Next Article in Journal
Common Strategies and Factors Affecting Off-Line Breath Sampling and Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis Using Thermal Desorption-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (TD-GC-MS)
Next Article in Special Issue
Interactions of Mycotoxin Alternariol with Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and OATP Transporters
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolites Associated with the Main Nutrients in Two Varieties of Purple Rice Processed to Polished Rice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interactions between Natural Products—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Coumarins of Lovage Roots (Levisticum officinale W.D.J.Koch): LC-MS Profile, Quantification, and Stability during Postharvest Storage

by
Daniil N. Olennikov
Laboratory of Biomedical Research, Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Science, Sakh’yanovoy Street 6, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russia
Metabolites 2023, 13(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010003
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Metabolites from Natural Sources)

Abstract

:
Lovage (Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch) is a known aromatic apiaceous species that is widely used as a culinary and medicinal plant. Traditionally, more scientific attention has been paid to lovage volatiles, while other groups of compounds have been underutilized. In this study, metabolites of fresh lovage roots were investigated by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and 25 compounds were identified, including coumarins as basic components and minor hydroxycinnamates; most were detected for the first time in the plant. Four major coumarins (including apterin, xanthotoxin, isopimpinellin, and pimpinellin) were successfully separated by a validated HPLC–PDA method, and the fresh roots of seven lovage cultivars as well as the dry roots of commercial lovage were quantified. The coumarin content deviation was 1.7–2.9 mg/g in the fresh roots and 15–24 mg/g in the dry roots. A variation in the coumarin level was found during storage of the fresh lovage roots at chill and room temperatures, while storage of the dried roots at room temperature showed the lowest loss of target compounds. This new information about the metabolites of lovage indicates the prospects of the plant roots as a source of dietary coumarins.

1. Introduction

Lovage (Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch; syn. Angelica levisticum (L.) All., Ligusticum levisticum L., and Selinum levisticum (L.) E.H.L. Krause)) is a single species of the Levisticum Hill genus included in the Apiaceae family. Lovage grows natively in Southwest Asia (Hazaran Mountain, Kerman province, Iran) and southern Europe and has been cultivated globally for a long time as a food plant and a source of spicy greens [1]. The parts of the plant that are used include the underground organs, the aboveground part, as well as seeds, which are typical for some food species of Apiaceae (celery, parsley, parsnip), in which greens, roots, and fruits have culinary value [2]. Lovage leaves are used as spicy salad greens because they have a characteristic odor close to the odor of celery and parsley, and the roots are used as a cooked or fresh vegetable [3]. Despite the lower popularity of lovage compared to related species, interest in the study of the component composition arose in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as evidenced by the data on the isolation of α-terpineol, cineol, and myristic acid from the roots [4]. Soon after, Naves (1943) discovered and characterized four phtalides (butyl phtalide, butyl dihydrophtalide, butyl tetrahydrophtalide, and butylidene phthalide) [4]. Subsequently, approximately 20 representatives of the phtalides group were isolated from the plant [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] (Table 1). Further investigation led to detection of polyynes, mono- and sesquiterpenes, phenolics, and other groups [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
Because all organs of the plant have a pronounced odor, the main studies of L. officinale have been focused on the study of the spicy-flavored components, which allowed to determine in detail the composition of the essential oil and volatile fractions from all organs of the plant, including roots [5,6,8,9,11,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], fruits [5,6,11,23,25], leaves [5,6,11,12,18,21,26], stems [5,6,11,12,18], and flowers [23,24,25,27]. Very little attention has been paid to the study of other groups of extractives. In particular, the presence of some simple phenols (eugenol, carvacrol, methyl salicylate, cuminaldehyde, estragole, and pentyl benzene) is known in volatile extracts of roots [4,11,21], fruits [6,25], and leaves [21], and the presence of hydroxycinnamates (derivatives of caffeic acid, ferulic acid, etc.) [10,12,14,15,29,30,31], coumarins [4,14,15,28], and flavonoids [12,14,15,29] is known in alcohol-derived extracts of the roots and leaves. Trustworthy information regarding fresh lovage roots is extremely scarce, partially owing to the difficulties of practical work with fresh tissue. This detrimental attitude towards the study of spice plants is unfortunately typical, leading to a profound lack of knowledge about the metabolome of this food species.
One of the poorly studied groups of phytocomponents characteristic of the food species of Apiaceae is the coumarin group, a group of phenolic α-pyrone compounds, which are well-studied for non-food members of the family but are still underutilized in regular products [32]. Coumarins of Apiaceae include simple coumarins (umbelliferon, scopoletin, esculetin) [33]; furanocoumarins (psoralen, bergapten, etc.) have been detected in celery [34], dill [35], and carrot [32]; pyranocoumarins (visnadin, dihydrosamidin, etc.) are typical for medical species such as Angelica [36], Peucedanum [37], and Phlojodicarpus [38,39]. Known data on coumarins of L. officinale are limited, and include information about pyranocoumarins psoralen, 5-methoxypsoralen, and imperatorin from fruits [28], apterin from the leaves [14,15], and bergapten from roots [4]. This information cannot be considered complete and needs additional study of the componential profile and quantification data of L. officinale coumarins. Additionally, furanocoumarins are bioactive metabolites with proven antivirus [40], antiallergic [41], antidiabetic [42], antidepressive [43], anticancer [44], and anti-inflammatory potential [45]. Thus, furanocoumarin-containing foods may be promising functional products.
Apiaceous vegetables (e.g., carrot, celery, and parsley) have a culinary application as fresh roots; therefore, owing to the limited postharvest shelf life, the study of chemical changes deserves special attention to reduce losses. In particular, it is known that the process of storing reduces the content of carotenes, phenolics, and ascorbic acid in fresh carrot roots [46,47], and chill storage allows to slow down destructive processes [48]. Twenty-days of storage of fresh celery roots resulted in the decrease or increase in the content of chlorogenic acids, depending on the variety [49], while the ascorbic acid content reduced after six days of postharvest refrigerated storage [50]. There is no information about postharvest stability of coumarins in lovage and other apiaceous species despite their obligate presence in root products.
As part of the ongoing study of Apiaceae coumarins [36,37,38,39], high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection with electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometric detection (HPLC–PDA–ESI–TQ–MS) was applied for phenolic metabolite profiling of the fresh roots of lovage (L. officinale), followed by the quantification of the principal components by rapid HPLC–PDA of the fresh roots of seven lovage cultivars and dry commercial products, and the postharvest changes of coumarins in the lovage roots were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Chemicals

Cultivated samples of Levisticum officinale roots were harvested in Buryat Fruit and Plant Nursery located in the vicinity of Ulan-Ude (Russia) using authenticated seeds of lovage (cv. Amur, Don Juan, Heracles, Lider, Magnus, Preobrazhenskii, Udalets) purchased in the National Seed Repository (Moscow, Russia). All plants were authenticated by Prof. N.I. Kashchenko (IGEB SB RAS, Ulan-Ude, Russia). The fresh roots were conditioned in plastic boxes and transported to the laboratory at 4 °C within 2–3 h. The reference standards were purchased from Anexib Chemicals (Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada): peucedanin (≥95%; No P173001); Biopurity Phytochemicals Ltd. (Chengdu, Sichuan, China): skimmin (≥98%; No BP1316); ChemFaces (Wuhan, Hubei, China): apterin (≥98%; No CFN95005), 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (≥98%; No. 94419), 1,3-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (≥98%; No. D8196), 3,4-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (≥90%; No. SMB00224), 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid, 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (≥85%; No. SMB00221), cichoriin (≥98%; No CFN95196), isobergapten (≥98%; No CFN90231), 5-O-feruloylquinic acid (≥98%; No CFN92889); MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA: angelicin (≥98%; No HY-N0763), apiosylskimmin (≥98%; No HY-N2356), isoimperatorin (≥98%; No HY-N0286), pimpinellin (≥98%; No HY-N0438); Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA): bergapten (≥99%; No 69664), esculin (≥95%; No Y0001612), esculetin (≥98%; No 246573), isopimpinellin (≥95%; No 61419), umbelliferone (≥99%; No H24003), xanthotoxin (≥98%; No 56448); Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA): imperatorin (≥98%; No S380901), osthole (≥98%; No S2337), and psoralen (≥98%; No S4737).

2.2. Plant Extracts Preparation

Fresh roots of 3 y.o. lovage plants (25–30 cm long) were homogenized by X-1740 homogenizer (Goldleaf Scientific, Riverside, CA, USA), and a portion of homogenate (5 g) was treated by 45 mL of methanol and sonicated twice (ultrasonic bath, 20 min, 50 °C, ultrasound power 100 W, frequency 35 kHz). Dry lovage roots were ground in laboratory grinder KM-100 (MRC group, Harlow, Essex, UK) till particle size 0.125 μm, and 1-g sample was extracted by 50 mL of methanol with double sonication (ultrasonic bath, 40 min, 50 °C, ultrasound power 100 W, frequency 35 kHz). Methanolic extract (after fresh or dry tissue extraction) was filtered through 0.22-μm syringe filters into a measuring flask (100 mL) and the final volume was filled up to 100 mL by methanol. The resultant extract was stored at 2 °C before analysis.

2.3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Photodiode Array Detection and Electrospray Ionization Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometric Detection (HPLC-PDA-ESI-TQ-MS) Metabolite Profiling

Lovage roots metabolite profiling was performed by HPLC-PDA-ESI-TQ-MS assay on the liquid chromatograph LC-20 Prominence coupled with photodiode array detector SPD-M30A (wavelength range 200–600 nm), triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer LCMS 8050 (all Shimadzu, Columbia, MD, USA) and ProntoSIL 120-5 C18 AQ column (1 mm × 50 mm, 1 μm; Knauer, Berlin, Germany). The gradient elution used eluents A (1% acetic acid in water) and B (1% acetic acid in acetonitrile) and the gradient program (%B): 0–4 min 5–100%, 4–5 min 100%, 5–6 min 100–5%, and 6–7 min 5%. The injection volume was 0.5 μL and the flow rate was 500 μL/min. Ultraviolet spectra were recorded in a spectral range 200–600 nm. Electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometric detection used temperature 300 °C in the ESI interface, 250 °C in the desolvation line, and 400 °C in the heat block. The nebulizing gas (N2) flow value was 3 L/min, heating gas (air)—10 L/min, and collision-induced dissociation gas (Ar)—0.3 mL/min. The source voltage of mass spectra was 3 kV, collision energy was +10–+25 eV (positive ionization), and the scanning range was m/z 80–1900. LabSolution’s workstation software managed the LC-MS system. The integrated analysis of retention time, ultraviolet and mass spectra data after comparison with the inner LC-MS library, reference standards and the literature data were used for the identification of metabolites.

2.4. HPLC-PDA-MS Metabolite Quantification

To quantify four coumarins (apterin, xanthotoxin, isopimpinellin, pimpinellin) in plant extracts, the HPLC-PDA-ESI-TQ-MS separation and detection conditions were used (Section 2.3). Reference standards were separately weighed (10 mg), dissolved in the methanol in volumetric flasks (10 mL), and the stock solution (1000 µg/mL) was used to prepare the calibration solutions (1–100 µg/mL). After the separation, PDA data were used to create ‘concentration–PDA peak area’ correlation. Correlation coefficient (r2), standard deviation (SYX), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), and linear range were calculated in Advanced Grapher 2.2 (Alentum Software Inc., Ramat-Gan, Israel) using calibration curve data. Values of intra-day and inter-day precisions and recovery of spiked sample were determined as described early [38]. Three HPLC runs were sufficient for the quantitative analyses, and the results were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (S.D.).

2.5. Lovage Roots Storage Experiment

Six and five portions of the fresh lovage samples (10 roots, approx. equal; cv. Lider) were deposited into the individual polystyrene bags (2 L) and incubated at (1) 1 °C (6 months) or (2) at 20 °C (14 days), respectively, in a ventilated MK 53 thermostat (BINDER GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). Five roots of stored samples were taken out for analysis (1) every month or (2) at 1, 3, 7, 11 and 14 days, and extraction/analysis procedure was applied (Section 2.2, Section 2.3 and Section 2.4). The samples of dry lovage roots (manufacturer Evalar, CJSC; production year 2016; 1 kg) were deposited into the individual polystyrene bags (2 L) and incubated at 10 °C in a ventilated MK 53 thermostat (BINDER GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany) for 6 years. Two-hundred portions of stored sample were taken out for analysis every year and extraction/analysis procedure was applied (Section 2.2, Section 2.3 and Section 2.4).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by one-way analysis of variance, and the significance of the mean difference was determined by Duncan’s multiple range test. Differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The results are presented as the mean ± S.D. The linear regression analysis and generation of calibration graphs were conducted using Advanced Grapher 2.2 (Alentum Software, Inc., Ramat-Gan, Israel).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phenolic Metabolite Profiling of Fresh Lovage Roots

Application of HPLC–PDA–ESI–tQ–MS and micro-sized column (1 × 50 mm) successfully separated 25 metabolites in 5 min in fresh lovage root extract. Identification was achieved after comparison of retention times and ultraviolet (UV) and mass spectra with reference standards and the literature data [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62] (Figure 1a and Table 2). The most abundant group of metabolites was coumarins, including nineteen compounds (13, 5, 6, 9, 10, 1425), and a lesser group of hydroxycinnamates consisted of six acids (4, 7, 8, and 1113). Coumarins have specific absorbance in the UV region [60] and gave a typical triplet in the positive ionization mass spectra, featuring signals of protonated ion [M+H]+ and 23 and 39 amu larger adducts with sodium [M+Na]+ and potassium [M+K]+ [38] (Figure 1b–e).
Simple coumarins with a bicyclic structure included esculetin (6,7-dihydroxycoumarin, 5) and two of its glycosides, i.e., of esculin (esculetin 6-O-glucoside, 1) [51] and cichoriin (esculetin 7-O-glucoside, 2) [52]; umbelliferone (7-hydroxycoumarin, 10) and two of its glycosides, i.e., skimmin (umbelliferone O-glucoside, 6) [55] and apiosylskimmin (3) [39]; and osthole (7-methoxy-8-isopentenylcoumarin, 23) [61] (Figure 2). None of the simple coumarins were previously found in the lovage roots. Eleven furanocoumarins have a non-glycosidic nature with the 2′,3′:7,6-coupled furan ring (e.g., psoralen (15) [57], bergapten (17) [58], xanthotoxin (18) [59], isopimpinellin (19) [60], imperatorin (22) [60], peucedanin (24) [62], and isoimperatorin (25) [60]) or the 2′,3′:8,7-coupled furan ring (e.g., vaginol (14) [56], angelicin (16) [57], pimpinellin (20) [60], and isobergapten (21) [60]). The only glycosidic furanocoumarin was vaginol 8-O-glucoside or apterin (9) [56]. Psoralen and imperatorin were previously detected in lovage fruits [28], bergapten was detected in the roots [4], and apterin was detected in the leaves of the plant [14,15]. Compounds 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, and 25 were found in L. officinale for the first time. The known dietary coumarins in rooting apiaceous foods have been found in carrot as 6-methoxymellein [63], bergapten, isopimpinellin, and xanthotoxin [64]; they have been found in fennel as bergapten, isopimpinellin, and xanthotoxin [64]; and they have been found in celery and parsley as umbellifereone, scopoletin and esculetin [34]. Thus, it is clear why lovage roots are able to accumulate coumarins with various structures.
Non-coumarin metabolites of fresh lovage roots are derivatives of caffeic acid as mono- (4) and di-O-caffeoylquinic acids (7, 1113) as well as 5-O-feruloylquinic acid [53]. Acid 4 has been previously found in the herbal part of lovage [12,14,15,31], and the remaining phenolics have been discovered for the first time in L. officinale. A previous report [29] showed that some flavonoid compounds can be detected in lovage roots; however, in our case, no member of this group was found.

3.2. Quantification of Four Principal Coumarins in Lovage Roots

Chromatographic conditions applied for metabolite profiling of fresh lovage roots gave appropriate separation of four principal coumarins with more abundant peak areas, such as for apterin (peak 9), xanthotoxin (peak 18), isopimpinellin (peak 19), and pimpinellin (peak 20), enabling their use for quantification of the mentioned coumarins in plant samples. To simplify and lower the cost of the assay, in this study, PDA detection was used, resulting in a fast and easy method of analysis. The validation procedure demonstrated the good linearity of the calibration equations built for four coumarins with correlation coefficients (r2) of 0.9925–0.9981 and standard deviations of (SYX) 9.76–11.52 × 10−2 (Table 3).
The limits of detection and limits of quantifications were 0.18–0.26 µg/mL and 0.56–0.78 µg/mL, respectively, and the linear range was 0–1000 µg/mL. The intra-day and inter-day precisions were high and showed relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 0.96–1.20% and 1.40–1.93%, respectively, and spiked samples demonstrated high recovery levels from 98.51% to 101.70%. All these results showed the appropriateness of the method for quantification of the principal coumarins in lovage roots.
Approbation of the quantification method was conducted on the fresh samples of seven lovage cultivars and eight commercially available dried lovage roots (Table 4). The contents of apterin, xanthotoxin, isopimpinellin, and pimpinellin varied in fresh roots as 197–357, 152–352, 486–863, and 904–1296 μg/g, respectively, showing that pimpinellin was the most common coumarin in all lovage samples. The total coumarin content in fresh roots ranged from 1739 (cv. Heracles) to 2902 μg/g (cv. Lider). Dried lovage roots demonstrated wide variation of apterin, xanthotoxin, isopimpinellin, and pimpinellin, with values of 1.53–4.11, 1.40–3.75, 4.83–7.80, and 7.36–11.26 mg/g, respectively, and pimpinellin was a common coumarin found in all samples. The range of total coumarin content in dried roots was 15.12–24.46 mg/g. Thus, fresh and dried lovage roots are rich sources of coumarins.
Regarding the bioactive properties of lovage coumarins, apterin has been previously determined to be a common apiaceous coumarin [65] and showed antioxidant [66], anti-tumor [67], anticholinesterase [68], antidiabetic [69,70], and anti-inflammatory activities [71]. Xanthotoxin has demonstrated various bioactivities, such as anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidative stress and antibacterial activities [72], while pimpinellin was determined to be an effective preventer of platelet-related thromboembolic diseases (such as atherosclerosis [73]), and isopimpinellin is antibacterial agent against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [74]. Thus, lovage roots are a valuable source of bioactive coumarins.

3.3. Post-Harvest Changes in Four Principal Coumarins in Lovage Roots

Traditionally, the methods of lovage root storage have been similar to those of other apiaceous root (carrot, parsley, celery, and fennel). The best preservation has been observed for chilled storage when the temperature is close to zero; however, room temperature storage is popular for fresh roots. Therefore, postharvest changes in fresh lovage roots were studied under two conditions: one group of samples was stored at 1 °C for 6 months, and second group was conditioned at 20 °C for two weeks. These periods were chosen taking into consideration the satisfactory appearance of vegetables; as a rule, after these dates, roots became flabby (lost firmness) and were no longer stored. Additional study was focused on the changes in dry lovage roots over long-term storage for 6 years at 10 °C (the temperature of a dry plant repository). Studies of the two different types of samples were due to the widespread use of both fresh and dried lovage roots for which it is necessary to determine the composition of coumarins before and after storage (Table 5 and Figure 3).
Chilled storage of fresh lovage roots negatively affected the total coumarin content. Storing roots for 6 months resulted in a loss of 25% of total coumarins, mostly because glycoside apterin losses resulted in 67% damage. Reduction in the content of non-glycosidic xanthotoxin, isopimpinellin, and pimpinellin was no more than 30% of the initial level. Postharvest changes occurred much more rapidly when fresh lovage roots were stored at room temperature. After 2 weeks of storage, a 32% loss of apterin was observed with almost full preservation of other coumarins. Dried lovage roots demonstrated good stability of coumarin content upon long-term storage. Non-glycosidic compounds were resistant and demonstrated approximately a 5% loss after 6 years of storage, and the decrease in glycoside apterin was more than 25%. Despite the loss of compounds during all types of storage, the lovage roots remained a source of coumarins even at the end of the expiration date.
The general trend of postharvest changes in both fresh and dried lovage roots is the significant loss of the glycosidic coumarin apterin. The same changes were observed for other storing plants. The roots of Hansenia forbesii (H.Boissieu) Pimenov and Kljuykov (syn. Notopterygium forbesii H.Boissieu) can lose up to 60% of the coumarin glycoside nodakenin (nodakenetin O-glucoside) during storage while maintaining non-glycosidic compounds [75]. Scopolin (scopoletin O-glucoside) and scopoletin reduction was observed in cassava roots (Manihot esculenta Crantz) after 7 days of dark storage at 29 °C [76]. Instability of flavonoid glycosides during short- and long-term storage was found for apple [77] and strawberry fruits [78,79]. The possible reasons are increasing cleavage processes that involved the influence of water, acids, and enzymes, resulting in hydrolysis of storage compounds [80]. However, in the case of lovage roots, most coumarins are found in the non-glycosidic form, thus preserving the valuable potential of the plant.

4. Conclusions

This study for the first time elucidated the phenolic profile of fresh lovage roots, a traditional food product that is still scarcely investigated. The basic components were simple coumarins and furanocoumarins with various structures with or without glycosidic fragments. Even though some metabolites were in the lovage roots, most identified compounds were new for the Levisticum officinale species. Successful chromatographic separation of the principal compounds resulted in creation of a convenient assay for quantification of four coumarins (i.e., apterin, xanthotoxin, isopimpinellin, and pimpinellin), which were found at high levels in both the various cultivars of the fresh lovage roots and in the dry commercial roots. These findings suggest for the first time that lovage roots are a good source of furanocoumarins with proven bioactivity, making lovage a functional food product. The results of the postharvest stability study of lovage coumarins demonstrated a gradual decrease in target compounds, especially the glycoside apterin in fresh and dried roots. However, the final losses accounted for less than one quarter of the total coumarin content, which confirmed satisfactory retention of furanocoumarins in lovage during postharvest storage. Therefore, the known spicy-aromatic vegetable lovage roots accumulate not only phthalides and volatile compounds but also coumarins, making it one of the most valuable apiaceous plants used as food and medicine

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, grant number 121030100227-7.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Iran, M.H.M.; Javanmardi, J. Lovage. In Handbook of Herbs and Spices; Peter, K.V., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jakubczyk, A.; Złotek, U.; Rybczyńska-Tkaczyk, K. Influence of elicitation and drying methods on anti-metabolic syndrome, and antimicrobial properties of extracts and hydrolysates obtained from elicited lovage (Levisticum officinale Koch). Nutrients 2021, 13, 4365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Matłok, N.; Gorzelany, J.; Figiel, A.; Balawejder, M. Effect of fertilisation on the quality of dried coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and lovage (Levisticum officinale). Agriculture 2021, 11, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Naves, Y.R. Etudes sur les matières végétales volatiles XXIV. Composition de l’huile essentielle et du résinoïde de livèche (Levisticum officinale Koch). Helv. Chim. Acta 1943, 26, 1281–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fehr, D. Über das ätherische Öl von Levisticum officinale. Planta Med. 1980, 40, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bylaitė, E.; Venskutonis, R.P.; Roozen, J.P. Influence of harvesting time on the composition of volatile components in different anatomical parts of lovage (Levisticum officinale Koch.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 3735–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mitsuhashi, H.; Muramatsu, T.; Nagai, U.; Nakano, T.; Ueno, K. Studies on the constituents of Umbelliferae plants. VIII. Distribution of alkylphthalides in Umbelliferae plants. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1963, 11, 1317–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gijbels, M.; Scheffer, J.; Baerheim Svendsen, A. Z-Butylidenephtalide in the essential oil from roots of Levisticum officinale. Planta Med. 1980, 40, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gijbels, M.; Scheffer, J.; Baerheim Svendsen, A. Phthalides in the essential oil from roots of Levisticum officinale. Planta Med. 1982, 44, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zschocke, S.; Liu, J.-H.; Stuppner, H.; Bauer, R. Comparative study of roots of Angelica sinensis and related umbelliferous drugs by thin layer chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Phytochem. Anal. 1998, 9, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moradalizadeh, M.; Akhgar, M.R.; Rajaei, P.; Faghihi-Zarandi, A. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Levisticum officinale growing wild in Iran. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2012, 47, 1007–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Spréa, R.M.; Fernandes, Â.; Calhelha, R.C.; Pereira, C.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Alves, M.J.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical and bioactive characterization of the aromatic plant Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch: A comprehensive study. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cichy, M.; Wray, V.; Höfle, G. Neue Inhaltsstoffe von Levisticum officinale Koch (Liebstöckel). Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1984, 1984, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Złotek, U.; Szymanowska, U.; Pecio, Ł.; Kozachok, S.; Jakubczyk, A. Antioxidative and potentially anti-inflammatory activity of phenolics from lovage leaves Levisticum officinale Koch elicited with jasmonic acid and yeast extract. Molecules 2019, 24, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Złotek, U.; Szymanowska, U.; Rybczyńska-Tkaczyk, K.; Jakubczyk, A. Effect of jasmonic acid, yeast extract elicitation, and drying methods on the main bioactive compounds and consumer quality of lovage (Levisticum officinale Koch). Foods 2020, 9, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Miran, M.; Monsef Esfahani, H.; Jung, J.H.; Aliahmadi, A.; Skropeta, D. Characterization and antibacterial activity of phthalides from the roots of the medicinal herb Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch. Iran J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 19, e124420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schinkovitz, A.; Stavri, M.; Gibbons, S.; Bucar, F. Antimycobacterial polyacetylenes from Levisticum officinale. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kemzūraitė, A.; Venskutonis, P.R.; Baranauskienė, R.; Navikienė, D. Optimization of supercritical CO2 extraction of different anatomical parts of lovage (Levisticum officinale Koch.) using response surface methodology and evaluation of extracts composition. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 87, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cu, J.-Q.; Pu, F.; Shi, Y.; Perineau, F.; Delmas, M.; Gaset, A. The chemical composition of lovage headspace and essential oils produced by solvent extraction with various solvents. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1990, 2, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Szebeni-Galambosi, Z.; Galambosi, B.; Holm, Y. Growth, yield and essential oil of lovage grown in Finland. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Raal, A.; Arak, E.; Orav, A.; Kailas, T.; Müürisepp, M. Composition of the essential oil of Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch from some European countries. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2008, 20, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dayeni, M.; Omidbaigi, R.; Bastan, M.R. Essential oil content and composition of Levisticum officinale large scale cultivated in Iran. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2006, 9, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heidarpour, O.; Souri, M.K.; Omidbaigi, R. Changes in content and constituents of essential oil in different plant parts of Lovage (Levisticum officinale Koch. Cv. Budakalaszi) cultivated in Iran. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2013, 16, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miran, M.; Monsef Esfahani, H.; Moridi Farimani, M.; Ahmadi, A.A.; Ebrahimi, S.N. Essential oil composition and antibacterial activity of Levisticum officinale Koch at different developmental stages. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2018, 21, 1051–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mirjalili, M.; Salehi, P.; Sonboli, A.; Hadian, J.; Ebrahimi, S.; Yousefzadi, M. The composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Levisticum officinale Koch. flowers and fruits at different developmental stages. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2010, 75, 1661–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sertel, S.; Eichhorn, T.; Plinkert, P.K.; Efferth, T. Chemical composition and antiproliferative activity of essential oil from the leaves of a medicinal herb, Levisticum officinale, against UMSCC1 head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  27. Samiee, K.; Akhgar, M.R.; Rustaiyan, A.; Masoudi, S. Composition of the volatiles of Ferulago carduchorum Boiss. et Hausskn. and Levisticum officinale Koch. obtained by hydrodistillation and extraction. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ceska, O.; Chaudhary, S.K.; Warrington, P.J.; Ashwood-Smith, M.J. Photoactive furocoumarins in fruits of some umbellifers. Phytochemistry 1986, 26, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Średnicka-Tober, D.; Hallmann, E.; Kopczyńska, K.; Góralska-Walczak, R.; Barański, M.; Grycz, A.; Seidler-Łożykowska, K.; Rembiałkowska, E.; Kazimierczak, R. Profile of selected secondary metabolites and antioxidant activity of valerian and lovage grown in organic and low-input conventional system. Metabolites 2022, 12, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spréa, R.M.; Fernandes, Â.; Finimundy, T.C.; Pereira, C.; Alves, M.J.; Calhelha, R.C.; Canan, C.; Barros, L.; Amaral, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Lovage (Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch) roots: A source of bioactive compounds towards a circular economy. Resources 2020, 9, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tajner-Czopek, A.; Gertchen, M.; Rytel, E.; Kita, A.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Sokół-Łętowska, A. Study of antioxidant activity of some medicinal plants having high content of caffeic acid derivatives. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Heghes, S.C.; Vostinaru, O.; Mogosan, C.; Miere, D.; Iuga, C.A.; Filip, L. Safety profile of nutraceuticals rich in coumarins: An update. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 803338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lončar, M.; Jakovljević, M.; Šubarić, D.; Pavlić, M.; Buzjak Služek, V.; Cindrić, I. Coumarins in food and methods of their determination. Foods 2020, 9, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Arsenov, D.; Župunski, M.; Pajević, S.; Nemeš, I.; Simin, N.; Alnuqaydan, A.M.; Watson, M.; Aloliqi, A.A.; Mimica-Dukić, N. Roots of Apium graveolens and Petroselinum crispum—Insight into phenolic status against toxicity level of trace elements. Plants 2021, 10, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kovač-Bešović, E.E.; Durić, K. Thin layer chromatography application in qualitative analysis on presence of coumarins and flavonoids in plant material. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2003, 3, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kim, E.; Nam, J.; Chang, W.; Zulfugarov, I.S.; Okhlopkova, Z.M.; Olennikov, D.N.; Chirikova, N.K.; Kim, S.-W. Angelica gigas Nakai and decursin downregulate Myc expression to promote cell death in B-cell lymphoma. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Olennikov, D.N. New coumarins from roots and fruit of Peucedanum morisonii. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2022, 58, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Olennikov, D.N.; Fedorov, I.A.; Kashchenko, N.I.; Chirikova, N.K.; Vennos, C. Khellactone derivatives and other phenolics of Phlojodicarpus sibiricus (Apiaceae): HPLC-DAD-ESI-QQQ-MS/MS and HPLC-UV profile, and antiobesity potential of dihydrosamidin. Molecules 2019, 24, 2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Olennikov, D.N.; Chirikova, N.K. New compounds from flowers of Phlojodicarpus sibiricus. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2020, 56, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hassan, S.T.S.; Šudomová, M.; Mazurakova, A.; Kubatka, P. Insights into antiviral properties and molecular mechanisms of non-flavonoid polyphenols against human herpesviruses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hsieh, C.-C.; Ng, Y.-Y.; Li, W.-S.; Tzeng, C.-Y.; Hsu, T.-Y.; Huang, W.-H.; Tsai, J.-C. Ameliorative effect of imperatorin on Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-induced allergic asthma by suppressing the Th2 response in mice. Molecules 2022, 27, 7028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ali, M.Y.; Zamponi, G.W.; Seong, S.H.; Jung, H.A.; Choi, J.S. 6-Formyl umbelliferone, a furanocoumarin from Angelica decursiva L., inhibits key diabetes-related enzymes and advanced glycation end-product formation. Molecules 2022, 27, 5720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kowalczyk, J.; Nakos-Bimpos, M.; Polissidis, A.; Dalla, C.; Kokras, N.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Budzyńska, B. Imperatorin influences depressive-like behaviors: A preclinical study on behavioral and neurochemical sex differences. Molecules 2022, 27, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Issa, M.Y.; Elshal, M.F.; Fathallah, N.; Abdelkawy, M.A.; Bishr, M.; Salama, O.; Abulfadl, Y.S. Potential anticancer activity of the furanocoumarin derivative xanthotoxin isolated from Ammi majus L. fruits: In vitro and in silico studies. Molecules 2022, 27, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Song, H.Y.; Jo, A.; Shin, J.; Lim, E.H.; Lee, Y.E.; Jeong, D.E.; Lee, M. Anti-inflammatory activities of isogosferol, a furanocoumarin isolated from Citrus junos seed shells through bioactivity-guided fractionation. Molecules 2019, 24, 4088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lee, C.Y. Changes in carotenoid content of carrots during growth and post-harvest storage. Food Chem. 1986, 20, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sobratee, N.; Workneh, T.S. Modelling of changes in postharvest quality parameters of stored carrots subjected to pre- and postharvest treatments. Int. J. Food Eng. 2015, 11, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Imsic, M.; Winkler, S.; Tomkins, B.; Jones, R. Effect of storage and cooking on β-carotene isomers in carrots (Daucus carota L. cv. “Stefano”). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 5109–5113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Anastasiadi, M.; Falagán, N.; Rossi, S.; Terry, L.A. A comprehensive study of factors affecting postharvest disorder development in celery. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 2021, 172, 111384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Johnson, C.E.; Elbe, J.H.; Lindsay, R.C. Extension of post-harvest storage life of sliced celery. J. Food Sci. 1974, 39, 678–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tattini, M.; Di Ferdinando, M.; Brunetti, C.; Goti, A.; Pollastri, S.; Bellasio, C.; Agati, G. Esculetin and esculin (esculetin 6-O-glucoside) occur as inclusions and are differentially distributed in the vacuole of palisade cells in Fraxinus ornus leaves: A fluorescence microscopy analysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2014, 140, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Moon, K.; Park, H.S.; Lee, A.; Min, J.; Park, Y.; Cha, J. Synthesis of α-cichoriin using Deinococcus geothermalis amylosucrase and its antiproliferative effect. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2022, 50, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, L.-Z.; Harnly, J.M. Identification of hydroxycinnamoylquinic acids of arnica flowers and burdock roots using a standardized LC-DAD-ESI/MS profiling method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 10105–10114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Khaikin, M.S.; Rakova, N.F. Ultraviolet spectra of some 6,7- and 7,8-dihydroxycoumarins. J. Appl. Spectr. 1968, 8, 640–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Petruľová-Poracká, V.; Repčák, M.; Vilková, M.; Imrich, J. Coumarins of Matricaria chamomilla L.: Aglycones and glycosides. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Steck, W.; Wetter, L.R. Apterin, an unusual glucoside of Zizia aptera. Phytochemistry 1974, 13, 1925–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jian, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Li, L.; Luo, J.; Kong, L. Two CYP71AJ enzymes function as psoralen synthase and angelicin synthase in the biosynthesis of furanocoumarins in Peucedanum praeruptorum Dunn. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 104, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Steck, W.; Bailey, B.K. Characterization of plant coumarins by combined gas chromatography, ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. Can. J. Chem. 1969, 47, 3577–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Finkelstein, N.; Albrecht, C.F.; van Jaarsveld, P.P. Isolation and structure elucidation of xanthotoxin, a phototoxic furanocoumarin, from Peucedanum galbanum. S. Afr. J. Bot. 1993, 59, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Frérot, E.; Decorzant, E. Quantification of total furocoumarins in Citrus oils by HPLC coupled with UV, fluorescence, and mass detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6879–6886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wu, X.; Gao, X.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, H.; Song, H.; Chen, Q. Fingerprint analysis of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson by high-speed counter-current chromatography. Molecules 2019, 24, 4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Krivut, B.A.; Perel’son, M.E. Spectrophotometric determination of peucedanin. Chem. Nat. Compd. 1970, 6, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Talcott, S.T.; Howard, L.R. Determination and distribution of 6-methoxymellein in fresh and processed carrot puree by a rapid spectrophotometric assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3237–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cherng, J.-M.; Chiang, W.; Chiang, L.-C. Immunomodulatory activities of common vegetables and spices of Umbelliferae and its related coumarins and flavonoids. Food Chem. 2008, 106, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Frederik, F.C.; Svendsen, A.B. Apterin, a common furanocoumarin glycoside in the umbelliferae. Phytochemistry 1976, 15, 1079–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hisamoto, M.; Kikuzaki, H.; Ohigashi, H.; Nakatani, N. Antioxidant compounds from the leaves of Peucedanum japonicum Thunb. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5255–5261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wang, S.-Q.; Li, X.; Wang, X.-N.; Wei, N.-N.; Lou, H.-X. Coumarins from Cicuta virosa and their modulating effects on multidrug-resistant (MDR) tumors. Phytochem. Lett. 2011, 4, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dincel, D.; Hatipoǧlu, S.D.; Gören, A.C.; Topcü, G. Anticholinesterase furocoumarins from Heracleum platytaenium, a species endemic to the Ida Mountains. Turk. J. Chem. 2013, 37, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Iwase, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Nishimura, K.; Takahashi, H.; Mohri, S.; Li, Y.; Goto, T. Suksdorfin promotes adipocyte differentiation and improves abnormalities in glucose metabolism via PPARγ activation. Lipids 2017, 52, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mi, J.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Huo, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H. A new benzofuran derivative glycoside and a new coumarin glycoside from roots of Heracleum dissectum Ledeb. Med. Chem. Res. 2017, 27, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, H.-L.; Wu, X.-Y.; Mi, J.; Peng, Y.-J.; Wang, Z.-G.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y. A new anti-inflammatory alkaloid from roots of Heracleum dissectum. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1700184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, A.; Lu, J.; Zhong, G.; Lu, L.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, C. Xanthotoxin (8-methoxypsoralen): A review of its chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity. Phytother. Res. 2022, 36, 3805–3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, G.; Yuan, Z.; Tian, X.; Xiong, X.; Guo, F.; Lin, Z.; Qin, Z. Pimpinellin inhibits collagen-induced platelet aggregation and activation through inhibiting granule secretion and PI3K/Akt pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 706363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zuo, G.-Y.; Wang, C.-J.; Han, J.; Li, Y.-Q.; Wang, G.-C. Synergism of coumarins from the Chinese drug Zanthoxylum nitidum with antibacterial agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Su, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Luo, P.; Zhang, Z. Effect of different post-harvest processing methods on the chemical constituents of Notopterygium franchetii by an UHPLC-QTOF-MS-MS metabolomics approach. Molecules 2019, 24, 3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Buschmann, H.; Rodriguez, M.X.; Tohme, J.; Beeching, J.R. Accumulation of hydroxycoumarins during post-harvest deterioration of tuberous roots of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Ann. Bot. 2000, 86, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Felicetti, D.A.; Schrader, L.E. Postharvest changes in pigment concentrations in “Fuji” apples with “Fuji” stain. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 125, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Olennikov, D.N.; Vasilieva, A.G.; Chirikova, N.K. Fragaria viridis fruit metabolites: Variation of LC-MS profile and antioxidant potential during ripening and storage. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Olennikov, D.N.; Khandy, M.T.; Chirikova, N.K. Oriental strawberry metabolites: LC–MS profiling, antioxidant potential, and postharvest changes of Fragaria orientalis fruits. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gazzarrini, S.; McCourt, P. Genetic interactions between ABA, ethylene and sugar signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) High-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometric detection chromatogram (base peak intensity chromatogram, positive ionization; MS: TIC) and photodiode array detection at 310 nm (PDA: 310 nm) chromatograms of an extract of L. officinale fresh roots (cv. Lider). (b) UV and mass spectra of principal coumarins: apterin (b), xanthotoxin (c), isopimpinellin (d), and pimpinellin (e). Compounds are numbered as listed in Table 2.
Figure 1. (a) High-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometric detection chromatogram (base peak intensity chromatogram, positive ionization; MS: TIC) and photodiode array detection at 310 nm (PDA: 310 nm) chromatograms of an extract of L. officinale fresh roots (cv. Lider). (b) UV and mass spectra of principal coumarins: apterin (b), xanthotoxin (c), isopimpinellin (d), and pimpinellin (e). Compounds are numbered as listed in Table 2.
Metabolites 13 00003 g001
Figure 2. Compounds 125 found in fresh lovage roots. βDApif–β-D-apiofuranose; Caf–caffeoyl; Fer–feruloyl; βDGlcp–β-D-glucopyranose.
Figure 2. Compounds 125 found in fresh lovage roots. βDApif–β-D-apiofuranose; Caf–caffeoyl; Fer–feruloyl; βDGlcp–β-D-glucopyranose.
Metabolites 13 00003 g002
Figure 3. Changes in coumarin content in lovage roots during storage of fresh roots at 1 °C (a) and at 20 °C (b) and dried roots at 10 °C (c). Lines: apterin (blue), xanthotoxin (red), isopimpinellin (yellow), and pimpinellin (green).
Figure 3. Changes in coumarin content in lovage roots during storage of fresh roots at 1 °C (a) and at 20 °C (b) and dried roots at 10 °C (c). Lines: apterin (blue), xanthotoxin (red), isopimpinellin (yellow), and pimpinellin (green).
Metabolites 13 00003 g003
Table 1. Synopsis of known lovage (Levisticum officinale) metabolites.
Table 1. Synopsis of known lovage (Levisticum officinale) metabolites.
CompoundsSource [Ref.]
Phtalides
Butyl phtalideRoots [4,5], fruit, leaves, stems [5,6], flowers [6]
Butyl dihydrophtalideRoots [4]
Butyl tetrahydrophtalideRoots [4]
(Z)- and (E)-Butylidene phthalideRoots [4,7,8,9,10], leaves, stems, fruits, flowers [5,6,11,12]
Butylidene 4,5-dihydrophthalideRoots, fruit, leaves, stems [5]
Propylidene phthalideRoots [9]
(Z)- and (E)-LigustilideRoots [7,9,10,13], leaves, stems, fruits, flowers [6,11,12,14,15]
7-Methoxy-3-propylidenephthalideRoots [16]
5-Hydroxybutylidene phthalideRoots [16]
7-Hydroxybutylidene phthalideRoots [16]
SenkyunolideRoots [9]
IsosenkyunolideRoots [9]
Validene-4,5-dihydrophthalideRoots [9], leaves, stems, fruits, flowers [6]
SedanolideLeaves, stems [6]
Polyynes
FalcarindiolRoots [10,13,17]
FalcarinolRoots [17,18]
Terpenes
Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes of essential oilsRoots [5,6,8,9,11,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], fruits [5,6,11,23,25], leaves [5,6,11,12,18,21,26], stems [5,6,11,12,18], flowers [23,24,25,27]
Phenols
EugenolRoots [4]
CarvacrolRoots [4]
Methyl salycilateFruits [6]
CuminaldehydeFruits [25]
EstragoleRoots [11]
Pentyl benzeneLeaves, roots [21]
Coumarins
PsoralenFruits [28]
5-MethoxypsoralenFruits [28]
ImperatorinFruits [28]
BergaptenRoots [4]
ApterinLeaves [14,15]
Phenolic acids
Gallic acidRoots [29]
Vanillic acidRoots [30]
Hydroxycinnamates
p-Coumaric acidRoots [29]
Caffeic acidRoots [29], leaves [14,15]
Ferulic acidRoots [29]
3-O-, 4-O-, 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acidsLeaves, stems [12,14,15,31]
Caffeoylglucaric acidRoots [30]
Coniferyl ferulateRoots [10]
Flavonoids
KaempferolRoots [29]
QuercetinRoots [29]
MyricetinRoots [29]
NicotiflorinLeaves, stems [12]
IsoquercitrinRoots [29]
RutinRoots [29], leaves, stems [12,14,15]
Maclurin-3-C-glucosideLeaves, stems [12]
Other groups
CatalpolRoots [30]
Sedanonic anhydride, butyric acid, palmitic acidRoots [4]
AngeolideRoots [13]
Nutrients, fatty acids, tocopherolsLeaves, stems [12]
Table 2. Chromatographic (t), ultraviolet (UV) and mass-spectrometric data (MS) of compounds 125 found in L. officinale fresh roots.
Table 2. Chromatographic (t), ultraviolet (UV) and mass-spectrometric data (MS) of compounds 125 found in L. officinale fresh roots.
No.t, minUV, λmax, nm[M+H]+, m/z[M+Na]+, m/z[M+K]+, m/zOther Ions, m/zCompound [Ref.]
11.124350341 (5)363 (100)379 (32)179 (9)Esculin (esculetin 6-O-glucoside) [51]
21.243348341 (3)363 (100)379 (24)179 (2)Cichoriin (esculetin 7-O-glucoside) [52]
31.376258, 312457 (7)479 (100)495 (38)163 (14)Apiosylskimmin [39]
41.567240, 327355 (100) 193 (30)5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid [53]
51.624258, 298, 352179 (100)201 (7)217 (4) Esculetin [54]
61.687258, 312325 (1)347 (100)363 (29)163 (8)Skimmin (umbelliferone O-glucoside) [55]
71.752240, 327517 (100) 355 (42), 193 (2)1,3-Di-O-caffeoylquinic acid [53]
81.942238, 321369 (100) 195 (20), 191 (18)5-O-Feruloylquinic acid [53]
92.042258, 324425 (2)447 (100)463 (27)263 (11)Apterin (vaginol 8-O-glucoside) [56]
102.084322163 (100)185 (14)201 (12) Umbelliferone [55]
112.127240, 329517 (100) 355 (38), 193 (4)3,4-Di-O-caffeoylquinic acid [53]
122.208240, 329517 (100) 355 (37), 193 (1)3,5-Di-O-caffeoylquinic acid [53]
132.458240, 329517 (100) 355 (40), 193 (1)4,5-Di-O-caffeoylquinic acid [53]
142.567254, 326263 (100)285 (15)301 (7) Vaginol [56]
152.693244, 298, 334187 (100)209 (5)225 (1) Psoralen [57]
162.942245, 304187 (100)209 (10)225 (3) Angelicin [57]
173.083250, 270, 311217 (100)239 (11)255 (7) Bergapten [58]
183.342242, 251, 301217 (100)239 (5)255 (1) Xanthotoxin [59]
193.621268, 312247 (100)269 (21)285 (18) Isopimpinellin [60]
203.759251, 306247 (100)269 (4)285 (1) Pimpinellin [60]
213.882251, 270217 (100)239 (25)255 (20) Isobergapten [60]
224.012351, 301271 (100)293 (18)309 (10) Imperatorin [60]
234.086256, 324245 (100)267 (11)283 (7) Osthole [61]
244.382255, 294, 341259 (100)281 (7)297 (3) Peucedanin [62]
254.501252, 309271 (100)293 (5)309 (2) Isoimperatorin [60]
Table 3. Regression equations, correlation coefficients (r2), standard deviation (SYX), limits of detection (LOD), limits of quantification (LOQ), and linear ranges for four reference standards.
Table 3. Regression equations, correlation coefficients (r2), standard deviation (SYX), limits of detection (LOD), limits of quantification (LOQ), and linear ranges for four reference standards.
Compounda ab aCorrelation Coefficient (r2)SYXLOD/
LOQ (µg/mL)
Linear Range (µg/mL)RSD% (Intra-Day)RSD%
(Inter-Day)
Recovery of Spiked
Sample REC%
Apterin1.4400−0.52610.992510.14 · 10−20.23/0.700–10001.201.59101.70
Xanthotoxin1.7207−0.01520.99819.76 · 10−20.18/0.560–8000.961.4098.92
Isopimpinellin1.9320−0.24190.995311.52 · 10−20.20/0.600–8001.071.7399.12
Pimpinellin1.2844−0.29150.996210.02 · 10−20.26/0.780–8001.141.9398.51
a Calibration equation parameters: y = a · x + b.
Table 4. Content of four coumarins in fresh and dried lovage roots.
Table 4. Content of four coumarins in fresh and dried lovage roots.
Plant SourceApterinXanthotoxinIsopimpinellinPimpinellinTotal
Fresh roots, μg/g fresh weight ± S.D.
cv. Amur357 ± 7307 ± 6683 ± 141152 ± 232499
cv. Don Juan289 ± 5273 ± 5592 ± 111062 ± 212216
cv. Heracles197 ± 4152 ± 4486 ± 10904 ± 181739
cv. Lider391 ± 7352 ± 7863 ± 171296 ± 252902
cv. Magnus326 ± 6286 ± 5794 ± 151272 ± 252678
cv. Preobrazhenskii321 ± 6292 ± 5837 ± 161110 ± 222560
cv. Udalets350 ± 7311 ± 6783 ± 15993 ± 192437
Dried roots, mg/g dry weight ± S.D.
A Gift from Nature Comp. (Orlando, FL, USA)2.83 ± 0.052.96 ± 0.057.41 ± 0.1411.26 ± 0.2224.46
Alpine Herb Company Inc. (Scarborough, ON, Canada)1.93 ± 0.032.53 ± 0.055.72 ± 0.118.63 ± 0.1718.81
Evalar, CJSC (Biysk, Russia)3.83 ± 0.073.25 ± 0.066.49 ± 0.1210.68 ± 0.2124.25
Khorst, LLC (Barnaul, Russia)3.26 ± 0.062.83 ± 0.055.73 ± 0.119.14 ± 0.1820.96
Lekra-Set, LLC (Barnaul, Russia)4.11 ± 0.083.75 ± 0.075.37 ± 0.1010.06 ± 0.2023.29
Russkie Korni Comp. (Korolyov, Russia)3.70 ± 0.073.14 ± 0.065.26 ± 0.109.47 ± 0.1821.57
Starwest Botanicals, Inc. (Sacramento, CA, USA)4.06 ± 0.083.52 ± 0.077.80 ± 0.158.26 ± 0.1623.64
TerraVita Comp. (Wilmington, DE, USA)1.53 ± 0.031.40 ± 0.024.83 ± 0.097.36 ± 0.1415.12
Table 5. Content of four coumarins in fresh and dried lovage roots during post-harvest storage.
Table 5. Content of four coumarins in fresh and dried lovage roots during post-harvest storage.
Storage
Duration
ApterinXanthotoxinIsopimpinellinPimpinellinTotal
Fresh roots (cv. Lider), μg/g fresh weight ± S.D.
Before storage391 ± 7352 ± 7863 ± 171296 ± 252902
MonthsChill storage (1 °C)
1342 ± 7 *341 ± 7854 ± 171215 ± 24 *2752
2304 ± 6 *337 ± 7 *832 ± 161183 ± 23 *2656
3286 ± 6 *311 ± 6 *806 ± 16 *1157 ± 23 *2560
4221 ± 4 *293 ± 6 *782 ± 15 *1102 ± 22 *2398
5163 ± 3 *276 ± 5 *774 ± 15 *1083 ± 21 *2296
6127 ± 2 *242 ± 5 *764 ± 15 *1026 ± 20 *2159
DaysRoom storage (20 °C)
1388 ± 7350 ± 7862 ± 171290 ± 252890
3370 ± 7 *348 ± 6860 ± 171283 ± 232861
7342 ± 6 *345 ± 7853 ± 181272 ± 252812
11304 ± 7 *340 ± 7850 ± 161254 ± 242748
14265 ± 5 *332 ± 7 *842 ± 181231 ± 24 *2670
Dried roots (Evalar, CJSC), mg/g dry weight ± S.D.
Before storage3.83 ± 0.073.25 ± 0.066.49 ± 0.1210.68 ± 0.2124.25
Years10 °C storage
13.70 ± 0.073.25 ± 0.066.45 ± 0.1210.65 ± 0.2024.05
23.52 ± 0.07 *3.22 ± 0.066.42 ± 0.1210.60 ± 0.2123.76
33.34 ± 0.06 *3.21 ± 0.066.38 ± 0.1110.58 ± 0.2123.51
43.19 ± 0.06 *3.19 ± 0.066.35 ± 0.1210.54 ± 0.2023.27
53.02 ± 0.06 *3.16 ± 0.066.30 ± 0.1110.40 ± 0.2022.88
62.86 ± 0.05 *3.10 ± 0.06 *6.25 ± 0.11 *10.22 ± 0.20 *22.43
Asterisk indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) vs. before storage level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olennikov, D.N. Coumarins of Lovage Roots (Levisticum officinale W.D.J.Koch): LC-MS Profile, Quantification, and Stability during Postharvest Storage. Metabolites 2023, 13, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010003

AMA Style

Olennikov DN. Coumarins of Lovage Roots (Levisticum officinale W.D.J.Koch): LC-MS Profile, Quantification, and Stability during Postharvest Storage. Metabolites. 2023; 13(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olennikov, Daniil N. 2023. "Coumarins of Lovage Roots (Levisticum officinale W.D.J.Koch): LC-MS Profile, Quantification, and Stability during Postharvest Storage" Metabolites 13, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop