You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Electronics
  • Review
  • Open Access

12 January 2023

A Critical Examination of the Beam-Squinting Effect in Broadband Mobile Communication: Review Paper

,
and
1
College of Information Engineering, Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad 00964, Iraq
2
Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
3
Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Basrah University College of Science and Technology, Basrah 61004, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Metamaterials and Metasurfaces

Abstract

Due to the fact that the quality of the received signal is adversely affected by the beam squint phenomenon, which is especially pertinent to the millimeter wave (mmwave) bands, many studies have been utilised by other researchers to provide light on some of the challenges that come with analysing this type of occurrence. Squint causes several issues, the most important of which are its detrimental effects on gain, line of sight, angle of arrival, progressive phase, usable bandwidth, and fading effect. As a result of these obstacles, the advantages of adopting a high-frequency band such as mmwave in modern wireless communication systems are severely limited. Squint-phenomena-related difficulties, such as decreased channel capacity, increased bit error rate (BER), and lowered quality of services, may have a substantial detrimental impact on channel performance. The squint phenomenon and associated issues become more pressing with the expansion of the frequency spectrum and the deviation of the arrival angle from boresight. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the relevant literature and to compare and contrast various methods in order to identify the most fruitful lines of inquiry for future research.

1. Introduction

In today’s world, almost everyone has a mobile device, and the number of people who do is growing. Concurrently, the number of interactive multimedia apps is also growing, and experts predict that this pattern will continue into the foreseeable future [1]. In spite of the fact that mobile technologies of the first, second, third, and fourth generations have spent the last 25 years working to increase the speed and efficiency of wireless networks, there are still some specific application areas in which current wireless networks are unable to deliver [2]. As the need for mobile traffic steadily develops, a bottleneck between spectrum constraints and capacity requirements is becoming more obvious. This bottleneck is becoming more and more apparent. The wireless bandwidth bottleneck is one of the most serious challenges faced by 5G communications [3]. Wireless carriers need to be ready to sustain a growth in total mobile traffic that may be as much as 1000 times higher than it is now since the need for capacity in mobile broadband communications is growing at a substantial rate each year. The pursuit of inventive solutions is required in order to make the transition to the fifth generation (5G) of wireless technology [4]. Because of the growing need for bandwidth, the millimetre wave spectrum has been standardised for use in high-speed wireless communication [5]. mmwaves are an interesting possibility since they have a significant amount of bandwidth and spectrum that is readily available (approximately 60 GHz) [6]. mmwave communications may make use of the large capacity that is now being underutilised, which will help them fulfil the high demands of the future generation of wireless networks [7].
Although the potential bandwidth of mmwave frequencies is promising, the propagation characteristics of these frequencies are very different from those of microwave frequency bands [8]. These propagation characteristics include path loss, diffraction and blockage, rain attenuation, air absorption, and foliage loss behaviours. The massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology is a potential answer to this problem. With this technology, a considerable number of antennas might provide sufficient gain to compensate for the route loss [9,10]. Massive MIMO over mmwaves is a novel approach that combines the benefits of massive MIMO antenna arrays with the vast amount of bandwidth that is currently accessible over mmwaves [11]. Massive MIMO over mmwaves has the potential to revolutionise wireless communication. Beam squint is one of the issues that arise in mmwave communications. This issue manifests itself as a change in the spatial direction of a beam as a function of frequency. As a consequence, there are discernible variations in the path phases at various frequencies.
In this paper, we explore the research that has been conducted so far on the subject of beam squint and how it might be alleviated while also minimising the complexity and expense of hardware implementation. Specifically, we examine how it might be possible to fix the problem while also keeping the implementation as simple and inexpensive as possible. Additionally, the segment of the research that relates to the exploitation of beam squint is presented in this study. The following is the structure of the paper: In Section 2, we discuss the many issues that pertain to the broadband communication. In the third section, the research that pertains to the beam squint effects are presented. While the research concerning the beam squint exploitation are discussed in Section 4, this section also focuses on other topics. Section 5 is where the conclusion of the paper can be found.

2. Broadband Communication

2.1. Millimeter Waves and Massive MIMO

In order to attain more bandwidth than traditional frequency bands, 5G and the following 6G mobile networks operate in high-frequency zones [12]. This allows for high-capacity wireless transmission of data at speeds up to several gigabits per second (Gbps) [13]. It is generally agreed that mmwave communication [14] is one of the most crucial technologies for reaching peak data rates of 10 Gbit/s [15]. This is due to the fact that increasing the bandwidth is an effective method for increasing the system’s capacity [7] and that there is a lot of bandwidth available in the mmwave channels. Measurement and modeling of mmwave channels [16] and assessment of the band’s potential for future wireless systems have received significant academic and industrial attention because of the spectrum’s abundance [17]. However, due to negative propagation effects, particularly those brought on by obstructions in the line of sight (LoS), these high frequencies have been used only sparingly up to this point [18]. It is important to handle the greater propagation losses associated with mmwave frequencies, especially beyond 100 m and in non-line of sight (NLoS) environments [19]. On the one hand, signal transmission becomes more difficult in areas with dense foliage and higher propagation loss [20]. Nonetheless, the link could be forced into the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) zone due to the constrained send signal power dispersed over a broad bandwidth [21]. To address these problems, several transceiver topologies have been created that steer the received or broadcast beams in the appropriate direction. [22]. The two main technologies that will enable 5G mmwave communication are MIMO and beamforming [23]. Beamforming is a method for using MIMO/array elements to direct the main lobe radiation beam at the transmitters and receivers in the desired directions, eliminating the undesirable spatial selectivity [24]. The beamforming array is widely divided into the following categories: analog, digital, and hybrid beamforming array [25]. Figure 1 shows the block diagram of massive MIMO system.
Figure 1. Functional block diagram of massive MIMO system [26].

2.1.1. Analog Beamforming

The architecture of analog beamforming is shown in Figure 2. A phased array is used to accomplish analog beamforming, and the single RF chain is powered by either an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) in the receiver or a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) in the transmitter. Frequency-up converters, power amplifiers, and other components form a transmitter’s RF chain; low-noise amplifiers, frequency-down converters, and other components form a receiver’s RF chain [27].
The phased array’s antenna weights are required to be digitally controllable phase changes. The relative amplitudes of the signal sent into the antennas of the transmitter cannot be adjusted, and the phases of the phase shifters are normally quantized to low resolution [28]. A beam is created as a result of the send signal, which is constructive in certain directions and destructive in others. On the basis of precise beam-steering tactics, the phase shifters’ phases can be dynamically changed. The receiver has a similar set of features [27].
Figure 2. An mmwave MIMO system using analog beamforming [29].

2.1.2. Digital Beamforming

The radio frequency (RF) signal in a digital array is transformed into a digital signal at the sub-array or element level, and beamforming is accomplished using a digital signal processor [30]. In order to process the control signals for beamforming, a digital signal processor is used, which offers additional flexibility and degrees of freedom for the implementation of effective beamforming algorithms. Due to the method’s requirement for a separate RF chain for each antenna element, it consumes a great deal of power and has a complicated architecture [31]. Figure 3 shows the structure of digital beamforming.
Figure 3. Digital beamforming [31].

2.1.3. Hybrid Beamforming

Recently, interest in the hybrid analog/digital beamforming array has increased [32,33]. This type of array increases the efficiency of analog beamforming while reducing the complexity of digital beamforming [34]. The hybrid beamformer is composed of two parts: an analog and a digital component [35]. The RF chains that compose the digital portion share a common structure with the many plans under discussion. For each user on each subcarrier, a hybrid beamforming’s digital component can be used, just like in traditional fully digital beamforming. In contrast, this is not true of the hybrid beamforming analog network or analog component. Since the transmitted signals for all users are combined by the digital beamformers and analog RF beamforming is a post-IFFT (inverse Fast Fourier Transform) operation, all users and subcarriers in an analog network share the same RF component [36]. Hybrid beamforming’s fundamental architecture is depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Hybrid beamforming [29].
Beam squint is a phenomenon caused by the frequency dependence of the magnitude of the phase shift in analog beamforming [37]. This can cause issues with wideband communication. The Digital Signal Processing (DSP) logic and digital beamforming algorithms can both use actual time delay. As a result, a phased array architecture with every element digitalized would naturally lend itself to solving the frequency dependency problem as well as offer the greatest degree of programmable flexibility. However, issues with this solution’s strength, size, and price can arise.
A time delay among elements occurs as a wavefront approaches an array of elements, and it depends on the wavefront angle in relation to boresight. The beam steering can be achieved with a single frequency by substituting a phase shift for the time delay [38]. This is true for narrowband waveforms, but in wideband waveforms when a phase shift is used to provide beam steering, the beam’s direction can change with frequency. As a result, the needed phase shift varies with frequency for a given beam direction. Alternately, the beam direction varies with frequency for a given phase shift. Beam squint is the effect where the beam angle changes depending on the frequency [39]. Figure 5 and Figure 6 shows the effect of beam squint.
Figure 5. The effect of beam squint [9].
Figure 6. Beam squint effect for a phased array antenna using electrical phase shifters operating at frequencies in the range of 10–20 GHz [39].
In addition, keep in mind that there is no phase shift between the elements at boresight (θ = 0°); hence, there is no way to induce any beam squint. As a result, both the frequency variation and the angle must be functions of the amount of beam squint [38]. Beam squint can seriously affect performance since mmwave communications depend heavily on accurate beam alignment between the transmitter and the receiver [40].

2.2. Effect of Beam Squint on the Communication System Performance

  • Bandwidth and Capacity:
The system bandwidth in wideband communication is constrained by the beam-squint phenomenon [41]. The beam squint effect is closely correlated to bandwidth; as bandwidth rises, the beam squint effect becomes more pronounced, and a larger fraction of the subcarriers experience tiny array gains. Even outside the main lobe, certain subcarriers may exist. As a result, the whole system’s capacity starts to decline [42]. Figure 7 shows the channel capacity versus the bandwidth with and without beam squint. It is clear from this figure that the capacity decreases as the array’s element count, fractional bandwidth, and beam focus angle rise.
Figure 7. Capacity as a function of bandwidth with beam squint (CBS) and without beam squint (CNBS) [41].
  • Channel estimation:
Channel estimation algorithms for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM), Maximum Mean Square Error (MMSE) estimator, and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) estimator are widely used [41]; however, these estimators do not consider beam squint phenomena. In [42], the MLE channel estimator was used to investigate the effect of beam squint on the estimation process, Fading was considered fixed, and the results showed that beam squint increases the error of channel estimation, even without any noise. The error also increases with increasing the number of antenna elements in the array, fractional bandwidth, and the magnitude of beam focus angle. Figure 8 shows an example of the MLE channel estimation with beam squint, where H(n) represents the true channel, and H ˆ (n) represents the estimated channel. It is clear from this figure that there is a difference between the actual channel and the estimated channel, even without considering the noise.
Figure 8. Example of MLE channel estimate using the receiver’s beam squint. There is no beam squint in the transmitter and only one path. No more noise exists. The number of antennas N = 16 [41].

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a literature review has been introduced to analyse the relative issues of the squint phenomena of mmwaves in antenna arrays for modern communication systems. It is found that such problems become very effective at high-frequency bands due to the dispersion effects of antenna arrays in terms of angle of arrival and gain variation, which directly effect the channel performance. For this purpose, the authors classified the main effective solutions to resolve such problems, which include beamforming, antenna geometry, and channel estimation algorithms. Another classification can be considered that exploits the beam squint to take advantages from squint phenomena to enhance the channel localization and capacity through splitting the beam to different directions. In spite of these classifications, beamforming, for example, based on digital processes, realizes an excellent solution to minimize the effect of beam squint on bit error rate and channel capacity, however; it consumes high complexity with excessive cost. The relative algorithm based on channel estimation could be considered the next revolutionary approach, whereby the system consumes less hardware complexity and cost. However, it is very limited when the channel environment becomes highly dynamic, which consumes high delay in the data processing. For this reason, it becomes unreliable with increasing traffic and signal attenuation. The third classification is assumed to be a solution method; however, it is not. It is indeed a suggestion to avoid the negative effects of such phenomena by splitting the beam of the antenna array to support channel localization and create multiuser communication channels. In view of the previous indications, a possible connection is found between the proposed classes to create a hybrid mixture to realize a high impact on the channel performance enhancement. This conclusion is built on the fact of dispersion, which is a relative problem with antenna arrays, channels, and subcarriers that cannot be resolved from one side and neglected from the other two. Therefore, for future research, a new technique must be recognized to find a complete solution that takes into the account beam squint effects at all communication system parts, thus leading us to fill the gaps in the developments in mmwave communication system for 5G and beyond.

Author Contributions

Investigation and original draft preparation, M.Q.A., supervision, methodology and review, A.H.M., Conceptualization, review and editing, R.A.A.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Authors thank the support of the higher education ministry from Iraq.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cihat, S.; Muhammet, T.; Turgut, O. A Review of Millimeter Wave Communication for 5G. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), Ankara, Turkey, 19–21 October 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ullah, H.; Nair, N.G.; Moore, A.; Nugent, C.; Muschamp, P.; Cuevas, M. 5G Communication: An Overview of Vehicle-to-Everything, Drones, and Healthcare Use-Cases. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 37251–37268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duong, T.; Elkashlan, M. Millimeter-wave communications for 5G: Fundamentals. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wei, L.; Hu, R.Q.; Qian, Y.; Wu, G. Key elements to enable millimeter wave communications for 5G wireless systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2014, 21, 136–143. [Google Scholar]
  5. van Berlo, B.; Elkelany, A.; Ozcelebi, T.; Meratnia, N. Millimeter Wave Sensing: A Review of Application Pipelines and Building Blocks. IEEE Sensors J. 2021, 21, 10332–10368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mohanty, S.; Agarwal, A.; Agarwal, K.; Mali, S.; Misran, G. Role of Millimeter Wave for Future 5G Mobile Networks: Its Po-tential, Prospects and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2021 1st Odisha International Conference on Electrical Power Engineering, Communication and Computing Technology (ODICON), Bhubaneswar, India, 8–9 January 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rappaport, T.S.; Sun, S.; Mayzus, R.; Zhao, H.; Azar, Y.; Wang, K.; Wong, G.N.; Schulz, J.K.; Samimi, M.; Gutierrez, F. Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5g cellular: It will work. Access IEEE 2013, 1, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bogale, T.; Wang, X.; Le, L. Chapter 9–mm-Wave communication enabling techniques for 5G wireless systems: A link level perspective. Mmwave Massive MIMO 2017, 195–225. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, M.; Gao, F.; Jin, S.; Lin. An Overview of Enhanced Massive MIMO With Array Signal Processing Techniques. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2019, 13, 886–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Akyildiz, I.F.; Han, C.; Nie, S. Combating the Distance Problem in the Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Frequency Bands. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Busari, S.A.; Huq, K.M.S.; Mumtaz, S.; Dai, L.; Rodriguez, J. Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Communication for Future Wireless Systems: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2017, 20, 836–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarieddeen, H.; Saeed, N.; Al-Naffouri, T.Y.; Alouini, M.-S. Next Generation Terahertz Communications: A Rendezvous of Sensing, Imaging, and Localization. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Al-Sadoon, M.; Patwary, M.; Parchin, N.; Aldelemy, A.; Abd-Alhameed, R. New Beamforming Ap-proach Using 60 GHz Antenna Arrays for Multi-Beams 5G Applications. Electronics 2022, 11, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, M.; Mumtaz, S.; Huang, Y.; Dai, L.; Li, Y.; Matthaiou, M.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; Bjornson, E.; Yang, K.; Chih-Lin, I.; et al. Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017, 35, 1909–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, J.; Valenzuela, R.A. How Much Spectrum is too Much in Millimeter Wave Wireless Access. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017, 35, 1444–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andrews, J.G.; Buzzi, S.; Choi, W.; Hanly, S.V.; Lozano, A.; Soong, A.C.K.; Zhang, J.C. What will 5G be? IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2014, 32, 1065–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andrews, J.G.; Bai, T.; Kulkarni, M.N.; Alkhateeb, A.; Gupta, A.K.; Heath, R.W. Modeling and Analyzing Millimeter Wave Cellular Systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2016, 65, 403–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Swindlehurst, A.L.; Ayanoglu, E.; Heydari, P.; Capolino, F. Millimeter-wave massive MIMO: The next wireless revolution? IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, W.; Li, Y.; Jin, D.; Su, L.; Chen, S. Millimeter-wave backhaul for 5G networks: Challenges and solutions. Sensors 2016, 16, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.; Niu, Y.; Wu, H.; Ai, B.; Chen, S.; Feng, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, N. Mobility Support for Millimeter Wave Communications: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2022, 24, 1816–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zugno, T.; Drago, M.; Giordani, M.; Polese, M.; Zorzi, M. Toward standardization of millimeter-wave vehicle-tovehicle networks: Open challenges and performance evaluation. IEEE Communi. Mag. 2020, 58, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kutty, S.; Sen, D. Beamforming for Millimeter Wave Communications: An Inclusive Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2015, 18, 949–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bjornson, E.; Van der Perre, L.; Buzzi, S.; Larsson, E.G. Massive MIMO in sub-6 GHz and mm-Wave: Physical, practical, and use-case differences. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2019, 26, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mandloi, M.S.; Gupta, P.; Parmar, A.; Malviya, P.; Malviya, L. Beamforming MIMO Array Antenna for 5G-Millimeter-Wave Application. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Herd, J.S.; Conway, M.D. The Evolution to Modern Phased Array Architectures. Proc. IEEE 2015, 104, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Araújo, D.C.; Maksymyuk, T.; de Almeida, A.L.; Maciel, T.; Mota, J.C.; Jo, M. Massive MIMO: Survey and future research topics. IET Commun. 2016, 10, 1938–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bogale, T.E.; Le, L.B.; Haghighat, A.; Vandendorpe, L. On the Number of RF Chains and Phase Shifters, and Scheduling Design with Hybrid Analog–Digital Beamforming. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2010, 15, 3311–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Venkateswaran, M.V.; van der Veen, A. Analog Beamforming in MIMO Communications with Phase Shift Networks and Online Channel Estimation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2010, 58, 4131–4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Steyskal, H. Digital beamforming. In Proceedings of the 1988 18th European Microwave Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 12–15 September 1988. [Google Scholar]
  30. Heath, R.W.; González-Prelcic, N.; Rangan, S.; Roh, W.; Sayeed, A.M. An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2016, 10, 436–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dan; Dudgeon, E.; Johnson, D.H. Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques; P T R Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sohrabi, F.; Yu, W. Hybrid Analog and Digital Beamforming for mmWave OFDM Large-Scale Antenna Arrays. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017, 35, 1432–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, G.; Huang, K.; Lau, V.K.N.; Xia, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, S. Hybrid Beamforming via the Kronecker Decomposition for the Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017, 35, 2097–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gherekhloo, S.; Ardah, K.; Haardt, M. Hybrid Beamforming Design for Downlink MU-MIMO-OFDM Millimeter-Wave Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 11th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), Hangzhou, China, 8–11 June 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  35. Khan, F.; Pi, Z.; Rajagopal, S. Millimeter-wave mobile broadband with large scale spatial processing for 5G mobile com-munication. In Proceedings of the 2012 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), Monticello, IL, USA, 1–5 October 2012; pp. 1517–1523. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, J.; Yu, X.; Letaief, K.B. Hybrid Beamforming for 5G and Beyond Millimeter-Wave Systems: A Holistic View. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2019, 1, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cai, M.; Laneman, J.N.; Hochwald, B. Beamforming codebook compensation for beam squint with channel capacity con-straint. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), Aachen, Germany, 25–30 June 2017; pp. 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pan, X.; Li, C.; Yang, L. Wideband beamspace squint user grouping algorithm based on subarray collaboration. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2022, 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Available online: https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialogue/articles/phased-array-antenna-patterns-part2.html (accessed on 1 June 2020).
  40. Yao, J. Microwave Photonics. J. Light. Technol. 2009, 27, 314–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bonjour, R.; Singleton, M.; Leuchtmann, P.; Leuthold, J. Comparison of steering angle and bandwidth for various phased array antenna concepts. Opt. Commun. 2016, 373, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cai, M. Modeling and Mitigating Beam Squint in Millimeter Wave Wireless Communication. Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana, March 2012. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rousseaux, O.; Leus, G.; Stoica, P.; Moonen, M. Gaussian maximum-likelihood channel estimation with short training se-quences. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2005, 4, 2945–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Targonski, S.; Pozar, D. Minimization of beam squint in microstrip reflectarrays using an offset feed. In Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1996 Digest, Baltimore, MD, USA, 21–26 July 1996; Volume 2, pp. 1326–1329. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sharma, S.B.; Pujara, D.A.; Chakrabarty, S.B.; Singh, V.K. Removal of Beam Squinting Effects in a Circularly Polarized Offset Parabolic Reflector Antenna Using a Matched Feed. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2009, 7, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Garakoui, S.K.; Klumperink, E.A.M.; Nauta, B.; van Vliet, F.E. Phased-array antenna beam squinting related to frequency dependency of delay circuits. In Proceedings of the 2011 41st European Microwave Conference, Manchester, UK, 10–13 October 2011; pp. 1304–1307. [Google Scholar]
  47. Longbrake, M. True time-delay beam steering for radar. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON), Dayton, OH, USA, 25–27 July 2012; pp. 246–249. [Google Scholar]
  48. Alomar, W.; Mortazawi, A. Elimination of beam squint in uniformly excited serially fed antenna arrays using negative group delay circuits. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, Chicago, IL, USA, 8–14 July 2012; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  49. Brilloun, L.; Sommerfeld, A. Wave Propagation and Group Velocity; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1960; pp. 113–137. [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu, Z.; Rehman, W.U.; Xu, X.; Tao, X. Minimize Beam Squint Solutions for 60GHz Millimeter-Wave Communication System. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2–5 September 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cai, M.; Gao, K.; Nie, D.; Hochwald, B.; Laneman, J.N.; Huang, H.; Liu, K. Effect of Wideband Beam Squint on Codebook Design in Phased-Array Wireless Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Washington, DC, USA, 4–8 December 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, X.; Qiao, D. Space-Time Block Coding-Based Beamforming for Beam Squint Compensation. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2018, 8, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Laurinavicius, I.; Zhu, H.; Wang, J.; Pan, Y. Beam Squint Exploitation for Linear Phased Arrays in a mmWave Multi-Carrier System. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 9–13 December 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, B.; Jian, M.; Gao, F.; Li, G.Y.; Lin, H. Beam Squint and Channel Estimation for Wideband mmWave Massive MIMO-OFDM Systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2019, 67, 5893–5908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, M.; Gao, F.; Gu, Y.; Flanagan, M.F. A Block Sparsity Based Channel Estimation Technique for mmWave Massive MIMO with Beam Squint Effect. In Proceedings of the ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Shanghai, China, 20–24 May 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  56. Longman, O.; Solodky, G.; Bilik, I. Beam Squint Correction for Phased Array Antennas Using the Tansec Waveform. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Radar Conference (RADAR), Washington, DC, USA, 28–30 April 2020; pp. 489–493. [Google Scholar]
  57. Noh, S.; Lee, J.; Yu, H.; Song, J. Design of Channel Estimation for Hybrid Beamforming Millimeter-Wave Systems in the Presence of Beam Squint. IEEE Syst. J. 2021, 16, 2834–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, Y.; Chen, D.; Jiang, T. Beam-Squint Mitigating in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Aided Wideband MmWave Communications. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Nanjing, China, 29 March–1 April 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  59. Liaskos, C.; Nie, S.; Tsioliaridou, A.; Pitsillides, A.; Ioannidis, S.; Akyildiz, I. A New Wireless Communication Paradigm through Software-Controlled Metasurfaces. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gao, F.; Wang, B.; Xing, C.; An, J.; Li, G.Y. Wideband Beamforming for Hybrid Massive MIMO Terahertz Communications. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021, 39, 1725–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Yue, G. Beam squint effect on high-throughput millimeter-wave communication with an ul-tra-massive phased array. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng. 2021, 22, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Park, S.-H.; Kim, B.; Kim, D.K.; Dai, L.; Wong, K.-K.; Chae, C.-B. Beam Squint in Ultra-wideband mm-Wave Systems: RF Lens Array vs. Phase-Shifter-Based Array. arxiv 2021, arXiv:2112.04188. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lorentz, H.A. The Theory of Electrons: And Its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat; Wentworth Press: Sydney, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  64. Afeef, L.; Kihero, A.B.; Arslan, H. Novel Transceiver Design in Wideband Massive MIMO for Beam Squint Minimization. arxiv 2022, arXiv:2207.04679. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lin, Z.; Niu, H.; An, K.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, G.; Chatzinotas, S.; Hu, Y. Refracting RIS-Aided Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Networks: Joint Beamforming Design and Optimization. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2022, 58, 3717–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pan, X.; Li, C.; Hua, M.; Yan, W.; Yang, L. Compact Multi-Wideband Array for Millimeter-Wave Communications Using Squint Beams. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 183146–183164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lin, Z.; Lin, M.; Wang, J.B.; de Cola, T.; Wang, J. Joint Beamforming and Power Allocation for Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Networks with Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2019, 3, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Luo, H.; Gao, F. Beam Squint Assisted User Localization in Near-Field Communications Systems. Arvix 2022, arXiv:2205.11392. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.