Next Article in Journal
Association of Systemic Inflammation with Inflammatory mRNA Expression in Visceral Adipose Tissue in Gestational Diabetes
Previous Article in Journal
Precision Probiotics Regulate Blood Glucose, Cholesterol, Body Fat Percentage, and Weight Under Eight-Week High-Fat Diet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ethnomedicinal Applications, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacological Properties of Zanthoxylum caribaeum Lam.: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenolic Compounds from Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson: Dereplication via UHPLC-HRMS/MS, Isolation, Identification, and Preliminary Biological Evaluation Focusing on Radical-Scavenging, Anti-α-Glucosidase, and Pro-Lipase Activities

by
Zlatina Kokanova-Nedialkova
1,
Yana Ilieva
2,
Teodor Marinov
1 and
Paraskev T. Nedialkov
1,*
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, 2 Dunav Str., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Infectious Microbiology, The Stephan Angeloff Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 26 Acad. G. Bonchev Str., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2025, 15(10), 643; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15100643
Submission received: 18 August 2025 / Revised: 20 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 25 September 2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson is a lesser-known species with potential pharmacological importance. This study aimed to profile phenolic compounds in its aerial parts and assess biological activities of isolated constituents, focusing on radical-scavenging, anti-α-glucosidase, and pro-lipase effects. Methods: Phenolic compounds from H. cerastoides aerial parts were dereplicated via UHPLC-HRMS/MS. The structures of isolated compounds were determined using spectroscopic methods (1D and 2D NMR, UV, and HRMS-ESI). Radical-scavenging was evaluated by DPPH and ABTS assays; anti-α-glucosidase and pro-lipase activities were measured by LC-MS. Results: UHPLC-HRMS profiling of a hydroalcoholic extract tentatively identified and quantified 39 phenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives. Furthermore, two new phenolic compounds, namely hypercerastoside A (HC4) and hypercerastoside B (HC6), together with three known compounds, coumaroylquinic acid (HC1), myricetin-3-O-glycoside (HC2), and myricetin-3-O-galactoside (HC3), as well as two artifacts, namely methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (HC5) and hypercerastoside C (HC7), were isolated from the ethylacetate extract of the aerial parts of title plant. Compounds HC2, HC3, and HC5 displayed the highest radical-scavenging activity. The anti-α-glucosidase test showed that compounds HC1 (IC50 = 44 µM) and HC3 (IC50 = 206 µM) possessed similar activity to acarbose (IC50 = 206 µM). Myricetin glycosides HC2 and HC3 enhanced lipase activity fivefold at 200 µM. Conclusions: H. cerastoides is a promising source of bioactive phenolic compounds with significant radical-scavenging and enzyme-modulating activities. These preliminary findings support further exploration of its therapeutic potential, especially for oxidative stress-related disorders, type 2 diabetes, and cachexia.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The genus Hypericum L. (St. John’s wort, Hypericaceae) comprises nearly 500 species that occur naturally or have been introduced on every continent of the world, except Antarctica [1]. Many of its representatives have been traditionally used as medicinal plants in different parts of the world, providing bioactive compounds with antidepressant, cytotoxic, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties. Several groups of phenolic compounds have been identified in Hypericum species, including anthraquinone derivatives (naphthodianthrones and dianthrones), acylphloroglucinols, xanthones, benzophenones, flavonoids, and chromones [2,3]. Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson (sect. Campylopus) is a perennial herbaceous plant, distributed in Southern Bulgaria, Northeastern Greece, and Northwestern Türkiye [4]. In Turkish folk medicine, the plant’s aerial parts are used for treating gastric disorders as a decoction or by drinking crushed juice every morning for 3 days [5,6]. A GC-MS analysis of the aerial parts of Hypericum cerastoides resulted in the characterization of 61 volatile constituents with α-pinene (58%), undecane (5%), and β-pinene (3%) as the most prominent compounds [7]. The essential oil (EO) obtained from the aerial parts of Hypericum cerastoides was recently analyzed using GC–MS–FID. Its composition was found to be notably distinct from that of other Hypericum species, including H. perforatum, H. rumeliacum, H. montbretii, and H. calycinum. The major constituents of the hydro-distilled EO from H. cerastoides were ethyl 2-methylpentanoate (6.87%), thymol (8.31%), hexadecanoic acid (36.48%), and 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol (28.49%). Due to the limited available data on the EO composition of H. cerastoides, this study represents the first detailed report in the literature [8]. Isomangiferin was reported for H. cerastoides by Kitanov and Nedialkov in 1998 [9], while rutin was later detected in the same species by HPLC analysis conducted by Crockett et al. [10]. Further studies of the title plant revealed the presence of hypericin, pseudohypericin, garcimangosone D, 1,7-dihydroxy-5,6-dimethoxyxanthone, I3-II8-biapigenin, isoquercitrin, quercetin, (−)-epicatechin, 6-O-p-coumaroyl-α/β-glucopyranose, chlorogenic acid, daucosterol linoleate, cerastioside A (a normonoterpene glycoside), and cerastioside B (a benzophenone glycoside). The results also showed that cerastioside A exhibited weak cytotoxicity against A375 (skin) and MCF7 (breast) cell lines with IC50 values of 158.92 ± 16.74 and 198.41 ± 6.48 μM, respectively [11]. The present study focuses on dereplicating polar phenolic constituents in aerial parts of the title plant by UHPLC-HRMS/MS analysis, isolation, and structural elucidation of two new, three known, and two artifact phenolic compounds. The isolated compounds’ anti-α-glucosidase, pro-lipase, and radical-scavenging (DPPH and ABTS tests) activities were established.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on a Rudolph Research Analytical Autopol VI (Hackettstown, NJ, USA). UV spectra were obtained using a UV-VIS spectrometer, Biochrom Libra S70 (Cambourne, UK). ESI-HRMS spectra were recorded using a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance II+ 600 spectrometer at 300 K, in acetone-d6 (99.96%, Deutero GmbH, Kastellaun, Germany). Column chromatography (CC) was performed using MCI GEL CHP20P Polymeric Adsorbent (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and Sephadex LH-20 (Supelco). Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) Breeze 2 high-pressure binary gradient system, consisting of a pump model 1525EF, a manual injector model 7725i, and a UV detector model 2489. Separations were achieved on a semi-preparative HPLC column, Kromasil C18 (250 × 21.2 mm, 10 µm), at 18 mL/min, and on a Kromasil C18 (250 × 10 mm, 5 µm) column at 5 mL/min, both purchased from Eka Chemicals AB (Bohus, Sweden).

2.2. Plant Material

The aerial parts (flowers, leaves, and stems) of Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson were collected near hut Treshtenik (GPS coordinates: 42.080921, 23.619284), Rila Mountain, Bulgaria, in July 2018 and were identified by P. T. Nedialkov. The voucher specimens (SOM-Co-1343) were deposited at the National Herbarium of the Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research (IBER) at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS).

2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The aerial parts of H. cerastoides were dried in the shade for 2 weeks, and a powdered plant material (378 g, 9% on drying) was extracted at room temperature with CH2Cl2 (6 × 1.5 L) by percolation. The CH2Cl2 extracts were combined, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield 154 g of a dark-green, waxy residue. The resulting residue was suspended in 600 mL of water and then extracted with ethyl acetate (10 × 250 mL). The ethyl acetate layers were combined and evaporated to dryness in a vacuum. The resulting EtOAc residue (14.8 g) was divided into three equal portions, which were subjected to MCI gel (330 × 40 mm, 100 mL) eluted with a mobile phase of MeOH: water (10:90→60:40). Sixty fractions from each portion were combined into six pooled fractions (I–VI) based on LC-MS profiles. Fraction III (233 mg, 20–25% MeOH) was subjected to column chromatography (CC) over Sephadex LH-20 (800 × 30 mm, 25 mL) using methanol as the eluent. The compound HC1 (3.78 mg) crystallized from sub-fraction 4–5 (45 mg). Semi-prep. HPLC of sub-fraction 14–18 (142 mg) eluted isocratically with MeCN-0.05% H3PO4 (12:88) led to the isolation of HC2 (19 mg) and HC3 (8 mg). Fraction IV (1279 mg, 25–35% MeOH) was subjected to column chromatography (CC) over Sephadex LH-20 (800 × 30 mm, 25 mL) using methanol as the eluent. An isocratic semi-prep. HPLC purification of subfraction 5–7 (682 mg) with MeCN-0.05% H3PO4 (20:80) gave pure HC4 (361 mg) and HC5 (33 mg). Furthermore, the fraction VI (671 mg, 45–50% MeOH) was subjected to CC over Sephadex LH-20 (800 × 30 mm, 25 mL) with MeOH as the eluent. Semi-prep. HPLC of sub-fraction 31–36 (119 mg) eluted isocratically with MeCN-0.05% H3PO4 (25:75) led to the isolation of HC6 (16 mg) and HC7 (17 mg).

2.3.1. Hypercerastoside A (HC4) (4,6-Dihydroxy Benzophenone-2-O-β-D-2″-Acetylglucopyranoside)

White amorphous powder; α D 20 : −45.6° (c 0.1, MeOH); UV/VIS λmax (MeOH) nm (log ε): 207 (4.67), 251 (4.05), 298 (3.50); +AlCl3: 278, 338; +NaOAc: 348; ESI-HRMS: found m/z 433.1139 [M–H], calcd. for C21H21O10 m/z 433.1129; MS2: m/z 391.1054 [M–C2H2O], 373.0929 [M–AcOH–H], 229.0503 [Magl–H]; 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 600 MHz): (Table 1); 13C NMR (acetone-d6, 150 MHz): (Table 1).

2.3.2. Hypercerastoside B (HC6) (4-O-{6-[(2E)-p-Hydroxycinnamoyl]-β-D-Glucopyranosyl}-6-isopropyl-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one)

White amorphous powder; α D 20 : +1.66° (c 0.115, CH3CN); UV/Vis λmax (CH3CN) nm (log ε): 226 (4.17), 311 (4.38); ESI-HRMS: found m/z 467.1909 [M + H]+, calcd. for C23H31O10 m/z 467.1912, MS2: m/z 309.0963 [M–Magl–H2O + H]+, 303.1433 [M–C9H7O3]+, 159.1016 [Magl + H]+, 147.0440 [MpCA−OH]+ 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 600 MHz): (Table 2); 13C NMR (acetone-d6, 150 MHz): (Table 2).

2.3.3. Hypercerastoside C (HC7) (Methyl 3-O-{6-[(2E)-p-hydroxycinnamoyl]-β-glucopyranosyl}-6-methyl-5-hydroxyheptanoate)

White amorphous powder; α D 20 : +0.92 (c 0.110, CH3CN); UV/Vis λmax (CH3CN) nm (log ε): 227sh (4.29), 313 (4.40); ESI-HRMS: found m/z 499.217 [M + H]+, calcd. for C24H35O11 m/z 499.2174, MS2: m/z 309.0966 [M–Magl–H2O + H]+, 191.1278 [Magl + H2O + H]+, 173.1172 [Magl−OH]+, 147.0440 [MpCA−OH]+; 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 600 MHz): (Table 3); 13C NMR (acetone-d6, 150 MHz): (Table 3).

2.4. Acid Hydrolysis

Compounds HC4, HC6, and HC7 (each 4 mg) were separately refluxed with 2 mL of 2 N HCl-MeOH (1:1) for 2 h. The reaction mixtures were filtered through Amberlite IRC-86 resin and washed with H2O. The eluate was filtered through a Diaion HP-20SS column and eluted with H2O and MeOH. The water portions were evaporated to dryness and analyzed for sugars by HPLC, following the method of Tanaka et al., with some modifications [12,13]. Briefly, the dry water eluate was treated with a solution (0.1 mL) of L-cysteine methyl ester in pyridine (5 mg/mL) at 60 °C for one hour. A solution (0.1 mL) of o-tolylisothiocyanate in pyridine (5 mg/mL) was added to the mixture and heated at 60 °C for 1 h. The solution was analyzed using HPLC [Purospher STAR RP-18 5 μm column (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; 4.6 × 250 mm) with 25% ACN in 50 mM H3PO4, flow rate 1 mL min−1, UV detection at 250 nm]. The presence of D-glucose (tR values of the tolylthiocarbamoyl-thiazolidine derivatives was 18.7 min) was found in the residues.

2.5. Anti-α-Glucosidase Activity Assay

The α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity was determined by LC-MS using p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside as the substrate, as described by Kokanova-Nedialkova et al. [14]. The assay mixture (160 µL) was prepared accordingly to Kang et al. [15] with some modifications [14]. An aliquot of 20 µL of a sample in phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 10% DMSO (or phosphate buffer containing 10% DMSO as a control), 100 µL phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and 20 µL enzyme solution (0.2 U/mL α-glucosidase in phosphate buffer) were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Then, 20 µL of substrate solution (2.5 mM p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, prepared in the same buffer) was added. The reaction was processed at 37 °C for 15 min and stopped by adding 840 µL acetonitrile (AcCN). The supernatant was then used for LC-MS analysis after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The amount of p-nitrophenol released from p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside was quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The inhibitory rates (%) were calculated according to the formula:
%   α G l u c o s i d a s e   i n h i b i t o r y   a c t i v i t y = A к A s a m p l e A к × 100 ,
where Aк is the area of the p-nitrophenol peak in the control, and Asample is the area of the p-nitrophenol peak in the sample. Acarbose was used as a positive control for the α-glucosidase inhibition assay.

2.6. Assay for Modulation of Lipase Activity

This assay was adapted from previous reports [16] for the determination of anti-lipase and pro-lipase activity by LC-MS [14]. Briefly, lipase from porcine pancreas, Type II (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MA, USA, product L3126), was dissolved in ultra-pure water at a 5 mg/mL concentration. The supernatant was then used after centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 min. The assay buffer was 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.2), and p-nitrophenyl laurate was used as the substrate. The substrate stock was 2 mg p-nitrophenyl laurate dissolved in 1 mL isopropanol and 4 mL 5 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0) containing 1% Triton X-100 (Fisher Scientific, Bridgewater, NJ, USA). The mixture was heated to facilitate dissolution, thoroughly mixed, and then cooled to room temperature. The assay mixture (1 mL) contained 20 µL of a sample in DMSO (or DMSO as a control), 860 µL of Tris buffer (pH 8.2), and 30 µL of enzyme solution. The mixture was combined, shaken, and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Then, 90 µL of substrate solution was added and shaken again. The reaction was processed at 37 °C for 2 h and stopped by adding 800 µL CH3CN to 200 µL of the assay mixture. The supernatant was then used for LC-MS analysis after centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 min. The amount of p-nitrophenol released from p-nitrophenyl laurate was quantified using LC-MS. Lipase inhibitory activity (%) was calculated according to the formula:
%   L i p a s e   i n h i b i t o r y   a c t i v i t y = A к A s a m p l e A к × 100 ,
where Aк is the area of the p-nitrophenol peak in the control, and Asample is the area of the p-nitrophenol peak in the sample. Orlistat was taken as a positive control for a lipase inhibition assay.
Pro-lipase activity (%) was calculated according to the formula:
%   P r o l i p a s e   a c t i v i t y = A s a m p l e A k A к × 100 ,
where Aк is the area of the p-nitrophenol peak in the control, and Asample is the area of the p-nitrophenol peak in the sample.

2.7. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity Assay

The scavenging activity of phenolic compounds against DPPH radicals was assessed using Kokanova-Nedialkova and Nedialkov methods, with some modifications [17]. Briefly, 300 µL of each compound in EtOH (100 µM) was mixed with 300 µL of DPPH ethanol solution (100 µM). The reaction mixture was thoroughly vortexed and left in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 517 nm. The following equation calculates the ability to scavenge DPPH radicals:
% D P P H   r a d i c a l   s c a v e n g i n g   a c t i v i t y = Abs control Abs sample Abs control × 100 ,
where Abscontrol is the absorbance of the DPPH radical in EtOH, and Abssample is the absorbance of the DPPH radical solution mixed with a sample.
Positive controls were vitamin C (100 µM) and Trolox (100 µM).

2.8. ABTS Radical-Scavenging Activity Assay

For ABTS assay, the procedure followed the method of Kokanova-Nedialkova and Nedialkov with some modifications [17]. The stock solutions included 7 mM ABTS and 2.4 mM potassium persulfate. The working solution was then prepared by mixing the two stock solutions in equal quantities and allowing them to react for 12–14 h at room temperature in the dark. The solution was then diluted by mixing 1 mL of the ABTS solution with 30 mL of ethanol. A fresh ABTS solution was prepared for each assay. Furthermore, 300 µL of each compound in EtOH (100 µM) was allowed to react with 1 mL of the ABTS solution, and the absorbance was taken at 734 nm after 7 min using a spectrophotometer. The ABTS scavenging capacity of the compound was calculated as:
% A B T S   r a d i c a l   s c a v e n g i n g   a c t i v i t y = Abs control Abs sample Abs control × 100
where Abscontrol is the absorbance of the ABTS radical in ethanol, and Abssample is the absorbance of an ABTS radical solution mixed with a sample.
Vitamin C (100 µM) and Trolox (100 µM) were used as positive controls.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The statistical program “Medcalc” ver. 23 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium) was used for data analysis. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. The statistical significance of the results vs. respective controls was calculated employing a Mann–Whitney non-parametric test. The accepted statistically significant differences occurred when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Dereplication and Semi-Quantitative Determination of Polar Phenolic Compounds in Aerial Parts from Hypericum cerastoides by UHPLC-HRMS/MS Analysis

Dereplication and semi-quantitative determination of polar phenolic compounds from the aerial parts of Hypericum cerastoides were achieved utilizing UHPLC-HRMS/MS analysis [18]. Thirty-nine phenolic compounds were identified (Table S1): flavonol aglycones and their glycosides, flavan-3-ols and a flavolignan, hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, benzophenones, xanthones, and flavone dimers.

3.1.1. Flavan-3-ols and a Flavolignan

In the full MS spectrum, the deprotonated molecules [M−H] of 1 and 2 appeared at m/z 305.07. The MS2 spectra of both compounds showed similar product ions at m/z 179.03, 137.02, and 125.02 (Figure S22), resulting from pyrogallol neutral loss, retro-Diels-Alder (RDA) fragmentation, and heterocyclic ring fusion (HFR). However, there was a substantial difference in retention times of 1 and 2, which were 2.87 and 4.98 min., respectively. Thus, comparing the obtained MS2 spectra and the retention times with recent data reports, metabolites 1 and 2 were tentatively identified as gallocatechin and galloepicatechin [19]. The deprotonated molecule [M−H] of compound 31 appeared at m/z 451.10. Its MS2 spectrum showed characteristic product ions at m/z 341.07, 217.01, 189.02, 109.03, 231.03 (Figure S23). The loss of the catechol group (110 Da) attached to the pyranone ring led to the formation of a fragment at m/z 341.07, which further lost a second catechol moiety (ring B from the catechin skeleton) and produced the ion at m/z 231.03. Subsequently, fragmentation of the later ion showed CH3 loss, followed by CHO elimination to give the product ions at m/z 217.01 and 189.02, respectively, which was in conformance with the fragmentation pattern of the cinchonain I isomers [20,21]. Thus, metabolite 31 was tentatively identified as cinchonaine Ib.

3.1.2. Hydroxycinnamic Acid Derivatives

The deprotonated molecule [M−H] of compound 5 appeared at m/z 325.09 in the full MS scans. The MS2 spectrum showed the product ions at m/z 163.04 and 179.17 corresponding to a loss of the hexose (162 Da) and a deprotonated form of a hexose unit, respectively. Subsequently, the former ion produced a fragment at m/z 119.05, indicative of carboxyl (44 Da) loss, characteristic of the cinnamic acids (Figure S24). Thus, according to the literature data, metabolite 5 was tentatively identified as 4-O-β-D-glucosyl-4-coumaric acid [22].

3.1.3. Flavonol Aglycones and Their Glycosides

The deprotonated molecule [M−H] of compound 37 appeared at m/z 285.04 in the full MS scans. Its MS2 spectrum showed characteristic product ions at m/z 257.05, 239.03, 229.05, and 185.06 (Figure S25). The former product ion resulted from CO (28 Da) loss. Subsequently, it undergoes further fragmentation, resulting in fragment ions at m/z 239.03 and 229.05, corresponding to the loss of H2O (18 Da) and CO (28 Da), respectively. Furthermore, the later fragment ion loses a CO2 (44 Da), producing a fragment at m/z 185.06. According to the literature data [23], the metabolite 37 was identified as kaempferol. Compound 26 shows a deprotonated [M−H] molecule at m/z 593.15. Its MS2 spectrum showed fragment ions at m/z 416.60, 285.04, 284.03, 257.05, 239.05, and 229.05. The former ion resulted from splitting off an O-linked hexose from a rhamnose unit. Subsequently, the loss of rhamnosyl moiety gave the base peak (m/z 285.04) corresponding to the deprotonated form of an aglycone. In contrast, a fragment ion at m/z 284.03 was derived from homolytic cleavage of the glycosidic bond [24]. In addition, the product ions at m/z 257.05, 239.05, and 229.05 were typical for kaempferol. Thus, metabolite 26 was tentatively identified as kaempferol-O-hexosylrhamnoside. The deprotonated molecule [M−H] of compound 18 appeared at m/z 609.15. Its MS2 spectrum showed a fragment ion at m/z 301.04, corresponding to the deprotonated molecule of the aglycon, and a fragment ion at m/z 300.03 (the base peak) derived from [M−H−Rha−Glu−H], the homolytic cleavage of the glycosidic bond. Furthermore, the latter ion undergoes subsequent losses of CHO (29 Da), CO + OH (45 Da), and CHO + CO (57 Da) to give the product ions at m/z 271.03, 255.03, and 243.03, respectively. According to the literature data [25], the metabolite was tentatively identified as quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (rutin). The deprotonated molecules [M–H] of the isobaric compounds 23 and 27 appeared at m/z 505.10. Their MS2 spectra showed similar fragment ions at m/z 301.04, 300.03, 271.03, 255.03, and 243.03, which are typical for quercetin. Furthermore, the product ions [M–H–CH3CO] at m/z 463.09 for 23 and [M–H–CH3COO] at m/z 445.08 for 27 indicated an acetyl group content in the hexose moiety. Thus, metabolites 23 and 27 were tentatively identified as quercetin-3-O-(6″-O-acetyl)-galactoside and quercetin-3-O-(2″-O-acetyl)-glucoside [26,27], respectively. Compounds 29 and 34 are also isobaric and show deprotonated [M–H] molecules at m/z 463.09. The MS2 spectra showed fragment ions at m/z 301.04 and 300.03, corresponding to the neutral loss of the hexose as a sugar moiety, characteristic of O-glycosides. The former ion corresponded to the deprotonated molecule of the aglycone, while the latter resulted from homolytic cleavage of the glycosidic bond. In addition, both compounds formed a fragment ion at m/z 151.00 with high intensity due to 1,3A0 cleavage. According to literature data [28], the greater abundance of the ion at m/z 301.04 compared to that at m/z 300.03, a prominent ion at m/z 151.00 (Figure S26), and the absence of more pronounced losses of small molecules such as OH, CO, HCO, etc., is observed in 4′-O-glycosides. Thus, compounds 29 and 34 were tentatively identified as quercetin-4′-O-galactoside and quercetin-4′-O-glucoside. The deprotonated molecule [M−H] of compound 13 appeared at m/z 625.14 in the full MS scans. The MS2 spectrum showed a fragment ion at m/z 317.03 resulting from a neutral loss of 309 Da, indicative of an O-linked rutinose. Furthermore, the compound produced a fragment ion at m/z 316.03 (the base peak) resulting from the homolytic cleavage of the glycosidic bond, which subsequently underwent CO + OH (45 Da) loss to give an ion at m/z 178.99, corresponding to 1,2A0 cleavage. According to a recent data report, metabolite 13 was tentatively identified as myricetin-O-rutinoside [29]. Compound 16 shows a deprotonated [M−H] molecule at m/z 565.08, which undergoes subsequent loss of CO2 (44 Da) to give an ion at m/z 521.09 in full MS scans. This phenomenon is typical for the malonyl glycosides, which are very labile in the negative ion mode using electrospray ionization [30]. In the MS2 spectrum, the later ion loses acetylhexose (205 Da) to produce an ion at m/z 316.02 (base peak). Furthermore, the fragment ions at m/z 317.03 and 178.99 are characteristic of myricetin. Thus, metabolite 13 was tentatively identified as myricetin-O-(malonyl)-hexoside. The deprotonated [M−H] molecules of isobaric compounds 20, 21, and 32 appeared at m/z 479.08. Their MS2 spectra show similar fragment ions at m/z 317.04, 316.04, 178.99, and 151.00. The precursor ions showed neutral losses of 163 Da to give a fragment ion at m/z 317.04 (the base peak) corresponding to a deprotonated myricetin molecule. In contrast, the ion at m/z 316.04 resulted from homolytic cleavage of the glycosidic bond. The former ion subsequently undergoes 1,2A0 and 1,3A0 cleavages in ring C to give fragment ions at m/z 178.99 and 151.00, respectively. According to the literature data [31], the higher abundance of the ion at m/z 317.04 compared to that at m/z 316.04 indicated that the hexose unit is linked to 7-OH. Furthermore, the difference in retention times of compounds 20, 21, and 32, which were 14.30, 14.50, and 10.94 min, respectively, suggested the presence of a different type of hexose moiety. Thus, metabolites 20, 21, and 32 were tentatively identified as myricetin-7-O-galactoside, myricetin-7-O-glucoside, and myricetin-7-O-hexoside.

3.1.4. Benzophenones

The deprotonated molecule [M−H] of compound 14 appeared at m/z 391.10 in the full MS scans. The MS2 spectrum showed a fragment ion at m/z 229.05, resulting from a neutral loss of 162 Da, indicative of an O-linked hexose. Furthermore, the latter ion undergoes cleavage of the bond between the carbonyl function and the aromatic ring B to give the fragment ion at m/z 151.00 (Figure S27). Thus, metabolite 14 was tentatively identified as garcimangosone D [32]. Compound 35 showed a deprotonated molecule [M−H] at m/z 433.11. Its MS2 spectrum produced a fragment ion at m/z 391.10 due to the loss of a CH3CO group, indicating the presence of an acetyl group in a hexose moiety. Furthermore, the fragmentation pattern was identical to that of compound 14. Thus, metabolite 37 was tentatively identified as trihydroxybenzophenone-O-(acetyl)-glucoside (acetyl-garcimangosone D).
In addition, Table S1 shows the results of the LC-HRMS analysis of metabolites 2–4, 6–12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 28, 30, 33, 35, 36, 38, and 39. A detailed description of their fragmentation patterns is given here [18].

3.2. Isolation and Identification of Some Polar Phenolic Compounds from the Ethylacetate Extract of the Aerial Parts of Hypericum cerastoides

An extensive chromatographic procedure of the EtOAc extract from the aerial parts of Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson resulted in the isolation and structural identification of seven phenolic compounds (HC1HC7) (Figure 1). The compounds’ structures were elucidated using spectral (MS, UV, and NMR) methods and hydrolysis. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra signals were unambiguously assigned using 2D NMR techniques. The known compounds were identified as coumaroylquinic acid HC1, myricetin-3-O-glycoside HC2, myricetin-3-O-galactoside HC3, and methyl ester of chlorogenic acid HC5, respectively, by comparing their spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature [33,34,35,36].
Compound HC4 (The isolation and structural elucidation of compound HC4 were part of Y.I.’s PhD Thesis, which can be found at https://ras.nacid.bg/api/reg/FilesStorage?key=cffffa1b-ac29-4f17-a9a7-1a998722ba7b&mimeType=application/pdf&fileName=Disertacia-Yana_Ilieva.pdf&dbId=1 (in Bulgarian), accessed on 15 August 2025 [37]) was obtained as an optically active, colorless amorphous powder. The ESI-HRMS spectrum of HC4 in negative mode showed a deprotonated molecule [M–H] at m/z 433.1139, suggesting a molecular formula C21H22O10. The MS/MS experiment revealed sequential neutral loss of an acetic acid (433.11→373.09) and a hexose (373.09→229.05). The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) displayed five signals corresponding to aromatic protons. The three of these that appeared downfield as multiplets at δH 7.72 (2H, H-2′ and H-6′), 7.55 (1H, H-4′), and 7.44 (2H, H-3′ and H-5′) shared a single COSY network (Figure 2). These signals exhibited positive cross-peaks in the HSQC experiment, corresponding to the carbon signals in the 13C NMR spectrum (Table 1), which appeared at δC 129.9 (C-2′ and C-6′), 133.1 (C-4′), and 128.9 (C-3′ and C-5′). These signals, together with the signal of non-oxygenated quaternary carbon at δC 140.3 (C-1′), were attributed to an unsubstituted phenyl group. The C-1′ carbon was connected to the carbonyl function at δC 196.5 (C=O) since some protons of the unsubstituted phenyl ring correlated with its signal in the HMBC experiment (Figure 2). In addition, the 1H NMR spectrum showed another two aromatic proton signals that appeared upfield as m-coupled doublets at δH 6.32 (1H, H-3) and 6.18 (1H, H-5), which correlated in the HSQC experiment with the signals at δC 95.8 (C-3) and 98.0 (C-5), respectively. In addition to the latter signals, the 13C NMR spectrum also shows signals of four quaternary carbons at δC 162.4 (C-4), 160.0 (C-6), 158.6 (C-2), and 109.4 (C-1), of which the first three are oxidized, while the last one is linked to the carbonyl function at δC 196.5. The signals discussed so far were typical of benzophenones with a 2,4,6-oxygenation pattern. In addition to the benzophenone signals, the 1H spectrum showed peaks at δH 5.01 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-1″), 4.46 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 9.6 Hz, H-2″), 3.55 (1H, dd, J = 9.6, 9.0 Hz, H-3″), 3.50 (1H, m, H-5″), 3.41 (1H, dd, J = 8.9, 9.6 Hz, H-4″), 3.90 (1H, dd, J = 2.6, 11.9 Hz, Ha-6″) and 3.71 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.9 Hz, Hb-6″) that showed cross-peaks in HSQC experiment with the signals at δC 99.6 (C-1″), 73.7 (C-2″), 75.9 (C-3″), 77.9 (C-5″), 71.3 (C-4″), 62.4 (C-6″), respectively, belonging to glucopyranose unit in β-configuration.
According to the correlation of the signal of the anomeric proton (H-1″) with the signal at δC 158.6 (C-2) in the HMBC experiment, C-2 was identified as the position of the sugar moiety. Furthermore, the 1H NMR spectrum showed a triproton singlet at δH 1.78 assigned to the methyl group of the acetyl moiety that was represented in the 13C-NMR spectrum by the signals at δC 169.3 (C-1′′′′) and 20.7 (C-2′′′′). These signals formed a cross-peak network in the HMBC experiment with the signals of H-2″ and C-2″, thus pointing out that the second OH-group of the glucopyranose unit was esterified with acetic acid. Therefore, the structure of HC4 was established as 4,6-dihydroxybenzophenone-2-O-β-D-2ꞌꞌ-acetylglucopyranoside and was given the trivial name hypercerastoside A.
Compound HC6 was obtained as an optically active, colorless amorphous powder. The ESI-HRMS spectrum of HC6 in positive mode showed a protonated molecule [M + H]+ at m/z 467.1909 (calculated 467.1912 for C23H29O10), suggesting a molecular formula C23H30O10 with nine degrees of unsaturation. The protonated molecule’s MS/MS spectrum showed characteristic fragments at m/z 309.0963 and 303.1433 due to aglycone and acyl moiety neutral loss, respectively. Furthermore, the product ions at m/z 159.1016 and 147.0440 can be attributed to the protonated molecule of the aglycone and p-hydroxycoumaroyl fragment, respectively. The plausible fragmentation is given in Figure 3.
The 1H-NMR spectrum of HC6 (Table 2) showed signals of two vicinal methyl groups (at δH 0.91) that gave a correlation in the COSY experiment (Figure 4) with a methine at δH 1.80. The latter was adjacent to an oxymethine at δH 4.45, which is a part of a hydrocarbon chain consisting, in addition, of two methylene groups (δH 2.27, 1.74, and 2.67), divided by an oxymethine at δH 4.35. Furthermore, in the 13C NMR spectrum (Table 2), along with the hydrogen-bearing carbons involved in the hydrocarbon chain (δC 17.7, 18.4, 31.7, 33.1, 37.0, 72.9, and 80.9), there was a carbonyl (δC 169.8) associated with an ester linkage.
These 1H and 13C NMR data agreed with those for 4-hydroxy-6-isopropyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one, the aglycone of cerastioside A [11]. Some sugar signals also appeared in the 1H NMR spectrum of HC6: the double doublets at δH 3.24, 3.45, and 3.40 with axial coupling constants, a multiplet at δH 3.61, an oxymethylene at δH 4.52 and 4.29, and a signal for an anomeric proton at δH 4.50 in β-configuration, all typical for a glucopyranose unit. The latter signal gave an HMBC correlation (Figure 4) with C-4 at δC 72.9, which was evidence for the attachment position of the glucopyranosyl unit to the aglycone. In addition, the 1H NMR spectrum showed two doublets, each representing two protons at δH 6.91 and 7.57, which were typical for a para-substituted benzene ring. Furthermore, the olefinic proton signals observed at δH 6.39 and 7.64 with a coupling constant of J = 16 Hz indicated a double bond with trans-configuration. Both signals gave HMBC correlations with benzene ring carbons at δC 126.9 and 131.0 and with the carbonyl at δC 167.5. These NMR data completely agreed with an esterified trans p-coumaric acid [38]. The acid carbonyl signal (δC 167.5) gave HMBC correlations with the sugar protons at position 6′ (δH 4.52 and 4.29). Thus, the structure of HC6 was established as 4-O-{6-[(2E)-p-hydroxycinnamoyl]-β-D-glucopyranosyl}-6-isopropyl-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one and was given the trivial name hypercerastoside B.
Compound HC7 was obtained as an optically active, colorless amorphous powder. The ESI-HRMS spectrum of HC7 in positive mode showed a protonated molecule [M + H]+ at m/z 499.2170 (calculated 499.2174 for C24H35O11), suggesting a molecular formula C23H30O10 with eight degrees of unsaturation. The MS/MS spectrum of the protonated molecule of HC7 shared two fragments (m/z 147.0440 and 309.0966) with those of HC6. This was evidence that both compounds had common moieties in their molecules. Furthermore, the characteristic product ions at m/z 191.1278 and 173.1172 were due to the aglycone moiety. The plausible fragmentation pattern of HC7 is shown in Figure 5.
The 1H NMR spectrum of compound HC7 (Table 3) displays signals corresponding to the sugar moiety (δH 4.49, 3.18, 3.45, 3.37, 3.61, 4.52, and 4.27) and p-hydroxycinnamic acid (δH 6.40, 7.63, 7.57, and 6.91), which are comparable to those observed in compound HC6. A similar correspondence is noted in the 13C NMR spectra of both compounds. Furthermore, analogous COSY and HMBC correlations are observed (Figure 6), supporting a glucopyranose unit esterified at the C-6 position with p-hydroxycinnamic acid, as in HC6. The 1H NMR spectrum of HC7 also indicates the presence of a terminal isopropyl group, as evidenced by two geminal methyl signals, H3-7 (δH 0.85) and H3-8 (δH 0.83), and a methine signal H-6 (δH 1.64). These signals are shifted upfield by 0.06, 0.08, and 0.16 ppm, respectively, compared to the HC6 signal. The H-6 signal exhibits a COSY correlation with the oxymethine proton H-5 (δH 3.54), which is shifted upfield by 0.91 ppm. The adjacent methylene protons H2-4 (δH 1.78 and 1.69) are also upfield-shifted, by 0.49 and 0.05 ppm, respectively. The remaining proton signals in the spectrum of HC7, including the oxymethine proton H-3 (δH 4.30) and the methylene protons H2-2 (δH 2.65), differ only slightly from those in HC6. In the 13C NMR spectrum of HC7, the aglycone signals exhibit upfield and downfield shifts relative to those of HC6. The most pronounced downfield shift (Δδ = +7.1 ppm) is observed for the C-5 carbon adjacent to the oxymethine group, while the most significant upfield shift (Δδ = −8.6 ppm) occurs for the C-6 methylene carbon. These observations suggest that in HC7, the hydroxyl group at C-5 is free and not involved in an ester linkage.
In addition, a singlet integrating for three protons is observed at δH 3.64, which shows an HMBC correlation with the carbonyl carbon at C-1 (δC 172.8). The HMBC spectrum also reveals a correlation between the anomeric proton of the sugar unit (δH 4.49) and the methine carbon at C-3 (δC 76.8), confirming that the sugar is attached to the aglycone at the C-3 position. Thus, the structure of HC7 was established as methyl 3-O-{6-[(2E)-p-hydroxycinnamoyl]-β-D-glucopyranosyl}-6-methyl-5-hydroxyheptanoate and was given the trivial name hypercerastoside C.
Compounds HC4 and HC6 were new natural products, while HC5 and HC7 were absent in the ethanol extract analyzed by LC/MS, and should be regarded as artifacts produced during extraction with methanol.

3.3. Biological Activities of the Isolated Phenolic Compounds from the Ethyl Acetate Extract of the Aerial Parts of Hypericum cerastoides

3.3.1. Radical-Scavenging Activity of Compounds HC1–HC7

The radical scavenging activity of the isolated compounds HC1HC7 was evaluated using the DPPH and ABTS assays. (Table 4). The activity of the tested compounds HC1HC7 (100 µM) was compared to that of Vitamin C and Trolox (positive controls) at the same concentrations, and expressed as a percentage of inhibition against DPPH and ABTS, respectively.
The highest DPPH radical scavenging activity was observed for compounds HC2 (myricetin-3-O-glucoside) (84.32%), HC3 (myricetin-3-O-galactoside) (82.70%), and HC5 (methyl ester of chlorogenic acid) (84.57%). Their activity exceeded that of Vitamin C and was very close to that of Trolox. In contrast, the other compounds—HC1 (18.95%), HC4 (14.63%), HC6 (15.93%), and HC7 (11.48%)—exhibited low DPPH radical scavenging activity.
Regarding ABTS radical scavenging activity, the results were similar. The myricetin flavonoids, compounds HC2 (97.23%) and HC3 (96.04%), exhibited the highest activity. Their activity exceeded that of the positive controls, Vitamin C (66.21%) and Trolox (94.16%). Excellent ABTS radical scavenging activity, higher than that of Vitamin C, was also observed for compound HC4 (70.20%) (hyperceratoside A) and HC5 (71.27%) (methyl ester of chlorogenic acid). The remaining compounds—HC1 (22.12%), HC6 (25.50%), and HC7 (26.88%)—showed lower ABTS activity.

3.3.2. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity of Compounds HC1–HC7

The compounds HC1HC7 were evaluated for their inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase, with acarbose used as a positive control. The IC50 values were calculated based on five different concentrations of the test substances and the reference inhibitor (1000 µM, 500 µM, 250 µM, 125 µM, and 62.5 µM). Among the evaluated compounds, HC1 (coumaroylquinic acid) exhibited the most potent α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with an IC50 of 44 µM, significantly surpassing that of acarbose (IC50 = 206 µM). Myricetin-3-O-galactoside (HC3) demonstrated an inhibitory effect equivalent to the reference compound (IC50 = 206 µM). In contrast, HC6 (hypercerastoside B) showed lower inhibitory activity, with an IC50 value of 371 µM. The remaining compounds—HC2, HC4, HC5, and HC7—did not exhibit measurable inhibitory activity under the tested conditions (Table 5).

3.3.3. Lipase Activity of Compounds HC1–HC7

The isolated compounds were evaluated for their modulatory effects on lipase activity at five concentrations (200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 µM). Orlistat (IC50 = 291.6 µM), marketed as Xenical and widely used in the treatment of obesity, was employed as a negative control. Orlistat functions by inhibiting pancreatic lipase, an enzyme responsible for breaking down dietary fats. By blocking this enzymatic activity, orlistat prevents the hydrolysis and subsequent absorption of triglycerides, resulting in the excretion of undigested fats from the body [39].
The results (Table 6) demonstrate that compounds HC1 (coumaroylquinic acid), HC2 (myricetin-3-O-glucoside), HC3 (myricetin-3-O-galactoside), HC5 (methyl ester of chlorogenic acid), and HC6 (hypercerastoside B) do not inhibit lipase activity; instead, they enhance it, exhibiting pro-lipase activity. Among them, the myricetin glycosides (compounds HC2 and HC3) showed the most pronounced effect, increasing lipase activity by approximately fivefold at a concentration of 200 µM compared to the control. Compound HC5 (methyl ester of chlorogenic acid) also demonstrated notable stimulation, enhancing enzymatic activity by 1.5-fold (169.79%) at the same concentration. In contrast, compounds HC6 (hypercerastoside B) and HC1 (coumaroylquinic acid) exhibited the weakest pro-lipase effects, increasing activity by 36.55% and 31.24%, respectively, at 200 µM. Furthermore, compounds HC4 (hypercerastoside A) and HC7 (hypercerastoside C) did not show any significant effect on lipase activity at lower concentrations.

4. Discussion

A previously developed and validated UHPLC-HRMS method was used for semi-quantitative determination of the identified metabolites in the aerial parts of Hypericum cerastoides. The quantity of the identified metabolites was calculated using external standards hyperoside, chlorogenic acid, or mangiferin [18]. The results are given in Table S1. A total of 39 metabolites were tentatively identified. The largest group is the group of flavonol aglycones and their glycosides. It consists of 22 compounds, and their amount was calculated at 2734.24 µg/g D.W. relative to hyperoside. The compounds in the most significant amounts are rutin 18 (470.62 µg/g D.W), isoquercitrin 19 (470.81 µg/g D.W), and myricetin-3-O-galactoside 12 (259.44 µg/g D.W). Except for compounds 18, 19, and quercetin 36, all the remaining flavonoids, including the quercetin glycosides 17, 22, 23, 27, 29, 30, and 34, the myricetin 33 and its glycosides 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21, and 32, as well as kaempferol 37 and its glucosides 24, 26, and 28, are reported here for the first time in Hypericum cerastoides. Five compounds represented the group of flavan-3-ols, and their total quantity was 527 µg/g D.W., calculated as hyperoside. Catechin 3 (193.22 µg/g D.W.) and procyanidin B2 6 (132.22 µg/g D.W.) were found in the highest amounts. Except for epicatechin 9, all remaining flavan-3-ols, including compounds 1–3 and 6, are reported here for the first time in H. cerastoides. The group of hydroxycinnamic acids consisted of 6 compounds, and their total quantity was calculated to be 367.71 µg/g D.W., expressed as chlorogenic acid. The most significant quantity was 5-O-feruloylquinic acid 10 (136.98 µg/g D.W). All detected hydroxycinnamic acids are reported here for the first time in H. cerastoides. Additionally, a flavolignan 31, a xanthone 35, two benzophenones 14 and 25, and two flavone dimers 38 and 39 were found in small amounts. Their amounts ranged from 66.65 to 157.12 µg/g D.W. The compounds 35, 38, and 39 are common in Hypericum species, while cinchonain Ib 31 is reported here for the first time in this genus.
An extensive chromatographic procedure of the EtOAc extract from the aerial parts of Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson resulted in the isolation and structural identification of seven phenolic compounds (HC1HC7) (Figure 1). Hyperceratoside A (HC4) and hyperceratoside B (HC6) are new natural products, while methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (HC5) and hyperceratoside C (HC7) were not detected in the EtOH extract and considered to be artifacts arising from the extraction with methanol. The isolated compounds are tested for radical-scavenging (DPPH and ABTS), α-glucosidase inhibitory, and lipase-modulating activities.
The results from DPPH and ABTS assays (Table 4) show that the myricetin glycosides (compounds HC2 and HC3) and the methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (compound HC5) have the highest radical scavenging activity in both assays.
Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between the chemical structure and radical scavenging activity of two major groups of phenolic compounds—flavonoids and phenolic acids—as well as their depsides.
It has been established that flavonoids must meet three key structural criteria to exhibit vigorous radical scavenging activity. First, the presence of a 3′,4′-ortho-dihydroxy configuration in the B-ring significantly enhances radical scavenging effectiveness. Second, a C2–C3 double bond configured with a 4-carbonyl group in the C-ring is essential. Third, the presence of a 3-OH group or both 3-OH and 5-OH groups in the A and C rings is also critical for optimal activity [40].
The myricetin glycosides (compounds HC2 and HC3) possess a 3′,4′-ortho-dihydroxyl configuration in the B-ring, a C2–C3 double bond conjugated with a 4-keto group in the C-ring, and hydroxyl groups at positions 5 and 7 in the A-ring—structural features that account for their vigorous radical scavenging activity in both DPPH and ABTS assays. HC2 and HC3 exhibit very similar activity levels in both assays. The only structural difference between them lies in the sugar moiety attached at position 3 of the C-ring—glucose in HC2 and galactose in HC3—which does not appear to influence their radical scavenging potential significantly.
The radical scavenging activity of hydroxycinnamic acids and their depsides depends mainly on the number and position of hydroxyl groups. Methoxylation of hydroxyl groups typically reduces the radical scavenging capacity of these compounds [40]. The methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (HC5) is a caffeic depside with quinic acid. Its high radical scavenging activity—84.57% in the DPPH assay and 71.27% in the ABTS assay—is likely attributed to the presence of five hydroxyl groups: two in the caffeic acid moiety and three in the quinic acid.
The results from the α-glucosidase inhibitory assay (Table 5) indicate that compounds HC1, HC3, and HC6 exhibit inhibitory effects comparable to those of acarbose (marketed as Glucobay), a drug commonly used to prevent type 2 diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. It is well established that acarbose delays the breakdown of carbohydrates by inhibiting α-glucosidase, an intestinal enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of complex carbohydrates such as starch and sucrose into glucose. By inhibiting this enzyme, acarbose slows down the release of glucose into the bloodstream, thereby attenuating postprandial blood glucose spikes. This mechanism contributes to the reduction in daily glycemic fluctuations and leads to lower average blood glucose levels. The findings suggest that Hypericum cerastoides represents a promising natural source for the isolation of compounds with α-glucosidase inhibitory activity.
The results for the lipase-modulating activity test (Table 6) demonstrate that compounds HC1, HC2, HC3, HC5, and HC6 exhibit pro-lipase activity. The myricetin glycosides (HC2 and HC3) and methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (HC5) are the most active constituents, while HC6 and HC1 exhibited the weakest pro-lipase effects. Compounds exhibiting pro-lipase activity have been identified as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of cachexia [41]. Cachexia is a pathological condition characterized by severe body wasting, marked by significant weight loss accompanied by the depletion of both adipose tissue and skeletal muscle mass. This syndrome is most commonly observed in patients with advanced-stage cancer, as well as in individuals suffering from anorexia or severe infectious diseases [42].

5. Conclusions

A UHPLC-HRMS-based profiling of hydroalcoholic extract from the aerial parts of Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson tentatively identified 39 phenolic compounds (flavonoids, flavan-3-ols, and a flavolignan, as well as hydrohycinnamic acid derivatives, benzophenones, a xanthone, and flavone dimers). The main groups were flavonoids (22 compounds) and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives (6 compounds), and their total amount was calculated at 2734.24 and 527 µg/g D.W. relative to hyperoside, respectively. Those present in the most significant quantities were rutin 18 (470.62 µg/g D.W), isoquercitrin 19 (470.81 µg/g D.W), myricetin-3-O-galactoside 12 (259.44 µg/g D.W), and 5-O-feruloylquinic acid 10 (136.98 µg/g D.W).
Two new phenolic compounds, namely hypercerastoside A (HC4) and hypercerastoside B (HC6), together with three known compounds, coumaroylquinic acid (HC1), myricetin-3-O-glycoside (HC2), and myricetin-3-O-galactoside (HC3), as well as two artifacts, namely methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (HC5) and hypercerastoside C (HC7), were isolated from the ethylacetate extract of the aerial parts of title plant and identified using spectroscopic methods (1D and 2D NMR, UV, and HRMS-ESI). Isolated compounds were tested for radical-scavenging, anti-α-glucosidase, and pro-lipase activity.
The radical scavenging activity of the isolated compounds HC1HC7 was evaluated using both the DPPH and ABTS assays. The results revealed that the myricetin glycosides (compounds HC2 and HC3), along with the methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (compound HC5), exhibited the highest radical scavenging activity in both assays. Their activity was either comparable to or exceeded that of standard antioxidants such as vitamin C and Trolox.
Compound HC1 (coumaroylquinic acid) demonstrated the most vigorous α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with an IC50 value of 44 µM, significantly surpassing that of acarbose (IC50 = 206 µM). Myricetin-3-O-galactoside (HC3) exhibited inhibitory activity equivalent to that of the reference compound (IC50 = 206 µM). These findings suggest that compounds HC1 and HC3 exert effects comparable to acarbose, a clinically used α-glucosidase inhibitor for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance.
The myricetin glycosides (compounds HC2 and HC3) exhibited the highest pro-lipase activity, enhancing lipase enzyme function by approximately fivefold at a concentration of 200 µM compared to the control. This pronounced stimulatory effect may suggest their potential application in the treatment of cachexia, a condition commonly associated with cancer, anorexia, and infectious diseases.
Overall, the findings suggest that H. cerastoides is a promising source of bioactive phenolic compounds with notable radical-scavenging and enzyme-modulating activities. These results emphasize its potential therapeutic relevance, especially for oxidative stress-related disorders, type 2 diabetes, and cachexia, and support further research to validate and expand these findings. The LC-MS profiling performed in this study offers a strong basis for future detailed phytochemical research focused on isolating a wider variety of biologically active compounds and validating their activity through in vivo experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo15100643/s1, Table S1: The detected and identified polar phenolic compounds and their quantity in the EtOH extract from the aerial parts of H. cerastoides; Figures S1–S21: MS and NMR spectra of compounds HC4, HC6, and HC7. Figures S22–S27: A plausible MS/MS fragmentation pattern of some metabolites found in the aerial parts of H. cerastoides.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.T.N. and Z.K.-N.; methodology and investigation, P.T.N., Y.I., T.M. and Z.K.-N.; data curation, T.M., Z.K.-N. and P.T.N. writing—original draft preparation, P.T.N., Z.K.-N. and T.M.; writing—review and editing, P.T.N., Y.I. and Z.K.-N.; visualization, P.T.N. and Z.K.-N.; supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, P.T.N. and Z.K.-N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union project NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, grant number BG-RRP-2.004-0004-C01 (LC-MS analysis and APC fees) and by the Medical Science Council at the Medical University of Sofia, grant number D-75/03.05.2018.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Crockett, S.; Robson, N. Taxonomy and Chemotaxonomy of the Genus Hypericum. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  2. Avato, P. A Survey on the Hypericum Genus: Secondary Metabolites and Bioactivity. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2005, 30, 603–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, J.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.C. Recent Advances Regarding Constituents and Bioactivities of Plants from the Genus Hypericum. Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 309–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Robson, N.K.B. Studies in the Genus Hypericum L. (Hypericaceae) 5(1). Sections 10. Olympia to 15/16. Crossophyllum. Phytotaxa 2010, 4, 5–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kizilarslan, Ç.; Özhatay, N. Wild Plants Used as Medicinal Purpose in the South Part of Izmit (Northwest Turkey). Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 9, 199–218. [Google Scholar]
  6. Özkan, E.E.; Mat, A. An Overview on Hypericum Species of Turkey. J. Pharmacogn. Phytother. 2013, 5, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Erken, S.; Malyer, H.; Demirci, F.; Demirci, B.; Baser, K.H.C. Chemical Investigations on Some Hypericum Species Growing in Turkey-I. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2001, 37, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Semerdjieva, I.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Dincheva, I.; Piperkova, N.; Maneva, V.; Cantrell, C.L.; Astatkie, T.; Stoyanova, A.; Ivanova, T. Essential Oil Composition of Seven Bulgarian Hypericum Species and Its Potential as a Biopesticide. Plants 2023, 12, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kitanov, G.M.; Nedialkov, P.T. Mangiferin and Isomangiferin in Some Hypericum Species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1998, 26, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Crockett, S.L.; Schaneberg, B.; Khan, I.A. Phytochemical Profiling of New and Old World Hypericum (St. John’s Wort) Species. Phytochem. Anal. 2005, 16, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Konya-Konuk, R.; Aru, B.; Öztürk, C.; Kırmızıbekmez, H. A Novel Normonoterpene Glycoside and a New Benzophenone Derivative from Hypericum cerastioides and Their in Vitro Cytotoxic Activities. Fitoterapia 2024, 179, 106276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tanaka, T.; Nakashima, T.; Ueda, T.; Tomii, K.; Kouno, I. Facile Discrimination of Aldose Enantiomers by Reversed-Phase HPLC. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 899–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nedialkov, P.T.; Kokanova-Nedialkova, Z.; Buecherl, D.; Momekov, G.; Heilmann, J.; Nikolov, S. 30-Normedicagenic Acid Glycosides from Chenopodium Foliosum. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 1419–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kokanova-Nedialkova, Z.; Kondeva-Burdina, M.; Nedialkov, P.T. Neuroprotective, Anti-α-Glucosidase and Prolipase Active Flavonoids from Good King Henry (Chenopodium bonus-henricus L.). Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 5484–5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kang, W.-Y.; Song, Y.-L.; Zhang, L. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Antioxidant Properties and Antidiabetic Activity of Hypericum ascyron L. Med. Chem. Res. 2011, 20, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McDougall, G.J.; Kulkarni, N.N.; Stewart, D. Berry Polyphenols Inhibit Pancreatic Lipase Activity in Vitro. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kokanova-Nedialkova, Z.; Nedialkov, P. Antioxidant Properties of 6-Methoxyflavonol Glycosides from the Aerial Parts of Chenopodium bonus-henricus L. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 2017, 49, 253–258. [Google Scholar]
  18. Marinov, T.; Kokanova-Nedialkova, Z.; Nedialkov, P. UHPLC-HRMS-Based Profiling and Simultaneous Quantification of the Hydrophilic Phenolic Compounds from the Aerial Parts of Hypericum aucheri Jaub. & Spach (Hypericaceae). Pharmacia 2024, 71, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.; Yan, X.; Bi, J.; Wu, X.; Liu, J.; Zhou, M. Identification of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Guava Dehydrated by Different Drying Methods. Dry. Technol. 2020, 38, 987–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beltrame, F.L.; Filho, E.R.; Barros, F.A.P.; Cortez, D.A.; Cass, Q.B. A Validated Higher-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for Quantification of Cinchonain Ib in Bark and Phytopharmaceuticals of Trichilia catigua Used as Catuaba. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1119, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, L.; Tu, Z.; Xie, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Sha, X. Antihyperglycemic, Antioxidant Activities of Two Acer palmatum Cultivars, and Identification of Phenolics Profile by UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS: New Natural Sources of Functional Constituents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 89, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohd Jusoh, N.H.; Subki, A.; Yeap, S.K.; Yap, K.C.; Jaganath, I.B. Pressurized Hot Water Extraction of Hydrosable Tannins from Phyllanthus tenellus Roxb. BMC Chem. 2019, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. March, R.E.; Miao, X.-S. A Fragmentation Study of Kaempferol Using Electrospray Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry at High Mass Resolution. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 231, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cuyckens, F.; Claeys, M. Mass Spectrometry in the Structural Analysis of Flavonoids. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 39, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Meng, X.; Yan, G.; Wang, X. Application of Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Rapid Analysis of Constituents and Metabolites from the Extracts of Acanthopanax senticosus Harms Leaf. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2016, 12, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. An, H.; Wang, H.; Lan, Y.; Hashi, Y.; Chen, S. Simultaneous Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids for the Quality Control of Apocynum venetum L. Leaves by HPLC–DAD–ESI–IT–TOF–MS and HPLC–DAD. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 85, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Xiao, Y.C.; Liu, L.T.; Bian, J.J.; Yan, C.Q.; Ye, L.; Zhao, M.X.; Huang, Q.S.; Wang, W.; Liang, K.; Shi, Z.F.; et al. Identification of Multiple Constituents in Shuganjieyu Capsule and Rat Plasma after Oral Administration by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Electrospray Ionization and Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Acta Chromatogr. 2018, 30, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cuyckens, F.; Claeys, M. Determination of the Glycosylation Site in Flavonoid Mono-O-Glycosides by Collision-Induced Dissociation of Electrospray-Generated Deprotonated and Sodiated Molecules. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 40, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.; Zhong, X.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, L.; Huang, X.; Dong, Z.; Yang, S.; He, W.; Zeng, J.; Qing, Z. Systematic Identification Metabolites of Hemerocallis citrina Borani by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Combined with a Screening Method. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 186, 113314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Yao, S.; Li, S.; Yang, W.; Jiang, B.; Liu, X.; Wu, W.; Qv, H.; Guo, D. Neutral Loss Ion Mapping Experiment Combined with Precursor Mass List and Dynamic Exclusion for Screening Unstable Malonyl Glucoside Conjugates. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2016, 27, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Karanga, Y.; Ilboudo, O.; Tapsoba, I.; Colson, E.; Gerbaux, P.; Bonzi-Coulibaly, Y.L. Characterization of Flavonoids in the Ethyl Acetate Extract from Euphorbia hirta L. by Liquid Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Sci. Struct. Matičre 2022, 6, 123–136. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, X.; Chen, H.; Jia, Y.; Peng, J.; Li, C. Inhibitory Effects against Alpha-Amylase of an Enriched Polyphenol Extract from Pericarp of Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana). Foods 2022, 11, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, M.; Liu, W.-X.; Zheng, M.-F.; Xu, Q.-L.; Wan, F.-H.; Wang, J.; Lei, T.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Tan, J.-W. Bioactive Quinic Acid Derivatives from Ageratina adenophora. Molecules 2013, 18, 14096–14104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Agrawal, P.K. Carbon-13 NMR of Flavonoids; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; ISBN 1-4832-9074-3. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mabry, T.; Markham, K.R.; Thomas, M.B. The Systematic Identification of Flavonoids; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1970; ISBN 3-642-88458-X. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pauli, G.F.; Poetsch, F.; Nahrstedt, A. Structure Assignment of Natural Quinic Acid Derivatives Using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Techniques. Phytochem. Anal. 1998, 9, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ilieva, Y. Acylphloroglucinols from Species of the Genus Hypericum L.: Isolation, Structural Characterization and Testing for Cytotoxic and Antineoplastic Activity. Ph.D. Thesis, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, H.; Orjala, J.; Sticher, O.; Rali, T. Acylated Flavonol Glycosides from Leaves of Stenochlaena palustris. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heck, A.M.; Yanovski, J.A.; Calis, K.A. Orlistat, a New Lipase Inhibitor for the Management of Obesity. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 2000, 20, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rice-Evans, C.A.; Miller, N.J.; Paganga, G. Structure-Antioxidant Activity Relationships of Flavonoids and Phenolic Acids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1996, 20, 933–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kusunoki, M.; Tsutsumi, K.; Tana, C.; Sato, D.; Nakamura, T. Lipoprotein Lipase Activation Improves the Cachexia and Obesity. J. Obes. Weight Loss Ther. 2013, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Peixoto da Silva, S.; Santos, J.M.O.; Costa e Silva, M.P.; Gil da Costa, R.M.; Medeiros, R. Cancer Cachexia and Its Pathophysiology: Links with Sarcopenia, Anorexia and Asthenia. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020, 11, 619–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The structures of the isolated phenolic compounds from the ethyl acetate extract of H. cerastioides.
Figure 1. The structures of the isolated phenolic compounds from the ethyl acetate extract of H. cerastioides.
Metabolites 15 00643 g001
Figure 2. The selected COSY and HMBC correlations of HC4.
Figure 2. The selected COSY and HMBC correlations of HC4.
Metabolites 15 00643 g002
Figure 3. A plausible fragmentation of compound HC6.
Figure 3. A plausible fragmentation of compound HC6.
Metabolites 15 00643 g003
Figure 4. Selected COSY and HMBC correlations of HC6.
Figure 4. Selected COSY and HMBC correlations of HC6.
Metabolites 15 00643 g004
Figure 5. A plausible fragmentation of compound HC7.
Figure 5. A plausible fragmentation of compound HC7.
Metabolites 15 00643 g005
Figure 6. Selected COSY and HMBC correlations of HC7.
Figure 6. Selected COSY and HMBC correlations of HC7.
Metabolites 15 00643 g006
Table 1. 1H and 13C NMR spectral data (in ppm) of compound HC4.
Table 1. 1H and 13C NMR spectral data (in ppm) of compound HC4.
Position δH, Int., Mult. (J in Hz)δC (ppm), Mult. 1
1-109.4, C
2-158.6, C
36.32, 1H, d (2.0)95.8, CH
4-162.4, C
56.18, 1H, d (2.0)98.0, CH
6-160.0, C
1′-140.3, C
2′7.72, 1H, m129.9, CH
3′7.44, 1H, m128.9, CH
4′7.55, 1H, m133.1, CH
5′7.44, 1H, m128.9, CH
6′7.72, 1H, m129.9, CH
C=O-196.5, C
1″5.01, 1H, d (8.0)99.6, CH
2″4.46, 1H, dd (8.0, 9.6)73.7, CH
3″3.55, 1H, dd (9.6, 9.0)75.9, CH
4″3.41, 1H, dd (8.9, 9.6)71.3, CH
5″3.50, 1H, m77.9, CH
6″3.90, 1H, dd (2.6, 11.9)
3.71, 1H, dd (5.6, 11.9)
62.4, CH2
1‴-169.3, C
2‴1.78, 3H, s20.7, CH3
1 The 1H-NMR spectrum and HSQC experiment determined multiplicities.
Table 2. 1H (at 600 MHz) and 13C NMR (at 150 MHz) spectral data (in ppm) of compound HC6 taken in (CD3)2CO.
Table 2. 1H (at 600 MHz) and 13C NMR (at 150 MHz) spectral data (in ppm) of compound HC6 taken in (CD3)2CO.
Position δH, Int., Mult. (J in Hz)δC (ppm), Mult. 1
2-169.8, C
32.67, 2H, d (3.8)37.0, CH2
44.35, 1H, m72.9, CH
52.27, 1H, m; 1.74, 1H, m31.7, CH2
64.45, 1H, m80.9, CH
71.80, 1H, m33.1, CH
80.91, 2H, d (6.8)18.4, CH3
90.91, 2H, d (6.8)17.7, CH3
1′4.50, 1H, d (7.8)104.2, CH
2′3.24, 1H, dd (9.0, 7.8)74.7, CH
3′3.45, 1H, dd (9.0, 8.8)77.6, CH
4′3.40, 1H, dd (9.2, 8.8)71.2, CH
5′3.61, 1H, m75.0, CH
6′4.52, 1H, dd (11.8, 2.0);
4.29, 1H, dd (11.8, 6.4)
64.3, CH2
1″-167.5, C
2″6.39, 1H, d (16.0)115.3, CH
3″7.64, 1H, d (16.0)145.6, CH
4″ 126.9, C
5″7.57, 2H, d (8.6)131.0, CH
6″6.91, 2H, d (8.6)116.7, CH
7″ 160.7, CH
8″6.91, 2H, d (8.6)116.7, CH
9″7.57, 2H, d (8.6)131.0, CH
1 The 1H-NMR spectrum and HSQC experiment determined multiplicities.
Table 3. 1H (at 600 MHz) and 13C NMR (at 150 MHz) spectral data (in ppm) of compound HC7 taken in (CD3)2CO.
Table 3. 1H (at 600 MHz) and 13C NMR (at 150 MHz) spectral data (in ppm) of compound HC7 taken in (CD3)2CO.
Position δH, Int., Mult. (J in Hz)δC (ppm), Mult. 1
1-172.8, C
22.65, 2H, m40.2, CH2
34.30, 1H, m76.8, CH
41.78, 1H, m; 1.69, 1H, m40.3, CH2
53.54, 1H, m73.8, CH
61.64, 1H, m34.4, CH
70.85, 3H, d (6.8)19.3, CH3
80.83, 3H, d (6.8)17.4, CH3
93.64, 3H, s51.8, CH3
1′4.49, 1H, d (7.8)103.9, CH
2′3.18, 1H, dd (9.0, 8.8)74.9, CH
3’3.45, 1H, dd (9.0, 8.8)77.7, CH
4’3.37, 1H, dd (9.0, 8.8)71.4, CH
5’3.61, 1H, m75.0, CH
6’4.52, 1H, dd (11.8, 2.2)
4.27, 1H, dd (11.8, 6.6)
64.5, CH2
1’’-167.5, C
2’’6.40, 1H, d (16.0)116.7, CH
3’’7.63, 1H, d (16.0)145.5, CH
4″-127.0, C
5″7.57, 2H, d (8.6)131.0, CH
6″6.91, 2H, d (8.6)115.5, CH
7″-160.6, C
8″6.91, 2H, d (8.6)116.7, CH
9″7.57, 2H, d (8.6)131.0, CH
1 The HSQC experiment determined multiplicities.
Table 4. DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging activity of compounds HC1HC7.
Table 4. DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging activity of compounds HC1HC7.
CompoundsDPPH % 1ABTS % 2
coumaroylquinic acid (HC1)18.95 ± 0.3622.12 ± 0.63
myricetin-3-O-glucoside (HC2)84.32 ± 0.2397.23 ± 0.45
myricetin-3-O-galactoside (HC3)82.70 ± 0.3496.04 ± 0.37
hypercerastoside A (HC4)14.63 ± 0.5070.20 ± 0.23
methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (HC5)84.57 ± 0.2771.27 ± 0.08
hypercerastoside B (HC6)15.93 ± 0.3325.50 ± 0.12
hypercerastoside C (HC7)11.48 ± 0.2126.88 ± 0.33
Vit C59.44 ± 0.4266.21 ± 0.45
Trolox88.33 ± 0.3394.16 ± 0.32
1 p < 0.05 vs. control (untreated DPPH). 2 p < 0.05 vs. control (untreated ABTS).
Table 5. α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity (IC50) of compounds HC1HC7.
Table 5. α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity (IC50) of compounds HC1HC7.
Compoundsα-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity (IC50 ± SD) 1
coumaroylquinic acid (HC1)44 ± 5 µM
myricetin-3-O-glucoside (HC2)NA 2
myricetin-3-O-galactoside (HC3)206 ± 13 µM
hypercerastoside A (HC4)NA 2
methyl ester of chlorogenic acid (HC5)NA 2
hypercerastoside B (HC6)371 ± 9 µM
hypercerastoside C (HC7)NA 2
Acarbose206 ± 10 µM
1 p > 0.05 vs. control (substrate + untreated enzyme). 2 The compound is not active.
Table 6. Pro-lipase activity of compounds HC1HC7.
Table 6. Pro-lipase activity of compounds HC1HC7.
CompoundsPro-Lipase Activity (%) 1 at
200 µM100 µM50 µM25 µM12.5 µM
HC131.24 ± 0.7024.44 ± 0.4615.05 ± 0.2710.86 ± 0.037.15 ± 0.17
HC2479.69 ± 7.63257.38 ± 3.68137.99 ± 2.6972.56 ± 1.2561.94 ± 0.44
HC3492.57 ± 10.25263.68 ± 4.96153.47 ± 3.5685.85 ± 1.1946.98 ± 0.48
HC4NA 2NA 2NA 2NA 2NA 2
HC5169.79 ± 4.2390.09 ± 2.1946.87 ± 1.1228.24 ± 0.6121.39 ± 0.21
HC636.55 ± 0.5727 ± 0.5015.96 ± 0.2313.75 ± 0.318.28 ± 0.17
HC7NA 1NA 1NA 1NA 1NA 1
1 p > 0.05 vs. control (substrate + untreated enzyme). 2 The compound is not active.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kokanova-Nedialkova, Z.; Ilieva, Y.; Marinov, T.; Nedialkov, P.T. Phenolic Compounds from Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson: Dereplication via UHPLC-HRMS/MS, Isolation, Identification, and Preliminary Biological Evaluation Focusing on Radical-Scavenging, Anti-α-Glucosidase, and Pro-Lipase Activities. Metabolites 2025, 15, 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15100643

AMA Style

Kokanova-Nedialkova Z, Ilieva Y, Marinov T, Nedialkov PT. Phenolic Compounds from Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson: Dereplication via UHPLC-HRMS/MS, Isolation, Identification, and Preliminary Biological Evaluation Focusing on Radical-Scavenging, Anti-α-Glucosidase, and Pro-Lipase Activities. Metabolites. 2025; 15(10):643. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15100643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kokanova-Nedialkova, Zlatina, Yana Ilieva, Teodor Marinov, and Paraskev T. Nedialkov. 2025. "Phenolic Compounds from Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson: Dereplication via UHPLC-HRMS/MS, Isolation, Identification, and Preliminary Biological Evaluation Focusing on Radical-Scavenging, Anti-α-Glucosidase, and Pro-Lipase Activities" Metabolites 15, no. 10: 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15100643

APA Style

Kokanova-Nedialkova, Z., Ilieva, Y., Marinov, T., & Nedialkov, P. T. (2025). Phenolic Compounds from Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N. Robson: Dereplication via UHPLC-HRMS/MS, Isolation, Identification, and Preliminary Biological Evaluation Focusing on Radical-Scavenging, Anti-α-Glucosidase, and Pro-Lipase Activities. Metabolites, 15(10), 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15100643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop