Next Article in Journal
Creativity in Business Education: A Review of Creative Self-Belief Theories and Arts-Based Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Service Open Innovation; Design Elements for the Food and Beverage Service Business
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2018, 4(4), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4040054

Exploring Perceptions of Sustainable Development in South Korea: An Approach Based on Advocacy Coalition Framework’s Belief System

1
Research Center for National Leadership, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Research Center for Behavioral Science, KH Corporation, Seoul 13461, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 October 2018 / Revised: 5 November 2018 / Accepted: 5 November 2018 / Published: 8 November 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [1279 KB, uploaded 8 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

The concept of sustainable development has been criticized for its broadness and ambiguity that permits different interpretations in separate views. However, the prior studies on sustainable development generally relied on survey data, so they have some limitations that preclude congruent conclusions. In contrast to prior studies, we used Q methodology, which is designed to investigate subjective perceptions as it is. This study aims to explore the South Koreans’ perceptions of sustainable development among various stakeholders such as experts, bureaucrats, legislatures, civic group members, company employees, and journalists. Based on the hierarchical belief system of the advocacy coalition framework, we classified all statements into three categories: core value, policy core, and secondary aspects. Using Q methodology, we extracted five types: (1) democrat; (2) idealist; (3) green growth advocate; (4) skeptics; and (5) elitist. We examined the distribution of the five types according to a hierarchical belief system, and discussed implications of the findings. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable development; advocacy coalition framework; Q methodology sustainable development; advocacy coalition framework; Q methodology
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lim, H.; Eun, J. Exploring Perceptions of Sustainable Development in South Korea: An Approach Based on Advocacy Coalition Framework’s Belief System. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2018, 4, 54.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. EISSN 2199-8531 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top