Next Article in Journal
Effects of Spiralling Trajectories on White Dwarf Spectra: High Rydberg States
Next Article in Special Issue
The Optical Model Absorption Term in the Frame of Fractional Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
A Radio-Frequency Ion Trap System for the Multi-Reflection Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer at SHANS and Its Offline Commissioning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Search for Weak Side Branches in the Electromagnetic Decay Paths of the 6526-keV 10+ Isomer in 54Fe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Isomers in the Cosmos

Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Atoms 2023, 11(11), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11110140
Submission received: 27 July 2023 / Revised: 25 September 2023 / Accepted: 24 October 2023 / Published: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Over a Century of Nuclear Isomers: Challenges and Prospects)

Abstract

:
The nucleosynthesis of chemical elements has been established to be the result of a variety of different types of nuclear reactions in stars. Under the extreme temperatures and densities encountered in such environments, nuclear isomers can be populated and thus complicate our understanding of these processes. In this paper, I have chosen to discuss five cases that illustrate how nuclear isomers can play important roles in the nucleosynthesis of chemical elements.

1. Introduction

In their landmark paper “Synthesis of the Elements in Stars”, Burbidge, Burbidge, Fowler, and Hoyle (B2FH) laid out the basic framework for understanding how nuclear reactions provide the energy to power the stars and that the “ashes” of these reactions are the chemical elements we observe today in the universe [1]. Charged-particle-induced reactions involving protons, alpha particles, 12C, and 16O lead to the production of elements up to the iron region of the periodic table. These types of fusion reactions stop there because of the increasing Coulomb barriers and because the nuclear binding energy per nucleon reaches a maximum in this area, thus making further reactions endothermic. To explain how the heavier elements were formed, B2FH proposed two different types of neutron capture mechanisms. In the s-process, (n,γ) reactions take place at rates that are “slow” compared to those of intervening beta decays. It is now thought that the s-process takes place in the helium-burning zones of red giant stars. The s-process produces about half of the isotopes between A = 56 and A = 209, and terminates at 209Bi. To account for the origin of the other half of the isotopes below mass 209 and to explain how thorium and uranium are synthesized, the r-process was proposed. In the r-process (n,γ), reactions take place at rates that are “rapid” compared to intervening beta decay rates. Thus, during the r-process, very neutron-rich unstable nuclei are produced. Once the neutron source turns off, these nuclei beta decay, producing the stable isotopes we observe today. Possible sites for the r-process are still being debated, with supernova explosions and neutron star mergers being the leading candidates.
All of these nucleosynthesis reactions require extremely high temperatures and densities compared to those we normally encounter on Earth. As a result, nuclear isomers are often populated either directly through such reactions or indirectly through processes such as photoexcitation. In some cases, the presence of isomers presents challenges to understanding how certain isotopes are produced, but can also be utilized to gain information about the conditions under which these reactions take place. In this paper, five isotopes with isomers were chosen to illustrate these concepts: 26Al, 99Tc, 148Pm. 176Lu, and 180Ta.

2. 26Al

In 1977, Lee et al. reported 26Mg/24Mg excesses in grains from the Allende meteorite that correlated with the Al/Mg elemental ratios [2]. This was interpreted to mean that the observed 26Mg was actually incorporated into the grains as live 26Al, which decayed in situ to produce the present-day anomalies. Given the relatively short half-life of 26Al, at 7.2 × 105 years, this implies that the nucleosynthetic event that produced the 26Al must have occurred very shortly before the formation of our solar system. This led to theories that perhaps a nearby supernova explosion produced this 26Al and may have actually triggered the formation of our solar system. Subsequently, high-energy-resolution germanium detectors aboard NASA’s High-Energy Astronomy Observatory, HEAO3, observed the 1.809 MeV gamma-ray line produced by the decay of 26Al in the interstellar medium [3]. This demonstrated that the nucleosynthesis of 26Al is an on-going activity in our galaxy. More recently, Diehl et al. utilized the INTEGRAL spectrometer’s gamma-ray detectors to measure the intensity of this same line and determined the total mass of 26Al present in our galaxy today to be 2.8 ± 0.8 solar masses. From this, they inferred that the rate of core collapse supernovas in our galaxy is 1.9 ± 1.1 per century [4].
As shown in Figure 1, the nuclear structure of 26Al adds an interesting complication to understanding the nucleosynthesis of this isotope. The first excited state of 26Al is a Jπ = 0+ isomer at an excitation energy of 228 keV that β+ decays to 26Mg with a 6.3 s half-life. 26Al is thought to be produced in stars via the 25Mg (p,γ) reaction, which is known to populate both the ground state and isomer [5,6]. Recent measurements of lower-lying resonances in the 25Mg (p,γ) reaction indicate that the net production of 26Alg is somewhat higher than previously thought [7]. Ward and Fowler [8] showed that, at low temperatures (<4 × 108 K), the isomer and ground state can be treated as separate entities and that the beta decay of the isomer somewhat reduces the net production rate of 26Alg. However, at higher temperatures, namely T~(1–2) × 109 K, these authors showed that photoexcitation reactions to states of intermediate spin (such as the states at 1759 and 2070 keV) can rapidly lead to thermal equilibration between the ground state and isomer. This then leads to a drastic reduction in the effective half-life of an 26Al nucleus to only about 16.5 min for T = 1 × 109 K. Nevertheless, a complete network calculation [8] shows that sufficient 26Alg can be produced and survive to explain the 26Mg anomalies observed in the Allende meteorite and in the interstellar medium.

3. 99Tc

Technetium is one of only two chemical elements below uranium on the periodic table that have no stable isotopes (the other being promethium, one of whose isotopes is discussed later in this paper). In 1952, P. W. Merrill reported the observation of spectral lines from the element technetium from the surfaces of some red-giant stars [10]. This observation provided strong evidence that nucleosyntheses in stars are still taking place throughout the universe. 99Tc is believed to be produced in stars via the s-process from neutron captures on 98Mo, followed by the beta decay of 99Mo. The long-lived 99Tc has a ground state with a half-life of 2.1 × 105 years and a t1/2 = 6.0 h isomer, 99Tcm, at an excitation energy of 142.7 keV [11]. The s-process is thought to take place in the helium-burning zones of red-giant stars and at temperatures in the order of 3 × 108 K. Under such conditions, the half-life of this isotope can be drastically reduced via photo excitation reactions. A partial level and decay scheme of 99Tc is shown in Figure 2.
At T= 3 × 108 K, the ground state and low-lying excited states of 99Tc rapidly come into thermal equilibrium. Although the beta decays of the levels at 140.5 and 181.1 keV have not been experimentally observed, they allow Gamow–Teller transitions and therefore can provide potentially rapid decay pathways for 99Tc. Takahashi et al. [12] carried out detailed shell model calculations and showed that the effective half-life of 99Tc under expected s-process conditions could be in the order of only 20 years. At the surface of the star, however, where the temperature is much lower, the half-life of 99Tc would be its known ground state value. Thus, if the technetium is dredged up from the interior of the star over a short time period, this could explain the presence of 99Tc on the surfaces of red-giant stars.
Although unrelated to nuclear astrophysics, it is interesting to note that 99Tcm has very important practical applications. Because of its relatively short half-life, and its emission of low-energy betas and gammas, it has become the most widely used medical radioisotope in the world. Tens of millions of diagnostic procedures are performed annually worldwide utilizing this short-lived isomer.

4. 148Pm

In the slow neutron capture process (s-process), neutron fluxes are relatively low and, as a result, if a radioactive isotope is produced, there is normally enough time between neutron captures for beta decay to occur. However, if the half-life of the unstable isotope is sufficiently long, then as a result of the competition between neutron capture and beta decay, a so-called “branch point” in the s-process path can occur. Thus, branch points offer the possibility of inferring the neutron density during the s-process. 148Pm is an example of this phenomenon. The path of the s-process around A = 148 is shown in Figure 3.
It has been observed that for s-process nuclei away from neutron magic numbers, σN (Z,A − 1) = σN (Z,A), where σ is the neutron capture cross section and N (Z,A) is the isotopic abundance of the species. However, Winters et al. [14] showed that σN (148Sm)/σN (150Sm) = 0.91 ± 0.03, thus indicating a branch at 148Pm. Once again, the nuclear structure adds an interesting complication to interpreting the results of the 148Pm branch point. The ground state of 148Pm has Jπ = 1 and beta decays to 148Sm, with a 5.4-day half-life. A Jπ = 6, t1/2 = 41 days isomer is located at a 137.2 keV excitation energy, and also beta decays 95% of the time. It has been estimated that neutron captures on 147Pm (Jπ = 7/2+) would produce roughly equal amounts of 148Pmg and 148Pmm. Furthermore, calculations indicate that the neutron capture cross-section on the isomer is approximately 2.5 barns versus 1.5 barns for the ground state [14]. Putting all of this information together leads to the conclusion that, if the populations of 148Pmg and 148Pmm were equal, then the s-process neutron density would be 1 × 108/cm3. On the other hand, if the ground state and isomer came into thermal equilibrium, then the isomer population would be much lower and the inferred neutron density would be 3 × 108/cm3 (Ref. [15]).
To resolve this issue, Lesko et al. [13] performed a detailed study of gamma ray transitions in 148Pm and found several levels below 500 keV excitation energy that decay to both the ground state and isomer. Such levels can serve as pathways for photoexcitation reactions to allow 148Pmg and 148Pmm to reach thermal equilibrium during the s-process. From their study, Lesko et al. concluded that such equilibration will take place for temperatures above approximately 0.9 × 108 K, which is lower than the temperature at which the s-process is believed to occur. Thus, the 148Pm branch point suggests that the s-process neutron density is 3 × 108/cm3, in agreement with that found from other branch point nuclei.

5. 176Lu

Among the few long-lived naturally occurring radioisotopes is 176Lu, with a ground state Jπ = 7 and half-life of approximately 4 × 1010 years. Because of its long half-life and reasonably large natural isotopic abundance of 2.59%, 176Lu is widely used as a geochronometer [16]. As can be seen in Figure 4, 176Lu is produced in the s-process from neutron captures on 175Lu and is shielded from the r-process by the stability of 176Yb.
In the 1970s, it was suggested that 176Lu could be used to determine the age of s-process nuclei [18,19]. However, the presence of a Jπ = 1 isomer at an excitation energy of 123 keV that beta decays to 176Hf with a 3.7-hour half-life but does not decay to 176Lug calls the utility of this isotope as a chronometer into question. If 176Lug and 176Lum reached thermal equilibrium during the s-process, then the effective half-life of the nucleus would be drastically reduced. A possible mechanism by which this could happen is shown in Figure 5. Using very strong radioactive sources, Norman et al. [20] showed that 176Lum was produced from 176Lug with the gamma rays from 60Co decay but not with those from 137Cs decay. These observations suggested that a mediating level like that shown in Figure 5 exists above 662 keV and below a 1332 keV excitation energy in 176Lu.
Subsequently, by performing detailed studies of gamma ray transitions in 176Lu, two groups confirmed the existence of such a mediating level at an excitation energy of 838.5 keV [17,21]. This level guarantees that for s-process temperatures above 3 × 108 K, 176Lug and 176Lum will be in thermal equilibrium. As a result, at such temperatures, the effective half-life of 176Lu would be less than 0.25 years [17]. Thus, the use of 176Lu as an s-process chronometer has been ruled out. The fact that not all 176Lu is destroyed by this mechanism has led to the idea that, instead of using it as an s-process chronometer, it could be used instead as a means to determine the temperature at which the s-process takes place [21].

6. 180Ta

180Ta bears the distinction of being the only naturally occurring isotope that is found in an isomeric state. As can be seen in Figure 6, the ground state of this nucleus has Jπ = 1+ and decays with an 8.1-hour half-life to 180W and 180Hf via beta minus and electron capture decays, respectively. The long-lived isomer is actually the second excited state of this nucleus at 77 keV and its decay has not yet been experimentally observed [22]. Another interesting feature of 180Tam is that, despite its low natural isotopic abundance of 0.012%, the nucleosynthetic mechanism by which it is produced has yet to be positively identified. As can be seen in Figure 4, 180Ta appears to be shielded from both the s- and r-processes. However, Beer and Ward suggested that 180Tam could be produced via a one- or two-step branch off the s- and/or r-process paths [23]. They proposed that a small beta decay branch from the Jπ = 8 isomer in 180Hf (produced at some level in the s-process) could explain the abundance of 180Tam. If that beta decay branch proved to be too small to account for all of the 180Tam, then the r-process could potentially make up the difference through a beta decay branch of 180Lu (produced in the r-process) to the 180Hf isomer, followed by its decay to 180Tam. The basic ideas of this model are shown in Figure 6.
Following the Beer and Ward proposal, a series of experiments were carried out to search for these previously unobserved beta decay branches. Kellogg and Norman performed careful measurements of the decay of 180Hfm that showed beta minus decay branches, but which were too small to account for the s-process production of 180Tam (Refs. [24,25]). Searches for an r-process contribution to 180Tam via the beta decay of 180Lu were also negative [26,27,28].
Figure 6. Partial level scheme of 180Ta and the beta decays of 180Lu and 180Hfm proposed by Beer and Ward to explain its nucleosynthesis. Taken from Ref. [25].
Figure 6. Partial level scheme of 180Ta and the beta decays of 180Lu and 180Hfm proposed by Beer and Ward to explain its nucleosynthesis. Taken from Ref. [25].
Atoms 11 00140 g006
Another issue concerning the nucleosynthesis of 180Ta is the question of its survivability in a stellar environment. Lakosi and Nguyen [29] showed that irradiations of 180Tam using gamma rays from a strong 60Co source produced the activity of the 8.1-hour 180Tag. However, no such effect was observed when a 137Cs source was used. This suggests that a “mediating level” that decays to both 180Tag and 180Tam exists above 662 keV and below 1332 keV. From this result, they inferred that the effective half-life of 180Ta at a temperature of 3 × 108 K would be reduced to a maximum of 42 days. Two detailed experiments using multi-detector gamma-ray spectrometers were conducted to search for such mediating levels, but no conclusive evidence was found [30,31]. While there are alternative ideas on how 180Ta is produced, the origin of nature’s rarest isotope remains a mystery.

7. Conclusions

26Al, 99Tc, 148Pm, 176Lu, and 180Ta all have isomers that influence the nucleosynthesis of these nuclei. In this paper, the specific effects for each of these isotopes have been discussed. Recently, other groups [32,33,34,35] have performed detailed theoretical studies on the influence of astronomical environments on the nuclear properties of these and other isotopes, including 34Cl, and 85Kr. New accelerator complexes, such as the Facility for Rare Ion Beams at Michigan State University, will enable ever more detailed studies of these and other isomers further from the valley of beta stability. Thus, the influences of nuclear structure and the harsh conditions in which these nuclei are produced combine to provide a rich area for past, present, and future research.

Funding

The writing of this paper was not supported by external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Burbidge, E.M.; Burbidge, G.R.; Fowler, W.A.; Hoyle, F. Synthesis of the elements in stars. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1957, 29, 547–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, T.; Papanastassiou, D.A.; Wasserburg, G.J. 26Aluminum in the early solar system-Fossil or fuel. Astrophys. J. 1977, 211, L107–L110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mahoney, W.A.; Ling, J.C.; Wheaton, W.A.; Jacobson, A.S. HEAO 3 discovery of 26Al in the interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 1984, 286, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Diehl, R.; Halloin, H.; Kretschmer, K.; Lichti, G.G.; Schönfelder, V.; Strong, A.W.; von Kienlin, A.; Wang, W.; Jean, P.; Knödlseder, J.; et al. Radioactive 26Al from massive stars in the Galaxy. Nature 2006, 439, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. King, J.D. Stellar rates for some reactions affecting production of 26Al (7.3 × 105 yr) during carbon burning. Astrophys. J. 1979, 230, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Norman, E.B. Relative yields of 26Alg/ and 26Alm from the 25Mg(p, γ)reaction. Astrophys. J. 1979, 231, 189–200. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, H.; Su, J.; Li, Z.H.; Li, Y.J.; Li, E.T.; Chen, C.; He, J.J.; Shen, Y.P.; Lian, G.; Guo, B.; et al. Updated reaction rate of 25Mg (p, γ) 26Al and its astrophysical implication. Phys. Rev. C 2023, 107, 065801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ward, R.A.; Fowler, W.A. Thermalization of long-lived nuclear isomeric states under stellar conditions. Astrophys. J. 1980, 238, 266–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Norman, E.B.; Lesko, K.T.; Chupp, T.E.; Schwalbach, P. 26gAl production cross sections from the 26Mg (p,n)26Al reaction. Nucl. Phys. A 1981, 357, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Merrill, P.W. Technetium in the stars. Science 1952, 115, 484. [Google Scholar]
  11. Browne, E.; Tuli, J. Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 99. Nucl. Data Sheets 2017, 145, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Takahashi, K.; Mathews, G.J.; Bloom, S.D. Shell-model calculation of 99Tc beta decay in astrophysical environments. Phys. Rev. C 1986, 33, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lesko, K.T.; Norman, E.B.; Larimer, R.M.; Bacelar, J.C.; Beck, E.M. Level scheme of 148Pm and the s-process neutron density. Phys. Rev. C 1989, 39, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Winters, R.R.; Käppeler, F.; Wisshak, K.; Mengoni, A.; Reffo, G. 148,150 Sm: A test for s-process nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. 1986, 300, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kappeler, N. Neutron capture reactions in astrophysics. AIP Conf. Proc. 1985, 125, 715–731. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vervoot, J. Lu-Hf Dating: The Lu-Hf Isotope System; Encyclopedia of Scientific Dating; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lesko, K.T.; Norman, E.B.; Larimer, R.M.; Sur, B.; Beausang, C.B. 176Lu: An unreliable s-process chronometer. Phys. Rev. C 1991, 44, 2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Audouze, J.; Fowler, W.A.; Schramm, D.N. 176Lu and s-process nucleosynthesis. Nature 1972, 238, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arnould, M. Some Comments about the 176Lu-176Hf Pair. Astron. Astrophys. 1973, 22, 311. [Google Scholar]
  20. Norman, E.B.; Bertram, T.; Kellogg, S.E.; Wong, P.; Gil, S. Equilibration of 176Lug,m during the s-process. Astrophys. J. 1985, 291, 834–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klay, N.; Käppeler, F.; Beer, H.; Schatz, G. Nuclear structure of 176Lu and its astrophysical consequences. II. 176Lu, a thermometer for stellar helium burning. Phys. Rev. C 1991, 44, 2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mccutchan, E.A. Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 180. Nucl. Data Sheets 2015, 126, 151–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Beer, H.; Ward, R.A. Neutron-capture nucleosynthesis of nature’s rarest stable isotope. Nature 1981, 291, 308–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kellogg, S.E.; Norman, E.B. Observation of the beta decay of 180Hfm. Phys. Rev. C 1985, 31, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kellogg, S.E.; Norman, E.B. Isomer-to-isomer beta decay of 180Hfm and the nucleosynthesis of 180Tam. Phys. Rev. C 1992, 46, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kellogg, S.E.; Norman, E.B. Search for the beta decay of 180Lu to 180Hfm. Phys. Rev. C 1986, 34, 2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lesko, K.T.; Norman, E.B.; Moltz, D.M.; Larimer, R.M.; Crane, S.G.; Kellogg, S.E. Isomeric levels in 180Lu and the nucleosynthesis of 180Tam. Phys. Rev. C 1986, 34, 2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Runte, E.; Schmidt-Ott, W.D.; Eschner, W.; Rosner, I.; Kirchner, R.; Klepper, O.; Rykaczewski, K. The decay of the new isotope 180Yb and the search for the r-process path to 180mTa. Z. Phys. A 1987, 328, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakosi, L.; Nguyen, T.C. Photoexcitation of 180Ta by 60Co and 137Cs gamma rays. Nucl. Phys. A 2002, 697, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dracoulis, G.D.; Mullins, S.M.; Byrne, A.P.; Kondev, F.G.; Kibédi, T.; Bayer, S.; Lane, G.J.; McGoram, T.R.; Davidson, P.M. Intrinsic states and collective structures in 180Ta. Phys. Rev. C 1998, 58, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saitoh, T.R.; Hashimoto, N.; Sletten, G.; Bark, R.A.; Törmänen, S.; Bergström, M.; Furuno, K.; Furutaka, K.; Hagemann, G.B.; Hayakawa, T.; et al. Structure of the doubly odd nucleus 180Ta: Description of 23 bands. Nucl. Phys. A 1999, 660, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Banerjee, P.; Misch, G.W.; Ghorui, S.K.; Sun, Y. Effective stellar β-decay rates of nuclei with long-lived isomers: 26Al and 34Cl. Phys. Rev. C 2018, 97, 065807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reifarth, R.; Fiebiger, S.; Göbel, K.; Heftrich, T.; Kausch, T.; Köppchen, C.; Kurtulgil, D.; Langer, C.; Thomas, B.; Weigand, M. Treatment of isomers in nucleosynthesis codes. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2018, 33, 1843011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Misch, G.W.; Sprouse, T.M.; Mumpower, M.R.; Couture, A.J.; Fryer, C.L.; Meyer, B.S.; Sun, Y. Sensitivity of neutron-rich nuclear isomer behavior to uncertainties in direct transitions. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Misch, G.W.; Ghorui, S.K.; Banerjee, P.; Sun, Y.; Mumpower, M.R. Astromers: Nuclear isomers in astrophysics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2020, 252, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Partial level and decay scheme of 26Al. Taken from Ref. [9].
Figure 1. Partial level and decay scheme of 26Al. Taken from Ref. [9].
Atoms 11 00140 g001
Figure 2. Partial level and decay scheme of 99Tc. The possibility of photoexcitation from 99Tcg to some higher-lying levels, followed by beta decay to 99Ru is shown.
Figure 2. Partial level and decay scheme of 99Tc. The possibility of photoexcitation from 99Tcg to some higher-lying levels, followed by beta decay to 99Ru is shown.
Atoms 11 00140 g002
Figure 3. s-process path near A = 148 indicating the branches at 147Pm and 148Pm. Stable nuclei are indicated by shaded triangles. Diagonal lines indicate β decays. Taken from Ref. [13].
Figure 3. s-process path near A = 148 indicating the branches at 147Pm and 148Pm. Stable nuclei are indicated by shaded triangles. Diagonal lines indicate β decays. Taken from Ref. [13].
Atoms 11 00140 g003
Figure 4. Region of the nuclear chart around A = 176 showing the path of the s-process and beta decays from the r-process. Taken from Ref. [17].
Figure 4. Region of the nuclear chart around A = 176 showing the path of the s-process and beta decays from the r-process. Taken from Ref. [17].
Atoms 11 00140 g004
Figure 5. Decay schemes of 176Lug and 176Lum. The equilibration of these two levels during the s-process could occur via photoexcitation to a higher-lying level of intermediate spin, which subsequently decays both of these states. Taken from Ref. [17].
Figure 5. Decay schemes of 176Lug and 176Lum. The equilibration of these two levels during the s-process could occur via photoexcitation to a higher-lying level of intermediate spin, which subsequently decays both of these states. Taken from Ref. [17].
Atoms 11 00140 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Norman, E.B. Isomers in the Cosmos. Atoms 2023, 11, 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11110140

AMA Style

Norman EB. Isomers in the Cosmos. Atoms. 2023; 11(11):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11110140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Norman, Eric B. 2023. "Isomers in the Cosmos" Atoms 11, no. 11: 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11110140

APA Style

Norman, E. B. (2023). Isomers in the Cosmos. Atoms, 11(11), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11110140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop