Next Article in Journal
Enzymatically Modified Fats Applied in Emulsions Stabilized by Polysaccharides
Next Article in Special Issue
Endothelial Dysfunction and Extra-Articular Neurological Manifestations in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Previous Article in Journal
Micro- to Nanoscale Bio-Hybrid Hydrogels Engineered by Ionizing Radiation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biomarkers to Personalize the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Focus on Autoantibodies and Pharmacogenetics
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Rheumatoid Arthritis in the View of Osteoimmunology

Biomolecules 2021, 11(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010048
by Mélanie Auréal 1,2, Irma Machuca-Gayet 1 and Fabienne Coury 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Biomolecules 2021, 11(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010048
Submission received: 30 September 2020 / Revised: 23 December 2020 / Accepted: 26 December 2020 / Published: 31 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis of Arthritis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This review is current and comprehensive regarding bone reactions in rheumatoid arthritis but is quite inaccurate with respect to origin and evolution of erosions at the periphery of rheumatoid joints.

Joint erosions of rheumatoid arthritis start by devitalization of cartilage (both matrix and chondrocytes) at the periphery of the joint by the actions of inflammatory molecules elaborated by neutrophils and cells within the synovium, principally macrophages. This leads to ingress of capillary blood vesels into the degraded marginal cartilage and expansion of hyperplastic synovium onto the cartilage surface, pannus.

Degradation of cartilage matrix proteins by proteases generated in the inflammatory response  results not only in Anti citrullinated protein antibody but also many other protein antibodies that are less well characterized with respect to their immunologic functions.

As the process proceeds, the cartilage is resorbed by chondroclasts , multinucleated cells from the same linage as osteoclasts. Only when the bone is exposed and the matrix on the surface of the bone is degraded do the processes described in the paper occur.

Therefore, Figure 2 is quite misleading.

Further the location of bone resorption and its extent are likely determined by biomechanical and physiologic factors distinct from inflammatory and immunologic mechanisms.

 

it is suggested that the relationships of osteoimunology to rheumatoid arthritis, important as they are, will be understood well only when placed in an accurate context of rheumatoid cartilage and bone  pathophysiology.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors presents an interesting and well-organized review. The manuscript highlights the importance of osteoimmunology as a key relationship between immune and bone systems to better understand the pathophysiology of systemic and local bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis. However, there are some concerns that need to be addressed.

  • Taken into account the aim to show and summarize the substantial progress in osteoimmunology and bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis, presented references have to be updated, less than 10% of cited references were published in the last 3 years.
  • Some aspects should also be approached. For instance, autophagy (1002/art.41290), chondrocytes or MSCs as other pivotal cells (10.3389/fimmu.2019.00266), microRNA (10.3390/ijms20205141), adipokines (10.3390/ijms20174091), or other factors like ctgf (10.1186/ar2863).
  • Figure 2. Self-explanatory caption should be added.
  • Definition of NOD/SCID mice or sost-/- mice is recommendable.
  • Correct mistake. 3.3.4. Autoimmunity instead of 3.3.3. Autoimmunity

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

That the purpose of this paper is to review the osteoimmunology of rheumatoid arthritis is accepted.The concept that subclinical inflammation usually affects bone early in disease is controversial, but stating this idea within the review is also acceptable.

 

However, Figure 2,even recognizing this is a schematic, shows advanced disease with cartilageand bone erosion..

Figure 2 is erroneous because while the bone is shown to be actively eroding, the cartilage, synovium interface appears unaffected by disease. Whenever bone is morphologically involved, the synovium is hyperplastic and cartilage at the interface shows erosion..

As well, the erosion and new bone formation are shown on the surface of the bone; the underlying bone appears normal. This is incorrect. The subchondral bone and bone marrow are profoundly affected and are in  fact the focal location of the osteoimmunologic interactions

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop