Next Article in Journal
Soluble Siglec-9 Improves Intestinal Barrier Function in a Mouse Model of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma TMAO Concentrations and Gut Microbiota Composition in Subjects with and Without Metabolic Syndrome: Results from Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 in Lung Diseases

1
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
2
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2025, 15(6), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060365
Submission received: 21 April 2025 / Revised: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 28 May 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunometabolism and Lung Fibrosis)

Abstract

Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), also known as osteopontin (OPN) or early T lymphocyte activation protein 1 (ETA-1), is a multifunctional protein involved in numerous biological processes, including immune modulation, stress response, and tissue remodeling. The role of SPP1 in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) has become an area of increasing interest, given its elevated expression in various ILDs such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), and pneumoconiosis, especially with recent data derived from single-cell RNA sequencing. In addition to ILDs, SPP1 has been implicated in infectious granulomatous lung diseases, lung and pleural malignancies, airway diseases, and COVID-19. In most cases, higher SPP1 levels in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or lung tissue carry a poor prognosis. SPP1 is expressed in multiple cells critical for fibrogenesis, including macrophages, epithelial cells, and fibroblasts, and SPP1 has emerged as a potential target for therapeutic interventions. Here, we review the proposed mechanisms by which SPP1 contributes to the development of lung disease, with an emphasis on ILD.

1. Introduction

Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), also known as osteopontin (OPN) or early T lymphocyte activation protein 1 (ETA-1), is a multifunctional extracellular matrix (ECM) protein that is implicated in various physiological and pathological processes [1]. The SPP1 gene is located on human chromosome 4q22.1 and is a 314-amino-acid protein consisting of seven exons, with exon 1 being untranslated. Initially identified for its involvement in bone homeostasis, recent studies have revealed that SPP1 is also a critical mediator of stress responses, immune modulation, and tissue remodeling. Despite SPP1’s involvement in numerous pulmonary pathologies, the precise mechanistic roles of SPP1 remain incompletely understood. This complexity partly stems from the presence of distinct SPP1 isoforms (Figure 1), which harbor unique functions depending on the cell type or disease context. Alternative splicing of SPP1 generates at least five major SPP1 isoforms:
  • SPP1-a, the full-length transcript containing all seven exons;
  • SPP1-b, lacking exon 5;
  • SPP1-c, lacking exon 4;
  • SPP1-4, which lacks both exons 4 and 5;
  • SPP1-5, which includes a retained intronic region between exons 3 and 4 that adds a novel exon and alters the translation start site. Subvariants of SPP1-5 (e.g., SPP1-5b through SPP1-5e) contain specific insertions or deletions in the novel exon. These splice variants differ in motifs for phosphorylation and transglutaminase crosslinking, contributing to isoform-specific functions in disease. Moreover, SPP1 exists in both intracellular and secreted forms and undergoes extensive post-translational modifications, including serine/threonine phosphorylation and glycosylation [2], which differentially influence its function. Exon 2 encodes the signal peptide necessary for secretion, while exons 3 through 7 contribute to its phosphorylation sites, calcium-binding domains, and receptor-binding motifs. The extracellular form of SPP1 primarily exerts its effects through interactions with integrins and CD44, regulating cellular functions such as migration, adhesion, and proliferation [3,4,5]. SPP1 contains a conserved Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif, which facilitates integrin binding and is regulated by active thrombin cleavage [6]. The integrin-binding Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif, located in exon 6, is essential for binding to αvβ3, αvβ5, and α8β1 integrins, and the SVVYGLR domain enables interaction with α4β1, α9β1, and α4β7 integrins. In addition to thrombin, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)—specifically MMP-3 and MMP-7—can also cleave SPP1 [7]. While most research has focused on the extracellular form, intracellular SPP1, located in the cytoplasm and nucleus, can act independently of receptor-mediated pathways, influencing processes such as calcium signaling, cytoskeletal organization, and apoptosis [8]. This dual localization raises important questions about how each form of SPP1 contributes to disease progression, either through extracellular signaling or intracellular regulation. The context of SPP1 expression—whether as part of a physiological adaptation or a pathological response—is also critical. In some instances, SPP1 upregulation may reflect an adaptive response to injury or inflammation, promoting tissue repair and cellular survival. Indeed, SPP1 has been shown to be a critical factor for lung development in mice [9]. However, SPP1 may contribute to disease processes such as fibrosis, immune dysregulation, or cancer metastasis. This multifaceted nature—being both protective and pathogenic—underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of SPP1’s isoform- and cell-specific functions, subcellular localization, and disease context.
This review will focus on the role of SPP1 in the pathogenesis of various acute and chronic lung diseases, including interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), granulomatous lung diseases, lung malignancies, airway diseases, pulmonary hypertension, and COVID-19 [10,11,12,13,14]. By exploring the diverse roles of SPP1 in these conditions, this review will highlight the potential of SPP1 as both a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker, as well as a therapeutic target in respiratory diseases, particularly for ILDs.
Figure 1. Domain structure and isoforms of SPP1. Figure created using BioRender.
Figure 1. Domain structure and isoforms of SPP1. Figure created using BioRender.
Metabolites 15 00365 g001

2. SPP1 in Interstitial Lung Diseases

(i) SPP1 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): ILD is an umbrella term for a group of disorders characterized by irreversible parenchymal fibrosis. IPF accounts for approximately 25% of ILD cases. IPF is a progressive disease with high mortality and an average life expectancy of less than three years following diagnosis [15]. Additionally, the incidence and prevalence of IPF and other ILDs continue to rise [16]. The current understanding of IPF pathogenesis suggests it begins with aberrant epithelial injury and dysregulated repair, which activates profibrotic monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) and (myo)fibroblasts [17]. Two approved anti-fibrotic therapies, pirfenidone and nintedanib, slow disease progression; however, neither halts nor reverses lung function decline. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new biomarkers and develop effective therapeutics for accurate diagnosis and disease treatment in IPF.
Plasma SPP1 levels—either alone or in combination with surfactant protein-D (SP-D) and MMP-7—have been shown to differentiate IPF from other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) [10]. An SPP1 concentration >6 ng/mL distinguishes IPF from other IIPs (adjusted odds ratio: 3.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.0–14.3), with 91% specificity but a relatively low sensitivity of 35%. A combined measurement of SPP1, SP-D, and MMP-7 enhances diagnostic accuracy, regardless of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) pattern, lung function, or smoking status. Notably, these biomarkers do not distinguish IPF from rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD (RA-ILD), likely due to the shared usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern seen on HRCT in both conditions. Serum proteomic screening has shown that SPP1 modestly predicts three-year transplant risk (hazard ratio: 1.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.1–1.59), although it is outperformed by other markers, such as latent-transforming growth factor β-binding protein 2 [18]. Additionally, SPP1 is significantly elevated in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from IPF patients compared to controls [19,20]. In summary, SPP1 is elevated in both serum and BAL fluid in IPF subjects and may serve as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker, either alone or in combination with other biomarkers.
SPP1 is upregulated in the lung tissue of bleomycin-injured wild-type mice by day 14 post-injury [21,22]. However, SPP1 expression remains unchanged in β6−/− mice, which exhibit inflammation but are protected from fibrosis, supporting a unique role for SPP1 in tissue remodeling. While immunohistochemistry reveals SPP1 expression primarily in the bronchial epithelial cells of healthy lungs [23], recent studies have also identified SPP1+ mononuclear cells in BAL fluid from healthy individuals. Transcriptomically, these cells more closely resemble monocytes than resident alveolar macrophages and express high levels of cell–matrix interaction genes [24]. In IPF patients and bleomycin-injured mice, SPP1 is elevated in alveolar epithelial cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts—the three key cell types implicated in IPF pathogenesis [19,22,25,26,27]. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies have repeatedly identified an abundant macrophage subset enriched in SPP1 in IPF lungs, particularly in the lower lobes. These SPP1high macrophages co-express MERTK and exhibit low FABP4 levels, indicating that they originate from circulating monocytes. These cells express genes involved in stress responses and promote differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, as demonstrated by causal modeling. Additionally, SPP1-/- mice have reduced TGF-β and MMP-2 [28] compared to wildtype mice, suggesting attenuated profibrotic responses. Smoking is a major risk factor for IPF, and studies have shown that patients with smoking-related lung diseases such as pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH) and desquamative interstitial pneumonitis (DIP) have much higher levels of SPP1 expression in BAL cells compared to those from IPF subjects [29].
Several mechanisms have been proposed to elucidate the role of SPP1 in fibrotic progression. In the fibrotic lung microenvironment, injured alveolar type II (ATII) cells secrete sonic hedgehog (SHH), which stimulates macrophage SPP1 production. SHH silencing or neutralizing antibodies of SHH reduce SPP1 production in ATII/macrophage co-culture systems [30]. SHH upregulates SPP1 via the GLI family of transcription factors, and GLI inhibition blocks this process. In vivo, SHH silencing reduces SPP1 expression and protects mice from developing fibrosis. Additionally, recombinant SPP1 can promote integrin-mediated migration, adhesion, and proliferation of fibroblasts. It also enhances epithelial cell proliferation and migration, effects that can be blocked by inhibiting SPP1-integrin and SPP1-CD44 interactions [19,22]. SPP1 modulates ECM-related proteins such as MMP-1, MMP-7, and TIMP-1 in epithelial cells. In fibroblasts, TGF-β increases SPP1 expression and drives differentiation via PI3K/AKT/mTOR. Silencing SPP1 reduces α-SMA and COL1A1 expression, and PI3K inhibition with LY294002 also lowers SPP1 levels [27]. Furthermore, silencing SPP1 blocks TGF-β-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro and, in bleomycin-injured mice, an important process in fibrosis progression [31]. Moreover, SPP1 also regulates T cell responses, as its original name, early T lymphocyte activation protein 1, suggests. In Spp1−/− mice, bleomycin injury results in attenuated Th17 and IL-17-producing γδ T cell responses, correlating with less inflammation and fibrosis [32]. In summary, SPP1 is constitutively expressed in epithelial cells and macrophages and can be induced in fibroblasts and immune cells, collectively contributing to IPF pathogenesis [33].
(ii) SPP1 in Connective Tissue Disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD): CTDs are systemic autoimmune conditions that frequently affect the lungs. CTD-ILDs account for approximately one-fifth of all ILDs, with ILD being a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among CTD patients [34]. SPP1 is upregulated in the serum and lungs of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and dermatomyositis [35,36,37]. Serum SPP1 levels are elevated in both diffuse and limited forms of SSc, and higher levels are predictive of future disease progression and lung function decline in patients with SSc-ILD [35,38]. ScRNA-seq has revealed elevated SPP1 expression in lung monocytes/macrophages from SSc-ILD subjects [35,39,40]. Immune complexes, but not lipopolysaccharide (LPS), stimulate SPP1 production in primary human monocytic cells, which is mediated by M-CSF and further augmented by IL-6 [35]. Monocyte-derived SPP1 promotes fibroblast migration, but it does not influence fibroblast proliferation or collagen production. Importantly, tocilizumab (a monoclonal IL-6 receptor antibody) has been approved for treating SSc-ILD and a study has found that serum SPP1 levels decrease following tocilizumab treatment in SSc-ILD patients. Using a single-cell assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq), several transcription factors—including MITF, TFEB, ATF6, SREBF1, BHLHE40, KLF6, ETV5, and members of the AP-1 family—have been shown to regulate SPP1-driven macrophage differentiation [39]. Interestingly, while SPP1-positive macrophages are enriched in both IPF and SSc-ILD lungs, they exhibit distinct characteristics [40]. For instance, interferon-γ (type II) signaling is upregulated in SPP1hi macrophages in IPF, whereas SPP1hi macrophages in SSc-ILD exhibit higher type I interferon activation. Moreover, both SPP1hi and FABP4hi macrophages contribute to the proliferating macrophage population in IPF, with SPP1hi macrophages being the predominant contributor, whereas only FABP4hi macrophages contribute to the proliferating population in SSc-ILD. In dermatomyositis-associated ILD (DM-ILD), serum SPP1 levels correlate with disease severity, especially in patients with anti-MDA5 antibodies, who are at higher risk of developing rapidly progressive ILD [37]. SPP1 levels are also increased in the serum of several other CTDs, such as Sjögren’s syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus, although the implications of lung involvement have not been explored [41,42]. Overall, SPP1 is upregulated across multiple CTDs, particularly in cases involving fibrosing ILD, where its levels are elevated in both blood and lung tissue and correlate with disease severity. These findings suggest that SPP1 may serve as a biomarker and potential therapeutic target in CTD-ILD.
(iii) SPP1 in Pneumoconiosis: Pneumoconiosis encompasses a group of ILDs caused by occupational inhalation of inorganic dusts, such as coal, silica, and asbestos. SPP1 is implicated in the pathogenesis of both silicosis and asbestosis, contributing to chronic inflammation and fibrotic remodeling. In an animal model of asbestosis, SPP1 expression is elevated in bronchiolar epithelial cells, and Spp1−/− mice exhibit reduced inflammation and collagen gene expression [43]. Serum SPP1 levels are elevated in individuals with a history of asbestos exposure who have both fibrosis and pleural plaques, but not in those with plaques or fibrosis alone [44]. SPP1 expression is also elevated in the lungs of patients with silicosis [45]. Silica exposure increases SPP1 levels in lung tissue, BAL fluid, and serum in mice. Spp1−/− mice are protected from developing silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis [46]. Notably, male mice have higher SPP1 levels than females, and ovariectomized female mice exhibit increased SPP1 expression and collagen deposition in the lungs compared to sham-treated female mice. Conversely, estrogen-treated male mice show reduced SPP1 expression. These findings are particularly important, as fibrotic ILDs are more prevalent and more severe in males. Studies have identified nuclear receptors within the SPP1 promoter region, and SPP1 can be induced by β-estradiol or progesterone in vivo, although this occurs in a highly isoform- and cell-context-dependent manner [47,48,49]. One mechanism by which SPP1 contributes to silicosis involves the release of macrophage-derived exosomes. A proteomic analysis of silica-exposed macrophages revealed that their exosomes contain SPP1, which promotes fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation [50].
There has been a significant increase in the usage of industrial nanotubes in recent decades. In a model of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) exposure, SPP1 enhances lung fibrosis by upregulating TGF-β and stimulating myofibroblast differentiation in vivo. Similar findings were observed in studies involving single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), where SPP1 acts upstream of TGF-β to drive fibroblast activation and ECM deposition [51,52]. Both studies demonstrated that Spp1−/− mice were protected from fibrosis and granuloma formation. Interestingly, SPP1-neutralizing antibodies attenuated nanotube-induced TGF-β production in macrophages, but not in epithelial cells.
(iv) SPP1 in Noninfectious Granulomatous Lung Diseases: Sarcoidosis is the most common noninfectious granulomatous lung disease, characterized by immune cell-driven inflammation and granuloma formation. Elevated serum SPP1 levels have been observed in patients with sarcoidosis [53,54], and increased SPP1 expression has been detected within sarcoid granulomas, although the serum level of SPP1 may be lower than that of interstitial pneumonia (IP) patients [55]. Moreover, SPP1 elevation is more pronounced in patients with pulmonary involvement compared to those with only cutaneous manifestations. Studies investigating SPP1 gene polymorphisms and sarcoidosis susceptibility have identified several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the disease, including rs11730582, rs11728697, and rs4754 [53,56]. As previously noted, SPP1 undergoes post-translational modifications, and research suggests that carboxyl-terminal SPP1 (C-SPP1) counteracts full-length SPP1 (F-SPP1) in sarcoidosis. While F-SPP1 promotes granuloma formation, C-SPP1 appears to inhibit this process [54]. In addition to sarcoidosis, SPP1 is also elevated in the histiocytes of various other granulomatous lung disorders [11], underscoring its broader role in granuloma formation and ILD pathogenesis. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis is another ILD characterized by granuloma formation. In patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, S100Ahi classical monocytes are present in peripheral blood, and trajectory analyses have shown that these cells differentiate into SPP1hi lung macrophages [57].
Collectively, these findings highlight SPP1 as a shared effector in the pathogenesis of fibrotic ILD and a promising target for therapeutic intervention. SPP1 is present in all critical cell types that promote fibrosis, including epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages. Elevated serum and BAL fluid SPP1 levels can be a potential biomarker for ILDs, and the global knockout of SPP1 can protect animals from developing pulmonary fibrosis in various experimental models of pulmonary fibrosis. However, the cellular origins of SPP1 remain unclear, and a cell-type-specific conditional knockout model would help advance our understanding of SPP1 in ILDs.

3. SPP1 in Infectious Granulomatous Lung Diseases

SPP1 expression is significantly upregulated in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in primary human alveolar macrophages [45]. It has been detected in macrophages, lymphocytes, and the extracellular matrix of lung tissues from patients with tuberculosis (TB). Elevated serum and plasma levels of SPP1 have been consistently reported in individuals with both active and latent TB, with levels decreasing following successful treatment for pulmonary TB [58,59,60,61,62]. Interestingly, patients co-infected with HIV and TB exhibit lower circulating SPP1 levels, possibly reflecting impaired immune activation [63]. SPP1 levels appear to correlate with disease severity. Patients who are acid-fast bacillus (AFB)-positive and those with more extensive radiographic abnormalities exhibit particularly high SPP1 levels [61,64]. Mechanistically, SPP1 may contribute to the host immune response against M. tuberculosis by promoting Th1 polarization through IL–12-dependent pathways [61]. Interestingly, this study also reports that serum SPP1 levels were higher in subjects with TB compared to subjects with sarcoidosis. In a case series of patients with severe Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) or nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections and underlying immune deficiencies, SPP1 expression was reduced in the lymph nodes, particularly in individuals with complete interferon-γ receptor 1 (IFNGR1) deficiency. In this cohort, higher tissue SPP1 expression was associated with better clinical outcomes, including improved survival and less severe infections, suggesting a protective role for SPP1 in T cell cytokine production, IFN- γ signaling, and macrophage recruitment during granuloma formation [45]. However, animal studies have yielded conflicting results. While some reports suggest that SPP1-deficient mice exhibit impaired immune control of mycobacterial infections, others have found no significant difference in host defense, implying that the role of SPP1 may be context-dependent and influenced by host genetics, immune status, and pathogen virulence [65,66]. Overall, SPP1 appears to modulate multiple aspects of the immune response during mycobacterial infection, particularly in granuloma formation and Th1 cytokine signaling, although its precise role in host protection remains to be fully elucidated. In other infectious lung diseases, Spp1−/− mice have severely impaired type-1 immunity to viral and Listeria monocytogenes infection and do not develop sarcoid-type granulomas. This is due to reduced interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interferon γ production in macrophages, while IL-10 production is increased [67].

4. SPP1 in Lung and Pleural Malignancies

Elevated levels of serum or tissue SPP1 are consistently observed in various cancers, including lung, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. Moreover, high SPP1 expression strongly correlates with poor clinical outcomes, suggesting its role as a marker of aggressive tumor behavior [68]. SPP1 contributes to tumorigenesis and cancer progression through multiple mechanisms, including immune modulation, promotion of cell survival, proliferation, and metastasis. Its interactions with integrins are essential for cytoskeletal rearrangements that drive cell motility and activate key signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). These pathways collectively support tumor cell proliferation, survival, and resistance to apoptosis [69,70]. For example, SPP1 activates the PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to the phosphorylation and inactivation of pro-apoptotic proteins like BCL2-associated agonist of cell death (BAD) and caspase-9, thereby enhancing tumor cell survival. Metastasis—the leading cause of cancer mortality and a common feature of lung cancer—is notably facilitated by SPP1. In non-small cell lung cancer, SPP1 is higher in the serum of patients with advanced stages (IV) cancer than in patients with stages I–III [71]. Additionally, SPP1 expression correlates with the extent of metastasis and has been proposed as a prognostic marker [72]. One mechanism by which SPP1 promotes lung cancer metastasis involves COL11A1-mediated EMT [73]. Additionally, the interaction of SPP1 with CD44 plays a pivotal role in creating a pro-metastatic tumor microenvironment. CD44 is essential for cell adhesion, migration, and invasion. The SPP1–CD44 interaction activates Rho family GTPases, which are critical for cytoskeletal reorganization and cell motility [5,74]. SPP1 also promotes angiogenesis by enhancing the blood supply to tumors via the induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [75]. It directly stimulates angiogenesis through the PI3K/AKT- and ERK-mediated pathways, with VEGF acting as a positive feedback signal [76]. Furthermore, SPP1 increases the expression of MMPs, particularly MMP-2 and MMP-9, which degrade the ECM and create a favorable environment for cancer cell invasion and metastasis [77,78]. Octamer-binding transcription factor 4A (OCT4A) and SPP1 are strongly co-expressed in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas and harbor a higher risk of metastasis. Silencing OCT4A reduces SPP1 expression and attenuates cancer cell migration [79]. SPP1 not only contributes to primary lung malignancy but also promotes lung metastasis of other cancers, such as melanoma [80].
Serum SPP1 levels are also significantly higher in individuals with pleural mesothelioma—a malignancy closely linked to asbestos exposure—than in those exposed to asbestos but without lung disease. In individuals with a history of asbestos exposure, a serum SPP1 level above 48.3 ng/mL yields a sensitivity of 77.6% and a specificity of 85.5% for diagnosing mesothelioma, with even higher accuracy observed in patients with stage I disease. Moreover, SPP1 levels are also elevated in the pleural fluid from mesothelioma patients compared to those with non-mesothelioma etiologies [44,81]. However, the sensitivity of serum SPP1 is lower than other biomarkers, such as serum mesothelin [82,83].
In summary, SPP1 holds promise as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for lung and pleural cancers. Its elevated expression promotes tumor progression through diverse mechanisms, including angiogenesis, EMT, MMP activation, and modulation of key signaling pathways essential for cell survival and proliferation, making it a compelling target for future cancer therapies.

5. SPP1 in Obstructive Lung Diseases and Reactive Airway Diseases

SPP1 is elevated in the distal airways of subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including increased expression in goblet and club cells. Elevated levels of SPP1 in sputum are associated with neutrophilic inflammation and the extent of radiographic emphysema, the most common subtype of COPD, highlighting its correlation with disease severity [84]. Furthermore, serum SPP1 levels are increased in COPD patients with frequent exacerbations and during acute exacerbations, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for monitoring disease activity and exacerbation risk [85,86]. Smoking, the primary risk factor for COPD, can upregulate SPP1 expression in airway epithelial cells in vitro [87] and in BAL cells in vivo [29]. SPP1 expression is elevated in various cell types in COPD. For example, lung dendritic cells from patients with emphysema exhibit higher SPP1 expression compared to controls. This finding was further validated in a cigarette smoke model, where SPP1 levels increased in lung antigen-presenting cells (APCs) after cigarette smoke exposure in wild-type mice. Additionally, Spp1−/− mice were protected from developing emphysema after smoke exposure [14]. Mechanistically, SPP1 is required for inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation from naïve T cells by downregulating the expression of the transcription factor IFN regulatory factor 7 (IRF7) in lung APCs. IRF7 acts as a negative regulator of IL-1β and IL-6 production, and SPP1 inhibits IRF7, thereby promoting the production of these pro-inflammatory cytokines. Ada−/− mice is another model of COPD, and Spp1−/−Ada−/− double knockout mouse leads to reduced histopathologic and biochemical features of pulmonary inflammation and emphysema, primarily by attenuating neutrophil recruitment and SPP1-dependent MMP9 production [88]. Interestingly, SPP1 does not affect MMP-12 production, another MMP critical for COPD pathogenesis, and Spp1−/−Ada−/− double knockout mice displayed no changes in myofibroblast activity. Moreover, SPP1 has been implicated in the upregulation of haptoglobin expression via the PI3K/AKT pathway, with PI3K inhibition reducing SPP1-induced haptoglobin production, positioning it as a potential therapeutic target for acute exacerbations of COPD [89].
In asthma, SPP1 levels are elevated in the serum, sputum, and bronchial tissue of patients, with studies linking these levels to disease severity and the timing of onset [90,91,92,93,94,95,96]. While BAL fluid and serum SPP1 levels are significantly increased in all asthmatic patients in the steady state, serum SPP1 levels were unexpectedly reduced during exacerbation [92]. Additionally, serum SPP1 levels are significantly higher in subjects with late-onset asthma compared to those with early-onset asthma. These highlight the potential of SPP1 as a biomarker for diagnosis, monitoring, and phenotyping. SPP1 is expressed in alveolar epithelial cells, macrophages, airway cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, T cells, and mast cells in asthmatic subjects [92,95,97]. In allergic responses, SPP1 may have opposing effects, with a proinflammatory response at primary systemic sensitization and an anti-inflammatory response during secondary pulmonary challenge. This is mainly regulated by T(H)2-suppressing plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs) during primary sensitization and T(H)2-promoting conventional DCs during secondary antigenic challenge. In an inhaled ovalbumin (OVA) model of chronic allergen-induced asthma, SPP1 expression correlates with collagen content and peribronchial smooth muscle area [90,95]. In the same model, the genetic knockout of Spp1 results in reduced airway remodeling and lower levels of Th2 cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-13, in both lung tissue homogenates and BAL fluid, suggesting that SPP1 plays a key role in the inflammatory response and structural remodeling associated with asthma [90]. There is conflicting data regarding SPP1 overexpression in allergic airway disease. Recombinant SPP1 (rSPP1) administration increases IL-13 and MMP-9 in the lungs of SPP1−/− mice and exacerbates airway hyperresponsiveness [95]. However, another study showed that administering rSPP1 during pulmonary secondary antigenic challenge decreased established T(H)2 responses and protected mice from developing allergic responses. One of the proposed mechanisms is that rSPP1 induces proliferation of human bronchial smooth muscle by binding to αvβ3 integrin receptor and activating the PI3K/AKT pathway. Interestingly, SPP1+-recruited macrophages are also present in allergic asthmatic patients, suggesting a potential conserved mechanism of lung injury and repair across a spectrum of lung diseases [97].

6. SPP1 in COVID-19-Associated Lung Disease

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, can lead to acute lung injury and, in some cases, long-term pulmonary complications including fibrosis. SPP1 is known to be highly expressed in alveolar macrophages from patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and mice that received intratracheal instillation of LPS [98]. ScRNA-seq analyses of BAL and autopsy lung tissue from patients with severe COVID-19 have revealed a marked increase in SPP1 expression, particularly in macrophages [12,36,99,100]. Spatial transcriptomic analyses also confirmed the presence of SPP1hi macrophages in subjects with severe COVID-19 and a murine model of COVID-19 infection [99,101]. These SPP1hi macrophages, which share transcriptional features with those found in IPF and other fibrotic ILDs, suggest a shared fibrotic signature across distinct etiologies. Indeed, BAL fluid SPP1 levels are predictive of post-COVID-19 ILDs [102], and profibrotic monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages, which are SPP1hi, are expanded in patients suffering from post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) with persistent respiratory symptoms [103].

7. Future Research

Despite recent advances in research, several critical knowledge gaps remain. The precise cellular sources of SPP1 are not fully defined, and global knockout models fail to capture the heterogeneity of its functions across cell types and disease states. Moreover, the isoform-specific effects of SPP1 and its post-translational modifications in acute and chronic lung diseases remain largely unexplored. Future research should prioritize (1) elucidating the cell-type-specific functions of SPP1 and performing cell type-specific studies using conditional knockout or lineage-tracing models to unravel the roles of SPP1 in epithelial, immune, and mesenchymal compartments; (2) isoform- and context-specific investigations to delineate the functional differences between full-length and cleaved forms of SPP1 across disease subtypes; (3) dissecting the upstream regulators and downstream effectors of SPP1 in fibrotic and inflammatory niches; (4) investigating the interplay between SPP1 and other fibrotic mediators in multi-omic frameworks to better define molecular endotypes; (5) longitudinal clinical studies to validate SPP1 as a prognostic biomarker and to define thresholds for clinical utility in diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic monitoring; and (6) exploring therapeutic modulation of the SPP1 axis, including the development of small molecule inhibitors, neutralizing antibodies, or gene-silencing approaches, particularly in early-stage disease or in combination with existing antifibrotic agents.

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, SPP1 represents a unifying effector across diverse forms of lung diseases, particularly ILD (see Table 1). Its pleiotropic roles in modulating inflammation, ECM deposition, immune cell recruitment, and tissue remodeling underscore its potential as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target. A deeper understanding of SPP1 biology may pave the way for personalized interventions and improved outcomes for patients suffering from these debilitating lung diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, C.H., A.N.C. and H.L.; writing—review and editing, H.L., J.L.L.-C., C.C., I.O.R. and C.H.; visualization, H.L.; funding acquisition, C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institute of Health grant number K08HL163406 to C.H.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Denhardt, D.T.; Noda, M.; O’Regan, A.W.; Pavlin, D.; Berman, J.S. Osteopontin as a means to cope with environmental insults: Regulation of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and cell survival. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 1055–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yim, A.; Smith, C.; Brown, A.M. Osteopontin/secreted phosphoprotein-1 harnesses glial-, immune-, and neuronal cell ligand-receptor interactions to sense and regulate acute and chronic neuroinflammation. Immunol. Rev. 2022, 311, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hu, D.D.; Lin, E.C.; Kovach, N.L.; Hoyer, J.R.; Smith, J.W. A biochemical characterization of the binding of osteopontin to integrins αvβ1 and αvβ5. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 26232–26238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Weber, G.F.; Ashkar, S.; Glimcher, M.J.; Cantor, H. Receptor-ligand interaction between CD44 and osteopontin (Eta-1). Science 1996, 271, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, J.L.; Wang, M.J.; Sudhir, P.R.; Chen, G.D.; Chi, C.W.; Chen, J.Y. Osteopontin promotes integrin activation through outside-in and inside-out mechanisms: OPN-CD44V interaction enhances survival in gastrointestinal cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 2089–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liaw, L.; Birk, D.E.; Ballas, C.B.; Whitsitt, J.S.; Davidson, J.M.; Hogan, B.L. Altered wound healing in mice lacking a functional osteopontin gene (spp1). J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 1468–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agnihotri, R.; Crawford, H.C.; Haro, H.; Matrisian, L.M.; Havrda, M.C.; Liaw, L. Osteopontin, a novel substrate for matrix metalloproteinase-3 (stromelysin-1) and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (matrilysin). J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 28261–28267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reggio, A.; Fuoco, C.; Deodati, R.; Palma, A. SPP1 macrophages across diseases: A call for reclassification? FASEB J. 2025, 39, e70448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ganguly, K.; Martin, T.M.; Concel, V.J.; Upadhyay, S.; Bein, K.; Brant, K.A.; George, L.; Mitra, A.; Thimraj, T.A.; Fabisiak, J.P.; et al. Secreted phosphoprotein 1 is a determinant of lung function development in mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014, 51, 637–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. White, E.S.; Xia, M.; Murray, S.; Dyal, R.; Flaherty, C.M.; Flaherty, K.R.; Moore, B.B.; Cheng, L.; Doyle, T.J.; Villalba, J.; et al. Plasma Surfactant Protein-D, Matrix Metalloproteinase-7, and Osteopontin Index Distinguishes Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis from Other Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 194, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Carlson, I.; Tognazzi, K.; Manseau, E.J.; Dvorak, H.F.; Brown, L.F. Osteopontin is strongly expressed by histiocytes in granulomas of diverse etiology. Lab. Investig. J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 1997, 77, 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bharat, A.; Querrey, M.; Markov, N.S.; Kim, S.; Kurihara, C.; Garza-Castillon, R.; Manerikar, A.; Shilatifard, A.; Tomic, R.; Politanska, Y.; et al. Lung transplantation for patients with severe COVID-19. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eabe4282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anwar, A.; Li, M.; Frid, M.G.; Kumar, B.; Gerasimovskaya, E.V.; Riddle, S.R.; McKeon, B.A.; Thukaram, R.; Meyrick, B.O.; Fini, M.A.; et al. Osteopontin is an endogenous modulator of the constitutively activated phenotype of pulmonary adventitial fibroblasts in hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2012, 303, L1–L11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shan, M.; Yuan, X.; Song, L.-Z.; Roberts, L.; Zarinkamar, N.; Seryshev, A.; Zhang, Y.; Hilsenbeck, S.; Chang, S.-H.; Dong, C.; et al. Cigarette smoke induction of osteopontin (SPP1) mediates TH17 inflammation in human and experimental emphysema. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 117ra9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zheng, Q.; Cox, I.A.; Campbell, J.A.; Xia, Q.; Otahal, P.; de Graaff, B.; Corte, T.J.; Teoh, A.K.; Walters, E.H.; Palmer, A.J. Mortality and survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ERJ Open Res. 2022, 8, 00591–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maher, T.M.; Bendstrup, E.; Dron, L.; Langley, J.; Smith, G.; Khalid, J.M.; Patel, H.; Kreuter, M. Global incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Res. 2021, 22, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Podolanczuk, A.J.; Wong, A.W.; Saito, S.; Lasky, J.A.; Ryerson, C.J.; Eickelberg, O. Update in Interstitial Lung Disease 2020. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 203, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oldham, J.M.; Huang, Y.; Bose, S.; Ma, S.-F.; Kim, J.S.; Schwab, A.; Ting, C.; Mou, K.; Lee, C.T.; Adegunsoye, A.; et al. Proteomic Biomarkers of Survival in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2024, 209, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pardo, A.; Gibson, K.; Cisneros, J.; Richards, T.J.; Yang, Y.; Becerril, C.; Yousem, S.; Herrera, I.; Ruiz, V.; Selman, M.; et al. Up-regulation and profibrotic role of osteopontin in human idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS Med. 2005, 2, e251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Foster, M.W.; Morrison, L.D.; Todd, J.L.; Snyder, L.D.; Thompson, J.W.; Soderblom, E.J.; Plonk, K.; Weinhold, K.J.; Townsend, R.; Minnich, A.; et al. Quantitative proteomics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 1238–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kaminski, N.; Allard, J.D.; Pittet, J.F.; Zuo, F.; Griffiths, M.J.D.; Morris, D.; Huang, X.; Sheppard, D.; Heller, R.A. Global analysis of gene expression in pulmonary fibrosis reveals distinct programs regulating lung inflammation and fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1778–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Takahashi, F.; Takahashi, K.; Okazaki, T.; Maeda, K.; Ienaga, H.; Maeda, M.; Kon, S.; Uede, T.; Fukuchi, Y. Role of osteopontin in the pathogenesis of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 24, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brown, L.F.; Berse, B.; Van de Water, L.; Papadopoulos-Sergiou, A.; Perruzzi, C.A.; Manseau, E.J.; Dvorak, H.F.; Senger, D.R. Expression and distribution of osteopontin in human tissues: Widespread association with luminal epithelial surfaces. Mol. Biol. Cell 1992, 3, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mould, K.J.; Moore, C.M.; McManus, S.A.; McCubbrey, A.L.; McClendon, J.D.; Griesmer, C.L.; Henson, P.M.; Janssen, W.J. Airspace Macrophages and Monocytes Exist in Transcriptionally Distinct Subsets in Healthy Adults. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 203, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morse, C.; Tabib, T.; Sembrat, J.; Buschur, K.L.; Bittar, H.T.; Valenzi, E.; Jiang, Y.; Kass, D.J.; Gibson, K.; Chen, W.; et al. Proliferating SPP1/MERTK-expressing macrophages in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, 1802441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reyfman, P.A.; Walter, J.M.; Joshi, N.; Anekalla, K.R.; McQuattie-Pimentel, A.C.; Chiu, S.; Fernandez, R.; Akbarpour, M.; Chen, C.-I.; Ren, Z.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Lung Provides Insights into the Pathobiology of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 1517–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yue, B.; Xiong, D.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Zhao, J.; Shao, J.; Wei, D.; Gao, F.; Huang, M.; Chen, J. SPP1 induces idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and NSCLC progression via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Respir. Res. 2024, 25, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Berman, J.S.; Serlin, D.; Li, X.; Whitley, G.; Hayes, J.; Rishikof, D.C.; Ricupero, D.A.; Liaw, L.; Goetschkes, M.; O’Regan, A.W. Altered bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in osteopontin-deficient mice. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2004, 286, L1311–L1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prasse, A.; Stahl, M.; Schulz, G.; Kayser, G.; Wang, L.; Ask, K.; Yalcintepe, J.; Kirschbaum, A.; Bargagli, E.; Zissel, G.; et al. Essential role of osteopontin in smoking-related interstitial lung diseases. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 1683–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hou, J.; Ji, J.; Chen, X.; Cao, H.; Tan, Y.; Cui, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Han, X. Alveolar epithelial cell-derived Sonic hedgehog promotes pulmonary fibrosis through OPN-dependent alternative macrophage activation. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 3530–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hatipoglu, O.F.; Uctepe, E.; Opoku, G.; Wake, H.; Ikemura, K.; Ohtsuki, T.; Inagaki, J.; Gunduz, M.; Gunduz, E.; Watanabe, S.; et al. Osteopontin silencing attenuates bleomycin-induced murine pulmonary fibrosis by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 139, 111633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Oh, K.; Seo, M.W.; Kim, Y.W.; Lee, D.S. Osteopontin Potentiates Pulmonary Inflammation and Fibrosis by Modulating IL-17/IFN-γ-secreting T-cell Ratios in Bleomycin-treated Mice. Immune Netw. 2015, 15, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bastos, A.C.S.d.F.; Gomes, A.V.P.; Silva, G.R.; Emerenciano, M.; Ferreira, L.B.; Gimba, E.R.P. The Intracellular and Secreted Sides of Osteopontin and Their Putative Physiopathological Roles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lederer, D.J.; Martinez, F.J. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1811–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gao, X.; Jia, G.; Guttman, A.; DePianto, D.J.; Morshead, K.B.; Sun, K.-H.; Ramamoorthi, N.; Heiden, J.A.V.; Modrusan, Z.; Wolters, P.J.; et al. Osteopontin Links Myeloid Activation and Disease Progression in Systemic Sclerosis. Cell Rep. Med. 2020, 1, 100140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. MacDonald, L.; Alivernini, S.; Tolusso, B.; Elmesmari, A.; Somma, D.; Perniola, S.; Paglionico, A.; Petricca, L.; Bosello, S.L.; Carfì, A.; et al. COVID-19 and RA share an SPP1 myeloid pathway that drives PD-L1+ neutrophils and CD14+ monocytes. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e147413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qiu, Y.; Feng, X.; Liu, C.; Shi, Y.; Xu, L.; You, H.; Wang, L.; Lv, C.; Wang, F.; Tan, W. Proteomic profiling identifies SPP1 associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2024, 26, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, M.; Schneider, D.J.; Mayes, M.D.; Assassi, S.; Arnett, F.C.; Tan, F.K.; Blackburn, M.R.; Agarwal, S.K. Osteopontin in systemic sclerosis and its role in dermal fibrosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 1605–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Papazoglou, A.; Huang, M.; Bulik, M.; Lafyatis, A.; Tabib, T.; Morse, C.; Sembrat, J.; Rojas, M.; Valenzi, E.; Lafyatis, R. Epigenetic Regulation of Profibrotic Macrophages in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022, 74, 2003–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Valenzi, E.; Tabib, T.; Papazoglou, A.; Sembrat, J.; Bittar, H.E.T.; Rojas, M.; Lafyatis, R. Disparate Interferon Signaling and Shared Aberrant Basaloid Cells in Single-Cell Profiling of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 595811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Clemente, N.; Raineri, D.; Cappellano, G.; Boggio, E.; Favero, F.; Soluri, M.F.; Dianzani, C.; Comi, C.; Dianzani, U.; Chiocchetti, A. Osteopontin Bridging Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Autoimmune Diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016, 7675437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kariuki, S.N.; Moore, J.G.; Kirou, K.A.; Crow, M.K.; Utset, T.O.; Niewold, T.B. Age- and gender-specific modulation of serum osteopontin and interferon-α by osteopontin genotype in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genes Immun. 2009, 10, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sabo-Attwood, T.; Ramos-Nino, M.E.; Eugenia-Ariza, M.; Macpherson, M.B.; Butnor, K.J.; Vacek, P.C.; McGee, S.P.; Clark, J.C.; Steele, C.; Mossman, B.T. Osteopontin modulates inflammation, mucin production, and gene expression signatures after inhalation of asbestos in a murine model of fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 1975–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pass, H.I.; Lott, D.; Lonardo, F.; Harbut, M.; Liu, Z.; Tang, N.; Carbone, M.; Webb, C.; Wali, A. Asbestos exposure, pleural mesothelioma, and serum osteopontin levels. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1564–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kotov, D.I.; Lee, O.V.; Fattinger, S.A.; Langner, C.A.; Guillen, J.V.; Peters, J.M.; Moon, A.; Burd, E.M.; Witt, K.C.; Stetson, D.B.; et al. Early cellular mechanisms of type I interferon-driven susceptibility to tuberculosis. Cell 2023, 186, 5536–5553.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Latoche, J.D.; Ufelle, A.C.; Fazzi, F.; Ganguly, K.; Leikauf, G.D.; Fattman, C.L. Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 and Sex-Specific Differences in Silica-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Feng, C.; Xu, Z.; Tang, X.; Cao, H.; Zhang, G.; Tan, J. Estrogen-Related Receptor α: A Significant Regulator and Promising Target in Bone Homeostasis and Bone Metastasis. Molecules 2022, 27, 3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zirngibl, R.A.; Chan, J.S.; Aubin, J.E. Divergent regulation of the Osteopontin promoter by the estrogen receptor-related receptors is isoform- and cell context dependent. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 2356–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Craig, A.M.; Denhardt, D.T. The murine gene encoding secreted phosphoprotein 1 (osteopontin): Promoter structure, activity, and induction in vivo by estrogen and progesterone. Gene 1991, 100, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, R.; Hao, C.; Wang, D.; Zhao, Q.; Li, C.; Wang, C.; Yao, W. SPP1 derived from silica-exposed macrophage exosomes triggers fibroblast transdifferentiation. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2021, 422, 115559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dong, J.; Ma, Q. Osteopontin enhances multi-walled carbon nanotube-triggered lung fibrosis by promoting TGF-β1 activation and myofibroblast differentiation. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2017, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Khaliullin, T.O.; Kisin, E.R.; Murray, A.R.; Yanamala, N.; Shurin, M.R.; Gutkin, D.W.; Fatkhutdinova, L.M.; Kagan, V.E.; Shvedova, A.A. Mediation of the single-walled carbon nanotubes induced pulmonary fibrogenic response by osteopontin and TGF-β1. Exp. Lung Res. 2017, 43, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lavi, H.; Assayag, M.; Schwartz, A.; Arish, N.; Fridlender, Z.G.; Berkman, N. The association between osteopontin gene polymorphisms, osteopontin expression and sarcoidosis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Maeda, K.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, F.; Tamura, N.; Maeda, M.; Kon, S.; Uede, T.; Fukuchi, Y. Distinct roles of osteopontin fragments in the development of the pulmonary involvement in sarcoidosis. Lung 2001, 179, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kadota, J.; Mizunoe, S.; Mito, K.; Mukae, H.; Yoshioka, S.; Kawakami, K.; Koguchi, Y.; Fukushima, K.; Kon, S.; Kohno, S.; et al. High plasma concentrations of osteopontin in patients with interstitial pneumonia. Respir. Med. 2005, 99, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maver, A.; Medica, I.; Salobir, B.; Tercelj, M.; Peterlin, B. Genetic variation in osteopontin gene is associated with susceptibility to sarcoidosis in Slovenian population. Dis. Markers 2009, 27, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhao, A.Y.; Unterman, A.; Abu Hussein, N.S.; Abu Hussein, N.S.; Prapti Sharma, P.; Nikola, F.; Flint, J.; Yan, X.; Adams, T.S.; Justet, A.; et al. Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Novel Immune Perturbations in Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2024, 210, 1252–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, D.; Tong, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Fan, H. The association between osteopontin and tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, Q.; Qi, F.; Ye, T.; Li, J.; Xu, G.; Xiaomeng He, X.; Guofang Deng, G.; Peize Zhang, P.; Mingfeng Liao, M.; Qiao, K.; et al. The interaction of macrophages and CD8 T cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is associated with latent tuberculosis infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2023, 12, 2239940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hasibuan, F.M.; Shiratori, B.; Senoputra, M.A.; Chagan-Yasutan, H.; Koesoemadinata, R.C.; Apriani, L.; Takahashi, Y.; Niki, T.; Alisjahbana, B.; Hattori, T. Evaluation of matricellular proteins in systemic and local immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 59, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Koguchi, Y.; Kawakami, K.; Uezu, K.; Fukushima, K.; Kon, S.; Maeda, M.; Nakamoto, A.; Owan, I.; Kuba, M.; Kudeken, N.; et al. High plasma osteopontin level and its relationship with interleukin-12-mediated type 1 T helper cell response in tuberculosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 167, 1355–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Medawar, L.; Tukiman, H.M.; Mbayo, G.; Donkor, S.; Owolabi, O.; Sutherland, J.S. Analysis of cellular and soluble profiles in QuantiFERON nonconverters, converters, and reverters in the Gambia. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2019, 7, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shete, A.; Bichare, S.; Pujari, V.; Virkar, R.; Thakar, M.; Ghate, M.; Patil, S.; Vyakarnam, A.; Gangakhedkar, R.; Bai, G.; et al. Elevated Levels of Galectin-9 but Not Osteopontin in HIV and Tuberculosis Infections Indicate Their Roles in Detecting MTB Infection in HIV Infected Individuals. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Inomata, S.; Shijubo, N.; Kon, S.; Maeda, M.; Yamada, G.; Sato, N.; Abe, S.; Uede, T. Circulating interleukin-18 and osteopontin are useful to evaluate disease activity in patients with tuberculosis. Cytokine 2005, 30, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nau, G.J.; Liaw, L.; Chupp, G.L.; Berman, J.S.; Hogan, B.L.; Young, R.A. Attenuated host resistance against Mycobacterium bovis BCG infection in mice lacking osteopontin. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 4223–4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Van Der Windt, G.J.; Wieland, C.W.; Wiersinga, W.J.; Florquin, S.; Van Der Poll, T. Osteopontin is not crucial to protective immunity during murine tuberculosis. Immunology 2009, 128 (Suppl. S1), e766–e776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ashkar, S.; Weber, G.F.; Panoutsakopoulou, V.; Sanchirico, M.E.; Jansson, M.; Zawaideh, S.; Rittling, S.R.; Denhardt, D.T.; Glimcher, M.J.; Cantor, H. Eta-1 (osteopontin): An early component of type-1 (cell-mediated) immunity. Science 2000, 287, 860–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhao, H.; Chen, Q.; Alam, A.; Cui, J.; Suen, K.C.; Soo, A.P.; Eguchi, S.; Gu, J.; Ma, D. The role of osteopontin in the progression of solid organ tumour. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yan, Z.; Hu, X.; Tang, B.; Deng, F. Role of osteopontin in cancer development and treatment. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Castello, L.M.; Raineri, D.; Salmi, L.; Clemente, N.; Vaschetto, R.; Quaglia, M.; Garzaro, M.; Gentilli, S.; Navalesi, P.; Cantaluppi, V.; et al. Osteopontin at the Crossroads of Inflammation and Tumor Progression. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 4049098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chang, Y.S.; Kim, H.J.; Chang, J.; Ahn, C.M.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, S.K. Elevated circulating level of osteopontin is associated with advanced disease state of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2007, 57, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hu, Z.; Lin, D.; Yuan, J.; Xiao, T.; Zhang, H.; Sun, W.; Han, N.; Ma, Y.; Di, X.; Gao, M.; et al. Overexpression of osteopontin is associated with more aggressive phenotypes in human non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 4646–4652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yi, X.; Luo, L.; Zhu, Y.; Deng, H.; Liao, H.; Shen, Y.; Zheng, Y. SPP1 facilitates cell migration and invasion by targeting COL11A1 in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2022, 22, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Teramoto, H.; Castellone, M.D.; Malek, R.L.; Letwin, N.; Frank, B.; Gutkind, J.S.; Lee, N.H. Autocrine activation of an osteopontin-CD44-Rac pathway enhances invasion and transformation by H-RasV12. Oncogene 2005, 24, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chakraborty, G.; Jain, S.; Kundu, G.C. Osteopontin promotes vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent breast tumor growth and angiogenesis via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dai, J.; Peng, L.; Fan, K.; Wang, H.; Wei, R.; Ji, G.; Cai, J.; Lu, B.; Li, B.; Zhang, D.; et al. Osteopontin induces angiogenesis through activation of PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 in endothelial cells. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3412–3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dong, B.; Wu, C.; Huang, L.; Qi, Y. Macrophage-Related SPP1 as a Potential Biomarker for Early Lymph Node Metastasis in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 739358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Frey, A.B.; Wali, A.; Pass, H.; Lonardo, F. Osteopontin is linked to p65 and MMP-9 expression in pulmonary adenocarcinoma but not in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Histopathology 2007, 50, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Koshimune, S.; Kosaka, M.; Mizuno, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Miyamoto, T.; Ebisui, K.; Toyooka, S.; Ohtsuka, A. Prognostic value of OCT4A and SPP1C transcript variant co-expression in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rangaswami, H.; Kundu, G.C. Osteopontin stimulates melanoma growth and lung metastasis through NIK/MEKK1-dependent MMP-9 activation pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2007, 18, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hiraki, A.; Aoe, K.; Ueoka, H. Asbestos exposure and serum osteopontin. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 304–305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Grigoriu, B.D.; Scherpereel, A.; Devos, P.; Chahine, B.; Letourneux, M.; Lebailly, P.; Grégoire, M.; Porte, H.; Copin, M.; Lassalle, P. Utility of osteopontin and serum mesothelin in malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis and prognosis assessment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 2928–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Creaney, J.; Yeoman, D.; Demelker, Y.; Segal, A.; Musk, A.W.; Skates, S.J.; Robinson, B.W.S. Comparison of osteopontin, megakaryocyte potentiating factor, and mesothelin proteins as markers in the serum of patients with malignant mesothelioma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2008, 3, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Papaporfyriou, A.; Loukides, S.; Kostikas, K.; Simoes, D.C.M.; Papatheodorou, G.; Konstantellou, E.; Hillas, G.; Papiris, S.; Koulouris, N.; Bakakos, P. Increased levels of osteopontin in sputum supernatant in patients with COPD. Chest 2014, 146, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lee, S.J.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, W.; Lim, S.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, Y.E.; Cho, Y.J.; Jeong, Y.Y.; Kim, H.C.; Lee, J.D.; et al. Increased plasma osteopontin in frequent exacerbator and acute exacerbation of COPD. Clin. Respir. J. 2014, 8, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, H.; Song, Z.; Qian, M.; Bai, C.; Wang, X. Selection of disease-specific biomarkers by integrating inflammatory mediators with clinical informatics in AECOPD patients: A preliminary study. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 1286–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ali, M.N.; Mori, M.; Mertens, T.C.J.; Siddhuraj, P.; Erjefält, J.S.; Önnerfjord, P.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Egesten, A. Osteopontin Expression in Small Airway Epithelium in Copd is Dependent on Differentiation and Confined to Subsets of Cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Schneider, D.J.; Lindsay, J.C.; Zhou, Y.; Molina, J.G.; Blackburn, M.R. Adenosine and osteopontin contribute to the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shi, L.; Zhu, B.; Xu, M.; Wang, X. Selection of AECOPD-specific immunomodulatory biomarkers by integrating genomics and proteomics with clinical informatics. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2018, 34, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kohan, M.; Bader, R.; Puxeddu, I.; Levi-Schaffer, F.; Breuer, R.; Berkman, N. Enhanced osteopontin expression in a murine model of allergen-induced airway remodelling. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2007, 37, 1444–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xu, H.; Lou, W.; Fu, F. Association between osteopontin expression and asthma: A meta-analysis. J. Int. Med. Res. 2019, 47, 3513–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Samitas, K.; Zervas, E.; Vittorakis, S.; Semitekolou, M.; Alissafi, T.; Bossios, A.; Gogos, H.; Economidou, E.; Lötvall, J.; Xanthou, G.; et al. Osteopontin expression and relation to disease severity in human asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 37, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Delimpoura, V.; Bakakos, P.; Tseliou, E.; Bessa, V.; Hillas, G.; Simoes, D.C.M.; Papiris, S.; Loukides, S. Increased levels of osteopontin in sputum supernatant in severe refractory asthma. Thorax 2010, 65, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Trinh, H.K.T.; Nguyen, T.V.T.; Kim, S.H.; Cao, T.B.T.; Luu, Q.Q.; Kim, S.; Park, H. Osteopontin contributes to late-onset asthma phenotypes in adult asthma patients. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Simoes, D.C.; Xanthou, G.; Petrochilou, K.; Panoutsakopoulou, V.; Roussos, C.; Gratziou, C. Osteopontin deficiency protects against airway remodeling and hyperresponsiveness in chronic asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 179, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xanthou, G.; Alissafi, T.; Semitekolou, M.; Simoes, D.C.M.; Economidou, E.; Gaga, M.; Lambrecht, B.N.; Lloyd, C.M.; Panoutsakopoulou, V. Osteopontin has a crucial role in allergic airway disease through regulation of dendritic cell subsets. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. King, E.M.; Zhao, Y.; Moore, C.M.; Steinhart, B.; Anderson, K.C.; Vestal, B.; Moore, P.K.; McManus, S.A.; Evans, C.M.; Mould, K.J. Gpnmb and Spp1 mark a conserved macrophage injury response masking fibrosis-specific programming in the lung. JCI Insight 2024, 9, e182700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Takahashi, F.; Takahashi, K.; Shimizu, K.; Cui, R.; Tada, N.; Takahashi, H.; Soma, S.; Yoshioka, M.; Fukuchi, Y. Osteopontin is strongly expressed by alveolar macrophages in the lungs of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung 2004, 182, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nyirenda, J.; Hardy, O.M.; Silva Filho, J.D.; Herder, V.; Attipa, C.; Ndovi, C.; Siwombo, M.; Namalima, T.R.; Suwedi, L.; Ilia, G.; et al. Spatially resolved single-cell atlas unveils a distinct cellular signature of fatal lung COVID-19 in a Malawian population. Nat. Med. 2024, 30, 3765–3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wendisch, D.; Dietrich, O.; Mari, T.; von Stillfried, S.; Ibarra, I.L.; Mittermaier, M.; Mache, C.; Chua, R.L.; Knoll, R.; Timm, S.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers profibrotic macrophage responses and lung fibrosis. Cell 2021, 184, 6243–6261 e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dinnon, K.H., 3rd; Leist, S.R.; Okuda, K.; Dang, H.; Fritch, E.J.; Gully, K.L.; De la Cruz, G.; Evangelista, M.D.; Asakura, T.; Gilmore, R.C.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection produces chronic pulmonary epithelial and immune cell dysfunction with fibrosis in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabo5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kanth, S.M.; Huapaya, J.A.; Gairhe, S.; Wang, H.; Tian, X.; Demirkale, C.Y.; Hou, C.; Ma, J.; Kuhns, D.B.; Fink, D.L.; et al. Longitudinal analysis of the lung proteome reveals persistent repair months after mild to moderate COVID-19. Cell Rep. Med. 2024, 5, 101642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bailey, J.I.; Puritz, C.H.; Senkow, K.J.; Markov, N.S.; Diaz, E.; Jonasson, E.; Yu, Z.; Swaminathan, S.; Lu, Z.; Fenske, S.; et al. Profibrotic monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages are expanded in patients with persistent respiratory symptoms and radiographic abnormalities after COVID-19. Nat. Immunol. 2024, 25, 2097–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. The role of SPP1 in various lung diseases.
Table 1. The role of SPP1 in various lung diseases.
Lung DiseaseSPP1 Function/Role
Interstitial Lung DiseaseIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Drives fibrosis via SHH-induced macrophage activation, TGF-b signaling, and integrin-mediated fibroblast proliferation.
  • Promotes EMT and modulates immune cell responses.
CTD-associated ILD
  • Stimulates fibroblast migration via IL-6 and M-CSF-activated macrophages. Regulated by immune complexes.
  • SPP1 levels decrease with IL-6 pathway inhibition (tocilizumab).
Pneumoconiosis
  • Mediates TGF-b signaling, macrophage-derived exosomes, and myofibroblast differentiation.
Granulomatous Lung Diseases (noninfectious)
  • Facilitates granuloma formation through full-length isoform; antagonized by C-terminal fragment.
  • Upregulated in macrophages within granulomas.
Infectious Granulomatous Diseases (e.g., TB)
  • Enhances Th1 immune response via IL-12 pathways.
  • Expression correlates with disease severity.
  • Modulates macrophage recruitment and IFN-g signaling.
Lung and Pleural Malignancies
  • Activates PI3K/AKT, NF-kB, and MAPK pathways.
  • Promotes EMT, angiogenesis, and metastasis via integrin/CD44 interaction.
  • Upregulates VEGF and MMPs.
Obstructive Lung Disease and Reactive Airway DiseaseCOPD
  • Drives Th1/Th17 inflammation by inhibiting IRF7 in lung APCs.
  • Increases IL-1b, IL-6, and MMP-9.
  • Induced by cigarette smoke exposure.
Asthma
  • Mediates airway remodeling and Th2 inflammation.
  • Activates PI3K/AKT in bronchial smooth muscle and influences IL-4, IL-13 expression.
COVID-19-associated Lung Disease
  • SPP1hi macrophages in severe and post-COVID lungs drive profibrotic programs; share features with IPF macrophages.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Coarfa, C.; Charania, A.N.; Larson-Casey, J.L.; Rosas, I.O.; He, C. Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 in Lung Diseases. Metabolites 2025, 15, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060365

AMA Style

Liu H, Coarfa C, Charania AN, Larson-Casey JL, Rosas IO, He C. Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 in Lung Diseases. Metabolites. 2025; 15(6):365. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Hongli, Cristian Coarfa, Arzoo N. Charania, Jennifer L. Larson-Casey, Ivan O. Rosas, and Chao He. 2025. "Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 in Lung Diseases" Metabolites 15, no. 6: 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060365

APA Style

Liu, H., Coarfa, C., Charania, A. N., Larson-Casey, J. L., Rosas, I. O., & He, C. (2025). Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 in Lung Diseases. Metabolites, 15(6), 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060365

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop