Next Article in Journal
Voltage Space Vector Equivalent Substitution Fault-Tolerance Control for Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter with Current-Tracking
Next Article in Special Issue
A Physical Layer Security Technique for NOMA Systems with MIMO SC-FDE Schemes
Previous Article in Journal
Blockage Detection in Pipeline Based on the Extended Kalman Filter Observer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Radar Waveform Optimization for Joint Radar Communications Performance
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Multi-Hop Relay Selection Based on Fade Durations

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 5110 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2020, 9(1), 92;
Received: 31 October 2019 / Revised: 8 December 2019 / Accepted: 11 December 2019 / Published: 2 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cooperative Communications for Future Wireless Systems)
In cooperative relaying, the selection of relays could be based on different parameters. The most well-known and frequently used metric is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this method of relay selection, the rapid fluctuation of the signal (i.e., fading) is not taken into account in the selection criteria. Such rapid signal change may cause significant loss of information, degrade signal quality for voice or video connections, or could make the channel coding fail. An alternative method of relay selection in a cooperative relay network is by considering fading. Such methods include average fade duration (AFD) and fade duration outage probability (FDOP), which are based on time correlation statistics. Both the AFD and the FDOP are computed in reference to a threshold value for signal quality. This work derives new formulas for two hop and three hop relay paths, with three hop paths given a penalty cost. Then optimization algorithms for each type of relay selection method are derived, including total path and link-by-link optimization. Simulation results provide optimal AFD and FDOP paths for various random network topologies. These paths are then compared to paths that would be found if SNR metrics were used instead. It is shown that SNR optimization results in much different performance. For cases of four sources and four relays, SNR based optimization frequently chose different relay paths, as low as only 63% of the same relay paths as FDOP or AFD optimizations. Because fade duration methods more accurately control the fading nature and true quality of the signals, the results here provide significant improvements in relay performance and allow two and three hop relay paths to be implemented effectively. View Full-Text
Keywords: cooperative relay wireless network; decode and forward (DF); average fade duration (AFD); level crossing rate (LCR); fade duration outage probability (FDOP) cooperative relay wireless network; decode and forward (DF); average fade duration (AFD); level crossing rate (LCR); fade duration outage probability (FDOP)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Assefa Gebremichail, A.; Beard, C.; Paropkari, R.A. Multi-Hop Relay Selection Based on Fade Durations. Electronics 2020, 9, 92.

AMA Style

Assefa Gebremichail A, Beard C, Paropkari RA. Multi-Hop Relay Selection Based on Fade Durations. Electronics. 2020; 9(1):92.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Assefa Gebremichail, Aklilu; Beard, Cory; Paropkari, Rahul A. 2020. "Multi-Hop Relay Selection Based on Fade Durations" Electronics 9, no. 1: 92.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop