control. These findings show that chitosan effectively improved the effect of pyraclostrobin on the nutritional quality of R. roxburghii fruits.

3.5. Influence of Pyraclostrobin and Chitosan on Amino Acids of R. roxburghii

The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on amino acids of R. roxburghii fruits is depicted in Table 4. Compared with P 100 or the control, P 100 + C 500 could significantly (p < 0.05) increase the EAA, NAA, and TAA of R. roxburghii fruits, as well as raise the percentage of EAA in TAA and EAA/NAA. EAA and the percentage of EAA in TAA of R. roxburghii fruits treated with P 100 + C 500 significantly (p < 0.05) exceeded those of the P 150 or C 500 treatments. Additionally, the NAA, TAA and EAA/NAA of R. roxburghii fruits were not significantly (p < 0.05) different in P 100 + C 500, P 150, and C 500 treatments, while those of P 100 + C 500 were slightly higher than those of P 150 and C 500. These results reveal that the enhancing effect for amino acids of R. roxburghii fruits by pyraclostrobin + chitosan was superior to that of their application alone.

4. Discussion

Pyraclostrobin is a good protective, therapeutic and systemic fungicide that can inhibit the electron transfer between cytochrome b and c1 in the mitochondrial respiration of various fungal pathogens such as Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, Hemimycetes, and Oomycetes, etc. [13,14]. Chitosan has favorable antifungal activity and induces resistance to various plant diseases [28,29,30,31]. In the previous reports from our research group, Wu et al. [18] demonstrated that 30% pyraclostrobin SC 150 mg L−1 could effectively control powdery mildew in R. roxburghii with a control efficacy of 91.01% after 14 d of spraying, and Li et al. [7] found that 1.0~1.5% chitosan could induce R. roxburghii’s resistance to powdery mildew with a control effect of 69.30%~72.87% after 30 d of spraying. In this study, 30% pyraclostrobin SC 100 mg L−1 + chitosan 500 mg L−1 displayed a superior control potential for powdery mildew with control effects of 89.30% and 94.58% after 7 d and 14 d of spraying, respectively, which were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the 81.77% and 88.76% of 30% pyraclostrobin SC 150 mg L−1, 68.47% and 80.39% of 30% pyraclostrobin SC 100 mg L−1, and 58.73% and 73.87% of chitosan 500 mg L−1, respectively. These results suggest that chitosan significantly enhanced pyraclostrobin’s control effect against powdery mildew and effectively decreased the application amount of pyraclostrobin. There is a notably synergetic effect: pyraclostrobin prevented pathogen infection and killed pathogens, while chitosan can both kill pathogens and induce a plant’s disease resistance.
Phenolics and flavonoids are precursors of lignin biosynthesis in plants, which can enhance lignification of host cells and thereby produce disease resistance [38]. Proteins are the metabolic basis of energy and material in plants, and Pro and soluble sugar participate in the regulation of cell permeability, while MDA is a product of membrane lipid peroxidation [38,39]. Meanwhile, SOD is a key protective enzyme for obliterating free radicals in plants, and PPO can catalyze the formation of lignin, phenolic oxidation products and quinones to produce disease resistance [38]. Many reports have also verified that chitosan can promote the increase in disease resistance substances in plants and stimulate the activity of defensive enzymes [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,39]. In previous reports from our research group, it was also shown that chitosan could effectively enhance the Pro, soluble sugar and flavonoid contents, SOD and POD activities of R. roxburghii leaves, and decrease their MDA [7,32]. In this study, pyraclostrobin + chitosan could effectively improve the total phenolics, total flavonoids, soluble protein, soluble sugar, Pro, SOD activity, PPO activity and MDA of R. roxburghii leaves, thereby more reliably enhancing the resistance of R. roxburghii to powdery mildew. These results are consistent with the above reports, and also emphasize that chitosan and pyraclostrobin have a notably synergetic effect in enhancing the disease resistance of R. roxburghii.
Chlorophyll is a photosynthetic pigment, and photosynthesis is a physiological basis for the yield and quality of R. roxburghii. Moreover, the main driving force for absorbing and transporting water and nutrients in plants is transpiration. Chakraborty et al. [27] demonstrated that chitosan can promote the photosynthetic rate of plants by increasing chlorophyll content, and further enhance their growth and development. The previous results in our research group also show that chitosan or chitosan + allicin effectively improved the chlorophyll and photosynthetic rate of R. roxburghii leaves [7,32]. In this study, the co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan could more effectively enhance the chlorophyll, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate of R. roxburghii compared to their application alone, thereby further promoting its favorable growth. Furthermore, the co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan could more effectively enhance the yield of R. roxburghii compared to their application alone. Chitosan can also activate the signal transduction and gene expression of auxin and cytokinin in plants, and further promote their growth and biomass formation [27,40]. This high yield of R. roxburghii treated with pyraclostrobin + chitosan derives from the synergetic contribution of the protection of pyraclostrobin and chitosan, as well as the growth promotion of chitosan.
Powdery mildew seriously restricts the quality of R. roxburghii. The favorable quality of R. roxburghii fruits depends on its good growth and no damage from disease or insect pests. In this study, under the premise that the co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan could effectively control powdery mildew in R. roxburghii and promote its growth, it was observed that they could also significantly (p < 0.05) promote the vitamin C, soluble solids, soluble protein, soluble sugar, total acidity, total flavonoids, total triterpenes, and SOD activity of R. roxburghii fruits. Meanwhile, the co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan could more effectively enhance the above quality parameters of R. roxburghii fruits compared to their application alone. Simultaneously, the co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan could also more effective improve the EAA, NAA, and TAA of R. roxburghii fruits than pyraclostrobin or chitosan alone. Based on the amino acid model proposed by WHO and FAO, the percentage of EAA in TAA and EAA/NAA of the superior quality foods are 40% and ≥0.6, respectively [41]. In this study, the percentage of EAA in TAA and EAA/NAA of R. roxburghii fruits treated with pyraclostrobin + chitosan were 19.17% and 0.26, which are closer to the ideal amino acid model values compared to pyraclostrobin, chitosan and the control. These results emphasize that chitosan is an effective tool with low-dosage pyraclostrobin for improving the quality and amino acids of R. roxburghii fruits.
Recently, growing attention has been focused on reducing the application of chemical fungicides and complementary or alternative measures for plant disease management [33,42]. Some reports demonstrated that chitosan can be an efficient adjuvant of isopyrazam azoxystrobin, allicin, and tetramycin against plant disease [32,33,34]. In the present study, the co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan could more efficiently control powdery mildew in R. roxburghii and enhance its resistance, photosynthesis, yield, quality and amino acids compared with their application alone, as well as effectively reducing pyraclostrobin application. Meanwhile, chitosan is a nontoxic natural biomolecule, and the pyraclostrobin concentration in the combination of pyraclostrobin and chitosan is relatively low (100 mg L−1 or 10,000-fold diluted liquid). Furthermore, the safe interval time (126 days, 10 April 10 to 3 September) for R. roxburghii fruits was very long. Hence, the potential risks caused by pyraclostrobin and chitosan were almost nonexistent. This work emphasizes that 30% pyraclostrobin SC 100 mg L−1 + chitosan 500 mg L−1 can be recommended as a novel and feasible formula combination for managing powdery mildew in R. roxburghii and reducing chemical fungicide application.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, chitosan effectively helped pyraclostrobin to control powdery mildew in R. roxburghii and decreased pyraclostrobin’s application. The co-application of pyraclostrobin and chitosan notably improved the total phenolics, total flavonoids, soluble protein, soluble sugar, and Pro contents and SOD and PPO activities in R. roxburghii leaves and decreased their MDA content, and reliably enhanced their chlorophyll contents, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate. Meanwhile, pyraclostrobin + chitosan exhibited a better effect in enhancing the yield, quality, and amino acids of R. roxburghii fruits compared to their application alone. This study highlights that chitosan together with pyraclostrobin can be proposed as a novel, green and feasible formula combination for controlling powdery mildew of R. roxburghii and reducing chemical fungicide application.

Author Contributions

X.W. and Y.S. constructed the project; X.W., Y.S. and C.Z. designed the experiments; C.Z. and Q.L. performed the experiments; C.Z., Q.L. and J.L. analyzed the data; C.Z. and X.W. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32160656), the “Hundred” Level Innovative Talent Foundation of Guizhou Province (no. 20164016, GCC[2022]023-1), the High-level Talent Fund Project of Guizhou Medical University (No. Xiaobohe (2022) 007), the Science-Technology Support Program of Guizhou Province (no. (2020)1Y115, (2020)1Y134, (2021)YB243), and the Cultivation Program of Guizhou University (no. (2019)09).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

References

  1. Wang, L.-T.; Lv, M.-J.; An, J.-Y.; Fan, X.-H.; Dong, M.-Z.; Zhang, S.-D.; Wang, J.-D.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Cai, Z.-H.; Fu, Y.-J. Botanical characteristics, phytochemistry and related biological activities of Rosa roxburghii Tratt fruit, and its potential use in functional foods: A review. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 1432–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Qi, L.L.; Zhou, R.L. The Healthcare Function and Development Trend of Toxburgh Rose. Food Res. Dev. 2016, 37, 212–214. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, D.; Lu, M.; Ludlow, R.A.; Zeng, J.; Ma, W.; An, H. Comparative ultrastructure of trichomes on various organs of Rosa roxburghii. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2021, 84, 2095–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, X.Z.; Zhao, H.B.; Li, Y.F.; Yu, Z.H.; Liu, X.H.; Huang, M.Z. Identification and Oenological Properties Analysis of a Strain of Hanseniaspora uvarum from Rosa roxburghii. Food Ferment. Ind. 2020, 46, 97–104. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang, X.; Yan, H.; Zhai, L.; Yang, Z.; Yi, Y. Characterization of the Rosa roxburghii Tratt transcriptome and analysis of MYB genes. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0203014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fan, W.G.; Pan, X.J.; Chen, H.; Yang, H.R.; Gong, F.F.; Guan, J.Y.; Wang, M.L.; Mu, R. Effects of Oxalic Acid on the Nutrient of Calcareous Cultivated Soil and Leaf, Fruit Yield and Quality of Rosa roxburghii Tratt. J. Fruit Sci. 2021, 38, 1113–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, J.; Guo, Z.; Luo, Y.; Wu, X.; An, H. Chitosan Can Induce Rosa roxburghii Tratt. against Sphaerotheca sp. and Enhance Its Resistance, Photosynthesis, Yield, and Quality. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, L.; Liu, X.D.; Huang, W.Y.; Wu, X.M. Occurrence and control technology of powdery mildew in Rose roxburgh Tratt. China Fruit 2021, 1, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, K.; Wang, J.L.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, D.P.; Huang, R.M. Efficacy of Five Fungicides in Rosa roxburghii Tratt against Sphaerotheca sp. Agrochemicals 2018, 57, 609–610. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yan, K.; Luo, Z.; Hu, F.; Wu, T.; Huang, R.M.; Yan, J. 6% Ascorbic Acid Aqueous Solutions Inducing Rosa roxburghii Tratt against Sphaerotheca sp. Agrochemicals 2017, 56, 528–530. [Google Scholar]
  11. Balba, H. Review of Strobilurin Fungicide Chemicals. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2007, 42, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Musso, L.; Fabbrini, A.; Dallavalle, S. Natural Compound-derived Cytochrome bc1 Complex Inhibitors as Antifungal Agents. Molecules 2020, 25, 4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xiong, H.; Liu, X.; Fan, Y.; Luan, S.; Huang, Q. Effect of Membrane Integrity on Survival Competition of Botrytis cinerea upon QoI Fungicide Pyraclostrobin. J. Phytopathol. 2020, 168, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A.; Mercader, J.V.; Agulló, C.; Abad-Somovilla, A.; Abad-Fuentes, A. Development of Immunoaffinity Columns for Pyraclostrobin Extraction from Fruit Juices and Analysis by Liquid Chromatography with UV Detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 4902–4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hunte, C.; Palsdottir, H.; Trumpower, B.L. Protonmotive Pathways and Mechanisms in the Cytochrome bc1Complex. FEBS Lett. 2003, 545, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bahia, K.H.; Pascal, L.; Dong-Woo, L.; Elisabeth, D.; Fevzi, D. Recent Advances in Cytochrome bc 1: Inter Monomer Electronic Communication? FEBS Lett. 2011, 586, 617–621. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pedersen, M.; Wegner, C.; Phansak, P.; Sarath, G.; Gaussoin, R.; Schlegel, V. Monitoring Wheat Mitochondrial Compositional and Respiratory Changes using Fourier transform Mid-infrared Spectroscopy in Response to Agrochemical Treatments. Spectrochim. Acta A 2017, 173, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, Q.; Lei, Q.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Luo, Y.; An, H.; Wu, X. Field Effects of Different Fungicides on Powdery Mildew of Rosa roxburghii Tratt. China Plant Prot. 2022, 42, 91–93. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, D.; Liu, M.; Yang, Y.; Shi, H.; Zhou, J.; He, D. Strong lethality and teratogenicity of strobilurins on Xenopus tropicalis embryos: Basing on ten agricultural fungicides. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 208, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J. Acute and Subchronic Toxicity of Pyraclostrobin in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 2017, 188, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Domingues, C.E.D.C.; Inoue, L.V.B.; Silva-Zacarin, E.C.M.; Malaspina, O. Fungicide Pyraclostrobin Affects Midgut Morphophysiology and Reduces Survival of Brazilian Native Stingless bee Melipona scutellaris. Ecotox. Environ. Safe 2020, 206, 111395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, X.; Yang, S.; Li, B.; Wang, A.; Mu, W. Comparative Toxicity of Multiple Exposure Routes of Pyraclostrobin in Adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 145957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cameron, A.; Sarojini, V. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: Chemical Control, Resistance Mechanisms and Possible Alternatives. Plant. Pathol. 2014, 63, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wicaksono, W.A.; Jones, E.E.; Casonato, S.; Monk, J.; Ridgway, H.J. Biological Control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), the Causal Agent of Bacterial Canker of Kiwifruit, Using Endophytic Bacteria Recovered from a Medicinal Plant. Biol. Control 2018, 116, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Q.; Long, Y.; Ai, Q.; Su, Y.; Lei, Y. Oligosaccharins Used Together with Tebuconazole Enhances Resistance of Kiwifruit against Soft Rot Disease and Improves Its Yield and Quality. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Verlee, A.; Mincke, S.; Stevens, C.V. Recent Developments in Antibacterial and Antifungal Chitosan and Its Derivatives. Carbohyd. Polym. 2017, 164, 268–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chakraborty, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rahman, M.; Khan, M.; Bhowmik, P.; Mahmud, N.U.; Tanveer, M.; Islam, T. Mechanism of Plant Growth Promotion and Disease Suppression by Chitosan Biopolymer. Agriculture 2020, 10, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Torres-Rodriguez, J.A.; Reyes-Pérez, J.J.; Castellanos, T.; Angulo, C.; Hernandez-Montiel, L.G. A Biopomyler with Antimicrobial Properties and Plant Resistance Inducer Against Phytopathogens: Chitosan. Not. Sci. Biol. 2021, 49, 12231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rahman, M.; Mukta, J.A.; Sabir, A.A.; Gupta, D.R.; Mohi-ud-din, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Miah, M.G.; Rahman, M.; Islam, M.T. Chitosan Biopolymer Promotes Yield and Stimulates Accumulation of Antioxidants in Strawberry Fruit. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Coutinho, T.C.; Ferreira, M.C.; Rosa, L.H.; de Oliveira, A.M.; de Oliveira Júnior, E.N. Penicillium citrinum and Penicillium mallochii: New Phytopathogens of Orange Fruit and Their Control Using Chitosan. Carbohyd. Polym. 2020, 234, 115918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El Amerany, F.; Meddich, A.; Wahbi, S.; Porzel, A.; Taourirte, M.; Rhazi, M.; Hause, B. Foliar Application of Chitosan Increases Tomato Growth and Influences Mycorrhization and Expression of Endo-Chitinase-Encoding Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, J.; Li, R.; Zhang, C.; Guo, Z.; Wu, X.; An, H. Co-Application of Allicin and Chitosan Increases Resistance of Rosa roxburghii against Powdery Mildew and Enhances Its Yield and Quality. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Lei, Y.; Su, Y.; Long, Y. Chitosan as an Adjuvant to Improve Isopyrazam Azoxystrobin against Leaf Spot Disease of Kiwifruit and Enhance Its Photosynthesis, Quality, and Amino Acids. Agriculture 2022, 12, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, C.; Li, H.; Wu, X.; Su, Y.; Long, Y. Co-Application of Tetramycin and Chitosan in Controlling Leaf Spot Disease of Kiwifruit and Enhancing Its Resistance, Photosynthesis, Quality and Amino Acids. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Q.; Zhang, C.; Long, Y.; Wu, X.; Su, Y.; Lei, Y.; Ai, Q. Bioactivity and Control Efficacy of the Novel Antibiotic Tetramycin against Various Kiwifruit Diseases. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, C.; Long, Y.-H.; Wang, Q.-P.; Li, J.-H.; Wu, X.-M.; Li, M. The effect of preharvest 28.6% chitosan composite film sprays for controlling the soft rot on kiwifruit. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 46, 180–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, C.; Long, Y.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Xing, D.; An, H.; Wu, X.; Wu, Y. A Chitosan Composite Film Sprayed before Pathogen Infection Effectively Controls Postharvest Soft Rot in Kiwifruit. Agronomy 2020, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vlot, A.C.; Sales, J.H.; Lenk, M.; Bauer, K.; Brambilla, A.; Sommer, A.; Chen, Y.; Wenig, M.; Nayem, S. Systemic propagation of immunity in plants. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 1234–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lopez-Moya, F.; Suarez-Fernandez, M.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Molecular Mechanisms of Chitosan Interactions with Fungi and Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dzung, N.A.; Khanh, V.T.P.; Dzung, T.T. Research on impact of chitosan oligomers on biophysical characteristics, growth, development and drought resistance of coffee. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, S.T.; Wu, K. Nutritional evaluation of protein—ratio coefficient of amino acid. Acta Nutr. Sin. 1988, 10, 187–190. [Google Scholar]
  42. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the 30 Years from 1981 to 2010. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 12 01304 g001 550
Figure 1. The putative mechanisms of chitosan-mediated plant growth regulation.
Figure 1. The putative mechanisms of chitosan-mediated plant growth regulation.
Biomolecules 12 01304 g001
Biomolecules 12 01304 g002 550
Figure 2. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the total phenolics (A), total flavonoids (B), soluble protein (C), and soluble sugar (D) contents of R. roxburghii leaves. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Figure 2. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the total phenolics (A), total flavonoids (B), soluble protein (C), and soluble sugar (D) contents of R. roxburghii leaves. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Biomolecules 12 01304 g002
Biomolecules 12 01304 g003 550
Figure 3. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the Pro (A), MDA (B), SOD activity (C), and PPO activity (D) of R. roxburghii leaves. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Figure 3. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the Pro (A), MDA (B), SOD activity (C), and PPO activity (D) of R. roxburghii leaves. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Biomolecules 12 01304 g003
Biomolecules 12 01304 g004 550
Figure 4. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the chlorophyll (A), Pn (B), Tr (C) and WUE (D) of R. roxburghii leaves. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Figure 4. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on the chlorophyll (A), Pn (B), Tr (C) and WUE (D) of R. roxburghii leaves. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Biomolecules 12 01304 g004
Biomolecules 12 01304 g005 550
Figure 5. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on single fruit weight (A) and fruit yield per plant (B) of R. roxburghii. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Figure 5. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on single fruit weight (A) and fruit yield per plant (B) of R. roxburghii. Error bars indicate the SD of the three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Biomolecules 12 01304 g005
Table
Table 1. The fertility information of soils in R. roxburghii orchard.
Table 1. The fertility information of soils in R. roxburghii orchard.
IndicesContent (g kg−1)IndicesContent (mg kg−1)IndicesContent (mg kg−1)
Organic matter13.56Available nitrogen56.84Available iron6.59
Total nitrogen1.42Available phosphorus4.66Available boron0.15
Total phosphorus1.68Available potassium27.51Exchangeable magnesium308.37
Total potassium1.24Available zinc0.71Available manganese15.46
Table
Table 2. The control effect of pyraclostrobin and chitosan against powdery mildew.
Table 2. The control effect of pyraclostrobin and chitosan against powdery mildew.
TreatmentsAfter 7 d of SprayingAfter 14 d of Spraying
Disease IndexControl Effect (%)Disease IndexControl Effect (%)
P 100 + C 5001.06 ± 0.20 eE89.30 ± 1.50 aA0.82 ± 0.22 eE94.58 ± 1.51 aA
P 1501.79 ± 0.18 dD81.77 ± 2.85 bB1.70 ± 0.26 dD88.76 ± 1.77 bB
P 1003.10 ± 0.11 cC68.47 ± 2.56 cC2.97 ± 0.19 cC80.39 ± 1.16 cC
C 5004.05 ± 0.12 bB58.73 ± 4.02 dD3.96 ± 0.24 bB73.87 ± 1.26 dD
Control9.87 ± 0.71 aA—15.16 ± 0.22 aA—
Values indicate the mean ± SD of three replicates. Different capital and small letters represent significant differences on 1% (p < 0.01) and 5% (p < 0.05) levels, respectively.
Table
Table 3. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on R. roxburghii quality.
Table 3. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on R. roxburghii quality.
TreatmentsVitamin C (mg g−1)Soluble Solid (%)Soluble Protein (%)Soluble Sugar (%)Total Acidity (%)Total Flavonoids (mg g−1)Total Triterpenes (mg g−1)SOD Activity (U g−1 FW)
P 100 + C 50023.59 ± 0.55 a12.44 ± 0.32 a15.89 ± 0.51 a4.16 ± 0.18 a1.52 ± 0.06 a6.32 ± 0.31 a20.71 ± 0.35 a711.54 ± 21.38 a
P 15021.16 ± 0.69 b11.7 7± 0.74 ab14.65 ± 0.59 b3.83 ± 0.16 a1.41 ± 0.07 ab5.86 ± 0.23 b17.95 ± 0.65 bc668.15 ± 26.21 a
P 10019.73 ± 0.6 c10.89 ± 0.59 bc14.12 ± 0.72 bc3.19 ± 0.17 b1.36 ± 0.07 b5.32 ± 0.12 c17.20 ± 0.68 c608.93 ± 28.44 b
C 500 21.05 ± 0.38 b11.85 ± 0.63 ab14.76 ± 0.63 b3.87 ± 0.19 a1.44 ± 0.09 ab5.93 ± 0.27 ab18.67 ± 0.55 b673.48 ± 17.68 a
Control18.04 ± 0.61 d10.53 ± 0.41 c13.41 ± 0.32 c3.08 ± 0.17 b1.23 ± 0.05 c5.16 ± 0.17 c15.16 ± 0.32 d556.89 ± 26.83 c
Values indicate the mean ± SD of three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Table
Table 4. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on R. roxburghii amino acids.
Table 4. The influence of pyraclostrobin and chitosan on R. roxburghii amino acids.
TreatmentsEAA (mg kg−1)NAA (mg kg−1)TAA(mg kg−1)The Percentage of EAA in TAA (%)EAA/NAA
P 100 + C 50088.47 ± 3.46 a339.22 ± 8.00 a461.76 ± 26.95 a19.17 ± 0.38 a0.26 ± 0.01 a
P 15075.29 ± 6.55 bc318.47 ± 10.41 abc414.28 ± 41.72 ab18.19 ± 0.26 b0.24 ± 0.01 ab
P 10068.86 ± 1.94 cd314.88 ± 14.11 bc401.33 ± 13.06 b17.16 ± 0.17 c0.22 ± 0.01 b
C 500 78.46 ± 2.12 b321.95 ± 9.02 ab424.85 ± 12.33 ab18.47 ± 0.05 b0.24 ± 0.00 ab
Control64.82 ± 5.52 d296.68 ± 16.25 c381.84 ± 32.65 b16.98 ± 0.07 c0.22 ± 0.02 b
Values indicate the mean ± SD of three replicates. Small letters represent significant differences on a 5% (p < 0.05) level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Li, Q.; Li, J.; Su, Y.; Wu, X. Chitosan as an Adjuvant to Enhance the Control Efficacy of Low-Dosage Pyraclostrobin against Powdery Mildew of Rosa roxburghii and Improve Its Photosynthesis, Yield, and Quality. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12091304

AMA Style

Zhang C, Li Q, Li J, Su Y, Wu X. Chitosan as an Adjuvant to Enhance the Control Efficacy of Low-Dosage Pyraclostrobin against Powdery Mildew of Rosa roxburghii and Improve Its Photosynthesis, Yield, and Quality. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(9):1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12091304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Cheng, Qinju Li, Jiaohong Li, Yue Su, and Xiaomao Wu. 2022. "Chitosan as an Adjuvant to Enhance the Control Efficacy of Low-Dosage Pyraclostrobin against Powdery Mildew of Rosa roxburghii and Improve Its Photosynthesis, Yield, and Quality" Biomolecules 12, no. 9: 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12091304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop