Next Article in Journal
Gold-Based Metal Drugs as Inhibitors of Coronavirus Proteins: The Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease by Auranofin and Its Analogs
Previous Article in Journal
Osteoglycin: An ECM Factor Regulating Fibrosis and Tumorigenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/biom12111673
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Channel Activity Using FDA-Approved Channel Modulators Independent of Variants

by
Han-Gang Yu
1,*,
Gina Sizemore
2,
Ivan Martinez
3 and
Peter Perrotta
4
1
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
2
Clinical Medicine Resources, EZCARE Walk-in Medical Center, Moorefield, WV 26836, USA
3
Department of Microbiology, Immunology, & Cell Biology, Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
4
Anatomy & Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(11), 1673; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111673
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 29 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 11 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: SARS-CoV-2 has undergone mutations, yielding clinically relevant variants. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that in SARS-CoV-2, two highly conserved Orf3a and E channels directly related to the virus replication were a target for the detection and inhibition of the viral replication, independent of the variant, using FDA-approved ion channel modulators. Methods: A combination of a fluorescence potassium ion assay with channel modulators was developed to detect SARS-CoV-2 Orf3a/E channel activity. Two FDA-approved drugs, amantadine (an antiviral) and amitriptyline (an antidepressant), which are ion channel blockers, were tested as to whether they inhibited Orf3a/E channel activity in isolated virus variants and in nasal swab samples from COVID-19 patients. The variants were confirmed by PCR sequencing. Results: In isolated SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants, the channel activity of Orf3a/E was detected and inhibited by emodin and gliclazide (IC50 = 0.42 mM). In the Delta swab samples, amitriptyline and amantadine inhibited the channel activity of viral proteins, with IC50 values of 0.73 mM and 1.11 mM, respectively. In the Omicron swab samples, amitriptyline inhibited the channel activity, with an IC50 of 0.76 mM. Conclusions: We developed an efficient method to screen FDA-approved ion channel modulators that could be repurposed to detect and inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication, independent of variants.

1. Introduction

SARS-CoV-2 has undergone continuous mutations throughout the pandemic, yielding clinically relevant variants such as Delta and Omicron. At the time of writing, the dominant variant was BA.5; this accounted for nearly 90% of all Omicron variants (including BA.2.12.1 and BA.4) in the US, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [1]. Genomic mutations, especially those occurring in spike and in nucleocapsid proteins, have increased the ability of viruses to escape protection from antibodies developed from previous infections and/or vaccinations [2,3,4,5].
Currently, the antiviral drug Paxlovid (Pfizer) is the standard therapy to treat mild–moderate COVID-19 symptoms in patients with a confirmed viral infection [6]. The effective component of Paxlovid, nirmatrelvir, is a protease inhibitor [6]. Another antiviral drug, bebtelovimab (Eli Lily), is a neutralizing IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the spike protein that is effective against Omicron subvariants [7,8]. Nevertheless, Omicron variants are still causing around 400 deaths per day [9] [CDC data], serving as a reminder that efforts to produce effective therapies against SARS-CoV-2 variants are needed to help control the virus spread and to decrease the risk of infected patients who are at risk of progressing to severe symptoms.
There are two viroporins within the SARS-CoV-2 genome, Orf3a and E; both of which can form non-voltage-gated cation channels [10,11,12]. The structural protein envelope (E) and the accessory protein Orf3a are viroporins that consist of conserved channel activity that is not affected by massive mutations. This conserved channel activity also provides a target for the functional screening of FDA-approved ion channel modulators already used to treat other diseases. Orf3a and E channels are Na+ and K+ cation permeable: the Orf3a channel is more selective to K+ [13,14] whereas the E channel is more selective to Na+ (10 times higher than K+) ions [13]. The E channel is also permeable to Ca2+ ions [15] and its channel activity is influenced by pH values [16]. We previously reported that by using a combination of ion channel modulators and a fluorescent K+ ion assay, a rapid method, the Orf3a/E channel activity could be detected, a strong indicator of live SARS-CoV-2 in the blood of COVID-19 patients [17].
In this work, we report that clinically relevant mutations occurring in several variants of concern (VOC) did not affect Orf3a/E channel activity. Combined with our previous detection methods, we show that FDA-approved ion channel modulators can be screened for their ability to inhibit Orf3a/E channel activity. As Orf3a/E channel activity is directly associated with viral replication, we believe that repurposing ion channel modulators that are already clinically used for other diseases represents an effective alternative therapy for COVID-19 patients, independent of the causative variants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. COVID-19 Patient Blood and Nasal Swab Samples

The use of blood and nasal swab samples obtained from COVID-19 patients was approved by the West Virginia University Institutional Review Board. The research was discussed with each patient and if the patient consented to the research project, whole blood was drawn by a standard venipuncture into one tube containing EDTA for anticoagulation. A total of 12 blood samples from 12 patients were included. A total of 58 nasal swab samples were collected from COVID-19 patients. Twenty-one (21) Delta and thirty-seven (37) Omicron nasal swab samples were used. The SARS-CoV-2 variant status (Delta or Omicron) was verified by sequencing.

2.2. UV-Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Isolated SARS-CoV-2 variants were obtained from the CDC. All purified viruses were UV-inactivated in a Biosafety Level 3 facility at the Health Sciences Center of West Virginia University. UV-inactivated viruses were studied in a Biosafety Level 2 facility.

2.3. Fluorescence K+ Assay and Orf3a/E Channel Activity Detection

A fluorescence-based potassium ion channel assay utilizes the ability of thallium (Tl+) to permeate K+ channels [18]. Once the K+ channels are open, Tl+ in the extracellular solution flows down its concentration gradient into the cells via K+ channels. Inside the cells, Tl+ binds to and activates a fluorogenic indicator dye preloaded into the cells, resulting in a dramatic increase in the fluorescence signal. This technique allows the rapid determination of K+ channel activity in a high-throughput manner [19]. We used a commercial kit (FluxOR Potassium ion channel assay, cat#: F10016, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to study the fluorescence detection of the Orf3a/E channel activity.
Samples of 10 μL each were added to a 96-well plate. Each sample was duplicated in two separate wells. The first replicate contained only the assay solution to establish the baseline signal and the second contained both the assay solution and Orf3a/E channel blockers. The fluorescence of each sample was repeated 3–6 times using a BioTek Synergy H4 Hybrid Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments Inc. Winooski, VT, USA).

2.4. Ion Channel Modulators

Emodin, gliclazide, and 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) were purchased from Sigma. A stock solution (50 mM) was prepared in DMSO. Approximately 0.5 mM of emodin and gliclazide were used in ~100 μL solution. DMSO at ~1–2% of the test solution had no effect on the test results.
Amantadine (ATD) and amitriptyline (ATT) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Cat # 18-600-501) (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and VWR (Cat # TCA0908-025G) (Radnor, PA, USA), respectively. Stock solutions (50 mM) for both ATD and ATT were prepared in H2O.

2.5. Antigen Testing of Blood Samples

Antigen testing was performed in a clinic laboratory using the CareStart Rapid Diagnostic Test for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen (Access Bio, Somerset, NJ, USA). Briefly, a nasopharyngeal swab was removed from a pouch and the swab was introduced into the nasal passage until it reached the posterior nasopharynx. The swab was rotated 3–5 times over the posterior nasopharynx, then removed from the nostril with a rotation to sample the anterior nares. In the laboratory, the seal was removed from an extraction vial containing the extraction buffer. The swab was placed in the extraction vial and vigorously rotated 5 times. The extraction vial was then squeezed whilst the swab was removed by rotating against the sides of the extraction vial to remove any excess fluid from the swab and a cap was placed on the extraction vial. The sample was mixed by tapping the bottom of the extraction tube whilst inverted and 3 drops were squeezed into the sample well. The results were read after ten minutes.
A red control line appeared at the top of the well next to the letter “C”. If the test was positive, a blue line appeared below the red line and across from the letter “T”. Positive results produced both red and blue lines. Negative results revealed only a single red line. A result with a blue line without a red line was invalid and test was repeated.

2.6. Data Analysis

Fluorescence data were collected using Gen5 2.0 microplate reader software (from BioTek), processed in Excel, and analyzed and plotted using GraphPad Prism 8.
For the IC50 calculation, four different concentrations (for example, 0 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.5 mM, and 4 mM) of one drug were studied. The IC50 was calculated using a non-linear fit for an inhibitor versus a normalized response model; specifically, Y = 100/(1 + X/IC50), where X was the concentration of the inhibitor and Y was the normalized fluorescence signal.

3. Results

Most mutations occur in the spike proteins, but a few occur in other proteins, including Orf3a and envelope proteins. Table 1 shows the mutations in the Orf3a and E channel proteins in the variants of concern (VOC).
We first verified the methodology we used to screen the drugs in the blood samples. Figure 1 shows the typical results for the detection of the Orf3a (red circle) and E (black diamond) channel activities. Emodin (hollow circle) and gliclazide were used to block the Orf3a and E channel activities, respectively. 4-AP was used to trigger a fluorescence response in the presence of the channel activity. As a negative control, normal plasma (NP) not infected with the virus was used, showing a lack of response to all the drugs studied (4-AP, emodin, and gliclazide).
We then tested the inhibitory effects of emodin and gliclazide in the isolated SARS-CoV-2 variants. Figure 2 shows the representative results using Orf3a/E channel blockers on isolated original (A), Alpha (B), Beta (C), and Delta (D) virus variants. At a combinational concentration of 2–4 mM, emodin and gliclazide could block the Orf3a and E channel activities in each of the SARS-CoV-2 variants studied.
We then used nasal swabs to test the inhibitory effects of emodin and gliclazide on the Orf3a/E channel activities. Figure 3 shows the results from the nasal samples prior to the Delta wave (A), during the Delta wave (B), and during the Omicron wave (C). Figure 3D shows a negative control of a swab sample for a negative PCR test. The Orf3a/E channel activities could be detected and blocked by emodin/gliclazide in all swab samples harboring the different variants.
To determine which FDA-approved ion channel blockers might inhibit the Orf3a/E channel activities, we used swab samples that were relatively easy to obtain. As shown in Figure 4, two clinically used drugs, the antiviral amantadine (ATD) and the antidepressant amitriptyline (ATT), could each inhibit the channel activity of the isolated SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (A) and Delta swab samples (B—ATD, C—ATT) in a concentration-dependent manner.
Figure 5 shows the inhibitory effects of amitriptyline on the channel activity of a swab sample taken from a patient infected with the Omicron variant. ATT at 3 mM reduced the channel activity (red), which was further blocked by 1 mM emodin/gliclazide (A), indicating that the channel activity was from the Orf3a/E ion channels. Figure 5B shows the lack of effect by DMSO as a negative control (red) and emodin/gliclazide as a positive control (blue). We further tested different concentrations of ATT on the Omicron swab samples and determined that ATT inhibited the channel activity, with an IC50 of 0.76 mM.
Finally, we found, using blood samples, that the Orf3a/E channel activity was much weaker for Omicron compared with the parental (prior to Delta) and Delta variants (Figure 6), suggesting that a less severe pathology was generally associated with the Omicron variant than previous variants.

4. Discussion

SARS-CoV-2 variants that are associated with increased transmission rates most often express changes in spike proteins [27]. Whilst the main concern is that these mutations reduce the efficacy of a few vaccines [28] due to decreasing neutralizing activity and immune escape mechanisms [27,29], there is also a risk that a few novel variants may not be detected by current PCR- and antigen-based testing. Most recently, a new B.1.616 variant has been identified in which only 15% of patients infected with this variant were detected by RT-PCR [26], probably due to the distinct set of mutations and one deletion on the spike-1 N-terminal domain [30].
The FDA has recently emphasized the impact of further viral mutations (mostly by BA.4/BA.5) on SARS-CoV-2 antigen-based and molecular tests [31,32] because mutations are found in the nucleocapsid proteins (P13 L, DEL31/33, P203 K, G204 R, and S413 R) [23] that are targeted by many of these tests.
The NIH COVID-19 treatment guidelines [33] recommend four therapeutic drugs—Paxlovid, bebtelovimab, remdesivir, and molnupiravir—to treat non-hospitalized symptomatic adults testing positive for COVID-19. Paxlovid is a combination of two generic drugs, nirmatrelvir (which disrupts viral replication) and ritonavir (which enhances the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir by slowing its metabolization by the liver) [6,34]. Recent in vitro studies suggest that Paxlovid-resistant strains of the virus might arise [35,36]. Bebtelovimab is a neutralizing immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that binds to the spike protein [37]. Remdesivir is an antagonist of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication [38]. Molnupiravir is a prodrug of the synthetic nucleoside derivative N4-hydroxycytidine, which introduces copy errors during viral RNA replication [39].
Additionally, the FDA has authorized Evusheld (AstraZeneca) for the preventive treatment of COVID-19 in patients with an immune compromise or a severe allergy [40]. Evusheld contains two recombinant human IgG1κ monoclonal antibodies, tixagevimab and cilgavimab; both of which bind to the distinct regions of the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. A recent study showed that the protective effects of Evusheld were evaded by the Omicron BA.4.6 variant [41].
In this work, we targeted virally-encoded viroporins in SARS-CoV-2 genomes due to their roles in inflammation, viral replication, and pathogenesis [42,43,44]. ORF3a promotes virus release, viral replication, and virulence [26,45]. It can also induce apoptosis in host cells [46]. By interacting with the host immune system, ORF3a activates the pro-IL-1β gene expression and IL-1β secretion as well as NF-κB signaling, thus promoting the generation of cytokine storms [47,48].
The E protein deletion of SARS-CoV-2 causes a significant attenuation of viral virulence, suggesting an important role of E protein in the viral replication and disease pathogenesis [26]. SARS-CoV-2 E channel activity can cause injury to the lungs and heart. An injection of purified SARS-CoV-2 E protein into mice caused acute respiratory distress syndrome-like lung pathological damage [49]. E channel activity also disrupted the conduction of action potentials and Ca2+ homeostasis in cardiomyocytes, increasing the risk of arrhythmias [50].
In a pilot study, we tested two FDA-approved drugs associated with ion channel activity, amantadine and amitriptyline. Amantadine is used to treat movement difficulties in Parkinson patients [51,52]. It is also an antiviral drug that binds to the M2 proton channels in the influenza A virus [53,54]. The proton channels have a low permeability for other ions [55], which may explain the lower potency compared with amitriptyline.
Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant used to treat major depressive disorders [56] and to alleviate pain in diabetic neuropathy [57]. Amitriptyline inhibits the serotonin and noradrenaline uptake [58] and antagonizes 5-HT2 receptors that inwardly conduct the Na+ current [59]. This may explain the higher potency of amitriptyline than amantadine in the inhibition of the Orf3a/E channel activity.
It is worth noting that in the early exploratory experiments, we used high concentrations of drugs to shorten the experimental time and focus on testing the central idea, which was whether FDA-approved ion channel modulators used in a clinic could be repurposed to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral activity, directly controlled by the 3a/E channel activity.
Many Na+ and K+ channel modulators have been used in clinics to treat a variety of diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias and neuropathic pain [60,61,62,63,64,65]. Repurposing a few of these cation channel modulators that have inhibitory effects on Orf3a/E channel activity may represent an efficient approach to improve the therapy of COVID-19 patients whilst controlling the virus spread.

Limitations of the Work

The sample size was not large in this work. The samples were collected when the disease prevalence was high (approximately up to 50%) at an outpatient clinic. A larger sample size is needed to test our method for detecting functional viral proteins in the blood during periods of lower disease prevalence. Additionally, we did not test the recent Omicron variants (BA.2–5).

5. Conclusions

We developed an efficient method to screen FDA-approved ion channel modulators that could be repurposed to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication, independent of the variants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-G.Y.; methodology, H.-G.Y., G.S., P.P. and I.M.; formal analysis, H.-G.Y.; data curation, H.-G.Y., G.S., I.M. and P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-G.Y.; writing—review and editing, H.-G.Y., G.S. and P.P.; funding acquisition, H.-G.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 2U54GM104942-03. And the APC was waived. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of West Virginia University (protocol #: 2101209604; approval date, 23 February 2021; 2004976401) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study will be openly available after publication at the journal website.

Acknowledgments

We thank Peter Stoilov in the Department of Biochemistry at the West Virginia University for the sequencing confirmation of the Delta and Omicron samples used in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. CDC-Variants. US COVID-19 Cases Caused by Variants. Available online: https://wwwcdcgov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/transmission/variant-caseshtml (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  2. Cao, Y.; Yisimayi, A.; Jian, F.; Song, W.; Xiao, T.; Wang, L.; Du, S.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.; et al. BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection. Nature 2022, 608, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tegally, H.; Moir, M.; Everatt, J.; Giovanetti, M.; Scheepers, C.; Wilkinson, E.; Subramoney, K.; Moyo, S.; Amoako, D.G.; Baxter, C.; et al. Continued Emergence and Evolution of Omicron in South Africa: New BA.4 and BA.5 lineages. medRxiv 2022, arXiv:2022.05.01.22274406. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tuekprakhon, A.; Nutalai, R.; Dijokaite-Guraliuc, A.; Zhou, D.; Ginn, H.M.; Selvaraj, M.; Liu, C.; Mentzer, A.J.; Supasa, P.; Duyvesteyn, H.M.E.; et al. Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum. Cell 2022, 185, 2422–2433.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kimura, I.; Yamasoba, D.; Tamura, T.; Nao, N.; Oda, Y.; Mitoma, S.; Ito, J.; Nasser, H.; Zahradnik, J.; Uriu, K.; et al. Virological characteristics of the novel SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants including BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5. bioRxiv 2022, arXiv:2022.05.26.493539. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hammond, J.; Leister-Tebbe, H.; Gardner, A.; Abreu, P.; Bao, W.; Wisemandle, W.; Baniecki, M.; Hendrick, V.M.; Damle, B.; Simón-Campos, A.; et al. Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1397–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hentzien, M.; Autran, B.; Piroth, L.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Calmy, A. A monoclonal antibody stands out against omicron subvariants: A call to action for a wider access to bebtelovimab. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Takashita, E.; Yamayoshi, S.; Simon, V.; van Bakel, H.; Sordillo, E.M.; Pekosz, A.; Fukushi, S.; Suzuki, T.; Maeda, K.; Halfmann, P.; et al. Efficacy of Antibodies and Antiviral Drugs against Omicron BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 Subvariants. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 468–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. CDC-Forcasting. Observed and Forcasted Weekly COVID-19 Deaths in the United States. Available online: https://covidcdcgov/covid-data-tracker/#forecasting (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  10. Singh Tomar, P.P.; Arkin, I.T. SARS-CoV-2 E protein is a potential ion channel that can be inhibited by Gliclazide and Memantine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 530, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schwarz, S.; Wang, K.; Yu, W.; Sun, B.; Schwarz, W. Emodin inhibits current through SARS-associated coronavirus 3a protein. Antiviral Res. 2011, 90, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pervushin, K.; Tan, E.; Parthasarathy, K.; Lin, X.; Jiang, F.L.; Yu, D.; Vararattanavech, A.; Soong, T.W.; Liu, D.X.; Torres, J. Structure and inhibition of the SARS coronavirus envelope protein ion channel. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilson, L.; McKinlay, C.; Gage, P.; Ewart, G. SARS coronavirus E protein forms cation-selective ion channels. Virology 2004, 330, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wilson, L.; Gage, P.; Ewart, G. Hexamethylene amiloride blocks E protein ion channels and inhibits coronavirus replication. Virology 2006, 353, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nieto-Torres, J.L.; Verdiá-Báguena, C.; Jimenez-Guardeño, J.M.; Regla-Nava, J.A.; Castaño-Rodriguez, C.; Fernandez-Delgado, R.; Torres, J.; Aguilella, V.M.; Enjuanes, L. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus E protein transports calcium ions and activates the NLRP3 inflammasome. Virology 2015, 485, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mandala, V.S.; McKay, M.J.; Shcherbakov, A.A.; Dregni, A.J.; Kolocouris, A.; Hong, M. Structure and drug binding of the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein transmembrane domain in lipid bilayers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020, 27, 1202–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yu, H.-G.; Sizemore, G.; Smoot, K.; Perrotta, P. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Orf3a and E Ion Channel Activity in COVID-19 Blood Samples. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2021, 5, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Weaver, C.D.; Harden, D.; Dworetzky, S.I.; Robertson, B.; Knox, R.J. A thallium-sensitive, fluorescence-based assay for detecting and characterizing potassium channel modulators in mammalian cells. J. Biomol. Screen. 2004, 9, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Raphemot, R.; Kadakia, R.J.; Olsen, M.L.; Banerjee, S.; Days, E.; Smith, S.S.; Weaver, C.D.; Denton, J.S. Development and validation of fluorescence-based and automated patch clamp-based functional assays for the inward rectifier potassium channel Kir4.1. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2013, 11, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Phutthasophit, K.; Buddhari, D.; Chinnawirotpisan, P.; Joonlasak, K.; Manasatienkij, W.; Huang, A.; Kaewkao, T.; Mahayos, N.; Khontong, R.; Iamsirithaworn, S.; et al. Coding-Complete Genome Sequences of Alpha and Delta SARS-CoV-2 Variants from Kamphaeng Phet Province, Thailand, from May to July 2021. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10, e0087721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Melloul, M.; Chouati, T.; Hemlali, M.; Alaoui Amine, S.; Touil, N.; Elannaz, H.; Ennibi, K.; Youbi, M.; Merabet, M.; Bellefquih, A.M.; et al. Genome Sequences of the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) and the Kappa Variant (B.1.617.1) Detected in Morocco. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10, e0072721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kannan, S.R.; Spratt, A.N.; Sharma, K.; Chand, H.S.; Byrareddy, S.N.; Singh, K. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: Unique features and their impact on pre-existing antibodies. J. Autoimmun. 2022, 126, 102779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gangavarapu, K.; Latif, A.A.; Mullen, J.L.; Alkuzweny, M.; Hufbauer, E.; Tsueng, G.; Haag, E.; Zeller, M.; Aceves, C.M.; Zaiets, K.; et al. Outbreak.info genomic reports: Scalable and dynamic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations. medRxiv 2022, arXiv:2022.01.27.22269965. [Google Scholar]
  24. Verdiá-Báguena, C.; Nieto-Torres, J.L.; Alcaraz, A.; Dediego, M.L.; Enjuanes, L.; Aguilella, V.M. Analysis of SARS-CoV E protein ion channel activity by tuning the protein and lipid charge. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1828, 2026–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Nieto-Torres, J.L.; DeDiego, M.L.; Verdiá-Báguena, C.; Jimenez-Guardeño, J.M.; Regla-Nava, J.A.; Fernandez-Delgado, R.; Castaño-Rodriguez, C.; Alcaraz, A.; Torres, J.; Aguilella, V.M.; et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Envelope Protein Ion Channel Activity Promotes Virus Fitness and Pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Castaño-Rodriguez, C.; Honrubia, J.M.; Gutiérrez-Álvarez, J.; DeDiego, M.L.; Nieto-Torres, J.L.; Jimenez-Guardeño, J.M.; Regla-Nava, J.A.; Fernandez-Delgado, R.; Verdia-Báguena, C.; Queralt-Martín, M.; et al. Role of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Viroporins E, 3a, and 8a in Replication and Pathogenesis. mBio 2018, 9, e02325-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Abdool Karim, S.S.; de Oliveira, T. New SARS-CoV-2 Variants—Clinical, Public Health, and Vaccine Implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1866–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peacock, T.P.; Penrice-Randal, R.; Hiscox, J.A.; Barclay, W.S. SARS-CoV-2 one year on: Evidence for ongoing viral adaptation. J. Gen. Virol. 2021, 102, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, R.E.; Zhang, X.; Case, J.B.; Winkler, E.S.; Liu, Y.; VanBlargan, L.A.; Liu, J.; Errico, J.M.; Xie, X.; Suryadevara, N.; et al. Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants to neutralization by monoclonal and serum-derived polyclonal antibodies. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fillatre, P.; Dufour, M.-J.; Behillil, S.; Vatan, R.; Reusse, P.; Gabellec, A.; Velmans, N.; Montagne, C.; Geffroy, S.; Droumaguet, E.; et al. A new SARS-CoV-2 variant poorly detected by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples, with high lethality. medRxiv 2021, arXiv:2021.05.05.21256690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. FDA-Omicron. Omicron Variant: Impact on Antigen Diagnostic Tests (As of 12/28/2021). Available online: https://wwwfdagov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-viral-mutations-impact-covid-19-tests#omicronvariantimpact (accessed on 5 September 2021).
  32. FDA-Omicron-Testing. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Mutations: Impact on COVID-19 Tests. Available online: https://wwwfdagov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-viral-mutations-impact-covid-19-tests#omicron-reduced (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  33. Guidelines, C.-T. Therapeutic Management of Nonhospitalized Adults With COVID-19. Available online: https://wwwcovid19treatmentguidelinesnihgov/management/clinical-management-of-adults/nonhospitalized-adults--therapeutic-management/ (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  34. Robinson, J. PANORAMIC trial to enlist 17,500 more patients as researchers add second COVID-19 antiviral. Pharm. J. 2022. Available online: https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/panoramic-trial-enlists-17500-more-patients-as-researchers-add-second-covid-19-antiviral (accessed on 5 September 2020).
  35. Zhou, Y.; Gammeltoft, K.A.; Ryberg, L.A.; Pham, L.V.; Fahnøe, U.; Binderup, A.; Hernandez, C.R.D.; Offersgaard, A.; Fernandez-Antunez, C.; Peters, G.H.J.; et al. Nirmatrelvir Resistant SARS-CoV-2 Variants with High Fitness in Vitro. bioRxiv 2022, arXiv:2022.06.06.494921. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jochmans, D.; Liu, C.; Donckers, K.; Stoycheva, A.; Boland, S.; Stevens, S.K.; De Vita, C.; Vanmechelen, B.; Maes, P.; Trüeb, B.; et al. The substitutions L50F, E166A and L167F in SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro are selected by a protease inhibitor—In vitro—And confer resistance to nirmatrelvir. bioRxiv 2022, arXiv:2022.06.07.495116. [Google Scholar]
  37. Westendorf, K.; Žentelis, S.; Wang, L.; Foster, D.; Vaillancourt, P.; Wiggin, M.; Lovett, E.; van der Lee, R.; Hendle, J.; Pustilnik, A.; et al. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab) potently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants. Cell Rep. 2022, 39, 110812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gordon, C.J.; Tchesnokov, E.P.; Woolner, E.; Perry, J.K.; Feng, J.Y.; Porter, D.P.; Götte, M. Remdesivir is a direct-acting antiviral that inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with high potency. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 6785–6797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Toots, M.; Yoon, J.J.; Cox, R.M.; Hart, M.; Sticher, Z.M.; Makhsous, N.; Plesker, R.; Barrena, A.H.; Reddy, P.G.; Mitchell, D.G.; et al. Characterization of orally efficacious influenza drug with high resistance barrier in ferrets and human airway epithelia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaax5866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. FDA-Evusheld. Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19. JAMA 2022, 327, 384–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, Q.; Li, Z.; Ho, J.; Guo, Y.; Yeh, A.Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, M.; Yu, J.; Sheng, Z.; Huang, Y.; et al. Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariant BA.4.6 to Antibody Neutralization. bioRxiv 2022, arXiv:2022.09.05.506628. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nieva, J.L.; Madan, V.; Carrasco, L. Viroporins: Structure and biological functions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Farag, N.S.; Breitinger, U.; Breitinger, H.G.; El Azizi, M.A. Viroporins and inflammasomes: A key to understand virus-induced inflammation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2020, 122, 105738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nieto-Torres, J.L.; Verdiá-Báguena, C.; Castaño-Rodriguez, C.; Aguilella, V.M.; Enjuanes, L. Relevance of Viroporin Ion Channel Activity on Viral Replication and Pathogenesis. Viruses 2015, 7, 3552–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Redondo, N.; Zaldívar-López, S.; Garrido, J.J.; Montoya, M. SARS-CoV-2 Accessory Proteins in Viral Pathogenesis: Knowns and Unknowns. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 708264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ren, Y.; Shu, T.; Wu, D.; Mu, J.; Wang, C.; Huang, M.; Han, Y.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Zhou, W.; Qiu, Y.; et al. The ORF3a protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces apoptosis in cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 881–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lu, W.; Xu, K.; Sun, B. SARS Accessory Proteins ORF3a and 9b and Their Functional Analysis. In Molecular Biology of the SARS-Coronavirus; Lal, S.K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  48. Siu, K.-L.; Yuen, K.-S.; Castano-Rodriguez, C.; Ye, Z.-W.; Yeung, M.-L.; Fung, S.-Y.; Yuan, S.; Chan, C.-P.; Yuen, K.-Y.; Enjuanes, L.; et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus ORF3a protein activates the NLRP3 inflammasome by promoting TRAF3-dependent ubiquitination of ASC. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 8865–8877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Xia, B.; Shen, X.; He, Y.; Pan, X.; Liu, F.L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, F.; Fang, S.; Wu, Y.; Duan, Z.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like pathological damages and constitutes an antiviral target. Cell Res. 2021, 31, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Polina, I.; Sung, J.H.; Jhun, B.S.; O-uchi, J. Abstract 15857: SARS-Cov-2 Genes Encode Ito-like Potassium Channels: Linkage Between Viroporins and High Mortality Rate in COVID-19 Patients with Pre-existing Cardiovascular Diseases. Circulation 2020, 142, A15857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kong, M.; Ba, M.; Ren, C.; Yu, L.; Dong, S.; Yu, G.; Liang, H. An updated meta-analysis of amantadine for treating dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 57316–57326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Pahwa, R.; Tanner, C.M.; Hauser, R.A.; Sethi, K.; Isaacson, S.; Truong, D.; Struck, L.; Ruby, A.E.; McClure, N.L.; Went, G.T.; et al. Amantadine extended release for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease (EASED Study). Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tokimatsu, I.; Nasu, M. Anti-influenza A viral drug-amantadine. Nihon Rinsho 2000, 58, 2288–2292. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hubsher, G.; Haider, M.; Okun, M.S. Amantadine. The journey from fighting flu to treating Parkinson disease. Neurology 2012, 78, 1096–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chizhmakov, I.V.; Geraghty, F.M.; Ogden, D.C.; Hayhurst, A.; Antoniou, M.; Hay, A.J. Selective proton permeability and pH regulation of the influenza virus M2 channel expressed in mouse erythroleukaemia cells. J. Physiol. 1996, 494, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Thour, A.; Marwaha, R. Amitriptyline. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  57. Alam, U.; Sloan, G.; Tesfaye, S. Treating Pain in Diabetic Neuropathy: Current and Developmental Drugs. Drugs 2020, 80, 363–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bendtsen, L.; Jensen, R.; Olesen, J. Amitriptyline, a combined serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor, reduces exteroceptive suppression of temporal muscle activity in patients with chronic tension-type headache. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Electromyogr. Mot. Control 1996, 101, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. McKinnon, N.K.; Reeves, D.C.; Akabas, M.H. 5-HT3 receptor ion size selectivity is a property of the transmembrane channel, not the cytoplasmic vestibule portals. J. Gen. Physiol. 2011, 138, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Birch, P.J.; Dekker, L.V.; James, I.F.; Southan, A.; Cronk, D. Strategies to identify ion channel modulators: Current and novel approaches to target neuropathic pain. Drug Discov. Today 2004, 9, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Colombo, E.; Francisconi, S.; Faravelli, L.; Izzo, E.; Pevarello, P. Ion channel blockers for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Future Med. Chem. 2010, 2, 803–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zuliani, V.; Rivara, M.; Fantini, M.; Costantino, G. Sodium channel blockers for neuropathic pain. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2010, 20, 755–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kale, V.P.; Amin, S.G.; Pandey, M.K. Targeting ion channels for cancer therapy by repurposing the approved drugs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA 2015, 1848, 2747–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Thireau, J.; Pasquie, J.L.; Martel, E.; Le Guennec, J.Y.; Richard, S. New drugs vs. old concepts: A fresh look at antiarrhythmics. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 132, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Darbar, D.; Roden, D.M. Future of antiarrhythmic drugs. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2006, 21, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 12 01673 g001 550
Figure 1. Channel activities of Orf3a and E inhibition by respective blockers: emodin, Orf3a channel blocker, gliclazide, and E channel blocker. NP: normal plasma. D: drugs (gliclazide + emodin). RFU: random fluorescence unit. The results were repeated in an additional 3–6 samples.
Figure 1. Channel activities of Orf3a and E inhibition by respective blockers: emodin, Orf3a channel blocker, gliclazide, and E channel blocker. NP: normal plasma. D: drugs (gliclazide + emodin). RFU: random fluorescence unit. The results were repeated in an additional 3–6 samples.
Biomolecules 12 01673 g001
Biomolecules 12 01673 g002 550
Figure 2. E/Orf3a channel blockers (gliclazide + emodin) on isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus variants: (A) original; (B) Alpha; (C) Beta; (D) Delta. All viruses were UV-inactivated. +D: drugs (gliclazide + emodin). The error bars are the average result from 3–6 repeats.
Figure 2. E/Orf3a channel blockers (gliclazide + emodin) on isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus variants: (A) original; (B) Alpha; (C) Beta; (D) Delta. All viruses were UV-inactivated. +D: drugs (gliclazide + emodin). The error bars are the average result from 3–6 repeats.
Biomolecules 12 01673 g002
Biomolecules 12 01673 g003 550
Figure 3. E/Orf3a channel blockers (gliclazide + emodin) on COVID-19 nasal swabs of various variants: (A) prior to Delta variant; (B) Delta variant; (C) Omicron variant; (D) negative swab control. Note that the y-axis scale is enlarged to show error bars and the drug trace has been moved down to avoid an overlap. +D: gliclazide + emodin. The error bars are the average result from 3–6 repeats.
Figure 3. E/Orf3a channel blockers (gliclazide + emodin) on COVID-19 nasal swabs of various variants: (A) prior to Delta variant; (B) Delta variant; (C) Omicron variant; (D) negative swab control. Note that the y-axis scale is enlarged to show error bars and the drug trace has been moved down to avoid an overlap. +D: gliclazide + emodin. The error bars are the average result from 3–6 repeats.
Biomolecules 12 01673 g003
Biomolecules 12 01673 g004 550
Figure 4. Inhibition of amantadine (ATD) and amitriptyline (ATT) on Delta variant swab: (A) isolated Delta virus (UN-inactivated); (B) inhibitory effects of ATD on Delta variant swab; (C) inhibitory effects of ATT on Delta variant swab.
Figure 4. Inhibition of amantadine (ATD) and amitriptyline (ATT) on Delta variant swab: (A) isolated Delta virus (UN-inactivated); (B) inhibitory effects of ATD on Delta variant swab; (C) inhibitory effects of ATT on Delta variant swab.
Biomolecules 12 01673 g004
Biomolecules 12 01673 g005 550
Figure 5. Inhibition of ATT on Omicron variant swab: (A) effects of ATT (red) and emodin/gliclazide (blue); (B) effects of emodin/gliclazide (red) and DMSO (blue).
Figure 5. Inhibition of ATT on Omicron variant swab: (A) effects of ATT (red) and emodin/gliclazide (blue); (B) effects of emodin/gliclazide (red) and DMSO (blue).
Biomolecules 12 01673 g005
Biomolecules 12 01673 g006 550
Figure 6. Orf3a/E channel activity of variants in blood. In blood, the SARS-CoV-2 virus channel activity was high in the sample prior to Delta (blue triangle), low during Delta (red circle), and undetectable in Omicron (black circle).
Figure 6. Orf3a/E channel activity of variants in blood. In blood, the SARS-CoV-2 virus channel activity was high in the sample prior to Delta (blue triangle), low during Delta (red circle), and undetectable in Omicron (black circle).
Biomolecules 12 01673 g006
Table
Table 1. Mutations in the Orf3a and E channel proteins in the variants of concern (VOC).
Table 1. Mutations in the Orf3a and E channel proteins in the variants of concern (VOC).
VOCOrf3aEnvelopeChannel Activity
Alpha [20]G254 *None(-)
Delta (B.1.617.2) [21]S26 LNone(-)
Omicron (BA.1–BA.5) [22,23]T223 IT9 I(-)
(-): not affected because the mutations occur outside the motif that controls the channel activity. E channel activity is controlled by a transmembrane domain between G10 and L37, which forms an ion channel [24,25]. Orf3a K+ channel activity is controlled by Y91, Y93, and Y109 [26]. *—mutation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, H.-G.; Sizemore, G.; Martinez, I.; Perrotta, P. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Channel Activity Using FDA-Approved Channel Modulators Independent of Variants. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111673

AMA Style

Yu H-G, Sizemore G, Martinez I, Perrotta P. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Channel Activity Using FDA-Approved Channel Modulators Independent of Variants. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(11):1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Han-Gang, Gina Sizemore, Ivan Martinez, and Peter Perrotta. 2022. "Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Channel Activity Using FDA-Approved Channel Modulators Independent of Variants" Biomolecules 12, no. 11: 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop