Next Article in Journal
Insight on the Role of Leptin: A Bridge from Obesity to Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular-Genetic Basis of Plant Breeding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular, Subcellular, and Arrhythmogenic Mechanisms in Genetic RyR2 Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Molecular Pathogenesis of Cardiac Arrhythmia

Department of Cell Physiology, Akita Graduate School of Medicine, Hondo 010-8543, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(10), 1393; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12101393
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Pathogenesis of Cardiac Arrhythmia)
The heart is a necessary organ for sustaining life in mammals, and it is the first organ to function during early development. Once this primary engine begins to operate, it continues to pump blood throughout the body until the individual animal dies. The miraculous homeostasis of the heartbeat, which involves tremendous energy consumption, is naturally synchronized with systemic homeostasis. The minimum unit of energy in the body is called the ATP, which is produced in large quantities in organelles called mitochondria. Recently, it has been shown that the quality maintenance of cardiac mitochondria is achieved by mobilizing the immune system [1]. In other words, cardiac mitochondrial function is being addressed as a systemic challenge. In this Special Issue, Dr. Takeuchi and Prof. Matsuoka provide a review focusing on Ca2+ dynamics in cardiac mitochondria [2]. Mitochondrial biophysical variables inside the cell are indirectly measured by selective drugs, selective fluorescent reagents, and selective genetic modification. Sophisticated studies have shown that mitochondrial ATP production and mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration are closely linked. During heart contraction, the mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration and NADH oxidation rate increase synchronously. Without a mechanism to excrete increased intramitochondrial Ca2+, the Ca2+ overload causes excessive oxidative phosphorylation, which produces reactive oxygen species (ROS); this, in turn, induces ventricular arrhythmias. The Na+/Ca2+/Li+ exchanger (NCLX) is responsible for mitochondrial Ca2+ excretion. While NCLX is thought to contribute to mitochondrial homeostasis, chronic activation of NCLX in heart failure conditions, where ATP production has shifted from being fatty acid dependent to being carbohydrate dependent, is expected to result in mitochondrial Ca2+ deprivation. Thus, the evaluation of disease status using mitochondrial function is critical and, at the same time, largely complicated. In order to understand such complex biological phenomena, Dr. Takeuchi and Prof. Matsuoka emphasize the importance of mathematical model analysis using computers.
Dr. Tsumoto and Prof. Kurata reviewed the bifurcation analysis on the cardiac action potentials, a type of mathematical model analysis [3]. In the bifurcation analysis, a set of differential equations (dynamic equations) is considered a system, and a sudden change from one stable status to another stable status is referred to as a bifurcation. The highly abstract approach of describing the action potential as a system enables us to identify specific single molecules that are essential for the stability of the system. Dr. Tsumoto and Prof. Kurata present various bifurcation analyses of cardiomyocyte excitation phenomena. While their review is effectively illustrative of the power of bifurcation analysis, they also identify a problem with bifurcation analysis, namely, that the interpretation of the bifurcations is not simple. For example, in analyzing early after-depolarization (EAD) by reducing the conductance of IKs and IKr, more than four bifurcations have been observed. Each bifurcation is an arrhythmia with a different molecular mechanism. In addition, different underlying models naturally lead to different results; in some cases, EAD can be explained by action potential reactivation, while in others, it is accompanied by intracellular Ca2+ release. Eventually, the accumulation of precise experimental data and trial and error in the analysis seem to be indispensable.
On the other hand, to elucidate the mechanism of cardiac function, Dr. Namekata et al. and Dr. Okada et al. employed a strategy of comparing different animal species [4,5]. To our knowledge, the normal beating heart is driven by a coupled-clock system in which Ca2+ release preceding the action potential is reflected in depolarization via a Na+–Ca2+ exchanger (NCX). Surprisingly, Dr. Namekata et al. pharmacologically excluded the need for an NCX in guinea pig heartbeat. Indeed, similar reports have previously been reported in cellular experiments [6]. Furthermore, the authors of the coupled-clock system themselves have recently reported in vivo observations demonstrating that the action potentials of pacemaker cells are heterogeneous, with Ca2+ release preceding the action potential, and the action potential preceding Ca2+ release [7]. It seems that the coupled clock is simply a phenomenological observation. Similarly, Dr. Okada et al. dismissed the high-scoring report stating that Tbx18 is the most critical transcription factor that characterizes pacemaker cells [8]. They reported that SHOX2 is the essential transcription factor for pacemaker cells when animal species, including humans, are considered [5].
The study of heart rhythm in this way has been a passion, and there are a wide variety of experimental and analytical methods. The most straightforward approach is to inhibit specific ion channels in the study of arrhythmias. For example, inhibition of human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) channels is known to produce ventricular arrhythmias, and Dr. Tamura et al. reported that synthetic estrogen has a protective effect against hERG channel inhibition [9]. Dr. Shimizu et al. reported that the intravenous anesthetic propofol suppresses hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels and is associated with bradyarrhythmia [10]. Furthermore, Dr. Flowler and Dr. Zissimopoulos reported a review of ventricular arrhythmias associated with ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2) mutations [11]. RyR2 is a giant ion channel with ~560 kDa subunits forming a tetramer, and more than 350 mutations have been reported. Mutations, thus, need to be classified as indicated in this review.
By the way, even though the molecular mechanisms of cardiac excitation and contraction are extremely well regulated, there is one heart region that is innately susceptible to arrhythmias: the pulmonary veins. The pulmonary veins are the source of the most frequent arrhythmia: atrial fibrillation. Bredeloux et al. have provided a review in this Special Issue on the history and latest findings in pulmonary vein research [12], and Okamoto et al. contributed new insights into the molecular mechanisms of pulmonary vein arrhythmias [13].
Finally, Dr. Omatsu-Kanbe discovered atypical cardiomyocytes (AMCs), which she reviewed in this Special Issue [14]. AMC is a new cell type, discovered in the cardiac myoblast removal fraction that was previously discarded in the experimental process. Because of their cell fusion ability, AMCs have the potential to play an active role in the healing process after myocardial injury, but their complete characteristics remain a mystery. It is deeply satisfying to see that the review manuscript on AMCs has finally been accepted for publication. New discoveries always have to fight against traditional standards. Still, researchers cannot stop fighting. We are proud to have produced a Special Issue that encourages new discoveries, such as that of AMCs.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all the authors for this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nicolás-Ávila, J.A.; Lechuga-Vieco, A.V.; Esteban-Martínez, L.; Sánchez-Díaz, M.; Díaz-García, E.; Santiago, D.J.; Rubio-Ponce, A.; Li, J.L.Y.; Balachander, A.; Quintana, J.A.; et al. A Network of Macrophages Supports Mitochondrial Homeostasis in the Heart. Cell 2020, 183, 94–109.e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Takeuchi, A.; Matsuoka, S. Physiological and Pathophysiological Roles of Mitochondrial Na+-Ca2+ Exchanger, NCLX, in Hearts. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tsumoto, K.; Kurata, Y. Bifurcations and Proarrhythmic Behaviors in Cardiac Electrical Excitations. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Namekata, I.; Jitsukata, K.; Fukuda, A.; Odaka, R.; Hamaguchi, S.; Tanaka, H. Intracellular Ca2+-Mediated Mechanisms for the Pacemaker Depolarization of the Mouse and Guinea Pig Sinus Node Tissue. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Okada, D.; Okamoto, Y.; Io, T.; Oka, M.; Kobayashi, D.; Ito, S.; Yamada, R.; Ishii, K.; Ono, K. Comparative Study of Transcriptome in the Hearts Isolated from Mice, Rats, and Humans. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Himeno, Y.; Toyoda, F.; Satoh, H.; Amano, A.; Cha, C.Y.; Matsuura, H.; Noma, A. Minor contribution of cytosolic Ca2+ transients to the pacemaker rhythm in guinea pig sinoatrial node cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 300, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bychkov, R.; Juhaszova, M.; Tsutsui, K.; Coletta, C.; Stern, M.D.; Maltsev, V.A.; Lakatta, E.G. Synchronized Cardiac Impulses Emerge From Heterogeneous Local Calcium Signals Within and Among Cells of Pacemaker Tissue. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2020, 6, 907–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kapoor, N.; Liang, W.; Marbán, E.; Cho, H.C. Direct conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes to pacemaker cells by expression of Tbx18. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tamura, F.; Sugimoto, S.; Sugimoto, M.; Sakamoto, K.; Yamaguchi, M.; Suzuki, T.; Fukuda, K.; Ieda, M.; Kurokawa, J. The Effect of a Synthetic Estrogen, Ethinylestradiol, on the hERG Block by E-4031. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shimizu, M.; Mi, X.; Toyoda, F.; Kojima, A.; Ding, W.-G.; Fukushima, Y.; Omatsu-Kanbe, M.; Kitagawa, H.; Matsuura, H. Propofol, an Anesthetic Agent, Inhibits HCN Channels through the Allosteric Modulation of the cAMP-Dependent Gating Mechanism. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fowler, E.D.; Zissimopoulos, S. Molecular, Subcellular, and Arrhythmogenic Mechanisms in Genetic RyR2 Disease. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bredeloux, P.; Pasqualin, C.; Bordy, R.; Maupoil, V.; Findlay, I. Automatic Activity Arising in Cardiac Muscle Sleeves of the Pulmonary Vein. Biomolecules 2021, 12, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Okamoto, Y.; Aung, N.Y.; Tanaka, M.; Takeda, Y.; Takagi, D.; Igarashi, W.; Ishii, K.; Yamakawa, M.; Ono, K. Preferential Expression of Ca2+-Stimulable Adenylyl Cyclase III in the Supraventricular Area, including Arrhythmogenic Pulmonary Vein of the Rat Heart. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Omatsu-Kanbe, M.; Fukunaga, R.; Mi, X.; Matsuura, H. Atypically Shaped Cardiomyocytes (ACMs): The Identification, Characterization and New Insights into a Subpopulation of Cardiomyocytes. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okamoto, Y.; Ono, K. Molecular Pathogenesis of Cardiac Arrhythmia. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12101393

AMA Style

Okamoto Y, Ono K. Molecular Pathogenesis of Cardiac Arrhythmia. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(10):1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12101393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okamoto, Yosuke, and Kyoichi Ono. 2022. "Molecular Pathogenesis of Cardiac Arrhythmia" Biomolecules 12, no. 10: 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12101393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop