Next Article in Journal
Evolved Pulsar Wind Nebulae
Next Article in Special Issue
Plane Symmetric Cosmological Model with Strange Quark Matter in f(R,T) Gravity
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Local Interactions Are Essential Elements for Dark Matter Halo Stability: A Cross-Model Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Andromeda Galaxy and Its Star Formation History
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Primordial Planets with an Admixture of Dark Matter Particles and Baryonic Matter †

1
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore 560029, India
2
Department of Physics, St Claret PU College, Bangalore 560013, India
3
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore 560034, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is an extended version from the proceeding paper: Kiren, O.; Arun, K.; Sivaram, C.; Paul, K. Mergers and Tidal Breakups of Binary Systems of Primordial DM Planets with Baryon Admixture and Emission of Gravitational Waves. In Proceedings of the 2nd Electronic Conference on Universe, Online, 16 February–2 March 2023.
Universe 2023, 9(9), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090401
Submission received: 27 June 2023 / Revised: 24 August 2023 / Accepted: 25 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023

Abstract

:
It has been suggested that primordial planets could have formed in the early universe and the missing baryons in the universe could be explained by primordial free-floating planets of solid hydrogen. Many such planets were recently discovered around the old and metal-poor stars, and such planets could have formed in early epochs. Another possibility for missing baryons in the universe could be that these baryons are admixed with DM particles inside the primordial planets. Here, we discuss the possibility of the admixture of baryons in the DM primordial planets discussed earlier. We consider gravitationally bound DM objects with the DM particles constituting them varying in mass from 20 to100 GeV. Different fractions of DM particles mixed with baryonic matter in forming the primordial planets are discussed. For the different mass range of DM particles forming DM planets, we have estimated the radius and density of these planets with different fractions of DM and baryonic particles. It is found that for heavier-mass DM particles with the admixture of certain fractions of baryonic particles, the mass of the planet increases and can reach or even substantially exceed Jupiter mass. The energy released during the process of merger of such primordial planets is discussed. The energy required for the tidal breakup of such an object in the vicinity of a black hole is also discussed.

1. Introduction

Dark matter (DM), almost five times more abundant than ordinary matter, is theorized as one of the basic constituents of the universe. Many experiments are running worldwide to detect these DM particles [1,2], but to date, the interaction of these particles with ordinary matter has proven to be so feeble that they have escaped direct detection [3,4]. In the cosmic structure formation, the lightest objects would have formed first, i.e., the structure formation is a bottom-up scenario. It is of interest to note that the earliest objects to form could perhaps have been primordial planets dominantly composed of DM. Here, we consider gravitationally bound objects made of DM particles [5]. These particles are assumed to be CDM particles and are also assumed to be fermions. These objects will have low non-thermal energies and hence the degeneracy pressure will be dominant [6,7]. The formation of such objects and their presence in large numbers in our galaxy could significantly reduce the number of free DM particles moving around in the universe. The typical mass of such objects, made up mostly of DM particles of mass m D , is given by [8].
M = M P l 3 m D 2
where M P l is the Planck mass given by M P l = c G 1 / 2 2 × 10 5   g . If we consider the mass of DM particles to be 60 GeV, favored from the detection of excess of gamma rays from the galactic center, attributed to the decay of 60 GeV DM particles [9], the mass of the DM object works out to be 10 29   g , which is the mass of Neptune.
The interior solution of the object is obtained in the same way as white dwarfs (WDs) [10]. The equation of state is the degeneracy pressure P = k ρ 5 3 , where ρ is the density of DM. The degeneracy pressure is given by P d = 2 n D 5 3 m D , where m D is the DM particle mass and n D is the number density given by M m D 4 3 π R 3 , where M is the mass of the object and R is the radius of the object. Thus, the degeneracy pressure becomes P d = 92 2 M 5 3 m D 8 3 R 5 This degeneracy pressure is balanced by the gravitational pressure ~ G M 2 R 4 , which gives the equation of the radius of the DM object [11]:
R = 92 2 G m D 8 3 M 1 3
where G is the gravitational constant and m D     60   G e V is the DM particle mass [12].
As the density of these objects falls with M 2 , the objects formed in later epochs would have a lower mass. If we consider the object density at a value 100 times the ambient density, say at z = 10 , we obtain a lower mass limit of the object as ≈ 10 14   g (typical asteroid mass). Therefore, the mass range of these DM objects will be from 10 14   g (asteroid mass) extending to the mass of Neptune. These objects could have formed in the early epochs of the universe (when local DM density was much higher) and be in existence even now.
The existence of (baryonic) primordial planets has been considered previously by many authors [13,14,15]. In our recent paper [16], we discussed the possibility of DM at high redshifts forming primordial planets composed entirely of DM to be one of the reasons for not detecting DM as the flux of ambient DM particles would be consequently reduced. The evolution of these DM primordial planets is discussed in detail in [17]. In [18], we proposed that the hypothesized Planet 9, in our solar system ([19,20,21]), could indeed be such a DM planet, with a mass about that of Neptune. This might explain why it has not been visibly detected so far.
Here, we discuss the possibility of baryons being mixed with the DM particles in forming these primordial objects. During the phase of formation of these primordial objects, as the primeval ambient cloud collapses, we consider the presence of baryonic matter in addition to the DM particles.

2. Mass and Radius of DM Planet Admixed with Baryonic Matter

If M D is the total mass of DM particles and M B is the total mass of baryonic particles in forming the primordial planet, then the total mass ( M T ) of the planet is given by
M T = M D + M B
The gravitational binding energy density ( P p l a n e t ) of such a planet of radius R admixed with both baryons and DM is given by
P p l a n e t = G M T 2 R 4
As the DM particles are admixed with baryonic particles in forming these structures, the DM particles will exert pressure, and the DM degeneracy pressure [22] is given by [23]
P D M   d e g = 2 M D 5 3 R 5 m D 8 3
where R is the radius of the planet and m D is the mass of DM particles forming the planet. On the other hand, when they are admixed, baryonic particles will also exert thermal and radiation pressure in addition to degeneracy pressure like DM particles. The degeneracy pressure exerted by the baryons is given by [24,25]
P B   d e g = 2 M B 5 3 R 5 m p 8 3
where m p is proton mass. It is assumed that the gravitational self energy ~ G M T 2 R goes into heating only the baryonic particles of mass M B as it is assumed that the DM does not interact with radiation. Thus, M B R g T = G M T 2 R . This leads to Equations (7) and (8). The thermal pressure and the radiation pressure exerted by the baryonic particles is given by
P B   T h e r m a l = M B R g T 4 3 π R 3
where R g is the gas constant and T is the temperature of baryonic matter given by
T = G M T m p k B R
where k B is Boltzmann’s constant. The radiation pressure is given by
P B   r a d = a T 4
where a is Stefan’s constant.
For forming the planet admixed with DM and baryonic particles, the gravitational binding energy density of the planet must be in balance with the radiation pressure, thermal pressure and degeneracy pressure of the baryonic and DM particles. Thus,
G M T 2 R 4 = 2 M D 5 3 R 5 m D 8 3 + 2 M B 5 3 R 5 m p 8 3 + G M T M B R 4 + a G M T m p k B R 4
where M T is the total mass of the planet, M B is the total mass of baryonic particles, M D is the total mass of DM particles, R is the radius of the planet, m d   is the mass of a DM particle, m p is the mass of a proton, a is Stefan’s constant and k B is Boltzmann’s constant.
If we assume a fraction f of baryonic particles being mixed with a ( 1 f ) fraction of DM particles, then M B and M D in Equation (1) can be replaced by f M T and ( 1 f ) M T , respectively. Thus, Equation (10) becomes
G M T 2 R 4 =   2 ( 1 f ) 5 3 M T 5 3 R 5 m D 8 3 + 2 f 5 3 M T 5 3 R 5 m p 8 3 + G f M T 2 R 4 + a G M T m p k B R 4
The mass of the planet formed with these particles will be given by
M = M P l 3 m e f f 2
where m e f f is the effective mass of the constituent particles forming the planet given by
m e f f = 1 f m D + f m B
When the effective mass is considered for the planetary formation, the mass of the object will increase (can be more than Jupiter mass) beyond the maximum limit ( 10 29   g ) proposed for DM planets [18]. This happens because the effective mass m e f f is reduced, since m D m B .
Consider such a planet with 50% of DM (assuming m D of 60 GeV) and 50% of baryonic matter. The mass of the planet is ~ 2 M J , where M J is the mass of Jupiter. For the planet of this mass, the baryonic radiation pressure will be very small compared to the degeneracy and thermal pressures. Hence the radiation pressure can be neglected from Equation (11). Thus,
G M T 2 R 4 =   2 ( 1 f ) 5 3 M T 5 3 R 5 m D 8 3 + 2 f 5 3 M T 5 3 R 5 m p 8 3 + G f M T 2 R 4
Thus, the radius of the object from the above equation becomes
R = 2 M T 1 3 G 1 f 2 3 m D 8 3 + f 5 3 ( 1 f ) m p 8 3
For the planet with mass ~ 2 M J , as discussed in the above case, the radius works out to be 9.8 × 10 5 cm.
Table 1 shows the mass and radius of the primordial planets with an admixture of DM and baryonic particles of different fractions and for 60 GeV DM particles. Figure 1 shows that the mass of DM planets with an admixture of baryonic particles increases their mass limit beyond the Neptune mass. For planets made entirely of DM, the maximum mass limit was Neptune mass and it can go down to asteroid mass. But with an admixture of DM and baryonic particles, the mass of the planet increases with the increase in the fraction of baryonic matter. When the baryonic fraction increases with respect to that of DM particles, the planetary mass can increase and go beyond the Jupiter mass (up to about fifty Jupiter mass). It is also found that some objects can have substellar masses (above 50 Jupiter mass), like that of brown dwarfs. The radius of these planets (admixed with DM and baryonic matter) also increases with an increase in the fraction of baryonic matter. It is found from Figure 2 that if the DM particles involved in the formation of these planets are heavier, the size of the planets increases compared to the planets being formed by lighter DM particles.

3. Rotating DM Object Admixed with Baryonic Matter

In the previous section, we discussed the possibility of the formation of DM planets with an admixture of baryonic and DM particles. There could be one such object within half a light year for the density of DM 0.1   G e V / c c around the solar neighborhood. These objects can rotate about their axis, thus emitting gravitational waves.
Consider such an object with 50 % DM and 50 % baryonic matter made up of DM particles of mass m D = 60   G e V . The mass and radius of the object from Table 1 is M o b j = 2 M J and R o b j = 9.8 × 10 5   c m , where M J is Jupiter mass. The gravitational wave energy emitted per unittime by the rotating individual object is given by
E ˙ = 32 5 G c 5 I 2 ω o b j 6 ϵ 2
where I is the moment of inertia of the object given by I = 2 5 M o b j R o b j 2 , ω o b j is the frequency of the rotating object and ϵ is the ellipticity of the object. Then, Equation (16) becomes
E ˙ = 128 125 G c 5 M o b j 2 R o b j 4 ω o b j 6 ϵ 2
The rotational frequency of the DM object spinning close to breakup is given by
ω o b j 2 R o b j 3 = G M o b j
where G is the gravitational constant. Thus, the maximum rotational frequency of the DM object is given by
ω o b j = G M o b j R o b j 3
Considering ϵ = 0.1 for the object of mass 2 M J and R o b j = 9.8 × 10 5   c m , the energy emitted per second works out to be 7.2 × 10 39   e r g / s with the frequency of 518   H z , which is well within the frequency of LIGO [26]. The typical period of rotation of the object is 2 π ω = 0.012   s . As the object rotates, it can break up emitting gravitational waves [27]. The binding energy of the object will be emitted as gravitational waves. The binding energy of the object is given by
E = G M o b j 2 R o b j
For the above object, the binding energy works out to be 9.82 × 10 47   e r g . The strain h (in the gravitational wave detector) is calculated using the formula
h = 2 G E r c 4
where E is the binding energy of the object, c is the speed of light and r is the distance of the object from Earth. If we consider this object at a distance of 10   A . U . from Earth, then the corresponding strain is 10 14 .

4. Binary Systems of DM Objects Admixed with Baryonic Matter

These primordial planetary objects can form binary systems. Considering a binary system with each component of mass 2 M J , size of 9.8 × 10 5 cm. and separation about ten times their size, the orbital period P is given by
G M T P 2 = 4 π 2 R 3
where R is the orbital radius and M T is the total mass of the system. The orbital period works out to be P = 0.27 s and the corresponding frequency is ω = 23 Hz. The binary system will be emitting gravitational wave energy [28] as it revolves, and the energy emitted per unit of time is given by
E ˙ = 32 5 G c 5 μ 2 R 4 ω 6 ϵ 2
where ϵ is the eccentricity of the orbit and μ is the reduced mass of the system given by
μ = M 1 M 2 M 1 + M 2
M 1 and M 2 are the masses of individual objects in the binary system. During their orbit around one another, they lose energy and the orbital radius keeps decreasing until it becomes 2 R o b j . The final merger period and merger frequency of the binary system will be P = 0.0243   s and ω = 260   H z . This frequency is also within the existing range of LIGO. The binding energy of the binary system will be emitted as gravitational waves and is given by
E = G M T 2 R
where R = 2 R o b j .
Figure 3 shows the orbital frequency of a binary system of primordial objects admixed with baryonic matter versus fraction of baryonic matter. From the figure, we can conclude that most of the frequency emitted by these binary systems falls in the LIGO range of frequency. Table 2 shows the gravitational wave energy emitted by the binary system for different fractions of baryons admixed with DM particles of mass ranging from 20 to 100 GeV in forming the planet. It is found that for greater-mass DM particles, the energy emitted as gravitational waves decreases. As the fraction of baryons increases, the energy emitted by the binary system will increase. If we consider these binary systems to be situated at distance r from Earth, then the strain, h, on Earth due to the gravitational radiation emission from them is given by Equation (21). If this binary system is assumed to be at distances 1   k p c and 10   k p c from Earth, then the strain due to the gravitational wave is 2 × 10 23 and 2 × 10 24 . The corresponding flux on Earth at these distances will be 8 × 10 9   e r g s / m 2 s and 8 × 10 11   e r g s / m 2 s .

5. Tidal Breakup of DM Object Admixed with Baryonic Matter near a Black Hole

If a primordial degenerate object (as discussed in the above sections) of mass M T and radius R approaches a BH of mass M B H , the tidal force is given by
F t i d a l = 4 G M B H M T R d 3
where d is the separation between the BH and the primordial object. The self-gravitational force of the object is given by
F s e l f = G M T 2 R 2
For the object to break up, the tidal force must be greater than the self-gravitational force of the object [29], i.e.,
4 G M B H M T R d 3 G M T 2 R 2
Considering the distance between the BH and object to be around 10 times the Schwarzschild radius ( d     10 2 G M B H c 2 ), the minimum mass of BH required for tidal break-up of the object is given by
M B H = c 3 R 3 2 45 G 3 2 M T 1 2
Figure 4 shows the mass of BH required for the tidal break-up of the primordial planet when it comes near the BH. The mass of the BH required for tidal break-up increases with the increase in the mass of DM particles as well as with the fraction of baryons in the primordial planet. As these objects orbit the BH, they lose energy according to Equation (23). Table 3 shows the gravitational wave energy emitted per second by the DM object consisting of different-mass DM particles with different fractions of baryons in forming the primordial object. It is found that energy decreases with the increase in the mass of the DM particles.
When they lose energy, the orbital radius keeps decreasing until the radius becomes equal to the Schwarzschild radius (Rsch). At the Schwarzschild radius, the frequency is given by
ω = G M T R 3
where M T is the total mass of the system and the orbital radius R = R s c h . The orbital binding energy will be emitted as gravitational waves at this frequency. The time of merger of the primordial object with the BH is given by [30,31]
t = 5 c 5 r i 4 256 M 2 μ G 3
where c is speed of light, ri is the initial orbital radius, M is the total mass of the system involving the BH and object, μ is the reduced mass of the system and G is the gravitational constant. For an object with 50% DM and 50% baryonic matter and made of 60 GeV DM particles, the merger time is 10 7   s .
Figure 5 shows the relation between the merger time and fraction of baryons in forming the primordial planet. It is found that the merger time increases with the increase in DM particle mass. Also, the merger time increases with the fraction of baryons, reaching a maximum for planets made of 60% baryonic matter.

6. Primordial Planetary Object at Galactic Center

At the center of our galaxy is a BH of mass 4 million solar masses ( M B H ) . It appears reasonable to assume that stars near the Galactic center (several stellar clusters are known to exist near galactic center [32,33] have planets and other small orbiting bodies, such as asteroids and comets. When the parent star approaches the central black hole, tidal interaction may either strip these bodies off their parent stars [34,35] or cause them to become more tightly bound. If we consider the primordial object orbiting around this BH, at R = 10 R s c h , where R is the orbital radius, then according to Kepler’s law, the orbital frequency is given by
ω o r b = G M B H R 3
The system will lose energy as the object orbits around the central BH and the orbital radius keeps decreasing. The energy emitted per second is given by Equation (23). For the primordial planet of mass 2 M J and R o b j = 9.8 × 10 5   c m , the energy emitted per unit of time works out to be 1.6 × 10 33   e r g / s . At an orbital radius equal to the Schwarzschild radius of the central BH, the binding energy will be emitted as gravitational waves. The final orbital frequency and energy emitted as gravitational waves for the above object works out to be 0.0178   H z and 1.7 × 10 51   e r g . The flux per unit of time falling on Earth from the gravitational waves is given by
F = E ˙ 4 π r 2
where E ˙ is the energy emitted per unit of time from the system and r is the distance of Earth from the center of the galaxy, equal to 8 kpc . The merger time of the object with the BH is given by Equation (31), and for the above object, t     10 19   s .
Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 show the variation in merger time with different fractions of baryons mixed with DM and with different masses of DM particles ranging from 20   G e V to 100   G e V for various separations of these objects from the BH. It is found that the merger time of the planet with the BH decreases as the fraction of baryons increases in the primordial planet and also increases with the increase in mass of the DM particles forming the planet. Considering the primordial planet at the center of the galaxy ( 8   k p c from Earth), the flux per unit of time on Earth is very low, of the order of 10 12   e r g s / m 2 s .

7. Possible Electromagnetic Radiation from Baryonic Fraction of the Merging Objects

If the objects were made of pure DM, the binding energy of the merging objects would be released as gravitational waves [36,37]. In the case of a primordial planet admixed with DM and baryons, the binding energy due to baryons will be emitted as electromagnetic waves (like merging neutron stars). Thus, during the merger, there will be emission of gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves by the baryonic particles inside the object. For objects with an equal proportion of DM and baryonic matter, the energy released as EM waves will be of the order of 10 47   e r g and it will be emitted in the frequency range of gamma radiation. These gamma rays emitted would be in short-duration bursts with a period the same as the final orbital period before the merger (around 5 ms).

8. Conclusions

Here, we have discussed the possibility of admixture of baryons in the DM primordial planets with the DM particles varying in mass from 20 GeV to 100 GeV. We have considered different fractions of admixture to form the planets. The mass of the primordial planets made completely of DM ranges from asteroid mass to Neptune mass, whereas the mass of primordial planets (admixed with DM and baryonic matter) is found to increase with the fraction of baryonic matter in the planets, and the mass of these objects can go well beyond the mass of Jupiter (around 40 times Jupiter mass) and can also approach substellar mass (brown dwarf mass). So far, thousands of exoplanets have been discovered by the Kepler mission and more will be found by NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission, which is observing the entire sky to locate planets orbiting the nearest and brightest stars. Many exoplanets (exo-Jupiters) discovered so far fall in this mass range and we are not very sure whether these exoplanets are entirely made of baryons. Some of the exoplanets with a mass several times Jupiter mass could be possible signatures of the presence of primordial planets with an admixture of baryonic and DM particles. It is also found that some of these planets could even reach substellar mass ( 10 32   g ) , like that of brown dwarfs [38,39]. Also, even if a small fraction of DM particles is trapped in these objects, the flux of ambient DM particles would be reduced significantly. This could be one of the many reasons for not detecting the DM particles in various experiments like the XENON1T experiment, etc., as suggested earlier. If two such primordial planets merge, they will release a lot of energy. The energy released and the time scale of merger of these objects is found to increase with the mass of primordial objects. The frequency of gravitational waves emitted during the merger is found to match with the frequency range of LIGO. The objects near the galactic center could consist of such primordial objects, planets, comets, etc. Here, we have also discussed the possibility of tidal break-up of these primordial objects in the presence of a BH. The mass of BH required for tidal break-up is calculated and it is found that the mass of BH required for tidal break-up increases with the DM particle mass and also with the increase in fraction of baryons in these objects. The energy released in the form of gravitational waves as well as the frequency of emission is tabulated and, again, it is found that the frequency falls in the sensitivity range of LIGO.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.; methodology, C.S., A.K. and O.V.K.; validation, C.S., A.K. and O.V.K.; investigation, O.V.K.; resources, A.K. and O.V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, O.V.K.; writing—review and editing, C.S., A.K. and O.V.K.; supervision, C.S. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aprile, E.; Arisaka, K.; Arneodo, F.; Askin, A.; Baudis, L.; Behrens, A.; Brown, E.; Cardoso, J.M.R.; Choi, B.; Cline, D.; et al. The XENON100 Dark Matter Experiment. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 35, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Undagoitia, T.M.; Rauch, L.J. Dark matter direct-detection experiments. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 2016, 43, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arun, K.; Gudennavar, S.; Sivaram, C. Dark matter, dark energy, and alternate models: A review. Adv. Space Res. 2017, 60, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gondolo, P.; Gelmini, G. Compatibility of DAMA dark matter detection with other searches. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 71, 123520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Diemand, J.; Moore, B.; Stade, J. Earth-mass dark-matter haloes as the first structures in the early Universe. Nature 2005, 433, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Markov, M. On possible existence of neutrino superstars. Phys. Lett. 1964, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Narain, G.; Schaffner-Bielich, J.; Mishustin, I. Compact stars made of fermionic dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 063003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sivaram, C.; Arun, K. Some enigmatic aspects of the early universe. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2011, 334, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, X.-J.; Zhang, W.-H.; Zhou, Y.-F. 750 GeV diphoton excess and a dark matter messenger at the Galactic Center. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 115006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shipman, H.L. Masses and Radii of White Dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 1972, 177, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sivaram, C.; Arun, K. Some more Exotic Dark Matter Candidates: GUT Balls, Fermi Balls…. arXiv 2011, arXiv:1109.5266. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gelmini, G. High energy cosmic rays. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2009, 171, 012012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shchekinov, Y.A.; Safonova, M.; Murthy, J. Planets in the early Universe. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2013, 346, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wickramasinghe, N.C.; Wallis, J.; Wallis, D.H.; Schild, R.E.; Gibson, C.H. Life-bearing primordial planets in the solar vicinity. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2012, 341, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gibson, C.H.; Wickramasinghe, C.N.; Schild, R.E. Instruments, Methods, and Missions for Astrobiology XIII; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2010; Volume 7819. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sivaram, C.; Arun, K.; Kiren, O.V. Primordial Planets Predominantly of Dark Matter. Earth Moon Planets 2019, 122, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kiren, O.V.; Arun, K.; Sivaram, C. Evolution of Primordial Dark Matter Planets in the Early Universe. Adv. Space Res. 2021, 68, 2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sivaram, C.; Kenath, A.; Kiren, O.V. Planet Nine, Dark Matter and MOND. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2016, 361, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Batygin, K.; Brown, M.E. Evidence for a distant giant planet in the Solar System. Astron. J. 2016, 151, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Trujillo, C.A.; Sheppard, S.S. A Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units. Nature 2014, 507, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Becker, J.C.; Adams, F.C.; Khain, T.; Hamilton, S.J.; Gerdes, D. Evaluating the Dynamical Stability of Outer Solar System Objects in the Presence of Planet Nine. Astron. J. 2017, 154, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carena, M.; Coyle, N.M.; Li, Y.Y.; McDermott, S.D.; Tsai, Y. Cosmologically degenerate fermions. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 083016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sivaram, C.; Arun, K. New Class of Dark Matter Objects and their Detection. arXiv 2009, arXiv:0910.2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Agrawal, V.; Barr, S.M.; Donoghue, J.F.; Seckel, D. The anthropic principle and the mass scale of the Standard Model. arXiv 1997, arXiv:9707380. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sedrakian, A. The physics of dense hadronic matter and compact stars. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2007, 58, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abbott, B.P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abernathy, M.R.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P.; Adhikari, R.X.; et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 061102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zimmermann, M.; Szedenits, E., Jr. Gravitational waves from rotating and precessing rigid bodies: Simple models and applications to pulsars. Phys. Rev. D 1979, 20, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rosado, P.A. Gravitational wave background from binary systems. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 084004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Perets, H.B.; Li, Z.; Lombardi, J.C.; Milcarek, S.R. Micro-tidal disruption events by stellar compact objects and the production of ultra-long GRBs. Astrophys. J. 2016, 823, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bethe, H.A.; Brown, G.E. Evolution of Binary Compact Objects That Merge. Astrophys. J. 1998, 506, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sadowski, A.; Belczynski, K.; Bulik, T.; Ivanova, N.; Rasio, F.A.; O’Shaughnessy, R. The Total Merger Rate of Compact Object Binaries in the Local Universe. Astrophys. J. 2008, 676, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Figer, D.F.; Kim, S.S.; Morris, M.; Serabyn, E.; Rich, R.M.; McLean, I.S. Hubble Space Telescope/NICMOS observations of massive stellar clusters near the galactic center. Astrophys. J. 1999, 525, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cotera, A.S.; Erickson, E.F.; Colgan, S.W.; Simpson, J.P.; Allen, D.A.; Burton, M.G. The Discovery of Hot Stars near the Galactic Center Thermal Radio Filaments. Astrophys. J. 1996, 461, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Antonini, F.; Lombardi, J.C.; Merritt, D. Tidal breakup of binary stars at the Galactic Center. II. Hydrodynamic simulations. Astrophys. J. 2011, 731, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, L.; Lin, D.N.C. Tidal Disruption of Stellar Clusters and the Spatial Distribution of Their Remnants Near the Galactic Center. Astrophys. J. 2023, 944, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Belczynski, K.; Buonanno, A.; Cantiello, M.; Fryer, C.L.; Holz, D.E.; Mandel, I.; Miller, M.C.; Walczak, M. The Formation and Gravitational-Wave Detection of Massive Stellar Black Hole Binaries. Astrophys. J. 2014, 789, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Eda, K.; Itoh, Y.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Silk, J. Gravitational waves as a probe of dark matter mini-spikes. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 044045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kirkpatrick, J.D.; Marocco, F.; Caselden, D.; Meisner, A.M.; Faherty, J.K.; Schneider, A.C.; Kuchner, M.J.; Casewell, S.L.; Gelino, C.R.; Cushing, M.C.; et al. The Enigmatic Brown Dwarf WISEA J153429.75-104303.3 (a.k.a. “The Accident”). Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 915, L6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Burrows, A.; Hubbard, W.B.; Lunine, J.I.; Liebert, J. The theory of brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2001, 73, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mass of the primordial planet versus fraction of baryons.
Figure 1. Mass of the primordial planet versus fraction of baryons.
Universe 09 00401 g001
Figure 2. Radius of the primordial planet versus fraction of baryons.
Figure 2. Radius of the primordial planet versus fraction of baryons.
Universe 09 00401 g002
Figure 3. Orbital frequency of binary system of primordial planets admixed.
Figure 3. Orbital frequency of binary system of primordial planets admixed.
Universe 09 00401 g003
Figure 4. Mass of BH for tidal break-up versus fraction of baryonic particles admixed to form the primordial planet.
Figure 4. Mass of BH for tidal break-up versus fraction of baryonic particles admixed to form the primordial planet.
Universe 09 00401 g004
Figure 5. Merger time versus fraction of baryons in forming the primordial planet for DM particles of mass 40 GeV and 100 GeV.
Figure 5. Merger time versus fraction of baryons in forming the primordial planet for DM particles of mass 40 GeV and 100 GeV.
Universe 09 00401 g005
Table 1. Mass and radius of primordial planet made of DM particle mass mD = 60 GeV. Here, MJ = 1.9 × 1030 g is the Jupiter mass.
Table 1. Mass and radius of primordial planet made of DM particle mass mD = 60 GeV. Here, MJ = 1.9 × 1030 g is the Jupiter mass.
f (%)(1 − f) (%)meff (GeV)Mass of Object (g)Radius of Object (cm)
109054.11.21 × 10305.47 × 104
208048.21.52 × 10301.81 × 105
307042.31.97 × 10303.72 × 105
406036.42.66 × 10306.34 × 105
505030.53.79 × 10309.81 × 105
604024.65.83 × 10301.44 × 106
703018.71.01 × 10312.07 × 106
802012.82.15 × 10313.01 × 106
90106.97.41 × 10314.85 × 106
Table 2. Total energy emitted as gravitational waves by the binary system for different masses of DM particles and with different fractions of baryons for forming the planet.
Table 2. Total energy emitted as gravitational waves by the binary system for different masses of DM particles and with different fractions of baryons for forming the planet.
f (%)E (in ergs) for
mD = 20 GeV
E (in ergs) for
mD = 40 GeV
E (in ergs) for
mD = 80 GeV
E (in ergs) for
mD = 100 GeV
101.16 × 10504.68 × 10481.86 × 10476.57 × 1046
205.51 × 10492.24 × 10488.94 × 10463.17 × 1046
304.40 × 10491.82 × 10487.35 × 10462.61 × 1046
404.54 × 10491.93 × 10487.90 × 10462.81 × 1046
505.67 × 10492.50 × 10481.04 × 10473.72 × 1046
608.50 × 10493.95 × 10481.69 × 10476.08 × 1046
701.58 × 10508.00 × 10483.59 × 10471.30 × 1047
804.00 × 10502.36 × 10491.16 × 10484.27 × 1047
901.73 × 10511.49 × 10509.21 × 10483.58 × 1048
Table 3. Gravitational radiation energy emitted per second by the DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles.
Table 3. Gravitational radiation energy emitted per second by the DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles.
f (%) E ˙ (erg/s) for
mD = 20 GeV
E ˙ (erg/s) for
mD = 40 GeV
E ˙ (erg/s) for
mD = 60 GeV
E ˙ (erg/s) for
mD = 80 GeV
E ˙ (erg/s) for
mD = 100 GeV
109.39 × 10512.79 × 10491.08 × 10481.08 × 10471.82 × 1046
203.97 × 10501.51 × 10485.95 × 10466 × 10451.01 × 1045
309.13 × 10493.72 × 10471.49 × 10461.51 × 10452.56 × 1044
404.21 × 10491.82 × 10477.41 × 10457.58 × 10441.29 × 1044
503.01 × 10491.39 × 10475.79 × 10455.98 × 10441.02 × 1044
603.06 × 10491.55 × 10476.65 × 10456.99 × 10441.21 × 1044
704.43 × 10492.58 × 10471.16 × 10461.26 × 10452.2 × 1044
809.85 × 10497.38 × 10473.67 × 10464.17 × 10457.55 × 1044
904.03 × 10505.59 × 10483.58 × 10474.66 × 10469.21 × 1045
Table 4. Merger time of DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles separated by a distance of 2Rsch from BH.
Table 4. Merger time of DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles separated by a distance of 2Rsch from BH.
f (%)t (s) for
mD = 20 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 40 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 80 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 100 GeV
104.65 × 10151.85 × 10167.38 × 10161.15 × 1017
203.73 × 10151.47 × 10165.85 × 10169.14 × 1016
302.90 × 10151.14 × 10164.50 × 10167.02 × 1016
402.18 × 10158.46 × 10153.33 × 10165.18 × 1016
501.57 × 10155.97 × 10152.33 × 10163.62 × 1016
601.05 × 10153.91 × 10151.51 × 10162.34 × 1016
706.38 × 10142.29 × 10158.67 × 10151.34 × 1016
803.27 × 10141.10 × 10154.01 × 10156.15 × 1015
901.19 × 10143.41 × 10151.13 × 10151.69 × 1015
Table 5. Merger time of DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles separated by a distance of 10Rsch from BH.
Table 5. Merger time of DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles separated by a distance of 10Rsch from BH.
f (%)t (s) for
mD = 20 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 40 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 80 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 100 GeV
102.91 × 10181.16 × 10194.62 × 10197.21 × 1019
202.33 × 10189.2 × 10183.66 × 10195.71 × 1019
301.82 × 10187.11 × 10182.81 × 10194.39 × 1019
401.37 × 10185.29 × 10182.08 × 10193.24 × 1019
509.79 × 10173.73 × 10181.46 × 10192.26 × 1019
606.57 × 10172.45 × 10189.43 × 10181.46 × 1019
703.99 × 10171.43 × 10185.42 × 10188.37 × 1018
802.05 × 10176.87 × 10172.51 × 10183.84 × 1018
907.47 × 10162.13 × 10177.03 × 10171.05 × 1018
Table 6. Merger time of DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles separated by a distance of 100Rsch from BH.
Table 6. Merger time of DM planet admixed with baryons for different-mass DM particles separated by a distance of 100Rsch from BH.
f (%)t (s) for
mD = 20 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 40 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 80 GeV
t (s) for
mD = 100 GeV
102.91 × 10221.16 × 10234.62 × 10237.21 × 1023
202.33 × 10229.2 × 10223.66 × 10235.71 × 1023
301.82 × 10227.11 × 10222.81 × 10234.39 × 1023
401.37 × 10225.29 × 10222.08 × 10233.24 × 1023
509.79 × 10213.73 × 10221.46 × 10232.26 × 1023
606.57 × 10212.45 × 10229.43 × 10221.46 × 1023
703.99 × 10211.43 × 10225.42 × 10228.37 × 1022
802.05 × 10216.87 × 10212.51 × 10223.84 × 1022
907.47 × 10202.13 × 10217.03 × 10211.05 × 1022
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kiren, O.V.; Kenath, A.; Sivaram, C. Primordial Planets with an Admixture of Dark Matter Particles and Baryonic Matter. Universe 2023, 9, 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090401

AMA Style

Kiren OV, Kenath A, Sivaram C. Primordial Planets with an Admixture of Dark Matter Particles and Baryonic Matter. Universe. 2023; 9(9):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kiren, O. V., Arun Kenath, and Chandra Sivaram. 2023. "Primordial Planets with an Admixture of Dark Matter Particles and Baryonic Matter" Universe 9, no. 9: 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop