Next Article in Journal
Studies of Peculiar Mg-Containing and Oscillating Bioapatites in Sheep and Horse Teeth
Previous Article in Journal
Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency and Squalene Synthase Inhibitor (TAK-475): The Balance to Extinguish the Inflammation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/biom11101437
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance of Affinity-Improved DARPin Targeting HIV Capsid Domain in Interference of Viral Progeny Production

by
Kanokporn Sornsuwan
1,2,
Weeraya Thongkhum
2,3,
Thanathat Pamonsupornwichit
2,
Tanawan Samleerat Carraway
4,
Suthinee Soponpong
2,3,
Supachai Sakkhachornphop
5,
Chatchai Tayapiwatana
1,2,3,* and
Umpa Yasamut
1,2,3,*
1
Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Center of Biomolecular Therapy and Diagnostic, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Center of Innovative Immunodiagnostic Development, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
4
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
5
Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(10), 1437; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101437
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 28 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Previously, a designed ankyrin repeat protein, AnkGAG1D4, was generated for intracellular targeting of the HIV-1 capsid domain. The efficiency was satisfactory in interfering with the HIV assembly process. Consequently, improved AnkGAG1D4 binding affinity was introduced by substituting tyrosine (Y) for serine (S) at position 45. However, the intracellular anti-HIV-1 activity of AnkGAG1D4-S45Y has not yet been validated. In this study, the performance of AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y in inhibiting wild-type HIV-1 and HIV-1 maturation inhibitor-resistant replication in SupT1 cells was evaluated. HIV-1 p24 and viral load assays were used to verify the biological activity of AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y as assembly inhibitors. In addition, retardation of syncytium formation in infected SupT1 cells was observed. Of note, the defense mechanism of both ankyrins did not induce the mutation of target amino acids in the capsid domain. The present data show that the potency of AnkGAG1D4-S45Y was superior to AnkGAG1D4 in interrupting either HIV-1 wild-type or the HIV maturation inhibitor-resistant strain.

1. Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains a major health problem worldwide. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is currently used to sustain HIV suppression and recover the immune function of patients [1,2]. Despite success in terms of improved clinical symptoms, adverse drug effects from using HAART have been reported. Therefore, alternative strategies have been developed for HIV therapy [3]. Several intrabodies have been designed to target the viral HIV-1 protein, e.g., scFvD8 [4], GPI scFv-X5 [5], and scFv 183-H12-5C [6], which were generated to inhibit HIV-1 replication in infected cells. However, cytoplasmic reducing conditions halted their development, since proper folding and stability requires disulfide bond formation.
Accordingly, the attempt to construct a disulfide bond-independent scaffold might be promising for HIV-1 therapy. An alpha repeat (αRep) protein has been designed to target HIV-1 Gag. This αRep exhibits activity by impairing the viral packaging and maturation process [7,8]. Another type of disulfide bond-free scaffold is called designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin), which is based on natural ankyrin [9]. This building block provides the properties of ankyrin in protein–protein interactions involved in several cellular activities [10,11,12]. The advantages of DARPin include high stability and solubility. Furthermore, resistance in the protease and reducing cytoplasmic environment may make ankyrin an intracellular therapeutic molecule [10]. According to these advantages, DARPins were designed to overcome several limitations when using immunoglobulins as therapeutics agents [13,14,15,16]. In addition, the DARPins have been reported to have a role in HIV inhibition. CD4-specific DARPins [17] and HIV gp120-specific DARPins [18] were designed to block HIV-1 entry. However, their efficiency was reduced by unwanted side effects [19] and mutation in the HIV envelope [20].
Besides the extracellular anti-HIV-1 DARPins, we reported an intracellular anti-HIV-1 DARPin, AnkGAG1D4, which specifically targets the N-terminus of the HIV-1 capsid protein [21]. AnkGAG1D4 provides anti-HIV-1 activity through interference with HIV Gag multimerization, an important step in HIV assembly. This ankyrin reduces the permissiveness of HIV-1 production in HIV-1-infected SupT1 cells [22]. In addition, AnkGAG1D4 has broad-spectrum antiviral activity against an HIV-1 circulatory strain that carries a mutation in the N-terminus capsid [23]. However, the anti-HIV-1 activity of AnkGAG1D4 was mediocre, especially in the late stage of infection [24]. Computational analysis and calculation of van der Waals (vdW) forces indicate the choices of key amino acid residues in ankyrin sequence [25]. An evaluation of the binding activity and affinity using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-modified method and bio-layer interferometry (BLI) showed that substitution of serine (S) at position 45 with tyrosine (Y), forming AnkGAG1D4-S45Y, leads to increased affinity against the HIV-1 capsid domain. Enhanced binding affinity of AnkGAG1D4 might provide complete HIV-1 inhibition.
The emergence of drug-resistant strains is another important obstacle in HIV-1 therapy. Mutations in the genes involved with antiretroviral drug target sites are continuously reported [26,27], resulting in the failure of HAART. Nowadays, several HIV-1 drugs and inhibitors have been developed in order to overcome this problem [28]. Capsid-targeting inhibitors represent one interesting compound, which work by interfering in the late stage of the HIV-1 life cycle, assembly and maturation [29,30]. The HIV-1 maturation inhibitor (MI) is a class of anti-HIV-1 compound that blocks proteolytic cleavage of the Gag protein, resulting in non-infectious virions. MI can be divided into two classes; betulinic acid-based and pyridone-based MI. The betulinic acid-based MI, bevirimat (BVM), blocks HIV-1 maturation by interrupting CA-SP1 cleavage [31]. According to the resistance-conferring mutation on the Gag protein, a BVM derivative, C28-BVM, was further developed [32]. The second class of MI, PF46396, exhibits antiretroviral activity in HIV-1 laboratory strain and HIV-1 circulatory isolates. However, HIV-1 resistance against both classes of MI has been reported [33,34,35]. These data indicate that even though new anti-HIV-1 agents were developed, it is not enough to inhibit HIV-1 replication. As the target region of AnkGAG1D4 is distinctive from that of MI, AnkGAG1D4 is expected to inhibit the assembly process of the HIV-1 MI-resistant strain.
This study was aimed at investigating the anti-HIV activity of binding affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4 in infected SupT1 cells. In addition, the role of the AnkGAG1D4 in HIV-1 maturation inhibitor resistant (MIR) strain was addressed. The HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V virus, carrying a mutation on the CA-SP1 junction on Gag protein, was used as a model. Regarding our results, the binding affinity-improved AnkGAG1D4 had increased antiviral activity against wild-type (WT) and MIR viruses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Lines and Plasmid

SupT1 cells (ATCC) were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL of penicillin (Gibco), 100 µg/mL of streptomycin (Gibco), and 2 mM of L-glutamine (Gibco). HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco), 100 U/mL of penicillin (Gibco), 100 µg/mL of streptomycin (Gibco), and 2 mM of L-glutamine (Gibco).
pNL4-3 plasmid, the infectious HIV-1 NL4-3 molecular clone (NIH), was used to produce the HIV-1 NL4-3 laboratory strain virus. Additionally, mutagenesis was performed on this plasmid to generate a clone of the HIV-1 MIR virus.

2.2. Preparation of HIV-1 Virions

HIV-1 NL4-3 viral stock was produced as previously described [36]. Briefly, 5 × 106 HEK293T cells were seeded in a 10 cm2 dish containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS-DMEM. At 70% cell confluence, cells were transfected with 5 µg of pNL4-3 plasmid using LipofectamineTM LTX reagent and PLUSTM reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After 48 h post-transfection, culture supernatant containing virus was harvested, centrifuged at 335× g for 5 min and filtrated through a 0.45 µm filter membrane to remove unwanted particles. The viral stock was aliquoted and kept at −80 °C. HIV-1 viral titer was determined by HIV viral load assay using COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS Taqman HIV-1 test (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

2.3. Construction of pNL4-3 MIRCAI201V Plasmid and Preparation of HIV-1 Maturation Inhibitor Resistant (MIR) Virus

In order to compare the function of AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y in HIV-1 MIR virus production, HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V was generated. Mutation at position 201 on CA-CTD from isoleucine (I) to valine (V), CAI201V, confers resistance of HIV-1, in both clade B and C, against PF-46396, and partial resistance to BVM [33,35]. To construct the molecular clone of HIV-1, NL4-3 MIRCAI201V, mutagenesis was performed on pNL4-3 plasmids using a QuickChange Lightening Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The synthesized oligonucleotides used in this experiment were as follows: Fwd_CAI201V: 5′cgaacccagattgtaagactgtgttaaaagcattgggacca-3′; Rev_CAI201V: 5′tggtcccaatgcttttaacacagtcttacaatctgggttcg-3′. The mutated plasmid was transformed into XL-1 blue competent E. coli cells for plasmid amplification. The plasmid-harboring XL-1 blue cells were grown on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar supplemented with 100 µg/mL of ampicillin, at 37 °C for 16 h. A bacterial colony was picked and further cultured in super broth (SB) supplemented with 100 µg/mL of ampicillin at 37 °C for 16 h. After culturing, the plasmid was extracted and purified using a Geneaid™ Midi Plasmid Kit (Geneaid Biotech, New Taipei, Taiwan). To confirm the corrected mutagenesis, pNL4-3 MIRCAI201V was subjected to plasmid sequencing analysis.
pNL4-3 MIRCAI201V was used for HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V viral production. This plasmid was transfected into HEK293T cells using MirusTransITX2 (Mirus Bio, Madison, WI, USA). After 48 h post-transfection, culture supernatant containing virus was harvested, centrifuged at 335× g for 5 min, and filtrated through 0.45 µm filter membrane to remove unwanted particles. The viral stock was aliquoted and kept at −80 °C. HIV-1 viral titer was determined by HIV viral load assay using COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS Taqman HIV-1 test (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

2.4. Generation of SupT1 Cells Stably Expressing Ankyrin Protein, AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, and AnkA32D3-EGFP by Lentiviral Gene Transferring Method

To generate SupT1 cells stably expressing ankyrin protein, 1 × 105 of SupT1 cells were transduced with VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vector at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1, with the addition of 5 ug/mL polybrene. Each VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vector included VSVG–CGW–Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, VSVG–CGW–Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, and VSVG–CGW–Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP. These cells were spinoculated at 2500× g for 1.30 h, and further cultured for 16 h. After incubation, these cells were washed 3 times with RPMI 1640 medium and cultured in 10% heat-inactivated FBS-RPMI 1640. To evaluate ankyrin expression in SupT1 cells, EGFP-positive cells were observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer-Colibri 7) and the percentage of EGFP-positive cells was determined by a CyAnTM ADP flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). SupT1 stable cells were sorted by a BD FACSMelodyTM cell sorter (BD biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) to obtain the comparable expression level of ankyrin. 2.6. Evaluation of CD4 surface expression on SupT1 was done on cells stably expressing ankyrin protein. To test whether overexpression of ankyrin in SupT1 cells interferes with CD4 expression on the cell surface, CD4 protein was examined by immunofluorescence staining. SupT1 cells and SupT1 stable cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated in 10% human AB serum-PBS on ice for 30 min. After incubation, the cells were stained with APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD4 antibody (Immunotools, Friesoythe, Germany) and placed on ice for 30 min. Next, cells were washed 3 times with FACS buffer solution and resuspended in fixation buffer (1% paraformaldehyde in PBS). CD4-positive cells were analyzed by a BD AccuriTMC6 cytometer (BD biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

2.5. Determination of Subcellular Localization of Ankyrin Proteins in SupT1 Cells

To determine subcellular localization of ankyrin proteins, ankyrin-EGFP-expressing SupT1 cells were observed under confocal fluorescence microscopy. SupT1 cells and ankyrin-EGFP-expressing SupT1 cells were centrifuged at 335× g for 5 min, then resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium. A total of 1 × 106 cells of SupT1 cells or ankyrin-EGFP-expressing SupT1 cells were seeded to poly-L lysine-precoated cover slips. Cells were incubated in humidified a 5% CO2 atmosphere incubator at 37 °C for 10 min. Cells were subsequently incubated in fixation buffer (4% paraformaldehyde in PBS) at room temperature for 15 min. After twice washing with PBS, cells were stained with a 1:1000 dilution of CellMaskTM Deep red membrane staining (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1:1000 dilution of Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in RPMI 1640 medium at 37 °C for 10 min. Cell imaging was performed using Nikon C2 plus confocal fluorescence microscopy (Nikon, TYO, Japan) at 63× magnification. Excitation wavelengths were 405 nm for Hoechst 33342, 488 nm for EGFP, and 560 nm for CellMaskTM Deep red membrane staining.

2.6. HIV-1 Challenge

SupT1 cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were incubated with 10 MOI of HIV-1 NL4-3 or NL4-3 MIRCAI201V virus. In this experiment, SupT1 cells without exogenous ankyrin expression and SupT1 cells expressing irrelevant ankyrin (Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP) were used as controls. After incubation, these cells were washed 3 times with RPMI 1640 medium, then cultured in 10% heat-inactivated FBS-RPMI 1640 medium. During the culture, cells were observed for syncytium formation under inverted microscopy. Cells were subcultured every 2 days, and culture supernatants were collected at days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, and 21 post-infection. Collected culture supernatants were centrifuged to removed debris and unwanted particles. Culture supernatant was kept at −80 °C for HIV-1 p24 and viral load assay.

2.7. Evaluation of HIV-1 p24 and Viral Load

The level of HIV-1 capsid (p24) in culture supernatant was evaluated using a GenscreenTM Ultra p24 ELISA kit (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Conquette, PAR, France). The viral particles in culture supernatant were lysed by 1% Triton-X 100 prior to the assay. Culture supernatants were added to a well precoated with monoclonal antibody against HIV-1 p24. After incubation and washing, biotinylated anti-HIV-1 p24 polyclonal antibody was added. The reaction was incubated at room temperature for 30 min, then washed. Next, HRP-conjugated streptavidin was added to the well, and the reaction was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After incubation and washing, the reaction was detected by adding chromogenic substrate, and stopped at 30 min with 1 N sulfuric acid solution. The absorbances were read using a microplate reader at 450 nm, and calculated for HIV-1 p24 levels using HIV-1 p24 standard curve. To further determine the viral production, culture supernatants at 13 days post- infection were subjected to HIV viral load assay. The level of HIV virion in culture supernatant was evaluated using reverse transcription quantification polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) by COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS Taqman HIV-1 test (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

2.8. Analysis of HIV-1 Capsid Sequence

The sequence analysis of the HIV-1 capsid was modified from a previously described method [22]. In brief, viral RNA was extracted from culture supernatant using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). To generate cDNA encoding the HIV-1 capsid, extracted RNA was used as a template for reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) using a Superscript III One-step RT-PCR system (Invitrogen, Friesoythe, Germany). The PCR reaction contained a pair of oligonucleotides, (FWD_RIHES_p24: 5′-ggatagaggtaaaagacaccaaggaagc-3′; REV_RIHES_p24: 5′-ctcattgcctcagccaaaacccttgc-3′), and PCR product was purified using a GENEJET PCR purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The purified PCR product was subjected to DNA sequencing with the same oligonucleotides with RT-PCR. To analyze sequencing results, HIV-1 capsid sequence was aligned against HIV-1 NL4-3 WT using SnapGene software version 2.8.3 (GSL Biotech, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. from 3 replicate experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 (indicated with asterisks).

3. Results

3.1. Expression of Ankyrin Protein Did Not Interfere with Cell-Surface CD4

To generate SupT1 stable cells, SupT1 cells were transduced with VSV-G pseudotyped lentivirus. Each lentivirus vector carries the gene encoding N-terminus myristoylated ankyrin protein with enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) fusion, including Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP. After 48 h post-transduction, SupT1 cells were observed to be EGFP positive under fluorescence microscopy (Figure 1A). Since a comparable expression level of ankyrin is required to verify their anti-HIV-1 activity in infected cells, these transduced SupT1 cells were sorted. After cell sorting, the percentage of EGFP-positive cells in SupT1 stable cells was approximately 100%, with a comparable level of ankyrin (Figure 1B,C). In addition, subcellular localization of ankyrin proteins in SupT1 cells was determined under confocal microscopy. The result showed that EGFP tagging ankyrins were colocalized with a plasma membrane dye, suggesting their targeting to inner leaflet of cell membrane as a result from the N-terminus myristoylation signal (Figure 2). To examine whether the expression of ankyrin interfered with the HIV receptor, CD4 expression on the surface of SupT1 stable cells was measured by flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that the number of CD4-positive cells in ankyrin-expressing and control SupT1 cells was similar (Figure 3A). The mean fluorescence intensity of CD4 in SupT1 cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells (Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) Ank GAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP) was 4.47 × 104, 5.58 × 104, 4.31 × 104, and 3.96 × 104, respectively (Figure 3B). These data suggest that the expression of N-terminus myristoylated ankyrin protein did not alter the level of CD4 on the cell surface of SupT1 cells.

3.2. AnkGAG1D4-S45Y Provides More Protection against HIV-1-Mediated Cell Death

To investigate the antiviral activity of ankyrin targeting the HIV-1 capsid, SupT1 and SupT1 stable cells (SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP) were infected with HIV-1 NL4-3 laboratory strain virus at an MOI of 10. A schematic representation of the experiments is shown in Figure 4A. Following HIV-1 infection, the cytopathic effect in infected cells was observed under inverted microscopy (Figure 4B,C). Syncytium formation in SupT1 and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3 was detected early at 5 days post-infection (Figure S1). The parental Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4 delayed the formation of syncytium cells in infected cells to 21 days post-infection, while no syncytium cells were observed in SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP. In addition, cell viability was monitored by the trypan blue exclusion method. The cell viability of HIV-1-infected SupT1 and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP was dramatically decreased at 9 days post-infection, and they were entirely dead at day 17 (Figure 4D). On the other hand, SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP had extended cell viability to 21 days with a greater percentage of viable cells in the latter.

3.3. AnkGAG1D4-S45Y Improves Antiviral Activity Than Parental Ankyrin in HIV-1-Infected SupT1 Cells

HIV-1 production in SupT1 cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells was evaluated using HIV-1 p24 ELISA. The level of p24 in SupT1 cells control was detected at 3 days post-infection, and continuously increased to 1.46 × 105 pg/mL at 13 days (Figure 5A). SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3, an irrelevant ankyrin, showed continuously increased p24 levels to 1.30 × 105 pg/mL at 13 days and was not different from infected the SupT1 cell control. Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP showed higher anti-HIV-1 potency based on 1000-fold lower HIV-1 production than the SupT1 cell control. However, at day 17, superior anti-HIV-1 activity of Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was indicated (Figure 5B). The level of HIV-1 p24 in Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was 1.47 × 103 and 44.36 pg/mL, respectively. HIV viral load assay confirmed the ability of Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP to inhibit viral replication, as the HIV RNA copy number was lower than in the SupT1 cell control and irrelevant ankyrin (Figure 5C). Moreover, HIV viral load confirmed that the number of RNA copies in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4 -S45Y-EGFP was 5.12 × 105 copies/mL, and in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP was 7.20 × 106 copies/mL.
Furthermore, the anti-HIV-1 activity of Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP in more extensive infection was investigated. In this experiment, SupT1 cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were infected with 50 MOI of WT HIV-1 NL4-3 virus and monitored as described above. Numerous syncytium cells were observed in SupT1 cell control and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP at 13 days post-infection (Figure S2). Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP showed a delay in syncytium cell formation at 17 days post-infection, whereas Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP delayed the formation of syncytium cells to 21 days. HIV-1 p24 ELISA demonstrated a low level of HIV-1 p24 in SupT1 cells control at 3 days post-infection, then instantly increased at 5 days post-infection (Figure 6A). HIV-1 p24 was continuously detected at high levels in infected SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP and produced similar levels to the SupT1 cell control. In contrast to Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, HIV p24 was detected at low levels. At day 17 post-infection, the detected p24 level in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP was 1.90 × 104 pg/mL (Figure 6B), which slightly increased at day 21. Surprisingly, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP retained the ability to inhibit HIV-1 replication. At 17 days post-infection, the p24 level in Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was 1000 times lower compared with the parental ankyrin. The number of HIV RNA copies in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was lower than in infected SupT1 cell controls and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP (Figure 6C). The number of HIV RNA copies was verified as 8.11 × 105 copies/mL in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP and 1.02 × 107 copies/mL in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP. Viral load assay indicated that Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP performed better in blocking viral replication.
In addition, a single cycle assay was performed to investigate the role of AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y in inhibiting HIV-1 production. SupT1 cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were infected with one MOI of VSV-G pseudotyped NL4-3 ∆Env virus (as shown in Supplementary Method). At 48 h post-infection, the morphology of infected SupT1 cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells was not different (Figure S3). In addition, HIV-1 p24 was determined by ELISA. The level of intracellular p24 of ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells was not significantly distinct from controls. Whereas, extracellular p24 was decreased in ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells (Figure S4A,B). The concentration of HIV-1 p24 in culture supernatant of SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was 28.78 and 8.94 pg/mL, respectively. These results suggested that HIV-1 assembly/release was impaired in the presence of ankyrin protein. Taken together, AnkGAG1D4-S45Y provides higher efficiency of intracellular antiviral effect on HIV-1 replication than the parental AnkGAG1D4.

3.4. Anti-HIV-1 Ankyrins Do Not Drive Mutation in Amino Acid Sequence of HIV-1 Capsid

According to the infection experiment, leakage of viral progeny was detected on the last day of observations. Therefore, we determined whether the leakage in protection was a result from mutation in the ankyrin-targeted region. Since our anti-HIV-1 ankyrins were against the HIV-1 capsid, viral cDNA was subjected to sequencing for capsid amino acid sequence analysis. According to the alignment result, no mutation was indicated, especially in helix 1 and helix 7 (Figure 7), targeting regions of ankyrin on the N-terminus capsid. These data suggest that the leakage of HIV-1 progeny was due to an overload of virus. In addition, AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y did not drive mutation in the HIV-1 capsid.

3.5. Binding Affinity-Enhanced Ankyrin Provides Antiviral Effects on HIV-1 Maturation Inhibitor Resistant Virus

To solve the drug resistance issue, several anti-HIV-1 compounds were established; the HIV-1 maturation inhibitor is one anti-HIV-1 compound. Although these anti-HIV-1 compounds performed well in inhibiting HIV-1 production, a number of MI-resistant strains were reported. In this study, the antiviral activity of ankyrin on HIV-1 MIR virus was investigated. HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V was selected as a model to observe intracellular anti-HIV-1 activity of ankyrin. SupT1 cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were infected with HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V virus at 10 MOI. After HIV-1 challenge, the infected cells were observed for syncytium formation under microscopy (Figure S5). Infected SupT1 cells and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3 cells showed no protection against HIV-1 replication. A number of syncytial cells were observed on day 13 in SupT1 cells and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkA32D3 cells with the appearance of clumping cells (Figure 8A). Consequently, p24 was detected at a very high level on day 13 (Figure 9A).
Both Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4 and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y expressed potency in inhibiting HIV-1 MIR virus. Interestingly, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y showed higher efficiency in protection, as syncytium cell formation was not observed until day 21 (Figure 8B), together with extended cell viability to day 21 (Figure 8C). Whereas, syncytium formation in Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4 was observed at day 17 post-infection (Figure S5). Consistently with the p24 level, the level of HIV-1 p24 in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y was significantly lower than in infected SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4 at 21 days post-infection (Figure 9B). However, HIV viral load assay indicated comparable anti-HIV-1 activity of Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4 and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y (Figure 9C). HIV-1 RNA copies in SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4 and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y were verified as 2.06 × 105 and 2.61 × 105 copies/mL, respectively.

4. Discussion

Although HAART is successfully used for HIV-1 therapy, it is limited by adverse drug effects and viral mutation. Furthermore, development of HIV-1 drugs takes years and is expensive [37]. It is desirable to establish new anti-HIV molecules against alternative viral targets in the HIV life cycle. Instead of antibodies and their derivatives, DARPins, representing a disulfide-independent scaffold, were sought for HIV-1 therapy based on their biological properties [3,38,39]. An extracellular DARPin, including CD4-specific DARPins and gp120-specific DARPins, was reported to inhibit HIV-1 entry [17,18]. Although these DARPins specifically perceive their target, limitations in terms of immune function and mutation-driven side effects were reported. CD4-specific DARPins can lead to impaired CD4 function, while gp120-specific DARPins drive mutation in the HIV-1 envelope. Moreover, a high clearance rate of DARPins in the blood circulation remains an obstacle [19]. Accordingly, we previously generated an intracellular AnkGAG1D4, which interferes with HIV-1 assembly by interacting with the N-terminus of HIV-1 capsid domain (CA-NTD) [21]. Several studies indicated that this specific area is crucial in viral assembly, maturation, and uncoating through viral capsid mutation [40,41]. The mutation leads to capsid polymorphisms that impair HIV-1 infectivity. Numerous CA-targeted molecules have been studied, such as PF74 [42], CAI [43], and GSCAI [16]. Although these molecules express activity in inhibiting HIV-1 replication, viral escape and inefficient cell penetration hamper its competency [44]. In contrast, DARPin is well-expressed inside the cells [45], specifically AnkGAG1D4, with the domain necessary for capsid polymorphism [21].
Despite the demonstrated anti-HIV-1 activity of AnkGAG1D4, protection in the late period of in vitro culture needs to be improved [24]. To enhance the efficiency of AnkGAG1D4, computational analysis was performed to identify the key residues on the ankyrin binding sites suitable for mutagenesis [25]. According to previous work, substituting tyrosine for serine improves the binding affinity of Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y without altering specificity. However, an investigation of the intracellular anti-HIV activity of affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4 is required. In this study, antiviral activity of Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y was observed in infected SupT1 cells compared with parental Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4. The affinity-improved ankyrin expression delayed the formation of syncytium cells and dramatically decreased viral replication as measured by p24 and viral load. By and large, different from mutant ankyrin, HIV-1 Gag was impaired in the assembly process, leading to reduced HIV-1 production in infected cells. The cytopathic effect in HIV-1 infected cells in the form of multinucleated giant cell formation and cell rupture represents a mechanism involving HIV-1 replication [46]. According to our experiment, inhibition of HIV-1 replication by AnkGAG1D4-S45Y results in late detection of syncytium formation, followed by extended cell viability. Although minimal progeny leakage was evidenced on day 21, the interactive amino acid sequence at HIV-1 NL4-3 CA was conserved. This suggests that both ankyrins were not likely to drive the mutation of HIV-1 NL4-3 CA. Thus, the progeny detected on the last day of culture probably resulted from the overload of HIV particles, which exceeded the ankyrin harness.
From our results, tyrosine substitution introduces binding affinity to intracellular Gag, since tyrosine is frequently found in the hot-spot of the antigen binding site [47]. Additionally, the role of tyrosine in mediating the binding of AnkGAG1D4 against a viral target has been highlighted by computational analysis and in vitro studies [25]. Tyrosine contains an aromatic side chain, comprising both a hydrophobic ring and a hydrophilic hydroxyl group, which contributes to its hydrogen bond forming ability, hydrophobic interaction, van der Waals interaction, and amino aromatic interaction [48,49]. Replacement with tyrosine provides more stable interaction of AnkGAG1D4-S45Y against viral targets, leading to higher efficiency in anti-viral activity.
Another group of CA-binding compounds is HIV-1 MIs. MIs confer anti-HIV activity through disrupting the maturation process of the virus at the CA–SP1 junction. However, HIV-1 is highly sensitive to mutations at the CA–SP1 junction, resulting in reports of MI-resistant strains [50]. Different from MI, our anti-assembly ankyrin specifically interacted with CA-NTD [21]. We assumed that AnkGAG1D4 inhibits replication of resistant viruses at the step prior to maturation. To prove the concept, we investigated the activity of AnkGAG1D4 and its mutant against MI-resistant virus. SupT1 cells expressing AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y were infected with HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V virus. This mutation has been reported to confer resistance against PF4696, the second-class HIV-1 maturation inhibitor, and partial resistance to BVM [33,34]. From the infection experiment, both anti-HIV-1 ankyrins were shown to have a negative effect on viral replication. Herein, HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V virus is a representative for observing antiviral activity against drug-resistant viruses. Another mutation on the HIV-1 capsid and downstream of the SP1 region also confers MI resistance [51,52]. Moreover, there are several reports on mutations in the HIV-1 genome, leading to the emergence of HIV-1 drug resistance against first-line ART [27] as well as a novel HIV-1 drug classes. For example, the M184V mutation along with thymidine analogue-associated mutations (TAMs) in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase gene increases abacavir resistance [53]. Another is Gag cleavage site mutation, which may confer resistance against protease inhibitors (PIs) in patients who fail PI-containing regimens [54]. As a different viral target site, AnkGAG1D4-S4Y might inhibit the viral replication of these resistant strains of HIV.

5. Conclusions

Our current results underscore the significance of AnkGAG1D4-S45Y for enhancing antiviral activity in either WT HIV-1 NL4-3 or MIR virus. Although the single amino acid change in a previous report did not markedly increase the affinity of AnkGAG1D4, the intracellular activity of AnkGAG1D4-S45Y demonstrated distinctly notable performance. Further improvement of AnkGAG1D4 affinity will provide a direction for rational design regarding predicted complexes from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom11101437/s1, Figure S1: Cell morphology of 10 MOI HIV-1 infected SupT1 cells at 5 days post-infection. Figure S2: Cell morphology of 50 MOI HIV-1 infected SupT1 cells. Figure S3: Cell morphology of 1 MOI of VSV-G pseudotyped NL4-3 ∆Env infected SupT1 cells or ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells. Figure S4: Anti-HIV-1 activity of ankyrin proteins in VSV-G pseudotyped virus NL4-3 ∆Env infected SupT1 cells or ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells. Figure S5: Cell morphology of 10 MOI HIV-1 MIRCAI201V infected SupT1 cells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.T. and U.Y.; methodology, K.S., W.T., T.P., T.S.C., S.S. (Suthinee Soponpong), and S.S. (Supachai Sakkhachornphop); investigation, K.S. and U.Y.; resources, C.T., S.S. (Supachai Sakkhachornphop), and U.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S.; writing—review and editing, C.T. and U.Y.; supervision, C.T.; project administration, C.T. and U.Y.; funding acquisition, C.T. and U.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Distinguished Research Professor Grant (NRCT 808/2563) of the National Research Council of Thailand, the Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council (NXPO), Thailand, through Program Management Unit for Competitiveness (PMU C), contract number C10F630145, the Program Management Unit for Human Resources and Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (grant number B05F630102), the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (Grant No. RGNS 63-067), Fundamental Fund 2022, Chiang Mai University, CMU Junior Research Fellowship Program, and AMS Research Grant of Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Koollawat Chupradit and Kriangkrai Chawansuntati are acknowledged for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reust, C.E. Common adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy for HIV disease. Am. Fam. Physician 2011, 83, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Carr, A. Toxicity of antiretroviral therapy and implications for drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chupradit, K.; Moonmuang, S.; Nangola, S.; Kitidee, K.; Yasamut, U.; Mougel, M.; Tayapiwatana, C. Current peptide and protein candidates challenging HIV therapy beyond the vaccine era. Viruses 2017, 9, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Legastelois, I.; Desgranges, C. Design and intracellular activity of a human single-chain antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 conserved gp41 epitope. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 5712–5715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ye, C.; Wang, W.; Cheng, L.; Li, G.; Wen, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Li, D.; Zhou, P.; Su, L. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored anti-HIV scFv efficiently protects CD4 T cells from HIV-1 infection and deletion in hu-PBL mice. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01389–e01416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Omar, M.T.C. Expression of Functional Anti-p24 scFv 183-H12-5C in HEK293T and Jurkat T Cells. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 7, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hadpech, S.; Nangola, S.; Chupradit, K.; Fanhchaksai, K.; Furnon, W.; Urvoas, A.; Valerio-Lepiniec, M.; Minard, P.; Boulanger, P.; Hong, S.-S.; et al. Alpha-helicoidal HEAT-like repeat proteins (αRep) selected as interactors of HIV-1 nucleocapsid negatively interfere with viral genome packaging and virus maturation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hadpech, S.; Peerakam, N.; Chupradit, K.; Tayapiwatana, C. Occupation of a thermoresistant-scaffold (αRep) at SP1-NC cleavage site disturbs the function of HIV-1 protease. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20201131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shilova, O.N.; Deyev, S.M. DARPins: Promising scaffolds for theranostics. Acta Nat. 2019, 11, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mosavi, L.K.; Cammett, T.J.; Desrosiers, D.C.; Peng, Z.-Y. The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1435–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cunha, S.R.; Mohler, P.J. Ankyrin protein networks in membrane formation and stabilization. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2009, 13, 4364–4376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cunha, S.R.; Mohler, P.J. Ankyrin-based cellular pathways for cardiac ion channel and transporter targeting and regulation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zahnd, C.; Wyler, E.; Schwenk, J.M.; Steiner, D.; Lawrence, M.C.; McKern, N.M.; Pecorari, F.; Ward, C.W.; Joos, T.O.; Plückthun, A. A designed ankyrin repeat protein evolved to picomolar affinity to Her2. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 369, 1015–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boersma, Y.L.; Chao, G.; Steiner, D.; Wittrup, K.D.; Plückthun, A. Bispecific designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor inhibit A431 cell proliferation and receptor recycling. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 41273–41285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Rodrigues, G.A.; Mason, M.; Christie, L.-A.; Hansen, C.; Hernandez, L.M.; Burke, J.; Luhrs, K.A.; Hohman, T.C. Functional characterization of abicipar-pegol, an anti-VEGF DARPin therapeutic that potently inhibits angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 5836–5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yant, S.R.; Mulato, A.; Hansen, D.; Tse, W.C.; Niedziela-Majka, A.; Zhang, J.R.; Stepan, G.J.; Jin, D.; Wong, M.H.; Perreira, J.M.; et al. A highly potent long-acting small-molecule HIV-1 capsid inhibitor with efficacy in a humanized mouse model. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schweizer, A.; Rusert, P.; Berlinger, L.; Ruprecht, C.R.; Mann, A.; Corthésy, S.; Turville, S.G.; Aravantinou, M.; Fischer, M.; Robbiani, M.; et al. CD4-specific designed ankyrin repeat proteins are novel potent HIV entry inhibitors with unique characteristics. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mann, A.; Friedrich, N.; Krarup, A.; Weber, J.; Stiegeler, E.; Dreier, B.; Pugach, P.; Robbiani, M.; Riedel, T.; Moehle, K.; et al. Conformation-dependent recognition of HIV gp120 by designed ankyrin repeat proteins provides access to novel HIV entry inhibitors. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pugach, P.; Krarup, A.; Gettie, A.; Kuroda, M.; Blanchard, J.; Piatak, M., Jr.; Lifson, J.D.; Trkola, A.; Robbiani, M. In vivo binding and retention of CD4-specific DARPin 57.2 in macaques. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hermann, F.G.; Egerer, L.; Brauer, F.; Gerum, C.; Schwalbe, H.; Dietrich, U.; von Laer, D. Mutations in gp120 contribute to the resistance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to membrane-anchored C-peptide maC46. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 4844–4853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Praditwongwan, W.; Chuankhayan, P.; Saoin, S.; Wisitponchai, T.; Lee, V.S.; Nangola, S.; Hong, S.S.; Minard, P.; Boulanger, P.; Chen, C.-J.; et al. Crystal structure of an antiviral ankyrin targeting the HIV-1 capsid and molecular modeling of the ankyrin-capsid complex. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2014, 28, 869–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nangola, S.; Urvoas, A.; Valerio-Lepiniec, M.; Khamaikawin, W.; Sakkhachornphop, S.; Hong, S.S.; Boulanger, P.; Minard, P.; Tayapiwatana, C. Antiviral activity of recombinant ankyrin targeted to the capsid domain of HIV-1 Gag polyprotein. Retrovirology 2012, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sakkhachornphop, S.; Hadpech, S.; Wisitponchai, T.; Panto, C.; Kantamala, D.; Utaipat, U.; Praparattanapan, J.; Kotarathitithum, W.; Taejaroenkul, S.; Yasamut, U.; et al. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of an ankyrin repeat protein on viral assembly against chimeric NL4-3 viruses carrying Gag/PR derived from circulating strains among Northern Thai patients. Viruses 2018, 10, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Khamaikawin, W.; Saoin, S.; Nangola, S.; Chupradit, K.; Sakkhachornphop, S.; Hadpech, S.; Onlamoon, N.; Ansari, A.A.; Byrareddy, S.N.; Boulanger, P.; et al. Combined antiviral therapy using designed molecular scaffolds targeting two distinct viral functions, HIV-1 genome integration and capsid assembly. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2015, 4, e249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saoin, S.; Wisitponchai, T.; Intachai, K.; Chupradit, K.; Moonmuang, S.; Nangola, S.; Kitidee, K.; Fanhchaksai, K.; Lee, V.S.; Hong, S.S.; et al. Deciphering critical amino acid residues to modify and enhance the binding affinity of ankyrin scaffold specific to capsid protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 36, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zazzi, M.; Hu, H.; Prosperi, M. The global burden of HIV-1 drug resistance in the past 20 years. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wensing, A.M.; Calvez, V.; Ceccherini-Silberstein, F.; Charpentier, C.; Günthard, H.F.; Paredes, R.; Shafer, R.W.; Richman, D.D. 2019 update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1. Top. Antivir. Med. 2019, 27, 111. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, X. Anti-retroviral drugs: Current state and development in the next decade. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pak, A.J.; Grime, J.M.A.; Yu, A.; Voth, G.A. Off-pathway assembly: A broad-spectrum mechanism of action for drugs that undermine controlled HIV-1 viral capsid formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 10214–10224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carnes, S.K.; Sheehan, J.H.; Aiken, C. Inhibitors of the HIV-1 capsid, a target of opportunity. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2018, 13, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Martin, D.E.; Salzwedel, K.; Allaway, G.P. Bevirimat: A novel maturation inhibitor for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2008, 19, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Urano, E.; Ablan, S.D.; Mandt, R.; Pauly, G.T.; Sigano, D.M.; Schneider, J.P.; Martin, D.E.; Nitz, T.J.; Wild, C.T.; Freed, E.O. Alkyl amine bevirimat derivatives are potent and broadly active HIV-1 maturation inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Waki, K.; Durell, S.R.; Soheilian, F.; Nagashima, K.; Butler, S.L.; Freed, E.O. Structural and functional insights into the HIV-1 maturation inhibitor binding pocket. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Blair, W.S.; Cao, J.; Fok-Seang, J.; Griffin, P.; Isaacson, J.; Jackson, R.L.; Murray, E.; Patick, A.K.; Peng, Q.; Perros, M.; et al. New small-molecule inhibitor class targeting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virion maturation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 5080–5087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ghimire, D.; Timilsina, U.; Srivastava, T.P.; Gaur, R. Insights into the activity of maturation inhibitor PF-46396 on HIV-1 clade C. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sakkhachornphop, S.; Jiranusornkul, S.; Kodchakorn, K.; Nangola, S.; Sirisanthana, T.; Tayapiwatana, C. Designed zinc finger protein interacting with the HIV-1 integrase recognition sequence at 2-LTR-circle junctions. Protein Sci. 2009, 18, 2219–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yildirim, O.; Gottwald, M.; Schüler, P.; Michel, M.C. Opportunities and challenges for drug development: Public–private partnerships, adaptive designs and big data. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Simeon, R.; Chen, Z. In vitro-engineered non-antibody protein therapeutics. Protein Cell 2018, 9, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Stumpp, M.T.; Dawson, K.M.; Binz, H.K. Beyond antibodies: The DARPin® drug platform. BioDrugs 2020, 34, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takemura, T.; Murakami, T. Functional constraints on HIV-1 capsid: Their impacts on the viral immune escape potency. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ramalho, R.; Rankovic, S.; Zhou, J.; Aiken, C.; Rousso, I. Analysis of the mechanical properties of wild type and hyperstable mutants of the HIV-1 capsid. Retrovirology 2016, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bhattacharya, A.; Alam, S.L.; Fricke, T.; Zadrozny, K.; Sedzicki, J.; Taylor, A.B.; Demeler, B.; Pornillos, O.; Ganser-Pornillos, B.K.; Diaz-Griffero, F.; et al. Structural basis of HIV-1 capsid recognition by PF74 and CPSF6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 18625–18630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ternois, F.; Sticht, J.; Duquerroy, S.; Kräusslich, H.G.; Rey, F.A. The HIV-1 capsid protein C-terminal domain in complex with a virus assembly inhibitor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12, 678–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Perrier, M.; Bertine, M.; Hingrat, Q.L.; Joly, V.; Visseaux, B.; Collin, G.; Landman, R.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Descamps, D.; Charpentier, C. Prevalence of gag mutations associated with in vitro resistance to capsid inhibitor GS-CA1 in HIV-1 antiretroviral-naive patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 2954–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Binz, H.K.; Stumpp, M.T.; Forrer, P.; Amstutz, P.; Plückthun, A. Designing repeat proteins: Well-expressed, soluble and stable proteins from combinatorial libraries of consensus ankyrin repeat proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Costin, J.M. Cytopathic mechanisms of HIV-1. Virol. J. 2007, 4, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Koide, S.; Sidhu, S.S. The importance of being tyrosine: Lessons in molecular recognition from minimalist synthetic binding proteins. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Moreira, I.S.; Martins, J.M.; Ramos, R.M.; Fernandes, P.A.; Ramos, M.J. Understanding the importance of the aromatic amino-acid residues as hot-spots. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1834, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Piotukh, K.; Freund, C. A novel hSH3 domain scaffold engineered to bind folded domains in CD2BP2 and HIV capsid protein. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2012, 25, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Schlicksup, C.J.; Zlotnick, A. Viral structural proteins as targets for antivirals. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2020, 45, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Dicker, I.; Zhang, S.; Ray, N.; Beno, B.R.; Regueiro-Ren, A.; Joshi, S.; Cockett, M.; Krystal, M.; Lataillade, M. Resistance profile of the HIV-1 maturation inhibitor GSK3532795 in vitro and in a clinical study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Urano, E.; Timilsina, U.; Kaplan, J.A.; Ablan, S.; Ghimire, D.; Pham, P.; Kuruppu, N.; Mandt, R.; Durell, S.R.; Nitz, T.J.; et al. Resistance to second-generation HIV-1 maturation inhibitors. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e02017–e02018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Harrigan, P.R.; Stone, C.; Griffin, P.; Nájera, I.; Bloor, S.; Kemp, S.; Tisdale, M.; Larder, B. Resistance profile of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir (1592U89) after monotherapy and combination therapy. CNA2001 Investigative Group. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 181, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Fun, A.; Wensing, A.M.; Verheyen, J.; Nijhuis, M. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Gag and protease: Partners in resistance. Retrovirology 2012, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 11 01437 g001 550
Figure 1. Establishment of SupT1 cells stably expressing ankyrin proteins. SupT1 cells were transduced with 1 MOI of VSV-G pseudotyped virus carrying gene encoding the ankyrin protein with EGFP fusion. (A) After 48 h post-transduction, EGFP-positive cells were observed under fluorescent microscopy. Cell imaging was done at 20× magnification with the same exposure time using Axio Observer 7. (B) After cell sorting, the level of ankyrin expression in SupT1 cells was investigated by flow cytometry. EGFP signal indicates ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells. (C) EGFP intensity in ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells shown in a bar graph. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 1. Establishment of SupT1 cells stably expressing ankyrin proteins. SupT1 cells were transduced with 1 MOI of VSV-G pseudotyped virus carrying gene encoding the ankyrin protein with EGFP fusion. (A) After 48 h post-transduction, EGFP-positive cells were observed under fluorescent microscopy. Cell imaging was done at 20× magnification with the same exposure time using Axio Observer 7. (B) After cell sorting, the level of ankyrin expression in SupT1 cells was investigated by flow cytometry. EGFP signal indicates ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells. (C) EGFP intensity in ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells shown in a bar graph. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g001
Biomolecules 11 01437 g002 550
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of ankyrins in SupT1 cells. Ankyrin-EGFP expressing SupT1 cells were stained with plasma membrane dye, CellMaskTM Deep Red. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Confocal imaging was done at 60× magnification using Nikon C2 plus confocal fluorescence microscopy. Green represents EGFP-tagging ankyrins. Blue indicates nucleus, and red shows the plasma membrane of SupT1 cells. AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y refer to SupT1 cells expressing AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y, respectively.
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of ankyrins in SupT1 cells. Ankyrin-EGFP expressing SupT1 cells were stained with plasma membrane dye, CellMaskTM Deep Red. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Confocal imaging was done at 60× magnification using Nikon C2 plus confocal fluorescence microscopy. Green represents EGFP-tagging ankyrins. Blue indicates nucleus, and red shows the plasma membrane of SupT1 cells. AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y refer to SupT1 cells expressing AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g002
Biomolecules 11 01437 g003 550
Figure 3. Surface CD4 expression on ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells. Ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were stained with APC conjugated anti-human CD4 antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Percentage of CD4 positive cells represented in a bar graph. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of APC indicates the level of CD4 expression on SupT1 cells. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 3. Surface CD4 expression on ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells. Ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were stained with APC conjugated anti-human CD4 antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Percentage of CD4 positive cells represented in a bar graph. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of APC indicates the level of CD4 expression on SupT1 cells. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g003
Biomolecules 11 01437 g004 550
Figure 4. Syncytium cell formation and cell viability of HIV-1-infected SupT1 cells expressing ankyrins. (A) SupT1 cells and SupT1 stable cells were infected with HIV-1 NL4-3 laboratory strain at 10 MOI. Infected cells were cultured and processed as shown. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. (B) At 13 days post-infection, syncytium formation in infected cells was observed under microscopy. Cell imaging was done at 20× magnification using Axio Vert.A1. Arrows point to syncytium cells. (C) Syncytium formation in infected SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was continuously observed until 21 days post-infection. (D) Cell viability of infected cells was determined using the Trypan blue exclusion method. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 4. Syncytium cell formation and cell viability of HIV-1-infected SupT1 cells expressing ankyrins. (A) SupT1 cells and SupT1 stable cells were infected with HIV-1 NL4-3 laboratory strain at 10 MOI. Infected cells were cultured and processed as shown. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. (B) At 13 days post-infection, syncytium formation in infected cells was observed under microscopy. Cell imaging was done at 20× magnification using Axio Vert.A1. Arrows point to syncytium cells. (C) Syncytium formation in infected SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was continuously observed until 21 days post-infection. (D) Cell viability of infected cells was determined using the Trypan blue exclusion method. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g004
Biomolecules 11 01437 g005 550
Figure 5. HIV replication in 10 MOI of HIV-1-infected SupT1 cells expressing binding affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. Cultured supernatant was collected at 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, and 21 days post-infection, then assayed to evaluate HIV-1 production. (A,B) HIV-1 p24 levels were determined using p24 ELISA. † Indicates undetectable HIV-1 p24 level. (C) HIV RNA copies were determined at 13 days post-infection using HIV viral load assay. Bar graph shows HIV RNA copies from viral load assay. Data represent mean ± SD from triplicate wells. * p ≤ 0.05 using unpaired t-test. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 5. HIV replication in 10 MOI of HIV-1-infected SupT1 cells expressing binding affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. Cultured supernatant was collected at 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, and 21 days post-infection, then assayed to evaluate HIV-1 production. (A,B) HIV-1 p24 levels were determined using p24 ELISA. † Indicates undetectable HIV-1 p24 level. (C) HIV RNA copies were determined at 13 days post-infection using HIV viral load assay. Bar graph shows HIV RNA copies from viral load assay. Data represent mean ± SD from triplicate wells. * p ≤ 0.05 using unpaired t-test. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g005
Biomolecules 11 01437 g006 550
Figure 6. HIV replication in 50 MOI HIV-1-infected SupT1 cells expressing binding affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. Cultured supernatant was collected at 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, and 21 days post-infection, then assayed to evaluate HIV-1 production. (A,B) HIV-1 p24 levels were determined using p24 ELISA. (C) HIV RNA copies were determined at 13 days post-infection using HIV viral load assay. Data represent mean ± SD from triplicate wells. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 6. HIV replication in 50 MOI HIV-1-infected SupT1 cells expressing binding affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. Cultured supernatant was collected at 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, and 21 days post-infection, then assayed to evaluate HIV-1 production. (A,B) HIV-1 p24 levels were determined using p24 ELISA. (C) HIV RNA copies were determined at 13 days post-infection using HIV viral load assay. Data represent mean ± SD from triplicate wells. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g006
Biomolecules 11 01437 g007 550
Figure 7. Sequencing analysis of the HIV-1 N-terminal capsid. WT HIV-1 NL4-3 viral RNA was extracted from culture supernatant harvested from HIV-1-infected cells. Then viral RNA was reverse transcribed into HIV-1 cDNA by RT-PCR. The HIV-1 capsid region was amplified and subjected to sequencing analysis. The diagram shows alignment of HIV-1 capsid sequence against WT HIV-1 NL4-3. Regions of helix 1 (upper) and helix 7 (lower) of HIV-1 capsid indicated in gray. Underlined letters indicate binding sites of ankyrins on the HIV-1 capsid. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent HIV-1 capsid sequence of viral particles released from HIV-1 infected SupT1 cell controls, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 7. Sequencing analysis of the HIV-1 N-terminal capsid. WT HIV-1 NL4-3 viral RNA was extracted from culture supernatant harvested from HIV-1-infected cells. Then viral RNA was reverse transcribed into HIV-1 cDNA by RT-PCR. The HIV-1 capsid region was amplified and subjected to sequencing analysis. The diagram shows alignment of HIV-1 capsid sequence against WT HIV-1 NL4-3. Regions of helix 1 (upper) and helix 7 (lower) of HIV-1 capsid indicated in gray. Underlined letters indicate binding sites of ankyrins on the HIV-1 capsid. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent HIV-1 capsid sequence of viral particles released from HIV-1 infected SupT1 cell controls, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g007
Biomolecules 11 01437 g008 550
Figure 8. Cell morphology and cell viability of HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V infected SupT1 stable cells. SupT1cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were infected with 10 MOI of HIV-1 MIRCAI201V virus. After infection, cells were subcultured every 2 days. (A) Syncytium cells and cell morphology were observed under microscopy. Cell imaging was done at 10× magnification using Axio Vert.A1. (B) Cell morphology of infected SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was continuously observed until 21 days post-infection. Arrows point to syncytium cells. (C) Cell viability of infected cells was determined using Trypan blue exclusion method. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 8. Cell morphology and cell viability of HIV-1 NL4-3 MIRCAI201V infected SupT1 stable cells. SupT1cells and ankyrin-expressing SupT1 cells were infected with 10 MOI of HIV-1 MIRCAI201V virus. After infection, cells were subcultured every 2 days. (A) Syncytium cells and cell morphology were observed under microscopy. Cell imaging was done at 10× magnification using Axio Vert.A1. (B) Cell morphology of infected SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP and SupT1/Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP was continuously observed until 21 days post-infection. Arrows point to syncytium cells. (C) Cell viability of infected cells was determined using Trypan blue exclusion method. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g008
Biomolecules 11 01437 g009 550
Figure 9. HIV-1 MIR viral replication in SupT1 cells expressing binding affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. Cultured supernatant was collected at 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21 days post-infection, then assayed to evaluate HIV-1 production. (A,B) HIV-1 p24 levels were determined using p24 ELISA. † Indicates undetectable level of HIV-1 p24. (C) HIV RNA copies were determined at 13 days post-infection using HIV viral load assay. Data represent mean ± SD from triplicate well. ns, non-significant. * p ≤ 0.05 using unpaired t-test. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Figure 9. HIV-1 MIR viral replication in SupT1 cells expressing binding affinity-enhanced AnkGAG1D4. After HIV-1 challenge, cells were subcultured every 2 days. Cultured supernatant was collected at 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21 days post-infection, then assayed to evaluate HIV-1 production. (A,B) HIV-1 p24 levels were determined using p24 ELISA. † Indicates undetectable level of HIV-1 p24. (C) HIV RNA copies were determined at 13 days post-infection using HIV viral load assay. Data represent mean ± SD from triplicate well. ns, non-significant. * p ≤ 0.05 using unpaired t-test. No ankyrin, AnkA32D3, AnkGAG1D4, and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y represent SupT1 cell control, SupT1 cells expressing Myr (+) AnkA32D3-EGFP, Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-EGFP, and Myr (+) AnkGAG1D4-S45Y-EGFP, respectively.
Biomolecules 11 01437 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sornsuwan, K.; Thongkhum, W.; Pamonsupornwichit, T.; Carraway, T.S.; Soponpong, S.; Sakkhachornphop, S.; Tayapiwatana, C.; Yasamut, U. Performance of Affinity-Improved DARPin Targeting HIV Capsid Domain in Interference of Viral Progeny Production. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101437

AMA Style

Sornsuwan K, Thongkhum W, Pamonsupornwichit T, Carraway TS, Soponpong S, Sakkhachornphop S, Tayapiwatana C, Yasamut U. Performance of Affinity-Improved DARPin Targeting HIV Capsid Domain in Interference of Viral Progeny Production. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(10):1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sornsuwan, Kanokporn, Weeraya Thongkhum, Thanathat Pamonsupornwichit, Tanawan Samleerat Carraway, Suthinee Soponpong, Supachai Sakkhachornphop, Chatchai Tayapiwatana, and Umpa Yasamut. 2021. "Performance of Affinity-Improved DARPin Targeting HIV Capsid Domain in Interference of Viral Progeny Production" Biomolecules 11, no. 10: 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101437

APA Style

Sornsuwan, K., Thongkhum, W., Pamonsupornwichit, T., Carraway, T. S., Soponpong, S., Sakkhachornphop, S., Tayapiwatana, C., & Yasamut, U. (2021). Performance of Affinity-Improved DARPin Targeting HIV Capsid Domain in Interference of Viral Progeny Production. Biomolecules, 11(10), 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop