Next Article in Journal
Worldwide Research on Open Innovation in SMEs
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing the Financial Performance of SMEs Based on Sharia Economy: Perspective of Economic Business Sustainability and Open Innovation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis

by
Sandra Grabowska
1,* and
Sebastian Saniuk
2
1
Faculty of Material Engineering, Department of Production Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 40-019 Katowice, Poland
2
Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Engineering Management and Logistic Systems, University of Zielona Gora, 65-417 Zielona Gora, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019
Submission received: 30 November 2021 / Revised: 7 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 12 January 2022

Abstract

:
The Fourth Industrial Revolution affects the operations of companies and results in new strategic thinking. The changes resulting from the requirements of Industry 4.0 force restructuring in many areas of management or the building of new business models. The aim of this article was to indicate the pillars that will form the basis for building business models of enterprises functioning in the era of Industry 4.0. The research methods used in this article were bibliometric analysis and analysis of the content of sophisticated publications. The results of this research are the analysis of the dynamics of publications in the area of business models in the era of Industry 4.0, an indication of the research areas undertaken in these publications and the identification of the pillars that will constitute the basis for building business models in the era of Industry 4.0. Business models in the era of Industry 4.0 are to be a method of increasing and using the company’s resources in order to achieve a competitive advantage through personalization of products and their new quality; their key competitive advantage will be a structure based on a network of cyber-physical cooperation. This article is dedicated to scientists and business practitioners looking for tips for building modern business models.

1. Introduction

The Fourth Industrial Revolution refers to the social, industrial and technological changes caused by the digital transformation of industry, which are identified with the concept of Industry 4.0 [1,2]. Industry 4.0 means the integration of intelligent machines and systems and the introduction of changes in production processes to increase production efficiency and introduce the possibility of flexible changes in their scope [3,4,5].
The use of state-of-the-art technological solutions on an ever-wider scale and the networking of the economy, which has an impact on the development of various forms of communication, competitiveness on a global scale and the increasing and more popular mobility of employees, are the trends and phenomena that affect people’s lifestyle and work and thus have an impact on the functioning of companies [6,7,8,9,10]. These patterns, combined with the rapidly changing professional environment, mean new opportunities and challenges for companies [11,12,13,14,15,16].
In the future business reality, what was previously a domain of many market participants will be offered within one application by one player. Trends will be shaped by customer expectations and experiences, creating the potential to transform almost any sector within the business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-customer (B2C) areas [17,18,19]. As a result, companies will have to define their strategies and business models in a completely different way over the next few years—not concerning traditional market competitors but the emerging consumer ecosystems [20,21,22,23]. New business concepts enable the creation of new business models, including open business models using open innovation. These models are the strategic and operational basis for changes in the configuration of products and processes in an enterprise. These models become the foundation of a competitive market advantage determined by the rules of the Industry 4.0 concept [24]. Dynamic technological development and solutions implemented in modern companies result in a change in management paradigms and the need to build new business models based on maintaining a balance between the development of autonomous (intelligent) technology and remote communication systems and the quality of life, and recognized values in different societies [25]. What distinguishes the Fourth Industrial Revolution is the knowledge of customer needs, which constitutes a competitive advantage of enterprises—correctly defining the opportunities, challenges and problems that it brings guarantees conscious use of new opportunities or new market opportunities [26,27].
The literature analysis identified a research gap in the lack of business models of enterprises operating in Industry 4.0, mainly the structure of the models, the pillars and the sources of their competitive advantage. This article aimed to indicate the pillars that will form the basis for building enterprises’ open business models in the Industry 4.0 environment. To achieve this aim, the following research questions were formulated:
  • How does Industry 4.0 affect business models?
  • What are the key pillars of Industry 4.0 affecting new business models?
The authors’ scientific contribution is to demonstrate the multidisciplinary nature of business models in the era of Industry 4.0 and to identify the pillars from which they will be built. This knowledge can provide important guidance for researchers but also business practitioners looking for guidelines for building open business models in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
This article is organized as follows: The second section describes Industry 4.0 and open business model assumptions. The third section presents the research methods. The fourth section of the article presents the research results and discussion. The discussion focuses on the business models of enterprises operating in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The final section of this article presents the conclusions.

2. Industry 4.0 towards Open Business Model

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is a term for the social, industrial and technological changes brought about by the digital transformation of industry. The name Industry 4.0 has been adopted in Europe, emerging from the German government’s work in 2010 to identify and analyze upcoming disruptive changes of strategic importance to the German economy. The term was used for the first time at the Hanover Fair in 2011 during the presentation of the industry’s future [28,29,30]. Industry 4.0 is a subset of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Customers and business partners are directly involved in business processes and value creation. Production is combined with high-quality services. In the future, with intelligent monitoring and decision making, companies and their entire networks should be able to control and optimize their operations almost in real time. Industry 4.0 is an upheaval in production control methodologies [31,32].
Industry 4.0 is essentially a trend towards automation and data sharing in manufacturing technologies and processes, including cyber-physical systems (CPSs), the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, cognitive computing and artificial intelligence. The main advantages of Industry 4.0 are as follows [33,34]:
  • Increased economic efficiency;
  • Increased work efficiency;
  • Increased flexibility;
  • Reduction in production costs;
  • Increased return on investment.
In the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the relationship between human capital and technological capital is modified. Automation of technical capital translates into a high quality of products and services. The increase in work efficiency is achieved primarily through an automatic or semi-automatic decision-making process [35,36]. Production is monitored, and it is much easier to bring new products to the production line and create opportunities for a single production operation. Production becomes flexible, and the factory becomes intelligent [37,38].
By linking an increasing number of industries to society, technology can influence production’s functionality and quality and quantity [39]. Industry 4.0 forces the implementation of modern IT solutions across the entire value chain, making it possible to produce personalized products for a specific customer and related value chains. Advanced information and communication technologies allow production to be precisely tailored to customer expectations while maintaining low costs, high quality and efficiency. Modern technology-based business models are accelerating the transformation of the industry, changing the market structure. This poses new challenges for many areas of management, which is forced to adapt to the digital world architecture [40,41].
Business models developed and implemented by companies determine their profitability and competitiveness. New strategic behavior is determined by the changes that can be observed in modern business. Currently, managers are required to use increasingly sophisticated management methods and concepts [42]. Analyzing the essence, structure and types of strategic models is an essential cognitive element of the sphere of development and operation. Such research also serves to improve existing business models and even build new models, which become necessary in the face of challenges and market volatility. The progressive globalization and networking of the economy make it necessary to create new business concepts. Their theoretical detail and, at the same time, the possibility of application are concepts of business models whose important element are business processes, which are, to some extent, a way of realizing value in the form of relationships with customers, particularly providing them with products that meet specific needs [43,44].
The company’s business model is presented as a set of activities, methods and timescales, using its resources to create the highest value for the client and secure its position to take over the value. Innovations can be applied to all business model elements and are essential for creating value for the customer. The business model reflects the implementation of the strategy in terms of economic effects. The role of the strategy is highlighted in the model because current and future revenues are generated by the products offered to customers and the competitive approach to the market. This results in a revenue stream and a return on investment, thanks to a combination of profit and an appropriate cost structure [45]. Thus, the business model is the configuration of the strategy with regard to the sources of income and profits [46,47].
Industry 4.0 technologies are creating new opportunities for businesses, greatly facilitating open business models based on open innovation. In open business models, collaboration with partners within cyber-physical systems becomes a key source of value creation and capture. They help create value by leveraging a large number of ideas, including external outsiders [48,49,50]. They also allow for greater value capture by leveraging a company’s key assets, resources or positions not only in its own business, but also in the business of other companies [51,52,53,54,55,56]. Companies with an open business model actively seek innovative ways to collaborate with all business partners: suppliers, customers or general partners, to expand their business, e.g., through servitization. In such a model, open innovation is integrated into the business model [57,58]. Different revenue generation methods are used. Diversification of revenue methods reduces risk and provides multiple paths to sustainable growth. Open business models start with participation, universal access and inclusivity [59]. Open innovation seems to be a natural direction of change in the evolution of business models of the Fourth Industrial Revolution era. The relationship of open innovation to open business models is very important because of the ideas of knowledge sharing, finding solutions that generate profit for the company and society, product responsibility and listening to the voice of stakeholders [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69].
Industry 4.0 requires the development of open business models that support the implementation of open innovation. Hence, this article carried out a bibliographic analysis in order to identify the current results of research in this area and to identify key areas of interest undertaken in selected scientific articles. The analysis sought answers to the following specific questions:
  • What is the total number of publications in the areas of “business models”, “Industry 4.0” and “business models and Industry 4.0”?
  • What is the ranking of researchers in terms of the number of publications and citations?
  • Which countries are leading in addressing the described topics?
  • Which research centers are leading in conducting research?
  • Which journals and conferences have addressed the issues under consideration?
  • Which research areas can be considered key based on the content of selected publications based on the criterion of “Highly Cited Paper”?
  • Which pillars of business models in the Industry 4.0 era are recognized in the selected papers?
Obtaining answers to the above questions will allow us to achieve the goal of this article, that is, to indicate the pillars that will form the basis for building enterprises’ open business models in the Industry 4.0 environment.

3. Materials and Methods

This paper used bibliometric analysis, which is considered as a method of evaluating research results and gaining a comprehensive view of the current scientific output. It involves the use and quantification of quantitative data in scientific work and quantitative indicators of various databases [70,71,72,73]. Bibliometric research is often used by researchers, public institutions, universities and enterprises. With the help of quantitative analysis, it is possible to study market trends and the dynamics of the development of thematic papers in a particular area [74].
Systematic literature network analysis (SLNA) was adopted as the method of bibliometric analysis. This approach identifies critical trends and issues that affect knowledge development in a given field more scientifically and objectively than descriptive reviews. It focuses on the classification of the research input and subjective criteria for selecting papers [75].
The publication search was conducted using the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection, a database from Clarivate Analytics. All publications that were written in English were searched. The Web of Science database was used for the bibliometric analysis because it is an interdisciplinary research platform that registers more than 12,000 journals with international reach and more than 160,000 conferences, including international conferences, worldwide. This database allows users to search multiple databases simultaneously from a single interface—through the Web of Science™ Core Collection. It collects many bibliometric indicators and studies from most disciplines. It is also the most widely used database of data and citations for scientific purposes [76]. The most significant advantage of this database is its transparency and orderliness. The Web of Science database is considered one of the most consistent databases of scientific publications [77]. Figure 1 shows the adopted research methodology.
The knowledge base related to the research on business models and Industry 4.0 is spreading significantly. The trend of publishing scientific papers on these areas is constantly growing, which indicates that research on the concept of business models and Industry 4.0 is still in the focus of scientists and researchers. Therefore, the current state of knowledge requires research to systematize and rationalize the created knowledge on this subject. The study of the knowledge creation process, transfer and development from a dynamic perspective will reveal its evolution over time. This bibliometric research was focused on three thematic/research areas (Figure 2):
Area I—Business Models (with open business models). This was the most extensive area covering the time span of the analyzed period from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021. Before 1996, there were single publications from this area, but due to their small number, the earlier years were not taken into account.
Area II—Industry 4.0, whose time span in the analyzed period is 1 January 2011 to 31 October 2021. This research area started in 2011 when German experts introduced an industry development strategy based on intelligent technology.
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0. The time span of the analyzed period is 1 January 2011 to 31 October 2021. It was assumed that business models in the Industry 4.0 era are a form of evolution of previous business models, absorbing the Industry 4.0 components and flexibly adapting to new market conditions resulting from the concept of Industry 4.0, currently also known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
The identification of thematic/research areas is a critical stage of analysis, and its results may change if different keywords are used. Finally, the searches were conducted on 3 November 2021 in Web of Science using selected keywords. The three defined research areas were searched in the category “Topic”, which includes: title, abstract, keywords defined by the author(s) and keywords plus (so-called “KeyWords Plus”—words and phrases extracted from the titles of cited articles).

4. Results

Table 1 shows the WoS database search results for the three subject areas studied. However, the dynamics of growth of interest in the researched areas are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.
The review of the dynamics of the number of published scientific papers from the studied areas from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021 indicates that the studied areas are still current, and interest in them is growing dynamically. Assuming four periods of time—emergence (the time of appearance of a new area), definition (the time when a new research area is already defined by many researchers taking into account different areas of knowledge), maturity of a concept (the time when a concept is already well known and described) and stabilization (the time when a concept is already firmly established in science and has even undergone multidirectional development), the following can be considered:
  • The area of “business models” already emerged in 1996. When the first publications were published to reflect on the new form of management, there were several of them on an annual basis. Currently, this area is at the end of the definition period, gradually moving to maturity; however, the concept of management through the definition of a business model still requires multi-faceted research and is intensively explored by researchers. Many researchers have defined the business model concept and identified its components that are essential for managing a company in a turbulent, competitive environment. Since 2015, the number of publications in this area has started to exceed one thousand, and the description of business models has become increasingly complex, multidimensional and multi-faceted.
  • The “Industry 4.0” area is a young research area, but the period of its emergence has already passed (2013). Since 2014, when only 35 papers were published in the WoS database, there has been a very intense growth of interest in this topic (issues). In 2017, the number of articles was 920, and since 2019, it has already exceeded the number of two thousand—every year.
  • For the area “business models and Industry 4.0”, the emergence phase dates back to 2015 (1 publication) and 2016 (11 publications). In 2019, the number of publications in this area increased to 46—this area is now in the final phase of definition.
Based on the Web of Science database, a ranking of scientists according to the number of published scientific papers indexed by this database (but with the number of published papers not less than three) was extracted. Table 2 shows the ranking of five scientists (top five), i.e., with the highest number of papers in a given research area. Within Area I, the most active researchers are from Denmark, Italy, China, England and the Netherlands and have written 183 publications. Within Area II, the most active researchers come from Mexico, Russia, Italy, China and the USA and have published 268 papers in the WoS database. On the other hand, for Area III, it is possible to identify 36 publications that met the defined criteria. Their authors represent Spain, Austria, Italy, Switzerland, Serbia, Germany and Poland. In Area III, no Chinese author was included in the top five list.
Five leading scientific institutions whose researchers published the most scientific papers in each area were selected from the statistics compiled (Table 3). It was found that researchers from these distinguished research centers published a total of 656 papers for Area I, 629 papers for Area II and 25 papers for Area III.
The Web of Science database allows for a detailed insight into the types of scientific areas in the selected scientific works. For each field of analysis, five fields of science which the individual publications are most often classified as belonging to are indicated. In-depth analysis indicated that the subject matter under examination is characterized by a multidisciplinary specificity. Such an approach allows for a comprehensive approach to research. A wide range of studies also characterized the analyzed areas; they drew knowledge about research methodologies, methods and tools from many sciences. Therefore, the studied areas cannot be explicitly subordinated to any of the sciences according to the classification of sciences adopted by the OECD. No scientific publication or scientific journal was found in the database with a “one-dimensional” character. The identified scientific papers were assigned to individual fields of science. This list is very diverse. However, it can be noted that Area I is primarily classified within the management and economic sciences (although business models originate from informatics), while Area II can be called “purely technical”, and Area III is a combination of the so-called “soft” and engineering and technical sciences. In order to verify the obtained results, the sources in which the researchers published the most works from the examined areas were also analyzed; similar to the previous categories, a list of the five most popular categories was compiled in three areas (Table 4). The analysis of the source titles of the publications confirmed that the studied topic has a multidisciplinary specificity (Table 5).
For each study area, we searched for papers distinguished by the “Highly Cited Paper” designation in the Web of Science database. For Area I, 169 such publications were determined in the database. For Area II, 197 publications were selected, while for Area III, 13 publications were distinguished. However, it should be remembered that the substantive quality of the work may determine a high citation index, the author’s authority, open access to the publication, the time at which the publication was published, etc. The lists of the five publications with the highest citation index are as follows. For Area I—Business Models, the following publications have the highest citation index:
  • Teece D.J. (2010) Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planing 43:2–3, pp. 172–194. This publication has been quoted 2504 times; its aim is to understand the importance of business models and explore their links with business strategies, innovation management and economic theory.
  • Amit R., Zott C. (2001) Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), pp. 493–520. This publication has been quoted 2014 times. The publication describes business models as the design of transactional content, structure and governance to create value by exploiting business opportunities.
  • Zott C., Amit R., Massa L. (2011) The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management 37:4, pp. 1019–1042. This publication has been quoted 1673 times to explain the concept of business models for banks and find a way to identify digital business models of banks.
  • Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom, S. (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and corporate change, 11(3), 529–555. This publication has been quoted 1672 times. This paper explores the role of the business model in capturing value from early-stage technology.
  • Rochet J.-Ch., Tirole J. (2003) Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), pp. 990–1029, https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 1531 times. This paper builds a model of platform competition with two-sided markets.
For Area II—Industry 4.0, the following publications have the highest citation index:
  • Lasi H., Fettke P., Kemper H.G., Feld T., Hoffmann M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & information systems engineering, 6(4), pp. 239–242. This publication has been quoted 1230 times; its aim is to describe Industry 4.0.
  • Xu L.D., Xu E.L., Li L. (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends, International Journal of Production Research, 56:8, pp. 2941–2962, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 750 times. This paper reviews the state of the art of Industry 4.0 as it relates to industries.
  • Lee J., Hung-An K., Shanhu Y., Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment. Procedia CRIP, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 747 times. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the trends of transformation of manufacturing services in a big data environment and the readiness of intelligent predictive computing tools to manage big data to achieve transparency and productivity in this way.
  • Zhong R., Xu X., Klotz E., Newman S. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review. Engineering, 3(5), pp. 616–630. This publication has been quoted 672 times. This article provides a comprehensive overview of related Industry 4.0 topics such as smart manufacturing, Internet of Things (IoT)-based manufacturing and cloud-based manufacturing.
  • Yongxin L., Deschamps F., Rocha E., Ramos L. (2017) Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal, International Journal of Production Research, 55:12, pp. 3609–3629, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 602 times. The purpose of this article is to outline research trends in Industry 4.0.
For Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0, the following publications have the highest citation index:
  • Moeuf A., Pellerin R., Lamouri S., Tamayo-Giraldo S., Barbaray R. (2018) The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research 56:3, pp. 1118–1136. This publication has been quoted 250 times; its purpose is to provide a literature review of existing applied research, covering various issues of Industry 4.0 in relation to SMEs.
  • Muller J.M., Buliga O., Voigt K.L. (2018) Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 132, pp. 2–17. This publication has been quoted 249 times. Its purpose is to analyze how Industry 4.0 triggers changes in the business models of manufacturing SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) by conducting qualitative research on a sample of 68 German SMEs from 3 industries (automotive suppliers, mechanical engineering and factories, as well as electrical engineering and ICT).
  • Nascimento D.L.M., Alencastro V., Quelhas O.L.G., Caiado R.G.G., Garza-Reyes J.A., Rocha-Lona L. Tortorella G. (2019) Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: A business model proposal”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(3), pp. 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 152 times. This article aims to explore how rising technologies from Industry 4.0 can be integrated with circular economy (CE) practices to establish a business model that reuses and recycles wasted material such as scrap metal or e-waste.
  • Frank A.G., Mendes G.H.S., Ayala N.F., Ghezzi A. (2019) Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 148, pp. 341–351. This publication has been quoted 148 times. It aims to show the basis for the growing research on the interface between service and Industry 4.0 because servicing and Industry 4.0 are considered to be two of the latest trends transforming industrial enterprises.
  • Ghobakhloo M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 252, 119869. This publication has been quoted 129 times. This paper aims to add to the sustainability literature by systematically identifying sustainability functions in Industry 4.0.
Based on the conducted research, international research trends for 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021 were identified based on scientific publications included in the international indexing database Web of Science. Analyzing the created semantic map (Figure 6), it is possible to identify the non-linear development of concepts and rapid changes in thinking and conducting scientific research. The purpose of visualizing the knowledge of business models and Industry 4.0 is to ask the following questions:
(1)
How have international research trends evolved from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021 (from the areas visualized in Figure 6)?
(2)
What are the key conceptual clusters formed on the historiographic map of scientific publications from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021?
The verification of the term network shown in Figure 6 reveals potential links grouped into topics. For the publications identified in the business models and Industry 4.0 area, the terms are divided into three clusters. The red cluster is oriented around companies. Terms such as business model, business model innovation, business model perspective, revenue, finance and waste belong to this cluster. The business process cluster refers to technique, property, algorithm, modeling, model transformation and development process. The third cluster, marked in blue, includes concepts related to the business cycle such as period, rate, effect, increase, parameter and prediction.

5. Discussion

Interestingly, A. Afuah [78] stated that two important theses must be considered to determine the essence of a business model:
Thesis I: An organization using its resources to run a business generates revenue, “offering it to the sector”. It offers the highest value to the client, while being in a position to capture value.
Thesis II: The competitiveness and flexibility of a company are determined by the combined interaction of company-specific factors with sector-specific factors.
The business model can also be understood as the organization’s adoption of methods of increasing and using resources in order to provide its customers with a range of products and services that are worth more than those of its competitors and that, at the same time, ensure the organization’s profitability [79,80]. It is treated as one of the determinants influencing the company’s efficiency. In comparison, B. Nogalski [81] pointed out that the business model is closely related to processes, particularly business processes, and therefore business management. The business model of an enterprise is a concept of how it intends to conduct its business in the environment it identifies with. Its shape, to a certain extent, is a specific configuration of resources, activities and offered products or services, which ensures the creation of value for the customer and the generation of profit for the owners of the enterprise [82].
In the literature, the dominant belief is that building business models is an important management instrument, which is a recipe for achieving competitiveness, flexibility and effective action. However, there is quite a clear research gap concerning the details of the methodology of building such models [83,84].
As a result of the conducted research, common research areas were identified for the scientific works under consideration in the third area (business models and Industry 4.0) of this bibliometric analysis—this area was mainly focused on due to the search for pillars that will form the basis of the architecture of business models of enterprises operating in the era of Industry 4.0. Detailed analysis of the content of the selected publications indicated that the construction of business models in an environment shaped by Industry 4.0 is most often associated with the attributes of Industry 4.0 (Internet of Things, big data, blockchain, smart factory, machine learning, 3D printing, etc.), cyber-physical collaborative networks, servicing, production personalization, equivalence and talent management. The authors of the published papers in this area formulated the following research questions:
  • How will the innovative business model be structured, especially in the SME sector?
  • How can the business model lead to a sustainable society?
  • Will servitization be a new direction for business models?
  • What will be the social dimension of business models?
The indicated issues were discussed at many international conferences, such as the following:
  • 10th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS).
  • 11th International Conference on Business Excellence—Strategy, Complexity and Energy in Changing Times.
  • 25th IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/25th ICE/IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ITMC).
  • IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS).
  • 35th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA).
Dynamic technological development and solutions implemented in modern companies result in a change in management paradigms and the need to build new business models based on maintaining a balance between the development of autonomous (intelligent) technology and remote communication systems and the quality of life, and recognized values in different societies. This is expressed in the creation of new open business models that allow the introduction of open innovations, rapid reorganization of processes and very flexible adjustment of the functioning of companies to new conditions and dynamically changing competitive and common environments. The issue of business models (especially open business models) has a comprehensive character because its scope covers all forms of business activity from the perspective of economic efficiency and non-financial effects of business activity. Intensive development of the digital economy started open business models, where the traditional formulas of providing value propositions are supported or replaced by solutions based on innovative information technologies and open innovations. This approach has a clear impact on new business concepts that translate into a specific open model that provides a strategic and operational basis for reconfiguring products and processes in an enterprise to compete in the market, determined by the rules of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Implementation of technological innovations (pillars of Industry 4.0) will bring many benefits to business models. It will enable the creation of a broad spectrum of value, customer orientation and customer needs, production of highly personalized products and monetization of customer knowledge [85]. Additional benefits of digitization can be derived by companies from servitization. Services can bring value to customers while becoming a channel for collecting data and information designed to support business feedback [86].
Business models are currently a significant area of scientific research exploration related to the search for ways to better understand their very essence and the ecosystems they shape. An in-depth analysis of the publications contained in the Web of Science database allowed defining current research areas in the field of business models in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Using the filter “Business Model” AND “Industry 4.0”, key words/research areas related to this topic were identified and presented in the form of a cluster (Figure 7).
Directly related to business models according to the identified keywords are the terms value chain, outsourcing, decision making, talent management, SMEs, B2B, B2C, flexibility, cyber-physical networks, sustainability and globalization. The keywords most frequently related to Industry 4.0 were as follows: innovation, big data, personalization, servicing, smart factory, modularity, blockchain, machine learning, cloud computing. These pillars will be the foundation of open business models that make extensive use of open innovation. The modern technology of Industry 4.0 will facilitate knowledge sharing, leveraging the experience of business partners and reaping the benefits of innovation.
However, a growing number of new tools and technologies are still underutilized in the creation of new business models, according to a study by Moewuf et al. This is most likely due to high investment costs [87].

6. Conclusions

This bibliometric analysis of the world’s scientific literature in the area of the business model and Industry 4.0 concepts is one of the first of its kind. It attempted to rationalize and systematize the existing scientific knowledge on the concept of business models in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. To this end, various quantitative bibliometric analyses were carried out. The software tools of the Web of Science database were used, which allowed presenting the flow of knowledge over time. The analysis allowed showing the reconstruction of the effects of scientific productivity in the studied areas over time. It was found that most of the publications contained in the Web of Science database concerned Area I—Business Models. This is because this area had the longest research period (from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021). The next set of publications in terms of number of publications included Area II—Industry 4.0, and the smallest set concerned Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0. Even if the same analysis period, i.e., 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021, were applied to all three segments, significant changes in the results would not be achieved because both concepts of “Industry 4.0” and business models in the Fourth Industrial Revolution are new concepts.
The conducted research showed a multidisciplinary character of the business model concept in the era of Industry 4.0 implementation. In this way, it was possible to obtain an interesting picture of knowledge from the studied areas. As a result, it can be concluded that business models in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution will be built on the pillars of business management and the technical area. The pillars of management will be decision making, outsourcing, value chains, talent management, SMEs, B2B, B2C, flexibility, cyber-physical networks, sustainable development and globalization. The pillars will be innovation, personalization, big data, 3D printing, services, IoT, smart factories, modularity, blockchains, machine learning and cloud computing in the technical field. In the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the concept of open business models is gradually being built using Industry 4.0 pillars to achieve a modern form of management capable of meeting the challenges of a turbulent, competitive and technologically advanced environment, creating an open business model based on innovation, which are the pillars of Industry 4.0. In an open business model using the technological solutions of Industry 4.0, it will be easy to use open innovation, provide access to knowledge and reduce the cost of technology and other new solutions.
This study’s main limitation is based on the number of citations and the popularity of publications, which cannot determine the actual contribution of scientific work in the areas studied. The choice of the Web of Science database, which, despite being an extensive interdisciplinary and international platform, covers only a fraction of scientific publications available worldwide, is one limitation. The fact that the “St. Matthew’s effect” is used in science may also be a criticism, showing a certain dependence. That is, researchers who are more respected in the community and are therefore often cited maintain more citations because their scientific publications are perceived as reliable and reputable.
The analysis of the concept of building models is an essential aspect of the theoretical treatment of business modeling, which is part of strategic management. Researchers’ interest in business models and Industry 4.0 is constantly growing. Theoretically, this study contributes to identifying the current state of knowledge about the concept of business models in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution by analyzing the evolution of the state of knowledge and trends. The results can be an important voice in the discussion on the subject under consideration in both technical and economic sciences. In the future, this study may be extended to include an analysis of the strength of the impact of the identified pillars on the architecture of open business models of enterprises operating in the era of Industry 4.0. As the directions of development of open business models and Industry 4.0 are unknown, it will be worthwhile to examine which of the identified pillars will even become megatrends. An in-depth analysis of how Industry 4.0 technology affects the use of open innovation in open business models may also be an interesting direction for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.; methodology, S.G.; software, S.G. and S.S.; validation, S.G.; formal analysis, S.G.; investigation, S.G.; resources, S.G.; data curation, S.G. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.; writing—review and editing, S.G. and S.S.; visualization, S.G.; supervision, S.G.; project administration, S.G.; funding acquisition, S.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Silesian University of Technology (Faculty of Materials Engineering, Department of Production Engineering) supported this work as a part of Statutory Research BK-207/RM1/2022 (11/010/BK_22/0038).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hermann, M.; Pentek, T.; Otto, B. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios, A Literature Review; Working Paper; Technische Universität: Dortmund, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lu, Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2017, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Beier, G.; Ullrich, A.; Niehoff, S.; Reißig, M.; Habich, M. Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Birkel, H.; Veile, J.W.; Müller, J.M.; Hartmann, E.; Voigt, K.-I. Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Erboz, G. How to Define Industry 4.0: The Main Pillars of Industry 4.0. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326557388_How_To_Define_Industry_40_Main_Pillars_Of_Industry_40 (accessed on 6 July 2021).
  6. Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution; The World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kagermann, H. Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. Industriellen Revolution. In Proceedings of the VDI-Nachrichten, Berlin, Germany, 1 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kagermann, H.; Helbig, J.; Hellinger, A.; Wahlster, W. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industry 4.0: Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry. Final Report of the Industry 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion 2013. Available online: http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Industrie_4.0/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2021).
  9. Azmi, A.N.; Kamin, Y.; Noordin, M.K.; Nasir, A.N.M. Towards industrial revolution 4.0: ‘employers’ expectations on fresh engineering graduates. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 267–272. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauernhansl, T.; Hompel, M.; Vogel-Henser, B. Industrie 4.0 in Produkten. Automatisierung und Logistik; Springer: Fachmedien/Wiesbaden, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Berger, R. The Industrie 4.0 Transition Quantified. How the Fourth Industrial Revolution Is Reshuffling the Economic, Social and Industrial Model; Roland Berger: Munich, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brettel, M.; Friedrichsen, N.; Keller, M.; Rosenberg, M. How virtualization, decentralization and networkbuilding change the manufacturing landscape. An Industry 4.0 Perspective. Periodical 2014, 8, 37. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nanterme, P.; Daugherty, P. Technology for People: The Era of the Intelligent Enterprise. Available online: https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/accenture/next-gen-4/tech-vision-2017/pdf/accenture-tv17-full.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  14. Saniuk, S.; Saniuk, A.; Cagáňová, D. Cyber Industry Networks as an Environment of the Industry 4.0 Implementation. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 27, 1649–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Saniuk, S.; Grabowska, S.; Gajdzik, B. Personalization of products in the Industry 4.0 concept and its impact on achieving a higher level of sustainable consumption. Energies 2020, 13, 5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saniuk, S.; Grabowska, S.; Gajdzik, B. Social expectations and market changes in the context of developing the industry 4.0 concept. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Arnold, C.; Kiel, D.; Voigt, K.I. How industry 4.0 changes business models in different manufacturing industries. In Proceedings of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), Boston, MA, USA, 13–16 March 2016; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  18. Baden-Filler, C.; Haefliger, S. Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Plan 2017, 46, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Burmeister, C.; Luettgens, D.; Piller, F.T. Business Model Innovation for Industrie 4.0: Why the Industrial Internet Mandates a New Perspective on Innovation. Die Unternehm. -Swiss J. Bus. Res. Practice 2016, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cavalcante, S.; Kesting, P.; Ulhøi, J. Business model dynamics and innovation: (re)establishing the missing linkages. Manag. Decis. 2011, 49, 1327–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chesbrough, H. Business Model Innovation: It’s Not About Technology Anymore. Strategy Leadersh. 2007, 35, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Grabowska, S.; Gajdzik, B.; Saniuk, S. The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 on Business Models. In Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0; EcoProduction (Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing), Grzybowska, K., Awasthi, A., Sawhney, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schneider, S.; Spieth, P. Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2013, 17, 1340001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Teece, D.J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wirtz, B.W.; Pistoia, A.; Ullrich, S.; Gottel, V. Business model innovation: Development, concept and future research directions. J. Busienss Models 2016, 4, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zott, C.; Amit, R. The business model: A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis. Strateg. Organ. 2013, 11, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Grabowska, S. Business model metallurgical company built on the competitive advantage. METAL 2016. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Brno, Czech Republic, 25–27 May 2016; pp. 1800–1807. [Google Scholar]
  28. Miśkiewicz, R.; Wolniak, R. Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pilloni, V. How Data Will Transform Industrial Processes: Crowdsensing, Crowdsourcing and Big Data as Pillars of Industry 4.0. Future Internet 2018, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Santos, K.; Loures, E.; Piechnicki, F.; Canciglieri, O. Opportunities Assessment of Product Development Process in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 1358–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, E.A. Cyber-physical systems-are computing foundations adequate. In Position Paper for NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap; Citeseer: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, J.; Bagheri, B.; Kao, H. Research Letters: A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2015, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Strozzi, F.; Colicchia, C.; Creazza, A.; Noè, C. Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 6572–6591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, S.; Wan, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, C. Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2016, 12, 3159805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Berger, R. Industry 4.0—The New Industrial Revolution—How Europe Will Succeed; Roland Berger Strategy Consultants: Munich, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  36. Morrar, R.; Arman, H. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2017, 7, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 408–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cosgrave, K.W. The smart cyber-physical systems of sustainable industry 4.0: Innovation-driven manufacturing technologies, creative cognitive computing, and advanced robotics. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2019, 7, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  39. Manavalan, E.; Jayakrishna, K. A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 127, 925–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hofmann, E.; Rüsch, M. Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput. Ind. 2017, 89, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Müller, J.M.; Kiel, D.; Voigt, K.-I. What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jabłoński, A. Twórczy model biznesu w koncepcji gospodarki sieciowej. Studia Pr. Kol. Zarządzania Finans. Zesz. Nauk. 2018, 162, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Newth, F. Business Models and Strategic Management. A New Integration; Business Expert Press: Hampton, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zott, C.; Amit, R.; Massa, L. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1019–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rasmussen, B. Business Model the Theory of the Firm; Working Paper; Victoria University of Technology: Footscray, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  46. Velu, C. Business Model Innovation and Third-Party Alliance on the Survival of New Firms. Technovation 2015, 35, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lee, J.; Suh, T.; Roy, D.; Baucus, M. Emerging Technology and Business Model Innovation: The Case of Artificial Intelligence. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Khumalo, M.; Van Der Lingen, E. The open business model in a dynamic business environment: A literature review. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 2017, 28, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sandulli, F.; Chesbrough, H. The Two Faces of Open Business Models. Research Paper Series (RPS). Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1325682 (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  50. Sheets, R.; Crawford, S. Harnessing the Power of Information Technology: Open Business Models in Higher Education. Educ. Rev. 2012, 47, n2. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chesbrough, H. Managing open innovation. Res. -Technol. Manag. 2004, 47, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bretschneider, U.; Ebel, P.; Leimeister, J. Open business model innovation via the internet: How Wiki technologies can improve the quality of business models. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2021, 18, 2040004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saebi, T.; Foss, N. Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. Eur. Manag. J. 2015, 33, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Chesbrough, H. Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2007, 48, 22. [Google Scholar]
  55. Chesbrough, H. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  56. Rojas, E.; Azevedo, A. Pillars and elements to develop an open business model for innovation networks. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 317–326. [Google Scholar]
  57. Brasseur, T.; Mladenow, A.; Strauss, C. Open business model innovation: Literature review and agenda for future research. Бuзнec-Инфopмamuкa 2017, 4, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Matějíček, M.; Marešová, P. Open Business Model and Open Innovation: Bibliographic Analysis; Hradec Economic Days. Available online: https://digilib.uhk.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.12603/259/Matejicek_Maresova.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Berre, A.; de Man, H.; Lew, Y.; Elvesæter, B.; Ursin-Holm, B. Open business model, process and service innovation with VDML and ServiceML. In Enterprise Interoperability: Research and Applications in Service-Oriented Ecosystem, Proceedings of the 5th International IFIP Working Conference IWIE 2013, Enschede, The Netherlands, 27–28 March 2013; Wiley-ISTE: London, UK, 2013; Volume 10, p. 127. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chiaroni, D.; Chiesa, V.; Frattini, F. The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation 2011, 31, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bluszcz, A.; Manowska, A. The Use of Hierarchical Agglomeration Methods in Assessing the Polish Energy Market. Energies 2021, 14, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moradi, E.; Jafari, S.M.; Doorbash, Z.M.; Mirzaei, A. Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2021, 26, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xie, X.; Wang, H. How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 124, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pile, T. Developing a Framework for Open Innovation; Pepperdine Graziadio Business School: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bogers, M.; Chesbrough, H.; Heaton, S.; Teece, D.J. Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Calif. Manage. Rev. 2019, 62, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Elmquist, M.; Fredberg, T.; Ollila, S. Exploring the field of open innovation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2009, 12, 326–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bluszcz, A.; Manowska, A. Differentiation of the Level of Sustainable Development of Energy Markets in the European Union Countries. Energies 2020, 13, 4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ozkan, N.N. An Example of Open Innovation: P&G. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 1496–1502. [Google Scholar]
  69. Bican, P.M.; Guderian, C.C.; Ringbeck, A.; Bican, P.M. Managing knowledge in open innovation processes: An intellectual property perspective. J. Knowl. Manag. 2017, 21, 1384–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, J.-J.; Chen, H.; Rogers, D.S.; Ellram, L.M.; Grawe, S.J. A bibliometric analysis of reverse logistics research (1992–2015) and opportunities for future research. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017, 47, 666–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kaur, R.; Awasthi, A. City logistics: A review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Bibliometr. Bus. Manag. 2018, 1, 160–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Norton, M.J. Introductory Concepts in Information Science; Information Today, Inc.: Medford, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  73. Du, H.; Li, B.; Brown, M.A.; Mao, G.; Rameezdeen, R.; Chen, H. Expanding and shifting trends in carbon market research: A quantitative bibliometric study. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pekarcikova, M.; Trebuna, P.; Kliment, M.; Dic, M. Solution of Bottlenecks in the Logistics Flow by Applying the Kanban Module in the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Software. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ziegler, B. Methods for Bibliometric Analysis of Research: Renewable Energy Case Study; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  76. Grzybowska, K.; Awasthi, A. Literature review on sustainable logistics and sustainable production for Industry 4.0. In Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0 New Opportunities and Challenges; Grzybowska, K., Awasthi, A., Sawhney, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A. Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts. Retr. Serv. 2015, 7, 1–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Afuah, A. Business Models. A Strategic Management Approach; McGraw-Hill Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  79. Brzóska, J. Model biznesowy–współczesna forma organizacyjnego zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. [in] Organizacja i Zarządzanie. Kwartalnik Naukowy. Gliwice 2009, 2, 5–23. [Google Scholar]
  80. Thomson, A.A.; Strickland, A.J. Strategic Management Concepts and Cases; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  81. Nogalski, B.; Niewiadomski, P. Business model—An ephemeral trend or a claim of the future? The orientation of enterprises within the agricultural machinery sector. Management 2019, 23, 7–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. DaSilva, C.M.; Trkman, P. Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Plan. 2004, 47, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Magretta, J. Why Business Models Matter? Available online: https://hbr.org/2002/05/why-business-models-matter (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  84. Prahalad, C.K.; Krishnan, M.S. New Age of Innovation; Mc Graw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  85. Müller, J.M.; Buliga, O.; Voigt, K.I. Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 132, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Frank, A.G.; Mendes, G.H.; Ayala, N.F.; Ghezzi, A. Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 141, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Moeuf, A.; Pellerin, R.; Lamouri, S.; Tamayo-Giraldo, S.; Barbaray, R. The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 1118–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Research methodology. Source: own elaboration.
Figure 1. Research methodology. Source: own elaboration.
Joitmc 08 00019 g001
Figure 2. Areas of bibliometric analysis. Source: own elaboration.
Figure 2. Areas of bibliometric analysis. Source: own elaboration.
Joitmc 08 00019 g002
Figure 3. The dynamics of growth of published articles in the WoS database from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021 in the field of business models. Source: own elaboration.
Figure 3. The dynamics of growth of published articles in the WoS database from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021 in the field of business models. Source: own elaboration.
Joitmc 08 00019 g003
Figure 4. Growth dynamics of published articles in the WoS database from 1 January 2011 to 31 October 2021 in the field of Industry 4.0. Source: own elaboration.
Figure 4. Growth dynamics of published articles in the WoS database from 1 January 2011 to 31 October 2021 in the field of Industry 4.0. Source: own elaboration.
Joitmc 08 00019 g004
Figure 5. Growth dynamics of published articles in the WoS database from 1 January 2011 to 31 October 2021 in the field of business models and Industry 4.0. Source: own elaboration.
Figure 5. Growth dynamics of published articles in the WoS database from 1 January 2011 to 31 October 2021 in the field of business models and Industry 4.0. Source: own elaboration.
Joitmc 08 00019 g005
Figure 6. Historiographic map of scientific publications on “business models and Industry 4.0” from 1 January 1996 to 30 October 2021.
Figure 6. Historiographic map of scientific publications on “business models and Industry 4.0” from 1 January 1996 to 30 October 2021.
Joitmc 08 00019 g006
Figure 7. Pillar cluster of business models of enterprises in the Industry 4.0 era. Source: own elaboration.
Figure 7. Pillar cluster of business models of enterprises in the Industry 4.0 era. Source: own elaboration.
Joitmc 08 00019 g007
Table 1. Search results for each area.
Table 1. Search results for each area.
Research AreaSearch Results
(Number of Documents)
Area I—Business Models15.031
Area II—Industry 4.010.329
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0200
Table 2. Top 5 authors (no less than 3 works).
Table 2. Top 5 authors (no less than 3 works).
TOP 5Surname of the AuthorCountry of Origin of the AuthorH-IndexSearch Results
(Number of Documents)
Area I—Business Models
ILindgren P.Denmark637
IIGhezzi A.Italy1834
IIIZhang J.China030
IVBocken NMP.Netherlands3428
IVEvans SEngland2728
VBouwman H.Netherlands2126
Area II—Industry 4.0
IRomero D.Mexico1936
IZharinov IO.Russia436
IIRauch E.Italy1735
IIShukalov AV.Russia1335
IIIZakoldaev DA.Russia434
IVLeitao P.No data available-31
IVLi D.China1031
VWuest T.USA-30
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0
IGanzarain J.Spain44
IIbarra D.Spain24
IMuller JMAustria84
IIAdrodegari F.Italy113
IIGebauer H.Switzerland323
IIHerceg IV.Serbia13
IIIgartua JI.Spain63
IIKrcmar H.Germany73
IISaccani N.Italy223
IISaniuk S.Poland123
IISchaefer D.Switzerland293
Table 3. Top 5 research centers (no less than 4 works).
Table 3. Top 5 research centers (no less than 4 works).
TOP 5Name of the Research CenterSearch Results
(Number of Documents)
Area I—Business Models
IUniversity of California System145
IIUniversity of London143
IIIDelft University of Technology129
IVPolytechnic University of Milan122
VUniversity of Cambridge117
Area II—Industry 4.0
ICentre National De La Recherche Scientifique Cnrs120
IRWTH Aachen University120
IIFraunhofer Gesellschaft115
IIIPolytechnic University of Milan106
IVUniversity of Basque Country89
VUniversidade Do Minho 79
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0
ITechnical University Czestochowa5
IIAarhus University4
IICentre Nationa De La Recherche Scientifigue 4
IILinkoping University4
IIMondragon Unibertsiatea4
IIUniversity of Zielona Gora4
Table 4. Top 5 Web of Science categories.
Table 4. Top 5 Web of Science categories.
TOP 5Category NameSearch Results
(Number of Documents)
Area I—Business Models
IManagement3443
IIBusiness3300
IIIComputer Science Information System1799
IVEngineering Electrical Electronic 1458
VComputer Science Theory Methods1217
Area II—Industry 4.0
IEngineering Electrical Electronic1841
IIEngineering Manufacturing1555
IIIEngineering Industrial1549
IVComputer Science Theory Methods1340
VAutomation Control Systems1288
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0
IManagement 42
IIBusiness41
IIIGreen Sustainable Science Technology31
IVEngineering Industrial29
VEnviromental Sciences27
Table 5. Top 5 source titles (no less than 4 works).
Table 5. Top 5 source titles (no less than 4 works).
TOP 5Source TitlesSearch Results
(Number of Documents)
Area I—Business Models
ISustainability—Journal 430
IIJournal of Cleaner Production—Journal285
IIILecture Notes in Computer Science—Journal186
IVProcedia CIRP148
VLecture Notes in Business Information Processing—Journal113
Area II—Industry 4.0
IIfac Papersonline—Journal 246
IISustainability—Journal245
IIIProcedia Manufacturing—Journal 219
IVIFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology—Book Series208
VIEEE Access197
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0
ISustainability—Journal22
IITechnological Forecasting and Social Change—Journal 7
IIIIFIP Advances in Production Systems (Conference)5
IIIProcedia CIRP5
IVEducation Excellence and Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision To Sustain Economic Development During Global Challenges (Conference)4
IVIEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (Ice/Itmc) (Conference)4
IVJournal of Cleaner Production—Journal4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S. Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019

AMA Style

Grabowska S, Saniuk S. Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022; 8(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grabowska, Sandra, and Sebastian Saniuk. 2022. "Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop