Abstract
We consider the new horizon first law in theory. We derive the general formulas to computed the entropy and energy for static spherically symmetric black hole. For applications, some nontrivial solutions in some popular theories are investigated, the entropies and the energies of static spherically symmetric black holes in these models are first calculated.
1. Introduction
There is a deep connection between thermodynamics and gravity. For a black hole, its area can be regarded as the entropy [], and four laws for dynamics like in thermodynamics were suggested []. For diffeomorphism invariance of gravitational theory, the entropy of a black hole can be seen as a Noether charge [,]. The Einstein equations had been derived from the first law of thermodynamics [], which was generalized to the non-equilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime []. This connection was also investigated in modified gravity theories—such as Lancos-Lovelock gravity [], theory [], and the scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity []. It was shown that the equation of motion for generalized gravity theory is equivalent to the thermodynamical relationship []. In spherically symmetric spacetime Padmanabhan presented a general form for understanding the thermodynamics of the horizon []. For a time-dependent evolution horizon or a fixed axis-symmetric horizon, the Einstein equations on horizon can be rewritten as a thermodynamic identity []. In cubic and quartic quasi-topological gravity, the field equations on dimensional topological black holes horizon with constant curvature can be expressed like the form of the first thermodynamical law []. In References [,], one can obtain the thermal entropy density of any spacetime from Einstein equations without assuming the temperature or the horizon.
In higher-order theories of gravity, issues about the entropy and energy of black hole are important. Especially the problems related to the energy of black hole are problematic, some attempts have been made to find a satisfactory answer to this question [,,,,]. Using the first law of the horizon, one can derived the entropy and energy of black hole in Einstein gravity []. Recently, as shown in Reference [], the entropy and energy of black hole in theories can be obtained simultaneously though the new horizon first law which was proposed in Reference []. Here we will consider the more complicated case: for the general spherically symmetric black hole we hope to obtain the energy and the entropy of black hole in theory, which can reduce to the results in References [,] for some special cases.
The rest of this article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we briefly review the new horizon first law. In Section 3, we investigate the entropy and energy of black holes in Theories. In Section 4, we calculate the energies and entropies for black holes in some theories for applications. Conclusion and discussion are given in Section 5.
2. The New Horizon First Law
Usually if the radial component of the stress-energy tensor acts as the thermodynamic pressure, , which is a special case of the assumption firstly proposed in Reference [], and assume an horizon equation of state with the temperature identified as the Hawking temperature and a geometric volume assigned to the horizon [], then the radial Einstein equation can be written as the first law of thermodynamics, which can be rewritten as a horizon first law by considering a imaginary displacement of the horizon []
where E is the quasilocal energy and S is the horizon entropy of the black hole. In Einstein gravity, E proves to be the Misner-Sharp energy []. The horizon first law (1) is a special case of the ‘unified first law’ [].
There are two problems in this procedure that are needed to be further examined. The first problem is that the thermodynamic variables was vague in the original derivation, which require further determination. Secondly because both S and V are functions of only , which makes the horizon first law (1) to be of a function only depending on . As a matter of fact, Equation (1) can be rewritten as , where the primes stands for the derivative with respected to . This makes the terms ‘heat’ and ‘work’ confused and results to a ‘vacuum interpretation’ of the first law (1) []. To avoid the problems mentioned above, a new horizon first law was proposed in Reference [], by varying the horizon equation of state with the temperature T and the pressure P as independent thermodynamic quantities
which obviously depends on both T and P, meaning that T and P can vary independently. The energy, and therefore the standard horizon first law (1) can be obtained via a degenerate Legendre transformation . The Gibbs free energy G and the horizon entropy S are derived concepts for specified volume. This new horizon first law has practical utility and provides further evidence for the connection between gravity and thermodynamics.
In 4-dimensional Einstein gravity, we briefly review this approach to explain how it works []. Considering the geometry of a static spherically symmetric black hole, which is given by
The horizon is local at where with .
Supposing minimal coupling to the matter and that the thermal sources are also the gravitational sources [], we have and identify the Hawking temperature as the thermal temperature T [], the component of the Einstein equation can be written as at the horizon
which is the horizon equation of state, where we take the units .
Since the identification of the Hawking temperature as the thermal temperature does not fall back on any gravitational field equations []. According to the conjecture suggested in Reference [], the definition of the pressure is identified as the component of the matter stress-energy, which is also independent of any gravitational theories. So it is reasonable to speculate that the radial component of the gravitational field equations under consideration takes the following form []
where C and D are some functions of , generally depending on the gravitational theory under consideration. Varying the generalized equation of state (5) and multiplying the volume of black hole, it is easy to get
where
and
by using the integration by parts. Taking the degenerate Legendre transformation , we finally derive the energy as
Hypothesizing that T, P, and V can be identified as the temperature, the pressure, and the volume, we can find that G, S, and E are the Gibbs free energy, the entropy, and the energy of the black hole, respectively. For Einstein gravity in four dimensions, it is easily to have and from (4), substituting them into Equations (8) and (9), we obtain and . It has been shown that the new horizon first law still works in theories [].
3. The Entropy and Energy of Black Holes in Theories
We consider the general spherically symmetric and static black hole in theories, whose geometry takes the form
where and are general functions of the coordinate r. Taking the largest positive root of , yields the event horizon which fulfils . The surface gravity is given by []
which gives the temperature of the black hole as
In four-dimensional spacetime, the general action of gravity theories with source is
where , is a function only depending on the Ricci scalar R, and is the matter Lagrangian. Physically must fulfil stability conditions []: (a) no ghosts, ; (b) no tachyons, []; (c) stable solutions, []. Additionally must also satisfy for the existence of an effective cosmological constant at high curvature and for recovering general relativity at early time. Varying the action (13) with respect to the metric, yields the gravitational field equations
where and is the energy-momentum tensor for the matter. The tress-energy tensor for the effective curvature fluid, , is given as following
where . Taking the trace of Equation (13), gives the relation as follow
For the general spherically symmetric and static black hole (10), the components of the Einstein tensor and the stress-energy tensor of the effective curvature fluid are respectively given by
and
where the prime denotes the derivative with respected to r. Substituting Equations (17) and (18), and into Equation (14), we derive
The volume V of the black hole (10) is given by []
where we have used the relation []. Substituting Equations (23) and (19) into Equation (8), we obtain the entropy as
thought the black hole (10) has different temperature and volume, its entropy (24) has the same form for the entropy of black hole with obtained in Reference []. The formula (24) can be obtained by using the Euclidean semiclassical approach or the Wald entropy formula [,,]. Using the degenerate Legendre transformation , inserting Equations (23) and (21) into Equation (9), then the energy of the black hole is given as follow
For , Equation (25) reduces to the results obtained in Reference [] where the entropy was obtained by using the Wald method. For , Equation (25) gives the result obtained in Reference []. Equations (24) and (25) show that the new horizon first law still work in theories for the general spherically symmetric and static black hole.
4. Applications
In this section, we will use Equations (24) and (25) to calculate the entropies and energies of black holes (10) in some popular theories to illustrate the method described above. These models allowe solutions with constant Ricci curvature (such as Schwarzschild-de Sitter or Schwarzschild solutions) or solutions with non-constant Ricci curvature. For a Schwarzschild-de Sitter solution, we have at the horizon [], which gives
This equation relates the mass M, the radius , and the Ricci curvature together.
We firstly start with a model which unifies inflation and cosmic acceleration under the same picture and was confirmed by the solar system tests []. This model takes the form
where is a constant which is given by with and the Ricci scalar at present. The effective cosmological constant is in the early universe and is in the present era. The stability condition, , gives
Due to the fact that , this model allows a Schwarzschild solution. For a Schwarzschild-de Sitter solution, we obtain from Equation (16),
The nonnegativity of the entropy gives additional limits on the parameters: . The entropy for Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole is
where must fulfil Equations (28) and (29).
For Schwarzschild black hole (), the stability condition (28) reduces to , and the entropy (31) reduces to
Computing the energy by using Equation (25), we have
For the Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, Equation (33) reduces to
where Equations (26) and (29) were used. For the Schwarzschild black hole, , Equation (34) reduces to
Since and , Equations (32) and (35) give new constraints on the parameters: (a) for Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole; and (b) for Schwarzschild black hole.
The second model we consider here was recovered from the entropy of black holes []
where and with , , and c a constant. Since , this type of theory admits no Schwarzschild solution. Use Equation (16), we get the condition for the Schwarzschild-de Sitter solution
The nonnegativity of the entropy gives additional constraints on the parameters: . For Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, the entropy is
where the condition (37) was uesed. Since , gives new limits on the parameters: for and for .
For Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, Equation (40) takes the form
where Equations (37) and (26) were used. The nonnegativity of the energy gives new constraints on the parameters: for and for .
We thirdly investigate the following theory which allows black hole solutions with non-constant Ricci curvature []
where is a parameter of the model which is related to an effective cosmological constant and is a parameter with units [distance] . This model admits a static spherically symmetric solution (10) which takes the follow form []
where Q is an integration constant. The event horizon of the black hole is located at: (a) for and ; (b) for , and ; (c) for and ; and (d) for and . The Ricci scalar evolves as
For and , the nonnegativity of the energy gives additional constraints on the parameters: .
We finally consider a power-law of , for example: , with constants a and . The functions and in (10) are found to take forms []
and
where is a integration constant. The event horizon is local at . In this case, function is given by
where . The entropy (24) and the energy (25) respectively reads
For , we obtain the results in Einstein’s gravity. The nonnegativity of the entropy and the energy give new constraints on the parameters: and .
5. Conclusions and Discussion
We investigated whether the new horizon first law still holds in theory with general spherically symmetric black hole (10). We derived the general formulas to computed the entropy and energy of the black hole. For black hole (10), its temperature, volume and entropy have different forms, but its entropy (24) has the same form for the entropy of black hole (3) obtained in Reference []. For applications, some nontrivial black hole solutions in some popular theories are considered, the entropies and the energies of black holes in these models are first calculated. The nonnegativity of entropy or energy gives new constraints on the parameters of theories, which may be useful for future researches. The formulas presented here can be used to calculate the energies and entropies of black holes in other types theories, but cannot be used in the case discussed in Reference [], where . In Reference [], a picture of equilibrium thermodynamics on the apparent horizon in the expanding cosmological background was obtained for a wide class of modified gravity theories. Whether this procedure can be applied to the apparent horizon in the expanding cosmological background worths further study.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, R.-J.Y.; calculation, writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study is supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11273010), Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. A2014201068), the Outstanding Youth Fund of Hebei University (No. 2012JQ02), and the Midwest universities comprehensive strength promotion project.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jing Zhai for helpful advice.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Bekenstein, J.D. Black holes and entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2333–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardeen, J.M.; Carter, B.; Hawking, S.W. The Four laws of black hole mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys. 1973, 31, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wald, R.M. Black hole entropy is the Noether charge. Phys. Rev. D 1993, 48, R3427–R3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iyer, V.; Wald, R.M. Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1994, 50, 846–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, T. Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 1260–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eling, C.; Guedens, R.; Jacobson, T. Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 121301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paranjape, A.; Sarkar, S.; Padmanabhan, T. Thermodynamic route to field equations in Lancos-Lovelock gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 104015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elizalde, E.; Silva, P.J. F(R) gravity equation of state. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 061501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamba, K.; Geng, C.-Q.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Equivalence of modified gravity equation to the Clausius relation. Europhys. Lett. 2010, 89, 50003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brustein, R.; Hadad, M. The Einstein equations for generalized theories of gravity and the thermodynamic relation δQ=TδS are equivalent. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 101301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmanabhan, T. Classical and quantum thermodynamics of horizons in spherically symmetric space-times. Class. Quant. Grav. 2002, 19, 5387–5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kothawala, D.; Sarkar, S.; Padmanabhan, T. Einstein’s equations as a thermodynamic identity: The Cases of stationary axisymmetric horizons and evolving spherically symmetric horizons. Phys. Lett. B 2007, 652, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheykhi, A.; Dehghani, M.H.; Dehghani, R. Horizon Thermodynamics and Gravitational Field Equations in Quasi Topological Gravity. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2014, 46, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R. The thermal entropy density of spacetime. Entropy 2013, 15, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.-J. Is gravity entropic force? Entropy 2014, 16, 4483–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cognola, G.; Gorbunova, O.; Sebastiani, L.; Zerbini, S. On the Energy Issue for a Class of Modified Higher Order Gravity Black Hole Solutions. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 023515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deser, S.; Tekin, B. Energy in generic higher curvature gravity theories. Phys. Rev. D 2003, 6, 084009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deser, S.; Tekin, B. New energy definition for higher curvature gravities. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 084032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abreu, G.; Visser, M. Tolman mass, generalized surface gravity, and entropy bounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 041302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, R.-G.; Cao, L.-M.; Hu, Y.-P.; Ohta, N. Generalized Misner-Sharp Energy in f(R) Gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 104016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Yang, R.-J. Horizon thermodynamics in f(R) theory. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, D.; Kubiznak, D.; Mann, R. Horizon Thermodynamics from Einstein’s Equation of State. Phys. Lett. B 2017, 771, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parikh, M.K. The Volume of black holes. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 124021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misner, C.W.; Sharp, D.H. Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse. Phys. Rev. 1964, 36, B571–B576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayward, S.A. Unified first law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics. Class. Quant. Grav. 1998, 15, 3147–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Criscienzo, R.; Hayward, S.A.; Nadalini, M.; Vanzo, L.; Zerbini, S. Hamilton-Jacobi tunneling method for dynamical horizons in different coordinate gauges. Class. Quant. Grav. 2010, 27, 015006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pogosian, L.; Silvestri, A. The pattern of growth in viable f(R) cosmologies. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 77, 023503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolgov, A.D.; Kawasaki, M. Can modified gravity explain accelerated cosmic expansion? Phys. Lett. B 2003, 573, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawicki, I.; Hu, W. Stability of Cosmological Solution in f(R) Models of Gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 127502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyer, E.; Hinterbichler, K. Boundary Terms, Variational Principles and Higher Derivative Modified Gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79, 024028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vollick, D.N. Noether Charge and Black Hole Entropy in Modified Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 76, 124001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iyer, V.; Wald, R.M. A Comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes. Phys. Rev. D 1995, 52, 4430–4439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Multamaki, T.; Vilja, I. Spherically symmetric solutions of modified field equations in f(R) theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 064022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nojiri, D.; Odintsov, S.D. Unifying inflation with ΛCDM epoch in modified f(R) gravity consistent with Solar System tests. Phys. Lett. B 2007, 657, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caravelli, F.; Modesto, L. Holographic effective actions from black holes. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 702, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Caate, P.; Jaime, L.G.; Salgado, M. Spherically symmetric black holes in f(R) gravity: Is geometric scalar hair supported ? Class. Quant. Grav. 2016, 33, 155005. [Google Scholar]
- Amirabi, Z.; Halilsoy, M.; Mazharimousavi, S.H. Generation of spherically symmetric metrics in f(R) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 2016, 76, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nashed, G.G.L.; Capozziello, S. Charged spherically symmetric black holes in f(R) gravity and their stability analysis. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 104018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamba, K.; Geng, C.-Q.; Shinji, T. Equilibrium thermodynamics in modified gravitational theories. Phys. Lett. B 2010, 688, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).