Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 on Protein Composition and DNA Content in Damaged Somatic Nerves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Modulation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channel Currents by Small Molecules: Effects on Amplitude and Gating During High-Frequency Stimulation

1
Department of Anesthesiology, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, No. 66, Sec. 2, Changhe Road, Annan District, Tainan City 70965, Taiwan
2
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, No.1.Daxue Rd., East Dist., Tainan City 701, Taiwan
3
Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam 999077, Hong Kong
4
Department of Anesthesiology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, 2 Village Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
5
Department of Physiology, Cheng Kung University Medical College, No.1.Daxue Rd., East Dist., Tainan City 701, Taiwan
6
School of Medicine, National Sun Yat-Sen University College of Medicine, No. 70 Lien-hai Rd., Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
7
Department of Medical Education and Research, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, No. 66, Sec. 2, Changhe Road, Annan District, Tainan City 70965, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sci. Pharm. 2025, 93(3), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm93030033
Submission received: 3 June 2025 / Revised: 9 July 2025 / Accepted: 22 July 2025 / Published: 24 July 2025

Abstract

Cumulative inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channel current (INa) caused by high-frequency depolarization plays a critical role in regulating electrical activity in excitable cells. As discussed in this review paper, exposure to certain small-molecule modulators can perturb INa during high-frequency stimulation, influencing the extent of cumulative inhibition and electrical excitability in excitable cells. Carbamazepine differentially suppressed transient or peak (INa(T)) and late (INa(L)) components of INa. Moreover, the cumulative inhibition of INa(T) during pulse-train stimulation at 40 Hz was enhanced by lacosamide. GV-58 was noted to exert stimulatory effect on INa(T) and INa(L). This stimulated INa was not countered by ω-conotoxin MVIID but was effectively reversed by ranolazine. GV-58′s exposure can slow down INa inactivation elicited during pulse-train stimulation. Lacosamide directly inhibited INa magnitude as well as promoted this cumulative inhibition of INa during pulse-train stimuli. Mirogabalin depressed INa magnitude as well as modulated frequency dependence of the current. Phenobarbital can directly modulate both the magnitude and frequency dependence of ionic currents, including INa. Previous investigations have shown that exposure to small-molecule modulators can perturb INa under conditions of high-frequency stimulation. This ionic mechanism plays a crucial role in modulating membrane excitability, hereby supporting the validity of these findings.

1. Introduction

Numerous isoforms of voltage-gated Na+ (NaV) channels have been established, namely NaV1.1 to NaV1.9 or SCN1A to SCN5A and SCN8A to SCN11A [1]. These NaV channel proteins consist of a single α subunit, each containing four homologous domains, and each domain comprising six transmembrane segments [1]. Furthermore, the β subunits of NaV channels serve as auxiliary proteins that regulate the function and expression of the α subunits, which form the ion-conducting pore for Na+ ions. These β subunits are essential for the proper operation of NaV channels and play a critical role in the generation and propagation of action potentials (APs) in excitable tissues, including nerves as well as skeletal and cardiac muscles [1].
During the rapid depolarization phase, the NaV channels are responsible for providing voltage-gated Na+ channel currents (INa), and they undergo rapid transitions from the closed to the open state, followed by a swift shift to the inactivated state. The INa amplitude, once triggered, propels the cell membrane into depolarization through a positive feedback cycle, initiating the AP upstroke in excitable cells. Their inactivation and recovery properties determine the refractory periods that affect the frequency at which excitable cells can fire APs [1,2,3].
The transient Na+ current (INa(T)) represents the fast-activating and rapidly inactivating component responsible for the upstroke of the AP. In addition to this primary current, NaV channels give rise to late Na+ currents (INa(L)), which include both persistent and resurgent components. The persistent Na+ current (INa(P)) consists of a small, non-inactivating inward current that can lower firing thresholds and promote repetitive firing, while the resurgent Na+ current emerges during repolarization and is thought to support high-frequency firing, particularly in specialized neuronal populations. Moreover, slow inactivation, a distinct gating process that develops over prolonged depolarizations, serves as a protective mechanism by reducing NaV channel availability during sustained activity and modulating responsiveness to high-frequency input. Together, these current components and gating transitions are critical in defining the cellular response to high-frequency stimulation and are thus essential targets for pharmacological modulation [1,3].
Previous studies have identified a phenomenon where the accumulation of INa inactivation occurs over successive short depolarizing pulses during high frequency stimulation, leading to cumulative inhibition across diverse cell types [2,3,4]. It has been demonstrated that the current understanding of slow inactivation occurs as a multistate process influenced by both voltage sensor dynamics and conformational changes in the pore module, supported by evidence from both prokaryotic and eukaryotic sodium channel studies [5]. Figure 1 illustrates this cumulative inhibition of INa under whole-cell voltage-clamp conditions during high-frequency stimulation using repetitive brief depolarizing pulses. The mechanism underlying the cumulative inhibition of INa remains unclear. This intrinsic regulation of AP firing is influenced by several confounding factors, including the amplitude and frequency of APs, variable discharge patterns, and even hormonal or neurotransmitter secretion [3].
This review synthesizes existing research on the amplitude and gating characteristics of INa, as well as the cumulative inhibition of INa during high-frequency stimulation, with particular emphasis on the modulatory effects of various small molecules, as summarized in Table 1. Table 1 also includes representations of the chemical structures of these small-molecule modulators. Although these substances differ in their chemical structures, their regulatory effects on INa will result in distinct impacts on various excitable tissues.

2. Effects of Small-Molecule Modulators on INa During High-Frequency Stimulation (20 or 40 Hz)

2.1. Carbamazepine (CBZ, Tegretol®)

Carbamazepine (CBZ) is an aromatic anticonvulsant commonly used to treat seizures and neuropathic pain, such as trigeminal neuralgia [11]. CBZ stabilizes the electrical activity in the brain, helping to prevent excessive and abnormal firing of neurons. It is also used as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia and myotonia and serves as a second-line treatment option for bipolar disorder. Despite its efficacy in anticonvulsant activities, side effects after CBZ treatment include hyponatremia, QT-interval prolongation, hyperprolactinemia, changes in pitch perception, and idiosyncratic reactions. Previous studies have shown that CBZ’s presence leads to a concentration-dependent suppression on INa(T) and INa(L) in Neuro-2a cells [6]. INa(T) is the rapid, short-lived influx of Na+ that occurs right at the beginning of an AP. It activates and then quickly inactivates within a few milliseconds. Persistent INa(L) is a much smaller but persistent current that continues flowing during the plateau phase of the AP [6]. It results from a small portion of NaV channels either failing to inactivate completely or reopening intermittently. Mechanistically, the key difference is that INa(T) is driven by fast activation and rapid inactivation of NaV channels, whereas persistent INa(L) arises from slow or incomplete inactivation, or stochastic reopening of these same channels [3]. Resurgent INa(L) supports high-frequency firing by enabling rapid recovery from inactivation. Whether CBZ can alter resurgent INa(L) remains to be further determined.
Interestingly, the INa(L) evoked by short step depolarization is more suppressed than the INa(T). The estimated IC50 values for inhibiting INa(T) and INa(L) in Neuro-2a cells are 36 and 18 µM, respectively [6]. IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) is the concentration of a compound that is required to reduce a specific biological or biochemical function by 50% under defined conditions. Additionally, CBZ diminishes the amplitude of window Na+ current in response to short ascending ramp voltage. Window Na+ current refers to a small, steady, non-inactivating component of sodium current that occurs when the activation and inactivation curves of NaV channels overlap within a certain voltage range. The concentration-dependent suppression of these currents should be taken into consideration for an understanding of CBZ’s mechanisms of action.
CBZ’s effect on INa(T) inactivation, triggered by pulse-train depolarizing stimuli, was reported to exhibit an excessive enhancement. The recovery of INa(T) inactivation during varying interpulse intervals was slowed in the CBZ presence [6]. Docking studies exploring the interaction between CBZ and NaV channel predicted that CBZ binds to specific amino-acid residues in NaV channels in excitable cells like Neuro-2a cells, making them susceptible to modifications by the CBZ molecule [6]. CBZ also suppresses the amplitude of INa in dorsal root ganglion neurons [11]. We also need to emphasize the importance of the differential inhibition of INa(T) and INa(L) by CBZ or other similar compounds. This differential inhibition holds particular significance as it may modulate the electrical behaviors, such as firing discharge patterns, of excitable cells both in culture and in vivo. Comprehending these modulatory effects is crucial, as they hold the potential to have implications for different neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders.

2.2. GV-58 ((2R)-2[[6-[(5-Methylthiophen-2-yl)methylamino]-9-propylpurin-2-yl]amino]butan-1-ol)

GV-58 is an opener of N- and P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels. It was hypothesized to impede the closure of the CaV channel, leading to a substantial augmentation in overall Ca2+ influx (motor nerve activity) during AP. Earlier studies have demonstrated that it is effective for the management of neuromuscular weakness, such as Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome. The immune system of these patients will mistakenly attack the CaV channels on the nerve cells, resulting in reduced release of neurotransmitters like acetylcholine.
Recent studies showed that, notwithstanding its effectiveness in stimulating the activity of CaV channels, the differential stimulation by GV-58 of INa(T) and INa(L) may participate in the regulation of electrical activities of excitable cells (e.g., GH3 and NSC-34 cells) [7]. The EC50 value for GV-58-stimulated INa(T) or INa(L) was calculated as 8.9 or 2.6 µM, respectively. EC50 (half maximal effective concentration) is a pharmacological term that refers to the concentration of a compound (or ligand) that produces 50% of its maximum possible effect. These values reflect the potency of GV-58 in enhancing each current component, rather than a direct comparison of their absolute magnitudes. Moreover, ω-conotoxin MVIID, a blocker of N- and P/Q-type CaV-channel currents, failed to suppress INa in GH3 cells, and further addition of ranolazine, an inhibitor of INa(L) [12], counteracted GV-58-stimulated INa(L) or AP firing [7]. GV-58 exposure increased recovery of INa inactivation evoked in response to varying interpulse intervals in a geometrics-based progression. The post-spike INa contributes to the overall electrical activity of the neuron during its refractory period, and it influences the cell’s ability to generate additional APs in response to subsequent stimuli. The GV-58 presence enhances the amplitude of post-spike and steady current, hence raising the occurrence of subthreshold potentials [4,13]. Subthreshold potential refers to the membrane potential of a neuron that has not yet reached the threshold required to trigger an AP, which is the electrical signal that allows neurons to communicate with each other [4].
Taken together, since EC50 values in GH3 cells tend to be lower than those required for its activation of N- and P/Q-type CaV channels, the GV-58 actions on INa are therapeutically or pharmacologically relevant. Whether GV-58-induced amelioration of neuromuscular weakness is pertinent to its stimulatory effect on the amplitude and/or gating of INa in motor neurons needs to be further delineated.

2.3. Lacosamide (LCS, Vimpat®, (2R)-2-Acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropanamide)

LCS is a functionalized compound that contains an amino acid-like structure and has been proved to be a valuable antiepileptic and analgesic drug available in both oral and intravenous forms for clinical use. LCS is a synthetic compound designed to modulate NaV channels in the brain. It is a medication that is used as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy. Prior investigations have shown LCS to be effective and well-tolerated among patients with various epileptic disorders.
In Neuro-2a cells, the decay of INa(T) and INa(L) during a 20 Hz train of depolarizing voltage commands (i.e., 40 ms pulses applied from −80 to −10 mV at a rate of 20 Hz for a total duration of 1 s) was observed to follow an exponential pattern over time. This type of accumulative inhibition displayed a frequency-dependent characteristic in INa(T) and INa(L) during rapid repetitive stimuli or high-frequency firing of APs [2,4]. When exposed to LCS, the extent of this accumulative inhibition was enhanced, resulting in a decrease in both current amplitude and the time constant of the time-dependent decaying process in INa(T) and INa(L) during pulse-train depolarizing stimuli [8]. Additionally, the LCS-induced increase in the decaying rate was reversed by veratridine, an agonist of NaV channel [8].
Moreover, LCS presence led to an increase in the values for last and slow time constants of recovery from the INa block caused by the preceding conditioning pulse-train stimuli. The evidence revealed distinct IC50 values required for suppressing INa(T) and INa(L) in GH3 cells, estimated as 78 and 34 µM, respectively, suggesting their differential responses to LCS [8]. These studies indicated that LCS induces a “loss-of-function” change in NaV channels, maintaining them in the inactivated state (conformations) during repetitive depolarizations, thus preventing excessive excitability.
Furthermore, cell exposure to LCS suppressed the strength of voltage-dependent hysteresis of the persistent Na+ current (INa(P)) elicited by triangular ramp voltage [8,14]. INa(P) refers to a non-inactivating or slowly inactivating component of INa that persists after the initial fast transient current has decayed. Voltage-dependent hysteresis refers to a phenomenon where the behavior of a system or material exhibits a time delay or lag in response to changes in voltage, and this delay is dependent on the voltage itself. This phenomenon can occur in certain biological systems, such change in ionic currents elicited by an isosceles-triangular ramp pulse [15]. By implementing streamlined data acquisition with digital-to-analog conversion, it becomes possible to apply an isosceles-triangular ramp voltage with varying durations to the specified cell, thereby achieving enhanced feasibility. This approach can be utilized for specific objectives, such as inducing hysteresis in different ionic currents [8,9,15].
The response of INa(P) to a short triangular ramp voltage exhibited a hysteretic behavior, which was marked by a figure-of-eight configuration (also known as an ∝-shaped configuration) within the hysteretic loop [8,14,15]. The INa(P) induced by using a double ramp voltage was consistently found to exhibit a figure-of-eight configuration. This phenomenon is quite closely related to the chaotic activity produced in neural tissue [16]. Taken together, LCS’s presence is effective at inhibiting INa in a time-, concentration-, hysteresis-, and frequency-dependent manner [8].
Previous electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that LCS selectively enhances the slow inactivation of NaV channels [5,8], distinguishing it mechanistically from traditional antiepileptic drugs that primarily affect fast inactivation. This enhancement stabilizes hyperexcitable neuronal membranes and reduces repetitive firing without significantly altering fast gating kinetics [5]. While LCS’s primary mechanism is well characterized, a detailed comparative analysis of its effects on fast versus slow inactivation has not been comprehensively presented. Therefore, further investigations—particularly using voltage-clamp protocols designed to isolate fast inactivation parameters—would be valuable to delineate any subtle modulatory effect on fast gating.

2.4. Mirogabalin (MGB, Tarlige®, IUPAC Name: 2-[(1R,5S,6S)-6-(Aminomethyl)-3-ethyl-6-bicyclo [3.2.0]hept-3-enyl]acetic Acid)

MGB, an orally administered gabapentinoid, was reported to act as a ligand for the α2δ-1 subunit of CaV channels. This mechanism enables the regulation of pain signal transmission in the nervous system. These included chronic pain resulting from nerve damage or dysfunction, including post-herpetic neuralgia, fibromyalgia, and diabetic neuropathy.
An intriguing report demonstrated that MGB depressed INa in GH3 cells, which is concentration-, time-, state-, frequency-, and hysteresis-dependent [9]. MGB treatment resulted in a differential inhibition of two components of INa, namely INa(T) and INa(L), with IC50 values of 19.5 and 7.3 µM, respectively, suggesting that MGB’s impact on INa(L) is more significant than on INa(T). The cumulative inhibition of INa(T) during a train of depolarizing pulses was enhanced in the presence of MGB. The time-dependent decline of INa(T) during a 40 Hz pulse-train depolarizing stimulus (lasting 1 s with 20 ms pulses applied from −80 to −10 mV) was more pronounced with MGB exposure. These findings suggest a frequency dependence of INa(T) during repetitive depolarizations [2,3]. Therefore, MGB exposure resulted in a loss-of-function integrity, attributed to the accentuated modification of INa inactivation, particularly evident during high-frequency APs.
Earlier studies have indicated that activation of L-type Ca2+ channels increased the mRNAs for two specific NaV-channel α subunits (NaV1.2 and NaV1.3) in GH3 cells [17]. It is hypothesized that MGB-induced blockage of INa in GH3 cells is linked to its inhibitory effects on voltage-gated Ca2+ currents, which are functionally present in excitable cells, including GH3 cells. However, further research has shown that the voltage-activated inward currents were influenced by either tefluthrin (Tef) stimulation or inhibition by tetrodotoxin or ranolazine. Tef and ranolazine have been demonstrated as activators and inhibitors of INa, respectively [12]. Tef, a type-I pyrethroid insecticide, is well-established to be an activator of INa, was added [12]. Continued exposure to MGB, followed by the addition of Tef, reversed the suppression of INa caused by MGB [9]. Although the ionic mechanism underlying MGB’s inhibitory action on NaV channels remains unclear, the MGB molecule may have a greater impact on the open/inactivated state rather than the resting (closed) state of the channel, leading to destabilization of the open conformation. It seems likely that MGB’s perturbations on excitable membranes cannot be solely attributed to its action on the α2δ subunit of CaV channels. NaV channel activity in excitable cells may render them susceptible to perturbations by MGB or other similar compounds. The interplay between MGB and NaV channels in excitable cells warrants further investigation to better understand their functional relationship and the potential implications for novel treatment or drug development. Figure 2 illustrates that MGB has an inhibitory effect on both CaV and NaV channels, leading to the alleviation of neuropathic pain.
It should be emphasized that the emergence of many instances of chronic pain sensation is not exclusively linked to CaV-channel dysfunction. The intrinsic functionality of INa plays a role in chronic neuropathic pain [18]. Indeed, ranolazine is a blocker of INa(L) that has been employed for chronic stable angina pectoris [12,18]. Moreover, as for the reasons behind MGB’s attenuation of different painful disorders, the extent to which this is due to the influence on the amplitude and gating of INa remains to be elucidated.
No studies have yet investigated the direct effect of MGB on NaV channels in heterologous expression systems such as HEK293 cells or Xenopus oocytes. The present findings in native cells suggest modulation of NaV currents; however, it is possible that this is an indirect consequence of MGB’s action on CaV channels via the α2δ-1 subunit. Future studies using heterologous expression of NaV channels, with or without co-expression of α2δ-1, will be essential to clarify whether MGB exerts a direct modulatory effect on NaV channel function.

2.5. Phenobarbital (PHB, Luminal Sodium®, Phenobarbitone)

PHB is a barbiturate that depresses the central nervous system, slowing down brain activities and producing both anticonvulsant and hypnotic effects. Its mechanism involves enhancing synaptic inhibitory effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain through GABA type A (GABAA) receptors [19]. PHB has a potential for tolerance, dependence, and addiction, making it a controlled drug in recent years.
PHB concentration-dependently suppresses INa(T) in Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells, with an IC50 of 83 µM [10]. However, the addition of either flumazenil or chlorotoxin, which are agents known to act on GABAA receptors or Cl- channels, did not reverse INa(T) blockages caused by PHB [10]. Alternatively, the regulatory effect of PHB on INa(T) decay during repetitive stimulation was reversed when Tef was introduced, but not by that of chlorotoxin, a blocker of Cl- channels. PHB concentration required to achieve half-maximal inhibition of INa in Neuro-2a cells was 83 µM, a value that falls within the range of clinically applied doses [10]. The results reflect that the perturbations by PHB or other structurally similar compounds on the amplitude, gating, and frequency dependence of INa(T) in Neuro-2a cells are a direct and fast process, independent of their agonistic actions on GABAA-mediated Cl- currents [10,20]. These findings shed light on the complex mechanisms of PHB’s actions in the central nervous system and its potential implications for the treatment of neurological disorders.
It is also essential to underline the significance of the M-type K+ current (IK(M)), also known as KCNQx-encoded currents, which can gradually increase during repetitive APs due to its slow activation and deactivation kinetics [21]. In this context, KCNQx primarily refers to KCNQ2, KCNQ3, and KCNQ5. KCNQ1 is predominantly expressed in the heart, while KCNQ4 is mainly found in the inner ear and auditory system. The IK(M) is a slow-activating and non-inactivating K+ current that plays a role in controlling the resting membrane potential of neurons and regulating their firing patterns. Furthermore, under conditions of high-frequency stimulation, the accumulation of IK(M) can hyperpolarize the after-potential, thereby expediting the recovery process of NaV channels from inactivation and enhancing NaV-channel availability [21]. In this context, “after-potential” refers to the membrane potential following long-lasting high-frequency stimulation. During such stimulation, IK(M) may accumulate progressively. As a result, when the high-frequency stimulation ceases, the enhanced IK(M) leads to a more hyperpolarized after-potential. This membrane hyperpolarization facilitates faster recovery of NaV channels from inactivation, thereby increasing their availability [21].
Recent findings demonstrated the role of PHB in facilitating the inhibition of IK(M) during pulse train stimulation. This suggests that the presence of PHB may disrupt the waveform of neuronal APs occurring at high frequency [10]. Moreover, the influence of PHB likely extends beyond the inhibition of IK(M), as it also synergistically affects multiple ionic currents, including INa, the erg-mediated K+ current (IK(erg)), IK(M), and the delayed-rectifier K+ current (IK(DR)). The term “erg” stands for ether-è-go-go-related gene, which is a family of genes that encode these voltage-gated K+ channels. Moreover, midazolam, which is a benzodiazepine hypnotic, has the ability to reduce the amplitude of IK(DR), while simultaneously increasing the rate at which the IK(DR) undergoes inactivation. These effects are thought to be not dependent on midazolam’s binding to benzodiazepine or nuclear receptors [22,23,24,25,26]. Figure 3 illustrates the effects of PHB on the cell membrane, which produce sedative/hypnotic, anesthetic, and anticonvulsant effects. PHB’s presence induces other unpredictable but crucial electrophysiological responses, despite its ability to activate GABAA receptors and enhance Cl- currents [18,27,28,29].
It is important to note the complexity of interpreting modulator (e.g., PHB) effect in native cells due to the presence of multiple ion channels and interacting proteins. Heterologous systems such Xenopus oocytes or HEK293 cells offer a reductionist approach that can help isolate the effects of a compound on a specific ion channel subtype. Therefore, applying heterologous expression systems to study phenobarbital’s direct effects on specific ion channels—such as NaV channel—would provide valuable mechanistic insights and help disentangle its multi-target actions.

3. Conclusions

Our discussion highlights the impact of small-molecule modulators on INa, revealing diverse underlying mechanisms that extend beyond their own original actions. Investigations conducted on excitable cells such as GH3 or Neuro-2a cells have unveiled alterations induced by these small-molecule modulators on INa. This effect is pronounced during high-frequency stimulation (e.g., 20 or 40 Hz). The implications of these modulatory actions on INa variants are expected to offer promising prospects for pharmacological, therapeutic, and clinical applications.
Furthermore, previous studies emphasized a critical aspect: the impact of these small molecules (Table 1) on diverse activities of excitable cells, with a specific focus on their regulatory effects on INa during high-frequency stimulation. This encompasses multiple factors, including stimulus-secretion coupling, membrane excitability, and AP firing, as depicted in Figure 4. A comprehensive understanding of these effects will thus hold paramount importance in grasping the broader ramifications of these small-molecule modulators and their utility within medical and therapeutic contexts. Additionally, whether the cumulative inhibition of INa under high-frequency stimulation is isoform-specific for NaV channels or region-specific within the brain requires further in-depth research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-Y.L., C.-W.C., S.-N.W. and E.C.S.; methodology, C.-W.C., S.-N.W., E.C.S. and Z.-H.G.; software, C.-W.C. and S.-N.W.; validation, E.C.S., Z.-H.G. and S.-N.W.; resources, C.-Y.L., S.-N.W. and C.-W.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.-H.G., E.C.S., C.-W.C. and S.-N.W.; writing—review and editing, Z.-H.G., E.C.S. and S.-N.W.; visualization, C.-Y.L., E.C.S. and S.-N.W.; supervision, S.-N.W.; project administration, C.-Y.L., E.C.S. and S.-N.W.; funding acquisition, S.-N.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper was supported in part by grants by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC-111-2314-B-006-028 and NSTC-112-2923-B-006-001), awarded to S.-N.W., as well as funding from An Nan Hospital (ANHRF112-42, ANHRF112-43, and ANHRF112-44), Taiwan, which also supported S.-N.W. The study was independently designed, and the data were collected, analyzed, and interpreted without any influence from the funders. The manuscript was authored without involvement from the funders, and the decision to publish the results was also made independently.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Information discussed in this manuscript will be provided by the corresponding author under reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

This work has been declared by the authors to be free of any conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
APaction potential
CaV channelvoltage-gated Ca2+ channel
GABAγ-aminobutyric acid;
GABAA receptorγ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor
IK(DR)delayed-rectifier K+ current
IK(erg)erg-mediated K+ current
IK(M)M-type K+ current
INavoltage-gated Na+ channel current
INa(L)late Na+ current
INa(P)persistent Na+ current
INa(T)Transient or peak Na+ current
NaV channelvoltage-gated Na+ channel

References

  1. Catterall, W.A.; Lenaeus, M.J.; Gamal El-Din, T.M. Structure and Pharmacology of Voltage-Gated Sodium and Calcium Channels. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2020, 60, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Navarro, M.A.; Salari, A.; Lin, J.L.; Cowan, L.M.; Penington, N.J.; Milescu, M.; Milescu, L.S. Sodium channels implement a molecular leaky integrator that detects action potentials and regulates neuronal firing. Elife 2020, 9, e54940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Upchurch, C.M.; Combe, C.L.; Knowlton, C.J.; Rousseau, V.G.; Gasparini, S.; Canavier, C.C. Long-Term Inactivation of Sodium Channels as a Mechanism of Adaptation in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 3768–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Taddese, A.; Bean, B.P. Subthreshold sodium current from rapidly inactivating sodium channels drives spontaneous firing of tuberomammillary neurons. Neuron 2002, 33, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, H.; Xia, Z.; Dong, J.; Huang, B.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, F.; Yan, R.; Shi, Y.; Gong, J.; Jiang, J.; et al. Structural mechanism of voltage-gated sodium channel slow inactivation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wu, P.M.; Cho, H.Y.; Chiang, C.W.; Chuang, T.H.; Wu, S.N.; Tu, Y.F. Characterization in Inhibitory Effectiveness of Carbamazepine in Voltage-Gated Na(+) and Erg-Mediated K(+) Currents in a Mouse Neural Crest-Derived (Neuro-2a) Cell Line. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cho, H.Y.; Chen, P.C.; Chuang, T.H.; Yu, M.C.; Wu, S.N. Activation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Current by GV-58, a Known Activator of CaV Channels. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wu, P.M.; Lin, Y.C.; Chiang, C.W.; Cho, H.Y.; Chuang, T.H.; Yu, M.C.; Wu, S.N.; Tu, Y.F. Effective Modulation by Lacosamide on Cumulative Inhibition of I(Na) during High-Frequency Stimulation and Recovery of I(Na) Block during Conditioning Pulse Train. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wu, S.N.; Wu, C.L.; Cho, H.Y.; Chiang, C.W. Effective Perturbations by Small-Molecule Modulators on Voltage-Dependent Hysteresis of Transmembrane Ionic Currents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, P.M.; Lai, P.C.; Cho, H.Y.; Chuang, T.H.; Wu, S.N.; Tu, Y.F. Effective Perturbations by Phenobarbital on I(Na), I(K(erg)), I(K(M)) and I(K(DR)) during Pulse Train Stimulation in Neuroblastoma Neuro-2a Cells. Biomedicines. 2022, 10, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dyong, T.M.; Gess, B.; Dumke, C.; Rolke, R.; Dohrn, M.F. Carbamazepine for Chronic Muscle Pain: A Retrospective Assessment of Indications, Side Effects, and Treatment Response. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. So, E.C.; Wu, S.N.; Lo, Y.C.; Su, K. Differential regulation of tefluthrin and telmisartan on the gating charges of I(Na) activation and inactivation as well as on resurgent and persistent I(Na) in a pituitary cell line (GH(3)). Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 285, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, N.; Hsiao, C.F.; Chandler, S.H. Membrane Resonance and Subthreshold Membrane Oscillations in Mesencephalic V Neurons: Participants in Burst Generation. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 3729–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, S.N. Ion Channels as a Potential Target in Pharmaceutical Designs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Villalba-Galea, C.A.; Chiem, A.T. Hysteretic Behavior in Voltage-Gated Channels. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 579596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Baysal, V.; Saraç, Z.; Yimaz, E. Chaotic resonance in Hodgkin-Huxley neuron. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019, 91, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vega, A.V.; Espinosa, J.L.; Lopez-Dominguez, A.M.; Lopez-Santiago, L.F.; Navarrete, A.; Cota, G. L-type calcium channel activation up-regulates the mRNAs for two different sodium channel alpha subunits (Nav1.1 and Nav1.3) in rat pituitary GH3 cells. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 2003, 116, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gomez, K.; Stratton, H.J.; Duran, P.; Loya, S.; Tang, C.; Calderon-Rivera, A.; Francois-Moutal, L.; Khanna, M.; Madura, C.L.; Luo, S.; et al. Identification and targeting of a unique Na(V)1.7 domain driving chronic pain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2217800120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kim, J.J.; Gharpure, A.; Teng, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Howard, R.J.; Zhu, S.; Noviello, C.M.; Walsh, R.M., Jr.; Lindahl, E.; Hibbs, R.E. Shared structural mechanisms of general anaesthetics and benzodiazepines. Nature 2020, 585, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lin, M.H.; Lin, J.F.; Yu, M.C.; Wu, S.N.; Wu, C.L.; Cho, H.Y. Characterization in Potent Modulation on Voltage-Gated Na(+) Current Exerted by Deltamethrin, a Pyrethroid Insecticide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Darwish, Y.; Fu, X.; Trussell, L.O.; Huang, H. KCNQ Channels Enable Reliable Presynaptic Spiking and Synaptic Transmission at High Frequency. J. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 3305–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Foo, N.P.; Liu, Y.F.; Wu, P.C.; Hsing, C.H.; Huang, B.M.; So, E.C. Midazolam’s Effects on Delayed-Rectifier K(+) Current and Intermediate-Conductance Ca(2+)-Activated K(+) Channel in Jurkat T-lymphocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Men, S.; Wang, H. Phenobarbital in Nuclear Receptor Activation: An Update. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2023, 51, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stevens, M.F.; Werdehausen, R.; Gaza, N.; Hermanns, H.; Kremer, D.; Bauer, I.; Küry, P.; Hollmann, M.W.; Braun, S. Midazolam activates the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis independent of benzodiazepine and death receptor signaling. Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2011, 36, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kagota, S.; Morikawa, K.; Ishida, H.; Chimoto, J.; Maruyama-Fumoto, K.; Yamada, S.; Shinozuka, K. Vasorelaxant effects of benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics, and tandospirone on isolated rat arteries. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 892, 173744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. So, E.C.; Wu, K.C.; Kao, F.C.; Wu, S.N. Effects of midazolam on ion currents and membrane potential in differentiated motor neuron-like NSC-34 and NG108-15 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 724, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Niquet, J.; Nguyen, D.; de Araujo Furtado, M.; Lumley, L. Treatment of cholinergic-induced status epilepticus with polytherapy targeting GABA and glutamate receptors. Epilepsia Open 2023, 8 (Suppl. 1), S117–S140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hossain, R.; Al-Khafaji, K.; Khan, R.A.; Sarkar, C.; Islam, M.S.; Dey, D.; Jain, D.; Faria, F.; Akbor, R.; Atolani, O.; et al. Quercetin and/or Ascorbic Acid Modulatory Effect on Phenobarbital-Induced Sleeping Mice Possibly through GABAA and GABAB Receptor Interaction Pathway. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liddiard, G.T.; Suryavanshi, P.S.; Glykys, J. Enhancing GABAergic Tonic Inhibition Reduces Seizure-Like Activity in the Neonatal Mouse Hippocampus and Neocortex. J. Neurosci. 2024, 44, e1342232023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Simplified graph illustrating the elicitation of voltage-gated Na+ channel currents (INa) in response to high-frequency stimulation at 20 or 40 Hz. The top graph represents the voltage applied (light blue) over a total duration of 1 s, while the bottom graph illustrates the corresponding current trace with downward (inward) deflection (black). The current trace exhibits fast activation and inactivation of INa in response to every brief depolarizing pulse. The dashed red arrow shown below illustrates an exponential decrease (i.e., cumulative inhibition) in the transient or peak INa (INa(T)) over time, with a deepening color indicating the extent of this decline.
Figure 1. Simplified graph illustrating the elicitation of voltage-gated Na+ channel currents (INa) in response to high-frequency stimulation at 20 or 40 Hz. The top graph represents the voltage applied (light blue) over a total duration of 1 s, while the bottom graph illustrates the corresponding current trace with downward (inward) deflection (black). The current trace exhibits fast activation and inactivation of INa in response to every brief depolarizing pulse. The dashed red arrow shown below illustrates an exponential decrease (i.e., cumulative inhibition) in the transient or peak INa (INa(T)) over time, with a deepening color indicating the extent of this decline.
Scipharm 93 00033 g001
Figure 2. A simplified graph illustrating that mirogabalin (MGB) is capable of inhibiting voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels (e.g., α2δ-1 subunit), as well as voltage-gated Na+ (NaV) channels, particularly during high-frequency stimulation. Ca2+ and Na+ ions will flow through specialized CaV and NaV channels, respectively, following their individual electrochemical gradients (as indicated by the blue curved arrow). The alleviation of neuropathic pain is attributed to the combined inhibitory effects of these interventions.
Figure 2. A simplified graph illustrating that mirogabalin (MGB) is capable of inhibiting voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels (e.g., α2δ-1 subunit), as well as voltage-gated Na+ (NaV) channels, particularly during high-frequency stimulation. Ca2+ and Na+ ions will flow through specialized CaV and NaV channels, respectively, following their individual electrochemical gradients (as indicated by the blue curved arrow). The alleviation of neuropathic pain is attributed to the combined inhibitory effects of these interventions.
Scipharm 93 00033 g002
Figure 3. A simplified graph demonstrating cellular responses induced by the action of phenobarbital (PHB). The drug stimulates γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors and concurrently exerts inhibitory effects on various ion currents across the cell membrane. This inhibitory effect on ionic currents becomes more prominent, especially under conditions of high-frequency stimulations. The currents involved comprise INa, as well as IK(M), IK(DR), and IK(erg). Due to these effects, the drug produces sedative/hypnotic, anesthetic, and anticonvulsant effects. In the diagram, the symbols “+” and “−“ denote stimulatory and inhibitory effects, respectively.
Figure 3. A simplified graph demonstrating cellular responses induced by the action of phenobarbital (PHB). The drug stimulates γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors and concurrently exerts inhibitory effects on various ion currents across the cell membrane. This inhibitory effect on ionic currents becomes more prominent, especially under conditions of high-frequency stimulations. The currents involved comprise INa, as well as IK(M), IK(DR), and IK(erg). Due to these effects, the drug produces sedative/hypnotic, anesthetic, and anticonvulsant effects. In the diagram, the symbols “+” and “−“ denote stimulatory and inhibitory effects, respectively.
Scipharm 93 00033 g003
Figure 4. A simplified graph illustrating the effects of carbamazepine, GV-58, lacosamide, mirogabalin, and phenobarbital on INa under conditions of high-frequency stimulation. These effects lead to alterations in stimulus-secretion coupling, membrane excitability, and AP firing. * Mirogabalin alleviates neuropathic pain, whereas # phenobarbital exerts sedative, hypnotic, anesthetic, and anticonvulsant effects. The black-colored downward deflection in the center indicates the representative INa trace in response to a brief depolarizing step.
Figure 4. A simplified graph illustrating the effects of carbamazepine, GV-58, lacosamide, mirogabalin, and phenobarbital on INa under conditions of high-frequency stimulation. These effects lead to alterations in stimulus-secretion coupling, membrane excitability, and AP firing. * Mirogabalin alleviates neuropathic pain, whereas # phenobarbital exerts sedative, hypnotic, anesthetic, and anticonvulsant effects. The black-colored downward deflection in the center indicates the representative INa trace in response to a brief depolarizing step.
Scipharm 93 00033 g004
Table 1. Small-molecule modulators with their abbreviations and chemical structure described in this paper in relation to the inhibition or stimulation of INa in excitable cells.
Table 1. Small-molecule modulators with their abbreviations and chemical structure described in this paper in relation to the inhibition or stimulation of INa in excitable cells.
Compound or Drug
(Abbreviated Name)
Chemical StructureReference
Carbamazepine (CBZ)Scipharm 93 00033 i001[6]
GV-58Scipharm 93 00033 i002[7]
Lacosamide (LCS)Scipharm 93 00033 i003[8]
Mirogabalin (MGB)Scipharm 93 00033 i004[9]
Phenobarbital (PHB)Scipharm 93 00033 i005[10]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, C.-Y.; Gao, Z.-H.; Cheung, C.-W.; So, E.C.; Wu, S.-N. Modulation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channel Currents by Small Molecules: Effects on Amplitude and Gating During High-Frequency Stimulation. Sci. Pharm. 2025, 93, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm93030033

AMA Style

Lin C-Y, Gao Z-H, Cheung C-W, So EC, Wu S-N. Modulation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channel Currents by Small Molecules: Effects on Amplitude and Gating During High-Frequency Stimulation. Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2025; 93(3):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm93030033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Cheng-Yuan, Zi-Han Gao, Chi-Wai Cheung, Edmund Cheung So, and Sheng-Nan Wu. 2025. "Modulation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channel Currents by Small Molecules: Effects on Amplitude and Gating During High-Frequency Stimulation" Scientia Pharmaceutica 93, no. 3: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm93030033

APA Style

Lin, C.-Y., Gao, Z.-H., Cheung, C.-W., So, E. C., & Wu, S.-N. (2025). Modulation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channel Currents by Small Molecules: Effects on Amplitude and Gating During High-Frequency Stimulation. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 93(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm93030033

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop