Next Article in Journal
The Study of Crash-Tolerant, Multi-Agent Offensive and Defensive Games Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Dark and Singular Highly Dispersive Optical Solitons with Kudryashov’s Sextic Power-Law of Nonlinear Refractive Index in the Absence of Inter-Modal Dispersion
Previous Article in Journal
Generating Even More Chaotic Instances in Hardware
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Dispersive Optical Solitons in Fiber Bragg Gratings with Quadratic-Cubic Nonlinearity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Optical Solitons in Magneto-Optic Waveguides Having Kudryashov’s Law of Nonlinear Refractive Index by Trial Equation Approach

1
Department of Mathematics, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China
2
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Grambling State University, Grambling, LA 71245, USA
3
Mathematical Modeling and Applied Computation (MMAC) Research Group, Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Applied Mathematics, National Research Nuclear University, 31 Kashirskoe Hwy, Moscow 115409, Russia
5
Department of Applied Sciences, Cross–Border Faculty of Humanities, Economics and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 111 Domneasca Street, 800201 Galati, Romania
6
Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa 0204, South Africa
7
Department of Computer Engineering, Biruni University, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey
8
Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Environment, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
9
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2023, 12(2), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020331
Submission received: 7 December 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 January 2023 / Published: 8 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Integrated Photonic Devices)

Abstract

:
The paper addresses optical solitons in magneto-optic waveguides that are studied using Kudryashov’s law of nonlinear refractive index in the presence of chromatic dispersion and Hamiltonian-type perturbation terms. The trial solution approach yielded a variety of soliton solutions, which are listed in this paper.

1. Introduction

Optical soliton dynamics is an essential feature in the telecommunications industry. The current world is paralyzed without Internet activity, which means with no solitons, life comes to a pure standstill. Therefore, it is imperative to address the soliton science dynamics to the fullest extent [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Incidentally, it is always wise to take into account magneto-optic waveguides as opposed to regular waveguides. Such forms of waveguides are always helpful considering the data load that is transmitted across trans-continental and trans-oceanic distances. The presence of a magnetic field can loosen up the solitons from their state of clutter. This only protects the spill-over of information between the solitons when they are very close together. Thus, it is of paramount importance to address the soliton science dynamics in nonlinear optics.
Incidentally, a variety of models that have been studied in the context of magneto-optic solitons. The various forms of the non-Kerr law of nonlinearity, apart from the Kerr law itself, studied in this context are parabolic law, power law, quadratic-cubic law, dual-power law and various others. The current work addresses the same issue, but with Kudryashov’s proposed form of nonlinear refractive index [10,11,12,13,14,15]. The trial solutions approach will be implemented to secure the solitons. The analytical results are displayed, along with the respective parameter constraints, and the corresponding numerical simulations are also exhibited. The derivation and display of the solitons and their numerics are presented after an overview of the model.

Governing Model

The model equations are introduced below [10,11,12,13,14,15]:
i u t + a 1 u x x + b 1 | u | n + c 1 | u | 2 n + d 1 | u | n + e 1 | u | 2 n + f 1 | v | n + g 1 | v | 2 n + h 1 | v | n + k 1 | v | 2 n u = Q 1 v + i β 1 u x + λ 1 | u | 2 n u x + γ 1 | u | 2 n x u + θ 1 | u | 2 n u x ,
and
i v t + a 2 v x x + b 2 | v | n + c 2 | v | 2 n + d 2 | v | n + e 2 | v | 2 n + f 2 | u | n + g 2 | u | 2 n + h 2 | u | n + k 2 | u | 2 n v = Q 2 u + i β 2 v x + λ 2 | v | 2 n v x + γ 2 | v | 2 n x v + θ 2 | v | 2 n v x ,
where γ l and θ l for l = 1 , 2 come from the nonlinear dispersions, while Q l stem from the magneto-optic parameters. f l , g l , h l and k l arise from the cross-phase modulation, while λ l emerge from the self-steepening terms. b l , c l , d l and e l yield the self-phase modulation, while β l give the inter-modal dispersions. x and t are the spatial and temporal variables in sequence, while a l stem from the chromatic dispersion. u ( x , t ) and v ( x , t ) depict the soliton wave profiles, while n comes from the full nonlinearity. Lastly, the first terms stem from the linear temporal evolution of the solitons, where i = 1 .

2. Mathematical Analysis

The soliton wave profiles shape up as
u ( x , t ) = U ( ξ ) e i ψ ( x , t ) ,
v ( x , t ) = V ( ξ ) e i ψ ( x , t ) ,
where U ( ξ ) and V ( ξ ) are the soliton amplitude components, while the wave variable and soliton phase component evolve as
ξ = x c t , ψ ( x , t ) = κ x + ω t + θ 0 .
Here c, κ , ω and θ 0 represent the velocity, frequency, wave number and phase constant in the sequence. Inserting (3) and (4) into (1) and (2), the real parts stick out as
a 1 U ω + β 1 κ + a 1 κ 2 U κ λ 1 + θ 1 U 2 n + 1 Q 1 V + b 1 U n 1 + c 1 U 2 n 1 + d 1 U n + 1 + e 1 U 2 n + 1 + f 1 V n + g 1 V 2 n + h 1 V n + k 1 V 2 n U = 0 ,
and
a 2 V ω + β 2 κ + a 2 κ 2 V κ λ 2 + θ 2 V 2 n + 1 Q 2 U + b 2 V n 1 + c 2 V 2 n 1 + d 2 V n + 1 + e 2 V 2 n + 1 + f 2 U n + g 2 U 2 n + h 2 U n + k 2 U 2 n V = 0 ,
while the imaginary parts stand out as
c + 2 a 1 κ + β 1 U + ( 2 n + 1 ) λ 1 + 2 n γ 1 + θ 1 U 2 n U = 0 ,
and
c + 2 a 2 κ + β 2 V + ( 2 n + 1 ) λ 2 + 2 n γ 2 + θ 2 V 2 n V = 0 .
Equations (8) and (9) leave us with the following restrictions:
c = 2 a 1 κ β 1 ,
( 2 n + 1 ) λ 1 + 2 n γ 1 + θ 1 = 0 ,
c = 2 a 2 κ β 2 ,
and
( 2 n + 1 ) λ 2 + 2 n γ 2 + θ 2 = 0 ,
while Equations (10) and (12) provide the frequency
κ = β 2 β 1 2 a 1 a 2 , a 1 a 2 , β 1 β 2 .
Set
V ( ξ ) = ϖ U ( ξ ) , ϖ 0 , ϖ 1 .
Thus, Equations (6) and (7) come out as
a 1 U 2 n 1 U + c 1 + g 1 ϖ 2 n + b 1 + f 1 ϖ n U n ω + β 1 κ + a 1 κ 2 + Q 1 ϖ U 2 n + d 1 + h 1 ϖ n U 3 n + e 1 + k 1 ϖ 2 n κ λ 1 + θ 1 U 4 n = 0 ,
and
a 2 ϖ U 2 n 1 U + c 2 ϖ 1 2 n + g 2 ϖ + b 2 ϖ 1 n + f 2 ϖ U n ω + β 2 κ + a 2 κ 2 ϖ + Q 2 U 2 n + d 2 ϖ n + 1 + h 2 ϖ U 3 n + e 2 ϖ 2 n + 1 + k 2 ϖ κ λ 2 + θ 2 ϖ 2 n + 1 U 4 n = 0 .
Considering Equations (16) and (17), one can be addressed by the aid of the constraint relations
a 1 = a 2 ϖ ,
c 1 + g 1 ϖ 2 n = c 2 ϖ 1 2 n + g 2 ϖ ,
b 1 + f 1 ϖ n = b 2 ϖ 1 n + f 2 ϖ ,
Q 1 ϖ + a 1 κ 2 + β 1 κ + ω = Q 2 + a 2 κ 2 + β 2 κ + ω ϖ ,
d 1 + h 1 ϖ n = d 2 ϖ n + 1 + h 2 ϖ ,
and
e 1 + k 1 ϖ 2 n κ λ 1 + θ 1 = e 2 ϖ 2 n + 1 + k 2 ϖ κ λ 2 + θ 2 ϖ 2 n + 1 .
Equations (18) and (21) give way to the wave number
ω = ϖ Q 1 Q 2 κ ϖ β 2 β 1 ( ϖ 1 ) .
With this restriction, U = H 1 n simplifies (16) to
n a 1 H H + ( 1 n ) a 1 ( H ) 2 + n 2 A 0 + A 1 H + A 2 H 2 + A 3 H 3 + A 4 H 4 = 0 ,
where
A 0 = c 1 + g 1 ϖ 2 n , A 1 = b 1 + f 1 ϖ n , A 2 = ω + β 1 κ + a 1 κ 2 + Q 1 ϖ , A 3 = d 1 + h 1 ϖ n , A 4 = e 1 + k 1 ϖ 2 n κ λ 1 + θ 1 .
We take the trial equation
( H ) 2 = i = 0 n s i H i ,
then we derive
H = i = 1 n i s i 2 H i 1 .
Substituting (27) and (28) into (25) and the next balancing ( H ) 2 with H 4 decreases (27) to
( H ) 2 = s 4 H 4 + s 3 H 3 + s 2 H 2 + s 1 H 1 + s 0 ,
where
s 4 = n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 , s 3 = 2 n 2 A 3 2 a 1 + 2 n a 1 3 n a 1 , s 2 = n 2 A 2 a 1 + n a 1 n a 1 , s 1 = 2 n 2 A 1 2 a 1 + 2 n a 1 n a 1 , s 0 = n 2 A 0 ( 1 + n ) a 1 .
Take transformation
G = s 4 1 4 H + s 3 4 s 4 , ξ 1 = s 4 1 4 ξ .
Thus, Equation (29) turns into
( G ξ 1 ) 2 = G 4 + z 2 G 2 + z 1 G + z 0 ,
where
z 2 = 3 8 s 3 2 s 4 3 2 + s 2 s 4 1 2 , z 1 = ( s 3 3 8 s 4 2 s 2 s 3 2 s 4 + s 1 ) s 4 1 4 , z 0 = 3 s 3 4 256 s 4 3 + s 2 s 3 2 16 s 4 2 s 1 s 3 4 s 4 + s 0 .
Rewrite Equation (32) as
± ξ 1 ξ 0 = d G F ( G ) ,
where F ( G ) = G 4 + z 2 G 2 + z 1 G + z 0 . According to Liu [16], the fourth-order complete discrimination system for the polynomial F ( G ) is given as
D 1 = 1 , D 2 = z 1 , D 3 = 2 z 1 3 + 8 z 1 z 3 9 z 2 2 , D 4 = z 1 3 z 2 2 + 4 z 1 4 z 3 + 36 z 1 z 2 2 z 3 32 z 1 2 z 3 2 27 4 z 2 4 + 64 z 3 3 , E 2 = 9 z 2 2 32 z 1 z 3 .
We can classify the roots of F ( G ) [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] and solve the integral (34).

3. Exact Solutions

(1) D 4 = 0 , D 3 = 0 , D 2 = 0 , then F ( G ) = G 4 , we get the rational wave
u 1 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 [ ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) ] 1 A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) .
(2) D 2 < 0 , D 3 = D 4 = 0 , E 2 < 0 , then F ( G ) = [ ( G τ 1 ) 2 + τ 2 2 ] 2 , we get the singular periodic wave
u 2 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 [ τ 2 tan ( τ 2 ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) + τ 1 ] A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 and τ 2 are real constants.
(3) E 2 > 0 , D 4 = D 3 = 0 , D 2 > 0 , then F ( G ) = ( G τ 1 ) 2 ( G τ 2 ) 2 , we get the singular soliton
u 3 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 [ τ 2 τ 1 2 ( coth ( τ 1 τ 2 ) [ ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ] 2 1 ) + τ 2 ] A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n × e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
and the dark soliton
u 4 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 [ τ 2 τ 1 2 ( tanh ( τ 1 τ 2 ) [ ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ] 2 1 ) + τ 2 ] A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n × e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 and τ 2 are real constants.
(4) E 2 = 0 , D 4 = D 3 = 0 , D 2 > 0 , then F ( G ) = ( G τ 1 ) 3 ( G τ 2 ) , we get the rational wave
u 5 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 [ τ 1 + 4 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) ( τ 2 τ 1 ) 2 [ ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ] 2 4 ] A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 and τ 2 are real constants.
(5) D 4 = 0 , D 3 > 0 , D 2 > 0 , then F ( G ) = ( G τ 1 ) 2 ( G τ 2 ) ( G τ 3 ) , we get the bright soliton
u 6 = { 2 ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( τ 2 τ 3 ) cosh [ ( τ 1 τ 2 ) ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) ] ( 2 τ 1 τ 2 τ 3 ) A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n × e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
and the singular soliton
u 7 = { 2 ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ± ( τ 2 τ 3 ) sinh [ ( τ 1 τ 2 ) ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) ] ( 2 τ 1 τ 2 τ 3 ) A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n × e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 , τ 2 and τ 3 are real constants.
(6) D 3 < 0 , D 4 = 0 , then F ( G ) = ( G τ 1 ) 2 [ ( G τ 2 ) 2 + τ 3 2 ] , we get the rational wave
u 8 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 e ± ( τ 1 τ 2 ) 2 + τ 3 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) τ 1 2 τ 2 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) 2 + τ 3 2 + 2 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) 2 + τ 3 2 ( τ 1 2 τ 2 ) ( e ± ( τ 1 τ 2 ) 2 + τ 3 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) τ 1 2 τ 2 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) 2 + τ 3 2 ) 2 1 A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 , τ 2 and τ 3 are real constants.
(7) D 4 > 0 , D 3 > 0 , D 2 > 0 , then F ( G ) = ( G τ 4 ) ( G τ 3 ) ( G τ 2 ) ( G τ 1 ) , we get the snoidal periodic waves
u 9 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 τ 2 ( τ 1 τ 4 ) s n 2 ( ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( τ 2 τ 4 ) 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , m ) τ 1 ( τ 2 τ 4 ) ( τ 1 τ 4 ) s n 2 ( ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( τ 2 τ 4 ) 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , m ) ( τ 2 τ 4 ) A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
and
u 10 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 τ 4 ( τ 2 τ 3 ) s n 2 ( ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( τ 2 τ 4 ) 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , m ) τ 3 ( τ 2 τ 4 ) ( τ 2 τ 3 ) s n 2 ( ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( τ 2 τ 4 ) 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , m ) ( τ 2 τ 4 ) A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 , τ 2 , τ 3 and τ 4 are real constants, and m 2 = ( τ 1 τ 4 ) ( τ 2 τ 3 ) ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( τ 2 τ 4 ) .
(8) D 4 < 0 & ( ( D 2 < 0 & D 3 < 0 ) ( D 2 = 0 & D 3 0 ) D 2 > 0 ) , then F ( G ) = ( G τ 1 ) ( G τ 2 ) [ ( G τ 3 ) 2 + τ 4 2 ] , we get the cnoidal periodic wave
u 11 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ϵ 1 c n 2 ( 2 τ 4 o 1 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) 2 o 1 o ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , o ) + ϵ 2 ϵ 3 c n 2 ( 2 τ 4 o 1 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) 2 o 1 o ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , o ) + ϵ 4 A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n × e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 , τ 2 , τ 3 and τ 4 are real constants, and
ϵ 1 = 1 2 ( τ 1 + τ 2 ) ϵ 3 1 2 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) ϵ 4 , ϵ 2 = 1 2 ( τ 1 + τ 2 ) ϵ 4 1 2 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) ϵ 3 , ϵ 3 = τ 1 τ 3 τ 4 o 1 , ϵ 4 = τ 1 τ 3 τ 4 o 1 , E = τ 4 2 + ( τ 1 τ 3 ) ( τ 2 τ 3 ) τ 4 ( τ 1 τ 2 ) , o 1 = E ± E 2 + 1 , o 2 = 1 1 + o 1 2 .
(9) D 4 > 0 & ( ( D 2 > 0 & D 3 0 ) D 2 0 ) , then F ( G ) = [ ( G τ 1 ) 2 + τ 2 2 ] [ ( G τ 3 ) 2 + τ 4 2 ] , we get the combo snoidal and cnoidal periodic wave
u 12 = { ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 × ϵ 1 s n ( τ 2 ( ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ( o 1 2 ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , o ) + ϵ 2 c n ( τ 2 ( ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ( o 1 2 ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , o ) ϵ 3 s n ( τ 2 ( ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ( o 1 2 ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , o ) + ϵ 4 c n ( τ 2 ( ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ( o 1 2 ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ) ϵ 3 2 + ϵ 4 2 ( ( n 2 A 4 a 1 + n a 1 2 n a 1 ) 1 4 ξ ξ 0 ) , o ) A 3 ( 1 + n 2 n ) 2 A 4 ( 2 + 2 n 3 n ) } 1 n e i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) ,
where τ 1 , τ 2 , τ 3 and τ 4 are real constants, and
ϵ 1 = τ 1 ϵ 3 + τ 2 ϵ 4 , ϵ 2 = τ 1 ϵ 4 τ 2 ϵ 3 , ϵ 3 = τ 2 τ 4 o 1 , ϵ 4 = τ 1 τ 3 , E = ( τ 1 τ 3 ) 2 + τ 2 2 + τ 4 2 2 τ 2 τ 4 , o 1 = E + E 2 1 , o = o 1 2 1 o 1 2 .
Figure 1 and Figure 2 exhibit the plots of dark and bright magneto-optic solitons (39) and (41), respectively.

4. Conclusions

The current paper displays solitons in magneto-optic waveguides that are studied using Kudryashov’s proposed law of refractive index. The trial solutions approach gave way to the solitons. The results are displayed, along with the numerical simulations. These results give a further insight into such waveguides with the form of self-phase modulation, as studied. These results give way to a number of future avenues of research. An immediate thought would be to handle the conservation laws. The conservation laws, when computed, would lead to further openings. The issue of quasi-monochromatic dynamics of optical solitons in a magneto-optic waveguide would subsequently follow through. The stochastically perturbed version of the model can also be pursued and studied once the conservation laws are in place. This would lead to the Langevin equations to finally depict the mean-free velocity of the soliton. Such studies are all underway and the results would be sequentially reported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-Y.W.; methodology, A.B.; software, Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.; writing—review and editing, S.M.; project administration, A.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous referees whose comments helped to improve this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ozisik, M.; Secer, A.; Bayram, M. The bell-shaped perturbed dispersive optical solitons of Biswas–Arshed equation using the new Kudryashov’s approach. Optik 2022, 267, 169650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Secer, A. Stochastic optical solitons with multiplicative white noise via Itô calculus. Optik 2022, 268, 169831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ozisik, M.; Secer, A.; Bayram, M. On the examination of optical soliton pulses of Manakov system with auxiliary equation technique. Optik 2022, 268, 169800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Esen, H.; Secer, A.; Ozisik, M.; Bayram, M. Dark, bright and singular optical solutions of the Kaup–Newell model with two analytical integration schemes. Optik 2022, 261, 169110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Esen, H.; Ozisik, M.; Secer, A.; Bayram, M. Optical soliton perturbation with Fokas–Lenells equation via enhanced modified extended tanh-expansion approach. Optik 2022, 267, 169615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ozdemir, N.; Esen, H.; Secer, A.; Bayram, M.; Sulaiman, T.A.; Yusuf, A.; Aydin, H. Optical solitons and other solutions to the Radhakrishnan-Kundu-Lakshmanan equation. Optik 2021, 242, 167363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ozisik, M.; Secer, A.; Bayram, M.; Aydin, H. An encyclopedia of Kudryashov’s integrability approaches applicable to optoelectronic devices. Optik 2022, 265, 169499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hutchings, D.C.; Holmes, B.M. Quasi-phase matching magneto-optical waveguides. MRS Online Proc. Libr. OPL 2011, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Choueikani, F.; Royer, F.; Jamon, D.; Siblini, A.; Rousseau, J.J.; Neveu, S.; Charara, J. Magneto-optical waveguides made of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles embedded in silica/zirconia organic-inorganic matrix. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 051113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, M.Y.; Biswas, A.; Yıldırım, Y.; Alshehri, H.M. Dispersive solitons in magneto-optic waveguides with Kudryashov’s form of self-phase modulation. Optik 2022, 269, 169860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, F. Propagation of solitons in optical fibers with generalized Kudryashov’s refractive index. Results Phys. 2021, 28, 104644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zayed, E.M.; Alngar, M.E.; Biswas, A.; Asma, M.; Ekici, M.; Alzahrani, A.K.; Belic, M.R. Solitons in magneto–optic waveguides with Kudryashov’s law of refractive index. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 140, 110129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zayed, E.M.; Alngar, M.E.; Biswas, A.; Kara, A.H.; Asma, M.; Ekici, M.; Khan, S.; Alzahrani, A.K.; Belic, M.R. Solitons and conservation laws in magneto–optic waveguides with generalized Kudryashov’s equation. Chin. J. Phys. 2021, 69, 186–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kudryashov, N.A. A generalized model for description of propagation pulses in optical fiber. Optik 2019, 189, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kudryashov, N.A. Mathematical model of propagation pulse in optical fiber with power nonlinearities. Optik 2020, 212, 164750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, C.S. Applications of complete discrimination system for polynomial for classifications of traveling wave solutions to nonlinear differential equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2010, 181, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.S. Trial equation method based on symmetry and applications to nonlinear equations arising in mathematical physics. Found. Phys. 2011, 41, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, C. Trial equation method and its applications to nonlinear evolution equations. Acta Phys. Sin. 2005, 54, 2505–2509. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, C.S. Using trial equation method to solve the exact solutions for two kinds of KdV equations with variable coefficients. Acta Phys. Sin. 2005, 54, 4506–4510. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cheng-Shi, L. A new trial equation method and its applications. Commun. Theor. Phys. 2006, 45, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng-Shi, L. Exact travelling wave solutions for (1+1)-dimensional dispersive long wave equation. Chin. Phys. 2005, 14, 1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, L. Bifurcation analysis and multiple solitons in birefringent fibers with coupled Schrödinger-Hirota equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 161, 112383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, L. Bifurcations and dispersive optical solitons for the nonlinear Schrödinger–Hirota equation in DWDM networks. Optik 2022, 262, 169276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, L. Bifurcations and multiple optical solitons for the dual-mode nonlinear Schrödinger equation with Kerr law nonlinearity. Optik 2022, 265, 169555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Surface plots of dark magneto-optic solitons (39) with e 1 = k 1 = λ 1 = θ 1 = κ = n = d 1 = ξ 0 = c = ω = θ 0 = 1 , a 1 = 1 , h 1 = τ 2 = ϖ = 2 and τ 1 = 3 .
Figure 1. Surface plots of dark magneto-optic solitons (39) with e 1 = k 1 = λ 1 = θ 1 = κ = n = d 1 = ξ 0 = c = ω = θ 0 = 1 , a 1 = 1 , h 1 = τ 2 = ϖ = 2 and τ 1 = 3 .
Electronics 12 00331 g001
Figure 2. Surface plots of bright magneto-optic solitons (41) with e 1 = k 1 = λ 1 = θ 1 = κ = n = d 1 = ξ 0 = c = ω = θ 0 = τ 3 = 1 , a 1 = 1 , h 1 = τ 2 = ϖ = 2 and τ 1 = 3 .
Figure 2. Surface plots of bright magneto-optic solitons (41) with e 1 = k 1 = λ 1 = θ 1 = κ = n = d 1 = ξ 0 = c = ω = θ 0 = τ 3 = 1 , a 1 = 1 , h 1 = τ 2 = ϖ = 2 and τ 1 = 3 .
Electronics 12 00331 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, M.-Y.; Biswas, A.; Yıldırım, Y.; Moraru, L.; Moldovanu, S.; Alghamdi, A.A. Optical Solitons in Magneto-Optic Waveguides Having Kudryashov’s Law of Nonlinear Refractive Index by Trial Equation Approach. Electronics 2023, 12, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020331

AMA Style

Wang M-Y, Biswas A, Yıldırım Y, Moraru L, Moldovanu S, Alghamdi AA. Optical Solitons in Magneto-Optic Waveguides Having Kudryashov’s Law of Nonlinear Refractive Index by Trial Equation Approach. Electronics. 2023; 12(2):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ming-Yue, Anjan Biswas, Yakup Yıldırım, Luminita Moraru, Simona Moldovanu, and Abdulah A. Alghamdi. 2023. "Optical Solitons in Magneto-Optic Waveguides Having Kudryashov’s Law of Nonlinear Refractive Index by Trial Equation Approach" Electronics 12, no. 2: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020331

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop