Abstract
In the past decade, with the development of communication technology, indoor air quality (IAQ) monitoring technology has made significant progress, which improves the real-time performance of the monitoring system, and reduces potential impacts on health-related pollutants. To investigate and analyze the development of IAQ monitoring technology and the application of communication technology in this field, this review conducts a comprehensive search, collation, and analysis of the literature in the relevant fields over the past decade, and reviews 91 articles from the usage scenarios, monitoring parameters, and communication technology of the IAQ monitoring system. The review shows the development and main research direction of IAQ monitoring, and focuses on the selection and application of communication technology in different projects. In addition, this study also discusses the problems and challenges in the IAQ monitoring system, which provides a reference for researchers and promotes the rapid and all-around development of IAQ monitoring.
1. Introduction
Indoor air quality (IAQ) constitutes a major problem for both the developing and developed worlds. As one of the fundamental rights of all, the right to breathe healthy air should also be guaranteed. Almost all of the global population breathe air that exceeds World Health Organization (WHO) guideline limits containing high levels of pollutants, with low- and middle-income countries suffering from the highest exposures, causing 7 million deaths annually [1]. However, most people tend to think that air pollution is only happening in outdoor environments, such as exhaust fumes from vehicles, the burning of fossil fuels in industries, or from forest fires. In fact, exposure to indoor and ambient air pollution increases the incidence of stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic respiratory diseases [2]. The World Health Organization linked 4.3 million deaths globally in 2012 to household cooking using coal, wood, and biomass stoves, compared with 3.7 million deaths for outdoor air pollution. People spend nearly 90% of their time indoors [3], which means that indoor air pollution will be more seriously damaging. Therefore, it is of great significance to monitor the IAQ similar to residences, classrooms, offices, and hospitals, among others [4,5,6]. Indoor air pollution might be polluted by volatile chemicals from building materials, cleaning products, cigarette smoke, and the burning of fuels from stoves and ovens, which has led to the provision of guidelines for selected indoor air pollutants, including benzene, carbon monoxide (CO), formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter (PM), and even carbon dioxide and ozone, which are easy to be ignored by people [7].
With the swift growth in commerce and transportation in modern civilization, in order to improve the indoor air environment, IAQ monitoring becomes indispensable. However, existing monitoring systems are unable to provide sufficient spatial and temporal resolutions of the data with cost-efficient and real-time solutions [8]. In the traditional IAQ monitoring system, the expensive monitoring cost, complex monitoring equipment, low data utilization rate, lack of timeliness, and short distance data transmission, limit the large-scale promotion of IAQ monitoring. However, with the development of communication technology in recent years, these problems have the opportunity to be solved [9].
The long development process from simple IAQ detection to a complex indoor air detection system is closely related to the development of communication technology. The timely use and management of data through wired transmission was a breakthrough in IAQ monitoring [10]. With the popularization of wireless communication technology widely used in the past decade, including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, mobile communication, LoRa, and ZigBee, etc. [11], wireless communication technology has been applied in more and more IAQ monitoring systems. Using ZigBee and Wi-Fi communication technology to achieve IAQ measurement and effective data transmission, the application of 3G and other mobile communication technologies in IAQ monitoring systems reduces the monitoring conditions [12]. The use of visible light communication (VLC) technology reduces the impact of electromagnetic interference (EMI) on the human body during IAQ monitoring [13]. At the same time, IAQ monitoring is combined with the Internet of Things (IoT) including perception layer, network layer, and application layer, which builds a bridge between IAQ monitoring and the client and adds more advanced functions, such as a real-time alarm function [14] and a mobile app view data function [15].
However, with the rapidly increasing number of studies, projects, and grey literature based on IAQ monitoring systems, information got scattered. Although there have been some reviews on IAQ monitoring, most of them only discuss the development process of IAQ monitoring systems or focus more on sensors and the deployment of sensors in IAQ monitoring systems [8,16,17,18,19,20]. No review has been published which focuses on the research progress of communication technology in the IAQ monitoring system. In particular, there is a lack of discussion on the development process of communication technology in IAQ monitoring systems, analysis, and suggestions for communication technology under different monitoring environments, or on the application direction of communication technology in IAQ monitoring systems in the future. In addition, there is a critical but overlooked gap in the literature that looks at the problems, challenges, and development direction of IAQ monitoring systems in recent years, especially under the background of the rapid development of communication technology, and the outbreak of epidemic. Therefore, this study aims to review and identify scientifically validated literature on the development of IAQ monitoring systems in the past decade, with an emphasis on communication technology in IAQ.
The structure of the paper is organized as follows. Section 1 provides an introduction and discusses the background of the study. Section 2 introduces the review methodology. Section 3 presents the distribution results, as well as a review table of the study. Section 4 shows the discussions and analysis of the results. Section 5 puts forward problems and challenges, with suggestions. Finally, Section 6 includes the discussion on critical conclusions and future outlook.
2. Methodology
In this review, we incorporate studies on communication technology in IAQ monitoring systems, which have been carried out and reported in scientific literature over the last ten years. The present review includes studies published from 2010 to 2021 in the following databases: Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science, all of which were written in English. The keywords and their combinations used were: “indoor air quality”, “indoor environment quality”, “indoor air pollution”, “IAQ”, and “monitor”. With no previous review articles on this topic, an exhaustive search was carried out, and published research and conference articles were also included. As the specific types of communication technologies used in relevant researches, such as Wi-Fi, ZigBee, and LoRa, are displayed in the title, abstract, or keyword of the article, or in the content of the article, it is difficult to directly use “communication technology” as keywords to retrieve information. Therefore, communication technology is not mentioned in the keywords, and the classification of communication technology is screened by follow-up studies reviewed in detail.
From all the studies retrieved using the above-mentioned keywords, we found a total of 782 publications with potential interest from the initial search and their titles were screened based on their context of research. The publications not delving into device development and focusing on sensor development were eliminated. From those, 170 publications remained and their abstracts were appropriately reviewed. Then, the following criteria were used for further exclusion: (i) focus on outdoor monitoring or special indoor monitoring such as cars and mines were excluded; (ii) articles which did not mention communication technology were excluded; and (iii) devices serving non-human, such as greenhouses for smart agriculture, were excluded. After this, 61 abstracts were excluded and 109 articles were carefully reviewed. Multiple publications of the same equipment were deleted or merged, and after rejecting five publications that did not have enough information regarding communication module development, 91 articles were finally organized into tables. These final eligible studies contain the following information: authors’ nationality, usage scenarios, monitoring parameters, and communication technology. Figure 1 shows a flowchart of the number of studies identified and included/excluded in the review process.
Figure 1.
Systematic review flowchart.
3. Distribution Results
In this review, 91 projects were reviewed to provide basic information on IAQ monitoring equipment, such as the publication date of projects, the geographical distribution of projects, the scene of equipment use, and the monitoring parameters. In addition, this paper focuses on reviewing and discussing the use of communication technology in each project.
3.1. Distribution by Year of Publication
To understand the research and development of the IAQ monitoring system, this review is not focused on a specific region or time, but collects projects from across the world. At the same time, it has taken 10 years as a period of study, to better show the development trend of the related research.
The distribution of the number of academic papers from 2010 to 2021 is shown in Figure 2. First, from the general trend, there is an increasing number of papers applying effective communication technologies in IAQ monitoring systems over time. Of these, in 2021 only six papers were published before September; in 2019 and 2020 there were 19 and 20 papers published, respectively; and in 2017 and 2018, there were 11 and 13 papers, respectively. The remaining years all had under ten papers published, with only one each in 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Figure 2.
Number of the research time distribution of projects from 2010–2021.
3.2. Distribution by Authors’ Nationality
In order to show more clearly the geographical distribution of projects developed for the IAQ monitoring system, Figure 3 labels the number of projects associated with each country by color. The study cases on IAQ monitoring systems reviewed in this review are from 23 countries. Of the 91 articles, the largest number of authors were from China, with a total of 20 authors, followed by India and the United States with 14 and 12 study cases each, respectively. This was followed by Indonesia and Italy, with six each; South Korea with five; Malaysia and Australia with four each; Portugal and the UK with three each; Hungary with two; and Romania, The Philippines, Turkey, Spain, UAE, Sri Lanka, Oman, Qatar, Germany, New Zealand; Saudi Arabia; and the Czech Republic with one study case each.
Figure 3.
Geographical distribution of the projects on the world map.
3.3. Distribution by Category
Of the 91 items reviewed, 21 explained specific scenarios to which the system applied, with the specific content illustrated in Figure 4. Most of the remaining projects were only for the general indoor environment. Of the 21 monitoring systems with a clearly defined environment, most were for homes, e.g., eight residential buildings with installed fresh air systems were selected to monitor IAQ, which showed that the IAQ varied with seasonal characteristics [21]. Of the remaining studies, one was for monitoring CO2 for the healthcare environment of hospitals [6]; four were for office buildings [22,23,24,25]; and the remaining seven studies were for school buildings, such as university lecture halls, laboratories, and dormitories. Therefore, in specific application scenarios, apart from private residential buildings, IAQ monitoring within the public indoor environment is the main research focus.
Figure 4.
Percentage of each building category.
A detailed summary of the various IAQ monitoring projects has been presented in chronological order, as shown in Table 1, including the publication date of the projects, the geographic distributions, the site of equipment use, and monitoring parameters.
Table 1.
The results of device design characteristics are summarized in chronological order of publication.
4. Discussion
The application of IoT technology liberates IAQ monitoring systems from traditional manual monitoring, and also gives birth to more development possibilities of the monitoring systems. Among them, a WSN has been used in most of the projects in this review. The application of this technology makes indoor air monitoring parameters no longer single, and more pollutants can be monitored at the same time. In addition, all kinds of advanced communication technology can also enter into the field of IAQ monitoring, and data timeliness and efficiency is also improved, making the system no longer just limited to the monitoring of pollutants, but more abundant functions can be achieved, such as combining it with the HVAC system to improve IAQ [45], and prediction of future air quality changes, etc. [95].
4.1. Sensors
Up to 24 IAQ parameters were monitored in 91 projects (Figure 5). The choice of parameters varies according to different equipment requirements. However, among the many monitoring parameters, most concerned the basic indoor temperature, humidity, and carbon dioxide, which are monitored by 81%, 78%, and 70% of the devices. As far as IAQ is concerned, indoor temperature and humidity are not pollutants, but they still have important monitoring significance. First of all, as far as human health is concerned, people have the most obvious feeling about the change in temperature and humidity, and the most basic comfort level is the appropriate temperature and humidity. Secondly, temperature and humidity are correlated with other pollutants, which can assist TVOC measurement [26]. The monitoring of carbon dioxide also has this function [30]. In addition, the amount of carbon dioxide is positively correlated with bacteria and PM [6]. The most important is the influence of carbon dioxide concentration on human health. Some studies show that when the concentration of carbon dioxide in indoor air increases to a moderate level, headache, fatigue, and inattention will be caused, while higher carbon dioxide concentration will lead to vomiting, dizziness, and other symptoms [106]. Therefore, it is an important monitoring content in indoor environments, such as school buildings and offices [24,39].
Figure 5.
Monitoring parameters in the reviewed projects.
The monitoring of PM has received increasing attention due to the dramatic impact of adverse weather in recent years, such as haze, and no exception is made in indoor air monitoring systems. Long-term exposure to the environment with higher concentrations of PM can easily lead to respiratory diseases, trigger asthma, and so on. Of the 91 projects, 53 monitored parameters contained PM, with at least five kinds of PM, including PM2.5, which were mentioned in the reviewed projects. It is important in IAQ monitoring of the facing kitchen because it mainly originates from the cooking process [36]. As relevant pollutants described by WHO, the monitoring of VOC (40%) and carbon monoxide (33%) also accounts for a large number because of their common sources and serious health effects. These compounds can cause several health issues with symptoms such as nausea, headache, dizziness, tiredness, nose, eye, and throat irritations [107]. Common symptoms of CO poisoning include vomiting, nausea, weakness, dizziness, headache, and loss of consciousness. Nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and ozone measurements were sporadic with <15 projects, less than 7% of the equipment detected BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene), which was identified as pollutants by WHO, and 16 projects also focused on other indoor environmental parameters, such as light, wind speed, noise and so on.
4.2. Communication Technology
The data detected by sensors need to be transmitted to the control center, forming a sensor network. For IAQ monitoring of an intelligent building system, the sensor network needs to have the characteristics of low initial network complexity, be easy to expand, have stable topology, and must meet the most basic needs of different levels. The transmission process is divided into wired, wireless, and hybrid wired-wireless. In this review, hybrid wireless-wired systems are classified as wireless. Among the 91 projects, except six of which were wired, wireless communication technology was adopted. Tiele et al. [71] used Inter-Integrated Circuit (I2C) and Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (UART) technology. Zhang and Zhao [96] designed an automatic detection device to monitor the air quality of buildings and used ethernet technology. The Serial Common Bus communication network CAN is used to exchange system information in another project [10]. In addition to being limited by the development of communication technology, some projects also choose to use wired communication technology in order to reduce costs and improve the security and integrity of data transmission [46].
More than 93% of projects use wireless transmission networks with diverse communication technologies. Figure 6 shows the number of 83 articles mentioning the types of wireless communication technology used, a large number of which use IoT technology. The rapid development of IoT technology promotes the application of wireless communication technology, which is used to transfer data to the cloud platform, in the IAQ monitoring system. This change has resulted in better timeliness and data processing application capabilities than traditional monitoring and realizes remote monitoring and control, which also provide an excellent direction for the development of IAQ monitoring. As can be seen from Figure 7, the usage of Wi-Fi and mobile communication shows an obvious increasing trend, while the use of Bluetooth is relatively stable. In addition, ZigBee decreases from the highest proportion of 71% (2014) to 5% (2021). These changes are closely related to the high-cost performance of Wi-Fi and the excellent short-distance communication capability of Bluetooth. The advantages and disadvantages of various wireless communication technologies, as well as their application in this review paper, will be introduced in detail below.
Figure 6.
The use of communication technology in the projects.
Figure 7.
Percentage of types of communication technology per year.
4.2.1. Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi is the most popular wireless technology used in a CPN. It is based on IEEE 802.11 standards and operates within 5–60 GHz unlicensed ISM (Industry, Scientific and Medical) frequency bands. It provides a coverage range of up to 100 m, which is widely used in schools, families, and other networks. Almost all mobile phones, personal computers, game consoles, and other electronic devices, provide a means to access the network through Wi-Fi [108]. Due to the advantages of Wi-Fi communication technology, such as reliability, safety, and high speed, and the low-cost of promotion, more than half of the projects in this review used Wi-Fi communication technology in their IAQ monitoring systems, mainly for communication from gateways to IoT servers [21,28,35,44,68,92].
Projects using Wi-Fi have taken many steps to address or reduce the impact of short-range transmission and relative high-cost and power consumption among short-range wireless technologies. In the selection section of Wi-Fi modules, AbdulWahhab, Hapsari et al. [33,43] used the ESP8266 module. It has eight digital pins I/O and also one analog pin in one board with low-price, small size, and low-power consumption, which makes it one of the best choices for IoT microcontrollers. Tastan and Gökozan, Esfahani et al. [32,58] developed the system using the ESP32 module, which is called an improved version of ESP8266. The ESP32 has a dual-core architecture and has many internal modules, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, RF, IR, CAN, and ethernet modules, etc. It costs slightly more than the ESP8266, but has better performance and lower power consumption. The ESP32 is a good choice for systems that require a more powerful processor, superior connectivity, and ultra-low power consumption. In addition, Ladekar and Daruwala [49] used the onboard Wi-Fi of Raspberry Pi, which makes the coding easier. In addition to the choice of hardware, Scarpa et al. [83] set the time interval for Wi-Fi connection to save battery by limiting the use of Wi-Fi modules.
4.2.2. ZigBee
ZigBee is another highly used wireless communication technology, with nearly a third of all studies using ZigBee in their systems. As a wireless personal area network (WPAN) based on the IEEE802.15.4 standard, ZigBee operates in the 2.4 ghz ISM band, which has a low data rate of 250 kbps. But its low-cost, low-power consumption, support for a large number of network nodes, and a variety of network topologies, makes it popular. ZigBee has a long service life of up to 10 years. Zhu et al. [24] used the ZigBee communication system to establish a network topology and bridge between sensor system, controller, and central control system. By monitoring indoor carbon dioxide, the optimal ventilation mode is determined to realize automatic control of IAQ. Due to the low transmission range of ZigBee, the XBee module, a low-power device, can be selected, which makes transmission distance up to 305 m indoors. [59]. XBee’s coverage can effectively meet the needs of indoor systems. In addition, XBee modules can be embedded in data collection circuits without the need to integrate external microcontrollers, which can save onboard space and weight, which is an advantage in indoor environments where space is limited [65].
4.2.3. Bluetooth
Bluetooth is low-power consumption and low-cost wireless communication technology based on the IEEE802.15.1 standard. It operates in the 2.4 GHz unlicensed ISM band. Bluetooth is a popular short-range wireless communication technology. It is commonly used in portable personal devices and is used in about one in ten systems in the papers reviewed. Bluetooth is used for communication between sensors and gateways, or data transmission between sensor networks and mobile phones and other electronic devices. Rastogi and Lohani [39] transmitted the carbon dioxide sensor data monitored in the classroom to the smartphone application using Bluetooth for subsequent data processing. Smith and Li [91] took Bluetooth as a means of communication between sensor systems and smartphones. Application software running on the user’s smartphone can be programmed to query sensor readings periodically or on-demand from the sensor system through Bluetooth, while the smartphone’s built-in Wi-Fi and cellular wireless transceivers can easily transmit sensor data to the cloud server in a tiered manner. The ultra-low power, low-cost version of this standard is named BLE, and three of the nine projects that used Bluetooth explicitly used BLE [5,22,48].
But Bluetooth does not have a strong layer of security to prevent eavesdropping, so it doesn’t meet the stringent security requirements of other wireless communication standards. Secondly, Bluetooth has low transmission coverage and some interference issues with 802.11, which makes the application of Bluetooth very limited.
4.2.4. Mobile Communication
There are different generations of mobile communication standards including second generation (2G including GSM), third generation (3G), fourth generation (4G including LTE) and GPRS, and devices based on these standards can communicate over cellular networks. When the monitoring system is abnormal, the main control system sends an SMS alarm to the user through GSM communication [4]. About one in ten of the systems reviewed in this review use mobile communications. Mobile communication is widely used in portable IAQ monitoring systems [12]. This is because the uncertainty of the monitoring location of portable equipment makes part of the wireless communication technology unable to meet its communication requirements, while mobile communication has a wider range of network coverage, which can realize the transmission, reception, and execution of data in the entire cellular are. Jo et al. [15] used LTE to deliver real-time data directly to a web server for sorting and visualization of air quality, eliminating the need for a gateway and a data logger. Secondly, mobile communication is also the main means of communication between sensor networks and smartphones, besides Bluetooth [67]. However, although mobile communication covers a wide range, its advantages in the IAQ monitoring system are not obvious, and the high cost and power consumption limit its large-scale promotion. This is one of the reasons why 5G, a new generation of broadband mobile communication technology characterized by high speed, low latency, and large connections, has not been applied to all the projects in this review.
4.2.5. LoRa
LoRa, a telecommunication protocol developed by the LoRaTM Alliance, is also used in the IAQ monitoring system. It has rates ranging from 0.3 KB/s to 50 kb/s and operates in the 868 and 900 MHz ISM bands. Due to LoRa’s low-power consumption, low-cost, and extremely long node battery life, it is widely used in outdoor monitoring fields such as intelligent agriculture, which is also an advantage for IAQ monitoring systems. LoRa is mostly used in the central unit to transmit sensor data to the cloud [42,47,85]. During LoRa’s deployment, portable home gateways were required, making it less simple than mobile communications, Wi-Fi, and other communication technologies. Secondly, LoRa technology’s exclusive private security protocol has many security problems, such as weak key management and a simple authentication mechanism, which makes environmental monitoring data easy to be stolen and it cannot support large-scale smart home application scenarios.
4.2.6. RFID
RFID technology is used in two articles in this review. RFID, radio-frequency identification, is a two-way RFID system consisting of a tag and a reader, where the tag receives and transmits radio waves. These labels are transmitted through the chip to the reader to identify the object. It can interface with handheld computing devices or personal computers, following the Electronic Product Code (EPC) protocol. RFID operates over a wide range of frequency bands, ranging from 120 kHz–10 GHz, with detection ranges from 10 cm to 200 m, and can provide data rates of up to 4 Mbps. RFID, as a communication technology, is used to connect sensor equipment and central units in IAQ monitoring [81]. However, in addition to communication, Tran et al. [84] used RFID technology to design a new battery-free sensor module to monitor IAQ. The RF energy harvester can sufficiently collect the available RF energy to supply power for sensing and wireless communication operation of the smart-sensor tag, which reduces the size and cost of the sensor.
4.2.7. Visible Light Communication
The EMI generated by radio frequency (RF) wireless communication for indoor environment monitoring may adversely affect the human body, especially with the elderly, patients, and infants, while it concurrently affects the operation of electronic devices. The application of bidirectional VLC technology without electronic interference can effectively solve this problem so that the indoor environment monitoring system can be applied to more special environments. Pham et al. [13] proposed an average-voltage tracking algorithm, enabling LED to be used as both a lighting system and a remote wireless communication system. VLC can cover the range of indoor lighting, up to 6 m, for short-distance communication technology. Because of its non-RF wireless communication, green communication technology has a broader development prospect. The characteristics of VLC itself, that is, visible light cannot penetrate objects, and the signal will be cut off if the signal terminal is blocked, which can ensure high information security. However, at the same time it is also a limitation of communication, so that it can be used as a backup choice for indoor wireless communication, and is an effective supplement to the existing RF communication technology.
4.2.8. Z-Wave
Designed specifically for remote control applications in residential and lightweight commercial environments, Z-Wave is a reliable, low-power, low-cost proprietary wireless communication technology. However, the communication distance of Z-Wave is short, and the data transmission rate is low, supporting the data rate of 40 kbps, covering a distance of 30 m. Perez et al. [70] used Z-Wave to transmit data from sensor nodes to the central gateway. To better monitor IAQ on campus, each node is equipped with a Z-Wave module, which improves the physical range of transmission to about 100 m in an undisturbed environment. Z-wave can be used with ordinary wireless devices because it is interferes less with other communications in the same band. However, it is a tree-like networking structure. Once the upper end of the branch is broken, all the devices at the lower end cannot communicate with the gateway. In addition, the frequency band used by Z-Wave is not legal in some countries, so it is seldom used in the IAQ monitoring system.
4.2.9. Heterogeneous Communications
Heterogeneous communication is also widely used in IAQ monitoring systems, and 10 papers clearly show that two or more wireless communication technologies are used. This combination of multiple communication technologies is more complex than the traditional single communication technology, but the communication effect is better. From the perspective of anti-interference to ensure communication, two modes such as GSM and Wi-Fi, ZigBee and Wi-Fi are integrated into the monitor to realize the transmission process of data from the monitor to the cloud platform. In this way, the real-time communication mode can be switched according to the actual situation, which greatly improves the adaptability and flexibility of the monitor [27,29,79,100].
The IAQ monitoring system needs to complete two stages of the communication process from sensor network to gateway, gateway to processing node, or cloud. The data processing methods and communication environment of the two processes are different. Selecting appropriate communication technology and making full use of the advantages of various communication technologies will effectively improve the performance of the system. In the review, most heterogeneous communication is a means of selecting Bluetooth for short-distance communication and other communication technologies [89,101]. As one of the most excellent short-distance communication technologies, Bluetooth has the advantage of low-cost and low-power consumption. It is a good choice to match with other medium and long-distance communication technologies. In Kanal and Tamas’s IAQ monitoring system for classrooms and other educational facilities, Bluetooth is used for sensor-to-gateway communication, and Wi-Fi is used for gateway-to-Internet communication [5]. Firdhous et al. [78], an IAQ monitoring system based on the IoT is proposed by using Bluetooth as the communication mode between the sensor and the gateway node, and Wi-Fi as the communication mode between the gateway node and the processing node, which is used to track the air pollution problem during the operation of indoor machines. Salamone et al. [82] designed an intelligent desk lamp, which hid the sensor in the lamp holder, used Bluetooth and ZigBee communication according to demand and integrated the IAQ monitoring system into the office environment.
4.2.10. Results and Suggestions
Table 2 compares the performance of each communication technology. In terms of distance, half of the eight wireless communication technologies we discussed are short distances. This is because the IAQ monitoring system is aimed at a small indoor environment and has little demand for long-distance transmission. Bluetooth excels at low-power consumption and low-cost. To put it simply, Wi-Fi is more suitable for IAQ monitoring in residential buildings due to its low promotion cost and extensive use in ordinary households. ZigBee supports a large number of network nodes and a variety of network topologies with low-cost, so it is suitable for IAQ monitoring communication in schools or office buildings with many monitoring points and complex room distribution. VLC communication takes into account its characteristics, as well as higher security, more to meet the communication needs of special hospitals and indoor buildings where important electronic equipment is stored. Bluetooth has excellent applications in any built environment, especially in combination with other communication technologies. Mobile communication technology has certain advantages in portable IAQ monitoring systems, and its network coverage is very wide. In addition to the particularity of VLC, other communication technologies have not been widely favored in IAQ monitoring systems.
Table 2.
Comparison of communication technologies.
5. Challenges and Recommendations
Although the use of various communication technologies based on the IoT has brought many benefits to IAQ monitoring systems, the investigation shows that in the development process of the IAQ monitoring system, some ways of using communication technology cannot maximize the system performance, and there are still related challenges in practical application. As shown in Figure 8, the main challenges, further discussions, and suggestions are listed below, according to the application requirements of IAQ monitoring systems.
Figure 8.
Challenges and recommendations for IAQ monitoring system.
5.1. Devices
The IAQ monitoring system is oriented to school, office, and residential environments, so there are special requirements for the system. The first is the shape of the device. The indoor monitoring environment is mostly a small area, and more content, especially the portable design of the system, requires monitoring equipment to be as small as possible. But most of the devices in the project are too big to ignore, some of them are bigger than the palm of an adult’s hand. In this case, the placement of the device is very limited, which not only reduces the user experience but may also limit part of the monitoring function of the system.
There are two ways to solve this problem. The first is to directly reduce the size, using smaller modules to reduce the final device size. In equipment, the bulk of the main occupation is the battery; this problem is more obvious in outdoor air quality monitoring systems. Since our system is indoor monitoring and can be plugged into power at any time, eliminating the battery can reduce most of the volume. It is this advantage that makes most communication modules battery-free with current technology. In this case, the small nature of the core module itself is more important. In terms of the communication module, Bluetooth is one of the better choices [91]. A Bluetooth module with low-power consumption is far smaller than a coin, which allows it to provide space for other modules, while reducing the volume of the device after it is embedded in the system. The Wi-Fi module also has the characteristic of small size. Although its power consumption is higher than that of Bluetooth, its operation can be guaranteed by the power supply at anytime and anywhere in the indoor environment. Battery-free devices can also be achieved by using RFID technology to collect available RF energy [84]. Secondly, the number of monitoring parameters can be reduced to monitor only one or two major indoor pollutants, which will greatly reduce the volume of equipment [12].
However, directly reducing the size of the system will most likely neuter the function of the system itself; therefore, perhaps “stealth” is a good choice. The simplest method is to embed the monitoring equipment directly into other commonly used interior decoration or equipment, such as lamps [82]. In addition, with the popularity of smartwatches, more and more functions are added to them, and embedding IAQ monitoring systems into them is also an option [59]. Perhaps more novel is the integration of IAQ monitoring systems into a robot. Social robots can interact with residents in a friendly manner, reducing the negative impact of the traditional long-term continuous monitoring process on users. Secondly, the robot is in the process of constant movement, which can monitor IAQ more comprehensively and reduce data errors caused by fixed position monitoring [22,34]. As for the communication module, the use of VLC communication technology can be perfect to solve this problem. LED can be used as a lighting system and a wireless communication system at the same time, which makes it integrated into the indoor environment. This communication mode can be better applied in special environments such as hospitals [13].
The standardization of equipment is very important for the wide application of the system, especially in the smart home. The improvement of interoperability of different communication technologies and data exchange protocols is conducive to the system being suitable for various environments and matching with more intelligent devices. Single air quality monitoring is not enough to meet the demand, and complete systems often involve the processing of air quality monitoring data and cooperation with other equipment, such as HVAC systems, to ensure acceptable IAQ. But communication problems often arise between various devices from manufacturers or companies with different technologies and standards. With the development of communication technology, such as the rapid development of 5G, as a communication technology that can carry more data, 5G will go deep into all fields and has certain development potential in IAQ monitoring. However, the lack of interoperability will make it more difficult to update existing systems. In addition, the large amount of data continuously generated by the device and the access of other devices can cause the network architecture of the device to fail, which cannot be easily resolved with complex heterogeneous devices. Considering the popularity of Wi-Fi in smart homes, it is suggested to use Wi-Fi as the main communication technology for system equipment in ordinary environments, such as the home. However, if the system does not require many updates and pursues low-cost and low-power consumption, this problem can be ignored.
5.2. Data
Data collection, transmission, storage, and processing, need to be solved in the system. In terms of data acquisition, since most IAQ monitoring systems purchase off-the-shelf sensors, it is common practice to use sensors to develop equipment without any prior testing. To compound the problem, studies have shown that some low-cost sensors can indeed have very high measurement errors compared to professional-grade reference devices [17]. In this case, the standardized practice, calibration, and verification of sensors can effectively guarantee the accuracy of data [98]. The transmission of data is also important. Compared with wired communication, wireless communication technology has more interference, such as environmental noise, and the same frequency signal interference. In heterogeneous devices, data loss may occur when faults occur due to different communication technologies. In this review, there is little discussion on the reliability of network communication, and only some papers carefully discuss the packet loss rate of their communication protocols or the reliability of sensor node-to-gateway communication [25]. Therefore, on the premise of ensuring the effective operation of the system, it is very important to discuss and select the appropriate communication technology of transmission distance based on the requirements. For example, VLC communication technology is not suitable for the indoor environment with more occlusion, because once the light is blocked, the communication process will be completely interrupted. The IAQ monitoring system may suffer from various failures during operation, such as communication failures caused by power outages, etc. Appropriate power outage mechanisms should also be considered to solve related failures [62]. Sensors are constantly generating data, and storing large amounts of data is a huge challenge. As a result, the need for data storage has led to the use of various software platforms and facilities, with real-time data and analysis stored in the cloud being the most common practice today. This method makes data storage and use more convenient, provides resources for further analysis, and opens up more possibilities for the application of the system, such as visual display and analysis of data [32]. In the era of data explosion, a more reliable, systematic, and scientific way to deal with data is needed. Data mining is one of the effective processing methods and will be paid attention to in future applications.
5.3. Security and Privacy
Security is one of the great challenges faced by IAQ monitoring systems, which is divided into the safety of the equipment itself and data security, that is, user privacy security. In terms of the system itself, proper design is very important. This means that the system is in the process of ensuring the maximum safe operation, as far as possible, to simplify the user’s use process, reduce the user’s operation difficulty, especially in the face of the elderly or children’s home IAQ monitoring system. Safe packaging and correct installation location are also important. Secondly, in the use of communication technology, reducing the impact of EMI on human health and electronic equipment also needs to be considered.
Data safety is also very important. The monitoring data of IAQ can intuitively show users’ living and working conditions in the monitored environment. For example, indoor lighting times or change in carbon dioxide concentration can reflect people’s sleeping and working time rules. The lack of security in the communication process may lead to the theft of users’ private data, attract malicious attackers, or send wrong information to harm the users’ security. In London, approximately 27% of Wi-Fi networks are poorly secured or not secure at all [109]. To solve this problem, we can start from many aspects, such as authorization, authentication, and access control. Only 2 of the 91 papers considered and solved data privacy-related issues, and they protected privacy in the two processes of storage and transmission, respectively. The channel in the IoT platform can be set to private so that the data in the cloud is secured [14]. Marques and Pitarma [50] designed a system in which end users use Wi-Fi-enabled mobile devices, such as smartphones, to connect hot spots and configure service set identifiers (SSID) and required Wi-Fi passwords. In addition, when installing the program, the system supports an easy installation process that can be carried out by the end-user. On one hand, the easy configuration feature avoids installation costs. On the other hand, this feature avoids the “invasion” of privacy related to the entry of unknown persons into the home of the end-user. Therefore, adding proper data encryption and proper authentication will help improve device security.
5.4. Cost
Cost control is one of the important issues to be considered in system development. Cost reduction is the main impetus to promote IAQ monitoring systems in homes and schools. Firstly, in terms of software, the cost involves the development, maintenance, and deployment of the system, as well as the continuous subscription of the IoT platform. Reducing software costs is also a big challenge for many researchers, so it is important to design and develop an economic model. In the hardware part, choosing low-cost sensors and communication modules can reduce the cost of the system. Due to a large number of applications of low-cost sensors, there have been reviews and discussions [17]. In terms of communication, the use of wired communication can reduce the cost to a certain extent, but it also limits the realization of some functions of the system, such as the use of I2C or UART communication technology [46,71]. Wired communication cannot flexibly change the detection position, which will significantly reduce the effect of air quality monitoring in more complex indoor environment. The most widely used wireless communication technologies also have their advantages and disadvantages. The system based on ZigBee registers a small range and exhibits poor through-wall performance, complex protocol, and inordinate price; the network is also exclusive and incompatible with devices in the market. The cost of Wi-Fi communication technology is slightly lower than ZigBee, especially its promotion cost, which is lower than other communication modes [60]. The ESP8266 module is the main choice for many people. However, the problems of small transmission range, high power consumption, and fewer sensor nodes that can access the system also need to be considered. Secondly, low-power Bluetooth is very cheap in terms of price, in addition to its small communication range [48]. Although mobile communication is expensive, many systems still choose this communication mode because of its large transmission range. Therefore, in terms of the selection of communication technologies, we should proceed from the actual needs and choose communication technologies with lower-cost and low-power consumption on the premise of meeting needs [5]. However, the existing problem is still that only by sacrificing part of the communication function can the cost be reduced. In addition to developing more economical high-performance communication technology, heterogeneous communication can also solve this problem to a certain extent. In the link that requires communication distance, the communication technology with slightly higher cost and power consumption is selected, and in the link that requires less communication technology, the communication technology with low-cost and power consumption can achieve the win-win situation of performance and economy.
5.5. System
With the development of the economy and the improvement of science and technology, users have higher and higher requirements for the performance of IAQ monitoring systems. Where the system is going is one of the challenges. On the one hand, the extensive use of all kinds of indoor appliances, such as printers, leads to a variety of indoor air pollution sources. The IAQ monitoring system has to consider adding some parameters based on traditional temperature and humidity and carbon dioxide monitoring parameters when facing the specific indoor environment. According to the survey, there are more and more kinds of project monitoring parameters in the past decade, and more than 57% of projects have more than five kinds of monitoring parameters. It will lose its monitoring significance if the data generated by a large number of monitoring parameters are not effectively utilized and processed. Some projects use existing standards to perform simple visual processing on the collected data and directly display it to users in the form of web pages and mobile apps [32,33,39,91], or set a warning threshold to remind users by email or SMS [14,75].
However, today’s requirements for data processing are not limited to traditional statistical processes. Based on monitoring air quality, analyzing data to predict future air quality trends has become one of the new hot research directions. Although this study has been started in 2015 [95], its research and application are not widespread due to the high error rate. However, since 2019, six of the papers in this review have predicted monitoring parameters. Due to the complexity of data processing, five of them have predicted single parameters. Carbon dioxide is not only an important monitoring parameter but also the most important prediction parameter. Four of the five were for carbon dioxide, and the remaining one was for PM10. They used a variety of algorithms, including artificial neural networks, auto-regressive moving average (ARMA), auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), support vector regression, XGBoost Regressor, and Compact Prediction Tree [38,39,41,43,60]. Mumtaz et al. [29] used the Long and Short Term Memory (LSTM) model to predict the six parameters with an accuracy of 99%. The prediction of future changes in air quality parameters marks a breakthrough in the study of IAQ monitoring systems, which means that people can take more active measures in the face of air quality than monitoring and remedial programs.
The requirements for the integrity of the IAQ monitoring system have always existed, and the system should consider solving the air quality problems while monitoring them. Many projects have already taken action, and cooperation with other equipment, such as ventilation equipment, can automatically realize the control of IAQ and ensure a good indoor air environment [30,36,45,55].
In the future, there are more requirements for the development of IAQ monitoring systems, covering more pollutants, more accurate sensors, more reliable communication, more effective data utilization, more perfect functions, and safer and cheaper products. In addition, social distancing in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to more people spending more time indoors. Poor air quality in a closed environment will be conducive to the spread of the virus, and monitoring of the indoor environment becomes more important. The survey shows that a number of projects have begun to conduct new research on IAQ monitoring systems in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic [26].
6. Conclusions
In this study, we review the scientific literature on the development of communication technologies in IAQ monitoring systems to address the growing grey documentation and scattered information. The latest developments in this field are studied to gain insight into emerging trends in technology applications by investigating and classifying related work, and to be particularly helpful to researchers developing new devices.
The number of studies on IAQ monitoring systems is increasing year by year. Most of the projects have some similarities, that is, the choice of popular monitoring parameters and communication technology is universal. However, in specific application scenarios and conditions, different projects show certain personalization. Ninety-one papers were reviewed and classified by category, year, and nationality of the author. The application of various communication technologies in the IAQ monitoring systems from 2010 to 2021 is discussed in detail. The results show that each communication technology has its advantages and limitations, and different wireless communication technology is suitable for different scenarios. In addition to the special monitoring parameters selected according to needs, the choice of communication technology also varies according to the needs. They are either wired or wireless, single, or combined. However, most projects prefer the more advanced and mature communication technology as the communication tool of their systems. The three most popular communication technologies on the market are Wi-Fi, ZigBee, and Bluetooth, but emerging technologies, such as 5G and other high-speed communication technologies, could still have a big impact on the current situation. To adopt more appropriate emerging communication technologies, researchers must be aware of emerging trends and technologies. We also carried out an in-depth analysis of different articles and analyzed the current problems and challenges of IAQ monitoring from five aspects: devices, data, security and privacy, cost, and system. To solve these problems, we also put forward the corresponding suggestions, based on which we pointed out the future development direction of IAQ monitoring systems. In particular, low-cost, high-performance solutions with low maintenance, energy efficiency, ease of operation, and a robust architecture are required.
This review of the literature may not be comprehensive and perfect, but it also reveals some problems and directions. The research and development of communication technology is rapid, but in the IAQ monitoring system, the related research of communication technology still lacks some attention. Few analyses and studies have been done on the communication technology specially designed for IAQ monitoring to optimize the communication technology selection in system development. However, it is believed that with the development of communication technology, the combination of IAQ monitoring research and communication technology will be more mature, while other new technologies will gradually be applied to IAQ monitoring research, and the technology of IAQ monitoring will be more mature and diverse.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.Z. and Z.W.; methodology, Y.Y.; validation, L.Z., Y.Y. and Z.W.; formal analysis, L.Z.; investigation, Y.Y.; data curation, Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.Z.; visualization, Y.Y.; supervision, L.Z.; project administration, Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Fundamental Research Funds for supporting this work. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52178066, 61803067, 52008073) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (DUT20JC45, DUT20JC15).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
| A | Ammonia/NH3 | NO2 | Nitrogen dioxide |
| AP | Air Pressure/Atmospheric Pressure | NOx | Nitrogen oxides |
| AV | Air Velocity | O2 | Oxygen |
| BLE | Bluetooth Low Energy | O3 | Ozone |
| BTEX | Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene | P | Propane/C3H8 |
| BZ | Benzene | PM | Particulate matter |
| C1 | CO/Carbon monoxide | PM2.5 | Fine particles with a diameter of 2.5 μm (μm) or less |
| C2 | CO2/Carbon dioxide | PM10 | Particles with a diameter of 10 μm (μm) or less |
| Cl2 | Chlorine | PM20 | Particles with a diameter of 20 μm (μm) or less |
| E | Ethanol | RH | Relative Humidity |
| F | Formaldehyde/HCHO | SO2 | Sulfur dioxide |
| H | Humidity | SO3 | Sulfur trioxide |
| H2 | Hydrogen | T | Temperature |
| LL | Light Level/light luminosity | TVOC | Total Volatile Organic Compounds |
| M | Methane/CH4 | UVI | Ultraviolet Index |
| NA | Not Available | VLC | Visible Light Communication |
| NL | Noise Level | VOC, VOCs | Volatile Organic Compounds |
References
- WHO. New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines Aim to Save Millions of Lives from Air Pollution. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/22-09-2021-new-who-global-air-quality-guidelines-aim-to-save-millions-of-lives-from-air-pollution (accessed on 15 October 2021).
- WHO. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Klepeis, N.E.; Nelson, W.C.; Ott, W.R.; Robinson, J.P.; Tsang, A.M.; Switzer, P.; Behar, J.V.; Hern, S.C.; Engelmann, W.H. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2001, 11, 231–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, W.; Wang, S. Indoor Air Quality Detector Design Based on ATMEGA32 Single Chip Computer. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies; Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanal, A.K.; Tamas, K. Assessment of Indoor Air Quality of Educational Facilities using an IoT Solution for a Healthy Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, I2MTC, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 25–28 May 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.-T.; Liao, C.-J.; Liu, J.-C.; Den, W.; Chou, Y.-C.; Tsai, J.-J. Construction and Application of an Intelligent Air Quality Monitoring System for Healthcare Environment. J. Med. Syst. 2014, 38, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO. Type of Pollutants. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/air-quality-and-health/health-impacts/types-of-pollutants (accessed on 10 November 2021).
- Morawska, L.; Thai, P.K.; Liu, X.; Asumadu-Sakyi, A.; Ayoko, G.; Bartonova, A.; Bedini, A.; Chai, F.; Christensen, B.; Dunbabin, M.; et al. Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? Environ. Int. 2018, 116, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, E.G.; Watkins, T.H.; Solomon, P.A.; Thoma, E.D.; Williams, R.W.; Hagler, G.S.W.; Shelow, D.; Hindin, D.A.; Kilaru, V.J.; Preuss, P.W. The Changing Paradigm of Air Pollution Monitoring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 11369–11377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillai, M.A.; Veerasingam, S. Implementation of Sensor Network for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Using CAN Interface. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Advances in Computer Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, 20–21 June 2010; ACE: Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2010; pp. 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, P.P. A survey on Internet of Things architectures. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2018, 30, 291–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawaal, H.; Jones, C.; Thompson, J. Personal Exposure Estimates via Portable and Wireless Sensing and Reporting of Particulate Pollution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, N.Q.; Rachim, V.P.; Chung, W.-Y. EMI-Free Bidirectional Real-Time Indoor Environment Monitoring System. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 5714–5722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kodali, R.K.; Pathuri, S.; Rajnarayanan, S.C. Smart Indoor Air Pollution Monitoring Station. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, ICCCI, Coimbatore, India, 22–24 January 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, J.; Jo, B.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Han, W. Development of an IoT-Based Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Platform. J. Sensors 2020, 2020, 8749764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, J.; Dutta, M.; Marques, G. Sensors for indoor air quality monitoring and assessment through Internet of Things: A systematic review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chojer, H.; Branco, P.; Martins, F.; Alvim-Ferraz, M.; Sousa, S. Development of low-cost indoor air quality monitoring devices: Recent advancements. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 727, 138385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nezis, I.; Biskos, G.; Eleftheriadis, K.; Kalantzi, O.-I. Particulate matter and health effects in offices—A review. Build. Environ. 2019, 156, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, H. Personal Environmental Monitoring System and network platform. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology, ICST, Auckland, New Zealand, 8–10 December 2015; IEEE Computer Society: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Martani, C.; Morawska, L.; Norford, L.; Choudhary, R.; Bell, M.; Leach, M. Indoor air quality and energy management through real-time sensing in commercial buildings. Energy Build. 2016, 111, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, K.; Sun, W.; Feng, G.; Wang, J.; Song, J. Indoor air quality analysis of 8 mechanically ventilated residential buildings in northeast China based on long-term monitoring. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 54, 101947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribino, P.; Bonomolo, M.; Lodato, C.; Vitale, G. A Humanoid Social Robot Based Approach for Indoor Environment Quality Monitoring and Well-Being Improvement. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2021, 13, 277–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhanalakshmi, S.; Poongothai, M.; Sharma, K.; Thampi, S.M.; Madria, S.; Fernando, X.; Doss, R.; Mehta, S.; Ciuonzo, D. IoT Based Indoor Air Quality and Smart Energy Management for HVAC System. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 171, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.-C.; Yu, C.W.; Cao, S.-J. Ventilation online monitoring and control system from the perspectives of technology application. Indoor Built Environ. 2020, 29, 587–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunelli, D.; Minakov, I.; Passerone, R.; Rossi, M. POVOMON: An Ad-hoc Wireless Sensor Network for indoor environmental monitoring. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy and Structural Monitoring Systems, EESMS, Naples, Italy, 17–18 September 2014; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bidila, T.; Pietraru, R.N.; Ionita, A.D.; Olteanu, A. Monitor Indoor Air Quality to Assess the Risk of COVID-19 Transmission. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science Technologies, CSCS, Bucharest, Romania, 26–28 May 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Qiao, S. Design of the Highly Integrated Indoor Environment Monitoring System with Dual Data Transmission Mode Based on the Interconnect of Things. IOP Conf. Series Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 668, 012028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hikmah, I.; Ramadhani, A.D.; Syifa, F.T. The comparison of essential oil concentration to maximum air quality produced by diffuser based on Internet of Things (IoT) technology to create a healthy room. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1816, 012029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mumtaz, R.; Zaidi, S.; Shakir, M.Z.; Shafi, U.; Malik, M.M.; Haque, A.; Mumtaz, S.; Zaidi, S. Internet of Things (IoT) Based Indoor Air Quality Sensing and Predictive Analytic—A COVID-19 Perspective. Electronics 2021, 10, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afroz, Z.; Higgins, G.; Shafiullah, G.; Urmee, T. Evaluation of real-life demand-controlled ventilation from the perception of indoor air quality with probable implications. Energy Build. 2020, 219, 110018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cicceri, G.; Scaffidi, C.; Benomar, Z.; Distefano, S.; Puliafito, A.; Tricomi, G.; Merlino, G. Smart Healthy Intelligent Room: Headcount through Air Quality Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, SMARTCOMP, Bologna, Italy, 14–17 September 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfahani, S.; Rollins, P.; Specht, J.P.; Cole, M.; Gardner, J.W. Smart City Battery Operated IoT Based Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Sensors, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 25–28 October 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hapsari, A.A.; Vresdian, D.J.; Aldiansyah, M.; Dionova, B.W.; Windari, A.C. Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System with Node.js and MQTT Application. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Advanced Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, ICITAMEE, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 13–14 October 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.; Cong, S.; Song, T.; Bian, K.; Song, L. AirScope: Mobile Robots-Assisted Cooperative Indoor Air Quality Sensing by Distributed Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 9189–9200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, S.; Bawa, S.; Sharma, S. IoT Enabled Low-Cost Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System with Botanical Solutions. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions), ICRITO, Noida, India, 4–5 June 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meris, P.R.; Dimaunahan, E.; Cruz, J.C.D.; Fadchar, N.A.; Manuel, M.C.; Bonaobra, J.C.C.; Ranosa, F.J.I.; Mangaoang, J.L.D.; Reyes, P.C. IOT Based—Automated Indoor Air Quality and LPG Leak Detection Control System using Support Vector Machine. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium, ICSGRC, Shah Alam, Malaysia, 8 August 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasution, T.H.; Hizriadi, A.; Tanjung, K.; Nurmayadi, F. Design of Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electrical, Telecommunication and Computer Engineering, ELTICOM, Medan, Indonesia, 3–4 September 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putra, J.C.P.; Susanto, T. Artificial Neural Network Modelling of Indoor CO2 Reduction as Energy-Efficient Strategies. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Exhibition on Sustainable Energy and Advanced Materials, ICE-SEAM, Surakarta, Indonesia, 16–17 October 2019; Sabino, U., Imaduddin, F., Prabowo, A.R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rastogi, K.; Lohani, D. An Internet of Things Framework to Forecast Indoor Air Quality Using Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Machine Learning and Metaheuristics Algorithms, and Applications, SoMMA, Trivandum, India, 18–21 December 2019; Thampi, S.M., Trajkovic, L., Li, K.C., Das, S., Wozniak, M., Berretti, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rickenbacker, H.J.; Collinge, W.O.; Hasik, V.; Ciranni, A.; Smith, I.; Colao, P.; Sharrard, A.L.; Bilec, M.M. Development of a framework for indoor air quality assessments in energy conservation districts. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 52, 101831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, J.; Dutta, M.; Marques, G. Indoor Air Quality Monitoring with IoT: Predicting PM10 for Enhanced Decision Support. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application, Sakheer, Bahrain, 8–9 November 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M.; Abdulghani, A.M.; Imran, M.A.; Abbasi, Q.H. Internet of Things (IoT) Enabled Smart Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computing, Networks and Internet of Things, CNIOT, Sanya, China, 24–26 April 2020; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AbdulWahhab, R.S. Air Quality System Using IoT for Indoor Environmental Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications, Stanbul, Turkey, 16–17 April 2019; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asthana, P.; Mishra, S. IoT Enabled Real Time Bolt based Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering and Sciences, CCTES, Lucknow, India, 14–15 September 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiesa, G.; Cesari, S.; Garcia, M.; Issa, M.; Li, S. Multisensor IoT Platform for Optimising IAQ Levels in Buildings through a Smart Ventilation System. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillooly, S.E.; Zhou, Y.; Vallarino, J.; Chu, M.T.; Michanowicz, D.R.; Levy, J.I.; Adamkiewicz, G. Development of an in-home, real-time air pollutant sensor platform and implications for community use. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jose, J.; Sasipraba, T. Indoor air quality monitors using IOT sensors and LPWAN. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics, ICOEI, Tirunelveli, India, 23–25 April 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanal, A.K.; Kovacshazy, T. IoT Solution for Assessing the Indoor Air Quality of Educational Facilities. In Proceedings of the 20th International Carpathian Control Conference, ICCC, Krakow-Wieliczka, Poland, 26–29 May 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ladekar, V.; Daruwala, R. Indoor Air Quality Monitoring on AWS Using MQTT Protocol. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT, Kanpur, India, 6–8 July 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marques, G.; Pitarma, R. A Cost-Effective Air Quality Supervision Solution for Enhanced Living Environments through the Internet of Things. Electronics 2019, 8, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nigam, H.; Saini, A.K.; Banerjee, S.; Kumar, A. Indoor Environment Air Quality Monitoring and its Notification to Building Occupants. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference: Technology, Knowledge, and Society, TENCON, Kochi, India, 17–20 October 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 2444–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parkinson, T.; Parkinson, A.; de Dear, R. Continuous IEQ monitoring system: Context and development. Build. Environ. 2019, 149, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parkinson, T.; Parkinson, A.; de Dear, R. Continuous IEQ monitoring system: Performance specifications and thermal comfort classification. Build. Environ. 2019, 149, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, K.; Laad, M.; Kamble, A.; Laad, S. A Consumer-Based Smart Home with Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System. IETE J. Res. 2019, 65, 758–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradityo, F.; Surantha, N. Indoor Air Quality Monitoring and Controlling System based on IoT and Fuzzy Logic. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology, ICoICT, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 24–26 July 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salman, N.; Kemp, A.H.; Khan, A.; Noakes, C. Real Time Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) based Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2019, 52, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satyanarayana, P.; Narmadha, R. Implementation of Wireless Sensor Network Based Indoor Air Quality Monitoring System using GSM. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2019, 8, 4885–4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taştan, M.; Gökozan, H. Real-Time Monitoring of Indoor Air Quality with Internet of Things-Based E-Nose. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, F.; Rüdiger, C.; Redouté, J.-M.; Yuce, M.R. A Wearable Multi-Sensor IoT Network System for Environmental Monitoring; Internet of Things; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiahou, R.; Yi, J.; He, L.; He, W.; Huang, T. Indoor Air Monitoring System Based on Internet of Things and Its Prediction Model. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Industrial Control Network and System Engineering Research, ICNSER, Shenyang, China, 21–22 April 2019; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.-T.; Chen, S.-T.; Den, W.; Wang, Y.-T.; Kristiani, E. Implementation of an Intelligent Indoor Environmental Monitoring and management system in cloud. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 96, 731–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benammar, M.; Abdaoui, A.; Ahmad, S.H.; Touati, F.; Kadri, A. A Modular IoT Platform for Real-Time Indoor Air Quality Monitoring. Sensors 2018, 18, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carre, A.; Williamson, T. Design and validation of a low cost indoor environment quality data logger. Energy Build. 2018, 158, 1751–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idrees, Z.; Zou, Z.; Zheng, L. Edge Computing Based IoT Architecture for Low Cost Air Pollution Monitoring Systems: A Comprehensive System Analysis, Design Considerations & Development. Sensors 2018, 18, 3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karami, M.; McMorrow, G.V.; Wang, L. Continuous monitoring of indoor environmental quality using an Arduino-based data acquisition system. J. Build. Eng. 2018, 19, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.-L.; Lee, J.-S. Development of indoor air quality supervision systems using ZigBee wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, ICIEA 2018, Wuhan, China, 31 May–2 June 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, H.; Li, W.; Wu, X. Design of indoor air quality monitoring system based on wireless sensor network. IOP Conf. Series Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 208, 012070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Garín, A.; Millán-García, J.; Baïri, A.; Millán-Medel, J.; Sala-Lizarraga, J. Environmental monitoring system based on an Open Source Platform and the Internet of Things for a building energy retrofit. Autom. Constr. 2018, 87, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panghurian, F.P.; Surantha, N.; Zahra, A. A low-power scenario for IOT-based indoor air quality monitoring system at workplace. IOP Conf. Series Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 195, 012048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez, A.O.; Bierer, B.; Scholz, L.; Wöllenstein, J.; Palzer, S. A Wireless Gas Sensor Network to Monitor Indoor Environmental Quality in Schools. Sensors 2018, 18, 4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiele, A.; Esfahani, S.; Covington, J. Design and Development of a Low-Cost, Portable Monitoring Device for Indoor Environment Quality. J. Sensors 2018, 2018, 5353816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tijani, I.B.; Almannaee, A.D.; Alharthi, A.A.; Alremeithi, A.M. Wireless sensor node for indoor air quality monitoring system. In Proceedings of the 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, ASET, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 6 February–5 April 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Boulic, M.; Phipps, R.; Chitty, C.; Moses, A.; Weyers, R.; Jang-Jaccard, J.; Olivares, G.; Ponder-Sutton, A.; Cunningham, C. Integrating Open-Source Technologies to Build a School Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Box (SKOMOBO); Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Jang-Jaccard, J.; Boulic, M.; Phipps, R.; Chitty, C.; Weyers, R.; Moses, A.; Olivares, G.; Ponder-Sutton, A.; Cunningham, C. Deployment issues for integrated open-source—Based indoor air quality school Monitoring Box (SKOMOBO). In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Seoul, Korea, 12–14 March 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakaria, N.A.; Zainal, Z.; Harum, N.; Chen, L.; Saleh, N.; Azni, F. Wireless Internet of Things-Based Air Quality Device for Smart Pollution Monitoring. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2018, 9, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.; Shin, D.; Kim, K.; Yang, J. Indoor Air Quality Analysis Using Deep Learning with Sensor Data. Sensors 2017, 17, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alhmiedat, T.; Samara, G. A low cost ZigBee sensor network architecture for indoor air quality monitoring. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 2017, 1, 15. [Google Scholar]
- Firdhous, M.; Sudantha, B.; Karunaratne, P. IoT enabled proactive indoor air quality monitoring system for sustainable health management. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies, ICCCT, Chennai, India, 23–24 February 2017; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, P.; Wang, Q. A high precise E-nose for daily indoor air quality monitoring in living environment. Integr. VLSI J. 2017, 58, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, A. Energy efficient and low cost air quality sensor for smart buildings. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on “Computational Intelligence and Communication Technology”, CICT, Ghaziabad, India, 9–10 February 2017; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; He, J. Design of an intelligent indoor air quality monitoring and purification device. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference, ITOEC, Chongqing, China, 3–5 October 2017; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1147–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salamone, F.; Belussi, L.; Danza, L.; Ghellere, M.; Meroni, I. How to control the Indoor Environmental Quality through the use of the Do-It-Yourself approach and new pervasive technologies. Energy Procedia 2017, 140, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarpa, M.; Ravagnin, R.; Schibuola, L.; Tambani, C. Development and testing of a platform aimed at pervasive monitoring of indoor environment and building energy. Energy Procedia 2017, 126, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.V.; Dang, N.T.; Chung, W.-Y. Battery-free smart-sensor system for real-time indoor air quality monitoring. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2017, 248, 930–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vcelak, J.; Vodicka, A.; Maska, M.; Mrna, J. Smart building monitoring from structure to indoor environment. In Proceedings of the 2017 Smart Cities Symposium Prague, SCSP, Prague, Czech Republic, 25–26 May 2017; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, J. A WiFi-enabled indoor air quality monitoring and control system: The design and control experiments. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA, Ohrid, Macedonia, 3–6 July 2017; IEEE Computer Society: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 927–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, S.; Li, X. Design of A Low-Cost Wireless Indoor Air Quality Sensor Network System. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 2016, 23, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.S.; Zanzinger, Z.; Debose, D.; Stephens, B. Open Source Building Science Sensors (OSBSS): A low-cost Arduino-based platform for long-term indoor environmental data collection. Build. Environ. 2016, 100, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Hwang, K.-I. A Comprehensive Real-Time Indoor Air-Quality Level Indicator. Sustainability 2016, 8, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitarma, R.; Marques, G.; Caetano, F. Monitoring Indoor Air Quality to Improve Occupational Health. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, WorldCIST, Recife, Brazil, 22–24 March 2016; Rocha, A., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Correia, A.M., Reis, L.P., Teixeira, M.M., Reis, L.P., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, J.P.; Li, X. AirSniffer: A smartphone-based sensor system for body area climate and air quality monitoring. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology, ISMICT, Worcester, MA, USA, 20–23 March 2016; IEEE Computer Society: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapashetti, A.; Vegiraju, D.; Ogunfunmi, T. IoT-enabled air quality monitoring device: A low cost smart health solution. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, GHTC, Seattle, WA, USA, 13–16 October 2016; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 682–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, S.M.; Shakaff, A.Y.; Saad, A.R.M.; Kamarudin, A.M.Y. Development of wireless sensor network for monitoring indoor air pollutant. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics, Engineering and Industrial Applications, ICoMEIA 2014, Penang, Malaysia, 28–30 May 2014; American Institute of Physics Inc.: College Park, MD, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Zhou, G.; Qin, W.; Zhang, B.; Chiang, P.Y. Air-kare: A Wi-Fi based, multi-sensor, real-time indoor air quality monitor. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Wireless Symposium, IWS, Shenzen, China, 30 March–1 April 2015; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, T.-C.; Lin, C.-C. An Intelligent Wireless Sensing and Control System to Improve Indoor Air Quality: Monitoring, Prediction, and Preaction. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015, 11, 140978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Design & implementation of an Air Quality Monitoring System for Indoor Environment based on Microcontroller. Int. J. Smart Home 2015, 9, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, S.; Li, X. A Cost-effective Wireless Sensor Network System for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Applications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2014, 34, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.-Y.; Chu, C.-H.; Shin, S.-M. ISSAQ: An Integrated Sensing Systems for Real-Time Indoor Air Quality Monitoring. IEEE Sensors J. 2014, 14, 4230–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, S.M.; Shakaff, A.Y.; Saad, A.R.; Kamarudin, A.M. Implementation of index for real-time monitoring indoor air quality system. In Proceedings of the 2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED), Penang, Malaysia, 19–21 August 2014; pp. 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.F.; Postolache, O. Wireless sensor network and web based information system for asthma trigger factors monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference: Instrumentation and Measurement for Sustainable Development, I2MTC, Montevideo, Uruguay, 12–15 May 2014; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1388–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, K.; Piedrahita, R.; Yun, X.; Tian, L.; Mansata, O.M.; Lv, Q.; Dick, R.P.; Hannigan, M.; Shang, L. User-Centric Indoor Air Quality Monitoring on Mobile Devices. AI Mag. 2013, 34, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, I.-H.; Chu, Y.-Y.; Kong, C.-Y.; Su, Y.-S. Implementation of Indoor VOC Air Pollution Monitoring System with Sensor Network. In Proceedings of the 2013 7th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS, Taichung, Taiwan, 3–5 July 2013; pp. 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, S.M.; Saad, A.R.M.; Kamarudin, A.M.Y.; Zakaria, A.; Shakaff, A.Y.M. Indoor air quality monitoring system using wireless sensor network (WSN) with web interface. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and System Engineering, ICEESE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 4–5 December 2013; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, S.; Sridevi, S.; Pitchiah, R. Indoor air quality monitoring using wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 2012 6th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), Kolkata, India, 18–21 December 2012; pp. 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzeng, C.-B.; Wey, T.-S. Design and Implement a Cost Effective and Ubiquitous Air Quality Monitoring System Based on ZigBee Wireless Sensor Network. In Proceedings of the 2011 2nd International Conference on Innovations in Bio-inspired Computing and Applications, IBICA, Shenzhen, China, 16–18 December 2011; pp. 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Hu, Z.; Liu, M.; Yang, H.; Kong, Q.; Liu, Y. Review of research on air-conditioning systems and indoor air quality control for human health. Int. J. Refrig. 2008, 32, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorai, A.K.; Tuluri, F.; Tchounwou, P.B. A GIS Based Approach for Assessing the Association between Air Pollution and Asthma in New York State, USA. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 4845–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuzlu, M.; Pipattanasomporn, M.; Rahman, S. Review of communication technologies for smart homes/building applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies—Asia, ISGT ASIA, Bangkok, Thailand, 3–6 November 2015; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshigoe, K.; Dai, W.; Abramson, M.; Jacobs, A. Overcoming invasion of privacy in smart home environment with synthetic packet injection. In Proceedings of the TRON Symposium, TRONSHOW, Tokyo, Japan, 9–11 December 2015; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).