Next Article in Journal
Dynamics of Trust in Institutions, the Legitimacy of the Social Order, and Social Open Innovation
Previous Article in Journal
The Development of an Interaction Mechanism between Universities and Other Innovation System Actors: Its Influence on University Innovation Activity Effectiveness
Open AccessArticle

The Development of Scientific Activity in Russian Universities

1
Autonomous Non-Profit Organization “Publishing House Scientific Review” (Nauchnoe Obozrenie), 9 Sukharevskiy M. lane, bld. 1, 127051 Moscow, Russia
2
Financial Policy Center of the Public Finance Department, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Leningradsky Prospekt 49, 125993 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Economics and Production Organization, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia
4
Institute of Master and Graduate Studies, Siberian State Automobile and Highway University (SibADI), Prospekt Mira, 5, 644080 Omsk, Russia
5
Research Institute of Perspective Directions and Technologies, Russian State Social University, 129226 Moscow, Russia
6
Departament of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Bol'shaya Pirogovskaya Ulitsa, 19c1, 119146 Moscow, Russia
7
Russian Language Department №4, RUDN University, 117198 Moscow, Russia
8
Research Institute of Digital Transformation Management, State University of Management, 99 Ryazansky Av., 109542 Moscow, Russia
9
Department of Economics and Finance, North-Eastern Federal University, 677000 Yakutsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6(4), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040110
Received: 11 August 2020 / Revised: 28 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 October 2020 / Published: 12 October 2020
The aim of this article was to develop scientific activity in Russian universities. Using the survey method, a sample of quantitative indicators of research output for the years 2011–2019 was formed. The respondents were comprised of 934 lecturers from 13 universities in Russia with different work experience, academic degrees, and indicators of scientific activity. The main components method was used to study the structure of scientific activity productivity indicators. Using the method of additive convolution, a five-factor integral model of the structure of scientific activity of a teacher was formed to evaluate the individual and collective productivity of scientific activity. The factor values and the integral indicator of scientific activity output were calculated, showing that the individual growth rates of the young lecturers’ output exceeded the growth rates of the older lecturers. Destructive factors relating to the scientific activity output of the lecturers and researchers in Russian universities (divided into two groups of young scientists and senior scientists) were determined and systematized based on the level of dominant influence. The features of the influence of the factor of emotional burnout on the scientific productivity of university teachers were revealed. View Full-Text
Keywords: higher education; publication productivity; researcher; Russia; university; scientific performance higher education; publication productivity; researcher; Russia; university; scientific performance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vasiljeva, M.; Ponkratov, V.; Volkova, T.; Khairova, S.; Nikitina, N.; Dudnik, O.; Alimova, M.; Kuznetsov, N.; Elyakova, I. The Development of Scientific Activity in Russian Universities. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 110.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop